Defining the Pathway to Definitive Care and Surgical Decompression after Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Results of a Canadian Population-Based Cohort Study

An Update of a Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Patients With Acute Spinal Cord Injury: Recommendations on the Role and Timing of Decompressive Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical practice guideline development.

OBJECTIVES

Acute spinal cord injury (SCI) can result in devastating motor, sensory, and autonomic impairment; loss of independence; and reduced quality of life. Preclinical evidence suggests that early decompression of the spinal cord may help to limit secondary injury, reduce damage to the neural tissue, and improve functional outcomes. Emerging evidence indicates that "early" surgical decompression completed within 24 hours of injury also improves neurological recovery in patients with acute SCI. The objective of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to update the 2017 recommendations on the timing of surgical decompression and to evaluate the evidence with respect to ultra-early surgery (in particular, but not limited to, <12 hours after acute SCI).

METHODS

A multidisciplinary, international, guideline development group (GDG) was formed that consisted of spine surgeons, neurologists, critical care specialists, emergency medicine doctors, physical medicine and rehabilitation professionals, as well as individuals living with SCI. A systematic review was conducted based on accepted methodological standards to evaluate the impact of early (within 24 hours of acute SCI) or ultra-early (in particular, but not limited to, within 12 hours of acute SCI) surgery on neurological recovery, functional outcomes, administrative outcomes, safety, and cost-effectiveness. The GRADE approach was used to rate the overall strength of evidence across studies for each primary outcome. Using the "evidence-to-recommendation" framework, recommendations were then developed that considered the balance of benefits and harms, financial impact, patient values, acceptability, and feasibility. The guideline was internally appraised using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool.

RESULTS

The GDG recommended that early surgery (≤24 hours after injury) be offered as the preferred option for adult patients with acute SCI regardless of level. This recommendation was based on moderate evidence suggesting that patients were 2 times more likely to recover by ≥ 2 ASIA Impairment Score (AIS) grades at 6 months (RR: 2.76, 95% CI 1.60 to 4.98) and 12 months (RR: 1.95, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.18) if they were decompressed within 24 hours compared to after 24 hours. Furthermore, patients undergoing early surgery improved by an additional 4.50 (95% 1.70 to 7.29) points on the ASIA Motor Score compared to patients undergoing surgery after 24 hours post-injury. The GDG also agreed that a recommendation for ultra-early surgery could not be made on the basis of the current evidence because of the small sample sizes, variable definitions of what constituted ultra-early in the literature, and the inconsistency of the evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

It is recommended that patients with an acute SCI, regardless of level, undergo surgery within 24 hours after injury when medically feasible. Future research is required to determine the differential effectiveness of early surgery in different subpopulations and the impact of ultra-early surgery on neurological recovery. Moreover, further work is required to define what constitutes effective spinal cord decompression and to individualize care. It is also recognized that a concerted international effort will be required to translate these recommendations into policy.

Epidemiology features of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injury in China, Wuhan

Spinal cord injuries are incredibly disabling and can have fatal consequences. At present, there is a lack of available information regarding the epidemiological characteristics of patients who have experienced spinal cord injury (SCI) in China. This retrospective hospital-based study was conducted in the Rehabilitation department of Wuhan's Tongji Hospital between 2016 and 2022. A total of 649 individuals diagnosed with SCI (both traumatic and non-traumatic) were admitted during this period. Data regarding various epidemiological features were gathered, including sex, age, etiology, occupation, neurological level of injury, the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale at the time of admission, and information on any accompanying injuries. Out of the 649 cases of SCI, there were 539 cases of traumatic SCI and 110 cases of non-traumatic SCI. The mean age at the time of injury was 45.6 ± 14.8 years. The ratio of male to female patients was higher in traumatic SCI at 2.82:1compared to non-traumatic SCI at 1.68:1. Traffic accidents were the most common cause of TSCI, accounting for (n = 207/539; 38.40%) of cases. On the other hand, neoplasm was the most common cause of NTSCI, accounting for (n = 38/110; 34.54%) of cases. The findings indicated a higher proportion of males, with traffic accidents being the main cause of injury among TSCI patients. It is crucial to prioritize the risk of falling among older adults and allocate more attention to this issue. These results emphasize the need for tailored preventive strategies that consider the unique characteristics of different types of SCI patients.

Traumatic spinal cord injury: acute phase treatment in critical care

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgical timing in traumatic spinal cord injury (t-SCI) remains a point of debate. Current guidelines recommend surgery within 24 h after trauma; however, earlier timeframes are currently intensively being investigated. The aim of this review is to provide an insight on the acute care of patients with t-SCI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Multiple studies show that there appears to be a beneficial effect on neurological recovery of early surgical decompression within 24 h after trauma. Currently, the impact of ultra-early surgery is less clear as well as lacking evidence for the most optimal surgical technique. Nevertheless, early surgery to decompress the spinal cord by whatever method can impact the occurrence for perioperative complications and potentially expedite rehabilitation. There are clinical and socioeconomic barriers in achieving timely and adequate surgical interventions for t-SCI.

SUMMARY

In this review, we provide an overview of the recent insights of surgical timing in t-SCI and the current barriers in acute t-SCI treatment.

Updates in the Early Management of Acute Spinal Cord Injury

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a leading cause of disability worldwide, and effective management is necessary to improve clinical outcomes. Many long-standing therapies including early reduction and spinal cord decompression, methylprednisolone administration, and optimization of spinal cord perfusion have been around for decades; however, their efficacy has remained controversial because of limited high-quality data. This review article highlights studies surrounding the role of early surgical decompression and its role in relieving mechanical pressure on the microvascular circulation thereby reducing intraspinal pressure. Furthermore, the article touches on the current role of methylprednisolone and identifies promising studies evaluating neuroprotective and neuroregenerative agents. Finally, this article outlines the expanding body of literature evaluating mean arterial pressure goals, cerebrospinal fluid drainage, and expansive duroplasty to further optimize vascularization to the spinal cord. Overall, this review aims to highlight evidence for SCI treatments and ongoing trials that may markedly affect SCI care in the near future.

Delays in Presentation After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury-A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Prompt surgical decompression after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) may be associated with improved sensorimotor outcomes. Delays in presentation may prevent timely decompression after TSCI.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review existing studies investigating delays in presentation after TSCI in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and high-income countries (HICs).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted and studies featuring quantitative or qualitative data on prehospital delays in TSCI presentation were included. Studies lacking quantitative or qualitative data on prehospital delays in TSCI presentation, case reports or series with <5 patients, review articles, or animal studies were excluded from our analysis.

RESULTS

After exclusion criteria were applied, 24 studies were retained, most of which were retrospective. Eleven studies were from LMICs and 13 were from HICs. Patients with TSCI in LMICs were younger than those in HICs, and most patients were male in both groups. A greater proportion of patients with TSCI in studies from LMICs presented >24 hours after injury (HIC average proportion, 12.0%; LMIC average proportion, 49.9%; P = 0.01). Financial barriers, lack of patient awareness and education, and prehospital transportation barriers were more often cited as reasons for delays in LMICs than in HICs, with prehospital transportation barriers cited as a reason for delay by every LMIC study included in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

Disparities in prehospital infrastructure between HICs and LMICs subject more patients in LMICs to increased delays in presentation to care.

Time is spine: What's over the horizon

The overarching theme in the early treatment of acute spinal cord injury (SCI) is to reduce the extent of secondary damage to facilitate early neurological and functional recovery. Although multiple studies have brought us innovative and potential new therapies to treat SCI, ameliorating neural damage remains a formidable challenge. Knowledge translation of clinical and basic research studies has shown that surgical intervention is a valuable treatment modality; however, the role, timing and optimal technique in surgery remains a topic of great controversy. While evidence to support the concept of ultra-early surgery for acute SCI continues to emerge, current protocols and international guidelines that encourage reducing time from trauma to surgery support the concept of "Time is Spine". The present article provides a critical narrative review of the current best practice, with a particular focus on the timing of surgical intervention, which shapes our understanding of how time is of the essence in the management of acute SCI.

Time to Surgery in Spinal Trauma: A Meta-Analysis of the World's Literature Comparing High-Income Countries to Low-Middle Income Countries

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to: 1) compare time from traumatic spinal injury (TSI) to operating room (OR) in high-income countries (HICs) versus low-middle-income countries (LMICs), and 2) evaluate hospital length of stay (LOS) in HICs versus LMICs.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines involving articles of all languages.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

published between 1991 and 2021, spine trauma population, single country/region, and recorded time from injury to OR. The primary outcome was time from injury to OR, and the secondary outcome was LOS. Means and standard deviations were estimated in a random effects model by DerSimonian and Laird methods.

RESULTS

Of 2367 articles, 163 met the inclusion criteria for systematic review. Regarding time from injury to OR, 23 articles were eligible for meta-analysis; 16 studies were conducted in HICs and 7 in LMICs, comprising 3819 patients with TSI. A significantly shorter mean time from injury to OR was found in HICs (1.92 days, 95% confidence interval 1.44-2.41) compared with LMICs (3.27 days, 95% confidence interval 2.27-4.27) (P = 0.020). Regarding length of stay, 14 articles were eligible for meta-analysis, 10 studies were conducted in HICs and 4 in LMICs, comprising 11,003 patients. There was no difference in LOS between HICs and LMICs (25.76 days vs. 20.48 days, P = 0.140).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with traumatic spinal injuries in HICs were more likely to undergo earlier surgery compared to patients in LMICs. No difference was found in total LOS between HICs and LMICs. While multiple factors can influence time to surgery, these findings draw attention to the global disparity in spinal trauma care.

Pursuing More Aggressive Timelines in the Surgical Treatment of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury (TSCI): A Retrospective Cohort Study with Subgroup Analysis

Background: The optimal timing of surgical therapy for traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) remains unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the impact of “ultra-early” (<4 h) versus “early” (4–24 h) time from injury to surgery in terms of the likelihood of neurologic recovery. Methods: The effect of surgery on neurological recovery was investigated by comparing the assessed initial and final values of the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS). A post hoc analysis was performed to gain insight into different subgroup regeneration behaviors concerning neurological injury levels. Results: Datasets from 69 cases with traumatic spinal cord injury were analyzed. Overall, 19/46 (41.3%) patients of the “ultra-early” cohort saw neurological recovery compared to 5/23 (21.7%) patients from the “early” cohort (p = 0.112). The subgroup analysis revealed differences based on the neurological level of injury (NLI) of a patient. An optimal cutpoint for patients with a cervical lesion was estimated at 234 min. Regarding the prediction of neurological improvement, sensitivity was 90.9% with a specificity of 68.4%, resulting in an AUC (area under the curve) of 84.2%. In thoracically and lumbar injured cases, the estimate was lower, ranging from 284 (thoracic) to 245 min (lumbar) with an AUC of 51.6% and 54.3%. Conclusions: Treatment within 24 h after TSCI is associated with neurological recovery. Our hypothesis that intervention within 4 h is related to an improvement in the neurological outcome was not confirmed in our collective. In a clinical context, this suggests that after TSCI there is a time frame to get the right patient to the right hospital according to advanced trauma life support (ATLS) guidelines.

Comparative analysis of the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute spinal cord injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 16 studies

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord injuries (SCI) are a devastating condition and can lead to severe functional and psychosocial problems. However, the influence of the timing of the surgical intervention for acute SCI remains debated, with substantial variability in clinical practice. Thus, this study aims to compare the efficacy of early and late surgical intervention for acute SCI.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science up to January 10, 2021 was conducted for relevant studies that compared early and late acute SCI. Neurological outcomes were assessed by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA). Early surgery was defined as the surgical intervention within 24 h after spinal injury. The primary outcome was the change of ASIA score from baseline to follow-up time after spinal injury. Second primary outcomes were clinical outcomes including neurological improvement rate, mortality, length of stay (LOS), charges ($), complications and ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS). All statistical analyses were performed using standard statistical procedures provided in Review Manager 5.2.

RESULTS

A total of 16 studies including 3977 SCI patients were identified finally. Our pooled results indicated that, compared with late surgery, patients who underwent early surgery experienced more ASIA score improvement, with pooled MDs of 2.32 points (95% CI 1.07-3.57; P = 0.0003) in total motor scores, 5.13 points (95% CI 3.94-6.32; P < 0.0001) in light touch scores, and 4.49 points (95% CI 2.22-6.76; P = 0.0001) in pin prick scores respectively. In addition, patients receiving early surgery experienced more total motor score after surgery (MD 3.30; 95% CI 0.82-5.79; P = 0.009). Patients who had early surgery also had higher neurological improvement rate (OR 1.66; 95% CI 1.19-2.31; P = 0.003), shorter LOS (MD -4.77; 95% CI -7.42 to -2.12), less charges ($) (MD -0.33; 95% CI -0.43 to -0.22), lower incidence of complications (OR 0.62; 95% CI 0.48-0.81), and higher AIS improvement rate (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.20-2.44) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with late surgery, acute SCI patients who underwent early surgery experienced greater recovery after spinal injury, with better neurological improvement, shorter LOS, less charges and lower incidence of complications.

Impaired Function and Altered Morphology in the Skeletal Muscles of Adult Men and Women With Type 1 Diabetes

CONTEXT

Previous investigations on skeletal muscle health in type 1 diabetes (T1D) have generally focused on later stages of disease progression where comorbidities are present and are posited as a primary mechanism of muscle dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate skeletal muscle function and morphology across the adult lifespan in those with and without T1D.

DESIGN

Participants underwent maximal contraction (MVC) testing, resting muscle biopsy, and venous blood sampling.

SETTING

Procedures in this study were undertaken at the McMaster University Medical Centre.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-five healthy adult (18-78 years old) men/males and women/females (T1D = 34; control = 31) matched for age/biological sex/body mass index; self-reported physical activity levels were included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Our primary measure in this study was MVC, with supporting histological/immunofluorescent measures.

RESULTS

After 35 years of age ("older adults"), MVC declined quicker in T1D subjects compared to controls. Loss of strength in T1D was accompanied by morphological changes associated with accelerated aging. Type 1 myofiber grouping was higher in T1D, and the groups were larger and more numerous than in controls. Older T1D females exhibited more myofibers expressing multiple myosin heavy chain isoforms (hybrid fibers) than controls, another feature of accelerated aging. Conversely, T1D males exhibited a shift toward type 2 fibers, with less evidence of myofiber grouping or hybrid fibers.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest impairments to skeletal muscle function and morphology exist in T1D. The decline in strength with T1D is accelerated after 35 years of age and may be responsible for the earlier onset of frailty, which characterizes those with diabetes.

The influence of timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury: a pooled analysis of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Although there is a strong biological rationale for early decompression of the injured spinal cord, the influence of the timing of surgical decompression for acute spinal cord injury (SCI) remains debated, with substantial variability in clinical practice. We aimed to objectively evaluate the effect of timing of decompressive surgery for acute SCI on long-term neurological outcomes.

METHODS

We did a pooled analysis of individual patient data derived from four independent, prospective, multicentre data sources, including data from December, 1991, to March, 2017. Three of these studies had been published; of these, only one study previously specifically analysed the effect of the timing of surgical decompression. These four datasets were selected because they were among the highest quality acute SCI datasets available and contained highly granular data. Individual patient data were obtained by request from study authors. All patients who underwent decompressive surgery for acute SCI within these datasets were included. Patients were stratified into early (<24 h after spinal injury) and late (≥24 h after spinal injury) decompression groups. Neurological outcomes were assessed by American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA), or International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI), examination. The primary endpoint was change in total motor score from baseline to 1 year after spinal injury. Secondary endpoints were ASIA Impairment Scale (AIS) grade and change in upper-extremity motor, lower-extremity motor, light touch, and pin prick scores after 1 year. One-stage meta-analyses were done by hierarchical mixed-effects regression adjusting for baseline score, age, mechanism of injury, AIS grade, level of injury, and administration of methylprednisolone. Effect sizes were summarised by mean difference (MD) for sensorimotor scores and common odds ratio (cOR) for AIS grade, with corresponding 95% CIs. As a secondary analysis, change in total motor score was regressed against time to surgical decompression (h) as a continuous variable, using a restricted cubic spline with adjustment for the same covariates as in the primary analysis.

FINDINGS

We identified 1548 eligible patients from the four datasets. Outcome data at 1 year after spinal injury were available for 1031 patients (66·6%). Patients who underwent early surgical decompression (n=528) experienced greater recovery than patients who had late decompression surgery (n=1020) at 1 year after spinal injury; total motor scores improved by 23·7 points (95% CI 19·2-28·2) in the early surgery group versus 19·7 points (15·3-24·0) in the late surgery group (MD 4·0 points [1·7-6·3]; p=0·0006), light touch scores improved by 19·0 points (15·1-23·0) vs 14·8 points (11·2-18·4; MD 4·3 [1·6-7·0]; p=0·0021), and pin prick scores improved by 18·3 points (13·7-22·9) versus 14·2 points (9·8-18·6; MD 4·0 [1·5-6·6]; p=0·0020). Patients who had early decompression also had better AIS grades at 1 year after surgery, indicating less severe impairment, compared with patients who had late surgery (cOR 1·48 [95% CI 1·16-1·89]; p=0·0019). When time to surgical decompression was modelled as a continuous variable, there was a steep decline in change in total motor score with increasing time during the first 24-36 h after injury (p<0·0001); and after 36 h, change in total motor score plateaued.

INTERPRETATION

Surgical decompression within 24 h of acute SCI is associated with improved sensorimotor recovery. The first 24-36 h after injury appears to represent a crucial time window to achieve optimal neurological recovery with decompressive surgery following acute SCI.

FUNDING

None.

Effect of Velocity and Duration of Residual Compression in a Rat Dislocation Spinal Cord Injury Model

Early decompression of the traumatically injured and persistently compressed spinal cord is intuitively beneficial for neurological outcome. Despite considerable pre-clinical evidence of a neurological benefit to early decompression, the effect of early surgical decompression in clinical spinal cord injury (SCI) remains less clear. The discrepancy between pre-clinical and clinical results may be due to differences between the biomechanical variables used in pre-clinical animal models and the biomechanical conditions occurring in clinical injuries. These pre-clinical variables include region of spinal cord, velocity of impact, and injury mechanism. In this study, the effect of velocity and duration of residual compression on injury severity were evaluated using a novel, rodent model of cervical dislocation SCI. Fifty-two male Sprague-Dawley rats were included in five groups: two timings of decompression (24 min, 240 min), two velocities (10 mm/sec, 500 mm/sec), and a sham group. All injuries involved a 1.45-mm dorsal dislocation of the C6 vertebra relative to C5 with subsequent residual compression of 0.8 mm. Animals were evaluated for motor function using the Martinez open field, grip strength, and grooming tests for 6 weeks post-injury. Immunohistochemistry and histology following sacrifice were conducted with counts for NeuN- and choline acetyltransferase (ChAT)-positive neurons, and length of cavitation. Behavioral testing and histological analysis revealed that injuries induced by the high velocity were consistently more severe than those induced by the low velocity, with behavioral correlations ranging between 0.46 and 0.58 (p < 0.05). Longer duration of residual compression did not produce significantly more severe injuries as measured by functional tests and histology. These findings demonstrate that the velocity of the initial traumatic impact may be a more important factor than duration of residual compression in determining SCI severity in a dislocation model of SCI.

Early Surgery for Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Where Are We Now?

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review.

OBJECTIVE

There is a strong biological rationale to perform early decompression after traumatic spinal cord injury (SCI). With an enlarging clinical evidence base, most spine surgeons internationally now favor early decompression for the majority of SCI patients; however, a number of pertinent questions remain surrounding this therapy.

METHODS

A narrative review evaluating the status of early surgery for SCI. In particular, we addressed the following questions: (1) Which patients stand to benefit most from early surgery? 2) What is the most appropriate time threshold defining early surgery?

RESULTS

Although heterogeneity exists, the evidence generally seems to support early surgery. While the best evidence exists for cervical SCI, there is insufficient data to support a differential effect for early surgery depending on neurological level or injury severity. When comparing thresholds to define early versus late surgery-including a later threshold (48-72 hours), an earlier threshold (24 hours), and an ultra-early threshold (8-12 hours)-the 2 earlier time points seem to be associated with the greatest potential for improved outcomes. However, existing prehospital and hospital logistics pose barriers to early surgery in a significant proportion of patients. An overview of recommendations from the recent AOSpine guidelines is provided.

CONCLUSION

In spite of increasing acceptance of early surgery post SCI, further research is needed to (1) identify subgroups of patients who stand to derive particular benefit-in particular to develop more evidence-based approaches for central cord syndrome and (2) investigate the efficacy and feasibility of ultra-early surgery targeting more aggressive timelines.

Clinical Characteristics and Challenges of Management of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in a Trauma Center of a Developing Country

Background  Traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) is a major burden in trauma care worldwide. Most victims are young, and the injury results in economic loss and psychological and social burden on the individual and the society. The outcome depends on the severity of primary spinal cord injury, interventions to prevent secondary insults to the damaged cord, and access to a specialized care. The lack of standard prehospital care and dedicated facilities for spine care coupled with challenges of inadequate health insurance coverage impact negatively on the outcome of care in patients with spinal cord injury in our practice. Objectives  This study was performed to determine the clinical profile of patients with TSCI and to highlight the factors that determine the early outcome in a resource-constrained trauma center. Materials and Methods   This study was a retrospective review of trauma registry and medical records of all the patients with acute TSCI at the National Trauma Center Abuja from September 2014 to December 2016. Results  A total of 133 patients with TSCI were studied. Most of these patients were young men with a mean age of 36 years. Most injury (72.2%) occurred following motor vehicular crash affecting mainly the cervical spinal cord (62.0%). None of the patients received standard prehospital care. Only 41.4% of the patients were transported to the hospital in an ambulance. About half (52.6%) of the patients suffered complete spinal cord injury (the American Spinal Injury Association [ASIA] A), and pressure ulcer was the most common complication (23.3%). Only 42% of the patients that needed surgical intervention were operated, mainly due to the inability to pay for the service. The ASIA grade on admission was the most significant determinant factor of morbidity and mortality. Conclusion  Optimal care of patients with TSCI was hindered by inadequate facilities and economic constraints.

Assessment and management of acute spinal cord injury: From point of injury to rehabilitation

CONTEXT

Spinal cord injury (SCI) is a devastating condition that can lead to significant neurological impairment and reduced quality of life. Despite advancements in our understanding of the pathophysiology and secondary injury mechanisms involved in SCI, there are currently very few effective treatments for this condition. The field, however, is rapidly changing as new treatments are developed and key discoveries are made.

METHODS

In this review, we outline the pathophysiology, management, and long-term rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic SCI. We also provide an in-depth overview of emerging therapies along the spectrum of the translational pipeline.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

The concept of "time is spine" refers to the concept which emphasizes the importance of early transfer to specialized centers, early decompressive surgery, and early delivery of other treatments (e.g. blood pressure augmentation, methylprednisolone) to affect long-term outcomes. Another important evolution in management has been the recognition and prevention of the chronic complications of SCI including respiratory compromise, bladder dysfunction, Charcot joints, and pressure sores through directed interventions along with early integration of physical rehabilitation and mobilization. There have also been significant advances in neuroprotective and neuroregenerative strategies for SCI, many of which are actively in clinical trial including riluzole, Cethrin, stem cell transplantation, and the use of functional electrical stimulation.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacologic treatments, cell-based therapies, and other technology-driven interventions will likely play a combinatorial role in the evolving management of SCI as the field continues to evolve.

Geomapping of Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury in Canada and Factors Related to Triage Pattern

Current research indicates that more than half of patients with traumatic spinal cord injury (tSCI) experience delays in transfer and receive surgery >24 h post-injury. The objectives of this study were to determine the geographic distribution of tSCI in Canada relative to specialized treatment facilities, to assess clinical and logistical factors at play for indirect admissions to those facilities, and to explore differences in current time to admission and simulated scenarios in an attempt to assess the potential impact of changes to triage protocols. This study included data from 876 patients with tSCI enrolled in the prospectively collected acute Rick Hansen Spinal Cord Injury Registry (RHSCIR) between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2013 for whom there were data on the location of their injury. Patients transported directly to a RHSCIR acute facility were more likely to reach the facility within 1 h of injury, whereas those transported indirectly were more likely to arrive 7 h later. Considering the injuries occurring within 40 km of a RHSCIR acute facility (n = 323), 249 patients (77%) were directly and 74 (23%) were indirectly admitted. In the multivariate regression analysis, only older age and longer road distance remained significantly associated with being indirectly admitted to a RHSCIR facility. Compared with the current status, the median time to admission decreased by 20% (3.5 h) in the 100% direct admission scenario, and increased by 102% (8.9 h) in the 100% indirect admission scenario.

Improving care standards for patients with spinal trauma combining a modified e-Delphi process and stakeholder interviews: a study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Around 300 people sustain a new traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI) in Australia each year; a relatively low incidence injury with extremely high long-term associated costs. Care standards are inconsistent nationally, lacking in consensus across important components of care such as prehospital spinal immobilisation, timing of surgery and timeliness of transfer to specialist services. This study aims to develop 'expertly defined' and agreed standards of care across the majority of disciplines involved for these patients.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A modified e-Delphi process will be used to gain consensus for best practice across specific clinical early care areas for the patient with TSCI; invited participants will include clinicians across Australia with relevant and significant expertise. A rapid literature review will identify available evidence, including any current guidelines from 2005 to 2015. Level and strength of evidence identified, including areas of contention, will be used to formulate the first round survey questions and statements. Participants will undertake 2-3 online survey rounds, responding anonymously to questionnaires regarding care practices and indicating their agreement or otherwise with practice standard statements. Relevant key stakeholders, including patients, will also be interviewed face to face.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval for this study was obtained by the NSW Population & Health Services Research Ethics Committee on 14 January 2016 (HREC/12/CIPHS/74). Seeking comprehensive understanding of how the variation in early care pathways and treatment can be addressed to achieve optimal patient outcomes and economic costs; the overall aim is the agreement to a consistent approach to the triage, treatment, transport and definitive care of acute TSCI victims. The agreed practice standards of care will inform the development of a Clinical Pathway with practice change strategies for implementation. These standards will offer a benchmark for state-wide and potentially national policy.