Concurrent Use of Opioids with Other Central Nervous System-Active Medications Among Older Adults

Exploiting relationship directionality to enhance statistical modeling of peer-influence across social networks

Risky-prescribing is the excessive or inappropriate prescription of drugs that singly or in combination pose significant risks of adverse health outcomes. In the United States, prescribing of opioids and other "risky" drugs is a national public health concern. We use a novel data framework-a directed network connecting physicians who encounter the same patients in a sequence of visits-to investigate if risky-prescribing diffuses across physicians through a process of peer-influence. Using a shared-patient network of 10 661 Ohio-based physicians constructed from Medicare claims data over 2014-2015, we extract information on the order in which patients encountered physicians to derive a directed patient-sharing network. This enables the novel decomposition of peer-effects of a medical practice such as risky-prescribing into directional (outbound and inbound) and bidirectional (mutual) relationship components. Using this framework, we develop models of peer-effects for contagion in risky-prescribing behavior as well as spillover effects. The latter is measured in terms of adverse health events suspected to be related to risky-prescribing in patients of peer-physicians. Estimated peer-effects were strongest when the patient-sharing relationship was mutual as opposed to directional. Using simulations we confirmed that our modeling and estimation strategies allows simultaneous estimation of each type of peer-effect (mutual and directional) with accuracy and precision. We also show that failing to account for these distinct mechanisms (a form of model mis-specification) produces misleading results, demonstrating the importance of retaining directional information in the construction of physician shared-patient networks. These findings suggest network-based interventions for reducing risky-prescribing.

Polypharmacy and Healthcare Service Use Among Prescription Opioid Poisoning Cases Age 50

Objectives: To examine relationships between polypharmacy and level of healthcare service use among prescription opioid poisoning cases age 50 and older. Methods: Data came from the American Association of Poison Control Center's National Poison Data System, 2015-2020. We used multinomial logistic regression to examine the study questions. Results: Of the 77 946 cases with prescription opioid exposures, 64.5% were managed at a healthcare facility (HCF). Of HCF-managed cases, 41.2% were treated/evaluated and released and 21.3% and 37.5% were admitted for noncritical care and critical care, respectively. Medications for cardiovascular disease, benzodiazepines, other types of sedatives/hypnotics, antipsychotics, muscle relaxants, acetaminophen, and gabapentin were associated with increased risk of admission to both noncritical and critical care compared to treatment/evaluation and release. Acetaminophen use had the highest relative risk ratios (RRRs) for noncritical care (1.70, 95% CI = 1.51-1.91) and critical care (1.56, 95% CI = 1.39-1.76). Each additional medication/substance used was associated with 1.14 (95% CI = 1.11-1.17) and 1.19 (95% CI = 1.16-1.22) greater risk of noncritical and critical care admissions, respectively. Conclusions: Among older-adult poison control center cases for prescription opioid exposures, co-use of several commonly prescribed/used medicines was associated with increased risk of admissions to both noncritical and critical care units. Careful monitoring of medication use among older adults who use prescription opioids may reduce the risk of unintentional and intentional opioid poisoning.

Health care system costs related to potentially inappropriate medication use involving opioids in older adults in Canada

BACKGROUND

Older adults are at risk of potentially inappropriate medication use given polypharmacy, multimorbidity, and age-related changes, which contribute to the growing burden associated with opioid use. The objective of this study was to estimate the costs of health service utilization attributable to opioid use and potentially inappropriate medication use involving opioids in older adults in a public health care system.

METHODS

The sample included 1201 older adults consulting in primary care, covered by the public drug plan, without a cancer diagnosis and opioid use in the year before interview. Secondary analyses were conducted using two data sources: health survey and provincial administrative data. Health system costs included inpatient and outpatient visits, physician billing, and medication costs. Unit costs were calculated using annual financial and activity reports from 2013-2014, adjusted to 2022 Canadian dollars. Opioid use and potentially inappropriate medication use involving opioids were identified over 3 years. Generalized linear models with gamma distribution were employed to model 3-year costs associated with opioid use and potentially inappropriate medication use involving opioids. A phase-based approach was implemented to provide descriptive results on the costs associated with each phase: i) no use, ii) opioid use, and iii) potentially inappropriate medication use involving opioids.

RESULTS

Opioid use and potentially inappropriate medication use involving opioids were associated with adjusted 3-year costs of $2,222 (95% CI: $1,179-$3,264) and $8,987 (95% CI: $7,370-$10,605), respectively, compared to no use. In phase-based analyses, costs were the highest during inappropriate use.

CONCLUSIONS

Potentially inappropriate medication use involving opioids is associated with higher costs compared to those observed with opioid use and no use. There is a need for more effective use of health care resources to reduce costs for the health care system.

Coprescribing of opioids and psychotropic medications among Medicare-enrolled older adults on long-term opioid therapy

BACKGROUND

Pressures to reduce opioid prescribing have potential to incentivize coprescribing of opioids (at lower dose) with psychotropic medications. Evidence concerning the extent of the problem is lacking. This study assessed trends in coprescribing and characterized coprescribing patterns among Medicare-enrolled older adults with chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) receiving long-term opioid therapy (LTOT).

METHODS

A cohort study was conducted using 2012-2018 5% National Medicare claims data. Eligible beneficiaries were continuously enrolled and had no claims for cancer diagnoses or hospice use, and ≥ 2 claims with diagnoses for CNCP conditions within a 30-day period in the 12 months before the index date (LTOT initiation). Coprescribing was defined as an overlap between opioids and any class of psychotropic medication (antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, muscle relaxants, and nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics) based on their prescription fill dates and days of supply in a given year. The occurrence of coprescribing, coprescribing intensity, and number of days of overlap with psychotropic medications were calculated for each calendar year.

RESULTS

The eligible study population of individuals on LTOT ranged from 2038 in 2013 to 1751 in 2018. The occurrence of coprescribing among eligible beneficiaries decreased from 73.41% in 2013 to 70.81% in 2015 and then increased slightly to 71.22% in 2018. Among eligible beneficiaries with at least one overlap day, the coprescribing intensity with any class of psychotropic medications showed minimal variation throughout the study period: 74.73% in 2013 and 72.67% in 2018. Across all the years, the coprescribing intensity was found to be highest with antidepressants (2013, 49.90%; 2018, 50.33%) followed by benzodiazepines (2013, 25.42%; 2018, 19.95%).

CONCLUSION

Coprescribing was common among older adults with CNCP who initiated LTOT but did not rise substantially in the period studied. Future research should investigate drivers behind coprescribing and safety of various patterns of use.

Benzodiazepine Dose Intensity among Patients Concurrently Prescribed Buprenorphine in Rhode Island

Background: The concomitant use of buprenorphine and benzodiazepines has been linked to patient fatalities, with greater risk occurring with higher doses of benzodiazepines. We assessed benzodiazepine dose intensity among patients who were concurrently prescribed buprenorphine, as compared with patients prescribed benzodiazepines who were not receiving buprenorphine. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of adult patients who received at least a 30-day supply of benzodiazepines during 2018, using data from the Rhode Island (RI) Prescription Drug Monitoring Program. Mean daily diazepam milligram equivalents (DME) were calculated overall and according to patient sex, age group, payment type, and RI county. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to assess the odds of higher-dose benzodiazepine utilization among patients with concurrent use of buprenorphine, as compared with patients not prescribed buprenorphine, adjusting for patient demographics. Results: Compared to patients prescribed benzodiazepines who were not receiving buprenorphine, those with concurrent buprenorphine utilization had a significantly higher mean DME/day (19.22, 95% CI: 18.70-19.74; vs 10.94, 95% CI: 10.93-10.95; p < 0.001). Patients who were prescribed benzodiazepines with concurrent utilization of buprenorphine also had a comparatively higher odds of a DME/day ≥15 (aOR: 2.86, 95% CI: 2.63-3.10), ≥20 DME/day (aOR: 2.98, 95% CI: 2.75-3.24), and ≥25 DME/day (aOR: 2.99, 95% CI: 2.65-3.18). Conclusion: Compared to patients prescribed benzodiazepines for at least 30 days who were not receiving buprenorphine, patients concurrently utilizing benzodiazepines and buprenorphine had more than twice the odds of higher dose benzodiazepine utilization. Future studies are needed to assess the relationship between benzodiazepine dose intensity, overdose outcomes, and treatment retention among patients receiving buprenorphine.

Trends and correlates of concurrent opioid and benzodiazepine and/or gabapentinoid use among Ontario nursing home residents

BACKGROUND

A concern with long-term opioid use is the increased risk arising when opioids are used concurrently with drugs that can potentiate their associated adverse effects. The drugs most often encountered are benzodiazepines (BZDs) and gabapentinoids. Our study objectives were to examine trends in the concurrent use of opioids and BZDs, or gabapentinoids, in a Canadian nursing home population over an 11-year period, and current resident-level correlates of this concurrent use.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based, repeated cross-sectional study among Ontario nursing home residents (>65 years) dispensed opioids between April 2009 and February 2020. For the last study year, we examined cross-sectional associations between resident characteristics and concurrent use of opioids with BZDs or gabapentinoids. Linked data on nursing home residents from clinical and health administrative databases was used. The yearly proportions of residents who were dispensed an opioid concurrently with a BZD or gabapentinoid were plotted with percent change derived from log-binomial regression models. Separate modified Poisson regression models estimated resident-level correlates of concurrent use of opioids with BZDs or gabapentinoids.

RESULTS

Over the study period, among residents dispensed an opioid there was a 53.2% relative decrease (30.7% to 14.4%) in concurrent BZD and a 505.4% relative increase (4.4% to 26.6%) in concurrent gabapentinoid use. In adjusted models, increasing age and worsening cognition were inversely associated with the concurrent use of both classes, but most other significantly related covariates were unique to each drug class (e.g., sex and anxiety disorders for BZD, pain severity and presence of pain-related conditions for gabapentinoids).

CONCLUSIONS

Co-administration of BZDs or gabapentinoids in Ontario nursing home residents dispensed opioids remains common, but the pattern of co-use has changed over time. Observed covariates of concurrent use in 2019/20 suggest distinct but overlapping resident populations requiring consideration of the relative risks versus benefits of this co-use and monitoring for potential harm.

Population-based screening to detect benzodiazepine drug-drug-drug interaction signals associated with unintentional traumatic injury

Drug interactions involving benzodiazepines and related drugs (BZDs) are increasingly recognized as a contributor to increased risk of unintentional traumatic injury. Yet, it remains unknown to what extent drug interaction triads (3DIs) may amplify BZDs' inherent injury risk. We identified BZD 3DI signals associated with increased injury rates by conducting high-throughput pharmacoepidemiologic screening of 2000-2019 Optum's health insurance data. Using self-controlled case series design, we included patients aged ≥ 16 years with an injury while using a BZD + co-dispensed medication (i.e., base pair). During base pair-exposed observation time, we identified other co-dispensed medications as candidate interacting precipitants. Within each patient, we compared injury rates during time exposed to the drug triad versus to the base pair only using conditional Poisson regression, adjusting for time-varying covariates. We calculated rate ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and accounted for multiple estimation via semi-Bayes shrinkage. Among the 65,123 BZD triads examined, 79 (0.1%) were associated with increased injury rates and considered 3DI signals. Adjusted RRs for signals ranged from 3.01 (95% CI = 1.53-5.94) for clonazepam + atorvastatin with cefuroxime to 1.42 (95% CI = 1.00-2.02, p = 0.049) for alprazolam + hydrocodone with tizanidine. These signals may help researchers prioritize future etiologic studies to investigate higher-order BZD interactions.

Factors associated with potentially inappropriate opioid use in community-living older adults consulting in primary care

OBJECTIVE

To study the factors associated with opioid use and potentially inappropriate opioid use (PIOU) in primary care older adults with non-cancer pain referring to the conceptual framework developed by the American Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of health survey and medico-administrative data from Québec, Canada. Individuals aged ≥65 were recruited between 2011 and 2013 in primary care clinics to participate in face-to-face interviews. The sample included 945 older adults without a malignant tumor over the study period or any tumor in the 2 years surrounding opioid use. Opioid use within a 3 year follow-up period was identified from the public drug plan database. Potentially inappropriate opioid use (PIOU) was defined using the American Geriatrics Society Beers 2019 list. Multinomial regression analyses were performed to study the factors (patient, pain, substance use, provider, healthcare system) associated with opioid use and PIOU.

RESULTS

In this sample of older adults, 26.2% used an opioid and 18.4% were categorized as PIOU. Factors associated with PIOU compared to opioid use included female sex, higher psychological distress, number of emergency department visits, and recruitment type of healthcare practice. Factors associated with PIOU compared to no use included female sex, country of origin, presence of a trauma, physical/psychiatric multimorbidity, number of outpatient consultations, pain severity/type, and number of prescribers.

CONCLUSIONS

Mental health and health system factors were associated with PIOU. Results highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for pain management, and the urgent need for implementing organizational efforts to optimize opioid use in primary care.

Opioid and Benzodiazepine Substitutes: Impact on Drug Overdose Mortality in Medicare Population

INTRODUCTION

Gabapentinoids (GABAs) and serotonergic drugs (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors [SSRIs]/serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors [SNRIs]) are increasingly being prescribed as potential substitutes to opioids and benzodiazepines (benzos), respectively, to treat co-occurring pain and anxiety disorders. The toxicities of these drug classes and their combinations are not well understood.

METHODS

We conducted a matched case-control study using 2013-2016 Medicare files linked to the National Death Index. Cases were enrollees who died from drug overdose. Controls were enrollees who died from other causes. Cases and controls were matched on patient characteristics and prior chronic conditions. Possession of any opioids, GABAs, benzos, and SSRIs/SNRIs in the month prior to death was defined as drug use. Combination drug use was defined as possessing at least 2 types of these prescriptions for an overlapping period of at least 7 days in the month prior to death.

RESULTS

Among 4323 matches, benzo possession was associated with twice the risk for drug overdose death in cases vs controls. Compared with opioid-benzo co-prescribing, combinations involving SSRIs/SNRIs and opioids (or GABAs) were associated with decreased risk (adjusted odds ratio 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.69 for opioids and SSRIs/SNRIs; adjusted odds ratio 0.59; 95% confidence interval, 0.44-0.79 for GABAs and SSRIs/SNRIs). Fatal drug overdose risk was similar in users of GABA-opioid, GABA-benzo, and opioid-benzo combinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Benzodiazepines, prescribed alone or in combination, were associated with an increased risk of drug overdose death. SSRIs/SNRIs were associated with lower risk of overdose death vs benzodiazepines. GABAs were not associated with decreased risk compared with opioids, raising concerns for GABAs' perceived relative safety.

Opioid Use Disorder and Older Adults: Navigating Treatment Options

The intent of the current article is to highlight via a case vignette challenges faced when managing pain across care transitions in an older adult with multiple comorbidities, including, but not limited to, opioid use disorder (OUD). This case will highlight the role of different medications for OUD, namely buprenorphine/naloxone, methadone, and naltrexone. Furthermore, the case illustrates medication-related considerations in addition to action steps that are needed when working with older adults. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 48(7), 4-9.].

Polypharmacy in Australian Veterans with Post-traumatic Stress Disorder upon Admission to a Mental Health Facility: A Retrospective Chart Review

Objective

Polypharmacy increases the risk of adverse drug events and drug–drug interactions, and contributes to falls, hospital admissions, morbidity and mortality. Veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder often have psychological and physical comorbidities, increasing the likelihood of general and psychotropic polypharmacy. This study investigates the prevalence of general and psychotropic polypharmacy in inpatient veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder, and illustrates potential risks associated with polypharmacy in this population.

Methods

Medical records of 219 veterans admitted to a mental health facility for post-traumatic stress disorder management were retrospectively reviewed. Medication lists on admission were extracted and coded according to Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification classes. The prevalence of general (five or more total medications), psychotropic (two or more N-code medications), and sedative (two or more medications with sedating effects) polypharmacy and Drug Burden Index were calculated. Class combinations were reported, and associations between demographic characteristics and polypharmacy were determined.

Results

Mean age was 62.5 (± 14.6) years. In addition to post-traumatic stress disorder, 90.9% had a diagnosis of at least one other psychiatric condition, and 96.8% had a diagnosis of at least one non-psychiatric medical condition. The prevalence of general polypharmacy was 76.7%, psychotropic polypharmacy was 79.9% and sedative polypharmacy was 75.3%. Drug Burden Index scores ranged from 0 to 8.2, with 66.2% of participants scoring ≥ 1.

Conclusions

This cohort of inpatient veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder had a high prevalence of general, psychotropic and sedative polypharmacy, and were at high risk for drug-related adverse events. This highlights the importance of increasing awareness of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate drug combinations, and the need for improved medication review by prescribers.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40801-022-00298-3.

Past-year use or misuse of an opioid is associated with use of a sedative-hypnotic medication: a US National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) study

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Prescription use and misuse of opioids are linked to greater sleep disturbance. However, there are limited data on the prevalence of sedative-hypnotic medication use among persons who use opioids. Therefore, this study examined whether past-year sedative-hypnotic use among persons who used/misused opioids was higher than among individuals who did not use opioids.

METHODS

Data were acquired from the US National Survey on Drug Use and Health for 2015-2018. Use of a sedative benzodiazepine (temazepam, flurazepam, triazolam) or a Z-drug (eszopiclone, zaleplon, zolpidem) was examined in relation to use/misuse of an opioid within the past year. Logistic regression models estimated the associations between opioids and sedative-hypnotics using inverse probability of treatment weighting. A secondary machine learning analysis tested 6 binary classifiers to predict sedative-hypnotic use based on opioid use/misuse and other covariates.

RESULTS

Of 171,766 respondents, 24% used a prescription opioid whereas 3.6% misused an opioid in the past year. Among those who used a prescription opioid, 1.9% received a sedative benzodiazepine and 9% received a Z-drug during the same time frame. Use of an opioid was associated with greater odds of sedative benzodiazepine use (odds ratio, 4.4; 95% confidence interval, 3.61-5.4) and Z-drug use (odds ratio, 3.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.51-4.09), and stronger associations were noted for misuse of an opioid. Machine learning models accurately classified sedative-hypnotic medication use for > 70% of respondents based on opioid use/misuse.

CONCLUSIONS

Sedative-hypnotic use is common among persons who use opioids, which is of concern given the elevated mortality risk with concurrent use of these substances.

CITATION

Tubbs AS, Ghani SB, Naps M, Grandner MA, Stein MD, Chakravorty S. Past-year use or misuse of an opiod is associated with use of a sedative-hypnotic medication: a US National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(3):809-816.

Risk Prescriptions of Strong Opioids in the Treatment of Chronic Non-Cancer Pain by Primary Care Physicians in Catalonia: Opicat Padris Project

The prescription of strong opioids (SO) for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP) is steadily increasing. This entails a high risk of adverse effects, a risk that increases with the concomitant prescription of SO with central nervous system depressant drugs and with the use of SO for non-recommended indications. In order to examine this concomitant risk prescription, we designed a descriptive, longitudinal, retrospective population-based study. Patients aged ≥15 years with a continued SO prescription for ≥3 months during 2013-2017 for CNCP were included. Of these, patients who had received concomitant prescriptions of SO and risk drugs (gabapentinoids, benzodiazepines and antidepressants) and those who had received immediate-release fentanyl (IRF) were selected. The study included 22,691 patients; 20,354 (89.7%) patients received concomitant risk prescriptions. Men and subjects with a higher socioeconomic status received fewer concomitant risk prescriptions. Benzodiazepines or Z-drugs were prescribed concomitantly with SO in 15,883 (70%) patients, antidepressants in 14,932 (65%) and gabapentinoids in 11,267 (49%), while 483 (21.32%) patients received IRF (2266 prescriptions in total) without a baseline SO. In conclusion, our study shows that a high percentage of patients prescribed SO for CNCP received concomitant prescriptions with known risks, as well as IRF for unauthorized indications.

Association of co-prescribing of opioid and benzodiazepine substitutes with incident falls and fractures among older adults: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Examine the association between the co-prescribing of opioids, benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids (pregabalin and gabapentin) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SSRI/SNRIs) in different combinations and the risk of falls and fractures.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study from 2015 to 2018.

SETTING

Medicare enrolment and claims data.

PARTICIPANTS

Medicare beneficiaries with both chronic pain and anxiety disorders in 2016 with continuous enrolments in Parts A and B from 2015 to 2016 who were prescribed any combination of opioid, benzodiazepine, gabapentinoid and SSRI/SNRI in 2017 for ≥7 days, as documented in their Medicare Part D coverage.

INTERVENTIONS

Any combination of use of seven drug regimens (benzodiazepine +opioid; benzodiazepine +gabapentinoid; benzodiazepine +SSRI/SNRI; opioid +gabapentinoid; opioid +SSRI/SNRI; gabapentinoid +SSRI/SNRI; ≥3 drug classes).

MAIN OUTCOMES

First event of fall and the first event of fracture after the index date, which was the first day of combination drug use that lasted ≥7 days in 2017.

RESULTS

A total of 47 964 patients (mean [SD] age, 75.9 [7.1]; 78.0% woman) with diagnoses of both chronic pain and anxiety were studied. The median (Q1-Q3) duration of drug combination use was 26 (14-30) days. After adjusting for demographic characteristics, chronic conditions and history of hospitalisation and fall or fracture, the co-prescribing of ≥3 drugs (adjusted HR [aHR], 1.38; 95% CI 1.14 to 1.67) and opioid plus gabapentinoid (aHR, 1.18; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.37) were associated with a high fall risk, compared with benzodiazepineplus opioid co-prescribing, findings consistent with the secondary analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting with propensity scores. The co-prescribing of benzodiazepine plus gabapentinoid (aHR, 0.76; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.98) was associated with lower fracture risk compared with the co-prescribing of benzodiazepine plus opioid, though this finding was not robust.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings add to comparative toxicity research on different combinations of gabapentinoids and serotonergic agents commonly prescribed with or as substitutes for opioids and benzodiazepines in patients with co-occurring chronic pain and anxiety.

Screening for and Management of Opioid Use Disorder in Older Adults in Primary Care

Opioid use disorder (OUD) is commonly seen in older adults in primary care offices. OUD when left untreated, often leads to overdose deaths, emergency department visits, and hospitalizations due to opioid-related adverse effects, especially respiratory and central nervous system depression. Primary care providers are on the front lines of efforts for its prevention, early detection, and treatment. This includes using the lowest doses of opioids for the shortest possible time for management of pain, routine screening, brief intervention, opioid withdrawal management, prescription of naloxone to prevent overdose death, and treatment with medications and psychosocial interventions for OUD. Referral to addiction treatment centers may be needed in complex cases. This review explores the epidemiology, screening, as well as management of OUD as it pertains to the elderly population.

Efficacy and Safety Considerations With Second-Generation Antipsychotics as Adjunctive Analgesics: A Review of Literature

Objective: To determine the efficacy and safety of second-generation antipsychotics (SGAs) as adjunctive analgesics. Data Sources: A comprehensive literature review was conducted between August 2020 and January 2021 on PubMed, Scopus, and ProQuest Central. Study Selection and Data Extraction: Keyword and Boolean phrase searches using the following terminology were conducted: "Quetiapine" OR "Risperidone" OR "Olanzapine" OR "Ziprasidone" AND "Analgesia" NOT "Psychosis" NOT "Psych." Articles that involved human adult patients who received any of the SGAs mentioned in the searching filter with an opioid were included. Articles that described pediatrics, pregnant women, patients who received any of these agents for treatment of psychosis and articles that were not in English, or readily translatable to English, were excluded. Data Synthesis: Three articles were selected for inclusion in this review, with 2 articles detailing reports with olanzapine and 1 article describing a randomized, controlled trial with extended-release quetiapine. Both olanzapine and quetiapine were able to decrease pain scores on the numeric rating scale, indicating a reduction pain experienced, and additionally reduced opioid craving behavior in patients. Depression scores and quality-of-life indicators improved with quetiapine, though those metrics were not studied with olanzapine. Conclusions: Select SGAs, specifically extended-release quetiapine and olanzapine, may serve as an appropriate adjunctive analgesic choice in select patients. Further research is required in a clinical setting to determine the exact role of this drug class in pain management.

Opioid prescribing among new users for non-cancer pain in the USA, Canada, UK, and Taiwan: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

The opioid epidemic in North America has been driven by an increase in the use and potency of prescription opioids, with ensuing excessive opioid-related deaths. Internationally, there are lower rates of opioid-related mortality, possibly because of differences in prescribing and health system policies. Our aim was to compare opioid prescribing rates in patients without cancer, across 5 centers in 4 countries. In addition, we evaluated differences in the type, strength, and starting dose of medication and whether these characteristics changed over time.

METHODS AND FINDINGS

We conducted a retrospective multicenter cohort study of adults who are new users of opioids without prior cancer. Electronic health records and administrative health records from Boston (United States), Quebec and Alberta (Canada), United Kingdom, and Taiwan were used to identify patients between 2006 and 2015. Standard dosages in morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) were calculated according to The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Age- and sex-standardized opioid prescribing rates were calculated for each jurisdiction. Of the 2,542,890 patients included, 44,690 were from Boston (US), 1,420,136 Alberta, 26,871 Quebec (Canada), 1,012,939 UK, and 38,254 Taiwan. The highest standardized opioid prescribing rates in 2014 were observed in Alberta at 66/1,000 persons compared to 52, 51, and 18/1,000 in the UK, US, and Quebec, respectively. The median MME/day (IQR) at initiation was highest in Boston at 38 (20 to 45); followed by Quebec, 27 (18 to 43); Alberta, 23 (9 to 38); UK, 12 (7 to 20); and Taiwan, 8 (4 to 11). Oxycodone was the first prescribed opioid in 65% of patients in the US cohort compared to 14% in Quebec, 4% in Alberta, 0.1% in the UK, and none in Taiwan. One of the limitations was that data were not available from all centers for the entirety of the 10-year period.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we observed substantial differences in opioid prescribing practices for non-cancer pain between jurisdictions. The preference to start patients on higher MME/day and more potent opioids in North America may be a contributing cause to the opioid epidemic.

Receipt of Concurrent VA and Non-VA Opioid and Sedative-Hypnotic Prescriptions Among Post-9/11 Veterans With Traumatic Brain Injury

OBJECTIVE

Receipt of concurrent psychotropic prescription medications from both US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and non-VA healthcare providers may increase risk of adverse opioid-related outcomes among veterans with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Little is known about patterns of dual-system opioid or sedative-hypnotic prescription receipt in this population. We estimated the prevalence and patterns of, and risk factors for, VA/non-VA prescription overlap among post-9/11 veterans with TBI receiving opioids from VA providers in Oregon.

SETTING

Oregon VA and non-VA outpatient care.

PARTICIPANTS

Post-9/11 veterans in Oregon with TBI who received an opioid prescription from VA providers between the years of 2014 and 2019.

DESIGN

Historical cohort study.

MAIN MEASURES

Prescription overlap of VA opioids and non-VA opioids or sedative-hypnotics; proportions of veterans who received VA or non-VA opioid, benzodiazepine, and nonbenzodiazepine sedative-hypnotic prescriptions were also examined by year and by veteran characteristics.

RESULTS

Among 1036 veterans with TBI receiving opioids from the VA, 210 (20.3%) received an overlapping opioid prescription from a non-VA provider; 5.3% received overlapping benzodiazepines; and none received overlapping nonbenzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics. Proportions of veterans with prescription overlap tended to decrease over time. Veterans with other than urban versus urban addresses (OR = 1.4; 95% CI, 1.0-1.8), high versus medium average annual VA visits (OR = 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.6), and VA service connection of 50% or more versus none/0% to 40% (OR = 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3-14.0) were more likely to have concurrent VA/non-VA prescriptions in bivariable analyses; other than urban remained associated with overlap in multivariable models. Similarly, veterans with comorbid posttraumatic stress disorder diagnoses were more likely to have concurrent VA/non-VA prescriptions in both bivariable and multivariable (OR = 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0-4.1) models.

CONCLUSION

Among post-9/11 veterans with TBI receiving VA opioids, a considerable proportion had overlapping non-VA prescription medications. Providers and healthcare systems should consider all sources of psychotropic prescriptions, and risk factors for overlapping medications, to help mitigate potentially unsafe medication use among veterans with TBI.

Concurrent Utilization of Prescription Opioids and Non-opioid Controlled Substances: Rhode Island Prescription Drug Monitoring Program, 2018

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the prevalence of concurrent prescription opioid and non-opioid controlled substance use in Rhode Island (RI).

METHODS

We conducted a cross sectional observational study using data from the RI Prescription Drug Monitoring Program on controlled substance prescriptions dispensed in 2018. We estimated the prevalence of concurrent use of other prescribed controlled substances among adults who received at least one opioid prescription.

RESULTS

In 2018, 142,692 RI adult residents received at least one opioid prescription, of whom 25.1% (99% confidence interval [CI]: 24.8-25.4) were concurrently prescribed at least one other controlled substance, including benzodiazepines (17.0%, 99% CI: 16.8-17.3), medications for insomnia (4.0%, 99% CI: 3.9-4.2), and stimulants (3.8%, 99% CI: 3.6-3.9).

CONCLUSION

The concurrent use of prescription opioids and other prescribed controlled substances is common. Our findings suggest an urgent need to implement focused initiatives to address controlled substance polypharmacy to reduce the risk of overdose.

The Benefits of T'ai Chi for Older Adults with Chronic Back Pain: A Qualitative Study

Objective: To determine the perceived benefits of t'ai chi in older adults with chronic low-back pain (cLBP). Design: A qualitative analysis from a randomized controlled feasibility trial. Subjects: Eighteen participants (65+ years old) with cLBP of at least moderate intensity. Intervention: A 36-week intervention beginning with twice weekly classes for 12 weeks, weekly classes for 6 weeks, biweekly classes for 6 weeks, and monthly classes for 12 weeks. Participants were asked to practice at home on nonclass days and videos were provided to assist in that process. Outcome Measures: Participants in the focus groups were asked to provide feedback on their experiences with the study as well as the benefits of their t'ai chi practice. We used demographic and class attendance data to describe the sample. Results: Regarding the benefits of t'ai chi practice, five major themes were identified: functional benefits, pain reduction/pain relief, psychospiritual benefits, the importance of social support in learning t'ai chi, and the integration of t'ai chi into daily activities. The most common functional benefits were improvements in balance, flexibility, leg strength, and posture. Some reported pain reduction or pain relief, but others did not. Increased relaxation, mindfulness, and a sense of connectedness were subthemes that emerged from psychospiritual benefits. Social support benefits included motivation to attend class and group support while learning a new skill. Finally, improved body awareness allowed participants to integrate t'ai chi skills into their daily activities. Conclusions: This qualitative analysis demonstrates the multifaceted benefits of t'ai chi for older adults living with cLBP.

Psychotropic and Opioid-Based Medication Use among Economically Disadvantaged African-American Older Adults

African-American older adults, particularly those who live in economically deprived areas, are less likely to receive pain and psychotropic medications, compared to Whites. This study explored the link between social, behavioral, and health correlates of pain and psychotropic medication use in a sample of economically disadvantaged African-American older adults. This community-based study recruited 740 African-American older adults who were 55+ yeas-old in economically disadvantaged areas of South Los Angeles. Opioid-based and psychotropic medications were the outcome variables. Gender, age, living arrangement, socioeconomic status (educational attainment and financial strain), continuity of medical care, health management organization membership, sleeping disorder/insomnia, arthritis, back pain, pain severity, self-rated health, depressive symptoms, and major chronic conditions were the explanatory variables. Logistic regression was used for data analyses. Arthritis, back pain, severe pain, and poor self-rated health were associated with opioid-based medications. Pain severity and depressive symptoms were correlated with psychotropic medication. Among African-American older adults, arthritis, back pain, poor self-rated health, and severe pain increase the chance of opioid-based and psychotropic medication. Future research should test factors that can reduce inappropriate and appropriate use and prescription of opioid-based and psychotropic medication among economically disadvantaged African-American older adults.