1
|
Juras MM, Coelho ACF, Vázquez AL, Ribeiro M, Kohlsdorf M, Custódio AL, Amador Buenabad NG, Perez LV, Hooley C, Barnett ML, Baumann AA. Parenting practices and interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: an exploratory cross-sectional study of caregivers in Brazil, Mexico, and the United States. PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA 2024; 37:12. [PMID: 38583110 PMCID: PMC10999397 DOI: 10.1186/s41155-024-00295-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/08/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The COVID-19 pandemic led countries' governments to rapidly establish lockdowns and social distancing, which altered family routines and the quality of family relationships worldwide. OBJECTIVES This exploratory cross-sectional study aimed to identify the impacts of the social distancing and lockdown in parenting practices of caregivers from Brazil, Mexico, and the USA, and to analyze the continuity of parenting intervention support for children and their families at the beginning of the pandemic in these countries. METHODS The sample consisted of 704 caregivers of children (286 from Brazil, 225 from Mexico, and 193 from the USA) who answered an online survey about parenting practices before/after quarantine, caregiver/child routines, feelings related to quarantine, changes in everyday life since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, contact with health professionals, and sources of parenting information. RESULTS Data indicate that caregivers from the three countries experienced similar parenting practices during this time, and did not report significant changes before and after the lockdown. They sought information about parenting predominantly via social media. Those receiving previous mental health care perceived the transition from in-person to telehealth services during the pandemic as feasible and acceptable. CONCLUSION This study will be helpful for clinicians and parents to contextualize their practices amid long-standing effects that the COVID-19 pandemic can have on children and their families during and post-pandemic from multiple cultural backgrounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lucia Vazquez Perez
- National Institute of Psychiatry Ramon de la Fuente Muniz, Huntsville, Mexico
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Elliott KS, Nabulsi EH, Sims-Rhodes N, Dubre V, Barena E, Yuen N, Morris M, Sass SM, Kennedy B, Singh KP. Modality and terminology changes for behavioral health service delivery during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review. Front Psychiatry 2024; 14:1265087. [PMID: 38375514 PMCID: PMC10876001 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1265087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic prompted healthcare professionals to implement service delivery adaptations to remain in compliance with safety regulations. Though many adaptations in service delivery were reported throughout the literature, a wide variety of terminology and definitions were used. Methods To address this, we conducted a PRISMA review to identify service delivery adaptations across behavioral healthcare services in the United States from March 2020 to May 2022 and to identify variations in terminology used to describe these adaptations. We identified 445 initial articles for our review across eight databases using predetermined keywords. Using a two-round screening process, authors used a team approach to identify the most appropriate articles for this review. Results Our results suggested that a total of 14 different terms were used to describe service modality changes, with the most frequent term being telehealth (63%). Each term found in our review and the frequency of use across identified articles is described in detail. Discussion Implications of this review such as understanding modality changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond are discussed. Our findings illustrate the importance of standardizing terminology to enhance communication and understanding among professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly S. Elliott
- Department of Healthcare Policy, Economics and Management, University of Texas at Tyler Health Science Center, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Eman H. Nabulsi
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Nicholas Sims-Rhodes
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Vandy Dubre
- Robert R. Muntz Library, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Emily Barena
- Department of Psychology and Counseling, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Nelly Yuen
- Department of Psychology and Counseling, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Michael Morris
- Department of Healthcare Policy, Economics and Management, University of Texas at Tyler Health Science Center, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Sarah M. Sass
- Department of Psychology and Counseling, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Bridget Kennedy
- Department of Psychology and Counseling, The University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| | - Karan P. Singh
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lombardi BM, de Saxe Zerden L, Greeno C. Federally Qualified Health Centers Use of Telehealth to Deliver Integrated Behavioral Health Care During COVID-19. Community Ment Health J 2024; 60:215-223. [PMID: 36547816 PMCID: PMC9774057 DOI: 10.1007/s10597-022-01070-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) that provide comprehensive health services, including integrated behavioral health (IBH), transitioned to deliver care via telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study explored how FQHCs adapted IBH services using telehealth. A mixed-method design was used, pairing a survey disseminated to FQHC administrators with a structured interview. Of the 46 administrators who participated in the survey, 14 (30.4%) reported delivering IBH using telecommunication prior to the pandemic. Since COVID-19, almost all of the FQHCs surveyed used telecommunication to deliver IBH (n = 44, 95.7%). Nine interviews with FQHC administrators resulted in the four themes: telehealth was essential; core components of IBH were impacted; payment parity and reimbursement were a concern; and telehealth addressed workforce issues. Findings confirm the necessity of telehealth for FQHCs during COVID-19. However due to the lack of co-location, warm-handoffs and other core components of IBH were limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brianna M Lombardi
- Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 590 Manning Dr, 27514, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Lisa de Saxe Zerden
- School of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 325 Pittsboro St., CB #3550, 27516, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Catherine Greeno
- School of Social Work, University of Pittsburgh, 4200 Fifth Ave., Pittsburgh, PA, 15260, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van Kessel R, Roman-Urrestarazu A, Anderson M, Kyriopoulos I, Field S, Monti G, Reed SD, Pavlova M, Wharton G, Mossialos E. Mapping Factors That Affect the Uptake of Digital Therapeutics Within Health Systems: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e48000. [PMID: 37490322 PMCID: PMC10410406 DOI: 10.2196/48000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital therapeutics are patient-facing digital health interventions that can significantly alter the health care landscape. Despite digital therapeutics being used to successfully treat a range of conditions, their uptake in health systems remains limited. Understanding the full spectrum of uptake factors is essential to identify ways in which policy makers and providers can facilitate the adoption of effective digital therapeutics within a health system, as well as the steps developers can take to assist in the deployment of products. OBJECTIVE In this review, we aimed to map the most frequently discussed factors that determine the integration of digital therapeutics into health systems and practical use of digital therapeutics by patients and professionals. METHODS A scoping review was conducted in MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Google Scholar. Relevant data were extracted and synthesized using a thematic analysis. RESULTS We identified 35,541 academic and 221 gray literature reports, with 244 (0.69%) included in the review, covering 35 countries. Overall, 85 factors that can impact the uptake of digital therapeutics were extracted and pooled into 5 categories: policy and system, patient characteristics, properties of digital therapeutics, characteristics of health professionals, and outcomes. The need for a regulatory framework for digital therapeutics was the most stated factor at the policy level. Demographic characteristics formed the most iterated patient-related factor, whereas digital literacy was considered the most important factor for health professionals. Among the properties of digital therapeutics, their interoperability across the broader health system was most emphasized. Finally, the ability to expand access to health care was the most frequently stated outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS The map of factors developed in this review offers a multistakeholder approach to recognizing the uptake factors of digital therapeutics in the health care pathway and provides an analytical tool for policy makers to assess their health system's readiness for digital therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin van Kessel
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
- Department of International Health, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Andres Roman-Urrestarazu
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Michael Anderson
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Ilias Kyriopoulos
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Samantha Field
- Department of Health Services Research and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Giovanni Monti
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Shelby D Reed
- Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Milena Pavlova
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - George Wharton
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elias Mossialos
- LSE Health, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Banks DE, Paschke ME, Li X, Fentem A, Rich A, Szlyk HS, Cavazos-Rehg P. Opioid Use Disorder and COVID-19: Treatment and Recovery Factors among Vulnerable Populations at the Intersection of Two U.S. Epidemics. J Psychoactive Drugs 2022; 54:300-308. [PMID: 35616267 PMCID: PMC9588537 DOI: 10.1080/02791072.2022.2079443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Revised: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Social inequities made some sociodemographic groups - including those of older age, minoritized race/ethnicity, and low socioeconomic status - disproportionately vulnerable to morbidity and mortality associated with the opioid epidemic and COVID-19 pandemic. Given shared vulnerability to these public health crises, it is critical to understand how COVID-19 impacts substance use disorder (SUD) treatment and recovery among people with these characteristics. The current study examined COVID-19's perceived impact on treatment factors and psychosocial outcomes by sociodemographic vulnerability. Patients receiving SUD treatment with a history of opioid misuse were recruited. Participants completed self-report questionnaires regarding the impact of COVID-19 on treatment indicators and mood and substance use symptoms. Most participants reported that COVID-19 decreased their treatment access and quality. There were no sociodemographic differences in treatment factors. Those with high sociodemographic vulnerability reported greater pandemic-related increases in depression and demonstrated greater mood symptoms. Post-hoc analyses demonstrated that unmet basic needs were significantly associated with lower treatment access and quality, greater mood symptoms, and higher substance use. Findings suggest pandemic-related stressors and barriers affected those across the sociodemographic spectrum. Treatment systems must address socioeconomic barriers to care exacerbated by the pandemic and bolster integrated treatment options for opioid use and mood disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devin E. Banks
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri – St. Louis, One University Blvd. 325 Stadler Hall, St. Louis, MO 63121
| | - Maria E. Paschke
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri – St. Louis, One University Blvd. 325 Stadler Hall, St. Louis, MO 63121
| | - Xiao Li
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Box 8134, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Andrea Fentem
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Box 8134, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Amanda Rich
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri – St. Louis, One University Blvd. 325 Stadler Hall, St. Louis, MO 63121
| | - Hannah S. Szlyk
- School of Social Work, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 120 Albany St, New Brunswick, NJ 08901
| | - Patricia Cavazos-Rehg
- Department of Psychiatry, Washington University School of Medicine, 660 South Euclid Avenue, Box 8134, St. Louis, MO 63110
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Norman S, Atabaki S, Atmore K, Biddle C, DiFazio M, Felten D, Fox E, Marschall D, Newman J, Robb A, Rowland C, Selekman R, Slovin A, Stein M, Strang J, Sable C. Home direct-to-consumer telehealth solutions for children with mental health disorders and the impact of Covid-19. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 2022; 27:244-258. [PMID: 34923834 DOI: 10.1177/13591045211064134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Delivery of mental health treatment in the home can close gaps in care. Telehealth also provides access to healthcare that has been disrupted due to the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2016, a home direct-to-consumer telehealth program was initiated. Mental health encounters made up a significant portion of all telehealth encounters and COVID-19 had a significant impact on accelerating the utilization of telehealth. Telemental health has been more successful at meeting targeted volumes than the overall health system. Of all the mental health diagnoses before and during COVID-19, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, Autism Spectrum Disorder, and Anxiety Disorder were most common. The direct-to-consumer telehealth program saved patients a significant amount of travel miles and associated time, based on data from the period before COVID-19. Payment reimbursement for direct-to-consumer telehealth professional services was similar to reimbursement for in-person visits. This program demonstrates direct-to-consumer telehealth is a feasible and acceptable care modality for a variety of youth mental health disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sierra Norman
- 12353University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | | - Cara Biddle
- 8404Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Marc DiFazio
- 8404Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Daniel Felten
- 8404Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Eduardo Fox
- 8404Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Julie Newman
- 8404Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Adelaide Robb
- 8404Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | - Ariella Slovin
- 8404Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Mark Stein
- 7274Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - John Strang
- 8404Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Craig Sable
- 8404Children's National Health System, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
COVID-19, Rural Communities, and Implications of Telebehavioral Health Services: Addressing the Benefits and Challenges of Behavioral Health Services via Telehealth in Nebraska. SOCIETIES 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/soc11040141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Telehealth has been in use, in various forms, for over a century and is growing increasingly more popular. The current research sought to examine the prevalence, benefits, and challenges of telehealth for behavioral and mental health services in the state of Nebraska with a particular focus on rural communities. The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with the research endeavors and impacted the questions that were asked related to the use of telebehavioral health. Specifically, the research included an investigation of the rates of use of telebehavioral health across agencies and whether/how the pandemic impacted the use of telehealth services. The research included an initial examination of more than 50 behavioral health agencies to assess overall utilization of telehealth. Researchers then conducted interviews with 15 practitioners to discuss the challenges and benefits associated with telehealth services. Key results suggest that implementation of telehealth in Nebraska has resulted in increased access to services among rural residents and has deeply impacted clinical practice. Additionally, clinicians identified specific benefits and challenges of telebehavioral health. It was also noted that the majority of clinicians plan to continue providing services via telehealth if the policies and regulations remain as they are post-COVID-19. Implications of this research highlight the efficiency and effectiveness of using telehealth to increase access.
Collapse
|