Telepractice Treatment for Aphasia: Association Between Clinical Outcomes and Client Satisfaction

Telehealth Assessments and Interventions for Individuals With Poststroke Aphasia: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

There are increasing demands for aphasia assessment and intervention services to be delivered remotely. The purpose of this scoping review was to address what is known about the delivery of assessments and interventions using telehealth for people with poststroke aphasia. Specifically, the review sought to (a) identify which telehealth assessment protocols have been used, (b) identify which telehealth intervention protocols have been used, and (c) describe evidence on the effectiveness and feasibility of telehealth for people with poststroke aphasia.

METHOD

A scoping review of the literature published in English since 2013 was conducted by searching MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies. A total of 869 articles were identified. Two reviewers screened records independently, finding 25 articles eligible for inclusion. Data extraction was conducted once and validated by the second reviewer.

RESULTS

Two of the included studies examined telehealth assessment protocols, whereas the remaining studies focused on the delivery of telehealth interventions. The results of the included studies illustrated both effectiveness and feasibility regarding telehealth for people with poststroke aphasia. However, a lack of procedural variation among the studies was found.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, this scoping review yielded continued support for the use of telehealth practices as an alternate mode of delivering both assessment and intervention services to people with poststroke aphasia. However, further research is needed to investigate the range of aphasia assessment and intervention protocols that can be offered via telehealth, such as assessments or interventions that use patient-reported measures or address extralinguistic cognitive abilities.

Applications of Telemedicine in Speech-Language Pathology: Evaluation of Patient Satisfaction

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to evaluate patient satisfaction with speech-language therapy televisits and to identify factors influencing the level of satisfaction.

METHODS

Participants were recruited from an academic tertiary voice and swallowing center who had completed ≥1 telehealth session of speech-language therapy with a speech-language pathologist between March, 2020 and April, 2021. Patient satisfaction was assessed using the Short Assessment of Patient Satisfaction (SAPS), a validated 7-item survey. Demographic characteristics of participants were collected from a review of patient charts.

RESULTS

65/239 patients completed the SAPS survey, representing a response rate of 27%. The average age of study participants was 54.92 ± 16.45 years, with 49.2% identifying as female, 33.9% as male, and 16.9% as trans-female. The mean SAPS score was 22.60 ± 3.89, with 84.62% of patients satisfied or very satisfied with their visit. Patients were most satisfied with provider respect (3.91 ± 0.34) and care received (3.74 ± 0.64), and least satisfied with visit length (2.32 ± 1.38) and explanation of treatment results (2.62 ± 1.72). Patient satisfaction was positively correlated with younger age and an increased number of televisits. Satisfaction did not differ significantly by gender identity, type of therapy received, insurance type, travel distance, or prior in-person therapy.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians are able to achieve high patient satisfaction with speech-language therapy when delivered by telehealth. Patient satisfaction remained high across diverse patient populations and range of clinical needs. Clinicians should remain cognizant of the unique limitations of older patients when conducting telehealth visits.

LAY SUMMARY

Clinicians are able to achieve high patient satisfaction with speech-language therapy when delivered via telehealth. Satisfaction remained high regardless of gender identity, type of therapy received, type of insurance, travel distance, or completion of prior in-person therapy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4 Laryngoscope, 133:895-900, 2023.

Patterns of acceptance and use of digital health services among the persistent frequent attenders of outpatient care: A qualitatively driven multimethod analysis

Objective

Utilising digital health services in the treatment of patients who frequently attend outpatient care could be beneficial for patients' health and the sustainability of health systems but carries the risk of digital exclusion. This study aimed to explore the patterns of acceptance and use of digital health services among frequent attenders (FAs), which may help in the assessment of patients' digital suitability.

Methods

Persistent FAs (N = 30) were recruited by random sampling from one Finnish municipality. The semistructured interviews were conducted in February-May 2021. We analysed the data with qualitative content analysis using the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) model. Additionally, we quantified the data for two-step cluster analyses to create separate cluster models that grouped FAs based on acceptance and use of (a) digital services for self-management of health and (b) telemedicine services.

Results

Based on digital self-management, FAs were defined as Self-Managers, Supported Self-Managers, and Non-Self-Managers. Based on telemedicine use, they were grouped into Telemedicine Users, Doubtful Telemedicine Users, and Telemedicine Refusers. The clusters described different opportunities, awareness, and interest in using digital health services. Referral from professionals seemed to promote digital service use. For some, digital services were not accessible.

Conclusions

Our findings emphasise the importance of assessing the suitability of FAs to digital health services, as their readiness to use may vary. Professionals should recommend digital services that support individual health to suitable patients. More accessible digital services could promote digital suitability despite functional limitations.

Virtual Behavioral Health Treatment Satisfaction and Outcomes Across Time

PURPOSE

The COVID-19 pandemic continues to have major and long-lasting impacts on health care delivery and mental health. As health care shifted to telehealth, legislation was adjusted to expand telehealth allowances, creating a unique opportunity to elucidate outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess long-term patient and clinician satisfaction and outcomes with virtual behavioral health.

METHODS

Data were obtained over 16 months from surveys to patients and clinicians receiving/providing virtual treatment. Outcomes data also were collected from medical records of adults receiving in-person and virtual behavioral health treatment. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Groups were compared using various chi-squared tests for categorical variables, Likert response trends over time, and conditional independence, with Wilcoxon rank-sum or Jonckheere trend test used to assess continuous variables. P-values of ≤0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients gave high ratings to virtual treatment and indicated a preference for virtual formats. Both patient and clinician preference for virtual visits increased significantly with time, and many clinicians perceived virtual services to be equally effective to in-person. Virtual programs had higher completion rates, attendance rates, and number of treatment visits, suggesting that virtual behavioral health had equivalent or better outcomes to in-person treatment and that attitudes toward telehealth changed over time.

CONCLUSIONS

If trends found in this study continue, telehealth may emerge as a preferred option long term This is important considering the increase in mental health needs associated with the COVID-19 pandemic and the eventuality that in-person restrictions ease as the pandemic subsides.