1
|
Collins LM, Nahum-Shani I, Guastaferro K, Strayhorn JC, Vanness DJ, Murphy SA. Intervention Optimization: A Paradigm Shift and Its Potential Implications for Clinical Psychology. Annu Rev Clin Psychol 2024; 20:21-47. [PMID: 38316143 PMCID: PMC11245367 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-080822-051119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2024]
Abstract
To build a coherent knowledge base about what psychological intervention strategies work, develop interventions that have positive societal impact, and maintain and increase this impact over time, it is necessary to replace the classical treatment package research paradigm. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) is an alternative paradigm that integrates ideas from behavioral science, engineering, implementation science, economics, and decision science. MOST enables optimization of interventions to strategically balance effectiveness, affordability, scalability, and efficiency. In this review we provide an overview of MOST, discuss several experimental designs that can be used in intervention optimization, consider how the investigator can use experimental results to select components for inclusion in the optimized intervention, discuss the application of MOST in implementation science, and list future issues in this rapidly evolving field. We highlight the feasibility of adopting this new research paradigm as well as its potential to hasten the progress of psychological intervention science.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M Collins
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA;
- Department of Biostatistics, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Inbal Nahum-Shani
- Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Kate Guastaferro
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA;
| | - Jillian C Strayhorn
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA;
| | - David J Vanness
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Susan A Murphy
- Departments of Statistics and Computer Science, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D'Aunno T, Neighbors CJ. Innovation in the Delivery of Behavioral Health Services. Annu Rev Public Health 2024; 45:507-525. [PMID: 37871139 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-071521-024027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
Several factors motivate the need for innovation to improve the delivery of behavioral health services, including increased rates of mental health and substance use disorders, limited access to services, inconsistent use of evidence-based practices, and persistent racial and ethnic disparities. This narrative review identifies promising innovations that address these challenges, assesses empirical evidence for the effectiveness of these innovations and the extent to which they have been adopted and implemented, and suggests next steps for research. We review five categories of innovations: organizational models, including a range of novel locations for providing services and new ways of organizing services within and across sites; information and communication technologies; workforce; treatment technologies; and policy and regulatory changes. We conclude by discussing the need to strengthen and accelerate the contributions of implementation science to close the gap between the launch of innovative behavioral health services and their widespread use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas D'Aunno
- Wagner Graduate School of Public Service, New York University, New York, NY, USA;
| | - Charles J Neighbors
- Department of Population Health, Grossman School of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guastaferro K, Tanner AE, Rulison KL, Miller AM, Milroy JJ, Wyrick DL, Collins LM. Recruiting and retaining first-year college students in online health research: Implementation considerations. JOURNAL OF AMERICAN COLLEGE HEALTH : J OF ACH 2024; 72:623-630. [PMID: 35325589 PMCID: PMC9508289 DOI: 10.1080/07448481.2022.2053132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Objective: Decreasing participation in intervention research among college students has implications for the external validity of behavioral intervention research. We describe recruitment and retention strategies used to promote participation in intervention research across a series of four randomized experiments. Method: We report the recruitment and retention rates by school for each experiment and qualitative feedback from students about recommendations for improving research participation. Results: There was considerable variation among schools' recruitment (4.9% to 64.7%) and retention (12% to 67.8%) rates. Student feedback suggested study timing (e.g., early in the semester), communication strategies (e.g., social media), and incentive structure (e.g., guaranteed incentives) could improve research participation. The highest survey participation rate was observed at the university which mandated students to complete the intervention (but not the survey). Conclusions: Intervention scientists must consider the population and study context to make informed decisions related to recruitment and retention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Guastaferro
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - A E Tanner
- Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| | - K L Rulison
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - A M Miller
- Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| | - J J Milroy
- Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| | - D L Wyrick
- Department of Public Health Education, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina, USA
| | - L M Collins
- School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kettrey HH, Thompson MP, Marx RA, Davis AJ. Effects of Campus Sexual Assault Prevention Programs on Attitudes and Behaviors Among American College Students: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Adolesc Health 2023; 72:831-844. [PMID: 37037692 DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2023.02.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
The US Campus Sexual Assault Violence Elimination (SaVE) Act of 2013 mandates that all higher education institutions receiving federal funds offer incoming students primary prevention and awareness programming addressing sexual violence. Yet, there is no thorough and up-to-date quantitative synthesis of the effects of campus sexual assault prevention programs on sexual assault attitudes/knowledge and behaviors. Thus, we conducted a systematic review of the literature and a meta-analysis of experimental and high-quality quasi-experimental research examining effects of college sexual assault prevention programs on sexual assault attitudes and behaviors. Our synthesis of 385 effect sizes from 80 eligible studies disseminated between 1991 and 2021 indicates campus sexual assault programs have a more pronounced effect on attitudes/knowledge than on violence. Effects on sexual assault victimization were significant but small (g = 0.15) and effects on sexual assault perpetration were nonsignificant. Moderator analyses indicate programs that use a risk reduction framework are associated with less favorable outcomes than programs that do not use a risk reduction framework. Considering the limited effect of campus sexual assault prevention programs on violence, we recommend programming efforts move beyond a focus on individuals and, instead, adopt an ecological perspective targeting individuals, social relationships, community factors, and societal factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Hensman Kettrey
- Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Criminal Justice, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina.
| | - Martie P Thompson
- Department of Public Health and Exercise Science, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina
| | | | - Alyssa J Davis
- Department of Sociology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Buskbjerg C, O'Toole MS, Zachariae R, Jensen AB, Frederiksen Y, Johansen C, von Heymann A, Speckens A, Johannsen M. Optimising psychological treatment for pain after breast cancer: a factorial design study protocol in Denmark. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066505. [PMID: 36948567 PMCID: PMC10040060 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/24/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION One in five breast cancer (BC) survivors are affected by persistent pain years after completing primary treatment. While the efficacy of psychological interventions for BC-related pain has been documented in several meta-analyses, reported effect sizes are generally modest, pointing to a need for optimisation. Guided by the Multiphase Optimization Strategy, the present study aims to optimise psychological treatment for BC-related pain by identifying active treatment components in a full factorial design. METHODS AND ANALYSIS The study uses a 2×3 factorial design, randomising 192 women with BC-related pain (18-75 years) to eight experimental conditions. The eight conditions consist of three contemporary cognitive-behavioural therapy components, namely: (1) mindful attention, (2) decentring, and (3) values and committed action. Each component is delivered in two sessions, and each participant will receive either zero, two, four or six sessions. Participants receiving two or three treatment components will be randomised to receive them in varying order. Assessments will be conducted at baseline (T1), session by session, every day for 6 days following the first session in each treatment component, at post-intervention (T2) and at 12-week follow-up (T3). Primary outcomes are pain intensity (Numerical Rating Scale) and pain interference (Brief Pain Inventory interference subscale) from T1 to T2. Secondary outcomes are pain burden, pain quality, pain frequency, pain catastrophising, psychological distress, well-being and fear of cancer recurrence. Possible mediators include mindful attention, decentring, and pain acceptance and activity engagement. Possible moderators are treatment expectancy, treatment adherence, satisfaction with treatment and therapeutic alliance. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval for the present study was received from the Central Denmark Region Committee on Health Research Ethics (no: 1-10-72-309-40). Findings will be made available to the study funders, care providers, patient organisations and other researchers at international conferences, and published in international, peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT05444101).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Buskbjerg
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Mia Skytte O'Toole
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Robert Zachariae
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Yoon Frederiksen
- Deparment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- The Sexology Unit, Aarhus University Hospital Psychiatry, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Christoffer Johansen
- CASTLE Cancer Late Effects Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Annika von Heymann
- CASTLE Cancer Late Effects Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Speckens
- Department of Psychiatry, Centre for Mindfulness, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Maja Johannsen
- Department of Psychology and Behavioural Sciences, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guastaferro K, Strayhorn JC. Multiphase optimization strategy: How to build more effective, affordable, scalable and efficient social and behavioural oral health interventions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2023; 51:103-107. [PMID: 36753408 DOI: 10.1111/cdoe.12784] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Revised: 06/06/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
This commentary introduces the field of social behavioural oral health interventions to the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). MOST is a principled framework for the development, optimization and evaluation of multicomponent interventions. Drawing from the fields of engineering, behavioural science, economics, decision science and public health, intervention optimization requires a strategic balance of effectiveness with affordability, scalability and efficiency. We argue that interventions developed using MOST are more likely to maximize the public health impact of social behavioural oral health interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Guastaferro
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jillian C Strayhorn
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
O’Hara KL, Knowles LM, Guastaferro K, Lyon AR. Human-centered design methods to achieve preparation phase goals in the multiphase optimization strategy framework. IMPLEMENTATION RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2022; 3:26334895221131052. [PMID: 37091076 PMCID: PMC9924242 DOI: 10.1177/26334895221131052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The public health impact of behavioral and biobehavioral interventions to prevent and treat mental health and substance use problems hinges on developing methods to strategically maximize their effectiveness, affordability, scalability, and efficiency. Methods The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) is an innovative, principled framework that guides the development of multicomponent interventions. Each phase of MOST (Preparation, Optimization, Evaluation) has explicit goals and a range of appropriate research methods to achieve them. Methods for attaining Optimization and Evaluation phase goals are well-developed. However, methods used in the Preparation phase are often highly researcher-specific, and concrete ways to achieve Preparation phase goals are a priority area for further development. Results We propose that the discover, design, build, and test (DDBT) framework provides a theory-driven and methods-rich roadmap for achieving the goals of the Preparation phase of MOST, including specifying the conceptual model, identifying and testing candidate intervention components, and defining the optimization objective. The DDBT framework capitalizes on strategies from the field of human-centered design and implementation science to drive its data collection methods. Conclusions MOST and DDBT share many conceptual features, including an explicit focus on implementation determinants, being iterative and flexible, and designing interventions for the greatest public health impact. The proposed synthesized DDBT/MOST approach integrates DDBT into the Preparation phase of MOST thereby providing a framework for rigorous and efficient intervention development research to bolster the success of intervention optimization. Plain Language Summary 1. What is already known about the topic? Optimizing behavioral interventions to balance effectiveness with affordability, scalability, and efficiency requires a significant investment in intervention development.2. What does this paper add? This paper provides a structured approach to integrating human-centered design principles into the Preparation phase of the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST).3. What are the implications for practice, research, or policy? The proposed synthesized model provides a framework for rigorous and efficient intervention development research in the Preparation phase of MOST that will ensure the success of intervention optimization and contribute to improving public health impact of mental health and substance use interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lindsey M. Knowles
- VA Puget Sound Health Care
System, Seattle, WA, USA
- University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Collins LM, Strayhorn JC, Vanness DJ. One view of the next decade of research on behavioral and biobehavioral approaches to cancer prevention and control: intervention optimization. Transl Behav Med 2021; 11:1998-2008. [PMID: 34850927 DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
As a new decade begins, we propose that the time is right to reexamine current methods and procedures and look for opportunities to accelerate progress in cancer prevention and control. In this article we offer our view of the next decade of research on behavioral and biobehavioral interventions for cancer prevention and control. We begin by discussing and questioning several implicit conventions. We then briefly introduce an alternative research framework: the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST). MOST, a principled framework for intervention development, optimization, and evaluation, stresses not only intervention effectiveness, but also intervention affordability, scalability, and efficiency. We review some current limitations of MOST along with future directions for methodological work in this area, and suggest some changes in the scientific environment we believe would permit wider adoption of intervention optimization. We propose that wider adoption of intervention optimization would have a positive impact on development and successful implementation of interventions for cancer prevention and control and on intervention science more broadly, including accumulation of a coherent base of knowledge about what works and what does not; establishment of an empirical basis for adaptation of interventions to different settings with different levels and types of resources; and, in the long run, acceleration of progress from Stage 0 to Stage V in the National Institutes of Health Model of Stages of Intervention Development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M Collins
- Departments of Social & Behavioral Sciences and Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jillian C Strayhorn
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Health and Human Development, University Park, PA, USA
| | - David J Vanness
- Department of Health Policy and Administration, College of Health and Human Development, University Park, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Guastaferro K, Strayhorn JC, Collins LM. The multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) in child maltreatment prevention research. JOURNAL OF CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES 2021; 30:2481-2491. [PMID: 34887652 PMCID: PMC8654128 DOI: 10.1007/s10826-021-02062-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Each year hundreds of thousands of children and families receive behavioral interventions designed to prevent child maltreatment; yet rates of maltreatment have not declined in over a decade. To reduce the prevalence and prevent the life-long negative consequences of child maltreatment, behavioral interventions must not only be effective, but also affordable, scalable, and efficient to meet the demand for these services. An innovative approach to intervention science is needed. The purpose of this article is to introduce the multiphase optimization strategy (MOST) to the field of child maltreatment prevention. MOST is an engineering-inspired framework for developing, optimizing, and evaluating multicomponent behavioral interventions. MOST enables intervention scientists to empirically examine the performance of each intervention component, independently and in combination. Using a hypothetical example of a home visiting intervention and artificial data, this article demonstrates how MOST may be used to optimize the content of a parent-focused in-home intervention and the engagement strategies of an intervention to increase completion rate to identify an intervention that is effective, efficient, economical, and scalable. We suggest that MOST will ultimately improve prevention science and hasten the progress of translational science to prevent child maltreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kate Guastaferro
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University
| | - Jillian C. Strayhorn
- Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Health and Human Development, The Pennsylvania State University
| | - Linda M. Collins
- Departments of Social & Behavioral Sciences and Biostatistics, School of Global Public Health, New York University
| |
Collapse
|