1
|
Grimmett C, Corbett T, Bradbury K, Morton K, May CR, Pinto BM, Foster C. Maintaining long-term physical activity after cancer: a conceptual framework to inform intervention development. J Cancer Surviv 2024; 18:1941-1950. [PMID: 37578616 PMCID: PMC11502551 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-023-01434-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This paper describes a conceptual framework of maintenance of physical activity (PA) and its application to future intervention design. METHODS Evidence from systematic literature reviews and in-depth (N = 27) qualitative interviews with individuals with cancer were used to develop a conceptual framework of long-term physical activity behaviour. Determinants of long-term PA were listed and linked with domains of the Theoretical Domains Framework which in turn were linked to associated behaviour change techniques (BCTs) and finally to proposed mechanisms of action (MoA). RESULTS The conceptual framework is presented within the context of non-modifiable contextual factors (such as demographic and material resources) and in the presence of learnt and adapted behavioural determinants of skills, competence and autonomous motivation that must be established as part of the initiation of physical activity behaviour. An inventory of 8 determinants of engagement in long-term PA after cancer was developed. Clusters of BCTs are presented along with proposed MoA which can be tested using mediation analysis in future trials. CONCLUSION Understanding the processes of PA maintenance after cancer and presentation of implementable and testable intervention components and mechanisms of action to promote continued PA can inform future intervention development. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS This resource can act as a starting point for selection of intervention components for those developing future interventions. This will facilitate effective support of individuals affected by cancer to maintain PA for the long term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Grimmett
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC+, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
| | - Teresa Corbett
- Faculty of Sport, Health and Social Sciences, Solent University, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Kate Morton
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC+, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Carl R May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Claire Foster
- Centre for Psychosocial Research in Cancer: CentRIC+, School of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Audet CM, Roller LJ, Aliyu MH, Rolando L, Alva M, Ali M, Schildcrout JS, Chakkalakal R. Evaluation of a Workplace Diabetes Prevention Program Delivered via Distance Learning: A Qualitative Study. HEALTH EDUCATION & BEHAVIOR 2024:10901981241285433. [PMID: 39370708 DOI: 10.1177/10901981241285433] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
Little is known about how distance learning impacts delivery of the National Diabetes Prevention Program (DPP) despite a rapid shift to this platform during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) public health emergency. We explored how a workplace DPP, delivered via distance learning, impacted knowledge, motivation, and behavioral skills of participants throughout the program. We conducted repeated qualitative interviews with distance learning participants at baseline, 6 months, and 12 months from September 2020 to July 2022. Three study team members coded interview data using individual responses as the unit of analysis. We used a thematic approach, using the information-motivation-behavioral skills framework, to analyze responses and generate understanding of the program's impact. The 27 individuals who participated in the interviews (89% women, mean age 56 years) reported the distance learning platform was effective in changing their behavior. The program's focus on food logging and setting limits on specific types of caloric intake was perceived as essential. Education on ideal levels of fat and sugar consumption, lessons on how to read food labels, and dissemination of recipes with healthy food substitutions allowed participants to initiate and sustain healthy decision-making. Strategies to increase physical activity, including breaking up exercise throughout the day, made reaching their goals more feasible. Participants reported food logging and weight reporting, as well as group support during sessions, either sustained or increased their motivation to adhere to the program over time. A workplace DPP delivered via distance learning successfully prompted improvements in the knowledge, motivation, and behavioral skills necessary to increase healthy eating and physical activity among participants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carolyn M Audet
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lance J Roller
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Muktar H Aliyu
- Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Lori Rolando
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Maria Alva
- Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Katangwe-Chigamba T, Kantilal K, Hartley-Palmer J, Salisu-Olatunji SO, Seeley C, Naughton F, Chester R. Diet and Physical Activity Interventions for People from Minority Ethnic Backgrounds in the UK: A Scoping Review Exploring Barriers, Enablers and Cultural Adaptations. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2024:10.1007/s40615-024-02112-y. [PMID: 39145834 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-024-02112-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) are a global pandemic, driven by obesity, poor diet and physical inactivity. In the UK, the prevalence of T2D and CVD is higher in minority ethnic groups. Lifestyle prevention interventions can be effective but uptake amongst minority ethnic groups in the UK is low and the extent of cultural adaptations to increase engagement unknown. AIM To explore barriers, enablers and culturally adapted lifestyle interventions in UK minority ethnic groups. METHODS Four electronic databases were searched from to January 2013-2023. Two independent reviewers carried out manuscript selection and data extraction. Barriers and enablers were mapped to the Capability + Opportunity + Motivation = Behaviour (COM-B) theoretical model. Intervention adaptations were linked to behaviour change strategies and reported within a Cultural Adaptation framework. RESULTS Twenty-three studies were included, reporting barriers/enablers, culturally adapted interventions or both. Barriers and enablers mostly mapped to social and physical opportunity, and reflective motivation. Common adaptation strategies considered behavioural influences related to culture, values, religious beliefs and/or traditions. Most impactful strategies were associated with using credible sources of information and reorganising social and environmental contexts. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The current umbrella approach to preventative intervention delivery is unlikely to promote sustained participation in behaviour change amongst UK ethnic minorities. Engagement strategies for this population should consider key determinants such as social contexts, beliefs and cultural norms. Important research gaps include interventions investigating tailored interventions for Black populations, and the impact of negative social experiences (e.g., racism) on engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thando Katangwe-Chigamba
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
| | - Kumud Kantilal
- Research Department of Primary Care & Population Health, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Joseph Hartley-Palmer
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | | | - Carys Seeley
- Norwich Clinical Trials Unit, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Felix Naughton
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| | - Rachel Chester
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cheung WC, Miles LM, Hawkes RE, French DP. Experiences of online group support for engaging and supporting participants in the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: A qualitative interview study. J Health Serv Res Policy 2024; 29:100-110. [PMID: 38096783 PMCID: PMC10910750 DOI: 10.1177/13558196231212846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme is a nine-month behavioural intervention for adults in England at risk of type 2 diabetes. This qualitative study aimed to explore how service users engaged with the group support available within the programme. METHODS The majority of participants (n = 33), all service users, were interviewed twice via telephone, at 2-4 months into the programme, and at the end of the programme at 8-10 months. Semi-structured interviews covered participants' experiences of online group support functions and how such groups served as a route of support to aid participants' behavioural changes. Data were analysed using manifest thematic analysis. RESULTS The majority of participants valued the format of closed group chats, which provided an interactive platform to offer and receive support during their behaviour change journey. However, engagement with group chats reduced over time, and some participants did not find them useful when there was a lack of common interests within the group. Health coaches helped to promote engagement and build rapport among participants within the group chats. Participants reported mixed experiences of discussion forums. CONCLUSIONS Programme developers should consider how to optimise online group support to help service users make behavioural changes, in terms of format, participant composition and use of health coach moderators. Further research is required to better understand who might benefit most from 'group chat' or 'discussion forum' support. Health coach moderation of online support groups is likely to facilitate engagement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wang Chun Cheung
- Research Assistant, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Lisa M Miles
- Research Associate, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Rhiannon E Hawkes
- Research Associate, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David P French
- Professor of Health Psychology, Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
French DP, Ahern AL, Greaves CJ, Hawkes RE, Higgs S, Pechey R, Sniehotta FF. Preventing type 2 diabetes: A research agenda for behavioural science. Diabet Med 2023; 40:e15147. [PMID: 37171753 PMCID: PMC10947238 DOI: 10.1111/dme.15147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023]
Abstract
AIMS The aim of this narrative review was to identify important knowledge gaps in behavioural science relating to type 2 diabetes prevention, to inform future research in the field. METHODS Seven researchers who have published behaviour science research applied to type 2 diabetes prevention independently identified several important gaps in knowledge. They met to discuss these and to generate recommendations to advance research in behavioural science of type 2 diabetes prevention. RESULTS A total of 21 overlapping recommendations for a research agenda were identified. These covered issues within the following broad categories: (a) evidencing the impact of whole population approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention, (b) understanding the utility of disease-specific approaches to type 2 diabetes prevention such as Diabetes Prevention Programmes (DPPs) compared to generic weight loss programmes, (c) identifying how best to increase reach and engagement of DPPs, whilst avoiding exacerbating inequalities, (d) the need to understand mechanism of DPPs, (e) the need to understand how to increase maintenance of changes as part of or following DPPs, (f) the need to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of alternative approaches to the typical self-regulation approaches that are most commonly used, and (g) the need to address emotional aspects of DPPs, to promote effectiveness and avoid harms. CONCLUSIONS There is a clear role for behavioural science in informing interventions to prevent people from developing type 2 diabetes, based on strong evidence of reach, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. This review identifies key priorities for research needed to improve existing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David P. French
- Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Amy L. Ahern
- MRC Epidemiology Unit, School of Clinical MedicineUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK
| | - Colin J. Greaves
- School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation SciencesUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Rhiannon E. Hawkes
- Manchester Centre of Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental HealthUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUK
| | - Suzanne Higgs
- School of PsychologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| | - Rachel Pechey
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health SciencesUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Falko F. Sniehotta
- Division of Public Health, Social and Preventive Medicine, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health (CPD)Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Heidelberg UniversityHeidelbergGermany
- NIHR Policy Research Unit Behavioural ScienceNewcastle UniversityUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Reeves D, Woodham AA, French D, Bower P, Holland F, Kontopantelis E, Cotterill S. The influence of demographic, health and psychosocial factors on patient uptake of the English NHS diabetes prevention programme. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:352. [PMID: 37041541 PMCID: PMC10091609 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09195-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevention of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is a major concern for health services around the world. The English NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-DPP) offers a group face-to-face behaviour change intervention, based around exercise and diet, to adults with non-diabetic hyperglycaemia (NDH), referred from primary care. Previous analysis of the first 100,000 referrals revealed just over half of those referred to the NHS-DPP took up a place. This study aimed to identify the demographic, health and psychosocial factors associated with NHS-DPP uptake to help inform the development of interventions to improve uptake and address inequities between population groups. METHODS Drawing on the Behavioral Model of Health Services Utilization we developed a survey questionnaire to collect data on a wide range of demographic, health and psychosocial factors that might influence uptake of the NHS-DPP. We distributed this questionnaire to a cross-sectional random sample of 597 patients referred to the NHS-DPP across 17 general practices, chosen for variation. Multivariable regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with NHS-DPP uptake. RESULTS 325 out of 597 questionnaires were completed (54%). Only a third of responders took up the offer of a place. The best performing model for uptake (AUC = 0.78) consisted of four factors: older age; beliefs concerning personal vulnerability to T2DM; self-efficacy for reducing T2DM risk; and the efficacy of the NHS-DPP. After accounting for these, demographic and health-related factors played only a minor role. CONCLUSION Unlike fixed demographic characteristics, psychosocial perceptions may be amenable to change. NHS-DPP uptake rates may be improved by targeting the beliefs of patients about their risk of developing T2DM, their ability to carry out and sustain behaviours to reduce this risk, and the efficacy of the NHS-DPP in providing the necessary understanding and skills required. The recently introduced digital version of the NHS DPP could help address the even lower uptake amongst younger adults. Such changes could facilitate proportional access from across different demographic strata.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Reeves
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Adrine Ablitt Woodham
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology & Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter Bower
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, NIHR ARC Greater Manchester, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Fiona Holland
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Evangelos Kontopantelis
- National Institute for Health Research School for Primary Care Research, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Sarah Cotterill
- Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Barry E, Greenhalgh T, Shaw S, Papoutsi C. Explaining the UK's 'high-risk' approach to type 2 diabetes prevention: findings from a qualitative interview study with policy-makers in England. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e066301. [PMID: 36750284 PMCID: PMC9906176 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES When seeking to prevent type 2 diabetes, a balance must be struck between individual approaches (focusing on people's behaviour 'choices') and population approaches (focusing on the environment in which those choices are made) to address the socioeconomic complexity of diabetes development. We sought to explore how this balance is negotiated in the accounts of policy-makers developing and enacting diabetes prevention policy. METHODS Twelve semistructured interviews were undertaken with nine UK policy-makers between 2018-2021. We explored their perspectives on disease prevention strategies and what influenced policy decision-making. Interviews were transcribed and analysed thematically using NVIVO. We used Shiffman's political priority framework to theorise why some diabetes prevention policy approaches gather political support while others do not. RESULTS The distribution of power and funding among relevant actors, and the way they exerted their power determined the dominant approach in diabetes prevention policy. As a result of this distribution, policy-makers framed their accounts of diabetes prevention policies in terms of individual behaviour change, monitoring personal quantitative markers but with limited ability to effect population-level approaches. Such an approach aligns with the current prevailing neoliberal political context, which focuses on individual lifestyle choices to prevent disease rather than on infrastructure measures to improve the environments and contexts within which those choices are made. CONCLUSION Within new local and national policy structures, there is an opportunity for collaborative working among the National Health Service, local governments and public health teams to balance the focus on disease prevention, addressing upstream drivers of ill health as well as targeting individuals with the highest risk of diabetes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleanor Barry
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Trisha Greenhalgh
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sara Shaw
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Chrysanthi Papoutsi
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hawkes RE, Miles LM, French DP. What behaviour change technique content is offered to service users of the nationally implemented English NHS Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme: Analysis of multiple sources of intervention content. Prev Med Rep 2023; 32:102112. [PMID: 36711000 PMCID: PMC9876742 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS-DDPP) is a behavioural intervention for adults in England at risk of developing Type 2 diabetes, rolled out nationally via independent providers and their digital partners. The NHS England programme specification indicated 19 behaviour change techniques (BCTs) which should be present in the intervention, including BCTs to support self-regulation. A previous evaluation of the face-to-face service found an under-delivery of some self-regulatory BCTs. This study assessed whether those 19 BCTs were offered in the different interventions delivered by four digital providers. A cross-sectional analysis of BCT content in the NHS-DDPP was elicited from the following sources: (a) online platforms (e.g. apps), (b) educational materials, and (c) health coaching (assessed via interviews with health coaches and audio-recorded telephone consultations). All materials were coded using the Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy v1. A total of 17, 15, 15 and 14 of the 19 specified BCTs were identified across the four digital provider programmes. A mean proportion of 43% of specified BCTs were present via providers' apps, 74% via educational materials, and 62% via health coaching. An additional 41 BCTs were included in at least one of the four providers' programmes. Fidelity of BCT content in the NHS-DDPP was better than previously identified for the face-to-face DPP service. However, BCTs were offered via multiple modalities, thus the degree to which users engage with the modalities will impact on their exposure to BCTs and likely effectiveness of the digital programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon E. Hawkes
- Corresponding author at: University of Manchester, Coupland 1 Building, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Whelan M, Bell L. The English national health service diabetes prevention programme (NHS DPP): A scoping review of existing evidence. Diabet Med 2022; 39:e14855. [PMID: 35441747 PMCID: PMC9321029 DOI: 10.1111/dme.14855] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The English National Health Service Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP) is commissioned by NHS England and has been rolled out across England to adults identified as being at high risk of type 2 diabetes. The present scoping review aimed to identify the extent and nature of evidence to date on the NHS DPP and describe what the evidence has reported. METHODS A scoping review involving searches of various sources (including MEDLINE, CINAHL, MediArXiv, Google Scholar and GreyLit) was conducted on 31 August 2021 and repeated on 09 February 2022. Only articles reporting on the NHS DPP made available since 2015 were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS 65 articles were included. Of these, 37 were journal publications. Most articles were made available in 2018 and 2020 (total n = 25). The majority of articles reported on uptake and retention (n = 27) whilst others reported on implementation considerations (n = 24), programme outcomes (n = 21), stakeholder experience (n = 8) and screening and referral processes (n = 3). Various research methods were reported and included qualitative (n = 9) and document analysis (n = 8). Articles revealed preliminary evidence on service user characteristics, rates of referral, uptake and retention as well as how far the NHS DPP is being delivered in line with its evidence base and service specification. CONCLUSIONS The evidence is accumulating on NHS DPP uptake and retention most, with emerging evidence on programme outcomes (such as weight loss and HbA1c). More evidence is warranted on stakeholder experience to decipher how to overcome low initial and long-term engagement reported by the current evidence base.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maxine Whelan
- Centre for Intelligent HealthcareCoventry UniversityCoventryUK
| | - Lauren Bell
- Centre for Intelligent HealthcareCoventry UniversityCoventryUK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Hawkes RE, Miles LM, French DP. Fidelity to Program Specification of the National Health Service Digital Diabetes Prevention Program Behavior Change Technique Content and Underpinning Theory: Document Analysis. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e34253. [PMID: 35476035 PMCID: PMC9096650 DOI: 10.2196/34253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The National Health Service (NHS) Diabetes Prevention Program is a behavior change intervention for adults in England who are identified as being at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. The face-to-face service was launched in 2016, followed by a digital service (NHS Digital Diabetes Prevention Program [NHS-DDPP]) in 2019. A total of 4 service providers were commissioned to deliver the NHS-DDPP and were required to deliver the digital service in line with a program specification detailing the key intervention content. The fidelity of the behavior change content in the digital service (ie, the extent to which the program is delivered as intended) is currently unknown. Digital interventions may allow higher fidelity as staff do not have to be trained to deliver all intervention content. Assessing fidelity of the intervention design is particularly important to establish the planned behavior change content in the NHS-DDPP and the extent to which this adheres to the program specification. This is the first known independent assessment of design fidelity in a large-scale digital behavior change intervention. Objective This study aims to assess the fidelity of the behavior change content in each of the 4 NHS-DDPP providers’ intervention designs to the full program specification. Methods We conducted a document review of each provider’s NHS-DDPP intervention design, along with interviews with program developers employed by the 4 digital providers (n=6). Providers’ intervention design documents and interview transcripts were coded for behavior change techniques (BCTs; ie, the active ingredients of the intervention) using the Behavior Change Technique Taxonomy version 1 and underpinning theory using the Theory Coding Scheme framework. The BCTs identified in each digital provider’s intervention design were compared with the 19 BCTs included in the program specification. Results Of the 19 BCTs specified in the program specification, the 4 providers planned to deliver 16 (84%), 17 (89%), 16 (84%), and 16 (84%) BCTs, respectively. An additional 41 unspecified BCTs were included in at least one of the 4 digital providers’ intervention designs. By contrast, inconsistent use of the underpinning theory was apparent across providers, and none of the providers had produced a logic model to explain how their programs were expected to work. All providers linked some of their planned BCTs to theoretical constructs; however, justification for the inclusion of other BCTs was not described. Conclusions The fidelity of BCT content in the NHS-DDPP was higher than that previously documented for the face-to-face service. Thus, if service users engage with the NHS-DDPP, this should increase the effectiveness of the program. However, given that a clear theoretical underpinning supports the translation of BCTs in intervention designs to intervention delivery, the absence of a logic model describing the constructs to be targeted by specific BCTs is potentially problematic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon E Hawkes
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Lisa M Miles
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - David P French
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, Division of Psychology and Mental Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|