Therapeutic Plasma Exchange and Its Impact on Drug Levels: An ACLPS Critical Review

Examination of drug removal profiles in patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange: A retrospective study

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) eliminates disease-contributing substances but may also affect drug concentrations. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of prescription drugs removable via TPE by reviewing patient medication histories.

METHODS

A retrospective, single-center study was conducted from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2022. The study included 244 patients undergoing 1087 TPE sessions. Drugs prescribed to patients on TPE days were categorized as "yes" (probably removable), "maybe" (possibly removable), and "no" (unlikely removable) regarding their removability via TPE.

RESULTS

Among 3966 prescriptions, 556 (14.0%) were analyzed, with 21.8%, 36.5%, and 41.7% falling into the "yes," "maybe," and "no" categories for removability. Although only 14.0% were categorized, 83.6% of patients received at least one analyzable drug. Among them, 83.8% had at least one potentially removable drug.

CONCLUSION

Real-world data highlights the need for caution in drug treatments during TPE to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes, particularly for specific drugs.

Multi-centers experience using therapeutic plasma exchange for corticosteroid/tocilizumab-refractory cytokine release syndrome following CAR-T therapy

The chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy significantly enhances the prognosis of various hematologic malignancies; however, the systemic expansion of CAR-T cells also gives rise to severe cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS). Despite the successful application of corticosteroids and tocilizumab in alleviating severe CRS in most patients, there are still individuals who experience life-threatening CRS without responding to the aforementioned therapies. In our retrospective cohort, we conducted an analysis of clinical and laboratory parameters, including inflammatory cytokines, in 17 patients from three centers who underwent therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for refractory CRS with or without ICANS following CAR-T products treatment. Our findings demonstrate a significant improvement in both clinical symptoms and laboratory parameters subsequent to TPE treatment. The rapid decrease in temperature and levels of inflammatory indexes indicates the remarkable scavenging efficacy of TPE against cytokine storm following CAR-T therapy. In conclusion, TPE may serve as a valuable and safe adjunct to corticosteroids and tocilizumab in the management of severe CRS resulting from CAR-T cell infusion. We eagerly await further prospective studies to validate this finding.

Examining an Interaction Between Plasma Exchange and Apixaban Resulting in an Acute Ischemic Stroke

Objective: Therapeutic drug monitoring is not routinely considered necessary in patients undergoing plasma exchange; however, it is possible for serum concentrations of select medications to be impacted by this procedure. Case: We describe a 50-year-old patient who presented to our facility with new onset aphasia and right-sided weakness. Despite presenting with a National Institute of Health Stroke Severity (NIHSS) score of 23, the patient did not receive fibrinolytic therapy due to his being anticoagulated with apixaban for atrial fibrillation. The patient instead underwent an emergent thrombectomy which resulted in a post-operative Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (TICI) score of 3. The patient had a significant past medical history including numerous previous strokes necessitating assistance with activities of daily living, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease, and thrombocytopenic purpura, for which he was receiving twice weekly plasma exchange and immunomodulatory therapy. The patient's last plasma exchange session was approximately 24 hours prior to admission, leading us to hypothesize that the patient's plasma exchange may have been implicated in the removal of apixaban from the serum and precipitating a stroke. Discussion/Conclusions: Heterogeneity of data exists when evaluating the effect of plasma exchange on apixaban. Although the drug properties of apixaban, including its low volume of distribution and high plasma protein binding capacity, support the notion that it may be vulnerable to removal through plasma exchange, only one other case report has been published on this phenomenon.

Tacrolimus and Cyclosporin Pharmacotherapy, Detection Methods, Cytochrome P450 Enzymes after Heart Transplantation

BACKGROUND

Advances in organ transplantation were made after the discovery of the pure form of cyclosporine by Dr Jean Borel in the 1970s. In fact, in clinical practice achieving a delicate balance in circulating immunosuppressive necessitate focus on the difficult task of posttransplant therapeutic drug monitoring.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the pharmacologic properties of cyclosporine- tacrolimus, detection methods, and the effects on the activity of cytochrome P450 enzymes when prescribing the most efficient treatments in forms of polypharmacy for the recipients of heart transplantation.

METHODS

Scientific literature on the interactions of tacrolimus and cyclosporine with human cytochrome P450 enzymes was searched using PUBMED.Gov (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), Web of Science, and Scopus.

RESULTS

Prescription immunosuppressive drugs based on polypharmacy accompanied by induction agents could result in hidden neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. A literature search shows that cyclosporine prescription with antihypertensives drugs needs close monitoring. Co-administration of tacrolimus and diltiazem or verapamil needs a decrease in the tacrolimus dose by 20-50%. Vigilant attention to the lowest possible statin dose is needed when coadministered with fluvastatin or pravastatin. Polypharmacy based on ticlopidine, clopidogrel, and cyclosporine or tacrolimus needs monitoring of immunosuppressive drug levels for several months. A prescription with clotrimazole or fluconazole needs close monitoring, and itraconazole or ketoconazole needs to reduce the initial dose by 50%. Combination with nefazodone needs to be avoided, and alternative drugs such as sertraline or citalopram could be prescribed in addition to further monitoring consideration. In prescription with phenytoin, the bound and free phenytoin levels need close monitoring.

CONCLUSION

Polypharmacy based on tacrolimus or cyclosporine needs vigilant therapeutic drug monitoring due to the cytochrome P450 enzymes associated with biochemical variables in metabolic pathways. Further attention to polypharmacy should be given to circulate drugs that could hide pharmacokinetics interactions associated with infections, malignancies, chronic kidney disease, and rejection after organ transplantation.

Immunity in the balance: Fatal disseminated adenovirus infection in a patient undergoing plasma exchange and immunosuppressive chemotherapy for anti-glomerular basement membrane disease

Anti-glomerular basement membrane (anti-GBM) disease (formerly known as Goodpasture's syndrome) is a rare autoinflammatory condition that affects the renal and/or pulmonary capillaries. The standard therapeutic regimen for anti-GBM disease involves therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), cyclophosphamide, and corticosteroids to rapidly remove and inhibit autoantibody production and reduce organ inflammation. Herein we report an 82-year-old female who developed anti-GBM disease but expired despite therapy, secondary to multi-organ failure in the setting of disseminated adenovirus disease. We discuss the utility and potential adverse effect of daily TPE for a protracted course (ie, 10-14 days), the recommended TPE intensity in the 2023 American Society for Apheresis guidelines, updated from every-other-day TPE in the 2019 guidelines, despite no new data. We also highlight the potential for unusual infections to occur in these patients due to the profound immunosuppression, and discuss the importance of balancing immunosuppression to treat the disease with close surveillance of any potential opportunistic infections.

Plasma exchange as a tool for removal of bevacizumab: Highlighting application for urgent surgery

Background

Bevacizumab is commonly used to manage cerebral edema associated with brain tumors. However, its long half-life poses challenges for patients requiring urgent surgery due to wound complications. We present a case of utilizing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) to remove bevacizumab in a patient with recurrent glioblastoma requiring urgent surgery.

Methods

A 58-year-old male with recurrent glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, presented with clinical and radiographic concern for ventriculitis requiring urgent wound washout only 4 days after his last bevacizumab infusion. TPE was performed for 3 sessions after surgery using a centrifugation-based cell separator. Replacement fluids included normal serum albumin, normal saline, and fresh frozen plasma. Bevacizumab levels were quantified using an enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay before and after each TPE session.

Results

TPE effectively removed bevacizumab, enabling safe surgery without new complications. Plasma bevacizumab levels decreased from 1087.63 to 145.35 ng/mL (13.4% of original) by the end of the last TPE session. This decline is consistent with nearly 3 half-lives, which compares favorably to the expected timeline of natural decline given the 21-day half-life.

Conclusions

We report a complex clinical scenario of a patient requiring urgent wound washout 4 days after last bevacizumab infusion for CNS infection. Surgery was successfully performed without new complications with use of TPE to remove bevacizumab immediately following surgery. This case highlights the feasibility of this approach, which may be utilized effectively in patients requiring surgery after having recently received bevacizumab.

Effect of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange on Itraconazole Pharmacokinetics: A Case Study

ABSTRACT

The authors present the case of a 34-year-old male patient who underwent therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) for amyopathic dermatomyositis. Immunosuppression resulted in Aspergillus lentulus pulmonary infection , requiring treatment with super bioavailable-itraconazole. Therapeutic itraconazole concentrations were attained after 2 weeks of treatment after dose adjustments. Interestingly, a substantial reduction in plasma itraconazole concentration was observed during TPE, which was attributed to an insufficient delay between the dosing of itraconazole and TPE initiation. Furthermore, there was an increase in plasma concentration post-TPE, which presumably reflects the redistribution of itraconazole from peripheral compartments back into plasma. This was confirmed by sampling of the TPE plasmapheresate, which revealed that changes in plasma concentration overestimated itraconazole clearance. These findings highlight that the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole are altered during TPE, which should be considered when timing drug administration and obtaining plasma concentrations.

State of the Evidence: Drug Removal via Apheresis

Therapeutic apheresis refers to a diversity of procedures in which specific hematologic components (e.g., plasma, erythrocytes, leukocytes, etc.) with pathological associations are removed from circulation (with possible replacement) in order to treat a variety of disease processes. As pharmacologic agents also circulate with these components, their removal is sometimes incidental, or in the scenario of drug toxicity, a therapeutic goal. The corpus of published manuscripts on this subject has grown immensely over the past few decades; however, the breadth of diseases, methods, and drugs that co-exist in this space make it challenging to generate generalizable evidence regarding drug removal via apheresis. This review discusses factors worth considering when interpreting literature-reported data on drug removal by apheresis with examples from several notable studies and highlights topics in need of evidential improvement and growth as our palette of therapeutic agents continues to expand.

Case Report of Seronegative Cancer-Associated Retinopathy in a Patient with Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Cancer-associated retinopathy (CAR) is a rare paraneoplastic syndrome characterized by autoimmune destruction of photoreceptor cells. It is associated with several tumor types, including small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC). Corticosteroids have been the mainstay treatment for CAR, although no therapeutic standard has truly been established. A 66-year-old female with significant smoking history and age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) presented with rapidly declining bilateral visual acuity. Ophthalmologic examination findings appeared consistent with the known diagnosis of ARMD but did not otherwise present a clear alternative etiology. Imaging with a computed tomography (CT) scan revealed a right hilar mass which was confirmed to be limited stage SCLC based on a subsequent biopsy and further imaging with a positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) scan. Antibody testing was negative for anti-recoverin antibodies. The patient experienced a complete response to chemoradiation with cisplatin and etoposide; however, her ocular symptoms did not respond to a combined treatment approach with corticosteroids, plasmapheresis, and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). While CAR represents a rare condition in SCLC, cases that are seronegative for anti-recoverin are even less common. Further, the diagnosis of CAR by ophthalmologic examination may be more challenging in patients with pre-existing ocular diseases, such as macular degeneration. Clinicians should have suspicion for paraneoplastic blindness in patients with known risk factors for malignancy, whose ocular symptoms are inconsistent with exam findings.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for multiorgan dysfunction among critically ill pediatric patients with leukemia: A single-institutional experience

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has well-documented applications in the adult population, outlined by the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) 2019 guidelines. Limited data exist regarding the use of TPE in critically ill pediatric patients; however, these reports rarely include patients with oncological diseases.

METHODS

We highlight the use of TPE in the acute management of seven pediatric patients with leukemia treated at Children's Mercy Hospital ICU from 2015 to 2020, including TPE specifications, baseline and interval laboratory evaluation, and outcome measures. Analysis compared those who did (n = 4) and did not (n = 3) survive 30 days post-TPE.

RESULTS

Multiorgan failure (MOF) prompted the initiation of TPE in 85.7% of patients, 57.1% of whom were also diagnosed with hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH). Baseline laboratory evaluations prior to initiation of TPE were similar between the two groups. With subsequent TPE treatments, C-reactive protein (CRP) and lactic acid decreased. CRP and lactic acid following the last TPE treatment were significantly higher for those deceased 30 days post-TPE (P = .023 and .031, respectively). No TPE-associated adverse events necessitated discontinuation of TPE treatment. Several surviving patients required chemotherapy dose reductions or alterations.

CONCLUSION

Our cohort demonstrated MOF and HLH consistently as indications for TPE, currently ASFA category III indications (optimal role of apheresis is not yet established). Recognition of this treatment modality earlier in the clinical course for critically ill oncological patients may lead to the development of formal protocols that may result in earlier initiation of TPE and improved outcomes.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the intensive care unit and with the critically ill, a focus on clinical nursing considerations

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a blood purification technique removing antibodies and plasma proteins to modulate disease and promote recovery. The procedure has different methods, using a membrane or plasma separator with many elements similar to continuous renal replacement therapy (CCRT) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). These nursing knowledge and skill sets apply where ICU nurses are providing TPE with increasing need. However, different care models are also in place where TPE is the responsibility of apheresis and nephrology teams visiting the ICU. The plasma replacement volume and prescribing is aligned with published guidelines but is variable when critical illness overlays the primary indication for TPE. There are some important considerations for TPE with respect to anticoagulation, machine settings, prescribing, and associated nursing management. TPE can be performed concurrent with CRRT in acute situations using Y‐piece and valve connectors and is a new and recent advanced blood purification for the ICU.

Dialysis and Extracorporeal Therapies for Enhanced Elimination of Toxic Ingestions and Poisoning

Poisoning and toxic ingestions cause significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. Extracorporeal therapies such as dialysis, haemoperfusion and plasma exchange are selectively applied to patients with severe intoxications unresponsive to standard interventions and can be lifesaving. Extracorporeal therapies are a complex but fundamental aspect of the practice of nephrology. Without high-quality evidence to guide implementation, an understanding of toxicokinetics and the physiochemical principles of the enhanced elimination techniques is especially important. This review provides a comphrensive, user-friendly outline of the application of extracorporeal therapy in the poisoned patient.

[Accidental colchicine intoxication in a cross-breed dog]

A 2-year old cross-breed dog presented due to acute vomiting and progressive lethargy following ingestion of the owner's anti-gout medication (colchicine, 0.35 mg/kg) 1-3 hours prior to presentation.The dog developed signs of all 3 stages of colchicine poisoning (gastrointestinal phase, multi-organ phase, recovery phase) and the clinical course was complicated by the presence of multi-organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and numerous negative prognostic factors.This case report describes the clinical and laboratory effects of colchicine poisoning and represents the first successful treatment of an accidental colchicine ingestion in a dog in Europe.

Plasma exchange in the intensive care unit: a narrative review

In this narrative review, we discuss the relevant issues of therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in critically ill patients. For many conditions, the optimal indication, device type, frequency, duration, type of replacement fluid and criteria for stopping TPE are uncertain. TPE is a potentially lifesaving but also invasive procedure with risk of adverse events and complications and requires close monitoring by experienced teams. In the intensive care unit (ICU), the indications for TPE can be divided into (1) absolute, well-established, and evidence-based, for which TPE is recognized as first-line therapy, (2) relative, for which TPE is a recognized second-line treatment (alone or combined) and (3) rescue therapy, where TPE is used with a limited or theoretical evidence base. New indications are emerging and ongoing knowledge gaps, notably regarding the use of TPE during critical illness, support the establishment of a TPE registry dedicated to intensive care medicine.

Phenytoin Pharmacokinetics During Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Plasma Exchange

Currently, there is minimal guidance to antiepileptic dose adjustment for a patient requiring either venoarterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) or plasma exchange (PLEX) therapy, and to our knowledge, there are rare guidances for a patient requiring both. Given the dangers with non-therapeutic concentrations of phenytoin, it is critical for the intensive care unit (ICU) practitioner to understand how the pharmacokinetic parameters of phenytoin change in critically ill patients requiring extracorporeal support. This case study presents a 41-year-old female transferred to the cardiovascular ICU requiring VA ECMO and PLEX for the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)-induced catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS). Free phenytoin concentrations were measured to assess the removal of phenytoin. There was no significant decrease in the free phenytoin concentrations post-PLEX and while on ECMO. Free phenytoin concentrations are not influenced in the setting of PLEX and while on ECMO.

Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of fondaparinux in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease patients undergoing chronic renal replacement therapy

PURPOSE

Data on the anti-Xa efficacy of fondaparinux in dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (DD-CKD) patients are scarce. This study characterizes the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of fondaparinux in DD-CKD patients undergoing renal replacement therapy (RRT), to assess dosing strategies.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational study was conducted using data on anti-Xa activity (112 samples) from 12 (3 male and 9 female) DD-CKD patients (median (IQR) age 71 years (63-88), weight 73 kg (59-98.5)). Eleven patients underwent high-flux or low-flux hemodialysis (HD) and one patient underwent peritoneal dialysis. Three patients were also treated with therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE). A non-linear mixed effects analysis was performed using NONMEM 7.3.0.

RESULTS

The lab-specific slope of the relationship between fondaparinux concentration and anti-Xa levels was 1.18 IU/µg. In a one-compartment model, clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) were 0.05289 L/h and 5.55 L, respectively. High-flux HD was found to increase the CL of fondaparinux 2.26 times. TPE also considerably increased CL, but the fold-change could not be accurately estimated. Low-flux HD and peritoneal dialysis did not impact PK parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

Model-based simulations showed that standard dosing (2.5 mg three times weekly before HD) results in a median anti-Xa activity of 0.55 IU/mL and 0.98 IU/mL, pre- and post-low-flux HD, respectively. In patients undergoing high-flux HD, these values are approximately 27% lower. Additional caution is warranted with TPE, as this treatment can reduce anti-Xa activity even further.

Evaluating the elimination status of medications used for COVID-19 during hemoperfusion and therapeutic plasma exchange: A review

Since late 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, better known as COVID-19) has rapidly spread worldwide. The primary pathophysiology by which COVID-19 leads to severe lung damage is cytokine releasing syndrome (CRS), which can cause death. Therefore, removing cytokines via therapeutic plasma exchange or hemoperfusion could be a therapeutic approach to treat CRS. However, hemoperfusion or therapeutic plasma exchange could alter the effectiveness of concomitant medications. Thus, concomitant medication doses might need to be adjusted to prevent their elimination via therapeutic plasma exchange or hemoperfusion, thus ensuring that these medications remain effective. This narrative review investigates the elimination status of current medications used to manage COVID-19 during hemoperfusion and therapeutic plasma exchange, with a focus on their pharmacokinetic profiles.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in the Critically Ill Patient: Technology and Indications

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is frequently the most common Apheresis Medicine technique used for extracorporeal therapy of a wide variety of renal, neurological, hematological, and other clinical indications. Many of these clinical indications require intensive care during critical illness. Conventional TPE uses one of two main technical methods to achieve the goal of removing known disease mediators from the plasma: using centrifugal forces to separate and remove components of blood, or a membrane filtration method that separates plasma from the cellular components of blood. The following review discusses the basic principles of TPE, the technological aspects, and relevant clinical scenarios encountered in the intensive care unit, including relevant guidelines and recommendations from the American Society for Apheresis.

Evaluation of tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid removal by simultaneous continuous hemodiafiltration and plasma exchange in a lung transplant patient

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The removal rates of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolic acid (MPA) by simultaneous plasma exchange (PE) and continuous hemodiafiltration (CHDF) are not clear.

CASE SUMMARY

We evaluated the removal rates of TAC and MPA by PE and CHDF started simultaneously 5 hours after administration in a lung transplant patient. TAC was not removed. MPA was transferred into the PE effluent, but the total amount in the effluent was only 1% of the dosage.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

TAC and MPA were less likely to be removed by PE and CHDF initiated 5 hours after administration.

PD-1/PDL-1 Inhibitors and Cardiotoxicity; Molecular, Etiological and Management Outlines

Background

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved several immunotherapeutic drugs for cancer since 2010, and many more are still being evaluated in other clinical studies. These inhibitors significantly increase response rates and result in the treatment of patients with advanced cancer. However, cancer immunotherapy leads to essential cardiac toxicity properties that have become distinct from other cancer patients' care and are mostly related to their etiology.

Aim of review

As potential implications, the occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events is particularly challenging and needs a comprehensive understanding of overall cancer-related etiology, clinical outcomes with different variable severity, and management.

Key scientific concepts of review

In terms of improving the overall survival of patients with cancer, clinicians should be careful in selecting either programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) or its programmed cell death ligand (PDL-1) inhibitors by evaluating their risk and clinical benefit for early intervention and decrease the level of morbidity and mortality of their patients. This review focuses on the effectiveness of PD-1/PL-1 antibodies and associated cardiotoxicity adverse events, including etiological mechanisms, diagnosis, and treatment.

The Influence of Different Disease States on Rituximab Pharmacokinetics

BACKGROUND

The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab, which promotes the selective depletion of CD20 positive B cells, was the first targeted therapy that was approved for the treatment of B-cell malignancies, and it is now widely prescribed in both malignant and non-malignant, immune-related diseases. However, the cause of its various clinical responses in certain diseases, have not been clearly elucidated. The variabilities in inter-individual pharmacokinetic and the emerging evidence of the relationships between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic may provide a better understanding of this drug.

METHODS

We searched and summarized the latest published articles on rituximab pharmacokinetic profiles and the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models in different patient populations, including B-cell malignancies, rheumatoid arthritis, ANCA-associated vasculitis, and glomerular kidney diseases.

RESULTS

Most pharmacokinetic data are drawn from clinical studies in oncology clinical practice. Body weight, gender, and antigen-related factors are proven to be the key factors affecting rituximab pharmacokinetics. In addition, the positive exposure-response relations were reported, which provide encouraging evidence for individualized therapies. While in immune disorders, especially in the off-labeled indications, pharmacokinetic studies are quite limited. Compared with that in B-cell malignancies, the differences in the pharmacokinetic parameters may be attributed to the different pathogeneses of diseases, mechanisms of action and dosing strategies. However, the correlation between drug exposure and clinical outcomes remains unclear.

CONCLUSION

Here, we provide an overview of the complexities associated with rituximab pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics in different diseases. Although many influencing factors need to be verified in future studies, a better understanding of the relationships between pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic may assist in optimizing rituximab clinical practice.

Drug Dosing in Patients Undergoing Therapeutic Plasma Exchange

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal process in which a large volume of whole blood is taken from the patient's vein. Plasma is then separated from the other cellular components of the blood and discarded while the remaining blood components may then be returned to the patient. Replacement fluids such as albumin or fresh-frozen plasma may or may not be used. TPE has been used clinically for the removal of pathologic targets in the plasma in a variety of conditions, such as pathogenic antibodies in autoimmune disorders. TPE is becoming more common in the neurointensive care space as autoimmunity has been shown to play an etiological role in many acute neurological disorders. It is important to note that not only does TPE removes pathologic elements from the plasma, but may also remove drugs, which may be an intended or unintended consequence. The objective of the current review is to provide an up-to-date summary of the available evidence pertaining to drug removal via TPE and provide relevant clinical suggestions where applicable. This review also aims to provide an easy-to-follow clinical tool in order to determine the possibility of a drug removal via TPE given the procedure-specific and pharmacokinetic drug properties.