Impact of a pharmacist-led, mHealth-based intervention on tacrolimus trough variability in kidney transplant recipients: A report from the TRANSAFE Rx randomized controlled trial

Assessment of the impact of telehealth intervention in patients with bone and joint infection

OBJECTIVES

Patients with bone and joint infections (BJI) are involved in a complex care pathway and require prolonged antimicrobial treatment. Some studies have suggested that a pharmacist-led telehealth intervention (TI) could help to ensure better follow-up of chronic diseases. To our knowledge, there are no data on the effects of pharmacist-led TI on patients with BJI. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of a TI on patients treated for BJIs at three weeks after hospital discharge.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients encountered during hospitalization and receiving standardized care including TI were included in the study. All adverse events (AE) reported by patients during TI were evaluated. Impact of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) provided by a clinical pharmacist following TI was evaluated by CLEO© (CLinical, Economic and Organizational) scale. Patient satisfaction concerning TI was assessed by an anonymous questionnaire following medical consultation at the end of antimicrobial treatment.

RESULTS

Over a 4-month period, 36 patients received TI. Fifty-two AEs were identified in 21 patients (58%). Two patients were hospitalized due to an AE. Clinical pharmacists provided 34 pharmaceutical interventions (PIs) for 23 patients (64%). According to CLEO scale, 11 PIs had a major clinical impact (32%), 6 PIs (18%) had a favorable impact on the direct cost of treatment and 27 PIs (79%) had positive organizational impact. Concerning TI process, patients were satisfied or very satisfied, with an average score of 9.6/10.

CONCLUSION

TI led to a high number of pharmaceutical interventions (PIs), with a meaningful clinical, organizational, and economic impact. Patients were also highly satisfied with this intervention.

Transplant recipient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of medication adherence monitoring technology: A mixed methods study

Medication nonadherence is a leading cause of graft loss. Adherence monitoring technologies-reminder texts, smart bottles, video-observed ingestion, and digestion-activated signaling pills-may support adherence. However, patient, care partner, and clinician perceptions of these tools are not well studied. We conducted qualitative individual semistructured interviews and focus groups among 97 participants at a single center: kidney and liver transplant recipients 2 weeks to 18 months posttransplant, their care partners, and transplant clinicians. We assessed adherence practices, reactions to monitoring technologies, and opportunities for care integration. One-size-fits-all approaches were deemed infeasible. Interviewees considered text messages the most acceptable approach; live video checks were the least acceptable and raised the most concerns for inconvenience and invasiveness. Digestion-activated signaling technology produced both excitement and apprehension. Patients and care partners generally aligned in perceptions of adherence monitoring integration into clinical care. Key themes were importance of routine, ease of use, leveraging technology for actionable medication changes, and aversion to surveillance. Transplant clinicians similarly considered text messages most acceptable and video checks least acceptable. Clinicians reported that early posttransplant use and real-time adherence tracking with patient feedback may facilitate successful implementation. The study provides initial insights that may inform future adherence technology implementation.

The measure of impact: Proposal of quality metrics for solid organ transplant pharmacy practice

As healthcare continues its transition toward value-based care, it is increasingly important for transplant pharmacists to demonstrate their impact on patient care, health-related outcomes, and healthcare costs. Evidence-based quality and performance metrics are recognized as crucial tools for measuring the value of service. Yet, there is a lack of well-developed and agreed-upon specific metrics for many clinical pharmacy specialties, including solid organ transplantation. To address this need, a panel of transplant pharmacy specialists conducted a detailed literature review and engaged in several panel discussions to identify quality metrics to be considered for assessing the value of clinical pharmacy services provided to solid organ transplant recipients and living donors. The proposed metrics are based on the Donabedian model and are categorized to coincide with the typical phases of transplant care. The measures focus on key issues that arise in transplant recipients related to medication therapy, including adverse drug events, nonadherence, and clinical outcomes attributable to medication therapy management. This article proposes a comprehensive set of measures, any number of which transplant pharmacists can adopt and measure over time to objectively gauge the value of services they are providing to transplant recipients, the transplant center, and the overall healthcare system.

Telemedicine for Kidney Transplant Recipients: Current State, Advantages, and Barriers

Telemedicine is defined as the use of electronic information and communication technologies to provide and support healthcare at a distance. In kidney transplantation, telemedicine is limited but is expected to grow markedly in the coming y. Current experience shows that it is possible to provide transplant care at a distance, with benefits for patients like reduced travel time and costs, better adherence to medication and appointment visits, more self-sufficiency, and more reliable blood pressure values. However, multiple barriers in different areas need to be overcome for successful implementation, such as recipients' preferences, willingness, skills, and digital literacy. Moreover, in many countries, limited digital infrastructure, legislation, local policy, costs, and reimbursement issues could be barriers to the implementation of telemedicine. Finally, telemedicine changes the way transplant professionals provide care, and this transition needs time, training, willingness, and acceptance. This review discusses the current state and benefits of telemedicine in kidney transplantation, with the aforementioned barriers, and provides an overview of future directions on telemedicine in kidney transplantation.

Digital health and acute kidney injury: consensus report of the 27th Acute Disease Quality Initiative workgroup

Acute kidney injury (AKI), which is a common complication of acute illnesses, affects the health of individuals in community, acute care and post-acute care settings. Although the recognition, prevention and management of AKI has advanced over the past decades, its incidence and related morbidity, mortality and health care burden remain overwhelming. The rapid growth of digital technologies has provided a new platform to improve patient care, and reports show demonstrable benefits in care processes and, in some instances, in patient outcomes. However, despite great progress, the potential benefits of using digital technology to manage AKI has not yet been fully explored or implemented in clinical practice. Digital health studies in AKI have shown variable evidence of benefits, and the digital divide means that access to digital technologies is not equitable. Upstream research and development costs, limited stakeholder participation and acceptance, and poor scalability of digital health solutions have hindered their widespread implementation and use. Here, we provide recommendations from the Acute Disease Quality Initiative consensus meeting, which involved experts in adult and paediatric nephrology, critical care, pharmacy and data science, at which the use of digital health for risk prediction, prevention, identification and management of AKI and its consequences was discussed.

The expanded role of the transplant pharmacist: A 10-year follow-up

The role of the transplant pharmacist is recognized by transplant programs, governmental groups, and professional organizations as an essential part of the transplant multidisciplinary team. This role has evolved drastically over the last decade with the advent of major advances in the science of transplantation and the growth of the field, which necessitate expanded pharmacy services to meet the needs of patients. Data now exist within all realms of the phases of care for a transplant recipient regarding the utility and benefit of a solid organ transplant (SOT) pharmacist. Furthermore, governing bodies now have the opportunity to use Board Certification in Solid Organ Transplant Pharmacotherapy as a mechanism to identify and recognize specialty knowledge and expertise within the field of SOT pharmacotherapy. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overarching review of the current and future state of SOT pharmacy while also identifying major changes to the profession, forthcoming challenges, and expected areas of growth.

Cost-Benefit Analysis of Involving Pharmacist for Medication Therapy Management in a Heart Transplant Clinic

BACKGROUND

Drug-related problems (DRPs) are common in recipients of solid organ transplants. Pharmacist-led medication therapy management (MTM) has cost benefits in kidney and liver transplants; however, whether MTM is also beneficial in heart transplants remains unclear. This study explored the cost benefits of involving pharmacists in the heart transplant clinic.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated DRPs for 1 year after implementation of pharmacist-led MTM in a heart transplant clinic. The DRPs were compared between patients receiving transplantation for <1 and >1 year. The risk matrix method was used to assess each DRP in terms of the estimated probability and severity of consequent adverse drug events (ADEs). For cost analysis, both estimated cost savings and avoidance were calculated.

RESULTS

During the 1-year MTM, 372 DRPs were identified by the pharmacist, among which 169 (45%) and 203 (55%) were from patients at <1-year and ≥1-year post-transplant periods, respectively. The 2 post-transplant periods (<1 year and ≥1 year) exhibited significant differences in the distribution of the dosage or frequency problems (30% vs 18%, P = .005) and the suggestion of more appropriate medication (4% vs 10%, P = .024). In all, 92 (29%) DRPs had an ADE probability of >10%; and 63 (17%) DRPs were estimated to cause ADEs with moderate severity or higher. The estimated cost savings and cost avoidance were US $4902 and US $4519, which equaled a cost-benefit ratio of 2.39.

CONCLUSION

Integration of pharmacists into heart transplant clinics could help address DRPs and may have cost benefits.

The effect of pharmacist-led interventions on the management and outcomes in chronic kidney disease (CKD): A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Background and Aims

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a progressive condition that results in a decline in kidney function over time. There are several conditions that increase the likelihood of developing CKD, particularly diabetes and hypertension. CKD increases the risk of mortality and has a detrimental impact on quality of life (QoL). Strategies for managing CKD include controlling cardiovascular risk factors and treating complications of CKD. There is an ever-increasing role of pharmacists in managing CKD, from the optimization of risk factors to patient education. However, currently, there is a lack of data on the effect pharmacist-led interventions have on the clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes.

Methods

This protocol, in adherence to PRISMA-P (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic review and Meta-Analysis Protocols) standards, describes a prospective systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, where any intervention led by a pharmacist in CKD is used. Comparison groups will consist of usual care or non-pharmacist-led interventions. Literature searches will be conducted in the following databases: MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science. Data pertaining to clinical (e.g., mortality), economic (e.g., healthcare-associated costs), and humanistic (e.g., QoL) outcomes will be extracted. Risk of bias will be assessed using the United States National Heart Lung and Blood Institute quality assessment tool for controlled intervention studies. A meta-analysis will be conducted to synthesize appropriate comparable outcomes.

Results

The findings of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal, where the results will be presented in lay language with appropriate infographics online and via social media.

Conclusion

The findings of this review can identify gaps in the literature concerning optimizing pharmacist-led interventions in improving outcomes. In addition, this review will establish the importance of pharmacists in managing CKD patients, and whether this may result in their increased incorporation in multidisciplinary teams.

Interventions for increasing immunosuppressant medication adherence in solid organ transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to immunosuppressant therapy is a significant concern following a solid organ transplant, given its association with graft failure. Adherence to immunosuppressant therapy is a modifiable patient behaviour, and different approaches to increasing adherence have emerged, including multi-component interventions. There has been limited exploration of the effectiveness of interventions to increase adherence to immunosuppressant therapy.

OBJECTIVES

This review aimed to look at the benefits and harms of using interventions for increasing adherence to immunosuppressant therapies in solid organ transplant recipients, including adults and children with a heart, lung, kidney, liver and pancreas transplant.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 14 October 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register were identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

All randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-RCTs, and cluster RCTs examining interventions to increase immunosuppressant adherence following a solid organ transplant (heart, lung, kidney, liver, pancreas) were included. There were no restrictions on language or publication type.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts of identified records, evaluated study quality and assessed the quality of the evidence using the GRADE approach. The risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane tool. The ABC taxonomy for measuring medication adherence provided the analysis framework, and the primary outcomes were immunosuppressant medication initiation, implementation (taking adherence, dosing adherence, timing adherence, drug holidays) and persistence. Secondary outcomes were surrogate markers of adherence, including self-reported adherence, trough concentration levels of immunosuppressant medication, acute graft rejection, graft loss, death, hospital readmission and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Meta-analysis was conducted where possible, and narrative synthesis was carried out for the remainder of the results.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty studies involving 3896 randomised participants (3718 adults and 178 adolescents) were included. Studies were heterogeneous in terms of the type of intervention and outcomes assessed. The majority of studies (80%) were conducted in kidney transplant recipients. Two studies examined paediatric solid organ transplant recipients. The risk of bias was generally high or unclear, leading to lower certainty in the results. Initiation of immunosuppression was not measured by the included studies. There is uncertain evidence of an association between immunosuppressant medication adherence interventions and the proportion of participants classified as adherent to taking immunosuppressant medication (4 studies, 445 participants: RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.20; I² = 78%). There was very marked heterogeneity in treatment effects between the four studies evaluating taking adherence, which may have been due to the different types of interventions used. There was evidence of increasing dosing adherence in the intervention group (8 studies, 713 participants: RR 1.14, 95% CI 1.03 to 1.26, I² = 61%).  There was very marked heterogeneity in treatment effects between the eight studies evaluating dosing adherence, which may have been due to the different types of interventions used. It was uncertain if an intervention to increase immunosuppressant adherence had an effect on timing adherence or drug holidays. There was limited evidence that an intervention to increase immunosuppressant adherence had an effect on persistence. There was limited evidence that an intervention to increase immunosuppressant adherence had an effect on secondary outcomes. For self-reported adherence, it is uncertain whether an intervention to increase adherence to immunosuppressant medication increases the proportion of participants classified as medically adherent to immunosuppressant therapy (9 studies, 755 participants: RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.49; I² = 74%; very low certainty evidence). Similarly, it is uncertain whether an intervention to increase adherence to immunosuppressant medication increases the mean adherence score on self-reported adherence measures (5 studies, 471 participants: SMD 0.65, 95% CI -0.31 to 1.60; I² = 96%; very low certainty evidence). For immunosuppressant trough concentration levels, it is uncertain whether an intervention to increase adherence to immunosuppressant medication increases the proportion of participants who reach target immunosuppressant trough concentration levels (4 studies, 348 participants: RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.40; I² = 40%; very low certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether an intervention to increase adherence to immunosuppressant medication may reduce hospitalisations (5 studies, 460 participants: RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.44 to 1.02; I² = 64%; low certainty evidence). There were limited, low certainty effects on patient-reported health outcomes such as HRQoL. There was no clear evidence to determine the effect of interventions on secondary outcomes, including acute graft rejection, graft loss and death. No harms from intervention participation were reported.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Interventions to increase taking and dosing adherence to immunosuppressant therapy may be effective; however, our findings suggest that current evidence in support of interventions to increase adherence to immunosuppressant therapy is overall of low methodological quality, attributable to small sample sizes, and heterogeneity identified for the types of interventions. Twenty-four studies are currently ongoing or awaiting assessment (3248 proposed participants); therefore, it is possible that findings may change with the inclusion of these large ongoing studies in future updates.

The Effectiveness of Pharmacist Interventions in the Management of Patient with Renal Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The existing trials have focused on a variety of interventions to improve outcomes in renal failure; however, quantitative evidence comparing the effect of performing multidimensional interventions is scarce. The present paper reviews data from previous randomized controlled trials (RCTs), examining interventions performed for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and transplants by multidisciplinary teams, including pharmacists. Methods: A systematic search with quality assessment was performed using the revised Cochrane Collaboration's 'Risk of Bias' tool. Results and Conclusion: Thirty-three RCTs were included in the review, and the data from nineteen protocols were included in further quantitative analyses. A wide range of outcomes was considered, including those associated with progression of CKD, cardiovascular risk factors, patient adherence, quality of life, prescription of relevant medications, drug-related problems (DRPs), rate of hospitalizations, and death. The heterogeneity between studies was high. Despite low-to-moderate quality of evidence and relatively short follow-up, the findings suggest that multidimensional interventions, taken by pharmacists within multidisciplinary teams, are important for improving some clinical outcomes, such as blood pressure, risk of cardiovascular diseases and renal progression, and they improve non-adherence to medication among individuals with renal failure.

Review and Evaluation of mHealth Apps in Solid Organ Transplantation: Past, Present, and Future

With the rapid and widespread expansion of smartphone availability and usage, mobile health (mHealth) has become a viable multipurpose treatment medium for the US healthcare system.

The Role of Intra-Patient Variability of Tacrolimus Drug Concentrations in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Focus on Liver, Heart, Lung and Pancreas

Tacrolimus, the keystone immunosuppressive drug administered after solid organ transplantation, presents a narrow therapeutic index and wide inter- and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability (IPV). The latter has been fairly studied in kidney transplantation, where it could impact outcomes. However, literature about other transplanted organ recipients remains inconclusive. This review aimed at summarizing the evidence about the IPV of tacrolimus concentrations outside of the scope of kidney transplantation. First, factors influencing IPV will be presented. Then, the potential of IPV as a biomarker predictive of graft outcomes will be discussed in liver, heart, lung and pancreas transplantation. Lastly, strategies to reduce IPV will be reviewed, with the ultimate objective being ready-to-implement solutions in clinical practice by transplantation professionals.

Digital Health Interventions by Clinical Pharmacists: A Systematic Review

Integrating digital interventions in healthcare has gained increasing popularity among clinical pharmacists (CPs) due to advances in technology. The purpose of this study was to systematically review CP-led digital interventions to improve patients' health-related clinical outcomes. PubMed and the Cochrane Database were searched to select studies that had conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate clinical outcomes in adults following a CP-led digital intervention for the period from January 2005 to August 2021. A total of 19 studies were included in our analysis. In these 19 studies, the most commonly used digital intervention by CPs was telephone use (n = 15), followed by a web-based tool (n = 2) and a mobile app (n = 2). These interventions were provided to serve a wide range of purposes in patients' outcomes: change in lab values (e.g., blood pressure, HbA1c) (n = 23), reduction in health service use (n = 8), enhancing adherence (n = 6), improvement in drug-related outcomes (n = 6), increase in survival (n = 3), and reduction in health-related risk (e.g., CVD risk) (n = 2). Although the impacts of telephone-based interventions on patients' outcomes were decidedly mixed, web-based interventions and mobile apps exerted generally positive influences. To date, little research has investigated the cost-effectiveness of digital interventions. Future studies are warranted.