Transforming approaches to treating TRK fusion cancer: historical comparison of larotrectinib and histology-specific therapies

OBJECTIVE

The results from basket trials utilized to gain regulatory approval of tumor-agnostic therapies can be difficult to interpret without the context of a comparator arm. We describe the role and efficacy of histology-based treatments to provide a historical comparison with larotrectinib.

METHODS

A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted on the clinical outcomes of current histology-based standard of care treatments used in non-small cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer, thyroid cancer, gliomas, soft tissue sarcoma, salivary gland cancer, and infantile fibrosarcoma (7 of the 21 tumor histologies in the larotrectinib trials). The review focused on advanced stage/metastatic disease to make a historical comparison with larotrectinib.

RESULTS

Larotrectinib provides positive outcomes in both adult and pediatric patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors known to harbor NTRK gene fusions across a wide range of tumor types. Although the numbers of patients per tumor type are limited, the results of this historical comparison demonstrated that larotrectinib is an efficacious treatment option when naïvely indirectly compared with historical treatments across all 7 reviewed tumor types, especially in comparison to later lines of therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing larotrectinib as a case example across these types of historical comparisons shows that larotrectinib provides positive efficacy outcomes in TRK fusion cancer across tumor histologies known to harbor NTRK gene fusions that may be preferable to historical treatments.

Better survival in impaired renal function patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated by cisplatin-pemetrexed

PURPOSE

Cisplatin-pemetrexed is the first-line chemotherapy for advanced, metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the risk of kidney toxicity limits the therapeutic schedule. We performed a retrospective study of patient survival at 1 year and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) outcomes in cisplatin-pemetrexed-treated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

Patients (P) treated for NSCLC between 2008 and 2014 were divided into two groups according to GFR at diagnosis: G1 (GFR ≥ 90 mL/min/1.73 m²) and G2 (GFR between 60 and 89 mL/min/1.73 m²). GFR were compared in the two groups at 3 and 12 months. The following statistical methods were used: multivariate generalized estimating equation model for GFR outcome, Kaplan-Meier method for patient survival rate, and Cox model for analysing survival criteria.

RESULTS

A total of 112 patients were included in the study (G1 = 87 P, G2 = 25 P). At 12 months, mean GFR significantly decreased by 28.4 mL/min/1.73 m² (- 22.3%, p = 0.001) in G1 and. 13.8 mL/min/1.73 m² (- 17.2%, p = 0.001) in G2. Median patient survival was 9.6 months (1.1-52.4) in G1 and 19.7 months (3.7-56.9) in G2. A better overall survival was significantly correlated with GFR between 60 and 89 mL/min/1.73 m² at diagnosis (p = 0.04), and higher cumulated doses of pemetrexed (p = 0.003) and cisplatin (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The better survival rate in G2 and its correlation with pemetrexed and cisplatin treatments suggest that, until other therapeutic choices become available, a cautious increase in dosage could be investigated as a way to improve poor prognoses.

Pemetrexed exposure predicts toxicity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

We explored whether total exposure to pemetrexed predicts effectiveness and toxicity in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Furthermore, we investigated alternative dosing schedules.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, patients with advanced NSCLC receiving first- or second-line pemetrexed(/platinum) were enrolled. Plasma sampling was performed weekly (cyclePK) and within 24 h (24hPK) after pemetrexed administration. With population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling, total exposure to pemetrexed during cycle 1 (area under the curve during chemotherapy cycle 1 [AUC₁]) was estimated and related to progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). We compared mean AUC₁ (mg·h/L) in patients with and without severe chemotherapy-related adverse events (AEs) during total treatment. Second, different dosing schedules were simulated to minimise the estimated variability (coefficient of variation [CV]) of AUC.

RESULTS

For 106 of 165 patients, concentrations of pemetrexed were quantified (24hPK, n = 15; cyclePK, n = 106). After adjusting for prognostic factors, sex, disease stage and World Health Organisation performance score, AUC₁ did not predict PFS/OS in treatment-naive patients (n = 95) (OS, hazard ratio [HR] = 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00-1.11; PFS, HR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.98-1.08). Patients with severe chemotherapy-related AEs (n = 55) had significantly higher AUC₁ values than patients without them (n = 51) (226 ± 53 vs 190 ± 31, p < 0.001). Compared with body surface area-based dosing (CV: 22.5%), simulation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)-based dosing (CV 18.5%) and fixed dose of 900 mg with 25% dose reduction, if the eGFR<60 mL/min (CV: 19.1%), resulted in less interindividual variability of AUC.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher exposure to pemetrexed does not increase PFS/OS but is significantly associated with increased occurrence of severe toxicity. Our findings suggest that fixed dosing reduces interpatient pharmacokinetic variability and thereby might prevent toxicity, while preserving effectiveness.

Comparative Efficacy of Second- and Subsequent-line Treatments for Metastatic NSCLC: A Fractional Polynomials Network Meta-analysis of Cancer Immunotherapies

BACKGROUND

Extended onset of treatment effect and longer-term survival with anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1)/programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) immunotherapies, atezolizumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab, have changed the landscape of second- or subsequent-line (2L+) treatments for adults with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This systematic literature review included phase I to IV randomized, controlled trials of 2L+ NSCLC therapies from MEDLINE, Embase, and secondary sources.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Studies of treatments approved in the European Union or United States had to be in English with ≥ 10 patients per arm. A fractional polynomials network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted because traditional NMA of hazard ratios does not account for delayed onset of clinical effect or long-term survival observed in PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitor trials. Adjusted analyses accounted for treatment switching in the atezolizumab OAK trial. Expected survival time reflected area under the curve over the time horizon. Expected overall survival (OS) was ranked by median ranking with 95% credible intervals and by surface under the cumulative ranking curve. Of 25,115 screened records, 28 studies were included in the quantitative analyses of OS and progression-free survival.

RESULTS

PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors had comparable expected 5-year OS; all performed better than other treatment options. In unadjusted analyses, surface under the cumulative ranking curve ranked nivolumab first (87.9%), followed by atezolizumab (85.8%) and pembrolizumab (82.8%). Analyses adjusted for patients switching from docetaxel to immunotherapy ranked atezolizumab first (89.6%), followed by nivolumab (86.5%) and pembrolizumab (81.9%).

CONCLUSION

This NMA applied an appropriate approach for indirect comparisons, including cancer immunotherapies, and supported robustness of PD-L1/PD-1 immunotherapies for 2L+ treatment of NSCLC.

A phase II study of the combination of docetaxel and bevacizumab for previously treated non-small cell lung cancer

Objective

The standard therapies for previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include docetaxel (DOC). Bevacizumab (BV), an antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) antibody, increases the antitumor effect of cytotoxic anticancer agents. A BV-containing combination regimen is recommended as the primary therapy for advanced non-squamous NSCLC. However, the efficacy of DOC + BV is unknown in patients with previously treated advanced NSCLC. We conducted a phase II clinical study of DOC + BV for patients with previously treated advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

Methods

Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this study from June 2011 through May 2014. Chemotherapy was repeated every 21 days unless there was evidence of disease progression or intolerance to the study treatment. We assessed efficacy and toxicity.

Results

The median progression-free survival was 30.7 weeks. The response rate was 47.8%. The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia (20 patients, 87.0%) and febrile neutropenia (7 patients, 30.4%).

Conclusions

The combination of DOC and BV often resulted in serious neutropenia, suggesting that this regimen is difficult to tolerate.

Phase I study of pemetrexed with sorafenib in advanced solid tumors

Purpose

To determine if combination treatment with pemetrexed and sorafenib is safe and tolerable in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Results

Thirty-seven patients were enrolled and 36 patients were treated (24 in cohort A; 12 in cohort B). The cohort A dose schedule resulted in problematic cumulative toxicity, while the cohort B dose schedule was found to be more tolerable. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was pemetrexed 750 mg/m² every 14 days with oral sorafenib 400 mg given twice daily on days 1–5. Because dosing delays and modifications were associated with the MTD, the recommended phase II dose was declared to be pemetrexed 500 mg/m² every 14 days with oral sorafenib 400 mg given twice daily on days 1–5. Thirty-three patients were evaluated for antitumor activity. One complete response and 4 partial responses were observed (15% overall response rate). Stable disease was seen in 15 patients (45%). Four patients had a continued response at 6 months, including 2 of 5 patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Experimental Design

A phase I trial employing a standard 3 + 3 design was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors. Cohort A involved a novel dose escalation schema exploring doses of pemetrexed every 14 days with continuous sorafenib. Cohort B involved a modified schedule of sorafenib dosing on days 1–5 of each 14-day pemetrexed cycle. Radiographic assessments were conducted every 8 weeks.

Conclusions

Pemetrexed and intermittent sorafenib therapy is a safe and tolerable combination for patients, with promising activity seen in patients with breast cancer.

Second-Line Chemotherapy and Beyond for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

The landscape for the second- and third-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer has changed dramatically over the last two decades. Immunotherapeutic agents have become a preferred choice following progression on platinum-based first-line chemotherapy. However, there remains a role for cytotoxic chemotherapy and pemetrexed and docetaxel (with or without ramucirumab) are approved for single-agent use in the second-line setting. With the discovery of new genetic alterations and the development of novel targeted drugs, the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer following progression on first-line therapy continues to become more complicated as new treatment algorithms evolve.

Pemetrexed for advanced stage nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: latest evidence about its extended use and outcomes

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still the leading cause of cancer-related death, and the treatment of advanced NSCLC relies on systemic treatments. During the last decade, pemetrexed, an antifolate agent, gradually became a key component of the treatment for patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC. It has indeed been shown to be efficient for first-line, maintenance and second- or third-line treatment in this subgroup of NSCLC. Moreover, it is usually well tolerated, with few grade 3 and 4 toxicities. Several studies have tried to identify predictive biomarkers of pemetrexed efficacy. Due to pemetrexed's mechanism of action, thymidilate synthase expression predictive value was investigated but could not be demonstrated. Currently, more than 400 trials of pemetrexed for the treatment of nonsquamous NSCLC are ongoing.

Phase II Study of High-Dose Pemetrexed Plus Cisplatin as First-Line Chemotherapy In the Treatment of Patients with Brain Metastases from Lung Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Brain metastases (BMs) occur in up to 40% of patients with nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). When surgery or radiosurgery is not possible, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the standard treatment, with a cerebral response rate of approximately 30%. Pemetrexed-based chemotherapy presents an approximately 40% response rate on brain lesions of NSCLC with brain metastases.

METHODS

This trial assessed the efficacy and safety of high-dose pemetrexed plus cisplatin in NSCLC with BMs after WBRT. Thirty-two patients with Karnofsky Performance Status ≥70 were enrolled. Patients of NSCLC with brain metastases were eligible for WBRT, which was administered at 30 Gy/10f. Thereafter, high-dose pemetrexed plus cisplatin was given up to 6 cycles. Primary end point was objective response rate (RR) and progression-free survival on BM. Secondary end points included extracerebral and overall RR, safety profile, and survival.

RESULTS

The objective cerebral RR (complete and partial response) was 68.8 % (22 of 32 patients). Extracerebral and globe RR was 37.5% and 31.3%, respectively. The median progression-free survival of BM was 13.6 months, and median overall survival was 19.1 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This modality of treatment appears to a better efficacy and a good safety of BM, as well as extracerebral. Further clinical studies are warranted.

Pemetrexed and cisplatin for the treatment of advanced, persistent, or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix: a limited access phase II trial of the gynecologic oncology group

PURPOSE

To estimate the antitumor activity of pemetrexed and cisplatin with objective tumor response (partial and complete) in patients with advanced, persistent, or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix and to determine the nature and degree of toxicity of this regimen. Secondarily, this study will determine the effects of this regimen on progression-free survival and overall survival.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible, consenting patients received pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) and cisplatin 50 mg/m(2) intravenously repeated every 21 days until disease progression or adverse events prohibited further therapy. Patients received no prior therapeutic chemotherapy, except when administered concurrently with primary radiation therapy. Subsequent doses were adjusted according to observed toxicity and protocol guidelines. Adverse events were assessed with Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 3.0. The primary measure of efficacy was tumor response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The study was stratified by prior radiation therapy.

RESULTS

From September 2008 to November 2011, 55 patients were enrolled by five Gynecologic Oncology Group member institutions; of those, 54 patients were eligible and assessable. The regimen was well tolerated with 26% receiving more than nine cycles. The most common greater than grade 2 toxicities were neutropenia 35%, leukopenia 28%, and metabolic 28%. The overall response rate was 31% (one complete and 16 partial). The median progression-free survival was 5.7 months, and overall survival was 12.3 months.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin demonstrates activity in the treatment of advanced, persistent, or recurrent carcinoma of the cervix.

Critical appraisal of pemetrexed in the treatment of NSCLC and metastatic pulmonary nodules

Pemetrexed, a new multitarget antifolate antineoplastic agent, has significantly improved the overall survival in nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer patients. Presently, pemetrexed is recommended for first line treatment in combination with platinum derivatives, for second line treatment as a single agent and, more recently, as maintenance treatment after first line chemotherapy. In this article we critically appraise the status of pemetrexed including pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, toxicity, and the cost effectiveness of pemetrexed, as well as the predictive biomarkers for pemetrexed based chemotherapy.

Relationship between progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with anticancer agents after first-line treatment failure

AIM

The hazard ratio of progression-free survival (PFS-HR) generally does not reflect that of overall survival (OS-HR) in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with first-line therapy. Short survival post-progression (SPP) better reflects the PFS-HR and OS-HR in simulations. We aimed to evaluate whether the PFS-HR reflects the OS-HR in NSCLC clinical trials for post-first-line treatments.

METHOD

We reviewed clinical studies of post-first-line anticancer agents for NSCLC. We examined the sample size of the experimental arm (EA), median PFS (mPFS) or median time to progression in the EA, median overall survival (mOS) in the EA, the PFS-HR and the OS-HR. SPP was defined as the difference between mOS and mPFS. The association between mPFS and SPP, mPFS and mOS, and the PFS-HR and OS-HR was tested. We sought for the optimal point of correlation of PFS-HR and OS-HR by every 1 month of SPP.

RESULTS

We identified 32 trials (34 arms). mPFS and mOS were weakly correlated (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.376; P = 0.0286). The PFS-HR and OS-HR were also moderately correlated (r = 0.415; P = 0.015). The maximum r value was 0.770 (SPP < 6 months; P < 0.0001) when we tested the associations between the PFS-HR and OS-HR for SPP using 1-month increments. The estimated regression equation at this point was OS-HR = 0.679 × (PFS-HR) + 0.349.

CONCLUSION

The PFS-HR and OS-HR were strongly correlated in advanced NSCLC patients treated with post-first-line anticancer agents, with a SPP of less than 6 months.

The place of pemetrexed in the management of non-small-cell lung cancer patients

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Chemotherapy is included in the management of the majority of NSCLC patients either in addition to a local treatment (surgery/radiotherapy) or alone. In this setting, pemetrexed has become one of the most important partners of current chemotherapy regimens for nonsquamous NSCLC patients. Indeed, pemetrexed demonstrated a comparable efficacy to other previously available drugs in NSCLC, with however a better safety profile and an easier schedule of administration. In addition, pemetrexed demonstrated a greater efficacy in nonsquamous NSCLC that lead to an exploration of the underlying potential biological background. It is now suggested that the tumor thymidylate synthase level may act as a predictor of pemetrexed efficacy, therefore potentially providing clinicians in the future with a predictor of efficacy, which it is usually lacking with standard chemotherapies.

Second-line pemetrexed treatment in Taiwanese patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: an open-label single-arm study

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Although global and Asian studies on second-line pemetrexed for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer have confirmed its efficacy and safety, a pivotal postcommitment study to consolidate the evidence regarding the Taiwanese population was warranted. This open-label single-arm study assessed the objective response rate to a tailored dose of single-agent pemetrexed in Taiwanese patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer who had received prior chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB/IV disease were treated with pemetrexed on day 1 of each 21-day cycle. A 500 mg/m(2) dose was administered in cycle 1. For cycle 2, the dose was increased to 1000 mg/m(2) (if there was no toxicity above predefined levels) or decreased to 375 mg/m(2). All patients received standard supplemental therapy. Patient follow-up continued until 18 months after the last patient was enrolled in this study or death. All patients were included in all analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 33 patients who were enrolled, 25 (75.8%) received the 1000 mg/m(2) dose during cycle 2; 18 patients were dropped from the study, including 17 (51.5%) who had died by the time of analysis. The objective response and disease control rates were 18.2% (95% confidence limits [CI]: 7.0-35.5) and 54.5% (95% CI: 36.4-71.9), respectively. No patients exhibited a complete response. There were two serious drug-related adverse events (neutropenia and leukopenia) and two drug-related adverse events that resulted in removal from the study. Decreased neutrophil/granulocyte counts were the most frequently observed drug-related grade 3/4 events (9 patients, 24 treatment cycles).

CONCLUSION

The objective response rate, disease control rate, and safety and tolerability profile in this population of Taiwanese patients were consistent with the published findings that were conducted using Asian and Western populations. These findings support the use of single-agent, second-line pemetrexed for the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer in Taiwanese patients.

Gemcitabine plus paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this retrospective study was to determine response rates, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity of gemcitabine and paclitaxel combinations with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer patients (NSCLC) who have progressive disease after platinum-based first-line chemotherapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the file records of patients treated with gemcitabine plus paclitaxel in advanced or metastatic NSCLC cases in a second-line setting. The chemotherapy schedule was as follows: gemcitabine 1500 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 administered every two weeks.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients (45 male, 3 female) were evaluated; stage IIIB/IV 6/42; PS0, 8.3%, PS1, 72.9%, PS2, 18.8%; median age, 56 years old (range 38-76). Six (12.5%) patients showed a partial response (PR), 13 (27.1%) stable disease (SD), and 27 (56.3%) progressive disease (PD). The median OS was 6.63 months (95% CI 4.0-9.2); the median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 1.8-3.6). Grade 3 and 4 hematologic toxicities, including neutropenia (n=4, 8.4%), and anemia (n=3, 6.3%) were encountered, but no grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia. One patient developed febrile neutropenia. There were no interruption for reasons of toxicity and no exitus related to therapy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of two-weekly gemcitabine plus paclitaxel was an effective and well-tolerated second-line chemotherapy regimen for advanced or metastatic NSCLC patients previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy. Although the most common and dose limiting toxicities were neutropenia and neuropathy, this regimen was tolerated well by the patients.

Pemetrexed for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a major cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Although advanced NSCLC is still incurable, various anti-neoplastic agents have become available for the treatment of this disease. Pemetrexed , a multi-target folate antagonist, has improved the survival of non-squamous NSCLC patients. Currently, pemetrexed is approved for first-line treatment in combination with a platinum derivate, for second-line treatment as a single agent and, more recently, as maintenance treatment after first-line chemotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

The authors analyzed the state of the art of pemetrexed through a review of the literature. Clinical trials and meta-analyses involving pemetrexed in NSCLC were evaluated. Pemetrexed improved survival of non-squamous NSCLC in first-line, maintenance, and second-line treatments; this benefit is limited to non-squamous histology. Because pemetrexed has become part of the standard of care, current clinical trials are designed to compare it to other investigational combinations. Limited data on resectable disease are available, and additional clinical trials are being conducted.

EXPERT OPINION

Pemetrexed has shown effectiveness and a favorable toxicity profile. Histology-driven indications and the relationship of pemetrexed with thymidylate synthase expression suggest that a more precise definition of predictive biomarkers could be further investigated.

Second-line pemetrexed versus docetaxel in Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized, open-label study

INTRODUCTION

This randomized, open-label study compared pemetrexed versus docetaxel as second-line therapy for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The primary endpoint tested non-inferiority of overall survival (OS) on the combined data from these patients and those in the global registration trial. Data from patients in the current study only (Chinese patients) were the basis for the study's secondary objectives.

METHODS

Patients with stage IIIB/IV disease were randomized (1:1) to receive pemetrexed (500 mg/m(2); 107 randomized; 106 treated) or docetaxel (75 mg/m(2); 104 randomized; 102 treated) on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. Treatment continued until progressive disease, unacceptable toxicity or patient/investigator decision. All efficacy and safety data were analyzed at the pre-specified study completion; supplementary OS analyses were performed later, after additional events had been recorded.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint of OS noninferiority of pemetrexed to docetaxel was not met, the lower CL was <50% and P>0.025 (efficacy retained=97.9% [95% CLs: 47.1, 141.9]; P=0.0276), in the combined population (pemetrexed: n=390, docetaxel: n=392). Supplementary values were 101.3% (95% CLs: 57.9, 148.8), P=0.0186. For the secondary objectives, assessed in the population from the current study (pemetrexed: n=107, docetaxel: n=104), median OS was 11.7 and 12.2 months for the pemetrexed and docetaxel arms, respectively (HR [95% CLs]: 1.14 [0.78, 1.68], P=0.492). Supplementary values were 11.4 and 11.5 months, respectively (HR [95% CLs]: 1.02 [0.74, 1.40], P=0.926). Median PFS values were 2.8 and 3.1 months (HR [95% CLs]: 1.05 [0.75, 1.46], P=0.770) and ORR values were 9.6% and 4.1% (odds ratio [95% CLs]: 2.50 [0.76, 8.25], P=0.133) for pemetrexed and docetaxel, respectively. Pemetrexed-treated patients had significantly fewer drug-related grade 3-4 adverse events (pemetrexed: 20.8%, docetaxel: 40.2%; P=0.003). Few drug-related serious adverse events were reported (pemetrexed: 5 patients, docetaxel: 8 patients).

CONCLUSION

The comparable efficacy and superior tolerability of pemetrexed compared with docetaxel in this study supports the use of single-agent, second-line pemetrexed for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Chinese patients. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00391274.

Combination chemotherapy with intermittent erlotinib and pemetrexed for pretreated patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a phase I dose-finding study

BACKGROUND

Erlotinib and pemetrexed have been approved for the second-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These two agents have different mechanisms of action. Combined treatment with erlotinib and pemetrexed could potentially augment the antitumor activity of either agent alone. In the present study, we investigated the safety profile of combined administration of the two agents in pretreated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

A phase I dose-finding study (Trial registration: UMIN000002900) was performed in patients with stage III/IV nonsquamous NSCLC whose disease had progressed on or after receiving first-line chemotherapy. Patients received 500 mg/m(2) of pemetrexed intravenously every 21 days and erlotinib (100 mg at Level 1 and 150 mg at Level 2) orally on days 2-16.

RESULTS

Twelve patients, nine males and three females, were recruited. Patient characteristics included a median age of 66 years (range, 48-78 years), stage IV disease (nine cases), adenocarcinoma (seven cases) and activating mutation-positives in the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (two cases). Treatment was well-tolerated, and the recommended dose of erlotinib was fixed at 150 mg. Dose-limiting toxicities were experienced in three patients and included: grade 3 elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase, repetitive grade 4 neutropenia that required reduction of the second dose of pemetrexed and grade 3 diarrhea. No patient experienced drug-induced interstitial lung disease. Three patients achieved a partial response and stable disease was maintained in five patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination chemotherapy of intermittent erlotinib with pemetrexed was well-tolerated, with promising efficacy against pretreated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

Pemetrexed versus docetaxel in second line non-small-cell lung cancer: results and subsets analyses of a multi-center, randomized, exploratory trial in Chinese patients

BACKGROUND

Pemetrexed and docetaxel are established therapies in second line non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Comparative data, concerning the two agents in the designated settings, however, are lacking in Chinese patients who account for the largest lung cancer population in the world.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

We designed and performed a multi-center, randomized, exploratory clinical trial of pemetrexed compared with docetaxel in second line chemotherapy in Chinese NSCLC patients. Eligible patients with histological or cytological diagnosis of stage IIIB or IV NSCLC, who were not suitable for curative therapy and had failed from prior first line chemotherapy regimen for at least 4 weeks, were randomized to receive either pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) intravenously day 1 with vitamin B12, folic acid, and dexamethasone, or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2) intravenously day 1 with dexamethasone. Both regimens were implemented once every 21 days for 2 cycles. This study was designed to be a non-inferiority trial that compared tumor response for overall response rate (ORR) between the two drugs as primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), Karnofsky performance status (KPS) scores and toxicities.

RESULTS

260 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive chemotherapy of either pemetrexed (132 patients) or docetaxel (128 patients). 106 patients in pemetrexed arm and 102 patients in docetaxel arm were evaluable for efficacy. The efficacy of pemetrexed was equivalent to that of docetaxel in the second-line treatment for Chinese NSCLC (ORR: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 9.4% vs. 4.9, p = 0.285, DCR: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 67.2% vs. 69.6%, p = 0.685). And pemetrexed seemed to slightly promote patients' average KPS score when comparing with docetaxel, although the difference was without statistical significance (changes of average KPS scores: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 0.28 ± 5.93 vs. -1.67 ± 8.57, p = 0.149). Patients receiving pemetrexed experienced significantly lower incidences of grade 3/4 neutropenia (7.0% vs. 27.6%, p < 0.001) and leucocytopenia (4.7% vs. 22.8%, p < 0.001) than those who received docetaxel. Also, there were lower incidences of alopecia, stomatitis, and neural abnormality for patients receiving pemetrexed than those receiving docetaxel. Incidence of serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase elevation, however, was higher in pemetrexed arm than in docetaxel arm (32.3% vs. 14.9%, p = 0.013). In addition, age ≥ 60 patients benefit from pemetrexed with equivalent efficacies yet much lower toxicities compared to docetaxel (DCR: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 66.67% vs. 81.58%, p = 0.146; grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities: pemetrexed vs. docetaxel = 17.25% vs. 39.6%, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with pemetrexed resulted in equivalent efficacy outcomes and better safety profiles compared with docetaxel in second-line therapy for advanced NSCLC in Chinese lung cancer population. And age ≥ 60 patients may benefit from second-line single pemetrexed.

Phase I dose-escalation study to examine the safety and tolerability of LY2603618, a checkpoint 1 kinase inhibitor, administered 1 day after pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) every 21 days in patients with cancer

PURPOSE

This phase I study aims at assessing the safety and tolerability of LY2603618, a selective inhibitor of Checkpoint Kinase 1, in combination with pemetrexed and determining the maximum tolerable dose and the pharmacokinetic parameters.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

This was an open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation study in patients with advanced solid tumors. Increasing doses of LY2603618 (40-195 mg/m(2)) were combined with 500 mg/m(2) of pemetrexed. LY2603618 was administered on Days 1 and 9 and pemetrexed on Day 8 in a 28-day cycle. For all subsequent 21-day cycles, pemetrexed was administered on Day 1 and LY2603618 on Day 2. Antitumor activity was evaluated as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0.

RESULTS

A total of 31 patients were enrolled into six cohorts (three at 40 mg/m(2) over 4.5-hour infusion, 1-hour infusion in subsequent cohorts: three each at 40 mg/m(2), 70 mg/m(2), and 195 mg/m(2); 13 at 105 mg/m(2); six at 150 mg/m(2)). Four patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity: diarrhea (105 mg/m(2)); reversible infusion-related reaction (150 mg/m(2)); thrombocytopenia (195 mg/m(2)); and fatigue (195 mg/m(2)). The maximum tolerated dose was defined as 150 mg/m(2). The pharmacokinetic data demonstrated that the exposure of LY2603618 increased in a dose-dependent manner, displayed a suitable half-life for maintaining required human exposures while minimizing the intra- and inter-cycle accumulation, and was unaffected by the pemetrexed administration. The pharmacokinetic-defined biologically efficacious dose was achieved at doses ≥105 mg/m(2).

CONCLUSION

LY2603618 administered approximately 24 h after pemetrexed showed acceptable safety and pharmacokinetic profiles.

Safety and efficacy of pemetrexed in maintenance therapy of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer incidence continues to rise and is the number one cause of cancer death in both men and women worldwide with projected 221,130 new cases and 156,940 deaths in the United States in 2011.1 Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents more than 85% of the cases with most patients having either locally advanced or metastatic disease at the time of initial diagnosis, and approximately 60%-70% of them have an adenocarcinoma histologic subtype. In the last three years, we have seen several advances in the management of NSCLC, with several factors playing an important role in the treatment decision making process. Maintenance therapy has been added to the algorithm of NSCLC management and Pemetrexed has been studied as single agent or in combination in this setting with recent studies showing safety and improved progression free survival (PFS) and/or overall survival (OS), still the disease for the most part has a dismal outcome. More research work needs to be done to identify which patients truly benefit from these approaches, and to whom we should offer maintenance or switch maintenance vs. close observation.

[Pemetrexed salvage chemotherapy for NSCLC: implementation study]

BACKGROUND

Registration trials demonstrated the activity of pemetrexed in non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) either in combination with first-line agents or in monotherapy for salvage treatment. The aim of our implementation study was to verify, in an unselected population, the results obtained with pemetrexed salvage chemotherapy in clinical practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The charts of all patients diagnosed with NSCLC, receiving pemetrexed for progressive disease after at least one previous course of chemotherapy, were retrospectively reviewed in two academic institutions. Response was assessed according to WHO and toxicity using the CTCAE and WHO criteria.

RESULTS

Between November 2004 and September 2009, 84 patients were given pemetrexed as second, third or greater than third line therapy (n=18/14/52). Intent-to-treat response rate was 11.9% (95% CI, 5%-18.8%). Median progression-free survival was 2.2 months and median survival time was 6.4 months. The most frequent grade 3-5 toxicity was neutropenia (23.9%).

CONCLUSION

Salvage chemotherapy with pemetrexed for progressing NSCLC confirmed, in an unselected population, who had been extensively treated previously, the level of activity observed in registration trials although a significant toxicity was noted.

Progression-free Survival Decreases with Each Subsequent Therapy in Patients Presenting for Phase I Clinical Trials

Background: There is often a finite progression-free interval of time between one systemic therapy and the next when treating patients with advanced cancer. While it appears that progression-free survival (PFS) between systemic therapies tends to get shorter for a number of factors, there has not been a formal evaluation of diverse tumor types in an advanced cancer population treated with commercially-available systemic therapies.

Methods: In an attempt to clarify the relationship between PFS between subsequent systemic therapies, we analyzed the records of 165 advanced cancer patients coming to our clinic for consideration for participation in six different phase I clinical trials requiring detailed and extensive past medical treatment history documentation.

Results: There were 77 men and 65 women meeting inclusion criteria with a median age at diagnosis of 55.3 years (range 9.4-81.6). The most common cancer types were colorectal (13.9%), other gastrointestinal (11.8%), prostate (11.8%). A median of 3 (range 1-11) systemic therapies were received prior to phase I evaluation. There was a significant decrease in PFS in systemic therapy for advanced disease from treatment 1 to treatment 2 to treatment 3 (p = 0.002), as well as, from treatment 1 through treatment 5 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: In an advanced cancer population of diverse tumor types, we observe a statistically significant decrease in PFS with each successive standard therapy. Identification of new therapies that reverse this trend of decreasing PFS may lead to improved clinical outcomes.

A retrospective study of pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin as second-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Comparable toxicity, better outcome

BACKGROUND

  The outcomes of single-agent regimens as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are poor. Pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin has been reportedly well-tolerated and active in chemotherapy-naïve NSCLC. The current study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effect and toxicity of the regimen of pemetrexed plus oxaliplatin for pretreated advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

  The clinical records of consecutive patients with metastatic NSCLC who received pemetrexed after failed first-line chemotherapy were reviewed.

RESULTS

  The medical records of 79 eligible patients were examined. Thirty-four of them were treated with a regimen of pemetrexed plus oxaliplatin (PEMOX). Another 45 patients were administered pemetrexed alone (PEM). Both regimens were well-tolerated and there was no therapy-related death. Comparable response rates (15.2% vs. 11.1%) and tumor control rates (63.6% vs. 47.5%) were observed between the two groups. Median time to progression and overall survival of the PEMOX and PEM groups were 18 weeks (95% confidence interval (CI): 13.72-22.28 weeks) versus 13 weeks (95%CI: 12.28-13.72 weeks; P= 0.002), and 31 weeks (95%CI: 15.56-46.44 weeks) versus 21 weeks (95%CI: 18.37-23.63 weeks; P= 0.006), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

  The current retrospective study suggests that pemetrexed combined with oxaliplatin as second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC has comparable safety and response with a pemetrexed alone regimen, but better survival.

Treatment of advanced non small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the major cause of cancer death in the world. Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts approximately 80-85% of all lung cancer diagnosis; the majority of patients will be diagnosed with non operable, advanced-stage disease. Palliative chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy represent the standard of care of this disease. Platinum based doublets with third generation agents are considered the standard of first line advanced NSCLC treatment. However, data arising from the availability of pemetrexed suggest that histology could play a key role in decision making. Advances in understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer have led to the identification of several specific targets such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) for therapeutic agents. Bevacizumab is the first recombinant humanized monoclonal antibody (mAb) binding VEGF to demonstrate clinical benefit and a rather survival prolongation in combination with chemotherapy in the treatment of non squamous chemo-naive advanced NSCLC patients. Two types of anti-EGFR targeting agents have reached advanced clinical development: mAbs and small molecule inhibitors of the EGFR tyrosine kinase enzymatic activity (TKIs). Among TKIs gefitinib has been tested in several phase II-III studies showing an improvement in survival and responses in first, second and third line treatment in selected patients with specific clinical and molecular characteristics. Furthermore, erlotinib has showed to significantly improve survival in an unselected population of patients following the failure of one or two chemotherapy regimens. This review will discuss the different therapeutic options for first and second line treatment in the clinical practice.

A phase I study of pemetrexed in patients with relapsed or refractory acute leukemia

PURPOSE

To investigate the toxicity profile, activity, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of pemetrexed in leukemia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with refractory or relapsed acute leukemia were eligible. A phase I 3+3 design was implemented. Pemetrexed was infused intravenously (IV) over 25 min with vitamin supplementation. Courses were repeated every 3 to 4 weeks according to toxicity and efficacy. The starting dose of 900 mg/m² was escalated by approximately 33% until the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was determined.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with acute myeloid (AML) or lymphocytic (ALL) leukemia received therapy. The main non-hematologic adverse event was liver dysfunction at several dose levels, including 2 DLTs at 3,600 mg/m². One patient with ALL (3,600 mg/m² dose level) achieved a partial response. Pemetrexed pharmacokinetics were linear with escalated dosing. Elevated plasma deoxyuridine was observed in a subset of patients following pemetrexed infusion, but was not correlated with dose levels. Changes in the nucleotide pools of circulating mononuclear cells were observed, but were variable.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II dose of pemetrexed for future leukemia studies is 2,700 mg/m(2) IV over 25 min every 3 to 4 weeks with vitamin supplementation. Deoxyuridine levels did not increase with increasing pemetrexed dose, suggesting pemetrexed inhibition of thymidylate synthase (TS) may be saturated by the 900 mg/m² dose level. However, no firm conclusion can be made regarding TS saturation in tumor cells. While tolerable, pemetrexed monotherapy had limited activity in this highly refractory population. Exploration of pemetrexed in combination with other active agents in leukemia is a reasonable future endeavor.

Phase i study of 'dose-dense' pemetrexed plus carboplatin/radiotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

BACKGROUND

This phase I study investigates the feasibility of carboplatin plus dose-dense (q2-week) pemetrexed given concurrently with radiotherapy (XRT) for locally advanced and oligometastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Eligible patients had Stage III or IV (oligometastatic) NSCLC. Patients received XRT to 63 Gy in standard fractionation. Patients received concurrent carboplatin (AUC = 6) during weeks 1 and 5 of XRT, and pemetrexed during weeks 1, 3, 5, and 7 of XRT. The starting dose level (level 1) of pemetrexed was 300 mg/m2. Following the finding of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) in dose level 1, an amended dose level (level 1A) continued pemetrexed at 300 mg/m2, but with involved field radiation instead of extended nodal irradiation. Consolidation consisted of carboplatin (AUC = 6) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) q3 weeks × 2 -3 cycles.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients were enrolled. Fourteen patients are evaluable for toxicity analysis. Of the initial 6 patients treated on dose level 1, two experienced DLTs (one grade 4 sepsis, one prolonged grade 3 esophagitis). There was one DLT (grade 5 pneumonitis) in the 8 patients treated on dose level 1A. In 16 patients evaluable for response (4 with oligometastatic stage IV disease and 12 with stage III disease), the median follow-up time is 17.8 months. Thirteen of 16 patients had in field local regional response. The actuarial median survival time was 28.6 months in all patients and 34.7 months (estimated) in stage III patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent carboplatin with dose-dense (q2week) pemetrexed at 300 mg/m2 with involved field XRT is feasible and encouraging in patients with locally advanced and oligometastatic NSCLC.

Feasibility study of two schedules of sunitinib in combination with pemetrexed in patients with advanced solid tumors

Background Sunitinib is an oral multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor and platelet-derived growth factor receptors, as well as of other receptor types. We have performed a feasibility study to investigate the safety of sunitinib in combination with pemetrexed for treatment of advanced refractory solid tumors. Methods Sunitinib was administered once daily on a continuous daily dosing (CDD) schedule (37.5 mg/day) or a 2-weeks-on, 1-week-off treatment schedule (50 mg/day, Schedule 2/1) in combination with pemetrexed at 500 mg/m² on day 1 of repeated 21-day cycles. Results Twelve patients were enrolled in the study: six on the CDD schedule and six on Schedule 2/1. None of the treated patients experienced a dose-limiting toxicity. Toxicities were manageable and similar in type to those observed in monotherapy studies of sunitinib and pemetrexed. Pharmacokinetic analysis did not reveal any substantial drug–drug interaction. One patient with squamous cell lung cancer showed a partial response and five patients had stable disease. Conclusions Combination therapy with sunitinib administered on Schedule 2/1 (50 mg/day) or a CDD schedule (37.5 mg/day) together with standard-dose pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) was well tolerated in previously treated patients with advanced solid tumors.

[American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer]

本文旨在为Ⅳ期非小细胞肺癌患者的治疗提供更新版推荐。本文资料检索源自2002年以来公布的相关随机试验文献。此指南范围限于化疗与生物治疗。更新委员会对这些文献进行了总结并提供了推荐更新。162篇文献符合标准被纳入参考。本推荐基于可改善总生存期的治疗方法。仅改善无进展生存期的治疗方法推动了对毒性及生存质量的监测。对于体力状态评分为0分或1分患者的一线治疗，可推荐以铂类为基础的细胞毒性药物的两药联用。对铂类治疗有禁忌的患者，可采用非铂类细胞毒性两药联合。对于体力状态评分为2分的患者，单一细胞毒性药物即可。对于疾病进展或经过4个周期的治疗仍对治疗无反应的患者，应停止一线细胞毒性化疗。即使在6个周期后患者对治疗仍有反应，亦应停止两药细胞毒性化疗。对于伴有明确的表皮生长因子受体（epidermal growth factor receptor, EGFR）突变的患者，可推荐一线采用吉非替尼治疗；对于EGFR突变为阴性或不明确的患者，细胞毒性化疗更佳。除具有特定临床特征的患者外，可推荐贝伐单抗与卡铂-紫杉醇联用。对于通过免疫组化证实EGFR阳性的肿瘤患者，可推荐西妥昔单抗与顺铂-长春瑞滨联用。多西紫杉醇、厄洛替尼、吉非替尼或培美曲塞被推荐作为二线治疗。对于未曾接受过厄洛替尼或吉非替尼治疗的患者，可推荐厄洛替尼作为三线治疗。现有数据不足以推荐常规三线采用细胞毒性药物。已有的证据也不足以推荐常规应用分子标记物选择化疗。

Pemetrexed in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Current therapeutic options for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) yield relatively modest improvements in survival leading to an ongoing search for new active treatment agents. In the past decade, pemetrexed has had an increasingly established role in the treatment of advanced NSCLC in both first- and second-line settings.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Currently available published data on mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced NSCLC are described. Peer-reviewed publications on the development of pemetrexed and its clinical use in NSCLC were reviewed (1995 - 2009).

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Pemetrexed is a multitargeted antifolate cytotoxic agent. Key Phase II and Phase III trials are described that have shown pemetrexed's efficacy in both the first- and second-line treatment of advanced NSCLC. The efficacy of pemetrexed seems to vary between squamous and nonsquamous histologies. Possible reasons for this are explored. Additionally, the potential role of pemetrexed in maintenance therapy is discussed.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Pemetrexed is an effective treatment for advanced NSCLC, with an overall favorable toxicity profile. There is growing evidence that, in patients treated with pemetrexed, nonsquamous tumors have improved outcomes compared to squamous cell tumors. Pemetrexed may also have a role in maintenance therapy for NSCLC.

Accelerated second-line or maintenance chemotherapy versus treatment at disease progression in NSCLC

For many decades, the use of chemotherapy as second-line therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer relied upon disease progression. Several studies have shown that four to six cycles of chemotherapy administered as front-line therapy treatment offers a survival advantage to patients; however, further chemotherapy beyond this initial treatment was more associated with side effects and no benefit in survival. Until 2009, second-line treatment for lung cancer was well established for three therapeutic agents: docetaxel, pemetrexed and erlotinib. Currently, the timeframe to use these agents has been challenged by two large randomized clinical trials in which pemetrexed (JMEN trial) and erlotinib (Sequential Tarceva in Unresectable NSCLC [SATURN] trial) were used as 'maintenance' therapy and shown to impact progression-free survival and overall survival. This review focuses on the actual dilemma that medical oncologists face in clinical practice in terms of when and to whom maintenance therapy should be applied or if the 'watch and wait' approach prior to start second-line therapy is still advisable.

A phase-I trial of pemetrexed plus carboplatin in recurrent ovarian cancer

BACKGROUND

Carboplatin-based combinations are established in platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer. To improve the therapeutic index, new platinum-based combinations are required. Pemetrexed is a multi-targeted antifolate inhibiting thymidylate synthase. The aim of this study was to determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and to characterize toxicities of the combination of pemetrexed (Pem) and carboplatin (Cb).

DESIGN

A standard three-patient cohort dose escalation was performed starting at Cb AUC-5 and Pem 500 mg/m(2). Patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer were eligible. Two levels of Cb (AUC-5, 6) and five levels of Pem (500, 600, 700, 800, and 900 mg/m(2)) were evaluated. DLTs were based on cycle 1.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were enrolled. The median age was 57.4 years (37.3-75.3) and the median platinum-free interval was 26.2 months (7.2-124.4). There was one DLT at dose level 3 in cycle one. No serious adverse events related to the study therapy were observed. The 20 patients completed 112 cycles of Cb (104 were planned) and 115 cycles of Pem (112 were planned). The maximum dose level of Cb AUC-6 and Pem 900 mg/m(2) was well tolerated. Response rates in 19 patients were: CR: 63.2%; PR: 21.1%; SD; 5.3%, PD: 10.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination carboplatin and pemetrexed is safe and well tolerated. A multicenter phase-II trial is currently underway.

American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline update on chemotherapy for stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer

The purpose of this article is to provide updated recommendations for the treatment of patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. A literature search identified relevant randomized trials published since 2002. The scope of the guideline was narrowed to chemotherapy and biologic therapy. An Update Committee reviewed the literature and made updated recommendations. One hundred sixty-two publications met the inclusion criteria. Recommendations were based on treatment strategies that improve overall survival. Treatments that improve only progression-free survival prompted scrutiny of toxicity and quality of life. For first-line therapy in patients with performance status of 0 or 1, a platinum-based two-drug combination of cytotoxic drugs is recommended. Nonplatinum cytotoxic doublets are acceptable for patients with contraindications to platinum therapy. For patients with performance status of 2, a single cytotoxic drug is sufficient. Stop first-line cytotoxic chemotherapy at disease progression or after four cycles in patients who are not responding to treatment. Stop two-drug cytotoxic chemotherapy at six cycles even in patients who are responding to therapy. The first-line use of gefitinib may be recommended for patients with known epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation; for negative or unknown EGFR mutation status, cytotoxic chemotherapy is preferred. Bevacizumab is recommended with carboplatin-paclitaxel, except for patients with certain clinical characteristics. Cetuximab is recommended with cisplatin-vinorelbine for patients with EGFR-positive tumors by immunohistochemistry. Docetaxel, erlotinib, gefitinib, or pemetrexed is recommended as second-line therapy. Erlotinib is recommended as third-line therapy for patients who have not received prior erlotinib or gefitinib. Data are insufficient to recommend the routine third-line use of cytotoxic drugs. Data are insufficient to recommend routine use of molecular markers to select chemotherapy.

Pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced non-squamous lung cancer

Pemetrexed, a new cytotoxic agent, is a potent inhibitor of thymidylate synthase and other folate-dependent enzymes. Firstly, pemetrexed was approved in combination with cisplatin for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Successively, it has been studied, as single-agent, in phase II and III trials for second-line therapy of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Based on these results, pemetrexed has been registered for the treatment of recurrent NSCLC. The next step was to test pemetrexed plus cisplatin versus gemcitabine plus cisplatin, as first-line therapy in advanced NSCLC patients, in a phase III, non-inferiority, randomized trial. This trial reported the pemetrexed plus cisplatin regimen to be not inferior, in terms of activity and efficacy, to the control arm but statistically better tolerated. The role of pemetrexed as maintenance therapy after first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC is currently being evaluated into a phase III trial. The consistency of the results of these recent studies has identified a predictive effect of NSCLC non-squamous histology for pemetrexed. To date, pemetrexed is registered, at the dose of 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 of a 3-week schedule, in combination with cisplatin, for first-line therapy and, as single-agent, for second-line treatment of patients with non-squamous NSCLC.This review shows the latest and indicates the future developments of pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced NSCLC patients.

Tailoring treatment of nonsmall cell lung cancer by tissue type: role of pemetrexed

Pemetrexed (ALIMTA, LY231514, MTA) is a novel multitargeted antifolate that is currently approved for the treatment of metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Recent evidence reveals that the drug's efficacy is limited to nonsquamous lung cancer histology. As we further understand the drug's mechanisms of action, new genomic and proteomic evidence is shedding light on why some patients respond while others do not. The first goal of this review is to briefly review pemetrexed's mechanism of action, resistance patterns, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics. We will also review the clinical trials that led to its use in NSCLC, with special attention to data showing that pemetrexed has greater efficacy in nonsquamous histologies of NSCLC. Furthermore, we will discuss the hypotheses for the genomic and proteomic basis for this variation in efficacy. Finally, we will report the future directions for pemetrexed as a personalized agent for nonsquamous NSCLC.

Phase II evaluation of pemetrexed in the treatment of recurrent or persistent platinum-resistant ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma: a study of the Gynecologic Oncology Group

PURPOSE

To estimate the antitumor activity of pemetrexed in patients with persistent or recurrent platinum-resistant epithelial ovarian or primary peritoneal cancer and to determine the nature and degree of toxicities.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A phase II trial was conducted by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Patients must have had cancer that had progressed on platinum-based primary chemotherapy or recurred within 6 months. Pemetrexed at a dose of 900 mg/m(2) was to be administered as an intravenous infusion over 10 minutes every 21 days. Dose delay and adjustment was permitted for toxicity. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable adverse effects.

RESULTS

From July 6, 2004, to August 23, 2006, 51 patients were entered. A total of 259 cycles (median, four; range one to 19 cycles) of pemetrexed were administered, with 40% of patients receiving six or more cycles. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. More serious toxicities (grade 3 and 4) included neutropenia in 42%, leukopenia in 25%, anemia in 15%, and constitutional in 15% of patients. No treatment-related deaths were reported. One patient (2%) had a complete and nine patients (19%) had partial responses, with a median duration response of 8.4 months. Seventeen patients (35%) had stable disease for a median of 4.1 months. Eighteen patients (38%) had increasing disease. Three patients (6%) were not assessable. Median progression-free survival was 2.9 months, and overall survival was 11.4 months.

CONCLUSION

Pemetrexed has sufficient activity in the treatment of recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer at the dose and schedule tested to warrant further investigation.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of pemetrexed plus cisplatin in chemonaive patients with locally advanced or metastatic malignant pleural mesothelioma or non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

Pemetrexed is approved as monotherapy and in combination with cisplatin. The established combination dose was identified before the addition of folic acid and vitamin B(12) to the treatment regimen. We evaluated the toxicity and pharmacokinetics (PK) of higher pemetrexed doses with cisplatin and vitamin supplementation.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma or non-small cell lung cancer received pemetrexed doses from 500 to 900 mg/m(2) + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin once every 21 days. Folic acid and vitamin B(12) were administered per label recommendations.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients received a combined total of 84 cycles. The maximum tolerated dose was 900 mg/m(2) pemetrexed + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Dose-limiting toxicities at this dose included grade 3 anemia, bronchopneumonia, and neutropenia, and 1 death from sepsis secondary to grade 4 febrile neutropenia, considered possibly related to study drugs. The recommended dose was 800 mg/m(2) pemetrexed + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Pemetrexed PK were consistent across doses; pemetrexed did not seem to affect total or free platinum PK.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemetrexed with vitamin supplementation was safe and well tolerated at higher doses than the currently established 500 mg/m(2) + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Based on this study, the recommended dose would be 800 mg/m(2) pemetrexed + 75 mg/m(2) cisplatin. However, recent studies showed a lack of improved efficacy for 900 or 1,000 mg/m(2) single-agent pemetrexed versus 500 mg/m(2) and a lack of PK/pharmacodynamic exposure-response relationship for the pemetrexed/cisplatin combination across pemetrexed exposures corresponding to this dose range. Based on currently available evidence, we recommend retaining the established dose.