Clinical outcomes and safety with trabectedin therapy in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas following failure of prior chemotherapy: results of a worldwide expanded access program study

S-p-bromobenzyl-glutathione cyclopentyl diester (BBGC) as novel therapeutic strategy to enhance trabectedin anti-tumor effect in soft tissue sarcoma preclinical models

Trabectedin, approved for the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS), interferes with cell division and genetic transcription processes. Due to its strong anti-tumor activity in only certain histotypes, several studies on trabectedin combinations are currently ongoing to improve its efficacy. In this study, we aimed to investigate novel potential therapeutic strategies to enhance the anti-tumor effect of trabectedin using integrated in silico, in vitro, and in vivo approaches. For in silico analysis, we screened two public datasets, GSEA M5190 and TCGA SARC. Fibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, dedifferentiated, and myxoid liposarcoma cell lines were used for in vitro studies. For in vivo experiments, fibrosarcoma orthotopic murine model was developed. In silico analysis identified Glo1 as the only druggable target upregulated after trabectedin treatment and correlated with poor prognosis. The specific Glo1 inhibitor, S-p-bromobenzylglutathione cyclopentyl diester (BBGC), increased trabectedin cytotoxicity in STS cells, and restored drug sensitivity in myxoid liposarcoma cells resistant to trabectedin. Moreover, the combined treatment with BBGC and trabectedin had a synergistic antitumor effect in vivo without any additional toxicity to mice. Based on these results, we believe that BBGC warrants further investigation to evaluate its potential clinical use in combination with trabectedin.

Trabectedin may be a valuable treatment option for elderly patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcomas

Background

In the landscape of metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (mSTS) treatment, anthracyclines have shown efficacy; however, their associated toxicity imposes significant limitations, especially in frail elderly patients with mSTS who are highly susceptible to severe adverse effects. In this context, trabectedin, due to its distinct pharmacological profile and safety profile, may represent an interesting alternative being demonstrated to be active in treating mSTS. These features hold particular significance for elderly and unfit patients with mSTS, where balancing treatment benefits with potential adverse effects represents the pivotal objective.

Methods

The investigation was focused on a specific group of 11 elderly patients with mSTS aged ≥70, all undergoing first-line treatment with trabectedin, and it was supported by comprehensive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic studies. Among these patients, 9 out of 11 started the treatment at a dose of 1.5 mg/m2.

Results

The primary objective of this investigation is to highlight trabectedin as a valuable first-line treatment option for elderly and unfit patients with mSTS. Additionally, this investigation seeks to explore whether higher administered doses of trabectedin can enhance clinical outcomes while maintaining the same toxicity profiles. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 77 days (95% CI, 53-89), the median overall survival (OS) was 397 days (95% CI, 66-2,102), while the overall toxicity of grade 3-4 severity amounted to 43%.

Conclusion

These findings provide new insights into the clinical outcomes and toxicity associated with trabectedin in an elderly patient population, enhancing our understanding of better treatment approaches for a specific population of patients with mSTS.

UK guidelines for the management of soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare tumours arising in mesenchymal tissues and can occur almost anywhere in the body. Their rarity, and the heterogeneity of subtype and location, means that developing evidence-based guidelines is complicated by the limitations of the data available. This makes it more important that STS are managed by expert multidisciplinary teams, to ensure consistent and optimal treatment, recruitment to clinical trials, and the ongoing accumulation of further data and knowledge. The development of appropriate guidance, by an experienced panel referring to the evidence available, is therefore a useful foundation on which to build progress in the field. These guidelines are an update of the previous versions published in 2010 and 2016 [1, 2]. The original guidelines were drawn up by a panel of UK sarcoma specialists convened under the auspices of the British Sarcoma Group (BSG) and were intended to provide a framework for the multidisciplinary care of patients with soft tissue sarcomas. This iteration of the guidance, as well as updating the general multidisciplinary management of soft tissue sarcoma, includes specific sections relating to the management of sarcomas at defined anatomical sites: gynaecological sarcomas, retroperitoneal sarcomas, breast sarcomas, and skin sarcomas. These are generally managed collaboratively by site specific multidisciplinary teams linked to the regional sarcoma specialist team, as stipulated in the recently published sarcoma service specification [3]. In the UK, any patient with a suspected soft tissue sarcoma should be referred to a specialist regional soft tissues sarcoma service, to be managed by a specialist sarcoma multidisciplinary team. Once the diagnosis has been confirmed using appropriate imaging and a tissue biopsy, the main modality of management is usually surgical excision performed by a specialist surgeon, combined with pre- or post-operative radiotherapy for tumours at higher risk for local recurrence. Systemic anti-cancer therapy (SACT) may be utilised in cases where the histological subtype is considered more sensitive to systemic treatment. Regular follow-up is recommended to assess local control, development of metastatic disease, and any late effects of treatment.

Well-differentiated liposarcomas and dedifferentiated liposarcomas: Systemic treatment options for two sibling neoplasms

Well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) account for 60 % of all liposarcomas, reflecting the heterogeneity of this type of sarcoma. Genetically, both types of liposarcomas are characterized by the amplification of MDM2 and CDK4 genes, which indicates an important molecular event with diagnostic and therapeutic relevance. In both localized WDLPS and DDLPS of the retroperitoneum and the extremities, between 25 % and 30 % of patients have local or distant recurrence, even when perioperatively treated, with clear margins present. The systemic treatment of WDLPS and DDLPS remains a challenge, with anthracyclines as the gold standard for first-line treatment. Several regimens have been tested with modest results regarding their efficacy. Herein we discuss the systemic treatment options for WDLPS and DDLPS and review their reported clinical efficacy results.

EJSO educational Special issue from the TARPSWG - Standard medical treatment and new options in retroperitoneal sarcoma

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas mainly consist histologically of liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas. For the liposarcoma subgroup, the local relapse rate seems to determine patients' overall prognosis. In contrast, leiomyosarcoma patients are challenged by the development of metastatic disease; therefore, effective systemic therapies are the cornerstone to improve patients' outcome. No doubt, the limited number of active regimens currently available makes the treatment of patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic disease challenging and results in the overall poor prognosis of this population. In this European Journal of Surgical Oncology Educational Special Issue from the Transatlantic Australasian RetroPeritoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG), we aim to summarize state-of-the-art systemic treatments for patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas with a focus on the locally advanced and metastatic disease setting including conventional standard chemotherapies as well as new innovative treatment approaches in order to identify current unmet medical needs guiding the sarcoma community to initiate appropriate translational research projects and design innovative clinical trials.

A review of the efficacy of trabectedin as second-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma

The goal of second-line therapy for most patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma is long-term tumor control without detriment to quality of life. Clinical practice guidelines recommend trabectedin as a second-line option for advanced soft tissue sarcoma as it can provide the necessary balance between these interwoven goals. Cumulative experience with trabectedin in clinical trials and clinical practice has informed its usage such that greater benefit can be derived. In particular, use in earlier lines allows more patients to achieve prolonged tumor control (six or more cycles). Efficacy outcomes are superior when trabectedin is administered as second- versus later-line therapy and when it is used continuously until disease progression.

Pediatric Non-Rhabdomyosarcoma Soft Tissue Sarcomas: Standard of Care and Treatment Recommendations from the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG)

This paper describes the standard of care for patients with non-rhabdomyosarcoma soft tissue sarcomas (NRSTS) and the therapeutic recommendations developed by the European paediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group (EpSSG). NRSTS form a very mixed group of mesenchymal extraskeletal malignancies. Their rarity, heterogeneity, and aggressiveness make the management of children and adolescents with these tumors complex and challenging. The overall cure rate for patients with NRSTS is around 70%, but survival depends on several prognostic variables, such as histotype and tumor grade, extent of disease and stage, tumor size, and tumor site. While surgery remains the mainstay of treatment for most of these tumors, a multimodal therapeutic approach including radiotherapy and chemotherapy is required in many cases. The EpSSG NRSTS 2005 study was the first prospective protocol tailored specifically to NRSTS. Together with the ARST0332 study developed by the North-American Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group (COG), the EpSSG NRSTS 2005 study currently represents the benchmark for these tumors, establishing risk-adapted standards of care. The EpSSG has developed common treatment recommendations for the large group of adult-type NRSTS (including synovial sarcoma), and specific treatment recommendations for other particular adult-type histologies (ie, alveolar soft-part sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma and dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans); other highly malignant tumors with a biology and clinical behavior differing from those of adult-type NRSTS (ie, rhabdoid tumors and desmoplastic small round cell tumor); and soft tissue tumors of intermediate malignancy (ie desmoid-type fibromatosis, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, and infantile fibrosarcoma). New effective drugs are needed for patients whose NRSTS carries the worst prognosis, ie, those with unresectable tumors, metastases at diagnosis, or relapsing disease. Progress in this area relies on our ability to develop international integrated prospective collaborations, both within existing pediatric oncology networks and, importantly, between the communities of specialists treating pediatric and adult sarcoma.

Trabectedin in Cancers: Mechanisms and Clinical Applications

Trabectedin, a tetrahydroisoquinoline alkaloid, is the first marine antineoplastic agent approved with special anticancer mechanisms involving DNA binding, DNA repair pathways, transcription regulation and regulation of the tumor microenvironment. It has favorable clinical applications, especially for the treatment of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, who failed in anthracyclines and ifosfamide therapy or could not receive these agents. Currently, trabectedin monotherapy regimen and regimens of combined therapy with other agents are both widely used for the treatment of malignancies, including soft tissue sarcomas, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, and non-small-cell lung cancer. In this review, we summarized the basic information and some updated knowledge on trabectedin, including its molecular structure, metabolism in various cancers, pharmaceutical mechanisms, clinical applications, drug combination, and adverse reactions, along with prospections on its possibly more optimal use in cancer treatment.

Single-Center Experience with Trabectedin for the Treatment of Non-L-sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of trabectedin for the treatment of leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma (commonly referred to as L-sarcomas) has been widely evidenced in clinical trials and real-world studies. Nevertheless, available literature on non-L-sarcomas is less abundant. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trabectedin in a cohort of patients with non-L-sarcomas in the real-world setting.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 34 patients who received trabectedin in the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain) between October 2013 and July 2020.

RESULTS

The most frequent histologic subtypes were undifferentiated spindle cell/pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 11, 32.4%), synovial sarcoma (n = 6, 17.7%), myxofibrosarcoma (n = 5, 14.7%), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (n = 4, 11.8%). The mean number of cycles with trabectedin was 5.5 (range 2-28). Three patients achieved partial response (8.8%) and eight patients showed stable disease (23.5%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 8.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 95% CI 1.9-23.7) and 32.4% (95% CI 17.4-50.5), respectively. Overall, progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI 2.1-3.4). The overall survival was 7.3 months (95% CI 4.7-12.8). The most common trabectedin-related grade 3 adverse events were observed in 10 patients (26.5%), mostly being neutropenia (14.7%) and elevated transaminases (5.9%), whereas one patient (2.9%) reported grade 4 febrile neutropenia that required hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this real-life study consistently support that trabectedin is an effective and safe option for the treatment of patients with non-L-sarcoma after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, or in patients who are unsuited to receive these agents.

Impact of Surgery and Chemotherapy on Metastatic Extrauterine Leiomyosarcoma

Background: Few studies have described the characteristics and prognostic factors of patients with metastatic extrauterine leiomyosarcoma (euLMS). Therefore, we retrospectively investigated the clinicopathological features, clinical outcomes, and prognostic factors of patients with euLMS. Methods: We recruited 61 patients with metastatic euLMS treated from 2006 to 2020 and collected and statistically analyzed information on patient-, tumor-, and treatment-related factors. The median follow-up period was 21.1 months. Results: Sixty-one patients with euLMS and a median age of 59 years were included. Furthermore, their five-year overall survival (OS) rate was 38.3%. Univariate analysis revealed that primary tumor size >10 cm, synchronous metastasis, initial metastatic sites >1, and no metastasectomy with curative intent were significantly associated with poor OS rate. Multivariate analysis identified primary tumor size >10 cm as an independent prognostic factor for poor OS. Among 24 patients who received metastasectomy with curative intent, the interval from the initial diagnosis to development of metastasis ≤6 months was significantly correlated with unfavorable OS. Among 37 patients who did not receive metastasectomy, chemotherapy after metastasis development was significantly related to better OS. Conclusions: Complete metastasectomy should be considered for metastatic euLMS treatment. Moreover, chemotherapy could prolong survival in patients with metastasis who are ineligible for metastasectomy.

Trabectedin plus durvalumab in patients with advanced pretreated soft tissue sarcoma and ovarian carcinoma (TRAMUNE): an open-label, multicenter phase Ib study

PURPOSE

Trabectedin has shown pre-clinical synergy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors in pre-clinical models.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

TRAMUNE is a phase Ib study investigating trabectedin combined with durvalumab trough a dose-escalation phase and two expansion cohorts (soft tissue sarcoma and ovarian carcinoma). Trabectedin was given at three dose levels (1 mg/m2, 1.2 mg/m2 and 1.5 mg/m2) on day 1, in combination with durvalumab, 1120 mg on day 2, every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of trabectedin combined with durvalumab and the objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST 1.1. The secondary endpoints included safety, 6-month progression-free rate (PFR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival, and biomarker analyses.

RESULTS

40 patients were included (dose escalation: n=9; STS cohort: n=16; ovarian cohort: n=15, 80% platinum resistant/refractory). The most frequent toxicities were grade 1-2 fatigue, nausea, neutropenia, and alanine/aspartate aminotransferase increase. One patient experienced a dose-limiting toxicity at dose level 2. Trabectedin at 1.2 mg/m2 was selected as the RP2D. In the STS cohort, 43% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage, the ORR was 7% (95% CI 0.2 - 33.9) and the 6-month PFR 28.6% (95% CI 8.4-58.1). In the ovarian carcinoma cohort, 43% of patients experienced tumor shrinkage, the ORR was 21.4% (95% CI 4.7 - 50.8) and the 6-month PFR 42.9% (95% CI 17.7 - 71.1). Baseline levels of PD-L1 expression and CD8-positive T-cell infiltrates were associated with PFS in ovarian carcinoma patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combining trabectedin and durvalumab is manageable. Promising activity is observed in platinum-refractory ovarian carcinoma patients.

Changes in Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio Predict Efficacy of Trabectedin for Soft-tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

Trabectedin and eribulin are widely used for the treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS). Previously it was shown that the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) predicts the efficacy of eribulin for STS. However, prognostic factors for trabectedin on STS have not been identified to date.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of data collected prospectively from 39 patients treated with trabectedin for recurrent or metastatic STS between October 2012 and December 2019. To determine the predictive factors of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Age ≥40 (HR=0.33, 95% CI=0.15-0.71; p=0.0050) and changes in NLR (ΔNLR) <0.5 (HR=2.40, 95% CI-1.01-5.72; p=0.048) were independent factors predictive of longer OS. In addition, age ≥40 (HR=0.23, 95% CI=0.10-0.52; p<0.001) was an independent predictor of longer PFS.

CONCLUSION

Changes in NLR and age ≥40 years were able to predict the efficacy of trabectedin for STS.

A single-arm multicentre phase II trial of doxorubicin in combination with trabectedin in the first-line treatment for leiomyosarcoma with long-term follow-up and impact of cytoreductive surgery

Background

Uterine leiomyosarcomas (U-LMSs) and soft tissue leiomyosarcomas (ST-LMSs) are rare tumours with poor prognosis when locally advanced or metastatic, and with moderate chemosensitivity. In 2015 we reported very encouraging results of the LMS-02 study (NCT02131480) with manageable toxicity. Herein, we report the updated and long-term results of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Patients and methods

Patients received 60 mg/m² intravenous doxorubicin followed by trabectedin 1.1 mg/m² as a 3-h infusion on day 1 and pegfilgrastim on day 2, every 3 weeks, up to six cycles. Surgery for residual disease was permitted. Patients were stratified into U-LMS and ST-LMS groups.

Results

One-hundred and eight patients were enrolled, mainly with metastatic disease (85%), and 20 patients (18.5%) had surgical resection of metastases after chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 7.2 years [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.9-8.2 years], the median PFS was 10.1 months (95% CI 8.5-12.6 months) in the whole population, and 8.3 months (95% CI 7.4-10.3 months) and 12.9 months (95% CI 9.2-14.1 months) for U-LMSs and ST-LMSs, respectively. The median OS was 34.4 months (95% CI 26.9-42.7 months), 27.5 months (95% CI 17.9-38.2 months), and 38.7 months (95% CI 31.0-52.9 months) for the whole population, U-LMSs, and ST-LMSs, respectively. The median OS of the patients with resected metastases was not reached versus 31.6 months in the overall population without surgery (95% CI 23.9-35.4 months).

Conclusions

These updated results confirm the impressive efficiency of the doxorubicin plus trabectedin combination given in first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced/metastatic LMS in terms of PFS and OS. Results of the LMS04 trial (NCT02997358), a randomized phase III study comparing the doxorubicin plus trabectedin combination versus doxorubicin alone in first-line therapy in metastatic LMSs, are pending.

•

Long-term results on PFS and OS of doxorubicin and trabectedin in first-line treatment for advanced leiomyosarcoma.

•

The update confirms the impressive efficiency of the doxo+trab in terms of PFS and OS.

•

Results of a randomized phase-III study comparing dox+trab combination versus doxo alone in first-line therapy in metastatic LMS are pending.

Analysis of clinical factors associated with survival in patients with soft-tissue sarcoma receiving trabectedin

OBJECTIVES

Soft-tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies. Treatment for advanced STS usually starts with anthracycline-based therapies, with no clear sequence for further treatment. A preferred option is trabectedin, especially for liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma (L-sarcoma). However, due to severe side effects and few clinical trials, further research of the parameters affecting survival is necessary for the optimal selection of patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 73 consecutive patients with STS treated with trabectedin at the University Hospital Centers at Zagreb and Osijek from 2014 to 2021. Our primary goals were evaluating factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The median PFS and OS for trabectedin were 3.6 months and 13.7 months, respectively. Patients with L-sarcoma exhibited longer PFS and a trend towards longer OS compared to those with non-L-sarcoma. However, these effects were primarily a result of the myxoid liposarcoma subtype, which exhibited a median PFS of 21.1 months and a median OS of 33.3 months, both significantly longer compared to non-myxoid L-sarcoma. Additionally, patients with three or more sites of metastases exhibited shorter median PFS (3.1 months vs. 3.6 months) and OS (5.7 months vs. 23.8 months) compared to only one metastatic site. There was no correlation between the PFS values of trabectedin and pazopanib and no difference in survival, regardless of the treatment sequence.

CONCLUSIONS

Trabectedin treatment yields the greatest survival benefit in patients with myxoid liposarcoma and low metastatic burden, whereas the additional use of pazopanib provides further clinical benefit, regardless of treatment sequence.

Impact of NICE guidelines on the survival of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas

AIMS

Urgent referral to a specialist centre for patients with a soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) has been recommended by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) in the UK since 2006. However, the impact of this recommendation on the prognosis for these patients remains unclear. We aimed to determine the impact of the NICE guidelines on the disease-specific survival (DSS) of patients with an STS.

METHODS

A total of 2,427 patients with an STS referred to a supraregional centre in the ten-year periods before (n = 1,386) and after (n = 1,041) the issue of the NICE guidelines were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean size of the tumour was significantly smaller at the time of diagnosis (10.3 cm (SD 6.5) vs 9.1 cm (SD 6.2); p < 0.001) and the number of patients who had undergone an inadvertent excision significantly decreased (28% (n = 389) vs 20% (n = 204); p < 0.001) following the introduction of the NICE guidelines. The five-year DSS was 63% in the pre-NICE and 71% in post-NICE groups (p < 0.001). The improved survival was more significant for those with a high-grade tumour (pre-NICE, 48%; post-NICE, 68%; p < 0.001). In those with a high-grade tumour, the mean size of the tumour (11.6 cm (SD 6.2) vs 9.6 cm (SD 5.8); p < 0.001) and the number of patients with metastasis at the time of diagnosis (15% (n = 124 vs 10% (n = 80); p = 0.007) significantly decreased in the post-NICE group.

CONCLUSION

An improvement in survival was seen after the introduction of the NICE guidelines, especially in patients with a high-grade STS. More patients were referred at an earlier stage, indicating a clearer pathway after the issue of national policy for the management of STSs in the UK. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):569-577.

Trabectedin for Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Non-Interventional, Retrospective, Multicenter Study of the Italian Sarcoma Group

Simple Summary

Active therapeutic options in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), able to induce durable objective responses, are scarce beyond first-line chemotherapy. Thus, new strategies and optimal sequencing in the treatment algorithm for sarcoma represents an utmost clinical challenge. This non-interventional, retrospective, multicenter study of the Italian sarcoma group aimed to provide insights of the real-world efficacy, toxicity, and management of patients with advanced STS treated with trabectedin in clinical practice across Italy. Our findings on 512 pretreated metastatic patients with multiple sarcoma histologies in terms of time-to-event outcomes (median progression-free survival of 5.1 months and median overall survival of 21.6 months) confirm the activity of this regimen in a real-life setting with a manageable and well-characterized safety profile. Our study has corroborated that in real-life clinical practice, trabectedin is mostly given as a second-line treatment to patients with a good performance status and high-grade, metastatic leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma.

Abstract

The Italian Sarcoma Group performed this retrospective analysis of patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma, pretreated with ≥1 anthracycline-based treatment, and treated with trabectedin every three weeks. Primary endpoint was to describe real-life use of trabectedin across Italy. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Overall, 512 patients from 20 Italian centers were evaluated. Leiomyosarcoma (37.7%)/liposarcoma (30.3%) were the most prevalent histological types (abbreviated as L-sarcoma). Patients received a median of four trabectedin cycles (range: 1–40), mostly as a second-line treatment (~60% of patients). The ORR was 13.7% superior (p < 0.0001) in patients with L-sarcoma compared with patients with non-L-sarcoma (16.6% vs. 9.0%). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.1 months, whereas median overall survival (OS) was 21.6 months. Significantly better PFS and OS were observed in patients with L-sarcoma, those with objective responses and/or disease stabilization, treated in an early line and treated with reduced dose. Bone marrow toxicity (61.4%) and transaminase increases (21.9%) were the most common grade 3/4 adverse events. The results of this real-life study suggest that trabectedin is an active treatment, which is mostly given as a second-line treatment to patients with a good performance status and high-grade, metastatic L-sarcoma (clinical trial information: NCT02793050).

Unmet Medical Needs and Future Perspectives for Leiomyosarcoma Patients-A Position Paper from the National LeioMyoSarcoma Foundation (NLMSF) and Sarcoma Patients EuroNet (SPAEN)

As leiomyosarcoma patients are challenged by the development of metastatic disease, effective systemic therapies are the cornerstone of outcome. However, the overall activity of the currently available conventional systemic treatments and the prognosis of patients with advanced or metastatic disease are still poor, making the treatment of this patient group challenging. Therefore, in a joint effort together with patient networks and organizations, namely Sarcoma Patients EuroNet (SPAEN), the international network of sarcoma patients organizations, and the National LeioMyoSarcoma Foundation (NLMSF) in the United States, we aim to summarize state-of-the-art treatments for leiomyosarcoma patients in order to identify knowledge gaps and current unmet needs, thereby guiding the community to design innovative clinical trials and basic research and close these research gaps. This position paper arose from a leiomyosarcoma research meeting in October 2020 hosted by the NLMSF and SPAEN.

A Growth Modulation Index-Based GEISTRA Score as a New Prognostic Tool for Trabectedin Efficacy in Patients with Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas: A Spanish Group for Sarcoma Research (GEIS) Retrospective Study

Simple Summary

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are an uncommon and heterogeneous group of tumors, with scarce options for treatment in advanced cases. There is no consensus regarding which is the best treatment sequence for these patients. Although trabectedin is an approved drug for STS treatment, after progression to anthracyclines, the clinical profile of the patients that most benefit from this drug it is not defined. We have retrospectively analyzed a sample of 357 nonselected sarcoma patients from real-world experience, treated homogeneously with trabectedin, confirming and validating results from previous clinical trials and other retrospective studies. After analyzing clinical prognostic factors, we selected those which predicted a better growth modulation index (GMI > 1.33), and we defined the GEISTRA score, an easy to obtain and reproducible clinical tool, that can help us to optimize the use of trabectedin in advanced sarcoma patients.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to identify an easily reliable prognostic score that selects the subset of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (ASTS) patients with a higher benefit with trabectedin in terms of time to progression and overall survival. A retrospective series of 357 patients with ASTS treated with trabectedin as second- or further-line in 19 centers across Spain was analyzed. First, it was confirmed that patients with high growth modulation index (GMI > 1.33) were associated with the better clinical outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with a GMI > 1.33. Thus, GEISTRA score was based on metastasis free-interval (MFI ≤ 9.7 months), Karnofsky < 80%, Non L-sarcomas and better response in the previous systemic line. The median GMI was 0.82 (0–69), with 198 patients (55%) with a GMI < 1, 41 (11.5%) with a GMI 1–1.33 and 118 (33.1%) with a GMI > 1.33. The lowest GEISTRA score showed a median of time-to-progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) of 5.7 and 19.5 months, respectively, whereas it was 1.8 and 3.1 months for TTP and OS, respectively, for the GEISTRA 4 score. This prognostic tool can contribute to better selecting candidates for trabectedin treatment in ASTS.

Real-world evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of trabectedin in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

The efficacy and tolerability of trabectedin in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) have been confirmed by various clinical studies involving lipo- and leiomyosarcomas as well as many other subtypes including translocation-related sarcomas. These data have been obtained from randomized phase II and III clinical trials. Studies in real-world clinical practice are necessary to bridge the efficacy-effectiveness gap and complete the body of evidence. Furthermore, reinforcing clinical experience with data from routine clinical practice allows drug management to be optimized and clinical benefits to be maximized.

AREAS COVERED

The present review provides the most significant data on the efficacy of trabectedin in real-world studies, and the interpretation of real-world experience with trabectedin, in patients with advanced STS.

EXPERT OPINION

Trabectedin has demonstrated durable disease control and an adequate safety profile, indicating it to be a suitable long-term treatment drug associated with a good quality of life. Personalized strategies and individualized objectives are the way forward in the management of STS.

Integration of Serum Metabolomics into Clinical Assessment to Improve Outcome Prediction of Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients Treated with Trabectedin

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a group of rare and heterogeneous cancers with few diagnostic or prognostic biomarkers. This metabolomics study aimed to identify new serum prognostic biomarkers to improve the prediction of overall survival in patients with metastatic STS. The study enrolled 24 patients treated with the same trabectedin regimen. The baseline serum metabolomics profile, targeted to 68 metabolites encompassing amino acids and bile acids pathways, was quantified by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. Correlations between individual metabolomics profiles and overall survival were examined and a risk model to predict survival was built by Cox multivariate regression. The median overall survival of the studied patients was 13.0 months (95% CI, 5.6–23.5). Among all the metabolites investigated, only citrulline and histidine correlated significantly with overall survival. The best Cox risk prediction model obtained integrating metabolomics and clinical data, included citrulline, hemoglobin and patients’ performance status score. It allowed to distinguish patients into a high-risk group with a low median overall survival of 2.1 months and a low- to moderate-risk group with a median overall survival of 19.1 months (p < 0.0001). The results of this metabolomics translation study indicate that citrulline, an amino acid belonging to the arginine metabolism, represents an important metabolic signature that may contribute to explain the high inter-patients overall survival variability of STS patients. The risk prediction model based on baseline serum citrulline, hemoglobin and performance status may represent a new prognostic tool for the early classification of patients with metastatic STS, according to their overall survival expectancy.

Efficacy and safety of trabectedin in metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma: A retrospective multicenter study of the Spanish ovarian cancer research group (GEICO)

•

Trabectedin confers clinical benefit in patients with recurrent/metastatic uterine leiomyosarcoma.

•

Our data are similar to those previously reported in clinical studies.

•

Trabectedin is especially effective when administered in earlier lines.

•

Trabectedin has a manageable safety profile.

Objective

We assessed trabectedin in patients with advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma (uLMS) in real-life clinical practice given according to the marketing authorization.

Methods

Thirty-six women from 11 tertiary hospitals across Spain who received trabectedin after anthracycline-containing regimen/s were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Median PFS and overall survival (OS) since starting trabectedin treatment were 5.4 (95%CI: 3.5–7.3) and 18.5 months (95%CI: 11.5–25.6), respectively. Median OS was significantly higher (P = 0.028) in patients receiving trabectedin in ≤ 2nd line (25.3 months) than in ≥ 3rd (15.1 months) and with ECOG performance status ≤ 1 at trabectedin start (19.8 months) than ECOG 2–3 (6.0 months, P = 0.013). When calculating OS since diagnosis, patients had longer OS with localized disease at diagnosis (87.4 months) vs. locally advanced (30.0 months) or metastatic (44.0 months, P = 0.041); and patients who received adjuvant therapy (87.4 months) compared with those who did not (30.0 months, P = 0.003), especially when receiving radiochemotherapy (106.7 months, P = 0.027). One patient (2.8%) had a complete response (CR) and nine patients (25.0%) achieved a partial response (PR) for an objective response rate of 27.8% with median response duration of 11 months (range: 4–93). Eighteen patients (50.0%) had disease stabilization for a disease control rate (DCR) of 77.8%. More patients receiving trabectedin in 1st-line of advanced disease achieved CR (16.7%) and PR (50.0%) than those in ≥ 2nd line/s (0.0% and 20.0%), whereas the DCR was similar across treatment lines. Reversible neutropenia was the most common grade 3/4 laboratory abnormality (19.4%).

Conclusions

Trabectedin confers clinical benefit in patients with recurrent/metastatic uLMS, given after failure to an anthracycline-based regimen being comparable to those reported in clinical trials and with a manageable safety profile.

Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Adolescents and Young Adults: A Specialist Center Experience

Purpose: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) account for 8% of all cancers in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Metastatic STS contribute significantly to disease-related mortality in this age group; however, data are limited due to under-representation in clinical trials. Methods: AYAs aged 18-39 years, diagnosed with metastatic STS between 1990 and 2012, were identified from The Royal Marsden Hospital database. Outcomes of interest were clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, overall survival (OS), and prognostic factors. Results: Overall, 455 patients were included. Median age at diagnosis of metastatic STS was 33 years (interquartile range [IQR] 27-37 years). The most common histological subtypes were leiomyosarcoma (n = 68, 15%), synovial sarcoma (n = 68, 15%), Ewing sarcoma (n = 44, 10%), and rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 35, 8%). Treatments included systemic therapy (n = 395, 87%; median 2 lines [IQR 1-3]; clinical trial n = 93, 22%), radiotherapy (n = 297, 66%), and metastasectomy (n = 191, 43%). Median duration between last chemotherapy regimen and death was 4.6 months (IQR 2-10). Median OS was 19.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 15.8-22.2); 5-year OS was 16%. Of common subtypes, patients with rhabdomyosarcoma had the worst OS (8.8 months; 95% CI 7.9-11.4). Adverse prognostic factors included male gender, synchronous metastases, bone or liver metastases, first-line polychemotherapy, and no metastasectomy. Conclusions: Outcomes were variable; patients with supposed chemosensitive subtypes had particularly poor survival. The diverse behavior of STS in AYAs highlights the need for subtype-specific clinical trials.

Different approaches to advanced soft tissue sarcomas depending on treatment line, goal of therapy and histological subtype

Introduction: Although rapid evolution over the past few years in advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) management has not been without its challenges, it has brought clarity in several areas.Areas covered: This article summarizes the proceedings of the third edition of the Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Evidence and Experience symposium held March 2019 in Madrid, Spain. An update is provided of current approaches to advanced STS management. Case studies illustrate the role of trabectedin in advanced STS management.Expert opinion: First-line treatment of advanced STS requires distinct therapeutic strategies depending on goal: tumor shrinkage or tumor control. Since all sarcoma patients benefit from active treatment irrespective of age or line of therapy, oncologists have a duty to offer active systemic therapies unless the patient is unfit for treatment or chooses to end active treatment. Beyond the first line, histology becomes increasingly relevant for treatment selection. Agents with activity in specific sarcoma subtypes have been identified. Rare tumors represent a substantial medical need requiring strong international collaboration between research groups, pharmaceutical companies, regulatory agencies, and patients to identify active drugs per subtype. Multidisciplinary care in an expert sarcoma center is the primary means of reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with sarcoma.

Retrospective Analysis of Trabectedin Therapy for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

BACKGROUND/AIM

Trabectedin is a synthetic antineoplastic agent approved for advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS) in Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Japan-approved dose of trabectedin for advanced STS.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 38 patients with advanced STS who received salvage chemotherapy with trabectedin.

RESULTS

The overall response and disease control rates were 16% (5 patients) and 67% (20 patients), respectively. The median progression-free and overall survival were 7.3 and 17.8 months, respectively. There were no significant differences between patients with liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma and those without, or between patients with TRS and those without. The most common grade 3-4 AEs were elevated transaminases and neutropenia.

CONCLUSION

Trabectedin 1.2 mg/m², as the approved dose in Japan, showed similar efficacy to the dose of 1.5 mg/m² used in Western countries. Trabectedin could be an option for advanced STS in Japan, regardless of histological subtype.

Precision Medicine in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Treatment

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a rare component of malignant diseases. STS includes various histological subtypes, and there are some important differences among the different histological subtypes regarding the mutation profile and sensitivity to antitumor agents. Many clinical trials of STS incorporating many different histological subtypes in various populations have been conducted; it is difficult to compare the findings and make conclusions about clinical efficacy. Targeted therapies focusing on specific histological subtypes and precision therapy focusing on the specific genetic mutation(s) of each STS patient are being investigated. Since STS patients are a small population, new clinical trial designs are required to evaluate and establish new targeted therapies for each histological subtype that has a limited number of patients, and preclinical investigations are needed to detect targetable mutations. Now that cancer genome profiling is used in clinical practice, it is urgently necessary to connect the genome profiling data obtained in clinical settings to the optimal clinical treatment strategies. Herein we review the development and challenges of precision therapy in the management of STS patients.

Long-term disease control by trabectedin in a patient with dedifferentiated liposarcoma: A case report

RATIONALE

Trabectedin is an antitumor drug considered to be effective for liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and translocation-related sarcoma. Concerning liposarcoma subtypes, evidence of the efficacy of trabectedin for dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is poor, whereas it is known to have high efficacy against myxoid liposarcoma. Moreover, there are few reports of long-term trabectedin treatment of cases of DDLPS. Here, we present a case of advanced metastatic DDLPS that achieved long-term disease control by trabectedin treatment.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 68-year-old man presented with a mass in his back. Magnetic resonance imaging showed a tumorous mass in his back which exhibited low intensity on T1-weighted and high intensity on T2-weighted images.

DIAGNOSIS

The mass was diagnosed as DDLPS by open biopsy.

INTERVENTIONS

The patient underwent gemcitabine+docetaxel combination therapy followed by pazopanib and eribulin; all these therapies failed to halt disease progression. Subsequently, we changed the regimen to trabectedin as fourth-line therapy.

OUTCOME

The patient achieved stable disease for approximately 18 months during 11 cycles of trabectedin therapy.

LESSONS

Trabectedin should be considered as a treatment option for DDLPS even in cases of numerous failed prior chemotherapy regimens.

Treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma by histological subtype: wish, prediction or reality?

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are heterogenous cancers encompassing more than 100 histological and molecular subtypes. Their extreme rarity underscores the need for international collaboration to identify specific treatment protocols. Increasing knowledge of STS complexity as defined by molecular biology has led to the introduction of targeted therapies for several sarcoma subtypes, which is an encouraging start. In advanced STS, doxorubicin-based regimens are standard first-line chemotherapy. Options for second and later lines include ifosfamide, trabectedin, pazopanib, eribulin and gemcitabine-based regimens. Histological subtype has become a key factor when selecting best options to treat advanced sarcoma; however, the challenges of identifying optimal treatments for all STS histotypes are undeniably formidable. Fortunately, the sarcoma community shares the common goal of seeking greater knowledge about the characteristics of each subtype in order to improve diagnosis and outcomes. Progress made to date in this regard suggests that the vision to treat by subtype is achievable.

Overall survival and histology-specific subgroup analyses from a phase 3, randomized controlled study of trabectedin or dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma

BACKGROUND

We performed a randomized phase 3 study of trabectedin versus dacarbazine in previously-treated patients with liposarcoma/leiomyosarcoma (LPS/LMS).

METHODS

Patients were randomized 2:1 to trabectedin (n = 384) or dacarbazine (n = 193) administered intravenously every 3 weeks. The primary objective was overall survival (OS). Secondary objectives were progression-free survival, objective response rate, safety, and patient-reported outcomes, all previously reported and demonstrating superior disease control with trabectedin. Results of the final OS analysis in preplanned subgroups of patients with LPS/LMS are presented.

RESULTS

At the time of the final OS analysis, 577 patients had been assigned randomly, including 423 (73%) with LMS and 154 (27%) with LPS. The median duration of treatment exposure was higher in the trabectedin arm compared with the dacarbazine arm (4 vs 2 cycles), as was the proportion of patients receiving an extended number of therapy courses (≥6 cycles: 42% vs 22%). This pattern was consistent across histological subgroups: the median number of treatment cycles (4 vs 2 for both subgroups) and proportion of patients with ≥6 treatment cycles (LMS, 43% vs 24%; LPS, 40% vs 16%). Despite improved disease control by trabectedin, no improvement in OS was observed; the final median OS for trabectedin versus dacarbazine was 13.7 versus 13.1 months (P = .49). Sensitivity analyses of OS suggest confounding by post-study anticancer therapies, which were utilized in most patients in both treatment arms (71% vs 69%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The final OS results demonstrated comparable survival between LPS/LMS patients receiving trabectedin or dacarbazine, which is consistent with the interim analysis results. Both LPS and LMS demonstrated improved disease control with trabectedin.

Marine-Derived Anticancer Agents: Clinical Benefits, Innovative Mechanisms, and New Targets

The role of the marine environment in the development of anticancer drugs has been widely reviewed, particularly in recent years. However, the innovation in terms of clinical benefits has not been duly emphasized, although there are important breakthroughs associated with the use of marine-derived anticancer agents that have altered the current paradigm in chemotherapy. In addition, the discovery and development of marine drugs has been extremely rewarding with significant scientific gains, such as the discovery of new anticancer mechanisms of action as well as novel molecular targets. Approximately 50 years since the approval of cytarabine, the marine-derived anticancer pharmaceutical pipeline includes four approved drugs and eighteen agents in clinical trials, six of which are in late development. Thus, the dynamic pharmaceutical pipeline consisting of approved and developmental marine-derived anticancer agents offers new hopes and new tools in the treatment of patients afflicted with previously intractable types of cancer.

Validation of Neutrophil Count as An Algorithm-Based Predictive Factor of Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas Treated with Trabectedin

Introduction: Based on a mathematical model of trabectedin-induced neutropenia, we assessed the predictive value of absolute neutrophil count (ANC) on progression-free survival (PFS) in an independent validation cohort of patients treated with trabectedin. Methods: We collected data from 87 patients in two expert centers who received at least two cycles of trabectedin for soft tissue sarcomas (STS) treatment. Correlations between ANC, patients' characteristics, and survival were assessed, and a multivariate model including tumor grade, performance status, ANC, and hemoglobin level was developed. Results: Therapeutic ANC ≥ 7.5 G/L level was associated with shorter PFS: 3.22 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.57⁻4.87) in patients with ANC ≥ 7.5 G/L vs. 5.78 months (95% CI, 3.95⁻7.61) in patients with ANC < 7.5 G/L (p = 0.009). Age, primary localization, lung metastases, dose reduction, hemoglobin, and albumin rates were also associated with PFS. In multivariate analysis, ANC ≥ 7.5 G/L was independently associated with poor PFS and overall survival. Conclusion: We validated increased pre-therapeutic ANC as a predictive factor of short PFS in patients starting trabectedin for STS. ANC appears to have an impact on survival rates and may be used as a decision-making tool for personalizing second-line strategies in patients with metastatic STS.

A patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude-mouse model precisely identifies effective and ineffective therapies for recurrent leiomyosarcoma

Leiomyosarcoma is a rare and recalcitrant disease. Doxorubicin (DOX) is usually considered first-line treatment for this disease, but frequently is ineffective. In order to individualize therapy for this and other cancers, we have developed the patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) mouse model. In the present study, we implanted a recurrent leiomyosarcoma from a resected tumor from the patient's thigh into the femoral muscle of nude mice. The following drugs were tested on the leiomyosarcoma PDOX model: DOX, the combination of gemcitabine (GEM) and docetaxel (DOC), trabectedin (TRA), temozolomide (TEM), pazopanib (PAZ) and olaratumab (OLA). Of these agents GEM/DOC, TRA and TEM were highly effective in the leiomyosarcoma PDOX model, the other agents, including first-line therapy DOX, were ineffective. Thus the leiomyosarcoma PDOX model could precisely distinguish effective and ineffective drugs, demonstrating the potential of the PDOX model for leiomyosarcoma treatment.

The changing landscape of phase II/III metastatic sarcoma clinical trials-analysis of ClinicalTrials.gov

Background

Well-designed clinical trials are of great importance in validating novel treatments and ensuring an evidence-based approach for sarcoma. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive landscape of the characteristics of metastatic or advanced sarcoma clinical trials using the substantial resource of the ClincialTrials.gov database.

Methods

We identified 260,755 trials registered with ClinicalTrials.gov in the last 20 years, and 277 of them were eligible for inclusion. The baseline characteristics were ascertained for each trial. The trials were systematically reviewed to validate their classification into 96 trials registered before 2008 and 181 trials registered between 2008 and 2017.

Results

We found that in the last decade, metastatic and advanced sarcoma trials were predominantly phase II-III studies (p = 0.048), were more likely to be ≥2 arms (17.7% vs 35.3%, respectively; p = 0.007), and were more likely to use randomized (13.5% vs 30.4%; p = 0.002) and double-blinded (2.1% vs 9.4%; p = 0.024) assignment than trials registered before 2008. Furthermore, in the last 10-year period, metastatic sarcoma trials were more likely to be conducted in Asia. Treatment involving target therapy and immunotherapy were more common (71.8% vs 37.5%; p < 0.001) than in previous years.

Conclusions

Our data showed provocative changes in the sarcoma landscape and demonstrated that the incidence of clinical trials with target therapy and immunotherapy is increasing. These findings emphasize the desperate need for novel strategies, including target therapy and immunotherapy, to improve the outcomes for patients with advanced sarcoma.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-018-5163-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Histology driven systemic therapy of liposarcoma-ready for prime time?

Liposarcomas are a subtype of soft tissue sarcomas arising from adipocytes. These mesenchymal tumors have been sub classified into well differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS), dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS), myxoid liposarcoma (MLPS) and pleomorphic liposarcoma (PLPS). This article reviews what has been reported regarding the responsiveness of these sarcoma subtypes to traditional and newly developed systemic therapies. The evolution of molecular targets for therapeutic intervention within the distinct histologies is discussed, along with, available evidence regarding the efficacy of novel target directed therapies. Response rates and outcomes for advanced disease therapeutic trials comprises the majority of this information, and where available, data from adjuvant therapy trials is reviewed. Overall survival for patients with advanced liposarcoma treated with systemic therapy is 16.3 months. The article addresses our progress toward the goal of improved liposarcoma outcomes through tailored interventions.

Systemic Treatment of Metastatic/Recurrent Uterine Leiomyosarcoma: A Changing Paradigm

The treatment of metastatic and recurrent uterine leoimyosarcoma (uLMS) has evolved rapidly in the past several years. Leoimyosarcoma is extremely aggressive and responds poorly to traditional chemotherapeutics. Recent regulatory approval of novel treatment options has significantly expanded the therapeutic armamentarium, and the addition of these therapies has challenged clinicians to select and optimally sequence these new compounds. Additionally, the potential role of immunotherapy is being assessed in current uLMS clinical trials. Given the increasing number of agents available both in the U.S. and globally, a treatment template that addresses optimal sequencing based upon expert consensus would be useful. Current guidelines, although listing various options, lack granularity by line of therapy. Most patients with leiomyosarcoma, even in early stage, are treated with surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy despite uLMS being relatively chemoresistant. Adjuvant chemotherapy often includes the combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel with or without doxorubicin in first-line systemic therapy, but these cytotoxic agents only provide patients with advanced disease a 5-year survival <30%. This review will focus on examination of current guidelines and consensus building for optimal sequencing of systemic therapies for advanced or recurrent uLMS. Critical ongoing studies investigating novel approaches including immunotherapeutics and genetic alterations also will be discussed. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Recent regulatory approval of novel treatment options has significantly expanded the therapeutic armamentarium, and the addition of these therapies has challenged clinicians to select and optimally sequence these compounds. This review will focus on examination of current guidelines and consensus building for optimal sequencing of systemic therapies for advanced or recurrent uterine leoimyosarcoma.

The challenge of the management of adolescents and young adults with soft tissue sarcomas

Soft tissue sarcomas are relatively frequent in adolescents and young adults and their clinical management may be complex, partly due to tumor associated factors, but also because different approaches have been adopted by pediatric and adult medical oncologists dealing with the same disease. However, times are changing and in the last few years, management has tended to converge towards a common strategy. Continued and increased international collaboration between pediatric and adult sarcoma groups is of critical importance to improve the quality of treatment as well as research programs dedicated to young patients with soft tissue sarcomas.

Options for treating different soft tissue sarcoma subtypes

Management of soft tissue sarcoma is increasingly subtype-dependent. Surgery is recommended for uterine leiomyosarcoma, with trabectedin being the preferred option for advanced disease when the treatment goal is long-term tumor stabilization. Liposarcoma subgroups are characterized by distinctive morphologies and genetics, different patterns of disease progression and clinical behavior, and variable responses to treatment. Genetic analysis of sarcomas has provided insights into pathogenesis with potential for developing new molecular targets. At the cytogenetic level, soft tissue sarcomas are categorized into specific, balanced translocations and those due to massive chromosomal rearrangements. For subtypes such as undifferentiated sarcomas, angiosarcomas, alveolar soft part sarcomas and clear cell sarcomas, evidence is especially limited, although it is known that these tumors display markedly different sensitivities to chemotherapeutic and targeted agents.

Current Molecular Targeted Therapies for Bone and Soft Tissue Sarcomas

Systemic treatment options for bone and soft tissue sarcomas remained unchanged until the 2000s. These cancers presented challenges in new drug development partly because of their rarity and heterogeneity. Many new molecular targeting drugs have been tried in the 2010s, and some were approved for bone and soft tissue sarcoma. As one of the first molecular targeted drugs approved for solid malignant tumors, imatinib's approval as a treatment for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been a great achievement. Following imatinib, other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for GISTs such as sunitinib and regorafenib, and pazopanib was approved for non-GIST soft tissue sarcomas. Olaratumab, the monoclonal antibody that targets platelet-derived growth factor receptor (PDGFR)-α, was shown to extend the overall survival of soft tissue sarcoma patients and was approved in 2016 in the U.S. as a breakthrough therapy. For bone tumors, new drugs are limited to denosumab, a receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand (RANKL) inhibitor, for treating giant cell tumors of bone. In this review, we explain and summarize the current molecular targeting therapies approved and in development for bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Soft Tissue and Uterine Leiomyosarcoma

Leiomyosarcoma (LMS) is one of the most common subtypes of soft tissue sarcoma in adults and can occur in almost any part of the body. Uterine leiomyosarcoma is the most common subtype of uterine sarcoma. Increased awareness of this unique histology has allowed for the development of drugs that are specific to LMS and has begun to shed light on the similarities and possible unique aspects of soft tissue and uterine LMS. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the epidemiology, diagnosis, genomics, and treatment options for LMS.

A noninterventional, multicenter, prospective phase IV study of trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma

This prospective, noninterventional study is the first phase IV trial designed to evaluate trabectedin in patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma in real-life clinical practice across Europe. To be included in the study, patients must have received more than or equal to one cycle of trabectedin and be currently on treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as defined by investigators. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate, time to progression and the growth modulation index (GMI), overall survival, and an assessment of the cancer-related symptoms and safety. A total of 218 patients from 41 European centers were evaluated. Patients received a median of six cycles per patient, mostly on an outpatient basis (n=132; 60.6%). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months, with 70 and 49% of patients free from progression at 3 and 6 months after treatment, respectively. Three (1.4%) patients achieved a complete response and 55 (25.2%) patients achieved a partial response for an objective response rate of 26.6%. A total of 85 (39.0%) patients had disease stabilization for a disease control rate of 65.6%. The median GMI was 0.8, with 5.1 and 38.8% of patients with a GMI of greater than 1.1 to less than 1.33 and greater than or equal to 1.33, respectively. The median overall survival was 21.3 months. Febrile neutropenia (2.3% of patients), neutropenia, nausea, and pneumonia (1.4% each) were the most common trabectedin-related grade 3/4 serious adverse drug reactions. Trabectedin confers clinically meaningful long-term benefits to patients with multiple soft tissue sarcoma histotypes, being either comparable or better than those observed previously in clinical trials, and with a manageable safety profile.

Managing sarcoma: where have we come from and where are we going?

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms of mesenchymal origin. Approximately 80% arise from soft tissue and 20% originate from bone. To date more than 100 sarcoma subtypes have been identified and they vary in molecular characteristics, pathology, clinical presentation and response to treatment. While sarcomas represent <1% of adult cancers, they account for approximately 21% of paediatric malignancies and thus pose some of the greatest risks of mortality and morbidity in children and young adults. Metastases occur in one-third of all patients and approximately 10-20% of sarcomas recur locally. Surgery in combination with preoperative and postoperative therapies is the primary treatment for localized sarcoma tumours and is the most promising curative possibility. Metastasized sarcomas, on the other hand, are treated primarily with single-agent or combination chemotherapy, but this rarely leads to a complete and robust response and often becomes a palliative form of treatment. The heterogeneity of sarcomas results in variable responses to current generalized treatment strategies. In light of this and the lack of curative strategies for metastatic and unresectable sarcomas, there is a need for novel subtype-specific treatment strategies. With the more recent understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of some of these tumours, the treatment of sarcoma subtypes with targeted therapies is a rapidly evolving field. This review discusses the current management of sarcomas as well as promising new therapies that are currently underway in clinical trials.

Combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel regresses both gastric leiomyosarcoma proliferation and invasion in an imageable patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (iPDOX) model

Gastric leiomyosarcoma is a recalcitrant cancer and the chemotherapy strategy is controversial. The present study used a patient-derived orthotopic xenograft (PDOX) nude mouse model of gastric leiomyosarcoma to identify an effective therapeutic regimen to develop individualized precision medicine for this disease. The gastric leiomyosarcoma obtained from a patient was first grown in transgenic nude mice ubiquitously expressing red fluorescent protein (RFP) to stably label the tumor stroma. The RFP-expressing tumor was then passaged orthotopically in the gastric wall of non-transgenic nude mice to establish an imageable PDOX (iPDOX) model. The bright fluorescent tumor was readily imaged over time to determine drug efficacy. Four weeks after implantation, 70 PDOX nude mice were divided into 7 groups: control without treatment (n = 10); doxorubicin (DOX) (2.4 mg/kg, intraperitoneally (i.p.), once a week for 2 weeks, n = 10); gemcitabine (GEM)/ docetaxel (DOC) (GEM: 100 mg/kg, DOC: 20 mg/kg, i.p., once a week for 2 weeks, n = 10); cyclophosphamide (CPA) (140 mg/kg, i.p., once a week for 2 weeks, n = 10); temozolomide (TEM) (25 mg/kg, orally, daily for 14 consecutive days, n = 10); yondelis (YON) (0.15 mg/kg, i.v., once a week for 2 weeks, n = 10); pazopanib (PAZ) (100 mg/kg, orally, daily for 14 consecutive days, n = 10). On day 14 from initiation of treatment, all treatments except PAZ significantly inhibited tumor growth compared with untreated control (DOX: p < 0.01, GEM/DOC: p < 0.01, CPA: p < 0.01, TEM: p < 0.01, YON: p < 0.01) on day 14 after initiation. In addition, only GEM/DOC was more significantly effective than DOX (p < 0.05). GEM/DOC could regress the leimyosarcoma in the PDOX model and has important clinical potential for precision individual treatment of leiomyosarcoma patients.

Review of past and present clinical cases with a view to future treatment options

In the 10 years that have elapsed since trabectedin was first granted approval in Europe for treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS), other cytotoxic agents and targeted therapies have been approved and numerous randomized controlled trials have been completed or are underway. As an academic exercise and positive proof of the advances in STS management that have occurred during the past decade, it is interesting to compare current and future treatment approaches. In this review, present and future treatment approaches are examined by case study for three STS subtypes: uterine leiomyosarcoma, abdominal dedifferentiated liposarcoma and malignant solitary fibrous tumor.

Targeted therapy for soft tissue sarcomas in adolescents and young adults

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors originating from the mesenchyme. Even though they affect individuals in all age groups, the prevalence of subtypes of STSs changes significantly from childhood through adolescence into adulthood. The mainstay of therapy is surgery, with or without the addition of chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy. These treatment modalities are associated, in many cases, with significant morbidity and, given the heterogeneity of tumor histologies encompassed by the term "STS", have not uniformly improved outcomes. Moreover, some subgroups of STSs appear to be more, and others less, responsive to conventional chemotherapy agents. Over the last two decades, our understanding of the biology of STSs is slowly increasing, allowing for the development of more targeted therapies. We review the new treatment modalities that have been tested on patients with STSs, with a special focus on adolescents and young adults, a group of patients that is often underrepresented in clinical trials and has not received the dedicated attention it deserves, given the significant differences in biology and treatment response in comparison to children and adults.