A randomized phase III trial comparing induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy alone as treatment of unresectable head and neck cancer

[French national standard for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of upper aero-digestive tract - General principles of treatment]

OBJECTIVES

The management of upper aerodigestive tract cancers is a complex specialty. It is essential to provide an update to establish optimal care. At the initiative of the INCa and under the auspices of the SFORL, the scientific committee, led by Professor Béatrix Barry, Dr. Gilles Dolivet, and Dr. Dominique De Raucourt, decided to develop a reference framework aimed at defining, in a scientific and consensus-based manner, the general principles of treatment for upper aerodigestive tract cancers applicable to all sub-locations.

METHODOLOGY

To develop this framework, a multidisciplinary team of practitioners was formed. A systematic analysis of the literature was conducted to produce recommendations classified by grades, in accordance with the standards of the French National Authority for Health (HAS).

RESULTS

The grading of recommendations according to HAS standards has allowed the establishment of a reference for patient care based on several criteria. In this framework, patients benefit from differentiated care based on prognostic factors they present (age, comorbidities, TNM status, HPV status, etc.), conditions of implementation, and quality criteria for indicated surgery (operability, resectability, margin quality, mutilation, salvage surgery), as well as quality criteria for radiotherapy (target volume, implementation time, etc.). The role of medical and postoperative treatments was also evaluated based on specific criteria. Finally, supportive care must be organized from the beginning and throughout the patients' care journey.

CONCLUSION

All collected data have led to the development of a comprehensive framework aimed at harmonizing practices nationally, facilitating decision-making in multidisciplinary consultation meetings, promoting equality in practices, and providing a state-of-the-art and reference practices for assessing the quality of care. This new framework is intended to be updated every 5 years to best reflect the latest advances in the field.

Latin American Consensus on the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is well known as a serious health problem worldwide, especially in low-income countries or those with limited resources, such as most countries in Latin America. International guidelines cannot always be applied to a population from a large region with specific conditions. This study established a Latin American guideline for care of patients with head and neck cancer and presented evidence of HNSCC management considering availability and oncologic benefit. A panel composed of 41 head and neck cancer experts systematically worked according to a modified Delphi process on (1) document compilation of evidence-based answers to different questions contextualized by resource availability and oncologic benefit regarding Latin America (region of limited resources and/or without access to all necessary health care system infrastructure), (2) revision of the answers and the classification of levels of evidence and degrees of recommendations of all recommendations, (3) validation of the consensus through two rounds of online surveys, and (4) manuscript composition. The consensus consists of 12 sections: Head and neck cancer staging, Histopathologic evaluation of head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-oral cavity, Clinical oncology-oral cavity, Head and neck surgery-oropharynx, Clinical oncology-oropharynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx, Head and neck surgery-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-larynx/hypopharynx, Clinical oncology-recurrent and metastatic head and neck cancer, Head and neck surgery-reconstruction and rehabilitation, and Radiation therapy. The present consensus established 48 recommendations on HNSCC patient care considering the availability of resources and focusing on oncologic benefit. These recommendations could also be used to formulate strategies in other regions like Latin America countries.

Facts and Hopes in Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: Current Approvals and Emerging Evidence

In 2021 and 2022, two immune checkpoint inhibitors received FDA approval in the neoadjuvant setting for the treatment of early-stage triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several more studies have since indicated the benefits, and challenges, of administering neoadjuvant immunotherapy prior to definitive surgery in the gastrointestinal, head and neck, and cutaneous realms. In addition, numerous ongoing phase II and phase III trials are investigating outcomes of neoadjuvant immune treatment in early-stage disease. As such, it is anticipated that more immune checkpoint inhibitors will receive approval for various neoadjuvant indications in the next several years. Medical oncologists, surgeons, and other providers in a multidisciplinary cancer care team will be presented with alternate treatment paradigms and clinical decisions regarding upfront surgery versus neoadjuvant treatment. Here, we describe the current evidence supporting use of immune checkpoint inhibitors for neoadjuvant treatment, ongoing studies, and clinical considerations of this treatment approach.

Impact of pretreatment quality of life on tolerance and survival outcome in head and neck cancer patients undergoing definitive CCRT

BACKGROUND

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is a predictor of treatment outcomes in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pretreatment HRQoL on treatment tolerance and survival outcomes in patients with HNC planned for concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in Taiwan.

METHODS

This study included 461 patients with HNC planned for definitive CCRT at three medical centers in Taiwan between August 2017 and December 2018. HRQoL was assessed using the QLQ-HN35 one week before the initiation of CCRT. Patients were grouped based on the sum scores of QLQ-HN35 (

RESULTS

The median QLQ-HN35 sum score among 461 patients was 39 (range, 30 to 96), varying with tumor site: 34 for nasopharynx, 44 for oropharynx, 45 for oral cavity, and 38 for hypopharynx. Patients with sum scores ≥ median were associated with higher risk for incomplete CCRT (13.4 % vs 6.5 %, odds ratio [OR] = 2.22, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.17-4.24, p = 0.015), emergency room visits (36.4 % vs 27.0 %, OR = 1.55, 95 % CI = 1.04-2.30, p = 0.030), unexpected hospitalization (33.8 % vs 19.6 %, OR = 2.10, 95 % CI = 1.37-3.21, p = 0.001), ≥ grade 3 hematological toxicities (34.2 % vs 21.3 %, OR = 1.92, 95 % CI = 1.27-2.91, p = 0.002), ≥ grade 3 non-hematological toxicities (78.8 % vs 68.7 %, OR = 1.69, 95 % CI = 1.11-2.58, p = 0.014), and low survival outcomes (hazard radio = 2.76, 95 % CI = 1.67-4.54, p < 0.001). Patients with lower sum scores in nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal tumors exhibited better OS than those with higher scores, while no significant difference in OS based on HRQoL was observed in oral cavity/hypopharyngeal cancer patients. Higher sum scores remained a negative indicator even after adjusting for other confounding factors.

CONCLUSION

In patients with HNC planned for definitive CCRT, pre-treatment HRQoL was significantly associated with treatment-related complications, tolerance, and survival outcomes. Furthermore, our results validated the clinical value of QLQ-HN35 as an indicator for predicting treatment tolerance and outcomes.

Collapse

Key Words

• Concurrent chemoradiotherapy
• Head and neck cancer
• Prognosis
• Quality of life

Collapse

MESH Headings Collapse

Grants Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Chia-Yen Hung Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan; Division of Hema-oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mackay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
Mei-Hui Hsu Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Shu-Hui Lee Department of Nursing, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Shun-Wen Hsueh Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Chiayi, Taiwan
Chang-Hsien Lu Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Chiayi, Chiayi, Taiwan
Kun-Yun Yeh Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan
Hung-Ming Wang Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Joseph Tung-Chieh Chang Department of Radiation Oncology Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Yu-Shin Hung Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Wen-Chi Chou Department of Hematology and Oncology, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.

Collapse

Locally Advanced oral Squamous cell Carcinomas: Auditing and Outcome Appraisal

Introduction: Patients with OSCC in India (oral squamous cell carcinoma) presents at a later stage with approximately 28% presenting at stage III and 64% at stage IV disease. In this retrospective study we have reviewed the treatment modalities rendered and outcomes associated for the management of locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma in our Institute. We evaluated the survival data and the factors effecting survival. Methods: Kaplan Meir method was used to evaluate OS and DFS rate and log rank test was used to compare the survival amongst groups. Cox regression analysis (univariate and multivariate) was used to evaluate the hazard ratio to find out the possible factors influencing risk of death and disease. Results: The median OS and DFS in our study were 32 and 24 months respectively. On a subset analysis of only T4b patients who underwent either upfront surgery or induction chemotherapy followed by surgery there was no significant difference in OS and DFS. All patients with TURD had partial response after induction chemotherapy and were subjected to surgical resection followed by adjuvant therapy. Conclusion: Extracapsular spread, bone involvement, skin infiltration, treatments, surgical margins and Lymph node size are the prime predictors of survival.Upfront surgery remains the standard of care for resectable LAOSCC. Induction chemotherapy might improve the resectability in technically unresectable OSCC. There is no difference in survival between concurrent chemoradiation, sequential chemoradiation and radical radiotherapy in the management of unresectable disease.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-023-04168-4.

Oncology for the rhinologist

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to summarize current evidence regarding the use of induction chemotherapy for a variety of histopathologies of sinonasal malignancy (SNMs) and to review the potential adverse effects of cytotoxic agents.

RECENT FINDINGS

Historically, patients with locally advanced SNMs have had relatively poor prognoses and high morbidity from treatment. The available retrospective data suggests that induction chemotherapy may improve outcomes for patients with sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC), neuroendocrine carcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma (SSCC), and esthesioneuroblastoma. For SNUC and SSCC, response or nonresponse to induction chemotherapy may prognosticate outcomes and for SNUC specifically, drive selection of definitive therapy. In chemosensitive pathologies, induction chemotherapy appears to improve organ preservation.

SUMMARY

Induction chemotherapy may improve functional and oncologic outcomes for patients with SNMs. Because of the rarity of these pathologies, the available data is primarily retrospective. Future randomized, prospective studies should be performed to further optimize and elucidate the role of induction chemotherapy for SNMs.

Frailty is an independent factor for health-related quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy

PURPOSE

Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is associated with treatment-related complications and poor survival in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). We investigated the effects of frailty on HRQoL in patients with HNC receiving definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT).

METHODS

A total of 461 consecutive patients with locally advanced HNC who received CCRT between 2017 and 2018 at three medical centers in Taiwan were included. Frailty and HRQoL were assessed using the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment and QLQ-H&N35 before CCRT. The sum score was calculated based on the first 30 questions of QLQ-H&N35. Multivariate analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of frailty on HRQoL.

RESULTS

The overall sum score was 39 (34-49). The sum scores of patients with impairments in 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4 frailty domains were 34 (32-38), 40 (34-47), 46 (36-55), 48 (41-64), and 56 (50-60), respectively. Patients with impairments in more frailty domains had a higher symptom burden (p for trend < 0.001). Frail patients tended to experience symptoms across all QLQ-H&N35 subscales. Sex, body mass index, tumor type, tumor stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, and frailty were determinants of HRQoL in the univariate analysis. Frailty was an independent determinant of HRQoL in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Routine frailty assessment may serve as a surrogate for the selection of patients with HNC with poor HRQoL before CCRT. Further studies are needed to determine whether appropriate interventions in frail patients would improve their HRQoL during CCRT.

Selective Treatment Deintensification by Reducing Radiation Dose and Omitting Concurrent Chemotherapy Based on Response to Induction Chemotherapy in Human Papillomavirus-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Single-Arm, Phase 2 Trial (IChoice-01)

PURPOSE

To demonstrate the feasibility of deintensification regimen in the light of the response to induction chemotherapy (IC) in human papillomavirus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with p16+ OPSCC, T1-2/N1-3M0 (excluding T1N1M0 with single and ≤3 cm lymph node) or T3-4N0-3M0 were enrolled between January 2019 and July 2021. All patients received 2 cycles of IC with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 dL and cisplatin 75 mg/m2 dL every 3 weeks. Those with major responses (≥50% decrease in both primary and lymph nodes) to IC entered the deintensification cohort (cohort D), in which intensity modulated radiation therapy alone was given to a reduced dose of 60 Gy/30 fractions. Those who failed to meet major responsesentered the concurrent chemoradiotherapy cohort (cohort C), where the dose was simultaneously integrated boosted to a standard 70 Gy/35 fractions to nonmajor response sites, concurrently with cisplatin 80 mg/m2 dL,22. Patient-reported swallow function was documented using the MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory. The primary endpoint was 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) using Simon's 2 stage design.

RESULTS

A total of 26 of 48 (54.2%) participants met the criteria to enter cohort D and 22 of 48 (45.8%) patients entered cohort C. With a median follow-up time of 29.7 months (6.9-48.0 months), 2-year PFS and OS rates were 85.4% and 93.6%, respectively for all enrolled patients. In cohort D, 2-year PFS and OS rates were both 100%. Grade 3 and 4 IC-related toxicities included leukopenia/neutropenia occurring in 41.7% and hyponatremia in 4.2% of patients. A higher incidence of grade 3 and 4 mucositis (61.9% vs 23.1% P = .022) was observed in cohort C. Consistent decline in longitudinal MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory scores were observed at month 3 after radiation therapy between cohorts and both were found to recover to baseline at month 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Selective radiation therapy dose reduction and concurrent chemotherapy removal based on IC response in HPV + OPSCC was feasible and promising. Further study of this strategy to balance efficacy and toxicity is warranted in a prospective controlled trial.

A Network Meta-Analysis of the Systemic Therapies in Unresectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The current standard treatment for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LASCCHN) comprises concurrent radiotherapy (CRT) alongside platinum-based chemotherapy. However, innovative therapeutic alternatives are being evaluated in phase II/III randomized trials. This study employed a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) using fixed effects to provide both direct and indirect comparisons of all existing treatment modalities for unresectable LASCCHN.

METHODS

We referenced randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 2000 to July 2023 by extensively reviewing PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science databases, adhering to the Cochrane methodology. Relevant data, including summary estimates of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), were extracted from these selected studies and recorded in a predefined database sheet. Subsequently, we conducted a random effects network meta-analysis using a Bayesian framework.

RESULTS

Based on the Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking (SUCRA) values, the league table organizes the various treatments for OS in the following order: IC + RT&MTT, MTT-CRT, IC + CRT&MTT, CRT, IC + CRT, MTT-RT, IC + MTT-RT, and RT. In a similar order, the treatments rank as follows according to the league table: IC + CRT&MTT, MTT-CRT, IC + CRT, IC + RT&MTT, CRT, IC + MTT-RT, MTT-RT, and RT. Notably, none of these treatments showed significant advantages over concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Despite concurrent chemoradiotherapy being the prevailing treatment for LASCCHN, our findings suggest the potential for improved outcomes when concurrent chemoradiotherapy is combined with targeted therapy or induction chemotherapy.

A prospective phase II randomized study of docetaxel combined with lobaplatin versus TPF regimen induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

To compare the toxicity and clinical efficacy of TL (docetaxel + lobaplatin) induction chemotherapy combined with lobaplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy and TPF (docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil) induction chemotherapy combined with cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

In total, 128 patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer were prospectively enrolled between August 2016 and April 2021. They were randomly divided into trial group and control group, all using chronological dosage mode. The trial group used TL regimen induction chemotherapy combined with lobaplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy; the control group used TPF regimen induction chemotherapy and cisplatin concurrent chemotherapy. The endpoints were adverse events and survival rates at 1, 3 and 5 years.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 42 months (20-71 months). (1) Adverse events: During induction chemotherapy, compared with TPF group, grade 3-4 leukocytes and neutrophils, diarrhea, 1-2 hyperbilirubinemia, nausea / vomiting, oral mucositis, fatigue, anorexia, hyponatremia were significantly lower in TL group (p<0. 05): 6% vs. 35%, 14% vs. 53%, 0% vs. 6%, 15% vs. 40%, 9% vs. 56%, 0% vs. 10%, 3% vs. 13%, 2% vs. 23%, 15% vs. 74%. During chemoradiotherapy, the incidence of hyponatremia, hypokalaemia and grade 1-2 nausea was significantly lower in the TL group (p<0. 05), with 24% vs. 69%, 20% vs. 65% and 24% vs. 44%, respectively. However, more grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia were observed in the TL group (15% vs. 3%, p<0. 05). (2) There was no significant difference in the recent objective response rate (ORR) between patients with TL group and TPF group (p=0.961). (3) There was no statistical difference in 1, 3 and 5 years OS between TL group and TPF group, respectively, (71.0% vs. 67.5%, p=0.573), (56.6% vs. 56.9%, p=0.814), (52.5% vs. 52.9%, p=0.841); 1, 3 and 5 years PFS are: (63.4% vs. 64.0%, p=0.883), (51.1% vs. 54.0%, p=0.705) and (47.3% vs. 45.9%, p=0.887), None of them were significantly different. Multivariate analysis of COX regression showed that T stage (p=0.01) and surgery (p=0.046) were independent factors affecting PFS and OS, respectively. OS subgroup analysis shows that people receiving the TL regimen in postoperative and nodal stage N1 and N2 patients tended to survive longer than those receiving the TPF regimen.

CONCLUSION

Patients with postoperative, N1 or N2 stage locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) may have more significant clinical benefits when treated with TL regimen. TL regimen has advantages in reducing toxic side effects and can be used as one of the first-line treatment options.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov (No. NCT03117257).

Taxanes in the Treatment of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Taxanes, particularly docetaxel (DTX), has been widely used for combination therapy of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). For locally advanced unresectable HNSCC, DTX combined with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil as a revolutionary treatment revealed an advantage in the improvement of patient outcome. In addition, DTX plus immune check inhibitors (ICIs) showed low toxicity and an increased response of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC (R/M HNSCC). Accumulated data indicate that taxanes not only function as antimitotics but also impair diverse oncogenic signalings, including angiogenesis, inflammatory response, ROS production, and apoptosis induction. However, despite an initial response, the development of resistance remains a major obstacle to treatment response. Taxane resistance could result from intrinsic mechanisms, such as enhanced DNA/RNA damage repair, increased drug efflux, and apoptosis inhibition, and extrinsic effects, such as angiogenesis and interactions between tumor cells and immune cells. This review provides an overview of taxanes therapy applied in different stages of HNSCC and describe the mechanisms of taxane resistance in HNSCC. Through a detailed understanding, the mechanisms of resistance may help in developing the potential therapeutic methods and the effective combination strategies to overcome drug resistance.

Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treatment efficacy and safety: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) accounts for approximately 3% of new cancer cases and 3% of all deaths worldwide. Most HNSCC patients are locally advanced (LA) at diagnosis. The combination of radiotherapy (RT), chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy are the primary LA-HNSCC treatment options. Nevertheless, the choice of optimal LA-HNSCC treatment remains controversial. We systematically searched public databases for LA-HNSCC-related studies and assess treatment effectiveness and safety by assessing the objective response rate (ORR), ≥3 adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), disease-free survival (DFS), local-region control (LRC), and disease-specific survival (DSS). 126 randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) were included in this study. We show that concurrent RT with nimotuzumab or conventional concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT) had significantly better efficacy and long-term survival without increasing AEs than RT alone. Accelerated fractionated radiotherapy (AFRT) showed better efficiency than conventional fractionated RT, although it had higher AEs. In addition, concurrent cetuximab combined with RT failed to show a significant advantage over RT alone. Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD42022352127.

Induction Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Sinonasal Undifferentiated Carcinoma: A Comprehensive Review

Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (SNSCC) and sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (SNUC) are two of the most common, high-grade malignancies of the sinonasal cavity. The standard of care for resectable lesions per the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines includes surgical resection with negative margins plus adjuvant radiation therapy. However, surgery for locally advanced disease with both orbital and intracranial involvement is associated with significant morbidity and poor overall survival. Over the last decade, induction chemotherapy (IC) has emerged as part of a multimodal treatment strategy to optimize locoregional disease control and minimize substantial surgical morbidity such as orbital exenteration without compromising rates of overall survival. The response to IC both guides additional therapy and helps prognosticate a patient's disease. This narrative review examines the data surrounding the management of patients with SNSCC and SNUC. The pros and cons of upfront surgical management plus adjuvant therapy will be explored, and the case for IC will be presented. The IC-specific regimens and treatment paradigms for SNSCC and SNUC will each be explored in detail. Organ preservation, treatment morbidity, and survival data will be presented, and evidence-based recommendations will be presented for the management of these patients.

Localized Drug Delivery Systems: An Update on Treatment Options for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinomas

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most common cancers in the world, with surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and immunotherapy being the primary treatment modalities. The treatment for HNSCC has evolved over time, due to which the prognosis has improved drastically. Despite the varied treatment options, major challenges persist. HNSCC chemotherapeutic and immunotherapeutic drugs are usually administered systemically, which could affect the patient's quality of life due to the associated side effects. Moreover, the systemic administration of salivary stimulating agents for the treatment of radiation-induced xerostomia is associated with toxicities. Localized drug delivery systems (LDDS) are gaining importance, as they have the potential to provide non-invasive, patient-friendly alternatives to cancer therapy with reduced dose-limiting toxicities. LDDSs involve directly delivering a drug to the tissue or organ affected by the disease. Some of the common localized routes of administration include the transdermal and transmucosal drug delivery system (DDSs). This review will attempt to explore the different treatment options using LDDSs for the treatment of HNSCC and radiotherapy-induced damage and their potential to provide a better experience for patients, as well as the obstacles that need to be addressed to render them successful.

Efficacy and feasibility of Apatinib and S-1 as a novel oral induction therapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an exploratory phase 2 open-label, single-arm trial

Objectives

The current standard nonsurgical treatment for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer (LA-HNSCC) is concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with CRT has been explored in HNSCC patients and is an acceptable strategy. However, the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) restricts its application. We conducted a clinical study to explore the efficacy and feasibility of a novel induction therapy with orally administered apatinib and S-1 in LA-HNSCC.

Materials and methods

This nonrandomized, single-arm, prospective clinical trial included patients with LA-HNSCCs. The eligibility criteria included histologically or cytologically confirmed HNSCC, with at least one radiographically measurable lesion detected by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computerized tomography (CT) scan, age 18-75 years, and a diagnosis of stage III to IVb according to the 7^th edition of the American Joint Committee of Cancer (AJCC). Patients received induction therapy with apatinib and S-1 for three cycles (3 weeks/cycle). The primary endpoint of this study was the objective response rate (ORR) to induction therapy. The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and AEs during induction treatment.

Results

From October 2017 to September 2020, 49 patients with LA-HNSCC were screened consecutively and 38 were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 60 years (range, 39-75). Thirty-three patients (86.8%) had stage IV disease according to the AJCC staging system. The ORR after induction therapy was 97.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 86.2%-99.9%). the 3-year OS rate was 64.2% (95% CI: 46.0%-78.2%) and 3-year PFS was 57.1% (95% CI: 40.8%-73.6%). The most common AEs during induction therapy were hypertension and hand-foot syndrome, which were manageable.

Conclusion

Apatinib combined with S-1 as novel induction therapy for LA-HNSCC patients resulted in a higher-than-anticipated ORR and manageable adverse effects. With the associated safety profile and preferable oral administration route, apatinib combined with S-1 is an attractive exploratory induction regimen in outpatient settings. However, this regimen failed to show a survival benefit.

Clinical trial registration

https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03267121, identifier NCT03267121.

Comparison the Acute Toxicity of Two Different Induction Chemotherapy Schedules with Cisplatin and Fluorouracil in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients

PURPOSE

To compare the acute toxicity of two different induction chemotherapy (IndCT) regimen followed by the same IMRT in patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From July 2015 to December 2016, 110 NPC patients with stage III-IV diseases were prospectively randomized to receive either a conventional triweekly cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (PF) for 3 cycles or weekly P-F for 10 doses, followed by the same IMRT to both arms. The primary endpoints of this study were grade 3/4 and any grade acute toxicities during IndCT period. The secondary endpoints included tumor response and various survivals.

RESULTS

Baseline patient characteristics were comparable in both groups. Patients who received weekly P-F experienced significant reduction of grade 3/4 acute toxicities, including neutropenia (12.7% vs. 40.0%, P=0.0012), anorexia (0% vs. 14.6%, P=0.0059), mucositis (0% vs. 14.6%, P=0.0059), and hyponatremia (0% vs. 16.4%, P=0.0027), compared with the triweekly PF group, resulting in fewer IndCT interruptions (1.8% vs. 16.4%, P=0.0203), emergency room visits (0% vs. 12.7%, P=0.0128), and additional hospitalizations (0% vs. 9.1%, P=0.0568). The acute toxicities during IMRT period were similar. Weekly P-F arm had higher complete response rates (83.6% vs. 61.8%, P=0.0152) and lower relapse rates (16.4% vs. 33.3%, P=0.0402) after a median follow-up of 67 months. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses revealed a better trend of locoregional failure-free (P=0.0892), distant metastasis failure-free (P=0.0775), and progression-free (P=0.0709) survivals, favoring the weekly P-F arm.

CONCLUSION

IndCT of weekly schedule does reduce acute toxicities without compromised tumor response and survivals.

Metronomic adjuvant chemotherapy evaluation in locally advanced head and neck cancers post radical chemoradiation - a randomised trial

Background

Locally advanced head and neck cancers treated with radical chemoradiation have unsatisfactory outcomes. Oral metronomic chemotherapy improves outcomes in comparison to maximum tolerated dose chemotherapy in the palliative setting. Limited evidence suggests that it may do so in an adjuvant setting. Hence this randomized study was conducted.

Methods

Patients of head and neck (HN) cancer with primary in oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx, with PS 0-2 post radical chemoradiation with documented complete response were randomized 1:1 to either observation or oral metronomic adjuvant chemotherapy (MAC) for 18 months. MAC consisted of weekly oral methotrexate (15 mg/m²) and celecoxib (200 mg PO BD). The primary endpoint was OS and the overall sample size was 1038. The study had 3 planned interim analyses for efficacy and futility. Trial registration- Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI): CTRI/2016/09/007315 [Registered on: 28/09/2016] Trial Registered Prospectively.

Findings

137 patients were recruited and an interim analysis was done. The 3 year PFS was 68.7% (95% CI 55.1-79.0) versus 60.8% (95% CI 47.9-71.4) in the observation and metronomic arm respectively (P value = 0.230). The hazard ratio was 1.42 (95% CI 0.80-2.51; P value = 0.231). The 3 year OS was 79.4% (95% CI 66.3-87.9) versus 62.4% (95% CI 49.5-72.8) in the observation and metronomic arm respectively (P value = 0.047). The hazard ratio was 1.83 (95% CI 1.0-3.36; P value = 0.051).

Interpretation

In this phase 3 randomized study, oral metronomic combinations of weekly methotrexate and daily celecoxib failed to improve the PFS or OS. Hence observation post-complete response post radical chemoradiation remains the standard of care.

Funding

ICON funded this study.

Induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancers, is there a best choice?

Locally advanced stages of squamous cancers of the head and neck (LAHNCs) acquire high propensity for local and systemic relapse. Addition of systemic therapy as an induction (IC) to the standard concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has become an approach of many practitioners. This strategy has shown to reduce metastases but did not affect survival in unselected populations. Meanwhile, the induction regimen including docetaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU (TPF) has shown superiority over other combinations, however, a survival advantage was not detected when compared to CCRT alone. This may be attributed to its high toxicity profile, inducing treatment delay, resistance, or variations in tumor sites and responses. Currently, newer systemic therapy combinations are being tested and indicators of benefit are being identified. The focus of this review is on the development of the choice of combination regimen for induction. Subsequently, proposed alternatives and strategies for patient selection will be introduced.

Induction Therapy for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

The optimal approach to locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) treatment remains controversial. For non-resectable LAHNSCC, the clinical interest of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or radiotherapy has been questioned. With the approval of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for this disease, treatment options have become more complex. Although new trial data have appeared every year, the results are still inconclusive. In this review, we provide readers with information on new strategies for LAHNSCC induction therapy, which will facilitate evidence-based decision making in LAHNSCC treatment.

Persistent lymph nodes after curative chemoradiotherapy for head and neck cancer: imaging predictors of response for decision-making

PURPOSE

To identify response predictors in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (N + HNSCC) and persistent lymph nodes after curative chemoradiotherapy treatment (CCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with N + HNSCC treated with CCRT and persistent lymph nodes at first follow-up between 2015 and 2021 were identified and analyzed. Complete response was defined as the absence of lymph node metastatic involvement in patients with salvage lymphadenectomy or the absence of progression after 1 year of successive follow-ups. Tumour type and location, staging, and human papillomavirus (HPV) status were considered for analysis. The number and size of lymph nodes, type, shape, enhancement and margins on diagnostic and follow-up CT were also analyzed.

RESULTS

The cohort included 46 patients with 134 pathological lymph nodes. Logistic regression models showed the following variables to be significant: performance of salvage lymphadenectomy (OR 0.094, [CI 95% 0.004-0.61], p = 0.037); the type of lymphadenopathy on diagnostic CE-CT (solid vs. cystic) (N1: OR = 4.11, [CI 95% 1.11-17.93], p = 0.042 and N3: OR 6.42, [CI 95% 1.2-42.56], p = 0.036); the change of shape (round to oval) on the follow-up CE-CT (OR 9.76, [CI 95% 1.79-8.57], p = 0.016) and the time in days between CCRT and the first follow-up CE-CT (OR 1.06, [CI 95% 1.004-1.13], p = 0.048).

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, the presence of solid lymph nodes on pre-treatment CT and the change in shape from round to oval on post-treatment CT are predictors of response to treatment in patients with N + HNSCC persistent lymph nodes after CCRT. Increasing the temporal interval between treatment and follow-up CT should be considered to avoid unnecessary nodal dissections.

Consensuses, controversies, and future directions in treatment deintensification for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer

The most common cancer caused by human papillomavirus (HPV) infection in the United States is oropharyngeal cancer (OPC), and its incidence has been rising since the turn of the century. Because of substantial long-term morbidities with chemoradiation and the favorable prognosis of HPV-positive OPC, identifying the optimal deintensification strategy for this group has been a keystone of academic head-and-neck surgery, radiation oncology, and medical oncology for over the past decade. However, the first generation of randomized chemotherapy deintensification trials failed to change the standard of care, triggering concern over the feasibility of de-escalation. National database studies estimate that up to one third of patients receive nonstandard de-escalated treatments, which have subspecialty-specific nuances. A synthesis of the multidisciplinary deintensification data and current treatment standards is important for the oncology community to reinforce best practices and ensure optimal patient outcomes. In this review, the authors present a summary and comparison of prospective HPV-positive OPC de-escalation trials. Chemotherapy attenuation compromises outcomes without reducing toxicity. Limited data comparing transoral robotic surgery (TORS) with radiation raise concern over toxicity and outcomes with TORS. There are promising data to support de-escalating adjuvant therapy after TORS, but consensus on treatment indications is needed. Encouraging radiation deintensification strategies have been reported (upfront dose reduction and induction chemotherapy-based patient selection), but level I evidence is years away. Ultimately, stage and HPV status may be insufficient to guide de-escalation. The future of deintensification may lie in incorporating intratreatment response assessments to harness the powers of personalized medicine and integrate real-time surveillance.

Treating Head and Neck Cancer in the Age of Immunotherapy: A 2023 Update

Most patients diagnosed with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) will present with locally advanced disease, requiring multimodality therapy. While this approach has a curative intent, a significant subset of these patients will develop locoregional failure and/or distant metastases. The prognosis of these patients is poor, and therapeutic options other than palliative chemotherapy are urgently needed. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) overexpression is an important factor in the pathogenesis of HNSCC, and a decade ago, the EGFR targeting monoclonal antibody cetuximab was approved for the treatment of late-stage HNSCC in different settings. In 2016, the anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors nivolumab and pembrolizumab were both approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC with disease progression on or after platinum-containing chemotherapy, and in 2019, pembrolizumab was approved for first-line treatment (either as monotherapy in PD-L1 expressing tumors, or in combination with chemotherapy). Currently, trials are ongoing to include immune checkpoint inhibition in the (neo)adjuvant treatment of HNSCC as well as in novel combinations with other drugs in the recurrent/metastatic setting to improve response rates and survival and help overcome resistance mechanisms to immune checkpoint blockade. This article provides a comprehensive review of the management of head and neck cancers in the current era of immunotherapy.

Comparison of Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes by Gender in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (KCSG HN13-01)

We aimed to compare treatment modalities and outcomes by gender in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). We characterized the sex-specific differences and compared the overall survival (OS) between male and female patients in a multicenter cohort of LA-HNSCC. To minimize the observed confounding, propensity score matching was utilized. The study included 445 patients; 385 (86.5%) were men and 60 (13.5%) were women. In terms of age, smoking habits, drinking habits, and primary tumor locations, there was a significant imbalance in sex before the matching. Propensity score matching yielded 60 patient pairs, with no statistical difference between the sexes in terms of their characteristics. As for the treatment strategies, there were no significant differences between the sexes before (p = 0.260) and after (p = 0.585) the propensity score matching. When comparing the survival probabilities between the sexes, OS was not significantly different in the overall (HR 1.02; 95% CI 0.59-1.76; p = 0.938) and propensity-score-matched population (HR 1.46; 95% CI 0.68-3.17; p = 0.331). These results suggest that there was no difference in prognosis by gender in the treatment modalities and outcomes of LA-HNSCC in real-world practice.

Induction TPF followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer: a preliminary analysis of a randomized phase 2 trial

PURPOSE

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is a standard treatment choice for locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to investigate whether induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by CCRT is superior to CCRT alone to treat locally advanced hypopharyngeal carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients (n = 142) were randomized to receive two cycles of paclitaxel/cisplatin/5-fluorouracil (TPF) IC followed by CCRT or CCRT alone. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). The secondary end points included the larynx-preservation rate, progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and toxicities.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 113 of the 142 patients were analyzed. With a median follow-up of 45.6 months (interquartile range 26.8-57.8 months), the 3-year OS was 53.1% in the IC + CCRT group compared with 54.8% in the CCRT group (hazard ratio, 1.004; 95% confidence interval, 0.573-1.761; P = 0.988). There were no statistically significant differences in PFS, DMFS, and the larynx-preservation rate between the two groups. The incidence of grade 3-4 hematological toxicity was much higher in the IC+ CCRT group than in the CCRT group (54.7% vs. 10%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding induction TPF to CCRT did not improve survival and the larynx-preservation rate in locally advanced hypopharyngeal cancer, but caused a higher incidence of acute hematological toxicities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT03558035. Date of first registration, 15/06/2018.

Randomized phase 3 noninferiority trial of radiotherapy and cisplatin vs radiotherapy and cetuximab after docetaxel-cisplatin-fluorouracil induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced unresectable head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for patients with unresectable, locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN); induction chemotherapy (ICT) may provide survival benefits in some patients. This study aimed to demonstrate the noninferiority of concomitant cetuximab plus radiotherapy (cet+RT) vs cisplatin plus radiotherapy (cis+RT) in patients with unresectable LA-SCCHN who were responsive to ICT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial studied patients with unresectable LA-SCCHN who received 3 cycles of ICT (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil; TPF) followed by cis+RT (standard arm) or cet+RT (experimental arm). The primary endpoint was noninferiority of the experimental arm vs the standard arm in terms of overall survival (OS), based on a hazard ratio (HR) of < 1.3. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, overall response, safety, and quality of life (QOL).

RESULTS

Between July 15, 2008, and July 5, 2013, 519 patients were recruited and started ICT; 407 patients received post-ICT treatment (cis+RT, n = 205; cet+RT, n = 202). At a median follow-up of 43.9 (cis+RT) and 41.1 (cet+RT) months, median OS was 63.6 and 42.9 months with cis+RT and cet+RT, respectively (HR [90% CI] = 1.106 [0.888-1.378], P =.4492). There were no differences in progression-free survival, overall response rates, or adverse event rates between groups. There was greater late neurotoxicity with cis+RT than cet+RT (P =.0058). Several QOL dimensions improved with cet+RT vs cis+RT (physical functioning, P =.0287; appetite loss, P =.0248; social contact, P =.0153).

CONCLUSION

Noninferiority of cet+RT over cis+RT was not demonstrated.

Current Evidence of a Deintensification Strategy for Patients with HPV-Related Oropharyngeal Cancer

Simple Summary

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer represents a distinct disease entity, showing favorable treatment responses and survival outcomes. While the deintensification of treatment for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer is widely considered necessary, details concerning patient selection and optimal strategies are undetermined. The heterogeneity of study populations and interventions in trials complicate the ability of physicians to apply the results in daily practice. The evolving landscape also requires physicians to consistently update the results of these trials. This article reviews the most recent evidence on the deintensification of HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer. We aim to provide physicians with some guidance regarding management options and assist researchers in appropriately designing trials in the future.

Abstract

Human papillomavirus (HPV)-related oropharyngeal cancer differs from HPV-negative oropharyngeal cancer in terms of etiology, epidemiology, and prognosis. Younger and lower comorbidity patient demographics and favorable prognosis allow HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer patients to anticipate longer life expectancy. Reducing long-term toxicities has become an increasingly important issue. Treatment deintensification to reduce toxicities has been investigated in terms of many aspects, and the reduction of radiotherapy (RT) dose in definitive treatment, replacement of platinum-based chemotherapy with cetuximab, response-tailored dose prescription after induction chemotherapy, and reduction of adjuvant RT dose after transoral surgery have been evaluated. We performed a literature review of prospective trials of deintensification for HPV-related oropharyngeal cancer. In phase II trials, reduction of RT dose in definitive treatment showed comparable survival outcomes to historical results. Two phase III randomized trials reported inferior survival outcomes for cetuximab-based chemoradiation compared with cisplatin-based chemoradiation. In a randomized phase III trial investigating adjuvant RT, deintensified RT showed noninferior survival outcomes in patients without extranodal extension but worse survival in patients with extranodal extension. Optimal RT dosage and patient selection require confirmation in future studies. Although many phase II trials have reported promising outcomes, the results of phase III trials are needed to change the standard treatment. Since high-level evidence has not been established, current deintensification should only be performed as part of a clinical study with caution. Implementation in clinical practice should not be undertaken until evidence from phase III randomized trials is available.

Paclitaxel Plus Cetuximab as Induction Chemotherapy for Patients With Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma Unfit for Cisplatin-Based Chemotherapy

Objectives

Induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by definitive treatment is an accepted non-surgical approach for locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC). However, ICT remains a challenge for cisplatin-unfit patients. We evaluated paclitaxel and cetuximab (P-C) as ICT in a cohort of LA-HNSCC patients unfit for cisplatin.

Materials and Methods

This is a retrospective analysis of patients with newly diagnosed LA-HNSCC considered unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy (age >70 and/or ECOG≥2 and/or comorbidities) treated with weekly P-C followed by definitive radiotherapy and cetuximab (RT-C) between 2010 and 2017. Toxicity and objective response rate (ORR) to ICT and RT-C were collected. Median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine baseline predictors of OS and PFS.

Results

A total of 57 patients were included. Grade 3–4 toxicity rate to ICT was 54.4%, and there was a death deemed treatment-related (G5). P-C achieved an ORR of 66.7%, including 12.3% of complete responses (CR). After P-C, 45 patients (78.9%) continued with concomitant RT-C. Twenty-six patients (45.6%) achieved a CR after definitive treatment. With a median follow-up of 21.7 months (range 1.2–94.6), median OS and PFS were 22.9 months and 10.7 months, respectively. The estimated 2-year OS and PFS rates were 48.9% and 33.7%, respectively. Disease stage had a negative impact on OS (stage IVb vs. III–IVa: HR = 2.55 [1.08–6.04], p = 0.03), with a trend towards worse PFS (HR = 1.92 [0.91–4.05], p = 0.09). Primary tumor in the larynx was associated with improved PFS but not OS (HR = 0.45 [0.22–0.92], p = 0.03, and HR = 0.69 [0.32–1.54], p = 0.37, respectively).

Conclusion

P-C was a well-tolerated and active ICT regimen in this cohort of LA-HNSCC patients unfit for cisplatin-based chemotherapy. P-C might represent a valid ICT option for unfit patients and may aid patient selection for definitive treatment.

Introducing Checkpoint Inhibitors Into the Curative Setting of Head and Neck Cancers: Lessons Learned, Future Considerations

The emergence of immunotherapy, in the form of immune checkpoint inhibitors, has irrevocably altered the paradigm of cancer treatment over the past decade. Multiple characteristics of the immune landscape in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma suggest a strong rationale for the use of immunotherapies in this disease. Data from studies with both single-agent immunotherapies and chemotherapy and immunotherapy combinations in patients with incurable, relapsed disease have confirmed the potential for immune checkpoint inhibitors to be translated into settings in which patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma are treated with curative intent. Indeed, a number of single-arm and randomized studies, including trials of immunotherapy with surgery, chemotherapy, or radiotherapy, have already been completed or are ongoing. In this review, we present promising data from studies in which immunotherapy has been used in conjunction with curative-intent surgery, both as neoadjuvant/induction treatment and as an adjuvant approach. In addition, we discuss the fact that immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is, once again, allowing oncologists to revisit the potential role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy as part of definitive treatment regimens for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Finally, we address the increasing interest in exploiting synergistic interactions between radiotherapy and immunotherapy in the context of radical radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy regimens. As a consequence of these new areas of research, we are optimistic that the next decade may see immunotherapy embedded within recommended standard-of-care curative regimens for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

The role of induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A nationwide population-based matched study

INTRODUCTION

Induction chemotherapy (IC) has a proven role in organ preservation and reducing distant failure. However, its ability to prolong survival remains controversy. Herein, our study aimed to investigate the impact of primary tumor location on survival in patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) treated with IC.

METHODS

Patients who were older than 18 years and diagnosed with LA-HNSCC between 2007 and 2016 were retrospectively identified from Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database and Taiwan Cancer Registry. Patients were categorized into two group: IC group and CCRT group. In order to reduce the selection bias, IC patients were individually matched with the CCRT patients. The oncologic outcomes were presented with overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 5547 patients were identified. After matching, 2208 patients were analyzed for outcomes comparison, including 1104 patients in each group. In general, median OS were 27.3 months versus 28.5 months in IC and CCRT group, respectively (p = 0.6151). Patients were stratified by primary tumor location. For patients with oral cavity cancers, the median OS was significantly inferior in IC group than those in CCRT group, while for patients with non-oral cavity cancer, the median OS was superior in IC group than those in CCRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary tumor location has a significant impact on survival in patients with LA-HNSCC treated with IC. Our study provides a strong evidence that primary tumor location should be taken into consideration during multidisciplinary approach.

Imaging response assessment for predicting outcomes after bioselection chemotherapy in larynx cancer: A secondary analysis of two prospective trials

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Bioselection with induction chemotherapy in larynx cancer is associated with excellent larynx preservation and disease-specific survival but requires visual inspection of the primary tumor. We retrospectively compare clinical and imaging response in bioselected patients to develop predictive models of surgeon-assessed response (SR), laryngectomy-free survival (LFS), and overall survival (OS) in bioselected patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a secondary analysis of patients on two single-institution bioselection trials, model building used a regularized regression model (elastic-net) and applied nested cross-validation. Logistic regression-based model was used to predict SR and Cox proportional hazard-based models were used to predict LFS and OS.

RESULTS

In 115 patients with a median age of 57 years, most patients had supraglottic tumors (73.0%) and T3/T4 disease (94.8%). Definitive treatment was chemoradiation in 76.5% and laryngectomy in 23.5%. Change in primary tumor (OR = 5.78, p < 0.001) and N-classification (OR = 1.64, p = 0.003) predicted SR (AUC 0.847). Change in tumor volume (HR = 0.58, p < 0.001) predicted LFS (c-index 0.724). N-classification (HR = 1.48, p = 0.04) and pre-chemotherapy tumor volume (HR = 1.30, p = 0.174) predicted OS (c-index 0.552).

CONCLUSIONS

Imaging offers a non-invasive opportunity to evaluate response to induction chemotherapy, complementary to surgeon assessment. Further evaluation of approaches to bioselection that optimize generalizability of this paradigm are needed, and clinical trials utilizing imaging to predict outcomes including LFS are warranted.

Induction Chemotherapy in Low-Risk HPV+ Oropharyngeal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is rapidly increasing in incidence, and has now become the most common head and neck cancer (HNC). Studies have demonstrated that HPV associated OPSCC is associated with a favorable prognosis compared with its HPV-negative counterparts, yet standard multimodality therapy is often associated with substantial acute and late treatment-related toxicity. While locoregional control is improved in HPV+ OPSCC, distant metastasis rate has gained recognition as a major cause of death in this population, with some studies suggesting similar rates as non-HPV-related cancers. Induction chemotherapy has been of long-standing interest in locoregionally advanced HNC, yet its use in combination with concomitant chemoradiation remains an area of controversy as a survival benefit remains unproven following randomized trials. Nevertheless, response to induction chemotherapy remains an important dynamic and prognostic biomarker, with response-adaptive de-intensified therapy in HPV+ OPSCC gaining traction in single-arm phase II studies demonstrating promising results. The emergence of immunotherapy in the recurrent/metastatic setting for HNC has led to enthusiasm to incorporate in the curative setting, yet its role remains undefined. Our institutional paradigm for HPV+ OPSCC incorporates induction therapy followed by risk and response adaptive locoregional treatment. Ultimately, the role of induction therapy in HPV+ OPSCC will need to be investigated in a randomized setting to be incorporated routinely into clinical practice.

Tumor Volume Reduction Rate to Induction Chemotherapy is a Prognostic Factor for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction: Aim of this retrospective cohort study is to evaluate the prognostic value of tumor volume reduction rate status post-induction chemotherapy in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Methods: Patients newly diagnosed from year 2007 to 2016 at a single center were included in this retrospective study. All patients had received induction Taxotere, Platinum, Fluorouracil followed by daily definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy for 70 Gy in 35 fractions concurrent with or without cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Tumor volume reduction rate was measured and calculated by contrast-enhanced computed tomography images at diagnosis, and after at least 1 cycle of induction chemotherapy, and analyzed though a univariate and multivariate Cox regression model. Results: Ninety patients of the primary cancer sites at hypopharynx (31/90, 34.4%), oropharynx (29/90, 32.2%), oral cavity (19/90, 21.1%), and larynx (11/90, 12.2%) were included in this study, with a median follow-up time interval of 3.9 years. In multivariate Cox regression analysis, the tumor volume reduction rate of the primary tumor (TVRR-T) was also an independently significant prognostic factor for disease-free survival (DFS) (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.62-0.97; P-value = .02). Other factors including patient's age at diagnosis, the primary cancer site, and RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors), were not significantly related. At a cutoff value using 50% in Kaplan–Meier survival analysis, the DFS was higher with TVRR-T ≥ 50% group (log-rank test, P = .024), and a trend of improved overall survival. (log-rank test, P = .069). Conclusion: TVRR-T is a probable prognostic factor for DFS. With a cut-off point of 50%, TVRR-T may indicate better DFS.

Characteristics and treatment patterns in older patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (KCSG HN13-01)

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Treatment decisions for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) are complicated, and multi-modal treatments are usually indicated. However, it is challenging for older patients to complete treatments. Thus, we investigated disease characteristics, real-world treatment, and outcomes in older LA-HNSCC patients.

METHODS

Older patients (aged ≥ 70 years) were selected from a large nationwide cohort that included 445 patients with stage III-IVB LA-HNSCC from January 2005 to December 2015. Their data were retrospectively analyzed and compared with those of younger patients.

RESULTS

Older patients accounted for 18.7% (83/445) of all patients with median age was 73 years (range, 70 to 89). Proportions of primary tumors in the hypopharynx and larynx were higher in older patients and older patients had a more advanced T stage and worse performance status. Regarding treatment strategies of older patients, 44.5% of patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), 41.0% underwent surgery, and 14.5% did not complete the planned treatment. Induction chemotherapy (IC) was administered to 27.7% (23/83) of older patients; the preferred regimen for IC was fluorouracil and cisplatin (47.9%). For CCRT, weekly cisplatin was prescribed 3.3 times more often than 3-weekly cisplatin (62.2% vs. 18.9%). Older patients had a 60% higher risk of death than younger patients (hazard ratio, 1.6; p = 0.035). Oral cavity cancer patients had the worst survival probability.

CONCLUSION

Older LA-HNSCC patients had aggressive tumor characteristics and received less intensive treatment, resulting in poor survival. Further research focusing on the older population is necessary.

Proton Image-guided Radiation Assignment for Therapeutic Escalation via Selection of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients [PIRATES]: A Phase I safety and feasibility trial of MRI-guided adaptive particle radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Radiation dose-escalation for head and neck cancer (HNC) patients aiming to improve cure rates is challenging due to the increased risk of unacceptable treatment-induced toxicities. With "Proton Image-guided Radiation Assignment for Therapeutic Escalation via Selection of locally advanced head and neck cancer patients" (PIRATES), we present a novel treatment approach that is designed to facilitate dose-escalation while minimizing the risk of dose-limiting toxicities for locally advanced HPV-negative HNC patients. The aim of this Phase I trial is to assess the safety & feasibility of PIRATES approach.

METHODS

The PIRATES protocol employs a multi-faceted dose-escalation approach to minimize the risk of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs): 1) sparing surrounding normal tissue from extraneous dose with intensity-modulated proton therapy, 2) mid-treatment hybrid hyper-fractionation for radiobiologic normal tissue sparing; 3) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) guided mid-treatment boost volume adaptation, and 4) iso-effective restricted organ-at-risk dosing to mucosa and bone tissues.The time-to-event Bayesian optimal interval (TITE-BOIN) design is employed to address the challenge of the long DLT window of 6 months and find the maximum tolerated dose. The primary endpoint is unacceptable radiation-induced toxicities (Grade 4, mucositis, dermatitis, or Grade 3 myelopathy, osteoradionecrosis) occurring within 6 months following radiotherapy. The second endpoint is any grade 3 toxicity occurring in 3-6 months after radiation.

DISCUSSION

The PIRATES dose-escalation approach is designed to provide a safe avenue to intensify local treatment for HNC patients for whom therapy with conventional radiation dose levels is likely to fail. PIRATES aims to minimize the radiation damage to the tissue surrounding the tumor volume with the combination of proton therapy and adaptive radiotherapy and within the high dose tumor volume with hybrid hyper-fractionation and not boosting mucosal and bone tissues. Ultimately, if successful, PIRATES has the potential to safety increase local control rates in HNC patients with high loco-regional failure risk.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04870840; Registration date: May 4, 2021.Netherlands Trial Register ID: NL9603; Registration date: July 15, 2021.

Interventions for the treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancer: chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers are the most common cancers arising in the head and neck. Treatment of oral cavity cancer is generally surgery followed by radiotherapy, whereas oropharyngeal cancers, which are more likely to be advanced at the time of diagnosis, are managed with radiotherapy or chemoradiation. Surgery for oral cancers can be disfiguring and both surgery and radiotherapy have significant functional side effects. The development of new chemotherapy agents, new combinations of agents and changes in the relative timing of surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy treatments may potentially bring about increases in both survival and quality of life for this group of patients. This review updates one last published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether chemotherapy, in addition to radiotherapy and/or surgery for oral cavity and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma results in improved overall survival, improved disease-free survival and/or improved locoregional control, when incorporated as either induction therapy given prior to locoregional treatment (i.e. radiotherapy or surgery), concurrent with radiotherapy or in the adjuvant (i.e. after locoregional treatment with radiotherapy or surgery) setting.

SEARCH METHODS

An information specialist searched 4 bibliographic databases up to 15 September 2021 and used additional search methods to identify published, unpublished and ongoing studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) where more than 50% of participants had primary tumours in the oral cavity or oropharynx, and that evaluated the addition of chemotherapy to other treatments such as radiotherapy and/or surgery, or compared two or more chemotherapy regimens or modes of administration.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

For this update, we assessed the new included trials for their risk of bias and at least two authors extracted data from them. Our primary outcome was overall survival (time to death from any cause). Secondary outcomes were disease-free survival (time to disease recurrence or death from any cause) and locoregional control (response to primary treatment). We contacted trial authors for additional information or clarification when necessary.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 100 studies with 18,813 participants. None of the included trials were at low risk of bias.  For induction chemotherapy, we reported the results for contemporary regimens that will be of interest to clinicians and people being treated for oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers. Overall, there is insufficient evidence to clearly demonstrate a survival benefit from induction chemotherapy with platinum plus 5-fluorouracil prior to radiotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) for death 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.04, P = 0.11; 7427 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence), prior to surgery (HR for death 1.06, 95% CI 0.71 to 1.60, P = 0.77; 198 participants, 1 study; low-certainty evidence) or prior to concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) with cisplatin (HR for death 0.71, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.35, P = 0.30; 389 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence). There is insufficient evidence to support the use of an induction chemotherapy regimen with cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil plus docetaxel prior to CRT with cisplatin (HR for death 1.08, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.44, P = 0.63; 760 participants, 3 studies; low-certainty evidence).  There is insufficient evidence to support the use of adjuvant chemotherapy over observation only following surgery (HR for death 0.95, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.22, P = 0.67; 353 participants, 5 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Among studies that compared post-surgical adjuvant CRT, as compared to post-surgical RT, adjuvant CRT showed a survival benefit (HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.98, P = 0.03; 1097 participants, 4 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). Primary treatment with CRT, as compared to radiotherapy alone,  was associated with a reduction in the risk of death (HR for death 0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.83, P < 0.00001; 2852 participants, 24 studies; moderate-certainty evidence).  AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review demonstrate that chemotherapy in the curative-intent treatment of oral cavity and oropharyngeal cancers only seems to be of benefit when used in specific circumstances together with locoregional treatment. The  evidence does not show a clear survival benefit from the use of induction chemotherapy prior to radiotherapy, surgery or CRT. Adjuvant CRT reduces the risk of death by 16%, as compared to radiotherapy alone. Concurrent chemoradiation as compared to radiation alone is associated with a greater than 20% improvement in overall survival; however, additional research is required to inform how the specific chemotherapy regimen may influence this benefit.

Toxicity of induction chemotherapy in head and neck cancer: The central role of skeletal muscle mass

BACKGROUND

To assess the impact of nutritional status on tolerance to induction chemotherapy by docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (ICT) in head and neck cancer (HNC).

METHODS

Ninety-two HNC patients were included. Toxicity was assessed according to common terminology criteria for adverse events. Nutritional status was assessed by body mass index (BMI), serum albumin, nutritional risk index (NRI), and CT scan (skeletal muscle mass index [SMI] at the first lumbar vertebral level).

RESULTS

Before treatment, average BMI was 22.7 ± 4.6 kg/m² , serum albumin 38.7 ± 5.8 g/L, NRI 97.6 ± 10.6, and SMI 36.4 ± 7.9 cm² /m² . After treatment, BMI was 23 ± 4.5, serum albumin 30.2 ± 7.1, and NRI 88.1 ± 9.2. During ICT, 52 (62%) patients developed at least one toxicity ≥ Grade 3. Pre-treatment SMI was the only predictive factor of toxicity irrespective of BMI (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

Low skeletal muscle mass is a predictive factor of toxicity to ICT in HNC.

Management of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

This article reviews the various treatment options, by primary or postoperative external radiotherapy and by brachytherapy for the p16-negative oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Dose levels, fractionation and association with systemic treatments are presented. The need for neck node dissection post local treatment is discussed, as well as specificities for the management of p16-positive tumours. Guidelines for target volume selection and delineation are thoroughly elaborated. Last, the management by radiotherapy of locoregional recurrences is discussed.

Hematological Toxicities of Concurrent Chemoradiotherapies in Head and Neck Cancers: Comparison Among Cisplatin, Nedaplatin, Lobaplatin, and Nimotuzumab

Background

Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is standard of care for locally advanced head and neck cancers (LAHNC). Nedaplatin, lobaplatin and nimotuzumab have shown anti-cancer effect with less gastrointestinal toxicity and nephrotoxicity. However, the profile of hematological toxicities of these agents in combination with radiotherapy has not been fully illustrated.

Methods

We retrospectively collected the clinical data of consecutive LAHNC patients treated by cisplatin-, nedaplatin-, lobaplatin-, and nimotuzumab-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Routine blood cell counts were obtained every 4 to 7 days. Hematological toxicities were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0.

Results

A total of 181 eligible LAHNC patients were assigned to nimotuzumab group (n = 34), cisplatin group (n = 52), nedaplatin group (n = 62) or lobaplatin group (n = 33). Among the four groups, nimotuzumab group displayed lightest hematological toxicities, followed by cisplatin group, nedaplatin group, and lobaplatin group. Lobaplatin was more likely to produce grade 3/4 leukopenia compared with cisplatin (48.5% vs 25.0%). Compared with cisplatin, nedaplatin and lobaplatin were more likely to cause grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (nedaplatin 19.4% vs cisplatin 3.8%; lobaplatin 30.3% vs cisplatin 3.8%). Similarly, nimotuzumab group showed highest nadir levels among the four groups, followed by cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin group. Moreover, concurrent platinum treatment and induction chemotherapy were risk factors of developing grade 3/4 hematological toxicities.

Conclusion

Nimotuzumab-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in head and neck cancers produced the lightest hematological toxicities, followed by cisplatin, nedaplatin, and lobaplatin. Patients should be given specific attention during concurrent chemoradiotherapy, particularly in the presence of previous induction chemotherapy.

The Molecular Basis and Therapeutic Aspects of Cisplatin Resistance in Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is a kind of malignant tumors with low survival rate and prone to have early metastasis and recurrence. Cisplatin is an alkylating agent which induces DNA damage through the formation of cisplatin-DNA adducts, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. In the management of advanced OSCC, cisplatin-based chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy has been considered as the first-line treatment. Unfortunately, only a portion of OSCC patients can benefit from cisplatin treatment, both inherent resistance and acquired resistance greatly limit the efficacy of cisplatin and even cause treatment failure. Herein, this review outline the underlying mechanisms of cisplatin resistance in OSCC from the aspects of DNA damage and repair, epigenetic regulation, transport processes, programmed cell death and tumor microenvironment. In addition, this review summarizes the strategies applicable to overcome cisplatin resistance, which can provide new ideas to improve the clinical therapeutic outcome of OSCC.

Current Therapeutic Strategies in Patients with Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Impact of the Tumor HPV Status

Simple Summary

Contrary to other head and neck subsites, oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) has shown a considerable increase in incidence over the past 20 years. This growing incidence is largely due to the increasing place of human papillomavirus (HPV)-related tumors. HPV-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC are two distinct entities with considerable differences in terms of treatment response and prognosis. However, there are no specific recommendations yet in the therapeutic management of OPSCC patients according to their tumor HPV-status. The aim of this review is therefore to discuss the therapeutic management of patients with OPSCC and the impact of HPV status on treatment selection.

Abstract

Since there is no published randomized study comparing surgical and non-surgical therapeutic strategies in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), the therapeutic management of these patients remains highly controversial. While human papillomavirus (HPV)-positive and HPV-negative OPSCC are now recognized as two distinct diseases with different epidemiological, biological, and clinical characteristics, the impact of HPV status on the management of OPSCC patients is still unclear. In this review, we analyze the current therapeutic options in patients with OPSCC, highlighting the most recent advances in surgical and non-surgical therapies, and we discuss the impact of HPV status on the therapeutic strategy.

Survey of radiation field and dose in human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal cancer: is de-escalation actually applied in clinical practice?

Purpose

Studies on de-escalation in radiation therapy (RT) for human papillomavirus-positive (HPV(+)) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) are currently ongoing. This study investigated the current practice regarding the radiation dose and field in the treatment of HPV(+) OPC.

Materials and Methods

The Korean Society for Head and Neck Oncology conducted a questionnaire on the primary treatment policy. Among them, for HPV(+) OPC scenarios, radiation oncologists were questioned regarding the field and dose of RT.

Results

Forty-two radiation oncologists responded to the survey. In definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) treatment for stage T2N1M0 OPC, most respondents prescribed a dose of >60 Gy to the primary tonsil and involved ipsilateral lymph nodes. However, eight of the respondents prescribed a relatively low dose of ≤54 Gy. For stage T2N1M0 OPC, postoperative adjuvant RT was prescribed by eight and nine respondents with a lower dose of ≤50 Gy for the ipsilateral tonsil and involved neck, respectively. In definitive CCRT in complete remission after induction chemotherapy for initial stage T2N3M0 OPC, de-escalation of the tonsil and involved neck were performed by eight and seven respondents, respectively. Regarding whether de-escalation is applied in radiotherapy for HPV(+) OPC, 27 (64.3%) did not do it at present, and 15 (35.7%) were doing or considering it.

Conclusion

The field and dose of prescribed treatment varied between institutions in Korea. Among them, dose de-escalation of RT in HPV(+) OPC was observed in approximately 20% of the respondents. Consensus guidelines will be set in the near future after the completion of ongoing prospective trials.

Defining the Role of Immunotherapy in the Curative Treatment of Locoregionally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: Promises, Challenges, and Opportunities

Recent advancements in the development of immunotherapies have raised the hope for patients with locally-advanced HNSCC (LA-HNSCC) to achieve improved oncologic outcomes without the heavy burden of treatment-related morbidity. While there are several ongoing late phase clinical trials that seek to determine whether immunotherapy can be effectively employed in the definitive setting, initial results from concurrent immuno-radiotherapy therapy trials have not shown strong evidence of benefit. Encouragingly, evidence from preclinical studies and early-phase neoadjuvant studies have begun to show potential pathways forward, with therapeutic combinations and sequences that intentionally spare tumor draining lymphatics in order to maximize the synergy between definitive local therapy and immunotherapy. The intent of this review is to summarize the scientific rationale and current clinical evidence for employing immunotherapy for LA-HNSCC as well as the ongoing efforts and challenges to determine how to optimally deliver and sequence immunotherapy alongside traditional therapeutics. In both the preclinical and clinical settings, we will discuss the application of immunotherapies to both surgical and radiotherapeutic management of HNSCC.

Ribophorin II Overexpression Is Associated with Poor Response to Induction Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Fluorouracil in P16-Negative Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

This study aims to evaluate the relationship between human ribophorin II (RPN2) and the effect of treatment using induction therapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (TPF) for p-16 negative locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). A total of 203 patients with locally advanced p-16 negative HNSCC who received induction chemotherapy with TPF at the Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between 2009 and 2014 were enrolled. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for RPN2 was examined and correlated with treatment outcome. Our study showed that RPN2 overexpression was significantly correlated with a poor response to induction chemotherapy with TPF. Both RPN2 overexpression and clinical N1 to N3 stages represented adverse prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RPN2 might be a predictive marker for treatment response to induction chemotherapy. Further clinical trials are needed to determine the therapeutic significance of RPN2 in patients with HNSCC.

Immunotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer: A Paradigm Shift From Induction Chemotherapy to Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy has the potential to enhance clinical outcomes by increasing anti-tumor immune responses in the presence of abundant tumor-derived antigen in an immune microenvironment that has not been exposed to previous therapy. The current mainstay of advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment remains surgery and radiotherapy with/without conventional chemotherapy. Despite this multi-modality treatment, advanced human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative HNSCC shows poor prognosis. Treatment intensification with neoadjuvant (induction) chemotherapies with platinum drugs are insufficient to significantly prolong overall survival. Although only 15-20% of patients benefit, immunotherapies have been approved and widely used for recurrent and metastatic HNSCC. These successes have led to checkpoint blockade therapies being testing in earlier treatment settings. Recent clinical trials of neoadjuvant immunotherapy show promising results and this methodology has the potential to change the treatment algorithm of HNSCC. This overview examines the treatment history of neoadjuvant approaches for HNSCC, and especially focuses on the recent topics of neoadjuvant immunotherapy for HNSCC.

Induction Chemotherapy for Advanced Oral Cavity Cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Head and neck cancer is a heterogeneous disease, comprising multiple subsites with diverse etiologic factors, pathology and molecular features, response to treatment, and prognosis. Systemic treatment is usually incorporated in the management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and the use of induction chemotherapy has theoretical benefits on reducing the risk of distant metastasis, provide an in vivo testing of response and tumor biology and the potential to allow a more personalized and less toxic local treatment after downstaging. The aim of this review is to access the role of induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced oral cavity cancer.

RECENT FINDINGS

Clinical trials analyzing this treatment strategy in patients with resectable disease, followed by surgery, and in unresectable disease, followed by (chemo)radiotherapy or surgery are discussed, pointing out strengths and limitations of this data and highlighting the standard treatment in each clinical scenario. Future perspectives, including the incorporation of checkpoint inhibitors and biomarkers for patient selection are discussed. Surgery followed by (chemo)radiation is the standard of care for resectable oral cavity cancer patients, and chemoradiation is the standard for those considered as unresectable. Future trials with the incorporation of immunotherapy and better patient selection based on clinical and molecular biomarkers can bring new hopes for better therapeutic results in these patients.

Prognostic factor analysis and long-term results of the TAX 323 (EORTC 24971) study in unresectable head and neck cancer patients

BACKGROUND

In the TAX 323 (EORTC 24971) phase III trial enrolling patients with unresectable locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (LA-SCCHN), the addition of docetaxel (T) to cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (PF)-based induction chemotherapy prior to definite radiotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

The data were updated for PFS, OS and treatment-related long-term side-effects. Baseline clinical and laboratory data of 17 variables were collected and subjected to univariate and multivariate prognostic factor analyses for OS.

RESULTS

All 358 patients randomised between 1999 and 2002 were included in the long-term analysis with a median follow-up of 8.6 years. The primary end-point of PFS remained significantly improved with TPF compared with PF (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.70; 95% CI, 0.56-0.88, p = 0.002), translating into a persisting benefit in OS (adjusted HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.60-0.95, p = 0.015). Long-term side-effects in the TPF/PF arms comprised tracheostomy (7%/5%), feeding tube dependency (3%/6%) and gastrostomy (11%/11%). Second malignancy occurred in 8%/3%, respectively. Out of 177 patients randomised to the TPF arm, 160 were included in the multivariate analysis. Grade 2 or more dysphagia (p = 0.002) and grade 2 or more pain (p = 0.004) at baseline were identified as independent negative prognostic factors. In addition, OS differed across primary tumour sites (p = 0.027) and was worse in patients with a higher N-stage (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

In LA-SCCHN patients treated with sequential chemoradiotherapy, TPF induction chemotherapy demonstrated long-lasting efficacy, superior to the PF regimen. Higher-grade dysphagia and pain are unfavourable prognosticators.

N3 (> 6 cm) squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: outcomes and predictive factors in 104 patients

Objective

To report outcome and predictive factors in patients with N3 (> 6 cm) non-metastatic locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LAHNSCC) treated with a conservative approach or with initial surgery.

Methods

104 patients were included: 69 treated with radiotherapy (RT) ± chemotherapy (CT) and 35 with nodal surgery with or without primary tumour resection, which was completed in 30 patients by adjuvant RT ± CT. Positron-emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) guided surveillance after RT ± CT was standard.

Results

Two-year overall survival (OS) and locoregional control (LRC) were 39.4% and 37.5%, respectively. In univariate analysis, body mass index (BMI), performance status (PS), p16 status and haemoglobin value influenced OS and disease-free survival (DFS). In multivariate analysis, p16 positive status and BMI ≥ 25 remained independent prognostic factors for better OS (p = 0.023) and DFS (p = 0.002). Only under/normal weight remained an independent and adverse significant prognostic factor in multivariate analysis for regional control (RC). Patients treated with primary RT ± CT had slightly better 2-year OS (43.5% versus 33.3%, p = 0.31).

Conclusions

Patients with N3 LAHNSCC have poor prognosis, but long term LRC is achievable, especially in overweight patients and those with a good PS.

Prognostic impact and potential predictive role of baseline circulating tumor cells in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The prognostic impact of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) or circulating tumor microemboli (CTM) in locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (LA-HNSCC) is yet to be determined, with conflicting results in previous trials. The role of induction chemotherapy (ICT) in the management of LA-HNSCC is controversial with no predictive biomarkers to guide treatment strategy in this scenario. The aim of this trial is to determine the prognostic impact of CTCs and CTM, their biomarkers expression by immunocytochemistry (ICC), and its potential role as predictors of ICT benefit in LA-HNSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective study, with newly diagnosed stage III/IV non-metastatic LA-HNSCC patients treated with curative intent. Blood samples analyzed for CTCs and CTM before treatment using the ISET method.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included. CTCs counts were an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS; HR: 1.17; 95 %CI: 1.05-1.31; p = 0.005) and progression free survival (PFS; HR:1.14; 95 %CI: 1.03-1.26; p = 0.007). Using the Lausen and Schumacher technique, 2.8 CTCs/mL for OS and 3.8 CTCs/mL for PFS were defined as the best cut-offs. CTM were detected in 27.7% of patients, correlating with worse PFS (HR = 2.70; IC95%: 1.30-5.58; p = 0.007). MRP-7 expression in CTM correlated with worse OS (HR = 3.49; 95 %CI: 1.01-12.04; p = 0.047) and PFS (HR = 3.62; 95 %CI: 1.08-12.13; p = 0.037). CTCs counts were predictive of complete response to treatment (OR = 0.74; 95 %CI: 0.58-0.95; p = 0.022) and high counts (cut-off 3.8/mL) and CTM were potential predictors of ICT benefit.

CONCLUSION

CTCs/CTM had significant prognostic impact and potential role as predictors of ICT benefit in LA-HNSCC.

Current status of systemic therapy in head and neck cancer

There are several controversies in the management of head and neck cancer (SCCHN). Although combined modality treatment is standard in locally advanced SCCHN (LA-SCCHN), the optimal timing of chemotherapy has been debated. Toxicity concerns with chemoradiation (CRT) using high dose cisplatin have prompted use of less intensive approaches. Weekly cisplatin and targeted therapies have been explored in randomized trials. Benefit of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LA-SCCHN is debated due to lack of impact on overall survival, however, it remains a viable option in the Indian setting where many patients are not eligible for upfront surgery or definite CRT due to advanced stage and poor performance status (PS). The complexity of data of immune check point inhibitors (ICPi) in metastatic setting needs cautious interpretation till an ideal biomarker for their benefit is identified. Their significant cost and promising data of oral metronomic therapy has made the treatment landscape of metastatic SCCHN even more complex. To address these burning issues, we did a critical review of evidence of systemic therapy in SCCHN.