1
|
Liao CK, Hsu YJ, Chern YJ, Yu YL, Lin YC, Hsieh PS, Chiang JM, You JF. Differences in characteristics and outcomes between early-onset colorectal cancer and late-onset colorectal cancers. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108687. [PMID: 39288563 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108687] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2024] [Revised: 08/20/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) represents a significant health burden worldwide, with a notable increase in early-onset colorectal cancer (EOCRC) cases, defined as those diagnosed before the age of 50 years. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using data from Taiwan's national cancer registry and a retrospective cohort from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, this study analyzed CRC cases diagnosed between 2008 and 2019. The analysis compared the EOCRC and late-onset CRC (LOCRC) groups in terms of clinicopathological characteristics, pre-diagnostic symptoms, and survival outcomes. RESULTS The analysis revealed a continuous increase in the annual incidence of EOCRC, with colon cancer and rectal cancer rising by 3.2 % and 3.3 %, respectively. Patients with EOCRC presented with more aggressive disease characteristics, such as signet-ring cell adenocarcinoma, mucinous adenocarcinoma, and poorly differentiated grade. Advanced stages at diagnosis, stages III and IV, were more common with EOCRC (62.4 %) than with LOCRC (50.3 %). Patients with EOCRC reported rectal bleeding, changes in bowel habits, and abdominal pain more frequently than those in the LOCRC group. There is a strong association between stool-related symptoms and left-sided CRC. Despite similar surgical outcomes, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate of patients with stage IV EOCRC was significantly lower than that of patients with LOCRC (32.8 % vs. 51.9 %, p = 0.012). CONCLUSION This study highlights a persistent rise in the incidence of EOCRC, with patients presenting with more aggressive disease and experiencing inferior survival. These findings underscore the importance of heightened awareness and early detection strategies for CRC, especially in younger populations, to improve the prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Kai Liao
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan.
| | - Yu-Jen Hsu
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Yih-Jong Chern
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Yen-Lin Yu
- School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan; Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung Branch, No. 222, Maijin Rd., Anle Dist., Keelung City, 204, Taiwan
| | - Yueh-Chen Lin
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Pao-Shiu Hsieh
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Jy-Ming Chiang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Jeng-Fu You
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, No. 5, Fuxing St., Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan; School of Medicine, Chang Gung University, No. 259, Wenhua 1st Road, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Okamoto K, Ozawa T, Nozawa H, Sasaki K, Murono K, Emoto S, Yamauchi S, Sugihara K, Ishihara S. Prognosis of early-onset vs. late-onset stage II/III colorectal cancer patients with adjuvant chemotherapy: a multicenter propensity score matched study. Int J Clin Oncol 2024:10.1007/s10147-024-02601-4. [PMID: 39143428 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-024-02601-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major global health concern, with a rising incidence in young individuals. Early-onset CRC displays unique clinicopathological and molecular characteristics, necessitating a closer examination of prognosis, particularly in the context of adjuvant chemotherapy. This study aimed to investigate the prognosis of early-onset CRC patients (< 50 years) diagnosed at stage II/III compared to older counterparts, utilizing propensity score matching to minimize heterogeneity. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 3324 stage II/III CRC patients aged < 70 years was conducted, focusing on age-based subgroups (< 50 vs. ≥ 50 years). Propensity score matching balanced clinical characteristics. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed. RESULTS In stage II CRC, age of onset did not impact prognosis after adjuvant chemotherapy, with no significant differences in RFS (5-year RFS rates: 80% in both groups, p = 0.98) and OS (5-year OS rates: 96% vs. 92%, p = 0.17). In stage III, a trend suggested slightly poorer OS in patients aged < 50 years than those ≥ 50 years (5-year OS rates: 85% vs. 88%, p = 0.077). However, in a propensity score-matched cohort, age-dependent differences were attenuated (5-year OS rates: 85% vs. 88%, p = 0.32). CONCLUSION In the context of stage II/III CRC patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy, age was not an independent predictor of prognosis. Age alone should not be the sole factor guiding treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuaki Okamoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan.
| | - Tsuyoshi Ozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| | - Shinichi Yamauchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Bunkyo-ku, Japan
| | | | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1, Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8655, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Okamoto K, Nozawa H, Emoto S, Murono K, Sasaki K, Ishihara S. Adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with colorectal cancer: a single-centre observational study in Japan. J Chemother 2024; 36:319-328. [PMID: 37881011 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2023.2273096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Abstract
Adjuvant chemotherapy improves the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) following radical resection. The aim of the present study is to review appropriate chemotherapeutic regimens for elderly patients. We examined 1138 Japanese patients who were operated for high-risk stage II or stage III CRC between July 2010 and June 2021 at our hospital. Patients were divided according to an age of 70 years. The efficacy of adjuvant therapy was analyzed in association with age and adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimens. A total of 507 patients (45%) were ≥70 years old. They were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001) or palliative chemotherapy after recurrence (p < 0.001) than patients aged <70 years. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) in stage III CRC patients was longer in the <70 years group than in the ≥70 years group (p = 0.006); however, CSS by regimens did not significantly differ between these groups. Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with the longer relapse-free survival of stage III CRC patients in the <70 years group (p = 0.005). Although adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a favourable CSS regardless of age, the implementation rate of adjuvant chemotherapy for elderly CRC patients was low, which may explain shorter CSS in stage III CRC patients the ≥70 years group than in the <70 years group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuaki Okamoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gallois C, Shi Q, Pederson LD, André T, Iveson TJ, Sobrero AF, Alberts S, de Gramont A, Meyerhardt JA, George T, Schmoll HJE, Souglakos I, Harkin A, Labianca R, Sinicrope FA, Oki E, Shields AF, Boukovinas I, Kerr R, Lonardi S, Yothers G, Yoshino T, Goldberg RM, Taieb J, Papamichael D. Oxaliplatin-Based Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: An ACCENT/IDEA Pooled Analysis of 12 Trials. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:2295-2305. [PMID: 38547438 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE A number of studies suggest that older patients may have reduced or no benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidines as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer (CC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We studied the prognostic impact of age, as well as treatment adherence/toxicity patterns according to age, in patients with stage III CC who received 3 or 6 months of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin/capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) on the basis of data collected from trials from the ACCENT and IDEA databases. Associations between age and time to recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), survival after recurrence (SAR), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were assessed by a Cox model or a competing risk model, stratified by studies and adjusted for sex, performance status, T and N stage, and year of enrollment. RESULTS A total of 17,909 patients were included; 24% of patients were age older than 70 years (n = 4,340). Patients age ≥70 years had higher rates of early treatment discontinuation. Rates of grade ≥3 adverse events were similar between those older and younger than 70 years, except for diarrhea and neutropenia that were more frequent in older patients treated with CAPOX (14.2% v 11.2%; P = .01 and 12.1% v 9.6%; P = .04, respectively). In multivariable analysis, TTR was not significantly different between patients <70 years and those ≥70 years, but DFS, OS, SAR, and CSS were significantly shorter in those patients ≥70 years. CONCLUSION In patients ≥70 years with stage III CC fit enough to be enrolled in clinical trials, oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy was well tolerated and led to similar TTR compared with younger patients, suggesting similar efficacy. TTR may be a more appropriate end point for efficacy in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claire Gallois
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, SIRIC CARPEM, Paris-Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Qian Shi
- Department of Quantitative Health Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Levi D Pederson
- Department of Quantitative Health Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Thierry André
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Antoine, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Timothy J Iveson
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Aimery de Gramont
- Department of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Institute, Levallois-Perret, France
| | | | - Thomas George
- University of Florida Health Cancer Center, Gainesville, FL
| | - Hans-Joachim E Schmoll
- Department Internal Medicine, Clinic of Internal Medicine IV, University Clinic Halle, Martin-Luther University, Halle, Germany
| | - Ioannis Souglakos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital of Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Andrea Harkin
- Cancer Research UK Glasgow Clinical Trials Unit, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Roberto Labianca
- Cancer Center, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII Bergamo, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Eiji Oki
- Department of Surgery and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | | | - Rachel Kerr
- Department of Oncology, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Department of Oncology, Veneto Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Greg Yothers
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Takayuki Yoshino
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute and the Mary Babb Randolph Cancer Center, Morgantown, WV
| | - Julien Taieb
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, SIRIC CARPEM, Paris-Cité University, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lecomte T, Tougeron D, Chautard R, Bressand D, Bibeau F, Blanc B, Cohen R, Jacques J, Lagasse JP, Laurent-Puig P, Lepage C, Lucidarme O, Martin-Babau J, Panis Y, Portales F, Taieb J, Aparicio T, Bouché O. Non-metastatic colon cancer: French Intergroup Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatments, and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, ACHBT, SFP, AFEF, and SFR). Dig Liver Dis 2024; 56:756-769. [PMID: 38383162 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.01.208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 01/25/2024] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This article is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of non-metastatic colon cancer (CC), revised in November 2022. METHODS These guidelines represent collaborative work of all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of CC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B, and C) according to the level of evidence found in the literature published up to November 2022. RESULTS Initial evaluation of CC is based on clinical examination, colonoscopy, chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) scan, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assay. CC is usually managed by surgery and adjuvant treatment depending on the pathological findings. The use of adjuvant therapy remains a challenging question in stage II disease. For high-risk stage II CC, adjuvant chemotherapy must be discussed and fluoropyrimidine monotherapy or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy proposed according to the type and number of poor prognostic features. Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (FOLFOX or CAPOX) is the current standard for adjuvant therapy of patients with stage III CC. However, these regimens are associated with significant oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity. The results of the recent IDEA study provide evidence that 3 months of treatment with CAPOX is as effective as 6 months of oxaliplatin-based therapy in patients with low-risk stage III CC (T1-3 and N1). A 6-month oxaliplatin-based therapy remains the standard of care for high-risk stage III CC (T4 and/or N2). For patients unfit for oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine monotherapy is recommended. CONCLUSION French guidelines for non-metastatic CC management help to offer the best personalized therapeutic strategy in daily clinical practice. Each individual case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary tumor board and then the treatment option decided with the patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Lecomte
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France; Inserm UMR 1069, Nutrition, Croissance et Cancer, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
| | - David Tougeron
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Poitiers University Hospital, Poitiers, France
| | - Romain Chautard
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France; Inserm UMR 1069, Nutrition, Croissance et Cancer, Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Diane Bressand
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Tours University Hospital, Tours, France
| | - Frédéric Bibeau
- Department of Pathology, Besançon University Hospital, Besançon, France
| | - Benjamin Blanc
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Dax Hospital, Dax, France
| | - Romain Cohen
- Sorbonne Université, Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine hospital, AP-HP, Inserm, Unité Mixte de Recherche Scientifique 938 et SiRIC CURAMUS, Saint-Antoine Research Center, Paris, France
| | - Jérémie Jacques
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Limoges University Hospital, Limoges, France
| | - Jean-Paul Lagasse
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Orléans University Hospital, Orléans, France
| | - Pierre Laurent-Puig
- Department of Biology, AP-HP, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Come Lepage
- Department of Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Dijon University Hospital, Dijon, France
| | - Olivier Lucidarme
- Department of Radiology, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Jérôme Martin-Babau
- Armoricain Center of Radiotherapy, Radiology and Oncology, Côtes D'Armor Private Hospital, Plérin, France
| | - Yves Panis
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, AP-HP, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Fabienne Portales
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Julien Taieb
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, AP-HP, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Digestive Oncology, Reims, CHU Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Okamoto K, Sasaki K, Nozawa H, Murono K, Emoto S, Yamauchi S, Sugihara K, Ishihara S. Poor prognosis of young male patients with stage III colorectal cancer: A multicenter retrospective study. J Surg Oncol 2024; 129:785-792. [PMID: 38115553 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/30/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES The number of young patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) is increasing. However, sex-dependent differences in the prognosis of young CRC remain unknown. METHODS We investigated patients aged <70 years with stage III CRC treated between January 2000 and December 2010 in 24 Japanese referral hospitals. Patients were divided into subgroups by age of 50 years (early-onset and late-onset groups) and sex, and clinical characteristics and survival outcomes were compared. Risk factors associated with poor survival outcomes were also analyzed. RESULTS Among 4758 consecutive patients, 771 (16%) were <50 years. Regardless of sex, there were more patients with rectal cancer and treated with adjuvant chemotherapy in the early-onset group. Among males, tumors in the early-onset group were poorly differentiated (p < 0.001), and patients were diagnosed at an advanced N stage (p = 0.010). Among females, there were more patients with left-sided cancer in the early-onset group (p < 0.001). Relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were worse in the early-onset group than in the late-onset group (5-year RFS rates: 58% and 63%, p = 0.024; 5-year OS rates: 76% and 81%, p = 0.041, respectively), while there were no age-dependent differences in the survival outcomes of female CRC patients. A multivariate analysis identified age <50 years as one of the independent risk factors associated with poor RFS in male stage III CRC patients (p = 0.032) CONCLUSIONS: Young male patients with stage III CRC showed poorer survival outcomes than their older counterparts. Therefore, age- and sex-related differences in the incidence of CRC recurrence need to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuaki Okamoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kazuhito Sasaki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Nozawa
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koji Murono
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shigenobu Emoto
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinichi Yamauchi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Sugihara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Soichiro Ishihara
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Piercey O, Wong HL, Leung C, To YH, Heong V, Lee M, Tie J, Steel M, Yeung JM, McCormick J, Gibbs P, Wong R. Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Treatment Recommendations, Treatment Administered and Impact on Cancer Recurrence. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2024; 23:95-103.e3. [PMID: 38242766 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A substantial proportion of patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) are older than 70 years. Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for older patients (OP) continues to be debated, with subgroup analyses of randomized trials not demonstrating a survival benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine backbone. PATIENTS AND METHODS We analyzed the multisite Australian ACCORD registry, which prospectively collects patient, tumor and treatment data along with long term clinical follow-up. We compared OP (≥70) with stage III CRC to younger patients ([YP] <70), including the proportion recommended AC and any reasons for not prescribing AC. AC administration, regimen choice, completion rates, and survival outcomes were also examined. RESULTS One thousand five hundred twelve patients enrolled in the ACCORD registry from 2005 to 2018 were included. Median follow-up was 57.0 months. Compared to the 827 YP, the 685 OP were less likely to be offered AC (71.5% vs. 96.5%, P < .0001) and when offered, were more likely to decline treatment (15.1% vs. 2.8%, P < .0001). Ultimately, 60.0% of OP and 93.7% of YP received AC (P < .0001). OP were less likely to receive oxaliplatin (27.5% vs. 84.7%, P < .0001) and to complete AC (75.9% vs. 85.7%, P < .0001). The probability of remaining recurrence-free was significantly higher in OP who received AC compared to those not treated (HR 0.73, P = .04) but not significantly improved with the addition of oxaliplatin (HR 0.75, P = .18). CONCLUSION OP were less likely than YP to receive AC. Receipt of AC reduced recurrences in OP, supporting its use, although no significant benefit was observed from the addition of oxaliplatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Piercey
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
| | - Hui-Li Wong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
| | - Clara Leung
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Yat Hang To
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
| | - Valerie Heong
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
| | - Margaret Lee
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia; Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia; Western Health, St Albans, Australia; Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Australia
| | - Jeanne Tie
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia
| | | | - Justin M Yeung
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; Western Health, St Albans, Australia
| | - Jacob McCormick
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia; Melbourne Health, Parkville, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia; The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia; Western Health, St Albans, Australia
| | - Rachel Wong
- The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, Australia; Eastern Health, Box Hill, Australia; Monash University, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Soler-González G, Sastre-Valera J, Viana-Alonso A, Aparicio-Urtasun J, García-Escobar I, Gómez-España MA, Guillén-Ponce C, Molina-Garrido MJ, Gironés-Sarrió R. Update on the management of elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:69-84. [PMID: 37498507 PMCID: PMC10761480 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03243-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumours worldwide, and 70% of CRC patients are over 65 years of age. However, the scientific evidence available for these patients is poor, as they are underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours, (TTD) and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD) have reviewed the scientific evidence available in older patients with CRC. This group of experts recommends a multidisciplinary approach and geriatric assessment (GA) before making a therapeutic decision because GA predicts the risk of toxicity and survival and helps to individualize treatment. In addition, elderly patients with localized CRC should undergo standard cancer resection, preferably laparoscopically. The indication for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) should be considered based on the potential benefit, the risk of recurrence, the life expectancy and patient comorbidities. When the disease is metastatic, the possibility of radical treatment with surgery, radiofrequency (RF) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) should be considered. The efficacy of palliative CT is similar to that seen in younger patients, but elderly patients are at increased risk of toxicity. Clinical trials should be conducted with the elderly population and include GAs and specific treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Soler-González
- Departamento de Oncología Médica, Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Avinguda de la Granvia de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Javier Sastre-Valera
- Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD), Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Viana-Alonso
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Nuestra Señora del Prado General University Hospital, Talavera de la Reina, Spain
| | - Jorge Aparicio-Urtasun
- Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD), Polytechnic la Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ignacio García-Escobar
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, General University Hospital of Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - María Auxiliadora Gómez-España
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Reina Sofía University Hospital. Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Carmen Guillén-Ponce
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Molina-Garrido
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Virgen de la Luz Hospital, Cuenca, Spain
| | - Regina Gironés-Sarrió
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Polytechnic la Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yang L, Yang J, Kleppe A, Danielsen HE, Kerr DJ. Personalizing adjuvant therapy for patients with colorectal cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2024; 21:67-79. [PMID: 38001356 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00834-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
The current standard-of-care adjuvant treatment for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) comprises a fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil or capecitabine) as a single agent or in combination with oxaliplatin, for either 3 or 6 months. Selection of therapy depends on conventional histopathological staging procedures, which constitute a blunt tool for patient stratification. Given the relatively marginal survival benefits that patients can derive from adjuvant treatment, improving the safety of chemotherapy regimens and identifying patients most likely to benefit from them is an area of unmet need. Patient stratification should enable distinguishing those at low risk of recurrence and a high chance of cure by surgery from those at higher risk of recurrence who would derive greater absolute benefits from chemotherapy. To this end, genetic analyses have led to the discovery of germline determinants of toxicity from fluoropyrimidines, the identification of patients at high risk of life-threatening toxicity, and enabling dose modulation to improve safety. Thus far, results from analyses of resected tissue to identify mutational or transcriptomic signatures with value as prognostic biomarkers have been rather disappointing. In the past few years, the application of artificial intelligence-driven models to digital images of resected tissue has identified potentially useful algorithms that stratify patients into distinct prognostic groups. Similarly, liquid biopsy approaches involving measurements of circulating tumour DNA after surgery are additionally useful tools to identify patients at high and low risk of tumour recurrence. In this Perspective, we provide an overview of the current landscape of adjuvant therapy for patients with CRC and discuss how new technologies will enable better personalization of therapy in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jinlin Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Andreas Kleppe
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Informatics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Centre for Research-based Innovation Visual Intelligence, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Håvard E Danielsen
- Institute for Cancer Genetics and Informatics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK
| | - David J Kerr
- Radcliffe Department of Medicine, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bekki T, Shimomura M, Saito Y, Nakahara M, Adachi T, Ikeda S, Shimizu Y, Kochi M, Ishizaki Y, Yoshimitsu M, Takakura Y, Shimizu W, Sumitani D, Kodama S, Fujimori M, Oheda M, Kobayashi H, Akabane S, Yano T, Ohdan H. Association between social background and implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for older patients undergoing curative resection of colorectal cancers, sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study. Int J Colorectal Dis 2023; 39:11. [PMID: 38153518 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-023-04583-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended following colorectal cancer resection based on risk of recurrence. In older patients, treatment decisions should consider recurrence rates and tolerability, as well as functional prognosis, residual disease, and social factors. This study aims to investigate factors, including social background, influencing implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients undergoing curative resection for colorectal cancer. METHODS This multi-institutional prospective cohort study included 15 institutions belonging to the Hiroshima Surgical study group for Clinical Oncology. We analyzed 159 older patients aged ≥ 80 years, who underwent curative resection for stage III colorectal cancer between December 2013 and June 2018, as sub-analysis of the HiSCO-04 study. RESULTS In total, 62 (39.0%) patients underwent postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Four factors were significantly associated with its implementation: performance status < 2, Charlson Comorbidity Index < 2, prognostic nutritional index ≥ 40, and presence of a spouse or siblings as lifestyle supporters. No significant difference was found in the backgrounds between complete and incomplete postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy patients. CONCLUSION Performance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, nutritional status, and presence of a spouse or siblings as lifestyle supporters are possible factors influencing the implementation of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients. To select appropriate treatment options, including postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, it is essential to consider physical condition and comorbidities of older patients, thoroughly explain the situation to their families, and establish a support system to enhance understanding of the available treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomoaki Bekki
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3 Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Chugoku Rosai Hospital, Kure, Japan
| | - Manabu Shimomura
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3 Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | - Yasufumi Saito
- Department of Surgery, Chugoku Rosai Hospital, Kure, Japan
| | | | - Tomohiro Adachi
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City North Medical Center Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ikeda
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yosuke Shimizu
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center/Chugoku Cancer Center, Institute for Clinical Research, Kure, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Kochi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, National Hospital Organization Higashihiroshima Medical Center, Higashihiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasuyo Ishizaki
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hiroshima-Nishi Medical Center, Otake, Japan
| | - Masanori Yoshimitsu
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yuji Takakura
- Department of Surgery, Chuden Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Wataru Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3 Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Shinya Kodama
- Department of Surgery, Yoshida General Hospital, Akitakata, Japan
| | - Masahiko Fujimori
- Department of Surgery, Kure City Medical Association Hospital, Kure, Japan
| | - Mamoru Oheda
- Department of Surgery, Sera Central Hospital, Sera, Japan
| | | | - Shintaro Akabane
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3 Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takuya Yano
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3 Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Kasumi 1-2-3 Minami-Ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Chiang FF, Huang SC, Yu PT, Chao TH, Huang YC. Oxidative Stress Induced by Chemotherapy: Evaluation of Glutathione and Its Related Antioxidant Enzyme Dynamics in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Nutrients 2023; 15:5104. [PMID: 38140363 PMCID: PMC10745799 DOI: 10.3390/nu15245104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
One of the mechanisms of chemotherapy is to increase the oxidative stress of cancer cells, leading to their apoptosis. Glutathione (GSH) and its related antioxidant enzymes might be stimulated to cope with increased oxidative stress during chemotherapy. Here, we studied the fluctuation in oxidative stress and GSH-related antioxidant capacities before tumor resection, after tumor resection, and after resection either with or without chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). This was a cross-sectional and follow-up design. We followed patients before having tumor resection (pre-resection), one month after tumor resection (post-resection), and after the first scheduled chemotherapy (post-chemo). If patients were required to receive chemotherapy after tumor resection, they were assigned to the chemotherapy group. Eligible patients were scheduled to undergo six to twelve cycles of chemotherapy at 2-week intervals and received single, double, or triple chemotherapeutic drugs as required. Those patients who did not require chemotherapy were assigned to the non-chemotherapy group. Indicators of oxidative stress and GSH-related antioxidant capacities were determined at the above three time points. We found in 48 patients of the chemotherapy group and in 43 patients of the non-chemotherapy group different fluctuations in levels of oxidative stress indicators and GSH-related antioxidant capacities starting from pre-resection, post-resection through the post-chemo period. Both groups showed significantly or slightly increased levels of advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), GSH, and its related enzymes in tumor tissues compared to adjacent normal tissues. Patients in the chemotherapy group had significantly lower plasma levels of GSH and glutathione disulfide (GSSG), but had significantly higher plasma glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase activities than patients in the non-chemotherapy group post-chemo. Plasma levels of malondialdehyde and AOPP were positively or negatively associated with GSH and GSSG levels post-chemo after adjustment for age, sex, and histological grading in patients receiving chemotherapy. These significant associations were, however, not seen in patients without chemotherapy. Patients with CRC may require higher GSH demands to cope with a greater oxidative stress resulting from chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Feng-Fan Chiang
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 40705, Taiwan;
- Department of Food and Nutrition, Providence University, Taichung 43301, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Chien Huang
- Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan; (S.-C.H.); (P.-T.Y.)
- Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Ting Yu
- Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan; (S.-C.H.); (P.-T.Y.)
| | - Te-Hsin Chao
- Chiayi & Wanqiao Branch, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Chiayi 60090, Taiwan;
| | - Yi-Chia Huang
- Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 40201, Taiwan; (S.-C.H.); (P.-T.Y.)
- Department of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 40201, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Simon HL, Reif de Paula T, Spigel ZA, Keller DS. Factors Associated With Adjuvant Chemotherapy Noncompliance and Survival in Older Adults With Stage III Colon Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2023; 66:1254-1262. [PMID: 36574320 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000002656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard management of stage III colon cancer includes surgical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite improved overall survival with adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer, it is reportedly underused in older adults. To date, no contemporary national analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy use and its impact on older adults with stage III colon cancer exists. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the current use of adjuvant chemotherapy in older adults with stage III colon cancer and determine factors associated with noncompliance. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS Conducted using the National Cancer Database. PATIENTS This study included patients aged 65 years and older undergoing curative resection for stage III colon adenocarcinomas, 2010-2017. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Adjuvant chemotherapy use, factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy use, and overall survival with and without adjuvant chemotherapy in older adults with pathologic stage III disease. RESULTS Of 64,608 patients included, 64.3% received adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly independently associated with improved 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival vs no adjuvant chemotherapy (92.8%, 75.3%, 62.4% vs 70.8%, 46.6%, 32.7%; HR 0.475; 95% CI, 0.459-0.492; p <0.001). Compared with the no adjuvant chemotherapy cohort, patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were younger, female, and less comorbid ( p < 0.001). Factors associated with adjuvant chemotherapy noncompliance included advancing age, lower annual income, open approach, longer length of stay, pathologic stage IIIA, and fewer than 12 lymph nodes. LIMITATIONS Administrative data source with inherent risks of bias, coding errors, and limitations in the fields available for analysis. CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival but was only used in 64.3% of older adults with stage III colon cancer. Adjuvant chemotherapy noncompliance was seen in the most vulnerable and highest-risk patients, including those with greater comorbidity, lower income, and patients who received open surgery. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C125 . FACTORES ASOCIADOS CON EL INCUMPLIMIENTO DE LA QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE Y LA SUPERVIVENCIA EN ADULTOS MAYORES CON CNCER DE COLON EN ESTADIO III ANTECEDENTES: El tratamiento estándar de oro del cáncer de colon en estadio III incluye la resección quirúrgica y la quimioterapia adyuvante. A pesar de la mejora de la supervivencia general con la quimioterapia adyuvante en el cáncer de colon en estadio III, se reporta que se utiliza poco en los adultos mayores. Hasta la fecha, no existe ningún análisis nacional actual, sobre el uso de quimioterapia adyuvante y su impacto en adultos mayores con cáncer de colon en etapa III.OBJETIVO: Evaluar el uso actual de quimioterapia adyuvante en adultos mayores con cáncer de colon en estadio III y determinar los factores asociados con el incumplimiento.DISEÑO: Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTES: Realizado y utilizando la Base de Datos Nacional de Cáncer.PACIENTES: Pacientes de 65 años o más sometidos a resección curativa por adenocarcinomas de colon en estadio III de 2010-2017.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: Uso de quimioterapia adyuvante, factores asociados con el uso de quimioterapia adyuvante y supervivencia general con y sin quimioterapia adyuvante en adultos mayores con enfermedad en estadio patológico III.RESULTADOS: De 64.608 pacientes incluidos, el 64,3% recibió quimioterapia adyuvante. La quimioterapia adyuvante se asoció de forma significativa e independiente con una mejor supervivencia general a 1, 3 y 5 años frente a ninguna quimioterapia adyuvante (92,8 %, 75,3 %, 62,4 % frente a 70,8 %, 46,6 %, 32,7 %; respectivamente, HR 0,475, 95 % IC 0,459-0,492, p < 0,001). En comparación con la cohorte sin quimioterapia adyuvante, los pacientes que recibieron quimioterapia adyuvante eran más jóvenes, mujeres y con menos comorbilidad. (p < 0,001). Los factores asociados con el incumplimiento de la quimioterapia adyuvante incluyeron edad avanzada (OR 0,857, IC del 95 % 0,854-0,861), ingresos anuales más bajos (OR 0,891, IC del 95 % 0,844-0,940), abordaje abierto (0,730, IC del 95 % 0,633-0,842), mayor duración de la estancia (OR 0,949, IC 95% 0,949-0,954) y estadio patológico IIIA (0,547, IC 95% 0,458-0,652) y <12.LIMITACIONES: Fuente de datos administrativos con riesgos inherentes de sesgo, errores de codificación y limitaciones en los campos disponibles para el análisis.CONCLUSIONES: La quimioterapia adyuvante mejoró significativamente la supervivencia general, pero solo se utilizó en el 64,3 % de los adultos mayores con cáncer de colon en estadio III. El incumplimiento de la quimioterapia adyuvante se observó en los pacientes más vulnerables y de mayor riesgo, incluidos aquellos con mayor comorbilidad, menores ingresos y pacientes que recibieron cirugía abierta. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C125 . (Traducción-Dr. Fidel Ruiz Healy ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hillary L Simon
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Thais Reif de Paula
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Houston College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Zachary A Spigel
- Department of Surgery, Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Deborah S Keller
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, California
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Su Y, Yang DS, Li YQ, Qin J, Liu L. Early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer characteristics, a practical nomogram and risk stratification system: a population-based study. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1190327. [PMID: 37260988 PMCID: PMC10228826 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1190327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 04/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study is to construct a novel and practical nomogram and risk stratification system to accurately predict cancer-specific survival (CSS) of early-onset locally advanced rectal cancer (EO-LARC) patients. Methods A total of 2440 patients diagnosed with EO-LARC between 2010 and 2019 were screened from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The pool of potentially eligible patients was randomly divided into two groups: a training cohort (N=1708) and a validation cohort (N=732). The nomogram was developed and calibrated using various methods, including the coherence index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration curves, and decision curves (DCA). A new risk classification system was established based on the nomogram. To compare the performance of this nomogram to that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system, DCA, net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were employed. Result Seven variables were included in the model. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the training cohort was 0.766, 0.736, and 0.731 at 3, 6, and 9 years, respectively. Calibration plots displayed good consistency between actual observations and the nomogram's predictions. The DCA curve further demonstrated the validity of the nomination form in clinical practice. Based on the scores of the nomogram, all patients were divided into a low-risk group, a middle-risk group, and a high-risk group. NRI for the 3-, 6-, and 9-year CSS(training cohort: 0.48, 0.45, 0.52; validation cohort: 0.42, 0.37, 0.37), IDI for the 3-, 6-, and 9-year CSS (training cohort: 0.09, 0.10, 0.11; validation cohort: 0.07, 0.08, 0.08). The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that the new risk classification system possesses a more extraordinary ability to identify patients in different risk groups than the AJCC staging. Conclusion A practical prognostic nomogram and novel risk classification system have been developed to efficiently predict the prognosis of EO-LARC. These tools can serve as a guide to individualize patient treatment and improve clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Su
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Da Shuai Yang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Yan qi Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jichao Qin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Lu Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dottorini L, Petrelli F, Ghidini A, Rea CG, Borgonovo K, Dognini G, Parati MC, Petrò D, Ghilardi M, Luciani A. Oxaliplatin in Adjuvant Colorectal Cancer: Is There a Role in Older Patients? J Clin Oncol 2023:JCO2300354. [PMID: 37186881 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.00354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniela Petrò
- Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - Mara Ghilardi
- Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| | - Andrea Luciani
- Oncology Unit, ASST Bergamo Ovest, Treviglio (BG), Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ioffe D, Dotan E. Guidance for Treating the Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:644-666. [PMID: 37052812 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01071-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The need for evidence-based data in the rapidly growing group of older patients is vast and more elderly-specific studies are desperately needed, for which there is clear demand from both patients and providers. Notably, many of the studies discussed in this review included unplanned subset analyses based on age and/or were not originally stratified by age; therefore, these data, particularly overall survival data, need to be interpreted with some caution as they may not be statistically valid based on the initial trial design and statistical plan. As we await data from ongoing elderly-specific trials, our recommendation for managing older patients with CRC should include geriatric screening tools (e.g., CSGA, VES-13, G8, CARG, CRASH) to help guide treatment adjustments for improved tolerability without sacrificing efficacy. For patients with a positive screen for significant geriatric concerns, a full geriatric assessment is recommended to guide treatment approach and supportive care. Prior data support the use of all approved medications for CRC in older adults who are fit; however, treatment breaks and dose attenuation with potential escalation are reasonable options for these patients. Ultimately, management decisions in the care of older adults with mCRC must be made through shared decision-making with the patient with consideration for the patient's functional status, comorbidities, goals of care, social support, as well as potential toxicities and possible effect on QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Ioffe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Okuda H, Shimomura M, Ikeda S, Nakahara M, Miguchi M, Ishizaki Y, Saitoh Y, Toyota K, Sumitani D, Shimizu Y, Takakura Y, Shimizu W, Yoshimitsu M, Kodama S, Fujimori M, Oheda M, Kobayashi H, Ohdan H. A prospective feasibility study of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for patients aged ≥ 80 years after curative resection of colorectal cancer, the HiSCO-03 study. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2023; 91:317-324. [PMID: 36947210 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-023-04526-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 03/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no consensus on the safety and effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) aged ≥ 80 years. We conducted a prospective multi-institutional phase II study of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin (UFT/LV) as adjuvant chemotherapy in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with stage III CRC aged ≥ 80 years who underwent curative resection were enrolled. Eligible patients received UFT/LV therapy (UFT, 300 mg/m2 per day as tegafur; LV, 75 mg/day on days 1-28, every 35 days for five courses). Primary endpoint was feasibility, and secondary endpoints were safety and relative dose intensity. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients were enrolled between 2013 and 2021. Of the 69 patients, 65 were included in the analysis. There were 32 males and 33 females with a median age of 82 years (range 80-88 years). In the primary endpoint, administration completion rate was 67.3% (95% confidence interval 54.9-77.6%), and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was below the threshold of 60%. 21 patients discontinued treatment because of adverse events (AEs) and refused treatment. The median relative dose intensities were 84% (range 4-100%) for UFT, and 100% (range 4-100%) for LV. Incidence of grade three or higher AEs were neutropenia (1.5%), aspartate transaminase elevation (3%), alanine transaminase elevation (1.5%), oral mucositis (3%), anemia (1.5%), and diarrhea (4.6%). CONCLUSIONS The indications for adjuvant UFT/LV therapy for elderly CRC aged ≥ 80 years were considered limited. It is necessary to clarify the background of patients in whom drug administration is discontinued and investigate their impact on long-term prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroshi Okuda
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Onomichi General Hospital, Onomichi, Japan
| | - Manabu Shimomura
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima City Asa Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ikeda
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54, Ujina-Kanda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan.
| | | | - Masashi Miguchi
- Department of Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, 1-5-54, Ujina-Kanda, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasuyo Ishizaki
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hiroshima-Nishi Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yasuhumi Saitoh
- Department of Surgery, Chugoku Rosai Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Toyota
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Higashihiroshima Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Yosuke Shimizu
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yuji Takakura
- Department of Surgery, Chuden Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Wataru Shimizu
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Shinya Kodama
- Department of Surgery, Yoshida General Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masahiko Fujimori
- Department of Surgery, Kure City Medical Association Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Mamoru Oheda
- Department of Surgery, Cera Central Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | - Hideki Ohdan
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Graduate School of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Akagündüz B, Guven DC, Ozer M, Okten IN, Atag E, Unek İT, Tatli AM, Karaoglu A. Tailoring adjuvant chemotherapy by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in older patients with stage II-III colon cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101367. [PMID: 36038467 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.08.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Baran Akagündüz
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erzincan Binali Yıldrıım University Medical School, Erzincan, Turkey.
| | - Deniz Can Guven
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Muhammet Ozer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Capital Health Regional Medical Center, Trenton, NJ, USA.
| | - Ilker Nihat Okten
- Department of Medical Oncology, Gaziantep Ersin Arslan State Hospital, Gaziantep, Turkey
| | - Elif Atag
- Department of Medical Oncology, Haydarpaşa Numune Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - İlkay Tugba Unek
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuzeylül University Medical School, 34000 Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ali Murat Tatli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Akdeniz University Medical School, 07010 Antalya, Turkey
| | - Aziz Karaoglu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dokuzeylül University Medical School, 34000 Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Aparicio T, Bouché O, Etienne PL, Barbier E, Mineur L, Desgrippes R, Guérin-Meyer V, Hocine F, Martin J, Le Brun-Ly V, Cretin J, Desramé J, Rinaldi Y, Cany L, Falandry C, Lefevre LB, Marous M, Terrebonne E, Mosser L, Turpin J, Turpin A, Bauguion L, Reichling C, Van den Eynde M, Carola E, Hiret S. Preliminary tolerance analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients after resection of stage III colon cancer from the PRODIGE 34-FFCD randomized trial. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 55:541-548. [PMID: 36115817 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colon adenocarcinoma mainly occurs in older patients. Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival after stage III colon cancer resection, but this improvement was not demonstrated in older patients. METHODS The purpose of ADAGE-PRODIGE 34, randomized open phase III trial is to compare in patients over 70 years oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine with fluoropyrimidine alone in fit patients (Group 1) and fluoropyrimidine with observation in frail patients (Group 2) after resection of stage III colon adenocarcinoma. We report a preliminary tolerance analysis on 50% of the first patients enrolled. RESULTS The analysis was conducted on 491 patients (378 in Group 1 and 113 in Group 2). Patients in Group 2 were older and showed more frailty criteria than those in Group 1. Cumulative grade 3-5 toxicities were more frequent in patients treated with oxaliplatin in Group 1 or with fluoropyrimidine in Group 2 than in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine in Group 1. At least one course was deferred in more than half of the patients in all groups. Early treatment cessation was more frequent in Group 2. CONCLUSION No safety concerns were raised for the continuation of accrual. The frailty criteria distribution suggests that the investigator's evaluation for group allocation was accurate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, CHU Saint Louis, APHP, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, Reims, France
| | - Pierre-Luc Etienne
- Centre Armoricain de Radiothérapie, Imagerie, Oncologie, et Hôpital Privé des Côtes d'Armor, Plérin, France
| | - Emilie Barbier
- Biostatistic department, Burgundy University, INSERM U866, Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France
| | - Laurent Mineur
- Oncology department, Clinique Saint Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - Romain Desgrippes
- Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, CH Saint-Malo, Saint-Malo, France
| | | | | | - Jean Martin
- Oncology department, Clinique François Chenieux, Limoges, France
| | | | | | | | - Yves Rinaldi
- Hepato Gastroenterology department, Hôpital Européen de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Cany
- Radiotherapy and Oncology department, Polyclinique Francheville, Perigueux, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Geriatry department CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France; Laboratoire CarMeN de l'Université de Lyon, Inserm U1060, INRA U1397, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA Lyon, UCOGIR- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Ouest - Guyane
| | | | | | - Eric Terrebonne
- Gastroenterology department, CHU Haut Lévèque, Pessac, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc Van den Eynde
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | | | - Sandrine Hiret
- Medical Oncology department, Institut Cancérologique de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tsuchiya A, Ogawa C, Kondo N, Kojima Y, Yamada Y, Terakado H. Exploratory study on relative dose intensity and reasons for dose reduction of adjuvant CAPOX therapy in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Glob Health Med 2022; 4:180-185. [PMID: 35855064 PMCID: PMC9243406 DOI: 10.35772/ghm.2021.01018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin, CAPOX, therapy is one of the standardized options for adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer, but the efficacy and the safety of CAPOX in elderly patients are unclear. In this study, we investigated the relative dose intensity (RDI) and reasons for dose reduction in patients over the age of 70 (elderly group) (n = 12) and those under the age of 70 (non-elderly group) (n = 24) receiving adjuvant CAPOX therapy for colorectal cancer. The median RDIs were 71.1% in the elderly group and 67.9% in the non-elderly group for oxaliplatin (p = 0.416), and 81.6% and 86.4% for capecitabine (p = 0.166), respectively. The rate of peripheral neuropathy which was the reason for dose reduction of oxaliplatin was approximately 4.5-fold higher in the non-elderly group than in the elderly group. In addition, hematologic toxicity was the most common reason for dose reduction at 50.0% in the elderly group. The results of this study suggested that a similar therapeutic intensity can be maintained in elderly patients relative to non-elderly patients by appropriate dose reduction and discontinuation of drug treatments. Elderly patients are more susceptible to hematologic toxicity than to peripheral neuropathy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayumi Tsuchiya
- Pharmaceutical Department, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Chiaki Ogawa
- Pharmaceutical Department, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Naoki Kondo
- Pharmaceutical Department, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasushi Kojima
- Gastroenterology, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuhide Yamada
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Terakado
- Pharmaceutical Department, Center Hospital of the National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
McCleary NJ, Zhang S, Ma C, Ou FS, Bainter TM, Venook AP, Niedzwiecki D, Lenz HJ, Innocenti F, O'Neil BH, Polite BN, Hochster HS, Atkins JN, Goldberg RM, Ng K, Mayer RJ, Blanke CD, O'Reilly EM, Fuchs CS, Meyerhardt JA. Age and comorbidity association with survival outcomes in metastatic colorectal cancer: CALGB 80405 analysis. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:469-479. [PMID: 35105521 PMCID: PMC9058225 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the interaction of comorbidities and age on survival outcomes in colorectal cancer (mCRC), nor how comorbidities impact treatment tolerance. METHODS We utilized a cohort of 1345 mCRC patients enrolled in CALGB/SWOG 80405, a multicenter phase III trial of fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or irinotecan (FOLFIRI) plus bevacizumab, cetuximab or both. Endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade ≥ 3 toxicities assessed using NCI CTCAE v.3.0. Participants completed a questionnaire, including a modified Charlson Comorbidity Index. Adjusted Cox and logistic regression models tested associations of comorbidities and age on the endpoints. RESULTS In CALGB/SWOG 80405, 1095 (81%) subjects were < 70 years and >70 250 (19%). Presence of ≥1 comorbidity was not significantly associated with either OS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.96-1.25) or PFS (HR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91-1.16). Compared to subjects <70 with no comorbidities, OS was non-significantly inferior for ≥70 with no comorbidities (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.98-1.49) and significantly inferior for ≥70 with at least one comorbidity (HR 1.51, 95% CI 1.22-1.86). There were no significant associations or interactions between age or comorbidity with PFS. Comorbidities were not associated with treatment-related toxicities. Age ≥ 70 was associated with greater risk of grade ≥ 3 toxicities (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.50-3.09, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Among participants in a clinical trial of combination chemotherapy for mCRC, presence of older age with comorbidities was associated with worse OS but not PFS. The association of age with toxicity suggests additional factors of care should be measured in clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine J McCleary
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America.
| | - Sui Zhang
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Chao Ma
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Fang-Shu Ou
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | - Tiffany M Bainter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, United States of America
| | | | | | - Heinz-Josef Lenz
- USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Federico Innocenti
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States of America
| | - Bert H O'Neil
- Simon Cancer Center, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America
| | - Blase N Polite
- Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States of America
| | - Howard S Hochster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, Brunswick, NJ, United States of America
| | - James N Atkins
- Southeast Cancer Control Consortium, CCOP, Goldsboro, NC, United States of America
| | - Richard M Goldberg
- West Virginia University Cancer Institute, Morgantown, WV, United States of America
| | - Kimmie Ng
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Robert J Mayer
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| | - Charles D Blanke
- SWOG and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States of America
| | - Eileen M O'Reilly
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Charles S Fuchs
- Yale Cancer Center and Smillow Cancer Hospital, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America
| | - Jeffrey A Meyerhardt
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, United States of America; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bang HJ, Shim HJ, Kim GR, Hwang JE, Bae WK, Chung IJ, Cho SH. Geriatric functional assessment for decision-making on adjuvant chemotherapy in older colon cancer patients. Korean J Intern Med 2022; 37:660-672. [PMID: 35421912 PMCID: PMC9082429 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2021.324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Revised: 10/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Despite the increasing need for geriatric assessment prior to chemotherapy, the method for this assessment remains inadequate for older cancer patients. We aimed to propose a simple assessment method to predict the performance of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients after colon cancer surgery. METHODS This prospective study included patients over 65 years of age who were scheduled for adjuvant chemotherapy after colon cancer surgery. Before initiating chemotherapy, their functional status was assessed on the basis of activities of daily living (ADL)/instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). These parameters were analyzed with clinical characteristics and the patterns of adjuvant chemotherapy. The focus was on the completion rate of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS A total of 89 patients with a median age of 72 years were analyzed. Among them, 54 (61%) were non-impaired and 35 (39%) were impaired regarding their ADL/IADL classification. Low body mass index and impairment of ADL/IADLs were significantly associated with chemotherapy interruption. Among toxicities, fatigue and hand-foot syndrome were independent prognostic factors for chemotherapy interruption. Impairments of ADL/IADL were significantly associated with fatigue regardless of age. Based on age and ADL/IADL stratification, younger patients (≤ 72 years) and/or those who were ADL/IADL non-impaired were significantly more likely to complete adjuvant chemotherapy than older patients (> 72 years) and ADL/IADL impaired patients (p = 0.038). This was regardless of the chemotherapy regimen. CONCLUSION Functional assessment using ADL/IADL is a convenient method to predict chemotherapy toxicity and performance. These results suggested that routine screening for ADL/IADLs could guide appropriate patient selection for the completion of adjuvant chemotherapy and predict expected outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Jin Bang
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Hyun Jeong Shim
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Ga Ram Kim
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Jun Eul Hwang
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Woo Kyun Bae
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Ik Joo Chung
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Sang Hee Cho
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Tominaga T, Nonaka T, Oyama S, Shiraishi T, Takeshita H, Hisanaga M, Fukuoka H, Fukuda A, Sumida Y, Hashimoto S, To K, Tanaka K, Sawai T, Nagayasu T. Effect of oxaliplatin in elderly colon cancer patients with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease: a multicenter, propensity score-matched analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1181-1188. [PMID: 35478036 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04159-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) using fluoro-pyrimidine and oxaliplatin (FU + oxaliplatin) is recommended after curative resection for locally advanced colon cancer patients, several randomized controlled trials have shown no additional effect of oxaliplatin in patients aged ≥ 70 years. Here, we examined the effectiveness of FU + oxaliplatin on the long-term outcome of old patients with a high risk of recurrence. METHODS This multicenter, retrospective study included 346 colon cancer patients diagnosed with pathological T4 and/or N2 disease from 2016 to 2020. They were divided into an old group (≥ 70 years, n = 197) and a young group (< 70 years, n = 167). Propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias, and 126 patients per group were matched. RESULTS Before matching, the rates of poor performance status (p < 0.001) and the presence of comorbidities (76.1% vs. 47.9%, p < 0.001) were higher in the old group. Although all baseline factors were similar between groups, after matching, the AC rate was lower in the old group (45.2% vs. 65.1%, p = 0.002). In the old group, relapse-free (82.2% vs. 55.6% and 69.6%, p < 0.05) and overall survival (83.1% vs. 80.0% and 44.4%, p < 0.05) rates were significantly higher in the AC patients with FU + oxaliplatin than in the AC patients with only FU and the non-AC patients. CONCLUSION The selected old colon cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence gained an additional benefit with respect to prognosis from FU + oxaliplatin as AC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tetsuro Tominaga
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
| | - Takashi Nonaka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan
| | - Shosaburo Oyama
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan
| | - Toshio Shiraishi
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Takeshita
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, Ohmura, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Makoto Hisanaga
- Department of Surgery, Isahaya General Hospital, Isahaya, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Fukuoka
- Department of Surgery, Isahaya General Hospital, Isahaya, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akiko Fukuda
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Saga, Japan
| | - Yorihisa Sumida
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Saga, Japan
| | - Shintaro Hashimoto
- Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, Sasebo, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Kazuo To
- Department of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, Sasebo, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Kenji Tanaka
- Department of Surgery, Saiseikai Nagasaki Hospital, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Terumitsu Sawai
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan
| | - Takeshi Nagayasu
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chen J, Zhang C, Wu Y. Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in elderly patients with colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2022; 16:383-391. [PMID: 35303773 DOI: 10.1080/17474124.2022.2056014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Elderly patients are frequently excluded from randomized trials. It is unclear if adjuvant chemotherapy improves outcomes of colorectal cancer in such patients. The current study aimed to review evidence on the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in elderly patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer by pooling data from real-world studies. METHODS PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases were searched for observational studies reporting adjusted data on OS and DFS in elderly (≥70 years) colorectal cancer patients based on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy. RESULTS Thirteen studies included. The meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant improved OS in elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.00001). Results were similar for sub-group analysis based on cancer stage and definition of elderly. Improvement in OS was noted in only Western population studies with no difference in Asian patients. The meta-analysis also revealed no statistically significant difference in DFS in elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery alone (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION Real-world evidence indicates that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS but not DFS in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Scarce evidence suggests a limited role of adjuvant chemotherapy in Asian patients which needs confirmation by further studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianbing Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Heping Hospital Affiliated to Changzhi Medical College, Changzhi, P.R China
| | - Chengda Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Third Hospital of Mianyang (Sichuan Mental Health Center), Mianyang, P.R China
| | - Yajuan Wu
- The Second Chest Radiotheropy Department, Shanxi Province Cancer Hospital/ Shanxi Hospital Affiliated to Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences/Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, P.R China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nöpel-Dünnebacke S, Jütte H, Denz R, Feder IS, Kraeft AL, Lugnier C, Teschendorf C, Collette D, Böhner H, Engel L, Mueller L, Hartmann F, Kaiser U, Bruch HR, Hollerbach S, Arnold D, Timmesfeld N, Tannapfel A, Reinacher-Schick A. Causes of mortality in elderly UICC stage III colon cancer (CC) patients--Tumor-related death and competing risks from the German AIO colorectal study group Colopredict Plus (CPP) registry. Cancer Med 2022; 11:1735-1744. [PMID: 35146948 PMCID: PMC9041084 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Colon cancer (CC) is a disease of elderly patients (pts.) with a median age of 73 years (yrs.). Lack of data about the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is caused by underrepresentation of this clinically relevant cohort in interventional trials. We analyzed real‐world data from the German CPP registry with regard to a possible benefit of ACT in elderly (70+ yrs.) versus younger pts. (50 to <70 yrs.) taking cause‐specific deaths into account. Methods We analyzed the effect of age and ACT on overall survival (OS) and cause‐specific death of stage III pts. using Cox regression. Results In total, 1558 pts. were analyzed and follow‐up was 24.6 months. 62.6% of the elderly received ACT whereas 91.1% of younger pts. (p < 0.001). Oxaliplatin combinations were significantly less often given to older than younger pts. (38.8% vs. 88.9%; p < 0.001). Mean Charlson comorbidity score was significantly lower in pts. that received ACT (0.61) than in those without ACT (1.16; p < 0.001). ACT was an independent positive prognostic factor for cancer‐related death in elderly pts. even in pts. 75+ yrs. No significant difference in the effect of ACT could be observed between age groups (interaction: cancer‐specific death HR = 1.7948, p = 0.1079; death of other cause HR = 0.7384, p = 0.6705). Conclusion ACT was an independent positive prognostic factor for OS. There may be a cohort of elderly with less co‐morbidities who benefit from ACT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefanie Nöpel-Dünnebacke
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Hendrick Jütte
- Institute of Pathology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Robin Denz
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Anna-Lena Kraeft
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | - Celine Lugnier
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Daniela Collette
- Joint Practice of Hematology and Oncology, Catholic Hospital Dortmund West, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Hinrich Böhner
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Catholic Hospital Dortmund West, Germany
| | - Lars Engel
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University, Hospital Nürnberg Nord, Nürnberg, Germany
| | | | - Frank Hartmann
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Klinikum Lippe, Lemgo, Germany
| | - Ulrich Kaiser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Bernsward Hospital, Hildesheim, Germany
| | | | | | - Dirk Arnold
- Department of Oncology, Hematology and Palliative Care, Asklepios Hospital, Cancer Center Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Nina Timmesfeld
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometrics and Epidemiology, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, St. Josef-Hospital Bochum, Ruhr-University, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhang D, Wang X, Zhang M, Yin Y, Guo J. Clinical efficacy of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients over 80 years old. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1853-1863. [PMID: 35857106 PMCID: PMC9388411 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04222-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and aggressive gastrointestinal cancer, and the prognostic impact associated with chemotherapy in super elderly (over 80 years old) patients remains poorly defined. We aimed to define the effect of chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with CRC over 80 years old. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective study including CRC patients over 80 years old was conducted. The patients were screened from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were applied as the primary and secondary outcome. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with OS and CSS. Survival curves of OS and CSS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS In total, 14,748 CRC patients over 80 years old were included in this study. The median patient age was 85 (IQR: 82-87). All patients were divided into surgical group and non-surgical group. The OS and CSS of the surgical group were significantly better than those of the non-surgical group (P < 0.001). Chemotherapy can improve OS and CSS for patients with stage III and IV (P < 0.001) in surgical group. For the super elderly patients with CRC, chemotherapy significantly improved OS and CSS in all TNM stages in non-surgical group. CONCLUSION For super elderly patients with colorectal cancer, tumor treatment should not be abandoned because of their age. It is necessary to carry out clinical trials in super elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongdong Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Xue Wang
- Jinan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jinan, 250001 Shandong China
| | - Mingbao Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Yafei Yin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianqiang Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Feliu J, Espinosa E, Basterretxea L, Paredero I, Llabrés E, Jiménez-Munárriz B, Antonio-Rebollo M, Losada B, Pinto A, Custodio AB, del Mar Muñoz M, Gómez-Mediavilla J, Torregrosa MD, Soler G, Cruz P, Higuera O, Molina-Garrido MJ. Prediction of Chemotoxicity, Unplanned Hospitalizations and Early Death in Older Patients with Colorectal Cancer Treated with Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010127. [PMID: 35008291 PMCID: PMC8749992 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Revised: 12/15/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Chemotoxicity, unplanned hospitalizations (Uhs) and early death (ED) are common among older patients with cancer who receive chemotherapy. Our objective was to determine factors predicting these complications. A predictive score for these three complications based on geriatric, tumor and laboratory variables was developed in a series of 215 older patients with colorectal carcinoma receiving chemotherapy. The use of this score may reliably identify patients at risk to have excessive toxicity with chemotherapy, UH or ED, thus helping to plan treatment, implement adaptive measures, and intensify follow-up. Abstract Purpose: To identify risk factors for toxicity, unplanned hospitalization (UH) and early death (ED) in older patients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) initiating chemotherapy. Methods: 215 patients over 70 years were prospectively included. Geriatric assessment was performed before treatment, and tumor and treatment variables were collected. The association between these factors and grade 3–5 toxicity, UH and ED (<6 months) was examined by using multivariable logistic regression. Score points were assigned to each risk factor. Results: During the first 6 months of treatment, 33% of patients developed grade 3–5 toxicity, 31% had UH and 23% died. Risk factors were, for toxicity, instrumental activities of daily living, creatinine clearance, weight loss and MAX2 index; for UH, Charlson Comorbidity Score, creatinine clearance, weight loss, serum albumin, and metastatic disease; and for ED, basic activities in daily living, weight loss, metastatic disease, and hemoglobin levels. Predictive scores were built with these variables. The areas under receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curves for toxicity, UH and ED were 0.70 (95% CI: 0.64–0.766), 0.726 (95% IC: 0.661–0.799) and 0.74 (95% IC: 0.678–0.809), respectively. Conclusion: Simple scores based on geriatric, tumor and laboratory characteristics predict severe toxicity, UH and ED, and may help in treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Feliu
- Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, IDIPAZ, CIBERONC, UAM-AMGEN Cathedra, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel./Fax: +3-491-727-7118
| | - Enrique Espinosa
- Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, IDIPAZ, CIBERONC, UAM-AMGEN Cathedra, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Laura Basterretxea
- Oncology Department, Donostia University Hospital, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (L.B.); (J.G.-M.)
| | - Irene Paredero
- Oncology Department, Doctor Peset University Hospital, 46017 Valencia, Spain; (I.P.); (M.-D.T.)
| | - Elisenda Llabrés
- Oncology Department, Insular University Hospital of Gran Canarias, 35016 Las Palmas, Spain;
| | | | - Maite Antonio-Rebollo
- Oncohematogeriatrics Unit, Institut Català d’Oncologia, IDIBELL Hospitalet, 08908 Barcelona, Spain; (M.A.-R.); (G.S.)
| | - Beatriz Losada
- Oncology Department, University Hospital of Fuenlabrada, 28942 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Alvaro Pinto
- Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, IDIPAZ, CIBERONC, UAM-AMGEN Cathedra, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Ana Belén Custodio
- Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, IDIPAZ, CIBERONC, UAM-AMGEN Cathedra, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - María del Mar Muñoz
- Oncology Department, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, 16002 Cuenca, Spain; (M.d.M.M.); (M.-J.M.-G.)
| | | | | | - Gema Soler
- Oncohematogeriatrics Unit, Institut Català d’Oncologia, IDIBELL Hospitalet, 08908 Barcelona, Spain; (M.A.-R.); (G.S.)
| | - Patricia Cruz
- Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, IDIPAZ, CIBERONC, UAM-AMGEN Cathedra, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Oliver Higuera
- Oncology Department, La Paz University Hospital, IDIPAZ, CIBERONC, UAM-AMGEN Cathedra, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Yoshino T, Argilés G, Oki E, Martinelli E, Taniguchi H, Arnold D, Mishima S, Li Y, Smruti BK, Ahn JB, Faud I, Chee CE, Yeh KH, Lin PC, Chua C, Hasbullah HH, Lee MA, Sharma A, Sun Y, Curigliano G, Bando H, Lordick F, Yamanaka T, Tabernero J, Baba E, Cervantes A, Ohtsu A, Peters S, Ishioka C, Pentheroudakis G. Pan-Asian adapted ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis treatment and follow-up of patients with localised colon cancer. Ann Oncol 2021; 32:1496-1510. [PMID: 34411693 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.08.1752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The most recent version of the European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) Clinical Practice Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of localised colon cancer was published in 2020. It was decided by both the ESMO and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology (JSMO) to convene a special virtual guidelines meeting in March 2021 to adapt the ESMO 2020 guidelines to take into account the ethnic differences associated with the treatment of localised colon cancer in Asian patients. These guidelines represent the consensus opinions reached by experts in the treatment of patients with localised colon cancer representing the oncological societies of Japan (JSMO), China (CSCO), India (ISMPO), Korea (KSMO), Malaysia (MOS), Singapore (SSO) and Taiwan (TOS). The voting was based on scientific evidence and was independent of the current treatment practices and drug availability and reimbursement situations in the different Asian countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Yoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan.
| | - G Argilés
- Luis Diaz Laboratory, MSKCC, Sloan Kettering Institute, New York, USA
| | - E Oki
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - E Martinelli
- Department of Precision Medicine, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples, Italy
| | - H Taniguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - D Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | - S Mishima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - Y Li
- Department of General Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - B K Smruti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Lilavati Hospital and Research Centre and Bombay Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - J B Ahn
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei Cancer Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - I Faud
- Department of Radiotherapy & Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - C E Chee
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, National University Cancer Institute, Singapore, Singapore
| | - K-H Yeh
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - P-C Lin
- Department of Oncology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - C Chua
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre, Singapore, Singapore
| | - H H Hasbullah
- Oncology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, UiTM Sg Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - M A Lee
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - A Sharma
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Y Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - G Curigliano
- Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, IRCCS and University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - H Bando
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - F Lordick
- Department of Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology, and Infectious Diseases, University Cancer Center, Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - T Yamanaka
- Department of Biostatistics, Yokohama City University, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - J Tabernero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), UVic-UCC, IOB-Quiron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Baba
- Department of Oncology and Social Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - A Cervantes
- CIBERONC, Department of Medical Oncology, Institute of Health Research, INCLIVIA, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain
| | - A Ohtsu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - S Peters
- Oncology Department, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - C Ishioka
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Heinemann V, Stintzing S. [Neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapy of resectable colon cancer - Current standards and developments]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2021; 146:1457-1467. [PMID: 34741291 DOI: 10.1055/a-1391-5124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The present review focusses on perioperative diagnosis and treatment of resectable colon cancer. In UICC stages associated with a higher risk of recurrence, adjuvant chemotherapy after resection of the primary tumor is an established standard. While initial data also indicate the benefit of Neoadjuvant, pre-operative chemotherapy, a final evaluation is still pending. The main focus of molecular testing in the perioperative setting is the analysis of microsatellite instability, which should routinely be performed in defined subgroups. In UICC stage II without risk factors, adjuvant therapy has a limited benefit and therefore is not a preferred option. In UICC stage II with risk factors, adjuvant therapy can be performed. The approach here is based on the recommendations applicable to stage III. In UICC stage III with low risk, adjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX for 3 months is preferentially recommended. In UICC stage III with high risk, adjuvant chemotherapy over 6 months is recommended, preferentially with FOLFOX. Microsatellite instability (MSI) is clearly associated with favorable prognosis in non-metastatic colon cancer. However, it cannot be considered a predictive factor for the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy. Specifically, recent data of the IDEA study have opened the arena for shared decision making between physicians and patients allowing to define individual treatment approaches based on common assessment of risks and benefits. After completion of perioperative treatment, structured follow-up is of great importance and should be carried out according to the recommendations of the S3 guideline.
Collapse
|
29
|
Hanna CR, Boyd KA, Wincenciak J, Graham J, Iveson T, Jones RJ, Wilson R. Do clinical trials change practice? A longitudinal, international assessment of colorectal cancer prescribing practices. Cancer Treat Res Commun 2021; 28:100445. [PMID: 34425469 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctarc.2021.100445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over half of the 1.5 million individuals globally who are diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) present with stage II-III disease. Understanding clinician attitudes towards treatment for this group is paramount to contextualise real-world outcomes and plan future trials. The aim of this study was to assess clinician awareness of trials assessing the optimal duration of CRC adjuvant therapy, their attitudes towards shorter treatment and their self-reported practice. METHODS A survey was developed using OnlineSurveys® and distributed to clinicians in April 2019, with a follow-up survey disseminated to a subset of respondents in August 2020. Microsoft Excel® and Stata® were used for analysis. RESULTS 265 clinicians replied to the first survey, with the majority aware of findings from the International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Therapy collaboration and contributory trials. Practice change was greatest for patients under 70 with low-risk stage III CRC, with most uncertainty around using 3-months of doublet chemotherapy for high-risk stage II disease. In August 2020, clinicians (n = 106) were more likely to use 3-months of FOLFOX for low-risk stage III disease and 3-months of CAPOX for stage II disease compared to April 2019. There was no indication that the COVID-19 pandemic had enduring changes on treatment decisions beyond those made in response to trial evidence. DISCUSSION Clinicians use a risk-stratified approach to treat CRC the adjuvant setting. Lower utilisation of doublet chemotherapy for older and stage II patients has affected the extent of trial implementation. Active dialogue regarding how trial results apply to these groups may improve consensus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine R Hanna
- CRUK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow CRUK Clinical Trials Unit Glasgow, 1042 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, United Kingdom.
| | - Kathleen A Boyd
- Health Economic and Health Technology Assessment, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow 1 Lilybank Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RZ, United Kingdom
| | - Joanna Wincenciak
- School of Education, University of Glasgow 1 Eldon St, Glasgow G3 6NH, United Kingdom
| | - Janet Graham
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow 1053 Great Western Road, G12 0YN Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
| | - Timothy Iveson
- University of Southampton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 0YD, United Kingdom.
| | - Robert J Jones
- CRUK Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow CRUK Clinical Trials Unit Glasgow, 1042 Great Western Road, Glasgow G12 0YN, United Kingdom
| | - Richard Wilson
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre and Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow 1053 Great Western Road, G12 0YN Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Taha HF, Harb OA, Gertallah LM, Abdelaziz LA. Choosing the Appropriate Individualized Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Stage III Colon Cancer Patients Under and Over 70 Years. J Gastrointest Cancer 2021; 53:581-591. [PMID: 34282542 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00666-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colon cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The increased incidence of comorbid diseases in elderly patients above 70 leads to the need of less aggressive strategies to be used in the adjuvant setting of stage III colon cancer. METHOD Our prospective cohort study was performed in the period from April 2017 to March 2020. Seventy-five patients with newly diagnosed stage III colon cancer received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery. Patients who either received adjuvant chemotherapy less than 3 months due to intolerability or toxicity from medications or who have more than one type of cancers or metastatic disease from the start were excluded from the study. Patients' clinicopathological characteristics in relation to oxaliplatin- and non-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapeutic regimens were analyzed with survival assessment. RESULTS In our study, patients above 70 had better overall survival (OS) in the non-oxaliplatin chemotherapy group (p-value = 0.032) in contrast to OS in patients under 70 which was better in the oxaliplatin group (p-value < 0.001). By comparing the OS between the two age groups, the OS was better in patients < 70 years (p-value = 0.001). Additionally, we found that the DFS in patients above 70 was better in oxaliplatin-based regimens than in the non-oxaliplatin group (p-value = 0.011) with better survival rates (81.8% vs 15.7%), and markedly high DFS in patients under 70 for oxaliplatin based regimens (p-value < 0.001), with survival rates (31.1% vs 0%). By comparing the DFS between the two age groups, the DFS was better in patients < 70 years (p-value < 0.001). The disease recurrence was in favor of the non-oxaliplatin group with significant p-value = 0.003, while mortality occurred more in the oxaliplatin group (p-value < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The appropriate selection of a personalized strategy for treatment of stage III colon cancer plays an important role in the outcome of the disease. Our findings supported the use of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as a standard treatment option in the adjuvant management of stage III colon cancer patients in all age groups. The benefit of non-oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy was limited to patients above 70 which might be an effective option for elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heba F Taha
- Medical Oncology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
| | - Ola A Harb
- Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Loay M Gertallah
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| | - Lobna A Abdelaziz
- Clinical Oncology & Nuclear Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
What Should We Recommend for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Adults Aged 75 and Older? ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:2540-2547. [PMID: 34287279 PMCID: PMC8293045 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28040231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The current recommendation to stop colorectal cancer screening for older adults is based on a lack of evidence due to systematic exclusion of this population from trials. Older adults are a heterogenous population with many available strategies for patient-centered assessment and decision-making. Evolutions in management strategies for colorectal cancer have made safe and effective options available to older adults, and the rationale to screen for treatable disease more reasonably, especially given the aging Canadian population. In this commentary, we review the current screening guidelines and the evidence upon which they were built, the unique considerations for screening older adults, new treatment options, the risks and benefits of increased screening and potential considerations for the new guidelines.
Collapse
|
32
|
Huang WK, Hsu HC, Chang SH, Chou WC, Chang PH, Chiang SF, Chang JWC, Chen JS, Yang TS, See LC. Real-World Effectiveness of Adjuvant Oxaliplatin Chemotherapy in Stage III Colon Cancer: A Controlled Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:693009. [PMID: 34267662 PMCID: PMC8276019 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.693009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: The real-world effectiveness of oxaliplatin in stage III colon cancer has not been determined in a large-scale population. We aimed to assess the real-world impact of adjuvant oxaliplatin treatment on the survival of these patients. Methods: Based on Taiwan cancer registry, we evaluated 17,801 patients with resected stage III colon cancer, including 14,168 patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy and 3,633 not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy as the control group between 2004 and 2014. We used the controlled interrupted time-series analysis to assess the three-year disease-free survival and five-year overall survival rates before (2004–2008) and after (2009–2014) the addition of oxaliplatin. Results: The introduction of oxaliplatin was associated with no significant improvement in the slopes (per half-year) of the three-year disease-free survival rate (0.2%, 95% CI: −1.7∼2.2%) and five-year overall survival rate (0.6%, 95% CI: −1.8∼3%). The patients receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy also showed no significant increase in the slopes (per half-year) of the three-year disease-free survival rate (0.6%, 95% CI: −1.4∼2.6%) and five-year overall survival rate (1%, 95% CI: −1.5∼3.5%). The nonsignificant results were consistent across subgroup analyses of age (<70 vs. ≥70 years), recurrence risk (T1-3 or N1 vs. T4 or N2), and cycle of oxaliplatin use (≤6 vs. >6). However, oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly increased the slope (per half-year) of the five-year OS (2%, 95% CI: 0.2∼3.8%) for patients in the high-risk group (T4 or N2). The present results were robust in several sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Among real-world patients with stage III colon cancer, the introduction of oxaliplatin does not yield a significant improvement in survival. Future work should identify the subpopulation(s) of patients who benefit significantly from the addition of oxaliplatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Kuan Huang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hung-Chih Hsu
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Hao Chang
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chi Chou
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Hung Chang
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung, Taiwan
| | - Sum-Fu Chiang
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - John Wen-Cheng Chang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shi Chen
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tsai-Sheng Yang
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Lai-Chu See
- Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Biostatistics Core Laboratory, Molecular Medicine Research Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Di Donato S, Vignoli A, Biagioni C, Malorni L, Mori E, Tenori L, Calamai V, Parnofiello A, Di Pierro G, Migliaccio I, Cantafio S, Baraghini M, Mottino G, Becheri D, Del Monte F, Miceli E, McCartney A, Di Leo A, Luchinat C, Biganzoli L. A Serum Metabolomics Classifier Derived from Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Predicts Relapse in the Adjuvant Setting. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13112762. [PMID: 34199435 PMCID: PMC8199587 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13112762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 05/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Around 30–40% of patients with early stage colorectal cancer (eCRC) experience relapse after surgery. Current recommendations for adjuvant therapy are based on suboptimal risk-stratification tools. In elderly patients, risk of relapse assessment is particularly important to ultimately avoid unnecessary chemotherapy-related toxicity in this frailer population. Serum metabolomics via NMR spectroscopy may improve risk stratification by identifying patients with residual micrometastases after surgery and thus at higher risk of relapse. We evaluated the serum metabolomic fingerprints of 94 elderly patients with eCRC (65 relapse free and 29 relapsed), and of 75 elderly patients with metastatic disease. Metabolomics efficiently discriminated patients with relapse-free eCRC from those with metastatic disease, correctly predicting relapse in 69% of relapsed eCRC patients. The metabolomic score was strongly and independently associated with prognosis. Our data suggest metabolomics as a valid addition to standard tools to refine risk stratification for eCRC and warrant further investigation. Abstract Adjuvant treatment for patients with early stage colorectal cancer (eCRC) is currently based on suboptimal risk stratification, especially for elderly patients. Metabolomics may improve the identification of patients with residual micrometastases after surgery. In this retrospective study, we hypothesized that metabolomic fingerprinting could improve risk stratification in patients with eCRC. Serum samples obtained after surgery from 94 elderly patients with eCRC (65 relapse free and 29 relapsed, after 5-years median follow up), and from 75 elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) obtained before a new line of chemotherapy, were retrospectively analyzed via proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The prognostic role of metabolomics in patients with eCRC was assessed using Kaplan–Meier curves. PCA-CA-kNN could discriminate the metabolomic fingerprint of patients with relapse-free eCRC and mCRC (70.0% accuracy using NOESY spectra). This model was used to classify the samples of patients with relapsed eCRC: 69% of eCRC patients with relapse were predicted as metastatic. The metabolomic classification was strongly associated with prognosis (p-value 0.0005, HR 3.64), independently of tumor stage. In conclusion, metabolomics could be an innovative tool to refine risk stratification in elderly patients with eCRC. Based on these results, a prospective trial aimed at improving risk stratification by metabolomic fingerprinting (LIBIMET) is ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Di Donato
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-057-480-2520
| | - Alessia Vignoli
- Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; (A.V.); (L.T.); (C.L.)
- Department of Chemistry “Ugo Schiff”, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Chiara Biagioni
- Bioinformatics Unit, Medical Oncology Department, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy;
| | - Luca Malorni
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
- “Sandro Pitigliani” Translational Research Unit, New Hospital of Prato, Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy;
| | - Elena Mori
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
| | - Leonardo Tenori
- Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; (A.V.); (L.T.); (C.L.)
- Department of Chemistry “Ugo Schiff”, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Vanessa Calamai
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
| | - Annamaria Parnofiello
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
- Department of Medicine (DAME), University of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Giulia Di Pierro
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
| | - Ilenia Migliaccio
- “Sandro Pitigliani” Translational Research Unit, New Hospital of Prato, Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy;
| | - Stefano Cantafio
- Department of Surgery, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (S.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Maddalena Baraghini
- Department of Surgery, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (S.C.); (M.B.)
| | - Giuseppe Mottino
- Department of Geriatrics, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (G.M.); (D.B.)
| | - Dimitri Becheri
- Department of Geriatrics, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (G.M.); (D.B.)
| | - Francesca Del Monte
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
| | - Elisangela Miceli
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
| | - Amelia McCartney
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
- School of Clinical Sciences, Monash University, 3168 Clayton, Australia
| | - Angelo Di Leo
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
| | - Claudio Luchinat
- Magnetic Resonance Center, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy; (A.V.); (L.T.); (C.L.)
- Department of Chemistry “Ugo Schiff”, University of Florence, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
- Consorzio Interuniversitario Risonanze Magnetiche di Metallo Proteine (C.I.R.M.M.P.), 50019 Sesto Fiorentino, Italy
| | - Laura Biganzoli
- Department of Medical Oncology, New Hospital of Prato S. Stefano, 59100 Prato, Italy; (L.M.); (E.M.); (V.C.); (A.P.); (G.D.P.); (F.D.M.); (E.M.); (A.M.); (A.D.L.); (L.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Rosati G, Lonardi S, Galli F, Di Bartolomeo M, Ronzoni M, Zampino MG, Banzi M, Zaniboni A, Pasini F, Bozzarelli S, Garattini SK, Ferrari D, Montesarchio V, Mambrini A, Ciuffreda L, Galli F, Pusceddu V, Carlomagno C, Bidoli P, Amoroso D, Bochicchio AM, Frassineti L, Corsi D, Bilancia D, Pastorino A, De Stefano A, Labianca R. Oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidines as adjuvant therapy for colon cancer in older patients: A subgroup analysis from the TOSCA trial. Eur J Cancer 2021; 148:190-201. [PMID: 33744715 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.01.051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Revised: 01/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies on oxaliplatin and fluoropyrimidines as adjuvant therapy in older patients with stage III colon cancer (CC) produced conflicting results. PATIENTS AND METHODS We assessed the impact of age on time to tumour recurrence (TTR), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) in 2360 patients with stage III CC (1667 aged <70 years and 693 ≥ 70 years) randomised to receive 3 or 6 months of FOLFOX or CAPOX within the frame of the phase III, TOSCA study. RESULTS Older patients compared with younger ones presented more frequently an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status equal to 1 (10.5% vs 3.3%, p < 0.001), a greater number of right-sided tumours (40.9% vs 26.6%, p < 0.001), and were at higher clinical risk (37.2% vs 33.2%, p = 0.062). The treatments were almost identical in the two cohorts (p = 0.965). We found a greater proportion of dose reductions (46.7% vs 41.4%, p = 0.018), treatment interruptions (26.1% vs 19.3%, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of recurrences (24.2% vs 20.3%, p = 0.033) in the older patients. The multivariable analysis of the TTR did not indicate a statistically significant effect of age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.98-1.44; p = 0.082). The HR comparing older with younger patients was 1.34 (95% CI: 1.12-1.59; p = 0.001) for DFS, 1.58 (95% CI: 1.26-1.99; p < 0.001) for OS, and 1.28 (95% CI: 0.96-1.70; p = 0.089) for CSS. CONCLUSIONS Worse prognostic factors and reduced treatment compliance have a negative impact on the efficacy of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant therapy in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerardo Rosati
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Carlo, Potenza, Italy.
| | - Sara Lonardi
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, Istituto Oncologico Veneto-IRCCS, Padova, Italy
| | - Fabio Galli
- Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | | | - Monica Ronzoni
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Raffaele-IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Maria G Zampino
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumours, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia-IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Maria Banzi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL-IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | - Felice Pasini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Rovigo, Italy
| | - Silvia Bozzarelli
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Humanitas Cancer Center-IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Silvio K Garattini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria S. Maria della Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | - Daris Ferrari
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera San Paolo, Milano, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Montesarchio
- Medical Oncology Unit, A.O.R.N. dei Colli-Ospedali Monaldi-Cotugno-CTO, Napoli, Italy
| | - Andrea Mambrini
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Massa Carrara, Italy
| | - Libero Ciuffreda
- Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesca Galli
- Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical Research, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milano, Italy
| | - Valeria Pusceddu
- Medical Oncology, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Chiara Carlomagno
- Medical Oncology, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Paolo Bidoli
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza, Italy
| | | | - Anna M Bochicchio
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS CROB Basilicata, Rionero in Vulture, Italy
| | | | - Domenico Corsi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Ospedale San G. Calibita Fatebenefratelli, Roma, Italy
| | | | | | - Alfonso De Stefano
- Experimental Clinical Abdominal Oncology Unit, INT-IRCCS, Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Feliu J, Espinosa E, Basterretxea L, Paredero I, Llabrés E, Jiménez-Munárriz B, Losada B, Pinto A, Custodio AB, Muñoz MDM, Gómez-Mediavilla J, Torregrosa MD, Cruz P, Higuera O, Molina-Garrido MJ. Prediction of Unplanned Hospitalizations in Older Patients Treated with Chemotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:1437. [PMID: 33809852 PMCID: PMC8004134 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13061437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2021] [Revised: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the incidence of unplanned hospitalization (UH) and to identify risk factors for UH in elderly patients with cancer who start chemotherapy. METHODS In all, 493 patients over 70 years starting new chemotherapy regimens were prospectively included. A pre-chemotherapy geriatric assessment was performed, and tumor and treatment variables were collected. The association between these factors and UH was examined by using multivariable logistic regression. Score points were assigned to each risk factor. RESULTS During the first 6 months of treatment, 37% of patients had at least one episode of UH. Risk factors were the use of combination chemotherapy at standard doses, a MAX2 index ≥1, a Charlson comorbidity score ≥2, albumin level <3.5 g/dL, falls in the past 6 months ≥1, and weight loss >5%. Three risk groups for UH were established according to the score in all patients: 0-1: 17.5%; 2: 34%; and 3-7: 57% (p < 0.001). The area under receiver operation characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67-0.77). CONCLUSION This simple tool can help to reduce the incidence of UH in elderly patients with cancer who are scheduled to initiate chemotherapy treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Feliu
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Enrique Espinosa
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Laura Basterretxea
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Donostia, 20014 Donostia, Spain; (L.B.); (J.G.-M.)
| | - Irene Paredero
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset, 46017 Valencia, Spain; (I.P.); (M.D.T.)
| | - Elisenda Llabrés
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canarias, 35016 Las Palmas, Spain;
| | | | - Beatriz Losada
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, 28942 Fuenlabrada, Spain;
| | - Alvaro Pinto
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Ana Belén Custodio
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - María del Mar Muñoz
- Oncology Department, Hospital Virgen de la Luz, 16002 Cuenca, Spain; (M.d.M.M.); (M.J.M.-G.)
| | | | | | - Patricia Cruz
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | - Oliver Higuera
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz. IDIPAZ, Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, 28046 Madrid, Spain; (E.E.); (A.P.); (A.B.C.); (P.C.); (O.H.)
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hata T, Hagihara K, Tsutsui A, Akamatsu H, Ohue M, Shingai T, Tei M, Ikenaga M, Kim HM, Osawa H, Takemoto H, Konishi K, Uemura M, Matsuda C, Mizushima T, Murata K, Ohno Y, Doki Y, Eguchi H. Administration Method of Adjuvant Tegafur-Uracil and Leucovorin Calcium in Patients with Resected Colorectal Cancer: A Phase III Study. Oncologist 2021; 26:e735-e741. [PMID: 33604941 PMCID: PMC8100551 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13724] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
LESSONS LEARNED The 3-year disease-free survival rate of the twice-daily regimen was not inferior to that of the conventional three-times-daily regimen, and the twice-daily regimen did not lead to an increase in adverse events. The effectiveness of the twice-daily regimen highlights an increased number of treatment options for patients. This will facilitate personalized medicine, particularly for elderly or frail patients who may experience more severe side effects from the combination therapy. BACKGROUND Tegafur-uracil (UFT)/leucovorin calcium (LV) is an adjuvant chemotherapy treatment for colorectal cancer. We conducted a multicenter randomized trial to assess the noninferiority of a twice-daily compared with a three-times-daily UFT/LV regimen for stage II/III colorectal cancer in an adjuvant setting. METHODS Patients were randomly assigned to group A (three doses of UFT [300 mg/m2 per day]/LV [75 mg per day]) or B (two doses of UFT [300 mg/m2 per day]/LV [50 mg per day]). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS In total, 386 patients were enrolled between July 28, 2011, and September 27, 2013. The 3-year disease-free survival rates of group A (n = 194) and B (n = 192) were 79.4% and 81.4% (95% confidence interval, 72.6-84.4-74.5-85.9), respectively. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events in group A and B were diarrhea (3.9% vs. 7.3%), neutropenia (2.9% vs. 1.6%), increase in aspartate aminotransferase (4.0% vs. 3.9%), increase in alanine aminotransferase (6.2% vs. 6.8%), nausea (1.7% vs. 3.4%), and fatigue (1.1% vs. 2.3%). CONCLUSION Group B outcomes were not inferior to group A outcomes, and adverse events did not increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taishi Hata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Anna Tsutsui
- Department of Mathematical Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Masayuki Ohue
- Department of Surgery, Osaka Police Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Mitsuyoshi Tei
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka Rosai Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masakazu Ikenaga
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ho Min Kim
- Department of Surgery, Rinku General Medical Center, Izumisano Municipal Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideki Osawa
- Department of Surgery, Japan Community Health Care Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | | | | | - Mamoru Uemura
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Chu Matsuda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tsunekazu Mizushima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kohei Murata
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kansai Rosai Hospital, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Yuko Ohno
- Department of Mathematical Health Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Doki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Eguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Alves CMM, de Oliveira Prado PC, Bastos RR. Net survival for colorectal cancer in Cuiabá and Várzea Grande (state of Mato Grosso), Brazil. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1196. [PMID: 33889205 PMCID: PMC8043687 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
In studies of cancer survival, Population-Based Cancer Registries (PBCRs) can provide an overview of the disease for places that have this source of information available. In Brazil, PBCR is officially available in 22 state capitals and 8 cities in the interior of the country. PBCR data from Cuiabá and Várzea Grande, state of Mato Grosso, in Midwestern Brazil, were used to estimate the survival rate of colon (C18), rectosigmoid junction (C19) and rectum (C20) cancer cases diagnosed in 2000-2009 according to the International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision. Five-year survival rate was estimated by the unbiased and consistent net survival estimator, which is used in the country estimates of the global surveillance of cancer survival programme CONCORD Group, for all cases, and also by sex, age group, diagnosis period and place of residence. The probability of death and the number of years of life lost to illness were also estimated. The estimated standardised 5-year survival rate for colorectal cancer was 45.46% (95% CI: 43.09%-47.96%) in the cities of Cuiabá and Várzea Grande. There was no difference between the curves when the survival rate was assessed by diagnostic period (2000-2004 and 2005-2009), sex, age group or city of residence. The gross 5-year probability of death from the disease was 51.2%, accounting for 6.4% of the gross probability of death from other causes, with 2.07 being the years of life lost to illness. The results obtained for Cuiabá and Várzea Grande are compatible with survival rates estimated for Brazil in the CONCORD study, but demonstrate the need to identify reasons why we continue to have low survival rates when compared to most countries involved in the global study mentioned. The results may reflect late diagnosis, difficult access and delays in starting treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christiane Maria Meurer Alves
- Programa de Pós Graduação em Saúde Coletiva, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Rua José Lourenço Kelmer, s/n – São Pedro, Juiz de Fora, 36036-900, Brazil
| | - Pedro Cainelli de Oliveira Prado
- Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Rua José Lourenço Kelmer, s/n – São Pedro, Juiz de Fora, 36036-900, Brazil
| | - Ronaldo Rocha Bastos
- Departamento de Estatística, Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora, Rua José Lourenço Kelmer, s/n – São Pedro, Juiz de Fora, 36036-900, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Margalit O, Boursi B, Rakez M, Thierry A, Yothers G, Wolmark N, Haller DG, Schmoll HJ, Shi Q, Shacham-Shmueli E, de Gramont A. Benefit of Oxaliplatin in Stage III Colon Cancer According to IDEA Risk Groups: Findings from the ACCENT Database of 4934 Patients. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:130-136. [PMID: 33775561 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 01/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) pooled analysis compared 3 to 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer. Patients were classified into low risk and high risk, suggesting low-risk patients may be offered only 3 months of treatment. In this study, we aimed to assess the benefit of oxaliplatin in the adjuvant setting per IDEA risk groups, using data from 3 large adjuvant phase III studies, namely Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/Fluorouracil/ Leucovorin in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer (MOSAIC), C-07, and XELOXA. METHODS Using the MOSAIC, C-07, and XELOXA previously published studies, we identified 2810 low-risk and 2124 high-risk patients with stage III colon cancer. We used Cox regression model to evaluate the magnitude of survival differences between IDEA risk groups, according to oxaliplatin use. Based on design similarity and equivalent follow-up data, MOSAIC and C-07 were pooled, whereas XELOXA was analyzed separately. Subgroup analyses were also performed for T4 and/or N2 patients. RESULTS Individuals with IDEA low and high risk derived overall survival benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant chemotherapy, with adjusted hazard ratios of 0.79 (0.66-0.95) and 0.84 (0.71-0.99), respectively. Among individuals with IDEA high risk, those with T4 disease did not gain overall survival benefit from addition of oxaliplatin with hazard ratio of 0.95 (0.71-1.27). Similar results were demonstrated using data from the XELOXA study. CONCLUSION IDEA risk classification per se does not predict benefit from addition of oxaliplatin to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer. T4 disease may predict lack of benefit from oxaliplatin addition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ofer Margalit
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Ben Boursi
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel; Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Manel Rakez
- Statistical Unit, Fondation A.R.CA.D - Aide et Recherche en CAncérologie Digestive, Levallois-Perret, France
| | - André Thierry
- Sorbonne University and Department of Medical Oncology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Greg Yothers
- NRG Oncology and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Norman Wolmark
- NRG Oncology and the Department of Biostatistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA; NRG Oncology and the NSABP Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Daniel G Haller
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Qian Shi
- Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Einat Shacham-Shmueli
- Department of Oncology, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel; Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Aimery de Gramont
- Statistical Unit, Fondation A.R.CA.D - Aide et Recherche en CAncérologie Digestive, Levallois-Perret, France; Department of Medical Oncology, Franco-British Institute, Levallois-Perret, France.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Boakye D, Nagrini R, Ahrens W, Haug U, Günther K. The association of comorbidities with administration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2021; 13:1758835920986520. [PMID: 33613694 PMCID: PMC7841869 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920986520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Chemotherapy is an established treatment for stage III colon cancer cases. Older age is known to be associated with less chemotherapy use in these patients, but there might be other relevant factors besides age that influence treatment administration. We summarized evidence on associations between comorbidity and adjuvant chemotherapy administration in stage III colon cancer patients in a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We searched the PubMed and Web of Science databases up to 2 June 2020 for studies on comorbidities and chemotherapy use in patients with stage III colon cancer. Summary odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using random-effects models. Subgroup analyses according to year of colon cancer diagnosis, timing of comorbidity assessment, and geographical region were also conducted. Results: Thirty-three studies were included in this review, including 219,406 stage III colon cancer patients overall. Chemotherapy administration was 60.9% (95% CI: 56.9% to 64.9%), increasing from 57.1% before 2001 to 66.3% after 2010. There were inverse associations between comorbidities and chemotherapy administration. Compared with patients with Charlson comorbidity score 0, those with scores 1 (OR = 0.79, 95% CI = 0.72–0.87) and 2+ (OR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.42–0.56) received chemotherapy less often. Among comorbidities, the strongest predictors of chemotherapy non-use were dementia (OR = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.33–0.54), followed by heart failure (OR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.28–0.70) and stroke (OR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.38–0.81). Conclusions: Merely 60% of stage III colon cancer patients receive chemotherapy. Comorbidities are strong predictors of chemotherapy non-use, but the association differs by comorbid condition and is strongest with dementia. Given the survival disadvantage of colon cancer patients with comorbidities, further evidence on the risk–benefit ratio of chemotherapy according to the type and severity of comorbidity and on the extent to which the survival disadvantage of comorbidity is explained by less use or lower tolerability of chemotherapy is needed to foster personalized medical care in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rajini Nagrini
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Ahrens
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- Institute of Statistics, Faculty of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Haug
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
- Faculty of Human and Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| | - Kathrin Günther
- Department of Epidemiological Methods and Etiological Research, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology – BIPS, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Preoperative detection of KRAS mutated circulating tumor DNA is an independent risk factor for recurrence in colorectal cancer. Sci Rep 2021; 11:441. [PMID: 33432066 PMCID: PMC7801374 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-79909-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Preoperative ctDNA status in relation to recurrence in cases of CRC remains unclear. We examined preoperative ctDNA detection by targeting KRAS gene mutations as a predictive marker for recurrence after CRC surgery. We measured the preoperative KRAS mutated ctDNA status and analyzed the correlation with clinicopathologic features of 180 patients that underwent surgery for CRC. We studied the association between preoperative KRAS mutated ctDNA and postoperative recurrence in patients (n = 150) that underwent radical surgery. KRAS mutated ctDNA was detected in 59 patients (32.8%). Median mutant allele frequency of KRAS in ctDNA was 0.20%. KRAS status in ctDNA and lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis were not significantly different. Among patients that underwent radical resection, recurrence occurred in 21 (14.0%, median follow-up 24 months). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, preoperative detection of KRAS mutated ctDNA was associated with inferior recurrence-free interval (RFI) (p = 0.002) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) (p = 0.025). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards model, preoperative detection of KRAS mutated ctDNA was an independent factor related to both RFI (HR = 3.08; p = 0.012) and RFS (HR = 2.18; p = 0.044). Preoperative measurement of KRAS mutated ctDNA could be useful to decide postoperative treatment.
Collapse
|
41
|
Hoshino N, Aoyama R, Hida K. Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Clin Oncol 2021; 26:883-892. [PMID: 33423148 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-021-01858-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection is established as a standard therapy for colon and rectal cancer. Although the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy has been shown by pooled analyses from randomized controlled trials, elderly patients still receive adjuvant chemotherapy less frequently than younger patients. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients based on observational studies in which the elderly patients would likely be representative of those encountered in real-world clinical settings. METHODS A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Observational studies that investigated the survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after curative resection in elderly patients (age ≥ 70 years) with colon or rectal cancer were included. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate and OS were assessed. Risk of bias was assessed using the ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS Eleven studies in elderly patients with colon cancer were included. No relevant study was identified for rectal cancer. Elderly patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy had a significantly higher 5-year OS rate than those who did not (risk ratio 1.51, 95% confidence interval 1.29-1.76, P < 0.001). There was also a significant improvement in OS in elderly patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio 0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.53-0.66, P < 0.001). The overall risk of bias was judged to be critical for both outcomes. CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy provides a survival benefit for elderly patients with colon cancer, although the quality of evidence is low.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuaki Hoshino
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan.
| | - Ryuhei Aoyama
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Koya Hida
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Shogoin-Kawahara-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The value of adjuvant chemotherapy in rectal cancer is controversial with opinions varying from 'not be used' since randomized trials have not shown significant gains to 'be used as in colon cancer' as the need is the same and colon and rectal cancers are quite similar. This review will look upon data critically and with open eyes. RECENT FINDINGS With the exception of one randomized phase II trial (ADORE) revealing a significant gain in disease-free survival using one more effective regimen (mFOLFOX) than bolus 5-fluorouracil leucovorin, no new data have been presented. However, bringing up aspects in previous trials, either considered irrelevant for the present situation or overall negative, of what adjuvant treatment can achieve, a small reduction (hazard ratio about 0.8) in the risk of recurrence is present. This reduction is not fundamentally different from that in colon cancer considering that adjuvant treatment for rectal cancer cannot be initiated as rapidly as it can after a colon cancer diagnosis. SUMMARY Adjuvant chemotherapy after rectal cancer surgery reduces recurrence risks but the benefit is limited and for most patients not clinically relevant. Neoadjuvant therapy can be more effective but results from randomized trials are not yet available.
Collapse
|
43
|
Tuca A, Gallego R, Ghanem I, Gil-Raga M, Feliu J. Chemotherapy and Targeted Agents in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E4015. [PMID: 33322567 PMCID: PMC7764481 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9124015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the main causes of cancer death in the elderly. The older patients constitute a heterogeneous group in terms of functional status, comorbidities, and aging-related conditions. Therefore, therapeutic decisions need to be individualized. Additionally, a higher toxicity risk comes from the fact that pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs as well as the tissue tolerance can be altered with aging. Although the chemotherapy efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is similar for older and young patients, more toxicity is presented in the elderly. While the mono-chemotherapy provides the same benefit for young and older patients, doublets front-line chemotherapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) in the elderly. Furthermore, the benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in older patients has been shown in several clinical trials, while the clinical data for the benefit of anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies are scarcer. Immunocheckpoint inhibitors could be an appropriate option for patients with microsatellite instability (MSI) tumors. A prior geriatric assessment is required before deciding the type of treatment in order to offer the best therapeutic option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Tuca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Rosa Gallego
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital of Granollers, 08402 Granollers, Spain;
| | - Ismael Ghanem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Mireia Gil-Raga
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Valencia, CIBERONC, 46014 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Jaime Feliu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
- Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Impact of the IDEA Collaboration Study Results on Clinical Practice in France for Patients With Stage III Colon Cancer: A National GERCOR - PRODIGE Survey. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2020; 20:79-83.e4. [PMID: 33281064 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2020.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2019] [Revised: 07/27/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The IDEA collaboration showed that the type and duration of adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III colon cancer (CC) could be adjusted according to the schedule of chemotherapy and the level of risk. We aimed at evaluating the implementation of IDEA's results in real-life practice for stage III CC. MATERIAL AND METHODS All clinicians registered in the French oncology cooperative groups GERCOR, FFCD, and UNICANCER GI mailing lists were invited to participate to an online anonymized nationwide survey from January 30, 2019 to March 31, 2019. Proportions were compared using the χ2 test. RESULTS A total of 213 physicians answered the survey. Of these, 173 (81%) considered that 3 months of adjuvant chemotherapy was the new standard of care for low-risk (pT1-3/N1) stage III CC, and 99% considered that 6 months remained the standard of care for high-risk (pT4 and/or pN2) stage III CC. In patients under 70 years, capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for 3 months was prescribed by 74% of the participants in low-risk CC, whereas 6 months of 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) was preferred for high-risk CC in 94% of cases. For patients over 70 years with good performance status and no comorbidities, 172 (81%) physicians prescribed oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for low-risk CC (3 months, 144 of 172%; 88%), and 200 (94%) physicians prescribed oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk CC (6 months, 199 of 200%; 99.5%). CONCLUSIONS The IDEA results have been practice-changing as French physicians have implemented 3 months of CAPOX for patients with low-risk stage III CC, substituting from 6 months of FOLFOX, which remains the preferred regimen for high-risk patients.
Collapse
|
45
|
Glimelius B. TOSCA-a delicious Swedish almond cake, an Italian opera and an Italian trial with important new data. Ann Oncol 2020; 32:6-8. [PMID: 33341192 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.10.598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- B Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Feliu J, Espinosa E, Basterretxea L, Paredero I, Llabrés E, Jiménez-Munárriz B, Antonio-Rebollo M, Losada B, Pinto A, Gironés R, Custodio AB, Muñoz MDM, Gómez-Mediavilla J, Torregrosa MD, Soler G, Cruz P, Higuera O, Molina-Garrido MJ. Undertreatment and overtreatment in older patients treated with chemotherapy. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 12:381-387. [PMID: 33109485 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Revised: 10/02/2020] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inconsistent doses and schemes are commonly used in older patients receiving cancer chemotherapy. We performed this study in patients with cancer and age ≥ 70 years to determine the frequency of undertreatment and overtreatment as well as factors influencing the decision to modify chemotherapy doses. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients aged ≥70 years starting new chemotherapy regimens were prospectively included in a multicentre study. The schedule and drug doses were determined by the treating oncologist. Pre-chemotherapy assessment included sociodemographics, treatment details and geriatric assessment (GA) variables. Association between these factors and undertreatment (use of less intensive cancer treatment [LICT] in a fit patient) or overtreatment (use of standard cancer treatment in an unfit older patient) were examined by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS Three- hundred ninety-seven patients were included, 43% of whom received LICT. If not adjusted for GA, toxicity did not differ between those receiving LICT (38%) or standard doses of chemotherapy (37%). If the dose of chemotherapy was analyzed according to the results of GA 61 (15%) patients had been undertreated and 133 (34%) had been overtreated. Undertreatment was related with increasing age and decreased renal function. Factors related with overtreatment were younger age, curative intention of treatment, prescription of G-CSF as primary prophylaxis and adequate cognitive status. Overtreated patients had more grade 3-4 toxicity than those receiving treatment adapted to fragility (42% vs 31%; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The use of chemotherapy without considering GA leads to overtreatment more commonly than undertreatment in older patients with cancer. Oncologists should take into account the results of GA to stratify patients and to avoid under or overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Feliu
- Oncology department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain; Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, CIBERONC, Spain.
| | - Enrique Espinosa
- Oncology department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Irene Paredero
- Oncology department, Hospital Universitario Dr. Peset. Valencia, Spain
| | - Elisenda Llabrés
- Oncology department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran Canarias, Spain
| | | | - Maite Antonio-Rebollo
- Oncohematogeriatrics Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Beatriz Losada
- Oncology department, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Spain
| | - Alvaro Pinto
- Oncology department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Regina Gironés
- Oncology department, Hospital Universitari y Politécnic La Fé, Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Gema Soler
- Oncohematogeriatrics Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL, Hospitalet, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Cruz
- Oncology department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | - Oliver Higuera
- Oncology department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lund JL, Webster-Clark MA, Hinton SP, Shmuel S, Stürmer T, Sanoff HK. Effectiveness of adjuvant FOLFOX vs 5FU/LV in adults over age 65 with stage II and III colon cancer using a novel hybrid approach. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2020; 29:1579-1587. [PMID: 33015888 DOI: 10.1002/pds.5148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Revised: 09/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Estimates of cancer therapy effects can differ in clinical trials and clinical practice, partly due to underrepresentation of certain patient subgroups in trials. We utilize a hybrid approach, combining clinical trial and real-world data, to estimate the comparative effectiveness of two adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for colon cancer. METHODS We identified patients aged 66 and older enrolled in the Multicenter International Study of Oxaliplatin/5FU-LV in the Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer. Similar patients were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, initiating adjuvant chemotherapy with either 5-fluorouracil (5FU) alone or in combination with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX). We used logistic regression to estimate the likelihood of trial enrollment as a function of age, sex, and substage. Using inverse odds of sampling weights (IOSW), we compared 5-year mortality in patients randomized to FOLFOX vs 5FU using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression, the Nelson-Aalen estimator for cumulative hazards, and bootstrapping for 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS There were 690 trial participants and 3834 SEER-Medicare patients. The SEER-Medicare population was older and had a higher proportion of stage IIIB and IIIC patients than the trial. After controlling for differences between populations, the IOSW 5-year HR was 1.21 (0.89, 1.65), slightly farther from the null than the trial estimate (HR = 1.14, 95%CI: 0.87, 1.49). CONCLUSIONS This study supports mounting evidence of little to no incremental reduction in 5-year mortality for FOLFOX vs 5FU in older adults with stage II-III colon cancer, emphasizing the importance of combining clinical trial and real-world data to support such conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer L Lund
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael A Webster-Clark
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Sharon Peacock Hinton
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Shahar Shmuel
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Til Stürmer
- Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hanna K Sanoff
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.,Division of Hematology/Oncology, School of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Impact of Anatomic Extent of Nodal Metastasis on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Outcomes in Stage III Colon Cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 2020; 63:1455-1465. [PMID: 32969889 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001790] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND An oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy regimen improves the survival outcomes of patients with stage III colon cancer. However, its complications are well-known. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to distinguish between the survival outcomes of patients who underwent curative resection for stage III colon cancer with oxaliplatin chemotherapy and those who underwent such resection without oxaliplatin chemotherapy. DESIGN This was a retrospective analytical study based on prospectively collected data. SETTINGS This study used data on patients who underwent surgery at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2014. PATIENTS A cohort of 254 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stage III colon cancer was included in this study. The patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with isolated pericolic lymph node metastasis (n = 175) and those with extrapericolic lymph node metastasis (n = 79). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinicopathologic features and 3-year survival outcomes were analyzed with and without oxaliplatin therapy in the pericolic lymph node group. RESULTS The pericolic lymph node group showed significantly improved overall survival compared with the extrapericolic lymph node group at a median follow-up of 48.5 months (95.8% vs 77.8%; p < 0.001). In contrast, there was no significant difference in overall survival (99.0% vs 92.0%; p = 0.137) and disease-free survival (89.1% vs 88.2%; p = 0.460) between the oxaliplatin and nonoxaliplatin subgroups of the pericolic lymph node group. Multivariate analysis showed that the administration of oxaliplatin chemotherapy to the pericolic lymph node group did not lead to a significant difference in the overall survival (p = 0.594). LIMITATIONS The study was limited by its retrospective design and single institutional data analysis. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that the anatomic extent of metastatic lymph nodes could affect patient prognosis, and the effect of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy may not be prominent in stage III colon cancer with isolated pericolic lymph node metastasis.
Collapse
|
49
|
Argilés G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, Hochhauser D, Salazar R, Iveson T, Laurent-Puig P, Quirke P, Yoshino T, Taieb J, Martinelli E, Arnold D. Localised colon cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2020; 31:1291-1305. [PMID: 32702383 DOI: 10.1016/j.annonc.2020.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 616] [Impact Index Per Article: 154.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- G Argilés
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Tabernero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital and Institute of Oncology (VHIO), UVic-UCC, IOB-Quiron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - R Labianca
- Department Oncology, Ospedale Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - R Salazar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Oncobell Program (IDIBELL), CIBERONC, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - T Iveson
- University Hospital Southampton, NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - P Laurent-Puig
- Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP Paris Centre, Paris, France; Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris University, Paris, France; INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France
| | - P Quirke
- Pathology and Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - T Yoshino
- National Cancer Centre Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan
| | - J Taieb
- Assitance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris AP-HP Paris Centre, Paris, France; Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM, Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Paris Sorbonne University, Paris University, Paris, France; INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France; Department of Gastroenterology and GI Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - E Martinelli
- Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Department of Precision Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - D Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Feliu J, Jiménez‐Munárriz B, Basterretxea L, Paredero I, Llabrés E, Antonio‐Rebollo M, Losada B, Espinosa E, Gironés R, Custodio AB, del Mar Muñoz M, Díaz‐Almirón M, Gómez‐Mediavilla J, Pinto A, Torregrosa M, Soler G, Cruz P, Higuera O, Molina‐Garrido MJ. Predicting Chemotherapy Toxicity in Older Patients with Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study. Oncologist 2020; 25:e1516-e1524. [PMID: 32329131 PMCID: PMC7543241 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard oncology tools are inadequate to distinguish which older patients are at higher risk of developing chemotherapy-related complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients over 70 years of age starting new chemotherapy regimens were prospectively included in a multicenter study. A prechemotherapy assessment that included sociodemographics, tumor/treatment variables, and geriatric assessment variables was performed. Association between these factors and the development of grade 3-5 toxicity was examined by using logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 551 patients were accrued. Chemotherapy doses (odds ratio [OR] 1.834; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.237-2.719) and creatinine clearance (OR 0.989; 95% CI 0.981-0.997) were the only factors independently associated with toxicity. Only 19% of patients who received reduced doses of chemotherapy and had a creatinine clearance ≥40 mL/minute had grade 3-4 toxicity, compared with 38% of those who received standard doses or had a creatinine clearance <40 mL/minute (p < .0001). However, no satisfactory multivariate model was obtained using different selection approaches. CONCLUSION Chemotherapy doses and renal function were identified as the major risk factors for developing severe toxicity in the older patient. These factors should be considered when planning to initiate a new chemotherapy regimen and should also lead to a closer follow-up in these patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Older patients are more vulnerable to chemotherapy toxicity. However, standard tools are inadequate to identify who is at higher risk of developing chemotherapy-related complications. Chemotherapy doses (standard vs. reduced) and renal function were identified as the major risk factors for developing severe toxicity in the elderly. These factors should be considered when planning to initiate a new chemotherapy regimen and should also lead to a closer follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaime Feliu
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario La Paz, Cátedra UAM‐AMGEN, CIBERONCMadridSpain
| | | | | | - Irene Paredero
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Dr. PesetValenciaSpain
| | - Elisenda Llabrés
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Insular de Gran CanariasLas PalmasSpain
| | - Maite Antonio‐Rebollo
- Oncohematogeriatrics Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL HospitaletBarcelonaSpain
| | - Beatriz Losada
- Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario de FuenlabradaMadridSpain
| | - Enrique Espinosa
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario La Paz, Cátedra UAM‐AMGEN, CIBERONCMadridSpain
| | - Regina Gironés
- Oncology Department, Hospital Lluis Alcanyis de XátivaValenciaSpain
| | - Ana Belén Custodio
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario La Paz, Cátedra UAM‐AMGEN, CIBERONCMadridSpain
| | | | - Mariana Díaz‐Almirón
- Biostatistics Department, Hospital La Paz, Universidad Autónoma de MadridMadridSpain
| | | | - Alvaro Pinto
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario La Paz, Cátedra UAM‐AMGEN, CIBERONCMadridSpain
| | | | - Gema Soler
- Oncohematogeriatrics Unit, Institut Català d'Oncologia, IDIBELL HospitaletBarcelonaSpain
| | - Patricia Cruz
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario La Paz, Cátedra UAM‐AMGEN, CIBERONCMadridSpain
| | - Oliver Higuera
- Oncology DepartmentHospital Universitario La Paz, Cátedra UAM‐AMGEN, CIBERONCMadridSpain
| | | |
Collapse
|