Disease characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes of follicular lymphoma in patients 40 years of age and younger: an analysis from the National Lymphocare Study†

[New classifications of malignant lymphomas - What changes are relevant for practice?]

An internationally uniform lymphoma classification is of fundamental importance for the comparability of clinical studies. There are currently 2 parallel classifications: the "International Consensus Classification" and the WHO-classification. Follicular lymphoma 3B is classified separately as follicular large cell lymphoma in WHO-HAEM5. The diagnostic criteria of lymphoplasmocytic lymphoma (LPL) have been adjusted, both classifications recommend molecular testing for MYD88 and CXCR4 mutations. There are no significant diagnostic changes in aggressive B-cell lymphomas. The ICC classify NLPBL and THRLBCL into the group of large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL). NLPHL/NLPBL-specific therapy must be considered, which differs greatly from the therapy of DLBCL, especially in the early stages. Peripheral T-cell lymphomas are a group of nodal T-cell lymphomas with a TFH phenotype and frequent mutations; peripheral T-cell lymphoma (NOS) is therefore a diagnosis of exclusion. Indolent T-cell lymphomas/lymphoproliferations of the GI tract are rare but must be differentiated from aggressive T-cell lymphomas. The WHO-HAEM5 also includes reactive/non-neoplastic lymph node lesions classified according to B or T cell predominance.

The pathobiology of select adolescent young adult lymphomas

Lymphoid cancers are among the most frequent cancers diagnosed in adolescents and young adults (AYA), ranging from approximately 30%-35% of cancer diagnoses in adolescent patients (age 10-19) to approximately 10% in patients aged 30-39 years. Moreover, the specific distribution of lymphoid cancer types varies by age with substantial shifts in the subtype distributions between pediatric, AYA, adult, and older adult patients. Currently, biology studies specific to AYA lymphomas are rare and therefore insight into age-related pathogenesis is incomplete. This review focuses on the paradigmatic epidemiology and pathogenesis of select lymphomas, occurring in the AYA patient population. With the example of posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorders, nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma, follicular lymphoma (incl. pediatric-type follicular lymphoma), and mediastinal lymphomas (incl. classic Hodgkin lymphoma, primary mediastinal large B cell lymphoma and mediastinal gray zone lymphoma), we here illustrate the current state-of-the-art in lymphoma classification, recent molecular insights including genomics, and translational opportunities. To improve outcome and quality of life, international collaboration in consortia dedicated to AYA lymphoma is needed to overcome challenges related to siloed biospecimens and data collections as well as to develop studies designed specifically for this unique population.

[Classification of indolent B-cell lymphomas : Novelties and open questions]

The 5th edition of the WHO classification (WHO-HAEM5) and the International Consensus Classification (ICC) have considerable overlap but also some distinct differences in categorizing indolent B‑cell lymphomas. Most differences with the expected impact on the daily diagnostic routine relate to follicular lymphoma (FL). Grading of FL remains mandatory only in the ICC; a diffuse growth pattern in an FL with > 15 blasts per high-power field (FL grade 3A) is not automatically classified as DLBCL according to WHO-HAEM5, and an FL subtype with unusual morphology (blastoid or large centrocyte) and biology is recognized as an entity only in the WHO-HAEM5. With the exception of B‑prolymphocytic leukemia, which is no longer acknowledged in WHO-HAEM5, there are only minor differences between both classifications and include updated names of entities, improved diagnostic criteria, and upgrades from provisional to definite entities.

Follicular Lymphoma in Young Adults: Study from a Regional Cancer Center in South India

Objective Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a disease of the elderly. It is postulated that younger patients have distinct tumor biology and treatment outcomes. Various lymphoma groups across the world have studied this to understand if young adults (YAs) need a different treatment approach. Our study fills the void in data from an Asian country on YA population with FL. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed young patients (age ≤40 years) diagnosed with FL at our center from 2012 to 2018. Their disease characteristics, treatment details, and outcomes were studied to examine any association between various parameters and survival. Results There were 28 young FL patients included in our study that constituted 14.6% of FL cases (males: 53.5% and females: 46.5%). The median age at diagnosis was 36.5 years. Most of the patients presented in an advanced stage, 57% had extranodal involvement, and 39.3% had bone marrow involvement at the time of presentation. The most common chemotherapy regimen used was cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone. Half of them received chemoimmunotherapy and only 18% continued rituximab as maintenance therapy. The overall response rate was 92.9% ( n = 26), and the remaining two patients had progressive disease while on treatment. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.1 years and median overall survival (OS) was not reached. On univariate analysis, extranodal disease was associated with a lower PFS ( p = 0.06) and low hemoglobin showed a significant association with OS ( p = 0.005). On multivariate analysis, none of the factors showed a significant association with survival. Conclusion Most YAs present with advanced disease with a good response to treatment and favorable outcomes.

Upfront identification of high-risk follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is a common disease with clinically indolent behavior, and a long natural history for the majority of patients. Despite excellent therapeutic strategies currently available for FL, approximately 10%-20% of patients will experience early disease progression, defined as occurring within two years of diagnosis. These patients have poor outcomes, with overall survival at 5 years ranging between 37% and 50%. Much of the biology driving early progression and inferior survival is attributed to early transformation events; however, transformation alone does not account for all the observed clinical heterogeneity and survival differences among patients. Several clinical, genetic, and molecular alterations in FL have been discovered that help define subsets of patients at risk for multiply relapses and refractory disease, and are slowly making their way into risk calculators to be used in daily practice. Additionally, the role of functional imaging with PET scan, as well as circulating and cell free tumor DNA are being evaluated as tools to define high-risk subsets of patients with FL. This review seeks to provide an over view of current and evolving biomarkers that define high-risk FL at diagnosis. The goal is for these tools to assist clinicians in integrating these rapidly evolving prognosis models into clinical practice, in the hopes of risk-stratifying treatments and improving outcomes for patients.

Follicular lymphomas in vulnerable/older patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Unlike for diffuse large-cell lymphoma, both the management of elderly patients with follicular lymphoma and the role of comprehensive geriatric evaluation to optimize treatment choices have been rarely addressed. This review analyses available evidence on follicular lymphoma occurring in aged persons.

RECENT FINDINGS

Most retrospective studies and expert recommendations agree that the diagnostic approach and the treatment algorithm in elderly follicular lymphoma should not differ from younger patients up to the age of 80. However, slowly progressing follicular lymphoma low-tumor burden should start treatment even though asymptomatic. Prospective identification of those unfit patients is needed where a treatment deintensification may not be detrimental. Octogenarians have more aggressive disease and do not benefit from chemoimmunotherapy more than from single-agent rituximab. An activity of daily living loss significantly impact on their outcome and specific prognostic scores may help in the better manage these oldest patients.

SUMMARY

Given the lack of prospective studies there is an urgent need to investigate if geriatric assessment including comorbidities, geriatric parameters, patient's reported outcomes and quality of life issues, may help selecting those frail elderly follicular lymphoma patients less suitable for full-dose treatments. In addition, the potential usefulness of the new noncytotoxic agents of proven efficacy in follicular lymphoma warrants specific investigations in older patients.

Duvelisib for CLL/SLL and follicular non-Hodgkin lymphoma

In this Blood Spotlight, the authors review the appropriate clinical background, mechanism of action, and detailed therapeutic data about duvelisib in chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) and follicular lymphoma.

Rural and urban patients with diffuse large B-cell and follicular lymphoma experience reduced overall survival: a National Cancer DataBase study

We examined 83,108 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and 43,393 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) to investigate disparities related to geographic population density, stratified as rural, urban, or metropolitan. We found that urban and rural patients less commonly had private insurance and high socioeconomic status. Urban and rural DLBCL patients were more likely to receive treatment within 14 days of diagnosis (OR 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.89-0.98; and OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.72-0.91) while urban FL patients were more likely to have treatment >14 days after diagnosis (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16). Multivariable analyses demonstrated that rural and urban patients had worse overall survival with DLBCL (hazard ratio [HR] 1.09; 95% CI 1-1.19 and HR 1.08; 95% CI 1.04-1.11) and FL (HR 1.11; 95% CI 1.04-1.18 and HR 1.2; 95% CI 1.02-1.41), respectively, suggesting needs for focused study and interventions for these populations.

How I manage patients with follicular lymphoma

Recent advances in the treatment of follicular lymphoma (FL) have provided insight into molecular and biological influences on pathogenesis and prognosis. Additionally, numerous available treatment strategies for both newly diagnosed and relapsed disease require thoughtful consideration of patient selection to avoid the burden of overtreatment and toxicities. This review provides a broad overview on our approach to managing patients with low grade FL.

Short regimen of rituximab plus lenalidomide in follicular lymphoma patients in need of first-line therapy

The SAKK 35/10 phase 2 trial, developed by the Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research and the Nordic Lymphoma Group, compared the activity of rituximab vs rituximab plus lenalidomide in untreated follicular lymphoma patients in need of systemic therapy. Patients were randomized to rituximab (375 mg/m² IV on day 1 of weeks 1-4 and repeated during weeks 12-15 in responding patients) or rituximab (same schedule) in combination with lenalidomide (15 mg orally daily for 18 weeks). Primary end point was complete response (CR)/unconfirmed CR (CRu) rate at 6 months. In total, 77 patients were allocated to rituximab monotherapy and 77 to the combination (47% poor-risk Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score in each arm). A significantly higher CR/CRu rate at 6 months was documented in the combination arm by the investigators (36%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 26%-48% vs 25%; 95% CI, 16%-36%) and confirmed by an independent response review of computed tomography scans only (61%; 95% CI, 49%-72% vs 36%; 95% CI, 26%-48%). After a median follow-up of 4 years, significantly higher 30-month CR/CRu rates and longer progression-free survival (PFS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were observed for the combination. Overall survival (OS) rates were similar in both arms (≥90%). Toxicity grade ≥3 was more common in the combination arm (56% vs 22% of patients), mainly represented by neutropenia (23% vs 7%). Addition of lenalidomide to rituximab significantly improved CR/CRu rates, PFS, and TTNT, with expected higher, but manageable toxicity. The excellent OS in both arms suggests that chemotherapy-free strategies should be further explored. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01307605.

Prognostic Value of Baseline and Interim Total Metabolic Tumor Volume and Total Lesion Glycolysis Measured on 18F-FDG PET-CT in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) at baseline and mid-treatment with ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) scans.

Methods

The study analyzed data from 48 patients with FL who were treated in Jiangsu Province Hospital and reviewed their baseline PET-CT scans. TMTV and TLG were computed by using the absolute value of 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 thresholding method, respectively.

Results

Median age was 53 years, 75.0% of patients had stage III to IV disease, 43.8% had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index 1 (FLIPI1) score of 3 to 5 and 20.8% had a FLIPI2 score of 3 to 5. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed the optimal cut-off values for TMTV3.0 and TLG3.0 were 476.4 (sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 78.0%; area under the curve [AUC], 0.760; p=0.003) and 2,676.9 (sensitivity, 71.4%; specificity, 78.0%; AUC, 0.760; p=0.003). On multivariable analysis, TMTV3.0 and TLG3.0 were independent predictors of both progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 5.406; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.326 to 22.040; p=0.019 and HR, 6.502; 95% CI, 1.079 to 39.182; p=0.042) and overall survival (OS) (HR, 4.111; 95% CI, 1.125 to 15.027; p=0.033 and HR, 5.885; 95% CI, 1.014 to 34.148; p=0.049). ROC curve analysis showed the optimal cut-off values for ΔTMTV3.0 and ΔTLG3.0 were 66.3% (sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 63.4%; AUC, 0.774; p < 0.001) and 64.5% (sensitivity, 85.7%; specificity, 65.9%; AUC, 0.777; p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Baseline TMTV and TLG are strong predictors of PFS and OS in FL. Furthermore, interim TMTV (ΔTMTV > 66.3%) and TLG (ΔTLG > 64.5%) reduction are valuable tools for early treatment response assessment in FL patients.

Treatment Patterns and Survival Outcomes in Patients With Follicular Lymphoma: A 2007 to 2015 Humedica Database Study

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated real-world treatment patterns and survival in follicular lymphoma (FL). This study evaluated these outcomes among newly diagnosed patients with FL in routine clinical care.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted in newly diagnosed patients with FL from Humedica, a large United States electronic medical record database, from January 1, 2008 to July 31, 2015. Patients were followed from treatment initiation until death, loss to follow-up, or end of study (September 30, 2015). Treatment patterns were assessed in the follow-up period. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2 years were evaluated in the overall population using Kaplan-Meier analyses. OS was also compared between patients with and without evidence of disease progression within 2 years following first-line therapy (ie, early progressors vs. non-early progressors).

RESULTS

A total of 1346 patients were included in the study, with most patients receiving rituximab-based regimens. Fewer early progressors received rituximab-based regimens. Across all lines, combination therapies predominated, particularly bendamustine + rituximab. Following first-line therapy, OS was 86.9% at 2 years, and median OS was not reached. Two-year PFS after first-line therapy was 64.6%, and median PFS was 48.1 months (95% confidence interval, 39.4-58.4 months). OS at 2 years was 76.8% among early progressors versus 90.4% among non-early progressors (P < .001); the median OS was not reached in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In routine clinical practice, rituximab-based regimens predominated; however, utilization of these regimens differed among early and non-early progressors. The assessment of survival outcomes also highlights the negative impact of early progression on OS in the rituximab-era.

Novel acquisitions on biology and management of transformed follicular lymphoma

Follicular lymphoma (FL) generally has an indolent clinical course, but in some patients, a histological transformation (HT) into aggressive entities may take place and often lead to a poorer survival. The rituximab era has seen an improved outcome of FL, including those with HT. The current treatment strategies for transformed FL are based on immunochemotherapy for the cases with HT at the time of diagnosis or as the first event after watchful waiting. Patients transforming after prior treatment of FL usually benefit from autologous stem cell transplant. Unfortunately, early assessment of the transformation risk remains elusive. Recent studies delved the mechanisms of HT, showing that this is a complex process, resulting from a number of epigenetic and genetic lesions occurring in the tumour cell population as well as progressive changes in the tumour microenvironment. This novel knowledge has prompted clinical investigations on a variety of new therapeutic strategies.

Risk stratification in follicular lymphoma

Advances in the understanding of FL biology, molecular characteristics and clinical risk factors are further highlighting the heterogeneity of this disease. Historically used prognostic factors were broadly based on clinical and laboratory features at the time of diagnosis. However novel prognostic factors are emerging that can be studied at the time of diagnosis, and relapse, and use a variety of tools including gene alterations and diagnostic imaging. These novel discoveries are being implemented into daily practice with the ultimate goal of providing a precise, individualized approach to every patient with FL.

Prognostic factors in follicular lymphoma: new tools to personalize risk

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent lymphoma, and it has a long median overall survival (OS). However, the recent discovery of clinical and biological prognostic biomarkers in FL is shedding light on FL heterogeneity and the need for a precise and risk-stratified individual approach at diagnosis and relapse. Many FL patients who are asymptomatic with indolent disease can be vulnerable to the toxicity, emotional distress, and financial burden of overtreatment. Yet a subset of FL patients develop chemoresistance to standard chemoimmunotherapy, experience transformation to aggressive lymphoma and rapid progression, and represent the population most in need of novel therapies and curative approaches. Novel biomarkers that incorporate both clinical and genetic determinants of poor risk are being developed with the hope of identifying high-risk patients at diagnosis in order to offer biologically rational targeted therapies.

Systemic Front Line Therapy of Follicular Lymphoma: When, to Whom and How

The natural history of follicular lymphoma is usually characterized by an indolent course with a high response rate to the first line therapy followed by recurrent relapses, with a time to next treatment becoming shorter after each subsequent treatment line. More than 80% of patients have advanced stage disease at diagnosis. The time of initiation and the nature of the treatment is mainly conditioned by symptoms, tumor burden, lymphoma grading, co-morbidities and patients preference. A number of clinical and biological factors have been determined to be prognostic in this disease, but the majority of them could not show to be predictive of response to treatment, and therefore can’t be used to guide the treatment choice. CD20 expression is the only predictive factor recognized in the treatment of FL and justifies the use of “naked” or “conjugated” anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies as a single agent or in combination with chemo- or targeted therapy. Nevertheless, as this marker is almost universally found in FL, it has little role in the choice of treatment. The outcome of patients with FL improved significantly in the last years, mainly due to the widespread use of rituximab, autologous and allogeneic transplantation in young and fit relapsed patients, the introduction of new drugs and the improvement in diagnostic accuracy and management of side effects. Agents as new monoclonal antibodies, immuno-modulating drugs, and target therapy have recently been developed and approved for the relapsed setting, while studies to evaluate their role in first line treatment are still ongoing. Here we report our considerations on first line treatment approach and on the potential factors which could help in the choice of therapy.

Baseline Metabolic Tumor Volume Predicts Outcome in High-Tumor-Burden Follicular Lymphoma: A Pooled Analysis of Three Multicenter Studies

PURPOSE

Identifying patients at high risk of progression and early death among those with high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma (FL) is unsatisfactory with current prognostic models. This study aimed to determine the prognostic impact of the total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) measured at baseline with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography-computed tomography ([¹⁸F]FDG/PET-CT) scans and its added value to these models.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A pooled analysis was performed by using patient data and centrally reviewed baseline PET-CT scans for 185 patients with FL who were receiving immunochemotherapy within three prospective trials. TMTV was computed by using the 41% maximum standardized uptake value thresholding method, and the optimal cutoff for survival prediction was determined.

RESULTS

Median age was 55 years, 92% of patients had stage III to IV disease, 37% had a Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) score of 3 to 5, and 31% had a FLIPI2 score of 3 to 5. With a median follow-up of 64 months, overall 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 55% and overall survival (OS) was 92%. Median TMTV was 297 cm³ (quartile 1 through quartile 3, 135 to 567 cm³). The optimal cutoff identified was 510 cm³, with a markedly inferior survival in the 29% of patients with TMTV > 510 cm³. Five-year PFS was 33% versus 65% (hazard ratio [HR], 2.90; P < .001), and 5-year OS was 85% versus 95% (HR, 3.45; P = .010). On multivariable analysis, TMTV (HR, 2.3; P = .002) and FLIPI2 score (HR, 2.2; P = .002) were independent predictors of PFS. In combination, they identify three risk groups: high TMTV and intermediate-to-high FLIPI2 score with 5-year PFS of 20% (HR, 5.0; P < .001), high TMTV or intermediate-to-high FLIPI2 score with 5-year PFS of 46% (HR, 2.1; P = .007), and low TMTV and low FLIP2 with 5-year PFS of 69%.

CONCLUSION

Baseline TMTV is a strong independent predictor of outcome in FL. In combination with FLIPI2 score, it identifies patients at high risk of early progression. It warrants further validation as a biomarker for development of first-line PET-adapted approaches in FL.