1
|
Zheng E, Włodarczyk M, Węgiel A, Osielczak A, Możdżan M, Biskup L, Grochowska A, Wołyniak M, Gajewski D, Porc M, Maryńczak K, Dziki Ł. Navigating through novelties concerning mCRC treatment-the role of immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy in mCRC. Front Surg 2024; 11:1398289. [PMID: 38948479 PMCID: PMC11211389 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1398289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the course of nearly six decades since the inception of initial trials involving 5-FU in the treatment of mCRC (metastatic colorectal cancer), our progressive comprehension of the pathophysiology, genetics, and surgical techniques related to mCRC has paved the way for the introduction of novel therapeutic modalities. These advancements not only have augmented the overall survival but have also positively impacted the quality of life (QoL) for affected individuals. Despite the remarkable progress made in the last two decades in the development of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and target therapies, mCRC remains an incurable disease, with a 5-year survival rate of 14%. In this comprehensive review, our primary goal is to present an overview of mCRC treatment methods following the latest guidelines provided by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), and the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS). Emphasis has been placed on outlining treatment approaches encompassing chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted therapy, and surgery's role in managing mCRC. Furthermore, our review delves into prospective avenues for developing new therapies, offering a glimpse into the future of alternative pathways that hold potential for advancing the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Zheng
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Marcin Włodarczyk
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Andrzej Węgiel
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Aleksandra Osielczak
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Maria Możdżan
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Laura Biskup
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Agata Grochowska
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Maria Wołyniak
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
- Department of Biostatistics and Translational Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Dominik Gajewski
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Mateusz Porc
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Kasper Maryńczak
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| | - Łukasz Dziki
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Lodz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O’Donnell CDJ, Hubbard J, Jin Z. Updates on the Management of Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1820. [PMID: 38791899 PMCID: PMC11120096 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16101820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) poses a significant global health challenge. Notably, the risk of CRC escalates with age, with the majority of cases occurring in those over the age of 65. Despite recent progress in tailoring treatments for early and advanced CRC, there is a lack of prospective data to guide the management of older patients, who are frequently underrepresented in clinical trials. This article reviews the contemporary landscape of managing older individuals with CRC, highlighting recent advancements and persisting challenges. The role of comprehensive geriatric assessment is explored. Opportunities for treatment escalation/de-escalation, with consideration of the older adult's fitness level. are reviewed in the neoadjuvant, surgical, adjuvant, and metastatic settings of colon and rectal cancers. Immunotherapy is shown to be an effective treatment option in older adults who have CRC with microsatellite instability. Promising new technologies such as circulating tumor DNA and recent phase III trials adding later-line systemic therapy options are discussed. Clinical recommendations based on the data available are summarized. We conclude that deliberate efforts to include older individuals in future colorectal cancer trials are essential to better guide the management of these patients in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor D. J. O’Donnell
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Building, Rochester, MN 55905, USA;
| | - Joleen Hubbard
- Allina Health Cancer Institute, Minneapolis, MN 55407, USA
| | - Zhaohui Jin
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Legoux JL, Faroux R, Barrière N, Le Malicot K, Tougeron D, Lorgis V, Guerin-Meyer V, Bourgeois V, Malka D, Aparicio T, Baconnier M, Lebrun-Ly V, Egreteau J, Khemissa Akouz F, Terme M, Lepage C, Boige V. First-Line LV5FU2 with or without Aflibercept in Patients with Non-Resectable Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Phase II Trial (PRODIGE 25-FFCD-FOLFA). Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1515. [PMID: 38672597 PMCID: PMC11049283 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081515] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Fluropyrimidine monotherapy is an option for some patients with inoperable metastatic colorectal cancer. Unlike bevacizumab, the addition of aflibercept, an antibody acting as an anti-angiogenic agent, has never been evaluated in this context. The aim of the study was to determine whether aflibercept could increase the efficacy of fluoropyrimidine monotherapy without increasing toxicity. This multicenter phase II non-comparative trial evaluated the addition of aflibercept to infusional 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid (LV5FU2 regimen) as first-line treatment in patients unfit to receive doublet cytotoxic chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). The clinical hypotheses expected a PFS rate at 6 months of over 40% (60% expected). A total of 117 patients, with a median age of 81 years, were included: 59 in arm A (LV5FU2-aflibercept) and 58 in arm B (LV5FU2 alone). Six-month PFS was 54.7% in both arms (90% CI 42.5-66.5 in both). Median overall survival was 21.8 months (arm A) and 25.1 months (arm B). Overall toxicity was more common in arm A: grade ≥ 3 toxicity in 82% versus 58.2%. Given the 6-month PFS, the study can be considered positive. However, the toxicity of aflibercept in this population was high, and continuation of the trial into phase III is not envisaged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean-Louis Legoux
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, CHU d’Orléans, 14 avenue de l’Hôpital, CS 86709, 45067 Orleans CEDEX 2, France
| | - Roger Faroux
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Les Oudairies, Boulevard Stéphane Moreau, 85925 La Roche sur Yon, France;
| | - Nicolas Barrière
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Hôpital Européen, 6 Rue Désirée Clary, CS 70356, 13331 Marseille CEDEX 03, France;
| | - Karine Le Malicot
- Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD), EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, Faculté de Médecine, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, 7, Boulevard Jeanne d’Arc, 21079 Dijon, France;
| | - David Tougeron
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, CHU de Poitiers, 2 Rue de la Miletrie, BP 577, 86021 Poitiers, France;
| | - Véronique Lorgis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Bourgogne, GRReCC, 18 Cours Général de Gaulle, 21000 Dijon, France;
| | - Véronique Guerin-Meyer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l’Ouest, Boulevard Jacques Monod, 44805 Saint Herblain, France;
| | - Vincent Bourgeois
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Duchenne, Allée Jacques Monod-BP 609, 62321 Boulogne Sur Mer, France;
| | - David Malka
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif CEDEX, France; (D.M.); (V.B.)
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology, Saint Louis Hospital, APHP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, 1 Avenue Claude Vellefaux, 75475 Paris, France;
| | - Matthieu Baconnier
- Department of Gastroenterology, Centre Hospitalier Annecy-Genevois, 1 Avenue de l’Hôpital, 74374 Pringy, France;
| | - Valérie Lebrun-Ly
- Department of Medical Oncology, CHU Dupuytren, 2 Avenue Martin Luther King, 87042 Limoges, France;
| | - Joëlle Egreteau
- Radiotherapy and Medical Oncology, Groupe Hospitalier Bretagne Sud, 5 Avenue de Choiseul, BP 12233, 56322 Lorient CEDEX, France;
| | - Faïza Khemissa Akouz
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint Jean Hospital, 20 Avenue du Languedoc, BP 49954, 66046 Perpignan CEDEX 9, France;
| | - Magali Terme
- INSERM U970—PARCC (Paris Cardiovascular Research Center), European Georges Pompidou Hospital, Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 56 rue Leblanc, 75015 Paris, France;
| | - Côme Lepage
- INSERM U866, Université de Bourgogne, 7 Boulevard Jeanne d’Arc, BP 27877, 21078 Dijon CEDEX, France;
| | - Valérie Boige
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 114 rue Edouard Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif CEDEX, France; (D.M.); (V.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Colloca GA, Venturino A. Prognostic Effect of Performance Status on Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Cancer Receiving First-Line Chemotherapy: A Meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Cancer 2024; 55:418-426. [PMID: 37966630 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-023-00983-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Performance status (PS) is a variable derived from the assessment of a patient's functional status, originally proposed to predict drug toxicity. However, despite its characteristic of being subjective and unidimensional, it has become one of the most important prognostic variables for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). In light of the considerable progressive prolongation of median overall survival (OS) of patients with mCRC, it is unclear whether PS continues to be a valid prognostic factor. This article aims to perform a meta-analysis to verify the current prognostic role of PS. METHODS A search on two databases of prospective trials of first-line chemotherapy in mCRC patients, published in English from 1991 to 2020, was done by predefined criteria. After the selection of phase III trials evaluating the prognostic role of PS, a meta-analysis has been performed. RESULTS Thirteen trials were included in the meta-analysis. They reported a reduction in the risk of death with a PS 0 compared to a PS 1 or more (HR 0.63, CI 0.54-0.72; 13 studies), which was confirmed for the comparison between PS 0 and PS 1. However, the study found significant heterogeneity (Q = 68.10; p-value < 0.001) and high-grade inconsistency (I2 = 82.38%). Therefore, to explore the reasons for the heterogeneity, a univariate meta-regression was performed, which suggested a possible moderating activity for liver metastases and timing of metastasis. CONCLUSIONS PS is a reliable prognostic factor for patients with mCRC receiving first-line chemotherapy but is poorly evaluated in phase III trials.
Collapse
|
5
|
Soler-González G, Sastre-Valera J, Viana-Alonso A, Aparicio-Urtasun J, García-Escobar I, Gómez-España MA, Guillén-Ponce C, Molina-Garrido MJ, Gironés-Sarrió R. Update on the management of elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Clin Transl Oncol 2024; 26:69-84. [PMID: 37498507 PMCID: PMC10761480 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03243-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common tumours worldwide, and 70% of CRC patients are over 65 years of age. However, the scientific evidence available for these patients is poor, as they are underrepresented in clinical trials. Therefore, a group of experts from the Oncogeriatrics Section of the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM), the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours, (TTD) and the Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD) have reviewed the scientific evidence available in older patients with CRC. This group of experts recommends a multidisciplinary approach and geriatric assessment (GA) before making a therapeutic decision because GA predicts the risk of toxicity and survival and helps to individualize treatment. In addition, elderly patients with localized CRC should undergo standard cancer resection, preferably laparoscopically. The indication for adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) should be considered based on the potential benefit, the risk of recurrence, the life expectancy and patient comorbidities. When the disease is metastatic, the possibility of radical treatment with surgery, radiofrequency (RF) or stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) should be considered. The efficacy of palliative CT is similar to that seen in younger patients, but elderly patients are at increased risk of toxicity. Clinical trials should be conducted with the elderly population and include GAs and specific treatment plans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gemma Soler-González
- Departamento de Oncología Médica, Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Institut Català d'Oncologia (ICO) L'Hospitalet, Avinguda de la Granvia de l'Hospitalet 199-203, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Javier Sastre-Valera
- Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD), Clinico San Carlos University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonio Viana-Alonso
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Nuestra Señora del Prado General University Hospital, Talavera de la Reina, Spain
| | - Jorge Aparicio-Urtasun
- Multidisciplinary Spanish Group of Digestive Cancer (GEMCAD), Polytechnic la Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| | - Ignacio García-Escobar
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, General University Hospital of Toledo, Toledo, Spain
| | - María Auxiliadora Gómez-España
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Reina Sofía University Hospital. Instituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba (IMIBIC), Córdoba, Spain
| | - Carmen Guillén-Ponce
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Ramón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - María José Molina-Garrido
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Virgen de la Luz Hospital, Cuenca, Spain
| | - Regina Gironés-Sarrió
- Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) Oncogeriatrics Section, Polytechnic la Fe University Hospital, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ioffe D, Dotan E. Evidence-Based Care of Older Adults With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Insights From Landmark Clinical Trials. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:5228-5236. [PMID: 37856768 PMCID: PMC10691792 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 07/31/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-related death in the United States with more than half of the patients diagnosed being older than 65 years, and an expected further increase in older adults (OA) diagnosed with this cancer in the coming years as the population ages. Prospective data guiding the management of older patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) have been limited and treatment decisions for these patients are often guided by chronologic age, crude evaluation of performance status, and extrapolation from trials conducted in younger individuals. Recent evidence from randomized clinical trials specifically designed for OA supports treatment deintensification and dose modification to increase tolerability without compromising efficacy in older, frailer patients with mCRC. Additional studies support the incorporation of geriatric assessment (GA)-driven care to further improve the outcomes of OA with mCRC. Although the use of GA has not been validated in guiding specific treatment selection or modification for OA with mCRC, it provides a comprehensive and objective evaluation of a patient's functional status, comorbidities, risk of potential toxicities, effect on the quality of life, goals of care, and assists with personalizing therapy. With the increase in the number of OA we care for in our practices, it is time to stop extrapolating and define an evidence-based approach for this population that is based on data from prospective elderly specific clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Ioffe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Mitani S, Kito Y, Hino K, Kawakami K, Izawa N, Hanamura F, Yamamoto Y, Shoji H, Komori A, Boku S, Tsuchihashi K, Kato K, Nonagase Y, Matsumoto T, Furuta M, Kawakami H. Real-World Treatment Sequencing in Vulnerable Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multicenter Retrospective Study. Target Oncol 2023; 18:707-715. [PMID: 37668815 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-00996-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data regarding treatment sequence for vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in a real-world setting are lacking. OBJECTIVE We aimed to assess treatment outcomes in second-line or later chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC in a real-world setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS Vulnerable patients with mCRC who received less intensive treatment ('vulnerable') regimens, i.e. fluoropyrimidines with or without biologics (FP), reduced-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics (Doublet), and anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monotherapy (Anti-EGFR), as first-line therapy between June 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS A total of 210 patients from 15 hospitals were analyzed. The median age was 78 years (range 28-90), and 44 patients (21%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score of 2. In the entire population, the median time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS) were 7.6 and 21.4 months, respectively. Following the failure of first-line therapy in 195 patients, 74 (38%), 24 (12%), and 13 (7%) patients received vulnerable regimens, full-dose doublet regimens with or without biologics, and other regimens, respectively, whereas 84 (43%) received best supportive care (BSC). In patients receiving vulnerable regimens as second-line therapy, the median TTF and OS were 4.4 and 13.7 months, respectively, while response rate and disease control rate were 18% and 62%, respectively. In 84 patients who received BSC, the median OS was 3.5 months. CONCLUSIONS Second-line chemotherapy for vulnerable patients with mCRC showed clinically meaningful outcomes; however, few patients received second-line therapy, and survival among patients who received BSC was dismal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seiichiro Mitani
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan
| | - Yosuke Kito
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital, Kanazawa, Japan
| | - Kaori Hino
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
| | - Kentaro Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Keiyukai Sapporo Hospital, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Naoki Izawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan
| | - Fumiyasu Hanamura
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Cancer Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Shoji
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Azusa Komori
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama, Japan
- Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita, Japan
| | - Shogen Boku
- Cancer Treatment Center, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Kenji Tsuchihashi
- Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Science, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Kyoko Kato
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Yoshikane Nonagase
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kishiwada City Hospital, Kishiwada, Japan
| | - Toshihiko Matsumoto
- Cancer Treatment Center, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiro Furuta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Hisato Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, 377-2 Ohno-higashi, Osaka-sayama, Osaka, 589-8511, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gouverneur A, Favary C, Jové J, Rouyer M, Bignon E, Salvo F, Tchalla A, Paillaud E, Aparicio T, Noize P. Impact of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on the Effectiveness and Safety of Bevacizumab in Older Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. Target Oncol 2023; 18:717-726. [PMID: 37682504 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-00986-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cardiovascular comorbidities are not contraindications of bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer. OBJECTIVE We aimed to evaluate the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities before bevacizumab treatment on overall survival and cardiovascular safety in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. METHODS A 2009-2015 cohort of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer aged ≥ 65 years administered first-line bevacizumab was extracted from the French healthcare reimbursement claims database. Baseline heart failure, hypertension, and venous/arterial thromboembolic events were identified. The 36-month overall survival rate was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the 36-month overall survival using a time-dependent, multivariable, Cox proportional hazards model. The 36-month cumulative incidence of cardiovascular events, and the impact of cardiovascular comorbidities on the likelihood of cardiovascular events were evaluated using the Fine and Gray model, with death as a competing risk. RESULTS We included 9222 patients (56.4% male; median age 73 years). Two-thirds (66.7%) had baseline cardiovascular comorbidities. The median 36-month overall survival was 20.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 19.9-21.0] and 21.8 [95% CI 21.1-22.6] months in patients with and without cardiovascular comorbidities, respectively. Age ≥ 75 years, dependency in activities of daily living, radiotherapy, and another targeted therapy were identified as death risk factors, but not cardiovascular comorbidities. At 36 months, cardiovascular events had occurred in 60.2% [95% CI 58.9-61.4] and 44.1% [95% CI 42.3-45.9] of patients with and without cardiovascular comorbidities. Baseline venous thrombosis, female, three or more cardiovascular medications, another targeted therapy, and more than six bevacizumab injections were identified as risk factors for cardiovascular events. CONCLUSIONS In clinical practice, cardiovascular comorbidities before administering bevacizumab to older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer impacted the cardiovascular safety, but not overall survival. Unless they limit functional independency, older patients with cardiovascular comorbidities should be treated with bevacizumab under close monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amandine Gouverneur
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, Team AHeaD; CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de pharmacologie médicale, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Clélia Favary
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM CIC-P 1401, Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jérémy Jové
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM CIC-P 1401, Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Magali Rouyer
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM CIC-P 1401, Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Emmanuelle Bignon
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM CIC-P 1401, Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Francesco Salvo
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, Team AHeaD; CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de pharmacologie médicale, 33000, Bordeaux, France
| | - Achille Tchalla
- Université de Limoges, Institut OMEGA HEALTH, Laboratoire VieSanté - UR 24134 (Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, e-Santé); CHU de Limoges, Pôle HU de gérontologie clinique, Service de médecine gériatrique, 87042, Limoges, France
| | - Elena Paillaud
- Université de Paris Cité, Paris Cancer Institute CARPEM; Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, APHP, Service de gériatrie, 75015, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Université de Paris; Hôpital Saint-Louis, APHP, Service de gastroentérologie, 75010, Paris, France
| | - Pernelle Noize
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, Team AHeaD; CHU de Bordeaux, Pôle de santé publique, Service de pharmacologie médicale, 33000, Bordeaux, France.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Huemer F, Dunkl C, Rinnerthaler G, Schlick K, Heregger R, Emmanuel K, Neureiter D, Klieser E, Deutschmann M, Roeder F, Greil R, Weiss L. Management of metastatic colorectal cancer in patients ≥70 years - a single center experience. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1222951. [PMID: 37560467 PMCID: PMC10407548 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1222951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Age-standardized mortality rates for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are highest among elderly patients. In current clinical guidelines, treatment recommendations for this patient population are based on a limited number of clinical trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this monocentric, retrospective analysis we characterized patients aged ≥70 years undergoing systemic therapy for mCRC and overall survival (OS) was investigated. RESULTS We included 117 unselected, consecutive mCRC patients aged ≥70 years undergoing systemic therapy for mCRC between February 2009 and July 2022. Median OS was 25.6 months (95% CI: 21.8-29.4). The median age was 78 years (range: 70-90) and 21%, 48%, 26% and 5% had an ECOG performance score of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median number of systemic therapy lines was 2 (range: 1-5). The choice of first-line chemotherapy backbone (doublet/triplet versus mono) did not impact OS (HR: 0.83, p=0.50) or the probability of receiving subsequent therapy (p=0.697). Metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment in the liver, lung, peritoneum and/or other organs were applied in 26 patients (22%) with curative intent. First-line anti-EGFR-based therapy showed a trend towards longer OS compared to anti-VEGF-based therapy or chemotherapy alone in left-sided mCRC (anti-EGFR: 39.3 months versus anti-VEGF: 27.3 months versus chemotherapy alone: 13.8 months, p=0.105). In multivariable analysis, metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment with curative intent (yes versus no, HR: 0.22, p<0.001), the ECOG performance score (2 versus 0, HR: 3.07, p=0.007; 3 versus 0, HR: 3.66, p=0.053) and the presence of liver metastases (yes versus no, HR: 1.79, p=0.049) were independently associated with OS. CONCLUSIONS Our findings corroborate front-line monochemotherapy in combination with targeted therapy as the treatment of choice for elderly mCRC patients with palliative treatment intent. Metastasectomy and/or local ablative treatment with curative intent are feasible and may improve OS in selected elderly mCRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Huemer
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Celine Dunkl
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Konstantin Schlick
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ronald Heregger
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Eckhard Klieser
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Michael Deutschmann
- Department of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Falk Roeder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Tumor Registry of the Province of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute - Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Tumor Registry of the Province of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ioffe D, Dotan E. Guidance for Treating the Older Adults with Colorectal Cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2023; 24:644-666. [PMID: 37052812 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01071-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/14/2023]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT The need for evidence-based data in the rapidly growing group of older patients is vast and more elderly-specific studies are desperately needed, for which there is clear demand from both patients and providers. Notably, many of the studies discussed in this review included unplanned subset analyses based on age and/or were not originally stratified by age; therefore, these data, particularly overall survival data, need to be interpreted with some caution as they may not be statistically valid based on the initial trial design and statistical plan. As we await data from ongoing elderly-specific trials, our recommendation for managing older patients with CRC should include geriatric screening tools (e.g., CSGA, VES-13, G8, CARG, CRASH) to help guide treatment adjustments for improved tolerability without sacrificing efficacy. For patients with a positive screen for significant geriatric concerns, a full geriatric assessment is recommended to guide treatment approach and supportive care. Prior data support the use of all approved medications for CRC in older adults who are fit; however, treatment breaks and dose attenuation with potential escalation are reasonable options for these patients. Ultimately, management decisions in the care of older adults with mCRC must be made through shared decision-making with the patient with consideration for the patient's functional status, comorbidities, goals of care, social support, as well as potential toxicities and possible effect on QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dina Ioffe
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA
| | - Efrat Dotan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Ave, Philadelphia, PA, 19111, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jiang W, Liu Q, Yang D, Yang SB. The efficacy of irinotecan supplementation for colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e28090. [PMID: 36254072 PMCID: PMC9575722 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The efficacy of irinotecan as the adjunctive therapy to fluorouracil and leucovorin remains controversial in patients with colorectal cancer. We conduct this meta-analysis to explore the efficacy of irinotecan supplementation for colorectal cancer. METHODS We have searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through March 19, 2020, and included randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of irinotecan plus fluorouracil and leucovorin for colorectal cancer. RESULTS Five randomized controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with fluorouracil and leucovorin for colorectal cancer, irinotecan supplementation could significantly improve progression-free survival rate (hazard ratio = 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.90; P = .003), median progression-free survival (standard mean difference = -0.30; 95% CI = -0.44 to -0.15; P < .0001), overall survival rate (hazard ratio = 0.77; 95% CI = 0.66-0.90; P = .001), and objective response (risk ratio [RR] = 0.57; 95% CI = 0.49-0.66; P < .00001) and decrease progressive disease (RR = 2.10; 95% CI = 1.40-3.14; P = .0003), but revealed no obvious effect on complete response (RR = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.33-2.29; P = .79). The incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events in irinotecan supplementation group was increased compared to control group (RR = 0.67; 95% CI = 0.57-0.79; P < .00001). CONCLUSIONS Irinotecan as the adjunctive therapy to fluorouracil and leucovorin can increase the survival and objective response of patients with colorectal cancer, but the incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events is found to be increased after irinotecan supplementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Jiang
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Lu zhou, 646000, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiying Liu
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Lu zhou, 646000, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Donglin Yang
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Lu zhou, 646000, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
| | - Shi-bin Yang
- Rehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Lu zhou, 646000, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China
- *Correspondence: Shi-bin Yang, Rehabilitation Medicine Department, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Lu zhou, 646000, Sichuan, People’s Republic of China; (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aparicio T, Bouché O, Etienne PL, Barbier E, Mineur L, Desgrippes R, Guérin-Meyer V, Hocine F, Martin J, Le Brun-Ly V, Cretin J, Desramé J, Rinaldi Y, Cany L, Falandry C, Lefevre LB, Marous M, Terrebonne E, Mosser L, Turpin J, Turpin A, Bauguion L, Reichling C, Van den Eynde M, Carola E, Hiret S. Preliminary tolerance analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy in older patients after resection of stage III colon cancer from the PRODIGE 34-FFCD randomized trial. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 55:541-548. [PMID: 36115817 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2022.08.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colon adenocarcinoma mainly occurs in older patients. Oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy improved disease-free survival after stage III colon cancer resection, but this improvement was not demonstrated in older patients. METHODS The purpose of ADAGE-PRODIGE 34, randomized open phase III trial is to compare in patients over 70 years oxaliplatin plus fluoropyrimidine with fluoropyrimidine alone in fit patients (Group 1) and fluoropyrimidine with observation in frail patients (Group 2) after resection of stage III colon adenocarcinoma. We report a preliminary tolerance analysis on 50% of the first patients enrolled. RESULTS The analysis was conducted on 491 patients (378 in Group 1 and 113 in Group 2). Patients in Group 2 were older and showed more frailty criteria than those in Group 1. Cumulative grade 3-5 toxicities were more frequent in patients treated with oxaliplatin in Group 1 or with fluoropyrimidine in Group 2 than in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine in Group 1. At least one course was deferred in more than half of the patients in all groups. Early treatment cessation was more frequent in Group 2. CONCLUSION No safety concerns were raised for the continuation of accrual. The frailty criteria distribution suggests that the investigator's evaluation for group allocation was accurate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, CHU Saint Louis, APHP, Université de Paris Cité, Paris, France.
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, Reims, France
| | - Pierre-Luc Etienne
- Centre Armoricain de Radiothérapie, Imagerie, Oncologie, et Hôpital Privé des Côtes d'Armor, Plérin, France
| | - Emilie Barbier
- Biostatistic department, Burgundy University, INSERM U866, Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France
| | - Laurent Mineur
- Oncology department, Clinique Saint Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - Romain Desgrippes
- Hepatogastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, CH Saint-Malo, Saint-Malo, France
| | | | | | - Jean Martin
- Oncology department, Clinique François Chenieux, Limoges, France
| | | | | | | | - Yves Rinaldi
- Hepato Gastroenterology department, Hôpital Européen de Marseille, Marseille, France
| | - Laurent Cany
- Radiotherapy and Oncology department, Polyclinique Francheville, Perigueux, France
| | - Claire Falandry
- Geriatry department CHU Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France; Laboratoire CarMeN de l'Université de Lyon, Inserm U1060, INRA U1397, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSA Lyon, UCOGIR- Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes Ouest - Guyane
| | | | | | - Eric Terrebonne
- Gastroenterology department, CHU Haut Lévèque, Pessac, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Marc Van den Eynde
- Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Bruxelles, Belgium
| | | | - Sandrine Hiret
- Medical Oncology department, Institut Cancérologique de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Stahler A, Modest DP, Fischer von Weikersthal L, Kaiser F, Decker T, Held S, Graeven U, Schwaner I, Denzlinger C, Schenk M, Kurreck A, Heinrich K, Gießen-Jung C, Neumann J, Kirchner T, Jung A, Stintzing S, Heinemann V. First-line fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab followed by irinotecan-escalation versus initial fluoropyrimidine, irinotecan and bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer - Final survival and per-protocol analysis of the randomised XELAVIRI trial (AIO KRK 0110). Eur J Cancer 2022; 173:194-203. [PMID: 35940054 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.06.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2022] [Revised: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The randomised open-label phase III XELAVIRI trial failed to demonstrate non-inferiority of the sequential application of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab followed by additional irinotecan at first progression (Arm A) versus initial combination of all agents (Arm B) for untreated metastatic colorectal cancer in the initial analysis of time-to-failure-of-strategy (TFS, 90% confidence boundary of 0.8). Here, we evaluate efficacy in the full analysis set (FAS), the per-protocol set, in addition to age-related and molecular subgroups. METHODS Median TFS, overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox regression models assessed hazard ratios (HRs) and confidence intervals (CIs) (TFS: 90%; OS, PFS: 95%). RESULTS Of 421 patients, 390 (92.6%), 391 (92.9%) and 357 (84.8%) events for TFS, OS and PFS were observed in the FAS with a median follow-up of 54.2 months (Arm A) versus 52.9 months (Arm B). Non-inferiority of sequential treatment for TFS was missed in the FAS (HR 0.93; 90% CI, 0.79-1.10; P = 0.482) and not shown in the per-protocol set (HR 0.93; 90% CI, 0.75-1.13, P = 0.433). Formal non-inferiority for TFS was observed for patients older than 70 years (HR 1.06; 90% CI, 0.80-1.41; P = 0.670) and patients with RAS mutant tumours (HR 1.12; 90% CI, 0.87-1.43; P = 0.465). In RAS/BRAF wild-type tumours, combination treatment was significantly superior to sequential therapy in all end-points. CONCLUSIONS In the overall population, XELAVIRI just missed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of sequential compared to combination therapy for TFS. However, the non-inferiority of sequential treatment was observed in elderly patients and RAS mutant tumours. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial registration ID (clinicaltrials.gov) NCT01249638.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Stahler
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
| | - Dominik P Modest
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ingo Schwaner
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Kurfürstendamm, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Michael Schenk
- Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Annika Kurreck
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
| | - Kathrin Heinrich
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany
| | | | - Jens Neumann
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Kirchner
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Andreas Jung
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, LMU Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Stintzing
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany; Charité - Universitätsmedizin, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Berlin, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Volker Heinemann
- Department of Medicine III, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Germany; LMU Munich, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sommerhäuser G, Kurreck A, Stintzing S, Heinemann V, von Weikersthal LF, Dechow T, Kaiser F, Karthaus M, Schwaner I, Fuchs M, König A, Roderburg C, Hoyer I, Quante M, Kiani A, Fruehauf S, Müller L, Reinacher-Schick A, Ettrich TJ, Stahler A, Modest DP. Study protocol of the FIRE-8 (AIO-KRK/YMO-0519) trial: a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II trial investigating the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus panitumumab versus trifluridine/tipiracil plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:820. [PMID: 35897060 PMCID: PMC9327141 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09892-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Initial systemic therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is usually based on two- or three-drug chemotherapy regimens with fluoropyrimidine (5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine), oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan, combined with either anti-VEGF (bevacizumab) or, for RAS wild-type (WT) tumors, anti-EGFR antibodies (panitumumab or cetuximab). Recommendations for patients who are not eligible for intensive combination therapies are limited and include fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab or single agent anti-EGFR antibody treatment. The use of a monochemotherapy concept of trifluridine/ tipiracil in combination with monoclonal antibodies is not approved for first-line therapy, yet. Results from the phase II TASCO trial evaluating trifluridine/ tipiracil plus bevacicumab in first-line treatment of mCRC patients and from the phase I/II APOLLON trial investigating trifluridine/ tipiracil plus panitumumab in pre-treated mCRC patients suggest favourable activity and tolerability of these new therapeutic approaches. Methods FIRE-8 (NCT05007132) is a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase II study which aims to evaluate the efficacy of first-line treatment with trifluridine/tipiracil (35 mg/m2 body surface area (BSA), orally twice daily on days 1–5 and 8–12, q28 days) plus either the anti-EGFR antibody panitumumab (6 mg/kg body weight, intravenously on day 1 and 15, q28 days) [arm A] or (as control arm) the anti-VEGF antibody bevacizumab (5 mg/kg body weight, intravenously on day 1 and 15, q28 days) [arm B] in RAS WT mCRC patients. The primary objective is to demonstrate an improved objective response rate (ORR) according to RECIST 1.1 from 30% (control arm) to 55% with panitumumab. With a power of 80% and a two-sided significance level of 0.05, 138 evaluable patients are needed. Given an estimated drop-out rate of 10%, 153 patients will be enrolled. Discussion To the best of our knowledge, this is the first phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy of trifluridine/tipiracil plus panitumumab in first-line treatment of RAS WT mCRC patients. The administration of anti-EGFR antibodies rather than anti-VEGF antibodies in combination with trifluridine/tipiracil may result in an increased initial efficacy. Trial registration EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) 2019-004223-20. Registered October 22, 2019, ClinicalTrials.govNCT05007132. Registered on August 12, 2021. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09892-8.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Sommerhäuser
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Kurreck
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Stintzing
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - V Heinemann
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Hematology/Oncology, LMU Klinikum, University of Munich, Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | - T Dechow
- Oncological Practice, Ravensburg, Germany
| | - F Kaiser
- Oncological Practice, Landshut, Germany
| | - M Karthaus
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Klinikum Neuperlach/ Klinikum Harlaching, Munich, Germany
| | - I Schwaner
- Oncological Practice Kurfuerstendamm, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Fuchs
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Gastrointestinal Oncology, München Klinik Bogenhausen, Munich, Germany
| | - A König
- Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology Goettingen, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany
| | - C Roderburg
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Infectiology, University Medical Center Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - I Hoyer
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Quante
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Endocrinology, and Infectiology, Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - A Kiani
- Department of Medicine IV, Klinikum Bayreuth GmbH, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - S Fruehauf
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Klinik Dr. Hancken GmbH, Stade, Germany
| | - L Müller
- Onkologie UnterEms, Leer, Germany
| | - A Reinacher-Schick
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Care, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - T J Ettrich
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - A Stahler
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - D P Modest
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Cancer Immunology (CVK/CCM), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), DKFZ, Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Moriwaki T, Nishina T, Sakai Y, Yamamoto Y, Shimada M, Ishida H, Amagai K, Sato M, Endo S, Negoro Y, Kuramochi H, Denda T, Hatachi Y, Ikezawa K, Nakajima G, Bando Y, Tsuji A, Yamamoto Y, Morimoto M, Kobayashi K, Hyodo I. Impact of chronological age on efficacy and safety of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab in older non-frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a combined analysis of individual data from two phase II studies of patients aged >75 years. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2022; 52:725-734. [PMID: 35470391 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyac073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Many clinical trials for older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have been conducted, and fluoropyrimidine and bevacizumab are standard treatments. However, the relationship between age and the efficacy and safety of this treatment is unclear in older metastatic colorectal cancer patients. METHODS Individual data from two phase II studies on older (≥75 years), non-frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with uracil-tegafur/leucovorin or S-1 combined with bevacizumab were collected. Patient characteristics were evaluated with multiple regression analyses for survival outcomes, using the Cox proportional hazard model and linear regression analyses for the worst grade of adverse events. RESULTS We enrolled 102 patients with a median age of 80 years (range, 75-88 years). Of the 70 patients who died, seven (10%) died of causes unrelated to disease or treatment. The study treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 19 patients (18.6%), with 63% aged ≥85 years. The adverse event that most commonly resulted in treatment discontinuation was grade 2 fatigue (21%). Chronological age was not associated with progression-free survival (Hazard ratio, 1.03; P = 0.40) or overall survival (Hazard ratio, 1.02; P = 0.65). Age was weakly associated with non-hematologic adverse events (regression coefficient [R], 0.27; P = 0.007), especially fatigue (R, 0.23; P = 0.02) and nausea (R, 0.19; P = 0.06), but not with hematologic (R, 0.05; P = 0.43) or bevacizumab-related (R, -0.06; P = 0.56) adverse events. CONCLUSIONS The efficacy of fluoropyrimidine plus bevacizumab was age-independent in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer aged ≥75 years, and attention should be paid to non-hematologic adverse events as age increases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Toshikazu Moriwaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba City, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Nishina
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama City, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Sakai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital, Tsuchiura City, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba City, Japan
| | - Mitsuo Shimada
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima University, Tokushima City, Japan
| | - Hiroyasu Ishida
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Mito Medical Center, Higashi Ibaraki gun, Japan
| | - Kenji Amagai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital and Cancer Center, Kasama City, Japan
| | - Mikio Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ryugasaki Saiseikai Hospital, Ryugasaki City, Japan
| | - Shinji Endo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Shinmatsudo Central General Hospital, Matsudo City, Japan
| | - Yuji Negoro
- Department of Oncological Medicine, Kochi Health Sciences Center, Kochi City, Kochi, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Kuramochi
- Department of Chemotherapy and Palliative Care, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
| | - Tadamichi Denda
- Division of Gastroenterology, Chiba Cancer Center, Chiba City, Japan
| | - Yukimasa Hatachi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe City, Japan
| | - Kazuto Ikezawa
- Division of Gastroenterology, Tsukuba Memorial Hospital, Tsukuba City, Japan
| | - Go Nakajima
- Department of Chemotherapy and Palliative Care, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Shinjuku-ku, Japan
| | - Yoshiaki Bando
- Department of Surgery, Tokushima Prefecture Naruto Hospital, Naruto City, Japan
| | - Akihito Tsuji
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine, Kita-gun, Japan
| | - Yuji Yamamoto
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Toon City, Japan
| | - Masamitsu Morimoto
- Department of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Ehime Medical Center, Toon City, Japan
| | - Kazuma Kobayashi
- Department of Surgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki City, Japan
| | - Ichinosuke Hyodo
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Matsuyama City, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lopez-Trabada D, Philippe A, Sorbere M, Lusardi V, Boussion H. [Medical oncological treatment of colorectal cancer in the elderly]. SOINS. GERONTOLOGIE 2022; 27:15-19. [PMID: 35393030 DOI: 10.1016/j.sger.2021.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Medical treatment with chemotherapy is discussed in several situations in the treatment of colon cancer. In the adjuvant setting, chemotherapy with 5FU±oxaliplatin for six months should be considered in the case of lymph node involvement. In the metastatic setting, several protocols exist. The choice of treatments should be based on the expected objectives in terms of response and survival gain, but also of tolerance and quality of life for the patient. A thorough oncogeriatric assessment helps to better define the therapeutic programme. The continuation of geriatric follow-up throughout the treatment process shows a benefit for the patient in terms of quality of life and tolerance of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Lopez-Trabada
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, 184 rue Faubourg- Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France.
| | - Anne Philippe
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, 184 rue Faubourg- Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Murielle Sorbere
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, 184 rue Faubourg- Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Valérie Lusardi
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, 184 rue Faubourg- Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
| | - Hélène Boussion
- Service d'oncologie médicale, hôpital Saint-Antoine, Assistance publique- Hôpitaux de Paris, 184 rue Faubourg- Saint-Antoine, 75012 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hoang T, Sohn DK, Kim BC, Cha Y, Kim J. Efficacy and Safety of Systemic Treatments Among Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Front Oncol 2022; 11:756214. [PMID: 35223449 PMCID: PMC8864322 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.756214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2021] [Accepted: 12/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Systemic treatments, namely, either monotherapy or combination therapy, are commonly administered to patients with advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). This study aimed to provide the complete efficacy and safety profiles and ranking of systemic therapies for the treatment of unresectable advanced or metastatic CRC. METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception until June 30, 2021, and also the bibliographies of relevant studies. Randomized controlled trials comparing two or more treatments, namely, at least capecitabine, 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, bevacizumab, cetuximab, oxaliplatin, or panitumumab were investigated. A network meta-analysis using the Bayesian approach was performed to compare the efficacy and safety of treatments. The surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated for the probability of each treatment as the most effective. The overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3, and serious adverse events (SAEs) were evaluated. RESULTS One hundred two publications with 36,147 participants were assigned to 39 different treatments. Among 11 treatments with full information on six outcomes, FOLFIRI/FOLFOX/FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab significantly improved both the ORR and DCR, compared to FOLFIRI. Although FOLFOX and FOLFIRI/FOLFOX + cetuximab significantly prolonged both OS and PFS, treatments were comparable in terms of AEs grade ≥3 and SAEs. The top highest SUCRA values were observed in the FOLFOXIRI + panitumumab group for ORR (96%) and DCR (99%), FOLFIRI + bevacizumab + panitumumab group for OS (62%) and PFS (54%), and FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab group for AEs grade ≥3 (59%) and SAEs (59%) outcomes. CONCLUSIONS These findings suggest an available range of systemic treatment therapies with different efficacy and safety profiles with patients. Further investigations of the side effects and mutation status are required to confirm our findings. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42019127772.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tung Hoang
- Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Dae Kyung Sohn
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Byung Chang Kim
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Yongjun Cha
- Center for Colorectal Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Jeongseon Kim
- Department of Cancer Biomedical Science, National Cancer Center Graduate School of Cancer Science and Policy, Goyang, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Zhang D, Wang X, Zhang M, Yin Y, Guo J. Clinical efficacy of chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients over 80 years old. Int J Colorectal Dis 2022; 37:1853-1863. [PMID: 35857106 PMCID: PMC9388411 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-022-04222-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common and aggressive gastrointestinal cancer, and the prognostic impact associated with chemotherapy in super elderly (over 80 years old) patients remains poorly defined. We aimed to define the effect of chemotherapy on the prognosis of patients with CRC over 80 years old. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective study including CRC patients over 80 years old was conducted. The patients were screened from the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were applied as the primary and secondary outcome. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to evaluate factors associated with OS and CSS. Survival curves of OS and CSS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS In total, 14,748 CRC patients over 80 years old were included in this study. The median patient age was 85 (IQR: 82-87). All patients were divided into surgical group and non-surgical group. The OS and CSS of the surgical group were significantly better than those of the non-surgical group (P < 0.001). Chemotherapy can improve OS and CSS for patients with stage III and IV (P < 0.001) in surgical group. For the super elderly patients with CRC, chemotherapy significantly improved OS and CSS in all TNM stages in non-surgical group. CONCLUSION For super elderly patients with colorectal cancer, tumor treatment should not be abandoned because of their age. It is necessary to carry out clinical trials in super elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongdong Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Xue Wang
- Jinan Maternal and Child Health Hospital, Jinan, 250001 Shandong China
| | - Mingbao Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Yafei Yin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| | - Jianqiang Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Hospital, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, 247 Beiyuan Street, Jinan, Shandong People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Reduced-dose of doublet chemotherapy combined with anti-EGFR antibodies in vulnerable older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: Data from the REVOLT study. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 13:302-307. [PMID: 34716122 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2021] [Revised: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To assess the toxicity patterns and effectiveness of doublet chemotherapy when administered at reduced doses of 20% (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI) in combination with anti-EGFR antibodies (cetuximab or panitumumab) in old, vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS We performed a retrospective observational study of RAS and BRAF wild-type, vulnerable patients aged ≥70 years with previously untreated mCRC. The primary endpoint was safety, and secondary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS One hundred and eighteen patients were collected from 14 selected Italian centres. The median age was 75 (range, 70-85). Geriatric screening by G8 tool gave a score ≤ 14 in all patients. In total, 75 and 43 patients received FOLFOX or FOLFIRI, respectively, in combination with panitumumab (53%) or cetuximab (47%). The overall incidence of grade (G) 3-4 neutropenia was 11.8%, and for skin rash 11%. The most frequent adverse events were G1-2 skin rash (49.1%), G1-2 diarrhea (21.1%) and G1-2 nausea (17.7%). The ORR was 57.3%. Stable disease was observed in 29.1% of patients, with a disease control rate of 86.4%. With a median follow-up of 18 months, the median PFS was 10.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 8.5-11.4), while the median OS was 18.0 months (95% CI: 16.0-19.9). No statistically significant difference was observed between the regimens in terms of ORR, PFS (p = 0.908), and OS (p = 0.832). CONCLUSION This study shows that with an appropriate design, including reduced doses, vulnerable older patients best tolerate chemotherapy when combined with anti-EGFR antibodies.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hiroi S, Miguchi M, Ikeda S, Nakahara H, Shinozaki K, Nishisaka T, Egi H, Itamoto T. Capecitabine Plus Bevacizumab for Cardiac Metastasis of Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Case Report and Literature Review. In Vivo 2021; 34:3413-3419. [PMID: 33144449 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.12180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Right ventricular cardiac metastasis from colorectal cancer (CRC) is rare and clinically silent. There is no standardised treatment. To date, only twelve cases have been reported in the literature. This is a case report and literature review of right ventricular cardiac metastasis from CRC. CASE REPORT A 75-year-old woman with a history of CRC treated with sigmoidectomy followed by liver and lung metastasectomy presented with a right ventricle tumour. Biopsy showed metastatic adenocarcinoma not suitable for resection because multiple lung metastases coexisted. The metastases were controlled for a prolonged duration by chemotherapy with capecitabine plus bevacizumab. According to the review of 13 cases, the median age of metastatic CRC that involves the right ventricle is 71 years and the primary site is half the colon and rectum. Half of cases have non-cardiac metastases at cardiac metastasis diagnosis. Chemotherapy is more suitable than resection in cases with metastases other than heart because resection of the right ventricle has a high risk. CONCLUSION Cardiac right ventricular metastasis from CRC can be controlled by capecitabine plus bevacizumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sawako Hiroi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Masashi Miguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hideki Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Katsunori Shinozaki
- Division of Clinical Oncology, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takashi Nishisaka
- Department of Pathology Clinical Laboratory, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Egi
- Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Toshiyuki Itamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterological and Transplant Surgery, Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Biomedical and Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Breton C, Aparicio T, Le Malicot K, Ducreux M, Lecomte T, Bachet JB, Taieb J, Legoux JL, De Gramont A, Bennouna J, Bouché O, Boussari O, Manfredi S, Gornet JM. Predictive factors of severe early treatment-related toxicity in patients receiving first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: Pooled analysis of 2190 patients enrolled in Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive (FFCD) trials. Eur J Cancer 2021; 153:40-50. [PMID: 34130228 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
AIM Few studies have explored the association between baseline characteristics and the occurrence of early toxicities in patients treated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Individual patient data of 2190 patients enrolled in 10 prospective FFCD (Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive) trials were analysed. Severe early toxicity was defined as the occurrence of grade ≥III toxicity within 3 months after initiation of chemotherapy (ET3). RESULTS Patients received monotherapy based on 5-FU (n = 1068), a cytotoxic doublet (n = 395) or tritherapy with a cytotoxic doublet plus anti-VEGF agent or a cytotoxic triplet (n = 727). The patients received 5-FU (100%), Irinotecan (39.6%), Oxaliplatin (13.4%), Bevacizumab (29.6%) or Aflibercept (1.8%). ET3 occurred in 244 patients (22.8%) with monotherapy, 248 patients (62.8%) with doublet and 392 patients (53.9%) with tritherapy. The most frequent ET3s were related to biological abnormalities and/or gastrointestinal, general and vascular disorders. The prognostic factors for the occurrence of an ET3 in multivariate analysis were a performance status of 2 rather than 0-1 (OR 2.57; 95% CI [1.16, 5.73]; p = 0.02), tritherapy versus monotherapy (OR 2.31; 95% CI [0.84, 6.33]; p = 0.02), alkaline phosphatase > 300 UI/l (OR 3.07; 95% CI [1.79, 5.27]; p < 0.001) and non-resected primary tumour versus resection (OR 1.59; 95% CI [1.06, 2.39]; p = 0.02). Median overall survival in patients without ET3 was significantly longer than that in patients with ET3 (HR 0.87; 95% CI [0.80-0.96]; p = 0.004). CONCLUSION ET3 is frequent whatever the treatment regimen and is associated with certain baseline characteristics. The clinical impact of ET3 on prognosis in mCRC warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clémence Breton
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Karine Le Malicot
- FFCD, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Michel Ducreux
- Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, Université Paris-Saclay, France
| | - Thierry Lecomte
- Hôpital universitaire de Tours, Université de Tours, Tours, France
| | - Jean-Baptiste Bachet
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Julien Taieb
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Université de Paris, SIRIC CARPEM, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Jaafar Bennouna
- Hôpital universitaire de Nantes, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Hôpital universitaire de Reims, Université de Reims Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - Olayide Boussari
- FFCD, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Sylvain Manfredi
- FFCD, EPICAD INSERM LNC-UMR 1231, University of Burgundy and Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Jean-Marc Gornet
- Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Saint Louis, Université de Paris, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dunn C, Hong W, Gibbs P, Ackland S, Sjoquist K, Tebbutt NC, Price T, Burge M. Personalizing First-Line Systemic Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Is There a Role for Initial Low-Intensity Therapy in 2021 and Beyond? A Perspective From Members of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2021; 20:245-255. [PMID: 34103264 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2021.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Palliative chemotherapy is the cornerstone of treatment for the majority of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, with the aim of increasing length and quality of life. Although guidelines outline the available treatment options in the first line, they provide limited guidance on choice and intensity of the chemotherapy backbone. Data from the TRIBE and TRIBE2 studies confirm a survival benefit with triplet FOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab, and this is a preferred option for younger patients with good performance status able to tolerate it. However, the relative benefit of a fluoropyrimidine doublet with oxaliplatin or irinotecan over single-agent fluoropyrimidine with or without a biologic is less certain; the available data demonstrate that single-agent fluoropyrimidine plus a biologic with planned sequencing of subsequent agents can produce similar overall survival outcomes with reduced toxicity. Our analysis of local real-world registry data suggests that this is an underutilized approach, particularly in younger and fitter patients. Established prognostic factors, including patient age, performance status, tumor sidedness, and biomarkers such as RAS/BRAF, are key in treatment selection; patients with left-sided RAS/BRAF wild-type disease or patients with low tumor bulk may be ideal for a less intensive regimen. Further studies are required to confirm the value of less-intensive regimens in the modern era, where the incorporation of biologic therapies has become routine and where non-chemotherapy options are emerging as viable options for molecularly defined patient subsets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Dunn
- Gibbs Lab, Personalised Medicine Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| | - Wei Hong
- Gibbs Lab, Personalised Medicine Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Peter Gibbs
- Gibbs Lab, Personalised Medicine Division, Walter and Eliza Hall Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Biology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Medical Oncology, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Ackland
- Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia; Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Katrin Sjoquist
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Cancer Care Centre, St. George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Niall C Tebbutt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Timothy Price
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia
| | - Matthew Burge
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Brisbane Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nakazawa J, Kawahira M, Kawahira M, Kodama T, Arima S, Iwashita Y, Mawatari S, Hashimoto S, Kanmura S, Hori T, Tsubouchi H, Ido A. Analysis of factors affecting progression-free survival of first-line chemotherapy in older patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:1200-1207. [PMID: 33994149 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 04/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Few studies have investigated factors influencing the efficacy of chemotherapy in older patients with cancer. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of G8, geriatric assessment (GA), and factors measured in general clinical practice for evaluating progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line palliative chemotherapy in older patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS This was a prospective observational study of older patients (age ≥ 70 years) with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. The modified cut-off value of G8 was determined by referring to two or more abnormal GA conditions. The usefulness of baseline GA and G8 (conventional and modified cut-off value) was assessed according to the efficacy (PFS and disease control rate) of the administered first-line palliative chemotherapy. RESULTS Overall, 93 patients were evaluated between March 2017 and February 2019. A modified G8 cut-off value of ≤12 had a sensitivity and specificity of 68.9% and 46.9%, respectively. PFS was significantly prolonged in the patients with G8 > 12, serum albumin ≥3.5 g/dl, and in whom grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred. There was no significant difference in the PFS between monotherapy and combination therapy. GA was not useful for predicting PFS prolongation or the occurrence of serious adverse events in first-line treatment. CONCLUSION Among older patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer who receive first-line chemotherapy, a modified G8 cut-off value of 12 points, occurrence of grade 3 or higher adverse events, albumin levels, rather than age or performance status were predictors of PFS prolongation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Junichi Nakazawa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-cho, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8760, Japan.
| | - Machiko Kawahira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-cho, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8760, Japan; Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan.
| | - Masahiro Kawahira
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-cho, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8760, Japan.
| | - Tomoko Kodama
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-cho, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8760, Japan.
| | - Shiho Arima
- Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan.
| | - Yuji Iwashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-cho, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8760, Japan.
| | - Seiji Mawatari
- Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan.
| | - Shinichi Hashimoto
- Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan.
| | - Shuji Kanmura
- Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan.
| | - Takeshi Hori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-cho, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8760, Japan.
| | - Hirohito Tsubouchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kagoshima City Hospital, 37-1 Uearata-cho, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8760, Japan.
| | - Akio Ido
- Digestive and Lifestyle Diseases, Kagoshima University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 8-35-1 Sakuragaoka, Kagoshima city, Kagoshima 890-8520, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Alabraba E, Gomez D. Systematic Review of Treatments for Colorectal Metastases in Elderly Patients to Guide Surveillance Cessation Following Hepatic Resection for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Am J Clin Oncol 2021; 44:210-223. [PMID: 33710135 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although included in surveillance programmes for colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases, elderly patients are susceptible to declines in health and quality of life that may render them unsuitable for further surveillance. Deciding when to cease surveillance is challenging. METHODS There are no publications focused on surveillance of elderly patients for CRC metastases. A systematic review of studies reporting treatment outcomes for CRC metastases in elderly patients was performed to assess the risk-benefit balance of the key objectives of surveillance; detecting and treating CRC metastases. RESULTS Sixty-eight eligible studies reported outcomes for surgery and chemotherapy in the elderly. Liver resections and use of chemotherapy, including biologics, are more conservative and have poorer outcomes in the elderly compared with younger patients. Selected studies demonstrated poorer quality-of-life (QoL) following surgery and chemotherapy. Studies of ablation in elderly patients are limited. DISCUSSION The survival benefit of treating CRC metastases with surgery or chemotherapy decreases with advancing age and QoL may decline in the elderly. The relatively lower efficacy and detrimental QoL impact of multimodal therapy options for detected CRC metastases in the elderly questions the benefit of surveillance in some elderly patients. Care of elderly patients should thus be customized based on their preference, formal geriatric assessment, natural life-expectancy, and the perceived risk-benefit balance of treating recurrent CRC metastases. Clinicians may consider surveillance cessation in patients aged 75 years and above if geriatric assessment is unsatisfactory, patients decline surveillance, or patient fitness deteriorates catastrophically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Alabraba
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - Dhanny Gomez
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Pancreatic Surgery, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
- NIHR Nottingham Digestive Disease Biomedical Research Unit, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Benson AB, Venook AP, Al-Hawary MM, Arain MA, Chen YJ, Ciombor KK, Cohen S, Cooper HS, Deming D, Farkas L, Garrido-Laguna I, Grem JL, Gunn A, Hecht JR, Hoffe S, Hubbard J, Hunt S, Johung KL, Kirilcuk N, Krishnamurthi S, Messersmith WA, Meyerhardt J, Miller ED, Mulcahy MF, Nurkin S, Overman MJ, Parikh A, Patel H, Pedersen K, Saltz L, Schneider C, Shibata D, Skibber JM, Sofocleous CT, Stoffel EM, Stotsky-Himelfarb E, Willett CG, Gregory KM, Gurski LA. Colon Cancer, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:329-359. [PMID: 33724754 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.0012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 691] [Impact Index Per Article: 230.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
This selection from the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines) for Colon Cancer focuses on systemic therapy options for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), because important updates have recently been made to this section. These updates include recommendations for first-line use of checkpoint inhibitors for mCRC, that is deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability-high, recommendations related to the use of biosimilars, and expanded recommendations for biomarker testing. The systemic therapy recommendations now include targeted therapy options for patients with mCRC that is HER2-amplified, or BRAF V600E mutation-positive. Treatment and management of nonmetastatic or resectable/ablatable metastatic disease are discussed in the complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for Colon Cancer available at NCCN.org. Additional topics covered in the complete version include risk assessment, staging, pathology, posttreatment surveillance, and survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Al B Benson
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Alan P Venook
- UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | - Stacey Cohen
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | - Linda Farkas
- UT Southwestern Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Steven Hunt
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | - Smitha Krishnamurthi
- Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | | | - Eric D Miller
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | | | - Katrina Pedersen
- Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Tuca A, Gallego R, Ghanem I, Gil-Raga M, Feliu J. Chemotherapy and Targeted Agents in the Treatment of Elderly Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E4015. [PMID: 33322567 PMCID: PMC7764481 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9124015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2020] [Revised: 12/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the main causes of cancer death in the elderly. The older patients constitute a heterogeneous group in terms of functional status, comorbidities, and aging-related conditions. Therefore, therapeutic decisions need to be individualized. Additionally, a higher toxicity risk comes from the fact that pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the drugs as well as the tissue tolerance can be altered with aging. Although the chemotherapy efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is similar for older and young patients, more toxicity is presented in the elderly. While the mono-chemotherapy provides the same benefit for young and older patients, doublets front-line chemotherapy improves progression-free survival (PFS) but not overall survival (OS) in the elderly. Furthermore, the benefit of the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy in older patients has been shown in several clinical trials, while the clinical data for the benefit of anti-epidermal growth factor antibodies are scarcer. Immunocheckpoint inhibitors could be an appropriate option for patients with microsatellite instability (MSI) tumors. A prior geriatric assessment is required before deciding the type of treatment in order to offer the best therapeutic option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert Tuca
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinic, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Rosa Gallego
- Department of Medical Oncology, General Hospital of Granollers, 08402 Granollers, Spain;
| | - Ismael Ghanem
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
| | - Mireia Gil-Raga
- Department of Medical Oncology, University General Hospital of Valencia, CIBERONC, 46014 Valencia, Spain;
| | - Jaime Feliu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz, CIBERONC, 28046 Madrid, Spain;
- Cátedra UAM-AMGEN, 28049 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Outcomes following potentially curative therapies for older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 2020; 47:591-596. [PMID: 33213959 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2020] [Accepted: 11/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Older age represents a major risk factor for developing colorectal cancer and the disease disproportionately affects patients older than 60 years of age. However, knowledge regarding the optimal management of older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) remains limited. The challenge of treating older patients arises in tailoring treatments to a heterogeneous cohort whilst adjusting for individuals with a wide variation of physiological reserve, a reduced tolerance to treatment side-effects and morbidity, and often different priorities as compared with younger patients. Data from the published literature supports the premise that older age alone is not an acceptable determinant of treatment options. In particular, patients aged 65-70 years with mCRC ought to be considered similarly to younger patients and patients aged 70-74 also stand to benefit from both hepatic resection and systemic therapy notwithstanding the higher rates of morbidity and mortality. Patients aged 75-79, and with sufficient physiological reserve ought to be considered for curative treatment options which are proportional to the extent of metastatic disease. Meanwhile, in patients aged ≥80 years, life-extending or life-enhancing benefit ought to be demonstrable prior to embarking upon major surgery as a curative treatment option. Older patients who meet the physiological eligibility criteria to enter clinical trials of systemic chemotherapy appear to gain similar benefit as younger patients and should not be excluded on the basis of age alone. Clinical trials that are specifically designed for older patients are feasible and could yield valuable information to guide clinical practice.
Collapse
|
28
|
Gilabert M, Ries P, Chanez B, Triby S, Francois E, Lièvre A, Rousseau F. Place of anti-EGFR therapy in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in 2020. J Geriatr Oncol 2020; 11:1229-1236. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2020.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
29
|
Komorowski AS, MacKay HJ, Pezo RC. Quality of adverse event reporting in phase III randomized controlled trials of breast and colorectal cancer: A systematic review. Cancer Med 2020; 9:5035-5050. [PMID: 32452660 PMCID: PMC7367648 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical trial reports often emphasize efficacy over harms, leading to misinterpretation of the risk-to-benefit ratio of new therapies. Clear and sufficiently detailed reporting of methods and results is especially important in the abstracts of trial reports, as readers often base their assessment of a trial on such information. In this study, we evaluated the quality of adverse event (AE) reporting and abstract quality in phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of systemic therapies in breast and colorectal cancer. METHODS Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of RCTs, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from November 2005 to September 2018. Phase III RCTs evaluating systemic therapies in breast or colorectal cancer were included. Each article was independently reviewed by two investigators using a standardized data extraction form based on guidelines developed by the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group. Descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and multivariable linear regression were used to analyze data. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS Of 166 RCTs identified, 99.4% reported harms in the manuscript body, and 59.6% reported harms in the abstract. Reporting was restricted to severe harms in 15.6% of RCTs. Statistical comparison of AE rates went unreported in 59.0% of studies. Information regarding AEs leading to dose reductions, treatment discontinuations, or study withdrawals went unreported in 59.3%, 18.7%, and 86.8% of studies, respectively. Recently published RCTs (P = .009) and those sponsored at least partially by for-profit companies (P = .003) had higher abstract quality scores. CONCLUSIONS Breast and colorectal cancer phase III RCTs inadequately report CONSORT-compliant AE data. Improved guideline adherence and abstract reporting is required to properly weigh benefits and harms of new oncologic therapies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019140673.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam S. Komorowski
- Division of Medical MicrobiologyMcMaster UniversityHamiltonONCanada
- Sunnybrook Research InstituteSunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoONCanada
| | - Helen J. MacKay
- Division of Medical OncologySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoONCanada
- Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| | - Rossanna C. Pezo
- Division of Medical OncologySunnybrook Health Sciences CentreTorontoONCanada
- Department of MedicineUniversity of TorontoTorontoONCanada
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Aparicio T, Canouï-Poitrine F, Caillet P, François E, Cudennec T, Carola E, Albrand G, Bouvier AM, Petri C, Couturier B, Phelip JM, Bengrine-Lefevre L, Paillaud E. Treatment guidelines of metastatic colorectal cancer in older patients from the French Society of Geriatric Oncology (SoFOG). Dig Liver Dis 2020; 52:493-505. [PMID: 32029404 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.12.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2019] [Revised: 12/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several guidelines dedicated to metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are available. Since 2013 no recent guidelines are specifically dedicated to older patients and based on a systematic review. MATERIALS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary Task Force with digestive oncologists, geriatricians and methodologists from the SoFOG was formed in 2016 to update recommendations on medical treatment of mCRC based on a systematic review of publications from 2000 to 2018. Search strategy has followed a standardized protocol from the formulation of clinical questions and definition of a search algorithm to the selection of complete articles for recommendations. RESULTS The four selected key questions were: For which older patients with mCRC can we considered: (1) Any chemotherapy, (2) Mono or poly-chemotherapy, (3) Anti-angiogenic therapy, (4) Other targeted therapy. Main recommendations for older patients are: (1) Omission of chemotherapy should be discussed with a geriatrician for patients with severe comorbidities, advanced dementia, uncontrolled psychiatric disorder or severe loss of autonomy. (2) If tumor response is not the main aim, a mono-chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil combined with bevacizumab is recommended as first-line. (3) For patients with symptoms related to metastases or with a planned metastasis ablation, a doublet chemotherapy combined with bevacizumab or anti-EGFR antibody in the context of a RAS wild type tumor is recommended as first-line. Preliminary data suggest that regorafenib may be used, in its registered indication, in patients under 80 with a performance status of 0 and no autonomy alterations and that trifluridine-tipiracil may be used with a tight supervising of hematological function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint Louis Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris, Paris, France.
| | - Florence Canouï-Poitrine
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Philippe Caillet
- Department of Geriatry, Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Eric François
- Department of Medical Oncology, Antoine-Lacassagne Center, University Côte d'Azur, Nice, France
| | - Tristan Cudennec
- Department of Geriatry, Ambroise Paré Hospital, APHP, University Versailles - Saint Quentin, Boulogne-Billancourt, France
| | - Elisabeth Carola
- Department of Medical Oncology, Public Sud de l'Oise Hospital, Creil, France
| | - Gilles Albrand
- Department of Geriatry, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Pierre Bénite, France
| | - Anne-Marie Bouvier
- Digestive Cancer Registry of Burgundy, INSERM UMR1231 EPICAD University of Burgundy Franche Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Camille Petri
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Bérengère Couturier
- Clinical Epidemiology and Ageing Unit, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, EA 7376, CEpiA- IMRB, University of Paris-Est, Créteil, France
| | - Jean-Marc Phelip
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Saint-Etienne Hospital, University Jean Monnet, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, France
| | | | - Elena Paillaud
- Department of Geriatry, Georges Pompidou Hospital, APHP, University of Paris, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Predictive factors for early progression during induction chemotherapy and chemotherapy-free interval: analysis from PRODIGE 9 trial. Br J Cancer 2020; 122:957-962. [PMID: 32015513 PMCID: PMC7109054 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-020-0735-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2019] [Revised: 12/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Identifying patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who will have an early disease progression during induction chemotherapy (IC) and identifying patients who may have a chemotherapy-free interval (CFI) after IC are two major challenges. Methods A logistic model was used to identify factors associated with early progression during IC and with short duration of the first CFI in 488 patients enrolled in the PRODIGE 9 trial. Independent factors were defined with a threshold 0.10. Results In multivariate analysis, baseline leukocytes >10 × 109/L (OR = 1.98 [1.02–3.8], p = 0.04), and stable or increasing CEA at 2 months (OR = 3.61 [1.68–7.75], p = 0.01) were independent factors associated with progression during IC. Male gender (OR = 1.725 [0.92–3.325], p = 0.09) and no tumour response at first evaluation (OR = 1.90 [0.96–3.76], p = 0.07) were significantly associated with a short CFI. The presence of BRAF V600E mutation was also associated with short CFI (OR = 4.59 [0.95; 22.3], p = 0.058). Conclusion High baseline leukocyte count and the lack of CEA decrease level at first evaluation were associated with early progression, and could be in favour of early chemotherapy intensification. Male gender, no tumour response at first evaluation and BRAF mutation are associated with a short CFI, and may be considered for maintenance chemotherapy after IC. Clinical trial number NCT00952029.
Collapse
|
32
|
Lombardi P, Marandino L, De Luca E, Zichi C, Reale ML, Pignataro D, Di Stefano RF, Ghisoni E, Mariniello A, Trevisi E, Leone G, Muratori L, La Salvia A, Sonetto C, Leone F, Aglietta M, Novello S, Scagliotti GV, Perrone F, Di Maio M. Quality of life assessment and reporting in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of phase III trials published between 2012 and 2018. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 146:102877. [PMID: 31981880 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.102877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 12/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, our aim was to describe quality of life (QoL) prevalence and heterogeneity in QoL reporting in colorectal cancer phase III trials. METHODS We included all phase III trials evaluating anticancer drugs in colorectal cancer patients published between 2012 and 2018 by 11 major journals. RESULTS Out of the 67 publications identified, in 41 (61.2 %) QoL was not listed among endpoints. Out of 26 primary publications of trials including QoL among endpoints, QoL results were not reported in 10 (38.5 %). Overall, no QoL data were available in 51/67 (76.1 %) primary publications. In particular, in the metastatic setting, QoL data were not available in 12/18 (66.7 %) trials with primary endpoint overall survival, and in 20/29 (69.0 %) trials with other primary endpoints. CONCLUSIONS QoL was absent in a high proportion of recently published phase III trials in colorectal cancer, even in trials of second or further lines, where attention to QoL should be particularly high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasquale Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Laura Marandino
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Emmanuele De Luca
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Clizia Zichi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Reale
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Daniele Pignataro
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Rosario F Di Stefano
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Eleonora Ghisoni
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Annapaola Mariniello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Elena Trevisi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Leone
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Leonardo Muratori
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Anna La Salvia
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Cristina Sonetto
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Francesco Leone
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Massimo Aglietta
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Candiolo Cancer Institute - FPO- IRCCS, Candiolo, TO, Italy
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Giorgio V Scagliotti
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, TO, Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Clinical Trials Unit, Istituto Nazionale per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori "Fondazione Giovanni Pascale"-IRCCS, Napoli, Italy
| | - Massimo Di Maio
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Ordine Mauriziano Hospital, Torino, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Yoshida Y, Kaneko M, Narukawa M. Magnitude of advantage in tumor response contributes to a better correlation between treatment effects on overall survival and progression-free survival: a literature-based meta-analysis of clinical trials in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 25:851-860. [PMID: 31950377 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01619-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/07/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although it is suggested that the endpoints originated from the concept of tumor shrinkage dynamics, such as early tumor shrinkage and depth of response, are strongly associated with overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), they are yet to be validated as a single surrogate endpoint of OS by themselves. This study aimed to investigate the impact of advantage in tumor response on the correlation between treatment effects on progression-free survival (PFS) and OS in mCRC patients. METHODS Based on an electronic search, we identified randomized controlled trials of first-line therapy for mCRC. The impact of advantage in objective response rate (ORR) on the correlation between treatment effects on PFS and OS was evaluated based on Spearman correlation coefficients (rs). RESULTS Forty-seven trials with a total of 24,018 patients were identified. The hazard ratio for PFS showed a relatively higher correlation with that for OS (rs = 0.63) when the trials were limited to those that demonstrated a larger difference in ORR, compared to the case for trials that demonstrated a smaller difference (rs = 0.32). This tendency was also observed in the subgroup analysis stratified by the types of treatment agents (targeted or non-targeted). CONCLUSIONS The magnitude of advantage in tumor response was suggested to contribute to a better prediction of OS benefit based on PFS in patients with mCRC. The accuracy of OS estimation in mCRC is expected to be improved by considering the degree of tumor shrinkage in conjunction with PFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosuke Yoshida
- Department of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Shirokane 5-9-1, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8641, Japan. .,MSD K.K., a Subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc, Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
| | - Masayuki Kaneko
- Department of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Shirokane 5-9-1, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8641, Japan
| | - Mamoru Narukawa
- Department of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, Shirokane 5-9-1, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8641, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Stage II or III Colon Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched, Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11122003. [PMID: 31842371 PMCID: PMC6966630 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11122003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Accepted: 12/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To determine the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with high-risk stage II or III colon adenocarcinoma, we conducted this propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study to estimate the effects of adjuvant treatments in high-risk stage II or III colon adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: Using propensity score matching, we minimized the confounding effects of sex, age, pathologic stage, tumor location, total chemotherapy cycles, and Charlson comorbidity index scores on adjuvant treatment outcomes in patients with high-risk stage II or III resectable colon adenocarcinoma. We selected the patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database and divided them into four groups: Group 1, comprising patients who received surgery alone; group 2, comprising those who received adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone; group 3, comprising those who received adjuvant oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine-leucovorin (FOLFOX); and group 4, comprising those who received adjuvant folinic acid-fluorouracil-irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Results: In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs, as well as the 95% confidence intervals (Cis)) for mortality observed for groups 1, 2, and 4 relative to group 3 were 1.55 (1.32 to 1.82), 1.22 (1.05 to 1.43), and 2.97 (2.43 to 3.63), respectively. After a stratified subgroup analysis for high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma, we noted that the aHR (95% CI) for mortality for group 2 relative to group 3 was 0.52 (0.30 to 0.89). Conclusions: Adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone is the most optimal regimen for patients with high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma compared with the other adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Adjuvant FOLFOX can serve as an optimal regimen for patients with pathologic stage III colon adenocarcinoma, regardless of age, sex, or tumor location.
Collapse
|
35
|
Phelip JM, Tougeron D, Léonard D, Benhaim L, Desolneux G, Dupré A, Michel P, Penna C, Tournigand C, Louvet C, Christou N, Chevallier P, Dohan A, Rousseaux B, Bouché O. Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO, SFR). Dig Liver Dis 2019; 51:1357-1363. [PMID: 31320305 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2019.05.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 66] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Revised: 05/28/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) published in January 2019, and available on the French Society of Gastroenterology website (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org). METHODS This collaborative work was realized by all French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of mCRC. Recommendations are graded in three categories (A, B and C), according to the level of evidence found in the literature, up until December 2018. RESULTS The management of metastatic colorectal cancer has become complex because of increasing available medical, radiological and surgical treatments alone or in combination. The therapeutic strategy should be defined before the first-line treatment, mostly depending on the presentation of the disease (resectability of the metastases, symptomatic and/or threatening disease), of the patient's condition (ECOG PS, comorbidities), and tumor biology (RAS, BRAF, MSI). The sequence of targeted therapies also seems to have an impact on the outcome (angiogenesis inhibition beyond progression). Surgical resection of metastases was the only curative intent treatment to date, joined recently by percutaneous tumor ablation tools (radiofrequency, microwave). Localized therapies such as hepatic intra-arterial infusion, radioembolization and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, also have seen their indications specified (liver-dominant disease and resectable peritoneal carcinomatosis). New treatments have been developed in heavily pretreated patients, increasing overall survival and preserving quality of life (regorafenib and trifluridine/tipiracil). Finally, immune checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated high efficacy in MSI mCRC. CONCLUSION French guidelines for mCRC management are put together to help offer the best personalized therapeutic strategy in daily clinical practice, as the mCRC therapeutic landscape is complexifying. These recommendations are permanently being reviewed and updated. Each individual case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary team (MDT).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Marc Phelip
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Saint Etienne, Saint Etienne, France.
| | - David Tougeron
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | - David Léonard
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Clinique de la Loire, Saumur, France
| | - Leonor Benhaim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, GustaveRoussy Cancer Center, UNICANCER, Villejuif, France
| | - Grégoire Desolneux
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Bergonie Institute, UNICANCER, Bordeaux, France
| | - Aurélien Dupré
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Leon Berard Cancer Center, UNICANCER, Lyon, France
| | - Pierre Michel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Christophe Penna
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Bicêtres Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Christophe Tournigand
- Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Henri-Mondor University Hospital, APHP, Creteil, France
| | - Christophe Louvet
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris (IMM), Paris, France
| | - Nikki Christou
- Department of Digestive, Endocrine and General Surgery, University Hospital of Limoges, France
| | | | - Anthony Dohan
- Department of Abdominal and Interventional Radiology, Cochin Unversity Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Benoist Rousseaux
- Department of Medical Oncology, Henri Mondor Hospital, APHP, Creteil, France; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Solid Tumor Department, New York, USA
| | - Olivier Bouché
- Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospital of Reims, Reims, France
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rogers JE, Eng C. Pharmacotherapeutic considerations for elderly patients with colorectal cancer. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20:2139-2160. [PMID: 31456458 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1657826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Oncology care in the elderly presents a dilemma. The majority of cancer cases are diagnosed in the elderly yet they are underrepresented in clinical trials. In addition to limited evidence-based medicine, the elderly is a heterogeneous population filled with pharmacotherapeutic challenges and barriers. Elderly metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treatment decisions encompass these challenges.Areas covered: Treatment based solely on chronological age is an unacceptable practice. Physiologic factors such as function, cognition, comorbidities, polypharmacy, among others must be considered. Oncology guidelines emphasize using a geriatric assessment (GA) as opposed to traditional oncology performance status measures to best identify risks. Our review shines light on these issues as they pertain to elderly unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).Expert opinion: The practical use of GA tools in oncology remain to be determined. Current barriers are the lack of a consistent tool to unify decision-making, provider education, and evidence-based use/outcomes in specific cancers. mCRC antineoplastic data surrounding GAs are scarce, and current mCRC national treatment algorithms are not stratified to encompass GA-driven therapy. Therefore, providers lack clear guidance or practicality of use. We hope mCRC trial designs will abandon age cutoffs and instead place more focus on GAs for inclusion and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jane E Rogers
- Department of Pharmacy Clinical Programs, U.T. M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Cathy Eng
- Department of Medicine Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Carrato A, Benavides M, Massutí B, Ferreiro-Monteagudo R, García Alfonso P, Falcó E, Reboredo M, Cano T, Gallego J, Viéitez JM, Layos L, Salud A, Polo E, Dotor E, Durán-Ogalla G, Rodriguez-Garrote M, Calvo A, Grande E, Aranda E. First-line single-agent regorafenib in frail patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a pilot phase II study of the Spanish Cooperative Group for the Treatment of Digestive Tumours (TTD). BMC Cancer 2019; 19:533. [PMID: 31159765 PMCID: PMC6547483 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-5753-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment of frail patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC) is controversial. This pilot phase II trial aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of regorafenib when administered in first-line to frail patients with advanced CRC. METHODS Frail patients without prior advanced colorectal cancer treatment were included in the study. Definition of frailty was defined per protocol based on dependency criteria, presence of chronic comorbid pathologies and/or geriatric features. MAIN OBJECTIVE to assess progression-free survival (PFS) rate at 6 months. Treatment consisted of 28-day cycles of orally administered regorafenib 160 mg/day (3 weeks followed by 1 week rest). RESULTS Forty-seven patients were included in the study. Median age was 81 years (range 63-89). Frailty criteria: dependency was observed in 26 patients (55%), comorbidities in 27 (57%) and geriatric features in 18 (38%). PFS rate at 6 months was 45% (95% confidence interval [CI] 30-60]. Median PFS was 5.6 months (95%CI 2.7-8.4). Median overall survival (OS) was 16 months (95%CI 7.8-24). Complete response, partial response and stable disease were observed in one, two and 21 patients respectively (objective response rate 6.4%; disease control rate 51%). Thirty-nine patients (83%) experienced grade 3-4 adverse events (AEs). The most common grade 3-4 AEs were hypertension (15 patients; 32%), asthenia (14; 30%), hypophosphatemia (6; 13%); diarrhea (4; 8%), hand-foot-skin reaction (4; 8%). There were two toxic deaths (4.2%) (grade 5 rectal bleeding and death not further specified). Dose reduction was required in 26 patients (55%) and dose-delays in 13 patients (28%). CONCLUSIONS The study did not meet the pre-specified boundary of 55% PFS rate at 6 months. Toxicity observed (83% patients experienced grade 3 and 4 AEs) preclude its current use in clinical practice on this setting. Disease control rate and overall survival results are interesting and might warrant further investigation to identify those who benefit from this approach. TRIAL REGISTRATION This trial was prospectively registered at EudraCT ( 2013-000236-94 ). Date of trial registration: April 9th, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A. Carrato
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBERONC, Alcala University, Ctra. De Colmenar Viejo, km 9,100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - M. Benavides
- Hospital Regional Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | - B. Massutí
- Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
| | - R. Ferreiro-Monteagudo
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBERONC, Alcala University, Ctra. De Colmenar Viejo, km 9,100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | | | - E. Falcó
- Hospital Son Llatzer, Mallorca, Spain
| | - M. Reboredo
- Complejo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña, La Coruña, Spain
| | - T. Cano
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, IMIBIC, University of Córdoba, CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Córdoba, Spain
| | - J. Gallego
- Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Alicante, Spain
| | - J. M. Viéitez
- Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | - L. Layos
- Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, ICO, Badalona, Spain
| | - A. Salud
- Hospital de Lleida Arnau de Vilanova, Lérida, Spain
| | - E. Polo
- Hospital Miguel Servet, Zaragoza, Spain
| | - E. Dotor
- Corporació Sanitària Parc Taulí, Barcelona, Spain
| | - G. Durán-Ogalla
- Hospital Regional Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
| | - M. Rodriguez-Garrote
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBERONC, Alcala University, Ctra. De Colmenar Viejo, km 9,100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - A. Calvo
- Hospital Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, Spain
| | - E. Grande
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, IRYCIS, CIBERONC, Alcala University, Ctra. De Colmenar Viejo, km 9,100, 28034 Madrid, Spain
| | - E. Aranda
- Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia, IMIBIC, University of Córdoba, CIBERONC, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Córdoba, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Taieb J. How best to treat older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:331-333. [DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30076-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2019] [Accepted: 02/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
39
|
Aparicio T, Bouché O, Taieb J, Maillard E, Kirscher S, Etienne PL, Faroux R, Khemissa Akouz F, El Hajbi F, Locher C, Rinaldi Y, Lecomte T, Lavau-Denes S, Baconnier M, Oden-Gangloff A, Genet D, Paillaud E, Retornaz F, François E, Bedenne L. Bevacizumab+chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in elderly patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase II trial-PRODIGE 20 study results. Ann Oncol 2019; 29:133-138. [PMID: 29045659 PMCID: PMC5834151 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdx529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Metastatic colorectal cancer frequently occurs in elderly patients. Bevacizumab in combination with front line chemotherapy (CT) is a standard treatment but some concern raised about tolerance of bevacizumab for these patients. The purpose of PRODIGE 20 was to evaluate tolerance and efficacy of bevacizumab according to specific end points in this population. Patients and methods Patients aged 75 years and over were randomly assigned to bevacizumab + CT (BEV) versus CT. LV5FU2, FOLFOX and FOLFIRI regimen were prescribed according to investigator’s choice. The composite co-primary end point, assessed 4 months after randomization, was based on efficacy (tumor control and absence of decrease of the Spitzer QoL index) and safety (absence of severe cardiovascular toxicities and unexpected hospitalization). For each arm, the treatment will be consider as inefficient if 20% or less of the patients met the efficacy criteria and not safe if 40% or less met the safety criteria. Results About 102 patients were randomized (51 BEV and 51 CT), median age was 80 years (range 75–91). Primary end point was met for efficacy in 50% and 58% and for safety in 61% and 71% of patients in BEV and CT, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 9.7 months in BEV and 7.8 months in CT. Median overall survival was 21.7 months in BEV and 19.8 months in CT. The 36-month overall survival rate was 27% in BEV and 10.1% in CT. Severe toxicities grade 3/4 were mainly non-hematologic toxicities (80.4% in BEV, 63.3% in CT). Conclusion Bevacizumab combined with CT was safe and efficient. Both arms met the primary safety and efficacy criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Aparicio
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU Saint Louis, APHP, Paris, France.,Université Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - O Bouché
- Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Robert Debré, Reims, France
| | - J Taieb
- Digestive Oncology Department, CHU Georges Pompidou, APHP, Paris, France
| | - E Maillard
- Statistics Department, Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France
| | - S Kirscher
- Oncology Department, Institut Sainte Catherine, Avignon, France
| | - P-L Etienne
- Oncology Department, CARIO, HPCA, Plérin, France
| | - R Faroux
- Gastroenterology Department, CHG Vendée, La Roche sur Yon, France
| | | | - F El Hajbi
- Oncology Department, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - C Locher
- Gastroenterology Department, CH Meaux, Meaux, France
| | - Y Rinaldi
- Gastroenterology Departement, Hôpital Européen, Marseille, France
| | - T Lecomte
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU Trousseau, Tours, France
| | | | - M Baconnier
- Gastroenterology Department, CH Annecy Genevois, Pringy, France
| | - A Oden-Gangloff
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU Charles Nicolle, Rouen, France
| | - D Genet
- Oncology Department, Clinique Chenieux, Limoges, France
| | - E Paillaud
- Geriatric Department, CHU Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France
| | - F Retornaz
- Geriatric Department, Hôpital Européen, Marseille, France
| | - E François
- Gastroenterology Department, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - L Bedenne
- Gastroenterology Department, CHU Le Bocage, INSERM U 866, Dijon, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Gouverneur A, Bezin J, Jové J, Bosco-Lévy P, Fourrier-Réglat A, Noize P. Treatment Modalities and Survival in Older Adults with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in Real Life. J Am Geriatr Soc 2019; 67:913-919. [PMID: 30840323 DOI: 10.1111/jgs.15858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 02/05/2019] [Accepted: 02/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is increasingly treated with targeted therapies, but little is known about real-life mCRC treatment in older adults. The aims were to describe the real-life first-line treatment modalities in older adult mCRC patients, to identify factors associated with treatment modalities, and to evaluate survival with regard to treatment modalities. PATIENTS AND METHODS A cohort of mCRC patients aged 65 years and older at diagnosis was identified between 2009 and 2013 using French national healthcare insurance system claims data. Treatment modalities were: treatment with one or more anticancer medication vs best supportive care and, among treated patients, treatment with targeted therapy vs conventional chemotherapy alone. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with treatment by anticancer medication and by targeted therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the independent effect of treatment modalities on overall survival while adjusting for baseline covariates identified with logistic regression. RESULTS A total of 503 patients were included with a median age of 78 years (54% were men). Of these, 299 (59%) were treated with anticancer medications. Among treated patients, 131 (44%) received targeted therapy. In multivariate analysis, age 75 years or older, renal failure, malnutrition, and five or more concomitant medications were associated with a lower likelihood of treatment with anticancer medications. Among treated patients, age 75 years or older, history of cancer, lymph node metastases, and a single metastatic site were associated with a lower likelihood of treatment with targeted therapy. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models found that treatment with any anticancer medication tended to be associated with a lower risk of death; treatment with targeted therapy was not significantly associated. CONCLUSION A more appropriate prescription of anticancer medications in the older adult will require the definition of more explicit criteria to avoid undertreatment. The real benefit of targeted therapies vs conventional chemotherapy alone needs to be confirmed in this population. J Am Geriatr Soc 67:913-919, 2019.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amandine Gouverneur
- Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux, France.,Pôle de Santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Julien Bezin
- Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux, France
| | - Jérémy Jové
- Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Annie Fourrier-Réglat
- Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux, France.,Pôle de Santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Bordeaux, France
| | - Pernelle Noize
- Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, team Pharmacoepidemiology, UMR 1219, University of Bordeaux, Inserm, Bordeaux, France.,Pôle de Santé publique, Service de Pharmacologie médicale, CHU de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France.,Bordeaux PharmacoEpi, INSERM CIC1401, Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Winther SB, Liposits G, Skuladottir H, Hofsli E, Shah CH, Poulsen LØ, Ryg J, Osterlund P, Berglund Å, Qvortrup C, Glimelius B, Sorbye H, Pfeiffer P. Reduced-dose combination chemotherapy (S-1 plus oxaliplatin) versus full-dose monotherapy (S-1) in older vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (NORDIC9): a randomised, open-label phase 2 trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:376-388. [PMID: 30852136 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30041-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Revised: 01/26/2019] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Older or vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are seldom included in randomised trials. The multicentre NORDIC9 trial evaluated reduced-dose combination chemotherapy compared with full-dose monotherapy in older, vulnerable patients. METHODS This randomised, open-label phase 2 trial was done in 23 Nordic oncology clinics and included patients aged 70 years or older with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer who were not candidates for full-dose combination chemotherapy. Patients were block randomised (1:1) using a web-based tool to full-dose S-1 (30 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14 every 3 weeks) followed by second-line treatment at progression with irinotecan (250 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks or 180 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 2 weeks) or reduced-dose combination chemotherapy with S-1 (20 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks) followed by second-line treatment at progression with S-1 (20 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14) and irinotecan (180 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 3 weeks). Use of bevacizumab (7·5 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each cycle) was optional. Treatment allocation was not masked and randomisation was stratified for institution and bevacizumab. The primary outcome was progression-free survival. Survival analyses were by intention to treat and safety analyses were done on the treated population. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2014-000394-39, and is closed to new participants. FINDINGS From March 9, 2015, to Oct 11, 2017, 160 patients with a median age of 78 years (IQR 76-81) were randomly assigned to full-dose monotherapy (n=83) or reduced-dose combination chemotherapy (n=77). At data cutoff (Sept 1, 2018; median follow-up 23·8 months [IQR 18·8-30·9]), 81 (98%) patients in the full-dose monotherapy group and 71 (92%) patients in the reduced-dose combination group had progressed or died. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer with reduced-dose combination chemotherapy (6·2 months [95% CI 5·3-8·3]) than with full-dose monotherapy (5·3 months [4·1-6·8]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72 [95% CI 0·52-0·99]; p=0·047). Toxicity was evaluated in 157 patients who received treatment. Significantly more patients in the full-dose monotherapy group (51 [62%] of 82 patients) experienced at least one grade 3-4 adverse event than in the reduced-dose combination group (32 [43%] of 75 patients; p=0·014). Grade 3-4 diarrhoea (12 [15%] vs two [3%]; p=0·018), fatigue (ten [12%] vs three [4%]; p=0·083), and dehydration (five [6%] vs none; p=0·060) were more frequent in the full-dose monotherapy group than in the reduced-dose combination group. Treatment-related deaths occurred in three patients during first-line treatment and three patients during second-line treatment (two in the full-dose monotherapy group vs one in the reduced-dose combination group in both cases). INTERPRETATION Reduced-dose combination chemotherapy with S-1 and oxaliplatin for older, vulnerable patients with metastatic colorectal cancer was more effective and resulted in less toxicity than full-dose monotherapy with S-1. Reduced-dose combination chemotherapy could be a preferred treatment for this population. FUNDING Taiho Pharmaceuticals, Nordic Group, the Danish Cancer Society, the Swedish Cancer Society, Academy of Geriatric Research (AgeCare), and Region of Southern Denmark.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stine Braendegaard Winther
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Gabor Liposits
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Halla Skuladottir
- Department of Oncology, Regional Hospital West Jutland, Herning, Denmark
| | - Eva Hofsli
- Department of Oncology, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | | | - Jesper Ryg
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Pia Osterlund
- Department of Oncology, Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland; Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki University, Finland
| | - Åke Berglund
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Camilla Qvortrup
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Halfdan Sorbye
- Department of Oncology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Academy of Geriatric Cancer Research (AgeCare), Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; OPEN, Odense Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Hidaka E, Maeda C, Nakahara K, Wakamura K, Ishiyama Y, Shimada S, Seki J, Takano Y, Oae S, Enami Y, Sawada N, Ishida F, Kudo SE. High Serum CA19-9 Concentration Predicts Poor Prognosis in Elderly Patients with Stage IV Colorectal Cancer. Gastrointest Tumors 2019; 5:117-124. [PMID: 30976583 PMCID: PMC6422141 DOI: 10.1159/000493793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM The optimal treatment strategy for elderly patients with stage IV colorectal cancer (CRC) remains controversial due to limited research data. The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment results and to clarify the prognostic factors, especially poor prognosis factors, in elderly patients with stage IV CRC. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the data of 82 elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) with stage IV CRC who underwent surgical treatment at our hospital between April 2001 and March 2017. Factors that affected prognosis and the ability to undergo treatment were analyzed via multivariate analysis. RESULTS The median overall survival (OS) in the patients with high pretreatment serum carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) concentration (> 370 U/mL) was significantly worse than in those with lower serum CA19-9 concentration (0-370 U/mL) (8.5 vs. 19.2 months, p = 0.0059). In univariate analysis, age (≥80 years) (p = 0.014), performance status of 1-3 (p = 0.028), and high pretreatment serum CA19-9 concentration (p = 0.014) were significant prognostic factors for poor OS. By contrast, resection of the primary tumor (p = 0.024), chemotherapy (p < 0.0001), and resection of distant metastasis (p = 0.0005) were significant prognostic factors for favorable OS. Multivariate analysis showed that a high pretreatment serum CA19-9 concentration was an independent prognostic factor for poor OS (p = 0.01). Meanwhile, resection of the primary tumor (p = 0.033), chemotherapy (p < 0.0001), and resection of distant metastasis (p = 0.0008) were prognostic factors for favorable OS. CONCLUSIONS A high pretreatment serum CA19-9 concentration (> 370 U/mL) was a reliable predictive factor for poor prognosis, and aggressive treatments should be performed carefully in these patients. Moreover, various treatments, including surgery and chemotherapy, might improve OS in elderly patients with stage IV CRC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eiji Hidaka
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Cacho-Díaz B, Lorenzana-Mendoza NA, Reyes-Soto G, Ávila-Funes JA, Navarrete-Reyes AP. Neurologic manifestations of elderly patients with cancer. Aging Clin Exp Res 2019; 31:201-207. [PMID: 29704209 DOI: 10.1007/s40520-018-0961-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 04/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The incidence of cancer is an age-related phenomenon; therefore, the interest on clinical manifestations, diagnostic approach and treatment strategies for older patients diagnosed with cancer has increased lately. Neurologic symptoms are one of the main reasons for consultation and a common cause of decreased quality of life among cancer patients. AIMS To identify the neurologic manifestations of patients ≥ 65 years of age diagnosed with cancer and compare them to those presented by a younger population. METHODS Cross-sectional study of cancer patients referred to neuro-oncologic consultation at a Cancer Center. Sociodemographic, health and oncologic characteristics were obtained through clinical interviews. Clinical symptoms and final diagnoses were also recorded. Bivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out. RESULTS More than 17,000 neuro-oncologic consultations in 3015 patients were given, 27% (n = 811) of them were ≥ 65 years of age. Most frequent primary neoplasms in elderly patients were: breast cancer, hematologic neoplasms, gynecological, urologic, skin and head and neck cancers. Elderly patients had an increased risk of having the following diagnoses: abnormal movements, stroke, peripheral vertigo, dementia, degenerative spine disorder, and delirium. DISCUSSION Elderly patients are considered a vulnerable population. The present study found that the main neoplasms associated with neurological manifestations are similar to the reported previously. We described the main symptoms that led to a neuro-oncological assessment. Moreover, we enlisted the final diagnoses made on elderly patients and compared them with others reports. To the best of our knowledge, this study provides valuable information, since there is scarce evidence in the literature about this topic. CONCLUSION Identifying the frequency and correlation of neurologic manifestations in older cancer patients will allow for the implementation of timely multidisciplinary care in an attempt to improve these patients' health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardo Cacho-Díaz
- Neuroscience Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, Av San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, ZC14080, Mexico City, Mexico.
| | - Nydia A Lorenzana-Mendoza
- Neuroscience Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, Av San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, ZC14080, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Gervith Reyes-Soto
- Neuroscience Unit, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Ciudad de México, Av San Fernando 22, Col. Sección XVI, ZC14080, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - José A Ávila-Funes
- Geriatric Unit, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Tlalpan, 14080, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - Ana P Navarrete-Reyes
- Geriatric Unit, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Vasco de Quiroga 15, Tlalpan, 14080, Ciudad de México, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Yu IS, Cheung WY. Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in the Era of Personalized Medicine: A More Tailored Approach to Systemic Therapy. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 2018:9450754. [PMID: 30519549 PMCID: PMC6241232 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9450754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2018] [Accepted: 10/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the second most common malignancy diagnosed in Canada. Despite declining incidence and mortality rates in recent years, there is still a significant number of cases that are metastatic at presentation. Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy was the backbone of colorectal cancer treatment, but the addition of irinotecan and oxaliplatin to form combination regimens has significantly improved overall survival. In the past decade, the development of novel biologic agents including therapies directed against vascular endothelial growth factor and epidermal growth factor receptor has further altered the landscape of metastatic colorectal cancer treatment. However, clinical trials have demonstrated that not all patients respond to these therapies similarly and consideration must be given to individual patient- and tumor-related factors. A more tailored and biomarker driven approach to treatment selection can optimize outcomes and avoid unnecessary adverse effects. In this review article, we offer a comprehensive overview of the panel of clinical- and tumor-associated characteristics that influence treatment decisions in metastatic colorectal cancer and how this sets the foundation for a more personalized treatment strategy in oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene S. Yu
- University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Jung YH, Kim JY, Jang YN, Yoo SH, Kim GH, Lee KM, Lee IK, Chung SM, Woo IS. Clinical characteristics and treatment propensity in elderly patients aged over 80 years with colorectal cancer. Korean J Intern Med 2018; 33:1182-1193. [PMID: 29166760 PMCID: PMC6234404 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2016.181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Accepted: 04/02/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Elderly patients (≥ 80 years) with colorectal cancer (CRC) tend to avoid active treatment at the time of diagnosis despite of recent advances in treatment. The aim of this study was to determine treatment propensity of elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with CRC in clinical practice and the impact of anticancer treatment on overall survival (OS). METHODS Medical charts of 152 elderly patients (aged ≥ 80 years) diagnosed with CRC between 1998 and 2012 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' clinical characteristics, treatment modalities received, and clinical outcome were analyzed. RESULTS Their median age was 82 years (range, 80 to 98). Of 152 patients, 148 were assessable for the extent of the disease. Eighty-two of 98 patients with localized disease and 28 of 50 patients with metastatic disease had received surgery or chemotherapy or both. Surgery was performed in 79 of 98 patients with localized disease and 15 of 50 patients with metastatic disease. Chemotherapy was administered in only 24 of 50 patients with metastatic disease. Patients who received anticancer treatment according to disease extent showed significantly longer OS compared to untreated patients (localized disease, 76.2 months vs. 15.4 months, p = 0.000; metastatic disease, 9.9 months vs. 2.6 months, p = 0.001). Along with anticancer treatment, favorable performance status (PS) was associated with longer OS in multivariate analysis of clinical outcome. CONCLUSION Elderly patients aged ≥ 80 years with CRC tended to receive less treatment for metastatic disease. Nevertheless, anticancer treatment in patients with favorable PS was effective in prolonging OS regardless of disease extent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Hwa Jung
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon Sun Hospital, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Jae Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yu Na Jang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Hoon Yoo
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gyo Hui Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kang Min Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Kyu Lee
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Mi Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - In Sook Woo
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Correspondence to In Sook Woo, M.D. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 10 63-ro, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul 07345, Korea Tel: +82-2-3779-1574 Fax: +82-2-780-3132 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lund CM, Vistisen KK, Dehlendorff C, Rønholt F, Johansen JS, Nielsen DL. Age-dependent differences in first-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the DISCO study. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1445-1454. [PMID: 30375911 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1531299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES First-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is effective and feasible in selected older patients. We investigated age-dependent differences in treatment and outcomes in patients with mCRC in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS A retrospective study of 654 patients with mCRC referred to first-line chemotherapy in 2008-2014. Patients were divided into two age groups: 50-69 and ≥70 (older patients). Binary outcomes were analyzed by logistic regression. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed by Cox proportional hazards regression, CRC-specific and other-cause mortality with Fine and Gray proportional hazard model for the sub-distribution of a competing risk. RESULTS After adjusting for performance status (PS) and comorbidity, older patients were more likely to receive monotherapy (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 9.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 4.52-17.91), lower doses, and no additional targeted therapy (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI 1.28-2.78) than younger patients. Yet, older patients experienced more toxicity and hospitalizations (aOR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.08-2.17). Among those treated, older patients had shorter PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.32, 95% CI 1.11-1.57), but after adjusting for PS and comorbidity, PFS was similar. No significant difference was found in CRC mortality (HR = 1.15, 95% CI 0.95-1.40) between age groups. Poor PS was associated with shorter OS and PFS and higher CRC mortality. CONCLUSIONS In the DISCO study, older patients with mCRC received less aggressive first-line chemotherapy. Yet, they experienced more toxicity. Younger and older patients had similar CRC mortality. Shorter PFS and higher CRC mortality were observed in patients with poor PS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia M. Lund
- Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Kirsten K. Vistisen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Christian Dehlendorff
- Department of Statistics and Pharmacoepidemiology, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Finn Rønholt
- Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Julia S. Johansen
- Department of Medicine, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dorte L. Nielsen
- Department of Oncology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Glimelius B, Pfeiffer P. Do we make progress in elderly patients with metastatic colorectal cancer? Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1422-1426. [PMID: 30384805 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1535189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Bengt Glimelius
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Per Pfeiffer
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Landre T, Maillard E, Taleb C, Ghebriou D, Guetz GD, Zelek L, Aparicio T. Impact of the addition of bevacizumab, oxaliplatin, or irinotecan to fluoropyrimidin in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. Int J Colorectal Dis 2018; 33:1125-1130. [PMID: 29680896 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-018-3053-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The clinical benefit of double-front-line therapy (including oxaliplatin or irinotecan or bevacizumab plus 5-fluorouracil (5FU) or capecitabine) compared to monotherapy (5FU or capecitabine) in elderly (> 70 years) patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) is controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of published randomized studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS The selection of the studies was carried out using PubMed with the following keywords: "metastatic colorectal cancer," "elderly," "oxaliplatin," "irinotecan," "bevacizumab," "survival." The efficacy endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were collected from the studies and pooled. By convention, an HR < 1 was a result in favor of biotherapy. RESULTS This meta-analysis (MA) included ten studies: three assessing irinotecan (FFCD 2001-02, CAIRO, and an already published MA by Folprecht), three assessing oxaliplatin (FOCUS2, FFCD 2000-05, and a published study by De Gramont), and four assessing bevacizumab (PRODIGE-20, AVEX, AGITG-MAX, and "AVF2192g" by Kabbinavar). Our MA included 1652 patients (62% of men). Concerning age, we chose a cut-off of 70 years or a cut-off of 75 years, corresponding to the available data for each study. The performance index (PS) was 0-1 for about 90% of patients, with the exception of FFCD 2001-02 and FOCUS2 which included 30% of patients with PS2. Overall, the addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidin statistically improves both OS and PFS (HR = 0.78; CI 0.63-0.96 and HR = 0.55; CI 0.44-0.67, respectively). The addition of oxaliplatin did not statistically improve OS (= 0.99; CI 0.85-1.17) but improves PFS (HR = 0.81; CI 0.67-0.97) as well as the addition of irinotecan (HR = 1.01; CI 0.84-1.22 and HR = 0.82; CI 0.68-1.00, respectively). CONCLUSION In previously untreated elderly patients with MCRC, the addition of bevacizumab to fluoropyrimidin appears more effective in terms of OS or PFS than the addition of oxaliplatin or irinotecan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thierry Landre
- Geriatric Oncology Coordination Unit - UCOG 93, APHP, René Muret Hospital, HUPSSD - Université Paris 13, Sevran, France. .,FRancilian Oncogeriatric Group (FROG), Argenteuil, France.
| | - Emilie Maillard
- Department of Biostatistics, Fédération Française de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France
| | - Chérifa Taleb
- Geriatric Oncology Coordination Unit - UCOG 93, APHP, René Muret Hospital, HUPSSD - Université Paris 13, Sevran, France.,Oncology Department, APHP, Avicenne Hospital, HUPSSD - Université Paris 13, Bobigny, France
| | - Djamel Ghebriou
- FRancilian Oncogeriatric Group (FROG), Argenteuil, France.,Department of Oncology, APHP, Tenon Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Gaetan Des Guetz
- Oncology Department, APHP, Avicenne Hospital, HUPSSD - Université Paris 13, Bobigny, France
| | - Laurent Zelek
- Geriatric Oncology Coordination Unit - UCOG 93, APHP, René Muret Hospital, HUPSSD - Université Paris 13, Sevran, France.,Oncology Department, APHP, Avicenne Hospital, HUPSSD - Université Paris 13, Bobigny, France
| | - Thomas Aparicio
- Department of Biostatistics, Fédération Française de Cancérologie Digestive, Dijon, France.,Gastroenterology Department, CHU Saint Louis, APHP, Université Paris 7, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Aparicio T, Ducreux M, Faroux R, Barbier E, Manfredi S, Lecomte T, Etienne PL, Bedenne L, Bennouna J, Phelip JM, François E, Michel P, Legoux JL, Gasmi M, Breysacher G, Rougier P, De Gramont A, Lepage C, Bouché O, Seitz JF, Adenis A, Alessio A, Aouakli A, Azzedine A, Bedjaoui A, Bidault A, Blanchi A, Botton A, Cadier-Lagnes A, Fatisse A, Gagnaire A, Gilbert A, Gueye A, Hollebecque A, Lemaire A, Mahamat A, Marre A, Patenotte A, Rotenberg A, Roussel A, Thirot-Bidault A, Votte A, Weber A, Zaanan A, Dupont-Gossart A, Villing A, Queuniet A, Coudert B, Denis B, Garcia B, Lafforgue B, Landi B, Leduc B, Linot B, Paillot B, Rhein B, Winkfield B, Barberis C, Becht C, Belletier C, Berger C, Bineau C, Borel C, Brezault C, Buffet C, Cornila C, Couffon C, De La Fouchardière C, Giraud C, Lecaille C, Lepere C, Lobry C, Locher C, Lombard-Bohas C, Paoletti C, Platini C, Rebischung C, Sarda C, Vilain C, Briac-Levaché C, Auby D, Baudet-Klepping D, Bechade D, Besson D, Cleau D, Festin D, Gargot D, Genet D, Goldfain D, Luet D, Malka D, Peré-Vergé D, Pillon D, Sevin-Robiche D, Smith D, Soubrane D, Tougeron D, Zylberait D, Carola E, Cuillerier E, Dorval Danquechin E, Echinard E, Janssen E, Maillard E, Mitry E, Norguet-Monnereau E, Suc E, Terrebonne E, Zrihen E, Pariente E, Almaric F, Audemar F, Bonnetain F, Desseigne F, Dewaele F, Di Fiore F, Ghiringhelli F, Husseini F, Khemissa F, Kikolski F, Morvan F, Petit-Laurent F, Riot F, Subtil F, Zerouala-Boussaha F, Caroli-Bosc F, Boilleau-Jolimoy G, Bordes G, Cavaglione G, Coulanjon G, Deplanque G, Gatineau-Saillant G, Goujon G, Medinger G, Roquin G, Brixi-Benmansour H, Castanie H, Lacroix H, Maechel H, Perrier H, Salloum H, Senellart H, Baumgaertner I, Cumin I, Graber I, Trouilloud I, Boutin J, Butel J, Charneau J, Cretin J, Dauba J, Deguiral J, Egreteau J, Ezenfis J, Forestier J, Goineau J, Lacourt J, Lafon J, Martin J, Meunier J, Moreau J, Provencal J, Taieb J, Thaury J, Tuaillon J, Vergniol J, Villand J, Vincent J, Volet J, Bachet J, Barbare J, Souquet J, Grangé J, Dor J, Paitel J, Jouve J, Raoul J, Cheula J, Gornet J, Sabate J, Vantelon J, Vaillant J, Aucouturier J, Barbieux J, Herr J, Lafargue J, Lagasse J, Latrive J, Plachot J, Ramain J, Robin J, Spano J, Douillard J, Beerblock K, Bouhier-Leporrier K, Slimane Fawzi K, Cany L, Chone L, Dahan L, Gasnault L, Rob L, Stefani L, Wander L, Baconnier M, Ben Abdelghani M, Benchalal M, Blasquez M, Carreiro M, Charbit M, Combe M, Duluc M, Fayolle M, Gignoux M, Giovannini M, Glikmanas M, Mabro M, Mignot M, Mornet M, Mousseau M, Mozer M, Pauwels M, Pelletier M, Porneuf M, Ramdani M, Schnee M, Tissot M, Zawadi M, Clavero-Fabri M, Gouttebel M, Kaminsky M, Galais M, Abdelli N, Barrière N, Bouaria N, Bouarioua N, Delas N, Gérardin N, Hess-Laurens N, Stremsdoerfer N, Berthelet O, Boulat O, Capitain O, Favre O, Amoyal P, Bergerault P, Burtin P, Cassan P, Chatrenet P, Chiappa P, Claudé P, Couzigou P, Feydy P, Follana P, Geoffroy P, Godeau P, Hammel P, Laplaige P, Lehair P, Martin P, Novello P, Pantioni P, Pienkowski P, Pouderoux P, Prost P, Ruszniewski P, Souillac P, Texereau P, Thévenet P, Haineaux P, Benoit R, Coriat R, Lamy R, Mackiewicz R, Beorchia S, Chaussade S, Hiret S, Jacquot S, Lavau Denes S, Montembault S, Nahon S, Nasca S, Nguyen S, Oddou-Lagraniere S, Pesque-Penaud S, Fratte S, Chatellier T, Mansourbakht T, Morin T, Walter T, Boige V, Bourgeois V, Derias V, Guérin-Meyer V, Hautefeuille V, Jestin Le Tallec V, Lorgis V, Quentin V, Sebbagh V, Veuillez V, Adhoute X, Coulaud X, Becouarn Y, Coscas Y, Courouble Y, Le Bricquir Y, Molin Y, Rinaldi Y, Lam Y, Ladhib Z. Overweight is associated to a better prognosis in metastatic colorectal cancer: A pooled analysis of FFCD trials. Eur J Cancer 2018; 98:1-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2018] [Revised: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 03/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
50
|
Aparicio T, Bouché O, Francois E, Retornaz F, Barbier E, Taieb J, Kirscher S, Etienne PL, Faroux R, Khemissa Akouz F, El Hajbi F, Locher C, Rinaldi Y, Lecomte T, Lavau-Denes S, Baconnier M, Oden-Gangloff A, Genet D, Bedenne L, Paillaud E, Zawadi MA, Volet J, Cavaglione G, Lepere C, Rougier P, Zaanan A, Besson D, Fawzi KS, Adenis A, Gatineau-Sailliant G, Brezault C, Coriat R, Tougeron D, Hautefeuille V, Chone L, Molin Y, Seitz JF, Le Tallec VJ, Ben Abdelghani M, Villing AL, Aouakli A, Sebbagh V, Bedjaoui A, Mitry E, Carola E, Boulat O, Queuniet AM, Capitain O, Jouve JL, Baumgaertner I, Almaric F, Bonnetain F, Subtil F. Geriatric analysis from PRODIGE 20 randomized phase II trial evaluating bevacizumab + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in older patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Eur J Cancer 2018; 97:16-24. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.03.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2017] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2018] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|