Tumor immune microenvironment and nivolumab efficacy in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer based on T790M status after disease progression during EGFR-TKI treatment

Case report: Sustained remission after combined sintilimab, anti-VEGF therapy, and chemotherapy in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer harboring acquired EGFR 19Del/T790M/cis-C797S mutation resistance

Third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are highly effective against tumors harboring the T790M mutation. However, patients treated with these inhibitors ultimately develop resistance, and the most common mechanism is the emergence of the EGFR C797S mutation. Few treatment regimens have been reported for this condition. In this report, we present a successful combination treatment with the programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, and chemotherapy with pemetrexed and cisplatin in a patient with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who developed acquired resistance with EGFR 19 exon deletion (19Del)/T790M/cis-C797S mutation following progression with ametinib therapy. This regimen was well tolerated, and the patient has remained progression-free for 15 months. Our case provides clinical evidence that the combination of PD-1 inhibitor, anti-VEGF therapy, and chemotherapy may be an efficacious therapeutic strategy for NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR 19Del/T790M/cis-C797S mutation resistance following progression with EGFR TKI therapy.

PD-L2 drives resistance to EGFR-TKIs: dynamic changes of the tumor immune environment and targeted therapy

There is a lack of effective treatments to overcome resistance to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR mutant tumors. A deeper understanding of resistance mechanisms can provide insights into reducing or eliminating resistance, and can potentially deliver targeted treatment measures to overcome resistance. Here, we identified that the dynamic changes of the tumor immune environment were important extrinsic factors driving tumor resistance to EGFR-TKIs in EGFR mutant cell lines and syngeneic tumor-bearing mice. Our results demonstrate that the acquired resistance to EGFR-TKIs is accompanied by aberrant expression of PD-L2, leading a dynamic shift from an initially favorable tumor immune environment to an immunosuppressive phenotype. PD-L2 expression significantly affected EGFR mutant cell apoptosis that depended on the proportion and function of CD8+ T cells in the tumor immune environment. Combined with single-cell sequencing and experimental results, we demonstrated that PD-L2 specifically inhibited the proliferation of CD8+ T cells and the secretion of granzyme B and perforin, leading to reduced apoptosis mediated by CD8+ T cells and enhanced immune escape of tumor cells, which drives EGFR-TKIs resistance. Importantly, we have identified a potent natural small-molecule inhibitor of PD-L2, zinc undecylenate. In vitro, it selectively and potently blocks the PD-L2/PD-1 interaction. In vivo, it abolishes the suppressive effect of the PD-L2-overexpressing tumor immune microenvironment by blocking PD-L2/PD-1 signaling. Moreover, the combination of zinc undecylenate and EGFR-TKIs can synergistically reverse tumor resistance, which is dependent on CD8+ T cells mediating apoptosis. Our study uncovers the PD-L2/PD-1 signaling pathway as a driving factor to mediate EGFR-TKIs resistance, and identifies a new naturally-derived agent to reverse EGFR-TKIs resistance.

The later-line efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib in EGFR-mutant patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant NSCLC: a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Effective treatment after EGFR-TKI resistance is of great clinical concern. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in combination with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1 antibody in later-line therapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients after TKI treatment failure and to explore the independent predictive factors of therapeutic efficacy.

METHODS

A total of 71 patients with confirmed advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed after previous standard EGFR-TKI therapy but still failed after multiline treatments were included retrospectively in this study. Most of the patients had previously received at least three lines of treatment. All were treated with anlotinib combined with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy. The safety of this combined treatment was assessed by the incidence of adverse events. The efficacy of the regimens was evaluated by survival analysis (OS, PFS, ORR, DCR).

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 28.6 months (range: 2.3-54.0 months), and the median number of treatment lines was 4. The overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 19.7% and 77.5%, respectively. The median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.2-7.4 months), and the median OS was 17.1 months (95% CI 12.0-22.3 months). Patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anlotinib had an encouraging intracranial ORR of 38.5% and a DCR of 80.8%. ECOG performance status < 2 at baseline was independent protective factors of PFS. Metastatic organs and ECOG performance status were independent parameters in predicting OS. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 66 (93.0%) patients; most of the adverse events were Grade 1-2, and no increase in adverse events was observed compared to monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib combined with an anti-PD-1/PD-L1-based regimen exhibited promising efficacy and tolerance in NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations after previous TKI failure. The efficacy of this combined regimen in patients with EGFR mutations should be further evaluated.

Association of immune-related adverse events with durvalumab efficacy after chemoradiotherapy in patients with unresectable Stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) have been found to predict PD-L1 inhibitor efficacy in metastatic NSCLC. However, the relation of irAEs to clinical outcome for nonmetastatic NSCLC has remained unknown.

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective study of Stage III NSCLC treated with PACIFIC regimen, the relation of irAEs to PFS was evaluated by 8-week landmark analysis to minimise lead-time bias as well as by multivariable analysis adjusted for baseline factors. irAEs were categorised as mild or nonmild according to whether they were treated with systemic steroid.

RESULTS

Median PFS was 16.0 months, not reached, and 9.7 months for patients without (85 cases) or with mild (21 cases) or nonmild (21 cases) irAEs, respectively. Multivariable analysis indicated that nonmild irAEs were associated with poor PFS, with HRs of 3.86 (95% CI, 1.31-11.38) compared with no irAEs and 11.58 (95% CI, 2.11-63.63) compared with mild irAEs. This pattern was consistent after irAE grade, the number of durvalumab doses and immune profiles (PD-L1 score, CD8+ tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte density, and tumour mutation burden) were taken into consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of mild irAEs might predict a better survival outcome, whereas immunosuppressive steroid-treated irAEs were associated with a worse outcome, regardless of baseline clinical and immune profiles.

The activity and immune dynamics of PD-1 inhibition on high-risk pulmonary ground glass opacity lesions: insights from a single-arm, phase II trial

Immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) protein significantly improve survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its impact on early-stage ground-glass opacity (GGO) lesions remains unclear. This is a single-arm, phase II trial (NCT04026841) using Simon's optimal two-stage design, of which 4 doses of sintilimab (200 mg per 3 weeks) were administrated in 36 enrolled multiple primary lung cancer (MPLC) patients with persistent high-risk (Lung-RADS category 4 or had progressed within 6 months) GGOs. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). T/B/NK-cell subpopulations, TCR-seq, cytokines, exosomal RNA, and multiplexed immunohistochemistry (mIHC) were monitored and compared between responders and non-responders. Finally, two intent-to-treat (ITT) lesions (pure-GGO or GGO-predominant) showed responses (ORR: 5.6%, 2/36), and no patients had progressive disease (PD). No grade 3-5 TRAEs occurred. The total response rate considering two ITT lesions and three non-intent-to-treat (NITT) lesions (pure-solid or solid-predominant) was 13.9% (5/36). The proportion of CD8+ T cells, the ratio of CD8+/CD4+, and the TCR clonality value were significantly higher in the peripheral blood of responders before treatment and decreased over time. Correspondingly, the mIHC analysis showed more CD8+ T cells infiltrated in responders. Besides, responders' cytokine concentrations of EGF and CTLA-4 increased during treatment. The exosomal expression of fatty acid metabolism and oxidative phosphorylation gene signatures were down-regulated among responders. Collectively, PD-1 inhibitor showed certain activity on high-risk pulmonary GGO lesions without safety concerns. Such effects were associated with specific T-cell re-distribution, EGF/CTLA-4 cytokine compensation, and regulation of metabolism pathways.

Soluble immune checkpoint factors reflect exhaustion of antitumor immunity and response to PD-1 blockade

BACKGROUNDPrecise stratification of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is needed for appropriate application of PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy.METHODSWe measured soluble forms of the immune-checkpoint molecules PD-L1, PD-1, and CTLA-4 in plasma of patients with advanced NSCLC before PD-1/PD-L1 blockade. A prospective biomarker-finding trial (cohort A) included 50 previously treated patients who received nivolumab. A retrospective observational study was performed for patients treated with any PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy (cohorts B and C), cytotoxic chemotherapy (cohort D), or targeted therapy (cohort E). Plasma samples from all patients were assayed for soluble immune-checkpoint molecules with a highly sensitive chemiluminescence-based assay.RESULTSNonresponsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy was associated with higher concentrations of these soluble immune factors among patients with immune-reactive (hot) tumors. Such an association was not apparent for patients treated with cytotoxic chemotherapy or targeted therapy. Integrative analysis of tumor size, PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue (tPD-L1), and gene expression in tumor tissue and peripheral CD8+ T cells revealed that high concentrations of the 3 soluble immune factors were associated with hyper or terminal exhaustion of antitumor immunity. The combination of soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) and sCTLA-4 efficiently discriminated responsiveness to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade among patients with immune-reactive tumors.CONCLUSIONCombinations of soluble immune factors might be able to identify patients unlikely to respond to PD-1/PD-L1 blockade as a result of terminal exhaustion of antitumor immunity. Our data suggest that such a combination better predicts, along with tPD-L1, for the response of patients with NSCLC.TRIAL REGISTRATIONUMIN000019674.FUNDINGThis study was funded by Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd. and Sysmex Corporation.

"Expression and prognostic relevance of PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 immune checkpoints in adrenocortical carcinoma"

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare endocrine malignancy with poor prognosis in advanced stages. While therapies targeting the checkpoint molecules programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), its ligand PD-L1 and the cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) have revolutionized treatment in many cancers, the results in ACC were heterogeneous. Their expression in ACC has not been systematically studied and might explain the variable response to checkpoint inhibitors. The expression of PD-1, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 was examined in 162 tumor samples from 122 ACC patients by immunohistochemistry (threshold of >1%) and correlated with tumoral T lymphocyte infiltration and clinical endpoints. Finally, uni- and multivariate analyses of progression-free and overall survival were performed. PD-1 and PD-L1 were expressed in 26.5% and 24.7% of samples, respectively, with low expression in most tumor samples (median positive cells: 2.1% and 21.7%. In contrast, CTLA-4 expression was observed in 52.5% of ACC with a median of 38.4% positive cells. Positive PD-1 expression was associated with longer progression-free survival (HR: 0.50, 95% CI 0.25-0.98, p=0.04) even after considering prognostic factors. In contrast, PD-L1 and CTLA-4 did not correlate with clinical outcome. Additionally, PD-1 and PD-L1 expression correlated significantly with the amount of CD3+, CD4+, FoxP3+ and CD8+ T cells. The heterogeneous expression of PD1, PD-L1, and CTLA-4 in this large series of well-annotated ACC samples might explain the heterogeneous results of the immunotherapies in advanced ACC. In addition, PD-1 expression is a strong prognostic biomarker that can easily be applied in routine clinical care and histopathological assessment.

Efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Immunotherapy is an emerging antitumor therapy that can improve the survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, only about 20% of NSCLC patients can benefit from this treatment. At present, whether patients with driving gene-positive NSCLC can benefit from immunotherapy is one of the hot issues. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC and concluded the efficacy of altered subtypes.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases. The primary endpoints included the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS), and median overall survival (mOS) in patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC.

Results

In all, 86 studies involving 4524 patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled ORRs in clinical trials treated with monoimmunotherapy of EGFR, ALK, and KRAS alteration were 6%, 0%, and 23%, respectively. In retrospective studies, the pooled ORRs of EGFR, ALK, KRAS, BRAF, MET, HER2, RET, and ROS1 alteration were 8%, 3%, 28%, 24%, 23%, 14%, 7%, and 8%, respectively. Among them, the pooled ORRs of KRAS non-G12C mutation, KRAS G12C mutation, BRAF V600E mutation, BRAF non-V600E mutation, MET-exon 14 skipping, and MET-amplification were 33% 40%, 20%, 34%, 17%, and 60%, respectively. In addition, the pooled mPFS rates of EGFR, KRAS, MET, HER2, and RET alteration were 2.77, 3.24, 2.48, 2.31, and 2.68 months, while the pooled mOS rates of EGFR and KRAS alteration were 9.98 and 12.29 months, respectively. In prospective data concerning EGFR mutation, the pooled ORR and mPFS treated with chemo-immunotherapy (IC) reached 38% and 6.20 months, while 58% and 8.48 months with chemo-immunotherapy plus anti-angiogenesis therapy (ICA). Moreover, the pooled mPFS and mOS of monoimmunotherapy was 2.33 months and 12.43 months.

Conclusions

EGFR-, ALK-, HER2-, RET-, and ROS1-altered NSCLC patients have poor reactivity to monoimmunotherapy but the efficacy of immune-based combined therapy is significantly improved. KRAS G12C mutation, BRAF non-V600E mutation, and MET amplification have better responses to immunotherapy, and more prospective studies are needed for further research.

PD-L1 expression and its correlation with clinicopathological and molecular characteristics in Chinese patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Little is known about the relationship between programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and histologic and genetic features in real-world Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients. From November 2017 to June 2019, tumor tissues were collected from 2674 non-small cell lung cancer patients. PD-L1 expression was detected with immunohistochemistry using the 22C3 and SP263 antibodies, and patients were stratified into subgroups based on a tumor proportion score of 1%, 1% to 49%, and ≥ 50%. Genetic alterations were profiled using targeted next-generation sequencing. In the total population, 50.5% had negative PD-L1 expression (tumor proportion score < 1%), 32.0% had low-positive expression (1%-49%), and 17.5% had high-positive expression (≥50%). The PD-L1 positive rate was 39.0% in squamous cell carcinomas and 53.6% in adenocarcinomas. PD-L1 expression was higher in squamous cell carcinomas (P < .001) and lower in adenocarcinomas (P < .001). Of the overall patient population, 11.2% had Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS) mutations, 44.9% had epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, 2.1% had BRAF V600E mutations, 0.3% had MET exon 14 skipping mutations, 5.4% had anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocations, and 0.9% had ROS proto-oncogene 1 translocations. Patients carrying ROS proto-oncogene 1 translocations (P = .006), KRAS (P < .001), and MET (P = .023) mutations had significantly elevated expression of PD-L1, while those harboring EGFR (P < .001) mutations had lower PD-L1 expression. In our study, PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in squamous cell carcinomas and lower in adenocarcinomas, and was positively associated with MET and KRAS mutations, as well as the wild-type EGFR gene state. Nonetheless, additional studies are needed to further validate those associations and determine the clinical significance for immune checkpoint inhibitors of these factors.

Targeting MDM2 in malignancies is a promising strategy for overcoming resistance to anticancer immunotherapy

MDM2 has been established as a biomarker indicating poor prognosis for individuals undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for different malignancies by various pancancer studies. Specifically, patients who have MDM2 amplification are vulnerable to the development of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) following anticancer immunotherapy, resulting in marked deleterious effects on survival rates. The mechanism of MDM2 involves its role as an oncogene during the development of malignancy, and MDM2 can promote both metastasis and tumor cell proliferation, which indirectly leads to disease progression. Moreover, MDM2 is vitally involved in modifying the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) as well as in influencing immune cells, eventually facilitating immune evasion and tolerance. Encouragingly, various MDM2 inhibitors have exhibited efficacy in relieving the TIME suppression caused by MDM2. These results demonstrate the prospects for breakthroughs in combination therapy using MDM2 inhibitors and anticancer immunotherapy.

Differential prognostic value of tumor and plasma T790M mutations in EGFR TKI-treated advanced NSCLC

Background

Substitution of methionine for threonine at codon 790 (T790M) of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) represents the major mechanism of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. We determined the prognostic impact and association of secondary T790M mutations with the outcomes of osimertinib and chemotherapy.

Methods

Patients (n = 460) progressing from first-line EGFR-TKI treatment were assessed. Tissue and/or liquid biopsies were used to determine T790M status; post-progression overall survival (OS) was analyzed.

Results

Overall, 143 (31.1%) patients were T790M positive, 95 (20.7%) were T790M negative, and 222 (48.2%) had unknown T790M status. T790M status [T790M positive versus T790M negative: hazard ratio (HR) 0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.32-0.70); p < 0.001, T790M unknown versus T790M negative: HR 1.97 (95% CI, 1.47-2.64); p < 0.001] was significantly associated with post-progression OS. T790M positivity rates were similar for tissue (90/168, 53.6%) and liquid (53/90, 58.9%) biopsies (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.433). Tumor T790M-positive patients had significantly longer post-progression OS than tumor T790M-negative patients (34.1 versus 17.1 months; log-rank test, p = 8 × 10-5). Post-progression OS was similar between plasma T790M-positive and -negative patients (17.4 versus not reached; log-rank test, p = 0.600). In tumor T790M-positive patients, post-progression OS was similar after osimertinib and chemotherapy [34.1 versus 29.1 months; log-rank test, p = 0.900; HR 1.06 (95% CI, 0.44-2.57); p = 0.897].

Conclusion

T790M positivity predicts better post-progression OS than T790M negativity; tumor T790M positivity has a stronger prognostic impact than plasma T790M positivity. Osimertinib and chemotherapy provide similar OS benefits in patients with T790M-positive tumors.

A phase II study of atezolizumab with bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC after TKI treatment failure (NEJ043 study)

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment failure are limited. An exploratory analysis of 26 patients in the IMpower150 study indicated that treatment with atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, and paclitaxel (ABCP) was effective in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. This phase II study was conducted to assess the efficacy of ABCP in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients after TKI treatment.

METHODS

Patients with non-squamous NSCLC harboring sensitizing EGFR mutations were enrolled. ABCP therapy was administered every 3 weeks for four cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) according to extramural review (ER). Key secondary endpoints and preplanned analysis included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR), and differences in the efficacy of ABCP according to prior EGFR-TKI administration, liver metastases, and brain metastases.

RESULTS

Sixty patients from 26 centers were enrolled. Median PFS was 7.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.7-8.2). The median OS was 23.1 months (95% CI: 13.1-not reached), and the ORR was 55.9%. PFS was significantly shorter in patients who had received osimertinib as a first-line treatment (7.2 months vs. 7.4 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.932, p = 0.023), those with brain metastases (5.7 months vs. 8 months, HR 1.86, p = 0.032), or those with liver metastases (5.4 months vs. 7.9 months, HR 2.779, p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Although this study did not meet the primary endpoint, ABCP showed clinically meaningful efficacy in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

Hope and Challenges: Immunotherapy in EGFR-Mutant NSCLC Patients

EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the preferred initial treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. Sadly, remission is transient, and no approved effective treatment options are available for EGFR-TKI-advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLCs. Although immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) induces sustained cancer remission in a subset of NSCLCs, ICI therapy exhibits limited activity in most EGFR-mutant NSCLCs. Mechanistically, the strong oncogenic EGFR signaling in EGFR-mutant NSCLCs contributes to a non-inflamed tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), characterized by a limited number of CD8+ T cell infiltration, a high number of regulatory CD4+ T cells, and an increased number of inactivated infiltrated T cells. Additionally, EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients are generally non-smokers with low levels of PD-L1 expression and tumor mutation burden. Promisingly, a small population of EGFR-mutant NSCLCs still durably respond to ICI therapy. The hope of ICI therapy from pre-clinical studies and clinical trials is reviewed in EGFR-mutant NSCLCs. The challenges of application ICI therapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLCs are also reviewed.

Outcome of non-small-cell lung cancer with driven mutations treated with anti-PD-(L)1 agents: A systematic review

Patients whose tumours harbour epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) driver mutations can benefit most from treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Most trials with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) included few patients whose tumour had oncogenic driver alterations. We therefore performed a meta-analysis of studies reporting the activity of ICIs in oncogene addicted NSCLC. A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library and EMBASE was conducted to identify relevant studies published up to 31 January 2021. The primary outcomes were median overall survival (OS); the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival and overall response rate (PFS and ORR). Overall, 46 studies were screened and selected for final analysis. The pooled ORR was 14.5% (95% CI 9.6-21.2%). The median pooled PFS in EGFR/ALK mutated cases was 3.9 months (95% CI 3-5.2 months). Median pooled OS was 10.7 months (95% CI 9.2-12.5 months). All registration trials in second line did not show any benefit of immunotherapy for the subgroup of patients with EGFR-mutated or ALK-rearranged tumours. The unsatisfied benefit of immunotherapy in oncogene-addicted tumours has been debated and is mainly due to the lower mutation burden of these neoplasms. Our data do not support the use of immunotherapy in the setting of oncogene actionable tumours. More data are needed to confirm or reject the benefit of the combination of TKIs with ICIs.

Ferroptosis-related STEAP3 acts as predictor and regulator in diffuse large B cell lymphoma through immune infiltration

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a usual-seen hematological malignant tumor possessing molecular and genetic heterogeneity. Ferroptosis induction has been increasingly acknowledged to be an advantageous therapeutic method in tumor treatment by triggering cell death of tumor cells. However, studies on the function of ferroptosis in DLBCL remain scarce, especially the interaction with the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). The clinical and biological functions of ferroptosis-related genes in DLBCL were still warranted to be explored. A ferroptosis-related risk model was constructed, followed by functional enrichment analyses and evaluation of immune profile. Quantitative real-time PCR, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry were conducted to examine the RNA and protein levels. Dysregulated expression of the major ferroptosis-related genes was found in DLBCL. A prognostic risk model based on 10 ferroptosis-related genes was constructed. The risk score served as an independent prognostic indicator for DLBCL patients in univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Patients with low-risk scores presented a more favorable prognosis. Functional enrichment analysis revealed that immune-related pathways were significantly enriched, and the high-risk group exhibited less immunocyte infiltration, lower immunoscore, and downregulated PD-L1 expression relative to the low-risk group. Two molecular subtypes were determined through consensus clustering of the expression of ferroptosis-related genes. Cluster 1 was relevant to favorable prognosis, higher immunoscore, and elevated PD-L1 expression. More importantly, STEAP3 was screened as a reliable biomarker for DLBCL, and its enhanced expression levels of mRNA and protein were verified in public databases and clinical specimens. Our study demonstrated the crucial role of ferroptosis-related genes including STEAP3 in the TIME of DLBCL and identified promising novel molecular targets for DLBCL treatment.

Tumor Microenvironment Landscape of NSCLC Reveals Resistance Mechanisms for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Blockade After Chemoradiotherapy: A Multicenter Prospective Biomarker Study (WJOG11518L:SUBMARINE)

INTRODUCTION

The PACIFIC regimen of consolidation therapy with the programmed cell death-ligand 1 inhibitor durvalumab after definitive concurrent chemoradiation therapy has become a standard of care for individuals with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Nevertheless, approximately half of the treated patients experience disease progression within 1 year, with the mechanisms of treatment resistance being poorly understood. We here performed a nationwide prospective biomarker study to explore the resistance mechanisms (WJOG11518L:SUBMARINE).

METHODS

A total of 135 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received the PACIFIC regimen were included for comprehensive profiling of the tumor microenvironment by immunohistochemistry, transcriptome analysis, and genomic sequencing of pretreatment tumor tissue and flow cytometric analysis of circulating immune cells. Progression-free survival was compared on the basis of these biomarkers.

RESULTS

The importance of preexisting effective adaptive immunity in tumors was revealed for treatment benefit regardless of genomic features. We also identified CD73 expression by cancer cells as a mechanism of resistance to the PACIFIC regimen. Multivariable analysis of immunohistochemistry data with key clinical factors as covariables indicated that low CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte density and the high CD73+ cancer cells were independently associated with poor durvalumab outcome (hazard ratios = 4.05 [95% confidence interval: 1.17-14.04] for CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes; 4.79 [95% confidence interval: 1.12-20.58] for CD73). In addition, whole-exome sequencing of paired tumor samples suggested that cancer cells eventually escaped immune pressure as a result of neoantigen plasticity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study emphasizes the importance of functional adaptive immunity in stage III NSCLC and implicates CD73 as a promising treatment target, thus providing insight forming a basis for development of a new treatment approach in NSCLC.

Sintilimab plus chemotherapy for patients with EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer with disease progression after EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor therapy (ORIENT-31): second interim analysis from a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

In the first interim analysis of the ORIENT-31 trial, compared with chemotherapy alone, sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305 plus chemotherapy (pemetrexed and cisplatin) significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with EGFR-mutated non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment. However, the benefit of anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 antibody added to chemotherapy in this patient population remains unclear, with no prospective evidence from phase 3 trials globally. We report the results from the prespecified second interim analysis of progression-free survival between sintilimab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone, the updated results of sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy, and preliminary overall survival results.

METHODS

This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial was done at 52 centres across China and included patients aged 18-75 years with locally advanced or metastatic (stage IIIB, IIIC, or IV according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer, eighth edition) EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC, disease progression after EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitor treatment (according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 [RECIST 1.1]), and at least one measurable lesion (according to RECIST 1.1). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), using an interactive web response system, to receive sintilimab (200 mg) plus IBI305 (15 mg/kg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and cisplatin (75 mg/m2), sintilimab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone on day 1 of each 3-week cycle for four cycles, followed by maintenance therapy of sintilimab, IBI305, and pemetrexed. All study drugs were administered intravenously. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population assessed by an independent radiographic review committee. Data cutoff was March 31, 2022, unless otherwise specified. The study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03802240 (ongoing).

FINDINGS

Between July 11, 2019, and March 31, 2022, 1011 patients were screened and 476 were randomly assigned (158 to the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 158 to the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 160 to the chemotherapy alone group). The median follow-up duration for progression-free survival was 12·9 months (IQR 8·2-17·8) in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 15·1 months (8·0-19·5) in the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 14·4 months (9·8-23·8) in the chemotherapy alone group. Sintilimab plus chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival compared with chemotherapy alone (median 5·5 months [95% CI 4·5-6·1] vs 4·3 months [4·1-5·3]; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72 [95% CI 0·55-0·94]; two-sided p=0·016). Significant progression-free survival benefit was sustained with sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone (median 7·2 months [95% CI 6·6-9·3]; HR: 0·51 [0·39-0·67]; two-sided p<0·0001). As of data cutoff (July 4, 2022), the median overall survival was 21·1 months (95% CI 17·5-23·9) for sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy (HR 0·98 [0·72-1·34]) and 20·5 months (15·8-25·3) for sintilimab plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·97 [0·71-1·32]) versus 19·2 months (15·8-22·4) for chemotherapy alone; after adjusting for crossover, the HR for sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone ranged from 0·79 (0·57-1·09) to 0·84 (0·61-1·15) and the HR for sintilimab plus chemotherapy to chemotherapy alone ranged from 0·78 (0·57-1·08) to 0·84 (0·61-1·16). The safety results were generally consistent with those in the first interim analysis; in particular, treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or worse occurred in 88 (56%) of 158 patients in the sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy group, 64 (41%) of 156 patients in the sintilimab plus chemotherapy group, and 79 (49%) of 160 patients in the chemotherapy alone group.

INTERPRETATION

This is the first prospective phase 3 trial to show the benefit of anti-PD-1 antibody plus chemotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on treatment with tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Compared with chemotherapy alone, sintilimab combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin showed significant and clinically meaningful improvement of progression-free survival with an optimal safety profile. Sintilimab plus IBI305 plus chemotherapy continued to show progression-free survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone in this second interim analysis with an additional 8-month follow-up.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China, Shanghai Municipal Science & Technology Commission Research Project, and Innovent Biologics.

TRANSLATION

For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

A 20-gene mutation signature predicts the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients

BACKGROUND

There is an unmet need to identify novel predictive biomarkers that enable more accurate identification of individuals who can benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The US FDA recently approved tumor mutational burden (TMB) score of ≥ 10 mut/Mb as a threshold for pembrolizumab treatment of solid tumors. Our study aimed to test the hypothesis that specific gene mutation signature may predict the efficacy of ICI therapy more precisely than high TMB (≥ 10).

METHODS

We selected 20 candidate genes that may predict for the efficacy of ICI therapy by the analysis of data from a published cohort of 350 advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Then, we compared the influences of various gene mutation signatures on the efficacy of ICI treatment. They were also compared with PD-L1 and TMB. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to evaluate the prognosis univariates, while selected univariates were adopted to develop a systematic nomogram.

RESULTS

A high mutation signature, where three or more of the 20 selected genes were mutated, was associated with the significant benefits of ICI therapy. Specifically, patients with high mutation signature were confirmed to have better prognosis for ICI treatment, compared with those with wild type (the median PFS: 7.17 vs. 2.90 months, p = 0.0004, HR = 0.47 (95% [CI]:0.32-0.68); the median OS: unreached vs. 9 months, p = 1.8E-8, HR = 0.17 (95% [CI]:0.11-0.25)). Moreover, those patients with the high mutation signature achieved significant ICI treatment benefits, while there was no difference of OS and PFS between patients without the signature but TMB-H (≥ 10) and those without the signature and low TMB(< 10). Finally, we constructed a novel nomogram to evaluate the efficacy of ICI therapy.

CONCLUSION

A high mutational signature with 3 or more of the 20-gene panel could provide more accurate predictions for the outcomes of ICI therapy than TMB ≥ 10 in NSCLC patients.

The Resistance to EGFR-TKIs in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Application of New Therapeutic Strategies

Almost 17% of Western patients affected by non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutation. Del19 and L858R are the most-common ones; they are positive predictive factors for EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Currently, osimertinib, a third-generation TKI, is the standard first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC patients with common EGFR mutations. This drug is also administered as a second-line treatment for those patients with the T790M EGFR mutation and previously treated with first- (erlotinib, gefitinib) or second- (afatinib) generation TKIs. However, despite the high clinical efficacy, the prognosis remains severe due to intrinsic or acquired resistance to EGRF-TKIs. Various mechanisms of resistance have been reported including the activation of other signalling pathways, the development of secondary mutations, the alteration of the downstream pathways, and phenotypic transformation. However, further data are needed to achieve the goal of overcoming resistance to EGFR-TKIs, hence the necessity of discovering novel genetic targets and developing new-generation drugs. This review aimed to deepen the knowledge of intrinsic and acquired molecular mechanisms of resistance to EGFR-TKIs and the development of new therapeutic strategies to overcome TKIs' resistance.

Efficacy of ICI-based treatment in advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1≥50% who developed EGFR-TKI resistance

Introduction

Platinum-based chemotherapy is still the standard of care for Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients after developing EGFR-TKI resistance. However, no study focusing on the role of immuno checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) based treatments for EGFR mutated NSCLC patients who carried programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) greater than 50% progressed after EGFR-TKI therapy. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the outcomes of ICI-based treatments for EGFR mutated NSCLC patients carried PD-L1 TPS≥50% after developing EGFR-TKI resistance and to explore the population that may benefited from ICI-based treatment.

Methods

We retrospectively collected data of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and PD-L1 TPS≥50% who have failed prior EGFR-TKI therapies without T790M mutation at Shanghai Chest Hospital between January 2018 and June 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were utilized to evaluate the outcomes of this study.

Results

A total of 146 patients were included. Up to June 20th, 2022, median follow-up was 36.7 months (IQR, 12.5-44.2 months). Among the population, 66 patients (45.2%) received chemotherapy, the remaning (54.8%) received ICI-based treatment, including 56 patients(70.0%) received ICI combined with chemotherapy (IC) and 24 patients (30.0%) received ICI monotherapy (IM). In IC group,31 patients received ICI combined with chemotherapy,19 patients received ICI combined with antiangiogenic therapy and remaing received ICI combined with chemotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy. Survival analysis shown that patients who received ICI-based treatment had better progress-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with those treated with other therapy (median PFS, 10.0 vs. 4.0 months, P<0.001; median OS, 39.5 vs. 24.2 months, P<0.001). What's more, patients who treated with IC treatment had a superior survival time than those received IM treatment (median PFS, 10.3 vs. 7.0 months, P<0.001; median OS, 41.6 vs. 32.4 months, P<0.001). Subgroup analysis found that the PFS and OS benefit of IC was evident in all subgroups.

Conclusions

For advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and PD-L1 TPS≥50% who have failed prior EGFR-TKI therapies without T790M mutation, ICI-based treatment could provide a more favorable survival than classical chemotherapy. What' s more, compared with ICI monotherapy, ICI combined with chemotherapy seems to be the preferred treatment.

EGFR-Driven Mutation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Influences the Features and Outcome of Brain Metastases

Background: Brain metastases (BMs) is one of the most frequent metastatic sites for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is a matter of debate whether EGFR mutation in the primary tumor may be a marker for the disease course, prognosis, and diagnostic imaging of BMs, comparable to that described for primary brain tumors, such as glioblastoma (GB). This issue was investigated in the present research manuscript. Methods: We performed a retrospective study to identify the relevance of EGFR mutations and prognostic factors for diagnostic imaging, survival, and disease course within a cohort of patients affected by NSCLC-BMs. Imaging was carried out using MRI at various time intervals. The disease course was assessed using a neurological exam carried out at three-month intervals. The survival was expressed from surgical intervention. Results: The patient cohort consisted of 81 patients. The overall survival of the cohort was 15 ± 1.7 months. EGFR mutation and ALK expression did not differ significantly for age, gender, and gross morphology of the BM. Contrariwise, the EGFR mutation was significantly associated with MRI concerning the occurrence of greater tumor (22.38 ± 21.35 cm³ versus 7.68 ± 6.44 cm³, p = 0.046) and edema volume (72.44 ± 60.71 cm³ versus 31.92 cm³, p = 0.028). In turn, the occurrence of MRI abnormalities was related to neurological symptoms assessed using the Karnofsky performance status and mostly depended on tumor-related edema (p = 0.048). However, the highest significant correlation was observed between EGFR mutation and the occurrence of seizures as the clinical onset of the neoplasm (p = 0.004). Conclusions: The presence of EGFR mutations significantly correlates with greater edema and mostly a higher seizure incidence of BMs from NSCLC. In contrast, EGFR mutations do not affect the patient's survival, the disease course, and focal neurological symptoms but seizures. This contrasts with the significance of EGFR in the course and prognosis of the primary tumor (NSCLC).

Clinical outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitors to treat non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor mutations

BACKGROUND

We aimed to determine the clinical. outcomes of various immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combinations for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. The results predicted the treatment efficacy of these combinations.

METHODS

From July 15, 2016 to March 22, 2022, 85 NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, enrolled at the Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, received ICI combinations after resistance to prior EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). These patients were diagnosed with EGFR mutations using an amplification refractory mutation system PCR (ARMS-PCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS). Survival times were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test.

RESULTS

Patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy had longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in survival time between patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy and patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy or ICIs combined with chemotherapy, which was due to the limitation sample size of patients who received ICIs combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy. Patients with L858R mutations had a longer PFS and OS than patients with exon 19 deletions. T790M negative patients benefited more from ICI combinations, compared with T790M positive patients. In addition, there was no significant difference in PFS and OS between patients with TP53 co-mutations and patients without a TP53 co-mutation. We also found that patients with prior first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance had longer PFS and OS than prior third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance patients. There was no new adverse event in this study.

CONCLUSIONS

EGFR-mutated patients who received ICIs combined with anti-angiogenic therapy had longer PFS and OS than patients with ICIs combined with chemotherapy. Patients with L858R or without T790M mutation benefited more from ICI combinations. Besides, patients with prior first-generation EGFR-TKI resistance could benefit more from ICIs combinations than prior third-generation EGFR-TKI resistance patients.

Targeting the EGFR signaling pathway in cancer therapy: What's new in 2023?

INTRODUCTION

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is frequently amplified, overexpressed, and mutated in multiple cancers. In normal cell physiology, EGFR signaling controls cellular differentiation, proliferation, growth, and survival. During tumorigenesis, mutations in EGFR lead to increased kinase activity supporting survival, uncontrolled proliferation, and migratory functions of cancer cells. Molecular agents targeting the EGFR pathway have been discovered, and their efficacy has been demonstrated in clinical trials. To date, 14 EGFR-targeted agents have been approved for cancer treatments.

AREAS COVERED

This review describes the newly identified pathways in EGFR signaling, the evolution of novel EGFR-acquired and innate resistance mechanisms, mutations, and adverse side effects of EGFR signaling inhibitors. Subsequently, the latest EGFR/panEGFR inhibitors in preclinical and clinical studies have been summarized. Finally, the consequences of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors and EGFR inhibitors have also been discussed.

EXPERT OPINION

As new mutations are threatened against EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), we suggest the development of new compounds targeting specific mutations without inducing new mutations. We discuss potential future research on developing EGFR-TKIs specific for exact allosteric sites to overcome acquired resistance and reduce adverse events. The rising trend of EGFR inhibitors in the pharma market and their economic impact on real-world clinical practice are discussed.

Tumor cell plasticity in targeted therapy-induced resistance: mechanisms and new strategies

Despite the success of targeted therapies in cancer treatment, therapy-induced resistance remains a major obstacle to a complete cure. Tumor cells evade treatments and relapse via phenotypic switching driven by intrinsic or induced cell plasticity. Several reversible mechanisms have been proposed to circumvent tumor cell plasticity, including epigenetic modifications, regulation of transcription factors, activation or suppression of key signaling pathways, as well as modification of the tumor environment. Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, tumor cell and cancer stem cell formation also serve as roads towards tumor cell plasticity. Corresponding treatment strategies have recently been developed that either target plasticity-related mechanisms or employ combination treatments. In this review, we delineate the formation of tumor cell plasticity and its manipulation of tumor evasion from targeted therapy. We discuss the non-genetic mechanisms of targeted drug-induced tumor cell plasticity in various types of tumors and provide insights into the contribution of tumor cell plasticity to acquired drug resistance. New therapeutic strategies such as inhibition or reversal of tumor cell plasticity are also presented. We also discuss the multitude of clinical trials that are ongoing worldwide with the intention of improving clinical outcomes. These advances provide a direction for developing novel therapeutic strategies and combination therapy regimens that target tumor cell plasticity.

At the crossroads of immunotherapy for oncogene-addicted subsets of NSCLC

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become a paradigm of precision medicine, with the discovery of numerous disease subtypes defined by specific oncogenic driver mutations leading to the development of a range of molecularly targeted therapies. Over the past decade, rapid progress has also been made in the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially antagonistic antibodies targeting the PD-L1-PD-1 axis, for the treatment of NSCLC. Although many of the major oncogenic drivers of NSCLC are associated with intrinsic resistance to ICIs, patients with certain oncogene-driven subtypes of the disease that are highly responsive to specific targeted therapies might also derive benefit from immunotherapy. However, the development of effective immunotherapy approaches for oncogene-addicted NSCLC has been challenged by a lack of predictive biomarkers for patient selection and limited knowledge of how ICIs and oncogene-directed targeted therapies should be combined. Therefore, whether ICIs alone or with chemotherapy or even in combination with molecularly targeted agents would offer comparable benefit in the context of selected oncogenic driver alterations to that observed in the general unselected NSCLC population remains an open question. In this Review, we discuss the effects of oncogenic driver mutations on the efficacy of ICIs and the immune tumour microenvironment as well as the potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited to overcome the challenges of immunotherapy for oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

Anti-PD-(L)1 therapy of non-small cell lung cancer-A summary of clinical trials and current progresses

Background

This review discusses the impact of mono or combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, comparing clinical outcomes and safety. Cancer subtype, tumor mutational burden (TMB), programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression state and T cell infiltration (TIL) density are considered for interpretations. Besides, current progresses in the field of immunotherapy are discussed.

Results

Anti-PD-(L)1 is a safe and an effective strategy in patients with advanced/metastatic NSCLC. Clinical responses to nivolumab and pembrolizumab, in particular, are promising. The most desired clinical responses are for patients receiving combination of anti-PD-(L)1 or anti-PD-(L)1/anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) with chemotherapy (taxane and platinum). PD-L1 expression state (PD-L1 ≥ 50%), patient performance state (PS: 0-1 ECOG scale) and effector T cell (Teff) immune signature considerably affect ICI responses. Higher ICI responses are also expected in TMB ^high but EGFR^-/ALK^- cancer patients. In regard with safety profile, adverse events (AEs) related to anti-PD-(L)1 are lower compared with that for platinum-based and docetaxel therapy. Toripalimab is the safest among various immunotherapy drugs. Bispecific antibodies against anti-PD-(L)1 with dominant signaling or alternative checkpoints in tumor microenvironment (TME) is the current focus in immunotherapy of cancers like NSCLC. Besides, the contribution of extracellular vesicles (EVs) to immune escape and their implication in cancer diagnosis and therapy is on the eye of current investigations.

Conclusion

Appropriate biomarker selection will improve therapy outcomes in ICI treated NSCLC patients, particularly in cases under combinatory ICI therapy. Application of bispecific antibodies and EV-based targeted therapy are effective novel strategies to improve therapeutic outcomes in cancer patients.

Treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with driver mutations: current applications and future directions

With the improved understanding of driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), expanding the targeted therapeutic options improved the survival and safety. However, responses to these agents are commonly temporary and incomplete. Moreover, even patients with the same oncogenic driver gene can respond diversely to the same agent. Furthermore, the therapeutic role of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in oncogene-driven NSCLC remains unclear. Therefore, this review aimed to classify the management of NSCLC with driver mutations based on the gene subtype, concomitant mutation, and dynamic alternation. Then, we provide an overview of the resistant mechanism of target therapy occurring in targeted alternations ("target-dependent resistance") and in the parallel and downstream pathways ("target-independent resistance"). Thirdly, we discuss the effectiveness of ICIs for NSCLC with driver mutations and the combined therapeutic approaches that might reverse the immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment. Finally, we listed the emerging treatment strategies for the new oncogenic alternations, and proposed the perspective of NSCLC with driver mutations. This review will guide clinicians to design tailored treatments for NSCLC with driver mutations.

Neoadjuvant sintilimab and chemotherapy in patients with potentially resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (KEEP-G 03): an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

The standard neoadjuvant treatments in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) still have either poor safety or efficacy. Better therapies are needed in China.

METHODS

This was an open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Patients with potentially resectable ESCC (cT1b-3, Nany, M0 or T4a, N0-1, or M0) received preoperative intravenous sintilimab plus triplet chemotherapy (liposomal paclitaxel, cisplatin, and S-1) every 3 weeks for two cycles. The primary endpoints were safety and surgical feasibility; the secondary endpoint was major pathological response (MPR) rate. Genomic biomarkers (genetic mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), circulating tumor DNA status and immune microenvironment) in baseline tumor samples were investigated.

RESULTS

All 30 patients completed two cycles of neoadjuvant treatment and underwent surgical resection. Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 36.7% (11/30) of patients. The most frequent TRAEs were decreased white cell count (76.7%), anemia (76.7%), and decreased neutrophil count (73.3%). All TRAEs were hematological toxicities; none caused ≥30 days surgical delay. The MPR and pathological complete response (pCR) rates were 50.0% (15/30; 95% CI 33.2 to 66.9) and 20.0% (6/30; 95% CI 9.5 to 37.3), respectively. Patients with higher TMB and more clonal mutations were more likely to respond. ERBB2 alterations and ctDNA high-releaser status have a negative correlation with neoadjuvant ICI response. No significant difference was observed between therapeutic response and tumor immune microenvironment.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant sintilimab plus platinum-based triplet chemotherapy appeared safe and feasible, did not delay surgery and induced a pCR rate of 20.0% in patients with potentially resectable ESCC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03946969.

Immunotherapy-based therapy as a promising treatment for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients after EGFR-TKI resistance

INTRODUCTION

Traditionally, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been regarded as a cold tumor based on the immunosuppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). However, recent studies have found that EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment could shift host immunity from immunosuppressive to immunosupportive TIME, which has renewed hopes of immunotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we highlight five main immunotherapy-based therapies for patients after EGFR-TKI failure, including safety and efficacy data from prospective and retrospective clinical studies.

EXPERT OPINION

The efficacy of immunotherapy alone is extremely limited. Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy show an ORR of 29.5%-59.3% and an mPFS of about 7 months. There is still scarce evidence for immunotherapy plus antiangiogenesis therapy. A combination of immunotherapy with EGFR-TKIs exhibits higher treatment-related adverse events and lower clinical outcomes compared to EGFR-TKI alone. Importantly, immunotherapy plus antiangiogenesis and chemotherapy achieves an mPFS of 6.9-10.2 months. In general, the strategy of combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy and/or an antiangiogenic drug is a novel and promising method for treating advanced NSCLC after EGFR-TKI failure. Therefore, the dominant population of EGFR-TKI resistant patients were characterized by EGFR uncommon mutation, EGFR L858R mutation, PD-L1 ≥ 50%, prior antiangiogenic drugs, and negative T790 M mutation for immunotherapy-based therapy.

Comparison of Chemotherapy Plus Pembrolizumab vs. Chemotherapy Alone in EGFR-Mutant Non-small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

Platinum doublet chemotherapy is the standard of care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation who had disease progression after tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). We aimed to assess immune checkpoint inhibitors efficacy in EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of sensitive EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who progressed after EGFR-TKIs and received platinum doublet chemotherapy plus immunotherapy between 2015 and 2021. Efficacy outcomes, including overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, were assessed and compared with those of patients who had received platinum-based doublet chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Of the total 869 patients, 82 treated with pembrolizumab and chemotherapy and 82 with only chemotherapy were selected. The median progression-free survival in patients administered pembrolizumab was significantly longer than those not administered pembrolizumab (6.7 months; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.0-8.5 vs. 4.2 months; 95% CI 3.3-5.0, hazard ratio [HR] 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.89, P = .0076). Improved median overall survival was also observed in patients receiving pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (26.7 [95% CI 22.6-30.8] vs. 13.4 months [95% CI 10.4-16.4], HR, 0.49 [95% CI 0.31-0.75], P = .0052). In addition, the overall response rate was higher in patients treated with than patients treated without pembrolizumab (34.1% and 20.7%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The combination of pembrolizumab with chemotherapy is associated with improved efficacy and survival in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC after TKI resistance, but these findings need to be confirmed in further prospective studies.

Landscape of Savolitinib Development for the Treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with MET Alteration-A Narrative Review

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is increasingly being treated with targeted therapies. Savolitinib (Orpathys^®) is highly selective mesenchymal epithelial transition (MET)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), which is conditionally approved in China for advanced NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutations (METex14). This article summarizes the clinical development of savolitinib, as a monotherapy in NSCLC with METex14 mutation and in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor in post EGFR-TKI resistance NSCLC due to MET-based acquired resistance. Preclinical models demonstrated anti-tumor activities in MET-driven cancer cell line and xenograft tumor models. The Phase Ia/Ib study established an optimized, recommended phase II dose in Chinese NSCLC patients, while TATTON study of savolitinib plus osimertinib in patients with EGFR mutant, MET-amplified and TKI-progressed NSCLC showed beneficial efficacy with acceptable safety profile. In a pivotal phase II study, Chinese patients with pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma, brain metastasis and other NSCLC subtype positive for METex14 mutation showed notable responses and acceptable safety profile with savolitinib. Currently, results from ongoing clinical trials are eagerly anticipated to confirm the efficacious and safety benefits of savolitinib as monotherapy and in combination with EGFR-TKI in acquired resistance setting in advanced NSCLC and its subtypes with MET alterations.

Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Immunotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Update and New Challenges

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a serious threat to the health of older adults. Despite the significant progress in immunotherapy, effective treatments for NSCLC remain limited. The development of tumors indicates failure in immune surveillance and the successful immune escape of tumor cells. Research on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) revealed these opposing immune processes and contributed to the discovery of new methods to suppress the immune escape and restore the immune surveillance functions. This paper aimed to provide updates on the current findings regarding the relevance of TIME in NSCLC treatment. It also aimed to introduce the TIME, immune editing, cancer immunotherapy, and new challenges. Based on the clinical data, the combination of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy is suitable for patients with NSCLC who are not eligible to undergo surgery. Combined ICI therapy after epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy should be considered in patients with EGFR mutations. Chemoradiotherapy may increase the density of CD8⁺ lymphocytes, which is significantly associated with better prognosis. For older patients and those with advanced-stage disease, regional tumor treatments, such as stereotactic radiation therapy and percutaneous cryoablation, may be more suitable, but further studies are needed to confirm this. In conclusion, restoring immune surveillance is as important as removing cancerous tissues; further studies that include the use of combined treatment methods, individualized treatment plans, and immunonutrition are warranted.

Anlotinib plus chemotherapy for T790M-negative EGFR-mutant non-sqNSCLC resistant to TKIs: A multicenter phase 1b/2 trial

BACKGROUND

This multicenter phase 1b/2 trial aimed to explore the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), activity, and safety of anlotinib plus chemotherapy in patients with T790M-negative epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after resistance to first- or second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs).

METHODS

In the phase 1b stage, patients received anlotinib (8/10/12 mg, days 1-14) combined with cisplatin (75 mg/m² , day 1) or carboplatin (AUC = 5, day 1) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m² , day 1) for a 3-week cycle based on a 3 + 3 dose-escalation design. In the phase 2 single-arm stage, anlotinib was administered at MTD combined with platinum plus pemetrexed for four cycles, followed by anlotinib maintenance therapy. The primary endpoint of the phase 2 stage was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The study was prematurely terminated due to slow accrual after 19 patients had been enrolled between January 18, 2019, and March 21, 2021. The MTD of anlotinib was 12 mg. The median PFS was 5.75 (95% confidence interval, 4.37-7.52) months. The objective response rate was 47.4% (95% confidence interval, 24.5%-71.1%). In the 12 mg group, seven (58.3%) patients experienced grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events, and the most common ones were hypertension (6 [50.0%]), decreased platelet count (2 [16.7%]), and hypertriglyceridemia (1 [8.3%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

CONCLUSION

Anlotinib plus platinum and pemetrexed showed promising antitumor activity with manageable toxicity in patients with T790M-negative EGFR-mutant advanced nonsquamous NSCLC after progression on first- or second-generation EGFR TKIs.

Virtual clinical trials of anti-PD-1 and anti-CTLA-4 immunotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma using a quantitative systems pharmacology model

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer and is the third-leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Most patients with HCC are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and the median survival for patients with advanced HCC treated with modern systemic therapy is less than 2 years. This leaves the advanced stage patients with limited treatment options. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand, are widely used in the treatment of HCC and are associated with durable responses in a subset of patients. ICIs targeting cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) also have clinical activity in HCC. Combination therapy of nivolumab (anti-PD-1) and ipilimumab (anti-CTLA-4) is the first treatment option for HCC to be approved by Food and Drug Administration that targets more than one immune checkpoints.

METHODS

In this study, we used the framework of quantitative systems pharmacology (QSP) to perform a virtual clinical trial for nivolumab and ipilimumab in HCC patients. Our model incorporates detailed biological mechanisms of interactions of immune cells and cancer cells leading to antitumor response. To conduct virtual clinical trial, we generate virtual patient from a cohort of 5,000 proposed patients by extending recent algorithms from literature. The model was calibrated using the data of the clinical trial CheckMate 040 (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01658878).

RESULTS

Retrospective analyses were performed for different immune checkpoint therapies as performed in CheckMate 040. Using machine learning approach, we predict the importance of potential biomarkers for immune blockade therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first QSP model for HCC with ICIs and the predictions are consistent with clinically observed outcomes. This study demonstrates that using a mechanistic understanding of the underlying pathophysiology, QSP models can facilitate patient selection and design clinical trials with improved success.

A Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model of Epidermal Growth Factor Mutations in Lung Adenocarcinomas

Simple Summary

Targeted therapy against epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutations has become the standard of care for non-small cell lung cancer, and there has not been an efficient genetic test for non-small cell lung cancer patients. The present study aims to find a novel data-driven genetic testing method that can effectively predict the mutation status of EGFR based on a prediction model combining clinical features. The results of this study provide a powerful theoretical basis for the establishment of an effective mutation prediction model. The prediction model can provide a high reference value aiding in EGFR mutation diagnosis and subsequent treatment course.

Abstract

Data from 758 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were retrospectively collected. All patients had undergone computed tomography imaging and EGFR gene testing. Radiomic features were extracted using the medical imaging tool 3D-Slicer and were combined with the clinical features to build a machine learning prediction model. The high-dimensional feature set was screened for optimal feature subsets using principal component analysis (PCA) and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Model prediction of EGFR mutation status in the validation group was evaluated using multiple classifiers. We showed that six clinical features and 622 radiomic features were initially collected. Thirty-one radiomic features with non-zero correlation coefficients were obtained by LASSO regression, and 24 features correlated with label values were obtained by PCA. The shared radiomic features determined by these two methods were selected and combined with the clinical features of the respective patient to form a subset of features related to EGFR mutations. The full dataset was partitioned into training and test sets at a ratio of 7:3 using 10-fold cross-validation. The area under the curve (AUC) of the four classifiers with cross-validations was: (1) K-nearest neighbor (AUCmean = 0.83, Acc = 81%); (2) random forest (AUCmean = 0.91, Acc = 83%); (3) LGBM (AUCmean = 0.94, Acc = 88%); and (4) support vector machine (AUCmean = 0.79, Acc = 83%). In summary, the subset of radiographic and clinical features selected by feature engineering effectively predicted the EGFR mutation status of this NSCLC patient cohort.

[Application of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in EGFR Mutant Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have greatly improved the survival rate of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients without driver mutation. Compared with wild-type tumors, tumors with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have greater heterogeneity in immune microenvironment characteristics such as programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and tumor mutational burden (TMB). Whether ICIs is suitable for NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation has been controversial. Clinical studies have shown that immunomonotherapy has no significant effect on patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC. ICIs combined with chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs show good survival benefits. This paper overviews the clinical research and related mechanism of ICIs single drug or combination therapy inadvanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation.
.

Crosstalk between the B7/CD28 and EGFR pathways: Mechanisms and therapeutic opportunities

Somatic activating mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are one of the most common oncogenic drivers in cancers such as non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), metastatic colorectal cancer, glioblastoma, head and neck cancer, pancreatic cancer, and breast cancer. Molecular-targeted agents against EGFR signaling pathways have shown robust clinical efficacy, but patients inevitably experience acquired resistance. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting PD-1/PD-L1 have exhibited durable anti-tumor responses in a subset of patients across multiple cancer types, their efficacy is limited in cancers harboring activating gene alterations of EGFR. Increasing studies have demonstrated that upregulation of new B7/CD28 family members such as B7-H3, B7x and HHLA2, is associated with EGFR signaling and may contribute to resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies by creating an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). In this review, we discuss the regulatory effect of EGFR signaling on the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway and new B7/CD28 family member pathways. Understanding these interactions may inform combination therapeutic strategies and potentially overcome the current challenge of resistance to EGFR-targeted therapies. We also summarize clinical data of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies in EGFR-mutated cancers, as well as ongoing clinical trials of combination of EGFR-targeted therapies and anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapies.

Tumour-draining lymph nodes in head and neck cancer are characterized by accumulation of CTLA-4 and PD-1 expressing Treg cells

INTRODUCTION

High Tregs infiltration within the tumour microenvironment (TME) of various cancers shows a positive correlation with poor prognosis. Despite the fact that tumour draining lymph nodes (TDLNs) are recognized as key organs playing a crucial role in response to immunotherapy and modulating anti-cancer immunity, the distribution of Tregs and their role in TDLNs remain uncertain thus far. The purpose of this project is to investigate the density of Tregs in TDLNs and non-TDLNs and their expression of immune checkpoint molecules - PD-1 and CTLA-4.

METHODS

Samples including TDLNs, non-TDLNs and metastatic lymph nodes (LNs) from 23 patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) were analyzed by multicolour flow cytometry with a focus on Tregs population and expression of CTLA-4 and PD-1.

RESULTS

TDLNs and metastatic LNs were characterized by a significantly higher infiltration of Tregs defined as CD4+FoxP3+CD25highCD127low cells and significantly higher expression of CTLA-4 and PD-1 on Tregs compared with non-TDLNs. Tregs in TDLNs and metastatic LNs co-expressed CTLA-4 and PD-1 abundantly. High expression of these immune check-point molecules correlated with positive N-stage but not with T-stage.

CONCLUSION

TDLNs and metastatic LNs are characterized by a high accumulation of Tregs expressing high levels of CTLA-4 and PD-1. High infiltration of Tregs can be a potential driver of an immunosuppressive milieu in TDLNs that can, in turn, favour cancer progression. High accumulation of Tregs expressing CTLA-4 and PD-1 in TDLNs is associated with lymph node involvement, but not with the size of the primary tumour.

Is ICI-based therapy better than chemotherapy for metastatic NSCLC patients who develop EGFR-TKI resistance? A real-world investigation

Purpose

To evaluate the outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments versus classical chemotherapy for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who develop epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) resistance and to explore the population that may benefit from ICI-based therapy.

Materials and methods

All patients who had previously received EGFR-TKI therapy at two cancer centers in China and developed resistance to targeted therapies were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were utilized to evaluate the outcomes of the study cohort.

Results

A total of 132 patients were included. The median follow-up time for this cohort was 21.7 months (IQR, 14.8–28.8 months), calculated from the date of EGFR-TKI resistance. The median PFS and OS were 4.9 months (IQR, 2.8–9.2) and 13.5 months (IQR, 6.6–26.5 months), respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that ICI-based therapy could significantly improve OS when compared to the classic chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.34–0.88; P = 0.01) after adjusting for variables such as gender, age, mutation status, and brain or liver metastasis status. The combined modality of ICI plus chemotherapy could offer a long-term OS benefit in most subgroups, such as young (<65 years) patients, and those without secondary T790M mutations or absence of liver and brain metastases, and the populations with good Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores.

Conclusion

For patients presenting with EGFR-TKI resistance, ICI-based therapy could offer a more favorable survival than classical chemotherapy. The combination of ICI with chemotherapy may be the optimal modality for those with good ECOG PS scores.

[Advances in ICIs Therapy after TKIs Resistance in Patients with EGFR Mutant NSCLC: A Review]

The follow-up treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation after drug resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have become a hotspot and difficulty at present. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy is a new and important choice for these patients, but many studies have shown unsatisfactory efficacy. However, some domestic and foreign studies have shown that ICIs combination therapy is still effective in some patients with positive driver genes and drug resistance after targeted therapy. So, in the era of immunotherapy, what are the differences in the efficacy of different combination immunotherapy strategies for different patients? What are the factors that affect efficacy? What are the interrelationships between these factors and other immunotherapy efficacy prediction biomarkers? All these problems have broad and important research value.
.

[Research Progress of Acquired Resistance Mediated by MET Amplification in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) amplification is an important driver of resistance in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and the combination of MET proto-oncogene (MET) and EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has shown promise in overcoming this molecularly defined acquired resistance. Emerging data also demonstrate MET amplification as a resistance driver to TKIs-treated anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-, RET-, and ROS1-fusion NSCLC. Here, we review the literature on recent research progress of MET amplification as a resistance driver to targeted therapy in oncogene-driven NSCLC and summarize the progress of clinical strategies to overcome the resistance mechanism.
.

Role of exosomes in lung cancer: A comprehensive insight from immunomodulation to theragnostic applications

Exosomes are 30 to 150 nm-diameter lipid bilayer-enclosed extracellular vesicles that enable cell-to-cell communication through secretion and uptake. The exosomal cargoes contain RNA, lipids, proteins, and metabolites which can be delivered to recipient cells in vivo. In a healthy lung, exosomes facilitate interaction between adaptive and innate immunity and help maintain normal lung physiology. However, tumor-derived exosomes in lung cancer (LC) can, on the other hand, restrict immune cell proliferation, cause apoptosis in activated CD8+ T effector cells, reduce natural killer cell activity, obstruct monocyte differentiation, and promote proliferation of myeloid-derived suppressor and regulatory T cells. In addition, exosomes in the tumor microenvironment may also play a critical role in cancer progression and the development of drug resistance. In this review, we aim to comprehensively examine the current updates on the role of exosomes in lung carcinogenesis and their potential application as a diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic tool in lung cancer.

Features of patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer benefiting from immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) generally show poor therapeutic efficacy in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, certain research indicate that a small proportion of these patients do respond to ICIs. The present study sought to identify the features of patients with EGFR mutations who might benefit from ICIs from multiple studies and discussed the optimal treatment paradigm for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR mutations.

Methods

The profiles of 114 advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations who received ICIs treatment were retrospectively reviewed. EGFR subtypes, programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, and clinical characteristics regarding their impact on the efficacy of ICIs were investigated.

Results

Patients with major EGFR mutations (L858R or 19Del) had a shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and a lower objective response rate (ORR) as compared to patients with rare (20ins or G719X) and other EGFR mutations. Although not statistically significant, median overall survival (OS) tended to be longer in patients with negative (&lt;1%) PD-L1 expression than with positive (≥1%) PD-L1 expression (15.61 vs. 7.40 months, p = 0.138). Median PFS and OS were significantly shorter in heavily treated patients (prior lines of therapy ≥3 lines vs. &lt;3 lines: mPFS, 1.80 vs. 2.50 months, p = 0.003; mOS, 6.70 vs. 14.00 months, p = 0.031). ORR was also lower in patients who had received ≥3 prior lines of therapy compared to in those &lt;3 prior lines of therapy (0.00% vs. 21.67%, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

Patients with major EGFR mutations showed poorer responses to ICIs than those with rare EGFR mutations. EGFR-mutated patients with lower PD-L1 expression showed a trend towards a longer OS after receiving ICIs. ICIs should be administered as early as possible to previously treated EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. ICI-based combined therapies may be a direction for treatment of these patient subtypes in the future.

Immunotherapy for EGFR-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: Current status, possible mechanisms and application prospects

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective against advanced and even perioperative non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and result in durable clinical benefit, regardless of programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression status in cancer. Existing clinical evidence shows that the effect of immunotherapy in patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC after the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance is not satisfactory. However, compared with monotherapy, ICIs combined with chemotherapy can improve the efficacy. Encouragingly, compared with that of patients with sensitive mutations, the progression-free survival of patients with rare mutations who were treated with ICIs was increased. Adequately maximizing the efficacy of ICIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients is worth exploring. In this review, we described preclinical and clinical studies of ICIs or combined therapy for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We further focused on EGFR mutations and the cancer immune response, with particular attention given to the role of EGFR activation in the cancer-immunity cycle. The mechanisms for the natural resistance to ICIs were explored to identify corresponding countermeasures that made more EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients benefit from ICIs.

Emerging strategies to overcome resistance to third-generation EGFR inhibitors

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), the receptor for members of the epidermal growth factor family, regulates cell proliferation and signal transduction; moreover, EGFR is related to the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, angiogenesis, invasion, metastasis, and apoptosis. Therefore, EGFR has become an important target for the treatment of cancer, including non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, breast cancer, glioma, cervical cancer, and bladder cancer. First- to third-generation EGFR inhibitors have shown considerable efficacy and have significantly improved disease prognosis. However, most patients develop drug resistance after treatment. The challenge of overcoming intrinsic and acquired resistance in primary and recurrent cancer mediated by EGFR mutations is thus driving the search for alternative strategies in the design of new therapeutic agents. In view of resistance to third-generation inhibitors, understanding the intricate mechanisms of resistance will offer insight for the development of more advanced targeted therapies. In this review, we discuss the molecular mechanisms of resistance to third-generation EGFR inhibitors and review recent strategies for overcoming resistance, new challenges, and future development directions.

Real-world data analysis of immune checkpoint inhibitors in stage III-IV adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma

Background

This study was designed to investigate the clinical application, efficacy, and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of lung cancer in the real world.

Methods

A retrospective, observational analysis was conducted on patients treated with ICIs in four tertiary hospitals in the region from January 2015 to March 2021, to evaluate the clinical efficacy of ICIs single-agent or combined chemotherapy and anti-vascular drugs in the first-line or second-line treatment of patients with lung cancer.

Results

Three hundred and fifteen patients were enrolled in this study. In patients with stage III-IV adenocarcinoma and Squamous cell carcinoma, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 35.5% (87/245) and 93.5% (229/245), respectively, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.8 months, and the median overall survival (OS) was not reached. A total of 132 patients received ICIs as the first-line treatment, the median treatment cycle was 8 cycles (2–20 cycles), the short-term efficacy ORR was 38.6%, DCR was 93.9%, and the median PFS was 11.4 months. One hundred thirteen patients received ICIs treatment as second-line treatment, the median treatment cycle was five cycles (2–10 cycles), the short-term efficacy ORR was 31.9%, DCR was 92.9%, and the median PFS was 10.0 months. There were no statistically significant differences in ORR, DCR, or median PFS with ICIs as the first-line treatment compared with the second-line treatment(P > 0.05). The results of subgroup analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status, pathological type and number of treatment lines were not correlated with median PFS(P > 0.05). However, there were statistically significant differences in programmed death-ligand 1(PD-L1) expression, corticosteroid interference, and antibiotic (Abx) treatment among all groups (P < 0.05). In terms of safety, the overall incidence of adverse reactions in 315 patients was 62.5%, and the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) was 13.7%. Grade 1–2 and 3–4 incidence of adverse events were 34.9 and 27.65%, respectively. There were four patients who experienced fatal irAEs, two cases were liver damage leading to liver failure, one case was immune related pneumonia, and one case was immune related myocarditis.

Conclusion

In the real world, ICIs has a good effect on patients with lung cancer and significantly improves ORR and PFS.

Assessing dynamic metabolic heterogeneity in non-small cell lung cancer patients via ultra-high sensitivity total-body [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging: quantitative analysis of [18F]FDG uptake in primary tumors and metastatic lymph nodes

PURPOSE

This study aimed to quantitatively assess [¹⁸F]FDG uptake in primary tumor (PT) and metastatic lymph node (mLN) in newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using the total-body [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT and to characterize the dynamic metabolic heterogeneity of NSCLC.

METHODS

The 60-min dynamic total-body [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT was performed before treatment. The PTs and mLNs were manually delineated. An unsupervised K-means classification method was used to cluster patients based on the imaging features of PTs. The metabolic features, including Patlak-Ki, Patlak-Intercept, SUV_mean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG), and textural features, were extracted from PTs and mLNs. The targeted next-generation sequencing of tumor-associated genes was performed. The expression of Ki67, CD3, CD8, CD34, CD68, and CD163 in PTs was determined by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients with stage IIIA-IV NSCLC were enrolled. Patients were divided into fast dynamic FDG metabolic group (F-DFM) and slow dynamic FDG metabolic group (S-DFM) by the unsupervised K-means classification of PTs. The F-DFM group showed significantly higher Patlak-Ki (P < 0.001) and SUV_mean (P < 0.001) of PTs compared with the S-DFM group, while no significant difference was observed in Patlak-Ki and SUV_mean of mLNs between the two groups. The texture analysis indicated that PTs in the S-DFM group were more heterogeneous in FDG uptake than those in the F-DFM group. Higher T cells (CD3⁺/CD8⁺) and macrophages (CD68⁺/CD163⁺) infiltration in the PTs were observed in the F-DFM group. No significant difference was observed in tumor mutational burden between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The dynamic total-body [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT stratified NSCLC patients into the F-DFM and S-DFM groups, based on Patlak-Ki and SUV_mean of PTs. PTs in the F-DFM group seemed to be more homogenous in terms of [¹⁸F]FDG uptake than those in the S-DFM group. The higher infiltrations of T cells and macrophages were observed in the F-DFM group, which suggested a potential benefit from immunotherapy.

A phase Ib dose-escalation study of troriluzole (BHV-4157), an oral glutamatergic signaling modulator, in combination with nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Glutamate signaling activates MAPK and PI3K/AKT pathways in tumor cells. Treatment with riluzole, a glutamate release inhibitor, has been previously shown to be safe in melanoma patients and produced biologic effects, but did not lead to radiographic responses, possibly due to poor pharmacokinetic properties. Therefore, we conducted a phase Ib trial to determine the safety and tolerability of the combination of the riluzole prodrug troriluzole (BHV-4157, trigriluzole) and the PD-1 antibody nivolumab in patients with advanced solid tumors.

METHODS

Patients with advanced or refractory solid tumors and measurable disease per RECIST 1.1 were treated with increasing doses of troriluzole using a semi-Bayesian modified toxicity probability interval dose escalation procedure. Troriluzole monotherapy was orally self-administered for a 14-day lead-in period followed by continuation of troriluzole in combination with nivolumab 240 mg IV every 2 weeks. Endpoints included safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and efficacy.

RESULTS

We enrolled 14 patients with advanced solid tumors (melanoma = 3, NSCLC = 3, renal cell carcinoma = 2, bladder/urothelial = 2, ovarian cancer = 1, adenoid cystic carcinoma = 1, pleural mesothelial = 1, head and neck cancer = 1). Eleven patients had cancer progression on prior therapy with PD-1 or PD-L1 agent. Patients received troriluzole total daily doses from 140 to 560 mg (divided). The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) occurring in ≥ 5 patients (> 35%) were transaminitis and increased lipase. DLT (dose-limiting toxicity) occurred in 3 patients: (1) grade 3 anorexia, (2) grade 3 fatigue and, (3) grade 3 atrial fibrillation. Six patients were treated at the MTD (maximum tolerated dose). No subjects discontinued treatment due to AEs. One response occurred (7%), which was a partial response in a subject who had PD-1 refractory disease. The 6-month PFS rate was 21%. PK data showed that the prodrug troriluzole was efficiently cleaved into riluzole by 2-h post-dosing in all dose cohorts tested.

CONCLUSION

The combination of troriluzole and nivolumab was safe and well-tolerated. The MTD of troriluzole was determined to be 420 mg total daily dose. The observed antitumor activity, primarily disease stabilization, is of interest in patients with PD-1 resistant tumors. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT03229278.

Impact of PD1 and PDL1 immunotherapy on non-small cell lung cancer outcomes: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

Despite comprising many cancer diagnoses, few treatments are suitable for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Trials suggest blockade of programmed death 1 (PD1) or its ligand (PDL1) may be effective for these patients. However, this therapy's impact on outcomes other than survival, and outcomes of patients not in trials, remains largely unknown. Therefore, we compared the effectiveness of PD1 and PDL1 immunotherapy to chemotherapy and placebo across multiple clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Six databases were searched on 12-13 October 2019 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating nivolumab, pembrolizumab, atezolizumab or durvalumab. Study selection was performed independently by two reviewers. Data for overall survival, progression-free survival, adverse effects (AEs) and quality of life (QoL) were descriptively and meta-analysed. Factors impacting treatment outcomes, including PDL1 expression, were explored. The similarity between RCT and observational data was assessed.

RESULTS

From 5423 search results, 139 full texts and abstracts were included. Immunotherapy was associated with a lower risk of death than both comparators. In RCTs, the incidence of treatment-related AEs was approximately 20% lower among patients using immunotherapy compared with chemotherapy. However, no other consistent benefits were observed. Progression-free survival results were inconsistent. Improvements to QoL varied according to the instrument used; however, QoL was not recorded widely. Survival results were similar between study designs; however, AEs incidence was lower in observational studies.

DISCUSSION

Among patients with aNSCLC, immunotherapy improved overall survival and incidence of treatment-related AEs compared with chemotherapy. Benefits to progression-free survival and QoL were less consistent.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42019153345.