Early results of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of cisplatin/S-1 and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Perioperative chemotherapy versus adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable gastric cancer: A systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The study aimed to investigate the prognosis and safety of perioperative chemotherapy (PC) compared with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC).

METHODS

We systematically searched and assessed studies in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library from inception to 1st September 2022.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies were eligible for the analysis, including 4686 patients in total. Our study found that patients with resectable gastric cancer undergoing PC had favorable prognosis on OS (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.69-0.87) and DFS (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.69-0.84) than those who undergoing AC. Addition of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to AC provided higher R0 resection rate but did not increase the risk of postoperative complication rate and most of the adverse event rates.

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrated that PC shows better OS and DFS in Asians with resectable gastric cancer compared with AC. PC should be preferred because of its favorable prognosis and similar safety.

Clinical Effect of Tumor-Specific Total Nutrients in Patients with Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Gastric Cancer Resection: A Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In this study, we combined adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastric cancer resection with tumor-specific total nutrient therapy to analyze how it affects the nutritional state and immune function of the patient.

METHOD

We collected data from 106 patients having undergone adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastric cancer resection between January 2020 and December 2021. We divided the patients into experimental and control groups (with 53 cases in each group) through single-blinded simple randomization using a random number table and the sealed envelope system. The control group received chemotherapy and the regular nutritional diet at the same time while the experimental group received tumor-specific total nutrients based on the control group. We analyzed the index results for the physical examination, nutritional status, and immune function of the patients in both groups recorded before and after one chemotherapeutic cycle.

RESULTS

The control and experimental group compositions were as follows: 58.5% and 52.8% males with a mean age ± standard deviation of 54.36 ± 12.68 and 55.15 ± 12.32 years, respectively. After one chemotherapeutic cycle and the nutritional intervention, the experimental group displayed better physical examination indicators than the control group concerning the weight (55.8 ± 5.41 vs. 54.8 ± 6.94, p = 0.621), body fat mass (13.3 ± 0.88 vs. 13.1 ± 0.91, p = 0.253), upper arm circumference (21.9 ± 0.94 vs. 21.2 ± 1.23 cm, p = 0.001), triceps skinfold thickness (15.1 ± 1.36 vs. 14.3 ± 1.62 cm, p = 0.007), and grip strength (23.0 ± 1.30 vs. 22.3 ± 1.33, p = 0.007). In addition, the experimental group yielded better nutritional-status indicators than the control, including albumin (35.2 ± 1.60 vs. 33.7 ± 1.44 g/L, p = 0.001), hemoglobin (115.7 ± 9.28 vs. 111.5 ± 10.56 g/L, p = 0.032), total protein (63.7 ± 5.85 vs. 60.5 ± 5.27 g/L, p = 0.004), transferrin (2.5 ± 0.53 vs. 2.2 ± 0.58 g/L, p = 0.007), and immune-function indicators CD4+ (32.8 ± 4.82 vs. 28.8 ± 3.76, p = 0.001), CD8+ (34.1 ± 3.36 vs. 37.2 ± 3.85, p = 0.001), CD4/CD8 (1.0 ± 0.28 vs. 0.8 ± 0.34, p = 0.001), IgA (2.7 ± 1.43 vs. 4.1 ± 1.47, p = 0.001), and IgG (8.8 ± 1.74 vs. 10.9 ± 1.28, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Combined tumor-specific total nutrient and adjuvant chemotherapy application after radical gastric cancer surgery effectively improves the nutritional state and immune function of the patients and could be applied in clinical practice.

Deep learning nomogram for predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in locally advanced gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

Developed and validated a deep learning radiomics nomogram using multi-phase contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) patients.

METHODS

This multi-center study retrospectively included 322 patients diagnosed with gastric cancer from January 2013 to June 2023 at two hospitals. Handcrafted radiomics technique and the EfficientNet V2 neural network were applied to arterial, portal venous, and delayed phase CT images to extract two-dimensional handcrafted and deep learning features. A nomogram model was built by integrating the handcrafted signature, the deep learning signature, with clinical features. Discriminative ability was assessed using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve and the precision-recall (P-R) curve. Model fitting was evaluated using calibration curves, and clinical utility was assessed through decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

The nomogram exhibited excellent performance. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.848 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.793-0.893)], 0.802 (95% CI 0.688-0.889), and 0.751 (95% CI 0.652-0.833) for the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. The AUCs of the P-R curves were 0.838 (95% CI 0.756-0.895), 0.541 (95% CI 0.329-0.740), and 0.556 (95% CI 0.376-0.722) for the corresponding sets. The nomogram outperformed the clinical model and handcrafted signature across all sets (all P < 0.05). The nomogram model demonstrated good calibration and provided greater net benefit within the relevant threshold range compared to other models.

CONCLUSION

This study created a deep learning nomogram using CECT images and clinical data to predict NAC response in LAGC patients undergoing surgical resection, offering personalized treatment insights.

Inhibition of CISD1 attenuates cisplatin-induced hearing loss in mice via the PI3K and MAPK pathways

Cisplatin is an effective chemotherapeutic drug for different cancers, but it also causes severe and permanent hearing loss. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction in cochlear hair cells (HCs) have been shown to be important in the pathogenesis of cisplatin-induced hearing loss (CIHL). CDGSH iron sulfur domain 1 (CISD1, also known as mitoNEET) plays a critical role in mitochondrial oxidative capacity and cellular bioenergetics. Targeting CISD1 may improve mitochondrial function in various diseases. However, the role of CISD1 in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity is unclear. Therefore, this study was performed to assess the role of CISD1 in cisplatin-induced ototoxicity. We found that CISD1 expression was significantly increased after cisplatin treatment in both HEI-OC1 cells and cochlear HCs. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of CISD1 with NL-1 inhibited cell apoptosis and reduced mitochondrial reactive oxygen species accumulation in HEI-OC1 cells and cochlear explants. Inhibition of CISD1 with small interfering RNA in HEI-OC1 cells had similar protective effects. Furthermore, NL-1 protected against CIHL in adult C57 mice, as evaluated by the auditory brainstem response and immunofluorescent staining. Mechanistically, RNA sequencing revealed that NL-1 attenuated CIHL via the PI3K and MAPK pathways. Most importantly, NL-1 did not interfere with the antitumor efficacy of cisplatin. In conclusion, our study revealed that targeting CISD1 with NL-1 reduced reactive oxygen species accumulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and apoptosis via the PI3K and MAPK pathways in HEI-OC1 cell lines and mouse cochlear explants in vitro, and it protected against CIHL in adult C57 mice. Our study suggests that CISD1 may serve as a novel target for the prevention of CIHL.

Machine learning for identifying tumor stemness genes and developing prognostic model in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer presents a formidable challenge, marked by its debilitating nature and often dire prognosis. Emerging evidence underscores the pivotal role of tumor stem cells in exacerbating treatment resistance and fueling disease recurrence in gastric cancer. Thus, the identification of genes contributing to tumor stemness assumes paramount importance. Employing a comprehensive approach encompassing ssGSEA, WGCNA, and various machine learning algorithms, this study endeavors to delineate tumor stemness key genes (TSKGs). Subsequently, these genes were harnessed to construct a prognostic model, termed the Tumor Stemness Risk Genes Prognostic Model (TSRGPM). Through PCA, Cox regression analysis and ROC curve analysis, the efficacy of Tumor Stemness Risk Scores (TSRS) in stratifying patient risk profiles was underscored, affirming its ability as an independent prognostic indicator. Notably, the TSRS exhibited a significant correlation with lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer. Furthermore, leveraging algorithms such as CIBERSORT to dissect immune infiltration patterns revealed a notable association between TSRS and monocytes and other cell. Subsequent scrutiny of tumor stemness risk genes (TSRGs) culminated in the identification of CDC25A for detailed investigation. Bioinformatics analyses unveil CDC25A's implication in driving the malignant phenotype of tumors, with a discernible impact on cell proliferation and DNA replication in gastric cancer. Noteworthy validation through in vitro experiments corroborated the bioinformatics findings, elucidating the pivotal role of CDC25A expression in modulating tumor stemness in gastric cancer. In summation, the established and validated TSRGPM holds promise in prognostication and delineation of potential therapeutic targets, thus heralding a pivotal stride towards personalized management of this malignancy.

Photodynamic therapy may salvage chemotherapy failure in gastric cancer: A case report and a literature review

Given the highly heterogeneous characteristics of advanced gastric cancer (GC), most patients must receive neoadjuvant therapy or conversion therapy consisting of chemotherapy to decrease tumor grade and improve the likelihood of complete resection. Drug resistance, however, always leads to an aborted conversion therapy and inevitable death. When meet drug resistance, alternative drug regimens will be applied with immunotherapy or targeted therapy, whose clinical efficacy remains limited when new drug resistance or severer liver and kidney toxicity emerge. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), a novel treatment, has demonstrated remarkable therapeutic efficacy in different stages of GC. However, no report has been reported so far on the clinical application of photodynamic therapy in conversion therapy after drug resistance. Here we report a case of middle-aged patient with advanced GC, who experienced failure of conversion therapy consisted of multi-line chemotherapy along with immunotherapy. Ultimate success was achieved through a comprehensive conversion therapy of PDT, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy. Subsequently, the patient underwent robotic-assisted radical gastrectomy while the surgical specimen showed no tumor cell exists. The patient underwent 3 cycles of systemic adjuvant therapy following surgical intervention. Presently, the patient remains 17 months in a satisfactory state of health.

Deep learning or radiomics based on CT for predicting the response of gastric cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Artificial intelligence (AI) models, clinical models (CM), and the integrated model (IM) are utilized to evaluate the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in patients diagnosed with gastric cancer.

Objective

The objective is to identify the diagnostic test of the AI model and to compare the accuracy of AI, CM, and IM through a comprehensive summary of head-to-head comparative studies.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase were systematically searched until September 5, 2023, to compile English language studies without regional restrictions. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) criteria. Forest plots were utilized to illustrate the findings of diagnostic accuracy, while Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic curves were generated to estimate sensitivity (SEN) and specificity (SPE). Meta-regression was applied to analyze heterogeneity across the studies. To assess the presence of publication bias, Deeks' funnel plot and an asymmetry test were employed.

Results

A total of 9 studies, comprising 3313 patients, were included for the AI model, with 7 head-to-head comparative studies involving 2699 patients. Across the 9 studies, the pooled SEN for the AI model was 0.75 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66, 0.82), and SPE was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84). Meta-regression was conducted, revealing that the cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and gold standard might be sources of heterogeneity. In the head-to-head comparative studies, the pooled SEN for AI was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69, 0.84) with SPE at 0.79 (95% CI: 0.70, 0.85). For CM, the pooled SEN was 0.67 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.77) with SPE at 0.59 (95% CI: 0.54, 0.64), while for IM, the pooled SEN was 0.83 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.86) with SPE at 0.69 (95% CI: 0.56, 0.79). Notably, there was no statistical difference, except that IM exhibited higher SEN than AI, while maintaining a similar level of SPE in pairwise comparisons. In the Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis subgroup, the CT-based Deep Learning (DL) subgroup, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline subgroup, the AI model exhibited higher SEN but lower SPE compared to the IM. Conversely, in the training cohort subgroup and the internal validation cohort subgroup, the AI model demonstrated lower SEN but higher SPE than the IM. The subgroup analysis underscored that factors such as the number of cohorts, cohort type, cut-off value, approach to predicting response, and choice of gold standard could impact the reliability and robustness of the results.

Conclusion

AI has demonstrated its viability as a tool for predicting the response of GC patients to NACT Furthermore, CT-based DL model in AI was sensitive to extract tumor features and predict the response. The results of subgroup analysis also supported the above conclusions. Large-scale rigorously designed diagnostic accuracy studies and head-to-head comparative studies are anticipated.

Systematic review registration

PROSPERO, CRD42022377030.

Efficacy and safety of perioperative therapy for locally resectable gastric cancer: A network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most commonly diagnosed malignancy worldwide, with over 1 million new cases per year, and the third leading cause of cancer-related death.

AIM

To determine the optimal perioperative treatment regimen for patients with locally resectable GC.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted, focusing on phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing perioperative chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy in treating locally resectable GC. The R0 resection rate, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and incidence of grade 3 or higher nonsurgical severe adverse events (SAEs) associated with various perioperative regimens were analyzed. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to compare treatment regimens and rank their efficacy.

RESULTS

Thirty RCTs involving 8346 patients were included in this study. Neoadjuvant XELOX plus neoadjuvant radiotherapy and neoadjuvant CF were found to significantly improve the R0 resection rate compared with surgery alone, and the former had the highest probability of being the most effective option in this context. Neoadjuvant plus adjuvant FLOT was associated with the highest probability of being the best regimen for improving OS. Owing to limited data, no definitive ranking could be determined for DFS. Considering nonsurgical SAEs, FLO has emerged as the safest treatment regimen.

CONCLUSION

This study provides valuable insights for clinicians when selecting perioperative treatment regimens for patients with locally resectable GC. Further studies are required to validate these findings.

Computed tomography-based radiomics nomogram for predicting therapeutic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer : A scale for treatment predicting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy results in various responses when used to treat locally advanced gastric cancer, we aimed to develop and validate a predictive model of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 128 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who underwent pre-treatment computed tomography (CT) scanning followed by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy were included (training cohort: n = 64; validation cohort: n = 64). We built a radiomics score combined with laboratory parameters to create a nomogram for predicting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and calculating scores for risk factors.

RESULTS

The radiomics score system demonstrated good stability and prediction performance for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, with the area under the curve of the training and validation cohorts being 0.8 and 0.64, respectively. The radiomics score proved to be an independent risk factor affecting the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In addition to the radiomics score, four other risk factors were included in the nomogram, namely the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, total bilirubin, ALT/AST, and CA199. The model had a C-index of 0.8.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicated that radiomics features could be potential biomarkers for the early prediction of the response to neoadjuvant treatment.

Delta computed tomography radiomics features-based nomogram predicts long-term efficacy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

No effective preoperative tool is available for predicting the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We aimed to explore the association between change values ("delta") in the radiomic signatures of computed tomography (CT) (delCT-RS) before and after NAC for AGC and overall survival(OS).

METHODS AND DESIGN

A total of 132 AGC patients with AGC were studied as a training cohort in our center, and 45 patients from another center were used as an external validation set. A radiomic signatures-clinical-nomogram(RS-CN) was established using delCT-RS and preoperative clinical variables. The prediction performance of RS-CN was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC)curve (AUC values), time-dependent ROC, decision curve analysis(DCA) and C-index.

RESULTS

Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that delCT-RS, cT-stage, cN-stage, Lauren-type and the value of variation of carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA) between NAC were independent risk factors for 3-year OS of AGC. In the training cohort, RS-CN had a good prediction performance for OS (C-Index 0.73) and AUC values were significantly better than those of delCT-RS, ypTNM-stage and tumor regression grade(TRG) (0.827 vs 0.704 vs 0.749 vs 0.571, p < 0.001). DCA and time-dependent ROC of RS-CN were better than those of ypTNM stage, TRG grade and delCT-RS. The prediction performance of the validation set was equivalent to that of the training set. The cut-off (177.2) of RS-CN score was obtained from X-Tile software, a score of > 177.2 was defined as high-risk group(HRG), and scores of ≤ 177.2 were defined as the low-risk group(LRG). The 3-year OS and disease free survival(DFS) of patients in the LRG were significantly better than those in the HRG. Adjuvant chemotherapy(AC) can only significantly improve the 3-year OS and DFS of the LRG. (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our nomogram based on delCT-RS has good prediction of prognosis before surgery and helps identify patients that are most likely to benefit from AC. It works well in precise and individualised NAC in AGC.

The optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (LAGC) has been recommended in several guidelines. However, there is no global consensus about the optimum of NAC regimens. We aimed to determine the optimal NAC regimen for LAGC.

Methods

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed. The literature search was conducted from inception to June 2022. The odds ratio (OR) value and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used for assessment of R0 resection rate and pathological complete response rate (pCR) as primary outcomes. The hazard ratio (HR) value and 95% CI were interpreted for the assessment of overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) as second outcomes. The risk ratio (RR) value and 95% CI were used for safety assessment.

Results

Twelve randomized controlled trials were identified with 3846 eligible participants. The network plots for R0 resectability, OS, and DFS constituted closed loops. The regimens of TPF (taxane and platinum plus fluoropyrimidine), ECF (epirubicin and cisplatin plus fluorouracil), and PF (platinum plus fluoropyrimidine) showed a meaningful improvement of R0 resectability, as well as OS and/or DFS, compared with surgery (including surgery-alone and surgery plus postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy). Importantly, among these regimens, TPF regimen showed significant superiority in R0 resection rate (versus ECF regimen), OS (versus ECF regimen), DFS (versus PF and ECF regimens), and pCR (versus PF regimen).

Conclusions

The taxane-based triplet regimen of TPF is likely the optimal neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for LAGC patients.

Laparoscopic versus Open Total Gastrectomy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: Short and Long-Term Results

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic gastrectomy for early gastric cancer is widely accepted and routinely performed. However, it is still debated whether the laparoscopic approach is a valid alternative to open gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer (AGC). The aim of this study is to compare short-and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic (LG) and open (OG) total gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy in patients with AGC.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative study was conducted on patients who underwent LG and OG for ACG between January 2015 and December 2021. Primary endpoints were the following: recurrence rate, 3-year disease-free survival, 3-year and 5-year overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analysis was conducted to compare variables influencing outcomes and survival.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients included: fifty-three OG and thirty-nine LG. No difference in morbidity and mortality. LG was associated with lower recurrence rates (OG 22.6% versus LG 12.8%, p = 0.048). No differences in 3-year and 5-year overall survival; 3-year disease-free survival was improved in the LG group on the univariate analysis but not after the multivariate one. LG was associated with longer operative time, lower blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Lymph node yield was higher in LG.

CONCLUSION

LG for AGC seems to provide satisfactory clinical and oncological outcomes in medium volume centers, improved postoperative results and possibly lower recurrence rates.

A Signature Based on Costimulatory Molecules for the Assessment of Prognosis and Immune Characteristics in Patients With Stomach Adenocarcinoma

Although costimulatory molecules have been shown to boost antitumor immune responses, their significance in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the gene expression patterns of costimulatory molecule genes in patients with STAD and develop a predictive signature to aid in therapy selection and outcome prediction. We used 60 costimulatory family genes from prior research to conduct the first complete costimulatory molecular analysis in patients with STAD. In the two study groups, consensus clustering analysis based on these 60 genes indicated unique distribution patterns and prognostic differences. Using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and Cox regression analysis, we identified nine costimulatory molecular gene pairs (CMGPs) with prognostic value. With these nine CMGPs, we were able to develop a costimulatory molecule-related prognostic signature that performed well in an external dataset. For the patients with STAD, the signature was proven to be a risk factor independent of the clinical characteristics, indicating that this signature may be employed in conjunction with clinical considerations. A further connection between the signature and immunotherapy response was discovered. The patients with high mutation rates, an abundance of infiltrating immune cells, and an immunosuppressive milieu were classified as high-risk patients. It is possible that these high-risk patients have a better prognosis for immunotherapy since they have higher cytolytic activity scores and immunophenoscores of CTLA4 and PD-L1/PD-L2 blockers. Therefore, our signature may help clinicians in assessing patient prognosis and developing treatment plans.

A CT-based deep learning radiomics nomogram for predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer: A multicenter cohort study

BACKGROUND

Accurate prediction of treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in individual patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) is essential for personalized medicine. We aimed to develop and validate a deep learning radiomics nomogram (DLRN) based on pretreatment contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images and clinical features to predict the response to NACT in patients with LAGC.

METHODS

719 patients with LAGC were retrospectively recruited from four Chinese hospitals between Dec 1st, 2014 and Nov 30th, 2020. The training cohort and internal validation cohort (IVC), comprising 243 and 103 patients, respectively, were randomly selected from center I; the external validation cohort1 (EVC1) comprised 207 patients from center II; and EVC2 comprised 166 patients from another two hospitals. Two imaging signatures, reflecting the phenotypes of the deep learning and handcrafted radiomics features, were constructed from the pretreatment portal venous-phase CT images. A four-step procedure, including reproducibility evaluation, the univariable analysis, the LASSO method, and the multivariable logistic regression analysis, was applied for feature selection and signature building. The integrated DLRN was then developed for the added value of the imaging signatures to independent clinicopathological factors for predicting the response to NACT. The prediction performance was assessed with respect to discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness. Kaplan-Meier survival curves based on the DLRN were used to estimate the disease-free survival (DFS) in the follow-up cohort (n = 300).

FINDINGS

The DLRN showed satisfactory discrimination of good response to NACT and yielded the areas under the receiver operating curve (AUCs) of 0.829 (95% CI, 0.739-0.920), 0.804 (95% CI, 0.732-0.877), and 0.827 (95% CI, 0.755-0.900) in the internal and two external validation cohorts, respectively, with good calibration in all cohorts (p > 0.05). Furthermore, the DLRN performed significantly better than the clinical model (p < 0.001). Decision curve analysis confirmed that the DLRN was clinically useful. Besides, DLRN was significantly associated with the DFS of patients with LAGC (p < 0.05).

INTERPRETATION

A deep learning-based radiomics nomogram exhibited a promising performance for predicting therapeutic response and clinical outcomes in patients with LAGC, which could provide valuable information for individualized treatment.

Effects of perioperative eicosapentaenoic acid‑enriched oral nutritional supplement on the long‑term oncological outcomes after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer

Basic and clinical reports have suggested that eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) exhibits anti-tumor activity. The present study evaluated whether perioperative EPA could improve the survival of patients with localized gastric cancer as a key secondary endpoint of a randomized clinical study. The present study was designed as multicenter, open-label, superiority, randomized trial to confirm the preventive effect of EPA on body weight loss after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Eligible patients were randomized to either the standard-diet group (EPA-off group) or EPA-on group by a centralized dynamic method. An EPA-enriched supplement (ProSure^®) was given to the EPA-on group in addition to their standard diet. This supplement included 600 kcal with 2.2 g/day of EPA. Among the 126 patients who were randomized, 123 patients (EPA-off group, n=60; EPA-on group, n=63) were examined in the survival analyses. All background factors were well balanced between the two groups. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates were 74.6 and 67.8%, respectively, in the EPA-off group, and 77.8 and 76.2% in the EPA-on group. There was no significant difference between the EPA-off and EPA-on groups (hazard ratio, 0.77; P=0.424). In the subgroup analysis, the hazard ratio was 0.39 in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 0.57 in patients with nodal metastasis. In conclusion, a clear survival benefit of perioperative EPA was not observed in localized gastric cancer. The value of EPA should be further tested in a future study in patients with unfavorable advanced gastric cancer. Clinical trial number: UMIN000006380; date of registration, September 21, 2011.

Validating a nodal regression system for gastric cancer: An ancillary cohort study of the GASTRODOC trial

BACKGROUND

To validate a nodal regression system for gastric cancer and to verify its impact on prognosis.

METHODS

This is an ancillary study which included 47 patients of the GASTRODOC trial. The dedicated pathologists of each Institute were invited to revise all the lymph nodes included in the surgical specimens in order to classify the regression according to the grading system proposed by Tsekrekos et al. The association of the nodal regression system and the clinico-pathological characteristics and prognosis were investigated.

RESULTS

According to the classification of Tsekrekos et al., there were 19 (40.4%) patients with grade a, 14 (29.8%) with grade b and 14 (29.8%) with grade c nodal regression. This regression system showed significant statistical associations with pathological N status (p < 0.001), residual tumor classification (p = 0.003) and Becker regression system (p = 0.011). At multivariable analysis only Tsekrekos' grading regression system was significantly associated with the PFS (HR 10.1, 95% CI 1.3-75.5; p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

The analyzed nodal regression system is significantly associated with Becker's regression system and it has a strong correlation with prognosis.

Phase II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus oxaliplatin for gastric cancer clinical T4 or N2-3

In Japan, the standard treatment for stage II or III gastric cancer is D2 gastrectomy followed by administration of S-1 for one year. However, patients with stage III disease have unsatisfactory survival rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of S-1 and oxaliplatin for advanced gastric cancer. Patients with cT4 or cN2-3 gastric cancer were scheduled to receive two courses of chemotherapy (130 mg/m² oxaliplatin on Day 1, 80 mg/m² S-1 per day twice daily for 14 days) followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. The secondary endpoints were rates of completion of protocol treatment, pathological response, and adverse events; and 3-year overall survival, 5-year overall survival, and 5-year recurrence-free survival. Between May 2016 and March 2019, 30 patients were enrolled in the study, all of whom completed the protocol treatment. The R0 resection rate (primary endpoint) was 93.3% (95% confidence interval: 77.9-99.2). The pathological response rate was 63.3%. Grade 3-4 toxicities included anemia (3.3%), anorexia (6.7%), and fatigue (3.3%). Relative dose intensities were 91.2% and 94.2% for S-1 and oxaliplatin, respectively. Neoadjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin is highly effective, achieving an acceptable R0 resection rate with relatively few severe toxicities and good compliance.Trial registration: Registry name: A prospective intervention study on the availability of preoperative SOX therapy for T4 or N2-3 gastric cancer. Trial ID: UMIN: UMIN000024656. https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R00002836.

Cudraxanthone L inhibits gastric cancer by regulating the MAPK signalling and promoting FAS-mediated pathway

Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common malignancies and has the second highest lethal rate in the world; thus, finding new medicines with high potency and low toxicity is urgent. Cudrania tricuspidata (Carr.) Bur. ex Lavallee (Moraceae) is a traditional medicinal herb that is considered to have antitumour efficacy. We extracted and isolated cudraxanthone L (CXL) from Cudrania tricuspidata and evaluated its anti-cancer efficacy. CXL treatment inhibited angiogenesis of chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) and repressed the cell viability of various human cancer cells, indicating it presented the antitumour potential. Among them, CXL presented the best inhibitory effects on MGC803 cells. In addition, the invasion, migration and clonogenicity were significantly repressed, S phase of the cell cycle was arrested, and apoptosis was induced when MGC803 cells were treated with CXL. The results of RNA sequencing, qRT-PCR and western blotting verified that CXL regulated the MAPK signalling pathway and induced apoptosis by FAS-mediated pathway. The in vivo data revealed that CXL arrested tumour growth without toxic effects and upregulated the protein levels in FAS-mediated pathway in MGC803 gastric cancer-bearing mice. In summary, we demonstrate CXL presents impactful anti-GC efficacy by regulating the MAPK signalling pathway and promoting the FAS-mediated pathway.

Comparisons of effects of SOX and mFOLFOX6 chemotherapy regimens on patients with locally advanced gastric cancer

The neoadjuvant chemotherapy plays an important role in locally advanced gastric cancer, but its efficacy, safety profiles and clinical outcomes among different regimens still remain controversial. In this study, totally 231 eligible patients with locally advanced gastric cancer were enrolled. These patients were divided into the observation group (SOX regimen, n = 123) and control group (mFOLFOX6 regimen, n = 108) according to different chemotherapy regimens. Then, the differences in chemotherapy efficacy, adverse reactions, surgical characteristics, complications and survival condition were compared. No significant differences were observed in clinical efficacy of chemotherapy, the rate of D2 lymph node clearance, R0 resection, complications, responses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival condition between two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of abdominal pain, diarrhoea, nausea and vomiting in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (16.26% vs 29.63%, χ² = 5.893, P < 0.05; 11.38% vs 26.85%, χ² = 9.084, P < 0.05; 35.77% vs 53.70%, χ² = 7.499, P < 0.05). The SOX regimen and mFOLFOX6 regimen have similar chemotherapy efficacy for locally advanced gastric cancer, but SOX regimen has a lower risk of gastrointestinal adverse reactions comparing with mFOLFOX6 regimen.

Effectiveness and Safety of Apatinib Plus Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Nonrandomized Controlled Trial

Importance

Apatinib is a novel treatment option for chemotherapy-refractory advanced gastric cancer (GC), but it has not been evaluated in patients with locally advanced GC.

Objective

To investigate the effectiveness and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced GC.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This multicenter, prospective, single-group, open-label, phase 2 nonrandomized controlled trial was conducted in 10 centers in southern China. Patients with M0 and either clinical T2 to T4 or N+ disease were enrolled between July 1, 2017, and June 30, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed from December 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020.

Interventions

Eligible patients received apatinib (500 mg orally once daily on days 1 to 21 and discontinued in the last cycle) plus SOX (S-1: 40-60 mg orally twice daily on days 1 to 14; oxaliplatin: 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1) every 3 weeks for 2 to 5 cycles. A D2 gastrectomy was performed 2 to 4 weeks after the last cycle.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary end point was R0 resection rate. Secondary end points were the response rate, toxic effects, and surgical outcome.

Results

A total of 48 patients (mean [SD] age, 63.2 [8.2] years; 37 men [77.1%]) were enrolled in this study. Forty patients underwent surgery (38 had gastrectomy, and 2 had exploratory laparotomy), with an R0 resection rate of 75.0% (95% CI, 60.4%-86.4%). The radiologic response rate was 75.0%, and T downstaging was observed in 16 of 44 patients (36.4%). The pathological response rate was 54.2% (95% CI, 39.2%-68.6%); moreover, this rate was significantly higher in patients who achieved a radiologic response compared with those who did not (12 [80.0%] vs 1 [20.0%]; P = .03) and in those who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status score of 0 (20 [76.9%] vs 10 [45.5%]; P = .03) or had tumors located in the upper one-third of the stomach (16 [61.5%] vs 7 [31.8%]; P = .04). Patients who achieved a pathological response (vs those who did not) had significantly less blood loss (median [range]: 60 [10-200] mL vs 80 [20-300] mL; P = .04) and significantly more lymph nodes harvested (median [range]: 40 [24-67] vs 32 [19-51]; P = .04) during surgery. Postoperative complications were observed in 7 of 38 patients (18.4%). Grade 3 toxic effects occurred in 16 of 48 patients (33.3%), and no grade 4 toxic effects or preoperative deaths were observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

This nonrandomized controlled trial found that apatinib combined with SOX was effective and had an acceptable safety profile as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced GC. A large-scale randomized clinical trial may be needed to confirm the findings.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03192735.

Inhibiting the JNK/ERK signaling pathway with geraniol for attenuating the proliferation of human gastric adenocarcinoma AGS cells

Geraniol, a natural compound found in the essential oils of various aromatic plants, has attracted attention for its probable anticancer effects. The molecular mechanisms of the cell proliferation suppression and apoptosis induction via geraniol in gastric cancer cells (AGS), however, remain unclear. Gastric cancer cells were treated with geraniol, and it was found that the IC₅₀ values were 25 μM/ml, as determined by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay. Results showed that 20 and 25 μM geraniol-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS) production (2'-7'dichlorofluorescin diacetate staining) and decreased mitochondrial membrane potential (rhodamine 123 staining) in AGS cells. Then, it effectively inhibited cell growth and induced apoptosis, confirmed through acridine orange/ethidium bromide, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, and propidium iodide staining and molecular marker analysis in AGS cells. Also, geraniol potently diminished caspase-9, Bax, Bcl-2, and caspase-3 expression in AGS cells. We also evaluated the essential mechanism of the cytotoxic effect of geraniol. Moreover, the present study depicted that geraniol-induced cell death through mitochondrial ROS production and inhibited the phosphorylation form of mitogen-activated protein kinase (p38, MAPK, JNK, and ERK1/2) signaling pathway. Taken together, these results concluded that geraniol has a novel therapeutic property against human stomach cancer.

Short-term results of a phase II study of preoperative docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer

Background

A multi-institutional phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 therapy in marginally resectable advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients with macroscopic type 4, large macroscopic type 3 and bulky lymph node metastasis received two cycles of preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 therapy (docetaxel 40 mg/m² and cisplatin 60 mg/m² on day 1, and S-1 80 mg/m² for 14 days, every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was the pathological response rate, with an expected value of 65%.

Results

Thirty-one patients were enrolled in this study. The pathological response rate was 54.8%, and it was higher than the threshold value but lower than the expected rate. The R0 resection rate was 93.5%. The frequencies of grade 3–4 toxicities during docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 therapy were 41.9% for neutropenia, 6.5% for febrile neutropenia and 32.3% for nausea/vomiting. Grade 2 and 3 surgical morbidities occurred in 23.3 and 6.7% of the patients, respectively.

Conclusions

Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 therapy was feasible in terms of chemotherapy-related toxicities and surgical morbidity, but the effect did not achieve the expected value. The association between the pathological response rate and survival will be evaluated in the final analysis of this clinical trial.

d-Carvone inhibits the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway and induced the apoptotic cell death in the human gastric cancer AGS cells

Globally, gastric cancer is one of the leading cause of death. Surgical and chemotherapy constitute an important treatment regimen. Unfortunately, less than 20 persons out of 100 patients are live on almost 5 years. Hence, a nontoxic, effective and significantly enhancing novel therapeutic agent is required. d-Carvone is a natural terpenoid present in the essential oils and abundant in the seeds of caraway, as well as known folk medication for diarrhea, acidity, and other gastric disorders. Nevertheless, the role of d-carvone on gastric cancer and its underlying molecular mechanism resides enigmatic. Cells were treated with d-carvone to find out the IC₅₀ by MTT assay. This study shows that 20 and 25 μM d-carvone has induced the reactive oxygen species production and mitochondrial membrane potential in gastric cancer AGS cells, which were evaluated by 2,7-dichlorofluoresceindiacetate and Rh123 staining methods, respectively. The effect of d-carvone against the Janus kinase 2 (JAK2)/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) pathway was studied through immunoblotting. Then, we found that it effectively inhibited the proliferation of cell, and the induction of cell apoptosis was scrutinized by dual, 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole, and also propidium iodide staining methods. We also explored the fundamental molecular signaling mechanism of the d-carvone and our data depicts that d-carvone induced apoptosis cell death by mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production and downregulation of the and JAK and STAT3 signaling molecules. These overall findings support that the d-carvone inhibits the JAK/STAT3 signaling pathway and induces cell death in the gastric cancer AGS cells.

Short-term outcomes of gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinical stage III gastric cancer: propensity score-matched analysis of a multi-institutional database

PURPOSE

Preoperative chemotherapy for gastric cancer may be effective from the standpoint of compliance, although there is insufficient evidence of its efficacy. We analyzed a multicenter database to clarify whether preoperative chemotherapy influenced the short-term outcomes of gastrectomy.

METHODS

We analyzed, retrospectively, 3571 patients who underwent gastrectomy between January, 2010 and December, 2014. Patients with clinical stage-III gastric adenocarcinoma were divided into a neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and a non-NAC group. We performed propensity-matched comparative analysis to stratify the groups according to age, sex, tumor region, tumor type, preoperative stage, procedure, lymph node dissection, and tumor differentiation. Preoperative blood data, surgical findings, and postoperative complications were analyzed.

RESULTS

Analysis of the matched NAC (n = 64) and non-NAC (n = 128) groups revealed that the preoperative values of neutrophils, platelets, and Hb were significantly lower in the NAC group. Blood loss during surgery was significantly higher, surgical times were longer, and the rate of repeat surgery was significantly lower in the NAC group; however, the rates of rehospitalization did not differ between the groups and mortality was 0% in both groups. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

NAC did not increase the complication rate of gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Preoperative or Perioperative Docetaxel, Oxaliplatin, and Capecitabine (GASTRODOC Regimen) in Patients with Locally-Advanced Resectable Gastric Cancer: A Randomized Phase-II Trial

Docetaxel associated with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil (FLOT) has been reported as the best perioperative treatment for gastric cancer. However, there is still some debate about the most appropriate number and timing of chemotherapy cycles. In this randomized multicenter phase II study, patients with resectable gastric cancer were staged through laparoscopy and peritoneal lavage cytology, and randomly assigned (1:1) to either four cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (arm A) or two preoperative + two postoperative cycles of docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and capecitabine (DOC) chemotherapy (arm B). The primary endpoint was to assess the percentage of patients receiving all the planned preoperative or perioperative chemotherapeutic cycles. Ninety-one patients were enrolled between September 2010 and August 2016. The treatment was well tolerated in both arms. Thirty-three (71.7%) and 24 (53.3%) patients completed the planned cycles in arms A and B, respectively (p = 0.066), reporting an odds ratio for early interruption of treatment of 0.45 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.18–1.07). Resection was curative in 39 (88.6%) arm A patients and 35 (83.3%) arm B patients. Five-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 51.2% (95% CI: 34.2–65.8) in arm A and 40.3% (95% CI: 28.9–55.2) in arm B (p = 0.300). Five-year survival was 58.5% (95% CI: 41.3–72.2) and 53.9% (95% CI: 35.5–69.3) (p = 0.883) in arms A and B, respectively. The planned treatment was more frequently completed and was more active, albeit not significantly, in the neoadjuvant arm than in the perioperative group.

A Retrospective Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer

Objective

To explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the doublet and triplet regimens of locally advanced gastric cancer.

Patients and Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 162 patients with gastric cancer who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, including 74 patients receiving doublet regimen (fluorouracil/platinum) and 88 patients receiving triplet regimen (fluorouracil/platinum/Taxol). Patients in both groups received neoadjuvant chemotherapy for two cycles, and underwent surgical resection 4 weeks after the end of chemotherapy.

Results

The total clinical remission rate was 68.6% (105/153), the phase-down rate was 46.4% (71/153), and the pathological response rate was 59.9% (97/162). In the doublet and triplet regimen, the clinical remission rate was 65.7% (44/67) and 70.9% (61/86) (P = 0.708), the descending period rate was 41.8% (28/67) and 50.0% (43/86) (P = 0.485), and the pathological response rate was 51.4% (38/74) and 67.0% (59/88) (P = 0.190). The median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) of 162 patients were 36.0 and 58.5 months. In the doublet and triplet regimen, the median DFS was 38.0 and 34.0 months (P = 0.377), and the median OS was 59.0 and 56.5 months (P = 0.256). The side effects of the doublet group were significantly lower than those of the triplet group, with leucopenia rate of 45.9% (34/74) and 62.5% (55/88) (P = 0.035); thrombocytopenia rate of 18.9% (14/74) and 35.2% (31/88) (P = 0.021); nausea rate of 45.9% (34/74) and 64.8% (57/88) (P = 0.016), and diarrhea rate of 1.4% (1/74) and 9.1% (8/88) (P = 0.032).

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is safe and effective for locally advanced gastric cancer. The clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the doublet group and the triplet group is equivalent, and the doublet group has better safety and tolerance.

Impact of Neoadjuvant Therapy on Minimally Invasive Surgical Outcomes in Advanced Gastric Cancer: An International Propensity Score-Matched Study

BACKGROUND

No international consensus on the treatment of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) exists. In the absence of well-designed, comparative studies between neoadjuvant versus adjuvant strategies, concerns about increased risk of postoperative complications remain barriers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for AGC. We evaluated surgical outcomes of AGC patients who received minimally invasive radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy after NAC.

METHODS

We collected data from two high-volume gastric cancer programs in the United States and China between January 2015 and December 2019 with the last follow-up in February 2020. AGC patients undergoing minimally invasive radical surgery were included. After propensity score-matching, surgical outcomes were analyzed. Risk-factor of complications was analyzed in the whole cohort.

RESULTS

After 1:1 propensity score-matching, 97 patients were included in each cohort. NAC + surgery cohort was younger (58.2 ± 10.3 vs. 61.3 ± 9.6, P = 0.036) with lower preoperative WBC count (5.7 ± 2.8 vs. 6.9 ± 2.1 × 10⁹/ml) than the surgery upfront cohort. NAC was not a risk-factor for postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR], 0.859; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-1.60; P = 0.633). Overall risk-factors of postoperative complications included age ≥ 60 years (OR, 21.338; 95% CI, 5.00-91.05; P < 0.001), tumor size ≥ 5 cm (OR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08-1.83; P < 0.001), operation time ≥ 240 min (OR, 5.53; 95% CI, 1.26-24.26; P = 0.012), and ASA classification ≥ II (OR, 13.14; 95% CI, 4.12-24.73; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

NAC before minimally invasive radical gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy does not increase postoperative complications, and these findings support broader application of NAC and MIS for AGC. Additional studies are required to determine the effect of NAC on long-term survival.

Primary results of a randomized two-by-two factorial phase II trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with two and four courses of cisplatin/S-1 and docetaxel/cisplatin/S-1 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer

Aim

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is promising to improve the survival of resectable gastric cancer. However, suitable regimen and treatment duration for NAC have not yet been established.

Methods

We conducted a randomized phase II trial to compare two and four courses of neoadjuvant S-1/cisplatin (SC) and S-1/cisplatin/docetaxel(DCS) using a two-by-two factorial design for locally resectable advanced gastric cancer. Patients with M0 and either T4 or T3 in case of junctional cancer or scirrhous-type cancer received two or four courses of SC or DCS. Then, patients underwent D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant S-1 chemotherapy for 1 year. The primary endpoint was 3-year overall survival. The planned sample size was 120 eligible patients.

Results

Between October 2011 and September 2014, 132 patients were assigned to CS (n = 66; 33 in 2-courses and 33 in 4-courses) and DCS (n = 66; 33 in 2-courses and 33 in 4-courses). The 3-year OS was 58.1% in CS and 60.0% in DCS with hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.48-1.34), while it was 53.1% in the two courses and 65.0% in the four courses with hazard ratio of 0.72 (95% CI, 0.43-1.22). In the survival analysis by duration in each regimen, the 3-year OS was 58.1% for both two and four courses in CS, while it was 48.5% for two courses of DCS and 71.9% for four courses of DCS.

Conclusions

Considering high 3-year OS, four courses DCS has a value to be tested in a future phase III study to confirm superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for high-risk advanced gastric cancer: long-term results of KDOG1001 trial

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of KDOG1001 trial after a minimum follow-up of 3 years.

METHODS

Patients with bulky N2 lymph nodes, linitis plastica (type 4), or large ulcero-invasive-type tumors (type 3) received up to four 28-day cycles of DCS neoadjuvant chemotherapy (docetaxel at 40 mg/m², cisplatin at 60 mg/m² on day 1, and S-1 at 40 mg/m² twice daily for 2 weeks) followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy plus adjuvant S-1 therapy for 1 year. The final preplanned analysis of long-term outcomes including overall survival and relapse-free survival was conducted after minimum follow-up of 3 years. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry, number UMIN 000003642, and has been completed.

RESULTS

From May 2010 through January 2017, 40 patients were enrolled. All included patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DCS followed by gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy, and 32 (80%) completed adjuvant S-1 therapy for 1 year. After a median follow-up for surviving patients of 68 months at the last follow-up in January 2020, 3-year overall survival rate was 77.5% (95% confidence interval 62.1-87.9%), while 3-year relapse-free survival rate was 62.5% (95% confidence interval 46.8-76.0%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with 4 cycles of DCS followed by D2 gastrectomy plus adjuvant S-1 was associated with relatively good long-term oncologic outcomes for patients with the high-risk gastric cancer.

Strategies and recommendations for the management of gastrointestinal surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic: experience shared by Chinese surgeons

Novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), is an ongoing public-health pandemic worldwide. Although SARS-CoV-2 has been known to spread primarily through respiratory droplets, recent evidence also supports fecal/oral as an additional route of transmission, raising concerns over gastrointestinal (GI) transmission of the infection. Herein, we, as the front-line Chinese GI surgeons, would like to share our experience and lessons in the combat against COVID-19. It is essential to create science-based, rational, and practical strategies during the outbreak of COVID-19. Here, we provide multi-institutional consensus on minimizing disease transmission while continuing to provide care from all aspects for patients in GI surgery, including outpatient clinics, inpatient units, gastrointestinal endoscopy centers, and adjustments in perioperative care. Our experiences and recommendations are worth sharing and may help to establish specific infection-control and outcome measures.

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on patients with advanced gastric cancer: A multicenter randomized clinical trial

Objectives

Exploring the efficacy and safety of perioperative chemotherapy on patients with AGC at different clinical and pathological stages.

Methods

A phase III randomized, multicenter, trial comparing adjuvant (arm A) or perioperative S‐1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX, arm B), and perioperative capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX, arm C) was initiated in T3/4, node + gastric cancer patients (unclear). Each patient received an 8‐cycle chemotherapy (3 weeks for one cycle). Group arms B and C received two cycles preoperatively, and six cycles postoperatively. Primary endpoints were R0 resection rate and DFS, and secondary endpoints included OS, ORR, DCR, and safety. This study was registered on Clinicaltrials.gov. NCT01516944.

Results

A total of 749 patients were randomly assigned into groups A, B, and C. Group A received 1460 circles chemotherapy and group B received 1177 circles while group C received 1200 circles. R0 resection rates in the three groups were 81.7%, 88.7%, and 83.1%, respectively. The difference between groups A and B was considered to be statistically significant (P = .018), and no significant difference between groups B and C (P = .051). Hazard ratio were compared between groups B and C and DFS showed 0.72 (0.67‐0.77 with 95% CI), P_{non‐inferiority} < .0001, P_log‐rank = .064). The CI top limit actually lower than the estimated value of 1.38, which indicated noninferiority of SOX to XELOX.

Conclusions

Compared with PAC, perioperative chemotherapy showed a significant improvement in R0 resection rates and prognosis in AGC patients with higher safety rates. This study was powered to show superiority of perioperative over adjuvant SOX, and noninferiority of SOX to XELOX. Volume measurement, repeated laparoscopic exploration combined with exfoliative cytology can be used as a supplementary method in the clinical staging and efficacy evaluation of AGC.

CT-based radiomics scores predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival in patients with gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a promising treatment option for potential resectable gastric cancer, but patients' responses vary. We aimed to develop and validate a radiomics score (rad_score) to predict treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and to investigate its efficacy in survival stratification.

METHODS

A total of 106 patients with neoadjuvant chemotherapy before gastrectomy were included (training cohort: n = 74; validation cohort: n = 32). Radiomics features were extracted from the pre-treatment portal venous-phase CT. After feature reduction, a rad_score was established by Randomised Tree algorithm. A rad_clinical_score was constructed by integrating the rad_score with clinical variables, so was a clinical score by clinical variables only. The three scores were validated regarding their discrimination and clinical usefulness. The patients were stratified into two groups according to the score thresholds (updated with post-operative clinical variables), and their survivals were compared.

RESULTS

In the validation cohort, the rad_score demonstrated a good predicting performance in treatment response to the neoadjuvant chemotherapy (AUC [95% CI] =0.82 [0.67, 0.98]), which was better than the clinical score (based on pre-operative clinical variables) without significant difference (0.62 [0.42, 0.83], P = 0.09). The rad_clinical_score could not further improve the performance of the rad_score (0.70 [0.51, 0.88], P = 0.16). Based on the thresholds of these scores, the high-score groups all achieved better survivals than the low-score groups in the whole cohort (all P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The rad_score that we developed was effective in predicting treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and in stratifying patients with gastric cancer into different survival groups. Our proposed strategy is useful for individualised treatment planning.

Optimization of perioperative approaches for advanced and late stages of gastric cancer: clinical proposal based on literature evidence, personal experience, and ongoing trials and research

BACKGROUND

The high incidence of gastric cancer (GC) and paradoxical high prevalence of advanced stage GC, amounting to around 2/3 at time of diagnosis, have urged doctors and researchers around the world not only to ameliorate the detection rate of GC at early stages but also to optimize the clinical management of GC at advanced stages.

CONTENT

We hereby recommend a more goal-oriented multimodality approach with objectives to increase survival rate and improve survival status. Based on precision and accurate clinical staging at diagnosis, we suggest that advanced stage GC (AGC) patients should be channeled into different treatment plans according to their disease status where they can be subjected to comprehensive measures involving chemo, radio, immunological, or target therapies depending on the pathophysiological behavior of their tumor. Patients assessed as potentially resectable cT4N + M0 can undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intent of tumor downsizing and downgrading followed by surgery with intraoperative hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to decrease the incidence of peritoneal dissemination due to surgical trauma and adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation in cases of bulky nodal metastasis. In cases with distal metastasis, conversion therapy is recommended with the possibility of surgery of curative intent in case of favorable response. The options of alternate treatment options such as trans-catheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) for limited liver lesions or neoadjuvant intraperitoneal plus systemic chemotherapy (NIPS) for peritoneal carcinomatosis have to be negotiated. With surgery as the cornerstone for cancer treatment, there is acknowledgment of the significance of perioperative comprehensive approaches but there has not been some consensus guiding clinical application. Henceforth, in this review, based on past literature, current guidelines and ongoing clinical trials, we have shared a proposal of the current treatment modalities in practice for the advanced stages of gastric cancer.

CONCLUSION

Even though surgery is the golden standard of radical cancer treatment, clinical reality shows that without proper perioperative management, patients undergoing radical resections manifest high rates of recurrence and metastasis. Hence, in this review, we have outlined a clinical agenda to optimize the management of advanced stage GC with objective to improve survival outcome and quality of life of patients.

Long-term outcomes of preoperative docetaxel with cisplatin plus S-1 therapy for gastric cancer with extensive nodal metastasis (JCOG1002)

BACKGROUND

Preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin plus S-1 (CS) followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus para-aortic lymph node (PAN) dissection is regarded as a standard treatment in Japan for advanced gastric cancer with bulky lymph node (BN) and/or PAN metastasis. In the JCOG1002, we added docetaxel to CS (DCS) to further improve long-term outcomes. However, the primary endpoint, clinical response rate (RR), did not reach the expected level (Ito et al. in Gastric Cancer 20:322-31, 2017). Herein, we report our long-term survival results.

METHODS

Patients with BN and/or PAN metastasis received 2 or 3 cycles of DCS therapy (docetaxel at 40 mg/m² and cisplatin at 60 mg/m² on day 1 and S-1 at 80 mg/m² per day for 2 weeks, followed by a 2-week rest) followed by gastrectomy with D2 plus PAN dissection and postoperative S-1 for 1 year.

RESULTS

Between July 2011 and May 2013, 53 patients were enrolled. Clinically, 17.0% had both PAN and BN metastasis, and the rest had either PAN (26.4%) or BN (56.6%) metastasis. Among all eligible patients, the 5-year overall survival was 54.9% (95% confidence interval 40.3-67.3%) at the last follow-up in May 2018. Among 44 eligible patients with R0 resection, the 5-year relapse-free survival was 47.7% (95% confidence interval 32.5-61.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adding docetaxel to CS in preoperative chemotherapy for extensive nodal metastasis improved neither short-term outcomes nor long-term survival. Preoperative chemotherapy with CS followed by D2 + PAN dissection and postoperative S-1 remains the standard of care for patients with extensive nodal metastasis.

SIRT1 inhibits chemoresistance and cancer stemness of gastric cancer by initiating an AMPK/FOXO3 positive feedback loop

Chemotherapy is the standard care for patients with gastric cancer (GC); however, resistance to existing drugs has limited its success. The persistence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is considered to be responsible for treatment failure. In this study, we demonstrated that SIRT1 expression was significantly downregulated in GC tissues, and that a low SIRT1 expression level indicated a poor prognosis in GC patients. We observed a suppressive role of SIRT1 in chemoresistance of GC both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, we found that SIRT1 eliminated CSC properties of GC cells. Mechanistically, SIRT1 exerted inhibitory activities on chemoresistance and CSC properties through FOXO3 and AMPK. Furthermore, a synergistic effect was revealed between FOXO3 and AMPK. AMPK promoted nuclear translocation of FOXO3 and enhanced its transcriptional activities. In addition, FOXO3 increased the expression level and activation of AMPKα by directly binding to its promoter and activating the transcription of AMPKα. Similar to SIRT1, low expression levels of p-AMPKα and FOXO3a are also related to the poor prognosis of GC patients. Moreover, we revealed a correlation between the expression levels of SIRT1, p-AMPKα, and FOXO3a. These findings indicated the importance of the SIRT1-AMPK/FOXO3 pathway in reversing chemoresistance and CSC properties of GC. Thus, exploring efficient strategies to activate the SIRT1-AMPK/FOXO3 pathway may lead to improving the survival of GC patients.

SIRT1 inhibits chemoresistance and cancer stemness of gastric cancer by initiating an AMPK/FOXO3 positive feedback loop

Chemotherapy is the standard care for patients with gastric cancer (GC); however, resistance to existing drugs has limited its success. The persistence of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is considered to be responsible for treatment failure. In this study, we demonstrated that SIRT1 expression was significantly downregulated in GC tissues, and that a low SIRT1 expression level indicated a poor prognosis in GC patients. We observed a suppressive role of SIRT1 in chemoresistance of GC both in vitro and in vivo. In addition, we found that SIRT1 eliminated CSC properties of GC cells. Mechanistically, SIRT1 exerted inhibitory activities on chemoresistance and CSC properties through FOXO3 and AMPK. Furthermore, a synergistic effect was revealed between FOXO3 and AMPK. AMPK promoted nuclear translocation of FOXO3 and enhanced its transcriptional activities. In addition, FOXO3 increased the expression level and activation of AMPKα by directly binding to its promoter and activating the transcription of AMPKα. Similar to SIRT1, low expression levels of p-AMPKα and FOXO3a are also related to the poor prognosis of GC patients. Moreover, we revealed a correlation between the expression levels of SIRT1, p-AMPKα, and FOXO3a. These findings indicated the importance of the SIRT1-AMPK/FOXO3 pathway in reversing chemoresistance and CSC properties of GC. Thus, exploring efficient strategies to activate the SIRT1-AMPK/FOXO3 pathway may lead to improving the survival of GC patients.

Maintenance chemotherapy using S-1 following definitive chemoradiotherapy in patients with N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with N3 stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) are at high risk for treatment failure. This study aims to assess the efficacy of maintenance chemotherapy (MC) using S-1 (MC-S1), a novel oral fluoropyrimidine agent, following definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with N3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma (N3-NPC).

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted for all N3-NPC treated with CRT with MC (CRT-MC) or without MC (CRT-non-MC) during 2014-2016. Toxicities with MC were recorded. Overall survival (OS), locoregional failure-free survival (LFFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) were compared between CRT-MC vs. CRT-non-MC cohorts.

RESULTS

A total of 130 N3 patients were identified, of whom 21 (16.2%) were treated with CRT-MC, and 109 (83.8%) with CRT-non-MC. Patient characteristics did not significantly differ between the CRT-MC and CRT-non-MC groups, with the exception of the number of cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Following IMRT 69 patients achieved a complete response (CR) (CRT-MC: 10; CRT-non-MC: 59), 61 had a partial response (PR) (11 vs. 50), and none maintained stable disease (SD) or developed progression of disease (PD). After a median follow-up of 41 months for surviving patients, a significant differences in OS (76.3% vs. 95.2%, p = 0.046) and DMFS (70.3% vs. 90.5%, p = 0.043) but not LFFS (84.9% vs. 100%, p = 0.091) at 3 years were observed between the CRT-non-MC and CRT-MC groups. Skin hyperpigmentation, leucopenia, fatigue, neutropenia, anorexia and nausea were the common but not severe (grade 1-2) toxicities of MC.

CONCLUSIONS

Using MC-S1 in N3-NPC patients following IMRT achieved superior survival to the CRT-non-MC patients. The toxicities of MC-S1 were mild and tolerable. Further clinical trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of MC-S1 in N3-NPC patients.

Pathological response and outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with DOC (docetaxel, oxaliplatin, capecitabine) or EOF (epirubicin, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil) for clinical T3-T4 non-metastatic gastric cancer

PURPOSE

In this prospective observational study, we sought to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel + oxaliplatin + capecitabine (DOC) with epirubicin + oxaliplatin + 5-fluouracil (EOF) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for clinical T3 or T4 non-metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

The DOC NAC consisted of docetaxel 35 mg/m² (days 1-8), oxaliplatin 85 mg/m² (day 1), and capecitabine 750 mg/m² twice daily (days 1-14), every 3 weeks. The EOF NAC consisted of intravenous (IV) epirubicin 50 mg/m2 combined with IV oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and continuous infusion 5-fluouracil 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5, every 3 weeks. After 4 cycles of NAC or upon progression during chemotherapy, patients underwent gastrectomy with standard D2 or D3 lymphadenectomy. Pathological complete response rate per Becker tumor regression grading system was the primary endpoint and the secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (2-yr PFS) and 2-year overall survival (2-yr OS) and tolerability.

RESULTS

Overall, we identified 63 patients with T3-4 non-metastatic GC starting either NAC regimen between January 2010 and December 2017 at our Institution: 34 in the DOC group and 29 in EOF group. Thirty patients (88%) in the DOC group and 22 (76%) in the EOF group completed the 4 planned cycles of NAC. Fifty-seven patients received surgery. Results indicated no statistical significant differences between the two groups, and only a trend for some better data in favour of the DOC group. The R0 resection rate was 90.6% and 88.0% for the DOC and EOF cohorts, respectively. The pathological complete response rate was 6.2% in the DOC group and 4.0% in the EOF group. Becker 1-2 pathological response was found in 46.8% of the DOC cohort and 28.0% of the EOF cohort (p = .14). The 2-yr PFS rate was 54.1% for DOC vs. 41.4% for EOF (p = .14) and the 2-yr OS rate was 80.8% for DOC vs. 58.6% for EOF (p = .05). Neutropenia was the most common grade ≥3 toxicity and occurred in 8 (23.5%) patients of the DOC group and 10 (34.4%) patients of the EOF group (p = .33).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings seem to confirm the feasibility of NAC for clinically T3 and T4 non-metastatic GC and, despite no statistical significant difference was documented, suggest a trend for better activity and tolerability for the docetaxel-based regimen (DOC) compared to the epirubicin-based combination (EOF).

Post-therapy pathologic tumor volume predicts survival in gastric cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy and gastrectomy

BACKGROUND

To demonstrate that post-therapy pathological tumor volume (ypTV) should be considered as an independent prognostic factor in advanced gastric cancer (GC) patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and gastrectomy.

METHODS

A total of 253 GC patients who received gastrectomy between January 2010 and December 2016 in our hospital were enrolled in this study. Clinicopathologic factors were evaluated using univariable and multivariable analysis. ypTV was calculated using π* (tumor diameter/2)² *tumor invasion depth (cm³).

RESULTS

Cut-point survival analysis demonstrated that the appropriate cut-offs for ypTV were 3, 6, 10, and 19 (cm³). Patients with tumor volumes of 0-3.0, 3.1-6.0, 6.1-10.0, 10.1-19.0, ≥19.1 cm³ were defined as ypTV1, 2, 3, 4a and 4b. Using multivariable analysis, the tumor volume (ypTV stage, P < 0.05), ypN stage (P < 0.05), response to NAC (P < 0.05), vascular invasion (P < 0.05) and ypTvNM staging (P < 0.05) were independent prognostic factors. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the 8th AJCC/UICC ypTNM staging was not a significant predictor for survival (P > 0.05); however, our newly defined ypTvNM staging was a significant predictor for survival (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

ypTV should be considered as an independent prognostic factor for GC patients after NAC. ypTvNM staging should be recommended to improve the accuracy of prognostic prediction for GC patients who received NAC plus gastrectomy.

Characteristics and Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients with Pathologic Complete Response to Preoperative Therapy

BACKGROUND

Pathologic complete response of a primary tumor (ypT0) after preoperative therapy is associated with improved overall survival (OS). However, whether other variables are associated with outcome for gastric cancer patients with ypT0 status is unknown.

METHODS

This study reviewed an institutional database of patients who underwent resection of gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma after preoperative therapy and identified patients with ypT0 status. Cox regression models were used to identify clinicopathologic predictors of OS.

RESULTS

Of 77 patients with ypT0 status identified in this study, 36 (47%) had gastroesophageal junction tumors. At presentation, 62 patients (81%) had clinical T3 disease, and 7 (9%) had clinical T4 disease. The clinical nodal status was positive (cN+) for 45 patients (58%). Preoperative chemoradiation was administered to 75 patients (97%). The median follow-up duration was 3.54 years. The median OS was 10 years, and the 5-year OS rate was 61%. Univariable analysis identified age of 65 years or older at the time of diagnosis, histologic grade, and ypN status as significant predictors of OS. Multivariable analysis confirmed age of 65 years or older [hazard ratio (HR), 4.26; p < 0.001] and persistent nodal disease (ypN+ status; HR, 5.12; p < 0.001) to be independently associated with OS. Clinical stage was not associated with survival. In the subset of ypT0N0 patients, no clinicopathologic feature was predictive of survival.

CONCLUSION

For gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma patients with ypT0 status after preoperative therapy, ypN+ status substantially reduced survival. Pretreatment clinical stage had no impact on OS for patients with a pathologic complete response.

COMplot, A Graphical Presentation of Complication Profiles and Adverse Effects for the Curative Treatment of Gastric Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: For the curative treatment of gastric cancer, several neoadjuvant, and adjuvant treatment-regimens are available which have shown to improve overall survival. No overview is available regarding toxicity and surgery related outcomes. Our aim was to construct a novel graphical method concerning adverse events (AEs) associated with multimodality treatment and perform a meta-analysis to compare different clinically relevant cytotoxic regimens with each other.

Methods: The PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and ASCO/ESMO databases were searched up to May 2019 for randomized controlled trials investigating curative treatment regimens for gastric cancer. To construct single and bidirectional bar-charts (COMplots), grade 1–2 and grade 3–5 AEs were extracted per cytotoxic regimen. For surgery-related outcomes a pre-specified set of complications was used. Thereafter, treatment-arms comparing the same regimens were combined in a single-arm random-effects meta-analysis and pooled-proportions were calculated with 95% confidence-intervals. Comparative meta-analyses were performed based on clinical relevance and compound similarity.

Results: In total 16 RCTs (n = 4,526 patients) were included investigating pre-operative-therapy and 39 RCTs investigating adjuvant-therapy (n = 13,732 patients). Pre-operative COMplots were created for among others; 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin-oxaliplatin-docetaxel (FLOT), epirubicin-cisplatin-fluoropyrimidine (ECF), cisplatin-fluoropyrimidine (CF), and oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine (FOx). Pre-operative FLOT showed a minor increase in grade 1–2 and grade 3–4 AEs compared to pre-operative ECF, CF, and FOx. A pooled analysis of patients who had received pre-operative therapy compared to patients who underwent direct surgery did not reveal any significant difference in surgery related morbidity/mortality. When we compared three commonly used adjuvant regimens; S-1 had the lowest amount of grade 3–4 AEs compared to capecitabine with oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and 5-FU with radiotherapy (5-FU+RT).

Conclusion: COMplot provides a novel tool to visualize and compare treatment related AEs for gastric cancer. Based on our comparisons, pre-operative FLOT had a manageable toxicity profile compared to other pre-operative doublet or triplet regimens. We found no evidence indicating surgical outcomes might be hampered by pre-operative therapy. Adjuvant S-1 had a more favorable toxicity profile compared to CAPOX and 5-FU+RT.

Application of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging information technology in adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

In order to study the application of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging information technology in breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy, female patients diagnosed with breast cancer in The People's Hospital of Shanxi Province are selected as research objects. Dynamic enhanced magnetic resonance imaging scans are performed to compare pathological changes by hematoxylin and eosin staining. The dynamic NMR morphological changes are used to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Semi-quantitative analysis is used to compare the TIC types of lesions, and the changes in quantitative analysis parameters are used to evaluate the efficacy. The results show that in the dynamic magnetic resonance imaging technique, the effective group (RECIST standard is CR and PR) has statistically significant changes in the quantitative analysis parameters K^trans and K_ep before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. K^trans and K_ep are used in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The assessment is consistent with the morphological RECIST criteria assessment and can be used for qualitative diagnosis of breast tumors.

Recent Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Review

Gastric cancer is a common malignancy with a poor prognosis, and surgical treatment remains the first-line approach to treatment to provide a cure. Despite advances in surgical techniques, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and neoadjuvant therapy, gastric cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Although the 5-year survival rate of early gastric cancer can reach >90%, due to the low early diagnosis rate, most patients present with advanced-stage gastric cancer. Therefore, there has been increasing interest in improving surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer. Lymph node dissection is an important part of the surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer due to the high incidence of lymph node metastasis. Although prospective studies have confirmed the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery for early gastric cancer, the relevant treatment models of advanced gastric cancer still need to be further explored and validated. This review aims to provide an update on the recent advances in the surgical treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Recent updates in perioperative chemotherapy and recurrence pattern of gastric cancer

Gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection has become the global standard procedure for locally advanced gastric cancer to maximally reduce locoregional recurrence. In East Asia, based on the evidence of the ACTS‐GC and the CLASSIC trials, postadjuvant chemotherapy with S‐1 monotherapy or capecitabine and oxaliplatin after curative D2 gastrectomy is the current standard strategy. However, approximately 20% to 30% of patients still develop distant recurrence even after these postadjuvant chemotherapies, especially in those with pathological stage III disease. This review summarizes recent (2008‐2018) evidence on the benefits of adjuvant therapy for locally advanced gastric cancer. JACRO GC‐07, a Phase III trial, recently showed a superior 3‐year recurrence‐free survival of the S‐1 plus docetaxel regimen in comparison to S‐1 monotherapy for patients with pathological stage III gastric cancer after curative D2 gastrectomy. With regard to recent new evidence on neoadjuvant strategy, JCOG0501, a Phase III trial, did not show any superiority in 3‐year overall survival (OS) of additional neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S‐1/cisplatin over postadjuvant S‐1 monotherapy in scirrhous type gastric cancer. Further clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy are ongoing to improve the poor prognosis for gastric cancer with extensive lymph node metastases. These trials could lead to new evidence for improved treatment of gastric cancer in the near future.

Circular RNAs as Biomarkers for Cancer

As a type of novel noncoding RNAs, circular RNAs (circRNAs) have attracted great interest due to its different characteristics from linear RNAs. They are abundantly and stably present in the transcriptome of eukaryotic cells, with development stage specificity and high conservatism. Because circRNAs are not easily degraded by exonuclease RNase R, they can exist more stably in body fluids than linear RNAs. Based on these unique conditions, circRNAs have great potential value as clinical diagnostic and prognostic markers. As the research deepens, more and more evidences suggest that circRNAs may be closely associated with many diseases, especially cancer. Numerous studies have demonstrated the abnormal expression of circRNAs in cancer, and they can regulate the occurrence and progression of cancer by targeting key genes. Abundant circRNAs in tissues and cells can be released into saliva and blood. It is undeniable that circRNAs are a class of promising future biomarkers for cancer diagnosis and prognosis. Here we summarize the researches on circRNAs and cancer over the past few years. We expect this summary to be a stepping stone to further exploration of possible circRNAs as cancer biomarkers.

Perioperative Therapy of Oesophagogastric Adenocarcinoma: Mainstay and Future Directions

Perioperative chemotherapy improves overall survival in patients with oesophagogastric adenocarcinoma (OAC) and locoregional disease. The mainstay of perioperative chemotherapy in these patients is a platinum/fluoropyrimidine combination. The phase III FLOT4 trial has shown that the FLOT triplet regimen (oxaliplatin, infusional 5-FU, and docetaxel) improves the outcome of patients with OAC and locoregional disease as compared to the ECF triplet (epirubicin, cisplatin, and infusional 5-FU). Targeted therapies have currently no role in the perioperative setting for the treatment of patients with OAC. For patients with oligometastatic disease, upfront gastrectomy followed by chemotherapy did not show any survival benefit compared with chemotherapy alone and thus should be discouraged. Whether surgery should be offered to patients with metastatic OAC achieving a systemic control after upfront chemotherapy is under scrutiny in the phase III FLOT5/Renaissance trial. After neoadjuvant treatment, lymph node status but not pathologic tumor response is an independent factor in the prediction of overall survival. Growing evidence suggests that perioperative chemotherapy may be associated with an increased mortality risk in patients with microsatellite instable (MSI)/mismatch repair-deficient (MMRD) adenocarcinoma, thus validating poor responsiveness to chemotherapy in MSI patients with locoregional disease.