1
|
D'Amico-Willman KM, Niederhuth CE, Sovic MG, Anderson ES, Gradziel TM, Fresnedo-Ramírez J. Hypermethylation and small RNA expression are associated with increased age in almond (Prunus dulcis [Mill.] D.A. Webb) accessions. PLANT SCIENCE : AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PLANT BIOLOGY 2024; 338:111918. [PMID: 37956826 DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2023.111918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
The focus of this study is to profile changes in DNA methylation and small RNA expression occurring with increased age in almond breeding germplasm to identify possible biomarkers of age that can be used to assess the potential of individuals to develop aging-related disorders. To profile DNA methylation in almond germplasm, 70 methylomes were generated from almond individuals representing three age cohorts (11, 7, and 2 years old) using an enzymatic methyl-seq approach followed by analysis to call differentially methylated regions (DMRs) within these cohorts. Small RNA (sRNA) expression was profiled in three breeding selections, each from two age cohorts (1 and 6 years old), using sRNA-Seq followed by differential expression analysis. Weighted chromosome-level methylation analysis reveals hypermethylation in 11-year-old almond breeding selections when compared to 2-year-old selections in the CG and CHH contexts. Seventeen consensus DMRs were identified in all age contrasts. sRNA expression differed significantly between the two age cohorts tested, with significantly decreased expression in sRNAs in the 6-year-old selections compared to the 1-year-old. Almond shows a pattern of hypermethylation and decreased sRNA expression with increased age. Identified DMRs and differentially expressed sRNAs could function as putative biomarkers of age following validation in additional age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chad E Niederhuth
- Department of Plant Biology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA
| | - Michael G Sovic
- Center for Applied Plant Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Elizabeth S Anderson
- Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA
| | - Thomas M Gradziel
- Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA
| | - Jonathan Fresnedo-Ramírez
- Translational Plant Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; Center for Applied Plant Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; Department of Horticulture and Crop Science, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, The Ohio State University, Wooster, OH 44691, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Qiu T, Aravena MC, Andrus R, Ascoli D, Bergeron Y, Berretti R, Bogdziewicz M, Boivin T, Bonal R, Caignard T, Calama R, Julio Camarero J, Clark CJ, Courbaud B, Delzon S, Donoso Calderon S, Farfan-Rios W, Gehring CA, Gilbert GS, Greenberg CH, Guo Q, Hille Ris Lambers J, Hoshizaki K, Ibanez I, Journé V, Kilner CL, Kobe RK, Koenig WD, Kunstler G, LaMontagne JM, Ledwon M, Lutz JA, Motta R, Myers JA, Nagel TA, Nuñez CL, Pearse IS, Piechnik Ł, Poulsen JR, Poulton-Kamakura R, Redmond MD, Reid CD, Rodman KC, Scher CL, Schmidt Van Marle H, Seget B, Sharma S, Silman M, Swenson JJ, Swift M, Uriarte M, Vacchiano G, Veblen TT, Whipple AV, Whitham TG, Wion AP, Wright SJ, Zhu K, Zimmerman JK, Żywiec M, Clark JS. Is there tree senescence? The fecundity evidence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2106130118. [PMID: 34400503 PMCID: PMC8403963 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2106130118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite its importance for forest regeneration, food webs, and human economies, changes in tree fecundity with tree size and age remain largely unknown. The allometric increase with tree diameter assumed in ecological models would substantially overestimate seed contributions from large trees if fecundity eventually declines with size. Current estimates are dominated by overrepresentation of small trees in regression models. We combined global fecundity data, including a substantial representation of large trees. We compared size-fecundity relationships against traditional allometric scaling with diameter and two models based on crown architecture. All allometric models fail to describe the declining rate of increase in fecundity with diameter found for 80% of 597 species in our analysis. The strong evidence of declining fecundity, beyond what can be explained by crown architectural change, is consistent with physiological decline. A downward revision of projected fecundity of large trees can improve the next generation of forest dynamic models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Qiu
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Marie-Claire Aravena
- Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza (FCFCN), La Pintana, 8820808 Santiago, Chile
| | - Robert Andrus
- Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309
| | - Davide Ascoli
- Department of Agriculture, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy
| | - Yves Bergeron
- Forest Research Institute, University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC J9X 5E4, Canada
- Department of Biological Sciences, University of Quebec in Abitibi-Temiscamingue, Rouyn-Noranda, QC H2L 2C4, Canada
| | - Roberta Berretti
- Department of Agriculture, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy
| | - Michal Bogdziewicz
- Department of Systematic Zoology, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, 61-614 Poznan, Poland
| | - Thomas Boivin
- l'Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Ecologie des Forets Mediterranennes, 84000 Avignon, France
| | - Raul Bonal
- Department of Biodiversity, Ecology and Evolution, Complutense University of Madrid, 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - Thomas Caignard
- Université Bordeaux, l'Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Biodiversity, Genes, and Communities (BIOGECO), 33615 Pessac, France
| | - Rafael Calama
- Centro de Investigación Forestal - Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA-CIFOR), 28040 Madrid, Spain
| | - J Julio Camarero
- Instituto Pirenaico de Ecología, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (IPE-CSIC), 50059 Zaragoza, Spain
| | - Connie J Clark
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Benoit Courbaud
- Université Grenoble Alpes, l'Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Laboratoire EcoSystémes et Sociétés En Montagne (LESSEM), 38402 St.-Martin-d'Heres, France
| | - Sylvain Delzon
- Université Bordeaux, l'Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Biodiversity, Genes, and Communities (BIOGECO), 33615 Pessac, France
| | - Sergio Donoso Calderon
- Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza (FCFCN), La Pintana, 8820808 Santiago, Chile
| | - William Farfan-Rios
- Center for Conservation and Sustainable Development, Missouri Botanical Garden, Washington University in Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110
| | - Catherine A Gehring
- Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011
| | - Gregory S Gilbert
- Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
| | - Cathryn H Greenberg
- Bent Creek Experimental Forest, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Asheville, NC 28801
| | - Qinfeng Guo
- Eastern Forest Environmental Threat Assessment Center, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
| | - Janneke Hille Ris Lambers
- Department of Environmental Systems Science, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zurich, 8092 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kazuhiko Hoshizaki
- Department of Biological Environment, Akita Prefectural University, Akita 010-0195, Japan
| | - Ines Ibanez
- School for Environment and Sustainability, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Valentin Journé
- Université Grenoble Alpes, l'Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Laboratoire EcoSystémes et Sociétés En Montagne (LESSEM), 38402 St.-Martin-d'Heres, France
| | | | - Richard K Kobe
- Department of Plant Biology, Program in Ecology, Evolutionary Biology, and Behavior, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
- Department of Forestry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824
| | - Walter D Koenig
- Hastings Reservation, University of California Berkeley, Carmel Valley, CA 93924
| | - Georges Kunstler
- Université Grenoble Alpes, l'Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Laboratoire EcoSystémes et Sociétés En Montagne (LESSEM), 38402 St.-Martin-d'Heres, France
| | | | - Mateusz Ledwon
- Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-016 Krakow, Poland
| | - James A Lutz
- Department of Wildland Resources, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322
- Ecology Center, Utah State University, Logan, UT 84322
| | - Renzo Motta
- Department of Agriculture, Forest and Food Sciences, University of Torino, 10095 Grugliasco, TO, Italy
| | - Jonathan A Myers
- Department of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130
| | - Thomas A Nagel
- Department of Forestry and Renewable Forest Resources, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Chase L Nuñez
- Department for the Ecology of Animal Societies, Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior, 78457 Konstanz, Germany
| | - Ian S Pearse
- US Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, Fort Collins, CO 80526
| | - Łukasz Piechnik
- W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-512 Krakow, Poland
| | - John R Poulsen
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | | | - Miranda D Redmond
- Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
| | - Chantal D Reid
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Kyle C Rodman
- Department of Forest and Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706
| | - C Lane Scher
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Harald Schmidt Van Marle
- Universidad de Chile, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza (FCFCN), La Pintana, 8820808 Santiago, Chile
| | - Barbara Seget
- W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-512 Krakow, Poland
| | - Shubhi Sharma
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Miles Silman
- Department of Biology, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC 27106
| | | | - Margaret Swift
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708
| | - Maria Uriarte
- Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
| | - Giorgio Vacchiano
- Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences - Production, Territory, Agroenergy (DISAA), University of Milan, 20133 Milano, Italy
| | - Thomas T Veblen
- Department of Geography, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309
| | - Amy V Whipple
- Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011
| | - Thomas G Whitham
- Department of Biological Sciences, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011
| | - Andreas P Wion
- Department of Forest and Rangeland Stewardship, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523
| | - S Joseph Wright
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Apartado 0843-03092, Balboa, Republic of Panama
| | - Kai Zhu
- Department of Environmental Studies, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 95064
| | - Jess K Zimmerman
- Department of Environmental Sciences, University of Puerto Rico, Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico, United States 00936
| | - Magdalena Żywiec
- W. Szafer Institute of Botany, Polish Academy of Sciences, 31-512 Krakow, Poland
| | - James S Clark
- Nicholas School of the Environment, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708;
- Université Grenoble Alpes, l'Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (INRAE), Laboratoire EcoSystémes et Sociétés En Montagne (LESSEM), 38402 St.-Martin-d'Heres, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tränkner C, Pfeiffer N, Kirchhoff M, Kopisch-Obuch FJ, van Dijk H, Schilhabel M, Hasler M, Emrani N. Deciphering the complex nature of bolting time regulation in Beta vulgaris. TAG. THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS. THEORETISCHE UND ANGEWANDTE GENETIK 2017; 130:1649-1667. [PMID: 28478574 DOI: 10.1007/s00122-017-2916-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Only few genetic loci are sufficient to increase the variation of bolting time in Beta vulgaris dramatically, regarding vernalization requirement, seasonal bolting time and reproduction type. Beta species show a wide variation of bolting time regarding the year of first reproduction, seasonal bolting time and the number of reproduction cycles. To elucidate the genetics of bolting time control, we used three F3 mapping populations that were produced by crossing a semelparous, annual sugar beet with iteroparous, vernalization-requiring wild beet genotypes. The semelparous plants died after reproduction, whereas iteroparous plants reproduced at least twice. All populations segregated for vernalization requirement, seasonal bolting time and the number of reproduction cycles. We found that vernalization requirement co-segregated with the bolting locus B on chromosome 2 and was inherited independently from semel- or iteroparous reproduction. Furthermore, we found that seasonal bolting time is a highly heritable trait (h 2 > 0.84), which is primarily controlled by two major QTL located on chromosome 4 and 9. Late bolting alleles of both loci act in a partially recessive manner and were identified in both iteroparous pollinators. We observed an additive interaction of both loci for bolting delay. The QTL region on chromosome 4 encompasses the floral promoter gene BvFT2, whereas the QTL on chromosome 9 co-localizes with the BR 1 locus, which controls post-winter bolting resistance. Our findings are applicable for marker-assisted sugar beet breeding regarding early bolting to accelerate generation cycles and late bolting to develop bolting-resistant spring and winter beets. Unexpectedly, one population segregated also for dwarf growth that was found to be controlled by a single locus on chromosome 9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conny Tränkner
- Plant Breeding Institute, University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany.
- Leibniz Institute of Vegetable and Ornamental Crops, Kühnhäuser Straße 101, 99090, Erfurt, Germany.
| | - Nina Pfeiffer
- Plant Breeding Institute, University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany
- KWS LOCHOW GMBH, Zuchtstation Wetze, 37154, Northeim, Germany
| | - Martin Kirchhoff
- Plant Breeding Institute, University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany
- Nordsaat Saatzucht GmbH, Böhnshauser Straße 1, 38895, Langenstein, Germany
| | - Friedrich J Kopisch-Obuch
- Plant Breeding Institute, University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany
- KWS SAAT SE, Grimsehlstraße 31, 37555, Einbeck, Germany
| | - Henk van Dijk
- Universite Lille, CNRS, UMR 8198 - Evo-Eco-Paleo, 59000, Lille, France
| | - Markus Schilhabel
- Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology, University of Kiel, Schittenhelmstr. 12, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| | - Mario Hasler
- Lehrfach Variationsstatistik, University of Kiel, Hermann-Rodewald-Straße 9, 24098, Kiel, Germany
| | - Nazgol Emrani
- Plant Breeding Institute, University of Kiel, Am Botanischen Garten 1-9, 24118, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Martínková J, Šmilauer P, Mihulka S, Latzel V, Klimešová J. The effect of injury on whole-plant senescence: an experiment with two root-sprouting Barbarea species. ANNALS OF BOTANY 2016; 117:667-79. [PMID: 26975314 PMCID: PMC4817502 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcw010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2015] [Revised: 11/05/2015] [Accepted: 12/13/2015] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Senescence is the process of losing fitness when growing old, and is shaped by the trade-off between maintenance and reproduction that makes reproduction more unsure and maintenance more costly with age. In repeatedly reproducing plants, reductions in growth and fertility are signs of senescence. Disturbance, however, provides an opportunity to reset the ageing clock and consequently potentially ameliorate senescence. METHODS To test the effects of disturbance on traits closely related to fitness and thus to senescence, a long-term garden experiment was established with two short-lived perennial congeners,Barbarea vulgaris and Barbarea stricta, that differ in their ability to resprout after injury. In the experiment, five damage treatments were applied to plants in four different phenophases. KEY RESULTS It was found that damage to the plant body significantly prolonged life span in B. vulgaris but decreased whole-life seed production in both species. High concentration of seed production in one growing season characterized short life spans. Both more severe damage and a more advanced phenological phase at the time of damage caused reproduction to be spread over more than one growing season and equalized per-season seed production. In terms of seed quality, average weight of a single seed decreased and seed germination rate increased with age regardless of damage. CONCLUSIONS Although disturbance is able to reset the ageing clock of plants, it is so harmful to plant fitness that resprouting serves, at best, only to alleviate slightly the signs of senescence. Thus, in terms of whole-life seed production, injured plants were not more successful than uninjured ones in the two studied species. Indeed, in these species, injury only slightly postponed or decelerated senescence and did not cause effective rejuvenation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Martínková
- Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82 Třeboň, Czech Republic,
| | - Petr Šmilauer
- University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and
| | - Stanislav Mihulka
- University of South Bohemia, Faculty of Science, Branišovská 1760, 370 05 České Budějovice, Czech Republic and
| | - Vít Latzel
- Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Zámek 1, 252 43 Průhonice, Czech Republic
| | - Jitka Klimešová
- Institute of Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Dukelská 135, 379 82 Třeboň, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Salguero-Gómez R, Shefferson RP, Hutchings MJ. Plants do not count… or do they? New perspectives on the universality of senescence. THE JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY 2013; 101:545-554. [PMID: 23853389 PMCID: PMC3708120 DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2013] [Accepted: 03/01/2013] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
1. Senescence, the physiological decline that results in decreasing survival and/or reproduction with age, remains one of the most perplexing topics in biology. Most theories explaining the evolution of senescence (i.e. antagonistic pleiotropy, accumulation of mutations, disposable soma) were developed decades ago. Even though these theories have implicitly focused on unitary animals, they have also been used as the foundation from which the universality of senescence across the tree of life is assumed. 2. Surprisingly, little is known about the general patterns, causes and consequences of whole-individual senescence in the plant kingdom. There are important differences between plants and most animals, including modular architecture, the absence of early determination of cell lines between the soma and gametes, and cellular division that does not always shorten telomere length. These characteristics violate the basic assumptions of the classical theories of senescence and therefore call the generality of senescence theories into question. 3. This Special Feature contributes to the field of whole-individual plant senescence with five research articles addressing topics ranging from physiology to demographic modelling and comparative analyses. These articles critically examine the basic assumptions of senescence theories such as age-specific gene action, the evolution of senescence regardless of the organism's architecture and environmental filtering, and the role of abiotic agents on mortality trajectories. 4.Synthesis. Understanding the conditions under which senescence has evolved is of general importance across biology, ecology, evolution, conservation biology, medicine, gerontology, law and social sciences. The question 'why is senescence universal or why is it not?' naturally calls for an evolutionary perspective. Senescence is a puzzling phenomenon, and new insights will be gained by uniting methods, theories and observations from formal demography, animal demography and plant population ecology. Plants are more amenable than animals to experiments investigating senescence, and there is a wealth of published plant demographic data that enable interpretation of experimental results in the context of their full life cycles. It is time to make plants count in the field of senescence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Salguero-Gómez
- Evolutionary Biodemography Laboratory, Max Planck Institute for Demographic ResearchKonrad-Zuße straße 1, 18057, Rostock, Germany
- Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation Science, University of QueenslandGoddard Building #8, St Lucia, Qld, 4072, Australia
| | - Richard P Shefferson
- Odum School of Ecology, University of Georgia140 East Green Street, Athens, GA, 30601, USA
| | - Michael J Hutchings
- School of Life Sciences, University of SussexFalmer, Brighton, Sussex, BN1 9QG, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wagmann K, Hautekèete NC, Piquot Y, Meunier C, Schmitt SE, Van Dijk H. Seed dormancy distribution: explanatory ecological factors. ANNALS OF BOTANY 2012; 110:1205-19. [PMID: 22952378 PMCID: PMC3478053 DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcs194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2012] [Accepted: 07/13/2012] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Knowledge of those traits that vary with latitude should be helpful in predicting how they may evolve locally under climate change. In the sea beet Beta vulgaris ssp. maritima, seed dormancy largely controls the timing of germination, is highly heritable and varies geographically; it is therefore thought to be selected by climate. The aim here was to characterize the variation in seed dormancy among sea beet populations across the French distribution area, as well as the ecological factors in situ that are correlated with and that could therefore select for seed dormancy. The relative importance of genetic inheritance vs. non-genetic variation is also evaluated. METHODS The proportions of dormant seeds from 85 natural populations encompassing different climates over the whole French distribution area were measured under controlled conditions. Germination phenology was observed in a common garden experiment. Dormancy variation of seeds collected in situ was compared with that of seeds collected on plants grown in the greenhouse. KEY RESULTS The proportions of dormant seeds in the greenhouse were highly variable, covering almost the entire range from 0 to 1, and followed a geographical pattern from lower dormancy at high latitudes to high dormancy at low latitudes. The distribution of dormancy was positively correlated with yearly temperatures, especially summer temperatures. Minimum temperatures in winter did not significantly explain the trait variation. The genetic component of the total variation was significant and is probably completed by an important adjustment to the local conditions brought about by maternal adaptive phenotypic plasticity. CONCLUSIONS Dormancy in sea beet could be interpreted as a way to limit summer germination and spread germination over the first autumn and spring or following autumns. This highly heritable trait has the potential to evolve in the relatively near future because of climate change.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Wagmann
- Laboratoire Génétique et Evolution des Populations Végétales, UMR 8198, CNRS, Université Lille 1, F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq cedex, France
| | - Nina-Coralie Hautekèete
- Laboratoire Génétique et Evolution des Populations Végétales, UMR 8198, CNRS, Université Lille 1, F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq cedex, France
| | - Yves Piquot
- Laboratoire Génétique et Evolution des Populations Végétales, UMR 8198, CNRS, Université Lille 1, F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq cedex, France
| | - Cécile Meunier
- Institut des Sciences de l'Evolution – Montpellier (I.S.E.M.), UMR UMII – CNRS 5554, Université de Montpellier II – CC 065, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 05, France
| | - S. Eric Schmitt
- Laboratoire Génétique et Evolution des Populations Végétales, UMR 8198, CNRS, Université Lille 1, F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq cedex, France
| | - Henk Van Dijk
- Laboratoire Génétique et Evolution des Populations Végétales, UMR 8198, CNRS, Université Lille 1, F-59655 Villeneuve d'Ascq cedex, France
| |
Collapse
|