New lessons from biology for economics and business: a systems approach to non-market environments

Drawing on recent advances in biology, this paper describes a systems approach, 'Systems Public Affairs' (SPA), to integrate non-market strategies in corporate purposes and strategies. Just as the environment of organisms affects and is affected by their development and evolution, so individuals and businesses adjust to and can shape their non-market environment, which we define as 'a historically formed national and social sphere, including laws, regulations, and policies, which supports, maintains and restrains the operation and preservation of markets'. The paper uses cases from South Korea to illustrate this approach. Emergent ideas in biology have great relevance for micro-foundations of business. Traditionally, economic activities are outcomes of individualistic decision-makers, each promoting their distinct objectives within economic markets. In the SPA approach, decision makers in the domains of business, policy and civil society collaborate in shaping non-market environments to align business objectives with public interest. This requires agency to rise to higher levels than that of businesses, policymakers and civil society through collaboration and experimentation in the presence of stochasticity and radical uncertainty. Analogous to the advancement of organism evolution through emergence of nervous systems and learning, so alignment of organizations with their non-market environments accelerates economic and social development.

Biology in the 21st century: Natural selection is cognitive selection

Natural selection has a formal definition as the natural process that results in the survival and reproductive success of individuals or groups best adjusted to their environment, leading to the perpetuation of those genetic qualities best suited to that organism's environmental niche. Within conventional Neo-Darwinism, the largest source of those variations that can be selected is presumed to be secondary to random genetic mutations. As these arise, natural selection sustains adaptive traits in the context of a 'struggle for existence'. Consequently, in the 20th century, natural selection was generally portrayed as the primary evolutionary driver. The 21st century offers a comprehensive alternative to Neo-Darwinian dogma within Cognition-Based Evolution. The substantial differences between these respective evolutionary frameworks have been most recently articulated in a revision of Crick's Central Dogma, a former centerpiece of Neo-Darwinism. The argument is now advanced that the concept of natural selection should also be comprehensively reappraised. Cognitive selection is presented as a more precise term better suited to 21st century biology. Since cognition began with life's origin, natural selection represents cognitive selection.

Genes, in context Philip Ball University of Chicago Press, 2023. 552 pp

As biologists have long known, the genome is only one piece in the puzzle of life.

Inter-virus relationships in mixed infections and virus-drought relationships in plants: a quantitative review

Inter-virus relationships in mixed infections and virus-drought relationships are important in agriculture and natural vegetation. In this quantitative review, we sampled published factorial experiments to probe for relationships against the null hypothesis of additivity. Our sample captured antagonistic, additive and synergistic inter-virus relationships in double infections. Virus-drought relationships in our sample were additive or antagonistic, reinforcing the notion that viruses have neutral or positive effects on droughted plants, or that drought enhances plant tolerance to viruses. Both inter-virus and virus-drought relationships vary with virus species, host plant to the level of cultivar or accession, timing of infection, plant age and trait and growing conditions. The trait-dependence of these relationships has implications for resource allocation in plants. Owing to lagging theories, more experimental research in these fields is bound to return phenomenological outcomes. Theoretical work can advance in two complementary directions. First, the effective theory models the behaviour of the system without specifying all the underlying causes that lead to system state change. Second, mechanistic theory based on a nuanced view of the plant phenotype that explicitly considers downward causation; the influence of the plant phenotype on inter-virus relations and vice versa; the impact of timing, intensity and duration of drought interacting with viruses to modulate the plant phenotype; both the soil (moisture) and atmospheric (vapour pressure deficit) aspects of drought. Theories should scale in time, from short term to full growing season, and in levels of organisation up to the relevant traits: crop yield in agriculture and fitness in nature.

Biological thermodynamics: Ervin Bauer and the unification of life sciences and physics

Biological systems operate toward the maximization of their self-maintenance and adaptability. This is achieved through the establishment of robust self-maintaining configurations acting as attractors resistant to external and internal perturbations. Ervin Bauer (1890-1938) was the first who formulated this essential thermodynamic constraint in the operation of biological systems, which he defined as the stable non-equilibrium state. The latter appears as the basic attractor relative to which biological organization is established. The stable non-equilibrium state represents a generalized cell energy status corresponding to efficient spatiotemporal organization of the fluxes of matter and energy and constantly reproducing the conditions of self-maintenance of metabolism and controlling the rates of major metabolic fluxes that follow thermodynamically and kinetically defined computational principles. This state is realized in the autopoietic structures having closed loops of causation based on the operation of biological codes. The principle of thermodynamic buffering determines the conditions for optimization of the fluxes of load and consumption in metabolism establishing the conditions of metabolic stable non-equilibrium. In developing and evolving biological systems, the principle of stable non-equilibrium is transformed into the principle of increasing external work, which is grounded in the hyper-restorative non-equilibrium dynamics. Bauer's concept of the stable non-equilibrium state puts thermodynamics into the frames of the internal biological causality governing self-maintenance and development of living systems. It can be defined as a relational theory of biological thermodynamics since the standard to which it refers represents the actual biological function rather than the abstract state of thermodynamic equilibrium.

Turning biology to life: some reflections

This essay presents various reflections on living systems, what they are and how they evolve, prompted by editing Teleonomy in Living Systems (a special issue of the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society). Conclusions include the suggestion that the linked notions of teleonomy and agency represent fundamental properties of matter that become apparent only when organized in the way that we consider to be that of a living system. As such, they are factors that form part of the intrinsic ‘a priori’ of living systems, as they evolve in form through space and time. Biology, the science of life and living systems, needs to be ‘biological’ if it is to be anything at all. Understanding the role of teleonomy (internal, inherent goal-seeking) will always play a necessary part in this endeavour: teleonomy represents one of the fundamental properties of living systems.

Teleonomy as a problem of self-causation

A theoretical framework is provided to explore teleonomy as a problem of self-causation, distinct from upward, downward and reticulate causation. Causality theories in biology are often formulated within hierarchy theories, where causation is conceptualized as running up or down the rungs of a ladder-like hierarchy or, more recently, as moving between multiple hierarchies. Research on the genealogy of cosmologies demonstrates that in addition to hierarchy theories, causality theories also depend upon ideas of time. This paper explores the roots and impact of both time and hierarchy thinking on causal reasoning in the evolutionary sciences. Within evolutionary biology, the Neodarwinian synthesis adheres to a linear notion of time associated with linear hierarchies that portray upward causation. Eco-evo-devo schools recognize the importance of downward causation and consequently receive resistance from the standard view because downward causation is sometimes understood as backward causation, considered impossible by adherents of a linear time model. In contrast, downward causation works with a spatial or presential time notion. Hybridization, lateral gene transfer, infective heredity, symbiosis and symbiogenesis require recognition of reticulate causation occurring in both space and time, or spacetime, between distinct and interacting ontological hierarchies. Teleonomy is distinct from these types of causation because it invokes the problem of self-causation. By asking how the focal level in a hierarchy can persist through time, self-causation raises philosophical concerns on the nature of duration, identity and individuality.

Modern physiology vindicates Darwin's dream

NEW FINDINGS

What is the topic of this review? Revisiting the 2013 article 'Physiology is rocking the foundations of evolutionary biology'. What advances does it highlight? The discovery that the genome is not isolated from the soma and the environment, and that there is no barrier preventing somatic characteristics being transmitted to the germline, means that Darwin's pangenetic ideas become relevant again.

ABSTRACT

Charles Darwin spent the last decade of his life collaborating with physiologists in search of the biological processes of evolution. He viewed physiology as the way forward in answering fundamental questions about inheritance, acquired characteristics, and the mechanisms by which organisms could achieve their ends and survival. He collaborated with 19th century physiologists, notably John Burdon-Sanderson and George Romanes, in his search for the mechanisms of transgenerational inheritance. The discovery that the genome is not isolated from the soma and the environment, and that there is no barrier preventing somatic characteristics being transmitted to the germline, means that Darwin's pangenetic ideas become relevant again. It is time for 21st century physiology to come to the rescue of evolutionary biology. This article outlines research lines by which this could be achieved.