Rectal cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic (ReCaP): multicentre prospective observational study

Postoperative Surgical Site and Secondary Infections in Colorectal Cancer Patients With a History of SARS-CoV-2: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic brought unique challenges to the field of healthcare, particularly to the surgical field. This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) and secondary infection between colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with a history of COVID-19 infection and those without.

METHOD

A cohort of 200 CRC patients, comprising 100 with a documented history of COVID-19 infection and 100 without, were retrospectively analyzed. Independent sample t-tests for continuous variables, Chi-square tests for categorical variables, and additionally univariate and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0.2 (Released 2023; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States). The data were collected from the medical records of patients treated at the Hernia and Colorectal Surgery department of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China. Key clinical variables examined included the incidence of SSIs, occurrence of secondary infections, presence of comorbidities such as diabetes and hypertension, and duration of hospitalization.

RESULTS

The comparative analysis yielded compelling differences between CRC patients with a history of COVID-19 infection and those without. The study revealed a significantly higher incidence of SSI (68.8% vs. 31.3%, p=0.003) and secondary infection (70.1% vs. 29.9%, p<0.001) among patients with a history of COVID-19. In the multivariate analysis for SSIs, hypertension (OR = 2.78, 95%CI: 1.03-7.54, p=0.044) and surgical procedure type (open vs. laparoscopic) (OR = 6.04, 95%CI: 1.88-19.43, p=0.003) were found to be significant independent predictors. Patients with a history of COVID-19 had a significantly higher incidence of secondary infections (70.1% vs. 29.9%, p<0.001), with multivariate analysis showing COVID-19 status (OR: 3.053, 95%CI: 1.515-6.154, p=0.002), hypertension (OR: 2.632, 95% CI: 1.154-6.006, p=0.021), and diabetes mellitus (OR: 4.326, 95%CI: 2.029-9.226, p<0.001) as independent risk factors.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights significant insight into SSI rates, secondary infection rates, and clinical characteristics between CRC patients with and without a history of COVID-19 infection. The findings underscore that CRC patients with hypertension who underwent open surgery procedures exhibited a higher susceptibility to SSI. Following CRC patients in combination with comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, and a history of COVID-19 infection exhibited higher susceptibility to secondary infections. This study contributes to the evolving understanding of the impact of COVID-19 history on surgical outcomes, providing valuable insight to healthcare providers in optimizing care for CRC patients in the context of this ongoing health crisis.

Resilience in Rectal Cancer Treatment: Lessons from the COVID-19 Era in Czech Republic

Introduction

The management of patients with COVID-19 infection has placed great pressure on the healthcare systems around the world. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the treatment outcomes of patients with rectal cancer by comparing them to those of patients with the same diagnosis in the pre-pandemic period.

Methods

Retrospective data analysis of patients undergoing multimodal treatment for rectal cancer at the four university hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic (2020-2021) and the 2-year pre-pandemic period (2018-2019).

Results

A total of 693 patients (319 in the pre-pandemic period and 374 in the pandemic period) with rectal cancer were included in the study. The demographic and clinical characteristics of patients in both study periods were comparable, as was the spectrum of surgical procedures. Palliative surgery was more common in the pandemic period (18% vs 13%, p=0.084). The proportion of patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic (p=0.025). There were no statistically significant differences between the study periods in the incidence/severity of post-operative complications, 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay. The number of positive resection margins was similar (5% vs 5%). Based on these results, COVID-19 had no effect on the postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing surgery for rectal cancer. Neoadjuvant treatment was more common in the pre-pandemic period (50% vs 45%). Long-course RT was predominantly offered in the pre-pandemic period, short-course RT during the pandemic. Significantly shorter "diagnosis-surgery" intervals were observed during the pandemic (23 days vs 33 days, p=0.0002). The "surgery-adjuvant therapy" interval was similar in both analysed study periods (p=0.219).

Conclusion

Our study showed, that despite concerns about the COVID-19 pandemic, multimodal treatment of rectal cancer was associated with unchanged postoperative morbidity rates, increased frequency of short-course neoadjuvant RT administration and shorter "diagnosis-surgery" intervals.

Disparate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on delays in colorectal cancer treatment: A National Cancer Database study

BACKGROUND

Timely treatment for patients with colorectal cancer may have been disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic. We evaluated the impact of the pandemic on delays to treatment with surgery or systemic therapy for patients with colorectal cancer and delineated factors predictive of delayed treatment.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database, patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer were categorized by year of diagnosis as COVID-19 era (2020) versus pre-COVID-19 (2018-2019). Categorical variables were compared by χ2 analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess odds ratios for delayed time to surgery or chemoimmunotherapy, defined as >60 days.

RESULTS

In total, 50,689 patients colorectal cancer were diagnosed patients who were pre-COVID-19 vs 21,331 within the COVID-19-era. Patients diagnosed with COVID-19 had a higher stage at diagnosis. There were no differences in the proportion of delayed time to surgery for patients diagnosed in 2020, but patients who were tested for COVID-19 had increased proportions of delayed time to surgery (P < .0001). In multivariate analysis, Black race (P = .0026) and uninsured/underinsured status (P = .0017) were associated with delayed time to surgery. Diagnosis during COVID-19 did not increase delayed time to chemoimmunotherapy, regardless of COVID-19 testing or positivity; however, delays were seen for Black (P < .0001), Hispanic (P < .0001), and uninsured/underinsured patients (P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Although the pandemic did not delay treatment for colorectal cancer overall, vulnerable and underserved populations were disproportionately affected by delays to all forms of therapy. The difference in colorectal cancer outcomes in the coming years as a result of delays in treatment may be significant for these patients.

Effects of First Wave of COVID-19 on Colon Cancer Multi-disciplinary Team Performance: A Two-Year Analysis

BACKGROUND

We investigated the effects of COVID-19-related delay on two-year outcomes of colon cancer treatment during the first wave of the pandemic.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-two patients were referred for bowel cancer at our National Health Service (NHS) trust between March and July 2020, and 41 patients were treated for colon cancer and followed up (a two-year) through a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Treatment delays and overall survival (OS) were also assessed.

RESULTS

Treatment delays were observed in 48% of patients. The average delay was 31 days beyond the 62-day mark (P0.001). Logistic and binary logistic regression models showed that a comorbid diagnosis of respiratory disease had a significant effect on delays in management and two-year outcomes (P=0.04), but without the likelihood of upstaging or a poorer outcome (P=0.942). The overall survival rate was 81.5%. Eight percent of bowel cancer surgeries could have been avoided if endoscopic visualization and biopsy were available, and 8% more surgeries could have been performed laparoscopically without fear of surrounding aerosols.

CONCLUSION

The findings showed that oncologic care provided minimal disruption to trust during the COVID-19 pandemic owing to a quick association between the NHS site and a green non-NHS site, resulting in acceptable two-year outcomes for colon cancer patients.

COVID-19 Effect on Surgery for Gastrointestinal Malignancies: Have Operative Volumes Recovered?

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 disrupted elective operations, cancer screening, and routine medical care while simultaneously overwhelming hospital staff and supplies. Operations for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies rely on endoscopic screening, staging, and neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), each of which was disrupted by the pandemic. The aim was to evaluate the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the US national rates of gastrointestinal oncologic operations.

METHODS

The Vizient Clinical Data Base® was queried for oncologic operations for esophageal, gastric, and colorectal malignancies with and without NAT from March 2019 to March 2022. Control chart analysis examined operative volume over time while Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare mean monthly volume before and during the pandemic.

RESULTS

A total of 95,912 patients were identified over 36 months; 5.8% esophageal, 6.3% gastric, 77.5% colonic, and 10.4% rectal operations. Esophageal operative volume decreased for 9 months during the pandemic and was significantly lower during than before the pandemic (p=0.002). Gastric operations decreased for 10 months early in the pandemic, but rebounded so that after 2 years volumes were unchanged (p=0.49). Colonic operations experienced a sharp decrease for 4 months at the beginning of the pandemic, but volumes quickly increased and overall were unchanged (p=0.29). Rectal operations decreased for 13 months and were significantly lower during than before the pandemic (p=0.018). Oncologic operations for patients receiving NAT varied.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 significantly disrupted the volume of gastrointestinal oncologic operations in the USA. Esophageal and rectal oncologic operations experienced prolonged and significant reductions while gastric and colonic oncologic operations transiently decreased but rebounded during the pandemic.

Radiation Oncologists' Approach to Rectosigmoid Junction Tumors in Turkey: The Turkish Society for Radiation Oncology Gastrointestinal Group Survey Study (TROD 02-007)

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The objective was to determine the preferences and perspectives regarding preoperative evaluation and treatment strategies for rectosigmoid junction cancer among radiation oncologists using a questionnaire survey.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Since defining the correct origin of the neoplasm is essential in tailoring the most appropriate treatment scheme in the rectosigmoid junction region, we surveyed Turkish radiation oncologists about clinical decisions in rectosigmoid junction cancer patients via a 20-point questionnaire.

RESULTS

Based on responses from 130 radiation oncologists surveyed across the country, 119 (91.5%) used the anterior peritoneal reflection as the landmark, while 111 (85.4%) used the distance from the anal verge to the boundary between the rectum and sigmoid. This indicates that most of the participants decided to consider both pretreatment evaluation methods. Although distance at colonoscopy can be very variable, when the discrepancy was observed between these methods, 66 (50.8%) participants made the final decision according to the distance from the anal verge in our questionnaire. The conclusion from the questionnaire is that there is difficulty in interpreting magnetic resonance imaging findings, and there is a need for anatomic landmarks relevant to the limit between the rectum and sigmoid so that clinicians can confidently facilitate the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide variation in the diagnosis and decision-making of rectosigmoid junction cancer among radiation oncologists in Turkey, according to our survey, because of several definitions of the rectosigmoid junction boundaries. Considerable attention is required to clarify whether the first preoperative treatment or surgery for rectosigmoid junction cancer.

Changes in colorectal cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: Interrupted time-series analysis using the National Database of Japan

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic forced us to accept changes in our usual diagnostic procedures and treatments for colorectal cancer. This study aimed to determine the impact of the pandemic on colorectal cancer treatment in Japan.

METHODS

The number of colorectal surgeries, stoma constructions, stent placements or long tube insertions, and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapies were determined each month using sampling datasets from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. The observation periods before and during the pandemic were January 2015 to January 2020 and April 2020 to January 2021, respectively. An interrupted time-series analysis was used to estimate the changes in the number of procedures during the pandemic.

RESULTS

The number of endoscopic surgeries for colon cancer significantly decreased in April and July 2020 and for rectal cancer in April 2020. Additionally, the number of laparoscopic and open surgeries for colon cancer significantly decreased in July 2020 and October 2020, respectively. The number of stoma constructions and stent placements or long tube insertions did not increase during the observation period. Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer significantly increased in April 2020 but levels returned shortly thereafter. These results suggest that the recommendations to overcome the pandemic proposed by expert committees, including the replacement of laparoscopic surgery with open surgery, stoma construction to avoid anastomotic leak, and replacement of surgery on the ileus with stent placement, were not widely implemented in Japan. However, as an exception, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer was performed as an alternative treatment to delay surgery in small quantities.

CONCLUSION

A declining number of surgeries raises concerns about cancer stage progression; however, we found no evidence to suggest cancer progression from the trajectory of the number of stoma constructions and stent placements. In Japan, even during the pandemic, conventional treatments were performed.

The impact of surgical delay on resectability of colorectal cancer: An international prospective cohort study

AIM

The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has provided a unique opportunity to explore the impact of surgical delays on cancer resectability. This study aimed to compare resectability for colorectal cancer patients undergoing delayed versus non-delayed surgery.

METHODS

This was an international prospective cohort study of consecutive colorectal cancer patients with a decision for curative surgery (January-April 2020). Surgical delay was defined as an operation taking place more than 4 weeks after treatment decision, in a patient who did not receive neoadjuvant therapy. A subgroup analysis explored the effects of delay in elective patients only. The impact of longer delays was explored in a sensitivity analysis. The primary outcome was complete resection, defined as curative resection with an R0 margin.

RESULTS

Overall, 5453 patients from 304 hospitals in 47 countries were included, of whom 6.6% (358/5453) did not receive their planned operation. Of the 4304 operated patients without neoadjuvant therapy, 40.5% (1744/4304) were delayed beyond 4 weeks. Delayed patients were more likely to be older, men, more comorbid, have higher body mass index and have rectal cancer and early stage disease. Delayed patients had higher unadjusted rates of complete resection (93.7% vs. 91.9%, P = 0.032) and lower rates of emergency surgery (4.5% vs. 22.5%, P < 0.001). After adjustment, delay was not associated with a lower rate of complete resection (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.90-1.55, P = 0.224), which was consistent in elective patients only (OR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69-1.27, P = 0.672). Longer delays were not associated with poorer outcomes.

CONCLUSION

One in 15 colorectal cancer patients did not receive their planned operation during the first wave of COVID-19. Surgical delay did not appear to compromise resectability, raising the hypothesis that any reduction in long-term survival attributable to delays is likely to be due to micro-metastatic disease.