OUP accepted manuscript

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: a retrospective pathway assessment in a regional cancer centre

BACKGROUND

The optimal care pathway (OCP) for people with breast cancer provides a framework for investigation and management of patients with breast cancer, with delays previously identified regionally.

AIM

With emphasis on the neoadjuvant pathway, the primary aim of this study was to assess the practicality of implementing the breast cancer OCP timeframes regionally in comparison to nationally referenced standards.

METHODS

A retrospective institutional audit was performed for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer. The time from referral to specialist review, completion of investigations, discussion at multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings, initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and surgery were calculated and compared to OCP.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients were included, with 19 patients living rurally (36%). Twenty-four patients (45%) were seen by a specialist surgeon within 2 weeks of referral. Following surgical review, 44 patients (83%) completed investigations within 2 weeks, and 43 patient cases (81%) were discussed at MDT meetings within 2 weeks. Forty-eight patients (91%) were commenced on neoadjuvant treatment within 4 weeks of decision to treat, and 43 patients (81%) underwent surgery within 6 weeks of neoadjuvant treatment completion. Delays from initial referral to NACT were more frequent in rural patients compared to urban (79% vs 94%, P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Adherence to OCP timeframes for patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy in a regional centre was feasible and strategies are needed to bridge gaps identified for rural patients.

Assessing the clinical utility of pre-operative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictor of clinicopathological parameters in patients being treated for primary breast cancer

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data supporting the role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratios (NLR) to determine clinicopathological parameters in patients being treated for primary breast cancer.

AIMS

To evaluate the association between pre-operative NLR and clinicopathological parameters in patients diagnosed with breast cancer.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed. This included consecutive patients indicated to undergo surgery for primary breast cancer at University Hospital Limerick between January 2010 and June 2017. NLR was expressed as a continuous variable. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were used to determine the correlation between NLR and clinicopathological data. Data analytics was performed using SPSS v29.0.

RESULTS

673 patients met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the median preoperative NLR is 2.63 (standard deviation: 1.42). At univariable analysis, patient age (beta coefficient: 0.009, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.001-0.017, P = 0.027), tumour size (beta coefficient: 0.013, 95% CI 0.005-0.021, P = 0.001), and human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 status (beta coefficient: - 0.370, 95% CI - 0.676-0.065, P = 0.017) were all predicted using NLR. However, at multivariable analysis, tumour size was the sole parameter predictable by NLR (beta coefficient: 0.011, 95% CI 0.002-0.019, P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that pre-operative NLR may serve as an independent predictor of tumour size in patients being treated with primary breast cancer. Ratification of these preliminary findings is warranted before robustly adopted into clinical practice.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in Resectable HNSCC: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immunotherapy is a recently recognised FDA-approved treatment for R/M HNSCC. Our goal is to explore the safety profile and the efficacy of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant setting before surgery in mucosal head and neck cancer.

METHODS

Three electronic databases had been systematically searched through March 2024. Demographic and tumour characteristics were extracted. Primary outcomes obtained were disease-free survival (DFS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), complete pathological response (cPR), which was defined as no residual tumour, and major pathological response (MPR), which as defined as <10% residual viable tumour. Safety outcomes examined were grade 3 and above adverse event, median time to surgery, delays to surgery, and death related to neoadjuvant treatment.

RESULTS

A total of 459 patients from 15 studies were included in the analysis. The pooled estimate of cPR for all the studies was 14.9% (95% confidence interval [CI] 8.0-26.2). Subgroup analysis showed chemoimmunotherapy had a higher cPR 30.1% (95% CI 22.8-38.62) compared with immunotherapy alone 1.4% (95% CI 0.3-5.2). There was no treatment-related death. Chemoimmunotherapy had a higher pooled estimate of adverse events 22.9% (95% CI 11.0-41.5) compared with immunotherapy alone 8.5% (95% CI 2.6-24.3). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that chemoimmunotherapy had a higher DFS compared with immunotherapy alone: 89.8% (95% CI 81.4-94.7) versus 80.44% (95% CI 73.9-85.7), respectively. Neoadjuvant immunoradiotherapy had conflicting results.

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy was well tolerated. Neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy may be more effective in treating LAHNSCC over immunotherapy alone; however, TRAEs were higher.

Contemporary Review of the Management and Treatment of Young Breast Cancer Patients

Approximately 11% of all new breast cancer cases annually are diagnosed in young women, and this continues to be the leading cause of death in women age 20 to 49. Young, premenopausal breast cancer patients present with more advanced stages and with a higher proportion of aggressive subtypes such as triple negative and HER2-enriched tumors. Recently, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) lowered the age threshold to initiate screening mammograms to age 40 to aid in earlier detection. Young age at diagnosis increases the likelihood for a pathogenic mutation, and genetic testing is recommended for all patients age 50 and younger. This population is often underrepresented in landmark clinical trials, and data is extrapolated for the treatment of young women with breast cancer. Despite there being no survival benefit to more extensive surgical treatments, such as mastectomy or contralateral prophylactic mastectomy, many patients opt against breast conservation. Young patients with breast cancer face issues related to treatment toxicities, potential overtreatment of their disease, mental health, sexual health, and fertility preservation. This unique population requires a multidisciplinary care team of physicians, surgeons, genetic counselors, fertility specialists, mental health professionals, physical therapists, and dieticians to provide individualized, comprehensive care. Our aim is to (1) provide a narrative review of retrospective studies, relevant society guidelines, and clinical trials focused on the contemporary treatment and management of YBC patients and (2) discuss important nuances in their care as a guide for members of their multidisciplinary treatment team.

Utility of Axillary Staging in Older Patients with HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

The utility of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in older patients remains controversial. Advancements in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapy have revolutionized disease response rates and prognosis, supporting efforts to re-evaluate the utility of SLNB. We aimed to assess the differences in treatment and overall survival (OS) in older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer based on SLNB.

METHODS

Using the National Cancer Database (2010-2020), patients ≥ 70 years of age diagnosed with cT1-2/cN0/M0, HER2-positive breast cancer were identified. Logistic regression assessed associations with SLNB, systemic therapy, and radiation. Cox proportional hazard models were used to identify factors associated with OS. Analyses were stratified by treatment sequence, i.e. upfront surgery or neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) followed by surgery.

RESULTS

Of the 17,609 patients included, 94% underwent upfront surgery (n = 16,492) and the remaining underwent NAT (n = 1117). Those who underwent SLNB were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy, irrespective of nodal status {upfront surgery/systemic therapy (odds ratio [OR] 2.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.17-3.67); upfront surgery/radiation (OR 3.97, 95% CI 3.03-5.21); NAT/radiation (OR 5.69, 95% CI 1.83-17.69)}. The breast pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was highest among the hormone receptor (HR)-negative/HER2-positive subtype (50.0%), of which none were found to be ypN+. Comorbidity burden was associated with significantly lower rates of adjuvant systemic therapy and worse OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent SLNB, regardless of pN status, were more likely to receive adjuvant therapy. Nodal positivity is exceedingly rare for patients with a breast pCR following NAT, especially among the HR-negative/HER2-positive subtype. It is reasonable to consider omission of SLNB in select subgroups of older patients with HER2-positive breast cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Neoadjuvant Pyrotinib for Human Epidermal Receptor 2-Positive Breast Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Neoadjuvant pyrotinib shows the potential to improve treatment response in human epidermal receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer patients, but relevant meta-analyses are scarce. This meta-analysis intended to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pyrotinib for HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Studies comparing the efficacy and safety between HER2-positive breast cancer patients receiving pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant treatment (pyrotinib group) and those receiving other neoadjuvant treatments (control group), were searched in EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang, and SinoMed until December 2023. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 4 cohort studies were included. The pyrotinib group and control group contained 540 and 684 patients, respectively. Pathological complete response (pCR) was higher in the pyrotinib group than in the control group [relative risk (RR)=1.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.63-2.29; P < 0.001]. Similar results were discovered in subgroup analyses of RCTs (RR = 1.89; 95% CI = 1.49-2.40; P < 0.001) and cohort studies (RR = 1.98; 95% CI = 1.55-2.53; P < 0.001). The objective response rate (ORR) was also higher in the pyrotinib group than in the control group (RR = 1.14; 95% CI = 1.07-1.21; P < 0.001). Regarding adverse events, only the incidence of diarrhea was increased in the pyrotinib group versus the control group (RR = 1.97; 95% CI = 1.31-2.96; P = 0.001), while others were not different, including nausea and vomiting, leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, hand-foot syndrome, and alopecia (all P > 0.05). No publication bias existed, and sensitivity analysis suggested the satisfactory robustness of this meta-analysis. In conclusion, compared with other neoadjuvant treatments, pyrotinib-containing neoadjuvant treatment achieves a better treatment response with a good safety profile in HER2-positive breast cancer patients.

Initial MRI findings predictive of a pathological complete response to neoadjuvant treatments in HER2-positive breast cancers

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine if initial MRI findings could predict a pathological complete response (pCR) following neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) in HER2-positive breast cancers.

METHODS

The study retrospectively included 111 patients (Center 1, training set) and 71 patients (Center 2, validation set) with HER2-positive cancer who underwent NST. Initial clinicopathological data and MRI findings were recorded. Continuous variables were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney and Student's t-tests, while categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 or Fisher's exact test. Univariate analysis was conducted to determine the associations between these variables and pathological complete response (pCR), defined as the absence of invasive malignant cells in the breast and lymph nodes. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed for associated non-mass enhancement (NME) parameter by analyzing 50 MR studies (intraclass correlation coefficient).

RESULTS

pCR was achieved in 67 patients, 51 (46 %) from Center 1 and 16 (23%) from Center 2 (p = 0.003), with significant differences between Centers 1 and 2 in tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels and lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001). The initial presence of suspicious associated NME was the only significant parameter predictive of pCR (p < 0.001 for Center 1 and 0.04 for Center 2). The inter-observer reproducibility for this MRI feature was good, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.872 (95 % CI: 0.73-1.00).

CONCLUSION

The presence of suspicious associated NME in HER2-positive cancers on the initial MRI study was predictive of achieving pCR after NST. This significant preliminary finding warrants confirmation through prospective multicenter studies.

Surgical outcomes and prognosis of HER2+ invasive breast cancer patients with a DCIS component treated with breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant systemic therapy

INTRODUCTION

In up to 72 % of HER2+ invasive breast cancer (IBC), a ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) component is present. The presence of DCIS is associated with increased positive surgical margins after breast-conserving surgery (BCS). The aim of this study was to assess surgical margins, recurrence and survival in a nationwide cohort of HER2+ IBC with versus without a DCIS component, treated with neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) and BCS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Women diagnosed with HER2+ IBC treated with NST and BCS, between 2010 and 2019, were selected from the Netherlands Cancer Registry and linked to the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were performed to determine locoregional recurrence rate (LRR) and overall survival (OS) and associated clinicopathological variables. Surgical outcomes and prognosis were compared between IBC only and IBC+DCIS.

RESULTS

A total of 3056 patients were included: 1832 with IBC and 1224 with IBC+DCIS. Patients with IBC+DCIS had significantly more often positive surgical margins compared to IBC (12.8 % versus 4.9 %, p < 0.001). Five-year LRR was significantly higher in patients with IBC+DCIS compared to IBC (6.8 % versus 3.6 %, p < 0.001), but the presence of DCIS itself was not significantly associated with LRR after adjusting for confounders in multivariable analysis. Five-year OS did not differ between IBC+DCIS and IBC (94.9 % versus 95.7 %, p = 0.293).

CONCLUSION

The presence of DCIS is associated with higher rates of positive surgical margins, but not with LRR and lower OS when adjusted for confounders. Further research is necessary to adequately select IBC+DCIS patients for BCS after NST.

Real-world experience with pertuzumab and trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy in neoadjuvant treatment for patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer: the NEOPERSUR study

PURPOSE

HER2-targeted therapies have dramatically improved outcomes of patients with HER2-positive breast cancer (BC), as demonstrated in neoadjuvant trials. This study aims to provide real-world evidence on the use and effectiveness of combined pertuzumab, trastuzumab and chemotherapy (CT) in early-stage HER2-positive BC.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicentre study was conducted on patients diagnosed with HER2-positive early BC treated with neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus CT at 13 Spanish sites. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR).

RESULTS

A total of 310 patients were included. Pertuzumab and trastuzumab were combined with anthracyclines and taxanes, carboplatin and docetaxel, and taxane-based CT in 77.1%, 16.5%, and 6.5% of patients, respectively. Overall, the pCR rate was 62.2%. The pCR was higher amongst patients with hormone receptor-negative tumours and with tumours expressing higher levels of Ki-67 (> 20%). After postoperative adjuvant treatment, 13.9% of patients relapsed. Those patients who did not achieve pCR, with tumours at advanced stages (III), and with node-positive disease were more likely to experience distant relapse. Median overall survival (OS) and distant disease-free survival (D-DFS) were not reached at the study end. The estimated mean OS and D-DFS times were 7.5 (95% CI 7.3-7.7) and 7.3 (95% CI 7.1-7.5) years, respectively (both were significantly longer amongst patients who achieved pCR). Grade 3-4 anti-HER2 related toxicities were reported in six (1.9%) patients.

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab plus CT achieve high pCR rates in real-life patients with HER2-positive early BC, showing an acceptable safety profile. Innovative adjuvant strategies are essential in patients at high risk of distant disease recurrence.

Survival outcomes of Zo-NAnTAx: a five-year analysis of zoledronic acid added to a neoadjuvant regimen for HER2-positive breast cancer

Background

Zoledronic acid (ZA) improved outcomes in breast cancer. In pre-clinical studies, ZA increased tumour regression in combination chemotherapy and anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) target therapy. The Zo-NAnTax study, a clinical trial combining ZA with neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive tumours met the primary endpoint, showing a higher pathological complete response (pCR) rate than predicted in patients receiving surgery. Here, we report the exploratory relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis after five years of follow-up.

Methods

Adult women with HER2-positive breast cancer amendable to curative surgery who consented to the study received four cycles of ZA at 4 mg + doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 + cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 followed by four cycles of ZA at 4 mg + docetaxel 100 mg/m2 + trastuzumab 6 mg/kg (8 mg/kg as a loading dose), all in a 21 days-cycle, totalizing 8 cycles before surgery. To achieve the primary endpoint of pCR rate between 22% and 35%, 56 patients were needed. The secondary endpoints included safety, gene expression according to treatment response, prediction of pCR rate by an interim breast magnetic resonance imaging (bMRI).

Results

Beyond the overall pCR rate of 42%, alongside a good safety profile, we showed similar pCR rates in both hormonal receptor (HR) positive (40%) and HR-negative (44%). RFS and OS at five years were evaluated in 58 subjects, and the overall rate was 79.3% and 86.2%, respectively. Numerically higher values of both RFS and OS were observed in patients achieving pCR vs. non-achieving, respectively 83.3% vs. non-pCR 76.5% (P=0.57) and 95.8% vs. non-pCR 79.4% (P=0.08). Although not statistically significant, OS was numerically equivalent according to HR status, respectively 85.7% vs. 87.5% for HR-positive and HR-negative (P=0.91), which contrasted with RFS, HR-positive 81% vs. HR-negative 75% (P=0.58). None of the assessed clinicopathological biomarkers significantly correlated with survival.

Conclusions

ZA plus neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer shows provoking survival outcomes. Clinical and pre-clinical investigation with dual anti-HER2 blockage is warranted.

Oncologic safety of breast conserving surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with multiple ipsilateral breast cancer: A retrospective multi-institutional cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The recent ACOSOG Z11102 trial demonstrated low recurrence rates with breast conserving surgery (BCS) in women with multiple ipsilateral breast cancers (MIBC). Questions remain regarding the oncologic safety of BCS in women with MIBC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent BCS following NAC for stage I-III breast cancer from 2012 to 2021 at two academic centers. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and the Kaplan-Meier method was used to provide estimates for recurrence and survival outcomes. MIBC was defined as ≥2 foci of malignancy.

RESULTS

A total of 544 patients were included; 29.4% (n = 160) ER+/HER2-, 17.7% (n = 96) ER+/HER2+, 18.2% (n = 99) ER-/HER2+, and 34.7% (n = 189) with ER-/HER2-disease. Overall, 80.5% (n = 438) had unifocal breast cancer while 19.5% (n = 106) had MIBC. Of patients with MIBC, 90.6% (n = 96) had multifocal and 9.4% (n = 10) had multicentric disease. Pathologic complete response was achieved in 41.1% of patients with MIBC versus 41.5% of patients with unifocal disease (p = 0.94). At a median follow-up of 55 months (IQR 32-83); 4.8% of patients in the unifocal group and 4.7% of patients in the MIBC group had had a local recurrence (p = 0.97). There was no difference in 5-year local recurrence-free survival (p = 0.92), recurrence-free survival (p = 0.06), or overall survival (p = 0.07) between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In this large cohort of women undergoing BCS post-NAC, there was no significant difference in in breast tumor recurrence or survival outcomes between patients with unifocal disease and those with MIBC.

Neoadjuvant trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) with response-directed definitive therapy in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer: a phase II study protocol (SHAMROCK study)

BACKGROUND

The current standard of care in the neoadjuvant setting for high-risk HER2-positive (HER2 +) breast cancer is to combine systemic chemotherapy with dual HER2 blockade, trastuzumab and pertuzumab. Targeted therapies have significantly improved outcomes for patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. To improve treatment-associated toxicity, chemotherapy-sparing approaches are currently being investigated. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is an HER2-directed antibody-drug-conjugate (ADC) with promising results in the metastatic setting for HER2-positive breast cancer. The SHAMROCK study investigates neoadjuvant T-DXd in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer, using pathological complete response (pCR) rate as the primary endpoint.

METHODS

This is a phase II open-label, single arm, adaptive multi-centre trial of T-DXd in the neoadjuvant setting in stage 2-3 HER2-positive breast cancer. Eligible patients will receive 5.4 mg/kg of T-DXd intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 6 cycles. A repeat biopsy will performed after 2 cycles for the RNA disruption index (RDI) score assessment. According to their likelihood of pCR, as determined by the RDI score, patients will either undergo 4 or 6 cycles of T-DXd prior to imaging. Patients with imaging complete response (iCR) after either 4 or 6 cycles will proceed to surgery. Patients who do not achieve iCR will either undergo further systemic therapy or proceed to surgery.

DISCUSSION

The SHAMROCK study is a chemotherapy-sparing approach to curative intent treatment, investigating neoadjuvant T-DXd. We hypothesise that neoadjuvant T-DXd will have a high pCR rate and be associated low toxicity in early stage HER2-positive breast cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

EudraCT Number: 2022-002485-32; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05710666; Cancer Trials Ireland study number: CTRIAL-IE 22-01.

HER2+ Early Breast Cancer: From Escalation via Targeted and Post-Neoadjuvant Treatment to De-Escalation

Background

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+, also referred to as ERBB2+) breast cancer is a subtype, historically associated with a particularly poor prognosis. Research into biological and molecular pathomechanisms of breast cancer has resulted in the development and adoption of several therapies targeting HER2. In parallel, various escalation/de-escalation strategies have been examined to further optimize patient outcomes and care.

Summary

In this review, we highlighted the landmark trials in the evolution of treatment and management of HER2+ early breast cancer (eBC).

Key Messages

Continuous research over the last two decades has gradually prolonged survival in patients with early HER2+ eBC. Incorporation of post-neoadjuvant setting into clinical practice improved long-term outcomes in high-risk patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy. In parallel, use of modern anti-HER2 agents may potentially allow omission of chemotherapy without compromising the survival in a significant number of selected patients. Current research focused on exploring the molecular heterogeneity of HER2+ breast cancer resulted in identification of new prognostic and predictive biomarkers which could pave the way toward the development of truly personalized therapy.

Circulating microRNAs can predict chemotherapy-induced toxicities in patients being treated for primary breast cancer

PURPOSE

Prescribing NAC for breast cancer is a pragmatic treatment strategy for several reasons; however, certain patients suffer chemotherapy-induced toxicities. Unfortunately, identifying patients at risk of toxicity often proves challenging. MiRNAs are small non-coding RNA molecules which modulate genetic expression. The aim of this study was to determine whether circulating miRNAs are sensitive biomarkers that can identify the patients likely to suffer treatment-related toxicities to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for primary breast cancer.

METHODS

This secondary exploratory from the prospective, multicentre translational research trial (CTRIAL ICORG10/11-NCT01722851) recruited 101 patients treated with NAC for breast cancer, from eight treatment sites across Ireland. A predetermined five miRNAs panel was quantified using RQ-PCR from patient bloods at diagnosis. MiRNA expression was correlated with chemotherapy-induced toxicities. Regression analyses was performed using SPSS v26.0.

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients with median age of 55 years were recruited (range: 25-76). The mean tumour size was 36 mm and 60.4% had nodal involvement (n = 61) Overall, 33.7% of patients developed peripheral neuropathies (n = 34), 28.7% developed neutropenia (n = 29), and 5.9% developed anaemia (n = 6). Reduced miR-195 predicted patients likely to develop neutropenia (P = 0.048), while increased miR-10b predicted those likely to develop anaemia (P = 0.049). Increased miR-145 predicted those experiencing nausea and vomiting (P = 0.019), while decreased miR-21 predicted the development of mucositis (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study which illustrates the value of measuring circulatory miRNA to predict patient-specific toxicities to NAC. These results support the ideology that circulatory miRNAs are biomarkers with utility in predicting chemotherapy toxicity as well as treatment response.

Predictors of successful neoadjuvant treatment in HER2‑positive breast cancer

The prognosis of local or locally advanced human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer after a complete response from neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAT) is excellent. However, some of the patients succumb to their disease, so novel predictive factors to identify these patients at risk are needed. Retrospective data from 119 patients treated at the Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Centre (Helsinki, Finland) were collected. All patients had in situ hybridization-confirmed HER2-positive breast cancer and underwent NAT with a curative intention. The primary tumours were relatively large, most patients had cytologically confirmed lymph node metastases and the treatments used were current regimens. A total of 63 (52.1%) patients had a pathological complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant therapy. Achieving pCR predicted longer disease-free survival (DFS; P=0.0083) but not overall survival (P=0.061). The patients with a pCR had an estimated DFS rate of 96.8% at 5 years, compared with only 59.7% of the patients with non-pCR. Radiological complete response (CR) was associated with pCR (P=0.00033), although imaging yielded 30.4% false-negative and 36.9% false-positive results. The association between the radiological CR and pCR was more obvious in oestrogen receptor-negative tumours. Moderate (compared with strong) immunohistochemical HER2 expression predicted a lower chance of pCR (P=0.0078) and worse breast cancer-specific survival (P=0.0015). In conclusion, pCR after NAT served as an important prognostic factor in women with high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer. The patients with only moderate immunohistochemical HER2 expression had a lower chance of reaching a pCR, as well as a shorter breast cancer-specific survival.

What is the ideal endpoint in early-stage immunotherapy neoadjuvant trials in lung cancer?

Numerous clinical trials investigating neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been performed over the last 5 years. As the number of neoadjuvant trials increases, attention must be paid to identifying informative trial endpoints. Complete pathologic response has been shown to be an appropriate surrogate endpoint for clinical outcomes, such as event-free survival or overall survival, in breast cancer and bladder cancer, but it is less established for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The simultaneous advances reported with adjuvant ICI make the optimal strategy for early-stage disease debatable. Considering the long time required to conduct trials, it is important to identify optimal endpoints and discover surrogate endpoints for survival that can help guide ongoing clinical research. Endpoints can be grouped into two categories: medical and surgical. Medical endpoints are measures of survival and drug activity; surgical endpoints describe the feasibility of neoadjuvant approaches at a surgical level as well as perioperative attrition and complications. There are also several exploratory endpoints, including circulating tumor DNA clearance and radiomics. In this review, we outline the advantages and disadvantages of commonly reported endpoints for clinical trials of neoadjuvant regimens in NSCLC.

Appraisal of Systemic Treatment Strategies in Early HER2-Positive Breast Cancer-A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2+) accounts for 15-20% of all breast cancer phenotypes. Even after the completion of the standard combination of chemotherapy and trastuzumab, relapse events occur in approximately 15% of cases. The neoadjuvant approach has multiple benefits that include the potential to downgrade staging and convert previously unresectable tumors to operable tumors. In addition, achieving a pathologic complete response (pCR) following preoperative systemic treatment is prognostic of enhanced survival outcomes. Thus, optimal evaluation among the suitable strategies is crucial in deciding which patients should be selected for the neoadjuvant approach.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted in the Embase, Medline, and Cochrane electronic libraries.

CONCLUSION

The evaluation of tumor and LN staging and, hence, stratifying BC recurrence risk are decisive factors in guiding clinicians to optimize treatment decisions between the neoadjuvant versus adjuvant approaches. For each individual case, it is important to consider the most likely postsurgical outcome, since, if the patient does not obtain pCR following neoadjuvant treatment, they are eligible for adjuvant T-DM1 in the case of residual disease. This review of HER2-positive female BC outlines suitable neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic treatment strategies for guiding clinical decision making around the selection of an appropriate therapy.

PTCH1 and CTNNB1 emerge as pivotal predictors of resistance to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ER+/HER2- breast cancer

Introduction

Endeavors in the molecular characterization of breast cancer opened the doors to endocrine therapies in ER+/HER2- breast cancer, increasing response rates substantially. Despite that, taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still a cornerstone for achieving breast-conserving surgery and complete tumor resection in locally advanced cancers with high recurrence risk. Nonetheless, the rate of chemoresistance is high, and deselecting patients who will not benefit from chemotherapy is a significant task to prevent futile toxicities. Several multigene assays are being used to guide decisions on chemotherapy. However, their development as prognostic assays but not predictive assays limits predictive strength, leading to discordant results. Moreover, high costs impediment their use in developing countries. For global health equity, robust predictors that can be cost-effectively incorporated into routine clinical management are essential.

Methods

In this study, we comprehensively analyzed 5 GEO datasets, 2 validation sets, and The Cancer Genome Atlas breast cancer data to identify predictors of resistance to taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy in ER+/HER2- breast cancer using efficient bioinformatics algorithms.

Results

Gene expression and gene set enrichment analysis of 5 GEO datasets revealed the upregulation of 63 genes and the enrichment of CTNNB1-related oncogenic signatures in non-responsive patients. We validated the upregulation and predictive strength of 18 genes associated with resistance in the validation cohort, all exhibiting higher predictive powers for residual disease and higher specificities for ER+/HER2- breast cancers compared to one of the benchmark multi-gene assays. Cox Proportional Hazards Regression in three different treatment arms (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and no systemic treatment) in a second comprehensive validation cohort strengthened the significance of PTCH1 and CTNNB1 as key predictors, with hazard ratios over 1.5, and 1.6 respectively in the univariate and multivariate models.

Discussion

Our results strongly suggest that PTCH1 and CTNNB1 can be used as robust and cost-effective predictors in developing countries to guide decisions on chemotherapy in ER +/HER2- breast cancer patients with a high risk of recurrence. The dual function of PTCH1 as a multidrug efflux pump and a hedgehog receptor, and the active involvement of CTNNB1 in breast cancer strongly indicate that PTCH1 and CTNNB1 can be potential drug targets to overcome chemoresistance in ER +/HER2- breast cancer patients.

Changing the role of pCR in breast cancer treatment - an unjustifiable interpretation of a good prognostic factor as a "factor for a good prognosis"

Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) of early breast cancer (EBC) has been recognized as a good prognostic factor in the treatment of breast cancer because of its significant correlation with long-term disease outcome. Based on this correlation, pCR has been accepted by health authorities (FDA, EMA) as a surrogate endpoint in clinical trials for accelerated drug approval. Moreover, in recent years, we have observed a tendency to treat pCR in routine clinical practice as a primary therapeutic target rather than just one of the pieces of information obtained from clinical trials. These trends in routine clinical practice are the result of recommendations in treatment guidelines, such as the ESMO recommendation "…to deliver all planned (neoadjuvant) treatment without unnecessary breaks, i.e. without dividing it into preoperative and postoperative periods, irrespective of the magnitude of tumor response", because "…this will increase the probability of achieving pCR, which is a proven factor for a good prognosis…". We hypothesize that the above recommendations and trends in routine clinical practice are the consequences of misunderstanding regarding the concept of pCR, which has led to a shift in its importance from a prognostic factor to a desired treatment outcome. The origin of this misunderstanding could be a strong subconscious incentive to achieve pCR, as patients who achieved pCR after NAST had a better long-term outcome compared with those who did not. In this paper, we attempt to prove our hypothesis. We performed a comprehensive analysis of the therapeutic effects of NAST and adjuvant systemic therapy (AST) in EBC to determine whether pCR, as a phenomenon that can only be achieved at NAST, improves prognosis per se. We used published papers as a source of data, which had a decisive influence on the formation of the modern attitude towards EBC therapy. We were unable to find any evidence supporting the use of pCR as a desired therapeutic goal because NAST (reinforced by pCR) was never demonstrated to be superior to AST in any context.

Pathologic response and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without pertuzumab in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer: the Neopearl nationwide collaborative study

Purpose

Clinical trials have shown a significant increase in pathologic complete response (pCR) with the addition of pertuzumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with early-stage HER-2 positive breast cancer. To date, limited studies have examined comparative outcomes of neoadjuvant pertuzumab in real-world setting. The Neopearl study aimed to assess comparative real-life efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant pertuzumab for these patients.

Methods

We conducted a nationwide retrospective analysis involving 17 oncology facilities with a certified multidisciplinary breast cancer treatment committee. We identified patients with HER-2 positive stage II-III breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on trastuzumab and taxanes with or without pertuzumab. All patients underwent breast surgery and received a comprehensive cardiologic evaluation at baseline and after neoadjuvant treatment. Patients who received the combination of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy constituted case cohort (PTCT), whereas those treated with trastuzumab and chemotherapy accounted for control cohort (TCT). The pCR rate and 5-year event free survival (EFS) were the primary outcomes. Secondary end-points were rates of conversion from planned modified radical mastectomy (MRM) to breast conservation surgery (BCS) and cardiotoxicities.

Results

From March 2014 to April 2021, we included 271 patients, 134 (49%) and 137 (51%) in TCT and PTCT cohort, respectively. Positive axillary lymph nodes and stage III were more frequent in PTCT cohort. The pCR rate was significantly increased in patients who received pertuzumab (49% vs 62%; OR 1.74, 95%CI 1.04-2.89) and with HER-2 enriched subtypes (16% vs 85%; OR 2.94, 95%CI 1.60-5.41). After a median follow-up of 5 years, the 5-year EFS was significantly prolonged only in patients treated with pertuzumab (81% vs 93%; HR 2.22, 95%CI 1.03-4.79). The same analysis performed on propensity score matched population showed concordant results. On univariate analysis, only patients with positive lymph nodes were found to benefit from pertuzumab for both pCR and 5-year EFS. The rates of conversion from MRM to BCS and cardiologic toxicities did not differ between the cohorts.

Conclusion

Our findings support previous data on improved outcomes with the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This benefit seems to be more significant in patients with clinically positive lymph nodes.

Review of the status of neoadjuvant therapy in HER2-positive breast cancer

Purpose

The development of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-directed therapies has revolutionized the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer. The aim of this article is to review the continually evolving treatment strategies in the neoadjuvant setting of HER2-positive breast cancer, as well as the current challenges and future perspectives.

Methods

Searches were undertaken on PubMed and Clinicaltrials.gov for relevant publications and trials.

Findings

The current standard of care in high-risk HER2-positive breast cancer is to combine chemotherapy with dual anti-HER2 therapy, for a synergistic anti-tumor effect. We discuss the pivotal trials which led to the adoption of this approach, as well as the benefit of these neoadjuvant strategies for guiding appropriate adjuvant therapy. De-escalation strategies are currently being investigated to avoid over treatment, and aim to safely reduce chemotherapy, while optimizing HER2-targeted therapies. The development and validation of a reliable biomarker is essential to enable these de-escalation strategies and personalization of treatment. In addition, promising novel therapies are currently being explored to further improve outcomes in HER2-positive breast cancer.

SCUBE2 as a Marker of Resistance to Taxane-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and a Potential Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer

Objective

Taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy is the most common neoadjuvant approach in breast cancer, especially in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and triple-negative subtypes. However, chemoresistance is a problem in many patients, and success rates are low in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. The aim of this study was to identify predictive markers for resistance to taxane-based therapy, which may have a potential as therapeutic targets in breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

Three comprehensive breast cancer Gene Expression Omnibus datasets were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in breast cancer patients resistant to taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Functional annotation clustering and enrichment analysis were performed on the DEGs list. A protein-protein interaction network was established with the upregulated genes. The predictive value and the differential expression of the central genes were validated in the extensive ROC Plotter database.

Results

Seventeen upregulated genes were found which were associated with resistance to taxane-based neoadjuvant therapy and high connectivity in the network analysis. ESR1, CCND1, and SCUBE2 emerged as the top three key genes associated with resistance. SCUBE2 displayed a high predictive power comparable to ESR1, and better than CCND1, the two commonly accepted markers. The predictive ability of SCUBE2 was higher in ER-positive and HER2-positive breast cancers.

Conclusion

These results suggest that SCUBE2 may be used as a predictive marker to guide decisions on neoadjuvant therapy. Emerging evidence about the role of SCUBE2 as a coreceptor involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis also suggests SCUBE2 as a potential therapeutic target. These points should be investigated in further studies.

Cardiotoxicity from neoadjuvant targeted treatment for breast cancer prior to surgery

Cancer treatment has been gradually shifting from non-specific cytotoxic agents to molecularly targeted drugs. Breast cancer (BC), a malignant tumor with one of the highest incidence worldwide, has seen a rapid development in terms of targeted therapies, leading to a radical change in the treatment paradigm. However, the use of targeted drugs is accompanied by an increasing rate of deaths due to non-tumor-related causes in BC patients, with cardiovascular complications as the most common cause. Cardiovascular toxicity during antitumor therapy has become a high-risk factor for survival in BC patients. Targeted drug-induced cardiotoxicity exerts a wide range of effects on cardiac structure and function, including conduction disturbances, QT interval prolongation, impaired myocardial contractility, myocardial fibrosis, and hypertrophy, resulting in various clinical manifestations, e.g., arrhythmias, cardiomyopathy, heart failure, and even sudden death. In adult patients, the incidence of antitumor targeted drug-induced cardiotoxicity can reach 50%, and current preclinical evaluation tools are often insufficiently effective in predicting clinical cardiotoxicity. Herein, we reviewed the current status of the occurrence, causative mechanisms, monitoring methods, and progress in the prevention and treatment of cardiotoxicity associated with preoperative neoadjuvant targeted therapy for BC. It supplements the absence of relevant review on the latest research progress of preoperative neoadjuvant targeted therapy for cardiotoxicity, with a view to providing more reference for clinical treatment of BC patients.

Evaluating the Fragility of Long-Term Outcomes for Neoadjuvant versus Adjuvant Chemotherapy Prescription in Early Breast Cancer: Pooled Data from 10 Randomised Clinical Trials

Introduction

Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) report similar outcomes following neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in breast cancer. “Fragility Indices” (FI) test significance reversal reported in RCTs.

Aim

To evaluate the FI of findings from RCTs assessing outcomes of NAC and AC.

Methods

A systematic review was performed as per PRISMA guidelines. RCTs of interest were identified and data pooled. Fisher’s exact test was used to calculate FI for reversal of statistical significance for dichotomous outcomes. “Fragility Quotient” (FQ) was calculated by division of the calculated FI by the sample size.

Results

Ten RCTs including 4928 patients. Mean follow-up was 8.2 years. For breast conservation surgery (BCS), the FI was 500 and FQ was 0.10781. For local recurrence (LR), the FI was 42 and FQ was 0.00852. FI and FQ varied for LR at 0–4 years (FI: 9), 5–9 years (FI: 2), 10–14 years (FI: 4), and 15+ years (FI: 3). Regarding distant recurrence (DR), the FI was 13 and FQ was 0.00264. FI and FQ trended downwards over time: 0–4 years (FI: 56), 5–9 years (FI: 18), 10–14 years (FI: 4), and 15+ years (FI: 4). For breast-cancer-specific mortality (BCSM), the overall FI was 51 and FQ was 0.01035. FI and FQ varied for BCSM at 0–4 years (FI: 5), 5–9 years (FI: 19), 10–14 years (FI: 8), and 15+ years (FI: 5). For overall survival (OS), the FI was 17 and FQ was 0.00345. FI and FQ were calculated with respect to OS at 0–4 years (FI: 19), 5–9 years (FI: 17), 10–14 years (FI: 19), and 15+ years (FI: 1).

Conclusion

FIs comparing survival following NAC and AC were of moderate-to-high fragility, indicating weak statistical significance. BCS eligibility following NAC was of low fragility, ratifying the oncological and surgical safety of NAC versus AC.

Level of Evidence

Systematic Review of Level I Randomised Control Trials.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with or without pertuzumab in patients with stage II and III HER2-positive breast cancer: a nationwide cohort analysis of pathologic response and 5-year survival

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

•

The benefit of adding pertuzumab to the (neo)adjuvant treatment of lymph node negative and HR+/HER2+ patients remains unclear.

•

Pertuzumab increases pCR rate from 41% to 65% in stage II-III HER2+ breast cancer.

•

5-year BCSS is 95% and 98% in patients treated without and with pertuzumab, respectively.

•

Patients <50 years benefit most from the addition of pertuzumab.

•

Survival benefit of pertuzumab is more evident in patients with higher stage, but independent of HR-status.

Advances in neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancers: a narrative review

Background and Objective

Breast cancer (BC) is currently the most frequently diagnosed cancer and the primary cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. Human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-positive BC accounts for 14.5-15% of all BCs, with a relatively poor prognosis. Neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has become a preferred treatment option for HER2+ BCs. With the continuous emergence of various clinical trials and new treatment concepts in BC, the NAT model has changed from chemotherapy alone to the neoadjuvant combination of anti-HER2-targeted therapy with chemotherapy, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, and so on. Therefore, an up-to-date review is needed to inform the selection of NAT strategies for HER2+ BCs.

Methods

This review was administrated with literature from the PubMed database. Manuscripts were searched using the following keywords: "neoadjuvant" or "preoperative", "breast cancer" or "breast neoplasm", "HER2+" or "HER2-positive", titles and abstracts were screened and evaluated independently by two authors. Information relating to the efficacy and safety profile of NAT for patients with HER2+ BCs were included and analyzed qualitatively. Only English-language articles were included.

Key Content and Findings

This review discusses the neoadjuvant situation for the surgical management of HER2-positive BCs around the world. In this paper, we describe the efficacy assessment of NAT, analyze clinical effect and toxicity of chemotherapy, and targeted therapy, including monoclonal antibody, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and other neoadjuvant treatments in HER2+ BC. The data shows while overall survival is the standard endpoint for efficacy, pathological complete response have been implemented more and more frequently in clinical trials for its convenience. Dual-targeted therapy plus chemotherapy exhibited favorable efficacy in most cases, meanwhile other treatment strategies such as combinations without chemotherapy or including CDK4/6 agents may be applicable in specific situation.

Conclusions

As an important part of BC treatment, NAT is lingering in the stage of continuous development, especially for patients with HER2-positive BC. The challenges we are facing today in this field are dose de-escalation without reducing efficacy and choose suitable combination of agents in clinical practice. Moreover, new biomarkers are warrant for individualize treatment.

Impact of body mass index on pathological complete response and survival of breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

High body mass index (BMI) is regarded as a poor prognostic factor in breast cancer (BC). However, its association with pathological complete response (pCR) and survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

We wanted to assess the prognostic impact of BMI in this setting.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective review of 314 BC patients undergoing NAC from 2010 to 2018. Patients were categorized as underweight/normal weight (UW/NW) (BMI < 25) or overweight/obese (OW/OB) (BMI ≥ 25). The relationship between BMI and other traditional clinical-pathological prognostic variables with the pCR rate was investigated using logistic regression analysis. The effect on event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Cox proportional hazards regression analysis.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-two patients were UW/NW while 192 were OW/OB. Multivariate analysis revealed that hormonal receptors negative, HER2 positive, and clinical tumor stage (cT) 1-2 were independent predictor factors for pCR. Multivariate analysis confirmed tumor grade G3 and lack of pCR as independent adverse prognostic factors for EFS, while factors associated with worse OS were cT3-4, hormone receptors negative, and lack of pCR. Non-significant differences in pCR, EFS, or OS were observed between the two baseline BMI categories.

CONCLUSIONS

In our experience, BMI is not associated with pCR, EFS, or OS in BC patients receiving NAC. Achieving pCR is the most consistent factor associated with EFS and OS. Prospective and well-designed studies taking into account other important biological and anthropometric factors are needed to determine the exact role of BMI in this setting.