High baseline soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) serum levels indicate adverse outcome after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pulmonary Congestion and Anemia in Hemodialysis: The Potential Link to Inflammation

Pulmonary congestion (PC) is common in hemodialysis (HD) patients. We explored the association of anemia and pulmonary congestion in HD patients. A prospective pilot observational study included 18 patients on maintenance HD. Individual B-lines scores (BLS; 8-sites method) were obtained by lung ultrasound, before and after the first two consecutive HD sessions of the week (HD1-HD2), with different inter-dialytic intervals (68 vs. 44 h). Bioimpedance spectroscopy body composition (BIS) was performed before each HD session. Hemoglobin (Hb) levels, in addition to circulating markers of chronic inflammation (soluble urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor [suPAR], soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity 2 [sST2]) were obtained. Mean (±SD) BLS values were quite elevated at all time points: Pre-HD1 (16 ± 5.53), post-HD1 (15.3 ± 6.63), pre-HD2 (16.3 ± 5.26) and post-HD2 (13.6 ± 5.83), respectively. No direct significant correlation was found between inflammation markers levels and BLS. However, mean levels (±SD, ng/mL) of suPAR pre-HD1 (7.88 ± 3.07) and pre-HD2 (7.78 ± 3.02) remained significantly above the normal range (<4 ng/mL), and sST2 levels reached 2-fold the upper normal value in most patients (27.4 ± 17.8). Pulmonary congestion reflected by BLS was negatively correlated to Hb levels pre-HD1 (R² = 0.439, p = 0.003), and pre-HD2 (R² = 0.301, p = 0.018). In addition, Hb levels were negatively correlated to global volume status estimated by BIS (R² = 0.351, p = 0.009). Hemoglobin levels were negatively correlated to pulmonary congestion and to the global volume status evaluated by BIS. Chronic inflammation markers were increased in HD patients, suggesting a complex volume- and non-volume-dependent pathophysiology of pulmonary congestion in HD patients.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor levels predict survival in patients with portal hypertension undergoing TIPS

Background & Aims

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the most effective therapy for complications of portal hypertension. However, clinical outcomes following TIPS placement vary widely between patients and identifying ideal candidates remains a challenge. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a circulating marker of immune activation that has previously been associated with liver inflammation, but its prognostic value in patients receiving TIPS is unknown. In the present study, we evaluated the potential clinical relevance of suPAR levels in patients undergoing TIPS insertion.

Methods

suPAR concentrations were measured by ELISA in hepatic vein (HV) and portal vein (PV) blood samples from 99 patients (training cohort) as well as peripheral venous blood samples from an additional 150 patients (validation cohort) undergoing TIPS placement. The association between suPAR levels and patient outcomes was assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox-regression analyses.

Results

suPAR concentrations were significantly higher in HV samples compared to PV samples and correlated with PV concentration, the presence of ascites, renal injury, and consequently with the Child-Pugh and MELD scores. Patients with lower suPAR levels had significantly better short- and long-term survival after TIPS insertion, which remained robust after adjustment for confounders in multivariate Cox-regression analyses. Sensitivity analysis showed an improvement in risk prediction in patients stratified by Child-Pugh or MELD scores. In an independent validation cohort, higher levels of suPAR predicted poor transplant-free survival after TIPS, particularly in patients with Child-Pugh A/B cirrhosis.

Conclusion

suPAR is largely derived from the injured liver and its levels are predictive of outcome in patients undergoing TIPS. suPAR, as a surrogate of hepatic inflammation, may be used to stratify care in patients following TIPS insertion.

Impact and implications

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is the most effective therapy for complications of portal hypertension. However, clinical outcomes following TIPS placement vary widely between patients and identification of the ideal candidates remains challenging. We show that soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), a circulating marker of immune activation that can easily be measured in routine clinical practice, is a novel marker to identify patients who will benefit from TIPS and those who will not.

P-suPAR may reflect the inflammatory response after pancreatic surgery

BACKGROUND

Several different scoring systems have been developed to predict post-pancreatectomy complications. Currently used inflammatory markers are of only limited value in predicting complications after pancreatic surgery. Plasma soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (P-suPAR) is a prognostic biomarker associated with different inflammatory conditions. The aim of this study was to investigate P-suPAR levels before and after pancreatic surgery.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-six patients evaluated for pancreatic surgery due to suspected malignant or premalignant lesion were recruited for this study at Tampere University Hospital between 2016 and 2021. P-suPAR was analyzed before the planned operation and on postoperative days (PODs) one and three.

RESULTS

One hundred and thirty-three patients [median age 67 (range 33-84) years, 50 % male] underwent a pancreatic surgery procedure. Compared to preoperative values [median 3.7 (IQR 3.1-4.7) ng/mL], P-suPAR was significantly lower on PODs 1 [3.2 (2.5-3.9) ng/mL; p < 0.001] and 3 [3.2 (2.7-4.1) ng/mL; p < 0.001]. P-suPAR on POD 1 was significantly lower in patients with postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) [2.6 (2.1-3.4) ng/mL] than in patients with no POPF [3.2 (2.6-3.8) ng/mL; p = 0.007]. Similar decreases in P-suPAR values were seen in patients with postoperative acute pancreatitis (POAP) and surgical site infection (SSI).

CONCLUSIONS

After pancreatic surgery, P-suPAR level on POD 1 is significantly lower in patients with POPF, POAP or SSI. P-suPAR is decreased after pancreatic resection in all patients. This type of postoperative P-suPAR profile has not previously been described, and may reflect the compensatory anti-inflammatory reaction following the initial systemic inflammatory reaction caused by surgical trauma.

Human antibody VH domains targeting uPAR as candidate therapeutics for cancers

The high expression of uPAR has been linked to tumor progression, invasion, and metastasis in several types of cancer. Such overexpression of uPAR makes it a potential target for immunotherapies across common cancers such as breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian cancer, and melanoma. In our study, two high-affinity and specific human VH domain antibody candidates, designed as clones 3 and 115, were isolated from a phage-displayed human VH antibody library. Domain-based bispecific T- cell engagers (DbTE) based on these two antibodies exhibited potent killing of uPAR-positive cancer cells. Thus, these two anti-uPAR domain antibodies are promising candidates for treating uPAR positive cancers.

Plasma soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (P-suPAR) in the diagnostics between malignant and non-malignant pancreatic lesions

BACKGROUND

Soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a biomarker elevated in several inflammatory conditions and cancers. It has recently been shown to be elevated in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) predicts the severity of the disease in first acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) and ten-year mortality after recovery from first AAP. According to our previous results, P-suPAR is not elevated in chronic pancreatitis (CP) and could possibly be used in distinguishing pancreatic cancer (PC) from CP. When imaging creates a suspicion of a pancreatic lesion, the distinction between malignant and non-malignant disease is crucial. Additional tools are needed, and we still lack a sufficiently sensitive and specific biomarker. Our aim was to further investigate whether preoperatively measured P-suPAR is beneficial in distinguishing between malignant and non-malignant pancreatic lesions.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-six patients evaluated in Tampere University Hospital for pancreatic surgery for suspected malignant pancreatic lesion were recruited for the study. The final study group consisted of 113 patients. P-suPAR and other covariates were measured before the planned operation.

RESULTS

P-suPAR was significantly higher in patients with pancreatic cancer (PC) [median 4.1 (IQR 3.3-5.1) ng/mL] than in patients with non-malignant [3.3 (2.9-4.4) ng/mL; p = 0.012] histology. ROC curve analysis resulted in an AUC of 0.65 (95% CI 0.55-0.76); p = 0.007 and a cutoff value of 3.2 ng/mL. Crosstabulation yielded sensitivity of 82% and specificity of 43%. A combination of positive P-suPAR and elevated plasma carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (P-CA19-9) tests did not improve sensitivity but elevated specificity up to 86-88%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative P-suPAR is elevated in patients with PC compared to patients with a non-malignant pancreatic lesion. Combining P-suPAR with P-CA19-9 may improve diagnostic accuracy.

Advanced iron oxide nanotheranostics for multimodal and precision treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Despite current advances in new approaches for cancer detection and treatment, pancreatic cancer remains one of the most lethal cancer types. Difficult to detect early, aggressive tumor biology, and resistance to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and immunotherapy result in a poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer patients with a 5-year survival of 10%. With advances in cancer nanotechnology, new imaging and drug delivery approaches that allow the development of multifunctional nanotheranostic agents offer opportunities for improving pancreatic cancer treatment using precision oncology. In this review, we will introduce potential applications of innovative theranostic strategies to address major challenges in the treatment of pancreatic cancer at different disease stages. Several important issues concerning targeted delivery of theranostic nanoparticles and tumor stromal barriers are discussed. We then focus on the development of a magnetic iron oxide nanoparticle platform for multimodal therapy of pancreatic cancer, including MRI monitoring targeted nanoparticle/drug delivery, therapeutic response, and tumor re-staging, activation of tumor immune response by immunoactivating nanoparticle and magnetic hyperthermia therapy, and intraoperative interventions for improving the outcome of targeted therapy. This article is categorized under: Nanotechnology Approaches to Biology > Nanoscale Systems in Biology Therapeutic Approaches and Drug Discovery > Nanomedicine for Oncologic Disease Diagnostic Tools > In Vivo Nanodiagnostics and Imaging.

The Role of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) in the Context of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (aSAH)—A Prospective Observational Study

Objective

Outcome after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) is highly variable and largely determined by early brain injury and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) represents a promising inflammatory marker which has previously been associated with outcome in traumatic brain injury and stroke patients. However, its relevance in the context of inflammatory changes after aSAH is unclear. Here, we aimed to characterize the role of circulating suPAR in both serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) as a novel biomarker for aSAH patients.

Methods

A total of 36 aSAH patients, 10 control patients with unruptured abdominal aneurysm and 32 healthy volunteers were included for analysis. suPAR was analyzed on the day of admission in all patients. In aSAH patients, suPAR was also determined on the day of DCI and the respective time frame in asymptomatic patients. One- and two-sample t-tests were used for simple difference comparisons within and between groups. Regression analysis was used to assess the influence of suPAR levels on outcome in terms of modified Rankin score.

Results

Significantly elevated suPAR serum levels (suPAR-SL) on admission were found for aSAH patients compared to healthy controls, but not compared to vascular control patients. Disease severity as documented according to Hunt and Hess grade and modified Fisher grade was associated with higher suPAR CSF levels (suPAR-CSFL). In aSAH patients, suPAR-SL increased daily by 4%, while suPAR-CSFL showed a significantly faster daily increase by an average of 22.5% per day. Each increase of the suPAR-SL by 1 ng/ml more than tripled the odds of developing DCI (OR = 3.06). While admission suPAR-CSFL was not predictive of DCI, we observed a significant correlation with modified Rankin's degree of disability at discharge.

Conclusion

Elevated suPAR serum level on admission as a biomarker for early inflammation after aSAH is associated with an increased risk of DCI. Elevated suPAR-CSFL levels correlate with a higher degree of disability at discharge. These distinct relations and the observation of a continuous increase over time affirm the role of inflammation in aSAH and require further study.

The Urokinase Plasminogen Activation System in Pancreatic Cancer: Prospective Diagnostic and Therapeutic Targets

Pancreatic cancer is a highly aggressive malignancy that features high recurrence rates and the poorest prognosis of all solid cancers. The urokinase plasminogen activation system (uPAS) is strongly implicated in the pathophysiology and clinical outcomes of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), which accounts for more than 90% of all pancreatic cancers. Overexpression of the urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) or its cell surface receptor uPAR is a key step in the acquisition of a metastatic phenotype via multiple mechanisms, including the increased activation of cell surface localised plasminogen which generates the serine protease plasmin. This triggers multiple downstream processes that promote tumour cell migration and invasion. Increasing clinical evidence shows that the overexpression of uPA, uPAR, or of both is strongly associated with worse clinicopathological features and poor prognosis in PDAC patients. This review provides an overview of the current understanding of the uPAS in the pathogenesis and progression of pancreatic cancer, with a focus on PDAC, and summarises the substantial body of evidence that supports the role of uPAS components, including plasminogen receptors, in this disease. The review further outlines the clinical utility of uPAS components as prospective diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers for PDAC, as well as a rationale for the development of novel uPAS-targeted therapeutics.

Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) as a Biomarker of Systemic Chronic Inflammation

Systemic chronic inflammation (SCI) is persistent, health-damaging, low-grade inflammation that plays a major role in immunosenescence and in development and progression of many diseases. But currently, there are no recognized standard biomarkers to assess SCI levels alone, and SCI is typically measured by combining biomarkers of acute inflammation and infection, e.g., CRP, IL-6, and TNFα. In this review, we highlight 10 properties and characteristics that are shared by the blood protein soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and SCI, supporting the argument that suPAR is a biomarker of SCI: (1) Expression and release of suPAR is upregulated by immune activation; (2) uPAR and suPAR exert pro-inflammatory functions; (3) suPAR is associated with the amount of circulating immune cells; (4) Blood suPAR levels correlate with the levels of established inflammatory biomarkers; (5) suPAR is minimally affected by acute changes and short-term influences, in contrast to many currently used markers of systemic inflammation; (6) Like SCI, suPAR is non-specifically associated with multiple diseases; (7) suPAR and SCI both predict morbidity and mortality; (8) suPAR and SCI share the same risk factors; (9) suPAR is associated with risk factors and outcomes of inflammation above and beyond other inflammatory biomarkers; (10) The suPAR level can be reduced by anti-inflammatory interventions and treatment of disease. Assessing SCI has the potential to inform risk for morbidity and mortality. Blood suPAR is a newer biomarker which may, in fact, be a biomarker of SCI since it is stably associated with inflammation and immune activation; shares the same risk factors as many age-related diseases; is both elevated by and predicts age-related diseases. There is strong evidence that suPAR is a prognostic marker of adverse events, morbidity, and mortality. It is associated with immune activity and prognosis across diverse conditions, including kidney disease, cardiovascular disease, cancer, diabetes, and inflammatory disorders. Thus, we think it likely represents a common underlying disease-process shared by many diseases; that is, SCI. We review the supporting literature and propose a research agenda that can help test the hypothesis that suPAR indexes SCI, with the potential of becoming the new gold standard for measuring SCI.

uPAR: An Essential Factor for Tumor Development

Tumorigenesis is closely related to the loss of control of many genes. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (uPAR), a glycolipid-anchored protein on the cell surface, is controlled by many factors in tumorigenesis and is expressed in many tumor tissues. In this review, we summarize the regulatory effects of the uPAR signaling pathway on processes and factors related to tumor progression, such as tumor cell proliferation, adhesion, metastasis, glycolysis, tumor microenvironment and angiogenesis. Overall, the evidence accumulated to date suggests that uPAR induction by tumor progression may be one of the most important factors affecting therapeutic efficacy. An improved understanding of the interactions between uPAR and its coreceptors in cancer will provide critical biomolecular information that may help to better predict the disease course and response to therapy.

Targeting the Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor (uPAR) in Human Diseases With a View to Non-invasive Imaging and Therapeutic Intervention

The interaction between the serine protease urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and its glycolipid-anchored receptor (uPAR) focalizes plasminogen activation to cell surfaces, thereby regulating extravascular fibrinolysis, cell adhesion, and migration. uPAR belongs to the Ly6/uPAR (LU) gene superfamily and the high-affinity binding site for uPA is assembled by a dynamic association of its three consecutive LU domains. In most human solid cancers, uPAR is expressed at the invasive areas of the tumor-stromal microenvironment. High levels of uPAR in resected tumors or shed to the plasma of cancer patients are robustly associated with poor prognosis and increased risk of relapse and metastasis. Over the years, a plethora of different strategies to inhibit uPA and uPAR function have been designed and investigated in vitro and in vivo in mouse models, but so far none have been implemented in the clinics. In recent years, uPAR-targeting with the intent of cytotoxic eradication of uPAR-expressing cells have nonetheless gained increasing momentum. Another avenue that is currently being explored is non-invasive imaging with specific uPAR-targeted reporter-molecules containing positron emitting radionuclides or near-infrared (NIR) florescence probes with the overarching aim of being able to: (i) localize disease dissemination using positron emission tomography (PET) and (ii) assist fluorescence guided surgery using optical imaging. In this review, we will discuss these advancements with special emphasis on applications using a small 9-mer peptide antagonist that targets uPAR with high affinity.

Levels of Circulating PD-L1 Are Decreased in Patients with Resectable Cholangiocarcinoma

Tumor resection represents the only curative treatment option for patients with biliary tract cancers (BTCs), including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), perihilar and extrahepatic CCA and gallbladder cancer. However, many patients develop early tumor recurrence and are unlikely to benefit from surgery. Therefore, markers to identify ideal surgical candidates are urgently needed. Circulating programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) has recently been associated with different malignancies, including pancreatic cancer which closely resembles BTC in terms of patients’ prognosis and tumor biology. Here, we aim at evaluating a potential role of circulating PD-L1 as a novel biomarker for resectable BTC. Methods: Serum levels of PD-L1 were analyzed by ELISA in 73 BTC patients and 42 healthy controls. Results: Circulating levels of preoperative PD-L1 were significantly lower in patients with BTC compared to controls. Patients with low PD-L1 levels displayed a strong trend towards an impaired prognosis, and circulating PD-L1 was negatively correlated with experimental markers of promalignant tumor characteristics such as CCL1, CCL21, CCL25 and CCL26. For 37 out of 73 patients, postoperative PD-L1 levels were available. Interestingly, after tumor resection, circulating PD-L1 raised to almost normal levels. Notably, patients with further decreasing PD-L1 concentrations after surgery showed a trend towards an impaired postoperative outcome. Conclusion: Circulating PD-L1 levels were decreased in patients with resectable BTC. Lack of normalization of PD-L1 levels after surgery might identify patients at high risk for tumor recurrence or adverse outcome.

Serum Levels of Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor Predict Tumor Response and Outcome to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have led to a paradigm shift in cancer therapy, improving outcomes in the treatment of various malignancies. However, not all patients benefit to the same extend from ICI. Reliable tools to predict treatment response and outcome are missing. Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is a marker of immune activation, whose levels are prognostic in various cancers. We evaluated circulating suPAR levels as a novel predictive and prognostic biomarker in patients receiving ICI therapy for solid tumors.

Methods

A total of n = 87 patients receiving ICI therapy for different solid malignancies as well as 32 healthy controls were included into this study. Serum levels of suPAR were measured by ELISA prior to and sequentially at two time points during ICI therapy.

Results

Baseline suPAR serum levels were significantly higher in solid tumor patients compared to healthy controls. Importantly, patients with low suPAR levels both before or during ICI treatment were more likely to have a favorable response to treatment at three and six months, respectively. This finding was confirmed by multivariate binary logistic regression analysis including several clinicopathological parameters. Moreover, circulating suPAR levels before and during therapy were an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS). As such, patients with initial suPAR levels above our ideal prognostic cut-off value (4.86 ng/ml) had a median OS of only 160 days compared to 705 days for patients with suPAR levels below this cut-off value. Finally, low baseline suPAR levels identified a subgroup of patients who experienced ICI-related side effects which in turn were associated with favorable treatment response and outcome.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that measurements of suPAR serum levels are a previously unknown, easily accessible tool to predict individual treatment response and outcome to ICI therapy. Circulating suPAR might therefore be implemented into stratification algorithms to identify the ideal candidates for ICI treatment.

Elevated soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor serum levels indicate poor survival following transarterial chemoembolization therapy for hepatic malignancies: An exploratory analysis

Background and Aim

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) represents a standard of care for patients with intermediate‐stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or liver metastases. However, identification of the ideal candidates for TACE therapy remains challenging. The soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) has recently evolved as a prognostic marker in patients with cancer; however no data on suPAR in the context of TACE exists.

Methods

Serum levels of suPAR were measured by an enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay in n = 48 TACE patients (HCC: n = 38, liver metastases: n = 10) before intervention and 1 day after TACE, as well as in 20 healthy controls.

Results

Serum levels of suPAR were significantly elevated in patients with liver cancer compared to healthy controls. Patients with or without an objective tumor response to TACE therapy had comparable levels of circulating suPAR. Importantly, baseline suPARs above the ideal prognostic cut‐off value (5.39 ng/mL) were a significant prognostic marker for reduced overall survival (OS) following TACE. As such, patients with initial suPAR levels >5.39 ng/mL showed a significantly reduced median OS of only 256 days compared to patients with suPAR serum levels below the cut‐off value (median OS: 611 days). In line with previous data, suPAR serum concentrations correlated with those of creatinine but were independent of tumor entity, leukocyte count, and C‐reactive protein in multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

Baseline suPAR serum levels provide important information on the postinterventional outcome of liver cancer patients receiving TACE.

Plasma suPAR may help to distinguish between chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

SuPAR (soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor) is a biomarker reflecting the inflammatory state of the human body. Earlier studies suggest that urinary suPAR/creatinine ratio levels are elevated in chronic pancreatitis (CP), and that plasma suPAR (P-suPAR) level is elevated in pancreatic cancer (PC). Our aim was to study the levels of P-suPAR in CP in a long-term prospective follow-up setting to explore the possibility of distinguishing between PC and CP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two patient groups were compared. The first group included 83 patients who were prospectively followed up after their first acute alcohol-induced pancreatitis (AAP) for median 7.0 (range 0.3-9.8) years. Twelve patients in this group developed CP during follow-up, and two patients were further excluded from the CP cohort. The second group consisted of 25 patients operated on for suspicion of pancreatic malignancy and final pathological diagnosis of PC. P-suPAR levels were measured and compared within and between these groups.

RESULTS

P-suPAR levels remained low during follow-up despite the development of CP. P-suPAR was significantly higher in PC patients [median 3.7 (IQR 3.1-4.4) ng/mL] than in CP patients [2.6 (1.8-3.6) ng/mL]; p = .014. A cutoff value of 2.8 ng/mL resulted from a ROC curve with area under curve (AUC) of 0.79 (95% CI 0.61-0.97), p = .009 in differentiation between PC and CP with a sensitivity and a specificity of 88% and 70% respectively.

CONCLUSION

P-suPAR is higher in patients with PC than in patients with CP, and it could thus be used in differentiating between PC and CP.

Circulating levels of microRNA193a-5p predict outcome in early stage hepatocellular carcinoma

While tumor resection and liver transplantation (LT) represent potentially curative therapeutic options for patients with early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the identification of the ideal surgical candidates has remained challenging. Just recently, miRNA-193a-5p was described as a tumor suppressor in murine and human HCC but only little is known about circulating miRNA-193a-5p in HCC patients. Here, we evaluated serum levels of miR-193a-5p by qPCR in 41 HCC patients undergoing tumor resection (n = 33) or LT (n = 8) and 20 controls. Circulating relative miR-193a-5p levels were significantly elevated in HCC patients compared to healthy controls. While relative miR-193a-5p levels were comparable between patients of different underlying disease etiology and tumor size, high relative miR-193a-5p levels were predictive for the patients' postoperative outcome, which was confirmed in uni- and multivariate Cox-regression analysis. As such, HCC patients with a preoperative relative miR-193a-5p level above the ideal cut-off value (3.57) had a median overall survival (OS) of only 451 days compared to 1158 days in patients with a relative miR-193a-5p level below this cut-off value. Our data support a novel function of miR-193a-5p as a biomarker in early-stage HCC patients that might help to identify the best surgical candidates in terms of postoperative outcome.

Prognostic prediction of a 12-methylation gene-based risk score system on pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD) accounts for ~85% of all pancreatic cancer cases and is associated with a less favorable prognosis. Aberrant DNA methylation may influence the progression of PAAD by inducing abnormal gene expression. Methylation data of PAAD samples with prognosis information were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (training set) and European Bioinformatics Institute Array Express databases (validation sets). Using the limma package, the differentially methylated genes in the training dataset were screened. Combined with the Weighted Gene Co-expression Network Analysis package, the co-methylated genes in key modules were identified. Then, a cor.test function in R software was applied to explore the functions of key the methylated genes. Correlation analyses of the expression levels and methylation levels of key methylated genes were performed, followed by identification of methylated genes associated with prognosis using Univariate Cox regression analysis. The optimal combination of prognosis related methylated genes was determined using a Cox-Proportional Hazards (Cox-PH) model. Subsequently, the risk score prognostic prediction system was constructed by combining the Cox-PH prognosis coefficients of the selected optimized genes. Based on the constructed risk score system, samples in all datasets were divided into high and low risk samples and the survival status was compared using survival curves. Furthermore, the correlation between independent prognostic factors and the risk score system was determined using the survival package. A total of 50 genes associated with prognosis of PAAD and a 12-gene optimal combination were obtained, including: CCAAT/enhancer binding protein α, histone cluster 1 H4E, STAM binding protein-like 1, phospholipase D3, centrosomal protein 55, ssDNA binding protein 4, glutamate AMPA receptor subunit 1, switch-associated protein 70, adenylate-cyclase activating polypeptide 1 receptor 1, yippee-like 3, homeobox C4 and insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1. Subsequently, a risk score prognostic prediction system of these 12 genes was constructed and validated. In addition, pathological N category, radiotherapy and risk status were identified as independent prognostic factors. Overall, the risk score prognostic prediction system constructed in the present study may be effective for predicting the prognosis of patients with PAAD.

Soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is lower in disease-free patients but cannot rule out incident disease in patients with suspected cancer

BACKGROUND

Accurate first-line diagnostics are essential for early recognition of cancer but also to identify patients free of disease. The biomarker soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is elevated in patients with cancer or non-malignant disease compared to disease-free patients. We tested if low suPAR could be used to identify disease-free patients in an accelerated cancer diagnostics program, including ruling out cancer.

METHODS

Patients with serious nonspecific symptoms and signs of cancer (NSSC) were included at the Diagnostic Outpatient Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark. Data from a clinical examination, including blood tests and imaging, was combined with national registry data on diagnoses and mortality. The association between blood suPAR and the primary outcome of disease-free (i.e., absence of incident disease and mortality) within 1-year follow-up was analysed with logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 1583 patients included, 349 (22.0%) were diagnosed with cancer, 837 (52.9%) with non-malignant disease, and 392 (25.8%) were disease-free within one year. Admission suPAR was significantly lower in disease-free patients compared to patients with cancer or non-malignant disease (P < 0.001), area under the curve 0.67 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.64-0.70). The highest positive predictive value (PPV) for the outcome of disease-free was 0.55 (95% CI: 0.41-0.68) at a suPAR of 1.65 ng/mL. Patients who died had significantly higher suPAR compared to patients who survived in all disease subgroups. The AUC of suPAR for 1-year mortality was 0.80 (95% CI: 0.77-0.83).

CONCLUSIONS

suPAR was significantly lower in disease-free individuals compared to patients with cancer or other conditions, but the PPV was not sufficiently high to terminate further clinical investigation with appropriate safety. Elevated suPAR may be a useful prognostic marker for adverse outcomes.

Soluble Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor (suPAR) Concentrations Are Elevated in Patients with Neuroendocrine Malignancies

Neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN) comprises heterogeneous tumors that are challenging to diagnose and, especially in cases of poorly differentiated (G3) NEN, are associated with very limited survival. Novel biomarkers allowing an early diagnosis as well as an optimal selection of suitable treatment options are urgently needed to improve the outcome of these patients. Recently, alterations of soluble urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) serum levels were described in various types of cancers. However, the role of circulating suPAR as a biomarker in patients with NEN is unknown. In this study, we measured suPAR serum levels in a large and well-characterized cohort of 187 patients with NEN (neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC) n = 30; neuroendocrine tumors (NET), n = 157) as well as 44 healthy controls. suPAR concentrations were significantly elevated in patients compared to controls. However, suPAR concentrations were independent of tumor-related factors such as the proliferation activity according to Ki-67, tumor grading, TNM (TNM classification of malignant tumors) stage, somatostatin receptor expression or clinical features such as functional or nonfunctional disease and the presence of tumor relapse. Interestingly, suPAR concentrations in NET patients were similar when compared to those measured in NEC patients. In contrast to previous results from other malignancies, in our analysis suPAR levels were not a significant predictor of overall survival. In conclusion, our data suggests that suPAR serum concentrations are elevated in NEN patients but do not allow prediction of outcome.