Languid Uptake of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections and Continued Reliance on Polymyxins

In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against gram-negative bacteria in patients with bacteremia and skin and soft-tissue infections in Colombia 2019-2021

OBJECTIVES

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is an option for infections caused by MDR gram-negative bacilli. In this study, we aimed to analyze the in vitro antimicrobial activity of CAZ-AVI and other antimicrobial agents against gram-negative bacilli that were collected in Colombia between 2019 and 2021 from patients with bacteremia and skin and soft-tissue infections (SSTIs).

METHODS

A total of 600 Enterobacterales and 259 P. aeruginosa strains were analyzed. The phenotypic resistance of isolates, particularly non-susceptibility to meropenem, multidrug-resistant (MDR) isolates, and difficult-to-treat (DTR) P. aeruginosa, was evaluated according to CLSI breakpoints.

RESULTS

Enterobacterales had the most susceptibility to CAZ-AVI (96.5 %) and tigecycline (95 %). Tigecycline and CAZ-AVI were the antimicrobial agents with the most in vitro activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE). CAZ-AVI was the antimicrobial treatment with the most activity against P. aeruginosa.

CONCLUSIONS

Tigecycline and CAZ-AVI were the antimicrobial agents with the most activity against CRE and MDR Enterobacterales. For P. aeruginosa, CAZ-AVI was the antimicrobial treatment with the most in vitro activity.

Risk factors and mortality of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection in haematology department: A 10-year retrospective study

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate the risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa bloodstream infection (CRPA-BSI) and identify predictors of outcomes among patients with P. aeruginosa bloodstream infection (PA-BSI).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with PA-BSI at Henan Cancer Hospital from 2013 to 2022.

RESULTS

Among the 503 incidences analysed, 15.1% of them were CRPA strains. Age, ANC < 100/mmc, receiving antifungal prophylaxis, exposure to carbapenems within the previous 90 days to onset of BSI, and allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) were associated with the development of CRPA-BSI. CRPA-BSI patients experienced significantly higher 28-day mortality rates compared to those with carbapenem-susceptible P. aeruginosa bloodstream infection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified age at BSI, active stage of haematological disease, procalcitonin levels, prior corticosteroid treatment, isolation of CRPA, and septic shock as independent predictors of 28-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for CRPA-BSI include age, ANC < 100/mmc, antifungal prophylaxis, exposure to carbapenems, and allo-HSCT. Additionally, age at BSI, active haematological disease, procalcitonin levels, prior corticosteroid treatment, CRPA isolation, and septic shock contribute to increased mortality rates among patients with PA-BSI.

The definition and global epidemiology of nonmobile colistin resistance (NMCR-3) determinants in Aeromonas from 1968 to 2022

Polymyxins are the last line of defense in infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The chromosomal EptA in Aeromonas genus was defined as a nonmobile colistin resistance determinant 3 (NMCR-3). A total of 14 NMCR-3 genotypes were identified. The global prevalence of Aeromonas-borne NMCRs and MCRs indicates an increasing trend from 1968 to 2022. And an index of resistance risk, i.e, the ratio of η = MCR/NMCR, was proposed to evaluate the propagation potential of NMCR-3. The colistin resistance in North America and Europe faced a high risk of increasing incidence of MCR since large proportions of NMCR-3 variants disseminated from Aeromonas sources. We concluded that NMCR-3 variants act natural progenitors for MCR-3/5/7, and the future MCR variant(s) will most likely be MCR-5 or MCR-7, which is also an early warning of next MCR(s) emerging in Aeromonas.

Risk Factors and Outcomes of Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Bloodstream Infection

Purpose

The rising incidence of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bloodstream infection (BSI) has made the selection of antibiotic therapy more difficult and caused high mortality. This study was aimed at exploring the risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) bloodstream infection and identifying the risk factors for the outcomes of patients with PA-BSI.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with PA-BSI in a tertiary hospital from January 2017 to December 2021 in China. Epidemiological, clinical, and microbiological characteristics were described. Risk factors for CRPA-BSI and the outcomes of PA-BSI inpatients were identified, using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results

A total of 198 PA-BSI inpatients were included. The negative outcome rate was significantly higher in patients infected with CRPA (15/34, 44.12%) than with carbapenem-susceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CSPA) (35/164, 21.34%), and the difference was statistically significant (P=0.005). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that previous exposure to carbapenem (OR 3.519, 95% CI 1.359-9.110, P=0.010) was an independent risk factor for CRPA-BSI. In addition, CRPA (OR 1.615, 95% CI 0.626-4.171, P=0.32) was not an independent risk factor for negative outcome among PA-BSI inpatients.

Conclusion

Our study showed that previous exposure to carbapenem was an independent risk factor for CRPA-BSI. CRPA was not an independent risk factor for a negative outcome in PA-BSI inpatients.

Epidemiology, Mechanisms of Resistance and Treatment Algorithm for Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: An Expert Panel Opinion

Antimicrobial resistance represents a serious threat for global health, causing an unacceptable burden in terms of morbidity, mortality and healthcare costs. In particular, in 2017, carbapenem-resistant organisms were listed by the WHO among the group of pathogens for which novel treatment strategies are urgently needed. Fortunately, several drugs and combinations have been introduced in recent years to treat multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. However, a correct use of these molecules is needed to preserve their efficacy. In the present paper, we will provide an overview on the epidemiology and mechanisms of resistance of the most common MDR Gram-negative bacteria, proposing a treatment algorithm for the management of infections due to carbapenem-resistant bacteria based on the most recent clinical evidence.

Treatment of MDR Gram-Negative Bacteria Infections: Ongoing and Prospective

Antimicrobial resistance is a serious public health concern across the world. Gram-negative resistance has propagated over the globe via various methods, the most challenging of which include extended-spectrum β-lactamases, carbapenemases, and AmpC enzymes. Gram-negative bacterial infections are difficult to treat in critically extremely sick persons. Resistance to different antibiotic treatments nearly always lowers the probability of proper empirical coverage, sometimes resulting in severe outcomes. Multidrug resistance can be combated with varying degrees of success using a combination of older drugs with high toxicity levels and novel therapeutics. The current therapies for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are discussed in this review, which includes innovative medications, older pharmaceuticals, creative combinations of the two, and therapeutic targets.

Early and Appropriate Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in the Indian Scenario

The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens exerts a substantial burden on the healthcare infrastructure worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared that multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens, especially, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the topmost priority while developing newer antimicrobials. The increasing prevalence of infectious diseases caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria also poses a challenge when choosing the empiric antimicrobial therapy for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The infections caused by MDR Gram-negative organisms ultimately result in increased mortality, morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and increased cost of management. To tackle these challenges, newer antimicrobials like ceftazidime-avibactam were explored. The article also discusses the in vitro activity and therapeutic efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam along with its pharmacokinetic properties and the role it will play in the management of MDR Gram-negative organisms in the Indian setting. Several studies have highlighted the role of early and appropriate antibiotic use in the reduction of mortality in patients with Gram-negative infections. Timely initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy for serious infections leads to favorable clinical outcomes. Early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam while treating MDR Gram-negative infections has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to highlight the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections. We have also summarized the information on outcomes achieved by early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam.

The Role of Colistin in the Era of New β-Lactam/β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations

With the current crisis related to the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB), classical treatment approaches with so-called “old-fashion antibiotics” are generally unsatisfactory. Newly approved β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors (BLBLIs) should be considered as the first-line treatment options for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infections. However, colistin can be prescribed for uncomplicated lower urinary tract infections caused by CR-GNB by relying on its pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties. Similarly, colistin can still be regarded as an alternative therapy for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) until new and effective agents are approved. Using colistin in combination regimens (i.e., including at least two in vitro active agents) can be considered in CRAB infections, and CRE infections with high risk of mortality. In conclusion, new BLBLIs have largely replaced colistin for the treatment of CR-GNB infections. Nevertheless, colistin may be needed for the treatment of CRAB infections and in the setting where the new BLBLIs are currently unavailable. In addition, with the advent of rapid diagnostic methods and novel antimicrobials, the application of personalized medicine has gained significant importance in the treatment of CRE infections.

Current and future perspectives in the treatment of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative infections

Microbial resistance is a serious threat to human health worldwide. Among the World Health Organisation's list of priority resistant bacteria, three are listed as critical-the highest level of concern-and all three are Gram-negative. Gram-negative resistance has spread worldwide via a variety of mechanisms, the most problematic being via AmpC enzymes, extended-spectrum β-lactamases, and carbapenemases. A combination of older drugs, many with high levels of toxicity, and newer agents are being used to combat multidrug resistance, with varying degrees of success. This review discusses the current treatments for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, including new agents, older compounds, and new combinations of both, and some new treatment targets that are currently under investigation.

How to: screening for mcr-mediated resistance to colistin

BACKGROUND

Colistin belongs to the last-resort antibiotics. The discovery of plasmid-bound colistin resistance mediated by the mcr-gene(s) is of great concern because, given its biological potential, there is a risk of its rapid spread.

OBJECTIVES

To discuss the current literature on the methods for the screening for mcr-mediated resistance to colistin.

SOURCES

Literature was drawn from a search of PubMed from 1 January 2016 to 26 April 2021.

CONTENT

The selective culture-based or culture-independent approach can be used for the screening of mcr-mediated resistance to colistin in clinical samples. Rapid Polymyxin NP, Colistin Drop or Colistin Agar Spot tests are applicable for the selection of isolates with a suspected resistance to colistin that has to be confirmed by broth microdilution. The mcr-mediated resistance to colistin can be confirmed by the detection of the causal gene(s) or by phenotype using EDTA-colistin broth disc elution; production of the MCR-1 enzyme can be confirmed with lateral flow immunoassay, using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of flight or liquid chromatography-based mass spectrometry. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) is the ultimate typing method. When a WGS platform is not available at a healthcare facility, a WGS-outsourced service, in combination with freely available bioinformatics tools, allows for the characterization of the mcr-gene(s) carrying isolates.

IMPLICATIONS

mcr-mediated colistin resistance should be monitored through active targeted screening. The broth microdilution method is required for colistin susceptibility testing but as only a selected number of clinical isolates are tested, colistin resistance, including mcr-mediated, may remain undetected. In mcr-1-positive Escherichia coli isolates, the MIC to colistin can range from 2 to 8 mg/L, so it is proposed that Enterobacterales with a colistin MIC of 2 mg/L should also be included in the mcr-mediated colistin resistance screening and those with a confirmed mcr-genotype and/or MCR-phenotype should be considered to be colistin-resistant.

Incidence of a subsequent carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection after previous colonisation or infection: a prospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

In patients with a history of carbapenemase-producing, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CP-CRE), the need for CP-CRE targeted treatment in subsequent sepsis episodes is unclear. This study aimed to characterise the incidence of subsequent CP-CRE infective episodes in individuals with prior CP-CRE colonisation and/or infection, and identify predictors for these subsequent CP-CRE infections.

METHODS

All adult inpatients with CP-CRE detected from any site between June 2012 and May 2014 at a tertiary-care hospital were prospectively followed for two years to assess for any subsequent CP-CRE infections. Potential factors to which patients were exposed during the follow-up period were collected from medical records and analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 171 patients were enrolled. Of 151 patients who entered the follow-up period, 16 (10.6%) developed a subsequent CP-CRE infection. The median time to a subsequent infective episode was 24.5 days (12-105 days). The type of carbapenemase was highly conserved within index and subsequent paired episodes (16 of 17 pairs). Patients with first CP-CRE isolated from intra-abdominal or respiratory sources were ≥7 times more likely to develop a subsequent infection, while most rectal carriers remain colonised. For carriers (n = 133), Klebsiella spp. (OR 4.7) and OXA carbapenemase (OR 9.4) were significant predictors of subsequent infection. In patients with initial infection (n = 18), end-stage renal failure requiring dialysis (OR 22.0) was the only predisposing factor.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of subsequent infections in patients with prior colonisation was low. Consideration for CP-CRE targeted therapy is recommended in patients on dialysis and previous CP-CRE infections involving the bloodstream and/or respiratory tract.

Cost Analysis of New Antibiotics to Treat Multidrug-Resistant Bacterial Infections: Mind the Gap

INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria rely on newly approved antibiotics, with limited evidence of their effectiveness for treating these infections. Data regarding cost of such an approach are lacking. We aimed to evaluate estimated cost of using newly approved antibiotic drugs compared to older antibiotics for the treatment of difficult-to-treat pathogens.

METHODS

MDR bacteria of interest included those defined by the World Health Organization as critical or of high priority for research. Old and newly approved antibiotics for these bacteria, defined as approved before or after January 2010, respectively, were evaluated for treatment cost and for 14-day treatment course. Estimated annual costs were calculated based on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's' report on MDR bacteria prevalence in US hospitalized patients. Old and new drugs costs were compared.

RESULTS

The cost of a 14-day treatment course for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia with a newly approved drug was found to be 6 to 60 times higher than that of older drugs. Similarly, the cost of a 14-day course for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales or MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa was doubled with new drugs; and for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, ~ 20 times higher with newer drugs. Annual incremental costs of treating difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacteria with new drugs ranged from 30 million to over 500 million USD.

CONCLUSIONS

Using newly approved antibiotic drugs for MDR infections carries a large incremental cost. Additional data to support survival benefit of these drugs are required to justify the price differences. Subgroups of patients who would benefit most from treatment should be defined.