Daptomycin Plus Fosfomycin Versus Daptomycin Alone for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and Endocarditis: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Efficacy of linezolid in monotherapy q12h versus q8h versus combined with daptomycin in the treatment of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus strains

BACKGROUND

Daptomycin is a bactericidal antibiotic, highly effective against MRSA. Linezolid, though bacteriostatic, is effective in MRSA pneumonia and has excellent meningeal penetration. Therefore, the combination of both antibiotics can be required in some patients with disseminated MRSA infections.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the in vitro activity of linezolid plus daptomycin against MRSA and glycopeptide-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus (GISA) strains and to determine the efficacy of linezolid monotherapy administered every 12 h versus every 8 h versus the combination of linezolid-q12h plus daptomycin against MRSA and GISA experimental endocarditis (EE).

METHODS

In vitro time-kill studies were performed using standard (105 cfu/L) and high (109 cfu/mL) inoculum of six MRSA strains, including one GISA strain. MRSA-277 and GISA-700788 were selected for the EE model. Animals were treated with linezolid-q12h (600 mg/kg/12 h), linezolid-q8h (600 mg/kg/8 h), daptomycin (6 mg/kg/day) or daptomycin plus linezolid-q12h mimicking human-like serum levels.

RESULTS

Linezolid-q8h and linezolid-q12h showed similar activity in MRSA-277 EE (P = 0.15). Against GISA-700788 endocarditis, linezolid-q8h was more effective than linezolid-q12h (P < 0.001). Daptomycin monotherapy was very effective against MRSA-277 and GISA-700788 EE, sterilizing 70% and 60% of valvular vegetations, respectively. Daptomycin plus linezolid-q12h was similarly effective at 60% and 56%, respectively. This combination showed neither in vitro nor in vivo antagonism, and daptomycin-non-susceptible strains were not recovered.

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing linezolid to 600 mg/8 h might be useful as initial treatment in clinical practice. If required, the combination of daptomycin plus linezolid-q12h could be a suitable option in MRSA/GISA bacteraemia/endocarditis.

Fingolimod as a potent anti-Staphylococcus aureus: pH-dependent cell envelope damage and eradication of biofilms/persisters

BACKGROUND

The urgent need for new antibacterial drugs has driven interest in repurposing therapies to combat Gram-positive biofilms and persisters. Fingolimod, an Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug for multiple sclerosis, shows bactericidal activity, particularly against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and biofilm-related infections. With a well-documented safety profile and strong translational potential, it aligns with World Health Organization's goals for antimicrobial repurposing. However, the action mode and mechanism of Fingolimod against gram-positive bacteria remain elusive.

METHODS

This study utilized clinical Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus), Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis), Streptococcus agalactiae (S. agalactiae). And their susceptibility to Fingolimod and other antibiotics was tested via Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) assays. Biofilm inhibition and hemolytic activity were evaluated using crystal violet staining, Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM), and hemolysis assays, respectively, while the effect of phospholipids on Fingolimod efficacy was assessed with checkerboard assays. Membrane permeability and integrity were measured using SYTOX green staining and transmission electron microscopy. Whole-genome sequencing was performed on Fingolimod-resistant S. aureus isolates to identify Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) linked to resistance.

RESULTS

Our data indicated that Fingolimod exerted bactericidal activity against a wide spectrum of gram-positive bacteria, including S. aureus, E. faecalis, S. agalactiae. Moreover, Fingolimod could significantly eliminate the persisters, inhibit biofilm formation and eradicate in-vitro mature biofilms of S. aureus. The mechanism by which Fingolimod rapidly eradicated S. aureus involved a pH-dependent disruption of bacterial cell permeability and envelope integrity. Concomitantly, exogenous supplementation of phospholipids in the culture medium resulted in a dose-dependent increase in the MIC of Fingolimod. Specifically, the addition of 64 μg/mL of cardiolipin (CL) and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) completely nullified the bactericidal activity of Fingolimod at a concentration of 4 times the MIC. After four months of Fingolimod exposure, the MIC values of S. aureus showed a slight increase, indicating that it is not prone to developing drug resistance.

CONCLUSION

Fingolimod exhibits bactericidal activity against diverse gram-positive bacteria, with remarkable effects on S. aureus (including MRSA), disrupting bacterial cell structural integrity in a pH-dependent way and eradicating biofilms and persisters of S. aureus.

Ceftaroline for bloodstream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of ceftaroline vs. vancomycin or daptomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (BSIs) (MRSA-BSIs).

METHODS

This multicentre retrospective study conducted in 15 Spanish hospitals included data from the first MRSA-BSIs of adult patients between January 2019 and December 2022. The ceftaroline group included patients who received ceftaroline for ≥72 hours within the first week of BSI onset; the standard-of-care (SOC) group included patients who received vancomycin or daptomycin ≥72 hours after BSI onset. Primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality and incidence of adverse events (AEs). Propensity-score matching and Cox proportional hazards analyses were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 429 MRSA-BSIs were included: 133 in the ceftaroline group and 296 in the SOC group. More patients in the ceftaroline group had a Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score >2 (51.1% vs. 36.5%; p < 0.01), complicated BSI (66.2% vs. 42.2%; p < 0.01), infective endocarditis (18.8% vs. 6.4%; p < 0.01) and prescribed in combination treatment (65.4% vs. 11.5%; p < 0.01), with no statistically significant differences in 30-day mortality: 23.3% ceftaroline (95% CI, 16.1-30.5%) vs. 16.2% SOC (95% CI, 12.0-20.4%), p 0.08. There were no statistically significant differences in 90-day mortality (33.1% ceftaroline vs. 26.7% SOC; p 0.17). After propensity-score matching, 105 patients treated with ceftaroline were matched with 105 controls: the 30-day mortality rates were 21.9% and 16.2% (p 0.38). Cox regression analysis of the entire cohort (n = 429) revealed that age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.05; 95% CI, 1.03-1.07) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score >2 (HR, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.50-3.65) were associated with 90-day mortality risk, although ceftaroline treatment did not demonstrate a significant effect (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.97-1.02). Incidence of AEs was 12.0% in ceftaroline vs. 4.4% in the SOC group (p < 0.01). Most AEs occurred when ceftaroline was used in combination vs. monotherapy (17.2% vs. 2.2%; p 0.01).

DISCUSSION

Ceftaroline was an effective treatment for MRSA-BSIs but was commonly prescribed in combination showing a higher incidence of AEs.

Emerging Concepts for the Treatment of Biofilm-Associated Bone and Joint Infections with IV Fosfomycin: A Literature Review

Due to the involvement of biofilms in the pathogenesis of bone and joint infections (BJI), the treatment of these infections is often challenging, especially when multidrug- or extensively drug-resistant (MDR/XDR) pathogens are involved. Intravenous fosfomycin (FOS) is a phosphoenolpyruvate analogue with a unique mode of action and broad-spectrum activity against both Gram-positive (GP) and Gram-negative (GN) pathogens. It is used in various severe and deep-seated infections, including BJIs. This review article focuses on preclinical and clinical data surrounding the use of FOS for biofilm-related BJIs. Data from several in vitro and animal models of infection demonstrated that FOS, especially in combination with other antibiotics, is effective against biofilms of (methicillin-resistant) Staphylococcus spp., (vancomycin-resistant) Enterococcus spp., carbapenem-resistant and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales, and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Data from clinical studies, mostly retrospective observational studies and case reports/case series, revealed that FOS was typically used in combination with other antibiotics for the treatment of various BJI, including acute and chronic osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint infections, and fracture-related infections, in adult and pediatric patients. Success rates often exceeded 80%. FOS exhibits good and fast penetration into bone tissue and is generally well tolerated, with only a few adverse drug reactions, such as gastrointestinal disorders and electrolyte imbalances. Collectively, the data indicate that FOS is a valuable option as part of combination regimens for the treatment of BJIs caused by both GP and GN bacteria.

Molecular Pharmacology of the Antibiotic Fosfomycin, an Inhibitor of Peptidoglycan Biosynthesis

The antibiotic fosfomycin is an epoxy-phosphonate natural product with a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity and distinct mechanism of action that has been in clinical use for 50 years. Fosfomycin is an irreversible covalent inhibitor of UDP-GlcNAc enolpyruvyl transferase (MurA), which catalyzes the first committed step in bacterial peptidoglycan biosynthesis. Fosfomycin binds to the active site of MurA in competition with substrate phosphoenolpyruvate (PEP) and undergoes the ring-opening nucleophilic attack of an active-site cysteine. MurA and its related enolpyruvyl transferase, 5-enolpyruvyl-shikimate-3-phosphate (EPSP) synthase (AroA), are the only known enzymes to catalyze the unusual enolpyruvyl transfer from PEP, and each is the target of an important inhibitor. Specifically, MurA is inactivated by fosfomycin, and EPSP synthase (AroA) of the shikimate pathway is the target of the herbicide glyphosate. Commonalities and differences in enzymatic reaction mechanisms of MurA and EPSP synthase provide a molecular rationale for the specificity of their respective inhibitors. With its distinct mode of molecular action and clinical activity against multidrug-resistant bacteria, fosfomycin continues to motivate the discovery and development of novel inhibitors of MurA.

Management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a comprehensive narrative review of available evidence focusing on current controversies and the challenges ahead

INTRODUCTION

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by Staphylococcus aureus are common worldwide, representing one of the most relevant issues in clinical infectious diseases practice. In particular, BSIs by methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA-BSI) are still today a challenge since mortality burden remains elevated although decades of research.

AREAS COVERED

The following topics regarding MRSA-BSI were reviewed and discussed by resorting to best available evidence retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE up to October 2024: i) epidemiology; ii) microbiology; iii) classification, with a focus on complicated and not complicated forms; iv) the structured approach to the patient; v) pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the main antimicrobial options; vi) controversies regarding the best therapeutic approach.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite ongoing efforts to better stratify and manage MRSA-BSI, there is no universally accepted classification system accurately distinguishing between uncomplicated/low risk and complicated/high risk forms. Biomarkers such as interleukin(IL)-10 hold promise in order to enable a more precise stratification, premise for an appropriate treatment plan. There is a theoretical rationale for implementing a combination therapy including a beta-lactam agent upfront, especially for patients considered at higher risk of unfavorable outcomes, but further data are necessary, and the same applies to newer adjuvants. Novel microbiological techniques may help in guiding antimicrobial duration.

Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Review

Importance

Staphylococcus aureus, a gram-positive bacterium, is the leading cause of death from bacteremia worldwide, with a case fatality rate of 15% to 30% and an estimated 300 000 deaths per year.

Observations

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia causes metastatic infection in more than one-third of cases, including endocarditis (≈12%), septic arthritis (7%), vertebral osteomyelitis (≈4%), spinal epidural abscess, psoas abscess, splenic abscess, septic pulmonary emboli, and seeding of implantable medical devices. Patients with S aureus bacteremia commonly present with fever or symptoms from metastatic infection, such as pain in the back, joints, abdomen or extremities, and/or change in mental status. Risk factors include intravascular devices such as implantable cardiac devices and dialysis vascular catheters, recent surgical procedures, injection drug use, diabetes, and previous S aureus infection. Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia is detected with blood cultures. Prolonged S aureus bacteremia (≥48 hours) is associated with a 90-day mortality risk of 39%. All patients with S aureus bacteremia should undergo transthoracic echocardiography; transesophageal echocardiography should be performed in patients at high risk for endocarditis, such as those with persistent bacteremia, persistent fever, metastatic infection foci, or implantable cardiac devices. Other imaging modalities, such as computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging, should be performed based on symptoms and localizing signs of metastatic infection. Staphylococcus aureus is categorized as methicillin-susceptible (MSSA) or methicillin-resistant (MRSA) based on susceptibility to β-lactam antibiotics. Initial treatment for S aureus bacteremia typically includes antibiotics active against MRSA such as vancomycin or daptomycin. Once antibiotic susceptibility results are available, antibiotics should be adjusted. Cefazolin or antistaphylococcal penicillins should be used for MSSA and vancomycin, daptomycin, or ceftobiprole for MRSA. Phase 3 trials for S aureus bacteremia demonstrated noninferiority of daptomycin to standard of care (treatment success, 53/120 [44%] vs 48/115 [42%]) and noninferiority of ceftobiprole to daptomycin (treatment success, 132/189 [70%] vs 136/198 [69%]). Source control is a critical component of treating S aureus bacteremia and may include removal of infected intravascular or implanted devices, drainage of abscesses, and surgical debridement.

Conclusions and relevance

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia has a case fatality rate of 15% to 30% and causes 300 000 deaths per year worldwide. Empirical antibiotic treatment should include vancomycin or daptomycin, which are active against MRSA. Once S aureus susceptibilities are known, MSSA should be treated with cefazolin or an antistaphylococcal penicillin. Additional clinical management consists of identifying sites of metastatic infection and pursuing source control for identified foci of infection.

Real-World Use, Effectiveness, and Safety of Intravenous Fosfomycin: The FORTRESS Study

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous fosfomycin (FOS) is a broad-spectrum antibiotic primarily used in combination therapy to treat severe infections caused by both Gram-positive (GP) and Gram-negative (GN) pathogens, including multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. The aim of this study, the largest to date, was to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, usage patterns, and patient characteristics of FOS in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Interim analysis of an ongoing, prospective, non-interventional, multicentre study in five European countries, involving centres in Germany, Italy, the United Kingdom, Greece, and Austria.

RESULTS

A total of 716 patients were enrolled between January 2017 and November 2023 (mean age: 62.8 years, APACHE II: 18.3, SOFA: 6.7). Main indications for FOS were bacteraemia/sepsis (23.6%), complicated urinary tract infections (18.0%), and bone and joint infections (17.4%). Other indications included hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia (11.0%), complicated skin and soft tissue infections (9.1%), bacterial meningitis/central nervous system (CNS) infections (7.8%), and infective endocarditis (6.4%). Most common pathogens identified were Staphylococcus aureus (31.4%, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus), Klebsiella spp. (including K. pneumoniae) (17.2%), Escherichia coli (14.2%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (12.9%), other Enterobacterales (10.9%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (8.4%). In 34.6% of patients, an MDR pathogen was involved. Carbapenem resistance (CR) was high in Klebsiella spp. infections (59/123, 48.0%). In most patients, FOS was used in combination therapy (90.2%). The median dose was 15 g/day. Overall, clinical success and clinical response were favourable with 75.3% and 83.4% at the end of FOS treatment. Clinical success rates in infections caused by MDR or CR pathogens were 78.0% and 81.8%, respectively. Microbiological cure was achieved in 82.4% of all patients. Electrolyte imbalances were the most frequently observed adverse drug reactions, while gastrointestinal disorders were rare.

CONCLUSION

The results from this study suggest that FOS is a safe and effective option as combination partner in the treatment of patients with severe infections caused by both GP and GN pathogens, including deep-seated infections and/or involvement of MDR bacteria.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02979951.

The Evolving Landscape of Infective Endocarditis: Difficult-to-Treat Resistance Bacteria and Novel Diagnostics at the Foreground

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a relatively rare but potentially life-threatening disease characterized by substantial mortality and long-term sequelae among the survivors. In recent decades, a dramatic change in the profile of patients diagnosed with IE has been observed primarily in developed countries, most likely due to an aging population and a recent increase in invasive medical procedures. Nowadays, the typical IE patient is usually older, with complex comorbidities, and a history significant for cardiac disease, including degenerative heart valve disease, prosthetic valves, or cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). Moreover, as patient risk factors change, predisposing them to more healthcare-associated IE, the microbiology of IE is also shifting; there are growing concerns regarding the rise in the incidence of IE caused by difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) bacteria in at-risk patients with frequent healthcare contact. The present review aims to explore the evolving landscape of IE and summarize the current knowledge on novel diagnostics to ensure timely diagnosis and outline optimal therapy for DTR bacterial IE.

Beyond Conventional Drug Design: Exploring the Broad-Spectrum Efficacy of Antimicrobial Peptides

In the fight against pathogenic infections, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) constitute a novel and promising class of compounds that defies accepted drug development conventions like Lipinski's rule. AMPs are remarkably effective against a variety of pathogens, including viruses, bacteria, parasites, and fungi. Their effectiveness, despite differing from traditional drug-like properties defies accepted standards. This review investigates the complex world of AMPs with an emphasis on their structural and physicochemical properties, which include size, sequence, structure, charge, and half-life. These distinguishing characteristics set AMPs apart from conventional therapeutics that adhere to Lipinski's rules and greatly contribute to their selective targeting, reduction of resistance, multifunctionality, and broad-spectrum efficacy. In contrast to traditional drugs that follow Lipinski's guidelines, AMPs have special qualities that play a big role in their ability to target specific targets, lower resistance, and work across a wide range of conditions. Our work is unique because of this nuanced investigation, which offers a new viewpoint on the potential of AMPs in tackling the worldwide problem of antibiotic resistance. In the face of the escalating global challenge of antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are innovative antimicrobial agents with unique mechanisms of action that challenge traditional Lipinski's Rule. They can withstand various microbial threats through membrane disruption, intracellular targeting, and immunomodulation. AMP versatility sets them apart from other antibiotics and their potential to address microbial infections and antibiotic resistance is growing. To fully unlock their potential, traditional drug development approaches need to be reconsidered. AMPs have revolutionary potential, paving the way for innovative solutions to health issues and transforming the antimicrobial therapy landscape.

Treatment of Complicated Gram-Positive Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis

The Gram-positive cocci Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus spp., and Enterococcus spp. are the most frequent causative organisms of bloodstream infections and infective endocarditis. "Complicated bacteremia" is a term used in S. aureus bloodstream infections and originally implied the presence of metastatic infectious foci (i.e. complications of S. aureus bacteremia). These complications demand longer antimicrobial treatment durations and, frequently, interventional source control. Several risk factors for the incidence of bacteremia complications have been identified and are often used for the definition of complicated bacteremia. Here, we discuss management and diagnostic approaches and treatment options for patients with complicated bacteremia, with particular focus on infective endocarditis. We also summarize the available evidence regarding imaging modalities and the choice of antimicrobial mono- or combination therapy according to resistance patterns for these pathogens as well as treatment durations and optimized application routes. Finally, we synopsize current and future areas of research in complicated bacteremia and infective endocarditis.

Could a Reduced Dose of 8 g of Continuous Infusion Fosfomycin Be Considered as Effective as and Safer than a Standard 16 g Dose When Combined with High-Dose Daptomycin in the Treatment of Staphylococcal osteoarticular Infections?

Background: Daptomycin plus fosfomycin combination therapy is a valuable strategy for treating staphylococcal osteoarticular infections (OIs), but hypernatremia and hypokalemia due to sodium overload are important issues. The aim of this study was to assess the likelihood of attaining a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target of AUC/MIC > 66.6 and/or of 70%t > MIC with continuous infusion (CI) fosfomycin at the recommended vs. reduced dose in patients with OIs receiving combination therapy with high-dose daptomycin. Adverse events were also evaluated. Methods: Patients with OIs treated with 8-10 mg/kg daily daptomycin plus CI fosfomycin, and who had a ≥1 TDM assessment of CI fosfomycin, were retrospectively included in the high-dose (16 g daily) or reduced-dose (<16 g daily) groups. The attainment of the PK/PD targets of 70%t > MIC and AUC/MIC > 66.6 up to an MIC of 32 mg/L was calculated. A CART analysis was used to identify a cut-off of fosfomycin AUC that indicated occurrence of hypernatremia and/or hypokalemia. Results: A total of 44 and 39 patients were included in the high- and reduced-dose groups, respectively. The two groups did not differ in terms of demographic characteristics, underlying infectious diseases and microbiological isolates. No differences between groups in attaining both PK/PD targets up to an MIC of 32 mg/L and in C-reactive protein reduction at the end of treatment were observed. Fosfomycin AUC > 8245 mg × h/L and >8326 mg × h/L were associated with hypernatremia and hypokalemia, respectively. Conclusions: CI fosfomycin at 8 g daily may reach optimal PK/PD target attainment with better safety than the recommended 16 g daily dose in patients with preserved renal function. Targeting fosfomycin AUC at 2131-8326 mg × h/L or steady-state concentration at 88.8-347 mg/L may be adequate for optimizing drug pharmacodynamics up to an MIC of 32 mg/L and minimizing the risk of hypernatremia and hypokalemia.

The effect of combining antibiotics on resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Under which conditions antibiotic combination therapy decelerates rather than accelerates resistance evolution is not well understood. We examined the effect of combining antibiotics on within-patient resistance development across various bacterial pathogens and antibiotics.

Methods

We searched CENTRAL, EMBASE, and PubMed for (quasi)-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to 24 November 2022. Trials comparing antibiotic treatments with different numbers of antibiotics were included. Patients were considered to have acquired resistance if, at the follow-up culture, a resistant bacterium (as defined by the study authors) was detected that had not been present in the baseline culture. We combined results using a random effects model and performed meta-regression and stratified analyses. The trials' risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool.

Results

42 trials were eligible and 29, including 5054 patients, qualified for statistical analysis. In most trials, resistance development was not the primary outcome and studies lacked power. The combined odds ratio for the acquisition of resistance comparing the group with the higher number of antibiotics with the comparison group was 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.25), with substantial between-study heterogeneity (I2=77%). We identified tentative evidence for potential beneficial or detrimental effects of antibiotic combination therapy for specific pathogens or medical conditions.

Conclusions

The evidence for combining a higher number of antibiotics compared to fewer from RCTs is scarce and overall compatible with both benefit or harm. Trials powered to detect differences in resistance development or well-designed observational studies are required to clarify the impact of combination therapy on resistance.

Funding

Support from the Swiss National Science Foundation (grant 310030B_176401 (SB, BS, CW), grant 32FP30-174281 (ME), grant 324730_207957 (RDK)) and from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID, cooperative agreement AI069924 (ME)) is gratefully acknowledged.

Efficacy and safety of antistaphylococcal penicillin or cephazolin-based combinations versus monotherapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: A propensity score analysis of nationwide prospective cohort

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of antistaphylococcal penicillin (ASP) or cephazolin-based combinations versus monotherapy in patients with native-valve infective endocarditis (IE) caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA).

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis of a multicentre prospective cohort. We include patients from 2008 to 2022 with definite native-valve, left-side IE due to MSSA treated primarily with ASP/cephazolin. Patients were categorized according to whether they initially received monotherapy or combination therapy for more than 72 h. A propensity score-matched cohort was planned.

RESULTS

Out of 420 included cases, 94 (22.4%) received monotherapy and 326 (77.6%) combination. Median combination duration was 14 days (interquartile range 10-20). Sixty-eight combination cases were matched with 68 monotherapy controls. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. There were no differences in in-hospital or one-year mortality between groups (OR 0.85, 95%CI 0.33-2.18 and HR 0.68, 95%CI 0.35-1.31, respectively). Endocarditis relapses and persistent bacteraemia rates were similar (0% vs 1.5%, p = 1.000; and 19.1% vs 13.2%, p = 0.352, respectively). Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in the combination group (15.0% vs 1.1%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic combinations for patients with native valve left-sided MSSA endocarditis did not improve patient's outcomes. Drug-related adverse events were more frequent in combination patients.

PBP4 is required for serum-induced cell wall thickening and antibiotic tolerance in Staphylococcus aureus

The bacterial pathogen Staphylococcus aureus responds to the host environment by synthesizing a thick peptidoglycan cell wall, which protects the bacterium from membrane-targeting antimicrobials and the immune response. However, the proteins required for this response were previously unknown. Here, we demonstrate by three independent approaches that the penicillin-binding protein PBP4 is crucial for serum-induced cell wall thickening. First, mutants lacking various non-essential cell wall synthesis enzymes were tested, revealing that a mutant lacking pbp4 was unable to generate a thick cell wall in serum. This resulted in reduced serum-induced tolerance of the pbp4 mutant toward the last resort antibiotic daptomycin relative to wild-type cells. Second, we found that serum-induced cell wall thickening occurred in each of a panel of 134 clinical bacteremia isolates, except for one strain with a naturally occurring mutation that results in an S140R substitution in the active site of PBP4. Finally, inhibition of PBP4 with cefoxitin prevented serum-induced cell wall thickening and the resulting antibiotic tolerance in the USA300 strain and clinical MRSA isolates. Together, this provides a rationale for combining daptomycin with cefoxitin, a PBP4 inhibitor, to potentially improve treatment outcomes for patients with invasive MRSA infections.

Comparative in vitro efficacy of antibiotics against the intracellular reservoir of Staphylococcus aureus

Staphylococcus aureus (SA) is a leading cause of bloodstream infection. The liver represents the sentinel immune organ for clearance of bloodstream pathogens and eradication of intracellular SA from liver-resident macrophages (Kupffer cells, KCs) eliminates the likely pathogenic reservoir that contributes to persistent bacteraemia.

OBJECTIVES

We assessed antimicrobial activity at phagolysosome-mimicking pH, intracellular penetration, and SA eradication within KCs in vitro for clinically prescribed antistaphylococcal agents alone or in combination: vancomycin, daptomycin, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, oritavancin, oxacillin, cefazolin; rifampin and fosfomycin.

METHODS

pH-adjusted broth microdilution assays, intracellular bioaccumulation assays, and intracellular killing assays against clinical bloodstream isolates were performed using a murine KC line with study agents.

RESULTS

Rifampin and β-lactams exhibited enhanced activity [2- to 16-fold minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) decrease] at phagolysosomal pH while vancomycin, oritavancin, daptomycin and fosfomycin demonstrated reduced activity (2- to 32-fold MIC increase in order of least to greatest potency reduction). All agents evaluated had poor to modest intracellular to extracellular concentration ratios (0.024-7.8), with exceptions of rifampin and oritavancin (intracellular to extracellular ratios of 17.4 and 78.2, respectively). Finally, we showed that the first-line treatment for SA bacteraemia (SAB), vancomycin, performed worse than all other tested antibiotics in eradicating intracellular SA at human Cmax concentration (0.20 log cfu decrease), while oritavancin performed better than all other agents alone (2.05 versus 1.06-1.36 log cfu decrease).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings raise concerns about the efficacy of commonly prescribed antibiotics against intracellular SA reservoirs and emphasize the need to consider targeting pathogen eradication from the liver to achieve early control of SAB.

Antibiotics with antibiofilm activity - rifampicin and beyond

The management of prosthetic joint infections is a complex and multilayered process that is additionally complicated by the formation of bacterial biofilm. Foreign material provides the ideal grounds for the development of an intricate matrix that hinders treatment and creates a difficult environment for antibiotics to act. Surgical intervention is often warranted but requires appropriate adjunctive therapy. Despite available guidelines, several aspects of antibiotic therapy with antibiofilm activity lack clear definition. Given the escalating challenges posed by antimicrobial resistance, extended treatment durations, and tolerance issues, it is essential to ensure that antimicrobials with antibiofilm activity are both potent and diverse. Evidence of biofilm-active drugs is highlighted, and alternatives to classical regimens are further discussed.

Host-induced cell wall remodeling impairs opsonophagocytosis of Staphylococcus aureus by neutrophils

The bacterial pathogen Staphylococcus aureus responds to the host environment by increasing the thickness of its cell wall. However, the impact of cell wall thickening on susceptibility to host defenses is unclear. Using bacteria incubated in human serum, we show that host-induced increases in cell wall thickness led to a reduction in the exposure of bound antibody and complement and a corresponding reduction in phagocytosis and killing by neutrophils. The exposure of opsonins bound to protein antigens or lipoteichoic acid (LTA) was most significantly reduced, while opsonization by IgG against wall teichoic acid or peptidoglycan was largely unaffected. Partial digestion of accumulated cell wall using the enzyme lysostaphin restored opsonin exposure and promoted phagocytosis and killing. Concordantly, the antibiotic fosfomycin inhibited cell wall remodeling and maintained the full susceptibility of S. aureus to opsonophagocytic killing by neutrophils. These findings reveal that host-induced changes to the S. aureus cell wall reduce the ability of the immune system to detect and kill this pathogen through reduced exposure of protein- and LTA-bound opsonins.

IMPORTANCE

Understanding how bacteria adapt to the host environment is critical in determining fundamental mechanisms of immune evasion, pathogenesis, and the identification of targets for new therapeutic approaches. Previous work demonstrated that Staphylococcus aureus remodels its cell envelope in response to host factors and we hypothesized that this may affect recognition by antibodies and thus killing by immune cells. As expected, incubation of S. aureus in human serum resulted in rapid binding of antibodies. However, as bacteria adapted to the serum, the increase in cell wall thickness resulted in a significant reduction in exposure of bound antibodies. This reduced antibody exposure, in turn, led to reduced killing by human neutrophils. Importantly, while antibodies bound to some cell surface structures became obscured, this was not the case for those bound to wall teichoic acid, which may have important implications for vaccine design.

Therapeutic Strategies to Combat Increasing Rates of Multidrug Resistant Pathogens

The emergence of antimicrobic-resistant infectious pathogens and the consequent rising in the incidence and prevalence of demises caused by or associated to infections which are not sensitive to drug treatments is one of today's major global health challenges. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) can bring to therapeutic failure, infection's persistence and risk of serious illness, in particular in vulnerable populations such as the elderly, patients with neoplastic diseases or the immunocompromised. It is assessed that AMR will induce until 10 million deaths per year by 2050, becoming the leading cause of disease-related deaths. The World Health Organisation (WHO) and the United Nations General Assembly urgently call for new measures to combat the phenomenon. Research and development of new antimicrobial agents has decreased due to market failure. However, promising results are coming from new alternative therapeutic strategies such as monoclonal antibodies, microbiome modulators, nanomaterial-based therapeutics, vaccines, and phages. This narrative review aimed to analyse the benefits and weaknesses of alternative therapeutic strategies to antibiotics which treat multidrug-resistant bacterial infections.

The effect of combining antibiotics on resistance: A systematic review and meta-analysis

When and under which conditions antibiotic combination therapy decelerates rather than accelerates resistance evolution is not well understood. We examined the effect of combining antibiotics on within-patient resistance development across various bacterial pathogens and antibiotics. We searched CENTRAL, EMBASE and PubMed for (quasi)-randomised controlled trials (RCTs) published from database inception to November 24th, 2022. Trials comparing antibiotic treatments with different numbers of antibiotics were included. A patient was considered to have acquired resistance if, at the follow-up culture, a resistant bacterium (as defined by the study authors) was detected that had not been present in the baseline culture. We combined results using a random effects model and performed meta-regression and stratified analyses. The trials' risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane tool. 42 trials were eligible and 29, including 5054 patients, were qualified for statistical analysis. In most trials, resistance development was not the primary outcome and studies lacked power. The combined odds ratio (OR) for the acquisition of resistance comparing the group with the higher number of antibiotics with the comparison group was 1.23 (95% CI 0.68-2.25), with substantial between-study heterogeneity (I 2 =77%). We identified tentative evidence for potential beneficial or detrimental effects of antibiotic combination therapy for specific pathogens or medical conditions. The evidence for combining a higher number of antibiotics compared to fewer from RCTs is scarce and overall, is compatible with both benefit or harm. Trials powered to detect differences in resistance development or well-designed observational studies are required to clarify the impact of combination therapy on resistance.

Adverse events during intravenous fosfomycin therapy in a real-life scenario. Risk factors and the potential role of therapeutic drug monitoring

BACKGROUND

Intravenous fosfomycin (IVFOF) is gaining interest in severe infections. Its use may be limited by adverse events (AEs). Little experience exists on IVFOF therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in real-life setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective study of patients receiving IVFOF for > 48 h at Policlinico Hospital (Milan, Italy) from 01/01/2019 to 01/01/2023. AEs associated to IVFOF graded CTCAE ≥ II were considered. Demographic and clinical risk factors for IVFOF-related AEs were analysed with simple and multivariable regression models. The determination of IVFOF TDM was made by a rapid ultraperformance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method (LC-MS/MS) on plasma samples. The performance of TDM (trough levels (Cmin) in intermittent infusion, steady state levels (Css) in continuous infusion) in predicting AEs ≤ 5 days after its assessment was evaluated.

RESULTS

Two hundred and twenty-four patients were included. At IVFOF initiation, 81/224 (36.2%) patients were in ICU and 35/224 (15.7%) had septic shock. The most frequent infection site was the low respiratory tract (124/224, 55.4%). Ninety-five patients (42.4%) experienced ≥ 1AEs, with median time of 4.0 (2.0-7.0) days from IVFOF initiation. Hypernatremia was the most frequent AE (53/224, 23.7%). Therapy discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 38/224 (17.0%). ICU setting, low respiratory tract infections and septic shock resulted associated with AEs (RRadjusted 1.59 (95%CI:1.09-2.31), 1.46 (95%CI:1.03-2.07) and 1.73 (95%CI:1.27-2.37), respectively), while IVFOF daily dose did not. Of the 68 patients undergone IVFOF TDM, TDM values predicted overall AEs and hypernatremia with AUROC of 0.65 (95%CI:0.44-0.86) and 0.91 (95%CI:0.79-1.0) respectively for Cmin, 0.67 (95%CI:0.39-0.95) and 0.76 (95%CI:0.52-1.0) respectively for Css.

CONCLUSIONS

We provided real world data on the use of IVFOF-based regimens and associated AEs. IVFOF TDM deserves further research as it may represent a valid tool to predict AEs.

KEY POINTS

Real world data on intravenous fosfomycin for severe bacterial infections. AEs occurred in over 40% (therapy discontinuation in 17%) and were related to baseline clinical severity but not to fosfomycin dose. TDM showed promising results in predicting AEs.

Exebacase in Addition to Standard-of-Care Antibiotics for Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections and Right-Sided Infective Endocarditis: A Phase 3, Superiority-Design, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Clinical Trial (DISRUPT)

BACKGROUND

Novel treatments are needed for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, particularly for methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Exebacase is a first-in-class antistaphylococcal lysin that is rapidly bactericidal and synergizes with antibiotics.

METHODS

In Direct Lysis of Staph Aureus Resistant Pathogen Trial of Exebacase (DISRUPT), a superiority-design phase 3 study, patients with S. aureus bacteremia/endocarditis were randomly assigned to receive a single dose of intravenous exebacase or placebo in addition to standard-of-care antibiotics. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical response at day 14 in the MRSA population.

RESULTS

A total of 259 patients were randomized before the study was stopped for futility based on the recommendation of the unblinded Data Safety Monitoring Board. Clinical response rates at day 14 in the MRSA population (n = 97) were 50.0% (exebacase + antibiotics; 32/64) versus 60.6% (antibiotics alone; 20/33) (P = .392). Overall, rates of adverse events were similar across groups. No adverse events of hypersensitivity related to exebacase were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Exebacase + antibiotics failed to improve clinical response at day 14 in patients with MRSA bacteremia/endocarditis. This result was unexpected based on phase 2 data that established proof-of-concept for exebacase + antibiotics in patients with MRSA bacteremia/endocarditis. In the antibiotics-alone group, the clinical response rate was higher than that seen in phase 2. Heterogeneity within the study population and a relatively small sample size in either the phase 2 or phase 3 studies may have increased the probability of imbalances in the multiple components of day 14 clinical outcome. This study provides lessons for future superiority studies in S. aureus bacteremia/endocarditis. Clinical Trials Registration.NCT04160468.

The Complex Intracellular Lifecycle of Staphylococcus aureus Contributes to Reduced Antibiotic Efficacy and Persistent Bacteremia

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia continues to be associated with significant morbidity and mortality, despite improvements in diagnostics and management. Persistent infections pose a major challenge to clinicians and have been consistently shown to increase the risk of mortality and other infectious complications. S. aureus, while typically not considered an intracellular pathogen, has been proven to utilize an intracellular niche, through several phenotypes including small colony variants, as a means for survival that has been linked to chronic, persistent, and recurrent infections. This intracellular persistence allows for protection from the host immune system and leads to reduced antibiotic efficacy through a variety of mechanisms. These include antimicrobial resistance, tolerance, and/or persistence in S. aureus that contribute to persistent bacteremia. This review will discuss the challenges associated with treating these complicated infections and the various methods that S. aureus uses to persist within the intracellular space.

Pharmacotherapies for multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections: current options and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are a serious concern for public health with high morbidity and mortality. Though many antibiotics have been introduced to manage these infections, there are remaining concerns regarding the optimal management of Gram-positive MDROs.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search on the PubMed/Medline database was conducted. We applied no language and time limits for the search strategy. In this narrative review, we discuss the current options for managing Gram-positive MDROs as well as non-traditional antibacterial agents in development.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite their introduction more than 70 years ago, glycopeptides are still the cornerstone in treating Gram-positive infections: all registrative studies of new antibiotics have glycopeptides as control; these studies are designed as not inferior studies, therefore it is almost impossible to give recommendations other than the use of glycopeptides in the treatment of Gram-positive infections. The best evidence on treatments different from glycopeptides comes from post-hoc analysis and meta-analysis. Non-traditional antibacterial agents are being studied to aid in short and effective antibiotic therapies. The use of non-traditional antibacterial agents is not restricted to replacing traditional antibacterial agents with alternative therapies; instead, they should be used in combination with antibiotic therapies.

Identification of the novel fosfomycin resistance gene fosSC in Staphylococcus capitis

OBJECTIVES

Fosfomycin has regained attention for treating infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and multidrug-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci. In this research, our objective was to investigate the mechanisms underlying fosfomycin resistance in Staphylococcus capitis.

METHODS

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of fosfomycin were assessed in 109 clinical S. capitis isolates by the agar dilution method. By cloning the fos-like genes into the shuttle vector, pTSSCm-Pcap, and observing the change in fosfomycin MICs, the gene function was verified. Core genome multilocus sequence typing and comparative genomics analysis were conducted to determine the population characteristics of S. capitis isolates and analyse the genetic environment of the fos-like genes.

RESULTS

We identified a novel fosfomycin resistance gene, fosSC, on the chromosome in 58 out of 109 (53.2%) S. capitis isolates. The deduced products of the fosSC genes shared 67.15-67.88% amino acid sequence identity with FosB. The RN-pT-fosSC transformants carrying fosSC showed a 512-fold increase in the fosfomycin MICs. The fosSC gene was embedded in a conserved genetic context, but IS431mec was located to the left of the fosSC gene in cluster L due to the insertion of staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec.

CONCLUSIONS

The chromosomal fosSC genes in some lineages of S. capitis explained their high-level fosfomycin resistance. Ongoing surveillance is crucial for monitoring the potential threat of horizontal transfer, which could be facilitated by the presence of mobile genetic elements surrounding the fosSC gene.

Short versus long duration of ceftaroline combination therapy and outcomes in persistent or high-grade MRSA bacteremia: A retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with high mortality rates. Despite antibiotic therapy, persistent bacteremia is challenging to treat. Combination therapy with ceftaroline has emerged as a potential treatment option; however, the optimal duration and clinical implications after bacteremia clearance are unknown.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study examined patients with high-grade or persistent MRSA bacteremia who were treated with ceftaroline combination therapy at the University of New Mexico Hospital between January 2014 and June 2021. Patients were categorized into short- (<7 days) or long-duration (≥7 days) groups based on the duration of combination therapy after bacteremia clearance. Outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, bacteremia recurrence, post-bacteremia clearance length of stay, and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 32 patients were included in this study. The most common sources of bacteremia were bone/joint and endovascular (28.1%, 9/32 each). The median duration of combination therapy after clearance was seven days (IQR 2.8, 11). Patients in the long-duration group had a lower Charlson comorbidity index (1.0 vs 5.5, p = 0.017) than those in the short-duration group. After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in the 30-day all-cause mortality between the groups (AOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.007-1.85, p = 0.18). No association was found between combination therapy duration and recurrence (OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.19-inf, p = 0.24) or adverse drug events (OR 3.46, 95% CI 0.39-74.86, p = 0.31). After controlling for total hospital length of stay, there was no significant difference in the post-bacteremia clearance length of stay between the two groups (p = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

Prolonging ceftaroline combination therapy after bacteremia clearance did not significantly improve outcomes in patients with persistent or high-grade MRSA bacteremia. The limitations of this study warrant cautious interpretation of its results. Larger studies are needed to determine the optimal duration and role of combination therapy for this difficult-to-treat infection.

Combination of Antistaphylococcal β-Lactam With Standard Therapy Compared to Standard Therapy Alone for the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Post Hoc Analysis of the CAMERA2 Trial Using a Desirability of Outcome Ranking Approach

Background

Desirability of outcome ranking (DOOR) is an emerging approach to clinical trial outcome measurement using an ordinal scale to incorporate efficacy and safety endpoints.

Methods

We applied a previously validated DOOR endpoint to a cohort of CAMERA2 trial participants with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MRSAB). Participants were randomly assigned to standard therapy, or to standard therapy plus an antistaphylococcal β-lactam (combination therapy). Each participant was assigned a DOOR category, within which they were further ranked according to their hospital length of stay (LOS) and duration of intravenous antibiotic treatment. We calculated the probability and the generalized odds ratio of participants receiving combination therapy having worse outcomes than those receiving standard therapy.

Results

Participants assigned combination therapy had a 54.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 48.9%-60.1%; P = .11) probability and a 1.2-fold odds (95% CI, .95-1.50; P = .12) of having a worse outcome than participants on standard therapy. When further ranked according to LOS and duration of antibiotic treatment, participants in the combination group had a 55.6% (95% CI, 49.5%-61.7%) and 55.3% (95% CI, 49.2%-61.4%) probability of having a worse outcome than participants in the standard treatment group, respectively.

Conclusions

When considering both efficacy and safety, treatment of MRSAB with a combination of standard therapy and a β-lactam likely results in a worse clinical outcome than standard therapy. However, a small benefit of combination therapy cannot be excluded. Most likely the toxicity of combination therapy outweighed any benefit from faster clearance of bacteremia.

Getting to the heart of the matter-are two agents really better than one for the treatment of staphylococcal infective endocarditis?

The recently published European Society of Cardiology guidelines for infective endocarditis management recommends daptomycin combination therapy for the treatment of staphylococcal endocarditis in severe penicillin allergy, rather than daptomycin monotherapy. We discuss the evidence base behind this recommendation, highlighting concerns regarding the lack of robust clinical studies, increased cost and logistical considerations, and adverse effects of combination therapy. Although further studies are required to elucidate the role of combination vs monotherapy in these patients, we propose a pragmatic management approach to reduce the risk of adverse antimicrobial side effects and limit costs, while aiming to maintain treatment efficacy.

Fosfomycin as salvage therapy for persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: A case series and review of the literature

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia can be persistent and refractory; however, the optimal approach for its treatment has not been determined. Although fosfomycin (FOM) has been shown to have synergistic effects with anti-MRSA agents in vitro, clinical experience with FOM combination therapy is limited. Thus, we present cases of persistent MRSA bacteremia that improved with the addition of FOM. In case 1, a 48-year-old man with prosthetic vascular graft infection developed persistent MRSA bacteremia despite vancomycin (VCM) and daptomycin (DAP) administration. On day 46, after the first positive blood culture, we added FOM to DAP. The blood culture became negative on day 53. In case 2, an 85-year-old woman presented with pacemaker-related MRSA bacteremia. She was treated with VCM, followed by DAP and DAP plus rifampicin. However, the bacteremia persisted for 32 days because of difficulties in immediate pacemaker removal. After adding FOM to DAP, the blood culture became negative on day 38. In case 3, a 57-year-old woman developed persistent MRSA bacteremia due to pulmonary valve endocarditis and pulmonary artery thrombosis after total esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. The bacteremia continued for 50 days despite treatment with DAP, followed by VCM, VCM plus minocycline, DAP plus linezolid (LZD), and VCM plus LZD. She was managed conservatively because of surgical complications. After adding FOM to VCM on day 51, the blood culture became negative on day 58. FOM combination therapy may be effective in eliminating bacteria and can serve as salvage therapy for refractory MRSA bacteremia.

Antibiotic Resistance to Molecules Commonly Prescribed for the Treatment of Antibiotic-Resistant Gram-Positive Pathogens: What Is Relevant for the Clinician?

Antibiotic resistance in Gram-positive pathogens is a relevant concern, particularly in the hospital setting. Several antibiotics are now available to treat these drug-resistant pathogens, such as daptomycin, dalbavancin, linezolid, tedizolid, ceftaroline, ceftobiprole, and fosfomycin. However, antibiotic resistance can also affect these newer molecules. Overall, this is not a frequent phenomenon, but it is a growing concern in some settings and can compromise the effectiveness of these molecules, leaving few therapeutic options. We reviewed the available evidence about the epidemiology of antibiotic resistance to these antibiotics and the main molecular mechanisms of resistance, particularly methicillin-resistant Sthaphylococcus aureus, methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium, and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae. We discussed the interpretation of susceptibility tests when minimum inhibitory concentrations are not available. We focused on the risk of the emergence of resistance during treatment, particularly for daptomycin and fosfomycin, and we discussed the strategies that can be implemented to reduce this phenomenon, which can lead to clinical failure despite appropriate antibiotic treatment. The judicious use of antibiotics, epidemiological surveillance, and infection control measures is essential to preserving the efficacy of these drugs.

Safety and effectiveness of fifth generation cephalosporins for the treatment of methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: a narrative review exploring past, present, and future

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bloodstream infection (BSI) is a major issue in healthcare, since it is often associated with endocarditis or deep site foci. Relevant morbidity and mortality associated with MRSA-BSIs forced the development of new antibiotic strategies; in particular, this review will focus the attention on fifth-generation cephalosporins (ceftaroline/ceftobiprole), that are the only ß-lactams active against MRSA.

AREAS COVERED

The review discusses the available randomized controlled trials and real-world observational studies conducted on safety and effectiveness of ceftaroline/ceftobiprole for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs. Finally, a proposal of MRSA-BSI treatment flowchart, based on fifth-generation cephalosporins, is described.

EXPERT OPINION

The use of anti-MRSA cephalosporins is an acceptable choice either in monotherapy or combination therapy for the treatment of MRSA-BSIs due to their relevant effectiveness and safety. Particularly, their use may be advisable in combination therapy in case of severe infections (including endocarditis or persistent bacteriemia) or in monotherapy in subjects at higher risk of drugs-induced toxicity with older regimens. On the contrary, caution should be taken in case of suspected/ascertained central nervous system infections due to inconsistent data regarding penetration of these drugs in cerebrospinal fluid and brain tissues.

New Antimicrobials and New Therapy Strategies for Endocarditis: Weapons That Should Be Defended

The overall low-quality evidence concerning the clinical benefits of different antibiotic regimens for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE), which has made it difficult to strongly support or reject any regimen of antibiotic therapy, has led to a discrepancy between the available guidelines and clinical practice. In this complex scenario, very recently published guidelines have attempted to fill this gap. Indeed, in recent years several antimicrobials have entered the market, including ceftobiprole, ceftaroline, and the long-acting lipoglycopeptides dalbavancin and oritavancin. Despite being approved for different indications, real-world data on their use for the treatment of IE, alone or in combination, has accumulated over time. Furthermore, an old antibiotic, fosfomycin, has gained renewed interest for the treatment of complicated infections such as IE. In this narrative review, we focused on new antimicrobials and therapeutic strategies that we believe may provide important contributions to the advancement of Gram-positive IE treatment, providing a summary of the current in vitro, in vivo, and clinical evidence supporting their use in clinical practice.

The Controversial Effect of Antibiotics on Methicillin-Sensitive S. aureus: A Comparative In Vitro Study

Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus (S.) aureus (MSSA) bacteremia remains a global challenge, despite the availability of antibiotics. Primary treatments include β-lactam agents such as cefazolin and flucloxacillin. Ongoing discussions have focused on the potential synergistic effects of combining these agents with rifampicin or fosfomycin to combat infections associated with biofilm formation. Managing staphylococcal infections is challenging due to antibacterial resistance, biofilms, and S. aureus's ability to invade and replicate within host cells. Intracellular invasion shields the bacteria from antibacterial agents and the immune system, often leading to incomplete bacterial clearance and chronic infections. Additionally, S. aureus can assume a dormant phenotype, known as the small colony variant (SCV), further complicating eradication and promoting persistence. This study investigated the impact of antibiotic combinations on the persistence of S. aureus 6850 and its stable small colony variant (SCV strain JB1) focusing on intracellular survival and biofilm formation. The results from the wild-type strain 6850 demonstrate that β-lactams combined with RIF effectively eliminated biofilms and intracellular bacteria but tend to select for SCVs in planktonic culture and host cells. Higher antibiotic concentrations were associated with an increase in the zeta potential of S. aureus, suggesting reduced membrane permeability to antimicrobials. When using the stable SCV mutant strain JB1, antibiotic combinations with rifampicin successfully cleared planktonic bacteria and biofilms but failed to eradicate intracellular bacteria. Given these findings, it is reasonable to report that β-lactams combined with rifampicin represent the optimal treatment for MSSA bacteremia. However, caution is warranted when employing this treatment over an extended period, as it may elevate the risk of selecting for small colony variants (SCVs) and, consequently, promoting bacterial persistence.

hptA Mutation May Mediate Fosfomycin Resistance in Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Isolates

Fosfomycin can be used alone or in combination to treat methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection. However, fosfomycin resistance has been observed in MRSA. In S. aureus, fosfomycin resistance is mediated by the fosfomycin-modifying enzyme FosB, or mutations in the target enzyme MurA. Mutations in the chromosomal glpT and uhpT genes, which encode fosfomycin transporters, also result in fosfomycin resistance. The three-component regulatory system HptRSA mediates the expression of uhpT and glpT in S. aureus. This study aimed to investigate the role of hptRSA mutation in fosfomycin resistance in MRSA clinical isolates. We found that hptRSA mutations were common in MRSA strains isolated from our hospital. Most mutations were amino acid substitutions and widely distributed in fosfomycin-sensitive and fosfomycin-resistant strains. However, HptA-truncated mutations were only found in fosB-negative fosfomycin-resistant strains with wild-type uhpT and glpT genes. Quantitative real-time PCR results showed that the transcription level of uhpT decreased by 13.7-25.6-fold in the HptA-truncated strains. Concordantly, the fosfomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of HptA-truncated strains was 64-128 μg/mL, while SA240 was 2 μg/mL. The low transcription level of uhpT and high increase in MIC suggest that hptA mutation may lead to fosfomycin resistance in MRSA. We complemented hptA in one of the HptA-truncated clinical strains (SA179), showing reversal of fosfomycin resistance (from 128 to 32 μg/mL). Then we knocked out hptA in S. aureus Newman; fosfomycin MIC increased from 4 to 64 μg/mL, suggesting that HptA mutation may play an important role in fosfomycin resistance.

Effectiveness of adjunctive rifampicin for treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether the addition of rifampicin to conventional treatment of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) reduces bacteriological or clinical failure or death.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from inception to 31 December 2022. Reference lists and PubMed citations of eligible studies were checked.

REVIEW METHODS

Two study authors independently identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving adult participants with SAB, in which an intervention group received adjunctive rifampicin and the control group received usual care with or without a placebo. Dichotomous data (bacteriological and clinical failure and deaths) were analysed and pooled across studies using risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using a Mantel-Haenszel random-effect model. The key variable of interest being whether rifampicin was used.

RESULTS

Six RCTs including 894 participants-of which 758 (85%) were from one trial-met the inclusion criteria. The addition of rifampicin to conventional treatment of SAB significantly reduced bacteriological failure by 59% (RR 0.41, 95% CI 0.21-0.81, I2 = 0%, number need to treat 27). However, it did not reduce clinical failure (RR 0.70, 95% CI 0.47-1.03, I2 = 0%) or deaths (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.70-1.32, I2 = 0%). Further, it did not reduce the duration of bacteraemia, or the length of hospital stay. Adjunctive rifampicin reduced SAB recurrences (1% versus 4%, P = 0.01). Emergence of rifampicin resistance during treatment was uncommon (<1%).

CONCLUSION

Although adjunctive rifampicin reduced the risk of bacteriological failure and recurrences, we found no mortality benefit to support its use in SAB.

Optimal drug therapy for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in adults

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Staphylococcus aureus is a significant human pathogen, causing a variety of infections, from skin and soft tissue infections to endocarditis, bone and joint infections and deep tissue abscesses. Mortality from S. aureus bacteraemia remains high, without major therapeutic advances in recent decades.

RECENT FINDINGS

In recent years, optimized dosing of antibiotics is increasingly being recognized as a cornerstone of management for severe infections including S. aureus bacteraemia. This comprehensive review details the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) targets for commonly used antistaphylococcal antibiotics and the doses predicted to achieve them in clinical practice. Recent advances in dosing of teicoplanin and use of cefazolin in CNS infections and findings from combination therapy studies are discussed. Drug exposure relationships related to toxicity are also detailed.

SUMMARY

This review details the different PK/PD targets for drugs used to treat S. aureus bacteraemia and how to apply them in various scenarios. The drug doses that achieve them, and the risks of toxicity are also provided.

Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin versus cloxacillin alone for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia: a randomized trial

Treatment failure occurs in about 25% of patients with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia. We assessed whether cloxacillin plus fosfomycin achieves better treatment success than cloxacillin alone in hospitalized adults with MSSA bacteremia. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase III-IV superiority randomized clinical trial. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive 2 g of intravenous cloxacillin alone every 4 h or with 3 g of intravenous fosfomycin every 6 h for the initial 7 days. The primary endpoint was treatment success at day 7, a composite endpoint with the following criteria: patient alive, stable or with improved quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, afebrile and with negative blood cultures for MSSA, adjudicated by an independent committee blinded to treatment allocation. We randomized 215 patients, of whom 105 received cloxacillin plus fosfomycin and 110 received cloxacillin alone. We analyzed the primary endpoint with the intention-to-treat approach in 214 patients who received at least 1 day of treatment. Treatment success at day 7 after randomization was achieved in 83 (79.8%) of 104 patients receiving combination treatment versus 82 (74.5%) of 110 patients receiving monotherapy (risk difference 5.3%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -5.95-16.48). Secondary endpoints, including mortality and adverse events, were similar in the two groups except for persistent bacteremia at day 3, which was less common in the combination arm. In a prespecified interim analysis, the independent committee recommended stopping recruitment for futility prior to meeting the planned randomization of 366 patients. Cloxacillin plus fosfomycin did not achieve better treatment success at day 7 of therapy than cloxacillin alone in MSSA bacteremia. Further trials should consider the intrinsic heterogeneity of the infection by using a more personalized approach. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03959345 .

Novel evidence on sepsis-inducing pathogens: from laboratory to bedside

Sepsis is a life-threatening condition and a significant cause of preventable morbidity and mortality globally. Among the leading causative agents of sepsis are bacterial pathogens Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Streptococcus pyogenes, along with fungal pathogens of the Candida species. Here, we focus on evidence from human studies but also include in vitro and in vivo cellular and molecular evidence, exploring how bacterial and fungal pathogens are associated with bloodstream infection and sepsis. This review presents a narrative update on pathogen epidemiology, virulence factors, host factors of susceptibility, mechanisms of immunomodulation, current therapies, antibiotic resistance, and opportunities for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutics, through the perspective of bloodstream infection and sepsis. A list of curated novel host and pathogen factors, diagnostic and prognostic markers, and potential therapeutical targets to tackle sepsis from the research laboratory is presented. Further, we discuss the complex nature of sepsis depending on the sepsis-inducing pathogen and host susceptibility, the more common strains associated with severe pathology and how these aspects may impact in the management of the clinical presentation of sepsis.

Isopropoxy Benzene Guanidine Ameliorates Streptococcus suis Infection In Vivo and In Vitro

Streptococcus suis, an encapsulated zoonotic pathogen, has been reported to cause a variety of infectious diseases, such as meningitis and streptococcal-toxic-shock-like syndrome. Increasing antimicrobial resistance has triggered the need for new treatments. In the present study, we found that isopropoxy benzene guanidine (IBG) significantly attenuated the effects caused by S. suis infection, in vivo and in vitro, by killing S. suis and reducing S. suis pathogenicity. Further studies showed that IBG disrupted the integrity of S. suis cell membranes and increased the permeability of S. suis cell membranes, leading to an imbalance in proton motive force and the accumulation of intracellular ATP. Meanwhile, IBG antagonized the hemolysis activity of suilysin and decreased the expression of Sly gene. In vivo, IBG improved the viability of S. suis SS3-infected mice by reducing tissue bacterial load. In conclusion, IBG is a promising compound for the treatment of S. suis infections, given its antibacterial and anti-hemolysis activity.

Adherence to 2015 ESC Guidelines for the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis: A Retrospective Multicentre Study (LEIOT Study)

Background: Infective endocarditis (IE) is still a severe disease with elevated morbidity and mortality. Nevertheless, the last European guidelines (GL) date back to 2015, and a recent survey described a diffuse suboptimal adherence to their recommendations. Here, we described a real-life scenario about adherence to IE treatment GL. Methods: This was a retrospective, multicentric, case–control study. All the cases of IE admitted to our wards from 2016 to 2020 were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups, according to the non-adherence (group A, cases) or adherence (group B, controls) to 2015 ESC guidelines. Only targeted treatments were considered. Groups were compared for demographic, clinical, microbiological, and laboratory data and outcome. As a post hoc analysis, we analysed the characteristics of deviations from the guidelines and how these deviations affected mortality. Results: A total of 246 patients were enrolled, with 128 (52%) in group A and 118 (48%) in group B. Groups were homogeneous except for aetiologies: staphylococcal and blood-culture-negative IE were more frequent in group A, while streptococcal and enterococcal IE were more frequent in group B (p < 0.001). In-hospital mortality was comparable in the two groups. The most frequent causes of deviations from the guidelines were use of daptomycin, in addition to standard treatments and the missing administration of rifampin or gentamycin. Conclusions: Adherence to 2015 ESC guidelines was limited but it did not affect mortality.

Treatment of Enterococcus faecalis Infective Endocarditis: A Continuing Challenge

Today, Enterococcus faecalis is one of the main causes of infective endocarditis in the world, generally affecting an elderly and fragile population, with a high mortality rate. Enterococci are partially resistant to many commonly used antimicrobial agents such as penicillin and ampicillin, as well as high-level resistance to most cephalosporins and sometimes carbapenems, because of low-affinity penicillin-binding proteins, that lead to an unacceptable number of therapeutic failures with monotherapy. For many years, the synergistic combination of penicillins and aminoglycosides has been the cornerstone of treatment, but the emergence of strains with high resistance to aminoglycosides led to the search for new alternatives, like dual beta-lactam therapy. The development of multi-drug resistant strains of Enterococcus faecium is a matter of considerable concern due to its probable spread to E. faecalis and have necessitated the search of new guidelines with the combination of daptomycin, fosfomycin or tigecycline. Some of them have scarce clinical experience and others are still under investigation and will be analyzed in this review. In addition, the need for prolonged treatment (6–8 weeks) to avoid relapses has forced to the consideration of other viable options as outpatient parenteral strategies, long-acting administrations with the new lipoglycopeptides (dalbavancin or oritavancin), and sequential oral treatments, which will also be discussed.

Repeated Emergence of Variant TetR Family Regulator, FarR, and Increased Resistance to Antimicrobial Unsaturated Fatty Acid among Clonal Complex 5 Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Resistance-nodulation-division (RND) superfamily efflux pumps promote antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative pathogens, but their role in Gram-positive pathogens, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is undocumented. However, recent in vitro selections for resistance of S. aureus to an antimicrobial fatty acid, linoleic acid, and an antibiotic, rhodomyrtone, identified H121Y and C116R substitution variants, respectively, in a TetR family regulator, FarR, promoting increased expression of the RND pump FarE. Hypothesizing that in vivo selection pressures have also promoted the emergence of FarR variants, we searched available genome data and found that strains with FarR^H121Y from human and bovine hosts have emerged sporadically in clonal complexes (CCs) CC1, CC30, CC8, CC22, and CC97, whereas multiple FarR variants have occurred within CC5 hospital-associated (HA)-MRSA. Of these, FarR^E160G and FarR^E93EE were exclusive to CC5, while FarR^C116Y, FarR^P165L, and FarR^G166D also occurred in nonrelated CCs, primarily from bovine hosts. Within CC5, FarR^C116Y and FarR^G166D strains were polyphyletic, each exhibiting two emergence events. FarR^C116Y and FarR^E160G were individually sufficient to confer increased expression of FarE and enhanced resistance to linoleic acid (LA). Isolates with FarR^E93EE were most closely related to S. aureus N315 MRSA and exhibited increased resistance independently of FarR^E93EE. Accumulation of pseudogenes and additional polymorphisms in FarR^E93EE strains contributed to a multiresistance phenotype which included fosfomycin and fusidic acid resistance in addition to increased linoleic acid resistance. These findings underscore the remarkable adaptive capacity of CC5 MRSA, which includes the polyphyletic USA100 lineage of HA-MRSA that is endemic in the Western hemisphere and known for the acquisition of multiple resistance phenotypes.

Enolpyruvate transferase MurAAA149E, identified during adaptation of Enterococcus faecium to daptomycin, increases stability of MurAA-MurG interaction

Daptomycin (DAP) is an antibiotic frequently used as a drug of last resort against vancomycin-resistant enterococci. One of the major challenges when using DAP against vancomycin-resistant enterococci is the emergence of resistance, which is mediated by the cell-envelope stress system LiaFSR. Indeed, inhibition of LiaFSR signaling has been suggested as a strategy to "resensitize" enterococci to DAP. In the absence of LiaFSR, alternative pathways mediating DAP resistance have been identified, including adaptive mutations in the enolpyruvate transferase MurAA (MurAAA149E), which catalyzes the first committed step in peptidoglycan biosynthesis; however, how these mutations confer resistance is unclear. Here, we investigated the biochemical basis for MurAAA149E-mediated adaptation to DAP to determine whether such an alternative pathway would undermine the potential efficacy of therapies that target the LiaFSR pathway. We found cells expressing MurAAA149E had increased susceptibility to glycoside hydrolases, consistent with decreased cell wall integrity. Furthermore, structure-function studies of MurAA and MurAAA149E using X-ray crystallography and biochemical analyses indicated only a modest decrease in MurAAA149E activity, but a 16-fold increase in affinity for MurG, which performs the last intracellular step of peptidoglycan synthesis. Exposure to DAP leads to mislocalization of cell division proteins including MurG. In Bacillus subtilis, MurAA and MurG colocalize at division septa and, thus, we propose MurAAA149E may contribute to DAP nonsusceptibility by increasing the stability of MurAA-MurG interactions to reduce DAP-induced mislocalization of these essential protein complexes.

Emerging issues on Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis and the role in therapy of daptomycin plus fosfomycin

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant and -susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA/MSSA) infections are a major global health-care problem. Bacteremia with S. aureus exhibits high rates of morbidity and mortality and can cause complicated infections such as infective endocarditis (IE). The emerging resistance profile of S. aureus is worrisome, and several international agencies have appealed for new treatment approaches to be developed.

AREAS COVERED

Daptomycin presents a rapid bactericidal effect against MRSA and has been considered at least as effective as vancomycin in treating MRSA bacteremia. However, therapy failure is often related to deep-seated infections, e.g. endocarditis, with high bacterial inocula and daptomycin regimens <10 mg/kg/day. Current antibiotic options for treating invasive S. aureus infections have limitations in monotherapy. Daptomycin in combination with other antibiotics, e.g. fosfomycin, may be effective in improving clinical outcomes in patients with MRSA IE.

EXPERT OPINION

Exploring therapeutic combinations has shown fosfomycin to have a unique mechanism of action and to be the most effective option in preventing the onset of resistance to and optimizing the efficacy of daptomycin, suggesting the synergistic combination of fosfomycin with daptomycin is a useful alternative treatment option for MSSA or MRSA IE.

Growth Arrest of Staphylococcus aureus Induces Daptomycin Tolerance via Cell Wall Remodelling

Almost all bactericidal drugs require bacterial replication and/or metabolic activity for their killing activity. When these processes are inhibited by bacteriostatic antibiotics, bacterial killing is significantly reduced. One notable exception is the lipopeptide antibiotic daptomycin, which has been reported to efficiently kill growth-arrested bacteria. However, these studies employed only short periods of growth arrest (<1 h), which may not fully represent the duration of growth arrest that can occur in vivo. We found that a growth inhibitory concentration of the protein synthesis inhibitor tetracycline led to a time-dependent induction of daptomycin tolerance in S. aureus, with an approximately 100,000-fold increase in survival after 16 h of growth arrest, relative to exponential-phase bacteria. Daptomycin tolerance required glucose and was associated with increased production of the cell wall polymers peptidoglycan and wall-teichoic acids. However, while the accumulation of peptidoglycan was required for daptomycin tolerance, only a low abundance of wall teichoic acid was necessary. Therefore, whereas tolerance to most antibiotics occurs passively due to a lack of metabolic activity and/or replication, daptomycin tolerance arises via active cell wall remodelling. IMPORTANCE Understanding why antibiotics sometimes fail to cure infections is fundamental to improving treatment outcomes. This is a major challenge when it comes to Staphylococcus aureus because this pathogen causes several different chronic or recurrent infections. Previous work has shown that a lack of replication, as often occurs during infection, makes bacteria tolerant of most bactericidal antibiotics. However, one antibiotic that has been reported to kill nonreplicating bacteria is daptomycin. In this work, we show that the growth arrest of S. aureus does in fact lead to daptomycin tolerance, but it requires time, nutrients, and biosynthetic pathways, making it distinct from other types of antibiotic tolerance that occur in nonreplicating bacteria.

Targeted Therapy of Severe Infections Caused by Staphylococcus aureus in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Multidisciplinary Proposal of Therapeutic Algorithms Based on Real-World Evidence

(1) Introduction: To develop evidence-based algorithms for targeted antibiotic therapy of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill adult patients. (2) Methods: A multidisciplinary team of four experts had several rounds of assessment for developing algorithms concerning targeted antimicrobial therapy of severe infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill patients. The literature search was performed by a researcher on PubMed-MEDLINE (until August 2022) to provide evidence for supporting therapeutic choices. Quality and strength of evidence was established according to a hierarchical scale of the study design. Two different algorithms were created, one for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and the other for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The therapeutic options were categorized for each different site of infection and were selected also on the basis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features. (3) Results: Cefazolin or oxacillin were the agents proposed for all of the different types of severe MSSA infections. The proposed targeted therapies for severe MRSA infections were different according to the infection site: daptomycin plus fosfomycin or ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for bloodstream infections, infective endocarditis, and/or infections associated with intracardiac/intravascular devices; ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for community-acquired pneumonia; linezolid alone or plus fosfomycin for infection-related ventilator-associated complications or for central nervous system infections; daptomycin alone or plus clindamycin for necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections. (4) Conclusions: We are confident that targeted therapies based on scientific evidence and optimization of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features of antibiotic monotherapy or combo therapy may represent valuable strategies for treating MSSA and MRSA infections.

The Combination of Daptomycin with Fosfomycin is More Effective than Daptomycin Alone in Reducing Mortality of Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcal Bloodstream Infections: A Retrospective, Comparative Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

High-dose daptomycin-based combinations are recommended for vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) bloodstream infection (BSI). Preclinical data have shown a synergistic effect of daptomycin/fosfomycin combinations against VRE. However, clinical studies comparing daptomycin monotherapy with daptomycin/fosfomycin combinations are unavailable.

METHODS

An observational study of VRE-BSI was performed between 2010-2021 on patients receiving daptomycin monotherapy (≥ 8 mg/kg) or daptomycin combined with intravenous fosfomycin. Patients treated with concomitant β-lactam combinations were excluded. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression and augmented inverse probability weighting (AIPW) analyses.

RESULTS

Among 224 patients, 176 received daptomycin monotherapy, and 48 received fosfomycin combinations. The median daptomycin and fosfomycin doses were 9.8 mg/kg and 12 g/day, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 77.3% and 47.9% in the daptomycin monotherapy and fosfomycin combination groups (P < 0.001), respectively. Multivariable logistic regression analysis predicted lower mortality with fosfomycin combination treatment (adjusted odds ratio, 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.17-0.73; P = 0.005). AIPW demonstrated a 17.8% reduced mortality with fosfomycin combinations (95% CI, - 30.6- - 4.9%; P = 0.007). The survival benefit was significant, especially among patients with a lower Pitt bacteremia score or fosfomycin minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤ 64 mg/l. Fosfomycin combination resulted in higher hypernatremia (10.4% vs. 2.8%, P = 0.04) and hypokalemia (33.3% vs. 15.3%, P = 0.009) compared to daptomycin monotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The combination of high-dose daptomycin with fosfomycin improved the survival rate of patients with VRE-BSI compared to daptomycin alone. The benefit of the combination was most pronounced for VRE with fosfomycin MIC ≤ 64 mg/l and for patients with a low Pitt bacteremia score.

Antimicrobial Treatment of Staphylococcus aureus Biofilms

Staphylococcus aureus is a microorganism frequently associated with implant-related infections, owing to its ability to produce biofilms. These infections are difficult to treat because antimicrobials must cross the biofilm to effectively inhibit bacterial growth. Although some antibiotics can penetrate the biofilm and reduce the bacterial load, it is important to understand that the results of routine sensitivity tests are not always valid for interpreting the activity of different drugs. In this review, a broad discussion on the genes involved in biofilm formation, quorum sensing, and antimicrobial activity in monotherapy and combination therapy is presented that should benefit researchers engaged in optimizing the treatment of infections associated with S. aureus biofilms.