Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Versus Efavirenz/Emtricitabine/TDF in Treatment-naive Adults With Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Infection: Week 96 Results of the Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3 DRIVE-AHEAD Noninferiority Trial

Weight Gain and Antiretroviral Therapy

Antiretroviral therapy (ART) agents as a determinant of body weight in ART-naïve and ART-experienced persons with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH) has become a major focus area in research and clinical settings. Recent studies demonstrating weight-suppressing properties of efavirenz and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate led to re-evaluation of weight gain studies, and a reassessment of whether other agents are weight promoting versus weight neutral. In this review, the authors synthesize recent literature on factors related to obesity, clinical measurements of adiposity, weight gain in ART-naïve and ART-experienced PWH, metabolic consequences of ART and weight gain, and the clinical management of weight gain in PWH.

Long-term effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of doravirine in antiretroviral-experienced people with HIV in real life

Real-life data on doravirine (DOR) in different drug combinations are limited. We evaluated the effectiveness of DOR plus two nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI), mainly abacavir/lamivudine, and dual therapies in people with HIV (PWH), mostly virologically suppressed. Ambispective observational study that enrolled adults PWH who initiated a DOR-based regimen from September 2020 to February 2022 at a referral center in Spain. Participants were grouped as follows: A, received DOR plus two NRTI; B, dual therapy (DT) with DOR plus dolutegravir (DTG) or darunavir/cobicistat (DRVc); C, DOR plus ≥two antiretroviral drugs. The primary endpoints were treatment effectiveness at week 48 by intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol analysis (OT). A cohort of 187 participants, 91% virologically suppressed, were analyzed after a median follow-up of 112 weeks (80-136). Group A received DOR plus abacavir/lamivudine (ABV/3TC) (n = 109) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TFV/3TC) (n = 45). At week 48, the effectiveness of DOR plus ABV/3TC by ITT was 90.8% (CI95, 88.0-93.6), better than with TFV/FTC [73.3% (66.7-79.9); P = 0.003]. Only one virologic failure was observed. Mild adverse effects were the cause of treatment discontinuation in 7.8%, followed by switching to a single-tablet regimen. In group B, the effectiveness by ITT was 92.9% (CI95, 88.0-97.8) at week 48. No adverse effects or virologic failure were registered in this group. DOR plus two NRTI or DT have long-term effectiveness and safety as a switching option for PWH, mostly virologically suppressed. The DOR plus ABV/3TC combination has shown even better effectiveness than TFV/FTC.IMPORTANCEDOR-based regimens have shown long-term effectiveness and safety in PWH, mostly virologically suppressed. The combination of DOR plus ABV/3TC has shown even better safety and effectiveness than TFV/FTC. DOR plus two NRTI offers cost benefits compared to other regimens.

Prevalence and Phenotypic Susceptibility to Doravirine of the HIV-1 Reverse Transcriptase V106I Polymorphism in B and Non-B Subtypes

BACKGROUND

Limited data are available regarding the susceptibility of the reverse transcriptase V106 polymorphism to doravirine.

METHODS

Doravirine susceptibility was measured in site-directed mutants (SDMs) containing V106I, V106A, V106M, and Y188L mutations in subtype B (NL4-3, HXB2) and CRF02_AG background and in recombinant viruses with RT harboring V106I alone derived from 50 people with HIV.

RESULTS

HIV-1 B subtype was detected in 1523 of 2705 cases. Prevalence of V106I was 3.2% in B and 2.5% in non-B subtypes, and was higher in subtype F (8.1%) and D (14.3%). Fold-changes (FC) in susceptibility for SDMs were below doravirine biological cutoff (3.0) for V106I, but not for V106A, V106M, and Y188L. Clinically derived viruses tested included 22 B (median FC, 1.2; interquartile range [IQR], 0.9-1.6) and 28 non-B subtypes (median FC, 1.8; IQR, 0.9-3.0). Nine (18%) viruses showed FC values equal or higher than the doravirine biological FC cutoff.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of the HIV-1 RT V106I polymorphism in MeditRes HIV consortium remains low, but significantly more prevalent in subtypes D and F. V106I minimally decreased the susceptibility to doravirine in SDMs and most clinical isolates. Reduced susceptibility seems to occur at increased frequency in subtype F1; however, the clinical impact remains to be investigated.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT04894357.

Switch to fixed-dose doravirine (100 mg) with islatravir (0·75 mg) once daily in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1 on antiretroviral therapy: 48-week results of a phase 3, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial

BACKGROUND

Doravirine and islatravir is an investigational, once-daily, single-tablet regimen with high antiviral potency, favourable safety and tolerability, and low propensity for resistance. We report week 48 results from a phase 3 trial evaluating switch from stable, oral antiretroviral therapy (ART) to the fixed combination of doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).

METHODS

This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, active-controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial was conducted at 77 research, community, and hospital-based clinics in 15 countries. Adults aged 18 years or older with fewer than 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL on any oral, two-drug or three-drug ART regimen for at least 3 months, and no history of previous virological failure on any past or current regimen were randomly assigned (1:1) by a computer-generated randomisation schedule to switch to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) or to continue their baseline ART regimen. Block randomisation was based on a block size of four, and randomisation was stratified by baseline regimen (ie, protease inhibitor, integrase inhibitor, or other). Participants in the doravirine and islatravir group were instructed to take one tablet at approximately the same time each day, and participants in the baseline ART group continued to take the medication according to the locally approved label. HIV-1 RNA and safety evaluations were done at baseline and weeks 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48. CD4 cell counts were measured at baseline, week 24, and week 48. The primary endpoint was proportion of participants with greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL at week 48 in the full analysis set (ie, all participants who received at least one dose of study drug) using the US Food and Drug Administration snapshot approach and prespecified non-inferiority margin of 4%. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04223778) and is completed.

FINDINGS

Between Feb 18 and Oct 2, 2020, 740 individuals were screened for eligibility, of whom 672 (90·8%) participants (249 [37·1%] women and 423 [62·9%] men; median CD4 count of 678 cells per μL [IQR 496-868]) were randomly assigned to doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg; n=336) or to continue baseline ART (n=336). The last follow-up visit occurred on Sept 8, 2021. At week 48, zero of 336 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group versus five (1·5%) of 336 participants in the baseline ART group had greater than or equal to 50 HIV-1 RNA copies per mL (difference -1·5, 95% CI -3·4 to -0·3). The per-protocol analysis showed consistent results. Headache was the most common adverse event in both groups (35 [10·4%] of 336 participants in the doravirine and islatravir group, 16 [4·8%] of 336 in the baseline ART group), infection rates were similar (113 [33·6%] in both groups), and discontinuations due to adverse events were low (seven [2·1%] vs one [0·3%]). 66 (19·6%) of 336 participants had treatment-related adverse events in the doravirine and islatravir group compared with 30 (8·9%) of 336 in the baseline ART group. In the islatravir and doravirine group, CD4 cell counts (mean change -30·3 cells per μL) and total lymphocyte counts (mean change -0·26 × 109/L) were decreased at 48 weeks.

INTERPRETATION

Switching to single-tablet doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg) maintained viral suppression up to week 48 and was non-inferior to antiretroviral combinations used in clinical practice for adults with HIV-1; however, decreases in CD4 cell and total lymphocyte counts do not support further development of once-daily doravirine (100 mg) and islatravir (0·75 mg).

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co.

Efficacy and effect on lipid profiles of switching to ainuovirine-based regimen versus continuing efavirenz-based regimen in people with HIV-1: 24-week results from a real-world, retrospective, multi-center cohort study

Ainuovirine (ANV), a novel non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI), was approved in China in 2021. In a previous randomized phase 3 trial, ANV demonstrated non-inferior efficacy relative to efavirenz (EFV) and was associated with lower rates of dyslipidemia. In this study, we aimed to explore lipid changes in treatment-experienced people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 (PWH) switching to ANV from EFV in real world. At week 24, 96.65% of patients in the ANV group and 93.25% in the EFV group had HIV-1 RNA levels below the limit of quantification (LOQ). Median changes from baseline in CD4 +T cell counts (37.0 vs 36.0 cells/µL, P = 0.886) and CD4+/CD8 +ratio (0.03 vs 0.10, P = 0.360) were similar between the two groups. The ANV group was superior to the EFV group in mean changes in total cholesterol (TC, -0.06 vs 0.26 mmol/L, P = 0.006), triglyceride (TG, -0.6 vs 0.14 mmol/L, P < 0.001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C, 0.09 vs 0.08 mmol/L, P = 0.006), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C, -0.18 vs 0.29 mmol/L, P < 0.001) at week 24. We also observed that a higher proportion of patients demonstrated improved TC (13.55% vs 4.45%, P = 0.015) or LDL-C (12.93% vs 6.89%, P = 0.017), and a lower proportion of patients showed worsened LDL-C (5.57% vs 13.52%, P = 0.017) with ANV than with EFV at week 24. In conclusion, we observed good efficacy and favorable changes in lipids in switching to ANV from EFV in treatment-experienced PWH in real world, indicating a promising switching option for PWH who may be more prone to metabolic or cardiovascular diseases.

Safety and efficacy of doravirine as first-line therapy in adults with HIV-1: week 192 results from the open-label extensions of the DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

In two phase 3 trials for first-line therapy in adults with HIV-1, doravirine showed non-inferior efficacy, a favourable safety profile, and a superior lipid profile to darunavir and efavirenz through to 48 and 96 weeks. Here we report 192-week results from both studies.

METHODS

DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD are multicentre, double-blind, randomised, active comparator-controlled, phase 3 trials of first-line antiretroviral treatment in adults with HIV-1. Eligible participants (aged ≥18 years) were naive to antiretroviral therapy, had plasma HIV-1 RNA 1000 copies per mL or more at screening, had no known resistance to any of the trial drugs, and had creatinine clearance 50 mL per min or more. DRIVE-FORWARD was conducted at 125 sites in 15 countries and compared doravirine (100 mg) with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (ritonavir [100 mg] and darunavir [800 mg]), each administered orally once daily with two nucleoside or nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (tenofovir disoproxil fumarate [300 mg] and emtricitabine [200 mg] or abacavir sulfate [600 mg] and lamivudine [300 mg]). DRIVE-AHEAD was conducted at 126 sites in 23 countries and compared doravirine (100 mg), lamivudine (300 mg), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg) with that of efavirenz (600 mg), emtricitabine (200 mg), and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (300 mg), all administered orally once daily. DRIVE-FORWARD enrolment was between Dec 1, 2014, and June 1, 2020, and DRIVE-AHEAD enrolment was between June 10, 2015, and Aug 10, 2020. After the 96-week double-blind phase, eligible participants could enter an open-label extension and either continue doravirine or switch from comparator to doravirine for an additional 96 weeks. Efficacy (HIV-1 RNA <50 copies per mL) and safety assessments (adverse events and changes in laboratory parameters) were pooled. The DRIVE-FORWARD and DRIVE-AHEAD trials were registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02275780 and NCT02403674.

FINDINGS

Of 1494 participants treated in the double-blind phase (1261 [84%] male and 233 [16%] female), 550 continued doravirine and 502 switched to doravirine in the extension. Using the FDA snapshot approach, HIV-1 RNA less than 50 copies per mL was maintained in 457 (83%) of 550 participants who continued doravirine and 404 (80%) of 502 participants who switched to doravirine. Protocol-defined virological failure and development of resistance were low, occurring mainly before week 96. Two (<1%) of 550 participants who continued doravirine reported serious drug-related adverse events, and three (1%) who continued doravirine and one (<1%) of 502 who switched to doravirine discontinued due to drug-related adverse events. Participants continuing or switching to doravirine showed generally favourable lipid profiles, little weight gain, and small decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rates, with no discontinuations due to increased creatinine or renal adverse events.

INTERPRETATION

Favourable efficacy and safety profiles for doravirine at week 96 were maintained through to week 192 in participants who continued or switched to doravirine, supporting use of doravirine for long-term first-line HIV-1 treatment and for virologically suppressed adults switching therapy.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Adolescents Living With HIV: Results Through Week 96 from IMPAACT 2014

BACKGROUND

IMPAACT 2014 study is a phase I/II, multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized study of doravirine (DOR) co-formulated with lamivudine (3TC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) as fixed-dose combination (DOR FDC) in adolescents with HIV-1. We report the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of DOR FDC through 96 weeks.

METHODS

Participants were adolescents aged 12 to <18 years who weighed at least 45 kg and who were either antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve or virologically suppressed without documented resistance mutations to DOR/3TC/TDF. The efficacy endpoint was the proportion of participants with HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL assessed at weeks 48 and 96 using the observed failure approach. Safety and tolerability outcomes were incidence of adverse events (AEs) and treatment discontinuations.

RESULTS

A total of 45 adolescents, median age 15 (range, 12-17) years, 58% females, were enrolled and 2 (4.4%) participants were ARV naïve. Of the 45 participants, 42 (93.3%) completed the study and 41 (91.1%) completed the study treatment. At week 48, 41/42 (97.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 87.4-99.9) and week 96, 37/40 (92.5%; 95% CI, 79.6-98.4) participants had achieved or maintained HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL. There were no treatment-related discontinuations due to AEs and no drug-related AEs ≥grade 3 or deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

We found once-daily dosing of DOR FDC to be safe and well tolerated for maintaining viral suppression through 96 weeks in adolescents living with HIV-1.

Doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in virologically suppressed people living with HIV: A real-life experience

BACKGROUND

Doravirine is a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) showing high efficacy and tolerability in both naïve and experienced people living with HIV (PLWHIV) in randomized trials, but scarce data are available to date from the real-life experience.

METHODS

We performed an observational, retrospective study of PLWHIV on suppressive antiretroviral therapy who switched to a daily single-tablet regimen containing doravirine 100 mg, lamivudine 300 mg, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate 300 mg.

RESULTS

As a whole, 62 suppressed patients (51 men, median age, 51.7 years; median CD4 T+ lymphocyte count, 577 cells/mm3) were enrolled. After 12 months, 58 (93.5%) patients showed HIV RNA <20 copies/mL and reasons for treatment failure were virological failure in one case, missing data in one case, and adverse events in two cases. At month 12, a significant decrease in median serum level of triglycerides (median change -61.2 mg/dL; p = .009) and total cholesterol (median change -38.4 mg/dL; p = .021) was reported, while a not significant median weight increase was registered (+0.55 kg).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, simplification to a single-tablet regimen of doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in virologically suppressed PLWHIV was effective and showed a good tolerability profile, in association with a significant improvement in serum lipid levels.

Structure-based design of novel heterocycle-substituted ATDP analogs as non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors with improved selectivity and solubility

Following on our recently developed biphenyl-ATDP non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor ZLM-66 (SI = 2019.80, S = 1.9 μg/mL), a series of novel heterocycle-substituted ATDP derivatives with significantly improved selectivity and solubility were identified by replacement of the biphenyl moiety of ZLM-66 with heterocyclic group with lower lipophilicity. Evidently, the representative analog 7w in this series exhibited dramatically enhanced selectivity and solubility (SI = 12,497.73, S = 4472 μg/mL) in comparison with ZLM-66 (SI = 2019.80, S = 1.9 μg/mL). This new NNRTI conferred low nanomolar inhibition of wild-type HIV-1 strain and tested mutant strains (K103N, L100I, Y181C, E138K, and K103N + Y181C). The analog also demonstrated favorable safety and pharmacokinetic profiles, as evidenced by its insensitivity to CYP and hERG, lack of mortality and pathological damage, and good oral bioavailability in rats (F = 27.1%). Further development of 7w for HIV therapy will be facilitated by this valuable information.

Estimated glomerular filtration rate partially recovered in patients without Hypertriglyceridemia during Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate treatment

BACKGROUND

Decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) treatment remains a concern, and few patients experience partial recovery of eGFR. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for eGFR recovery in patients with and without hypertriglyceridemia.

METHODS

A total of 203 patients with chronic HBV infection were prospectively recruited and followed up for three years. Data were collected at baseline, first, second, and third years during TDF treatment.

RESULTS

Most patients achieved normal ALT (80.0% vs. 82.5%) and undetectable HBV DNA (95.0% vs. 95.6%) in both groups (p > 0.05). For patients with hypertriglyceridemia, eGFR and cholesterol did not change significantly during the 3-year follow-up, while triglyceride (TG) decreased significantly in the first year and persisted at a lower level in the subsequent two years. For patients without hypertriglyceridemia, eGFR declined significantly in the first year of treatment, then gradually recovered during the subsequent two years, and eGFR was negatively correlated with TG at the four time points. Fifteen (15/183, 8.2%) patients without hypertriglyceridemia experienced eGFR partial recovery in the third year. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that baseline eGFR <90 mL/(min·1.73 m²) (p < 0.01; 95% CI: 0.019-0.284) and age (p < 0.01; 95% CI: 0.817-0.960) were independent risk factors for eGFR recovery.

CONCLUSION

eGFR partially recovered in patients without hypertriglyceridemia during TDF treatment, and TG regulation might be a useful strategy to hinder renal function decline, although larger, confirmatory studies are necessary to validate our findings.Key messagesFor patients with normal triglyceride, eGFR declined significantly at the first year of TDF treatment, then gradually recovered during the subsequent two years, and eGFR was negatively correlated with TG. Baseline eGFR <90 mL/(min·1.73 m²) and age were independent risk factors for eGFR recovery.

Population pharmacokinetic analysis of doravirine in real-world people with HIV

AIMS

The pharmacokinetics of doravirine has been studied in clinical trials but not in real-world settings. Our study aims to characterize and identify factors influencing doravirine (a CYP3A4 substrate) pharmacokinetics in real-world people with HIV (PWH).

METHODS

A total of 174 doravirine concentrations measured in 146 PWH followed up in the therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) program at the University Hospital of Lausanne (Switzerland) between 2019 and 2023 were included in the analysis. Demographic data, clinical information and comedications were recorded during the routine SHCS visits (every 3-6 months). Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations to investigate the clinical significance of the covariates retained in the final model were performed using NONMEM.

RESULTS

A one-compartment model with first-order absorption and linear elimination best described doravirine pharmacokinetics. Potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and, to a lesser extent age, were the only tested covariates to significantly impact doravirine clearance (CL). Potent CYP3A4 inhibitors reduced CL by 50%, and a 30% decrease in CL was observed in an 80-year-old compared with a 55-year-old PWH. The effect of potent CYP3A4 inhibitors was prominent, explaining 59% of between-subject variability in CL. Model-based simulations predicted 2.8-fold and 1.6-fold increases in median steady-state trough and maximum doravirine concentrations, respectively, when a potent CYP3A4 inhibitor was co-administered.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings show that potent CYP3A4 inhibitors and age influence doravirine pharmacokinetics. However, given the good tolerability of doravirine, dosing adjustment of doravirine is probably not mandatory in those situations. TDM remains useful essentially in specific clinical situations, such as hepatic impairment, suspected nonadherence or pregnancy.

Doravirine Plus Integrase Strand Transfer Inhibitors as a 2-Drug Treatment-Switch Strategy in People Living with HIV: The Real-Life DORINI Multicentric Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Few data are available about the efficacy, durability, and tolerability of doravirine (DOR) + integrase strand inhibitors (INI) as a switching strategy among antiretroviral therapy (ART)-experienced people living with HIV (PLWH).

SETTING

Retrospective, multicenter cohort study investigating the durability, efficacy, and tolerability of 2 off-label drug associations of DOR + INI among ART-experienced PLWH.

METHODS

The study included PLWH who switched to DOR combined with either raltegravir (RAL) or dolutegravir (DTG) between June 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, with at least 1 follow-up (FU) visit. Virologic, biometric, and metabolic parameters were evaluated at baseline (T0) and at 1-3 (T1), 6 (T2), and 12 (T3) months. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses assessed the 28-week probability of persistence on the regimens. Patient satisfaction was measured using the HIV Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Ninety-five PLWH were included, 52 in DOR + RAL and 43 in DOR + DTG. Six treatment discontinuations were reported during a mean of 37 (±17) weeks of FU (incidence of 2.7 × 1000 person-weeks FU). Only 2 were the result of virological failure without resistance mutations. DOR + DTG demonstrated significantly higher 28-week persistence than DOR + RAL (HR 1.90, 95% CI: 1.24-2.90, log-rank: P = 0.003). Weight, waist circumference, and fasting lipids reduced considerably at T3 vs T0. Overall, high satisfaction with the new treatment was reported, particularly in the DOR + RAL (68 (64-72)/72), compared with the DOR + DTG group (58 (50-65)/72, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience revealed few treatment discontinuations, improved metabolic parameters, and high patient satisfaction among ART-experienced PLWH switching to DOR combined with INI, irrespective of the specific INI used.

Current drugs for HIV-1: from challenges to potential in HIV/AIDS

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) persists in latently infected CD4+T cells and integrates with the host genome until cell death. Acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) is associated with HIV-1. Possibly, treating HIV/AIDS is an essential but challenging clinical goal. This review provides a detailed account of the types and mechanisms of monotherapy and combination therapy against HIV-1 and describes nanoparticle and hydrogel delivery systems. In particular, the recently developed capsid inhibitor (Lenacapavir) and the Ainuovirine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine combination (ACC008) are described. It is interestingly to note that the lack of the multipass transmembrane proteins serine incorporator 3 (SERINC3) and the multipass transmembrane proteins serine incorporator 5 (SERINC5) may be one of the reasons for the enhanced infectivity of HIV-1. This discovery of SERINC3 and SERINC5 provides new ideas for HIV-1 medication development. Therefore, we believe that in treating AIDS, antiviral medications should be rationally selected for pre-exposure and post-exposure prophylaxis to avoid the emergence of drug resistance. Attention should be paid to the research and development of new drugs to predict HIV mutations as accurately as possible and to develop immune antibodies to provide multiple guarantees for the cure of AIDS.

Efficacy and Safety of Two-Drug Regimens That Are Approved from 2018 to 2022 for the Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Disease and Its Opportunistic Infections

The human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is a type of virus that targets the body's immune cells. HIV infection can be divided into three phases: acute HIV infection, chronic HIV infection, and acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). HIV-infected people are immunosuppressed and at risk of developing opportunistic infections such as pneumonia, tuberculosis, candidiasis, toxoplasmosis, and Salmonella infection. The two types of HIV are known as HIV-1 and HIV-2. HIV-1 is the predominant and more common cause of AIDS worldwide, with an estimated 38 million people living with HIV-1 while an estimated 1 to 2 million people live with HIV-2. No effective cures are currently available for HIV infection. Current treatments emphasise the drug's safety and tolerability, as lifelong management is needed to manage HIV infection. The goal of this review is to study the efficacy and safety of newly approved drugs from 2018 to 2022 for the treatment of HIV by the United States Food and Drug Administration (US-FDA). The drugs included Cabotegravir and Rilpivirine, Fostemsavir, Doravirine, and Ibalizumab. From the review, switching to doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) was shown to be noninferior to the continuation of the previous regimen, efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (EFV/FTC/TDF) in virologically suppressed adults with HIV-1. However, DOR/3TC/TDF had shown a preferable safety profile with lower discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), lower neuropsychiatric AEs, and a preferable lipid profile. Ibalizumab was also safe, well tolerated, and had been proven effective against multiple drug-resistant strains of viruses.

Changes in Metabolic Profile in PLWHIV Switching to Doravirine-Based Regimen

Thanks to the modern ARV regimens and the fact that the morbidity and mortality of metabolic syndrome increases with age, clinicians are continuously researching effective and safe antiretroviral regimens with low impact on the lipid profile. Doravirine (DOR) is the latest non-nucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) that shows long-term safety and tolerability and a favorable lipid profile. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of DOR-based three-drug regimens on the lipid profile in clinical practice. We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 38 treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed people living with HIV (PLWH) switching to this regimen, following the eligibility criteria. We carried out comparison analysis of immunological and metabolic parameters between baseline and 48 weeks of follow up. In our cohort of treatment-experienced, virologically suppressed PLWH, three-drug regimens with DOR showed good efficacy and a positive profile on lipid metabolism at 48 weeks of follow up.

Residual phenotypic susceptibility to doravirine in multidrug-resistant HIV-1 from subjects enrolled in the PRESTIGIO Registry

OBJECTIVES

Doravirine shows a rather distinct resistance profile within the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) class. This study aimed to evaluate the phenotypic susceptibility to doravirine, rilpivirine and etravirine in a panel of multidrug-resistant (MDR) HIV-1 isolates collected from people living with HIV (PLWH) enrolled in the PRESTIGIO Registry.

METHODS

Recombinant viruses expressing PLWH-derived protease, reverse transcriptase coding regions were generated from plasma samples at virological failure with documented resistance to protease inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, NNRTIs and integrase strand transfer inhibitors. In vitro susceptibility was assessed through a phenotypic assay measuring fold-change values with respect to the reference NL4-3 virus. Genotypic susceptibility was computed by the Stanford HIVdb algorithm 8.9-1.

RESULTS

Plasma samples were collected from 22 PLWH: 20 (91%) were male, median age 55 years (IQR 50-58), time since HIV-1 diagnosis 27 years (23-31) and time on antiretroviral treatment 23 years (22-26). Median doravirine, etravirine and rilpivirine fold-change values were 9.8 (2.9-40.4), 42.9 (3.1-100.0) and 100.0 (17.9-100.0), respectively. According to the fold-change cut-offs, full susceptibility was observed in five (23%), four (18%) and one (5%) cases with doravirine, etravirine and rilpivirine, respectively. Irrespective of the presence of specific doravirine mutations, higher numbers of NNRTI mutations correlated with higher fold-change values for doravirine. By comparing the distribution of fold-change values with the Stanford HIVdb predicted susceptibility, a significant correlation was detected for doravirine and rilpivirine but not etravirine.

CONCLUSION

Despite extensive cross-resistance among NNRTIs, doravirine can be a valid option in a proportion of PLWH with MDR HIV-1. Doravirine activity appeared to be inferred with fair accuracy by the HIVdb algorithm.

Future of Antiretroviral Drugs and Evolution of HIV-1 Drug Resistance

Highly active antiretroviral (ARV) therapy has been used for many years, but the use in low- and middle-income countries of antiretroviral drugs with low genetic barrier to resistance, combined with limited availability of viral load testing, has led to higher rates of acquired drug resistance, sustaining the rate of transmitted drug resistance. Here, we describe the evolution of ARV drugs with the ongoing development of injectable long-acting forms and the requirements regarding all new ARV drugs (i.e., no transmitted drug resistance, no cross-resistance and high genetic barrier to resistance). Then, we report the evolution of both transmitted and acquired resistance regarding new ARV drugs. The WHO has set very ambitious but motivating goals for HIV testing, treatment and viral suppression, aiming to achieve rates of 95% for all three by 2025. Reaching these goals requires a wide implementation and use of close virological monitoring in LMICs.

Potential role of doravirine for the treatment of HIV-1-infected persons with transmitted drug resistance

BACKGROUND

Doravirine has a unique resistance profile but how this profile might increase its usefulness beyond first-line therapy in persons with susceptible viruses has not been well studied. We sought to determine scenarios in which doravirine would retain activity against isolates from ART-naïve persons with transmitted drug resistance (TDR) and to identify gaps in available doravirine susceptibility data.

METHODS

We analyzed published in vitro doravirine susceptibility data and applied the results to 42,535 RT sequences from ART-naïve persons published between 2017 and 2021. NNRTI drug resistance mutations (DRMs) were defined as those with a Stanford HIV Drug Resistance Database doravirine penalty score either alone or in combination with other mutations.

RESULTS

V106A, Y188L, F227C/L, M230L, and Y318F were associated with the greatest reductions in doravirine susceptibility. However, several NNRTI DRMs and DRM combinations lacking these canonical resistance mutations had > tenfold reduced susceptibility including G190E, one isolate with G190S, three isolates with L100I + K103N, one isolate with K103N + P225H, and isolates with L100I + K103N + V108I and K101E + Y181C + G190A. Of the 42,535 ART-naïve sequences, 3,374 (7.9%) contained a NNRTI DRM of which 2,788 (82.6%) contained 1 DRM (n = 33 distinct mutations), 426 (12.6%) contained 2 DRMs (79 distinct pairs of mutations), and 143 (4.2%) contained ≥ 3 DRMs (86 distinct mutation patterns). Among the 2,788 sequences with one DRM, 112 (4.0%) were associated with ≥ 3.0-fold reduced doravirine susceptibility while 2,625 (94.2%) were associated with < 3.0-fold reduced susceptibility. Data were not available for individual NNRTI DRMs in 51 sequences (1.8%). Among the 426 sequences with two NNRTI DRMs, 180 (42.3%) were associated with ≥ 3.0 fold reduced doravirine susceptibility while just 32 (7.5%) had < 3.0 fold reduced susceptibility. Data were not available for 214 (50.2%) sequences containing two NNRTI DRMs.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line therapy containing doravirine plus two NRTIs is expected to be effective in treating most persons with TDR as more than 80% of TDR sequences had a single NNRTI DRM and as more than 90% with a single DRM were expected to be susceptible to doravirine. However, caution is required for the use of doravirine in persons with more than one NNRTI DRM even if none of the DRMs are canonical doravirine-resistance mutations.

Pharmacokinetics, Tolerability, and Safety of Doravirine and Doravirine/Lamivudine/Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate Fixed-Dose Combination Tablets in Adolescents Living With HIV: Week 24 Results From IMPAACT 2014

BACKGROUND

We studied the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of 100-mg doravirine and doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate fixed-dose combination (100/300/300 mg DOR FDC) treatment in adolescents with HIV-1.

METHODS

Adolescents ages 12 to younger than 18 years were enrolled in 2 sequential cohorts. Cohort 1 evaluated intensive PK and short-term safety of 100-mg single-dose doravirine in adolescents ≥35 kg. Cohort 2 participants either initiated treatment with DOR FDC (antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve) or switched to DOR FDC from a previous ARV regimen (virologically suppressed). The first 10 Cohort 2 participants had intensive PK evaluations, and safety, sparse PK, and HIV RNA were assessed through week 24.

RESULTS

Fifty-five adolescents, median age 15.0 years and baseline weight 51.5 kg, were enrolled. Nine participants completed Cohort 1 PK assessments (8 of the 9 participants weighed ≥45 kg) and 45 initiated study drug in Cohort 2. The doravirine geometric mean (GM) AUC 0-∞ was 34.8 μM∙hour, and the GM C 24 was 514 nM after a single dose, with a predicted steady-state GM C 24,ss,pred of 690 nM. Cohort 2 enrolled adolescents weighing ≥45 kg. Plasma concentrations of doravirine, tenofovir, and lamivudine achieved by Cohort 2 participants were similar to those reported in adults. No drug-related serious or grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred. Forty-two of 45 participants (93.3%; 95% CI: [81.7, 98.6]) achieved or maintained HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL.

CONCLUSIONS

Doravirine and DOR FDC achieved target PK in adolescents with HIV-1. DOR FDC was well-tolerated and maintained excellent virologic efficacy through 24 weeks, offering a favorable option for adolescents.

Updates on HIV and Kidney Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With the advent of antiretroviral therapy, HIV infection has become a chronic disease in developed countries.

RECENT FINDINGS

Non-HIV-driven risk factors for kidney disease, such as APOL1 risk variants and other genetic and environmental factors, have been discovered and are better described. Consequently, the field of HIV-associated kidney disease has evolved with greater attention given to traditional risk factors of CKD and antiretroviral treatment's nephrotoxicity. In this review, we explore risk factors of HIV-associated kidney disease, diagnostic tools, kidney pathology in HIV-positive individuals, and antiretroviral therapy-associated nephrotoxicity.

Clinical predictors of efavirenz-based regimen treatment durability: A two-year case-control study of antiretroviral-naïve patients

BACKGROUND

While efavirenz-associated adverse drug events (ADEs) were widely established, the clinical relevance is uncertain.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess the extent of treatment interruption caused by efavirenz-associated ADEs.

METHODS

A case-control study of efavirenz recipients who did, versus did not (control) develop adverse drug events (ADE), and who were matched for baseline CD4 + at a ratio of 1:1.3 was conducted. Antiretroviral -naïve patients who were started on efavirenz were followed up retrospectively, and their records scrutinized every month for 2 years. Demographic and clinical predictors of treatment interruption were computed using Cox proportional hazard models. Kaplan- Meier curves were plotted to assess time to treatment interruption for the two groups. Clinical endpoints were: i) efficacy -improved CD4 + counts and/or viral load (VL) suppression, ii) safety -absence of treatment-limiting toxicities, and iii) durability - no interruption until follow-up ended.

RESULTS

Both groups had comparable CD4 + counts at baseline (p = 0.15). At t = 24-months, VL in both groups were suppressed to undetectable levels (<20 copies/mL) while median CD4 + was 353 cells/µL (IQR: 249-460). The mean time on treatment was 23 months (95% CI, 22.3 -23.4) in the control group without ADE and 20 months (95% CI, 18.9 - 21.6) in the ADE group (p = 0.001). Kaplan-Meier plots demonstrated that 59.5% of patients who experienced > 1 ADE versus 81% of those who did not experience any ADE were estimated to continue treatment for up to 24 months with no interruption (p = 0.001). Most interruptions to EFV treatment occurred in the presence of opportunistic infections and these were detected within the first 5 months of treatment initiation. Independent predictors which negatively impacted the dependent variable i.e., treatment durability, were intravenous drug use (adjusted hazard ratio, aHR 2.17, 95% CI, 1.03-4.61, p = 0.043), presence of > 1 opportunistic infection(s) (aHR 2.2, 95% CI, 1.13-4.21, p = 0.021), and presence of > 1 serious ADE(s) (aHR 4.18, 95% CI, 1.98-8.85, p = 0.00).

CONCLUSION

Efavirenz' role as the preferred first-line regimen for South-East Asia's resource-limited regions will need to be carefully tailored to suit the regional population. Findings have implications to policy-makers and clinicians, particularly for the treatment of patients who develop ADEs and opportunistic infections, and for intravenous drug user subgroups.

Real-life use of Doravirine in treatment-experienced people living with HIV: A multicenter Italian study

Use of doravirine (DOR), a new nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors recently approved for HIV treatment, is still unclear in clinical practice and real-life data are scarce. We retrospectively investigated the rationale for switching people with HIV to DOR-containing/-based regimens in a real-life cohort. Among 132 patients (68.9% males, median age 56 years), the main reasons to start DOR were prevention of toxicities (39.4%) and dyslipidemia (18.2%). DOR was combined with integrase inhibitors in 40.9% cases, and in 25.7% of patients, DOR was prescribed without availability of a genotypic resistance test. Twenty-four weeks after the switch to DOR-containing/-based regimens, no significant changes in CD4+ T-cell count, CD4/CD8 ratio, detectable HIV-RNA, serum creatinine levels, and body weight were detected. By contrast, a significant reduction in lipids (both cholesterol and triglycerides) was observed in 52 patients for whom a follow-up assessment was available (P = .008 and .01, respectively). Our data confirmed that switching to DOR-containing/-based regimens may have a favorable impact on lipid profile and a neutral impact on weight gain. However, more data are needed to support its use in patients who do not have a genotypic test available or have an extensive nonnucleoside reverse-transcriptase inhibitors-associated resistance, as well as its use in a dual regimen, especially in combination with second-generation integrase inhibitors.

Doravirine: its role in HIV treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

We reviewed evidence concerning the novel nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor doravirine, aiming to identify situations where it may be selected in preference to integrase inhibitors.

RECENT FINDINGS

Doravirine is licenced for the treatment of HIV-1 in North America and Europe. In two multicentre randomized controlled trials, noninferiority with comparator drugs efavirenz and darunavir/ritonavir was observed at 96 weeks. Doravirine is associated with a lower incidence of neuropsychiatric side effects relative to efavirenz, and favourable lipid changes relative to darunavir over 96 weeks. A lower incidence of weight gain, relative to indirect comparisons with integrase inhibitors, was observed. Doravirine has a high genetic barrier to resistance with retained activity in the presence of single NNRTI mutations K103N, Y181C and G190A. Primary drug resistance is infrequent and may be higher in South Africa relative to European populations. Doravirine may be used in renal or hepatic impairment and has a low potential for drug-drug interactions.

SUMMARY

Doravirine is a well tolerated and effective agent in ART-naive patients. Direct comparison with integrase inhibitors, and evidence on the outcomes of treatment with doravirine in the presence of prior NNRTI experience are required to better elucidate which patients will benefit most from doravirine therapy.

Real life use of dolutegravir doravirine dual regimen in experienced elderly PLWH with multiple comorbidities and on polypharmacy: A retrospective analysis

By increasing life expectancy of people living with HIV, the most clinical challenge is managing both drug-to-drug interactions and comorbidities (especially metabolic). Doravirine (DOR), a new non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, recently approved for the treatment of HIV, could be a good companion of dolutegravir (DTG) in a dual regimen for experienced elderly patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy.We herein report our preliminary experience in a small cohort of elderly patients (>50 years of age) with multimorbidity and on polypharmacy who were switched to DOR/DTG dual regimen and followed-up for 3 months. The study was conducted at the Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit of Padua University Hospital, Italy.Eighteen patients were included, 72.2% males and 27.8% postmenopausal women, mean age was of 61.3 years (7.6), 50% experienced AIDS events. Switches to DOR and DTG were mainly due to high cardiovascular and metabolic risk (72.2%), and interactions among comedications (50%). Antiretrovirals that subjects were switched off were mostly boosted protease inhibitors 66.7%. We observed a viral suppression among all subjects. Interestingly, we observed a statistically significant reduction in body mass index, body weight and waist circumference, eGFR, and a significant increase in serum creatinine levels. No significant changes in CD4+ T cell count was observed from the baseline. Lipid and fasting glucose values did not change significantly.To the best of our knowledge this is the first experience reporting real-life outcome of switch to DTG + DOR in elderly with multimorbidity and on polypharmacy. From our very preliminary data the dual combination of DTG and DOR could be a good treatment strategy for these subjects. However, our findings need to be validated on a greater number of patients.

Retroviral reverse transcriptase: Structure, function and inhibition

Reverse transcriptase (RT) is a multifunctional enzyme that has RNA- and DNA-dependent DNA polymerase activity and ribonuclease H (RNase H) activity, and is responsible for the reverse transcription of retroviral single-stranded RNA into double-stranded DNA. The essential role that RT plays in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) life cycle is highlighted by the fact that multiple antiviral drugs-which can be classified into two distinct therapeutic classes-are routinely used to treat and/or prevent HIV infection. This book chapter provides detailed insights into the three-dimensional structure of HIV RT, the biochemical mechanisms of DNA polymerization and RNase H activity, and the mechanisms by which nucleoside/nucleotide and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors block reverse transcription.

Impact of HIV-1 Resistance-Associated Mutations on Susceptibility to Doravirine: Analysis of Real-World Clinical Isolates

Clinical management of human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1) infection may be negatively impacted by either acquired or transmitted drug resistance. Here, we aim to extend our understanding of the impact of resistance-associated mutations (RAMs) on the susceptibility of clinical isolates to the nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) doravirine. Clinical isolates from people living with HIV-1 undergoing routine testing for susceptibility to doravirine and other approved NNRTIs (etravirine, rilpivirine, efavirenz, and nevirapine) were collected from August 2018 to August 2019. Susceptibility in the presence/absence of NNRTI and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) mutations was determined using cutoffs for relative fold change in inhibition (ratio of the 50% inhibitory concentration [IC₅₀] of patient virus compared with the IC₅₀ of a wild-type reference strain). Biological cutoffs of 3- to 15-fold change were investigated for doravirine, with preestablished cutoffs used for the other NNRTIs. Of 4,070 clinical isolates, 42.9% had ≥1 NNRTI RAM. More isolates were susceptible to doravirine (92.5-96.7%) than to etravirine (91.5%), rilpivirine (89.5%), efavirenz (81.5%), or nevirapine (77.5%). Based on a 3-fold cutoff, doravirine susceptibility was retained in 44.7-65.8% of isolates resistant to another NNRTI and 28.5% of isolates resistant to all other tested NNRTIs. The presence of NRTI RAMs, including thymidine analog mutations, was associated with doravirine hypersusceptibility in some isolates, particularly in the absence of NNRTI RAMs. These results support the favorable resistance profile of doravirine and are of particular importance given the challenge posed by both acquired and transmitted resistance.

An update on neuropsychiatric adverse effects with second-generation integrase inhibitors and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuropsychiatric adverse effects (NPAE) associated with integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) and nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs) are a growing concern, with higher rates in the real-world compared to phase III trials. This paper reviews the incidence, risk factors, and management of NPAE with second-generation INSTIs, INSTI/rilpivirine dual therapy, and doravirine.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent cohort data confirm up to 8% NPAE-associated discontinuations for dolutegravir; NPAE with dolutegravir/rilpivirine therapy are higher than with dolutegravir alone, whereas bictegravir appears similar to dolutegravir. In contrast, NPAE with cabotegravir alone or with rilpivirine appears to be low. Doravirine has NPAE rates similar to rilpivirine and lower than efavirenz. Risk factors for NPAE include female gender, concurrent abacavir use, Sub-Saharan African descent, and age, whereas underlying psychiatric conditions do not appear to increase risk. Strategies to manage NPAE include changing administration time, therapeutic drug monitoring, or regimen modification including within-class INSTI changes. People experiencing NPAE with dolutegravir may tolerate bictegravir.

SUMMARY

Overall, mild to moderate NPAE are associated with INSTIs and newer NNRTIs. Rarely, more severe symptoms may occur and lead to treatment discontinuation. Clinicians should be aware of NPAE to identify and manage drug-related adverse effects.

Hepatotoxicity of contemporary antiretroviral drugs

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To date, more than 30 antiretroviral drugs have been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of HIV infection. As new drugs with better efficacy and safety profile become available for clinical practice, older drugs are either withdrawn from the market or become no longer actively prescribed. We review hepatotoxicity associated with contemporary antiretroviral drugs, with emphasis on data from the past 3 years.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although less robust data exists for side effects of contemporary antiretroviral medications recently approved for the management of HIV (i.e., doravirine, ibalizumab, fostemsavir, cabotegravir), the risks of substantial hepatotoxicity appears to be minimal with these agents.

SUMMARY

Although newer antiretroviral drugs are better tolerated than their earlier counterparts, they are not completely devoid of adverse drug reactions, including hepatotoxicity. Monitoring patients on antiretroviral therapy for treatment-emergent liver injury should continue to be part of routine clinical care.

Brief Report: Switching to DOR/3TC/TDF Maintains HIV-1 Virologic Suppression Through Week 144 in the DRIVE-SHIFT Trial

BACKGROUND

In the primary analysis of the DRIVE-SHIFT trial, switching to doravirine/lamivudine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (DOR/3TC/TDF) maintained suppression of HIV-1 through week 48. Here, we present long-term efficacy and safety outcomes through week 144 of the DRIVE-SHIFT trial.

METHODS

This phase 3, randomized, open-label trial evaluated switching from a stable antiretroviral regimen to once-daily DOR/3TC/TDF in adults with HIV-1 suppressed for ≥6 months and no previous virologic failure. Participants switched at day 1 [immediate switch group (ISG); n = 447] or week 24 [delayed switch group (DSG); n = 209]. Nine ISG participants who completed week 48 but did not enter extension-1 were excluded from week 144 efficacy analyses.

RESULTS

At week 144, HIV-1 RNA <50 copies/mL was maintained in 80.1% of the ISG (351/438) and 83.7% of the DSG (175/209), while 2.7% (12/438) and 4.8% (10/209), respectively, had HIV-1 RNA ≥50 copies/mL (Food and Drug Administration Snapshot approach). Protocol-defined virologic failure after switch occurred in 2.1% of ISG (9/438) and 3.3% of DSG (7/209); no viral resistance to doravirine was detected in 4 participants with samples available. Reductions in fasting lipids were observed at 24 weeks after switch and maintained through week 144. The mean weight change from switch to week 144 was +1.4 kg for ISG and +1.2 kg for DSG. The most common adverse events were nasopharyngitis (16.2%), headache (12.3%), and diarrhea (9.1%). Overall, 4.1% discontinued because of adverse events, and no deaths occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that switching to once-daily DOR/3TC/TDF is a generally well-tolerated option for maintaining viral suppression in adults considering a change in therapy.

REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02397096.

Hepatotoxicity of Contemporary Antiretroviral Drugs: A Review and Evaluation of Published Clinical Data

Contemporary antiretroviral agents afford enhanced potency and safety for patients living with HIV. Newer antiretroviral drugs are often better tolerated than those initially approved in the early stages of the HIV epidemic. While the safety profile has improved, adverse drug reactions still occur. We have segregated the antiretroviral agents used in contemporary practice into class groupings based on their mechanism of antiviral activity (non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, integrase inhibitors, protease inhibitors, and entry inhibitors) while providing a review and discussion of the hepatoxicity seen in the most relevant clinical literature published to date. Clinical literature for individual agents is discussed and agent comparisons afforded within each group in tabular format. Our review will provide a summative overview of the incidence and medications associated with hepatic adverse reactions linked to the use of contemporary antiretroviral drugs.

Are New Antiretroviral Treatments Increasing the Risk of Weight Gain?

There is a growing body of evidence from both observational and randomised trials implicating integrase inhibitors, particularly dolutegravir and bictegravir, with the development of weight gain and obesity in people living with HIV. Evidence with cabotegravir, the newest integrase inhibitor, is limited. Reasons for weight gain are currently unknown. Proposed mechanisms include improved tolerability, direct impact on adipogenesis, and gut microbiome disturbance. Clinical trials have found that weight gain with integrase inhibitors is greatest for women and people of Black ethnicity. Evidence suggests that the nucleoside reverse transcriptase backbone has additional effects on weight gain, with tenofovir alafenamide potentially enhancing the weight gain effect. Weight gain and obesity have long-term consequences, including metabolic syndrome, development of type 2 diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease and adverse birth outcomes. However, the current evidence for the medium and long-term effects of weight gain associated with integrase inhibitors is limited. There is an urgent need for clinical trials with longer follow-up periods and standardised endpoints to evaluate these effects. New thresholds for weight gain should be established as guidance for clinicians to stop treatment where weight gain is excessive. Novel treatments such as doravirine could offer a suitable therapy alternative, with current evidence showing efficacy with limited effect on weight gain.