In vitro identification of underutilized β-lactam combinations against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia isolates

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia is a serious clinical challenge with high mortality rates. Antibiotic combination therapy is currently used in cases of persistent infection; however, the limited development of new antibiotics will likely increase the need for combination therapy, and better methods are needed for identifying effective combinations for treating persistent bacteremia. To identify pairwise combinations with the most consistent potential for benefit compared to monotherapy with a primary anti-MRSA agent, we conducted a systematic study with an in vitro high-throughput methodology. We tested daptomycin and vancomycin each in combination with gentamicin, rifampicin, cefazolin, and oxacillin, and ceftaroline with daptomycin, gentamicin, and rifampicin. Combining cefazolin with daptomycin lowered the daptomycin concentration required to reach 95% growth inhibition (IC95) for all isolates tested and lowered daptomycin IC95 below the sensitivity breakpoint for five out of six isolates that had daptomycin minimum inhibitory concentrations at or above the sensitivity breakpoint. Similarly, vancomycin IC95s were decreased when vancomycin was combined with cefazolin for 86.7% of the isolates tested. This was a higher percentage than was achieved by adding any other secondary antibiotic to vancomycin. Adding rifampicin to daptomycin or vancomycin did not always reduce IC95s and failed to produce synergistic interaction in any of the isolates tested; the addition of rifampicin to ceftaroline was frequently synergistic and always lowered the amount of ceftaroline required to reach the IC95. These analyses rationalize further in vivo evaluation of three drug pairs for MRSA bacteremia: daptomycin+cefazolin, vancomycin+cefazolin, and ceftaroline+rifampicin.IMPORTANCEBloodstream infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) have a high mortality rate despite the availability of vancomycin, daptomycin, and newer antibiotics including ceftaroline. With the slow output of the antibiotic pipeline and the serious clinical challenge posed by persistent MRSA infections, better strategies for utilizing combination therapy are becoming increasingly necessary. We demonstrated the value of a systematic high-throughput approach, adapted from prior work testing antibiotic combinations against tuberculosis and other mycobacteria, by using this approach to test antibiotic pairs against a panel of MRSA isolates with diverse patterns of antibiotic susceptibility. We identified three antibiotic pairs-daptomycin+cefazolin, vancomycin+cefazolin, and ceftaroline+rifampicin-where the addition of the second antibiotic improved the potency of the first antibiotic across all or most isolates tested. Our results indicate that these pairs warrant further evaluation in the clinical setting.

Effectiveness and safety of cefazolin versus cloxacillin in endocarditis due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus spp.: a multicenter propensity weighted cohort study

PURPOSE

To compare the effectiveness and safety of cefazolin versus cloxacillin for the treatment of infective endocarditis (IE) due to methicillin-sensitive Staphylococci (MSS).

METHODS

Data were retrospectively collected on patients treated for a definite MSS endocarditis who received cefazolin or cloxacillin for at least 10 consecutive days in six French hospitals between January-1 2014 and December-31 2020. The primary endpoint was treatment failure defined as a composite of death within 90 days of starting antibiotherapy, or embolic event during antibiotherapy, or relapse of IE within 90 days of stopping antibiotherapy. We used Cox regression adjusted for the inverse probability of treatment weighting of receiving cefazolin.

RESULTS

192 patients were included (median age 67.8 years). IE was caused by S.aureus in 175 (91.1%) and by coagulase-negative staphylococci in 17 (8.9%). Ninety-four patients (48.9%) received cefazolin, and 98 (51%) received cloxacillin. 34 patients (34.7%) with cefazolin and 26 (27.7%) with cloxacillin met the composite primary endpoint, with no significant differences between groups (adjusted HR = 1.13, 95% CI 0.63 to 2.03). There were no significant differences in secondary efficacy endpoints or biological safety events.

CONCLUSION

The effectiveness of cefazolin did not significantly differ from cloxacillin for the treatment of MSS endocarditis.

Comparative effectiveness of empirical antibiotic treatments in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: A post hoc analysis of a prospective French cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The empirical treatment of infective endocarditis is still debated. The aim of this study was to compare the impact of empirical treatment with antistaphylococcal penicillin (ASP) or cefazolin vs. other treatments in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) endocarditis.

METHODS

A post hoc analysis of a prospective cohort study of patients hospitalized in a French reference centre with MSSA endocarditis was conducted between 2013 and 2022. The primary outcome was the duration of bacteraemia under treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 208 patients included, 101 patients (48.6%) were classified in the reference group (ASP or cefazolin) and 107 (52.4%) in the non-reference group. Empirical treatment with ASP/cefazolin was associated with a shorter duration of bacteraemia compared to other treatments (3.6 d vs. 4.6 d, P = 0.01). This difference was not corrected by the addition of an aminoglycoside (3.6 d vs. 4.7 d, P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis, empirical treatment with ASP/cefazolin was associated with a duration of bacteraemia ≤72 h (P = 0.02), whereas endocarditis on native valves (P = 0.01), and intracardiac abscess were associated with longer duration of bacteraemia (P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Empirical treatment of endocarditis with ASP or Cefazolin is more effective than other treatments in MSSA endocarditis, even when the other treatments are combined with aminoglycosides.

Daptomycin Plus Oxacillin for Persistent Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

BACKGROUND

The preferred antibiotic salvage regimen for persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (MSSAB) is unclear. Ertapenem with cefazolin or an antistaphylococcal penicillin has been primarily described, but identifying alternative carbapenem-sparing options may support antibiotic stewardship efforts and decrease the risk of antibiotic-associated Clostridioides difficile infection.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of daptomycin plus oxacillin (D/O) for persistent MSSAB.

METHODS

This was a single-center, retrospective cohort of patients with persistent MSSAB who received D/O between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2023. Adult patients were included if they had blood cultures positive for MSSA ≥72 hours and received D/O combination for ≥48 hours. Patients were excluded if they were pregnant, incarcerated, or received another antibiotic considered to have excellent activity against MSSA. The primary outcome was time to MSSA bacteremia clearance post-daptomycin initiation. Secondary outcomes included microbiological cure, hospital length of stay, 90-day all-cause mortality, MSSA bacteremia-related mortality, 90-day readmission for MSSAB, and incidence of antibiotic-associated adverse effects. Time to MSSAB clearance post-D/O initiation was plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimation.

RESULTS

Seven unique patient encounters were identified including 4 with endocarditis. Despite a median MSSA bacteremia duration of 7.8 days, median clearance was 2 days post-daptomycin initiation. All achieved microbiological cure, and no adverse effects were reported. Ninety-day all-cause mortality, MSSAB-related mortality, and 90-day readmission for MSSAB occurred in 28.6%, 14.3%, and 14.3% of patients, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

D/O was an effective, well-tolerated salvage regimen in this cohort and may represent a carbapenem-sparing option for persistent MSSAB.

Understanding vancomycin nephrotoxicity augmented by β-lactams: a synthesis of endosymbiosis, proximal renal tubule mitochondrial metabolism, and β-lactam chemistry

The recent understanding that hydrophobic β-lactams have greater affinity for organic anion transporter-3 (OAT-3) of the proximal renal tubule could provide valuable insights for anticipating β-lactams that may exacerbate vancomycin-induced nephrotoxicity. Vancomycin alone provides oxidative stress on the highly metabolic proximal tubular cells. Hydrophobic β-lactams (eg, piperacillin and anti-staphylococcal β-lactams) could have greater OAT-3 mediated uptake into proximal tubular cells than hydrophilic β-lactams (eg, most cephalosporins and carbapenems), thereby causing greater mitochondrial stress on these susceptible cells. It remains to be seen whether concomitant drugs that inhibit OAT-3 mediated cellular uptake of β-lactams into proximal tubular cells or provide antioxidant effects might mitigate β-lactam augmented vancomycin nephrotoxicity. Furthermore, the serum creatinine rise seen with vancomycin and hydrophobic β-lactams might represent competition for creatinine-secreting transporters (of which OAT-3 is one), thus, indicating creatinine retention rather than renal injury. In the meantime, clinicians are advised to utilise less nephrotoxic combinations in both empirical and directed antibiotic selection settings until further research is conducted.

Cephalotin Versus Dicloxacillin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteraemia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

First-line treatments for methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia are nafcillin, oxacillin, or cefazolin. Regional shortages of these antibiotics force clinicians to use other options like dicloxacillin and cephalotin. This study aims to describe and compare the safety and efficacy of cephalotin and dicloxacillin for the treatment of MSSA bacteraemia.

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted in a referral centre in Mexico City. We identified MSSA isolates in blood cultures from 1 January 2012 to 31 December 2022. Patients ≥ 18 years of age, with a first episode of MSSA bacteraemia, who received cephalotin or dicloxacillin as the definitive antibiotic treatment, were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

We included 202 patients, of which 48% (97/202) received cephalotin as the definitive therapy and 52% (105/202) received dicloxacillin. In-hospital all-cause mortality was 20.7% (42/202). There were no differences in all-cause in-hospital mortality between patients receiving cephalotin or dicloxacillin (20% vs. 21%, p = 0.43), nor in 30-day all-cause mortality (14% vs. 18%, p = 0.57) or 90-day all-cause mortality (24% vs. 22%, p = 0.82). No severe adverse reactions were associated with either antibiotic.

CONCLUSIONS

Cephalotin and dicloxacillin were equally effective for treating MSSA bacteraemia, and both showed an adequate safety profile.

Significant Publications on Infectious Diseases Pharmacotherapy in 2021

Purpose: To summarize the most noteworthy infectious diseases (ID) pharmacotherapy articles published in peer-reviewed literature in 2021. Summary: Members of the Houston Infectious Diseases Network (HIDN) nominated articles that were deemed to have significant contributions to ID pharmacotherapy in 2021. These nominations included articles pertaining to both general ID, including coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS) pharmacotherapy. A total of 35 articles were nominated by HIDN: 30 articles pertaining to general ID pharmacotherapy and 5 articles with HIV/AIDS focus. To select the most influential articles of 2021, a survey was created and distributed to members of the Society of Infectious Diseases Pharmacists (SIDP). Of the 239 SIDP members who responded to the survey, there were 192 recorded votes for the top 10 general ID pharmacotherapy articles and 47 recorded votes for the top HIV/AIDS article, respectively. The top publications are summarized. Conclusion: Antimicrobial stewardship and the optimal management of infectious disease states continues to be a priority in the midst of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic. In light of the sheer volume of ID-related articles published in the past year, this review aims to aid clinicians in remaining up-to-date on key practice-changing ID pharmacotherapy publications from 2021.

Contemporary use of cefazolin for MSSA infective endocarditis: analysis of a national prospective cohort

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to assess the real use of cefazolin for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infective endocarditis (IE) in the Spanish National Endocarditis Database (GAMES) and to compare it with antistaphylococcal penicillin (ASP).

METHODS

Prospective cohort study with retrospective analysis of a cohort of MSSA IE treated with cloxacillin and/or cefazolin. Outcomes assessed were relapse; intra-hospital, overall, and endocarditis-related mortality; and adverse events. Risk of renal toxicity with each treatment was evaluated separately.

RESULTS

We included 631 IE episodes caused by MSSA treated with cloxacillin and/or cefazolin. Antibiotic treatment was cloxacillin, cefazolin, or both in 537 (85%), 57 (9%), and 37 (6%) episodes, respectively. Patients treated with cefazolin had significantly higher rates of comorbidities (median Charlson Index 7, P <0.01) and previous renal failure (57.9%, P <0.01). Patients treated with cloxacillin presented higher rates of septic shock (25%, P = 0.033) and new-onset or worsening renal failure (47.3%, P = 0.024) with significantly higher rates of in-hospital mortality (38.5%, P = 0.017). One-year IE-related mortality and rate of relapses were similar between treatment groups. None of the treatments were identified as risk or protective factors.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that cefazolin is a valuable option for the treatment of MSSA IE, without differences in 1-year mortality or relapses compared with cloxacillin, and might be considered equally effective.

Contemporary Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia-Controversies in Clinical Practice

Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) carries a high risk for excess morbidity and mortality. Despite its prevalence, significant practice variation continues to permeate clinical management of this syndrome. Since the publication of the 2011 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines on management of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections, the field of SAB has evolved with the emergence of newer diagnostic strategies and therapeutic options. In this review, we seek to provide a comprehensive overview of the evaluation and management of SAB, with special focus on areas where the highest level of evidence is lacking to inform best practices.

Therapeutic Options for Adult Patients With Persistent Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of antimicrobial therapies used in the management of persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search using the PubMed database (inception to December 2022) was conducted using the search terms "Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia," "methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia," "persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia," and "refractory methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia ." In addition, therapeutic agents which could be used as treatment for MSSA including "nafcillin," "oxacillin," "cefazolin," "ceftaroline," "gentamicin," "rifampin," and "daptomycin" were also combined with the aforementioned search terms to capture data using these agents.

STUDY SELECTION/DATA EXTRACTION

Clinical data were limited to those published in the English language. Articles and abstracts were considered for inclusion in addition to ongoing trials identified through ClinicalTrials.gov.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A total of 78 articles were reviewed including 17 in vitro or animal model studies and 39 studies including patient data. The remaining 22 articles included guidelines, review articles, and editorials. Recent data evaluating use of dual β-lactam regimens for persistent MSSA bacteremia were limited to 8 case reports or case series.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

At present, there is little guidance on how to best manage patients with persistent MSSA bacteremia. This narrative review collates the available data to assist clinicians in selecting the best possible antimicrobial regimen when facing this clinical conundrum.

CONCLUSIONS

Modification of antimicrobial therapy, in conjunction with source control and infectious diseases consultation, may all be necessary to sterilize blood cultures in patients with persistent MSSA bacteremia.

Global Differences in the Management of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: No International Standard of Care

BACKGROUND

Despite being the leading cause of mortality from bloodstream infections worldwide, little is known about regional variation in treatment practices for Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB). The aim of this study was to identify global variation in management, diagnostics, and definitions of SAB.

METHODS

During a 20-day period in 2022, physicians throughout the world were surveyed on SAB treatment practices. The survey was distributed through listservs, e-mails, and social media.

RESULTS

In total, 2031 physicians from 71 different countries on 6 continents (North America [701, 35%], Europe [573, 28%], Asia [409, 20%], Oceania [182, 9%], South America [124, 6%], and Africa [42, 2%]) completed the survey. Management-based responses differed significantly by continent for preferred treatment of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, use of adjunctive rifampin for prosthetic material infection, and use of oral antibiotics (P < .01 for all comparisons). The 18F-FDG PET/CT scans were most commonly used in Europe (94%) and least frequently used in Africa (13%) and North America (51%; P < .01). Although most respondents defined persistent SAB as 3-4 days of positive blood cultures, responses ranged from 2 days in 31% of European respondents to 7 days in 38% of Asian respondents (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Large practice variations for SAB exist throughout the world, reflecting the paucity of high-quality data and the absence of an international standard of care for the management of SAB.

Disc Test for Detecting Staphylococcus aureus Strains Producing Type A and Type C β-Lactamases

Staphylococcus aureus can produce β-lactamases capable of hydrolyzing penicillins and first-generation cephalosporins. The propensity of type A and type C β-lactamase-producing S. aureus (TAPSA and TCPSA) to hydrolyze cefazolin at a high inoculum is termed the cefazolin inoculum effect (CIE). Strains with a CIE have a theoretical risk of causing treatment failure and are unable to be detected routinely by most laboratories. We developed a high-performing yet straightforward β-lactamase disc test that identifies and differentiates both TAPSA and TCPSA and is suitable for routine diagnostic laboratory workflows. Clinical isolates of S. aureus resistant to penicillin were identified, and their blaZ genes were sequenced. MICs were determined at low and high inocula (5 × 105 CFU/mL and 5 × 107 CFU/mL), and isolates demonstrating a CIE were characterized. A semimechanistic model was established to describe differential hydrolysis patterns, and candidate models were iteratively assessed using area-under-the-curve analysis from competitor receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Biomarker thresholds were derived from Youdon index-derived optimal cutoff values. Genetic analysis of 99 isolates identified 26 TAPSA isolates and 45 TCPSA isolates. The model best differentiating TAPSA from non-TAPSA utilized cefazolin-to-cephalothin ratio analysis (sensitivity, 96.2%; specificity, 98.6%). The model best differentiating TCPSA from non-TCPSA incorporated cefazolin, cephalothin, and oxacillin (sensitivity, 88.6%; specificity, 96.6%). TAPSA and TCPSA can be differentiated using three antibiotic discs on a single agar plate. The test has potential value in typing the β-lactamase type from isolates from patients that are candidates for or have failed cefazolin therapy. IMPORTANCE The key significance of this article is that it details a straightforward method of performing a disc test that can differentiate Staphylococcus aureus isolates that are likely to be associated with a cefazolin inoculum effect and theoretical risk of cefazolin treatment failure from isolates that are less likely to be associated with a cefazolin inoculum effect.

Heartbreaking Decisions: The Dogma and Uncertainties of Antimicrobial Therapy in Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but increasingly prevalent disease with high morbidity and mortality, requiring antimicrobials and at times surgical intervention. Through the decades of healthcare professionals' experience with managing IE, certain dogmas and uncertainties have arisen around its pharmacotherapy. The introduction of new antimicrobials and novel combinations are exciting developments but also further complicate IE treatment choices. In this review, we provide and evaluate the relevant evidence focused around contemporary debates in IE treatment pharmacotherapy, including beta-lactam choice in MSSA IE, combination therapies (aminoglycosides, ceftaroline), the use of oral antimicrobials, the role of rifamycins, and long-acting lipoglycopeptides.

Safe shortening of antibiotic treatment duration for complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAFE trial): protocol for a randomised, controlled, open-label, non-inferiority trial comparing 4 and 6 weeks of antibiotic treatment

INTRODUCTION

A major knowledge gap in the treatment of complicated Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is the optimal duration of antibiotic therapy. Safe shortening of antibiotic therapy has the potential to reduce adverse drug events, length of hospital stay and costs. The objective of the SAFE trial is to evaluate whether 4 weeks of antibiotic therapy is non-inferior to 6 weeks in patients with complicated SAB.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The SAFE-trial is a multicentre, non-inferiority, open-label, parallel group, randomised controlled trial evaluating 4 versus 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy for complicated SAB. The study is performed in 15 university hospitals and general hospitals in the Netherlands. Eligible patients are adults with methicillin-susceptible SAB with evidence of deep-seated or metastatic infection and/or predictors of complicated SAB. Only patients with a satisfactory clinical response to initial antibiotic treatment are included. Patients with infected prosthetic material or an undrained abscess of 5 cm or more at day 14 of adequate antibiotic treatment are excluded. Primary outcome is success of therapy after 180 days, a combined endpoint of survival without evidence of microbiologically confirmed disease relapse. Assuming a primary endpoint occurrence of 90% in the 6 weeks group, a non-inferiority margin of 7.5% is used. Enrolment of 396 patients in total is required to demonstrate non-inferiority of shorter antibiotic therapy with a power of 80%. Currently, 152 patients are enrolled in the study.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This is the first randomised controlled trial evaluating duration of antibiotic therapy for complicated SAB. Non-inferiority of 4 weeks of treatment would allow shortening of treatment duration in selected patients with complicated SAB. This study is approved by the Medical Ethics Committee VUmc (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) and registered under NL8347 (the Netherlands Trial Register). Results of the study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NL8347 (the Netherlands Trial Register).

Targeted Therapy of Severe Infections Caused by Staphylococcus aureus in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Multidisciplinary Proposal of Therapeutic Algorithms Based on Real-World Evidence

(1) Introduction: To develop evidence-based algorithms for targeted antibiotic therapy of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill adult patients. (2) Methods: A multidisciplinary team of four experts had several rounds of assessment for developing algorithms concerning targeted antimicrobial therapy of severe infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill patients. The literature search was performed by a researcher on PubMed-MEDLINE (until August 2022) to provide evidence for supporting therapeutic choices. Quality and strength of evidence was established according to a hierarchical scale of the study design. Two different algorithms were created, one for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and the other for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The therapeutic options were categorized for each different site of infection and were selected also on the basis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features. (3) Results: Cefazolin or oxacillin were the agents proposed for all of the different types of severe MSSA infections. The proposed targeted therapies for severe MRSA infections were different according to the infection site: daptomycin plus fosfomycin or ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for bloodstream infections, infective endocarditis, and/or infections associated with intracardiac/intravascular devices; ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for community-acquired pneumonia; linezolid alone or plus fosfomycin for infection-related ventilator-associated complications or for central nervous system infections; daptomycin alone or plus clindamycin for necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections. (4) Conclusions: We are confident that targeted therapies based on scientific evidence and optimization of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features of antibiotic monotherapy or combo therapy may represent valuable strategies for treating MSSA and MRSA infections.

Prevalence of a cefazolin inoculum effect associated with blaZ gene types, and clinical outcomes among methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus blood isolates of patients with infective endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

A proportion of blaZ gene-positive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) strains exhibits the cefazolin inoculum effect (CInE). Its clinical impact remains uncertain but could compromise the use of cefazolin in high-burden infections. To date, no study has been conducted in France or in Europe. We aimed to assess the prevalence of CInE and its association with blaZ beta-lactamase and S. aureus protein A (spa) types, and to assess the clinical outcomes in cefazolin-treated patients for infective endocarditis whose strain exhibited a CInE.

METHODS

This was a French single-center retrospective study of 51 MSSA strains from patients of the Nantes endocarditis prospective cohort, conducted between 2013 and 2018.

RESULTS

Cefazolin MIC₅₀ at high inoculum was 2 mg/L (IQR 1-2). CInE was found in 17.6 % of tested strains. Among blaZ-positive strains (n = 44), type A beta-lactamase was predominant (n = 25, 57 %). Thirty-seven S. aureus protein A (spa) types were found. No statistical association was shown between blaZ or spa types and CInE. CInE was neither associated with a higher rate of persistent bacteremia (25 % vs 56.3 %, p = 0.58) nor with clinical failure in patients treated with cefazolin, in comparison to patients with no CInE strain (25 % vs 56.3 %, p = 0.58).

CONCLUSION

The cefazolin inoculum effect was found in a substantial number of Staphylococcus aureus strains; however, minimum inhibitory concentrations remained globally low. CInE was not associated with a higher proportion of clinical failure on treatment.

Frequency of pharmacological target attainment with flucloxacillin and cefazolin in invasive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infection: a prospective cohort study in hospitalized patients

BACKGROUND

The proportion of patients with invasive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection who achieve target concentrations of flucloxacillin or cefazolin with standard dosing regimens is uncertain. This study measured drug concentrations in a prospective cohort of patients with invasive S. aureus infections to determine the frequency of target concentration attainment, and risk factors for failure to achieve target concentrations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Unbound flucloxacillin and cefazolin plasma concentrations were measured at the midpoint between intravenous doses. Adequate and optimal targets were defined as an unbound plasma concentration of ≥1 and ≥2 times the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) (flucloxacillin 0.5 mg/L, cefazolin 2 mg/L), respectively (50%fT_≥1MIC, 50%fT_≥2MIC).

RESULTS

There were 50 patients in each of the flucloxacillin and cefazolin groups. Eighty-five (85%) patients met the target of 50%fT_≥2MIC and 95 (95%) patients met the target of 50%fT_≥1MIC. The median unbound flucloxacillin concentration was 2.6 mg/L [interquartile range (IQR) 1.0-8.1]. The median unbound cefazolin concentration was 15.4 mg/L (IQR 8.8-28.2). A higher proportion of patients in the flucloxacillin group failed to achieve the optimal target compared with the cefazolin group [13 (26%) vs 2 (4%); P=0.002]. Younger age and higher creatinine clearance were associated with lower plasma concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard dosing of flucloxacillin and cefazolin in the treatment of invasive MSSA infections may not achieve target plasma concentrations for a subgroup of patients. Measuring drug concentrations identifies this subgroup and facilitates dose individualization.

Cefazolin in the treatment of central nervous system infections: A narrative review and recommendation

Infections of the central nervous system (CNS) are complex to treat and associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Historically, antistaphylococcal penicillins such as nafcillin were recommended for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible staphylococcal CNS infections. However, the use of antistaphylococcal penicillins presents challenges, such as frequent dosing administration and adverse events with protracted use. This narrative reviews available clinical and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data for cefazolin in CNS infections and produces a recommendation for use. Based on the limited available evidence analyzed, dose optimized cefazolin is likely a safe and effective alternative to antistaphylococcal penicillins for a variety of CNS infections due to methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Given the site of infection and wide therapeutic index of cefazolin, practitioners may consider dosing cefazolin regimens of 2 g IV every 6 h or a continuous infusion of 8-10 g daily instead of 2 g IV every 8 h to optimize PK/PD properties.

Antimicrobial Resistance and Mortality in Hospitalized Patients with Bacteremia in the Greater Paris Area from 2016 to 2019

PURPOSE

Antibiotic-resistant bacteremia is a leading global cause of infectious disease morbidity and mortality. Clinical data warehouses (CDWs) allow for the secure, real-time coupling of diverse data sources from real-world clinical settings, including care-based medical-administrative data and laboratory-based microbiological data. The main purpose of this study was to assess the contribution of CDWs in the epidemiological study of antibiotic resistance by constructing a database of bacteremia patients, BactHub, and describing their main clinico-microbiological features and outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients with bacteremia hospitalized between January 1, 2016 and December 31, 2019 in 14 acute care university hospitals from the Greater Paris area were identified; their first bacteremia episode was included. Data describing patients, episodes of bacteremia, bacterial isolates, and antimicrobial resistance were structured.

RESULTS

Among 29,228 patients with bacteremia, 41% of episodes were community-onset (CO) and 59% were hospital-acquired (HA). Thirty-day and ninety-day mortality rates were 15% and 20% in CO episodes, and 18% and 36% in HA episodes. Overall resistance rates were high, including third-generation cephalosporin resistance among Klebsiella pneumoniae (CO 21%, HA 37%) and Escherichia coli (CO 13%, HA 17%), and methicillin resistance among Staphylococcus aureus (CO 11%, HA 14%). Annual incidence rates increased significantly from 2017 to 2019, from 20.0 to 20.9 to 22.1 stays with bacteremia per 1000 stays (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The Bacthub database provides accurate clinico-microbiological data describing bacteremia across France's largest hospital group. Data from Bacthub may inform surveillance and the clinical decision-making process for bacteremia patients, including choice of antimicrobial therapy. The database also offers opportunities for research, including analysis of hospital care pathways and significant patient outcomes such as mortality and recurrence of infection.

Combination with a FtsZ inhibitor potentiates the in vivo efficacy of oxacillin against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Oxacillin is a first-line antibiotic for the treatment of methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections but is ineffective against methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) due to resistance. Here we present results showing that co-administering oxacillin with the FtsZ-targeting prodrug TXA709 renders oxacillin efficacious against MRSA. The combination of oxacillin and the active product of TXA709 (TXA707) is associated with synergistic bactericidal activity against clinical isolates of MRSA that are resistant to current standard-of-care antibiotics. We show that MRSA cells treated with oxacillin in combination with TXA707 exhibit morphological characteristics and PBP2 mislocalization behavior similar to that exhibited by MSSA cells treated with oxacillin alone. Co-administration with TXA709 renders oxacillin efficacious in mouse models of both systemic and tissue infection with MRSA, with this efficacy being observed at human-equivalent doses of oxacillin well below that recommended for daily adult use. Pharmacokinetic evaluations in mice reveal that co-administration with TXA709 also increases total exposure to oxacillin. Viewed as a whole, our results highlight the clinical potential of repurposing oxacillin to treat MRSA infections through combination with a FtsZ inhibitor.

Clinical Outcomes of an Innovative Cefazolin Delivery Program for MSSA Infections in OPAT

Cefazolin is a recommended treatment for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections that has been successfully used in outpatient parenteral antibiotic therapy (OPAT) programs. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of cefazolin delivered each day (Group 24) vs. every two days (Group 48) for MSSA infections in OPAT programs. It was a prospective observational study with retrospective analysis of a cohort of MSSA infections attended in OPAT. The primary outcome was treatment success, defined as completing the antimicrobial regimen without death, treatment discontinuation, or readmission during treatment and follow-up. A univariate and multivariate logistic regression model was built. A two-sided p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Of the 149 MSSA infections treated with cefazolin 2 g/8 h in OPATs, 94 and 55 patients were included in the delivery Group 24 and Group 48, respectively. Treatment failure and unplanned readmission rates were similar in both groups (11.7% vs. 7.3% p = 0.752 and 8.5% vs. 5.5% p = 0.491). There was a significant increase in vascular access complications in Group 24 (33.0%) with respect to Group 48 (7.3%) (p < 0.001). Treating uncomplicated MSSA infection with cefazolin home-delivered every two days through an OPAT program is not associated with an increased risk of treatment failure and entails a significant reduction in resource consumption compared to daily delivery.

The Cost-effectiveness of Cefazolin Compared With Antistaphylococcal Penicillins for the Treatment of Methicillin-Sensitive Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Background

Methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia is associated with significant morbidity, mortality, and hospitalization costs. Cefazolin and antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs), such as nafcillin, are the preferred treatments for MSSA bacteremia. The aim of this study was to compare the cost-effectiveness of each approach.

Methods

We constructed a decision-analytic model comparing the use of cefazolin with ASPs for the treatment of MSSA bacteremia. Cost-effectiveness was determined by calculating deaths averted and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Uncertainty was addressed by plotting cost-effectiveness planes and acceptability curves for various willingness-to-pay thresholds.

Results

In the base-case analysis, the cost associated with the cefazolin strategy was $38 863.1, and the associated probability of survival was 0.91. For the ASP strategy, the cost was $48 578.8, and the probability of survival was 0.81. The incremental difference in cost between the 2 strategies was $9715.7, with hospital length of stay being the main driver of cost, and the incremental difference in effectiveness was 0.10. Overall, cefazolin results in savings of $97 156.8 per death averted (ICER, $–97 156.8/death averted). In the probabilistic analysis, at a willingness-to-pay of $50 000, cefazolin had a 68% chance of being cost-effective compared with ASPs. In cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, the cefazolin strategy was cost-effective in 73.5%–81.8% of simulations compared with ASP for a willingness-to-pay ranging up to $50 000.

Conclusions

The use of cefazolin is a cost-effective strategy for the treatment of MSSA bacteremia and, when clinically appropriate, this strategy results in considerable health care cost-savings.

Effects of the cefazolin shortage on the sales, cost, and appropriate use of other antimicrobials

Background

Shortages of antimicrobials lead to treatment failures, increase medical costs, and accelerate the development of antimicrobial resistance. We evaluated the effects of the serious cefazolin shortage in 2019 in Japan on the sales, costs, and appropriate use of other antimicrobials.

Methods

We evaluated monthly defined daily doses/1000 inhabitants/day (DID) values of antimicrobial sales from January 2016 to December 2019 using wholesaler’s sales databases. Using 2016–2018 sales data, we generated a prediction model of DID in 2019 under the assumption that the cefazolin shortage did not occur. We then compared the predicted DID and actual DID. Cefazolin, government-recommended alternatives, and government-not-recommended broad-spectrum alternatives were assessed. Antimicrobial groups according to the AWaRe classification were also assessed to evaluate the effect on appropriate antimicrobial use. In addition, we evaluated changes in costs between 9 months before and after the cefazolin shortage.

Results

DID values of total antimicrobials increased sharply 1 month before the decrease in cefazolin. Actual DIDs were higher than predicted DIDs for ceftriaxone, flomoxef, clindamycin, cefotiam, piperacillin/tazobactam, and meropenem. Actual DID values were higher than the predicted DID values in the Watch group. The costs of antimicrobials between pre- and post- cefazolin shortage were unchanged.

Conclusion

The cefazolin shortage brought confusion to the antimicrobial market and led to a setback in the appropriate use of antimicrobials. Early recognition and structures for prompt reactions to antimicrobial shortages are needed. Moreover, development of a system to secure the supply of essential antimicrobials is required.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12913-021-07139-z.

Antistaphylococcal penicillins vs. cefazolin in the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: a quasi-experimental monocentre study

Whether cefazolin is as effective and safer than antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) for the treatment of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infective endocarditis (IE) is still debated in the absence of a randomized controlled trial. In this quasi-experimental study, we aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of these two treatments in MSSA-IE, using the ASPs nationwide shortage in April 2016 as a unique opportunity to overcome the indication bias associated with observational studies. In this single-centre study, we compared patients with Duke-Li definite MSSA-IE treated with ASPs from January 2015 to March 2016 versus those treated with cefazolin from April 2016 to December 2018, when ASPs were not available. Effectiveness outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality. Safety outcomes included significant decrease in GFR and significant increase in serum liver enzymes. Logrank test was used to compare survival rates. Of 73 patients with MSSA-IE, 35 and 38 were treated with ASPs and cefazolin, respectively. Baseline patients' characteristics (demography, native or prosthetic valve IE, clinical characteristics, cardiac and septic complications) were similar between groups. Ninety-day all-cause mortality was 28.6% and 21.1%, in patients treated with ASPs and cefazolin, respectively (logrank p = 0.5727). There was no difference between groups for incident renal or liver toxicity events: acute kidney injury 45.7% vs. 44.7% (p = 0.933), increased ALT 5.7% vs. 13.2% (p = 0.432), bilirubin increase 5.7% vs. 10.5% (p = 0.676), in ASPs vs. cefazolin groups, respectively. In this quasi-experimental, effectiveness and safety did not statistically differ between ASPs and cefazolin for MSSA-IE treatment.

Ceftriaxone and methicillin-susceptible staphylococcus aureus: a perspective from pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics studies

INTRODUCTION

: Usage of ceftriaxone-based therapy to treat Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections is a controversial issue, from in vitro to clinical studies.

AREA COVERED

: We conducted a literature review using PubMed of articles with ceftriaxone pharmacokinetics parameters and built a probability of target attainment (PTA) based on PK values from stable conditions (non-critically-ill patients) with goals of fT>55%, fT>75%, and fT>100%. Ceftriaxone's minimal inhibitory concentration from 31 MSSA strains (0.25-64mg/L) was used to build the cumulative fraction response (CFR). The isolates were clinically relevant from blood, bronchoalveolar lavage, and soft tissue biopsy.

EXPERT OPINION

The results from controversies about using ceftriaxone for MSSA infections have been commonly addressed in the literature. However, variables such as (i) pharmacokinetic profile, (ii) pharmacodynamic target, (iii) site of infection, and (iv) MIC distributions may influence divergences. From this pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics perspective, ceftriaxone may be a reasonable option for MSSA infections when the MIC50 and MIC90 were 4mg/L and 8mg/L. CFR analysis demonstrated that ceftriaxone 1g q24h could be used if bacteriostasis is the aim (fT>55%), while 1g q12h should be used for bactericidal effects (fT>75% or fT>100%). Since there is a lack of data from clinical trials, the findings should be interpreted cautiously.

Combination therapy with rifampicin or fosfomycin in patients with Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection at high risk for complications or relapse: results of a large prospective observational cohort

OBJECTIVES

To investigate whether Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infection (SAB) patients at high risk for complications or relapse benefit from combination therapy with adjunctive rifampicin or fosfomycin.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis, SAB patients with native valve infective endocarditis, osteoarticular infections or implanted foreign devices were included. The co-primary endpoints were all-cause 90 day mortality and death or SAB-related late complications within 180 days. To overcome treatment selection bias and account for its time dependence, inverse probability of treatment weights were calculated and included in marginal structural Cox proportional hazard models (MSCMs).

RESULTS

A total of 578 patients were included in the analysis, of which 313 (54%) received combination therapy with either rifampicin (n = 242) or fosfomycin (n = 58). In the multivariable MSCM, combination therapy was associated with a better outcome, that is, a lower rate of death or SAB-related late complications within 180 days (HR 0.65, 95% CI 0.46-0.92). This beneficial effect was primarily seen in patients with implanted foreign devices, in which combination therapy was associated with a lower rate of death or SAB-related late complications within 180 days (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.35-0.79) and a lower 90 day mortality (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.36-0.91). Upon agent-specific stratification, we found no significant differences in outcomes between combination therapy containing rifampicin and fosfomycin; however, the number of patients in most subgroups was not large enough to draw firm conclusions.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with implanted foreign devices, combination therapy was associated with a better long-term outcome. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.

Coagulation disorders during treatment with cefazolin and rifampicin: rare but dangerous

We describe a 79-year-old man with spondylodiscitis and unknown pathogen, treated with cefazolin and rifampicin. He developed a massive digestive hemorrhage. Prothrombin time was prolonged with severe vitamin-K-dependent clotting-factor deficiency. Severe bleeding can occur during cefazolin and rifampicin use. This deficiency should be assessed before prescribing cefazolin-rifampicin and prothrombin time monitored.

Clinical Outcomes of Daptomycin Versus Anti-Staphylococcal Beta-Lactams in Definitive Treatment of Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bloodstream Infections

OBJECTIVES

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is the leading cause of bacteraemia and infective endocarditis worldwide. The preferred management of patients with methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) bacteraemia includes definitive therapy with intravenous anti-staphylococcal beta-lactam (ASBL) antibiotics. Daptomycin (DAP) has been targeted as a viable substitute for beta-lactam allergic or intolerant patients.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort study assessed clinical outcomes of DAP compared with ASBL antibiotics [nafcillin (NAF) or cefazolin (CFZ)] for the treatment of MSSA bacteraemia in patients hospitalised from 01 November 2011 to 31 October 2018. The primary outcome was a composite of the following: clinical failure, MSSA recurrence and MSSA persistence or inpatient infection-related mortality. Secondary outcomes included duration of MSSA bacteraemia, infection-related length of stay, infection-related 90-day readmission, 30-day all-cause mortality, and adverse events necessitating a change in therapy.

RESULTS

Of 89 patients with MSSA bacteraemia who were included: 29 received DAP, 30 received NAF and 30 received CFZ. There was no difference in the composite primary outcome in patients treated with DAP compared with ASBL (10% vs. 5%, P = 0.39). The DAP cohort had a longer hospital length of stay compared with the ASBL group (20 days vs. 11.5 days, P = 0.0007). No differences were detected between other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that DAP may serve as a comparable alternative to ASBLs for treatment of MSSA bacteraemia, as no differences in clinical outcomes were identified. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Adjunctive Daptomycin in the Treatment of Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Bloodstream infections (BSIs) with methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Our objective in this study was to determine the efficacy of synergistic treatment with daptomycin when given with either cefazolin or cloxacillin for the treatment of MSSA BSI.

METHODS

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed at 2 academic hospitals in Montreal, Canada. Patients aged ≥18 years with MSSA BSI receiving either cefazolin or cloxacillin monotherapy were considered for inclusion. In addition to the standard-of-care treatment, participants received a 5-day course of adjunctive daptomycin or placebo. The primary outcome was the duration of MSSA BSI in days.

RESULTS

Of 318 participants screened, 115 were enrolled and 104 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (median age, 67 years; 34.5% female). The median duration of bacteremia was 2.04 days among patients who received daptomycin vs 1.65 days in those who received placebo (absolute difference, 0.39 days; P = .40). In a modified intention-to-treat analysis that involved participants who remained bacteremic at the time of enrollment, we found a median duration of bacteremia of 3.06 days among patients who received daptomycin vs 3.0 days in those who received placebo (absolute difference, 0.06 days; P = .77). Ninety-day mortality in the daptomycin arm was 18.9% vs 17.7% in the placebo arm (P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with MSSA BSIs, the administration of adjunctive daptomycin therapy to standard-of-care treatment did not shorten the duration of bacteremia and should not be routinely considered.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02972983.

Critical National Shortage of Cefazolin in Japan: Management Strategies

The shortage of antimicrobials poses a global health threat. In Japan, for instance, the current, critical shortage of cefazolin, a first-line agent for the treatment of common infectious diseases and surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis, has had a substantial impact on inpatient care. A shortage of essential antimicrobial agents like cefazolin leads to increased consumption of alternative antimicrobial agents with broad-spectrum activity, with the unintended consequence of militating against antimicrobial stewardship efforts in inpatient settings and potentially promoting antimicrobial resistance. Although there is global awareness of the shortage of crucial antimicrobials, action to resolve this problem, especially with a view to preventing antimicrobial resistance and promoting antimicrobial stewardship, has been slow, possibly due to the failure to appreciate the urgency of the dilemma. A comprehensive plan for stabilizing antimicrobial access and international collaboration to secure a continuous supply of essential antimicrobials are urgently needed.

Impact of a Rapid Blood Culture Diagnostic Panel on Time to Optimal Antimicrobial Therapy at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center

PURPOSE

Utilization of rapid diagnostic testing alongside intensive antimicrobial stewardship interventions improves patient outcomes. We sought to determine the clinical impact of a rapid blood culture identification (BCID) panel in an established Antimicrobial Stewardship Program (ASP) with limited personnel resources.

METHODS

A single center retrospective pre- and post-intervention cohort study was performed following the implementation of a BCID panel on patients admitted with at least 1 positive blood culture during the study period. The primary outcome was time to optimal therapy from blood culture collection. Secondary outcomes included days of therapy (DOT), length of stay, and 30-day mortality and readmission rates.

RESULTS

277 patients were screened with 180 patients included, with 82 patients in the pre-BCID and 98 in the post-BCID arms. Median time to optimal therapy was 73.8 hours (IQR; 1.1-79.6) in the pre-BCID arm and 34.7 hours (IQR; 10.9-71.6) in the post-BCID arm (p ≤ 0.001). Median DOT for vancomycin was 4 and 3 days (p ≤ 0.001), and for piperacillin-tazobactam was 3.5 and 2 days (p ≤ 0.007), for the pre-BCID and post-BCID arms, respectively. Median length of hospitalization was decreased from 11 to 9 days (p = 0.031). No significant change in 30-day readmission rate was noted, with a trend toward lower mortality (12% vs 5%; p = 0.086).

CONCLUSION

Introduction of BCID into the daily workflow resulted in a significant reduction in time to optimal therapy for bloodstream infections and DOT for select broad-spectrum antibiotics, highlighting the potential benefits of rapid diagnostics even in settings with limited personnel resources.

β-Lactams against the Fortress of the Gram-Positive Staphylococcus aureus Bacterium

The biological diversity of the unicellular bacteria-whether assessed by shape, food, metabolism, or ecological niche-surely rivals (if not exceeds) that of the multicellular eukaryotes. The relationship between bacteria whose ecological niche is the eukaryote, and the eukaryote, is often symbiosis or stasis. Some bacteria, however, seek advantage in this relationship. One of the most successful-to the disadvantage of the eukaryote-is the small (less than 1 μm diameter) and nearly spherical Staphylococcus aureus bacterium. For decades, successful clinical control of its infection has been accomplished using β-lactam antibiotics such as the penicillins and the cephalosporins. Over these same decades S. aureus has perfected resistance mechanisms against these antibiotics, which are then countered by new generations of β-lactam structure. This review addresses the current breadth of biochemical and microbiological efforts to preserve the future of the β-lactam antibiotics through a better understanding of how S. aureus protects the enzyme targets of the β-lactams, the penicillin-binding proteins. The penicillin-binding proteins are essential enzyme catalysts for the biosynthesis of the cell wall, and understanding how this cell wall is integrated into the protective cell envelope of the bacterium may identify new antibacterials and new adjuvants that preserve the efficacy of the β-lactams.

A Test for the Rapid Detection of the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect in Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus

The cefazolin inoculum effect (CzIE) has been associated with therapeutic failures and mortality in invasive methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections. A diagnostic test to detect the CzIE is not currently available. We developed a rapid (∼3 h) CzIE colorimetric test to detect staphylococcal-β-lactamase (BlaZ) activity in supernatants after ampicillin induction. The test was validated using 689 bloodstream MSSA isolates recovered from Latin America and the United States. The cefazolin MIC determination at a high inoculum (10⁷ CFU/ml) was used as a reference standard (cutoff ≥16 μg/ml). All isolates underwent genome sequencing. A total of 257 (37.3%) of MSSA isolates exhibited the CzIE by the reference standard method. The overall sensitivity and specificity of the colorimetric test was 82.5% and 88.9%, respectively. Sensitivity in MSSA isolates harboring type A BlaZ (the most efficient enzyme against cefazolin) was 92.7% with a specificity of 87.8%. The performance of the test was lower against type B and C enzymes (sensitivities of 53.3% and 72.3%, respectively). When the reference value was set to ≥32 μg/ml, the sensitivity for isolates carrying type A enzymes was 98.2%. Specificity was 100% for MSSA lacking blaZ The overall negative predictive value ranged from 81.4% to 95.6% in Latin American countries using published prevalence rates of the CzIE. MSSA isolates from the United States were genetically diverse, with no distinguishing genomic differences from Latin American MSSA, distributed among 18 sequence types. A novel test can readily identify most MSSA isolates exhibiting the CzIE, particularly those carrying type A BlaZ. In contrast to the MIC determination using high inoculum, the rapid test is inexpensive, feasible, and easy to perform. After minor validation steps, it could be incorporated into the routine clinical laboratory workflow.

Antistaphylococcal Penicillin vs Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Spinal Epidural Abscesses

Cefazolin is commonly used as an alternative to antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) in treating methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections; however, no study has compared these agents in MSSA spinal epidural abscess (SEA). We describe our experience in managing MSSA SEA and compare the clinical efficacy of cefazolin with ASPs. This retrospective multicenter study reviewed 79 adult patients diagnosed with SEA between January 2006 and July 2020 using data collected from electronic health records and clinical microbiology laboratory databases. Forty-five patients received cefazolin, while 34 received ASPs. The total antibiotic duration was longer in the ASPs group but not statistically significant. There were no significant differences in treatment failure at week 6 vs week 12, 30-day vs overall mortality, or in 90-day recurrence rates between the treatment groups. Cefazolin was equally as effective as ASPs, and our findings suggest that it can be an alternative to ASPs in the treatment of MSSA SEA.

Reduced Mortality of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia in a Retrospective Cohort Study of 2139 Patients: 2007-2015

BACKGROUND

Understanding the changing epidemiology of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia, as well as the variables associated with poor outcomes, can yield insight into potential interventions.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective, observational cohort study of adult patients at an academic medical center in New York City who had S. aureus bloodstream infections between 1 January 2007 and 31 December 2015. Participants were divided into 3 periods: group 1 (2007-2009), group 2 (2010-2012), and group 3 (2013-2015) for trend analysis. All clinical strains were genotyped (spa.). The main outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

There were 1264 episodes of methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and 875 episodes of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, with a rising proportion due to MSSA (55% group 1; 59% group 2; 63% group 3; P = .03.) There were no significant changes in average age, gender, Charlson score, and distribution of strain genotypes. Mortality in MRSA infection was unchanged (25% group 1; 25% group 2; 26% group 3), while mortality in MSSA infection significantly declined (18% group 1; 18% group 2; 13% group 3). The average time to antistaphylococcal therapy (AST) in MSSA infection declined during the study (3.7 days group 1; 3.5 group 2; 2.2 group 3). In multivariate analysis, AST within 7 days of initial positive MSSA culture was associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality in MSSA bloodstream infection is declining, associated with a decrease in time to targeted therapy. These results emphasize the potential for rapid diagnostics and early optimization of treatment to impact outcomes in MSSA bacteremia.

Prolonged cefazolin course for treatment of methicillin susceptible staphylococcus species infections and the impact on the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria during cloxacillin shortage

OBJECTIVES

To describe the efficacy and safety of prolonged cefazolin course for Staphylococcus infection and the emergence of multidrug-resistant bacteria carriage after treatment.

METHODS

Monocentric retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized for blood stream infections (BSI) and osteoarticular infections (OAI) by methicillin susceptible staphylococcal species treated with cefazolin from January 2015 to July 2017. Rectal and nasal swabs were performed at cefazolin initiation and end of treatment to detect respectively methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) producing bacteria.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight patients were included, 41 had a bacteremia including 22 endocarditis and 22 OAI. Mean duration of treatment was 21.5 days at a mean daily dose of 6.5g/d. Fifty-five (94.5%) received combination therapy. Fifty-two (89.7%) of patients achieved bacteriological cure. Four patients were ESBL carriers at inclusion. No additional ESBL or MRSA were detected by end of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Cefazolin appears as an effective and safe treatment for BSI or osteoarticular infection and does not appear to select MRSA or ESBL.

Methicillin-susceptible and Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: Nationwide Estimates of 30-Day Readmission, In-hospital Mortality, Length of Stay, and Cost in the United States

BACKGROUND

Information on outcomes of methicillin-susceptible and -resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA and MRSA, respectively) bacteremia, particularly readmission, is scarce and requires further research to inform optimal patient care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis using the 2014 Nationwide Readmissions Database, capturing 49.3% of US hospitalizations. We identified MSSA and MRSA bacteremia using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification among patients aged ≥18 years. Thirty-day readmission, mortality, length of stay, and costs were assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression, logistic regression, Poisson regression, and generalized linear model with gamma distribution and log link, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 92 089 (standard error [SE], 1905) patients with S. aureus bacteremia, 48.5% (SE, 0.4%) had MRSA bacteremia. Thirty-day readmission rate was 22% (SE, 0.3) overall with no difference between MRSA and MSSA, but MRSA bacteremia had more readmission for bacteremia recurrence (hazard ratio, 1.17 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.02-1.34]), higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio, 1.15 [95% CI, 1.07-1.23]), and longer hospitalization (incidence rate ratio, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.06-1.11]). Readmission with bacteremia recurrence was particularly more common among patients with endocarditis, immunocompromising comorbidities, and drug abuse. The cost of readmission was $12 425 (SE, $174) per case overall, and $19 186 (SE, $623) in those with bacteremia recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-day readmission after S. aureus bacteremia is common and costly. MRSA bacteremia is associated with readmission for bacteremia recurrence, increased mortality, and longer hospitalization. Efforts should continue to optimize patient care, particularly for those with risk factors, to decrease readmission and associated morbidity and mortality in patients with S. aureus bacteremia.

Comparative outcomes of cefazolin versus antistaphylococcal penicillins in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis: a post hoc analysis of a prospective multicentre French cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Current guidelines recommend cefazolin as an alternative to antistaphylococcal penicillins (ASPs) in methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infective endocarditis despite the lack of comparative study. The objective of this study was to evaluate the comparative outcomes of cefazolin vs. ASPs in MSSA infective endocarditis.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of an observational multicentre cohort study using prospectively collected data from patients with MSSA endocarditis confirmed by endocarditis team and treated either with cefazolin or ASPs between July 2013 and December 2018. Patients were excluded if they received both treatments. The primary outcome was 90-day all-cause mortality.

RESULTS

Of 210 patients included, 53 patients (25.2%) received cefazolin and 157 (74.8%) received ASPs. The overall 90-day mortality rate was 27.6% (58/210 patients), 24.5% (13/53) in the cefazolin group vs. 28.7% (45/157) in the ASP group (p 0.561). Premature antimicrobial discontinuation due to adverse events occurred less frequently with cefazolin than with ASPs (0/53 vs. 13/157 patients; p 0.042). In multivariate analysis, there was no difference in 90-day mortality between cefazolin and ASPs (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.49-2.91; p 0.681), while age (aOR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03-1.09; p < 0.001), Charlson comorbidity index (aOR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.36 p 0.023), cerebral embolism (aOR, 2.83; 95% CI, 1.33-6.14; p 0.007) and intensive care unit admission (aOR, 4.16; 95% CI, 1.89-9.59; p 0.001) were factors significantly associated with higher mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Cefazolin seems to be a possible alternative to ASPs in MSSA endocarditis. More studies are needed to confirm these results and determine which treatment should be recommended as first-line therapy.

Cefazolin and Ertapenem Salvage Therapy Rapidly Clears Persistent Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

Cefazolin and ertapenem combination therapy was used successfully to salvage 11 cases (6 endocarditis) of persistent methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) bacteremia, including immediate clearance (≤24 hours) in 8 cases. While in vitro synergy was modest, cefazolin plus ertapenem exhibited synergistic action in a rat model of MSSA endocarditis. The combination of cefazolin and ertapenem provides potent in vivo activity against MSSA beyond what is predicted in vitro and warrants further clinical study in the treatment of refractory MSSA bacteremia and endocarditis.

Expanding the Spectrum of Antibiotics Capable of Killing Multidrug-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Infections from antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa are a serious threat because reduced antibiotic efficacy complicates treatment decisions and prolongs the disease state in many patients. To expand the arsenal of treatments against antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) pathogens, 600-Da branched polyethylenimine (BPEI) can overcome antibiotic resistance mechanisms and potentiate β-lactam antibiotics against Gram-positive bacteria. BPEI binds cell-wall teichoic acids and disables resistance factors from penicillin binding proteins PBP2a and PBP4. This study describes a new mechanism of action for BPEI potentiation of antibiotics generally regarded as agents effective against Gram-positive pathogens but not Gram-negative bacteria. 600-Da BPEI is able to reduce the barriers to drug influx and facilitate the uptake of a non-β-lactam co-drug, erythromycin, which targets the intracellular machinery. Also, BPEI can suppress production of the cytokine interleukin IL-8 by human epithelial keratinocytes. This enables BPEI to function as a broad-spectrum antibiotic potentiator, and expands the opportunities to improve drug design, antibiotic development, and therapeutic approaches against pathogenic bacteria, especially for wound care.

Moving beyond unsolicited consultation: additional impact of a structured intervention on mortality in Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia

BACKGROUND

Some evidence-based bundles have tried to standardize the management of Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) to improve the outcome. The aim of our study was to analyse the additional impact on mortality of a structured intervention in patients with SAB.

METHODS

Compliance with the bundle was evaluated in an ambispective cohort of patients with SAB, which included a retrospective cohort [including patients treated before and after the implementation of a bacteraemia programme (no-BP and BP, respectively)] and a prospective cohort (i-BP), in which an additional specific intervention for bundle application was implemented. Multivariate logistic regression was used to measure the influence of the independent variables including compliance with the bundle on 14 and 30 day crude mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 271 adult patients with SAB were included. Mortality was significantly different among the three groups (no-BP, BP and i-BP): mortality at 14 days was 18% versus 7% versus 2%, respectively, P = 0.002; and mortality at 30 days was 20% versus 12% versus 5%, respectively, P = 0.011. The factors associated with 14 and 30 day mortality in multivariable analysis were heart failure (OR = 7.63 and OR = 2.27, respectively), MRSA infection (OR = 4.02 and OR = 4.37, respectively) and persistent bacteraemia (OR = 11.01 and OR = 7.83, respectively); protective factors were catheter-related bacteraemia (OR = 0.16 and OR = 0.19, respectively) and >75% bundle compliance (OR = 0.15 and OR = 0.199, respectively). Time required to perform the intervention and the follow-up was 50 min (IQR 40-55 min) per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

High-level compliance with a standardized bundle of intervention for management of SAB that requires little time was associated with lower mortality at 14 and 30 days.

Overcoming Multidrug Resistance and Biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa with a Single Dual-Function Potentiator of β-Lactams

Clinicians prescribe hundreds of millions of β-lactam antibiotics to treat the majority of patients presenting with bacterial infections. Patient outcomes are positive unless resistant bacteria, such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa), are present. P. aeruginosa has both intrinsic and acquired antibiotic resistance, making clinical management of infection a real challenge, particularly when these bacteria are sequestered in biofilms. These problems would be alleviated if, upon the initial presentation of bacterial infection symptoms, clinicians were able to administer an antibiotic that kills both susceptible and otherwise resistant bacteria and eradicates biofilms. As the most common class of antibiotics, β-lactams could be used in a new drug if the leading causes of β-lactam antibiotic resistance, permeation barriers from lipopolysaccharide, efflux pumps, and β-lactamase enzymes, were also defeated. Against P. aeruginosa and their biofilms, the potency of β-lactam antibiotics is restored with 600 Da branched polyethylenimine (600 Da BPEI). Checkerboard assays using microtiter plates demonstrate the potentiation of piperacillin, cefepime, Meropenem, and erythromycin antibiotics. Growth curves demonstrate that only a combination of 600 Da BPEI and piperacillin produces growth inhibition against antibiotic resistant P. aeruginosa. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to confirm that the combination treatment leads to abnormal P. aeruginosa morphology. Data collected with isothermal titration calorimetry and fluorescence spectroscopy demonstrate a mechanism of action in which potentiation at low concentrations of 600 Da BPEI reduces diffusion barriers from lipopolysaccharides without disrupting the outer membrane itself. Coupled with the ability to overcome a reduction in antibiotic activity created by biofilm exopolymers, targeting anionic sites on lipopolysaccharides and biofilm exopolysaccharides with the same compound provides new opportunities to counter the rise of multidrug-resistant infections.

Genome Sequence Comparison of Staphylococcus aureus TX0117 and a Beta-Lactamase-Cured Derivative Shows Increased Cationic Peptide Resistance Accompanying Mutations in relA and mnaA

Staphylococcus aureus strain TX0117 is a methicillin-susceptible bacterium with type A beta-lactamase exhibiting a high cefazolin inoculum effect. TX0117 was cured of blaZ, yielding TX0117c with increased antimicrobial peptide resistance. The sequencing and genome assembly of TX0117 elucidate six mutations between TX0117 and TX0117c, including relA truncation and mnA_1 substitution.

Novel Insights into the Classification of Staphylococcal β-Lactamases in Relation to the Cefazolin Inoculum Effect

Cefazolin has become a prominent therapy for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infections. However, an important concern is the cefazolin inoculum effect (CzIE), a phenomenon mediated by staphylococcal β-lactamases. Four variants of staphylococcal β-lactamases have been described based on serological methodologies and limited sequence information. Here, we sought to reassess the classification of staphylococcal β-lactamases and their correlation with the CzIE. We included a large collection of 690 contemporary bloodstream MSSA isolates recovered from Latin America, a region with a high prevalence of the CzIE. We determined cefazolin MICs at standard and high inoculums by broth microdilution. Whole-genome sequencing was performed to classify the β-lactamase in each isolate based on the predicted full sequence of BlaZ. We used the classical schemes for β-lactamase classification and compared it to BlaZ allotypes found in unique sequences using the genomic information. Phylogenetic analyses were performed based on the BlaZ and core-genome sequences. The overall prevalence of the CzIE was 40%. Among 641 genomes, type C was the most predominant β-lactamase (37%), followed by type A (33%). We found 29 allotypes and 43 different substitutions in BlaZ. A single allotype, designated BlaZ-2, showed a robust and statistically significant association with the CzIE. Two other allotypes (BlaZ-3 and BlaZ-5) were associated with a lack of the CzIE. Three amino acid substitutions (A9V, E112A, and G145E) showed statistically significant association with the CzIE (P = <0.01). CC30 was the predominant clone among isolates displaying the CzIE. Thus, we provide a novel approach to the classification of the staphylococcal β-lactamases with the potential to more accurately identify MSSA strains exhibiting the CzIE.

Comparison of Nafcillin and Cefazolin for the Treatment of Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

BACKGROUND

Traditionally, the antibiotic of choice for Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus related blood stream infections (MSSA-BSI) are the antistaphylococcal penicillins. Cefazolin is considered an alternative agent, with recent evidence showing similar clinical efficacy. This study further evaluates the utility of nafcillin versus cefazolin in MSSA bacteremia including high disease burden sources of infection and its impact on treatment failure.

METHODS

This retrospective study included patients admitted to Methodist LeBonheur Healthcare adult hospitals from 2011 to 2016. Patients were included if they received at least 3 days of either nafcillin or cefazolin and had a positive blood culture for MSSA. The primary objective was to evaluate rates of treatment failure between groups. Secondary outcomes included clinical and microbiological cure, MSSA-BSI associated readmissions, identification of risk factors for treatment failure including disease burden, in-hospital and 90 day mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 277 patients were included (nafcillin n = 126; cefazolin n = 151). Treatment failure and microbiologic cure were similar between nafcillin and cefazolin (20.6% vs. 16.6%; 91.2% vs. 87.2%, respectively). Clinical cure was significantly higher in the cefazolin treatment arm (93.4 vs. 83.3%; P = 0.012). However, the total number of patients with high disease burden was greater in the nafcillin group (54.8% vs. 39.1%; P = 0.011). Higher rates of in-hospital mortality were observed in the nafcillin group (15.1% vs. 6%; P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study observed significantly higher rates of clinical cure and reduced in-hospital mortality in patients who received cefazolin. Further analysis is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of these agents and identifying predictors of treatment failure.