Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Detection Practices in California: What Are We Missing?

The carbapenem inoculum effect provides insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying carbapenem resistance in Enterobacterales

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are important pathogens that can develop resistance via multiple molecular mechanisms, including hydrolysis or reduced antibiotic influx. Identifying these mechanisms can improve pathogen surveillance, infection control, and patient care. We investigated how resistance mechanisms influence the carbapenem inoculum effect (IE), a phenomenon where inoculum size affects antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). We demonstrated that seven different carbapenemases impart a meropenem IE in Escherichia coli. Across 110 clinical CRE isolates, the carbapenem IE strictly depended on resistance mechanism: all carbapenemase-producing CRE (CP-CRE) exhibited a strong IE, whereas porin-deficient CRE displayed none. Concerningly, 50% and 24% of CP-CRE isolates changed susceptibility classification to meropenem and ertapenem, respectively, across the allowable inoculum range in clinical guidelines. The meropenem IE, and the ratio of ertapenem to meropenem minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) at standard inoculum, reliably identified CP-CRE. Understanding how resistance mechanisms affect AST could improve diagnosis and guide therapies for CRE infections.

Recommendations for change in infection prevention programs and practice

Fifty years of evolution in infection prevention and control programs have involved significant accomplishments related to clinical practices, methodologies, and technology. However, regulatory mandates, and resource and research limitations, coupled with emerging infection threats such as the COVID-19 pandemic, present considerable challenges for infection preventionists. This article provides guidance and recommendations in 14 key areas. These interventions should be considered for implementation by United States health care facilities in the near future.

Next-Generation Sequencing of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains Isolated from Patients Hospitalized in the University Hospital Facilities

Carbapenem-resistant (CR) Klebsiella pneumoniae represents an urgent worldwide threat. We focused on CR K. pneumoniae in selected facilities of the University Hospital Bratislava (UHB) to investigate sequence types (STs), clonal relatedness, and antimicrobial resistance. Suspected carbapenem-nonsusceptible K. pneumoniae strains were obtained from hospitalized patients. Further examination included carbapenemase confirmation, cgMLST, and quantitative susceptibility testing. Of the total 41 CR K. pneumoniae strains, 26 (63.4%) were determined as ST11 in hospital No. 1; of these ST11, 22 (84.6%) were found in the first internal clinic. Six (14.6%) ST258 and three (7.3%) ST584 occurred in hospital No. 2; the most, i.e., four (66.7%), ST258 were detected in the geriatric clinic. In hospital No. 3, we found two (4.8%) ST584 and one (2.4%) ST258. Of the ST11 set, 24 (92.3%) produced NDM-1. Furthermore, seven (87.5) ST258 and five (100%) ST584 strains generated KPC-2. Antimicrobial resistance was as follows: ertapenem 97.6%, meropenem 63.4%, tigecycline 7.3%, eravacycline 7.3%, and colistin 2.5%. We revealed a presumably epidemiological association of ST11 with transmission, particularly in the first internal clinic of hospital No. 1, while ST258 and ST584 were related to interhospital dissemination between medical facilities No. 2 and No. 3. It is essential to prevent the circulation of these pathogens within and between healthcare facilities.

Changing times: The impact of gram-negative breakpoint changes over the previous decade

We assessed breakpoint changes of 13,101 Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from the past decade. All β-lactams and fluoroquinolones demonstrated decreased susceptibilities following breakpoint changes. Enterobacter cloacae experienced the largest average decrease in susceptibility amongst the Enterobacterales at 5.3% and P. aeruginosa experienced an average decrease in susceptibility of 9.3%.

A Multicenter Comparison of Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Rates in the US (2016 to 2020): Facility-Reported Rates versus Rates Based on Updated Clinical Laboratory and Standards Institute Breakpoints

Adoption of revised antimicrobial susceptibility breakpoints is often slow, potentially leading to underreporting of antimicrobial resistance. We compared facility-reported rates of carbapenem nonsusceptibility (NS; intermediate or resistant) with NS rates based on current Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints for Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates in ambulatory and inpatient adults in the BD Insights Research Database (US) from 2016 to 2020. Overall, 77.4% (937,926/1,211,845) and 90.6% (2,157,785/2,381,824) of nonduplicate Enterobacterales isolates with facility-reported susceptibility results had MIC data for ertapenem (ETP) and imipenem/meropenem/doripenem (IPM/MEM/DOR), respectively; 86.9% (255,844/294,426) of P. aeruginosa isolates had MIC data for IPM/MEM/DOR. Facility-reported susceptibility and susceptibility based on CLSI criteria resulted in comparable carbapenem susceptibility rates (99.3% versus 99.1% for ETP-susceptible Enterobacterales, 98.9% versus 98.4% for IPM/MEM/DOR-susceptible Enterobacterales, and 84.9% versus 83.3% for IPM/MEM/DOR-susceptible P. aeruginosa). However, compared with CLSI criteria, facilities underreported Enterobacterales- and IPM/MEM/DOR-NS isolates by 18.8% and 26.5%, respectively, and P. aeruginosa IPM/MEM/DOR-NS isolates by 9.8%. Underreporting was observed for both intermediate and resistant isolates. Our data suggest that delayed adoption of revised breakpoints has a small but potentially important impact on reported rates of antimicrobial resistance. Facilities should be aware of local epidemiology, evaluate potential underreporting of resistance, and assess the related clinical impact. IMPORTANCE Clinicians often base antimicrobial therapeutic decisions on laboratory determinations of pathogen susceptibility to an antibiotic based on MIC breakpoints. MIC breakpoints evolve over time based on new information; between 2010 and 2012 the CLSI lowered carbapenem breakpoints for Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and these were subsequently adopted by the US Food and Drug Administration. Carbapenems are important therapeutic options for these difficult-to-treat pathogens, so understanding resistance rates is critically important. However, laboratories can be slow to adopt updated breakpoints. We used MIC data to evaluate whether reports received by hospitals for carbapenem susceptibility were consistent with updated CLSI breakpoints. Although overall susceptibility rates were similar between hospital reports and susceptibility based on updated CLSI criteria, the percentages of carbapenem-resistant isolates were significantly underreported by hospital reports. Delayed adoption of MIC breakpoints may impact epidemiological understanding of resistance and contribute to the spread of resistant pathogens.

The Practical Problem With Carbapenem Testing and Reporting Accurate Bacterial Susceptibilities

Background: Antibiotic resistance is an evolving issue which requires constant review. Susceptibility breakpoints are revised in line with new microbiological and pharmacological data. Susceptibility breakpoints for carbapenems and Enterobacterales were revised in response to the rise in resistance and the potential for standard doses of carbapenems to provide the necessary antibiotic exposure and to accurately identify rates of carbapenem resistance.

Objectives: This review sought to identify real-world implications associated with lack of testing and reporting current carbapenem breakpoints and potential barriers that may impede implementation of these strategies.

Methods: A literature review was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar electronic databases.

Results: The failure to adopt revised breakpoints incurs negative clinical outcomes and carries increased cost implications. However, there were several impediments highlighted which are barriers for laboratories to implement breakpoint updates.

Conclusion: Possible practical steps to implement revised breakpoints which apply to carbapenems and Enterobacterales are proposed. The challenge for laboratories is to be aware and implement these changes to provide accurate and relevant susceptibility results for clinicians.

Molecular Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Collected in the United States

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a growing public health concern due to resistance to multiple antibiotics and potential to cause health care-associated infections with high mortality. Carbapenemase-producing CRE are of particular concern given that carbapenemase-encoding genes often are located on mobile genetic elements that may spread between different organisms and species. In this study, we performed phenotypic and genotypic characterization of CRE collected at eight U.S. sites participating in active population- and laboratory-based surveillance of carbapenem-resistant organisms. Among 421 CRE tested, the majority were isolated from urine (n = 349, 83%). Klebsiella pneumoniae was the most common organism (n = 265, 63%), followed by Enterobacter cloacae complex (n = 77, 18%) and Escherichia coli (n = 50, 12%). Of 419 isolates analyzed by whole genome sequencing, 307 (73%) harbored a carbapenemase gene; variants of bla_KPC predominated (n = 299, 97%). The occurrence of carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae, E. cloacae complex, and E. coli varied by region; the predominant sequence type within each genus was ST258, ST171, and ST131, respectively. None of the carbapenemase-producing CRE isolates displayed resistance to all antimicrobials tested; susceptibility to amikacin and tigecycline was generally retained.

Raising the Bar: Improving Antimicrobial Resistance Detection by Clinical Laboratories by Ensuring Use of Current Breakpoints

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing global challenge detected by antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) performed by clinical laboratories. AST results are interpreted using clinical breakpoints, which are updated to enable accurate detection of new and emerging AMR. Laboratories that do not apply up-to-date breakpoints impede global efforts to address the AMR crisis, but the extent of this practice is poorly understood.

Methods

A total of 1490 clinical laboratories participating in a College of American Pathologists proficiency testing survey for bacterial cultures were queried to determine use of obsolete breakpoints.

Results

Between 37.9% and 70.5% of US laboratories reported using obsolete breakpoints for the antimicrobials that were queried. In contrast, only 17.7%-43.7% of international laboratories reported using obsolete breakpoints (P < .001 for all comparisons). Use of current breakpoints varied by AST system, with more laboratories reporting use of current breakpoints in the US if the system had achieved US Food and Drug Administration clearance with current breakpoints. Among laboratories that indicated use of obsolete breakpoints, 55.9% had no plans to update to current standards. The most common reason cited was manufacturer-related issues (51.3%) and lack of internal resources to perform analytical validation studies to make the update (23.4%). Thirteen percent of laboratories indicated they were unaware of breakpoint changes or the need to update breakpoints.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate a significant gap in the ability to detect AMR in the US, and to a lesser extent internationally. Improved application of current breakpoints by clinical laboratories will require combined action from regulatory agencies, laboratory accreditation groups, and device manufacturers.

RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP® Test for Rapid Detection of Polymyxin Resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii

A homemade and culture-based test, relying on the visual detection of the reduction of the resazurin reagent (a cell viability indicator), has been developed for the rapid detection of polymyxin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii. Here, we evaluated the industrial version of this test, the RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP^® test (Liofilchem, Italy). A well-characterized panel of 68 clinical A. baumannii strains (36 polymyxin-susceptible, 26 polymyxin-resistant A. baumannii, and 6 colistin-heteroresistant isolates) of worldwide origin was tested. All the colistin-susceptible A. baumannii isolates gave negative results according to the RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP^® test, except for a single isolate that gave a false-positive result. Out of the 26 colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains, 25 were correctly identified as colistin resistant using the RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP^® test. Only a single colistin-resistant A. baumannii strain gave a false-negative result. Additionally, the six colistin-heteroresistant isolates tested gave positive results. Altogether, the sensitivity and the specificity of the test were found to be 96% and 97%, respectively. The turn-around-time of this easy-to-perform test was 3-4h, which showed excellent reliability for identification of polymyxin resistance in A. baumannii. The RapidResa Polymyxin Acinetobacter NP^® test allows a rapid differentiation between polymyxin-susceptible and -resistant A. baumannii isolates, which may contribute to optimization of the use of polymyxins for treating infections due to multidrug-resistant A. baumannii.

Clinical impact of cefepime breakpoint in patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bacteraemia

The application of cefepime breakpoint for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) bacteraemia has not been explored. Adult cases of monomicrobial bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by cefepime-susceptible [minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/L] K. pneumoniae isolates with carbapenem resistance between 2010 and 2015 were reviewed. Patients treated with cefepime were compared with those treated by other active agents using a propensity score-matched analysis to assess therapeutic effectiveness. The primary endpoint was 30-day crude mortality. A total of 114 patients experienced cefepime-susceptible CRKP bacteraemia and 40 (35.1%) died during hospitalisation. A total of 33 patients (28.9%) received cefepime therapy. Fifteen patients (13.2%) had BSI due to carbapenemase-producing isolates, and 86.7% (13/15) of carbapenemase-producing isolates were classified as cefepime susceptible dose-dependent (SDD). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, 30-day mortality was independently associated with the presence of a critical illness [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 12.89, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.88-42.83; P < 0.001], pneumonia (aOR = 5.97, 95% CI 1.65-21.76; P = 0.007) and rapidly fatal underlying disease (aOR = 6.43, 95% CI 1.30-31.09; P = 0.02). In contrast, cefepime-based therapy (aOR = 0.03, 95% CI 0.003-0.38; P = 0.006) and combination therapy (aOR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.02-0.36; P = 0.001) were protective against a fatal outcome. Based on current breakpoints for Enterobacterales, cefepime therapy was not associated with an unfavourable outcome for CRKP BSI with MIC-based dosing strategies. However, the susceptibility result of SDD to cefepime should alert clinicians for possible therapeutic failure.

Virulence-determinants and antibiotic-resistance genes of MDR-E. coli isolated from secondary infections following FMD-outbreak in cattle

This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence, multidrug-resistance traits, PCR-detection of virulence, and antibiotic-resistance genes of E. coli isolated from secondary infections following FMD-outbreak in cattle. A total of 160 random samples were gathered from private dairy farms in Damietta Province, Egypt. The specimens were subjected to bacteriological examination, serotyping, congo-red binding assay, antibiogram-testing, and PCR-monitoring of virulence-determinant genes (tsh, phoA, hly, eaeA, sta, and lt) as well as the antibiotic-resistance genes (bla_TEM, bla_KPC, and bla_CTX). The prevalence of E. coli was 30% (n = 48) distributed in 8 serogroups (40/48, 83.3%), while 8 isolates (8/48, 16.6%) were untypable. Besides, 83.3% of the examined isolates were positive for CR-binding. The tested strains harbored the virulence genes phoA, hly, tsh, eaeA, sta, and lt with a prevalence of 100% and 50%, 45.8%, 25%, 8.4%, and 6.2%, respectively. Furthermore, 50% of the recovered strains were multidrug-resistant (MDR) to penicillins, cephalosporins, and carbapenems, and are harboring the bla_TEM, bla_CTX, and bla_KPC genes. Moreover, 25% of the examined strains are resistant to penicillins, and cephalosporins, and are harboring the bla_TEM and bla_CTX genes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report concerning the E. coli secondary bacterial infections following the FMD-outbreak. The emergence of MDR strains is considered a public health threat and indicates complicated treatment and bad prognosis of infections caused by such strains. Colistin sulfate and levofloxacin have a promising in vitro activity against MDR-E. coli.

Antibiogram and Genetic Characterization of Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens Incriminated in Healthcare-Associated Infections

Purpose

Carbapenems are considered the most efficient antibiotic used in the treatment of nosocomial infections. Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative rods are becoming a serious hazard in hospitals threatening public health. The aim of the current study was to investigate the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens incriminated in healthcare-associated infections, along with antimicrobial resistance profiles, carbapenemase and metallo-β-lactamase production, and their molecular characterization.

Methods

A total of 186 clinical specimens were collected from 133 patients at various hospitals in Cairo, Egypt. The obtained specimens were subjected to bacteriological examination, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, detection of carbapenemase production using the modified Hodge test (MHT), the metallo-β-lactamase production using the EDTA combined disc test (CDT), and PCR-based detection of the bla _KPC and bla _GES resistance genes. The identification of the highly resistant retrieved isolates was then confirmed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Results

The most common isolated Gram-negative species was Klebsiella pneumoniae (40.9%), followed by Acinetobacter baumannii (18.8%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17.3%), Escherichia coli (15.4%), Enterobacter aerogenes (5.3%), and Proteus mirabilis (2.4%). The prevalence of carbapenem-resistant isolates was 36.1% (n=75). However, 86.5% of the recovered clinical isolates were susceptible to colistin. The MHT revealed that 33.6% (n=70) of the tested strains were positive for carbapenemase production, while the CDT showed that 33.17% (n=69) of the examined strains were metallo-β-lactamase producers. The PCR revealed that 98.6% (74/75) of the tested strains possessed the bla _KPC gene; moreover, 97.3% (73/75) of the examined strains harbored the bla _GES gene.

Conclusion

This study displayed the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative pathogens incriminated in healthcare-associated infections. The accurate identification of carbapenem-resistant bacterial pathogens is pivotal for the treatment of patients, in addition to propelling appropriate contamination control measures to restrain the fast spread of such pathogens. Colistin showed a potent in vitro antimicrobial activity against the carbapenem-resistant strains.

Antimicrobial Stewardship: What the Clinical Laboratory Needs to Know

Misuse of antibiotics, including unnecessary use or inappropriate selection, may result in side effects and poor outcome in individual patients, as well as contribute to the spread of antimicrobial resistance. Antimicrobial stewardship programs exist to reduce such misuse of antibiotics and ill effect in order to promote patient outcome. The importance of diagnostics, antibiogram data, possible interventions, and impact are reviewed. It is essential for clinical microbiologists and other health care members to understand the field and scope of antimicrobial stewardship, actively participate in, and understand the value they bring to supporting their institution's efforts.

Update on Susceptibility Testing: Genotypic and Phenotypic Methods

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) is now, more than ever, a critical role of the microbiology laboratory. Several factors limit its application for patient care and antimicrobial resistance epidemiology, including time to results, requirements for pure cultures, and high starting concentration of bacteria. This review discusses the global status of AST and new phenotypic and genotypic methods in late-stage development or that are new to market.

Precision medicine for the diagnosis and treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales: time to think from a different perspective

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) represent a global public health problem. Precision medicine (PM) is a multicomponent medical approach that should be used to individualize the management of patients infected with CRE.

AREAS COVERED

Here, we differentiate carbapenem-producing CRE (CP-CRE) from non-CP-CRE and the importance of this distinction in clinical practice. The current phenotypic CRE-case definition and its implications are also discussed. Additionally, we summarize data regarding phenotypic and molecular diagnostic tools and available antibiotics. In order to review the most relevant data, a comprehensive literature search of peer-reviewed articles in PubMed and abstracts presented at high-impact conferences was performed.

EXPERT OPINION

PM in CRE infections entails a multi-step process that includes applying the current phenotypic definition, utilization of the right phenotypic or molecular testing methods, and thorough evaluation of risk factors, source of infection, and comorbidities. A powerful armamentarium is available to treat CRE infections, including recently approved agents. Randomized controlled trials targeting specific pathogens instead of site of infections may be appropriate to fill in the current gaps. In light of the diverse enzymology behind CP-CRE, PM should be employed to provide the best therapy based on the underlying resistance mechanism.

Evaluation of resazurin-based assay for rapid detection of polymyxin-resistant gram-negative bacteria

Background

Colistin resistance is considered a serious problem due to a lack of alternative antibiotics. The Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test is a resazurin reduction-based technique that relies on the visual detection of bacterial growth in the presence of a defined concentration of colistin. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test in the detection of colistin susceptibility in common clinical Gram-negative bacteria.

Results

A total of 253 clinical isolates from a teaching hospital, including Acinetobacter baumanii (n = 58, 8 colistin-resistant), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 61, 11 colistin-resistant), Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 70, 20 colistin-resistant) and Escherichia coli (n = 64, 14 colistin-resistant) were tested in this study. The sensitivity and specificity of the Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test compared to Broth microdilution method was 100 and 99%, respectively.

Conclusions

Our results suggest that Rapid ResaPolymyxin Acinetobacter/Pseudomonas NP test could be used as an accurate detection method for colistin resistance.

Breakpoint beware: reliance on historical breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae leads to discrepancies in interpretation of susceptibility testing for carbapenems and cephalosporins and gaps in detection of carbapenem-resistant organisms

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) are an important public health and infection prevention threat. CRE are typically detected via phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST), for which interpretive standards were modified in recent years. Our objective was to measure the impact of breakpoint changes on AST interpretation for CRE. Zone sizes from disk diffusion AST for Enterobacteriaceae isolates recovered from clinical cultures over a 1-year period (n = 10,183) and CRE from clinical and environmental sources from the USA and Pakistan (n = 342) were evaluated. Results were interpreted according to historical (CLSI M100-S19) and current (CLSI M100-S29) breakpoints. Interpretive errors were calculated according to the FDA definitions. Using current breakpoints as the reference standard, 56 (17%) very major (false susceptibility) errors occurred for cefepime and 13 (45%) very major errors for meropenem interpretation using historical breakpoints in clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, corresponding to 12 carbapenemase-producing CRE that would have been missed during the 1-year period. For confirmed bla_KPC CP-CRE clinical and environmental isolates (n = 149), the very major error rate for historic breakpoints was 8%, 30%, 63%, and 0% for cefepime, meropenem, imipenem, and ertapenem, respectively. For bla_KPC isolates, the use of historical breakpoints would have led to 42 (28%) reports of false susceptibility to meropenem. Failure to adopt updated AST breakpoints may lead to reports of false susceptibility for antimicrobials commonly used to treat Gram-negative infections and preclude recognition of CRE. Such errors could negatively impact patient care and hamper infection control and public health efforts.

Antibiotic Breakpoints: How Redefining Susceptibility Preserves Efficacy and Improves Patient Care

Carbapenems are a primary treatment for infections from multidrug-resistant bacterial pathogens. To maintain their efficacy and control the emergence of further resistance, breakpoints that correspond to recommended doses with appropriate PK/PD target attainment are paramount.

We Cannot Do It Alone: The Intersection of Public Health, Public Policy, and Clinical Microbiology

Infectious diseases by definition spread and therefore have impact beyond local hospitals and institutions where they occur. With increasingly complex and worrisome infectious disease evolution including emergence of multidrug resistance, regional, national, and international agencies and resources must work hand in hand with local clinical microbiology laboratories to address these global threats. Described are examples of such resources, both existing and aspirational, that will be needed to address the infectious disease challenges ahead. The authors comment on several instances of entrenched policy that are nonproductive and may be worthy of revision to address unmet needs in infectious disease diagnostics.

Antibiotic-affinity chromatographic test strip for quantitative analysis and antibiotic resistance testing of Staphylococcus aureus

Bacterial analysis and antibiotic resistance testing (ART) are of great significance in clinical diagnosis and therapy of bacterial infectious diseases. In this work, a portable antibiotic-affinity chromatographic test strip has been developed for rapid analysis of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and further applied for ART of this pathogen. Porcine IgG was immobilized on a nitrocellulose membrane for capturing S. aureus based on the selective binding capability of the Fc fragment of IgG toward protein A on the surface of the target bacteria. Fluorescent microspheres modified with teicoplanin (TEI) were applied as signal substances to trace S. aureus utilizing the hydrogen bond conjugation between this antibiotic and Gram-positive bacteria. S. aureus can be analyzed within the concentration range from 1.4 × 10³ CFU mL^-1 to 1.4 × 10⁷ CFU mL^-1. The recovery values for spiked samples were 93.3-110.0%. The obtained results of ART for penicillin, daptomycin, gentamicin, cefoxitin and clindamycin against S. aureus showed agreement with those of traditional broth dilution method. The procedures for bacterial analysis and ART can be accomplished within 20 and 110 min, respectively. The antibiotic-affinity chromatographic test strip showed great promise in point-of-care testing because of its ideal portability and rapidity.

Don't Get Wound Up: Revised Fluoroquinolone Breakpoints for Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Fluoroquinolones remain some of the more commonly prescribed antimicrobial agents in the United States, despite the wide array of reported side effects that are associated with their use. In 2019, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute revised the fluoroquinolone antimicrobial susceptibility testing breakpoints for both Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa This breakpoint revision was deemed necessary on the basis of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic analyses suggesting that the previous breakpoints were too high, in addition to the inability of the previous breakpoints to detect low-level resistance to this antibiotic class. In this minireview, we review the published data in support of this revision, as well as the potential challenges that these breakpoint revisions are likely to pose for clinical laboratories.

CIM City: the Game Continues for a Better Carbapenemase Test

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing agree that carbapenemase testing is not necessary for clinical care, provided that the laboratory is up to date with current breakpoints. Nonetheless, publication on the development and modification of carbapenemase tests continues, as is the case in this issue of the Journal of Clinical Microbiology (R. W. Beresford and M. Maley, J Clin Microbiol 57:e01852-18, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01852-18). This commentary explores modifications to the carbapenem inactivation method-but is this the right focus for clinical laboratories?

Understanding and Addressing CLSI Breakpoint Revisions: a Primer for Clinical Laboratories

The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised several breakpoints since 2010 for bacteria that grow aerobically. In 2019, these revisions include changes to the ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin breakpoints for the Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, daptomycin breakpoints for Enterococcus spp., and ceftaroline breakpoints for Staphylococcus aureus Implementation of the revisions is a challenge for all laboratories, as not all systems have FDA clearance for the revised (current) breakpoints, compounded by the need for laboratories to perform validation studies and to make updates to laboratory information system/electronic medical record builds in the setting of limited information technology infrastructure. This minireview describes the breakpoint revisions in the M100 supplement since 2010 and strategies for the laboratory on how to best adopt these in clinical testing.

Evaluation of the MicroScan Colistin Well and Gradient Diffusion Strips for Colistin Susceptibility Testing in Enterobacteriaceae

Many laboratories are unable to perform colistin susceptibility testing. Diffusion-based antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods are not recommended, and not all laboratories have the capacity to perform broth microdilution (BMD). Using a multistep tiered approach, we investigated whether the adapted use of the MicroScan colistin well (4 μg/ml) could enhance laboratory capacity for the detection and subsequent molecular characterization of colistin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae For the MicroScan colistin well, categorical agreement with BMD was 92.7%, and the very major error rate was 10.7%. For gradient diffusion strips, the categorical agreement was 86.4%, and the very major error rate was 53.6%. The MicroScan colistin well detected all isolates carrying mcr-1 or mcr-2 genes (n = 16), but gradient diffusion strips identified an MIC of ≥4 for colistin for only 62.5% of these isolates. A 6-month prospective phenotypic and genotypic study performed at a single clinical microbiology laboratory assessed isolates growing in the MicroScan colistin well for concordance. While 37 of 39 isolates growing in the MicroScan colistin well displayed a colistin MIC of ≥4 by BMD, all were determined to be negative for the mcr-1 and mcr-2 genes by PCR. A retrospective review of all Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp., and Enterobacter spp. tested by MicroScan at this laboratory in 2016 identified 260 of 7,894 (3.3%) isolates that grew in the MicroScan colistin well. Based on the data presented, clinical and public health laboratories could use the MicroScan colistin well as a first screen for the detection of isolates displaying elevated colistin MICs, which could then undergo further characterization.

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: An emerging bacterial threat

The first reports of carbapenem resistance in Enterobacteriaceae isolates occurred in the early 1990s. Researchers published the first report of an isolate that produced Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase in 2001. Since that time, carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae isolates have disseminated globally. Microbiology laboratories are integral to the control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). Laboratories need to be able to identify CRE, identify possible therapeutic alternatives, and sometimes identify the type of mechanism responsible for the carbapenem-resistant phenotype. Knowledge of these tasks is essential for all clinical microbiology laboratorians.

Laboratory practices for identification and reporting of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Department of Veterans Affairs facilities

Laboratory identification of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is a key step in controlling its spread. Our survey showed that most Veterans Affairs laboratories follow VA guidelines for initial CRE identification, whereas 55.0% use PCR to confirm carbapenemase production. Most respondents were knowledgeable about CRE guidelines. Barriers included staffing, training, and financial resources.

Public Health Efforts Can Impact Adoption of Current Susceptibility Breakpoints, but Closer Attention from Regulatory Bodies Is Needed

Microbiological testing, including interpretation of antimicrobial susceptibility testing results using current breakpoints, is crucial for clinical care and infection control. Continued use of obsolete Enterobacteriaceae carbapenem breakpoints is common in clinical laboratories. The purposes of this study were (i) to determine why laboratories failed to update breakpoints and (ii) to provide support for breakpoint updates. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Health conducted a 1-year outreach program for 41 hospitals in Los Angeles County that had reported, in a prior survey of California laboratories, using obsolete Enterobacteriaceae carbapenem breakpoints. In-person interviews with hospital stakeholders and customized expert guidance and resources were provided to aid laboratories in updating breakpoints, including support from technical representatives from antimicrobial susceptibility testing device manufacturers. Forty-one hospitals were targeted, 7 of which had updated breakpoints since the prior survey. Of the 34 remaining hospitals, 27 (79%) assumed that their instruments applied current breakpoints, 17 (50%) were uncertain how to change breakpoints, and 10 (29%) lacked resources to perform a validation study for off-label use of the breakpoints on their systems. Only 7 hospitals (21%) were familiar with the FDA/CDC Antibiotic Resistance Isolate Bank. All hospitals launched a breakpoint update process; 16 (47%) successfully updated breakpoints, 12 (35%) received isolates from the CDC in order to validate breakpoints on their systems, and 6 (18%) were planning to update within 1 year. The public health intervention was moderately successful in identifying and overcoming barriers to updating Enterobacteriaceae carbapenem breakpoints in Los Angeles hospitals. However, the majority of targeted hospitals continued to use obsolete breakpoints despite 1 year of effort. These findings have important implications for the quality of patient care and patient safety. Other public health jurisdictions may want to utilize similar resources to bridge the patient safety gap, while manufacturers, the FDA, and others determine how best to address this growing public health issue.

The Continued Value of Disk Diffusion for Assessing Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Clinical Laboratories: Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group

Expedited pathways to antimicrobial agent approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have led to increased delays between drug approval and the availability of FDA-cleared antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) devices. Antimicrobial disks for use with disk diffusion testing are among the first AST devices available to clinical laboratories. However, many laboratories are reluctant to implement disk diffusion testing for a variety of reasons, including dwindling proficiency with this method, interruptions of the laboratory workflow, uncertainty surrounding the quality and reliability of disk diffusion tests, and a perceived need to report MIC values to clinicians. This minireview provides a report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group on the current standards and clinical utility of disk diffusion testing.

Impact of 21st Century Cures Act on Breakpoints and Commercial Antimicrobial Susceptibility Test Systems: Progress and Pitfalls

Antimicrobial resistance is the most pressing medical challenge of the past decade. At the front line are clinical laboratories, which are responsible for accurately reporting antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) results to clinicians and public health authorities. The ability of the laboratory to detect resistance has been hampered by several factors. In 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act was signed into law, marking an important step toward resolving many regulatory dilemmas that hampered development and updates to commercial AST systems (cASTs). We describe the pathway and history of U.S. regulation of cASTs and outline both the rewards and unmet needs possible from the 21st Century Cures Act.

CLSI Methods Development and Standardization Working Group Best Practices for Evaluation of Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests

Effective evaluations of antimicrobial susceptibility tests (ASTs) require robust study design. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing has recognized that many published studies reporting the performance of commercial ASTs (cASTs) suffer from major design and/or analysis flaws, rendering the results difficult or impossible to interpret. This minireview outlines the current consensus of the Methods Development and Standardization Working Group of the CLSI Subcommittee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing regarding best practices for systematic evaluation of the performance of an AST, including the analysis and presentation of essential data intended for publication.

Direct-from-Blood-Culture Disk Diffusion To Determine Antimicrobial Susceptibility of Gram-Negative Bacteria: Preliminary Report from the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute Methods Development and Standardization Working Group

The performance of a disk diffusion test using broth from positive blood cultures as inoculum (direct disk diffusion [dDD]) was evaluated for a collection of 20 challenge isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates seeded into human blood were inoculated into Bactec Plus Aerobic/F, VersaTREK Redox 1, and BacT/Alert FA Plus bottles and incubated in the respective automated blood culture systems. Disk diffusion results were compared to reference disk diffusion results. Categorical agreement (CA) values for dDD, after removal of random errors due to natural MIC variation, were 87.8%, 88.4%, and 92.2% for the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. No very major errors (VME) were observed, and major error (ME) rates were 3.0%, 2.3%, and 1.7%, respectively. Incubation of the dDD test samples for 6 h compared to incubation for 16 to 18 h resulted in 19.9% of tests having too light of growth to allow reading of zones of inhibition. Among the evaluable dDD tests, CA values were 58.9%, 76.6%, and 73.2% for the isolates seeded into the BacT/Alert, Bactec, and VersaTREK systems, respectively. VME rates for isolates seeded into these systems were 2.2%, 1.8%, and 3.0%, respectively, and ME rates were 25.4%, 6.1%, and 2.8%, respectively, at the 6-h reading. The best performance of dDD was found for blood cultures with bacterial concentrations in the range of 7.6 × 10⁷ to 5.0 × 10⁸ CFU/ml; CA values ranged from 94.7 to 96.2% for these concentrations after 18 h of incubation and from 76.9 to 84.1% after 6 h of incubation. These preliminary data demonstrate the potential accuracy of dDD testing by the clinical laboratory.