Safety Profile of Medicines Used for the Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis: A Descriptive Study Based on the WHO Database (VigiBase®)

BACKGROUND

The introduction of new drugs that increase the usage of repurposed medicines for managing drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) comes with challenges of understanding, properly managing, and predicting adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In addition to the health consequences of ADRs for the individual, ADRs can reduce treatment adherence, thus contributing to resistance. This study aimed to describe the magnitude and characteristics of DR-TB-related ADRs through an analysis of ADRs reported to the WHO database (VigiBase) in the period from January 2018 to December 2020.

METHODS

A descriptive analysis was performed on selected reports from VigiBase on the basis of medicine-potential ADR pairs. The ADRs were stratified by sex, age group, reporting country, seriousness, outcome of the reaction, and dechallenge and rechallenge.

RESULTS

In total, 25 medicines reported to be suspected individual medicines or as a fixed-dose combination in the study period were included the study. Pyrazinamide (n = 836; 11.2%) was the most commonly reported medicine associated with ADRs, followed by ethionamide (n = 783; 10.5%) and cycloserine (n = 696; 9.3%). From the report included in this analysis, 2334 (31.2%) required complete withdrawal of the suspected medicine(s), followed by reduction of the dose (77; 1.0%) and an increased dose (4; 0.1%). Almost half of the reports were serious ADRs mainly caused by bedaquiline, delamanid, clofazimine, linezolid, and cycloserine that are the backbone of the DR-TB treatment currently in use.

CONCLUSIONS

A third of the reports required medication withdrawal, which impacts treatment adherence and ultimately leads to drug resistance. Additionally, more than 40% of the reports indicated that ADRs appeared two months after the commencement of treatment, thus it's important to remain alert for the potential ADRs for the entire duration of the treatment.

Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis Treatment Outcomes among Children and Adolescents in Karachi, Pakistan

BACKGROUND

Significant data gaps exist for children and adolescents with drug-resistant (DR) TB, particularly from high TB incidence settings. This report provides a descriptive analysis of programmatic outcomes among children and adolescents treated for DR-TB in Pakistan.

METHODS

We extracted programmatic data from January 2014 to December 2019 from a tertiary care hospital with specialised child and adolescent DR-TB services. A physician assessed all children and adolescents (0-19 years) with presumptive DR-TB, including details of exposure to DR-TB, medical history, radiology, and laboratory results. All patients received treatment as per national DR-TB management guidelines based on WHO recommendations.

RESULTS

There were 262 treatment episodes for 247 patients enrolled during the study period. The median age of the cohort was 16 years (IQR: 13-18 years) with 16 (6.1%) children being under 5 years; 237 (90.5%) patients had pulmonary TB. The majority of the patients (194 or 74.1%) experienced a favourable treatment outcome and 26 (9.9%) died while on treatment. Female patients (78.5%) were more likely to experience favourable outcomes compared to males (64.7%; chi-sqr p-value = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We found high rates of favourable outcomes in children and adolescents treated for DR-TB. However, there were few young children in our cohort and there was a considerable gender gap that enhanced efforts to diagnose DR-TB in young children and to elucidate and mitigate the reasons for poor outcomes amongst males.

The definition of tuberculosis infection based on the spectrum of tuberculosis disease

Latent tuberculosis infection was the term traditionally used to indicate tuberculosis (TB) infection. This term was used to define “a state of persistent immune response to stimulation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigens through tests such as the tuberculin skin test (TST) or an interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) without clinically active TB”. Recent evidence indicates that the spectrum from TB infection to TB disease is much more complex, including a “continuum” of situations didactically reported as uninfected individual, TB infection, incipient TB, subclinical TB without signs/symptoms, subclinical TB with unrecognised signs/symptoms, and TB disease with signs/symptoms. Recent evidence suggests that subclinical TB is responsible for important M. tuberculosis transmission. This review describes the different stages described above and their relationships. It also summarises the new developments in prevention, diagnosis and treatment of TB infection as well as their public health and policy implications.

The evolution from TB infection to disease is now described as a “continuum process”. Understanding of this is important to appreciate what is new on prevention, diagnosis and treatment of TB infection.https://bit.ly/3jauRKA

Clinical standards for the assessment, management and rehabilitation of post-TB lung disease

BACKGROUND: Increasing evidence suggests that post-TB lung disease (PTLD) causes significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on the assessment and management of PTLD and the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR).METHODS: A panel of global experts in the field of TB care and PR was identified; 62 participated in a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale was used to score the initial ideas for standards and after several rounds of revision the document was approved (with 100% agreement).RESULTS: Five clinical standards were defined: Standard 1, to assess patients at the end of TB treatment for PTLD (with adaptation for children and specific settings/situations); Standard 2, to identify patients with PTLD for PR; Standard 3, tailoring the PR programme to patient needs and the local setting; Standard 4, to evaluate the effectiveness of PR; and Standard 5, to conduct education and counselling. Standard 6 addresses public health aspects of PTLD and outcomes due to PR.CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based set of Clinical Standards for PTLD. Our aim is to improve patient care and quality of life by guiding clinicians, programme managers and public health officers in planning and implementing adequate measures to assess and manage PTLD.

Evidence-based Definition for Extensively Drug-resistant Tuberculosis

RATIONALE

Until 2020, extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis (XDR-TB) was defined as resistance to rifampicin and isoniazid (multidrug-resistant tuberculosis, MDR-TB), any fluoroquinolone (FQ) and any second-line injectable drug (SLID). In 2019 the World Health Organization issued new recommendations for managing patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis, substantially limiting the role of SLID in MDR-TB treatment and thus putting that XDR-TB definition into question.

OBJECTIVE

To propose an up-to-date definition for XDR-TB.

METHODS

We used a large dataset to assess treatment outcomes for MDR-TB patients exposed to any type of longer regimen. We included patients with bacteriologically confirmed MDR-TB and known FQ and SLID resistance results. We did logistic regression to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) for unfavourable treatment outcome (failure, relapse, death, loss-to-follow-up) by resistance pattern (FQ, SLID) and Group A drug use (moxifloxacin/levofloxacin, linezolid, bedaquiline).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

We included 11,666 patients with MDR-TB; 4653 (39.9%) had an unfavourable treatment outcome. Resistance to FQs increased the odds of an unfavourable treatment outcome (aOR 1.91; 95% confidence interval [95%CI] 1.63-2.23). Administration of bedaquiline and/or linezolid improved treatment outcomes regardless of resistance to FQ and/or SLID. Among XDR-TB patients, compared to persons receiving no Group A drug, aORs for unfavourable outcome were 0.37 (95%CI 0.20-0.69) with linezolid only, 0.40 (95%CI 0.21-0.77) with bedaquiline only, and 0.21 (95%CI 0.12-0.38) with both.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports a new definition of XDR-TB as MDR plus additional resistance to FQ plus bedaquiline and/or linezolid, and helps assess the adequacy of this definition for surveillance and treatment choice.NOTE: This article has been updated on July 16, 2021. When it was initially posted on June 9, 2021, the name of one of the coauthors, Dr. Christian Lienhardt, was inadvertently omitted. This version includes Dr. Lienhardt's affilations and contributions; the affiliations have therefore been renumbered.

Defining Outcomes of Tuberculosis (Treatment): From the Past to the Future

Untreated active tuberculosis (TB) has a very high long-term mortality. Treatment of TB reduces mortality dramatically and should maximize cure, preventing ongoing transmission and TB sequelae. However, predicting the risk of failure and relapse is crucial for the management of individual patients and for the evaluation of effectiveness of programs. Various outcome definitions for drug-sensitive and drug-resistant TB were developed, implemented, and endorsed since introduction of TB chemotherapy by the World Health Organization (WHO), mostly based on culture and smear results. They should be applicable for individual patient care, surveillance, and research. Definitions with focus on program evaluation differ from definitions to evaluate the efficacy and effectiveness of regimens. Lack of sputum production at the later stage of treatment reduces the easy applicability of current definitions. Definitions of failure and cure are sometimes difficult to apply. Alternative approaches suggest culture positivity at 6 months or more of treatment as an indicator for failure. New definitions for cure including a relapse-free period posttreatment and reduced number of culture and smear results are considered. Increasing variation and individualization of treatment and its duration urgently require new approaches using pathogen- or host-specific biomarkers, which indicate risk of failure and define cure. Such biomarkers are under evaluation but still far from translation in clinical routine practice.

Outcome of treatment of MDR-TB or drug-resistant patients treated with bedaquiline and delamanid: Results from a large global cohort

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends countries introduce new anti-TB drugs in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. The aim of the study is to prospectively evaluate the effectiveness of bedaquiline (and/or delamanid)- containing regimens in a large cohort of consecutive TB patients treated globally. This observational, prospective study is based on data collected and provided by Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN) centres and analysed twice a year. All consecutive patients (including children/adolescents) treated with bedaquiline and/or delamanid were enrolled, and managed according to WHO and national guidelines. Overall, 52 centres from 29 countries/regions in all continents reported 883 patients as of January 31st 2021, 24/29 countries/regions providing data on 100% of their consecutive patients (10-80% in the remaining 5 countries). The drug-resistance pattern of the patients was severe (>30% with extensively drug-resistant -TB; median number of resistant drugs 5 (3-7) in the overall cohort and 6 (4-8) among patients with a final outcome). For the patients with a final outcome (477/883, 54.0%) the median (IQR) number of months of anti-TB treatment was 18 (13-23) (in days 553 (385-678)). The proportion of patients achieving sputum smear and culture conversion ranged from 93.4% and 92.8% respectively (whole cohort) to 89.3% and 88.8% respectively (patients with a final outcome), a median (IQR) time to sputum smear and culture conversion of 58 (30-90) days for the whole cohort and 60 (30-100) for patients with a final outcome and, respectively, of 55 (30-90) and 60 (30-90) days for culture conversion. Of 383 patients treated with bedaquiline but not delamanid, 284 (74.2%) achieved treatment success, while 25 (6.5%) died, 11 (2.9%) failed and 63 (16.5%) were lost to follow-up.

Improving Quality of Patient Data for Treatment of Multidrug- or Rifampin-Resistant Tuberculosis

International policy for treatment of multidrug- and rifampin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR TB) relies largely on individual patient data (IPD) from observational studies of patients treated under routine conditions. We prepared guidance on which data to collect and what measures could improve consistency and utility for future evidence-based recommendations. We highlight critical stages in data collection at which improvements to uniformity, accuracy, and completeness could add value to IPD quality. Through a repetitive development process, we suggest essential patient- and treatment-related characteristics that should be collected by prospective contributors of observational IPD in MDR/RR TB.

MDR/XDR-TB management of patients and contacts: Challenges facing the new decade. The 2020 clinical update by the Global Tuberculosis Network

The continuous flow of new research articles on MDR-TB diagnosis, treatment, prevention and rehabilitation requires frequent update of existing guidelines. This review is aimed at providing clinicians and public health staff with an updated and easy-to-consult document arising from consensus of Global Tuberculosis Network (GTN) experts. The core published documents and guidelines have been reviewed, including the recently published MDR-TB WHO rapid advice and ATS/CDC/ERS/IDSA guidelines. After a rapid review of epidemiology and risk factors, the clinical priorities on MDR-TB diagnosis (including whole genome sequencing and drug-susceptibility testing interpretations) and treatment (treatment design and management, TB in children) are discussed. Furthermore, the review comprehensively describes the latest information on contact tracing and LTBI management in MDR-TB contacts, while providing guidance on post-treatment functional evaluation and rehabilitation of TB sequelae, infection control and other public health priorities.

Surveillance of adverse events in the treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis: first global report

The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that countries implement pharmacovigilance and collect information on active drug safety monitoring (aDSM) and management of adverse events.The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the frequency and severity of adverse events to anti-tuberculosis (TB) drugs in a cohort of consecutive TB patients treated with new (i.e. bedaquiline, delamanid) and repurposed (i.e. clofazimine, linezolid) drugs, based on the WHO aDSM project. Adverse events were collected prospectively after attribution to a specific drug together with demographic, bacteriological, radiological and clinical information at diagnosis and during therapy. This interim analysis included patients who completed or were still on treatment at time of data collection.Globally, 45 centres from 26 countries/regions reported 658 patients (68.7% male, 4.4% HIV co-infected) treated as follows: 87.7% with bedaquiline, 18.4% with delamanid (6.1% with both), 81.5% with linezolid and 32.4% with clofazimine. Overall, 504 adverse event episodes were reported: 447 (88.7%) were classified as minor (grade 1-2) and 57 (11.3%) as serious (grade 3-5). The majority of the 57 serious adverse events reported by 55 patients (51 out of 57, 89.5%) ultimately resolved. Among patients reporting serious adverse events, some drugs held responsible were discontinued: bedaquiline in 0.35% (two out of 577), delamanid in 0.8% (one out of 121), linezolid in 1.9% (10 out of 536) and clofazimine in 1.4% (three out of 213) of patients. Serious adverse events were reported in 6.9% (nine out of 131) of patients treated with amikacin, 0.4% (one out of 221) with ethionamide/prothionamide, 2.8% (15 out of 536) with linezolid and 1.8% (eight out of 498) with cycloserine/terizidone.The aDSM study provided valuable information, but implementation needs scaling-up to support patient-centred care.

Treatment of Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

The treatment of drug-resistant tuberculosis (TB) is complicated and has evolved significantly in the past decade with the advent of rapid molecular tests and updated evidence-based guidelines of the World Health Organization and other organizations. The latest recommendations incorporate the use of new drugs and regimens that maximize efficacy and minimize toxicity to improve treatment outcomes for the patients. This article provides an overview of the latest published strategies for clinical and programmatic management of drug-resistant TB.

Regimens to treat multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: past, present and future perspectives

Over the past few decades, treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR)/extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (TB) has been challenging because of its prolonged duration (up to 20-24 months), toxicity, costs and sub-optimal outcomes.After over 40 years of neglect, two new drugs (bedaquiline and delamanid) have been made available to manage difficult-to-treat MDR-/XDR-TB cases. World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines published in March 2019 endorsed the possibility of treating MDR-TB patients with a full oral regimen, following previous guidelines published in 2016 which launched a shorter regimen lasting 9-10 months.The objectives of this article are to review the main achievements in MDR-TB treatment through the description of the existing WHO strategies, to discuss the main ongoing trials and to shed light on potential future scenarios and revised definitions necessary to manage drug-resistant TB.