Potential for Point-of-Care Tests to Reduce Chlamydia-associated Burden in the United States: A Mathematical Modeling Analysis

Heterogeneity in practitioner-reported barriers to use, cost considerations and priorities for point of care sexually transmitted infection tests on surveys across seven years

BACKGROUND

Point of care diagnostic tests (POCTs) for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) have the potential to improve STI care worldwide. However, barriers to adoption, cost considerations and practitioner priorities may not be uniform globally and over time. We conducted two surveys, 7 years apart, among members of the International Union Against Sexually Transmitted Infections (IUSTI), and compare results here.

METHODS

Surveys were given to members attending two IUSTI conferences in 2012 (Australia) and 2019 (Estonia). Descriptive analyses were performed and chi-square or Fisher's exact tests conducted.

RESULTS

Amongst N = 190 participants in 2012 and N = 166 in 2019, 61% in 2012 and 77% in 2019 were from high-income countries (HICs). In 2012, 84% of respondents from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and 70% from HICs thought cost of test was more important than amount of reimbursement. Trends were similar in 2019. In 2012, unreliability was considered the most important barrier to POCT use by all groups, followed by being laboratory-driven and complexity. In 2019, time frame was considered most important, followed by unreliability and being laboratory-driven. In 2012, the top priority for POCT development among LMIC respondents was early HIV seroconversion (31%), versus chlamydia (57%) for HICs. In 2019, chlamydia remained top priority for HICs (40%), followed by early HIV seroconversion (19%) and gonorrhea (17%); top priorities for LMICs were chlamydia (26%), HPV (24%), and early HIV seroconversion (21%).

CONCLUSIONS

Practitioner priorities for STI POCTs may be shifting. Cost may be critical to adoption in all settings. Larger studies are needed to verify findings.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on technologic and process innovation in point-of-care diagnostics for sexually transmitted infections

The STI diagnostic landscape of FDA cleared tests for use at point-of-care (POC), as well as those emergency use authorized for COVID-19 are reviewed; some of these COVID-19 diagnostics may have platform potential as STI diagnostics. Finally, process innovation is described with self-collection and hub-and-spoke mail-in to reference lab models. Movement of Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA)-waived POC tests to over-the-counter formats will make tests more accessible to consumers. Together with public health messaging, these measures could accelerate STI and COVID-19 syndemic diagnostic solutions.

Practical Challenges of Point-of-Care Testing

The practical challenges of point-of-care testing (POCT) include analytical performance and quality compared with testing performed in a central laboratory and higher cost per test compared with laboratory-based tests. These challenges can be addressed with new test technology, consensus, and practice guidelines for the use of POCT, instituting a quality management system and data connectivity in the POCT setting, and studies that demonstrate evidence of clinical and economic value of POCT.

Point-of-Care Testing for Sexually Transmitted Infections

Point-of-care testing for sexually transmitted infections is essential for controlling transmission and preventing sequelae in high-risk populations. Since the World Health Organization published the ASSURED criteria, point-of-care testing has improved for use in large population screening and rapid testing that prevents loss of clinical follow-up. Recent advancements have been advantageous for low-resource areas allowing testing at a minimal cost without reliable electricity or refrigeration. Point-of-care nucleic acid detection and amplification techniques are recommended, but are often inaccessible in low-resource areas. Future advancements in point-of-care diagnostic testing should focus on improving antibody-based assays, monitoring viral loads, and detecting antimicrobial resistance.

Advances in Diagnostics of Sexually Transmitted Infections

Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) are caused by various pathogens, many of which have common symptoms. Diagnostic tests are critical to supporting clinical evaluations in making patient management decisions. Molecular diagnostics are the preferred test type when available, especially in asymptomatic patients for many STIs. However, for some infections, serology offers the best insight into infectious status. Clinicians should be aware of the performance characteristics of the available STI diagnostic tests and understand how to use them. Point-of-care tests are helpful to implement rapid and accurate treatment responses, which are particularly helpful in certain at-risk populations.

A sample-to-answer, quantitative real-time PCR system with low-cost, gravity-driven microfluidic cartridge for rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B, and human papillomavirus 16/18

The pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), due to the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), has created an unprecedented threat to the global health system, especially in resource-limited areas. This challenge shines a spotlight on the urgent need for a point-of-care (POC) quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) test for sensitive and rapid diagnosis of viral infections. In a POC system, a closed, single-use, microfluidic cartridge is commonly utilized for integration of nucleic acid preparation, PCR amplification and florescence detection. But, most current cartridge systems often involve complicated nucleic acid extraction via active pumping that relies on cumbersome external hardware, causing increases in system complexity and cost. In this work, we demonstrate a gravity-driven cartridge design for an integrated viral RNA/DNA diagnostic test that does not require auxiliary hardware for fluid pumping due to adopted extraction-free amplification. This microfluidic cartridge only contains two reaction chambers for nucleic acid lysis and amplification respectively, enabling a fast qPCR test in less than 30 min. This gravity-driven pumping strategy can help simplify and minimize the microfluidic cartridge, thus enabling high-throughput (up to 12 test cartridges per test) molecular detection via a small cartridge readout system. Thus, this work addresses the scalability limitation of POC molecular testing and can be run in any settings. We verified the analytical sensitivity and specificity of the cartridge testing for respiratory pathogens and sexually transmitted diseases using SARS-CoV-2, influenza A/B RNA samples, and human papillomavirus 16/18 DNA samples. Our cartridge system exhibited a comparable detection performance to the current gold standard qPCR instrument ABI 7500. Moreover, our system showed very high diagnostic accuracy for viral RNA/DNA detection that was well validated by ROC curve analysis. The sample-to-answer molecular testing system reported in this work has the advantages of simplicity, rapidity, and low cost, making it highly promising for prevention and control of infectious diseases in poor-resource areas.

Summary of the Fourth Annual American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association Workshop on Improving Sexually Transmitted Infection Control Efforts Through Cross-Sector Collaboration

ABSTRACT

The American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association has, for several years, been conducting a cross-sector workshop to bring together a variety of stakeholders to develop ideas for collaboratively improving the sexually transmitted infection control efforts in the United States. In this summary, we share the content of discussions and ideas of the fourth annual workshop for future research and potential changes to practice with a focus on diagnostic capacity.

Clinical Integration of a Highly Accurate Polymerase Chain Reaction Point-of-Care Test Can Inform Immediate Treatment Decisions for Chlamydia, Gonorrhea, and Trichomonas

BACKGROUND

Accurate same-day sexually transmitted infection (STI) diagnostic testing is generally unavailable, leading to syndromic management with high rates of overtreatment and undertreatment. We analyzed the ease of integration of the Visby STI Panel into clinical practice, studied acceptance by patients and clinic personnel, and assessed the potential to inform accurate treatment decisions.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional single-visit study of 55 women aged 18 to 56 years, women self-collected vaginal swab samples that were analyzed using the Visby STI Panel for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG), and Trichomonas vaginalis (TV). Results were compared with standard-of-care clinic results from send-out laboratory polymerase chain reaction tests. Surveys assessed patient and device operator experiences with the Visby STI Panel and clinicians' perceived need for and acceptance of the device. Time parameters were measured to evaluate the impact on clinical workflow, and syndromic treatment decisions were compared with anticipated treatment based on the Visby STI Panel results.

RESULTS

Patients strongly agreed that sample self-collection was easy, and operators reported the device easy to use. Clinicians valued the rapid return of results, and patients were comfortable waiting up to 30 minutes to receive them. In 13 of 15 cases, the Visby STI Panel correctly identified undertreated patients as infected and correctly identified all 33 incidences of overtreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical adoption of the Visby STI Panel into primary care clinics and doctors' offices could reduce overtreatment and undertreatment of STIs. If integrated efficiently into the clinical workflow, the test would have minimal impact on staff time and visit duration for patients.

Controversies and evidence on Chlamydia testing and treatment in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men: a narrative review

Background

Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide. CT is mainly asymptomatic. Test-and-treat strategies are widely implemented to prevent transmission and complications. Strategies are not without controversy in asymptomatic women and men who have sex with men (MSM). Concerns are emerging to test and treat asymptomatic persons for urogenital CT (‘Controversy 1’) and pharyngeal or rectal CT (‘Controversy 2’), whereby testing symptomatic persons is not under debate. Opposed views in CT treatment involve using azithromycin versus doxycycline (‘Controversy 3’). The objective of this review is to provide coverage of these public health and clinical controversies by reviewing the current scientific evidence.

Methods

A literature search was performed using PubMed for relevant publications between 2018 and September 2021, and iterative retrieval of additional relevant publications.

Results

Controversy 1. In women, the majority of asymptomatic CT are at the urogenital site, and detections mostly include viable CT. CT easily transmits to a partner and potentially also between the vaginal and rectal areas; the clinical impact of urogenital CT is established, although risks for adverse outcomes are uncertain. Wide-scale testing in asymptomatic women has not resulted in reduced prevalence. In MSM, evidence for the clinical impact of asymptomatic urogenital CT is lacking. Controversy 2. Rectal CT is common in women diagnosed with urogenital CT, but the clinical impact of asymptomatic rectal CT is uncertain. In MSM, rectal CT is common, and most CT infections are at the rectal site, yet the risk of longer term complications is unknown. In both sexes, pharyngeal CT is uncommon and has no documented clinical impact. Controversy 3. In the treatment of rectal CT, doxycycline has superior effectiveness to azithromycin. Evidence has also accumulated on the harms of test-and-treat strategies.

Conclusions

Current practices vary widely, from widescale test-and-treat approaches to more individual patient- and partner-level case management. Choosing which asymptomatic people to test at what anatomic site, and whether to test or not, requires an urgent (re-)definition of the goals of testing and treating asymptomatic persons. Treatment guidelines are shifting toward universal doxycycline use, and clinical practice now faces the challenge of implementation.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12879-022-07171-2.

Test-and-treat is a key strategy in the control of Chlamydia trachomatis (CT). We discuss recent controversies and present scientific evidence regarding urogenital, rectal, and pharyngeal CT test-and-treat strategies in women and in men who have sex with men (MSM). This should inform best practices for the prevention and management of the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection (STI) worldwide.

If We Make It, Will They Take It? Attitudes Toward the Acceptability of Chlamydia Point-of-Care Testing Among Adolescents and Young Adults

BACKGROUND

Adolescent women, 15 to 19 years of age, have the highest rate of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in the United States. The objective of this study was to ascertain knowledge and experience of C. trachomatis and acceptance of C. trachomatis point-of-care testing (POCT) if made available over-the-counter (OTC). Currently, there are no tests for C. trachomatis available OTC for purchase.

METHODS

Patients attending adolescent clinics at University Hospital of Brooklyn and Kings County Hospital received an anonymous 12-item questionnaire. Both clinics serve predominantly African and Caribbean American urban populations. Questions included demographics, sexual orientation, chlamydia knowledge, testing history, prior infection, partner notification, and acceptance of OTC POCT for C. trachomatis.

RESULTS

Surveys from 151 patients (116 women, 35 men) aged 12 to 21 years (mean age, 17.6 years) were analyzed. Only 34 of the 151 (22.5%) respondents understood C. trachomatis transmission; 31 (20.5%) knew its complications. Sixty-seven (44.4%) would purchase an OTC test but 101 (66.8%) would pay no more than $20. All 151 patients reported that they would follow-up with doctor if positive; 143 (94.7%) would notify partners, although 5 of the 31 (16.1%) women with prior infection did not notify partners.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly half (44%) of adolescents in our population would be interested in using a potential OTC test for C. trachomatis. Cost was a major disincentive. Knowledge of infection remains cursory. However, those with a history of C. trachomatis infection and familiar with its complications were more interested in purchasing a home test. Although 100% of the respondents reported that they would follow-up with their physician if they tested positive, past behavior suggests that partner notification might be suboptimal.

What can be learnt from a qualitative evaluation of implementing a rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service?

OBJECTIVES

To investigate experiences of implementing a new rapid sexual health testing, diagnosis and treatment service.

DESIGN

A theory-based qualitative evaluation with a focused ethnographic approach using non-participant observations and interviews with patient and clinic staff. Normalisation process theory was used to structure interview questions and thematic analysis.

SETTING

A sexual health centre in Bristol, UK.

PARTICIPANTS

26 patients and 21 staff involved in the rapid sexually transmitted infection (STI) service were interviewed. Purposive sampling was aimed for a range of views and experiences and sociodemographics and STI results for patients, job grades and roles for staff. 40 hours of observations were conducted.

RESULTS

Implementation of the new service required co-ordinated changes in practice across multiple staff teams. Patients also needed to make changes to how they accessed the service. Multiple small 'pilots' of process changes were necessary to find workable options. For example, the service was introduced in phases beginning with male patients. This responsive operating mode created challenges for delivering comprehensive training and communication in advance to all staff. However, staff worked together to adjust and improve the new service, and morale was buoyed through observing positive impacts on patient care. Patients valued faster results and avoiding unnecessary treatment. Patients reported that they were willing to drop-off self-samples and return for a follow-up appointment, enabling infection-specific treatment in accordance with test results, thus improving antimicrobial stewardship.

CONCLUSIONS

The new service was acceptable to staff and patients. Implementation of service changes to improve access and delivery of care in the context of stretched resources can pose challenges for staff at all levels. Early evaluation of pilots of process changes played an important role in the success of the service by rapidly feeding back issues for adjustment. Visibility to staff of positive impacts on patient care is important in maintaining morale.

Pelvic inflammatory disease in the adolescent and young adult: An update

Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is an infection of the female upper genital tract that is typically polymicrobial with classic core involvement of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and/or Chlamydia trachomatis, though other endogenous flora from the vagino-cervical areas can be involved as well. It is often a sexually transmitted disease but other etiologic routes are also noted. A variety of risk factors have been identified including adolescence, young adulthood, adolescent cervical ectropion, multiple sexual partners, immature immune system, history of previous PID, risky contraceptive practices and others. An early diagnosis and prompt treatment are necessary to reduce risks of PID complications such as chronic pelvic pain, ectopic pregnancy and infertility. Current management principles of PID are also reviewed. It is important for clinicians to screen sexually active females for common sexually transmitted infections such as Chlamydia trachomatis and provide safer sex education to their adolescent and young adult patients. Clinicians should provide comprehensive management to persons with PID and utilize established guidelines such as those from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

A profile of the binx health io® molecular point-of-care test for chlamydia and gonorrhea in women and men

Introduction: Point-of-care (POC) tests for Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) and Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) are urgently needed to control the STI epidemic in order to offer patients an immediate diagnoses and accurate treatment before they leave a clinical encounter and thus reduce transmission and sequelae. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) have increased sensitivity and specificity, but very few POC assays can provide results of such tests within the usual time of the patient visit.Areas covered: This review describes the technology and performance characteristics of the binx health io® [Boston, MA] (binx io) CT/NG assay, a new rapid molecular POC assay. The assay is compared to other available molecular POC tests. We also describe the importance of time to results and assay performance for this POC assay.Expert opinion: The binx io CT/NG assay offers the ability to incorporate the use of POC tests to identify and immediately treat chlamydia and gonococcal infections into the clinical visit, which will provide improved outcomes for patients. Additional implementation studies are needed to optimize the adoption of this new test.

Development and Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Test in a Low-Resource Setting with High Rates of Chlamydia trachomatis Urogenital Infections in Fiji

Rapid and precise detection of Chlamydia trachomatis, the leading global cause of sexually transmitted infections (STI), at the point of care (POC) is required for treatment decisions to prevent transmission and sequelae, including pelvic inflammatory disease, ectopic pregnancy, tubal factor infertility, and preterm birth. We developed a rapid POC test (POCT), termed LH-POCT, which uses loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) of nucleic acids. We performed a head-to-head comparison with the Cepheid Xpert CT/NG assay using clinician-collected, deidentified paired vaginal samples from a parent study that consecutively enrolled symptomatic and asymptomatic females over 18 years of age from the Ministry of Health and Medical Services Health Centers in Fiji. Samples were processed by the Xpert CT/NG assay and LH-POCT, blinded to the comparator. Discrepant samples were resolved by quantitative PCR. Deidentified clinical data and tests for Trichomonas vaginalis, Candida, and bacterial vaginosis (BV) were provided. There were a total of 353 samples from 327 females. C. trachomatis positivity was 16.7% (59/353), while the prevalence was 16.82% (55/327) after discrepant resolution. Seven discrepant samples resolved to four false negatives, two false positives, and one true positive for the LH-POCT. The sensitivity of the LH-POCT was 93.65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 84.53% to 98.24%), and specificity was 99.31% (95% CI, 97.53% to 99.92%). Discrepant samples clustered among women with vaginal discharge and/or BV. The prototype LH-POCT workflow has excellent performance, meeting many World Health Organization ASSURED criteria for POC tests, including a sample-to-result time of 35 min. Our LH-POCT holds promise for improving clinical practice to prevent and control C. trachomatis STIs in diverse health care settings globally.

Overcoming Challenges with the Adoption of Point-of-Care Testing: From Technology Push and Clinical Needs to Value Propositions

Major technical challenges often prevent developers from producing new point-of-care technologies that deliver the required clinical performance in the intended settings of use. But even when devices meet clinical requirements, they can fail to be adopted and successfully implemented. Adoption barriers occur when decision makers do not understand the "value proposition" of new technologies. Current discussions of value in the context of point-of-care testing focus predominantly on the intended use and performance of the device from the manufacturer's point-of-view. However, the perspective of potential adopters in determining whether new devices provide value is also important, as is the opinion of all stakeholders who will be impacted. Incorporating value concepts into decisions made across the full development-to-adoption continuum can increase the likelihood that point-of-care testing will have the desired impact on health care delivery and patient outcomes. This article discusses how various approaches to technology development impact adoption and compares the characteristics of these approaches to emerging value concepts. It also provides an overview of value initiatives and tools that are being developed to support the evaluation of value propositions. These are presented for a range of technology adoption decision contexts, with particular applicability to point-of-care testing. Expanding the focus of research to address gaps in both the creation and evaluation of value propositions is imperative in order for value concepts to positively influence the adoption of point-of-care testing.

Point-by-Point Progress: Gonorrhea Point of Care Tests

INTRODUCTION

Point-of-care (POC) tests for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (Ng) are urgently needed to control the gonorrhea epidemic, so patients can receive immediate diagnoses and treatment. While the advent of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) has improved the accuracy of Ng identification, very few POC assays are able to provide results of such tests at the clinical visit. Additionally, antimicrobial resistance (AMR) presents a unique treatment challenge for Ng.

AREAS COVERED

This review notes that older POC tests have lower sensitivity for Ng, compared to the currently-available NAATs, and are not adequate for the current demand for high sensitivity. Promising newer assays, which can be used at the POC are covered. This review also includes data about clinicians' and patients' acceptability and expectations of POC tests for Ng, testing of extragenital specimens, pooling studies, as well as their impact clinically, and use in low-resource settings.

EXPERT OPINION

The ability to use POC tests to identify and immediately treat Ng infections at the patient encounter offers many benefits and opportunities. POC tests for Ng are currently available, but not widely used especially in low-resource settings. Further development of POC tests with AMR testing capacity is needed to help guide antimicrobial stewardship.

Evaluation of the Performance of a Point-of-Care Test for Chlamydia and Gonorrhea

IMPORTANCE

Rates of chlamydial and gonococcal infection continue to increase in the United States, as do the associated costs of untreated infections. Improved diagnostic technologies that support testing and treating in 1 clinical visit are critical to advancing efforts to control the rates of chlamydial and gonococcal infection.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical performance of a point-of-care (POC) molecular diagnostic assay for the detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

A noninterventional, cross-sectional clinical study was conducted from September 18, 2018, through March 13, 2019, at sexually transmitted infection (STI), HIV, family planning, and obstetrics and gynecology clinics where STI screening is routine, using a convenience sample and comparing commercially available assays with a new 30-minute POC assay. Patients included were those eligible for STI screening or diagnostic testing who had not taken antibiotics effective against chlamydia or gonorrhea within the previous 28 days. Four vaginal swab samples were collected from women and a first-catch urine sample was obtained from men.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

A composite infection status was used to classify participants as infected if 2 or more comparator results were positive, as not infected if 2 or more comparator samples were negative, and as unevaluable if 1 result was invalid and the other 2 results did not agree with each other.

RESULTS

Swab samples from 1523 women (median age, 27 years [interquartile range, 17-37 years]), 817 (53.6%) of whom presented with symptoms, and 922 men (median age, 29 years [interquartile range, 17-41 years]), 308 (33.4%) of whom were symptomatic, were tested. For chlamydia, sensitivity of the new POC assay was 96.1% (95% CI, 91.2%-98.3%) for women and 92.5% (95% CI, 86.4%-96.0%) for men. For gonorrhea, sensitivity estimates were 100.0% (95% CI, 92.1%-100.0%) for women and 97.3% (95% CI, 90.7%-99.3%) for men. For chlamydia, specificity of the new POC assay was 99.1% (95% CI, 98.4%-99.5%) for women and 99.3% (95% CI, 98.4%-99.7%) for men. For gonorrhea, specificity estimates were 99.9% (95% CI, 99.5%-100%) for women and 100% (95% CI, 95.5%-100%) for men. Non-laboratory-trained personnel performed 94.8% of all tests (2318 of 2445) during the study.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This study suggests that self-obtained vaginal swab samples were associated with performance equivalent to laboratory-based molecular diagnostics, which can support use of this POC assay in many settings. The availability of an easy-to-use, rapid (30-minute) molecular test for accurate detection of chlamydia and gonorrhea has the power to facilitate testing and treatment in a single patient visit for these STIs.

[Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - Synergies between Family Practices and Gynaecological Specialised Assessment]

Pelvic Inflammatory Disease - Synergies between Family Practices and Gynaecological Specialised Assessment Abstract. The 'pelvic inflammatory disease' (PID) describes an ascending inflammation of the upper female genital tract, beginning with a local cervicitis and proceeding to endometritis and adnexitis. It is a common clinical picture with rising numbers in recent years, and it occurs both in gynaecological and general practice. The symptoms are often unspecific, discrete or althogehter lacking. In order to reduce long-term risks of chronic pelvic pain, sterility and/or ectopic pregnancies, rapid diagnosis followed by immediate therapy and a good interdisciplinary cooperation are necessary. Screening programs for chlamydia and gonococcus as the most common pathogens of PID have not yet been implemented in Switzerland so far.