Coronary artery disease patients without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs)- a forgotten group calling out for new discoveries

Clinical outcomes and coronary artery lesion characteristics of young patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction and no standard modifiable risk factors

BACKGROUND

Among ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients, those with no standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking) have higher 30-day mortality than those with SMuRFs. Differences in coronary lesion characteristics remain unclear.

METHODS

Data from STEMI patients aged ≤60 years from the Asia Pacific Evaluation of Cardiovascular Therapies Network (Australia, Hong Kong, Malaysia, Singapore, and Vietnam) was retrospectively analysed. Exclusion criteria included incomplete SMuRF data, prior myocardial infarction, or prior coronary revascularisation. Lesion type was defined using the American College of Cardiology criteria. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) were defined as peri-procedural myocardial infarction, emergency coronary artery bypass surgery, cerebrovascular event, or mortality. Multiple logistic regressions were used.

RESULTS

Of 4404 patients, 767 (17.4%) were SMuRFless. SMuRFless patients were more frequently younger (median age 51 vs. 53 years; p < 0.001), female (22.6% vs. 15.5%; p < 0.001), thrombolysed (20.1% vs. 12.5%; p < 0.001), and in cardiogenic shock (11.2% vs. 8.6%; p = 0.020). SMuRFless patients had significantly higher in-hospital MACE (7.2% vs. 4.3%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.25; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.24-4.08; p = 0.008) but 1-year mortality was not significantly different (3.6% vs. 5.7%, aOR 0.58; 95% CI 0.06-6.12; p = 0.549). Compared with patients with SMuRFs (4918 lesions), the SMuRFless (940 lesions) had fewer type B2/C lesions (60.8% vs. 65.6%; p = 0.020) and fewer lesions ≥20 mm (51.1% vs. 57.1%; p = 0.002) but more procedural complications (5.1% vs. 2.7%; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Among young STEMI patients, the SMuRFless have shorter and less complex lesions, but worse procedural and short-term MACE outcomes.

Distinct circulating cytokine levels in patients with angiography-proven coronary artery disease compared to disease-free controls

Background

Systemic inflammation has a critical role in the development of symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD). Identification of inflammatory pathways may provide a platform for novel therapeutic approaches. We sought to determine whether there are differences in circulating cytokine profiles between patients with CAD and disease-free controls as well as according to the severity of the disease.

Methods

Case-control study's population consisted of 452 patients who underwent diagnostic invasive coronary angiography due to clinical indications. We measured the serum concentrations of 48 circulating cytokines. Extent of CAD was assessed using the SYNTAX Score in 116 patients. Cytokine differences between groups were tested using Mann-Whitney U test and associations with CAD were explored using a logistic regression model.

Results

Overall, 310 patients had angiographically verified CAD whereas 142 had no angiographically-detected coronary atherosclerosis. In multivariable logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, history of smoking and treatment for diabetes and hyperlipidemia, increased levels of interleukin 9 (OR 1.359, 95%CI 1.046-1.766, p = 0.022), IL-17 (1.491, 95%CI 1.115-1.994, p = 0.007) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (OR 1.440, 95%CI 1.089-1.904, p = 0.011) were independently associated with CAD. Patients with SYNTAX Score>22 had increased levels of stromal cell-derived factor 1 alfa (SDF-1α), beta-nerve growth factor (β-NGF), IL-3 and decreased level of IL-17 compared to those with score ≤22 when adjusted for smoking and use of beta-blockers.

Conclusions

Patients with CAD have distinct circulating cytokine profiles compared to disease-free controls. Distinct cytokines may have pivotal roles at different stages of coronary atherosclerosis. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03444259 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03444259).

Prognostic significance of triglyceride-glucose index in acute coronary syndrome patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors

BACKGROUND

A significant percentage of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) are being identified. Nonetheless, the prognostic influence of the TyG index on adverse events in this type of patient remains unexplored. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of the TyG index among ACS patients without SMuRFs for predicting adverse outcomes.

METHODS

This study involved 1140 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with ACS without SMuRFs at Beijing Anzhen Hospital between May 2018 and December 2020 and underwent coronary angiography. Each patient was followed up for a period of 35 to 66 months after discharge. The objective of this study was to examine major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), which included all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal ischemic stroke, as well as ischemia-driven revascularization.

RESULTS

During the median follow-up period of 48.3 months, 220 (19.3%) MACCE events occurred. The average age of the participants was 59.55 ± 10.98 years, and the average TyG index was 8.67 ± 0.53. In the fully adjusted model, when considering the TyG index as either a continuous/categorical variable, significant associations with adverse outcomes were observed. Specifically, for each 1 standard deviation increase in the TyG index within the highest TyG index group, there was a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.245 (95% confidence interval CI 1.030, 1.504) for MACCE and 1.303 (95% CI 1.026, 1.653) for ischemia-driven revascularization (both P < 0.05), when the TyG index was analyzed as a continuous variable. Similarly, when the TyG index was examined as a categorical variable, the HR (95% CI) for MACCE in the highest TyG index group was 1.693 (95% CI 1.051, 2.727) (P < 0.05) in the fully adjusted model, while the HR (95% CI) for ischemia-driven revascularization was 1.855 (95% CI 0.998, 3.449) (P = 0.051). Additionally, the TyG index was found to be associated with a poor prognosis among the subgroup.

CONCLUSION

The TyG index is correlated with poor prognosis in patients with ACS without SMuRFs, suggesting that it may be an independent predictive factor of adverse events among these individuals.

Prevalence, predictors, and in-hospital outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction among young adults without traditional cardiovascular risk factors in the United States

Background

Standard Modifiable Cardiovascular Risk Factors (SMuRF) such as hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking have long been established in the etiology of atherosclerotic disease. Studies suggest that patients without any of these risk factors (SMuRF-less) who present with ST-elevation myocardial infarction have worse outcomes.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample databases (2016 to 2020) was queried to identify STEMI admissions as a principal diagnosis using ICD 10 codes. The study population aged 18 to 45 years were divided into cohorts of SMuRF and SMuRF-less based on the presence of ≥1 risk factor (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and smoking), and in-hospital outcomes were compared.

Results

41,990 patients were identified as the final study population. 38,495 patients were identified as SMuRF, and 3495 patients were SMuRF-less. Compared to SMuRF patients, SMuRF-less patients are more likely to be females (23.2 % vs. 21.2 %), have congestive heart failure (16.6 % vs. 13.7 %, p < 0.01) but less likely to have obesity (13.7 % vs 28.0 %, p < 0.01) In evaluating outcomes, SMuRF-less patients had higher adjusted in-hospital mortality (aOR 2.6, CI 1.5-4.2, p < 0.01), Cardiogenic shock (aOR 1.8, CI 1.3-2.5, p < 0.01), acute kidney injury (aOR 1.4, CI 1.0-1.9, p = 0.02), and Extramembrane Corporeal Oxygenation (aOR 4.1, CI 1.1-15.1, p = 0.03). Fluid and electrolyte abnormalities was an independent predictor of mortality among SMuRF-less patients (aOR 3.82, CI 1.3-11.2, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

Young patients who present with STEMI and have no traditional cardiovascular risk factors have worse in-hospital outcomes. Further research is needed to evaluate the impact of non-traditional risk factors on acute myocardial infarction.

Associations Between Estimated Pulse Wave Velocity and Five-Year All-Cause Mortality in Patients with Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease with and without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors: Evidence From NHANES 1999-2016

Aim

The study aimed to analyze the associations between estimated pulse wave velocity (ePWV) and 5-year mortality in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) patients with and without standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs), which included smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, and hypercholesterolemia.

Methods

The present retrospective cohort study utilized data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) between 1999 and 2016. Patients with ASCVD who completed both the questionnaire survey and serum testing were included. Patients were categorized into the ≥1 SMuRF group if they had at least one SMuRF, while those without any SMuRFs were classified into the SMuRF-less group. The ePWV, which was calculated using the age and mean blood pressure, was evenly divided into three categories: low (Q1), medium (Q2), and high (Q3). Multivariable weighted Cox proportional-hazard regression analyses were utilized to explore the risk factors associated with 5-year mortality in patients with and without SMuRFs. And restricted cubic spline curve (RCS) was used to assess their nonlinear correlation.

Results

A total of 1901 patients with ASCVD were included in the study. For the patients in ≥1 SMuRF group, the Q3 group included patients who were older, with a higher proportion of males, more comorbidities, and a lower body mass index than the Q1 group (P<0.05). The Cox proportional-hazard regression model results revealed, the Q3 group had a higher risk of 5-year mortality than the Q1 group [hazard ratio (HR) 4.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) (2.66, 6.95), P<0.001]. RCS demonstrated a linear trend between high level of ePWV and decreased risks of mortality. Similar results were observed in the SMuRF-less group [HR 10.62, 95% CI (1.22, 92.06), P=0.032].

Conclusion

A high level of ePWV signified a higher risk of 5-year mortality in ASCVD patients with and without SMuRFs.

Computed tomographic angiography measures of coronary plaque in clinical trials: opportunities and considerations to accelerate drug translation

Atherosclerotic coronary artery disease (CAD) is the causal pathological process driving most major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) worldwide. The complex development of atherosclerosis manifests as intimal plaque which occurs in the presence or absence of traditional risk factors. There are numerous effective medications for modifying CAD but new pharmacologic therapies require increasingly large and expensive cardiovascular outcome trials to assess their potential impact on MACE and to obtain regulatory approval. For many disease areas, nearly a half of drugs are approved by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration based on beneficial effects on surrogate endpoints. For cardiovascular disease, only low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and blood pressure are approved as surrogates for cardiovascular disease. Valid surrogates of CAD are urgently needed to facilitate robust evaluation of novel, beneficial treatments and inspire investment. Fortunately, advances in non-invasive imaging offer new opportunity for accelerating CAD drug development. Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) is the most advanced candidate, with the ability to measure accurately and reproducibly characterize the underlying causal disease itself. Indeed, favourable changes in plaque burden have been shown to be associated with improved outcomes, and CCTA may have a unique role as an effective surrogate endpoint for therapies that are designed to improve CAD outcomes. CCTA also has the potential to de-risk clinical endpoint-based trials both financially and by enrichment of participants at higher likelihood of MACE. Furthermore, total non-calcified, and high-risk plaque volume, and their change over time, provide a causally linked measure of coronary artery disease which is inextricably linked to MACE, and represents a robust surrogate imaging biomarker with potential to be endorsed by regulatory authorities. Global consensus on specific imaging endpoints and protocols for optimal clinical trial design is essential as we work towards a rigorous, sustainable and staged pathway for new CAD therapies.

Pharmacogenomic biomarkers in coronary artery disease: a narrative review

Coronary artery disease (CAD) has a high mortality rate. Despite various therapeutic targets, non-responsiveness to drugs remains a prevalent issue. Pharmacogenomics assesses the way an individual's genetic attributes affect their likely response to drug therapy. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms play a crucial role in determining these outcomes. This review offers an overview of single-nucleotide polymorphisms investigated in clinical studies and their associations with drug response/nonresponse in the treatment of CAD. A total of 104 studies of whole sets of chromosomes and several genes were explored. A total of 161 polymorphisms exhibited associations with drug response/nonresponse in CAD across diverse ethnic populations. This pool can serve as a pharmacogenomic biomarker for predicting response to drug therapy in patients with CAD.

Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women

Ischemic heart disease is the primary cause of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in both men and women. Strategies targeting traditional modifiable risk factors are essential - including hypertension, smoking, dyslipidemia and diabetes mellitus - particularly for atherosclerosis, but additionally for stroke, heart failure and some arrhythmias. However, challenges related to education, screening and equitable access to effective preventative therapies persist, and are particularly problematic for women around the globe and those from lower socioeconomic groups. The association of female-specific risk factors (e.g. premature menopause, gestational hypertension, small for gestational age births) with CVD provides a potential window for targeted prevention strategies. However, further evidence for specific effective screening and interventions is urgently required. In addition to population-level factors involved in increasing the risk of suffering a CVD event, efforts are leveraging the enormous potential of blood-based 'omics', improved imaging biomarkers and increasingly complex bioinformatic analytic approaches to strive toward more personalized early disease detection and personalized preventative therapies. These novel tactics may be particularly relevant for women in whom traditional risk factors perform poorly. Here we discuss established and emerging approaches for improving risk assessment, early disease detection and effective preventative strategies to reduce the mammoth burden of CVD in women.

Gut microbiome-based noninvasive diagnostic model to predict acute coronary syndromes

Background

Previous studies have shown that alterations in the gut microbiota are closely associated with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) development. However, the value of gut microbiota for early diagnosis of ACS remains understudied.

Methods

We recruited 66 volunteers, including 29 patients with a first diagnosis of ACS and 37 healthy volunteers during the same period, collected their fecal samples, and sequenced the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. Functional prediction of the microbiota was performed using PICRUSt2. Subsequently, we constructed a nomogram and corresponding webpage based on microbial markers to assist in the diagnosis of ACS. The diagnostic performance and usefulness of the model were analyzed using boostrap internal validation, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

Compared to that of healthy controls, the diversity and composition of microbial community of patients with ACS was markedly abnormal. Potentially pathogenic genera such as Streptococcus and Acinetobacter were significantly increased in the ACS group, whereas certain SCFA-producing genera such as Blautia and Agathobacter were depleted. In addition, in the correlation analysis with clinical indicators, the microbiota was observed to be associated with the level of inflammation and severity of coronary atherosclerosis. Finally, a diagnostic model for ACS based on gut microbiota and clinical variables was developed with an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.963 (95% CI: 0.925-1) and an AUC value of 0.948 (95% CI: 0.549-0.641) for bootstrap internal validation. The calibration curves of the model show good consistency between the actual and predicted probabilities. The DCA showed that the model had a high net clinical benefit for clinical applications.

Conclusion

Our study is the first to characterize the composition and function of the gut microbiota in patients with ACS and healthy populations in Southwest China and demonstrates the potential effect of the microbiota as a non-invasive marker for the early diagnosis of ACS.

Infarct severity and outcomes in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients without standard modifiable risk factors - A multicenter cardiac magnetic resonance study

BACKGROUND

Standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) are well-established players in the pathogenesis of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, in a significant proportion of STEMI patients, no SMuRFs can be identified, and the outcomes of this subgroup are not well described.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the infarct characteristics at myocardial-tissue level and subsequent clinical outcomes in SMuRF-less STEMIs.

METHODS

This multicenter, individual patient-data analysis included 2012 STEMI patients enrolled in four cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging studies conducted in Austria, Germany, Scotland, and the Netherlands. Unstable patients at time of CMR (e.g. cardiogenic shock/after cardiac arrest) were excluded. SMuRF-less was defined as absence of hypertension, smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and diabetes mellitus. All patients underwent CMR 3(interquartile range [IQR]:2-4) days after infarction to assess left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction, infarct size and microvascular obstruction (MVO). Clinical endpoints were defined as major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including all-cause mortality, re-infarction and heart failure.

RESULTS

No SMuRF was identified in 185 patients (9%). These SMuRF-less patients were older, more often male, had lower TIMI risk score and pre-interventional TIMI flow, and less frequently multivessel-disease. SMuRF-less patients did not show significant differences in CMR markers compared to patients with SMuRFs (all p > 0.10). During a median follow-up of 12 (IQR:12-27) months, 199 patients (10%) experienced a MACE. No significant difference in MACE rates was observed between SMuRF-less patients and patients with SMuRFs (8vs.10%, p = 0.39).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large individual patient-data pooled analysis of low-risk STEMI patients, infarct characteristics and clinical outcomes were not different according to SMuRF status.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Young Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Without Standard Modifiable Risk Factors

Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) with no standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking) have worse short-term mortality than those with SMuRFs. Whether this association extends to younger patients is unclear. A retrospective cohort study was performed of patients aged 18 to 45 years with STEMI at 3 Australian hospitals between 2010 and 2020. Nonatherosclerotic causes of STEMI were excluded. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included 1 and 2-year mortality. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used. Of 597 patients, the median age was 42 (interquartile range 38 to 44) years, 85.1% were men and 8.4% were SMuRF-less. Patients who are SMuRF-less were >2 times more likely to have cardiac arrest (28.0% vs 12.6%, p = 0.003); require vasopressors (16.0% vs 6.8%, p = 0.018), mechanical support (10.0% vs 2.3%, p = 0.046), or intensive care admission (20.0% vs 5.7%, p <0.001); and have higher rate of left anterior descending artery infarcts than those with SMuRFs (62.0% vs 47.2%, p = 0.045). No significant differences in thrombolysis or percutaneous intervention were observed. Guideline-directed medical therapy at discharge was high (>90%), and not different in the SMuRF-less. 30-day mortality was almost fivefold higher in the SMuRF-less (hazard ratio 4.70, 95% confidence interval 1.66 to 13.35, p = 0.004), remaining significant at 1 and 2 years. In conclusion, young patients who are SMuRF-less have a higher 30-day mortality after STEMI than their counterparts with SMuRFs. This may be partially mediated by higher rates of cardiac arrest and left anterior descending artery territory events. These findings further highlight the need for improved prevention and management of SMuRF-less STEMI.

Overcoming cohort heterogeneity for the prediction of subclinical cardiovascular disease risk

Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of mortality with an estimated half a billion people affected in 2019. However, detecting signals between specific pathophysiology and coronary plaque phenotypes using complex multi-omic discovery datasets remains challenging due to the diversity of individuals and their risk factors. Given the complex cohort heterogeneity present in those with coronary artery disease (CAD), we illustrate several different methods, both knowledge-guided and data-driven approaches, for identifying subcohorts of individuals with subclinical CAD and distinct metabolomic signatures. We then demonstrate that utilizing these subcohorts can improve the prediction of subclinical CAD and can facilitate the discovery of novel biomarkers of subclinical disease. Analyses acknowledging cohort heterogeneity through identifying and utilizing these subcohorts may be able to advance our understanding of CVD and provide more effective preventative treatments to reduce the burden of this disease in individuals and in society as a whole.

Association of clinical, laboratory and imaging biomarkers with the occurrence of acute myocardial infarction in patients without standard modifiable risk factors - rationale and design of the "Beyond-SMuRFs Study"

BACKGROUND

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains the leading cause of mortality worldwide. The majority of patients who suffer an AMI have a history of at least one of the standard modifiable risk factors (SMuRFs): smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and diabetes mellitus. However, emerging scientific evidence recognizes a clinically significant and increasing proportion of patients presenting with AMI without any SMuRF (SMuRF-less patients). To date, there are no adequate data to define specific risk factors or biomarkers associated with the development of AMIs in these patients.

METHODS

The ''Beyond-SMuRFs Study'' is a prospective, non-interventional cohort trial designed to enroll patients with AMI and no previous coronary intervention history, who undergo coronary angiography in two academic hospitals in Thessaloniki, Greece. The rationale of the study is to investigate potential relations between SMuRF-less AMIs and the clinical, laboratory and imaging profile of patients, by comparing parameters between patients with and without SMuRFs. Complete demographic and comprehensive clinical data will be recorded, Venous blood samples will be collected before coronary angiography and the following parameters will be measured: total blood count, standard biochemistry parameters, coagulation tests, hormone levels, glycosylated hemoglobin, N- terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin T levels- as well as serum levels of novel atherosclerosis indicators and pro-inflammatory biomarkers. Furthermore, all participants will undergo a complete and comprehensive transthoracic echocardiographic assessment according to a pre-specified protocol within 24 h from admission. Among others, 2D-speckle-tracking echocardiographic analysis of cardiac chambers and non-invasive calculation of myocardial work indices for the left ventricle will be performed. Moreover, all patients will be assessed for angiographic parameters and the complexity of coronary artery disease using the SYNTAX score. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models will be used to phenotypically characterize SMuRF-less patients and investigate independent clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic and angiographic biomarkers-predictors of SMuRF-less status in AMI.The first patient was enrolled in March 2022 and completion of enrollment is expected until December 2023.

DISCUSSION

The ''Beyond-SmuRFs'' study is an ongoing prospective trial aiming to investigate potential clinical, laboratory and imaging biomarkers associated with the occurrence of AMIs in SMuRF-less patients. The configuration of these patients' profiles could lead to the development of personalized risk-stratification models predicting the occurrence of cardiovascular events in SΜuRF-less individuals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05535582 / September 10, 2022.

Management and outcomes of patients admitted with type 2 myocardial infarction with and without standard modifiable risk factors

BACKGROUND

Whilst it is known patients without standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRF; hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolaemia, smoking) have worse outcomes in Type 1 acute myocardial infarction (AMI), the relationship between type 2 AMI (T2AMI) and outcomes in patients with and without SMuRF is unknown. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients hospitalised with T2AMI based on the presence of SMuRF.

METHODS

Using the National Inpatient Sample, all hospitalizations with a primary discharge diagnosis of T2AMI were stratified according to SMuRF status (SMuRF and SMURF-less). Primary outcome was all-cause mortality while secondary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), major bleeding and ischemic stroke. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

Among 17,595 included hospitalizations, 1345 (7.6%) were SMuRF-less and 16,250 (92.4%) were SMuRF. On adjusted analysis, SMuRF-less patients had increased odds of all-cause mortality (aOR 2.43, 95% CI 1.83 to 3.23), MACCE (aOR 2.32, 95% CI 1.79 to 2.90) and ischaemic stroke (aOR 2.57, 95% CI 1.56 to 4.24) compared to their SMuRF counterparts. Secondary diagnoses among both cohorts were similar, with respiratory disorders most prevalent followed by cardiovascular and renal disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

T2AMI in the absence of SMuRF was associated with worse in-hospital outcomes compared to SMuRF-less patients. There was no SMuRF-based difference in the secondary diagnoses with the most common being respiratory, cardiovascular, and renal disorders. Further studies are warranted to improve overall care and outcomes of SMuRF-less patients.

Association of Circulating Platelet Extracellular Vesicles and Pulse Wave Velocity with Cardiovascular Risk Estimation

Elevated circulating platelet-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been reported in conditions associated with thrombotic risk. The present study aimed to assess the relationship between circulating platelet-derived EV levels, cardiovascular risk stratification and vascular organ damage, as assessed by pulse wave velocity (PWV). A total of 92 patients were included in the present analysis. Platelet EV were evaluated by flow cytometry (CD41+/Annexin v+). The cardiovascular risk was determined using the 2021 ESC guideline stratification and SCORE2 and SCORE-OP. PWV was performed as a surrogate to assess macrovascular damage. Risk stratification revealed significant group differences in EV levels (ANOVA, p = 0.04). Post hoc analysis demonstrated significantly higher levels of EVs in the very high-risk group compared with the young participants (12.53 ± 8.69 vs. 7.51 ± 4.67 EV/µL, p = 0.03). Linear regression models showed SCORE2 and SCORE-OP (p = 0.04) was a predictor of EV levels. EVs showed a significant association with macrovascular organ damage measured by PWV (p = 0.01). PWV progressively increased with more severe cardiovascular risk (p < 0.001) and was also associated with SCORE2 and SCORE-OP (p < 0.001). Within the pooled group of subjects with low to moderate risk and young participants (<40 years), those with EV levels in the highest tertile had a trend towards higher nocturnal blood pressure levels, fasting glucose concentration, lipid levels, homocysteine and PWV. Levels of platelet-derived EVs were highest in those patients with very high CV risk. Within a pooled group of patients with low to moderate risk, an unfavourable cardiometabolic profile was present with higher EV levels.

Mortality and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients Presenting With Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction Despite No Standard Modifiable Risk Factors: Results From the SWEDEHEART Registry

Background A significant proportion of patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (MI) have no standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs) and have unexpected worse 30-day outcomes compared with those with SMuRFs. The aim of this article is to examine outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI in the absence of SMuRFs. Methods and Results Presenting features, management, and outcomes of patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI without SmuRFs (hypertension, diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, smoking) were compared with those with SmuRFs in the Swedish MI registry SWEDEHEART (Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies; 2005-2018). Cox proportional hazard models were used. Out of 99 718 patients with non-ST-segment-elevation MI, 11 131 (11.2%) had no SMuRFs. Patients without SMuRFs had higher all-cause and cardiovascular mortality at 30 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20 [95% CI, 1.10-1.30], P<0.0001; and HR, 1.25 [95% CI, 1.13-1.38]), a difference that remained after adjustment for age and sex. SMuRF-less patients were less likely to receive secondary prevention statins (76% versus 82%); angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockade (54% versus 72%); or β-blockers (81% versus 87%, P for all <0.0001), with lowest rates observed in women without SMuRFs. In patients who survived to 30 days, rates of all-cause and cardiovascular death were lower in patients without SMuRFs compared with those with risk factors, over 12 years. Conclusions One in 10 patients presenting with non-ST-segment-elevation MI present without traditional risk factors. The excess 30-day mortality rate in this group emphasizes the need for both improved population-based strategies for prevention of MI, as well as the need for equitable evidence-based treatment at the time of an MI.

Angiographic severity in acute coronary syndrome patients with and without standard modifiable risk factors

Background

Routine coronary artery disease (CAD) secondary prevention strategies target standard modifiable cardiovascular risk factors (SMuRFs), which include: diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and smoking. However, a significant proportion of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) present without any SMuRFs. The angiographic severity of disease in this population has not yet been investigated.

Methods

After propensity score matching of patients without SMuRFs and patients with ≥1 SMuRFs (ratio 1:3), we used zero-inflated negative binomial regression modeling to investigate the relationship of SMuRF-less status with the angiographic severity of CAD, as measured by the SYNTAX score. Survival analysis was performed to investigate differences in all-cause mortality at 30 days and at the end of follow-up period.

Results

We analyzed 534 patients presenting with ACS who underwent coronary angiography. Of them, 56 (10.5%) presented without any SMuRF. After propensity score matching, the median SYNTAX score was 13.8 (IQR 0-22.1) in 56 SMuRF-less patients and 14 (IQR 5-25) in 166 patients with ≥1 SMuRFs. SMuRF-less status was associated with increased odds of zero SYNTAX score [zero-part model: odds ratio = 2.11, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.03-4.33], but not with decreased SYNTAX score among patients with non-zero SYNTAX score (count-part model: incidence rate ratio = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.79-1.24); the overall distribution of the SYNTAX score was similar between the two groups (p = 0.26). The 30-day risk for all-cause mortality was higher for SMuRF-less patients compared to patients with ≥1 SMuRFs [hazard ratio (HR) = 3.58, 95% CI: 1.30-9.88]; however, the all-cause mortality risk was not different between the two groups over a median 1.7-year follow-up (HR = 1.72, 95% CI: 0.83-3.57).

Conclusion

Among patients with ACS, the absence of SMuRFs is associated with increased odds for non-obstructive CAD and with increased short-term mortality rates.

The Translation and Commercialisation of Biomarkers for Cardiovascular Disease—A Review

As a leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide, cardiovascular disease and its diagnosis, quantification, and stratification remain significant health issues. Increasingly, patients present with cardiovascular disease in the absence of known risk factors, suggesting the presence of yet unrecognized pathological processes and disease predispositions. Fortunately, a host of emerging cardiovascular biomarkers characterizing and quantifying ischaemic heart disease have shown great promise in both laboratory settings and clinical trials. These have demonstrated improved predictive value additional to widely accepted biomarkers as well as providing insight into molecular phenotypes beneath the broad umbrella of cardiovascular disease that may allow for further personalized treatment regimens. However, the process of translation into clinical practice – particularly navigating the legal and commercial landscape – poses a number of challenges. Practical and legal barriers to the biomarker translational pipeline must be further considered to develop strategies to bring novel biomarkers into the clinical sphere and apply these advances at the patient bedside. Here we review the progress of emerging biomarkers in the cardiovascular space, with particular focus on those relevant to the unmet needs in ischaemic heart disease.