Safety of Ustekinumab and Vedolizumab During Pregnancy-Pregnancy, Neonatal, and Infant Outcome: A Prospective Multicentre Study

A Benefit-Risk Conceptual Framework for Biologic Use During Pregnancy: A Mini-Review

Recent reports related to in utero exposure of marketed immunosuppressive biologics led to clinical recommendations to delay live vaccinations for infants due to the concern of reduced vaccine effectiveness and/or increased risk of vaccine-related disease. These delays can increase the risk of children contracting vaccine preventable diseases, yet the alternative cessation of biologics during pregnancy may result in increased autoimmune disease activity for the pregnant person, raising complex benefit-risk (B-R) considerations and trade-offs. Our goal is to develop a conceptual framework for B-R assessment based on the key benefits and risks pregnant people would consider for themselves and their children when continuing (vs. discontinuing) a biologic during pregnancy. The proposed framework defines the decision contexts, key domains and attributes for potential benefits, and risks of biologic use during pregnancy, informed by a literature review of indications for biologics and refined with key clinical stakeholders. The framework includes both the pregnant person taking the biologic and the infant potentially exposed to the biologic in utero, with potential benefit and risk domains and attributes for each participant. To advance this conceptual framework, there are considerations of potential biases and uncertainty of available data that will be imperative to address when quantifying the B-R framework. For these reasons, we recommend the formation of a consortium to ensure development of a robust, validated framework that can be adopted in the healthcare setting.

Vedolizumab Safety During Pregnancy and Lactation in a Patient with Ulcerative Colitis: A Case Report

Background

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects young adults of reproductive age, and questions related to pregnancy and breastfeeding are common in clinical practice. Most medications used to treat IBD are considered safe during pregnancy, except methotrexate and small molecules such as tofacitinib. Despite few studies regarding vedolizumab (VDZ) safety, it appears to be safe during pregnancy. Therefore, this study aimed to report the management of ulcerative colitis in pregnant patient refractory to anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents using VDZ.

Case Report

A female, 38 years old, with ulcerative colitis was refractory to conventional treatment with mesalazine, sulfasalazine, and azathioprine. She was hospitalized at six weeks of gestation with severe acute colitis requiring the use of infliximab (IFX) to induce remission. She had a spontaneous abortion at nine weeks of gestation after the second dose of IFX. Since there was no endoscopic improvement after six months of IFX treatment, VDZ treatment was initiated. During the VDZ infusion period, the patient discovered that she was pregnant with twins, leading to the discussion of the risks and benefits of continuing the VDZ. The patient presented with disease clinical remission with the use of VDZ, and the babies were born at 34 weeks of gestation without complications. Breastfeeding was also performed without complications.

Conclusion

Continued VDZ medication is safe during pregnancy and breastfeeding, with adverse events similar to anti-TNF therapy.

Pharmacokinetics of Monoclonal Antibodies Throughout Pregnancy: A Systematic Literature Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Although little information is available on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) during pregnancy, multiple mAbs are being used during pregnancy for various indications. The aim of this systematic literature review was to characterize the PK of mAbs throughout pregnancy.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was carried out in PubMed and Embase on 21 April 2023. Articles were included when information on PK or exposure parameters of mAbs in pregnant women was available.

RESULTS

A total of 42 relevant articles were included, of which eight discussed adalimumab, three certolizumab pegol, five eculizumab, one golimumab, 12 infliximab (IFX), two natalizumab, one canakinumab, one omalizumab, five tocilizumab, eight ustekinumab, and five vedolizumab. One of the 42 studies reported information on clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (VD) of IFX; all other studies only reported on serum concentrations in the pre-pregnancy state, different trimesters, and the postpartum period. For all of the assessed mAbs except IFX, serum concentrations were similar to concentrations in the pre-pregnancy state or modestly decreased. In contrast, IFX trough concentrations generally increased in the second and third trimesters in comparison to the non-pregnant state.

CONCLUSION

Available information suggests that the anatomical and physiological changes throughout pregnancy may have meaningful effects on the PK of mAbs. For most mAbs (not IFX), modestly higher dosing (per mg) maybe needed during pregnancy to sustain a similar serum exposure compared to pre-pregnancy.

Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Levels in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Infants Exposed In Utero

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Vedolizumab and ustekinumab pharmacokinetics in pregnancy and the infant after in utero exposure remain incompletely defined. We aim to define the antenatal stability of ustekinumab and vedolizumab levels and the time at which infant drug levels become undetectable.

METHODS

This multicenter prospective observational cohort study recruited pregnant or preconception women with inflammatory bowel disease receiving vedolizumab or ustekinumab. Trough drug levels, clinical data, and biochemical data were documented preconception, during each trimester of pregnancy, and postpartum. Maternal and cord blood drug levels were measured at delivery and in infants until undetectable. Infant outcomes were assessed until 2 years of age.

RESULTS

A total of 102 participants (vedolizumab, n = 58) were included. The majority of mothers were, and remained, in clinical and biochemical remission. Maternal vedolizumab levels decreased over the course of pregnancy in association with increasing weight, rather than increasing gestation. Maternal ustekinumab levels remained stable. The median time to drug becoming undetectable in the infant was shorter for vedolizumab (11 wk; range, 5-19 wk; n = 32) than ustekinumab (14 wk; range, 9-36 wk; n = 17) and correlated positively with infant delivery level. Thirty-two of 41 (88%) and 17 of 30 (67%) vedolizumab- and ustekinumab-exposed infants had undetectable drug levels by 15 weeks of age, respectively. Pregnancy and infant outcomes were favorable. Twenty infants with undetectable drug levels received the rotavirus vaccine, with no adverse reactions reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Maternal vedolizumab levels decreased, whereas ustekinumab levels remained stable over the course of pregnancy. Most vedolizumab- and approximately half of ustekinumab-exposed infants had undetectable drug levels by 15 weeks of age. No concerning maternal or infant safety signals were identified.

Ustekinumab in the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Evolving Paradigms

Inflammatory bowel diseases, comprising Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic, relapsing, and remitting immune-mediated inflammatory diseases affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Ustekinumab (UST) is a monoclonal antibody that blocks the p40 subunit of the anti-interleukin (IL) 12/23. Pivotal trials (CERTIFI and UNITI-IM for CD, UNIFI for UC) established the efficacy of UST for the induction and maintenance of remission in both CD and UC, with the most favorable results in naïve patients to biologics. In recent years, a wealth of 'real-world' data has emerged supporting positive clinical, endoscopic, and histological outcomes in patients treated with UST, as well as reassuring safety data. More recently, the results of the first head-to-head trials of UST and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists were reported. Moreover, a number of studies exploring the role of UST in specific clinical settings, such as perianal CD, postoperative complications and recurrence, extraintestinal manifestations, chronic antibiotic-refractory pouchitis, and pregnancy, were reported. This review explores the results reported to date on UST, including those from pivotal trials, real-world data, and emerging studies regarding therapeutic drug monitoring and immunogenicity. The safety profile of UST was also reviewed.

Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Vedolizumab- and Ustekinumab-Exposed Pregnancies: Results From the PIANO Registry

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease with quiescent disease are similar to those in the general population. Data from the Pregnancy Inflammatory bowel disease And Neonatal Outcomes registry have demonstrated the safety of antitumor necrosis factor (TNF) α agents and thiopurines in pregnancy. The objective of this study was to provide information from the Pregnancy Inflammatory bowel disease And Neonatal Outcomes registry on maternal and fetal outcomes in patients exposed to the newer biologics ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ).

METHODS

In this multicenter prospective observational study, we included pregnant women with singleton pregnancies and a diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease. Questionnaires were administered to women at study intake, each subsequent trimester, delivery, and 4, 9, and 12 months after birth. Bivariate analyses were used to determine the independent effects of specific drug classes on outcomes. The exposure cohorts were VDZ, UST, anti-TNF, immunomodulators, and combination with anti-TNF and immunomodulators. All were compared with no exposure and with biologics/immunomodulators.

RESULTS

There were 1,669 completed pregnancies with 1,610 live births. The maternal mean age was 32.1 (SD 4.6) years at delivery with 66 VDZ exposed and 47 UST exposed. Women on UST were more likely to have Crohn's disease. There was no increased risk of spontaneous abortion, small for gestational age, low birth weight, neonatal intensive care unit stay, congenital malformations, or intrauterine growth restriction with in utero VDZ or UST exposure. The rate of preterm birth was lower (0.0%) for the UST-exposed cohort when compared with other cohorts including VDZ (13.8%), anti-TNF (8.2%), combination therapy (14.2%), immunomodulators (12.3%), and unexposed (9.7%) ( P = 0.03). Rates of serious infections at birth, 4 months, and within the first 12 months of life were comparable among all cohorts. Nonserious infections were lower at 12 months in UST-exposed pregnancies. There was no increased risk signal for placental complications in the VDZ cohort. UST infant concentrations at birth were increased whereas VDZ concentrations were overall decreased compared with maternal serum drug concentration.

DISCUSSION

This analysis of UST and VDZ exposure during pregnancy suggests no increase in complications compared with TNF, immunomodulators, and combination TNF/immunomodulators. No signal was found for increased placental events with either therapy. Continuation of UST and VDZ throughout pregnancy is recommended.

Vedolizumab Does Not Affect Antibody Secreting Cell Recruitment to the Lactating Mammary Gland of Mothers With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Despite a known role for α4β7 and MAdCAM-1 for the recruitment of antibody secreting cells to the lactating mammary gland, vedolizumab which targets integrin α4β7 did not lower breastmilk IgA in lactating mothers with IBD receiving the drug. It is likely that antibody secreting cells alternatively employ α4β1 to arrest on VCAM-1 also expressed by the lactating mammary gland.

Infant Ustekinumab Clearance, Risk of Infection, and Development After Exposure During Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

Evidence on ustekinumab safety in pregnancy is gradually expanding, but its clearance in the postnatal period is unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate ustekinumab concentrations in umbilical cord blood and rates of clearance after birth, as well as how these correlate with maternal drug concentrations, risk of infection, and developmental milestones during the first year of life.

METHODS

Pregnant women with inflammatory bowel disease were prospectively recruited from 19 hospitals in Denmark and the Netherlands between 2018 and 2022. Infant infections leading to hospitalization/antibiotics and developmental milestones were assessed. Serum ustekinumab concentrations were measured at delivery and specific time points. Nonlinear regression analysis was applied to estimate clearance.

RESULTS

In 78 live-born infants from 76 pregnancies, we observed a low risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and normal developmental milestones. At birth, the median infant-mother ustekinumab ratio was 2.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.69-2.81). Mean time to infant clearance was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval, 6.1-7.3 months). One in 4 infants at 6 months had an extremely low median concentration of 0.015 μg/mL (range 0.005-0.12 μg/mL). No variation in median ustekinumab concentration was noted between infants with (2.8 [range 0.4-6.9] μg/mL) and without (3.1 [range 0.7-11.0] μg/mL) infections during the first year of life (P = .41).

CONCLUSIONS

No adverse signals after intrauterine exposure to ustekinumab were observed with respect to pregnancy outcome, infections, or developmental milestones during the first year of life. Infant ustekinumab concentration was not associated with risk of infections. With the ustekinumab clearance profile, live attenuated vaccination from 6 months of age seems of low risk.

Safety of Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Compared With Anti-TNF in Pregnant Women With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Limited data are available on the consequences of prenatal exposure to vedolizumab and ustekinumab. We aimed to compare the safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab with that of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) in pregnant women with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

METHODS

Using nationwide, comprehensive data of the EPI-MERES registry, we identified pregnancies in women with IBD in France, exposed to anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab between 2014 and 2021. We compared pregnancy outcomes and complications in the offspring according to treatment exposure during pregnancy. We applied a propensity score matching for maternal, IBD, and pregnancy characteristics.

RESULTS

Three hundred ninety-eight pregnancies exposed to vedolizumab were compared with 1592 pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF; 464 pregnancies exposed to ustekinumab were compared with 1856 pregnancies exposed to anti-TNF. Overall, compared with anti-TNF, neither vedolizumab nor ustekinumab was associated with increased risks of abortion, caesarean section, stillbirth, preterm birth, serious infections, malignancies, or congenital abnormality in children. Women exposed to ustekinumab had an increased risk of small for gestational age births.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, the safety of vedolizumab and ustekinumab compared with anti-TNF use during pregnancy is reassuring. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Common teratogenic medication exposures-a population-based study of pregnancies in the United States

BACKGROUND

Risk mitigation for most teratogenic medications relies on risk communication via drug label, and prenatal exposures remain common. Information on the types of and risk factors for prenatal exposures to medications with teratogenic risk can guide strategies to reduce exposure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to identify medications with known or potential teratogenic risk commonly used during pregnancy among privately insured persons.

STUDY DESIGN

We used the Merative™ MarketScan® Commercial Database to identify pregnancies with live or nonlive (ectopic pregnancies, spontaneous and elective abortions, stillbirths) outcomes among persons aged 12 to 55 years from 2011 to 2018. Start/end dates of medication exposure and pregnancy outcomes were identified via an adapted algorithm based on validation studies. We required continuous health plan enrollment from 90 days before conception until 30 days after the pregnancy end date. Medications with known or potential teratogenic risk were selected from TERIS (Teratogen Information System) and drug monographs based on the level of risk and quality of evidence (138 with known and 60 with potential risk). We defined prenatal exposure on the basis of ≥1 outpatient pharmacy claim or medical encounter for medication administration during target pregnancy periods considering medication risk profiles (eg, risk only in the first trimester or at a certain dose threshold). Sex hormones and hormone analogs, and abortion and postpartum/abortion hemorrhage treatments were not considered as teratogenic medications because of challenges in separating pregnancy-related indications, nor were opioids (because of complex risk-benefit considerations) or antiobesity medications if their only teratogenic mechanism was weight loss.

RESULTS

Among all pregnancies, the 10 medications with known teratogenic risk and the highest prenatal exposures were sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (1988 per 100,000 pregnancy-years), high-dose fluconazole (1248), topiramate (351), lisinopril (144), warfarin (57), losartan (56), carbamazepine (50), valproate (49), vedolizumab (28 since 2015), and valsartan (25). Prevalence of exposure to sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim decreased from 2346 to 1453 per 100,000 pregnancy-years from 2011 to 2018, but prevalence of exposure to vedolizumab increased 6-fold since its approval in 2015. Prenatal exposures in the first trimester were higher among nonlive pregnancies than among live-birth pregnancies, with the largest difference observed for warfarin (nonlive 370 vs live birth 78), followed by valproate (258 vs 86) and topiramate (1728 vs 674). Prenatal exposures to medications with potential teratogenic risk were most prevalent for low-dose fluconazole (6495), metoprolol (1325), and atenolol (448). The largest first-trimester exposure differences between nonlive and live-birth pregnancies were observed for lithium (242 vs 89), gabapentin (1639 vs 653), and duloxetine (1914 vs 860). Steady increases in hydralazine and gabapentin exposures were observed during the study years, whereas atenolol exposure decreased (561 to 280).

CONCLUSION

Several medications with teratogenic risk for which there are potentially safer alternatives continue to be used during pregnancy. The fluctuating rates of prenatal exposure observed for select teratogenic medications suggest that regular reevaluation of risk mitigation strategies is needed. Future research focusing on understanding the clinical context of medication use is necessary to develop effective strategies for reducing exposures to medications with teratogenic risk during pregnancy.

Case report: A pregnant woman with Crohn disease who used ustekinumab to the 3rd trimester developed severe infection

RATIONALE

Crohn disease (CD) and pregnancy often impact each other, which poses challenges for women with CD to successfully give birth to a healthy baby. The latest guideline recommends that patients with active inflammatory bowel disease delay pregnancy to induce remission and optimize disease control. Research data has showed that the incidence of infection and severe infection in patients treated with ustekinumab (UST) did not increase compared to those treated with a placebo.

PATIENT CONCERNS

This report describes the entire process of a pregnant woman with CD who has undergone ileostomy and long-term enteral nutrition and requires biological agents to control the disease, from conception to delivery. This case was pregnant during CD period and regularly treated with UST to the third trimester, with the onset of sepsis and septic shock at 38 weeks gestation.

DIAGNOSES

The patient was pathologically diagnosed with CD 16 years ago and admitted to our department at 38 weeks gestation.

INTERVENTIONS

After admission to our department, fetal heart monitoring indicated fetal distress, so we immediately terminated the pregnancy by cesarean section. After the diagnosis of septic shock, the patient was transferred to intensive care unit for active anti-infection and symptomatic supportive treatment.

OUTCOMES

The mother only experienced an infection in the third trimester, and cured by active treatment. The newborn was delivered at full term and confirmed to be low birth weight.

LESSONS

Her experience suggests that although pregnant during Crohn active period, a good outcome can be achieved through positively controlling with medication and closely monitoring it. The use of UST during pregnancy appears to be safe for both the mother and fetus but may be associated with severe infections.

Pregnancy and medications for inflammatory bowel disease: An updated narrative review

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is often diagnosed during the peak reproductive years of young women. Women with active IBD around conception are at a significantly increased risk of disease relapse during pregnancy, which is associated with poor pregnancy and neonatal outcomes. Given these substantial risks, it is prudent that disease remission should ideally be achieved before conception. Unfortunately, some patients may experience a disease flare-up even if they are in a state of remission before pregnancy. Patients must continue their IBD medications to reduce the risk of disease flare and subsequent poor outcomes during the gestational and postpartum periods. When treating IBD flare-ups during pregnancy, the management is quite similar to the therapeutic approach for non-pregnant patients with IBD, including 5-aminosalicylate, steroids, calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs), and biologic therapies. While the data regarding the safety of CNIs in pregnant women with IBD is limited, the findings in our recent meta-analysis suggest that CNIs may be safer to use in those with IBD than in solid organ transplant recipients. There are several types of biologics and small-molecule therapies currently approved for IBD, and physicians should thoroughly understand their clinical benefits and safety profiles when utilizing these treatments in the context of pregnancy. This review highlights recent studies, including our systematic review and meta-analysis, and discusses the clinical advantages and safety considerations of biologics and small molecules for pregnant women with IBD.