Perioperative Use of Vedolizumab is not Associated with Postoperative Infectious Complications in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis Undergoing Colectomy

Influencing factors and preventive measures of infectious complications after intestinal resection for Crohn’s disease

The incidence of Crohn’s disease (CD) has increased in recent years, with most patients requiring intestinal resection. Complications after intestinal resection for CD can lead to poor prognosis and recurrence, among which infectious complications are the most common. This study aimed to investigate the common risk factors, including medications, preoperative nutritional status, surgery-related factors, microorganisms, lesion location and type, and so forth, causing infectious complications after intestinal resection for CD, and to propose corresponding preventive measures. The findings provided guidance for identifying susceptibility factors and the early intervention and prevention of infectious complications after intestinal resection for CD in clinical practice.

Impact of Biologics and Small-Molecule Agents on Postoperative Complications in IBD: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with IBD may require colectomy for severe disease unresponsive or refractory to pharmacological therapy. The question of the impact of biologic use on postoperative complications is a topic of active investigation.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic literature review was performed to describe the current state of knowledge of the impact of perioperative biologic and tofacitinib use on postoperative complications in patients with IBD.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies between January 2000 and January 2023, in any language, were searched, followed by a snowball search identifying further studies in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles regarding pediatric or endoscopic management were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Preoperative or perioperative exposure to biologics in IBD was included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Infectious and noninfectious complications, including anastomotic leaks, surgical site infections, urinary tract infections, pneumonia, sepsis, septic shock, postoperative length of stay, readmission, and reoperation, were the main outcomes measured.

RESULTS

A total of 28 studies were included for analysis in this review, including 7 meta-analyses or systematic reviews and 5 randomized studies. Snowball search identified 11 additional studies providing topical information. Overall, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors likely do not increase the risk of postoperative adverse outcomes, while data on other biologics and small-molecule agents are emerging.

LIMITATIONS

This is a qualitative review including all study types. The varied nature of study types precludes quantitative comparison.

CONCLUSIONS

Although steroids increase postoperative infectious and noninfectious complications, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors do not appear to increase postoperative infectious and noninfectious complications. There is a need for further perioperative data for other agents. See video from symposium .

Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Is Intracorporeal Anastomosis Feasible? A Retrospective Cohort Comparison Study

Background: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) affects all ages and backgrounds, and many individuals require surgical intervention during their disease course. The adoption of laparoscopic techniques in this patient population has been slow, including intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA). The aim of our study was to determine if ICA was feasible and safe in patients with IBD undergoing laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRHC). Methods: This is a retrospective, single institution cohort study of elective and emergent cases of LRHC at a single academic center. Patients included underwent LRHC or ileocolic resection for IBD. Exclusion criteria: conversion to laparotomy, resection without anastomosis, or unconfirmed diagnosis of IBD. Main outcomes studied were anastomotic leak rate, surgical site infection (SSI), postoperative length of stay, 30-day readmission/reoperation, and operative time. Secondary outcomes were incisional hernia rates and rates of disease recurrence. Results: A total of 70 patients were included, 12 underwent ICA and 58 extracorporeal anastomosis. Anastomotic leak rate (intracorporeal 8.3% [n = 1], extracorporeal 8.6% [n = 5], P = .97), and SSI rates (intracorporeal 0%, extracorporeal 6.9% [n = 4], P = .36) were similar. Mean postoperative length of stay, rates of 30-day readmission/reoperation and diagnosis of hernia at 1 year were not significantly different. Rates of IBD recurrence and location of recurrence at 1 year were similar. However, operative time was significantly longer in those undergoing ICA (intracorporeal 187 minutes versus extracorporeal 139 minutes, P = < .05). Conclusions: ICA is a safe option in patients with IBD undergoing LRHC.

Perioperative Management of Ulcerative Colitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Patients with ulcerative colitis may require colectomy for severe disease unresponsive or refractory to pharmacological therapy. Managing ulcerative colitis is complicated because there are many factors at play, including patient optimization and treatment, as the guidance varies on the ideal perioperative use of corticosteroids, immunomodulators, biologics, and small molecule agents.

OBJECTIVE

A systematic literature review was performed to describe the current status of perioperative management of ulcerative colitis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed and Cochrane databases were used.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies published between January 2000 and January 2022, in any language, were included. Articles regarding pediatric or endoscopic management were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Perioperative management of ulcerative colitis was included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Successful management, including reducing surgical complication rates, was measured.

RESULTS

A total of 121 studies were included in this review, including 23 meta-analyses or systematic reviews, 25 reviews, and 51 cohort studies.

LIMITATIONS

Qualitative review including all study types. The varied nature of study types precludes quantitative comparison.

CONCLUSION

Indications for colectomy in ulcerative colitis include severe disease unresponsive to medical treatment and colitis-associated neoplasia. Urgent colectomy has a higher mortality rate than elective colectomy. Corticosteroids are associated with postsurgical infectious complications and should be stopped or weaned before surgery. Biologics are not associated with adverse postoperative effects and do not necessarily need to be stopped preoperatively. Additionally, the clinician must assess individuals' comorbidities, nutrition status, and risk of venous thromboembolism. Nutritional imbalance should be corrected, ideally at the preoperative period. Postoperatively, corticosteroids can be tapered on the basis of the length of preoperative corticosteroid use.

Staging Pouch Surgery in Ulcerative Colitis in the Biological Era

Restorative proctocolectomy, or ileal pouch anal anastomosis, is considered the standard treatment for intractable ulcerative colitis. When the pelvic pouch was first introduced in 1978, a two-stage procedure with proctocolectomy, construction of the pelvic pouch, and a diverting loop with subsequent closure were suggested. Over the decades that the pelvic pouch has been around, some principal technical issues have been addressed to improve the method. In more recent days the laparoscopic approach has been additionally introduced. During the same time-period the medical arsenal has developed far more with the increasing use of immune modulators and the introduction of biologicals. Staging of restorative proctocolectomy with a pelvic pouch refers to how many sessions, or stages, the procedure should be divided into. The main goal with restorative proctocolectomy is a safe operation with optimal short- and long-term function. In this paper we aim to review the present knowledge and views on staging of the pouch procedure in ulcerative colitis, especially with consideration to the treatment with biologicals.

Association between vedolizumab and postoperative complications in IBD: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of preoperative vedolizumab (VDZ) therapy on postoperative complications in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is still controversial. This meta-analysis aims to review postoperative complications of IBD patients who preoperatively received VDZ.

METHODS

A meta-analysis of the available literature was performed. Studies of IBD patients who received VDZ and non-VDZ therapy (including anti-TNF-α agents, non-biological therapy, other biological agents, ustekinumab, and placebo) before surgery were included. Primary outcomes included overall complications, infectious complications, and non-infectious complications.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 1925 IBD patients were enrolled, among which 709 patients received VDZ treatment. The results show that, compared with non-VDZ treatment, there is no significant difference in the incidence of overall complications (OR = 1.25, p = 0.43) for adult IBD patients treated with VDZ preoperatively, the incidence of infectious complications (OR = 0.49, p = 0.001) decreases, but the risks of all surgical site infection (SSI) (Crohn's disease (CD): OR = 2.97, p < 0.001), superficial surgical site infection (sSSI) (OR = 2.24, p = 0.02), and ileus (OR = 2.16, p < 0.001) increase. The risk of mucocutaneous separation (MCS) (OR = 4.69, p = 0.03) with VDZ is also higher than non-VDZ. Two studies involved pediatric patients and showed no difference in ileus (OR = 0.55, p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, compared with non-VDZ treatment, preoperative use of VDZ is relatively safer in adult IBD patients, which does not increase the risk of overall postoperative complications and reduces the occurrence of infectious complications. But, it increases the risk of all SSI and sSSI in infectious complications and the incidence of ileus and MCS in non-infectious complications. Due to lack of sufficient data, the safety of VDZ in pediatric patients is uncertain and requires further study.

Preoperative Serum Vedolizumab Levels Do Not Impact Postoperative Outcomes in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab has been proposed to lead to fewer postoperative complications because of its gut specificity. Studies, however, suggest an increased risk of surgical site infections, yet the data are conflicting.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the effect of vedolizumab drug levels on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery for IBD.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study of a prospectively maintained database.

SETTING

Patients were operated on by a single surgeon at an academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 72 patients with IBD undergoing major abdominal surgery were included.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were exposed preoperatively to vedolizumab.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome measured was the postoperative morbidity in patients who had IBD with detectable vs undetectable vedolizumab levels.

RESULTS

A total of 72 patients were included in the study. Thirty-eight patients had detectable vedolizumab levels (>1.6 μg/mL), and 34 had undetectable vedolizumab levels. The overall rate of complications was 39%, and ileus was the most common complication. There were no significant differences in clinical variables between the detectable and undetectable vedolizumab level patient groups except for the time between the last dose and surgery (p < 0.01). There were 42 patients in the ulcerative colitis cohort; 48% had an undetectable vedolizumab level and 52% had a detectable vedolizumab level. There were no differences in any postoperative morbidity between ulcerative colitis groups. The Crohn's cohort had 27 patients; 48% had an undetectable vedolizumab levels and 52% had a detectable vedolizumab level. There was a significantly lower incidence of postoperative ileus in patients who had Crohn's disease with detectable vedolizumab levels compared with patients with an undetectable vedolizumab level (p < 0.04).

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include a low overall patient population and a high rate of stoma formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Serum vedolizumab levels do not influence postoperative morbidity in IBD. Vedolizumab may reduce the incidence of postoperative ileus in patients with Crohn's disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B574.

LOS NIVELES DE VEDOLIZUMAB EN SUERO PREOPERATORIO, NO AFECTAN LOS RESULTADOS POSTOPERATORIOS EN LA ENFERMEDAD INFLAMATORIA INTESTINAL

ANTECEDENTES:Se ha propuesto que el vedolizumab presenta menos complicaciones postoperatorias debido a su especificidad intestinal. Sin embargo, estudios sugieren un mayor riesgo de infecciones en el sitio quirúrgico, aunque los datos son contradictorios.OBJETIVO:Evaluar el efecto en los niveles del fármaco vedolizumab, en resultados postoperatorios de pacientes sometidos a cirugía mayor abdominal, por enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo de una base de datos mantenida prospectivamente.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Pacientes intervenidos por un solo cirujano en un centro médico académico.PACIENTES:Un total de 72 pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal sometidos a cirugía mayor abdominal.INTERVENCIONES:Exposición preoperatoria a vedolizumab.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Morbilidad postoperatoria en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, con niveles detectables versus no detectables de vedolizumab.RESULTADOS:Se incluyó en el estudio a un total de 72 pacientes. Treinta y ocho pacientes tuvieron niveles detectables de vedolizumab (> 1,6 mcg / ml) y 34 con niveles no detectables de vedolizumab. La tasa global de complicaciones fue del 39% y el íleo fue la complicación más común. No hubo diferencias significativas en las variables clínicas entre los grupos de pacientes con niveles detectables y no detectables de vedolizumab, excepto por el intervalo de tiempo entre la última dosis y la cirugía (p <.01). La cohorte de colitis ulcerosa tuvo 42 pacientes, el 48% con un nivel no detectable de vedolizumab y el 52% un nivel detectable de vedolizumab. No hubo diferencias en ninguna morbilidad postoperatoria entre los grupos de colitis ulcerosa. La cohorte de Crohn tuvo 27 pacientes, 48% con niveles no detectables de vedolizumab y el 52% con niveles detectables de vedolizumab. Hubo una incidencia significativamente menor de íleo postoperatorio en pacientes de Crohn con niveles detectables de vedolizumab, comparados con los pacientes con un nivel no detectable de vedolizumab (p <0,04).LIMITACIONES:Las limitaciones incluyen una baja población general de pacientes y una alta tasa de formación de estomas.CONCLUSIONES:Los niveles séricos de vedolizumab no influyen en la morbilidad postoperatoria de la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal. Vedolizumab puede reducir la incidencia de íleo postoperatorio en pacientes de Crohn. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B574.

Impact of Biological Agents on Postsurgical Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Multicentre Study of Geteccu

Background: The impact of biologics on the risk of postoperative complications (PC) in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is still an ongoing debate. This lack of evidence is more relevant for ustekinumab and vedolizumab. Aims: To evaluate the impact of biologics on the risk of PC. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in 37 centres. Patients treated with biologics within 12 weeks before surgery were considered “exposed”. The impact of the exposure on the risk of 30-day PC and the risk of infections was assessed by logistic regression and propensity score-matched analysis. Results: A total of 1535 surgeries were performed on 1370 patients. Of them, 711 surgeries were conducted in the exposed cohort (584 anti-TNF, 58 vedolizumab and 69 ustekinumab). In the multivariate analysis, male gender (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.2–2.0), urgent surgery (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2–2.2), laparotomy approach (OR: 1.5; 95% CI: 1.1–1.9) and severe anaemia (OR: 1.8; 95% CI: 1.3–2.6) had higher risk of PC, while academic hospitals had significantly lower risk. Exposure to biologics (either anti-TNF, vedolizumab or ustekinumab) did not increase the risk of PC (OR: 1.2; 95% CI: 0.97–1.58), although it could be a risk factor for postoperative infections (OR 1.5; 95% CI: 1.03–2.27). Conclusions: Preoperative administration of biologics does not seem to be a risk factor for overall PC, although it may be so for postoperative infections.

Perioperative safety of tofacitinib in surgical ulcerative colitis patients

AIM

The literature regarding monoclonal antibodies and increased postoperative complications in inflammatory bowel disease remains controversial. There have been no studies investigating tofacitinib. The aim of this work was to determine preoperative exposure to the small-molecule inhibitor tofacitinib and postoperative outcomes.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective review of all adult patients exposed to tofacitinib within 4 weeks of total abdominal colectomy for medically refractory ulcerative colitis between 1 January 2018 and 1 September 2020 at four inflammatory bowel disease referral centres. Data collected included patient demographics and 90-day postoperative morbidity, readmission and reoperation rates.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (32 men, 60%) with ulcerative colitis underwent a total abdominal colectomy (n = 50 laparoscopic, 94%) for medically refractory disease. Previous exposure to monoclonal antibodies included infliximab (n = 34), adalimumab (n = 35), certolizumab pegol (n = 5), vedolizumab (n = 33) and ustekinumab (n = 10). Twenty-seven (51%) patients were on concurrent prednisone at a median daily dose of 30 mg by mouth (range 5-60 mg). There were no postoperative deaths. Ninety-day postoperative complications included ileus (n = 7, 13.2%), superficial surgical site infection (n = 4, 7.5%), intra-abdominal abscess (n = 2, 3.8%) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) (n = 7, 13.2%). Locations of VTE included portomesenteric venous thrombus (n = 4), internal iliac vein (n = 2) and pulmonary embolism (n = 1). Nine (17%) patients were readmitted to hospital and five (9%) patients had a reoperation.

CONCLUSION

Mirroring the recently issued US Food and Drug Administration black box warning of an increased risk of VTE in medically treated ulcerative colitis patients taking tofacitinib, preoperative tofacitinib exposure may present an increased risk of postoperative VTE events. Consideration should be given for prolonged VTE prophylaxis on hospital discharge.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Preoperative Vedolizumab and Postoperative Complications in Patients with IBD

OBJECTIVES

The effect of vedolizumab on postoperative outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains unclear. We aimed to determine the relation between preoperative vedolizumab and early postoperative complications in patients with IBD undergoing abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A search of databases and abstracts from gastroenterology conferences was performed. Primary outcomes included overall and infectious postoperative complication rates as well as surgical site infections. Studies that compared Crohn disease, ulcerative colitis, or patients with IBD-undefined with preoperative vedolizumab treatment undergoing abdominal surgery with controls with preoperative antitumor necrosis factor-α (anti-TNF-α) treatment or no preoperative biologic treatment were included. A meta-analysis was completed using the Mantel-Haenszel and DerSimonian and Laird models.

RESULTS

Six studies totaling 1201 patients were included; 281 patients were treated preoperatively with vedolizumab, 327 patients were treated preoperatively with anti-TNF-α agents, and 593 patients were not treated preoperatively with any biologics. There was no significant difference in overall complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-2.24, P = 0.92, I² =77%) between the vedolizumab and no-biologic groups. There also was no significant difference in infectious complications (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.37-2.69, P = 1.00, I² = 78%), which persisted after sensitivity analysis (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.31-1.60, P = 0.41, I² = 46%). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in overall complications (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.24-2.46, P = 0.66, I² = 85%) and infectious complications (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.20-3.94, P = 0.87, I² = 86%) between the vedolizumab and anti-TNF-α groups. After sensitivity analysis, differences in overall and infectious complications remained insignificant (OR 0.54 and 0.50, 95% CI 0.24-1.17 and 0.22-1.15, P = 0.12 and 0.10, I² = 39% and 18%, respectively). Vedolizumab was also not associated with a significant increase in surgical site infections compared with the no-biologic (OR 1.45, 95% CI 0.33-6.32, P = 0.62, I² = 75%) and anti-TNF (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.22-7.60, P = 0.77, I² = 81%) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative treatment with vedolizumab in patients with IBD undergoing abdominal surgery is not associated with increases in overall or infectious postoperative complications compared with preoperative anti-TNF-α treatment and no preoperative biologic treatment. Large, prospective studies are needed to further assess the impact of preoperative vedolizumab treatment on postoperative complications, particularly with respect to IBD subtype.

Exploring the Relationship between Biologics and Postoperative Surgical Morbidity in Ulcerative Colitis: A Review

BACKGROUND

With the paradigm shift related to the overspread use of biological agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), several questions emerged from the surgical perspective. Whether the use of biologicals would be associated with higher rates of postoperative complications in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients still remains controversial.

AIMS

We aimed to analyze the literature, searching for studies that correlated postoperative complications and preoperative exposure to biologics in UC patients, and synthesize these data qualitatively in order to check the possible impact of biologics on postoperative surgical morbidity in this population.

METHODS

Included studies were identified by electronic search in the PUBMED database according to the PRISMA (Preferred Items of Reports for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines. The quality and bias assessments were performed by MINORS (methodological index for non-randomized studies) criteria for non-randomized studies.

RESULTS

608 studies were initially identified, 22 of which were selected for qualitative evaluation. From those, 19 studies (17 retrospective and two prospective) included preoperative anti-TNF. Seven described an increased risk of postoperative complications, and 12 showed no significant increase postoperative morbidity. Only three studies included surgical UC patients with previous use of vedolizumab, two retrospective and one prospective, all with no significant correlation between the drug and an increase in postoperative complication rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite conflicting results, most studies have not shown increased complication rates after abdominal surgical procedures in patients with UC with preoperative exposure to biologics. Further prospective studies are needed to better establish the impact of preoperative biologics and surgical complications in UC.

Risk of Postoperative Infectious Complications From Medical Therapies in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) medications on postoperative infection risk within 30 days of surgery.

METHODS

We searched multiple electronic databases and reference lists of articles dating up to August 2018 for prospective and retrospective studies comparing postoperative infection risk in patients treated with an IBD medication perioperatively with the risk in patients who were not taking that medication. Outcomes were overall infectious complications and intra-abdominal infections within 30 days of surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-three studies were included. Overall infectious complications were increased in patients who received anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents (odds ratio [OR] 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.50) and corticosteroids (OR 1.34; 95% CI, 1.25-1.44) and decreased in those who received 5-aminosalicylic acid (OR 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87). No difference was observed in those treated with immunomodulators (OR 1.08; 95% CI, 0.94-1.25) or anti-integrin agents (OR 1.06; 95% CI, 0.67-1.69). Both corticosteroids and anti-TNF agents were associated with increased intra-abdominal infection risk (OR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.33-2.00 and OR 1.46; 95% CI, 1.08-1.97, respectively), whereas no impact was observed with 5-aminosalicylates, immunomodulators, or anti-integrin therapy. Twenty-two studies had low risk of bias while the remaining studies had very high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids and anti-TNF agents were associated with increased overall postoperative infection risk as well as intra-abdominal infection in IBD patients, whereas no increased risk was observed for immunomodulators or anti-integrin therapy. Although these results may result from residual confounding rather than from a true biological effect, prospective studies that control for potential confounding factors are required to generate higher-quality evidence.

Risk of postoperative infectious complications from medical therapies in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Medications used to treat inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have significantly improved patient outcomes and delayed time to surgery. However, some of these therapies are recognized to increase the general risk of infection and have an unclear impact on postoperative infection risk.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the impact of perioperative IBD medications on the risk of postoperative infections within 30 days of surgery.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane IBD Group's Specialized Register (29 October 2019), MEDLINE (January 1966 to October 2019), Embase (January 1985 to October 2019), the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform from inception up to October 2019, and reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, prospective cohort studies, retrospective cohort studies, case-control studies and cross-sectional studies comparing participants treated with an IBD medication preoperatively or within 30 days postoperatively to those who were not taking that medication (either another active medication, placebo, or no treatment). We included published study reports and abstracts.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and extracted data. The primary outcome was postoperative infection within 30 days of surgery. Secondary outcomes included incisional infections and wound dehiscence, intra-abdominal infectious complications and extra-abdominal infections. Three review authors assessed risks of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We contacted authors for additional information when data were missing. For the primary and secondary outcomes, we calculated odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using the generic inverse variance method. When applicable, we analyzed adjusted and unadjusted data separately. We evaluated the certainty of the evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 68 observational cohort studies (total number of participants unknown because some studies did not report the number of participants). Of these, 48 studies reported including participants with Crohn's disease, 36 reported including participants with ulcerative colitis and five reported including participants with indeterminate colitis. All 42 studies that reported urgency of surgery included elective surgeries, with 31 (74%) of those also including emergency surgeries. Twenty-four studies had low risk of bias while the rest had very high risk. Based on pooling of adjusted data, we calculated ORs for postoperative total infection rates in participants who received corticosteroids (OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.38 to 2.09; low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.76; low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.20 to 2.13; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 1.04, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.36; low-certainty evidence). We pooled unadjusted data to assess postoperative total infection rates for the use of aminosalicylates (5-ASA) (OR 0.76, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.14; very low-certainty evidence). One secondary outcome examined was wound-related complications in participants using: corticosteroids (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.74; very low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 1.35, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.89; very low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.18, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.68; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 1.64, 95% CI 0.77 to 3.50; very low-certainty evidence) compared to controls. Another secondary outcome examined the odds of postoperative intra-abdominal infections in participants using: corticosteroids (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.28 to 1.84; very low-certainty evidence), 5-ASA (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.33; very low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.12; very low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04 to 1.82; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.14 to 1.20; very low-certainty evidence) compared to controls. Lastly we checked the odds for extra-abdominal infections in participants using: corticosteroids (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.55; very low-certainty evidence), immunomodulators (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.71; very low-certainty evidence), anti-TNF agents (OR 1.34, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.87; very low-certainty evidence) and anti-integrin agents (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.43 to 3.08; very low-certainty evidence) compared to controls.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence for corticosteroids, 5-ASA, immunomodulators, anti-TNF medications and anti-integrin medications was of low or very low certainty. The impact of these medications on postoperative infectious complications is uncertain and we can draw no firm conclusions about their safety in the perioperative period. Decisions on preoperative IBD medications should be tailored to each person's unique circumstances. Future studies should focus on controlling for potential confounding factors to generate higher-quality evidence.

Vedolizumab in the Perioperative Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

The isolated effect of vedolizumab on increased postoperative complications remains debated, similar to the controversial data on anti-TNF and postoperative complications.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of vedolizumab on postoperative complications.

METHODS

A review of the literature available to date on studies comparing postoperative outcomes in vedolizumab-treated versus non-vedolizumab-treated patients was performed. Studies were stratified by those which combined all inflammatory bowel disease together, those specifically focusing on Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis individually, and those which included pediatric patients alone.

RESULTS

The data remains controversial in both the adult and pediatric literature regarding the association of vedolizumab and increased postoperative complications. The strongest association between vedolizumab and an increased risk of postoperative infectious complications seems to be in the Crohn's disease literature.

CONCLUSION

Vedolizumab may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative infectious complications in Crohn's disease, but the literature remains controversial due to difficulty in isolating the effect of the biologic alone in a chronically ill, heterogeneous patient population who are on multiple medications including corticosteroids.

Pre-operative Exposure to Ustekinumab: A Risk Factor for Postoperative Complications in Crohn's Disease (CD)?

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the intestinal tract that is characterised by a relapsing and remitting course. Despite advancements in therapeutic options for CD, a substantial number of patients still require surgery for medically refractory disease or disease-related complications. Given the widespread adoption of biologic therapies for the management of patients with moderate-to-severe CD, a high number of patients are likely to be on biologic therapy at the time of needing intestinal surgery: the safety of biologics in perioperative setting is of great interest. While more clinical data are available for TNF antagonists and vedolizumab, the safety data for ustekinumab, an IL 12/23 inhibitor, is lacking. Here, we review the available data from published literature on the postoperative outcomes for CD patients exposed to ustekinumab perioperatively.

The impact of pre-operative biologic therapy on post-operative surgical outcomes in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Biologic therapy has emerged as an effective modality amongst the medical treatment options available for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, its impact on post-operative care in patients with UC is still debatable. This review evaluates the risk of post-operative complications following biologic treatment in patients with UC.

METHODS

A systematic search of the relevant databases was conducted with the aim of identifying studies that compared the post-operative complication rates of UC patients who were either exposed or not exposed to a biologic therapy prior to their surgery. Outcomes of interest included both infection-related complications and overall surgical morbidity. Pooled odds-ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Review Manager 5.3.

RESULTS

In all, 20 studies, reviewing a total of 12,494 patients with UC, were included in the meta-analysis. Of these, 2254 patients were exposed to a biologic therapy prior to surgery. The pooled ORs for infection-related complications (n = 8067) and overall complications (n = 11,869) were 0.98 (95% CI 0.66-1.45) and 1.14 (95% CI 1.04-1.28), respectively, which suggested that there was no significant association between the use of pre-operative biologic therapy and post-operative complications. Interestingly, the interval between the last dose of biologic therapy and surgery did not influence the risk of having a post-operative infection.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests that pre-operative biologic therapy does not increase the overall risk of having post-operative infection-related or other complications. PROSPERO registration id-CRD42019141827.

The value of preoperative spirometry testing for predicting postoperative risk in upper abdominal and thoracic surgery assessed using big-data analysis

Background

Spirometry is used to evaluate postoperative outcomes in thoracic surgery. However, the clinical utility of spirometry for predicting postoperative complications has not been determined. We used big-data analysis to examine the relationship between pulmonary function tests and postoperative complications.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed clinical data from 31,827 patients who underwent spirometry within the 3 months prior to their surgery between January 2000 and December 2014 at a single tertiary referral hospital. The data were extracted in de-identified form via the automated clinical research information system. Surgical procedures included thoracic and upper abdominal surgery.

Results

Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that type of surgery, older age (>65 years), low albumin and smoking were associated with postoperative infections [95% confidence interval (CI) of the odds ratio (OR) 1.27–1.60 (>65 years); 1.52–1.96 (low albumin); 1.40–1.98 (current smoker)]. Notably, lower forced vital capacity (FVC) was an independent risk factor for postoperative infection, prolonged intensive care unit stay, and in-hospital death, regardless of airflow limitation [OR 95% CI: 1.31–1.69 (FVC 50–80%); 2.02–4.24 (FVC <50%)]. Lower forced expiratory volume in 1 sec (FEV₁) was also an independent risk factor for postoperative infection [OR 95% CI: 1.61–2.26 (FEV₁ 50–80%); 2.27–4.21 (FEV₁ <50%)]. Airflow limitation assessed by FEV₁ was negatively correlated with postoperative infection in multivariable analysis (OR 95% CI: 0.51–0.88).

Conclusions

Lower preoperative FVC could be used to predict postoperative infection and complications in thoracic and upper abdominal surgery regardless of airflow limitation.

Are Biologics Safe in the Immediate Postoperative Period? A Single-Center Evaluation of Consecutive Crohn's Surgical Patients

BACKGROUND

There is no study to date examining the safety of initiating or restarting biologic therapy after major abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine differences in the rates of 90-day superficial surgical site infections, intra-abdominal sepsis, and overall postoperative infectious complications among patients who were initiated on or restarted a biologic within 90 days postoperatively compared with those who were not.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

The study was conducted at an IBD referral center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients with Crohn's disease who received a biologic therapy within 90 days of a major abdominal operation between May 20, 2014, and December 31, 2018, were included.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Ninety-day superficial surgical site infection, intra-abdominal sepsis, and overall postoperative infectious complications were measured.

RESULTS

A total of 680 patients with Crohn's disease were included: 351 were initiated on biologic therapy within 90 days after surgery and 329 were not. Patients exposed to biologic therapy postoperatively were younger (p < 0.001), had a lower BMI (p = 0.0014), were less often diabetic (p = 0.0011), and were more often exposed preoperatively to biologics (p < 0.0001) and immunomodulators (p < 0.0001) but not corticosteroids (p = 0.8399). Of those exposed postoperatively, nearly all (93.7%) had been on a biologics preoperatively, and most resumed the same biologic (68.0%). The median time to starting biologic therapy postoperatively was 31 days (range, 7-89 d). Postoperative biologic exposure was not associated with an increased risk of superficial surgical site infection (HR = 1.02 (95% CI, 0.95-1.09) per week; p = 0.59), intra-abdominal sepsis (HR = 1.07 (95% CI, 0.99-1.16); p = 0.73), or overall postoperative infectious complications (HR = 1.02 (95% CI, 0.98-1.07); p = 0.338); the overall rates of each at 90 days was 13%, 8%, and 28%.

LIMITATIONS

The study was limited by its retrospective design and single-center data.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative initiation or resumption of biologic therapy did not increase 90-day rates of superficial surgical site infection, intra-abdominal sepsis, or total infectious complications after major abdominal surgery for Crohn's disease. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B207. ¿SON SEGUROS LOS FÁRMACOS BIOLÓGICOS EN EL POSTOPERATORIO INMEDIATO? UNA EVALUACIÓN DE UN SOLO CENTRO DE PACIENTES QUIRÚRGICOS CONSECUTIVOS CON ENFERMEDAD DE CROHN: No hay ningún estudio hasta la fecha que examine la seguridad de iniciar o reiniciar la terapia biológica después de una cirugía abdominal mayor en enfermedad de Crohn.Determinar las diferencias en las tasas a 90 días de infecciones del sitio quirúrgico superficial, sepsis intraabdominal y complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales entre los pacientes en que se inició o reinició un biológico dentro de los 90 días después de la operación en comparación con aquellos que no lo recibieron.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.Centro de referencia de enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.Pacientes adultos con enfermedad de Crohn que recibieron una terapia biológica dentro de los 90 días de una operación abdominal mayor entre el 20 de mayo de 2014 y el 31 de diciembre de 2018.Infección superficial del sitio quirúrgico, sepsis intraabdominal y complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales a 90 días.Se incluyeron un total de 680 pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn: 351 se iniciaron en terapia biológica dentro de los 90 días posteriores a la cirugía y 329 no. Los pacientes expuestos a terapia biológica después de la operación eran más jóvenes (p <0.001), tenían un índice de masa corporal más bajo (p = 0.0014), eran con menos frecuencia diabéticos (p = 0.0011) y estaban expuestos con mayor frecuencia preoperatoriamente a fármacos biológicos (p <0.0001) e inmunomoduladores (p <0.0001) pero no a corticosteroides (p = 0.8399). De los expuestos postoperatoriamente, casi todos (93.7%) habían estado en terapia biológica en el preoperatorio, y la mayoría reanudó la misma terapia biológica (68%). La mediana de tiempo para comenzar la terapia biológica después de la operación fue de 31 días (rango, 7-89 días). La exposición biológica postoperatoria no se asoció con un mayor riesgo de infección superficial del sitio quirúrgico (HR 1.02 (0.95-1.09) por semana, p = 0.59), sepsis intraabdominal. (HR: 1.07 (0.99-1.16), p = 0.73), o complicaciones infecciosas postoperatorias generales (HR: 1.02, intervalo de confianza del 95% 0.98-1.07, p = 0.338); las tasas generales de cada uno a los 90 días fue del 13%, 8% y 28%.Diseño retrospectivo, y datos de un centro único.El inicio o la reanudación en el postoperatorio de la terapia biológica no aumentaron las tasas a 90 días de infección superficial de sitio quirúrgico, sepsis intraabdominal o complicaciones infecciosas totales después de una cirugía abdominal mayor por enfermedad de Crohn. Consulte el Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B207. (Traducción-Dr Jorge Silva Velazco).

Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Biologics

INTRODUCTION

The advent of monoclonal antibody therapy for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has greatly changed the multidisciplinary management of these patients, including surgical approaches. As an increasing number of inflammatory bowel disease patients are being medically managed with monoclonal antibody therapy or combination therapy with immunomodulators, more patients are coming to the operating room having been exposed to these medical therapies.

METHODS

A search of the relevant literature regarding monoclonal antibody therapy and postoperative outcomes was performed.

RESULTS

Significant controversy remains regarding the association between monoclonal antibodies and postoperative outcomes. Different classes of monoclonal antibodies may have different impacts on infectious complications. Operations for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis alter how we think about a change in care in the era of monoclonal antibodies.

CONCLUSION

In Crohn's disease, intestinal diversion may be considered in patient and disease specific scenarios and in ulcerative colitis, the use of a 3-stage approach to an ileal pouch is now more often used.

Immune Cell Circuits in Mucosal Wound Healing: Clinical Implications

Background

An intact mucosal barrier is essential for homeostasis in the gastrointestinal tract. Various pathological conditions such as infection or immune-mediated inflammation as well as therapeutic interventions like bowel surgery can result in injury of the intestinal mucosa. To counteract potential negative sequelae and to restore integrity of the tissue, a tightly regulated machinery of mechanisms exists, which crucially depends on the presence and absence of various immune cell subsets in different phases of intestinal wound healing. Cell trafficking is an increasingly acknowledged process that steers the localization of cells in tissues and the circulation. Thus, such cell circuits also crucially impact on the recruitment of immune cells in wound healing.

Summary

We performed a selective literature research. In our review, we will shortly delineate some basic principles of intestinal immune cell trafficking before discussing the contribution of different immune cells to wound healing. Finally, we will discuss potential clinical implications of immune cell trafficking and wound healing interactions in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and bowel surgery.

Key Messages

Intestinal wound healing has immense importance in pathological conditions like IBD, anastomotic healing, and others. Immune cell trafficking is indispensable for the correct temporal and spatial interaction of the cells involved. Further research is required to understand the final consequences of interfering with immune cell trafficking for intestinal wound healing.

Risk of postoperative complications among ulcerative colitis patients treated preoperatively with vedolizumab: a matched case-control study

Background

Although biologic agents have revolutionized the medical management of severe ulcerative colitis (UC), there is considerable controversy regarding adverse effects of vedolizumab on surgical outcomes. We evaluated 30-day postoperative morbidity in UC patients undergoing abdominal colectomy (AC) treated with vedolizumab before surgery.

Methods

From 2007 to 2017, 285 patients were enrolled in prospectively maintained database evaluating the role of clinical, serologic markers with clinical phenotypes in UC. The patients treated with vedolizumab within 12 weeks of AC was queried, then matched 1:3:3 into 3 preoperative treatment groups based on age, gender and surgical treatment of UC; ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) with ileostomy vs total colectomy with end stoma: a) vedolizumab (n = 25); b) anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) (n = 74); and c) no biologics (n = 54). Thirty-day postoperative complications among patient groups were compared.

Results

The 3 patient groups were well-matched in other characteristics including disease duration, disease extent, medication history and preoperative serological data. There were no significant differences in the overall incidence of postoperative complications among patients treated preoperatively with vedolizumab, anti-TNFs, or no biologics (44% vs. 45% vs. 37%; p = 0.67). Although there was no significant difference between patient cohorts in infectious complications (p = 0.20), postoperative ileus (POI) was significantly more common among the vedolizumab group (n = 9; 36%) compared to anti-TNF (n = 12; 16%) or no biologics (n = 5; 9%) (p = 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that vedolizumab treatment prior to surgery was an independent risk factor for POI (OR: 5.16, 95% CI; 1.71–15.52; p = .004).

Conclusion

Although preoperative vedolizumab exposure did not influence the rate of overall 30-day postoperative complications, vedolizumab tends to increase incidence of POI.

ECCO Guidelines on Therapeutics in Crohn's Disease: Surgical Treatment

This article is the second in a series of two publications relating to the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] evidence-based consensus on the management of Crohn's disease. The first article covers medical management; the present article addresses surgical management, including preoperative aspects and drug management before surgery. It also provides technical advice for a variety of common clinical situations. Both articles together represent the evidence-based recommendations of the ECCO for Crohn's disease and an update of previous guidelines.

Case-matched Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Following Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease After Exposure to Vedolizumab vs Other Biologics

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The effects of vedolizumab [VEDO] exposure on perioperative outcomes following surgery for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] remain controversial. The aim of our study was to compare postoperative morbidity of IBD surgery following treatment with VEDO vs other biologics or no biologics.

METHODS

An institutional review board-approved, prospectively collected database was queried to identify all patients undergoing abdominal surgery for IBD between August 2012 and May 2017. The impact of VEDO within 12 weeks preoperatively on postoperative morbidity was initially assessed with univariate and multivariable analyses on all patients. A case-matched analysis was then carried out comparing patients exposed to VEDO vs other biologic agents, based on gender, age ± 5 years, diagnosis, date of surgery ± 2 years, and surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Out of 980 patients, 141 received VEDO. The majority of patients [59%] underwent surgery involving end or diverting ostomy creation. The initial multivariate analysis conducted on all patients indicated that VEDO use was independently associated with increased overall morbidity [p <0.001], but not infectious morbidity [p = 0.30]. However, the case-matched comparison of 95 VEDO-treated patients vs 95 patients treated with adalimumab or infliximab did not indicate any difference in overall morbidity [p = 0.32], infectious complications [p = 0.15], or surgical site infections [p = 0.12].

CONCLUSIONS

In a study population having a high rate of surgery involving ostomy creation, the exposure to preoperative VEDO was not associated with an increased morbidity rate when compared with other biologics.

Non-classical monocyte homing to the gut via α4β7 integrin mediates macrophage-dependent intestinal wound healing

OBJECTIVE

To study the role of α4β7 integrin for gut homing of monocytes and to explore the biological consequences of therapeutic α4β7 inhibition with regard to intestinal wound healing.

DESIGN

We studied the expression of homing markers on monocyte subsets in the peripheral blood and on macrophage subsets in the gut of patients with IBD and controls with flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry. Integrin function was addressed with dynamic adhesion assays and in vivo gut homing assays. In vivo wound healing was studied in mice deficient for or depleted of α4β7 integrin.

RESULTS

Classical and non-classical monocytes were clearly dichotomous regarding homing marker expression including relevant expression of α4β7 integrin on human and mouse non-classical monocytes but not on classical monocytes. Monocyte-expressed α4β7 integrin was functionally important for dynamic adhesion to mucosal vascular addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 and in vivo gut homing. Impaired α4β7-dependent gut homing was associated with reduced (effect size about 20%) and delayed wound healing and suppressed perilesional presence of wound healing macrophages. Non-classical monocytes in the peripheral blood were increased in patients with IBD under clinical treatment with vedolizumab.

CONCLUSION

In addition to reported effects on lymphocytes, anti-α4β7 therapy in IBD also targets non-classical monocytes. Impaired gut homing of such monocytes might lead to a reduction of wound healing macrophages and could potentially explain increased rates of postoperative complications in vedolizumab-treated patients, which have been observed in some studies.

Up-to-date surgery for ulcerative colitis in the era of biologics

Introduction: In recent decades, biologics have resulted in significantly improved medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC). Rates of surgery for UC are declining. However, there is still a controversial question of the relation of biologics to postoperative adverse outcomes and the most appropriate timing for operative intervention.Areas covered: In this review, we explore the updated treatment algorithm of acute severe colitis, describe postoperative outcomes in patients exposed to biologics preoperatively, and discuss the primary indications for staging surgery in chronic refractory cases, largely with prolonged medical therapy.Expert opinion: Delaying pouch construction to when patients are in better health is suggested as a safer strategy over the long term. The surgical management of UC patients in the biologic era needs to be individualized, and a case-based multidisciplinary decision is critical for improved outcomes and a reduction of morbidity and mortality.

Anti-trafficking agents in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the latest developments in the field of anti-trafficking agents (ATAs), a class of therapeutics with growing importance in the field of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) that specifically inhibit steps of immune cell trafficking.

RECENT FINDINGS

Several translational and clinical studies have further shaped the knowledge about the mechanisms and effects of the anti-α4β7 integrin antibody vedolizumab. In parallel, new ATAs like the anti-β7 integrin antibody etrolizumab and the anti-MAdCAM-1 antibody ontamalimab are investigated in phase III clinical trials and might soon increase the therapeutic armamentarium in IBD.

SUMMARY

ATAs have unique mechanisms of action and can meanwhile be considered an indispensable column of IBD therapy. Further efforts are necessary to elucidate complex mechanistic aspects, to exactly define their role in relation to other therapeutic approaches and to identify novel treatment targets as well as biomarkers for personalized medicine.

Systematic review of perioperative use of immunosuppressive agents in patients undergoing bariatric surgery

BACKGROUND

Patients who qualify for bariatric surgery are increasingly experiencing co-morbid conditions, which often require management through the use of immunosuppressive agents, such as corticosteroids, tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitors, or other immunomodulators, which may increase the risk of infection or wound healing complications. Perioperative management of these agents in bariatric surgery is challenging because of the lack of research in this patient population. With the use of immunosuppressive agents on the rise, the effects of these medications must be understood, both the risks posed in the perioperative period, and the benefit their sustained use may have for co-morbidity management.

OBJECTIVES

To describe the safety of immunosuppressive agents prior to bariatric surgery.

SETTING

United States of America.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted to answer these questions about commonly encountered immunosuppressive agents. This review includes information from 37 studies to present recommendations and reasoning for the discontinuation and postoperative reinitiation of immunosuppressive agents including, tumor necrosis alpha factor-a inhibitors, methotrexate, and more.

RESULTS

Research addressing complications of these medications in patients undergoing bariatric surgery is sparse. Information from abdominal or general surgical complications may serve as a basis for conservative recommendations. Data specific to each agent or class are presented below.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of these agents may be critical for patients' chronic disease management, and the consequences of their impact should be considered by bariatric surgeons. While their immune system effects ultimately lead to disease management, each agent must be handled individually due to the varying effects and the potential for perioperative untoward effects.

Biological Treatment and the Potential Risk of Adverse Postoperative Outcome in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An Open-Source Expert Panel Review of the Current Literature and Future Perspectives

Background

There is widespread concern that treatment with biologic agents may be associated with suboptimal postoperative outcome after surgery for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD).

Aim

We aimed to search and analyze the literature regarding the potential association of biologic treatment on adverse postoperative outcome in patients with IBD. We used the subject as a case in point for surgical research. The aim was not to conduct a new systematic review.

Method

This is an updated narrative review written in a collaborative method by authors invited through Twitter via the following hashtags (#OpenSourceResearch and #SoMe4Surgery). The manuscript was presented as slides on Twitter to allow discussion of each section of the paper sequentially. A Google document was created, which was shared across social media, and comments and edits were verified by the primary author to ensure accuracy and consistency.

Results

Forty-one collaborators responded to the invitation, and a total of 106 studies were identified that investigated the potential association of preoperative biological treatment on postoperative outcome in patients with IBD. Most of these studies were retrospective observational cohorts: 3 were prospective, 4 experimental, and 3 population-based studies. These studies were previously analyzed in 10 systematic/narrative reviews and 14 meta-analyses. Type of biologic agents, dose, drug concentration, antidrug antibodies, interval between last dose, and types of surgery varied widely among the studies. Adjustment for confounders and bias control ranged from good to very poor. Only 10 studies reported postoperative outcome according to Clavien–Dindo classification.

Conclusion

Although a large number of studies investigated the potential effect of biological treatment on postoperative outcomes, many reported divergent results. There is a need for randomized controlled trials. Future studies should focus on the avoiding the weakness of prior studies we identified. Seeking collaborators and sharing information via Twitter was integral to widening the contributors/authors and peer review for this article and was an effective method of collaboration.

Effects of preoperative anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha infusion timing on postoperative surgical site infection in inflammatory bowel disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha agents (anti-TNF-α) have been widely used in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, few published meta-analyses have focused on timing of the last infusion before surgery. We evaluated the relationship between preoperative anti-TNF-α timing and postoperative surgical site infection to provide additional evidence for surgeons to choose appropriate dates for surgery.

Methods

We searched from inception until January 2019 for studies that documented postoperative complications of adults with IBD who underwent preoperative anti-TNF-α treatment. Primary outcomes of included studies were the odds ratios of preoperative anti-TNF-α time frames (4, 8 and 12 weeks). In addition, surgical site infection and its subtypes (anastomotic leakage, abscesses and wound infection) were analysed.

Results

Twenty-seven publications were included. No significant difference between anti-TNF-α and control cohorts was observed for most postoperative surgical site infections (or its subtypes) when the preoperative anti-TNF-α infusion time window was within 4, 8 or 12 weeks. Additionally, no significant difference in postoperative complications was observed between preoperative anti-TNF-α windows of within four weeks and more than four weeks.

Conclusions

In terms of surgical site infection and its subtypes, anti-TNF-α may be safe for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease patients who receive their last infusion of anti-TNF-α more than four weeks before surgery. We also found no evidence that anti-TNF-α was a risk factor when administered within four weeks, with the exception of subgroup results from a single study. Stratified by time window, use of anti-TNF-α until surgery has the potential to become a more considered strategy in clinical practice.

Management of Biological Therapy Before Elective Inflammatory Bowel Disease Surgeries

Increasing uptake of biologic therapy has contributed to declining surgical rates for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, a significant number of patients on biologic therapy will go on to require surgery. The literature is conflicted with regard to the preoperative management of biologic therapy before urgent or elective IBD surgery. This article reviews the available data on postoperative complications following preoperative treatment with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha therapy, anti-integrin therapy, and anti-interleukin therapy.

Maneuvering Clinical Pathways for Ulcerative Colitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent years have brought about several advances in the treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Here, we discuss salient recommendations of recent treatment guidelines; review the efficacy, safety, and real-world data of vedolizumab and tofacitinib; appraise their place vis-à-vis established agents; and consider the newly proposed approaches of risk-stratified and treat-to-target therapy.

RECENT FINDINGS

Once daily oral mesalamine dosing is equivalent to split dosing in mild-moderate UC. Real-world data are accumulating on the effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab for moderate to severe UC, while there are few such data on the most recently approved agent, tofacitinib. High-dose infliximab is being investigated for severe UC. New approaches are challenging the established paradigm of selecting therapy based on current disease activity. The risk-stratified approach incorporates long-term risk as well as the current burden of inflammation. The treat-to-target approach aims at improved long-term outcomes by adjusting therapy to resolve intestinal inflammation. The therapeutic options for UC are continually expanding. Risk-stratified therapy and the treat-to-target approach represent paradigm shifts in UC management. Optimal disease control requires an individualized approach that takes into consideration current inflammatory burden, long-term risk, patient preferences, and ongoing assessment of response to treatment.

Immune cell trafficking and retention in inflammatory bowel disease: mechanistic insights and therapeutic advances

Intestinal immune cell trafficking has been identified as a central event in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Intensive research on different aspects of the immune mechanisms controlling and controlled by T cell trafficking and retention has led to the approval of the anti-α4β7 antibody vedolizumab, the ongoing development of a number of further anti-trafficking agents (ATAs) such as the anti-β7 antibody etrolizumab or the anti-MAdCAM-1 antibody ontamalimab and the identification of potential future targets like G-protein coupled receptor 15. However, several aspects of the biology of immune cell trafficking and regarding the mechanism of action of ATAs are still unclear, for example, which impact these compounds have on the trafficking of non-lymphocyte populations like monocytes and how precisely these therapies differ with regard to their effect on immune cell subpopulations. This review will summarise recent advances of basic science in the field of intestinal immune cell trafficking and discuss these findings with regard to different pharmacological approaches from a translational perspective.

Vedolizumab use in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases undergoing surgery: clinical trials and post-marketing experience

Background

Patients with inflammatory bowel diseases frequently require surgery, but immunotherapies used in disease management may increase the risk of post-operative complications. We investigated frequencies of post-operative complications in patients who received vedolizumab-a gut-selective antibody approved for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease-in clinical-trial and post-marketing settings.

Methods

This post hoc analysis of safety data from GEMINI 1, GEMINI 2, and long-term safety studies included patients who had had colectomy or bowel surgery/resection. Data from the post-marketing Vedolizumab Global Safety Database were also analysed (data cutoff point: 19 May 2016). Adverse events relating to post-operative complications were identified using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms.

Results

Of 58 total surgeries in patients included in GEMINI 1 and GEMINI 2, post-operative complications were reported for 3/51 vedolizumab-treated patients (5.9%) and 1/7 placebo-treated patients (14.3%). In the long-term safety study, 157/2,243 patients (7%) had colectomy or bowel surgery/resection; of these 157 patients who underwent surgery, 11 (7%) experienced a post-operative complication. Median time between last pre-operative vedolizumab dose and surgery was 23 days in GEMINI 1, 20 days in GEMINI 2, and 39‒40 days in the long-term safety study. In the post-marketing setting, based on data covering approximately 46,978 patient-years of vedolizumab exposure, post-operative complications were reported in 19 patients.

Conclusions

In clinical trials, complications of colectomy and bowel surgery/resection appeared infrequent, with minimal difference between vedolizumab and placebo. The frequency of post-operative complications in the post-marketing setting appears low.

Ileal-anal pouches: A review of its history, indications, and complications

The ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) has revolutionised the surgical management of ulcerative colitis (UC) and familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP). Despite refinement in surgical technique(s) and patient selection, IPAA can be associated with significant morbidity. As the IPAA celebrated its 40^th anniversary in 2018, this review provides a timely outline of its history, indications, and complications. IPAA has undergone significant modification since 1978. For both UC and FAP, IPAA surgery aims to definitively cure disease and prevent malignant degeneration, while providing adequate continence and avoiding a permanent stoma. The majority of patients experience long-term success, but “early” and “late” complications are recognised. Pelvic sepsis is a common early complication with far-reaching consequences of long-term pouch dysfunction, but prompt intervention (either radiological or surgical) reduces the risk of pouch failure. Even in the absence of sepsis, pouch dysfunction is a long-term complication that may have a myriad of causes. Pouchitis is a common cause that remains incompletely understood and difficult to manage at times. 10% of patients succumb to the diagnosis of pouch failure, which is traditionally associated with the need for pouch excision. This review provides a timely outline of the history, indications, and complications associated with IPAA. Patient selection remains key, and contraindications exist for this surgery. A structured management plan is vital to the successful management of complications following pouch surgery.

Postoperative Outcomes in Ustekinumab-Treated Patients Undergoing Abdominal Operations for Crohn’s Disease: Single-Center Series

Introduction

The impact of ustekinumab on adverse postoperative outcomes in Crohn’s disease (CD) remains largely unknown. We determined the difference in 90-day postoperative complication rates among CD patients exposed to ustekinumab within 12 weeks prior to an abdominal operation as compared to patients not exposed to biologic therapy.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all adults with CD who underwent an abdominal operation between October 1, 2017 and December 31, 2018 at a single tertiary medical center was performed. Data collection included patient demographics, concurrent immunosuppression, serum laboratory values, operative values, and 90-day outcomes including superficial surgical site infection (sSSI), intra-abdominal sepsis, overall infectious complications, readmission, and reoperation rates. The primary outcome was the 90-day rate of intra-abdominal sepsis.

Results

Fifty-seven CD patients received ustekinumab and 277 received no biologic therapy in the 12 weeks prior to major abdominal surgery. Ustekinumab-exposed patients were younger, less likely to have diabetes mellitus or active tobacco exposure, were more often obese, and more often taking a concurrent immunomodulator. Ustekinumab remained an independent predictor of intra-abdominal sepsis on multivariable logistic regression. Immunomodulator exposure was associated with significantly increased rates of sSSI and overall complication rates.

Conclusions

Ustekinumab is associated with increased rates of 90-day postoperative intra-abdominal sepsis following a major abdominal operation for CD.

ACG Clinical Guideline: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic inflammatory disorder. These guidelines indicate the preferred approach to the management of adults with UC and represent the official practice recommendations of the American College of Gastroenterology. The scientific evidence for these guidelines was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) process. In instances where the evidence was not appropriate for GRADE, but there was consensus of significant clinical merit, "key concept" statements were developed using expert consensus. These guidelines are meant to be broadly applicable and should be viewed as the preferred, but not only, approach to clinical scenarios.

The Effect of Biologics on Postoperative Complications in Children With Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Bowel Resection

OBJECTIVES

There has been limited investigation of pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who have been treated with biologic agents and undergo operative management. Postoperative complications in the adult setting have been mixed and in the pediatric population the data have been limited. This study compares children with IBD treated with biologic agents to patients treated with nonbiologic therapy before bowel resection.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective chart review study of 62 children with IBD who underwent bowel resection between 2001 and 2017. Analysis included patient demographics, medications used before surgery, incidence of postoperative complications, indication for surgery, type of operation, and additional surgeries required. Postoperative complications were defined as superficial skin infection, leak at anastomotic site, intra-abdominal abscess, wound dehiscence, and so on. Complications were compared based on medical therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 62 children reviewed, 21 carried the diagnosis of ulcerative colitis, 40 had Crohn disease, and 1 had IBD-unspecified. Thirty-seven of the patients were treated with infliximab, adalimumab, or vedolizumab before their bowel resection. There were 4 complications documented within 30 days of the operation, with an overall complication rate of 6.45%. There were 2 complications in each of the cohorts, including intra-abdominal abscess (2), abdominal wall abscess (1), and pouchitis (1).

CONCLUSION

The number of complications was the same between those who did and did not receive a preoperative biologic agent. This study suggests that biologics may be safe to use in patients undergoing bowel resection.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: Vedolizumab and Postoperative Complications in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

Several studies have reported the surgical outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients exposed to vedolizumab (VDZ) preoperatively, with conflicting results. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the risk of postoperative complications in IBD patients preoperatively exposed to VDZ in comparison with patients exposed to anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treatment or no biologic therapy.

METHODS

A systematic review with a meta-analysis of the existing literature was conducted. The main outcomes included the odds of developing overall postoperative complications, infectious complications, surgical site infections, need for repeat surgery, and major postoperative complications, as defined by the Clavien-Dindo criteria.

RESULTS

Four studies were included in the meta-analysis. The risk of all postoperative complications was not significantly different between IBD patients exposed preoperatively to VDZ vs anti-TNFs (odds ratio [OR], 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-1.88). In patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), the OR for complications was significantly lower in VDZ-exposed as opposed to anti-TNF-exposed patients (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.14-0.85); the comparison was insignificant in Crohn's disease. There were no significant differences in the risk of infectious complications, surgical site infections, need for reoperation, or major surgical complications in patients exposed to VDZ vs anti-TNFs. There were no significant differences in outcomes when comparing patients exposed to VDZ with those not given biologic therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis did not detect an increased risk of postoperative complications with preoperative VDZ exposure; the risk of overall complications may be lower in UC patients in comparison with those with anti-TNF exposure. These results merit further verification in future studies.

Risk of post-operative surgical site infections after vedolizumab vs anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy: a propensity score matching analysis in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Perioperative vedolizumab (VDZ) and anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNFi) therapies are implicated in causing post-operative complications in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

AIM

To compare the risk of surgical site infections (SSIs) between VDZ- and TNFi-treated IBD patients in propensity-matched cohorts.

METHODS

The Optum Research Database was used to identify IBD patients who received VDZ or TNFi within 30 days prior to abdominal surgery between January 2015 and December 2016. The date of IBD-related abdominal surgery was defined as the index date. SSIs were determined by ICD-9/10 and CPT codes related to superficial wound infections or deep organ space infections after surgery. Propensity score 1:1 matching established comparable cohorts based on VDZ or TNFi exposure before surgery based on evidence-based risk modifiers.

RESULTS

The propensity-matched sample included 186 patients who received pre-operative biologic therapy (VDZ, n = 94; TNFi, n = 92). VDZ and TNFi cohorts were similar based on age, gender, IBD type, concomitant immunomodulator exposure, chronic opioid or corticosteroid therapy, Charlson Comorbidity Index and malnutrition. VDZ patients were more likely to undergo an open bowel resection with ostomy. After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in post-operative SSIs (TNFi 12.0% vs VDZ 14.9%, P = 0.56). Multivariable analysis indicated that malnutrition was the sole risk factor for developing SSI (OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.11-8.71) regardless of the type of biologic exposure.

CONCLUSION

In the largest, risk-adjusted cohort analysis to date, perioperative exposure to VDZ therapy was not associated with a significantly higher risk of developing an SSI compared to TNFi therapy.

Vedolizumab and early postoperative complications in nonintestinal surgery: a case-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a gut-specific α4-β7 integrin antagonist that has demonstrated efficacy in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). The safety of VDZ in the perioperative period remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate postoperative complications and perioperative safety in VDZ-treated patients undergoing nonintestinal operations.

METHODS

A case-matched study was performed at two inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) referral centers. Adult patients with CD and UC who underwent a nonintestinal surgical procedure during treatment with VDZ were included. Patients who had their last VDZ infusion up to 12 weeks before the procedure were considered exposed and were matched in a 1:1 ratio to patients without VDZ therapy, according to type of surgical procedure, age, and sex. The primary outcome was overall risk of early postoperative infectious complications (up to 30 days after surgery), readmissions, reoperations, surgical site infections, and other infections. The VDZ and control groups were subsequently compared using the Pearson χ2 test and Wilcoxon rank sum.

RESULTS

We identified 34 patients treated with VDZ who underwent 36 nonintestinal surgical procedures. These patients were matched with 36 control procedures. Postoperative complications were not different between the VDZ-treated and control cohorts for all outcomes analyzed: infectious complications occurred in 14% versus 8% (p = 0.45), superficial surgical site infections 6% versus 0% (p = 0.15), reoperations 6% versus 3% (p = 0.56) and readmissions 11% versus 6% (p = 0.37).

CONCLUSIONS

VDZ-treated patients with IBD undergoing nonintestinal procedures did not have an increased risk of overall postoperative infections or other complications compared with matched controls.

The impact of biologics in surgical outcomes in ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative Colitis (UC) is an immune mediated condition characterized by inflammation of colonic mucosa, associated with progressive damage of the colon and possible complications, such as hemorrhage, perforation and cancer. It is strongly advocated a treat to target approach in patients with UC consisting in an early and aggressive inflammatory control. Some patients can require colectomy for medically refractory disease or to treat colonic neoplasia. Even though the first line biologic therapy targeting the tumor necrosis factor-alfa (TNF-α) is associated with improvement of the inflammation in some patients, others do not respond at first or lose response over time. Novel drugs targeting different inflammatory pathways have been studied in UC, however, it remains unclear whether surgical rates have been reduced in the biological era. Controversy also exists if biological agents impair surgical postoperative complication rates in UC. The aim of this review is to describe all relevant data available and briefly summarize the real impact of biologics in surgical outcomes in ulcerative colitis.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Preoperative Vedolizumab Treatment and Postoperative Complications in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The impact of vedolizumab, a gut-selective monoclonal antibody, on postoperative outcomes is unclear. This study aimed to assess the impact of preoperative vedolizumab treatment on the rate of postoperative complications in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] undergoing abdominal surgery.

METHODS

A systematic search of multiple electronic databases from inception until May 2017 identified studies reporting rates of postoperative complications in vedolizumab-treated IBD patients compared to no biologic exposure or anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) treated IBD patients. Outcomes of interest included postoperative infectious complications and overall postoperative complications. Pooled risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated using the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five studies comprising 307 vedolizumab-treated IBD patients, 490 anti-TNF-treated IBD patients and 535 IBD patients not exposed to preoperative biologic therapy were included. The risk of postoperative infectious complications (risk ratio [RR] 0.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.37-2.65) and overall postoperative complications [RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.46-2.15] were not significantly different between vedolizumab-treated patients and those who received no preoperative biologic therapy. In addition, the risk of postoperative infectious complications [RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.34-2.90] and overall postoperative complications [RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.44-1.92] were not significantly different between vedolizumab-treated vs anti-TNF-treated patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative vedolizumab treatment in IBD patients does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of postoperative infectious or overall postoperative complications compared to either preoperative anti-TNF therapy or no biologic therapy. Future prospective studies which include perioperative drug level monitoring are needed to confirm these findings.

[Emerging Therapies: What Are Promising in the Near Future?]

The treatment of inflammatory bowel disease has evolved with the development of anti-TNF agents. In spite of long-term effectiveness, many patients do not respond or no longer responds to these drugs. Therefore, the development of new drugs that act on different inflammatory pathways has become necessary. Vedolizumab, a gut-specific biological agent, inhibits interaction α4β7 integrin with mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule-1 without inhibiting systemic immune responses. Long-term vedolizumab therapy in patients with Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis was safe and effective. Additionally, vedolizumab can be used in patients already failed an anti-TNF therapy. Ustekinumab is a fully human immunoglobulin G1 kappa monoclonal antibody that blocks the p40 subunit of IL-12 and IL-23. Ustekinumab will be a clinically effective agent to use in medically-refractory Crohn's disease especially as a second line drug. Tofacitinib is an oral, small molecule that inhibits JAK1, JAK3 and in a lesser extent, JAK2. Perhaps the most attractive things of these JAK inhibitors is that they are given orally instead of parenterally. Early results showed that patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis receiving tofacitinib were more likely to achieve remission at 8 weeks than those receiving placebo. However, these results have not been as robust in Crohn's disease. Much of the positioning will depend on the safety profile such as opportunistic infection and atherogenic risk. The challenges for the future are to determine the therapeutic drug monitoring-guided dose optimization, optimal timing and drug combinations to produce the most effective, and safest outcomes for IBD patients.