Progressive left and right heart dysfunction in coronavirus disease-19: Prospective echocardiographic evaluation

Clinical utility of ambulatory ECG monitoring and 2D-ventricular strain for evaluation of post-COVID-19 ventricular arrhythmia

BACKGROUND

A relatively common complication of COVID -19 infection is arrhythmia. There is limited information about myocardial deformation and heart rate variability (HRV) in symptomatic post COVID patients presented by ventricular arrhythmia.

AIM OF THE STUDY

Our goal was to assess 2D-ventricular strain and heart rate variability indices (evaluated by ambulatory ECG monitoring) in post-COVID-19 patients suffering from ventricular arrhythmia.

METHODS

The current observational case-control study performed on 60 patients one month after they had recovered from the COVID-19 infection. Thirty healthy volunteers served as the control group. Each participant had a full medical history review, blood tests, a 12-lead surface electrocardiogram (ECG), 24-h ambulatory ECG monitoring, and an echo-Doppler examination to evaluate the left ventricular (LV) dimensions, tissue Doppler velocities, and 2D-speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) for both the LV and right ventricular (RV) strain.

RESULTS

Symptomatic post-COVID patients with monomorphic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) showed a substantial impairment of LV/RV systolic and diastolic functions, LV/RV myocardial performance (MPI) with reduced indices of HRV. Patients with higher versus lower ventricular burden had poorer functional status, higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers and reduced parameters of HRV (New York Heart Association (NYHA) class: 2.1 ± 0.9 vs. 1.5 ± 0.6, p < 0.001, C-reactive protein (CRP): 13.3 ± 4.1 vs. 8.3 ± 5.9 mg/L, p < 0.0001, low frequency/high frequency (LF/HF): 3.6 ± 2.4 vs. 2.2 ± 1.2, p < 0.002, the root mean square of the difference between successive normal intervals (rMSSD): 21.8 ± 4.7 vs. 29.3 ± 14.9 ms, p < 0.039 and the standard deviation of the RR interval (SDNN): 69.8 ± 19.1 vs.108.8 ± 37.4 ms, p < 0.0001). The ventricular burden positively correlated with neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (r = 0.33, p < 0.001), CRP (r = 0.60, p < 0.0001), while it negatively correlated with LV-global longitudinal strain (GLS) (r = -0.38, p < 0.0001), and RV-GLS (r = -0.37, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with post-COVID symptoms presented by ventricular arrhythmia had poor functional status. Patients with post-COVID symptoms and ventricular arrhythmia had subclinical myocardial damage, evidenced by speckle tracking echocardiography while having apparently preserved LV systolic function. The burden of ventricular arrhythmia in post-COVID patients significantly correlated with increased inflammatory biomarkers and reduced biventricular strain.

Echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular performance in COVID-19 related acute respiratory distress syndrome: the importance of systo-diastolic interaction

BACKGROUND

The cardiac manifestations of COVID-19 have been described in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) admitted to intensive care unit (ICU). The presence and impact of right ventricular (RV) diastolic function and performance has not been studied in this population yet. We describe the prevalence of RV diastolic dysfunction, assessed by the pulmonary valve pre-ejection A wave (PV A wave), and the RV systo-diastolic interaction, using the RV total isovolumic time (t-IVT), in COVID-19 ARDS.

RESULTS

Prospective observational study enrolling patients with moderate to severe COVID-19 ARDS admitted to ICU who underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram within 24 h of ICU admission and at least a second one during the ICU stay. Respiratory, hemodynamic and biochemistry parameters were collected. 163 patients (age 61.0 ± 9.3 years, 72% males) were enrolled. 36 patients (22.1%) had RV dysfunction, 45 (27.1%) LV systolic dysfunction. 73 patients (44.7%) had PV A wave. The RV t-IVT correlated with TAPSE at ICU admission (p < 0.002; r - 0.61), presence of PV A wave (p < 0.001; r 0.78), peak inspiratory pressure (PIP) (p < 0.001; r 0.42), PEEP (p < 0.001; r 0.68), dynamic driving pressure (DDP) (p < 0.001; r 0.58), and PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.01; r - 0.35). The presence of PV A wave was associated with higher PIP (p < 0.001; r 0.45), higher PEEP (p < 0.001; r 0.56), higher DDP (p < 0.01, r 0.51), and lower PaO2/FiO2 ratio (p < 0.001; r - 0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

RV t-IVT and the presence of PV A wave are non-invasive means to describe a significant RV diastolic dysfunction and may be consider descriptive signs of RV performance in COVID-19 ARDS.

Association Between Baseline Echocardiographic Parameters and Acute Coronavirus Disease 2019 Infection in Hospitalized Patients

Background The current study aimed to examine the association between baseline clinical and echocardiographic parameters with new-onset coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection. Methodology We retrospectively enrolled consecutive hospitalized patients from our center during the national outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Overall, 100 patients were enrolled, including 38 patients with COVID-19 infection. Results Compared with those without infection, patients with COVID-19 infection were more likely male (63.2% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.008), were older (59.08 vs. 52.35 years, p = 0.022), had higher heart failure (31.6% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.018) and hypertension (52.6% vs. 30.6%, p = 0.036) rates, had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (61.16% vs. 65.76%, p = 0.018), had higher A-wave velocity (86.84 vs. 73.63 cm/s, p = 0.003), and had and lower E/A ratio (0.85 vs 1.04, p = 0.015). On univariate and multivariate analysis, baseline echocardiographic parameters (LVEF and A-wave velocity) were independent risk factors for COVID-19 infection. There were no significant changes in echocardiographic parameters during the one-month follow-up period in patients infected and not infected with COVID-19. Conclusions In conclusion, baseline echocardiographic parameters were significantly associated with acute COVID-19 infection.

COVID-19 and Cardiovascular Diseases: From Cellular Mechanisms to Clinical Manifestations

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), quickly spread worldwide and led to over 581 million confirmed cases and over 6 million deaths as 1 August 2022. The binding of the viral surface spike protein to the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor is the primary mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Not only highly expressed in the lung, ACE2 is also widely distributed in the heart, mainly in cardiomyocytes and pericytes. The strong association between COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been demonstrated by increased clinical evidence. Preexisting CVD risk factors, including obesity, hypertension, and diabetes etc., increase susceptibility to COVID-19. In turn, COVID-19 exacerbates the progression of CVD, including myocardial damage, arrhythmia, acute myocarditis, heart failure, and thromboembolism. Moreover, cardiovascular risks post recovery and the vaccination-associated cardiovascular problems have become increasingly evident. To demonstrate the association between COVID-19 and CVD, this review detailly illustrated the impact of COVID-19 on different cells (cardiomyocytes, pericytes, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts) in myocardial tissue and provides an overview of the clinical manifestations of cardiovascular involvements in the pandemic. Finally, the issues related to myocardial injury post recovery, as well as vaccination-induced CVD, has also been emphasized.

Cardiovascular Complications and Imaging in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic 2020 to Present

The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the world that was not previously conceivable. In early 2020, hospitals on all continents were overwhelmed with patients afflicted with this novel virus, with unanticipated mortality worldwide. The virus has had a deleterious effect, particularly the respiratory and cardiovascular systems. Cardiovascular biomarkers demonstrated an array of cardiovascular insults from hypoxia to inflammatory and perfusion abnormalities of the myocardium to life-threatening arrhythmias and heart failure. Patients were at increased risk of a pro-thrombotic state early in the course of the disease. Cardiovascular imaging became a primary tool in diagnosing, prognosing and risk-stratifying patients. Transthoracic echocardiography became the initial imaging modality in management of cardiovascular implications. In addition to cardiac function, LV longitudinal strain (LVLS) and right ventricular free wall strain (RVFWS) were indicators of increased morbidly and mortality. Cardiac MRI has become the diagnostic cardiovascular imaging for myocardial injury and tissue evaluation in the age of COVID-19.

American Society of Echocardiography COVID-19 Statement Update: Lessons Learned and Preparation for Future Pandemics

The COVID-19 pandemic has evolved since the publication of the initial American Society of Echocardiography (ASE) statements providing guidance to echocardiography laboratories. In light of new developments, the ASE convened a diverse, expert writing group to address the current state of the COVID-19 pandemic and to apply lessons learned to echocardiography laboratory operations in future pandemics. This statement addresses important areas specifically impacted by the current and future pandemics: (1) indications for echocardiography, (2) application of echocardiographic services in a pandemic, (3) infection/transmission mitigation strategies, (4) role of cardiac point-of-care ultrasound/critical care echocardiography, and (5) training in echocardiography.

Literature Review-Transthoracic Echocardiography, Computed Tomography Angiography, and Their Value in Clinical Decision Making and Outcome Predictions in Patients with COVID-19 Associated Cardiovascular Complications

The sudden outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic posed a great threat to the world's healthcare systems. It resulted in the development of new methods and algorithms for the diagnosis and treatment of both COVID-19 and its complications. Diagnostic imaging played a crucial role in both cases. Among the most widely used examinations are transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and computed tomography angiography (CTA). Cardiovascular complications in COVID-19 are frequently associated with a severe inflammatory response, which results in acute respiratory failure, further leading to severe complications of the cardiovascular system. Our review aims to discuss the value of TTE and CTA in clinical decision making and outcome prediction in patients with COVID-19-associated cardiovascular complications. Our review revealed the high clinical value of various TTE findings and their association with mortality and the prediction of patients' clinical outcomes, especially when used with other laboratory parameters. The strongest association between increased mortality and findings in TTE was observed for tachycardia and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio (OR) 24.06) and tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion/pulmonary artery systolic pressure ratio (TAPSE/PASP ratio) < 0.31 mm/mmHg (OR 17.80). CTA is a valuable tool in diagnosing COVID-19-associated pulmonary embolism, but its association with mortality and its predictive role should always be combined with laboratory findings and patients' medical history. D-dimers > 3000 ng/mL were found as the strongest predictors of pulmonary embolism (PE) (OR 7.494). Our review indicates the necessity for an active search for cardiovascular complications in patients with severe COVID-19, as they are linked with an increased probability of fatal outcomes.

The Effect of COVID-19 on Long-Term Cardiac Function in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure

Aim      To evaluate functional changes in the heart in the long-term following COVID-19 in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).Material and methods  Case reports of 54 patients aged 69.1±9.7 years who had COVID-19 from January 2021 through January 2022 and had been previously diagnosed with NYHA functional class II-III CHF were studied. Two comparison groups were isolated: HF with LV EF &gt;50 % (n=39) and &lt;50 % (n=15). Echocardiography was used to evaluate changes in LV EF and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) 5-6 months following COVID-19.Results In all CHF patients after COVID-19 at 5.8 months on average, LV EF decreased (median difference, 2.5 %; 95 % confidence interval (CI): 6.99×10-5- 4.99) and PASP increased (median difference, 8 mm Hg; 95 % CI: 4.5-12.9). In the HF group with LV EF &lt;50 %, the decrease in EF was greater than in the group with LV EF &gt;50 % (6.9 and 0.7 %, respectively; p=0.037); furthermore, the CHF phenotype did not influence the change in PASP (p=0.4). The one-factor regression analysis showed that the dynamics of LV EF decrease was significantly influenced by the baseline decrease in LV EF, whereas the change in PASP was influenced by the dynamics of LV EF decrease, presence of dyslipidemia, and statin treatment. Furthermore, the multifactorial analysis showed that prognostically significant factors for long-term changes in LV EF following COVID-19 were male gender (odds ratio (OR), 5.92; 95 % CI: 1.31-26.75; p=0.014), LV EF at baseline &lt;50 % (OR, 0.88; 95 % CI: 0.8-0.96; p&lt;0.001); changes in PASP depended on the presence of dyslipidemia (OR, 0.08; 95 % CI: 0.01-0.84; p=0.018).Conclusion      This study showed that COVID-19 in the long term can influence the course of CHF; in this process, HF patients with EF &lt;50 % have progression of systolic dysfunction and PASP, whereas patients with EF &gt;50 % have an isolated increase in PASP.

Association of Echocardiographic Findings with in-Hospital Mortality of COVID-19 Patients and Their Changes in One-Month Follow-Up; a Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Evidence showed that cardiac complications may occur in coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) during the acute and post-infection phases. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the echocardiographic characteristics and in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 patients as well as the changes after one-month follow-up.

METHOD

All adult (≥18 years old) hospitalized COVID-19 patients in need of echocardiography based on the guideline of the Iranian Society of Echocardiography for performing various types of echocardiography during the COVID-19 pandemic were included in this study. An expert cardiologist performed the echocardiography on all patients and also on all available patients one month after discharge.

RESULTS

146 hospitalized cases of COVID-19 and 81 cases available for 1-month follow-up echocardiography were studied in this prospective study. Left ventricle wall hypokinesia, aorta valve stenosis, dilated Inferior Vena Cava (IVC), and Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure (PASP) of more than 35 were associated with 3.59 (95% CI: 1.19-10.79, p = 0.02), ‎11 (95% CI: 3.3 - 36.63, p = 0.001), ‎5.58 (95% CI: 1.04-29.41, p = 0.041)‎, and 2.91 (95% CI: 1.35 - 6.3, p = 0.001) times higher odds of mortality than healthy subjects. In 1-month follow-up of patients, deterioration in LVEF (p = 0.03) was detected in the not-fully vaccinated patients, and a significant decrease in PASP was observed in all cases (p = 0.04); but these changes were not clinically important.

CONCLUSION

Left ventricle wall hypokinesia, aorta valve stenosis, dilated IVC, and PASP ≥ 35 were predictors of in-hospital mortality in our study. There were not any potential clinically significant differences in one-month echocardiographic follow-ups of the studied patients.

Myocardial Work in Patients Hospitalized With COVID-19: Relation to Biomarkers, COVID-19 Severity, and All-Cause Mortality

Background COVID-19 infection has been hypothesized to affect left ventricular function; however, the underlying mechanisms and the association to clinical outcome are not understood. The global work index (GWI) is a novel echocardiographic measure of systolic function that may offer insights on cardiac dysfunction in COVID-19. We hypothesized that GWI was associated with disease severity and all-cause death in patients with COVID-19. Methods and Results In a multicenter study of patients admitted with COVID-19 (n=305), 249 underwent pressure-strain loop analyses to quantify GWI at a median time of 4 days after admission. We examined the association of GWI to cardiac biomarkers (troponin and NT-proBNP [N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide]), disease severity (oxygen requirement and CRP [C-reactive protein]), and all-cause death. Patients with elevated troponin (n=71) exhibited significantly reduced GWI (1508 versus 1707 mm Hg%; P=0.018). A curvilinear association to NT-proBNP was observed, with increasing NT-proBNP once GWI decreased below 1446 mm Hg%. Moreover, GWI was significantly associated with a higher oxygen requirement (relative increase of 6% per 100-mm Hg% decrease). No association was observed with CRP. Of the 249 patients, 37 died during follow-up (median, 58 days). In multivariable Cox regression, GWI was associated with all-cause death (hazard ratio, 1.08 [95% CI, 1.01-1.15], per 100-mm Hg% decrease), but did not increase C-statistics when added to clinical parameters. Conclusions In patients admitted with COVID-19, our findings indicate that NT-proBNP and troponin may be associated with lower GWI, whereas CRP is not. GWI was independently associated with all-cause death, but did not provide prognostic information beyond readily available clinical parameters. Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT04377035.

Risk of Cardiovascular Events After COVID-19

We aimed to determine absolute and relative risks of either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection for late cardiovascular (CV) events and all-cause mortality. We conducted a retrospective double cohort study of patients with either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection (COVID-19+ cohort) and its documented absence (COVID-19- cohort). The study investigators drew a simple random sample of records from all patients under the Oregon Health & Science University Healthcare (n = 65,585), with available COVID-19 test results, performed March 1, 2020 to September 13, 2020. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years and no established Oregon Health & Science University care. The primary outcome was a composite of CV morbidity and mortality. All-cause mortality was the secondary outcome. The study population included 1,355 patients (mean age 48.7 ± 20.5 years; 770 women [57%], 977 White non-Hispanic [72%]; 1,072 ensured [79%]; 563 with CV disease history [42%]). During a median 6 months at risk, the primary composite outcome was observed in 38 of 319 patients who were COVID-19+ (12%) and 65 of 1,036 patients who were COVID-19- (6%). In the Cox regression, adjusted for demographics, health insurance, and reason for COVID-19 testing, SARS-CoV-2 infection was associated with the risk for primary composite outcome (hazard ratio 1.71, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.78, p = 0.029). Inverse probability-weighted estimation, conditioned for 31 covariates, showed that for every patient who was COVID-19+, the average time to all-cause death was 65.5 days less than when all these patients were COVID-19-: average treatment effect on the treated -65.5 (95% confidence interval -125.4 to -5.61) days, p = 0.032. In conclusion, either symptomatic or asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection is associated with an increased risk for late CV outcomes and has a causal effect on all-cause mortality in a late post-COVID-19 period.