Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Left Ventricular Thrombus, A Prospective Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

Oral anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and network meta-analysis with reconstructed time-to-event data

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with high rates of systemic embolism. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) are the only approved treatment for LVT. Although evidence suggests direct oral anticoagulant (DOACs) to be at least equally effective in general, the efficacy of individual DOACs remains unclear.

METHODS

A literature search was performed in EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science looking for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized controlled studies of interventions (NRSI) comparing individual DOACs to VKAs for the treatment of LVT. Individual patient data was reconstructed and incorporated in a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) and a Cox frailty regression model.

RESULTS

A total of 2545 patients across 19 studies (4 RCTs, 15 NRSI) were included. 1738 received VKAs, 581 received Rivaroxaban, 226 received Apixaban, 82 received Dabigatran and 2 received Edoxaban. LVT resolution was less likely with VKAs compared to Rivaroxaban in the time-to-event analysis (HR 0.66, 95% CI [0.49; 0.91], p = 0.01). There was no difference for other DOACs compared to VKAs. Rivaroxaban reduced ischemic stroke compared to VKAs (OR 0.18, 95% CrI [0.05; 0.49]), other DOACs did not.

CONCLUSION

In this NMA, Rivaroxaban showed faster LVT resolution and consecutively lower odds of ischemic stroke than VKAs while Apixaban and Dabigatran showed at least equal efficacy. Given the quality and size of the available studies, these differences between individual DOACs should be acknowledged as hypothesis generating only. Future adequately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to assess possible time-varying effects between individual DOACs.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Management of Left Ventricular Thrombus After Myocardial Infarction: A Meta-Analysis

Left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation remains a post-acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complication even in the modern era of early reperfusion. The optimal anticoagulation regimen in this clinical scenario is poorly defined. The present meta-analysis sought to investigate the efficacy and safety profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for the management of LV thrombus after AMI. A systematic literature review was conducted in electronic databases to identify studies reporting efficacy and safety outcome data regarding the use of DOACs versus VKAs for patients with LV thrombus after AMI. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were conducted to synthesize pooled ORs. Eight studies comprising a total of 605 patients were included. DOACs were associated with an almost twofold higher likelihood of thrombus resolution compared with VKAs (pooled OR 1.95 [1.25 to 3.04], p = 0.003, I2 = 0%), and decreased the risk of systemic embolism by 70% (pooled OR 0.30 [0.12 to 0.75]; p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). The use of DOACs was associated with a 54% lower risk of bleeding compared with VKAs (pooled OR 0.46 [0.26 to 0.84], p = 0.01, I2 = 0%). Overall, patients receiving DOACs had a 63% lower risk of reaching the composite outcome of safety and efficacy compared with patients using VKAs (pooled OR 0.37 [0.23 to 0.60], p <0.0001, I2 = 0%). In conclusion, DOACs appear to have a more favorable efficacy and safety profile compared with VKAs for the management of LV thrombus related to AMI.

Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin-k antagonists in the treatment of left ventricular thrombosis. A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Since the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and their comparison with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), conflicting results have been reported regarding the optimal treatment for left ventricular thrombosis (LVT).

OBJECTIVES

In this meta-analysis, we intend to comprehensively evaluate the safety and efficacy of these treatments.

METHODS

All clinical trials and cohorts that compared the efficacy or safety of VKAs with DOACs in the treatment of LVTs were systematically searched until April 15, 2023.

RESULTS

The results of 32 studies with a pooled sample size of 4213 patients were extracted for meta-analysis. DOACs, especially rivaroxaban and apixaban, cause faster resolution, lower mortality, and fewer complications (SSE and bleeding events) than VKAs in the management of LVTs.

CONCLUSION

Compared with VKAs, DOACs result in significantly faster (only rivaroxaban) and safer resolution of left ventricular thrombosis.

Oral anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular thrombus: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used off-label to treat patients with left ventricular thrombus (LVT). We analysed available meta-data comparing DOACs and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) for efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search and meta-analysis of observational and randomized data comparing DOACs vs. VKAs in patients with LVT. Endpoints of interest were stroke or systemic embolism, thrombus resolution, all-cause death, and a composite bleeding endpoint. Estimates were pooled using a random-effects model meta-analysis, and their robustness was investigated using sensitivity and influential analyses.

RESULTS

We identified 22 articles (18 observational studies, 4 small randomized clinical trials) reporting on a total of 3587 patients (2489 VKA vs. 1098 DOAC therapy). The pooled estimates for stroke or systemic embolism [odds ratio (OR): 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.57, 1.15] and thrombus resolution (OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.46) were comparable, and there was low heterogeneity overall across the included studies. The use of DOACs was associated with lower odds of all-cause death (OR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.46, 0.92) and a composite bleeding endpoint (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.47, 0.97). A risk of bias was evident particularly for observational reports, with some publication bias suggested in funnel plots.

CONCLUSION

In this comprehensive analysis of mainly observational data, the use of DOACs was not associated with a significant difference in stroke or systemic embolism, or thrombus resolution, compared with VKA therapy. The use of DOACs was associated with a lower rate of all-cause death and fewer bleeding events. Adequately sized randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm these findings, which could allow a wider adoption of DOACs in patients with LVT.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants: Navigating Through Clinical Challenges

PURPOSE

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been approved, for over a decade, by both European and American medicine agencies, for treatment and prevention of several cardiovascular conditions. Since then, an increasing amount of data has been added to the medical literature day by day, resulting in a dichotomy in selection of the appropriate agent, dosage, and duration of treatment for special populations with multiple comorbidities. Considering these issues, we have prepared a comprehensive review for the clinical practitioner, to optimize the DOAC utilization in clinical practice.

METHODS

A thorough literature search and review was conducted, concerning mainly the last decade. Our review focused on the current guidelines and the most recently published studies in PubMed, Science Direct Scopus, and Google Scholar to date.

CONCLUSION

The purpose of this study is to provide guidance for healthcare professionals for making proper decisions when confronted with clinical challenges. Nevertheless, further research is required to establish DOAC superiority in complicated cases, where there is clinical uncertainty.

Meta-Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus

BACKGROUND

Literature on the preferred anticoagulant for treating left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is lacking. Thus, our objective was to compare the efficacy of DOACs versus warfarin in treating LVT.

METHODS

Databases were searched for RCTs and adjusted observational studies that compared DOAC versus warfarin through March 2024. The primary efficacy outcomes of interest were LVT resolution, systemic embolism, composite of stroke, and TIA. The primary safety outcomes encompassed all-cause mortality and bleeding events.

RESULTS

Our meta-analysis including 31 studies demonstrated that DOAC use was associated with higher odds of thrombus resolution (OR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.86-1.31, p: 0.46). A statistically significant reduction in the risk of stroke/TIA was observed in the DOAC group versus the warfarin group (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48-0.89, p: 0.007). Furthermore, statistically significant reduced risks of all-cause mortality (OR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.47-0.98, p: 0.04) and bleeding events (OR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.89, p: 0.004) were observed with DOAC use as compared to warfarin use.

CONCLUSION

Compared to VKAs, DOACs are noninferior as the anticoagulant of choice for LVT treatment. However, further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.

Postmyocardial Infarction Ventricular Aneurysm: JACC Focus Seminar 5/5

Ventricular aneurysm represents a rare complication of transmural acute myocardial infarction, although other cardiac, congenital, or metabolic diseases may also predispose to such condition. Ventricular expansion includes all the cardiac layers, usually with a large segment involved. Adverse events include recurrent angina, reduced ventricular stroke volume with congestive heart failure, mitral regurgitation, thromboembolism, and ventricular arrhythmias. Multimodality imaging is paramount to provide comprehensive assessment, allowing for appropriate therapeutic decision-making. When indicated, surgical intervention remains the gold standard, although additional therapy (heart failure, anticoagulation, and advanced antiarrhythmic treatment) might be required. However, the STICH (Surgical Treatment for Ischemic Heart Failure) trial did not show any advantage from adding surgical ventricular reconstruction to coronary artery bypass surgery in terms of survival, rehospitalization or symptoms, compared with revascularization alone. Finally, implantable cardiac defibrillator may reduce the risk of fatal arrhythmias.

Protein adsorption on blood-contacting surfaces: A thermodynamic perspective to guide the design of antithrombogenic polymer coatings

Blood-contacting medical devices often succumb to thrombosis, limiting their durability and safety in clinical applications. Thrombosis is fundamentally initiated by the nonspecific adsorption of proteins to the material surface, which is strongly governed by thermodynamic factors established by the nature of the interaction between the material surface, surrounding water molecules, and the protein itself. Along these lines, different surface materials (such as polymeric, metallic, ceramic, or composite) induce different entropic and enthalpic changes at the surface-protein interface, with material wettability significantly impacting this behavior. Consequently, protein adsorption on medical devices can be modulated by altering their wettability and surface energy. A plethora of polymeric coating modifications have been utilized for this purpose; hydrophobic modifications may promote or inhibit protein adsorption determined by van der Waals forces, while hydrophilic materials achieve this by mainly relying on hydrogen bonding, or unbalanced/balanced electrostatic interactions. This review offers a cohesive understanding of the thermodynamics governing these phenomena, to specifically aid in the design and selection of hemocompatible polymeric coatings for biomedical applications. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Blood-contacting medical devices often succumb to thrombosis, limiting their durability and safety in clinical applications. A plethora of polymeric coating modifications have been utilized for addressing this issue. This review offers a cohesive understanding of the thermodynamics governing these phenomena, to specifically aid in the design and selection of hemocompatible polymeric coatings for biomedical applications.

Emerging Trends in Left Ventricular Thrombus: A Comprehensive Review of Non-Ischemic and Ischemic Cardiopathies, Including Eosinophilic Myocarditis, Chagas Cardiomyopathy, Amyloidosis, and Innovative Anticoagulant Approaches

This comprehensive review explores the intricate aspects of left ventricular thrombus (LVT), a potential complication in both ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. It provides a thorough understanding of left ventricular thrombus, revealing its uncommon incidence in the general population (7 cases per 10,000 patients), predominantly linked to ischemic heart diseases (ICMs) at an 80% prevalence rate. Diagnostic tools, notably transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR), demonstrate varying sensitivity but remain indispensable in specific clinical contexts related to LVT as non-invasive diagnostic modalities. A detailed comparison between ICM patients and those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) who have left ventricular thrombus reveals subtle distinctions with significant clinical implications. This analysis underscores the importance of these imaging techniques in distinguishing between the two conditions. Additionally, we explored the occurrence of LVT in specific non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, including Takotsubo syndrome, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, eosinophilic myocarditis, Chagas disease, cardiac amyloidosis, and several other conditions. The article further delves into anticoagulation strategies, thoroughly examining their impact on LVT regression and patient outcomes. Pharmacological interventions, with a focus on direct oral anticoagulants, emerge as promising alternatives; however, there is insufficient information on their efficiency and safety, especially in NICM population. In conclusion, this review highlights the complex nature of LVT, incorporating a range of etiopathogenic factors, diagnostic complexities, and evolving therapeutic approaches. It emphasizes the pressing need for ongoing research in this field.

A China-Based Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Novel Oral Anticoagulants versus Warfarin in Patients with Left Ventricular Thrombosis

Purpose

This study aims to conduct a comprehensive cost-effectiveness comparison between novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) and warfarin in Chinese patients with left ventricular thrombosis (LVT). By incorporating the impact of volume-based procurement (VBP) policy for pharmaceuticals in China, this analysis intends to provide crucial insights for informed healthcare decision-making.

Patients and Methods

A Markov model was employed to simulate the disease progression of LVT over a 54-week time horizon, using weekly cycles and six mutually exclusive health states. The model incorporated transition probabilities between health states calculated based on clinical trial data and literature sources. Various cost and utility parameters were also included. Additionally, a series of sensitivity analyses were conducted to address parameter variations and associated uncertainties.

Results

The study finding suggest that from the perspective of Chinese healthcare, the majority of brand-name drug (BND) NOACs generally lack cost-effectiveness when compared to warfarin. However, when considered the VBP policy, NOACs, particularly rivaroxaban, prove to be more cost-effective than warfarin. Rivaroxaban provided an additional 0.0304 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) per patient and reduced overall medical costs by 9095.73 CNY, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of -298,786.20 CNY/QALY. Sensitivity analysis indicated a 78.4% probability of any NOACs being more cost-effective compared to warfarin. However, specifically considering NOACs under the VBP policy, the likelihood of them being more cost-effective approached 90%.

Conclusion

Taking into account Chinese pharmaceutical procurement policies, the findings highlight the superior efficacy of NOACs, especially rivaroxaban, in enhancing both the quality of life and economic benefits for Chinese LVT patients. NOACs present a more cost-effective treatment option, improving patient quality of life and healthcare cost efficiency compared to warfarin.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs vs. VKAs in treatment of left ventricular thrombus- a meta-analysis update

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) formation in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) or cardiomyopathies is not uncommon. The optimal oral anticoagulation therapy for resolving LVT has been under intense debate. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain the anticoagulant of choice for this condition, according to practice guidelines. Evidence supporting the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in the management of LVT continues to grow. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was carried out in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus databases in July 2023. The efficacy outcomes of this study were thrombus resolution, ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, stroke/systemic embolism, all-cause mortality, and adverse cardiovascular events. The safety outcomes were any bleeding, major bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. A total of twenty-seven eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis. Data were analyzed utilizing Stata software version 15.1.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between DOACs and VKAs with regard to LVT resolution (RR = 1.00, 95% CI 0.95-1.05, P = 0.99). In the overall analysis, DOACs significantly reduced the risk of stroke (RR = 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.96, P = 0.021), all-cause mortality (RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.57-0.86, P = 0.001), any bleeding (RR = 0.75, 95% CI 0.61-0.92, P = 0.006) and major bleeding (RR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.52-0.85, P = 0.001) when compared to VKAs. Meanwhile, in the sub-analysis examining randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the aforementioned outcomes no longer differed significantly between the DOACs and VKAs groups. The incidences of systemic embolism (RR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.54-1.22, P = 0.32), stroke/systemic embolism (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.72-1.00, P = 0.056), intracranial hemorrhage (RR = 0.59, 95% CI 0.23-1.54, P = 0.28), and adverse cardiovascular events (RR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.63-1.56, P = 0.92) were comparable between the DOACs and VKAs groups. A subgroup analysis showed that patients treated with rivaroxaban had a significantly lower risk of stroke (RR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.08-0.72, P = 0.011) than those in the VKAs group.

CONCLUSION

With non-inferior efficacy and superior safety, DOACs are promising therapeutic alternatives to VKAs in the treatment of LVT. Further robust investigations are warranted to confirm our findings.

Use of apixaban in children awaiting heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

The use of apixaban in the pediatric cardiac population is expanding. We describe our apixaban dosing and monitoring strategy in children and young adults awaiting heart transplantation, along with outcomes related to bleeding and thrombosis during wait-list and early post-transplant periods.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective, single-center analysis of all patients receiving apixaban while awaiting cardiac transplantation. Weight-based dosing was monitored with peak drug-specific anti-Xa chromogenic analysis. Significant post-operative bleeding defined by chest tube output or need for surgical intervention.

RESULTS

From September 2020 to December 2022, 19 patients, median age 13.5 years (6.1, 15.8 years), weighing 48.9 kg (15.4, 67.6) received apixaban while awaiting transplant. Indication for apixaban was prophylaxis (n = 18, 3 with ventricular assist devices) and treatment of thrombus (n = 1). There were no clinically relevant non-major or major bleeding, nor thrombotic events while awaiting transplant. The median time from last apixaban dose to arrival in the operating room was 23.2 h (15.6-33.8), with median random apixaban level of 37 ng/mL (28.3, 59), 6.3 h (4.8, 8.4) prior to arrival in the operating room. In this study, 32% of patients had significant post-operative bleeding based on chest tube output post-transplant or need for intervention. No patients meeting criteria for significant post-operative bleeding were thought to be attributable to apixaban.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful use of apixaban can be safe and effective while awaiting heart transplant. There was no appreciable increase in peri-operative bleeding. The use of apixaban is promising in providing safe, predictable and efficacious anticoagulation while avoiding additional patient stressors.

When Direct Oral Anticoagulants Should Not Be Standard Treatment: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

For most patients, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are preferred over vitamin K antagonists for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for venous thromboembolism treatment. However, randomized controlled trials suggest that DOACs may not be as efficacious or as safe as the current standard of care in conditions such as mechanical heart valves, thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome, and atrial fibrillation associated with rheumatic heart disease. DOACs do not provide a net benefit in conditions such as embolic stroke of undetermined source. Their efficacy is uncertain for conditions such as left ventricular thrombus, catheter-associated deep vein thrombosis, cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, and for patients with atrial fibrillation or venous thrombosis who have end-stage renal disease. This paper provides an evidence-based review of randomized controlled trials on DOACs, detailing when they have demonstrated efficacy and safety, when DOACs should not be the standard of care, where their safety and efficacy are uncertain, and areas requiring further research.

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) versus vitamin K antagonist in left ventricular thrombus: An updated meta-analysis

Background and Aims

Current clinical guidelines for treating left ventricular thrombus (LVT) are limited by inadequate evidence to inform the comparative efficacy of oral anticoagulants. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in patients with LVT.

Methods

Four standard databases were searched for relevant literature comparing the efficacy and safety between DOAC and VKA for LVT treatment, published before August 19, 2023. Both the randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included in the analysis. The outcomes of interest were the resolution of LVT, all-cause mortality, stroke, systemic embolism, and bleeding. Data from the selected studies were extracted and analyzed using RevMan 5.4 using odds ratio.

Results

Among 3959 studies from the database search and bibliography review, 33 were included in the analysis. LVT resolution was observed in 72.59% in the DOAC group versus 67.49% in the VKA group (odds ratio [OR]: 1.28, confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.53). Mortality was lower in the DOAC group (11.71% vs. 18.56%) (OR: 0.60, CI: 0.36-1.00; borderline statistical significance). Likewise, bleeding events (9.60% vs. 13.19%) (OR: 0.65, CI: 0.52-0.81) and stroke (7.54% vs. 11.04%) (OR: 0.71, CI: 0.53-0.96) were also significantly lower in the DOAC group.

Conclusion

DOAC use for LVT showed better thrombus resolution and reduced risk of bleeding and stroke compared to VKA. Likewise, DOAC use was associated with lower mortality with borderline statistical significance.

Systemic right ventricle complications in levo-transposition of the great arteries: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Congenitally corrected levo-transposition of the great arteries (L-TGA) is a congenital heart disease in which the ventricles and great arteries are transposed from their typical anatomy. In L-TGA, the double discordance, atrioventricular and ventriculoarterial, create an acyanotic milieu which allows patients to survive their early decades, however, progressive systemic right ventricle (sRV) dysfunction creates complications later in life. sRV dysfunction and remodeling predisposes patients to intracardiac thrombus (ICT) formation.

CASE SUMMARY

A 40-year-old male with L-TGA presented with symptoms of acute decompensated heart failure. In childhood, he had surgical repair of a ventricular septal defect. In adulthood, he developed sRV dysfunction, systemic tricuspid valve (sTV) regurgitation, and left-bundle branch block for which he underwent cardiac resynchronization therapy. Transthoracic echocardiogram showed a sRV ejection fraction of 40%, severe sTV regurgitation, and a newly identified sRV ICT. ICT was confirmed by ultrasound-enhancing agents and transesophageal echocardiography. Our patient was optimized with guideline-directed medical therapy and diuresis. Anticoagulation was achieved with a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) and he was later referred for evaluation by advanced heart failure and heart transplant services.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation with VKA is the mainstay of treatment in the absence of conclusive data supporting direct oral anticoagulant use in ICT in patients with congenital heart disease. This case illustrates the natural history of L-TGA and highlights the importance of surveillance and monitoring with dedicated cardiac imaging to identify complications.

Direct Oral Anticoagulation Versus Warfarin in Left Ventricular Thrombus: Pooled Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Patients with impaired left ventricular (LV) function can develop LV thrombus, a potentially life-threatening condition due to risk of stroke and embolization. Conventional treatment with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs; e.g., warfarin) puts patients at risk of bleeding, and the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) appears promising, although data are scant. We searched the published English language literature for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DOACs with VKAs in LV thrombus. End points were failure to resolve, thromboembolic events (stroke, embolism), bleeding, or any adverse event (composite of thromboembolism or bleeding), or all-cause death. Data were pooled and analyzed in hierarchical Bayesian models. In three eligible RCTs, 141 patients were studied during an average of 4.6 months (53.8 patient-years; n = 71 assigned to DOAC, n = 70 assigned to VKA). A similar number of patients in each treatment arm demonstrated failure to resolve (DOAC: 14/71 vs. VKA: 15/70) and death events (3/71 vs. 4/70). However, patients on DOACs suffered fewer strokes/thromboembolic events (1/71 vs. 7/70; log odds ratio [OR], -2.02 [95% credible interval (CI95 ), -4.53 to -0.31]) and fewer bleeding events (2/71 vs. 9/70; log OR, -1.62 [CI95 , -3.43 to -0.26]), leading to fewer patients on DOACs with any adverse event versus VKAs (3/71 vs. 16/70; log OR, -1.93 [CI95 , -3.33 to -0.75]). In conclusion, pooled analysis of RCT data favors DOACs over VKAs in patients with LV thrombus in terms of both efficacy and safety.

Trial sequential analysis of efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants and vitamin K antagonists against left ventricular thrombus

Meta-analysis may increase the risk of random errors. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) has been developed to adjust for these random errors. We conducted TSA on the efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in left ventricular thrombus (LVT) patients in order to estimate how many additional patients should be required to draw definite conclusions. PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for articles directly comparing DOACs and VKAs for LVT in LV thrombus resolution, stroke, any thromboembolism, major bleeding, any bleeding, and all-cause death. TSA was conducted with a cumulative Z-curve, monitoring boundaries, and required sample size. A simulated trial was run and TSA estimated the sample sizes of trials needed to draw definite conclusions. Of 4749 articles, 25 studies were used for the analysis. TSA revealed the current sample size already demonstrated superiority of DOACs in LV thrombus resolution and stroke, and futility in any thromboembolism and all-cause death. Two other outcomes did not achieve the required sample size. The sample size of new trials needed to demonstrate the superiority of DOACs over VKAs was estimated 400 for any bleeding. Corresponding trials needed to demonstrate no significant differences could be estimated for major bleeding and any bleeding (n = 200 and n = 2000, respectively). Current results show that the sample size required to draw definite conclusions was not reached for two outcomes, and there was a risk of random error. Further randomized controlled trials with sample sizes estimated by TSA will work effectively to obtain valid conclusions.

Clinical profile and prognosis of elderly patients with left ventricular thrombus after anticoagulation

BACKGROUND

Contemporary data regarding the clinical characteristics and prognosis of left ventricular thrombus (LVT) in older adults (aged ≥ 65 years old) are lacking. In this study, we characterized elderly patients with LVT (aged ≥ 65 years old) and investigated the long-term prognosis in this highly vulnerable patient population.

METHODS

This single-center, retrospective study was conducted from January 2017 to December 2022. Patients with a reported LVT were assessed primarily by transthoracic echocardiography (TEE) and classified into two groups: elderly LVT groups and younger LVT groups. All patients were treated with anticoagulant treatment. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as the composite of all-cause mortality, systemic embolism, and rehospitalization for cardiovascular events. Survival analyses were performed with the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional-hazard model.

RESULTS

A total of 315 eligible patients were included. Compared to the younger LVT group (n = 171), the elderly LVT group (n = 144) had a lower proportion of males and lower serum creatinine clearance, as well as a higher level of NT-proBNP, and a higher rate of history of systemic embolism. LVT resolution occurred in 59.7% and 69.0% of patients in the elderly LVT group and younger LVT group, respectively, with no significant difference (adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.74-1.28; P = 0.836). Yet, elderly patients with LVT, had higher prevalence rates of MACE (adjusted HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.10-2.11; P = 0.012), systemic embolism (adjusted HR, 2.81; 95% CI, 1.20-6.59; P = 0.017) and all-cause mortality (adjusted HR, 2.20; 95% CI, 1.29-3.74; P = 0.004) compared with younger patients with LVT. After adjusting for mortality in the Fine-Gray model, similar results were observed. Additionally, patients treated with different anticoagulation therapies (DOACs vs. warfarin) achieved a similar improvement in prognosis (P > 0.05) or LVT resolution (P > 0.05) in elderly patients with LVT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results found that elderly patients experiencing LVT have a poor prognosis compared with the younger ones. Clinical prognosis in elderly patients did not significantly differ with the type of anticoagulant used. With aging societies worldwide, further evidence of antithrombotic therapy in elderly individuals with LVT is necessary.

What's the optimal duration of anticoagulation in patients with left ventricular thrombus?

INTRODUCTION

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) occurs in acute myocardial infarction and in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. LVT may result in embolic stroke. Currently, the duration of anticoagulation for LVT is unclear. This is an important clinical question as prolonged anticoagulation is associated with increased bleeding risks, while premature discontinuation may result in embolic complications.

AREAS COVERED

There are no randomized trial data regarding anticoagulation duration for LVT. Guidelines and expert consensus recommend anticoagulation for 3-6 months with cessation of anticoagulation if interval imaging demonstrates thrombus resolution. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) is more sensitive and specific compared to echocardiography for LVT detection, and may be appropriate for high-risk patients. Prolonged anticoagulation may be considered in unresolved protuberant or mobile LVT, and in patients with resolved LVT but persistent depressed left ventricular ejection fraction and/or myocardial akinesia or dyskinesia.

EXPERT OPINION

CMR will likely be increasingly used for LVT surveillance to guide anticoagulation duration. Further research is needed to determine which patients with persistent LVT on CMR benefit from prolonged anticoagulation.

Review of the Etiology, Diagnosis, and Management of Left Ventricular Thrombus

The incidence of left ventricular (LV) thrombus following acute myocardial infarction has declined significantly due to recent advancements in reperfusion and antithrombotic therapies. The development of LV thrombus depends on Virchow's triad: endothelial injury following myocardial infarction, blood stasis from LV dysfunction, and hypercoagulability. Diagnostic modalities for LV thrombus include transthoracic echocardiography and late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Anticoagulation with direct oral anticoagulants or vitamin K antagonists for 3 months following initial diagnosis of LV thrombus remains the treatment of choice for LV thrombus. However, further evidence is needed to demonstrate the noninferiority of direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists for the prevention of thromboembolic events.

A prediction model for left ventricular thrombus persistence/recurrence: based on a prospective study and a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

It remains unknown whether anticoagulation for persistent left ventricular (LV) thrombus should be continued indefinitely. Identifying patients with a high risk of thrombus unresolved may be helpful to determine the optimum anticoagulation duration. This study aimed to develop a prediction model to forecast thrombus persistence or recurrence in patients with LV thrombus.

METHODS

We enrolled patients prospectively from 2020 to 2022 and retrospectively from 2013 to 2019 at the National Center of Cardiovascular Diseases of China. The two cohorts were then combined to derive predictive models of thrombus persistence/recurrence. The primary study comprised patients who received systemic oral anticoagulants and had imaging records available at the end of a 3-month follow-up period. The Lasso regression algorithm and the logistic regression were performed to select independent predictors. The calibration curve was generated and a nomogram risk prediction model was applied as a risk stratification tool.

RESULTS

A total of 172 (64 in the prospective cohort and 108 in the retrospective cohort) patients were included, with 124 patients in a training set and 48 patients in a validation set. Six predictors were incorporated into the multivariate logistic regression prediction model. The area under the receiving operating characteristic was 0.852 in the training set and 0.631 in the validation set. Patients with protuberant thrombus and higher baseline D-dimer levels had a reduced risk of persistence/recurrence (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.03-0.69, P = 0.025; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43-0.91, P = 0.030, separately), whereas thicker thrombus was linked to an increased rate of persistent thrombus (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.20, P = 0.002). Additionally, patients with diverse diagnoses or receiving different antiplatelet treatments had different rates of LV thrombus persistence/recurrence at 3 months.

CONCLUSIONS

This prediction model provides tools to forecast the occurrence of persistent/recurrent thrombus and allows the identification of characteristics associated with unresolved thrombus. To validate the model and determine the duration of anticoagulation in patients with persistent thrombus, prospective randomized trials are necessary.

The Discovery of an Intracardiac Thrombus Following a Mild COVID-19 Infection: A Case Report and Review of Literature

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) (COVID-19) is a viral disease that predominantly affects the respiratory system, but extrapulmonary manifestations have been increasingly reported over the course of the pandemic. Common extrapulmonary manifestations include the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, and neurological systems, such as diarrhea, rashes, loss of smell/taste, myalgia, acute kidney injury, cardiac arrhythmias, or heart failure. COVID-19 infection is associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events, especially in the setting of severe disease. We present a case of a 42-year-old female who recently tested positive for COVID-19 infection and presented to the clinic with complaints of palpitations that started after her diagnosis. An electrocardiogram done in the clinic showed sinus rhythm, and the patient was placed on an event monitor, which showed no evidence of tachyarrhythmia. A transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) done as part of the workup showed a large thrombus in the right ventricular outflow tract attached to the ventricular side of the pulmonic valve. The patient was started on a therapeutic dose of apixaban at 10 mg twice a day (BID) for seven days and 5 mg twice a day afterward.

An exploratory study of effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with left ventricular thrombus (R-DISSOLVE)

Evidence on the treatment for left ventricular (LV) thrombus is limited and mainly derives from retrospective studies. The aim of R-DISSOLVE was to explore the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with LV thrombus. R-DISSOLVE was a prospective, interventional, single-arm study, conducted from Oct 2020 to June 2022 at Fuwai Hospital, China. Patients with a history of LV thrombus < 3 months and with systemic anticoagulation therapy < 1 month were included. The thrombus was quantitatively confirmed by contrast-enhanced echocardiography (CE) at baseline and follow-up visits. Eligible patients were assigned to rivaroxaban (20 mg once daily or 15 mg if creatinine clearance was between 30 and 49 mL/min) and its concentration was determined by detecting anti-Xa activity. The primary efficacy outcome was the rate of LV thrombus resolution at 12 weeks. The main safety outcome was the composite of ISTH major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. A total of 64 patients with complete CE results were analyzed for efficacy outcomes. The mean LV ejection fraction was 25.4 ± 9.0%. The dose-response curve of rivaroxaban was satisfactory based on the peak and trough plasma levels and all concentrations were in the recommended treatment range according to NOAC guidelines. The incidence rate of thrombus resolution at 6 weeks was 66.1% (41/62, 95% CI 53.0-77.7%), and of thrombus resolution or reduction was 95.2% (59/62, 95% CI 86.5-99.0%). At 12 weeks, the thrombus resolution rate was 78.1% (50/64, 95% CI 66.0-87.5%) while the rate of thrombus resolution or reduction was 95.3% (61/64, 95% CI 86.9-99.0%). The main safety outcome occurred in 4 of 75 patients (5.3%) (2 ISTH major bleeding and 2 clinically relevant non-major bleeding). In patients with LV thrombus, we reported a high thrombus resolution rate with acceptable safety by rivaroxaban, which could be a potential option for further LV thrombus treatment.Trial registration This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04970381.

Dilemmas in hematology: consults in patients with arterial thrombosis

Arterial thrombotic events, particularly ischemic stroke and myocardial infarction, are common, and mostly occur due to atherosclerotic disease or arrhythmias. The diagnosis and management of the majority of such events occurs without the involvement of a hematologist, following established guidelines or pathways. In this review, we discuss 3 scenarios in which optimal management is less certain. These scenarios concern patients with a left ventricular thrombus, in whom the duration and choice of anticoagulant has been debated, patients with ischemic stroke and a patent foramen ovale, in whom the role of patent foramen ovale closure requires careful consideration, and the role of thrombophilia testing in young patients after a stroke or myocardial infarction, which remains an area of contention. We consider the available evidence and published guidelines in order to provide a practical, evidence-based approach to these 3 clinical scenarios.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists for left ventricular thrombus: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim    To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) as compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA) in the treatment of left ventricular (LV) thrombosis.Material and methods    A search was performed in PubMed and Google Scholar for studies that compared DOAC and VKA in the treatment of LV thrombosis with respect of thromboembolic events, hemorrhagic complications, and thrombus resolution. The effect was evaluated with the odds ratio (OR) that was computed using a fixed effects model.Results    For these systematic review and meta-analysis, 19 studies were selected, including 2 randomized and 17 cohort studies. The articles included into these systematic review and meta-analysis, were published from 2018 through 2021. In total, 2970 patients (mean age, 58.8 лет; 1879 (61.2 %) men) with LV thrombus were included into the meta-analysis. Mean follow-up duration was 17.9 months. The meta-analysis showed no significant difference between DOAC and VKA in the incidence of the study outcomes: thromboembolic events (OR, 0.86; 95 % CI: 0.67-1.10; р=0.22), hemorrhagic complications (OR, 0.77; 95 % CI: 0.55-1.07; р=0.12), thrombus resolution (OR, 0.96; 95 % CI: 0.76-1.22; р=0.77). In a subgroup analysis, rivaroxaban compared to VKA significantly (79%) reduced the risk of thromboembolic complications (OR, 0.21; 95 % CI: 0.05-0.83; р=0.03) with no significant differences in hemorrhagic events (OR, 0.60; 95 % CI: 0.21-1.71; р=0.34) or thrombus resolution (OR, 1.44; 95 % CI: 0.83-1.31; р=0.20). The apixaban treatment group had significantly more (4.88 times) cases of thrombus resolution than the VKA treatment group (OR, 4.88; 95 % CI: 1.37-17.30; р=0.01); for apixaban, data on hemorrhagic and thromboembolic complications were not available.Conclusions    The therapeutic efficacy and side effects of the DOAC treatment for LV thrombosis were similar to those of VKA with respect of thromboembolic events, hemorrhage, and thrombus resolution.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke and Systemic Embolism Prevention in Patients with Left Ventricular Thrombus

In recent years, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) have accumulated evidence of efficacy and safety in various clinical scenarios and are approved for a wide spectrum of indications. Still, they are currently used off-label for left ventricular thrombus owing to a paucity of evidence. For the same reason, there is a lack of guideline indication as well. Our work is based on an exhaustive analysis of the available literature and provides a structured and detailed update on the use of DOACs in patients with left ventricle thrombus. The safety and efficacy of DOACs were analyzed in particular clinical scenarios. As far as we know, this is the first paper that analyzes DOACs in this approach.

Left Ventricular Thrombosis: Current Perspective and Use of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is a serious risk factor for systemic embolism development. Despite the evident danger of this condition, current guidelines describe management of patients with this potentially fatal complication very briefly. LVT can complicate myocardial infarction where its incidence is around 10%, as well as various forms of cardiomyopathies and novel coronavirus infection. According to clinical guidelines vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) should be used as treatment of choice for thrombus resolution. However, experts point out that this therapy lacks necessary evidential base and bears certain difficulties because of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamical properties of VKAs. These drawbacks are absent in direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), the possibility of using which in LVT is being actively studied. As for now, published results of 3 randomised clinical trials have demonstrated similar safety and efficacy profiles of DOACs and VKAs. Similarly, the majority of retrospective cohort studies did not observe significant differences between two groups, where some of them have shown superiority of DOACs especially in terms of earlier thrombus resolution. Nevertheless, some studies have found DOACs ineffective and even potentially unsafe regarding systemic embolism. Existing data does not allow to form an unambiguous conclusion about the equivalence of DOACs and VKAs for LVT resolution. Large randomised clinical trials are needed to determine efficacy and safety of such treatment in these patients.

Oral Anticoagulant Use and Appropriateness in Elderly Patients with Atrial Fibrillation in Complex Clinical Conditions: ACONVENIENCE Study

Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) is the most common arrhythmia in older patients. Although direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are the antithrombotic treatment of choice, irrespective of age, certain factors may limit their use. The aim of the ACONVENIENCE study was to consult the opinion of a multidisciplinary panel of experts on the appropriateness of using OACs in elderly patients (>75 years) with NVAF associated with certain complex clinical conditions. A consensus project was performed on the basis of a systematic review of the literature, and application of a two-round Delphi survey. The agreement of 79 panellists on 30 Delphi-type statements was evaluated, and their opinion on the appropriateness of different oral anticoagulants in 16 complex clinical scenarios was assessed. A total of 27 consensus statements were agreed upon, including all statements addressing anticoagulation in older patients and in patients at high risk of bleeding complications, and most of those addressing frailty, dementia, risk of falling, and complex cardiac situations. It was almost unanimously agreed upon that advanced age should not influence the anticoagulation decision. Apixaban was the highest-rated therapeutic option in 14/16 situations, followed by edoxaban. There is a high degree of agreement on anticoagulation in older patients with NVAF. Age should not be the single limiting factor when prescribing OACs, and the decision should be made based on net clinical benefit and a comprehensive geriatric assessment. Apixaban, followed by edoxaban, was considered the most appropriate treatment in the various complex clinical situations examined.

Direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of left ventricular thrombosis: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

This meta-analysis aims to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in the setting of left ventricular thrombosis (LVT).

METHOD AND RESULTS

We systematically searched MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Biomed Central and Web of Science for trials comparing DOACs versus VKAs in the setting of LVT and reporting outcome data on thrombosis resolution, stroke and bleeding. Fourteen studies were finally selected. The Mantel-Haenszel method with a random effect model was used for the pooled analysis. The primary outcome was the occurrence of LVT resolution. The secondary outcomes were the occurrence of stroke or bleeding during treatment. One thousand three hundred and thirty-two patients were included in the analysis for the primary outcome. Of these, 424 were treated with DOACs and 908 with VKAs. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for the primary outcome was 1.00 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.77-1.31, I2 0.0%], reflecting equal effect in terms of thrombus resolution. Overall, 2290 patients, 608 on DOACs and 1682 on VKAs were included in the analysis of stroke occurrence, showing reduced risk of events in patients treated with DOACs (pooled OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.93; I2 0.0%) as well as for bleeding occurrence (number of patients included 2139; pooled OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.44-0.94; I2 0.0%).

CONCLUSION

Compared with VKAs, we found DOACs to have similar efficacy on thrombus resolution and favorable effects on stroke reduction and bleedings. DOACs should be considered as an alternative treatment for LVT. Large prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to confirm this exploratory finding.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists for the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombus: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials

ABSTRACT

Left ventricular thrombi (LVTs) increase the risk of stroke, systemic embolism, and subsequent death. Current guidelines recommend vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) as first-line treatment for LVT. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are increasingly used as alternatives to warfarin for the treatment of LVT. However, the efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs remain controversial. Thus, we conducted an updated meta-analysis of DOACs versus VKAs for LVT treatment. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials, and Cochrane Library databases for relevant articles published before December 11, 2021. The relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for each study. The meta-analysis included 12 cohort studies and 3 randomized controlled trials with a total of 2334 patients. We found that DOACs had a lower risk of clinically significant bleeding than VKAs (RR = 0.6; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.90; P = 0.01; I2 = 0%). There was no difference in LVT resolution (RR = 1.01; 95% CI, 0.93 to 1.09; P = 0.48; I2 = 0%), stroke and/or systematic embolic events (RR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.11 to 1.55; P = 0.2; I2 = 30%), and all-cause mortality (RR = 0.9; 95% CI, 0.58 to 1.4; P = 0.65; I2 = 0%). Overall, DOACs are noninferior to warfarin in LVT treatment but have a lower risk of clinically significant bleeding. This suggests that DOACs might be better alternatives to warfarin for LVT treatment.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in the Treatment of Left Ventricular Thrombi

Left ventricular thrombi form due to the presence of Virchow's triad in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction. This complication increases the incidence of systemic embolization, hence anticoagulation is recommended to decrease this risk. Up to the present time, vitamin K antagonists are recommended by all societal guidelines for patients with left ventricular thrombi. Recently, several studies have investigated the role of different anticoagulants and yielded promising outcomes. This opinion article focuses on the evidence supporting vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants in patients with left ventricular thrombi.

Safety and Effectiveness of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin for Treating Left Ventricular Thrombus

BACKGROUND

Patients with left ventricular thrombus are at high risk for ischemic stroke and systemic embolization. The mainstay of treatment is anticoagulation, but it remains unclear if direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are a safe and effective treatment strategy compared to warfarin. We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared to warfarin in an integrated health system in the United States.

METHODS

Consecutive patients with left ventricular thrombus on transthoracic echocardiogram from May 2010 to April 2020 were identified. Comparative effectiveness and safety of DOACs and warfarin were evaluated using multivariable Cox proportional hazard models and inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

Among 433 patients with left ventricular thrombus, 134 (30.9%) were treated with DOACs and 299 (69.1%) were treated with warfarin. Patients were followed for a median of 3.4 years. For the primary effectiveness outcome of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and transient ischemic attack, no significant difference was observed between use of DOACs compared to warfarin (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] of 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.48-1.18, p = 0.21). For the primary safety outcome of intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal bleeding, and other bleed requiring hospitalization, DOAC usage was associated with a lower risk of bleeding (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87, p = 0.0008).

CONCLUSIONS

In this diverse population-based cohort of patients, DOAC treatment for left ventricular thrombus appears to be as safe and effective as warfarin treatment. These findings support the use of DOACs for patients with left ventricular thrombus.

Switching from warfarin to direct-acting oral anticoagulants: it is time to move forward!

Oral vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), warfarin, have been in routine clinical use for almost 70 years for various cardiovascular conditions. Direct-Acting Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as competitive alternatives for VKAs to prevent stroke in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and have become the preferred choice in several clinical indications for anticoagulation. Recent guidelines have limited the use of DOACs to patients with non-valvular AF to reduce the risk of cardioembolic complications and to treat venous thromboembolism (VTE). Although emerging evidence is suggestive of its high efficacy, there was a lack of data to support DOACs safety profile in patients with mechanical valve prosthesis, intracardiac thrombi, or other conditions such as cardiac device implantation or catheter ablation. Therefore, several clinical trials have been conducted to assess the beneficial effects of using DOACs, instead of VKAs, for various non-guideline-approved indications. This review aimed to discuss the current guideline-approved indications for DOACs, advantages, and limitations of DOACs use in various clinical indications highlighting the potential emerging indications and remaining challenges for DOACs use. Several considerations are in favour of switching from warfarin to DOACs including superior efficacy, better adverse effect profile, fewer drug-drug interactions, and they do not require frequent international normalized ratio (INR) monitoring. Large randomized controlled trials are required to determine the safety and efficacy of their use in various clinical indications.

Are direct oral anticoagulants preferable to warfarin for the treatment of left ventricular thrombi? A Bayesian meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

There is no clear consensus on the optimal choice of anticoagulant in patients with left ventricular thrombi (LVT). Given the potentially fatal complications associated with this disease entity, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to synthesize the latest evidence on this topic.

Methods

We performed a comprehensive search of electronic databases to identify RCTs comparing warfarin to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with LVT. A random-effects Bayesian analysis using a binomial-normal hierarchical model was performed to compare the two treatment options with regards to the risk of mortality, stroke, LVT resolution, and major bleeding.

Results

In an analysis comprising 3 RCTs (N = 139), there were no statistically significant differences regarding mortality (OR: 0.68; 95% CrI: 0.10 to 4.43), stroke (OR: 0.14; 95% CrI: 0.01 to 1.27), or LVT resolution (OR: 1.17; 95% CrI: 0.37 to 3.45). Major bleeding was significantly lower in the DOAC group (OR: 0.16; 95% CrI: 0.02 to 0.82).

Conclusion

In patients with LVT, the currently available evidence from RCTs supports the use of DOACs rather than warfarin due to lower major bleeding risks and no evidence of inferiority with respect to mortality, stroke or LVT resolution.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants vs Vitamin K Antagonists in Left Ventricular Thrombi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is increasing interest in direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), given their safety and convenience in atrial fibrillation, compared with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). However, the use of DOACs in left ventricular (LV) thrombi is considered off-label, with current guidelines recommending VKAs. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the safety and efficacy of DOACs to VKAs in the management of LV thrombi.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted for studies published between January 1, 2009 and January 31, 2021 in PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Included studies compared DOACs to VKAs for the treatment of LV thrombi and reported on relevant outcomes. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Sixteen cohort studies and 2 randomized controlled trials were identified, which included 2666 patients (DOAC = 674; VKA = 1992). Compared with VKAs, DOACs were associated with a statistically significant reduction in stroke (OR 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-0.96; P = 0.03; I 2 = 0%). There were no significant differences in bleeding (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.50-1.02; P = 0.07; I2  = 0%), systemic embolism (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.41-1.44; P = 0.41; I2  = 0%), stroke or systemic embolism (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.53-1.33; P = 0.45; I2  = 33%), mortality (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.64-1.57; P = 0.98; I2  = 0%) or LV thrombus resolution (OR 1.29, 95% CI 0.83-1.99; P = 0.26; I2  = 56%).

CONCLUSIONS

Within the context of low-quality evidence, there was a statistically significant reduction in stroke among those treated with DOACs, without an increase in bleeding. There were no significant differences in systemic embolism, stroke or systemic embolism, mortality, or LV thrombus resolution, suggesting that DOACs may be a reasonable option for treatment of LV thrombi.