Comparative efficacy and safety of different catheter ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Case report of persistent atrial fibrillation with durably isolated pulmonary veins: what's next?

Background

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as a safe and effective treatment for patients with paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation. Nevertheless, in some patients, a relapse of atrial fibrillation occurs although pulmonary veins are durably isolated. For those patients, the underlying mechanisms of atrial fibrillation perpetuation are manifold and optimal treatment options are not yet defined.

Case summary

We describe a case of a 55-year-old man with a history of atrial fibrillation and previous PVI presenting with persistent AF and arrhythmia induced cardiomyopathy. During the redo procedure, electro-anatomical mapping revealed durably isolated PV. Bipolar mapping showed large low-voltage areas at the posterior wall and the septum. As the patient was refractory to electrical cardioversion, it was decided to modify the large low-voltage areas as potential arrhythmic substrate. After performing additional ablation with isolation of the posterior wall and two anterior/septal lines, the patient spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm.

Discussion

Ablation in patients with persistent AF despite durable PVI remains a challenge for the treating team. Individualized ablation approaches addressing additional arrhythmic substrates or extra-PV triggers can be considered to treat patients with persistent AF and durable PVI.

Cardiac Radiofrequency Ablation Exacerbates Myocardial Injury through Pro-Inflammatory Response and Pro-Oxidative Stress in Elderly Patients with Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

There is a need to assess myocardial damage after radiofrequency ablation of the pulmonary veins (PV) for persistent atrial fibrillation (PAF) in elderly patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate oxidative stress, inflammatory response and myocardial damage in elderly patients with PAF after radiofrequency ablation of the PV.

METHODS

High-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT), malondialdehyde-modified low-density lipoprotein (MDA-LDL), acrolein (ACR), lipid hydroperoxide (LHP), toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), soluble growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (sST2), angiotensin II (Ang II) and myocardial blood flow (MBF) were determined before ablation and at 1, 3 and 5 months after radiofrequency ablation.

RESULTS

The levels of hsTnT, MDA-LDL, ACR, LHP, TLR4, sST2 and Ang II were increased 3 months after ablations compared with before ablation and 1 month after ablation, respectively (P<0.001); they were further increased at 5 months after ablation compared with the 1- and 3-month groups, respectively (P<0.001). MBF was decreased in the 3 months group after ablations compared with before ablation and 1-month after ablation, respectively (P<0.001), and was further decreased in 5-months after ablations compared with 1-month and 3-month groups, respectively (P<0.001). Patients with epicardial monopolar radiofrequency ablation had higher levels of hsTnT, MDA-LDL, ACR, LHP, TLR4, sST2, Ang II and lower MBF than patients with endocardial monopolar and bipolar radiofrequency ablations, respectively (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Monopolar radiofrequency ablation method could result in more myocardial injury than bipolar radiofrequency ablation. Oxidative stress and inflammatory response may be involved in cardiac radiofrequency ablation-induced myocardial injury, resulting in myocardial ischemia in elderly patients with PAF.

Progress in atrial fibrillation ablation during 25 years of Europace journal

The first edition of Europace journal in 1999 came right around the time of the landmark publication of the electrophysiologists from Bordeaux, establishing how elimination of ectopic activity from the pulmonary veins (PVs) resulted in a marked reduction of atrial fibrillation (AF). The past 25 years have seen an incredible surge in scientific interest to develop new catheters and energy sources to optimize durability and safety of ablation, as well as study the mechanisms for AF and devise ablation strategies. While ablation in the beginning was performed with classic 4 mm tip catheters that emitted radiofrequency (RF) energy to create tissue lesions, this evolved to using irrigation and contact force (CF) measurement while increasing power. Also, so-called single-shot devices were developed with balloons and arrays to create larger contiguous lesions, and energy sources changed from RF current to cryogenic ablation and more recently pulsed field ablation with electrical current. Although PV ablation has remained the basis for every AF ablation, it was soon recognized that this was not enough to cure all patients, especially those with non-paroxysmal AF. Standardized approaches for additional ablation targets have been used but have not been satisfactory in all patients so far. This led to highly technical mapping systems that are meant to unravel the drivers for the maintenance of AF. In the following sections, the development of energies, strategies, and tools is described with a focus on the contribution of Europace to publish the outcomes of studies that were done during the past 25 years.

Electrographic flow-guided ablation in redo patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (FLOW-AF): design and rationale

Background

Electrographic flow (EGF) mapping enables the dynamic detection of functional or active atrial fibrillation (AF) sources outside the pulmonary veins (PVs), and the presence or absence of these sources offers a novel framework for classifying and treating persistent AF patients based on the underlying pathophysiology of their AF disease.

Objective

The primary objective of the FLOW-AF trial is to evaluate the reliability of the EGF algorithm technology (Ablamap software) to identify AF sources and guide ablation therapy in patients with persistent AF.

Methods

The FLOW-AF trial (NCT04473963) is a prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical study in which patients with persistent or long-standing persistent AF who have failed prior PV isolation (PVI) undergo EGF mapping after confirmation of intact PVI. In total, 85 patients will be enrolled and stratified based on the presence or absence of EGF-identified sources. Patients with an EGF-identified source above the predetermined activity threshold of ≥26.5% will be randomized in a 1:1 fashion to PVI only vs PVI + ablation of EGF-identified extra-PV sources of AF.

Results

The primary safety endpoint is freedom from serious adverse events related to the procedure through 7 days following the randomization procedure; and the primary effectiveness endpoint is the successful elimination of significant sources of excitation with the target parameter the activity of the leading source.

Conclusions

The FLOW-AF trial is a randomized study designed to evaluate the ability of the EGF mapping algorithm to identify patients with active extra-PV AF sources.

Procedure-Related Complications of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is a commonly performed procedure. However, it is associated with potentially significant complications. Reported procedure-related complication rates are highly variable, depending in part on study design.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this systematic review and pooled analysis was to determine the rate of procedure-related complications associated with catheter ablation of AF using data from randomized control trials and to assess temporal trends.

METHODS

MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched from January 2013 to September 2022 for randomized control trials that included patients undergoing a first ablation procedure of AF using either radiofrequency or cryoballoon (PROSPERO, CRD42022370273).

RESULTS

A total of 1,468 references were retrieved, of which 89 studies met inclusion criteria. A total of 15,701 patients were included in the current analysis. Overall and severe procedure-related complication rates were 4.51% (95% CI: 3.76%-5.32%) and 2.44% (95% CI: 1.98%-2.93%), respectively. Vascular complications were the most frequent type of complication (1.31%). The next most common complications were pericardial effusion/tamponade (0.78%) and stroke/transient ischemic attack (0.17%). The procedure-related complication rate during the most recent 5-year period of publication was significantly lower than during the earlier 5-year period (3.77% vs 5.31%; P = 0.043). The pooled mortality rate was stable over the 2 time periods (0.06% vs 0.05%; P = 0.892). There was no significant difference in complication rate according to pattern of AF, ablation modality, or ablation strategies beyond pulmonary vein isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Procedure-related complications and mortality rates associated with catheter ablation of AF are low and have declined in the past decade.

Heart rate characteristic based modelling of atrial fibrillatory rate using implanted cardiac monitor data

Objective. The objective of the present study is to investigate the feasibility of using heart rate characteristics to estimate atrial fibrillatory rate (AFR) in a cohort of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients continuously monitored with an implantable cardiac monitor. We will use a mixed model approach to investigate population effect and patient specific effects of heart rate characteristics on AFR, and will correct for the effect of previous ablations, episode duration, and onset date and time.Approach. The f-wave signals, from which AFR is estimated, were extracted using a QRST cancellation process of the AF episodes in a cohort of 99 patients (67% male; 57 ± 12 years) monitored for 9.2(0.2-24.3) months as median(min-max). The AFR from 2453 f-wave signals included in the analysis was estimated using a model-based approach. The association between AFR and heart rate characteristics, prior ablations, and episode-related features were modelled using fixed-effect and mixed-effect modelling approaches.Main results. The mixed-effect models had a better fit to the data than fixed-effect models showing h.c. of determination (R2 = 0.49 versusR2 = 0.04) when relating the variations of AFR to the heart rate features. However, when correcting for the other factors, the mixed-effect model showed the best fit (R2 = 0.04). AFR was found to be significantly affected by previous catheter ablations (p< 0.05), episode duration (p< 0.05), and irregularity of theRRinterval series (p< 0.05).Significance. Mixed-effect models are more suitable for AFR modelling. AFR was shown to be faster in episodes with longer duration, less organizedRRintervals and after several ablation procedures.

Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Structural Heart Disease: A Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia encountered in clinical practice. Patients with structural heart disease (SHD) are at an increased risk of developing this arrhythmia and are particularly susceptible to the deleterious hemodynamic effects it carries. In the last two decades, catheter ablation (CA) has emerged as a valuable strategy for rhythm control and is currently part of the standard care for symptomatic relief in patients with AF. Growing evidence suggests that CA of AF may have potential benefits that extend beyond symptoms. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of this intervention on SHD patients.

Comparing efficacy and safety in catheter ablation strategies for atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the most efficient catheter ablation (CA) strategy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies for AF ablation through network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, and CENTRAL was performed up to October 5th, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing different CA approaches were included. Efficacy was defined as arrhythmia recurrence after CA and safety as any reported complication related to the procedure during a minimum follow-up time of 6 months.

RESULTS

In total, 67 RCTs (n = 9871) comparing 19 different CA strategies were included. The risk of recurrence was significantly decreased compared to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone for PVI with renal denervation (RR: 0.60, CI: 0.38-0.94), PVI with ganglia-plexi ablation (RR: 0.62, CI: 0.41-0.94), PVI with additional ablation lines (RR: 0.8, CI: 0.68-0.95) and PVI in combination with bi-atrial modification (RR: 0.32, CI: 0.11-0.88). Strategies including PVI appeared superior to non-PVI strategies such as electrogram-based approaches. No significant differences in safety were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

This NMA showed that PVI in combination with additional CA strategies, such as autonomic modulation and additional lines, seem to increase the efficacy of PVI alone. These strategies can be considered in treating patients with AF, since, additionally, no differences in safety were observed. This study provides decision-makers with comprehensive and comparative evidence about the efficacy and safety of different CA strategies.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registry number: CRD42020169494 .