OUP accepted manuscript

Autopsy of all young sudden death cases is important to increase survival in family members left behind

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is an important public health problem worldwide, accounting for an estimated 6-20% of total mortality. A significant proportion of SCD is caused by inherited heart disease, especially among the young. An autopsy is crucial to establish a diagnosis of inherited heart disease, allowing for subsequent identification of family members who require cardiac evaluation. Autopsy of cases of unexplained sudden death in the young is recommended by both the European Society of Cardiology and the American Heart Association. Overall autopsy rates, however, have been declining in many countries across the globe, and there is a lack of skilled trained pathologists able to carry out full autopsies. Recent studies show that not all cases of sudden death in the young are autopsied, likely due to financial, administrative, and organizational limitations as well as awareness among police, legal authorities, and physicians. Consequently, diagnoses of inherited heart disease are likely missed, along with the opportunity for treatment and prevention among surviving relatives. This article reviews the evidence for the role of autopsy in sudden death, how the cardiologist should interpret the autopsy-record, and how this can be integrated and implemented in clinical practice. Finally, we identify areas for future research along with potential for healthcare reform aimed at increasing autopsy awareness and ultimately reducing mortality from SCD.

Correlations and discrepancies between cardiac ultrasound, clinical diagnosis and the autopsy findings in early deceased patients with suspected cardiovascular emergencies

Cardiac ultrasound (CUS), either focused cardiac ultrasound (FoCUS) or emergency echocardiography, is frequently used in cardiovascular (CV) emergencies. We assessed correlations and discrepancies between CUS, clinical diagnosis and the autopsy findings in early deceased patients with suspected CV emergencies. We retrospectively analysed clinical and autopsy data of 131 consecutive patients who died within 24 h of hospital admission. The type of CUS and its findings were analysed in relation to the clinical and autopsy diagnoses. CUS was performed in 58% of patients - FoCUS in 83%, emergency echocardiography in 12%, and both types of CUS in 5% of cases. CUS was performed more frequently in patients without a history of CV disease (64 vs. 40%, p = 0.08) and when the time between admission and death was longer (6 vs. 2 h, p = 0.021). In 7% of patients, CUS was inconclusive. In 10% of patients, the ante-mortem cause of death could not be determined, while discrepancies between the clinical and post-mortem diagnosis were found in 26% of cases. In the multivariate logistic regression model, only conclusive CUS [odds ratio (OR) 2.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-7.39, p = 0.044] and chest pain at presentation (OR 30.19, 95%CI 5.65 -161.22, p < 0.001) were independently associated with congruent clinical and autopsy diagnosis. In a tertiary university hospital, FoCUS was used more frequently than emergency echocardiography in critically ill patients with suspected cardiac emergencies. Chest pain at presentation and a conclusive CUS were associated with concordant clinical and autopsy diagnoses.

Congenital heart diseases (CHDs) and forensic investigations: Searching for the cause of death

Congenital Heart Diseases (CHDs) are a group of structural abnormalities or defects of the heart that are present at birth. CHDs could be connected to sudden death (SD), defined by the WHO (World Health Organization) as "death occurring within 24 h after the onset of the symptoms" in an apparently "healthy" subject. These conditions can range from relatively mild defects to severe, life-threatening anomalies. The prevalence of CHDs varies across populations, but they affect millions of individuals worldwide. This article aims to discuss the post-mortem investigation of death related to CHDs, exploring the forensic approach, current methodologies, challenges, and potential advancements in this challenging field. A further goal of this article is to provide a guide for understanding these complex diseases, highlighting the pivotal role of autopsy, histopathology, and genetic investigations in defining the cause of death, and providing evidence about the translational use of autopsy reports. Forensic investigations play a crucial role in understanding the complexities of CHDs and determining the cause of death accurately. Through collaboration between medical professionals and forensic experts, meticulous examinations, and analysis of evidence, valuable insights can be gained. These insights not only provide closure to the families affected but also contribute to the prevention of future tragedies.

Researching COVID to enhance recovery (RECOVER) tissue pathology study protocol: Rationale, objectives, and design

IMPORTANCE

SARS-CoV-2 infection can result in ongoing, relapsing, or new symptoms or organ dysfunction after the acute phase of infection, termed Post-Acute Sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 (PASC), or long COVID. The characteristics, prevalence, trajectory and mechanisms of PASC are poorly understood. The objectives of the Researching COVID to Enhance Recovery (RECOVER) tissue pathology study (RECOVER-Pathology) are to: (1) characterize prevalence and types of organ injury/disease and pathology occurring with PASC; (2) characterize the association of pathologic findings with clinical and other characteristics; (3) define the pathophysiology and mechanisms of PASC, and possible mediation via viral persistence; and (4) establish a post-mortem tissue biobank and post-mortem brain imaging biorepository.

METHODS

RECOVER-Pathology is a cross-sectional study of decedents dying at least 15 days following initial SARS-CoV-2 infection. Eligible decedents must meet WHO criteria for suspected, probable, or confirmed infection and must be aged 18 years or more at the time of death. Enrollment occurs at 7 sites in four U.S. states and Washington, DC. Comprehensive autopsies are conducted according to a standardized protocol within 24 hours of death; tissue samples are sent to the PASC Biorepository for later analyses. Data on clinical history are collected from the medical records and/or next of kin. The primary study outcomes include an array of pathologic features organized by organ system. Causal inference methods will be employed to investigate associations between risk factors and pathologic outcomes.

DISCUSSION

RECOVER-Pathology is the largest autopsy study addressing PASC among US adults. Results of this study are intended to elucidate mechanisms of organ injury and disease and enhance our understanding of the pathophysiology of PASC.

Prevalence of Multiple Causes of Death Within Young and Middle-Aged People Experiencing Sudden Cardiac Arrest

BACKGROUND

Multiple causes of death are increasingly reported, particularly in older populations. Rates of multiple causes of young sudden death have not been quantified.

METHOD

The End Unexplained Cardiac Death (EndUCD) registry was utilised to identify cases of young sudden death (aged 1-50 years) referred for forensic assessment from April 2019 to April 2022. Causes of death were coded according to whether one or more underlying causes of death were identified. Patients were compared according to the number of causes of death, with significant predictors assessed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

1,085 cases of sudden death were identified. 263 (24.2%) cases had more than one competing cause of their sudden death. The most common multi-causal associations identified were dual non-cardiac causes of the sudden death (n=68), cardiomyopathy with non-cardiac event (n=64) and coronary artery disease with non-cardiac cause (n=63). Multi-causal death was more common in those undergoing comprehensive autopsy examination (95.8% vs 77.6%, p<0.0001), and in the setting of higher body mass index (median 31.3 kg/m2 vs 29.9 kg/m2, p=0.01), older age (44.3 years vs 41.4 years, p<0.0001), non-ventricular cardiac arrest rhythm (93.2% vs 87.3%, p=0.009), and smoking (22.8% vs 14.2%, p=0.001). The strongest predictor of multiple pathologies was comprehensive autopsy examination compared with external inspection, full-body post-mortem computed tomography and review of ancillary documentation and investigations (odds ratio 6.49, 95% confidence interval 3.47-12.14).

CONCLUSIONS

One-quarter of young sudden deaths have more than one underlying cause, highlighting the value of comprehensive investigations including autopsy. Awareness of the complexity of young sudden death is important, along with multidisciplinary involvement to ensure all contributors to death are identified.

The Lancet Commission to reduce the global burden of sudden cardiac death: a call for multidisciplinary action

Despite major advancements in cardiovascular medicine, sudden cardiac death (SCD) continues to be an enormous medical and societal challenge, claiming millions of lives every year. Efforts to prevent SCD are hampered by imperfect risk prediction and inadequate solutions to specifically address arrhythmogenesis. Although resuscitation strategies have witnessed substantial evolution, there is a need to strengthen the organisation of community interventions and emergency medical systems across varied locations and health-care structures. With all the technological and medical advances of the 21st century, the fact that survival from sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) remains lower than 10% in most parts of the world is unacceptable. Recognising this urgent need, the Lancet Commission on SCD was constituted, bringing together 30 international experts in varied disciplines. Consistent progress in tackling SCD will require a completely revamped approach to SCD prevention, with wide-sweeping policy changes that will empower the development of both governmental and community-based programmes to maximise survival from SCA, and to comprehensively attend to survivors and decedents' families after the event. International collaborative efforts that maximally leverage and connect the expertise of various research organisations will need to be prioritised to properly address identified gaps. The Commission places substantial emphasis on the need to develop a multidisciplinary strategy that encompasses all aspects of SCD prevention and treatment. The Commission provides a critical assessment of the current scientific efforts in the field, and puts forth key recommendations to challenge, activate, and intensify efforts by both the scientific and global community with new directions, research, and innovation to reduce the burden of SCD worldwide.

A systematic review of global autopsy rates in all-cause mortality and young sudden death

Autopsy is the gold standard method for determining cause of death. Young sudden death (SD) is a prototype condition in which autopsy is universally recommended. The aim of this review was to quantify real-world global rates of autopsy in either all-cause death or young SD. A systematic review was conducted. Rates of autopsy in all-cause death and in young SD were determined in each country using scientific and commercial search engines. In total, 59 of 195 countries (30.3%) reported autopsy rates in all-cause death, with rates varying from 0.01%-83.9%. Almost all of these figures derived from academic publications rather than governmental statistics. Only 16 of 195 countries (8.2%) reported autopsy rates in the context of young SD, with reported rates ranging from 5%-100%. The definition of "young" was heterogeneous. No governmental statistics reported autopsy rates in young SD. Risks of bias included inability to verify reported figures, heterogeneity in reporting of clinical vs medicolegal autopsies, and the small number of studies identified overall, resulting in the consistent exclusion of low- and middle-income countries. In conclusion, most countries globally do not report autopsy rates in either all-cause death (69.7%) or in SD (92.8%). Without transparent reporting of autopsy rates, global burdens of disease and rates of sudden cardiac death cannot be reliably calculated.