Exercise oscillatory breathing in diastolic heart failure: prevalence and prognostic insights

Prognostic utility of cardiopulmonary exercise testing with simultaneous exercise echocardiography in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

AIMS

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) combined with exercise echocardiography (CPETecho) allows simultaneous assessments of cardiac, pulmonary, and ventilation in heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). This study sought to determine whether simultaneous assessment of CPET variables could provide additive predictive value over exercise stress echocardiography in patients with dyspnoea.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CPETecho was performed in 443 patients with suspected HFpEF (240 HFpEF and 203 controls without HF). Patients with HFpEF were divided based on peak oxygen consumption (VO2, ≥10 or <10 ml/min/kg) or the slope of minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production (VE vs. VCO2 slope ≥45.0 or <45.0). The primary endpoint was defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, unplanned hospital visits requiring intravenous diuretics, or intensification of oral diuretics. During a median follow-up of 399 days, the composite outcome occurred in 57 patients. E/e' ratio during peak exercise was associated with adverse outcomes. Patients with HFpEF and lower peak VO2 had increased risks of the composite event (hazard ratio [HR] 5.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.65-9.62, p < 0.0001 vs. controls; HR 3.14, 95% CI 1.69-5.84, p = 0.0003 vs. HFpEF with higher peak VO2). Elevated VE versus VCO2 slope was also associated with adverse events in HFpEF. The addition of either the presence of abnormal peak VO2 or VE versus VCO2 slope increased the predictive ability over the model based on age, sex, atrial fibrillation, left atrial volume index, and exercise E/e' (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These data provide new insights into the role of CPETecho in patients with HFpEF.

Minute Ventilation/Carbon Dioxide Production Slope Could Predict Short- and Long-Term Prognosis of Patients After Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

(1) Background: Heart failure (HF) leads to functional disability and major cardiovascular events (MACEs). Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard for assessing aerobic capacity and prognostic stratification. This study aimed to evaluate the predischarge CPET variables in patients with acute decompensated HF and identify the submaximal CPET variables with prognostic value. (2) Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary center in Taiwan. Patients surviving their first episode of decompensated HF and undergoing predischarge CPET (February 2017 to January 2023) were analyzed. Follow-up was conducted until a MACE or administrative censoring (up to 5 years). Cox regression identified the significant predictors of MACE. (3) Results: The study included 553, 485, and 267 patients at the 3-month, 1-year, and 5-year follow-ups, respectively. MACE rates were 15.0%, 34.2%, and 50.9%. The VE/VCO2 slope was a significant predictor of MACE at all intervals. A VE/VCO2 slope >38.95 increased the risk of MACE by 2.49-fold at 3 months and 1.81-fold at 1 year (both p < 0.001). A slope > 37.35 increased the 5-year MACE risk by 1.75-fold (p = 0.002). (4) Conclusions: The VE/VCO2 slope is a significant submaximal CPET predictor of MACE in patients post-acute decompensated HF for both short- and long-term outcomes.

Phenotyping cardiopulmonary exercise testing measures in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: A comparison between Italy and Brazil

BACKGROUND

While patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) constitutes a global health crisis the incidence, prevalence and prognosis of the disease may differ depending on the continent and country.

OBJECTIVE

To profile, analyze and compare cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) data of patients with HFrEF between Italian and Brazilian cohorts.

METHODS

In this observational study, a total of 630 patients with clinical and functional diagnosis of HFrEF (315 patients from Brazil and 315 patients from Italy) performed CPET.

RESULTS

Although Brazilian patients were slightly younger (Brazil 60±10 vs Italy 64±11 p<0.001) with a better peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2), circulatory power and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p<0.01), ventilatory inefficiency and oscillation ventilation was higher when compared to the Italian cohort. When stratifying patients with LVEF≤30 % and age≥60 years, Brazilian patients presented worse ventilatory efficiency, and lower peak V̇O2 compared to the Italian cohort.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HFrEF from Brazil exhibited higher ventilatory inefficiency and a greater prevalence of oscillatory ventilation during CPET compared to patients with the same diagnosis from Italy.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation: the past, present, and future

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) is a fascinating event that can be appreciated in the cardiopulmonary exercise test and is characterized by a cyclic fluctuation of minute ventilation, tidal volume, oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, and end-tidal pressure for oxygen and carbon dioxide. Its mechanisms stem from a dysregulation of the normal control feedback of ventilation involving one or more of its components, namely, chemoreflex delay, chemoreflex gain, plant delay, and plant gain. In this review, we intend to breakdown therapeutic targets according to pathophysiology and revise the prognostic value of exercise oscillatory ventilation in the setting of heart failure and other diagnoses.

Software development to standardize the clinical diagnosis of exercise oscillatory ventilation in heart failure

BACKGROUND

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) is characterized by periodic oscillations of minute ventilation during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Despite its prognostic value in chronic heart failure (HF), its diagnosis is complex due to technical limitations. An easier and more accurate way of EOV identification can contribute to a better approach and clinical diagnosis. This study aims to describe a software development to standardize the EOV diagnosis from CPET's raw data in heart failure patients and test its reliability (intra- and inter-rater).

METHODS

The software was developed in the "drag-and-drop" G-language using LabVIEW®. Five EOV definitions (Ben-Dov, Corrà, Kremser, Leite, and Sun definitions), two alternative approaches, one smoothing technique, and some basic statistics were incorporated into the interface to visualize four charts of the ventilatory response. EOV identification was based on a set of criteria verified from the interaction between amplitude, cycle length, and oscillation time. Two raters analyzed the datasets. In addition, repeated measurements were verified after six months using about 25% of the initial data. Cohen's kappa coefficient (κ) was used to investigate the reliability.

RESULTS

Overall, 391 tests were analyzed in duplicate (inter-rater reliability) and 100 tests were randomized for new analysis (intra-rater reliability). High inter-rater (κ > 0.80) and intra-rater (κ > 0.80) reliability of the five EOV diagnoses were observed.

CONCLUSION

The present study proposes novel semi-automated software to detect EOV in HF, with high inter and intra-rater agreements. The software project and its tutorial are freely available for download.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation in patients with coexisting chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and heart failure: Clinical implications

BACKGROUND

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) is considered an important variable for predicting poor prognosis in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, there are no studies evaluating EOV presence in the coexistence chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and HFrEF.

AIMS

I) To compare the clinical characteristics of participants with coexisting HFrEF-COPD with and without EOV during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET); and II) to identify the impact of EOV on mortality during follow-up for 35 months.

METHODS

50 stable HFrEF-COPD (EF<50%) participants underwent CPET and were followed for 35 months. The parametric Student's t-test, chi-square tests, linear regression model and Kaplan-Meier analysis were applied.

RESULTS

We identified 13 (26%) participants with EOV and 37 (74%) without EOV (N-EOV) during exercise. The EOV group had worse cardiac function (LVEF: 30 ± 6% vs. N-EOV 40 ± 9%, p = 0.007), worse pulmonary function (FEV1: 1.04 ± 0.7 L vs. N-EOV 1.88 ± 0.7 L, p = 0.007), a higher mortality rate [7 (54%) vs. N-EOV 8 (27%), p = 0.02], higher minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (V̇˙E/ V̇˙ CO2) slope (42 ± 7 vs. N-EOV 36 ± 8, p = 0.04), reduced peak ventilation (L/min) (26.2 ± 16.7 vs. N-EOV 40.3 ± 16.4, p = 0.01) and peak oxygen uptake (mlO2 kg-1 min-1) (11.0 ± 4.0 vs. N-EOV 13.5 ± 3.4 ml●kg-1●min-1, p = 0.04) when compared with N-EOV group. We found that EOV group had a higher risk of mortality during follow-up (long-rank p = 0.001) than patients with N-EOV group.

CONCLUSION

The presence of EOV is associated with greater severity of coexisting HFrEF and COPD and a reduced prognosis. Assessment of EOV in participants with coexisting HFrEF-COPD, as a biomarker for both clinical status and prognosis may therefore be warranted.

Hemodynamic Gain Index and Exercise Capacity in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Decreased exercise capacity portends a poor prognosis in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The hemodynamic gain index (HGI) is an integrated marker of hemodynamic reserve measured during exercise stress testing and is associated with survival. The goal of this study was to establish the association of HGI with exercise capacity, serum biomarkers, and echocardiography features in subjects with HFpEF. In 209 subjects with HFpEF enrolled in the RELAX (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in Diastolic Heart Failure) trial who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing, we calculated the HGI ([peak heart rate [HR] × peak systolic blood pressure [SBP]-[HR at rest × SBP at rest])/(HR at rest × SBP at rest) and tested associations with outcomes of interest. The median (interquartile range) HGI was 0.94 (0.5 to 1.3) beats per min/mm Hg. In multivariable-adjusted linear regression, higher HGI was associated with greater peak oxygen consumption (VO₂), VO₂ at anaerobic threshold, peak minute ventilation, and 6-minute walk distance (all p <0.001). Higher HGI was associated with lower serum high-sensitivity troponin I, pro-collagen III, N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, and creatinine (all p <0.05) and with longer deceleration time, lower E/A ratio, and lower left atrial volume index by echocardiography (all p <0.05). In conclusion, higher HGI in stable HFpEF was associated with greater exercise capacity, a biomarker profile indicating less myocardial injury and fibrosis and less kidney dysfunction, and with less severe diastolic dysfunction. These results suggest that HGI, an easily calculated metric from routine exercise testing, is a marker of functional capacity and disease severity in HFpEF and may serve as a surrogate for VO₂ parameters for use in treadmill testing without gas exchange capability.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation in patients with advanced heart failure with and without left ventricular assist device

BACKGROUND

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV), indicating pathological fluctuations on pulmonary arterial pressure, is associated with mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Whether left ventricular assist device (LVAD)-induced ventricular unloading can reverse EOV and may prevent short-term rehospitalization has not been investigated.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective single-center in- and outpatient analysis of patients with (n = 20, LVAD) and without (n = 27, HF) circulatory support and reduced ejection fraction (EF, 22.8 ± 7.9%). The association of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables and 3 months-rehospitalization (3MR) as a primary outcome was analyzed. Furthermore, CPET variables were compared regarding the presence of EOV (+/-).

RESULTS

Lower VO_2peak (11.6 ± 4.9 ml/kg/min vs. 14.4 ± 4.3 ml/kg/min, p = 0.039), lower increase of PETCO₂ (CI = 0.049-1.127; p = 0.068), and higher VE/VCO₂ (43.8 ± 9.5 vs. 38.3 ± 10.6; p = 0.069) were associated with 3MR. Flattening of O₂ pulse (CI = 0.139-2.379; p = 0.487) had no impact on 3MR. EOV was present in 59.5% (n = 28/47) of patients, without a significant difference between LVAD and HF patients (p = 0.959). Patients with HF/EOV+ demonstrated significantly lower VO_2peak compared with HF/EOV- (p = 0.039). LVAD/EOV+ displayed significantly lower EF (p = 0.004) and fewer aortic valve opening than LVAD/EOV- (p = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

Lower VO_2peak , but not EOV, was associated with 3MR. EOV occurred at a similar rate in LVAD and HF patients, which may illustrate insufficient unloading during exercise in chronic LVAD therapy and may contribute to the limited exercise capacity following LVAD implantation. Simultaneous CPET and right heart catheterization studies are needed to elucidate whether EOV may serve as a non-invasive predictor of insufficient LV unloading necessitating LVAD reprograming.

Cardiopulmonary Exercise Physiology in AL Amyloidosis Patients with Cardiac Involvement and Its Association with Cardiac Imaging Parameters

Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has been widely used for the functional evaluation of patients with heart failure. Patients with amyloidosis and cardiac involvement typically present with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction. We sought to evaluate the use of CPET parameters in patients with AL amyloidosis for the assessment of disease severity and prognosis and their association with cardiac imaging findings. Methods: A single-center prospective analysis was conducted, which included 23 consecutive ambulatory patients with AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement, not requiring hospitalization or intravenous diuretics. Patient evaluation included CPET, laboratory testing, echocardiography and cardiac MRI. The cohort was divided according to the presence of high-risk CPET characteristics (below median peak VO2 and above median VE/VCO2). Results: Patients with AL amyloidosis and cardiac involvement (median age was 60 years (56.5% males) had median peak relative VO2 (VO2/kg) of 17.8 mL/kg/min, VE/VCO2 slope of 39.4 and circulatory power of 2362.5 mmHg⋅mL/kg/min. Peak relative VO2 gradually declined across Mayo stages (p = 0.046) and exhibited a significant inverse correlation with NT-proBNP levels (r = −0.52, p = 0.01). Among imaging parameters, peak VO2 positively correlated with global work efficiency (r = 0.61, p < 0.001), and global work index (r = 0.45, p = 0.04). The group of patients with high-risk CPET findings showed evidence of more advanced disease, such as higher NT-proBNP levels (p = 0.007), increased septal and posterior left ventricular wall thickness (p = 0.043 and p = 0.033 respectively) and decreased global work efficiency (p = 0.027) without substantial differences in cardiac MRI parameters. In this group of patients, peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 were not associated significantly with overall survival and cardiac response at one year. Conclusion: In patients with AL amyloidosis, evaluation of exercise capacity with CPET identified a group of patients with more advanced cardiac involvement. The potential of CPET as a risk stratification tool in AL amyloidosis with cardiac involvement warrants further research.

Sensitivity and specificity of different exercise oscillatory ventilation definitions to predict 2-year major adverse cardiovascular outcomes in chronic heart failure patients

BACKGROUND

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) shows a four-fold greater risk of adverse events. This study aims to analyze the sensitivity and specificity of three EOV diagnostic definitions to predict adverse outcomes at a 2-year follow-up and to compare its EOV prevalence and relations with the patient's profile.

METHODS

Cardiopulmonary exercise tests from 233 heart failure patients were analyzed. Two blinded reviewers used a semiautomated software to identify EOV cases pattern according to the definitions of Ben-Dov, Corrà, and Leite. Data were grouped in EOV-positive or EOV-negative according to each definition. Baseline characteristics, EOV prevalence, relative risk, sensitivity, and specificity to predict 2-years of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The Corrà definition led to the best prediction of 2-year major cardiovascular adverse outcomes (HR 2.46 [1.16 to 5.25]; p = 0.019, AUC = 0.618; p = 0.007). EOV prevalence was 17.2%, 17.2%, and 9.4% applying Ben-Dov, Corrà, and Leite definition, respectively. The main clinical differences between EOV-positive and EOV-negative patients were: MECKI score and VE/VCO₂ slope (all definitions), and BNP levels (Ben-Dov and Leite). BNP levels were correlated with amplitude (rho = 0.255; p = 0.033) and cycle length (rho = 0.388; p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Corrà definition was the only one that exhibited the capacity to predict major adverse cardiovascular outcomes at a 2-year follow-up. Regardless of its definition, EOV was more often prevalent in patients with a greater MECKI score and VE/VCO₂ slope values.

Exercise Testing in HFpEF: an Appraisal Through Diagnosis, Pathophysiology and Therapy A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) and European Association of Preventive Cardiology (EAPC) of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)

Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) universally complain of exercise intolerance and dyspnoea as key clinical correlates. Cardiac as well as extracardiac components play a role for the limited exercise capacity, including an impaired cardiac and peripheral vascular reserve, a limitation in mechanical ventilation and/or gas exchange with reduced pulmonary vascular reserve, skeletal muscle dysfunction and iron deficiency/anaemia. Although most of these components can be differentiated and quantified through gas exchange analysis by cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), the information provided by objective measures of exercise performance have not been systematically considered in the recent algorithms/scores for HFpEF diagnosis, neither by European nor US groups. The current Clinical Consensus Statement by the HFA and EAPC Association of the ESC aims at outlining the role of exercise testing and its pathophysiological, clinical and prognostic insights, addressing the implication of a thorough functional evaluation from the diagnostic algorithm to the pathophysiology and treatment perspectives of HFpEF. Along with these goals, we provide a specific analysis on the evidence that CPET is the standard for assessing, quantifying, and differentiating the origin of dyspnoea and exercise impairment and even more so when combined with echo and/or invasive hemodynamic evaluation is here provided. This will lead to improved quality of diagnosis when applying the proposed scores and may also help useful to implement the progressive characterization of the specific HFpEF phenotypes, a critical step toward the delivery of phenotype-specific treatments.

Exercise Oscillatory Breathing in Heart Failure with reduced ejection fraction: clinical implication

AIM

I) to evaluate the impact of exertional oscillatory ventilation (EOV) in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) compared with patients without EOV (N-EOV); II) to identify the influence of EOV persistence (P-EOV) and EOV disappearance (D-EOV) during CPET on the outcomes of mortality and hospitalization in HFrEF patients; and III) to identify further predictors of mortality and hospitalization in patients with P-EOV.

METHODS AND RESULTS

315 stable HFrEF patients underwent CPET and were followed for 35 months. We identified 202 patients N-EOV and 113 patients with EOV. Patients with EOV presented more symptoms (NYHA III: 35% vs. N-EOV 20%, p < 0.05), worse cardiac function (LVEF: 28 ± 6 vs. N-EOV 39 ± 1, p < 0.05), higher minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (V̇E/V̇CO2 slope: 41 ± 11 vs. N-EOV 37 ± 8, p < 0.05) and a higher rate of deaths (26% vs. N-EOV 6%, p < 0.05) and hospitalization (29% vs. N-EOV 9%, p < 0.05). P-EOV patients had more severe HFrEF (NYHA IV: 23% vs D-EOV: 9%, p < 0.05), had worse cardiac function (LVEF: 24 ± 5 vs. D-EOV: 34 ± 3, p < 0.05) and had lower peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2) (12.0 ± 3.0 vs D-EOV: 13.3 ± 3.0 mlO2.kg-1.min-1, p < 0.05). Among P-EOV, other independent predictors of mortality were V̇E/V̇CO2 slope ≥36 and V̇O2 peak ≤12 mlO2.kg-1.min-1; a V̇E/V̇CO2 slope≥34 was a significant predictor of hospitalization. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that, HFrEF patients with P-EOV had a higher risk of mortality and higher risk of hospitalization (p < 0.05) than patients with D-EOV and N-EOV.

CONCLUSION

In HFrEF patients, EOV persistence during exercise had a strong prognostic role. In P-EOV patients V̇E/V̇CO2 ≥36 and V̇O2 peak ≤12 mlO2.kg-1.min-1, had a further additive negative prognostic role.

Exercise Stress Echocardiography in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

More than half of patients with heart failure have a preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The prevalence of HFpEF has been increasing worldwide and is expected to increase further, making it an important health-care problem. The diagnosis of HFpEF is straightforward in the presence of obvious objective signs of congestion; however, it is challenging in patients presenting with a low degree of congestion because abnormal elevation in intracardiac pressures may occur only during physiological stress conditions, such as during exercise. On the basis of this hemodynamic background, current consensus guidelines have emphasized the importance of exercise stress testing to reveal abnormalities during exercise, and exercise stress echocardiography (i.e., diastolic stress echocardiography) may be used as an initial diagnostic approach to HFpEF owing to its noninvasive nature and wide availability. However, evidence supporting the use of this method remains limited and many knowledge gaps exist with respect to diastolic stress echocardiography. This review summarizes the current understanding of the use of diastolic stress echocardiography in the diagnostic evaluation of HFpEF and discusses its strengths and limitations to encourage future studies on this subject.

Exercise Intolerance in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction

Exercise intolerance represents a typical feature of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and is associated with a poor quality of life, frequent hospitalizations, and increased all-cause mortality. The cardiopulmonary exercise test is the best method to quantify exercise intolerance, and allows detection of the main mechanism responsible for the exercise limitation, influencing treatment and prognosis. Exercise training programs improve exercise tolerance in HFpEF. However, studies are needed to identify appropriate type and duration. This article discusses the pathophysiology of exercise limitation in HFpEF, describes methods of determining exercise tolerance class, and evaluates prognostic implications and potential therapeutic strategies.

Exercise Oscillatory Ventilation in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

To assess the prevalence and clinical correlates of exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Retrospective single-center study. Thirty-six consecutive HCM patients who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Two patients (5.6%) had EOV. Both patients with peak oxygen consumption (VO₂) less than or equal to 9.1 ml/kg/min had EOV. Left atrial size was greater in patients with EOV. Of the 2 patients in the study population with an abnormal blood pressure response to exercise, 1 had EOV. Both patients with New York Heart Association Class 3 heart failure had EOV. This is the first report of EOV in HCM. EOV is uncommon in patients with HCM. EOV appears to be a marker of disease severity as evidenced by overt heart failure, left atrial enlargement, and low peak VO₂.

Physical Functioning in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly prevalent, yet interventions and therapies to improve outcomes remain limited. There has been increasing attention towards the impact of comorbidities and physical functioning (PF) on poor clinical outcomes within this population. In this review, we summarize and discuss the literature on PF in HFpEF, its association with clinical and patient-centered outcomes, and future advances in the care of HFpEF with respect to PF. Multiple PF metrics have been demonstrated to provide prognostic value within HFpEF, yet the data are less robust compared with other patient populations, highlighting the need for further investigation. The evaluation and detection of poor PF provides a potential strategy to improve care in HFpEF, and future studies are needed to understand if modulating PF improves clinical and/or patient-reported outcomes. LAY SUMMARY: • Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) commonly have impaired physical functioning (PF) demonstrated by limitations across a wide range of common PF metrics.• Impaired PF metrics demonstrate prognostic value for both clinical and patient-reported outcomes in HFpEF, making them plausible therapeutic targets to improve outcomes.• Clinical trials are ongoing to investigate novel methods of detecting, monitoring, and improving impaired PF to enhance HFpEF care.Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly prevalent, yet interventions and therapies to improve outcomes remain limited. As such, there has been increasing focus on the impact of physical performance (PF) on clinical and patient-centered outcomes. In this review, we discuss the state of PF in patients with HFpEF by examining the multitude of PF metrics available, their respective strengths and limitations, and their associations with outcomes in HFpEF. We highlight future advances in the care of HFpEF with respect to PF, particularly regarding the evaluation and detection of poor PF.

Altered Hemodynamics and End-Organ Damage in Heart Failure: Impact on the Lung and Kidney

Heart failure is characterized by pathologic hemodynamic derangements, including elevated cardiac filling pressures ("backward" failure), which may or may not coexist with reduced cardiac output ("forward" failure). Even when normal during unstressed conditions such as rest, hemodynamics classically become abnormal during stressors such as exercise in patients with heart failure. This has important upstream and downstream effects on multiple organ systems, particularly with respect to the lungs and kidneys. Hemodynamic abnormalities in heart failure are affected by processes that extend well beyond the cardiac myocyte, including important roles for pericardial constraint, ventricular interaction, and altered venous capacity. Hemodynamic perturbations have widespread effects across multiple heart failure phenotypes, ranging from reduced to preserved ejection fraction, acute to chronic disease, and cardiogenic shock to preserved perfusion states. In the lung, hemodynamic derangements lead to the development of abnormalities in ventilatory control and efficiency, pulmonary congestion, capillary stress failure, and eventually pulmonary vascular disease. In the kidney, hemodynamic perturbations lead to sodium and water retention and worsening renal function. Improved understanding of the mechanisms by which altered hemodynamics in heart failure affect the lungs and kidneys is needed in order to design novel strategies to improve clinical outcomes.

Mitigation of Exercise Oscillatory Ventilation Score by Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) is a consequence of ventilatory control system instability and is commonly observed in patients with advanced heart failure (HF); it is associated with adverse prognosis. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) on oscillatory ventilation as quantified by a proposed EOV score.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients with HF (N = 35) who underwent clinically indicated CRT, cardiopulmonary exercise testing and carbon dioxide (CO₂) chemosensitivity by rebreathe before and 4-6 months after CRT were included in this post hoc analysis. With CRT, EOV scores improved in 22 patients (63%). In these patients, left ventricular ejection fraction, left atrial volume, brain natriuretic peptide concentration, and CO₂ chemosensitivity significantly improved after CRT (P < 0.05). Furthermore, minute ventilation per unit CO₂ production significantly decreased, and end-tidal CO₂ increased at rest and at peak exercise post-CRT. Multiple regression analysis showed only the change of CO₂ chemosensitivity to be significantly associated with the improvement of the EOV score (b = 0.64; F = 11.3; P = 0.004). In the group without EOV score improvement (n = 13), though left ventricular ejection fraction significantly increased with CRT (P = 0.015), no significant changes in ventilation or gas exchange were observed.

CONCLUSION

The EOV score was mitigated by CRT and was associated with decreased CO₂ chemosensitivity.

Pulmonary Limitations in Heart Failure

The heart and lungs are intimately linked. Hence, impaired function of one organ may lead to changes in the other. Accordingly, heart failure is associated with airway obstruction, loss of lung volume, impaired gas exchange, and abnormal ventilatory control. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is an excellent tool for evaluation of gas exchange and ventilatory control. Indeed, many parameters routinely measured during cardiopulmonary exercise testing, including the level of minute ventilation per unit of carbon dioxide production and the presence of exercise oscillatory ventilation, have been found to be strongly associated with prognosis in patients with heart failure.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation and prognosis in heart failure patients with reduced and mid-range ejection fraction

AIMS

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) is a pivotal cardiopulmonary exercise test parameter for the prognostic evaluation of patients with chronic heart failure (HF). It has been described in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (<40%, HFrEF) and with HF with preserved ejection fraction (>50%, HFpEF), but no data are available for patients with HF with mid-range ejection fraction (40-49%, HFmrEF). The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic role of EOV in HFmrEF patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We analysed 1239 patients with HFmrEF and 4482 patients with HFrEF, enrolled in the MECKI score database, with a 2-year follow-up. The study endpoint was the composite of cardiovascular death, urgent heart transplant, and ventricular assist device implantation. We identified EOV in 968 cases (16% and 17% of cases in HFmrEF and HFrEF, respectively). HFrEF EOV+ patients were significantly older, and their parameters suggested a more severe HF than HFrEF EOV- patients. A similar behaviour was found in HFmrEF EOV+ vs. EOV- patients. Kaplan-Meier analysis, irrespective of ejection fraction, showed that EOV is associated with a worse survival, and that patients with HFrEF and HFmrEF EOV+ had a significantly worse outcome than the EOV- of the same ejection fraction groups. EOV-associated survival differences in HFmrEF patients started after 18 months of follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Exercise oscillatory ventilation has a similar prevalence and ominous prognostic value in both HFmrEF and HFrEF patients, indicating a group of patients in need of a more intensive follow-up and a more aggressive therapy. In HFmrEF, the survival curves between EOV+ and EOV- patients diverged only after 18 months.

Effect of pre-discharge cardiopulmonary fitness on outcomes in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction after percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze cardiopulmonary fitness in Phase I cardiac rehabilitation on the prognosis of patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

The study enrolled a total of 499 STEMI patients treated with PCI between January 2015 and December 2015. Patients were assigned to individualized exercise prescriptions (IEP) group and non-individualized exercise prescriptions (NIEP) group according to whether they accept or refuse individualized exercise prescriptions. We compared the incidence of major cardiovascular events between the two groups. IEP group were further divided into two subgroups based on prognosis status, namely good prognosis (GP) group and poor prognosis (PP) group. Key cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPX) variables that may affect the prognosis of patients were identified through comparison of the cardio-respiratory fitness (CRF).

RESULTS

There is no significant difference in the incidence of cardio-genetic death, re-hospitalization, heart failure, stroke, or atrial fibrillation between the IEP and the NIEP group. But the incidence of total major adverse cardiac events (MACE) was significantly lower in the IEP group than in the NIEP group (P = 0.039). The oxygen consumption (VO₂) at ventilation threshold (VT), minute CO₂ ventilation (E-VCO₂), margin of minute ventilation carbon dioxide production (△CO₂)_, rest partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide(R-P_ETCO₂), exercise partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide(E-P_ETCO₂) and margin of partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide(△P_ETCO₂) were significantly higher in the GP subgroup than in the PP subgroup; and the slope for minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (V_E/VCO₂) was significantly lower in GP subgroup than in PP subgroup (P = 0.010). The VO₂ at VT, V_E/VCO₂ slope, E-VCO₂, △CO₂, R-P_ETCO₂, E-P_ETCO₂ and margin of partial pressure of end-tidal carbon dioxide CO₂ (△P_ETCO₂) were predictive of adverse events. The VO₂ at VT was an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Individualized exercise prescription of Phase I cardiac rehabilitation reduced the incidence of cardiovascular events in patients with STEMI after PCI. VO₂ at VT is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease prognosis, and could be used as an important evaluating indicator for Phase I cardiac rehabilitation.

Combination of Peak Exercise Systolic Blood Pressure and Left Atrial Diameter as a Novel Non-Spirometry Prognostic Predictor Comparable to Peak Oxygen Uptake for Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction

BACKGROUND

Although peak oxygen uptake (pV̇O2) is a well-established powerful prognostic predictor in heart failure (HF) patients, implementation of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPX) is limited by its complex analysis. We aimed to develop a new bivariate predictor obtained without respiratory gas measurement, comparable to pV̇O2.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 560 consecutive HF patients with ejection fraction (EF) <45% who underwent CPX. During a median follow-up of 49.0 months, the composite of all-cause death or HF hospitalization occurred in 228 patients (40.7%) and all-cause death in 111 (19.8%). pV̇O2was the strongest single predictor of the composite outcome (chi-square, 99.3). Among the bivariate non-spirometry parameters, the ratio of systolic blood pressure at peak exercise to left atrial diameter (pSBP/LAD) was the strongest predictor (chi-square, 112.4). Patients with pSBP/LAD <2.8 mmHg/mm, compared with those with pSBP/LAD ≥2.8 mmHg/mm, had a hazard ratio of 3.84 (95% confidence interval, 2.95-5.04) for the composite outcome and 3.66 (2.50-5.37) for all-cause death. In the subgroup with pV̇O2<14 mL/kg/min (n=149), where pV̇O2had no further predictive value, pSBP was the strongest single predictor, and the predictive power of pSBP/LAD was more enhanced.

CONCLUSIONS

pSBP/LAD was a new powerful predictor of HF hospitalization and death, comparable to pV̇O2, in HF with reduced EF. Because of its simplicity and high availability, this index has the potential for more widespread use than pV̇O2.

The Role of Gas Exchange Variables in Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing for Risk Stratification and Management of Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is common in the developed world and results in significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate risk assessment methods and prognostic variables are therefore needed to guide clinical decision making for medical therapy and surgical interventions with the ultimate goal of decreasing risk and improving health outcomes. The purpose of this review is to examine the role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) and its most commonly used ventilatory gas exchange variables for the purpose of risk stratification and management of HFrEF. We evaluated five widely studied gas exchange variables from CPET in HFrEF patients based on nine previously used systematic criteria for biomarkers. This paper provides clinicians with a comprehensive and critical overview, class recommendations and evidence levels. Although some CPET variables met more criteria than others, evidence supporting the clinical assessment of variables beyond peak V̇O₂ is well-established. A multi-variable approach also including the V̇_E-V̇CO₂ slope and EOV is therefore recommended.

Prognostic Role of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Clinical Practice

Risk stratification is a mainstay in the care of cardiac and pulmonary disorders, as the identification of adverse outcomes helps provide measures to improve survival and quality of life. The cardiopulmonary exercise test is a useful prognostic tool in the clinical evaluation of several pathological conditions, such as heart diseases, respiratory disorders, and pulmonary hypertension. If not contraindicated, a cardiopulmonary exercise test should always be performed and integrated with clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic parameters to better stratify patient risk. In heart failure, the cardiopulmonary exercise test is important in all the stages of patient management, from diagnosis to risk assessment. Different exercise variables have been advocated as prognostic indicators in this condition, including peak oxygen uptake, ventilatory efficiency, respiratory patterns, and identification of the anaerobic threshold. The prognostic role of the cardiopulmonary exercise test in heart failure is amplified when included in multiparametric risk stratification methodology, currently considered the best method to assess patient outcome. In respiratory disorders and in pulmonary hypertension, cardiopulmonary exercise test parameters, focusing on ventilatory performance during exercise, may help evaluate the risk of adverse events. Finally, the cardiopulmonary exercise test may help define the presence of coexisting cardiac and respiratory disorders, a combination that leads to increased rates of disability and mortality.

Periodic Breathing during Incremental Exercise

Periodic breathing during incremental cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a regularly recurring waxing and waning of tidal volume due to oscillations in central respiratory drive. Periodic breathing is a sign of respiratory control system instability, which may occur at rest or during exercise. The possible mechanisms responsible for exertional periodic breathing might be related to any instability of the ventilatory regulation caused by: (1) increased circulatory delay (i.e., circulation time from the lung to the brain and chemoreceptors due to reduced cardiac index leading to delay in information transfer), (2) increase in controller gain (i.e., increased central and peripheral chemoreceptor sensitivity to arterial partial pressure of oxygen and of carbon dioxide), or (3) reduction in system damping (i.e., baroreflex impairment). Periodic breathing during exercise is observed in several cardiovascular disease populations, but it is a particularly frequent phenomenon in heart failure due to systolic dysfunction. The detection of exertional periodic breathing is linked to outcome and heralds worse prognosis in heart failure, independently of the criteria adopted for its definition. In small heart failure cohorts, exertional periodic breathing has been abolished with several dedicated interventions, but results have not yet been confirmed. Accordingly, further studies are needed to define the role of visceral feedbacks in determining periodic breathing during exercise as well as to look for specific tools for preventing/treating its occurrence in heart failure.

Assessment of Thoracic Blood Volume by Computerized Tomography in Patients With Heart Failure and Periodic Breathing

BACKGROUND

Periodic breathing (PB) is often observed in patients with HF at rest, with sleep and during exercise. However, mechanisms underlying abnormal ventilatory control are not entirely established.

METHODS

Eleven subjects with HF (10 males, age = 69 ± 12 y) and 12 age-matched control subjects (8 males, age = 65 ± 9 y) participated in the study. PB was defined as a peak in the 0.003-0.04 Hz frequency range of the flow signal during 6 minutes of awake resting breathing. Thoracic blood volumes (V_t, thorax; V_h, heart; V_p, pulmonary), mean transit times (MTTs), and extravascular lung water (EVLW) were quantified using computerized tomography.

RESULTS

PB was observed in 7 subjects with HF and was associated with worse functional status. The HF PB-present group had thoracic blood volumes nearly double those of control and HF PB-absent subjects (volumes reported as mL/m² body surface area, P values vs control: control = 813 ± 246, HF PB-absent = 822 ± 161 P = .981, HF PB-present = 1579 ± 548 P = .002). PB was associated with longer pulmonary MTT (control = 6.7 ± 1.2 s, HF PB-absent = 6.0 ± 0.8 s, HF PB-present = 8.4 ± 1.6 s; P = .033, HF PB-present vs HF PB-absent). EVLW was not elevated in the PB group.

CONCLUSIONS

Subjects with HF and PB at rest have greater centralization of blood volume.

Post-Exercise Oxygen Uptake Recovery Delay: A Novel Index of Impaired Cardiac Reserve Capacity in Heart Failure

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to characterize the functional and prognostic significance of oxygen uptake (VO2) kinetics following peak exercise in individuals with heart failure (HF).

BACKGROUND

It is unknown to what extent patterns of VO2 recovery following exercise reflect circulatory response during exercise in HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF).

METHODS

We investigated patients (30 HFpEF, 20 HFrEF, and 22 control subjects) who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing with invasive hemodynamic monitoring and a second distinct HF cohort (n = 106) who underwent noninvasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing with assessment of long-term outcomes. Fick cardiac output (CO) and cardiac filling pressures were measured at rest and throughout exercise in the initial cohort. A novel metric, VO2 recovery delay (VO2RD), defined as time until post-exercise VO2 falls permanently below peak VO2, was measured to characterize VO2 recovery kinetics.

RESULTS

VO2RD in patients with HFpEF (median 25 s [interquartile range (IQR): 9 to 39 s]) and HFrEF (28 s [IQR: 2 to 52 s]) was in excess of control subjects (5 s [IQR: 0 to 7 s]; p < 0.0001 and p = 0.003, respectively). VO2RD was inversely related to cardiac output augmentation during exercise in HFpEF (ρ = -0.70) and HFrEF (ρ = -0.73, both p < 0.001). In the second cohort, VO2RD predicted transplant-free survival in univariate and multivariable Cox regression analysis (Cox hazard ratios: 1.49 and 1.37 per 10-s increase in VO2RD, respectively; both p < 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Post-exercise VO2RD is an easily recognizable, noninvasively derived pattern that signals impaired cardiac output augmentation during exercise and predicts outcomes in HF. The presence and duration of VO2RD may complement established exercise measurements for assessment of cardiac reserve capacity.

Ventilatory response to exercise in cardiopulmonary disease: the role of chemosensitivity and dead space

The lungs and heart are irrevocably linked in their oxygen (O₂) and carbon dioxide (CO₂) transport functions. Functional impairment of the lungs often affects heart function and vice versa The steepness with which ventilation (V'_E) rises with respect to CO₂ production (V'_CO2 ) (i.e. the V'_E/V'_CO2 slope) is a measure of ventilatory efficiency and can be used to identify an abnormal ventilatory response to exercise. The V'_E/V'_CO2 slope is a prognostic marker in several chronic cardiopulmonary diseases independent of other exercise-related variables such as peak O₂ uptake (V'_O2 ). The V'_E/V'_CO2 slope is determined by two factors: 1) the arterial CO₂ partial pressure (P_aCO2 ) during exercise and 2) the fraction of the tidal volume (V_T) that goes to dead space (V_D) (i.e. the physiological dead space ratio (V_D/V_T)). An altered P_aCO2 set-point and chemosensitivity are present in many cardiopulmonary diseases, which influence V'_E/V'_CO2 by affecting P_aCO2 Increased ventilation-perfusion heterogeneity, causing inefficient gas exchange, also contributes to the abnormal V'_E/V'_CO2 observed in cardiopulmonary diseases by increasing V_D/V_T During cardiopulmonary exercise testing, the P_aCO2 during exercise is often not measured and V_D/V_T is only estimated by taking into account the end-tidal CO₂ partial pressure (P_ETCO2 ); however, P_aCO2 is not accurately estimated from P_ETCO2 in patients with cardiopulmonary disease. Measuring arterial gases (P_aO2 and P_aCO2 ) before and during exercise provides information on the real (and not "estimated") V_D/V_T coupled with a true measure of gas exchange efficiency such as the difference between alveolar and arterial O₂ partial pressure and the difference between arterial and end-tidal CO₂ partial pressure during exercise.

Minute-Ventilation Variability during Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test is Higher in Sedentary Men Than in Athletes

BACKGROUND

The occurrence of minute-ventilation oscillations during exercise, named periodic breathing, exhibits important prognostic information in heart failure. Considering that exercise training could influence the fluctuation of ventilatory components during exercise, we hypothesized that ventilatory variability during exercise would be greater in sedentary men than athletes.

OBJECTIVE

To compare time-domain variability of ventilatory components of sedentary healthy men and athletes during a progressive maximal exercise test, evaluating their relationship to other variables usually obtained during a cardiopulmonary exercise test.

METHODS

Analysis of time-domain variability (SD/n and RMSSD/n) of minute-ventilation (Ve), respiratory rate (RR) and tidal volume (Vt) during a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test of 9 athletes and 9 sedentary men was performed. Data was compared by two-tailed Student T test and Pearson´s correlations test.

RESULTS

Sedentary men exhibited greater Vt (SD/n: 1.6 ± 0.3 vs. 0.9 ± 0.3 mL/breaths; p < 0.001) and Ve (SD/n: 97.5 ± 23.1 vs. 71.6 ± 4.8 mL/min x breaths; p = 0.038) variabilities than athletes. VE/VCO2 correlated to Vt variability (RMSSD/n) in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Time-domain variability of Vt and Ve during exercise is greater in sedentary than athletes, with a positive relationship between VE/VCO2 pointing to a possible influence of ventilation-perfusion ratio on ventilatory variability during exercise in healthy volunteers.

Prognostic Value of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Heart Failure With Reduced, Midrange, and Preserved Ejection Fraction

Background

This study aimed to compare the independent and incremental prognostic value of peak oxygen consumption (VO₂) and minute ventilation/carbon dioxide production (VE/VCO₂) in heart failure (HF) with preserved (HFpEF), midrange (HFmEF), and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction (LVEF).

Methods and Results

In 195 HFpEF (LVEF ≥50%), 144 HFmEF (LVEF 40–49%), and 630 HFrEF (LVEF <40%) patients, we assessed the association of cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables with the composite outcome of death, left ventricular assist device implantation, or heart transplantation (256 events; median follow‐up of 4.2 years), and 2‐year incident HF hospitalization (244 events). In multivariable Cox regression analysis, greater association with outcomes in HFpEF than HFrEF were noted with peak VO₂ (HR [95% confidence interval]: 0.76 [0.67–0.87] versus 0.87 [0.83–0.90] for the composite outcome, P_interaction=0.052; 0.77 [0.69–0.86] versus 0.92 [0.88–0.95], respectively for HF hospitalization, P_interaction=0.003) and VE/VCO₂ slope (1.11 [1.06–1.17] versus 1.04 [1.03–1.06], respectively for the composite outcome, P_interaction=0.012; 1.10 [1.05–1.15] versus 1.04 [1.03–1.06], respectively for HF hospitalization, P_interaction=0.019). In HFmEF, peak VO₂ and VE/VCO₂ slope were associated with the composite outcome (0.79 [0.70–0.90] and 1.12 [1.05–1.19], respectively), while only peak VO₂ was related to HF hospitalization (0.81 [0.72–0.92]). In HFpEF and HFrEF, peak VO₂ and VE/VCO₂ slope provided incremental prognostic value beyond clinical variables based on the C‐statistic, net reclassification improvement, and integrated diagnostic improvement, with models containing both measures demonstrating the greatest incremental value.

Conclusions

Both peak VO₂ and VE/VCO₂ slope provided incremental value beyond clinical characteristics and LVEF for predicting outcomes in HFpEF. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing variables provided greater risk discrimination in HFpEF than HFrEF.

Role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in clinical stratification in heart failure. A position paper from the Committee on Exercise Physiology and Training of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology

Traditionally, the main indication for cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) in heart failure (HF) was for the selection of candidates to heart transplantation: CPET was mainly performed in middle-aged male patients with HF and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Today, CPET is used in broader patients' populations, including women, elderly, patients with co-morbidities, those with preserved ejection fraction, or left ventricular assistance device recipients, i.e. individuals with different responses to incremental exercise and markedly different prognosis. Moreover, the diagnostic and prognostic utility of symptom-limited CPET parameters derived from submaximal tests is more and more considered, since many patients are unable to achieve maximal aerobic power. Repeated tests are also being used for risk stratification and evaluation of intervention, so that these data are now available. Finally, patients, physicians and healthcare decision makers are increasingly considering how treatments might impact morbidity and quality of life rather than focusing more exclusively on hard endpoints (such as mortality) as was often the case in the past. Innovative prognostic flowcharts, with CPET at their core, that help optimize risk stratification and the selection of management options in HF patients, have been developed.

Physiological Techniques and Pulmonary Hypertension - Left Heart Disease

Group 2 Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with left heart disease (LHD;Group 2 PH) and is the most common form of PH. Group 2 PH represents an important subgroup of patients with LHD where the development of PH leads to a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. Early diagnosis may provide an opportunity to intervene and significantly delay progression. In addition to clinical suspicion, several approaches including hemodynamic assessment, exercise testing, and imaging techniques play an important role in better disease characterization and management. Here, we review the role of physiologic based hemodynamic and exercise assessments of Group 2 PH patients.

Prognostic value of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The Henry Ford HospITal CardioPulmonary EXercise Testing (FIT-CPX) project

BACKGROUND

Although cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) testing in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction is well established, there are limited data on the value of CPX variables in patients with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We sought to determine the prognostic value of select CPX measures in patients with HFpEF.

METHODS

This was a retrospective analysis of patients with HFpEF (ejection fraction ≥ 50%) who performed a CPX test between 1997 and 2010. Selected CPX variables included peak oxygen uptake (VO2), percent predicted maximum oxygen uptake (ppMVO2), minute ventilation to carbon dioxide production slope (VE/VCO2 slope) and exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV). Separate Cox regression analyses were performed to assess the relationship between each CPX variable and a composite outcome of all-cause mortality or cardiac transplant.

RESULTS

We identified 173 HFpEF patients (45% women, 58% non-white, age 54 ± 14 years) with complete CPX data. During a median follow-up of 5.2 years, there were 42 deaths and 5 cardiac transplants. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year cumulative event-free survival was 96%, 90%, and 82%, respectively. Based on the Wald statistic from the Cox regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, and β-blockade therapy, ppMVO2 was the strongest predictor of the end point (Wald χ(2) = 15.0, hazard ratio per 10%, P < .001), followed by peak VO2 (Wald χ(2) = 11.8, P = .001). VE/VCO2 slope (Wald χ(2)= 0.4, P = .54) and EOV (Wald χ(2) = 0.15, P = .70) had no significant association to the composite outcome.

CONCLUSION

These data support the prognostic utility of peak VO2 and ppMVO2 in patients with HFpEF. Additional studies are needed to define optimal cut points to identify low- and high-risk patients.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation: Mechanisms and prognostic significance

Alteration in breathing patterns characterized by cyclic variation of ventilation during rest and during exercise has been recognized in patients with advanced heart failure (HF) for nearly two centuries. Periodic breathing (PB) during exercise is known as exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) and is characterized by the periods of hyperpnea and hypopnea without interposed apnea. EOV is a non-invasive parameter detected during submaximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. Presence of EOV during exercise in HF patients indicates significant impairment in resting and exercise hemodynamic parameters. EOV is also an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in HF patients both with reduced and preserved ejection fraction irrespective of other gas exchange variables. Circulatory delay, increased chemosensitivity, pulmonary congestion and increased ergoreflex signaling have been proposed as the mechanisms underlying the generation of EOV in HF patients. There is no proven treatment of EOV but its reversal has been noted with phosphodiesterase inhibitors, exercise training and acetazolamide in relatively small studies. In this review, we discuss the mechanistic basis of PB during exercise and the clinical implications of recognizing PB patterns in patients with HF.

Altered breathing syndrome in heart failure: newer insights and treatment options

In patients with heart failure (HF), altered breathing patterns, including periodic breathing, Cheyne-Stokes breathing, and oscillatory ventilation, are seen in several situations. Since all forms of altered breathing cause similar detrimental effects on clinical outcomes, they may be considered collectively as an "altered breathing syndrome." Altered breathing syndrome should be recognized as a comorbid condition of HF and as a potential therapeutic target. In this review, we discuss mechanisms and therapeutic options of altered breathing while sleeping, while awake at rest, and during exercise.

An overview of the applied definitions and diagnostic methods to assess exercise oscillatory ventilation--a systematic review

The variable "exercise oscillatory ventilation" (EOV), assessed during cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET), recently became a fundamental prognostic parameter in patients with heart failure. In literature, various definitions are suggested, but an uniformly accepted description to identify EOV still lacks. We performed a systematic review of the literature in order to determine the different definitions and diagnostic techniques to assess EOV. A systematic search strategy was established and executed in seven databases (PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Clinical Trials, Science Direct, Pedro, Web Of Science library and Medline (Ovid)) resulting in 605 citations after de-duplication. Full-text articles (n=124) were assessed for eligibility, resulting in 75 citations. The review accounted 17,440 patients of whom 4,638 subjects presented EOV. Seven studies described EOV in a non-heart failure population accounting 168 EOV subjects. The definitions could be categorized in nine subdivisions of which four (n=43) referred to an original description. The other subdivisions were combinations of the original definitions (n=11), quantifications (n=4), computational (n=3), vaguely described (n=8) or not defined (n=6). Symptom limited maximal exercise tests were conducted to assess EOV, however the modes, protocols, software and data sampling were divers. Heterogeneity in the numerous definitions to identify EOV and the vaguely described assessment methods are hindering the evolution to a standardized uniformly accepted definition and technique to identify this abnormal breathing pattern. Unity in definition and international adopted assessment is warranted to strengthen its validity as a prognostic marker and could promote communication. It may facilitate clinical trials on pathophysiology and origin of EOV.

Exercise oscillatory ventilation in patients with Fontan physiology

BACKGROUND

Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV) refers to regular oscillations in minute ventilation (VE) during exercise. Its presence correlates with heart failure severity and worse prognosis in adults with acquired heart failure. We evaluated the prevalence and predictive value of EOV in patients with single ventricle Fontan physiology.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a cross-sectional analysis and prospective survival analysis of patients who had undergone a Fontan procedure and subsequent cardiopulmonary exercise test. Data were reviewed for baseline characteristics and incident mortality, heart transplant, or nonelective cardiovascular hospitalization. EOV was defined as regular oscillations for >60% of exercise duration with amplitude >15% of average VE. Survival analysis was performed using Cox regression. Among 253 subjects, EOV was present in 37.5%. Patients with EOV were younger (18.8±9.0 versus 21.7±10.1 years; P=0.02). EOV was associated with higher New York Heart Association functional class (P=0.02) and VE/VCO2 slope (36.8±6.9 versus 33.7±5.7; P=0.0002), but not with peak VO2 (59.7±14.3 versus 61.0±16.0% predicted; P=0.52) or noninvasive measures of cardiac function. The presence of EOV was associated with slightly lower mean cardiac index but other invasive hemodynamic variables were similar. During a median follow-up of 5.5 years, 22 patients underwent transplant or died (n=19 primary deaths, 3 transplants with 2 subsequent deaths). EOV was associated with increased risk of death or transplant (hazard ratio, 3.9; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-10.0; P=0.002) and also predicted the combined outcome of death, transplant, or nonelective cardiovascular hospitalization after adjusting for New York Heart Association functional class, peak VO2, and other covariates (multivariable hazard ratio, 2.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-3.6; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

EOV is common in the Fontan population and strongly predicts lower transplant-free survival.

Contemporary insights and novel treatment approaches to central sleep apnea syndrome in heart failure

OPINION STATEMENT

Central sleep apnea (CSA) is a common and under-diagnosed condition commonly associated with Cheyne-Stokes respiration. It is particularly prevalent in the heart failure population affecting up to 40 % of all patients with heart failure. The pathophysiology associated with CSA is based on the underlying effects of hypoventilation and hyperventilation, with neurologic dysregulation of respiratory control as the primary defect. However, therapeutic options are limited because of the prevailing perception that CSA is a consequence, rather than cause of morbidity and mortality. At present, the main focus remains treating the underlying problem (ie, intensifying heart failure therapeutics, decongestion), whereas additional suggestions of using acetazolamide, progesterone, nocturnal oxygen, and theophylline have not been validated with contemporary clinical trials. Positive pressure ventilation is currently the primary recommendation for all patients with sleep-disordered breathing (CSA included), and in some patients may effectively reduce the apnea-hypopnea index. However, significant research is ongoing to determine how to treat this complex patient population.