Take a deep (nitric oxide) breath and follow the reverse translational research pathway

Nitric Oxide in Cardiac Surgery: A Review Article

Perioperative organ injury remains a medical, social and economic problem in cardiac surgery. Patients with postoperative organ dysfunction have increases in morbidity, length of stay, long-term mortality, treatment costs and rehabilitation time. Currently, there are no pharmaceutical technologies or non-pharmacological interventions that can mitigate the continuum of multiple organ dysfunction and improve the outcomes of cardiac surgery. It is essential to identify agents that trigger or mediate an organ-protective phenotype during cardiac surgery. The authors highlight nitric oxide (NO) ability to act as an agent for perioperative protection of organs and tissues, especially in the heart-kidney axis. NO has been delivered in clinical practice at an acceptable cost, and the side effects of its use are known, predictable, reversible and relatively rare. This review presents basic data, physiological research and literature on the clinical application of NO in cardiac surgery. Results support the use of NO as a safe and promising approach in perioperative patient management. Further clinical research is required to define the role of NO as an adjunct therapy that can improve outcomes in cardiac surgery. Clinicians also have to identify cohorts of responders for perioperative NO therapy and the optimal modes for this technology.

Targeting myocardial ischaemic injury in the absence of reperfusion

Sudden myocardial ischaemia causes an acute coronary syndrome. In the case of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), this is usually caused by the acute rupture of atherosclerotic plaque and obstruction of a coronary artery. Timely restoration of blood flow can reduce infarct size, but ischaemic regions of myocardium remain in up to two-thirds of patients due to microvascular obstruction (MVO). Experimentally, cardioprotective strategies can limit infarct size, but these are primarily intended to target reperfusion injury. Here, we address the question of whether it is possible to specifically prevent ischaemic injury, for example in models of chronic coronary artery occlusion. Two main types of intervention are identified: those that preserve ATP levels by reducing myocardial oxygen consumption, (e.g. hypothermia; cardiac unloading; a reduction in heart rate or contractility; or ischaemic preconditioning), and those that increase myocardial oxygen/blood supply (e.g. collateral vessel dilation). An important consideration in these studies is the method used to assess infarct size, which is not straightforward in the absence of reperfusion. After several hours, most of the ischaemic area is likely to become infarcted, unless it is supplied by pre-formed collateral vessels. Therefore, therapies that stimulate the formation of new collaterals can potentially limit injury during subsequent exposure to ischaemia. After a prolonged period of ischaemia, the heart undergoes a remodelling process. Interventions, such as those targeting inflammation, may prevent adverse remodelling. Finally, harnessing of the endogenous process of myocardial regeneration has the potential to restore cardiomyocytes lost during infarction.

Editor's Choice- Pathophysiology and therapy of myocardial ischaemia/reperfusion syndrome

There is a need to find interventions able to reduce the extent of injury in reperfused ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) beyond timely reperfusion. In this review, we summarise the clinical impact of STEMI from epidemiological, clinical and biological perspectives. We also revise the pathophysiology underlying the ischaemia/reperfusion syndrome occurring in reperfused STEMI, including the several players involved in this syndrome, such as cardiomyocytes, microcirculation and circulating cells. Interventions aimed to reduce the resultant infarct size, known as cardioprotective therapies, are extensively discussed, putting the focus on both mechanical interventions (i.e. ischaemic conditioning) and promising pharmacological therapies, such as early intravenous metoprolol, exenatide and other glucose modulators, N-acetylcysteine as well as on some other classic therapies which have failed to be translated to the clinical arena. Novel targets for evolving therapeutic interventions to ameliorate ischaemia/reperfusion injury are also discussed. Finally, we highlight the necessity to improve the study design of future randomised clinical trials in the field, as well as to select patients better who can most likely benefit from cardioprotective interventions.

Pharmacological preconditioning with inhaled nitric oxide (NO): Organ-specific differences in the lifetime of blood and tissue NO metabolites

BACKGROUND

Endogenous nitric oxide (NO) may contribute to ischemic and anesthetic preconditioning while exogenous NO protects against ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury in the heart and other organs. Why those beneficial effects observed in animal models do not always translate into clinical effectiveness remains unclear. To mitigate reperfusion damage a source of NO is required. NO inhalation is known to increase tissue NO metabolites, but little information exists about the lifetime of these species. We therefore sought to investigate the fate of major NO metabolite classes following NO inhalation in mice in vivo.

METHODS

C57BL/6J mice were exposed to 80 ppm NO for 1 h. NO metabolites were measured in blood (plasma and erythrocytes) and tissues (heart, liver, lung, kidney and brain) immediately after NO exposure and up to 48 h thereafter. Concentrations of S-nitrosothiols, N-nitrosamines and NO-heme products as well as nitrite and nitrate were quantified by gas-phase chemiluminescence and ion chromatography. In separate experiments, mice breathed 80 ppm NO for 1 h prior to cardiac I/R injury (induced by coronary arterial ligation for 1 h, followed by recovery). After sacrifice, the size of the myocardial infarction (MI) and the area at risk (AAR) were measured.

RESULTS

After NO inhalation, elevated nitroso/nitrosyl levels returned to baseline over the next 24 h, with distinct multi-phasic decay profiles in each compartment. S/N-nitroso compounds and NO-hemoglobin in blood decreased exponentially, but remained above baseline for up to 30min, whereas nitrate was elevated for up to 3hrs after discontinuing NO breathing. Hepatic S/N-nitroso species concentrations remained steady for 30min before dropping exponentially. Nitrate only rose in blood, liver and kidney; nitrite tended to be lower in all organs immediately after NO inhalation but fluctuated considerably in concentration thereafter. NO inhalation before myocardial ischemia decreased the ratio of MI/AAR by 30% vs controls (p = 0.002); only cardiac S-nitrosothiols and NO-hemes were elevated at time of reperfusion onset.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolites in blood do not reflect NO metabolite status of any organ. Although NO is rapidly inactivated by hemoglobin-mediated oxidation in the circulation, long-lived tissue metabolites may account for the myocardial preconditioning effects of inhaled NO. NO inhalation may afford similar protection in other organs.