2021 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Impact of Banhabaekchulcheonmatang (Banxia Baizhu Tianma Tang) and Hwangryeonhaedoktang (Huang Lian Jie Du Tang) on edoxaban: Herb-drug interaction study in healthy subjects

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Concurrent use of traditional herbal medicines and conventional drugs, particularly for stroke treatment, is widespread, raising concerns about potential drug interactions.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This clinical study aimed to investigate interactions between edoxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, and two traditional herbal medicines commonly used for stroke: Banhabaekchulcheonmatang (BBCT) and Hwangryeonhaedoktang (HRHDT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Korean healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, open-label, three-period, three-treatment, two-sequence clinical study. Treatments consisted of a single oral dose of edoxaban tablet (60 mg) in the presence or absence of multiple doses of BBCT or HRHDT three times daily for six days. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of edoxaban and its active metabolite M4 were assessed following administration of edoxaban alone or in co-administration with BBCT or HRHDT.

RESULTS

When edoxaban was co-administered with BBCT or HRHDT, the area under the curve (AUC) of edoxaban remained unaffected. However, its peak concentrations (Cmax) were decreased by 18.5%-28.1%. Similarly, co-administration of edoxaban with BBCT or HRHDT slightly decreased the AUC of M4 and reduced its Cmax by 16.8%-27.1%. Results revealed that BBCT and HRHDT had a minor impact on pharmacokinetics of edoxaban and M4. Despite alterations in systemic exposures, all pharmacodynamic parameters of edoxaban derived from activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time were equivalent irrespective of herbal medicine co-administration.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings contribute to our understanding of potential interactions between conventional anticoagulants and traditional herbal medicines, highlighting the need for comprehensive evaluation in clinical practice.

Atrial fibrillation management in older hospitalized patients: Evidence of a poor oral anticoagulants prescriptive attitude from the Italian REPOSI registry

Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases in older patients which also show a high thromboembolic risk. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are recommended to prevent cardioembolic events and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improved anti-thrombotic treatment. However, the benefits/risks of anticoagulant in older patients still need to be completely defined. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe the treatment with OACs in older AF hospitalized patients, and to identify factors influencing OAC therapy or discontinuation using the REgistro Politerapie SIMI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify predictors of OACs treatment and discontinuation. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to evaluate one-year mortality by treatment groups. AF patients were 1,128(26.5 %) at discharge and 1,098(97.3 %) required OAC treatment; about half of them (N = 528;48.1 %) were no-OACs users; 236(21.5 %) and 334(30.4 %) used DOACs and VKA, respectively. Increasing DOACs use was observed during the study period. Predictors of OACs treatment were: BMI (OR:1.04; 95 %CI:1.01-1.07), Barthel index (OR:1.01; 95 %CI:1.01-1.02), medications number (OR:1.07; 95 %CI:1.01-1.13). Conversely, a lower probability was found in patients with a high CIR.S (OR:0.59; 95 %CI:0.36-0.97) and neoplasm (OR:0.57; 95 %CI:0.37-0.88). Hospital stay (OR:1.02; 95 %CI:1.01-1.05), neoplasm (OR:2.25; 95 %CI:1.07-4.70) and INR (OR:1.21; 95 %CI:1.05-1.40) increased OACs discontinuation. A lower discontinuation was observed in dyslipidemic patients (OR:0.18; 95 %CI:0.04-0.82) and heart failure (OR:0.38; 95 %CI:0.21-0.70). Among AF patients, 157(14.3 %) died during the follow-up year. Age (HR = 1.05; 95 %CI = 1.03-1.08) and CIR.S (HR = 2.54; 95 %CI = 1.53-4.21) were associated with a greater mortality risk. In conclusion, critical issues related to the underuse and discontinuation of OACs therapy in hospitalized older patients were highlighted.

Real-world study of isavuconazole adverse events based on pharmacovigilance spontaneous reporting systems

BACKGROUND

Isavuconazole is a novel second-generation triazole antifungal agent.We conducted a retrospective investigation to analyze the occurrence of adverse events (AEs) associated with isavuconazole in real-world clinical use by data-mining self-reporting databases, aiming to provide comprehensive data for its safe and effective clinical application.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

All data obtained from the VigiBase, the EudraVigilance and the FAERS database. In the FAERS database, data mining algorithms, including reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR), were utilized to detect adverse event (AE) signals.

RESULTS

A total of 4,105 AE reports related to isavuconazole were retrieved from these databases. The highest proportion of AE reports was observed in individuals aged between 18-64 years old. The general disorders and administration site conditions system organ class accounted for the largest number of reported cases. The system organ classes with most signals and reports included general disorders and administration site conditions, blood and lymphatic system disorders as well as investigations related to hepatobiliary disorders. Notably high ROR and PRR values were observed for AE signals associated with hepatobiliary disorders.

CONCLUSION

Isavuconazole has fewer interactions and less liver, kidney and cardiac toxicity than other triazole antibiotics. The identification of novel AEs necessitates meticulous attention and further investigation and analysis.

Comparison of Risk-Scoring Models to Predict Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Patients With Direct Oral Anticoagulants

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) remains a concern with the use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). We evaluated the efficacy of four risk-scoring models (HAS-BLED, ATRIA, VTE-BLEED, and ORBIT) in predicting GIB according to the concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy in DOAC users.

METHODS

Patients prescribed DOAC between December 2014 and October 2020 were enrolled in two university-affiliated hospitals. The performance of the four models was compared based on the concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcomes were likelihood ratios and the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve to predict GIB.

RESULTS

A total of 4494 patients were included in the study. The AUROC values for the entire cohort were 0.643 (95% CI: 0.601-0.686) for HAS-BLED, 0.693 (95% CI: 0.649-0.737) for ATRIA, 0.708 (95% CI: 0.665-0.750) for VTE-BLEED, and 0.709 (95% CI: 0.667-0.751) for ORBIT. The AUROC for all scoring models increased in patients without antiplatelet therapy compared to the entire cohort and patients with antiplatelet therapy. The specificity and diagnostic accuracy for all scoring models increased in patients without antiplatelet therapy compared to patients with antiplatelet.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirmed that current risk-scoring models for predicting GIB perform better in patients without antiplatelet therapy than in those on concomitant antiplatelet therapy. This suggests that future risk prediction models should consider the concomitant use of antiplatelet therapy for diagnostic accuracy.

Plasmatic variability of direct oral anticoagulants in people with atrial fibrillation and previous gastric surgery: a pilot case series

BACKGROUND

Data on cardioembolic prevention with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with previous gastric surgery are lacking. We report inter- and intra-individual differences in DOAC concentration in people with gastric surgery, to identify potential treatment options.

METHODS

Patients with previous gastric surgery receiving DOAC for AF as stroke secondary prevention, and undergoing peak-trough DOAC plasmatic testing were selected from the regional EDDIE-AF registry. DOAC levels were tested at least 75-102 h after DOAC initiation with Siemens Innovance® assays.

RESULTS

Eight patients with previous gastric surgery were included (mean age 75 years, 50% women). Overall, only 20/36 tests were within range (55.5%; apixaban 75.0%; dabigatran 0%; edoxaban 64.3%; rivaroxaban 33.3%). Rivaroxaban and dabigatran failed to reach therapeutic peak-trough concentrations. Apixaban and edoxaban reached therapeutic levels in 4/6 and 3/7 cases respectively, with marginal out-of-target concentrations in all remaining cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data support a consistent variability in DOAC absorption after gastric surgery, suggesting that implementation of DOAC plasmatic testing may help in ensuring therapeutic levels are met whenever DOACs are preferred over warfarin.

Phenotypes of Patients with Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) Underdosing in Atrial Fibrillation: Results from the ARENA Registry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Oral anticoagulation in patients with atrial fibrillation is crucial to prevent thrombus formation in the heart, a major cause of ischemic stroke. The appropriate dose of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) - either standard or reduced dose - must be chosen individually in accordance with defined patient characteristics. However, a significant proportion of patients receive inappropriately low DOAC doses (underdosing). With a novel medication-based approach, this study aims to facilitate the identification of patients at risk of DOAC underdosing.

METHODS

The prospective ARENA registry is a multi-centre study on patients with atrial fibrillation in Germany. Patients gave detailed information on medication, including over-the-counter preparations. Medication data were grouped according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification. In a bivariate analysis, the characteristics of patients on an appropriate versus inappropriate dose were compared (n = 866). To further evaluate variables for their association with underdosing, a model based on ATC third level medication data complemented with dose-adjustment criteria and validated clinical scores in all patients with complete information was built (n = 504).

RESULTS

In 15% of patients, an inappropriately low dose was found. The number of DOAC drug interactions, concomitant antiplatelet therapy and the total drug count were the most important predictors of DOAC underdosing. Mineral supplements and better health-related quality of life (HrQoL) were predictive of correct DOAC dosing, among others.

CONCLUSIONS

Medication-related data showed to be predictive of DOAC underdosing. Clinicians should check for inappropriately reduced DOAC doses, especially in patients undergoing antiplatelet therapy, polypharmacy and reduced HrQoL.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02978248; date of registration: 30 November 2016.

Early vs later non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with acute ischemic stroke and atrial fibrillation: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

There are conflicting published data on the optimal timing of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with acute ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of early initiation of NOACs with later initiation of NOACs in those patients, we conducted a meta-analysis of phase 3 or phase 4 randomized controlled trials.

METHODS

We systematically searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases. A random effects model was selected to pool the effect measurement estimates (risk ratios [RRs] and 95% confidence intervals [CIs]).

RESULTS

Three randomized controlled trials with 6442 enrolled patients with AF and acute ischemic stroke were included. Compared with later NOAC therapy, early NOAC therapy was associated with nonsignificant reductions in the risk of primary outcomes (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.65-1.05). Subgroup analysis found that in reducing risk of primary outcomes, early anticoagulation may benefit female patients more than male patients (0.54 [0.35-0.83] vs 0.97 [0.63-1.50]; P for interaction, .06). Numerically lower rates of recurrent ischemic stroke (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.56-1.15), death (RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.81-1.15), and systemic embolism (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.16-1.11) were observed in early initiation of NOACs in comparison with later initiation of NOACs. There was no difference in major bleeding (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.55-1.74), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.43-1.96), or major extracranial bleeding (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.28-1.95) between groups.

CONCLUSION

In AF patients with acute ischemic stroke, early initiation of NOACs is not inferior to later initiation of NOACs in reducing composite events, without increased hazard of bleeding, especially in female patients.

Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand

Background

Appropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been associated with clinical efficacy and safety. Several studies have shown that DOAC dosing are often inconsistent with guideline recommendations. Little is known about this issue in Thailand. This study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of DOAC dosing in Thai hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Method

This was a retrospective descriptive study conducted on hospitalized patients at Rajavithi Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Inpatients diagnosed with AF and treated with DOACs between February 2021 and February 2023 were enrolled in the study. The appropriate dosing of DOACs was assessed according to the recommendation of the 2021 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (EHRA). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data; median (interquartile range) for continuous variables, and numbers and percentages for categorical variables.

Results

A total of 120 patients with AF were evaluated for dosing. The patients received rivaroxaban in 47 cases (39.2 %), apixaban in 32 cases (26.7 %), edoxaban in 31 cases (25.8 %), and dabigatran in 10 cases (8.3 %). Most of the patients were elderly, with a median age of 77.5 (68-84) years. Females were predominant (57.5 %). Our findings indicate that the prevalence of appropriate dosing of DOACs was 63.3 %. However, approximately one-third of patients received inappropriate dosing, with 24 (20.0 %) being overdosed, and 20 (16.7 %) being underdosed. The highest overdosing and underdosing rates were seen in dabigatran (90.0 %) and apixaban (21.9 %), respectively.

Conclusion

Inappropriate dosing of DOACs according to the 2021 EHRA recommendations was high in 36.7 %, with overdosing mostly occurring in 20.0 %. The high number of inappropriate dosing highlights the need for implementation of optimal strategies to select the appropriate dose of DOACs in Thai hospitalized patients with AF.

Plasma apixaban concentrations and thrombin generation assay parameters in response to dose reduction for atrial fibrillation

AIMS

To investigate plasma apixaban concentrations and thrombin generation assay (TGA) parameters across different apixaban doses in atrial fibrillation patients who had dose-reduction criteria for apixaban.

METHODS

This observational study included 374 patients (mean age 75.6 ± 7.7 years, 54.8% female) with dose-reduction criteria for apixaban. The patients were divided into 3 groups: (i) on-label standard dose (5 mg twice daily, n = 166); (ii) on-label reduced dose (2.5 mg twice daily, n = 55); and (iii) off-label underdose (2.5 mg twice daily, n = 153). Apixaban concentrations determined via the anti-Xa assay and TGA parameters were compared at trough levels.

RESULTS

The off-label underdose group exhibited significantly lower apixaban trough concentrations than the on-label reduced-dose and standard-dose groups (56.7 ± 42.9 vs. 83.7 ± 70.4 vs. 129.9 ± 101.8 ng/mL, all P < .001). Less than 70% of all patients fell within the expected range of apixaban concentrations. Proportions exceeding the upper limit of the expected range were significantly lower in the off-label underdose group (1.3%) than in the on-label reduced-dose (9.1%, P = .005) and standard-dose (12.7%, P < .001) groups. The TGA parameters showed the on-label standard-dose group displaying the lowest thrombogenic profiles. Lower creatinine clearance was the most significant predictor of higher apixaban concentrations.

CONCLUSION

Off-label underdosed apixaban resulted in lower apixaban concentrations than both on-label standard and reduced-dose regimens. A considerable proportion of the patients exhibited apixaban concentrations outside the expected range, suggesting the potential benefits of plasma concentration monitoring. Further studies are needed to compare dosages directly, investigate the impact of plasma apixaban concentration monitoring and validate the current dose-reduction criteria.

Predictors and Outcomes of Inappropriate Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients Receiving Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose adjustment is based on age, renal function, and body weight. There is a paucity of data describing the factors associated with the prescription of inappropriate dosage and their impact on clinical outcomes among patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS

In a single-center study, 432 patients who were on long-term DOAC therapy and underwent TAVI between 2015 and 2022 were included. We analyzed the predictors and outcomes of inappropriate dosing of DOACs; namely apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. A composite endpoint, including all-cause mortality, life-threatening/major bleeding, stroke, peripheral thromboembolic complications, or myocardial infarction, was assessed after 1 year.

RESULTS

In this TAVI cohort, inappropriate DOAC dosing was observed in 20.6% of patients. Inappropriate DOAC dosage was related to female gender (adj. odds ratio [OR] 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-4.51, p < 0.001) as well as lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (adj. OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00, p = 0.019), and to the administration of non-rivaroxaban DOACs (adj. OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16-0.50, p < 0.001). After 1 year, patients on both appropriate and inappropriate DOAC dosage exhibited comparable rates of the composite endpoint (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.53-1.46, p = 0.622). Old age (adj. OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10, p = 0.018) as well as anemia (adj. OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99, p = 0.031) emerged as independent predictors of the composite endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

In this TAVI cohort, female gender and renal insufficiency were associated with inappropriate DOAC dosage, whereas rivaroxaban was linked to appropriate dosing. Inadequate DOAC dosage did not translate into a worse outcome in our TAVI population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospective Segeberg TAVI Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03192774).

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Competing stroke mechanisms despite adequate oral anticoagulant therapy: the role of transesophageal echocardiography

AIMS

Ischemic strokes in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) despite optimal adherence pose a therapeutic challenge. We assessed the utility of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in identifying potential competing cardiac causes for stroke that occurred despite adequate OAT.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke between January 2022 and June 2023 who were on OAT for an established long-term indication. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, along with assessment of OAT adherence, were conducted. Demographic data, OAT details, and stroke characteristics were analysed to determine the influence of TEE findings on therapeutic decisions.

RESULTS

We included 26 patients. TEE identified potential cardiac competing stroke mechanisms in 88% of cases, with valvular thrombi and left atrial or appendage thrombus being predominant. Infective endocarditis, often asymptomatic, was unexpectedly prevalent. TEE significantly influenced therapeutic decisions, especially in cases where transthoracic echocardiography was inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

TEE may be crucial for unravelling the mechanisms of ischemic stroke in patients on adequate OAT, guiding precise therapeutic strategies and potentially reducing the risk of recurrent embolic events. Our findings underscore the limitations of standard echocardiography in detecting cardiac embolic sources and emphasize the importance of tailored decision-making in secondary stroke prevention.

Handling delayed or missed direct oral anticoagulant doses: model-informed individual remedial dosing

ABSTRACT

Nonadherence to direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) pharmacotherapy may increase the risk of thromboembolism or bleeding, and delayed or missed doses are the most common types of nonadherence. Current recommendations from regulatory agencies or guidelines regarding this issue lack evidence and fail to consider individual differences. This study aimed to develop individual remedial dosing strategies when the dose was delayed or missed for DOACs, including rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban, and dabigatran etexilate. Remedial dosing regimens based on population pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) modeling and simulation strategies were developed to expeditiously restore drug concentration or PD biomarkers within the therapeutic range. Population PK-PD characteristics of DOACs were retrieved from previously published literature. The effects of factors that influence PK and PD parameters were assessed for their impact on remedial dosing regimens. A web-based dashboard was established with R-shiny to recommend remedial dosing regimens based on patient traits, dosing schedules, and delay duration. Addressing delayed or missed doses relies on the delay time and specific DOACs involved. Additionally, age, body weight, renal function, and polypharmacy may marginally affect remedial strategies. The proposed remedial dosing strategies surpass current recommendations, with less deviation time beyond the therapeutic range. The online dashboard offers quick and convenient solutions for addressing missed or delayed DOACs, enabling individualized remedial dosing strategies based on patient characteristics to mitigate the risks of bleeding and thrombosis.

Usual On-therapy Ranges of Drug Concentrations in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Treated with Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

 Although most patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) do not require drug concentration measurements, there are situations where such information could be useful. Existing guidance documents provide usual on-therapy ranges for drug concentrations, but these have important limitations.

METHODS

 This is a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting trough and peak levels of DOAC regimens approved for stroke prevention in AF. We used random effects models and the quantile estimation method to estimate the median and a usual on-therapy range (10th and 90th percentiles).

RESULTS

 Of 4,822 unique publications, 53 studies met eligibility (29,266 trough and 12,103 peak levels). Usual on-therapy ranges for trough levels were 38 to 155 and 58 to 206 ng/mL for apixaban 2.5 and 5 mg twice daily; 35 to 138 and 33 to 151 ng/mL for dabigatran 110 and 150 mg twice daily; 8 to 54 and 13 to 66 ng/mL for edoxaban 30 and 60 mg daily; and 16 to 74 and 19 to 72 ng/mL for rivaroxaban 15 and 20 mg daily. The corresponding range for peak levels were 96 to 251 and 132 to 343; 65 to 223 and 76 to 285; 57 to 219 and 127 to 407; 131 to 384, and 169 to 313 ng/mL, respectively.

CONCLUSION

 This systematic review and meta-analysis provides updated and more representative usual on-therapy ranges of DOAC levels in patients with AF.

Treatment appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation for stroke prevention: A real-world prospective study

INTRODUCTION

Inappropriate use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is common, affecting up to 30% of atrial fibrillation (AF) population receiving treatment for stroke prevention. This study assessed appropriateness of anticoagulation in anticoagulation-naive AF patients treated with DOACs during a 12-month prospective follow-up.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study included all anticoagulation-naive AF patients referred for anticoagulation for stroke prevention at a tertiary cardiovascular center. Participants were prospectively followed through phone call interviews by a dedicated nurse at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after enrollment.

RESULTS

Of 403 anticoagulation-naive AF patients, rivaroxaban was prescribed for 325 patients (80.7%) and apixaban for 78 (19.3%). Inappropriate therapy was observed in 23% (76/325) and 46% (36/78) of patients treated with rivaroxaban and apixaban, respectively. Undertreatment was predominant scenario for both drugs, detected in 78.5% (78/112) of patients treated inappropriately, and was more frequently observed with apixaban versus rivaroxaban (44.8% vs 16.3%). During 12 months, inappropriate treatment was corrected in only 13% of all patients. The multivariate regression model identified creatinine clearance ≤ 49 mL/min (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 4.21), female sex (OR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.97), and age ≥ 80 years (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.22 to 2.83) as independent covariates associated with inappropriate dosing.

CONCLUSIONS

Inappropriate therapy with DOACs for stroke prevention in patients with AF is common, and the dosage were corrected in few patients during the 12-month follow-up. Our findings highlight the persistent lack of knowledge regarding appropriate DOAC dosage and need for continuous education.

Comparative safety and effectiveness of oral anticoagulants in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and high risk of gastrointestinal bleeding: A nationwide French cohort study

BACKGROUND

This observational study compared effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs; apixaban, rivaroxaban, dabigatran) or vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at high risk for gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB).

METHODS

Anticoagulant-naïve adults with NVAF with ≥1 GIB risk factor, initiating anticoagulant treatment January 2016-December 2019, and covered by the French national health data system were eligible. Outcomes included major bleeding (MB) and stroke/systemic embolism (SE). Patient characteristics were balanced using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

A total of 314,184 patients were identified with 162,150 (51.5%) in the apixaban cohort, 88,427 (28.1%) in the rivaroxaban cohort, 16,465 (5.2%) in the dabigatran cohort, and 47,142 (15.0%) in the VKA cohort (mean age 79.0 years, standard deviation 10.5; 51.0% female). A total of 45,124 apixaban-VKAs, 38,737 rivaroxaban-VKAs, 16,415 dabigatran-VKAs, 88,414 apixaban-rivaroxaban, 16,464 apixaban-dabigatran, and 16,459 rivaroxaban-dabigatran pairs were retained after propensity score matching. Apixaban had lower risk of MB versus dabigatran (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.63-0.83) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.59-0.66). Apixaban had lower risk of GIB versus dabigatran (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.37-0.56) and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.49-0.59). Risk of GIB was similar with dabigatran versus rivaroxaban (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.89-1.24). Apixaban had lower risk of stroke/SE versus rivaroxaban (HR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.84-0.96), while risk was similar versus dabigatran (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.9-1.3). All DOACs had lower risk of MB and stroke/SE versus VKAs (p<0.001 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs had improved safety and effectiveness from bleeding and stroke/SE, respectively, versus VKAs among patients with NVAF at high risk for GIB. Apixaban was associated with lower MB and GIB risk versus other DOACs. For stroke/SE, apixaban was associated with reduced risk versus rivaroxaban and similar risk versus dabigatran.

Anatomical description of malformations of the neck of the left atrial appendage

The recently-described left atrial appendage (LAA) neck is a truncated cone-shaped structure that connects the LAA orifice to its lobe. It shows malformations in some cases, but their exact description and clinical significance are unknown. Therefore, the aim of this study was to provide a detailed anatomical and morphometric analysis of LAA neck malformations in clinical context. A total of 250 autopsied human hearts (20.0% women, 46.7 ± 18.2 years old) were examined for mural malformations: spikes and bulges. Endocardial roughness of the LAA neck with a depth <2 mm and no recognizable epicardial protrusion was defined as ectopic trabeculation. LAA neck malformations were found in 13.6%, bulges in 10.0% of the hearts examined, spikes in only 3.2%, and ectopic trabeculations in 24.8%. In one case, both a bulge and a spike were found in the LAA neck. Most LAA neck roughness was observed on the aortic and venous surfaces of the LAA neck. Those surfaces were the most common locations for malformations and ectopic trabeculations. The LAA wall was significantly thinner than the surrounding neck wall within the bulges and the ectopic trabeculations, but not in the spikes.

Intake Patterns and Experiences of Patients Using Direct Oral Anticoagulants Measured by Electronic Monitoring in Community Pharmacies

Purpose

Several international organizations advocate for monitoring of adherence to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), given the prevalent issue of suboptimal adherence to DOACs. The aim was to investigate intake patterns in patients on DOAC therapy by electronic monitoring of medication adherence in community pharmacies (using a Medication Event Monitoring System® (MEMS®)-device), and to assess patients' experiences with this device.

Patients and Methods

Patients using apixaban, rivaroxaban or edoxaban and visiting a community pharmacy, were included. Adherence was electronically monitored over a twelve-week period. Pharmacists conducted data readings from the electronic device at six and twelve weeks, and discussed these data with the patients. At the beginning and end of the study, patients completed a questionnaire about their expectations and experiences respectively.

Results

Eighty-nine patients were included and high taking adherence rates were observed (median adherence of 100% for once-daily dosed patients and 96.7% for twice-daily dosed patients), but more than half of the patients took at least one dose too late or skipped at least one dose, possibly resulting in temporarily reduced protection against thromboembolic events. Most patients who felt that their adherence had improved, believed this was due to the combination of the electronic device and the personal follow-up by the pharmacist. Although most patients stated that medication adherence is their own responsibility, they were grateful for the support they received from their community pharmacist.

Conclusion

High adherence rates were observed, but there was still room for improvement regarding intake moments. Positive experiences with an electronic device for medication adherence monitoring were reported.

Bleeding Associated With Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Nationwide Population Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated drug-drug interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation taking both a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and an antiarrhythmic drug.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using data from the National Health Insurance database (2012-2018), we identified 78 805 patients with atrial fibrillation on DOACs, with 24 142 taking amiodarone, 8631 taking propafenone, 2784 taking dronedarone, 297 taking flecainide, 177 taking sotalol, and 42 772 on DOACs alone. Patients with bradycardia, heart block, heart failure, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valves, or incomplete data were excluded. Propensity score matching compared those taking both DOACs and antiarrhythmic drugs with those on DOACs alone. There was an increased risk of major bleeding in patients concomitantly taking DOACs with amiodarone when compared with matched patients taking DOACs alone (hazard ratio [HR],1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.23]; P=0.0044), particularly in patients taking dabigatran (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.03-1.38]; P=0.0175). No significant difference in bleeding risk was found for propafenone, dronedarone, flecainide, or sotalol. The small sample sizes in the flecainide and sotalol groups limit interpretation. Notably, intracranial bleeding risk was higher in patients on DOACs and amiodarone, regardless of age. Additionally, patients <80 years old taking dabigatran with amiodarone or propafenone had a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of DOACs with amiodarone, but not dronedarone or propafenone, increases the risk of major bleeding, particularly intracranial bleeding. This study provides new evidence to guide clinicians to tailor concomitant anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Increasing Very Low-Dose Edoxaban Prescription: Effectiveness and Safety Data of Korean AF Patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Evidence remains limited on the real-world prescription of very low-dose oral anticoagulation among frail patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We described the practice patterns, effectiveness, and safety of very low-dose edoxaban (15 mg once daily).

METHODS

Patients with AF prescribed edoxaban 15 mg once daily in 2 tertiary hospitals between 2016 and September 2022 were included. Baseline clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes of interest were thromboembolic and bleeding events.

RESULTS

A total of 674 patients were included (mean age 78.3±9.1, 49.7% aged ≥80 years, 49.3% women, median follow-up 1.0±1.2 years). Mean CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3.9±1.6, and the modified HAS-BLED score was 2.0±1.1. Between 2016 and 2022, the number of very low-dose edoxaban prescriptions increased. The main reasons for the prescription of very low-dose were low body weight (55.5% below 60 kg), anaemia (62.8%), chronic kidney disease (40.2%), active cancer (15.3%), concomitant anti-platelet use (26.7%), and prior major bleeding (19.7%). During a median follow-up duration of 8 (interquartile range 3-16) months, overall thromboembolic and bleeding events occurred in 16 (2.3%) and 88 (13.1%) patients, respectively. Compared to the expected event rates on the established risk scoring systems, patients receiving very low-dose edoxaban demonstrated a 61% reduction in ischemic stroke, a 68% reduction of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack/systemic embolism, whereas a 49% increase in major bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescription of very low-dose edoxaban was increased over time, attributable to various clinical factors. The use of very low-dose edoxaban reduced the expected risk of thromboembolic events.

Biological Variation of Hemostasis Analytes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Using Dabigatran

BACKGROUND

Analytical criteria for laboratory analysis based on biological variation are considered state-of-the-art. While biological variance should ideally be measured in patient populations for whom the tests are relevant, data are mostly only available from healthy individuals. We determined the biological variance of activated partial thromboplasmin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, and trough dabigatran levels in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were treated with dabigatran.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2022, patients with AF treated >3 months with dabigatran were included. Blood was collected monthly up to 10 times for the measurement of APTT, PT, fibrinogen, and trough dabigatran levels. Between-subject variance (CVG), within-subject variance (CVI), and analytical variance (CVA) were calculated.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants (median age 65.8 years, 22.2% women) were included, with 130 samples in total. For APTT, the CVG was 11.5%, the CVI 8.8%, and the CVA 1.1%. For PT, these values were 5.2%, 4.0%, and 1.0% and for fibrinogen 13.6%, 11.8%, and 1.6%, respectively. For the dabigatran levels, the percentages were 37.9%, 33.0%, and 3.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We assessed the biological variance of APTT, PT, fibrinogen, and dabigatran in a patient population with long-term dabigatran use. The analytical performances of coagulation laboratory tests in patients with AF treated with dabigatran were comparable to those in healthy volunteers.CCMO Registration Number: NL67304.078.18.

Effectiveness of a self-management program for anticoagulated patients to improve their knowledge about treatment and time in therapeutic range

Oral anticoagulation self-control programs have demonstrated efficiency and cost-effectiveness over recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a training intervention focused on patients with antivitamin K anticoagulants included in a self-care program. For this, we made a quasi-experimental study, pretest and post-test, using a validated questionnaire with 2 measures, before and after an educational intervention about oral anticoagulation focused on patients that will initiate the self-control program in consultation. To check the patient's adherence and coagulation level, we evaluated the Rosendaal time in therapeutic rank, both before and after the intervention. One hundred fifty patients were included since the start of the self-monitoring program in our center in 2016. The mean age was 49 years (standard deviation [SD] = 17.24). The distribution by gender was 76 women and 69 men (52.4%-47.6%). The mean score for the first test was 14.61 (SD = 3.26) and the mean score for the second test was 17.01 (SD = 2.14) (P <.001). We also measured Rosendaal time in therapeutic rank, a parameter that indicates stabilization in international normalized ratio determinations and quality of the anticoagulation management. Values before and after interventions were also statistically significant (67.46 vs 70.53, P <.001). Patients' knowledge improved after the training session, with statistical significance. Despite intentional sampling, the population was homogeneous. Scoring data dispersion in the second test was significantly lower than in the first one. Time on therapeutic rank values was better after the training. We intend to adapt its content to the rest of anticoagulated patients to enhance and improve their follow-up.

Tailoring oral anticoagulant treatment in the era of multi-drug therapies for PAH and CTEPH

The use of oral anticoagulants in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) presents distinct therapeutic challenges and benefits. In PAH, the benefits of oral anticoagulation are uncertain, with studies yielding mixed results on their efficacy and safety. Conversely, oral anticoagulants are a cornerstone in the treatment of CTEPH, where their use is consistently recommended to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events. The choice between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a significant clinical question, as each type presents advantages and potential drawbacks. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with concomitant PAH and CTEPH treatments complicate anticoagulant management, necessitating careful consideration of individual patient regimens. This review examines the current evidence on oral anticoagulant use in PAH and CTEPH and discusses the implications of DDIs within a context of multi-drug treatments, including targeted drugs in PAH.

Clinical Features, Management, and Recurrence of Acute Ischemic Stroke Occurring in Patients on Oral Anticoagulant Treatment for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-World Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The optimal management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with oral anticoagulation (OA) is challenging. Our study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcome of AIS in patients with OA for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data on NVAF patients with AIS on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) admitted to our Stroke Unit from 2017 to 2022. Ninety-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 90-day, and 12-month stroke recurrences were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients (53.2% female, mean age 82.8±6.7 y), 117 (69.2%) on DOAC, and 52 on VKA (30.8%), were enrolled. Mean age, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mRS ≥4 were significantly higher in VKA patients. 63.4% of VKA patients had subtherapeutic INR, whereas 47.1% of DOAC patients were on low-dose (14.2% off-label). Large vessel occlusion and embolic etiology were more frequent in VKA patients (34.6% vs. 26.4%, P =0.358; 92.3% vs. 74.3%, P =0.007, respectively), whereas lacunar strokes were more frequent in DOAC patients (19.8% vs. 12.2%, P =0.366). Among patients on VKA before AIS 86.4% were switched to DOAC, whereas a DOAC-to-VKA and a DOAC-to-DOAC switch were done in 25.4% and 11.7%, respectively. Stroke recurrence occurred in 6.4% of patients at 90 days and 10.7% at 12 months. Anticoagulant switching was not associated with stroke recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, nonembolic etiology was more frequent in DOAC patients and anticoagulant switching did not reduce the risk of stroke recurrence. Prospective multicentric studies are warranted.

The safety of available pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulant drugs reduce the risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists, gold standard therapy for decades, have been deposed by the direct oral anticoagulants that exhibit superior safety profiles. However, hemorrhagic complications remain a major concern to anticoagulation.

AREAS COVERED

We searched available data in the literature to review the current knowledge on the safety profiles of available anticoagulants.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite a relevant leap forward with the introduction of DOACs, safety concerns persist in some fields of the current pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. In-depth knowledge of the safety profile of available anticoagulants and dealing with safety issues in patient subgroups is of utmost importance. Bleeding risk scores should not be dichotomously used to decide anticoagulation treatment but rather to promote shared decision, identify and correct modifiable risk factors, and set monitoring frequency. Additional issues that wait to be investigated in order to improve the safety of therapy include circulating levels of direct oral anticoagulants and anticoagulation in patient sub-groups: very elderly, frail, those with advanced kidney or liver disease, and so on. Safety may be improved from the in-depth knowledge of safety concerns and therapeutic options.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin's efficacy and safety in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver cirrhosis (LC).

BACKGROUND

Evidence of the pharmacodynamics of DOACs is limited in patients with AF and LC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the largest hospital system in Taiwan, involving patients with AF and LC for the years 2012 to 2021. Hazards of thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism), intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were investigated with a new-user, active comparator design. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance potential confounders between treatment groups.

RESULTS

In total, 478 DOAC users and 247 warfarin users were included. DOACs and warfarin demonstrated similar trends in preventing thromboembolic events, namely ischemic stroke [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.05 (95% CI: 0.42-2.61)], transient ischemic attack [aHR, 1.36 (95% CI: 0.18-10.31)], and systemic embolism [aHR, 0.49 (95% CI: 0.14-1.70)]. DOAC use was associated with a similar risk of intracranial hemorrhage [aHR, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.26-1.59)] and gastrointestinal bleeding [aHR, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.39-1.03)], a decreased risk of major bleeding [aHR, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.42-0.99)], and a reduction in mortality [aHR, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.54-0.99)]. DOAC users exhibited a significant reduction in major bleeding risk in patients with Child-Pugh class A (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs showed potential safety advantages over warfarin for patients with nonvalvular AF and LC, particularly in reducing major bleeding risk in those with Child-Pugh class A.

Cardiovascular and non-renal complications of chronic kidney disease: Managing risk

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) currently affects approximately 850 million people globally and is continuing to increase in prevalence as well as in importance as a cause of death. The excess mortality related to CKD is mostly caused by an increase in cardiovascular disease. This includes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease as many promoters of atherosclerosis, such as blood pressure, lipid levels and hypercoagulation, are increased in people with CKD. Diabetes is a leading cause of CKD contributing to the risk of CVD, and obesity is also increasingly prevalent. Management of these risk factors is therefore very important in CKD, and to reduce risk of CKD progression. Heart failure is also more prevalent in CKD and, again, many risk factors are shared. The concept of foundational pillars in the management of heart failure has been adapted to the treatment of CKD, with many organ-protective interventions, such renin-angiotensin system blockade, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism, reducing the risk for mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but also for progression of CKD. Atrial fibrillation is also more common with CKD and affects the management of the former. In this review these non-renal complications of CKD are discussed, along with how the risk of these complications should be managed. Many new opportunities have demonstrated heart and kidney organ protection, but implementation is a challenge.

Efficacy and Safety of Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, and Edoxaban for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Based on Blood Coagulation Activity and Drug Plasma Concentration: SETtsu and North Osaka Multicenter Direct Oral AntiCoagulant (SET DOAC) Registry

Background: The therapeutic effects of oral anticoagulant drugs for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) suggest that the three factor Xa (FXa) inhibitors may have distinct safety profiles, though this is not yet fully conclusive. This study investigated the current dosing of rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban by monitoring drug plasma concentration (PC) and coagulation activity from the viewpoint of the safety. Methods and results: This multicenter clinical study monitored the drug PC and two coagulation biomarkers (fibrinogen and fibrin monomer complex [FMC]) at peak and trough timing in 268 outpatients taking rivaroxaban (n = 72), apixaban (n = 71), and edoxaban (n = 125) for NVAF. Doses were adjusted based on the dose-adjustment criteria of each drug. Referencing our previous study, peak drug PC remained below the cut-off level for predicting bleeding events except in eight patients (rivaroxaban, n = 3; apixaban, n = 2; edoxaban, n = 3) in whom bleeding events occurred. Among them, two (one each on rivaroxaban and edoxaban) had a peak drug PC below the cut-off level. Drug PCs widely varied from peak to trough, whereas FMC levels, reflecting thrombin activity, remained within the normal range (<6.1 µg/mL) regardless of PC variations. These results indicated that the anticoagulant effects of these drugs persisted throughout the day regardless of the drug PC levels, dosage, and dosing frequency. Regarding the change over time in peak PC, the elevation over time developed more in rivaroxaban (29/57; 50.9%, p < 0.05) than in edoxaban (32/101; 31.7%), and rivaroxaban tended to accumulate more than edoxaban. Conclusions: Although drug PC levels of once-daily FXa inhibitors widely varied from peak to trough, FMC levels were maintained within the normal range without daily variations. Rivaroxaban also tended to accumulate over time. The results indicate the low risk of thrombotic events with once-daily FXa inhibitors and its correspondence to the twice-daily regimen.

A Real-World, Prospective, Observational Study of Rivaroxaban on Prevention of Stroke and Non-Central Nervous Systemic Embolism in Renally Impaired Korean Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation: XARENAL

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Several real-world studies have been done in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF); however, information on its safety profile in patients with renal impairment is limited. XARENAL, a real-world study, aimed to prospectively investigate the safety profile of rivaroxaban in patients with NVAF with renal impairment (creatinine clearance [CrCl], 15-49 mL/min).

METHODS

XARENAL is an observational single-arm cohort study in renal impairment NVAF patients. Patients were followed up approximately every 3 months for 1 year or until 30 days following early discontinuation. The primary endpoint was major bleeding events. All adverse events, symptomatic thromboembolic events, treatment duration, and renal function change from baseline were the secondary endpoints.

RESULTS

XARENAL included 888 patients from 29 study sites. Overall, 713 (80.3%) had moderate renal impairment (CrCl, 30-49 mL/min), and 175 (19.7%) had severe renal impairment (CrCl, 15-29 mL/min) with a mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of 45.2±13.0 mL/min/1.73 m². The mean risk scores were 3.3±1.4 and 1.7±0.9 for CHA₂DS₂-VASc score and HAS-BLED score, respectively. An incidence proportion of 5.6% (6.2 events per 100 patient-years) developed major bleeding; however, fatal bleeding occurred in 0.5% (0.5 events per 100 patient-years). The mean change in the eGFR was 2.22±26.47 mL/min/1.73 m² per year.

CONCLUSIONS

XARENAL observed no meaningful differences in major bleeding events from other previous findings as well as renal function changes in rivaroxaban-treated NVAF patients with renal impairment, which is considered to be acceptable in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03746301.

Management of heart disease in renal transplant recipients: a national Delphi survey-based SET/SEC/SEN consensus document

Renal transplantation improves the survival and quality of life of patients with end-stage renal disease. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in renal transplant recipients. The bidirectional relationship between renal and heart disease creates a unique clinical scenario that demands a comprehensive and personalized approach. This expert consensus, drafted by the Spanish Society of Transplantation, the Spanish Society of Cardiology, and the Spanish Society of Nephrology, aims to assess current practices and propose strategies for the management of heart disease in renal transplant recipients. A panel of Spanish nephrologists and cardiologists with expertise in renal and heart transplantation reviewed the scientific evidence concerning the current management of heart disease in renal transplant recipients. Subsequently, consensus statements were created through a 2-round Delphi methodology, resulting in 30 statements covering key topics such as the identification of renal transplant candidates, the management of heart disease in renal transplant recipients, and eligibility for combined heart-kidney transplantation in patients with both end-stage renal disease and cardiac disease. These consensus statements provide expert guidance for the management of heart disease in renal transplant recipients, an area where published clinical evidence remains limited.

Drug-drug-interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to the emergency department

Introduction

Polypharmacy is a growing concern in healthcare systems. While available data on potential drug-drug interactions (pDDI) from emergency department (ED) patients is derived from heterogenous populations, this study specifically focused on patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that patients with AF have similar comorbidities, receive similar drugs, and have similar pDDIs. The overarching aim was to highlight frequent pDDIs, providing practical guidance for treating healthcare professionals and consequently reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions.

Methods

Two hundred patients ≥18 years with AF, who received rate- or rhythm-controlling medication at the ED of the University Hospital Vienna, and who were on long-term medication before admission, were eligible. Long-term medication alone, as well as in combination with medication administered at the ED were analyzed for pDDIs using the Lexicomp® Drug interactions database.

Results

Within the long-term medication of patients', we identified 664 pDDIs. Drugs administered at the ED increased pDDIs more than 3-fold to 2085. Approximately, every fifth patient received a contraindicated drug combination (on average 0.24 per patient), while 70% received drug combinations for which therapy modifications are recommended (on average 1.59 per patient). The most frequently involved drugs included amiodarone, propofol, bisoprolol, enoxaparin, and acetylsalicylic acid. Increased risk of bleeding, QTc prolongation, and myopathy were among the most relevant potential consequences of these interactions.

Discussion

In conclusion, an optimization of medication would be advisable in almost every AF patient. Treating healthcare professionals should be cautious of drugs that increase bleeding risk, prolong QTc, or bear a risk for myopathy.

Amiodarone Therapy: Updated Practical Insights

Amiodarone, a bi-iodinated benzofuran derivative, is among the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drugs due to its high level of effectiveness. Though initially categorized as a class III agent, amiodarone exhibits antiarrhythmic properties across all four classes of antiarrhythmic drugs. Amiodarone is highly effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation while also playing a crucial role in preventing a range of ventricular arrhythmias. Amiodarone has a complex pharmacokinetic profile, characterized by a large volume of distribution and a long half-life, which can range from several weeks to months, resulting in prolonged effects even after discontinuation. Side effects may include thyroid dysfunction, pulmonary fibrosis, and hepatic injury, necessitating regular follow-ups. Additionally, amiodarone interacts with several drugs, including anticoagulants, which must be managed to prevent adverse effects. Therefore, a deep understanding of both oral and intravenous formulations, as well as proper dosage adjustments, is essential. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive and updated review on amiodarone's indications, contraindications, recommended dosages, drug interactions, side effects, and monitoring protocols.

Pharmacodynamics of Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran in Adults with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving R-CHOP Immunochemotherapy

Background/Objectives: Rivaroxaban and dabigatran are commonly used for thromboembolic disease management in active cancer patients. However, limited research explores the impact of concurrent chemotherapy on the pharmacodynamics of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of combined chemotherapy with rivaroxaban and dabigatran on the pharmacodynamics in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).; Methods: This was a prospective, pharmacodynamic study. Eligible subjects were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with DLBCL and initiating R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) immunochemotherapy. The enrolled adults received either rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) or dabigatran etixalate (110 mg twice daily). Plasma anti-factor Xa (FXa) in participants on rivaroxaban and diluted thrombin time (dTT) in participants on dabigatran were assessed over the dosing interval before and after R-CHOP administration. Pharmacodynamic parameters of rivaroxaban and dabigatran were determined using a non-compartmental analysis.; Results: Twenty-six adults participated, with twelve in the rivaroxaban group and fourteen in the dabigatran group. The mean age was 59 ± 14.4 years. In the rivaroxaban group, the AUEC of FXa inhibition showed no significant change after R-CHOP (mean difference 3.8 ng·h/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) -155.4 to 163.0, p = 0.96). Similarly, in the dabigatran group, the AUEC of dTT remained unchanged post R-CHOP (mean difference 54.41 ng·h/mL, 95% CI -99.09 to 207.9 ng/mL, p = 0.46). However, the median time-to-peak dTT was significantly faster with R-CHOP (3 h, [min-max, 1.5-8] compared to without it (4 h, [min-max, 3-8], p = 0.04); Conclusions: Concurrent R-CHOP chemotherapy did not significantly impact FXa inhibition by rivaroxaban or dTT by dabigatran. The time-to-peak dTT was faster when dabigatran was administered with R-CHOP.

Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures

Over the past 50 years, the number and invasiveness of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures globally have increased substantially. However, cardiovascular interventions are inherently associated with a risk of acute brain injury, both periprocedurally and postprocedurally, which impairs medical outcomes and increases health-care costs. Current international clinical guidelines generally do not cover the area of acute brain injury related to cardiovascular invasive procedures. In this international Consensus Statement, we compile the available knowledge (including data on prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and management) to formulate consensus recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute brain injury caused by cardiovascular interventions. We also identify knowledge gaps and possible future directions in clinical research into acute brain injury related to cardiovascular interventions.

Pulmonary Embolism in Critically Ill Patients-Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management

Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often immobilized and on mechanical ventilation, placing them at increased risk for thromboembolic diseases, particularly deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and, to a lesser extent, pulmonary embolism (PE). While these conditions are frequently encountered in the emergency department, managing them in the ICU presents unique challenges. Although existing guidelines are comprehensive and effective, they are primarily designed for patients presenting with PE in the emergency department and do not fully address the complexities of managing critically ill patients in the ICU. This review aims to summarize the available data on these challenging cases, offering a practical approach to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PE, particularly when it is acquired in the ICU.

Optimizing anticoagulation therapy for in-hospital patients on direct oral anticoagulants: a single-centre modified Delphi study

AIMS

The management of patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) during hospitalization is a common challenge in clinical practice. Although bridging is generally not recommended, too often DOACs are switched to parenteral therapy with low molecular weight heparins. Our objectives were to update a local guideline for perioperative DOAC management and to develop a guideline for the anticoagulation management in non-surgical patients regarding temporary DOAC discontinuation.

METHODS

We executed a two-step modified Delphi study in a 1000-bed university hospital in Belgium. The Delphi questionnaires were developed based on a literature review and a telephone survey of prescribers. Two expert panels were established: one dedicated to perioperative DOAC management and the other to DOAC management in non-surgical patients. Both panels completed two rounds, commencing with an individual and online round, followed by a face-to-face group session.

RESULTS

After the two-round Delphi process, the updated perioperative guideline on DOAC management included reasons for delaying the resumption of DOACs following surgery, such as oral intake not possible, the probability of re-intervention within 3 days, and insufficient haemostasis (e.g. active clinically significant haematoma, haemorrhagic drains or wounds). Furthermore, a guideline for non-surgical hospitalized patients was developed, outlining possible reasons for interrupting DOAC therapy. Both guidelines offer clear anticoagulation therapy strategies corresponding to the identified scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

We have updated and developed guidelines for DOAC management in surgical and non-surgical patients during hospitalization, which aim to support prescribers and to enhance targeted prescription review by hospital pharmacists.

Transitioning between therapeutic anticoagulants: a clinicians guide to switching patients to or from DOAC therapy

INTRODUCTION

The transition to or from direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is common in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and UpToDate up to March 2024 for conditions and approaches for transitioning from one agent to the other. No randomized clinical trials were retrieved except for two studies regarding switching to DOAC in well-conducted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy. A narrative review was conducted addressing the conditions for switching from one agent to the other, such as thromboembolic events and major bleeding during anticoagulation, development or worsening of kidney or liver failure, initiation of interfering drugs, adverse events such as allergic reactions, frailty, patients' preferences, and affordability. During transitions from one anticoagulant to the other, the risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding complications should be minimized. The current approaches for such transitions are derived from those employed in clinical trials evaluating DOAC and from product information.

EXPERT OPINION

Many uncertainties remain regarding those circumstances requiring a change in anticoagulant strategies, as they lack evidence-based guidance. It can be envisaged that the problem of switching to and from DOAC will need additional studies especially addressing the conditions and the best approach to such transitions.

Managing elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity: call for a systematic approach

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often accompanied by comorbidities. Not only cardiovascular but also non-cardiovascular comorbidities have been associated with AF. Multimorbidity is therefore a common finding in patients with AF, especially in elderly patients. Multimorbidity is associated with adverse outcomes, adds complexity to AF management, and poses a significant burden on healthcare costs. It is expected that the prevalence of elderly patients with multimorbidity will increase significantly. It is therefore crucial to outline implications for clinical practice and guide comprehensive multimorbidity management.

AREAS COVERED

This perspective article outlines multimorbidity in AF and the importance of comprehensive comorbidity management. It addresses current clinical practice guided by international guidelines and the need for integrated care including a patient-centered focus, comprehensive AF management, coordinated multidisciplinary care, and supporting technology. Moreover, it proposes a novel model of care delivery following a systematic approach to multimorbidity management.

EXPERT OPINION

Providing comprehensive care by means of a multidisciplinary team and patient engagement is crucial to provide optimal personalized care for elderly patients with AF and multimorbidity. A systematic integrated care approach seems promising, but further studies are needed to investigate the feasibility of a systematic approach and prioritization of comorbidity management in patients with multimorbidity.

Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients on chronic hemodialysis: Contemporary appraisal on the role for patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis and in this patient population, management in terms of oral anticoagulation (OAC) presents unique challenges due to the increased risk of both thromboembolic events and bleeding complications. The attributable risk of AF for stroke may differ from patients without CKD, raising the question if OAC is indicated at all. Historically, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the standard treatment for anticoagulation in AF; however, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an alternative therapeutic option, whereby data from prospective randomised trials with hemodialysis patients is limited resulting in great variability of practice and guideline recommendations. This review summarizes existing data sources regarding the use and benefit of oral anticoagulation with VKA and DOAC in hemodialysis patients.

Rivaroxaban for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome: A Single-Arm, Prospective Study

Introduction

Thromboembolism is a recognized complication of nephrotic syndrome (NS). Evidence supporting the use of rivaroxaban to prevent NS-related thrombosis is limited and controversial. This study aimed to explore the impact of NS on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and to collect observational data on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban as primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with NS.

Methods

This prospective study analyzed 141 patients with NS who received rivaroxaban (10 mg/day) for thromboprophylaxis. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure the trough and peak plasma concentrations (Ctrough and Cmax) of rivaroxaban. The influence of clinical and genetic factors on these concentrations was examined using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

The median Cmax and Ctrough were 68.5 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 31.7-105.5 ng/mL) and 4.4 ng/mL (IQR, 1.2-11.9 ng/mL), respectively. The incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) was 12.8%, while that of bleeding events was 14.2%, although all were classified as minor. Albumin level was the most significant factor affecting Cmax (ρ = 0.55; p < 0.001) and was also significantly associated with TEs (0.81; 0.71-0.91 per 1.0 g/dL increase; p = 0.001) and bleeding risks (1.11; 1.03-1.19 per 1.0 g/dL increase; p = 0.008). Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene significantly influenced Ctrough but were not associated with clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

Hypoalbuminemia significantly affects the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in NS patients. A dose-adjustment strategy based on rivaroxaban concentrations, accounting for variable albumin levels, may improve the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in this population.

The effect of edoxaban on apoptosis in an abdominal aortic aneurysm model in rats

Background

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of edoxaban, which is used in venous thrombosis, systemic embolism, and stroke, on an aortic aneurysm model and to demonstrate the pharmacokinetic and molecular effects of edoxaban through the induction of apoptosis.

Methods

In this double-blind experimental study, 21 Wistar albino male rats (mean weight: 290 g; range, 280 to 300 g) were divided into three groups: the sham group (n=7), the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) group (n=7), and the AAA-edoxaban group (n=7). Edoxaban 10 mg/kg was given to the AAA-edoxaban group by oral gavage daily for 30 days. At the end of 30 days, the aneurysmal aorta was surgically removed and histologically examined. The abdominal aorta was surgically exposed and wrapped with a calcium chloride (0.5 mol/L) sponge for 10 min.

Results

Immunohistochemically, aortic sections were marked with caspase-3 and caspase-9 antibodies. It was observed that the pathways that trigger apoptosis (caspase-3 and caspase-9; p <0.004 and p <0.005, respectively) were significantly reduced in the AAA-edoxaban group compared to the AAA group. In the AAA-edoxaban group, it was observed that the expansion in aortic diameter and the deterioration in the elastic fibril structure in the aortic aneurysm were decreased as a result of edoxaban treatment. Edoxaban treatment was observed to reduce cell death in both the tunica intima and tunica media.

Conclusion

This study provided strong evidence of the protective effect of edoxaban on aortic aneurysm-related vascular damage by reducing apoptosis and mitophagy.

Ten tips to manage oral anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). While general treatment strategies for AF may largely be transferred to patients with mild to moderate CKD, patients with advanced CKD-particularly hemodialysis (HD) patients-with AF pose substantial therapeutical challenges to cardiologists and nephrologists. The arguably greatest dilemma is the very limited evidence on appropriate strategies for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in HD patients with AF, since the risk for both thromboembolic events without oral anticoagulation and severe bleeding events with oral anticoagulation are substantially increased in advanced CKD, compared with the general population. Thus, the benefit to risk ratio of either vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants is less evident in HD than in non-CKD patients with AF. As a multidisciplinary panel of clinicians, we here propose 10 tips that may help our colleagues to navigate between the risk of undertreatment-exposing CKD patients with AF to a high stroke risk-and overtreatment-exposing the very same patients to a prohibitively high bleeding risk. These tips include ideas on alternative risk stratification strategies and novel treatment approaches that are currently in clinical studies-such as factor XI inhibitors or left atrial appendage closure-and may become game-changers for HD patients with AF.

2024 Chinese Expert Consensus Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly, Endorsed by Geriatric Society of Chinese Medical Association (Cardiovascular Group) and Chinese Society of Geriatric Health Medicine (Cardiovascular Branch): Executive Summary

The consensus guidelines of the Geriatric Society of Chinese Medical Association on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly was first published in 2011 and updated in 2016, with endorsement by Chinese Society of Geriatric Health Medicine. Since then, many important studies regarding the screening and treatment in the elderly population have been reported, necessitating this updated expert consensus guideline. The writing committee members comprehensively reviewed updated evidence pertaining to elderly patients with AF, and formulated this 2024 update. The highlighted issues focused on the following: screening for AF, geriatric comprehensive assessment, use of the Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway for the elderly patients, and special clinical settings related to elderly patients with AF. New recommendations addressing smart technology facilitated AF screening, ABC pathway based management, and optimal anticoagulation were developed, with a focus on the elderly.

Safety and efficacy of direct oral anticoagulants in chronic kidney disease: a meta-analysis

Background

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as the first-line therapy for venous thromboembolism and stroke prophylaxis in atrial fibrillation. As DOACs are partially excreted renally, their safety in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear.

Objectives

To synthesize primary evidence on the safety profile of DOACs in patients with CKD.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from inception to June 2023 for randomized and nonrandomized cohort studies comparing DOACs with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in CKD patients. Screening and data collection were conducted in duplicate. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding, defined by International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis criteria, stratified by CKD severity. Meta-analysis was done using the Mantel-Haenszel random-effects model, presented as odds ratios (ORs) with corresponding 95% CIs.

Results

Of the 2355 articles captured in the literature search, 25 nonrandomized studies (n = 6832) and 6 randomized studies (n = 66,898) were included. DOACs reduced major bleeding compared with VKAs in all subgroups (stage 4: OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58, 0.93; stage 5/renal replacement therapy: OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.50, 0.98; stage unspecified: OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.63, 0.83). Apixaban and rivaroxaban both reduced major bleeding in stage 5/renal replacement therapy patients (apixaban: OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.52, 0.85; rivaroxaban: OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.35, 0.94).

Conclusion

In this meta-analysis, DOACs reduced major bleeding compared with VKAs in stage 4, stage 5/renal replacement therapy, and CKD stage unspecified patients. Future analysis should evaluate the impact of specific DOACs and dosage on safety and efficacy in this population.

Anticoagulation in Chronic Kidney Disease

The nuanced landscape of anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents a formidable challenge, intricately balancing the dual hazards of hemorrhage and thrombosis. These patients find themselves in a precarious position, teetering on the edge of these risks due to compromised platelet functionality and systemic disturbances within their coagulation frameworks. The management of such patients necessitates a meticulous approach to dosing adjustments and vigilant monitoring to navigate the perilous waters of anticoagulant therapy. This is especially critical considering the altered pharmacokinetics in CKD, where the clearance of drugs is significantly impeded, heightening the risk of accumulation and adverse effects. In the evolving narrative of anticoagulation therapy, the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has heralded a new era, offering a glimmer of hope for those navigating the complexities of CKD. These agents, with their promise of easier management and a reduced need for monitoring, have begun to reshape the contours of care, particularly for patients not yet on dialysis. However, this is not without its caveats. The application of DOACs in the context of advanced CKD remains a largely uncharted territory, necessitating a cautious exploration to unearth their true potential and limitations. Moreover, the advent of innovative strategies such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) underscores the dynamic nature of anticoagulation therapy, potentially offering a tailored solution for those at the intersection of CKD and elevated stroke risk. Yet the journey toward integrating such advancements into standard practice is laden with unanswered questions, demanding rigorous investigation to illuminate their efficacy and safety across the spectrum of kidney disease. In summary, the management of anticoagulation in CKD is a delicate dance, requiring a harmonious blend of precision, caution, and innovation. As we venture further into this complex domain, we must build upon our current understanding, embracing both emerging therapies and the need for ongoing research. Only then can we hope to offer our patients a path that navigates the narrow strait between bleeding and clotting, toward safer and more effective care.

Apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban but not dabigatran are associated with higher mortality compared to vitamin-K antagonists: A retrospective German claims data analysis

BACKGROUND

Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) have widely been replaced by non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This includes Austria, Germany and Switzerland, where as VKA, instead of warfarin, the much longer-acting phenprocoumon is used, which was not compared to NOACs in clinical trials.

METHODS

Using administrative data from a large German health insurance, we included all anticoagulation-naïve patients with a first prescription of a NOAC or VKA between 2012 and 2020. We analysed overall survival, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, major thromboembolic events and major bleeding.

RESULTS

Overall, 570,137 patients were included (apixaban: 26.9%, dabigatran: 4.6%, edoxaban: 8.8%, rivaroxaban: 39.1% and VKA: 20.7% of these 99.4% phenprocoumon). In the primary analysis using a 1:1 propensity score matching-cohort (PSM-cohort), a significantly higher overall mortality was found for apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (all p < 0.001) but not for dabigatran (p = 0.13) compared to VKA. In this PSM-cohort, 5-year mortality was 22.7% for apixaban versus 12.7% for VKA, 19.5% for edoxaban versus 11.4% for VKA, 16.0% for rivaroxaban versus 12.3% for VKA (all p < 0.001) and 13.0% for dabigatran versus 12.8% for VKA (p = 0.06). The observed effect was confirmed in sensitivity analyses using un-weighted and three different weighted Fine-Gray regression models on the basis of the entire cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large real-world analysis, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not dabigatran, were associated with worse survival compared to VKA. These findings, consistent with a few other studies including phenprocoumon, cast profound doubts on the unreflected, general use of NOACs. Randomized trials should assess whether phenprocoumon might actually be superior to NOACs.