2021 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation management in older hospitalized patients: Evidence of a poor oral anticoagulants prescriptive attitude from the Italian REPOSI registry

Atrial fibrillation (AF) prevalence increases in older patients which also show a high thromboembolic risk. Oral anticoagulants (OACs) are recommended to prevent cardioembolic events and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) improved anti-thrombotic treatment. However, the benefits/risks of anticoagulant in older patients still need to be completely defined. This retrospective observational study aimed to describe the treatment with OACs in older AF hospitalized patients, and to identify factors influencing OAC therapy or discontinuation using the REgistro Politerapie SIMI. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were applied to identify predictors of OACs treatment and discontinuation. Cox proportional hazards models were performed to evaluate one-year mortality by treatment groups. AF patients were 1,128(26.5 %) at discharge and 1,098(97.3 %) required OAC treatment; about half of them (N = 528;48.1 %) were no-OACs users; 236(21.5 %) and 334(30.4 %) used DOACs and VKA, respectively. Increasing DOACs use was observed during the study period. Predictors of OACs treatment were: BMI (OR:1.04; 95 %CI:1.01-1.07), Barthel index (OR:1.01; 95 %CI:1.01-1.02), medications number (OR:1.07; 95 %CI:1.01-1.13). Conversely, a lower probability was found in patients with a high CIR.S (OR:0.59; 95 %CI:0.36-0.97) and neoplasm (OR:0.57; 95 %CI:0.37-0.88). Hospital stay (OR:1.02; 95 %CI:1.01-1.05), neoplasm (OR:2.25; 95 %CI:1.07-4.70) and INR (OR:1.21; 95 %CI:1.05-1.40) increased OACs discontinuation. A lower discontinuation was observed in dyslipidemic patients (OR:0.18; 95 %CI:0.04-0.82) and heart failure (OR:0.38; 95 %CI:0.21-0.70). Among AF patients, 157(14.3 %) died during the follow-up year. Age (HR = 1.05; 95 %CI = 1.03-1.08) and CIR.S (HR = 2.54; 95 %CI = 1.53-4.21) were associated with a greater mortality risk. In conclusion, critical issues related to the underuse and discontinuation of OACs therapy in hospitalized older patients were highlighted.

Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand

Background

Appropriate dosing of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has been associated with clinical efficacy and safety. Several studies have shown that DOAC dosing are often inconsistent with guideline recommendations. Little is known about this issue in Thailand. This study aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of DOAC dosing in Thai hospitalized patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Method

This was a retrospective descriptive study conducted on hospitalized patients at Rajavithi Hospital, a tertiary care hospital in Thailand. Inpatients diagnosed with AF and treated with DOACs between February 2021 and February 2023 were enrolled in the study. The appropriate dosing of DOACs was assessed according to the recommendation of the 2021 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the Use of Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (EHRA). Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data; median (interquartile range) for continuous variables, and numbers and percentages for categorical variables.

Results

A total of 120 patients with AF were evaluated for dosing. The patients received rivaroxaban in 47 cases (39.2 %), apixaban in 32 cases (26.7 %), edoxaban in 31 cases (25.8 %), and dabigatran in 10 cases (8.3 %). Most of the patients were elderly, with a median age of 77.5 (68-84) years. Females were predominant (57.5 %). Our findings indicate that the prevalence of appropriate dosing of DOACs was 63.3 %. However, approximately one-third of patients received inappropriate dosing, with 24 (20.0 %) being overdosed, and 20 (16.7 %) being underdosed. The highest overdosing and underdosing rates were seen in dabigatran (90.0 %) and apixaban (21.9 %), respectively.

Conclusion

Inappropriate dosing of DOACs according to the 2021 EHRA recommendations was high in 36.7 %, with overdosing mostly occurring in 20.0 %. The high number of inappropriate dosing highlights the need for implementation of optimal strategies to select the appropriate dose of DOACs in Thai hospitalized patients with AF.

Competing stroke mechanisms despite adequate oral anticoagulant therapy: the role of transesophageal echocardiography

AIMS

Ischemic strokes in patients on oral anticoagulant therapy (OAT) despite optimal adherence pose a therapeutic challenge. We assessed the utility of transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in identifying potential competing cardiac causes for stroke that occurred despite adequate OAT.

METHODS

This retrospective observational study included patients admitted for acute ischemic stroke between January 2022 and June 2023 who were on OAT for an established long-term indication. Transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography, along with assessment of OAT adherence, were conducted. Demographic data, OAT details, and stroke characteristics were analysed to determine the influence of TEE findings on therapeutic decisions.

RESULTS

We included 26 patients. TEE identified potential cardiac competing stroke mechanisms in 88% of cases, with valvular thrombi and left atrial or appendage thrombus being predominant. Infective endocarditis, often asymptomatic, was unexpectedly prevalent. TEE significantly influenced therapeutic decisions, especially in cases where transthoracic echocardiography was inconclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

TEE may be crucial for unravelling the mechanisms of ischemic stroke in patients on adequate OAT, guiding precise therapeutic strategies and potentially reducing the risk of recurrent embolic events. Our findings underscore the limitations of standard echocardiography in detecting cardiac embolic sources and emphasize the importance of tailored decision-making in secondary stroke prevention.

Bleeding Associated With Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Using Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Nationwide Population Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated drug-drug interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation taking both a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) and an antiarrhythmic drug.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using data from the National Health Insurance database (2012-2018), we identified 78 805 patients with atrial fibrillation on DOACs, with 24 142 taking amiodarone, 8631 taking propafenone, 2784 taking dronedarone, 297 taking flecainide, 177 taking sotalol, and 42 772 on DOACs alone. Patients with bradycardia, heart block, heart failure, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valves, or incomplete data were excluded. Propensity score matching compared those taking both DOACs and antiarrhythmic drugs with those on DOACs alone. There was an increased risk of major bleeding in patients concomitantly taking DOACs with amiodarone when compared with matched patients taking DOACs alone (hazard ratio [HR],1.13 [95% CI, 1.04-1.23]; P=0.0044), particularly in patients taking dabigatran (HR, 1.19 [95% CI, 1.03-1.38]; P=0.0175). No significant difference in bleeding risk was found for propafenone, dronedarone, flecainide, or sotalol. The small sample sizes in the flecainide and sotalol groups limit interpretation. Notably, intracranial bleeding risk was higher in patients on DOACs and amiodarone, regardless of age. Additionally, patients <80 years old taking dabigatran with amiodarone or propafenone had a higher risk of gastrointestinal bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of DOACs with amiodarone, but not dronedarone or propafenone, increases the risk of major bleeding, particularly intracranial bleeding. This study provides new evidence to guide clinicians to tailor concomitant anticoagulation and antiarrhythmic therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation.

Biological Variation of Hemostasis Analytes in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Using Dabigatran

BACKGROUND

Analytical criteria for laboratory analysis based on biological variation are considered state-of-the-art. While biological variance should ideally be measured in patient populations for whom the tests are relevant, data are mostly only available from healthy individuals. We determined the biological variance of activated partial thromboplasmin time (APTT), prothrombin time (PT), fibrinogen, and trough dabigatran levels in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who were treated with dabigatran.

METHODS

Between 2019 and 2022, patients with AF treated >3 months with dabigatran were included. Blood was collected monthly up to 10 times for the measurement of APTT, PT, fibrinogen, and trough dabigatran levels. Between-subject variance (CVG), within-subject variance (CVI), and analytical variance (CVA) were calculated.

RESULTS

Eighteen participants (median age 65.8 years, 22.2% women) were included, with 130 samples in total. For APTT, the CVG was 11.5%, the CVI 8.8%, and the CVA 1.1%. For PT, these values were 5.2%, 4.0%, and 1.0% and for fibrinogen 13.6%, 11.8%, and 1.6%, respectively. For the dabigatran levels, the percentages were 37.9%, 33.0%, and 3.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

We assessed the biological variance of APTT, PT, fibrinogen, and dabigatran in a patient population with long-term dabigatran use. The analytical performances of coagulation laboratory tests in patients with AF treated with dabigatran were comparable to those in healthy volunteers.CCMO Registration Number: NL67304.078.18.

Predictors and Outcomes of Inappropriate Dosing of Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Patients Receiving Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

INTRODUCTION

Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) dose adjustment is based on age, renal function, and body weight. There is a paucity of data describing the factors associated with the prescription of inappropriate dosage and their impact on clinical outcomes among patients receiving transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

METHODS

In a single-center study, 432 patients who were on long-term DOAC therapy and underwent TAVI between 2015 and 2022 were included. We analyzed the predictors and outcomes of inappropriate dosing of DOACs; namely apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. A composite endpoint, including all-cause mortality, life-threatening/major bleeding, stroke, peripheral thromboembolic complications, or myocardial infarction, was assessed after 1 year.

RESULTS

In this TAVI cohort, inappropriate DOAC dosing was observed in 20.6% of patients. Inappropriate DOAC dosage was related to female gender (adj. odds ratio [OR] 2.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64-4.51, p < 0.001) as well as lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (adj. OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-1.00, p = 0.019), and to the administration of non-rivaroxaban DOACs (adj. OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16-0.50, p < 0.001). After 1 year, patients on both appropriate and inappropriate DOAC dosage exhibited comparable rates of the composite endpoint (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.53-1.46, p = 0.622). Old age (adj. OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.10, p = 0.018) as well as anemia (adj. OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.75-0.99, p = 0.031) emerged as independent predictors of the composite endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

In this TAVI cohort, female gender and renal insufficiency were associated with inappropriate DOAC dosage, whereas rivaroxaban was linked to appropriate dosing. Inadequate DOAC dosage did not translate into a worse outcome in our TAVI population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospective Segeberg TAVI Registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03192774).

Transitioning between therapeutic anticoagulants: a clinicians guide to switching patients to or from DOAC therapy

INTRODUCTION

The transition to or from direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is common in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and UpToDate up to March 2024 for conditions and approaches for transitioning from one agent to the other. No randomized clinical trials were retrieved except for two studies regarding switching to DOAC in well-conducted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy. A narrative review was conducted addressing the conditions for switching from one agent to the other, such as thromboembolic events and major bleeding during anticoagulation, development or worsening of kidney or liver failure, initiation of interfering drugs, adverse events such as allergic reactions, frailty, patients' preferences, and affordability. During transitions from one anticoagulant to the other, the risk of both thromboembolic and bleeding complications should be minimized. The current approaches for such transitions are derived from those employed in clinical trials evaluating DOAC and from product information.

EXPERT OPINION

Many uncertainties remain regarding those circumstances requiring a change in anticoagulant strategies, as they lack evidence-based guidance. It can be envisaged that the problem of switching to and from DOAC will need additional studies especially addressing the conditions and the best approach to such transitions.

Effectiveness of a self-management program for anticoagulated patients to improve their knowledge about treatment and time in therapeutic range

Oral anticoagulation self-control programs have demonstrated efficiency and cost-effectiveness over recent years. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a training intervention focused on patients with antivitamin K anticoagulants included in a self-care program. For this, we made a quasi-experimental study, pretest and post-test, using a validated questionnaire with 2 measures, before and after an educational intervention about oral anticoagulation focused on patients that will initiate the self-control program in consultation. To check the patient's adherence and coagulation level, we evaluated the Rosendaal time in therapeutic rank, both before and after the intervention. One hundred fifty patients were included since the start of the self-monitoring program in our center in 2016. The mean age was 49 years (standard deviation [SD] = 17.24). The distribution by gender was 76 women and 69 men (52.4%-47.6%). The mean score for the first test was 14.61 (SD = 3.26) and the mean score for the second test was 17.01 (SD = 2.14) (P <.001). We also measured Rosendaal time in therapeutic rank, a parameter that indicates stabilization in international normalized ratio determinations and quality of the anticoagulation management. Values before and after interventions were also statistically significant (67.46 vs 70.53, P <.001). Patients' knowledge improved after the training session, with statistical significance. Despite intentional sampling, the population was homogeneous. Scoring data dispersion in the second test was significantly lower than in the first one. Time on therapeutic rank values was better after the training. We intend to adapt its content to the rest of anticoagulated patients to enhance and improve their follow-up.

Clinical Features, Management, and Recurrence of Acute Ischemic Stroke Occurring in Patients on Oral Anticoagulant Treatment for Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation: A Real-World Retrospective Study

OBJECTIVES

The optimal management of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) in patients with oral anticoagulation (OA) is challenging. Our study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics and outcome of AIS in patients with OA for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data on NVAF patients with AIS on direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA) admitted to our Stroke Unit from 2017 to 2022. Ninety-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS), 90-day, and 12-month stroke recurrences were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 169 patients (53.2% female, mean age 82.8±6.7 y), 117 (69.2%) on DOAC, and 52 on VKA (30.8%), were enrolled. Mean age, in-hospital mortality, and 90-day mRS ≥4 were significantly higher in VKA patients. 63.4% of VKA patients had subtherapeutic INR, whereas 47.1% of DOAC patients were on low-dose (14.2% off-label). Large vessel occlusion and embolic etiology were more frequent in VKA patients (34.6% vs. 26.4%, P =0.358; 92.3% vs. 74.3%, P =0.007, respectively), whereas lacunar strokes were more frequent in DOAC patients (19.8% vs. 12.2%, P =0.366). Among patients on VKA before AIS 86.4% were switched to DOAC, whereas a DOAC-to-VKA and a DOAC-to-DOAC switch were done in 25.4% and 11.7%, respectively. Stroke recurrence occurred in 6.4% of patients at 90 days and 10.7% at 12 months. Anticoagulant switching was not associated with stroke recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, nonembolic etiology was more frequent in DOAC patients and anticoagulant switching did not reduce the risk of stroke recurrence. Prospective multicentric studies are warranted.

Efficacy and Safety of Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and Liver Cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Comparing direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin's efficacy and safety in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF) and liver cirrhosis (LC).

BACKGROUND

Evidence of the pharmacodynamics of DOACs is limited in patients with AF and LC.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in the largest hospital system in Taiwan, involving patients with AF and LC for the years 2012 to 2021. Hazards of thromboembolic events (ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack, and systemic embolism), intracranial hemorrhage, gastrointestinal, major bleeding, and all-cause mortality were investigated with a new-user, active comparator design. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied to balance potential confounders between treatment groups.

RESULTS

In total, 478 DOAC users and 247 warfarin users were included. DOACs and warfarin demonstrated similar trends in preventing thromboembolic events, namely ischemic stroke [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR), 1.05 (95% CI: 0.42-2.61)], transient ischemic attack [aHR, 1.36 (95% CI: 0.18-10.31)], and systemic embolism [aHR, 0.49 (95% CI: 0.14-1.70)]. DOAC use was associated with a similar risk of intracranial hemorrhage [aHR, 0.65 (95% CI: 0.26-1.59)] and gastrointestinal bleeding [aHR, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.39-1.03)], a decreased risk of major bleeding [aHR, 0.64 (95% CI: 0.42-0.99)], and a reduction in mortality [aHR, 0.73 (95% CI: 0.54-0.99)]. DOAC users exhibited a significant reduction in major bleeding risk in patients with Child-Pugh class A (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI: 0.33-0.70).

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs showed potential safety advantages over warfarin for patients with nonvalvular AF and LC, particularly in reducing major bleeding risk in those with Child-Pugh class A.

Cardiovascular and non-renal complications of chronic kidney disease: Managing risk

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) currently affects approximately 850 million people globally and is continuing to increase in prevalence as well as in importance as a cause of death. The excess mortality related to CKD is mostly caused by an increase in cardiovascular disease. This includes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease as many promoters of atherosclerosis, such as blood pressure, lipid levels and hypercoagulation, are increased in people with CKD. Diabetes is a leading cause of CKD contributing to the risk of CVD, and obesity is also increasingly prevalent. Management of these risk factors is therefore very important in CKD, and to reduce risk of CKD progression. Heart failure is also more prevalent in CKD and, again, many risk factors are shared. The concept of foundational pillars in the management of heart failure has been adapted to the treatment of CKD, with many organ-protective interventions, such renin-angiotensin system blockade, sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibition and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism, reducing the risk for mortality in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but also for progression of CKD. Atrial fibrillation is also more common with CKD and affects the management of the former. In this review these non-renal complications of CKD are discussed, along with how the risk of these complications should be managed. Many new opportunities have demonstrated heart and kidney organ protection, but implementation is a challenge.

Impact of Banhabaekchulcheonmatang (Banxia Baizhu Tianma Tang) and Hwangryeonhaedoktang (Huang Lian Jie Du Tang) on edoxaban: Herb-drug interaction study in healthy subjects

ETHNOPHARMACOLOGICAL RELEVANCE

Concurrent use of traditional herbal medicines and conventional drugs, particularly for stroke treatment, is widespread, raising concerns about potential drug interactions.

AIM OF THE STUDY

This clinical study aimed to investigate interactions between edoxaban, a direct oral anticoagulant, and two traditional herbal medicines commonly used for stroke: Banhabaekchulcheonmatang (BBCT) and Hwangryeonhaedoktang (HRHDT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Korean healthy volunteers participated in a randomized, open-label, three-period, three-treatment, two-sequence clinical study. Treatments consisted of a single oral dose of edoxaban tablet (60 mg) in the presence or absence of multiple doses of BBCT or HRHDT three times daily for six days. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters of edoxaban and its active metabolite M4 were assessed following administration of edoxaban alone or in co-administration with BBCT or HRHDT.

RESULTS

When edoxaban was co-administered with BBCT or HRHDT, the area under the curve (AUC) of edoxaban remained unaffected. However, its peak concentrations (Cmax) were decreased by 18.5%-28.1%. Similarly, co-administration of edoxaban with BBCT or HRHDT slightly decreased the AUC of M4 and reduced its Cmax by 16.8%-27.1%. Results revealed that BBCT and HRHDT had a minor impact on pharmacokinetics of edoxaban and M4. Despite alterations in systemic exposures, all pharmacodynamic parameters of edoxaban derived from activated partial thromboplastin time and prothrombin time were equivalent irrespective of herbal medicine co-administration.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings contribute to our understanding of potential interactions between conventional anticoagulants and traditional herbal medicines, highlighting the need for comprehensive evaluation in clinical practice.

Managing elderly patients with atrial fibrillation and multimorbidity: call for a systematic approach

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is often accompanied by comorbidities. Not only cardiovascular, but also non-cardiovascular comorbidities have been associated with AF. Multimorbidity is therefore a common finding in patients with AF, especially in elderly patients. Multimorbidity is associated with adverse outcomes, adds complexity to AF management and poses a significant burden on healthcare costs. It is expected that the prevalence of elderly patients with multimorbidity will increase significantly. It is therefore crucial to outline implications for clinical practice and guide comprehensive multimorbidity management.

AREAS COVERED

This perspective article outlines multimorbidity in AF and the importance of comprehensive comorbidity management. It addresses current clinical practice guided by international guidelines and the need for integrated care including a patient-centered focus, comprehensive AF management, coordinated multidisciplinary care, and supporting technology. Moreover, it proposes a novel model of care delivery following a systematic approach to multimorbidity management.

EXPERT OPINION

Providing comprehensive care by means of a multidisciplinary team and patient engagement is crucial to provide optimal personalized care for elderly patients with AF and multimorbidity. A systematic integrated care approach seems promising, but further studies are needed to investigate the feasibility of a systematic approach and prioritization of comorbidity management in patients with multimorbidity.

Drug-drug-interactions in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted to the emergency department

Introduction

Polypharmacy is a growing concern in healthcare systems. While available data on potential drug-drug interactions (pDDI) from emergency department (ED) patients is derived from heterogenous populations, this study specifically focused on patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We hypothesized that patients with AF have similar comorbidities, receive similar drugs, and have similar pDDIs. The overarching aim was to highlight frequent pDDIs, providing practical guidance for treating healthcare professionals and consequently reduce the risk of adverse drug reactions.

Methods

Two hundred patients ≥18 years with AF, who received rate- or rhythm-controlling medication at the ED of the University Hospital Vienna, and who were on long-term medication before admission, were eligible. Long-term medication alone, as well as in combination with medication administered at the ED were analyzed for pDDIs using the Lexicomp® Drug interactions database.

Results

Within the long-term medication of patients', we identified 664 pDDIs. Drugs administered at the ED increased pDDIs more than 3-fold to 2085. Approximately, every fifth patient received a contraindicated drug combination (on average 0.24 per patient), while 70% received drug combinations for which therapy modifications are recommended (on average 1.59 per patient). The most frequently involved drugs included amiodarone, propofol, bisoprolol, enoxaparin, and acetylsalicylic acid. Increased risk of bleeding, QTc prolongation, and myopathy were among the most relevant potential consequences of these interactions.

Discussion

In conclusion, an optimization of medication would be advisable in almost every AF patient. Treating healthcare professionals should be cautious of drugs that increase bleeding risk, prolong QTc, or bear a risk for myopathy.

Amiodarone Therapy: Updated Practical Insights

Amiodarone, a bi-iodinated benzofuran derivative, is among the most commonly used antiarrhythmic drugs due to its high level of effectiveness. Though initially categorized as a class III agent, amiodarone exhibits antiarrhythmic properties across all four classes of antiarrhythmic drugs. Amiodarone is highly effective in maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation while also playing a crucial role in preventing a range of ventricular arrhythmias. Amiodarone has a complex pharmacokinetic profile, characterized by a large volume of distribution and a long half-life, which can range from several weeks to months, resulting in prolonged effects even after discontinuation. Side effects may include thyroid dysfunction, pulmonary fibrosis, and hepatic injury, necessitating regular follow-ups. Additionally, amiodarone interacts with several drugs, including anticoagulants, which must be managed to prevent adverse effects. Therefore, a deep understanding of both oral and intravenous formulations, as well as proper dosage adjustments, is essential. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive and updated review on amiodarone's indications, contraindications, recommended dosages, drug interactions, side effects, and monitoring protocols.

Pharmacodynamics of Rivaroxaban and Dabigatran in Adults with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Receiving R-CHOP Immunochemotherapy

Background/Objectives: Rivaroxaban and dabigatran are commonly used for thromboembolic disease management in active cancer patients. However, limited research explores the impact of concurrent chemotherapy on the pharmacodynamics of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of combined chemotherapy with rivaroxaban and dabigatran on the pharmacodynamics in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).; Methods: This was a prospective, pharmacodynamic study. Eligible subjects were ≥18 years old, diagnosed with DLBCL and initiating R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) immunochemotherapy. The enrolled adults received either rivaroxaban (10 mg once daily) or dabigatran etixalate (110 mg twice daily). Plasma anti-factor Xa (FXa) in participants on rivaroxaban and diluted thrombin time (dTT) in participants on dabigatran were assessed over the dosing interval before and after R-CHOP administration. Pharmacodynamic parameters of rivaroxaban and dabigatran were determined using a non-compartmental analysis.; Results: Twenty-six adults participated, with twelve in the rivaroxaban group and fourteen in the dabigatran group. The mean age was 59 ± 14.4 years. In the rivaroxaban group, the AUEC of FXa inhibition showed no significant change after R-CHOP (mean difference 3.8 ng·h/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI) -155.4 to 163.0, p = 0.96). Similarly, in the dabigatran group, the AUEC of dTT remained unchanged post R-CHOP (mean difference 54.41 ng·h/mL, 95% CI -99.09 to 207.9 ng/mL, p = 0.46). However, the median time-to-peak dTT was significantly faster with R-CHOP (3 h, [min-max, 1.5-8] compared to without it (4 h, [min-max, 3-8], p = 0.04); Conclusions: Concurrent R-CHOP chemotherapy did not significantly impact FXa inhibition by rivaroxaban or dTT by dabigatran. The time-to-peak dTT was faster when dabigatran was administered with R-CHOP.

Clinical and subclinical acute brain injury caused by invasive cardiovascular procedures

Over the past 50 years, the number and invasiveness of percutaneous cardiovascular procedures globally have increased substantially. However, cardiovascular interventions are inherently associated with a risk of acute brain injury, both periprocedurally and postprocedurally, which impairs medical outcomes and increases health-care costs. Current international clinical guidelines generally do not cover the area of acute brain injury related to cardiovascular invasive procedures. In this international Consensus Statement, we compile the available knowledge (including data on prevalence, pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical presentation and management) to formulate consensus recommendations on the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of acute brain injury caused by cardiovascular interventions. We also identify knowledge gaps and possible future directions in clinical research into acute brain injury related to cardiovascular interventions.

Pulmonary Embolism in Critically Ill Patients-Prevention, Diagnosis, and Management

Critically ill patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are often immobilized and on mechanical ventilation, placing them at increased risk for thromboembolic diseases, particularly deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and, to a lesser extent, pulmonary embolism (PE). While these conditions are frequently encountered in the emergency department, managing them in the ICU presents unique challenges. Although existing guidelines are comprehensive and effective, they are primarily designed for patients presenting with PE in the emergency department and do not fully address the complexities of managing critically ill patients in the ICU. This review aims to summarize the available data on these challenging cases, offering a practical approach to the prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of PE, particularly when it is acquired in the ICU.

Optimizing anticoagulation therapy for in-hospital patients on direct oral anticoagulants: a single-centre modified Delphi study

AIMS

The management of patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) during hospitalization is a common challenge in clinical practice. Although bridging is generally not recommended, too often DOACs are switched to parenteral therapy with low molecular weight heparins. Our objectives were to update a local guideline for perioperative DOAC management and to develop a guideline for the anticoagulation management in non-surgical patients regarding temporary DOAC discontinuation.

METHODS

We executed a two-step modified Delphi study in a 1000-bed university hospital in Belgium. The Delphi questionnaires were developed based on a literature review and a telephone survey of prescribers. Two expert panels were established: one dedicated to perioperative DOAC management and the other to DOAC management in non-surgical patients. Both panels completed two rounds, commencing with an individual and online round, followed by a face-to-face group session.

RESULTS

After the two-round Delphi process, the updated perioperative guideline on DOAC management included reasons for delaying the resumption of DOACs following surgery, such as oral intake not possible, the probability of re-intervention within 3 days, and insufficient haemostasis (e.g. active clinically significant haematoma, haemorrhagic drains or wounds). Furthermore, a guideline for non-surgical hospitalized patients was developed, outlining possible reasons for interrupting DOAC therapy. Both guidelines offer clear anticoagulation therapy strategies corresponding to the identified scenarios.

CONCLUSIONS

We have updated and developed guidelines for DOAC management in surgical and non-surgical patients during hospitalization, which aim to support prescribers and to enhance targeted prescription review by hospital pharmacists.

Use of direct oral anticoagulants in patients on chronic hemodialysis: Contemporary appraisal on the role for patients with atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergoing hemodialysis and in this patient population, management in terms of oral anticoagulation (OAC) presents unique challenges due to the increased risk of both thromboembolic events and bleeding complications. The attributable risk of AF for stroke may differ from patients without CKD, raising the question if OAC is indicated at all. Historically, vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the standard treatment for anticoagulation in AF; however, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have emerged as an alternative therapeutic option, whereby data from prospective randomised trials with hemodialysis patients is limited resulting in great variability of practice and guideline recommendations. This review summarizes existing data sources regarding the use and benefit of oral anticoagulation with VKA and DOAC in hemodialysis patients.

Rivaroxaban for Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Patients with Nephrotic Syndrome: A Single-Arm, Prospective Study

Introduction

Thromboembolism is a recognized complication of nephrotic syndrome (NS). Evidence supporting the use of rivaroxaban to prevent NS-related thrombosis is limited and controversial. This study aimed to explore the impact of NS on rivaroxaban pharmacokinetics and to collect observational data on the efficacy and safety of rivaroxaban as primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with NS.

Methods

This prospective study analyzed 141 patients with NS who received rivaroxaban (10 mg/day) for thromboprophylaxis. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry was used to measure the trough and peak plasma concentrations (Ctrough and Cmax) of rivaroxaban. The influence of clinical and genetic factors on these concentrations was examined using multivariate logistic regression.

Results

The median Cmax and Ctrough were 68.5 ng/mL (interquartile range [IQR], 31.7-105.5 ng/mL) and 4.4 ng/mL (IQR, 1.2-11.9 ng/mL), respectively. The incidence of thromboembolic events (TEs) was 12.8%, while that of bleeding events was 14.2%, although all were classified as minor. Albumin level was the most significant factor affecting Cmax (ρ = 0.55; p < 0.001) and was also significantly associated with TEs (0.81; 0.71-0.91 per 1.0 g/dL increase; p = 0.001) and bleeding risks (1.11; 1.03-1.19 per 1.0 g/dL increase; p = 0.008). Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the ABCB1 gene significantly influenced Ctrough but were not associated with clinical outcomes.

Conclusion

Hypoalbuminemia significantly affects the pharmacokinetics of rivaroxaban in NS patients. A dose-adjustment strategy based on rivaroxaban concentrations, accounting for variable albumin levels, may improve the safety and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis in this population.

2024 Chinese Expert Consensus Guidelines on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation in the Elderly, Endorsed by Geriatric Society of Chinese Medical Association (Cardiovascular Group) and Chinese Society of Geriatric Health Medicine (Cardiovascular Branch): Executive Summary

The consensus guidelines of the Geriatric Society of Chinese Medical Association on the management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in the elderly was first published in 2011 and updated in 2016, with endorsement by Chinese Society of Geriatric Health Medicine. Since then, many important studies regarding the screening and treatment in the elderly population have been reported, necessitating this updated expert consensus guideline. The writing committee members comprehensively reviewed updated evidence pertaining to elderly patients with AF, and formulated this 2024 update. The highlighted issues focused on the following: screening for AF, geriatric comprehensive assessment, use of the Atrial fibrillation Better Care (ABC) pathway for the elderly patients, and special clinical settings related to elderly patients with AF. New recommendations addressing smart technology facilitated AF screening, ABC pathway based management, and optimal anticoagulation were developed, with a focus on the elderly.

Ten tips to manage oral anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have a high incidence and prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF). While general treatment strategies for AF may largely be transferred to patients with mild to moderate CKD, patients with advanced CKD-particularly hemodialysis (HD) patients-with AF pose substantial therapeutical challenges to cardiologists and nephrologists. The arguably greatest dilemma is the very limited evidence on appropriate strategies for prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in HD patients with AF, since the risk for both thromboembolic events without oral anticoagulation and severe bleeding events with oral anticoagulation are substantially increased in advanced CKD, compared with the general population. Thus, the benefit to risk ratio of either vitamin K antagonists or direct oral anticoagulants is less evident in HD than in non-CKD patients with AF. As a multidisciplinary panel of clinicians, we here propose 10 tips that may help our colleagues to navigate between the risk of undertreatment-exposing CKD patients with AF to a high stroke risk-and overtreatment-exposing the very same patients to a prohibitively high bleeding risk. These tips include ideas on alternative risk stratification strategies and novel treatment approaches that are currently in clinical studies-such as factor XI inhibitors or left atrial appendage closure-and may become game-changers for HD patients with AF.

The safety of available pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation

INTRODUCTION

Oral anticoagulant drugs reduce the risk of stroke associated with atrial fibrillation. Vitamin K antagonists, gold standard therapy for decades, have been deposed by the direct oral anticoagulants that exhibit superior safety profiles. However, hemorrhagic complications remain a major concern to anticoagulation.

AREAS COVERED

We searched available data in the literature to review the current knowledge on the safety profiles of available anticoagulants.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite a relevant leap forward with the introduction of DOACs, safety concerns persist in some fields of the current pharmacotherapy for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. In-depth knowledge of the safety profile of available anticoagulants and dealing with safety issues in patient subgroups is of utmost importance. Bleeding risk scores should not be dichotomously used to decide anticoagulation treatment but rather to promote shared decision, identify and correct modifiable risk factors, and set monitoring frequency. Additional issues that wait to be investigated in order to improve the safety of therapy include circulating levels of direct oral anticoagulants and anticoagulation in patient sub-groups: very elderly, frail, those with advanced kidney or liver disease, and so on. Safety may be improved from the in-depth knowledge of safety concerns and therapeutic options.

Anticoagulation in Chronic Kidney Disease

The nuanced landscape of anticoagulation therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) presents a formidable challenge, intricately balancing the dual hazards of hemorrhage and thrombosis. These patients find themselves in a precarious position, teetering on the edge of these risks due to compromised platelet functionality and systemic disturbances within their coagulation frameworks. The management of such patients necessitates a meticulous approach to dosing adjustments and vigilant monitoring to navigate the perilous waters of anticoagulant therapy. This is especially critical considering the altered pharmacokinetics in CKD, where the clearance of drugs is significantly impeded, heightening the risk of accumulation and adverse effects. In the evolving narrative of anticoagulation therapy, the introduction of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) has heralded a new era, offering a glimmer of hope for those navigating the complexities of CKD. These agents, with their promise of easier management and a reduced need for monitoring, have begun to reshape the contours of care, particularly for patients not yet on dialysis. However, this is not without its caveats. The application of DOACs in the context of advanced CKD remains a largely uncharted territory, necessitating a cautious exploration to unearth their true potential and limitations. Moreover, the advent of innovative strategies such as left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) underscores the dynamic nature of anticoagulation therapy, potentially offering a tailored solution for those at the intersection of CKD and elevated stroke risk. Yet the journey toward integrating such advancements into standard practice is laden with unanswered questions, demanding rigorous investigation to illuminate their efficacy and safety across the spectrum of kidney disease. In summary, the management of anticoagulation in CKD is a delicate dance, requiring a harmonious blend of precision, caution, and innovation. As we venture further into this complex domain, we must build upon our current understanding, embracing both emerging therapies and the need for ongoing research. Only then can we hope to offer our patients a path that navigates the narrow strait between bleeding and clotting, toward safer and more effective care.

Apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban but not dabigatran are associated with higher mortality compared to vitamin-K antagonists: A retrospective German claims data analysis

BACKGROUND

Vitamin-K antagonists (VKAs) have widely been replaced by non-VKA oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This includes Austria, Germany and Switzerland, where as VKA, instead of warfarin, the much longer-acting phenprocoumon is used, which was not compared to NOACs in clinical trials.

METHODS

Using administrative data from a large German health insurance, we included all anticoagulation-naïve patients with a first prescription of a NOAC or VKA between 2012 and 2020. We analysed overall survival, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events, major thromboembolic events and major bleeding.

RESULTS

Overall, 570,137 patients were included (apixaban: 26.9%, dabigatran: 4.6%, edoxaban: 8.8%, rivaroxaban: 39.1% and VKA: 20.7% of these 99.4% phenprocoumon). In the primary analysis using a 1:1 propensity score matching-cohort (PSM-cohort), a significantly higher overall mortality was found for apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban (all p < 0.001) but not for dabigatran (p = 0.13) compared to VKA. In this PSM-cohort, 5-year mortality was 22.7% for apixaban versus 12.7% for VKA, 19.5% for edoxaban versus 11.4% for VKA, 16.0% for rivaroxaban versus 12.3% for VKA (all p < 0.001) and 13.0% for dabigatran versus 12.8% for VKA (p = 0.06). The observed effect was confirmed in sensitivity analyses using un-weighted and three different weighted Fine-Gray regression models on the basis of the entire cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

In this large real-world analysis, apixaban, edoxaban and rivaroxaban, but not dabigatran, were associated with worse survival compared to VKA. These findings, consistent with a few other studies including phenprocoumon, cast profound doubts on the unreflected, general use of NOACs. Randomized trials should assess whether phenprocoumon might actually be superior to NOACs.

Efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients on chronic dialysis

BACKGROUND

Clinical trials of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are scarce and inconclusive in patients who are receiving dialysis, for whom DOAC are not labelled in Europe. In a French nationwide registry study of patients on chronic dialysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of off-label DOAC use vs approved vitamin K antagonist (VKA).

METHODS

Data on patients on dialysis were extracted from the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network (REIN) registry and merged with data from the French national healthcare system database (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). Patients on dialysis who had initiated treatment with an oral anticoagulant between 1 January 2012 and 31 December 2020, were eligible for inclusion. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding events and the primary effectiveness outcome was the occurrence of thrombotic events. Using propensity score-weighted cause-specific Cox regression, we compared the safety and effectiveness outcomes for DOAC and VKA.

RESULTS

A total of 8954 patients received an oral anticoagulant (483 DOAC and 8471 VKA) for the first time after the initiation of dialysis. Over a median (interquartile range) follow-up period of 1.7 (0.8-3.2) years, 2567 patients presented a first thromboembolic event and 1254 patients had a bleeding event. After propensity score adjustment, the risk of a thromboembolic event was significantly lower in patients treated with a DOAC than in patients treated with a VKA {weighted hazard ratio (wHR) [95% confidence interval (CI)] 0.66 (0.46; 0.94)}. A non-significant trend toward a lower risk of major bleeding events was found in DOAC-treated patients, relative to VKA-treated patients [wHR (95% CI) 0.68 (0.41; 1.12)]. The results were consistent across subgroups and in sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large group of dialysis patients initiating an oral anticoagulant, the off-label use of DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of thromboembolic events and a non-significantly lower risk of bleeding, relative to VKA use. This provides reassurance regarding the off-label use of DOACs in people on dialysis.

Effectiveness and Safety of the Coadministration of Rifampin and Warfarin versus Direct Oral Anticoagulants: A Cohort Study

Introduction

Pharmacokinetic studies have shown that rifampin reduces the levels of oral anticoagulants during the initiation of coadministration, raising concerns about an increased thrombotic risk, but there are limited comparative clinical outcomes between rifampin and warfarin compared with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of concurrent use of rifampin and warfarin versus DOACs, with assessments of outcome-associated factors and oral anticoagulant (OAC) management quality.

Methods

A total of 142 patients given rifampin plus warfarin (n = 56) or DOACs (n = 86) for over 7 days were included, and their clinical data and outcomes were compared.

Results

The median Charlson Comorbidity Index and HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal renal/liver function, stroke, bleeding history or predisposition, labile INR, elderly, drugs/alcohol concomitantly) score of the two groups were 2 and 3, respectively. The incidence rate of composite ischemic or thromboembolic events was 2.16 and 1.44 per 10,000 patient-days in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively, with an adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of 0.41 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.02-7.34). The incidence rate of composite major bleeding or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding events was 1.58 and 1.52 per 10,000 patient-days in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively, with an adjusted HR of 1.12 (95% CI 0.32-4.45). The risk of composite bleeding events increased with a higher HAS-BLED score (HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.02-2.63). Moreover, 34.3% of warfarin users maintained a percent time in therapeutic range of above 50%. Furthermore, 77.9% of DOAC users received appropriate dosing.

Conclusion

No significant differences were observed in terms of the incidence of thrombotic or bleeding events between the two groups during coadministration. In addition, a higher HAS-BLED score was associated with a greater risk of bleeding events regardless of the class of OACs used. Finally, close monitoring of bleeding events should be considered.

More early bleeds associated with high baseline direct oral anticoagulant levels in atrial fibrillation: the MAS study

ABSTRACT

Treatment with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) is effective and safe. However, bleeding complications still occur. Whether DOAC level measurement may further improve treatment efficacy and safety is still an open issue. In the "Measure and See" study, venous blood was collected 15-30 days after DOAC initiation in patients with AF who were then followed up for 1 year to record the occurrence of major and clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. DOAC plasma levels were measured in 1 laboratory, and results were kept blind to patients and treating doctors. Trough DOAC levels were assessed in 1657 patients (957 [57.7%] and 700 patients treated with standard and low-dose, respectively). Fifty bleeding events were recorded during 1606 years of follow-up (3.11% pt/yrs). Fifteen bleeding events (4.97% pt/yrs) occurred in patients with C-trough standardized values in the highest activity class (>0.50), whereas 35 events (2.69% pt/yrs) occurred in those with values in the 2 lower classes (≤0.50, P = .0401). Increasing DOAC levels and low-dose DOAC use were associated with increased bleeding risk in the first 3 months of treatment. Overall, 19% of patients receiving low doses had standardized values in the highest class. More bleeding occurred in patients on low (4.3% pt/yrs) vs standard (2.2% pt/yrs; P = .0160) dose DOAC. Early measurement of DOAC levels in patients with AF identified many individuals with high levels despite the low doses use and had more bleeding risk during the first 3 months of treatment. This trial was registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT03803579.

Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Interactions between Food or Herbal Products and Oral Anticoagulants: Evidence Review, Practical Recommendations, and Knowledge Gaps

Interactions between food and oral anticoagulants (OACs), particularly vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin, are widely recognized and may also be clinically relevant for direct OACs. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions with food or herbs can lead to anticoagulation potentiation, increased risk of bleeding, or reduced drug efficacy, all compromising patient safety. We conducted a systematic search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on PubMed for assessments of interactions between OACs and various ingestants. Since the RCT evidence was slim, we also reviewed prospective longitudinal studies, case series, and case reports to identify possible associations between foods and anticoagulation therapy. We referred to basic or translational studies that shared putative explanations for such interactions, but we failed to identify high-quality evidence in most cases. The limited evidence, small sample size of the studies, conflicting results, and possible heterogeneity in the contents of herbal products prevent a conclusive assessment of these interactions. Existing evidence suggests that (1) cranberry juice consumption (up to 240 mL/d and probably even more) with warfarin is safe; (2) use of green leafy vegetables with a high daily content (more than 250 µg) of vitamin K should be cautioned for patients receiving warfarin, because it may decrease warfarin efficacy. It is also advisable for patients to maintain highly constant intake of green leafy vegetables to ensure stable warfarin effectiveness; (3) ginger, even in small quantities (excluding commercial ginger-flavored beverages, which contain only negligible amounts of ginger), and mango (more than one fruit) can both potentiate warfarin effects; (4) patients taking OACs should avoid St. John's wort due to diminished anticoagulant effect; and (5) consumption of less than 240 mL of grapefruit juice daily is unlikely to interact with OACs. Future longitudinal observational cohort studies and RCTs with larger sample sizes are needed to study specific interactions between food or herbal products and OACs.

Facial trauma with life-threatening bleeding treated by andexanet alfa administration: A case report

Recently, anticoagulant reversal has become a treatment option for life-threatening bleeding, especially in intracranial hemorrhage. Although evidence of the beneficial efficacy of andexanet alfa accumulates in cases of intracranial hemorrhage, little is known about its effectiveness in head injuries without intracranial hemorrhage. We present the case of an 87-year-old man who suffered a stroke 1 year previously and had been taking apixaban since then, who was brought to the emergency department with facial trauma due to a fall. Upon arrival at the hospital, the patient was conscious, and his vital signs were normal; however, physical examination revealed epistaxis, and plain head computed tomography (CT) showed multiple facial fractures without intracranial hemorrhage. As epistaxis was challenging to control, upper airway obstruction developed. His percutaneous oxygen saturation (SpO2) decreased rapidly, and he underwent tracheal intubation. Contrast-enhanced head CT revealed at least two extravasations, near the anterior wall of the right maxillary sinus and from the nasal canal to the nasopharynx area. However, embolization using interventional radiology was deemed difficult. Because the bleeding did not stop, we determined the bleeding was life-threatening and uncontrollable. Therefore, we infused andexanet alfa to stop the bleeding. After infusion, hemostasis was confirmed. This case suggests the effectiveness of andexanet alfa in cases of facial trauma and extracranial bleeding difficult to stop, resulting in favorable outcomes and hemostatic effects.

Use of DOACs in frail elderly patients in light of class genericization

BACKGROUND

Frailty and comorbidity influence the therapeutic approach in everyday clinical practice. The DOACs genericization opens a reflection on their differences from a pharmacological and bioavailability point of view, particularly in elderly frail patients. The aim of this project was to create a national Delphi consensus on the topic of the use of DOACs for atrial fibrillation (AF) in such patients, in light of the genericization of the class.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The consensus dealt with 3 main topics: a) efficacy and safety of DOACs in elderly and/or frail patients; b) therapeutic choice in specific frailty scenarios; c) DOACs genericization. 56 cardiologists, two internists and two neurologists from Italy expressed their level of agreement on each statement by using a 5-point Likert scale (1: strongly disagree, 2: disagree, 3: uncertain, 4: agree, 5: strongly agree). A positive consensus was reached if the percentage of agreement (vote 1-2, positive consensus) or disagreement (votes 4-5, negative consensus) was >66%; otherwise, no consensus was reached. Results are displayed accordingly.

CONCLUSIONS

After 10 years of everyday clinical management of DOACs for AF, specific elements differentiating a molecule from another, either for efficacy or for safety, are consolidated. However, some uncertainties still exist in particular contexts, such as chronic kidney disease or cancer patients. Clinicians have an unsure attitude towards generic drugs, because clinical practice is lacking as well as a proper knowledge of the topic. Albeit being an alternative, the choice of the generic drug must remain the responsibility of the clinician.

Tailoring oral anticoagulant treatment in the era of multi-drug therapies for PAH and CTEPH

The use of oral anticoagulants in the management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) presents distinct therapeutic challenges and benefits. In PAH, the benefits of oral anticoagulation are uncertain, with studies yielding mixed results on their efficacy and safety. Conversely, oral anticoagulants are a cornerstone in the treatment of CTEPH, where their use is consistently recommended to prevent recurrent thromboembolic events. The choice between vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) remains a significant clinical question, as each type presents advantages and potential drawbacks. Furthermore, drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with concomitant PAH and CTEPH treatments complicate anticoagulant management, necessitating careful consideration of individual patient regimens. This review examines the current evidence on oral anticoagulant use in PAH and CTEPH and discusses the implications of DDIs within a context of multi-drug treatments, including targeted drugs in PAH.

Apixaban Use in Patients with Kidney Impairment: A Review of Pharmacokinetic, Interventional, and Observational Study Data

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) remains a significant global health issue and is a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Patients with CKD have an increased risk of developing atrial fibrillation (AF) and venous thromboembolism (VTE). While direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have become a standard of care for anticoagulation (AC) in patients with AF and VTE, the appropriate use of these agents in comorbid kidney impairment warrants detailed discussion. This scientific narrative review summarizes the effectiveness and safety of apixaban use in patients with renal dysfunction by assessing the current published pharmacokinetic, interventional, observational, and guideline data. Apixaban is a highly selective, orally active, direct inhibitor of factor Xa, with well-established pharmacokinetics and consistent clinical outcomes across a broad range of patient populations, including those with kidney impairment. Overall, the scientific literature has shown that apixaban has a favorable clinical efficacy and safety profile compared with vitamin K antagonists for patients with AF or VTE and comorbid kidney impairment. These data support the approved label dosing strategy of apixaban in reducing the risk of stroke/systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular AF and in treating VTE across all ranges of kidney function. Both clinician experience and knowledge of patient-specific factors may be required in the management of comorbid patients with advanced CKD or those requiring dialysis, as data on these patients are limited.

Clinical decisions for appropriate management of patients with atrial fibrillation

The management of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) requires intricate clinical decision-making to optimize outcomes. In everyday clinical practice, physicians undergo difficult choices to better manage patients with AF. They need to balance thromboembolic and bleeding risk to focus on patients' symptoms and to manage a variety of multiple comorbidities. In this review, we aimed to explore the multifaceted dimensions of clinical decision-making in AF patients, encompassing the definition and diagnosis of clinical AF, stroke risk stratification, oral anticoagulant therapy selection, consideration of bleeding risk, and the ongoing debate between rhythm and rate control strategies. We will also focus on possible grey zones for the management of AF patients. In navigating this intricate landscape, clinicians must reconcile the dynamic interplay of patient-specific factors, evolving guidelines, and emerging therapies. The review underscores the need for personalized, evidence-based clinical decision-making to tailor interventions for optimal outcomes according to specific AF patient profiles.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

To stop or not to stop novel oral anticoagulants prior to performing joint interventional maneuvers? Evidence from a prospective study that the therapy can be maintained

Anticoagulation is common in patients undergoing routine musculoskeletal interventional maneuvers. Previous retrospective studies have established the safety of continuing anticoagulation with novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) when performing this kind of interventions. Indeed, ultrasound (US)-guided interventional maneuvers have shown a superior safety profile compared to blind anatomical maneuvers. To evaluate prospectively the periprocedural bleeding events in NOAC-anticoagulated patients undergoing interventional articular or periarticular procedures. Consecutive patients diagnosed with inflammatory or degenerative rheumatologic pathology requiring interventional maneuvers were prospectively recruited. Group 1 was treated with NOACs, group 2 was treated with vitamin K antagonists, and group 3 was not anticoagulated. Prior to the international maneuver, NOAC therapy was continuously administered, in regimens dictated by the underlying anticoagulation indication. Demographics, comorbidities, laboratory parameters, locally administered medication (corticosteroids or viscosupplementation), interventional maneuver location, needle size, and local bleeding events were recorded. Post-procedural control was performed at 30 min, 48 h, and 7 days. No articular/periarticular bleeding event occurred in patients treated with NOACs, regardless of their type and dosage, locally administered medication, needle size, location, and number of interventions per individual. Several patients in all groups developed small superficial ecchymoses at the injection site. Our results suggest that NOACs are safe to be used in a continuous regimen prior to US-guided injections, even as dual antithrombotic therapy (in combination with aspirin). The use of lower gauge needles, chosen for viscosupplementation therapy, was not burdened with adverse effects on the procedural outcome. Key Points • Currently, no prospective studies have been performed to establish the safety of continuous NOAC anticoagulation when performing routine intra- or periarticular interventional maneuvers. • The study offers an extensive view on a wide spectrum of intra- and periarticular interventional maneuvers including anatomic targets and needle sizes that were not previously assessed. • The study offers a perspective into performing repetitive maneuvers in the same patient, both over a short time and at longer intervals. • The zero periprocedural bleeding risk observed in our study may reassure practitioners and suggest that US-guided interventional therapeutic interventions are safe in patients treated with a continuous regimen of different NOACs.

Brivaracetam use in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus on its role as first add-on therapy in focal epilepsy and beyond

BACKGROUND

Antiseizure medications remain the cornerstone of treatment for epilepsy, although a proportion of individuals with the condition will continue to experience seizures despite appropriate therapy. Treatment choices for epilepsy are based on variables related to both the individual patient and the available medications. Brivaracetam is a third-generation agent antiseizure medication.

METHODS

We carried out a Delphi consensus exercise to define the role of brivaracetam in clinical practice and to provide guidance about its use as first add-on ASM and in selected clinical scenarios. A total of 15 consensus statements were drafted by an expert panel following review of the literature and all were approved in the first round of voting by panelists. The consensus indicated different clinical scenarios for which brivaracetam can be a good candidate for treatment, including first add-on use.

RESULTS

Overall, brivaracetam was considered to have many advantageous characteristics that render it a suitable option for patients with focal epilepsy, including a fast onset of action, favorable pharmacokinetic profile with few drug-drug interactions, broad-spectrum activity, and being well tolerated across a range of doses. Brivaracetam is also associated with sustained clinical response and good tolerability in the long term.

CONCLUSIONS

These characteristics also make it suitable as an early add-on for the elderly and for patients with post-stroke epilepsy or status epilepticus as highlighted by the present Delphi consensus.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Older and Frail Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Decade of Experience

INTRODUCTION

Both the prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its subsequent use of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are rapidly increasing in patients of older age. In the absence of contra-indications, guidelines advocate anticoagulation based on the CHA2DS2-VASc score for all AF patients aged 75 and above. However, some practitioners are hesitant to prescribe anticoagulants to older and frail patients due to perceived elevated bleeding risks. This review delves into the comparative treatment outcomes of DOACs versus vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in older patients with AF, particularly focusing on those of advanced age, frailty, increased risk of falling, chronic kidney disease (CKD), or with a history of major bleeding. Additionally, considerations on the use of off-label DOAC doses, the role of left atrial appendage (LAA) closure and future developments in factor XIa-inhibitors will be discussed.

RESULTS

While strong evidence supports the use of DOACs in the vital older patients with nonvalvular AF, it remains scant in frail patient groups. There is some evidence from non-randomized studies suggesting that the effect of DOACs compared with VKAs is consistent between frail and nonfrail patients. However, recent findings from a single randomized trial showed increased bleeding risks but comparable thromboembolic outcomes in frail individuals switching from VKAs to DOACs. In patients with an increased risk of falling, data suggest no relevant interaction of increased risk of falling on the effectiveness and safety of DOACs compared with warfarin. Resuming oral anticoagulants in patients with Af after major bleeding seems to be beneficial. Off-label low-dose DOAC is often prescribed to patients who were underrepresented in larger randomized trails because of an elevated risk of bleeding or overexposure to DOACs, but its effect on clinical outcomes remains uncertain.

CONCLUSIONS

DOACs are the recommended oral anticoagulant for vital older patients with AF. The scarcity of data backing DOAC use in frail individuals, those with renal impairments, or significant bleeding history underscores the necessity for further investigation. However, existing evidence suggests at least similar effectiveness and safety and potential benefits for DOACs in these patient subsets. Therefore, there is no reason to suggest these patients should be treated differently than the established guidelines regarding anticoagulation.

Dose Reduction of Edoxaban in Patients 80 Years and Older With Atrial Fibrillation: Post Hoc Analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

In older patients with atrial fibrillation who take anticoagulants for stroke prevention, bleeding is increased compared with younger patients, thus, clinicians frequently prescribe lower than recommended doses in older patients despite limited randomized data.

Objective

To evaluate ischemic and bleeding outcomes in patients 80 years and older with atrial fibrillation receiving edoxaban, 60 mg vs 30 mg, and edoxaban, 30 mg vs warfarin.

Design, Setting, and Participants

The ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 trial (Effective Anticoagulation With Factor Xa Next Generation in Atrial Fibrillation-Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction 48) was a parallel-design, double-blind, global clinical trial that randomized patients with atrial fibrillation to either one of 2 edoxaban dosing regimens or warfarin. This secondary analysis focused on patients 80 years or older without dose-reduction criteria receiving edoxaban, 60 mg vs 30 mg, as well as patients with or without dose-reduction criteria receiving edoxaban, 30 mg, vs warfarin. Study data were analyzed between October 2022 and December 2023.

Interventions

Oral edoxaban, 30 mg once daily; edoxaban, 60 mg once daily; or warfarin.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Primary net clinical outcome of death, stroke or systemic embolism, and major bleeding and each individual component.

Results

The current analysis included 2966 patients 80 years and older (mean [SD] age, 83 [2.7] years; 1671 male [56%]). Among 1138 patients 80 years and older without dose-reduction criteria, those receiving edoxaban, 60 mg vs 30 mg, had more major bleeding events (hazard ratio [HR], 1.57; 95% CI, 1.04-2.38; P = .03), particularly gastrointestinal hemorrhage (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.29-3.90; P = .004), with no significant difference in efficacy end points. Findings were supported by analyses of endogenous factor Xa inhibition, a marker of anticoagulant effect, which was comparable between younger patients receiving edoxaban, 60 mg, and older patients receiving edoxaban, 30 mg. In 2406 patients 80 years and older with or without dose-reduction criteria, patients receiving edoxaban, 30 mg, vs warfarin had lower rates of the primary net clinical outcome (HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.68-0.91; P = .001), major bleeding (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.45-0.77; P < .001), and death (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.70-1.00; P = .046), whereas rates of stroke or systemic embolism were comparable.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this post hoc analysis of the ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 randomized clinical trial, in patients 80 years and older with atrial fibrillation, major bleeding events were lower in patients randomized to receive edoxaban, 30 mg per day, compared with either edoxaban, 60 mg per day (in patients without dose-reduction criteria), or warfarin (irrespective of dose-reduction status), without an offsetting increase in ischemic events. These data support the concept that lower-dose anticoagulants, such as edoxaban, 30 mg, may be considered in older patients with atrial fibrillation even in the absence of dose-reduction criteria.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00781391.

Treating cancer-associated venous thromboembolism: A practical approach

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a common and potentially life-threatening complication in patients with cancer. Both cancer and its treatments increase the risk of developing VTE. Specific cancer types and individual patient comorbidities increase the risk of developing cancer-associated VTE, and the risk of bleeding is increased with anticoagulation therapies. The aims of this article are to summarize the latest evidence for treating cancer-associated VTE, discuss the practical considerations involved, and share best practices for VTE treatment in patients with cancer. The article pays particular attention to challenging contexts including patients with brain, lung, gastrointestinal, and genitourinary tumors and those with hematological malignancies. Furthermore, the article summarizes specific clinical scenarios that require additional treatment considerations, including extremes of body weight, nausea and gastrointestinal disturbances, compromised renal function, and anemia, and touches upon the relevance of drug-drug interactions. Historically, vitamin K antagonists and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) have been used as therapy for cancer-associated VTE. The development of direct oral anticoagulants has provided additional treatment options, which, in certain instances, offer advantages over LMWHs. There are numerous factors that need to be considered when treating cancer-associated VTE, and although various treatment guidelines are helpful, they do not reflect each unique scenario that may arise in clinical practice. This article provides a summary of the latest evidence and a practical approach for treating cancer-associated VTE.

Anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and treatment of venous thromboembolism and portal vein thrombosis in cirrhosis: guidance from the SSC of the ISTH

While advanced liver disease was previously considered to be an acquired bleeding disorder, there is increasing recognition of an associated prothrombotic state with patients being at higher risk of atrial fibrillation (AF) and stroke and venous thromboembolism (VTE) including portal vein thrombosis (PVT). We review the available literature on epidemiology, pathophysiology, and risk factors and provide guidance on anticoagulant management of these conditions in adults with cirrhosis. In patients with Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis and AF, we recommend anticoagulation with standard-dose direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in accordance with cardiology guideline recommendations for patients without liver disease. In those with Child-Pugh C cirrhosis, there is inadequate evidence with respect to the benefit and risk of anticoagulation for stroke prevention in AF. In patients with cirrhosis and acute deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, we recommend anticoagulation and suggest use of either a DOAC or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH)/vitamin K antagonist (VKA) in Child-Pugh A or B cirrhosis and LMWH alone (or as a bridge to VKA in patients with a normal baseline international normalized ratio) in Child-Pugh C cirrhosis. We recommend anticoagulation for patients with cirrhosis and symptomatic PVT. We suggest anticoagulation for those with asymptomatic, progressing PVT and recommend continuing extended anticoagulation for liver transplant candidates with PVT.

Advances in the medical treatment and diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulation

INTRODUCTION

With the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), it entails expanding oral anticoagulants (OACs) use, carrying a higher risk of associated hemorrhagic events, including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Despite advances in OACs development with a better safety profile and reversal agent for these anticoagulants, there is still no consensus on the optimal management of patients with OACs-associated ICH.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the authors have carried out an exhaustive search on the advances in recent years. The authors provide an update on the management of ICH in anticoagulated patients, as well as an update on the latest evidence on anticoagulation resumption, recent therapeutic strategies, and investigational drugs that could play a role in the future.

EXPERT OPINION

Following an ICH event in an anticoagulated patient, a comprehensive clinical evaluation is imperative. Anticoagulation should be promptly withdrawn and reversed. Once the patient is stabilized, a reintroduction of anticoagulation should be considered, typically within a timeframe of 4-8 weeks, if feasible. If re-anticoagulation is not possible, alternative options such as Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion are available.

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Off-Label Underdosed Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Asian Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Off-label underdosed direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are commonly utilised in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) since they are prone to bleeding with OACs. However, the efficacy and safety of off-label underdosing DOACs are controversial. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of off-label underdosed DOACs in Asian patients with AF.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from 2010 to July 5, 2024, for randomised controlled trials or observational studies that compared off-label DOACs and on-label/warfarin in Asian patients with AF. The primary outcomes included ischaemic stroke or systemic embolism (ISSE) and major bleeding (MB), while secondary outcomes included all-cause death, gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), and myocardial infarction (MI). Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled using random-effects models.

RESULTS

Twenty observational studies were included. Seventeen studies compared off-label underdosed DOACs versus on-label DOACs, whereas five studies compared off-label underdosed DOACs versus warfarin. Off-label underdosed DOACs were associated with higher risk of ISSE (pooled HR [pHR] = 1.17; 95% CI: 1.00-1.38, p = 0.048) and ICH (pHR = 1.27; 95% CI: 1.06-1.52, p = 0.010) versus on-label. Subgroup analysis demonstrated increased ISSE risk with off-label underdosed rivaroxaban compared to on-label (pHR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.07-2.08). Compared to warfarin, off-label underdosed DOACs were associated with decreased risk of MB (pHR = 0.46; 95% CI: 0.32-0.65, p < 0.001), GIB (pHR = 0.52; 95% CI: 0.29-0.93, p = 0.028), ICH (pHR = 0.60; 95% CI: 0.42-0.86, p = 0.005), and all-cause death (pHR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.56-0.87, p = 0.001), while illustrating similar ISSE risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-label underdosed DOACs, particularly rivaroxaban, was associated with increased ISSE risk but did not decrease bleeding compared to on-label. Adherence to appropriate DOAC doses should be emphasised to achieve the best clinical outcomes for Asian patients with AF.