1
|
Preda A, Falco R, Tognola C, Carbonaro M, Vargiu S, Gallazzi M, Baroni M, Gigli L, Varrenti M, Colombo G, Zanotto G, Giannattasio C, Mazzone P, Guarracini F. Contemporary Advances in Cardiac Remote Monitoring: A Comprehensive, Updated Mini-Review. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:819. [PMID: 38793002 PMCID: PMC11122881 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60050819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/15/2024] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
Over the past decade, remote monitoring (RM) has become an increasingly popular way to improve healthcare and health outcomes. Modern cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are capable of recording an increasing amount of data related to CIED function, arrhythmias, physiological status and hemodynamic parameters, providing in-depth and updated information on patient cardiovascular function. The extensive use of RM for patients with CIED allows for early diagnosis and rapid assessment of relevant issues, both clinical and technical, as well as replacing outpatient follow-up improving overall management without compromise safety. This approach is recommended by current guidelines for all eligible patients affected by different chronic cardiac conditions including either brady- and tachy-arrhythmias and heart failure. Beyond to clinical advantages, RM has demonstrated cost-effectiveness and is associated with elevated levels of patient satisfaction. Future perspectives include improving security, interoperability and diagnostic power as well as to engage patients with digital health technology. This review aims to update existing data concerning clinical outcomes in patients managed with RM in the wide spectrum of cardiac arrhythmias and Hear Failure (HF), disclosing also about safety, effectiveness, patient satisfaction and cost-saving.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Preda
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Raffaele Falco
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Chiara Tognola
- Clinical Cardiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Carbonaro
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Sara Vargiu
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Michela Gallazzi
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Matteo Baroni
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Lorenzo Gigli
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Marisa Varrenti
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Giulia Colombo
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Gabriele Zanotto
- Department of Cardiology, Ospedale Magalini di Villafranca, 37069 Villafranca di Verona, Italy
| | - Cristina Giannattasio
- Clinical Cardiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy
- School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milan, Italy
| | - Patrizio Mazzone
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| | - Fabrizio Guarracini
- Electrophysiology Unit, De Gasperis Cardio Center, Niguarda Hospital, 20162 Milan, Italy (M.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Seo J, Alhuarrat MAD, Krishnan S, Saralidze T, Lim H, Chen B, Flomenbaum D, Naser A, Kharawala A, Apple SJ, Ferrick N, Chudow J, Di Biase L, Fisher JD, Krumerman A, Ferrick KJ. Utilization of the remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in a diverse demographic cohort: Insights from a single-center observation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2024; 47:185-194. [PMID: 38010836 DOI: 10.1111/pace.14883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 10/29/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite its clinical benefits, patient compliance to remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) varies and remains under-studied in diverse populations. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate RM compliance, clinical outcomes, and identify demographic and socioeconomic factors affecting RM in a diverse urban population in New York. METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients enrolled in CIED RM at Montefiore Medical Center between December 2017 and May 2022. RM compliance was defined as the percentage of days compliant to RM transmission divided by the total prescribed days of RM. Patients were censored when they were lost to follow-up or at the time of death. The cohorts were categorized into low (≤30%), intermediate (31-69%), and high (≥70%) RM compliance groups. Statistical analyses were conducted accordingly. RESULTS Among 853 patients, median RM compliance was 55%. Age inversely affected compliance (p < .001), and high compliance was associated with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) usage and implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD)/cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRTD) devices. The low-compliance group had a higher mortality rate and fewer regular clinic visits (p < .001) than high-compliance group. Socioeconomic factors did not significantly impact compliance, while Asians showed higher compliance compared with Whites (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.08-12.43; p = .04). Technical issues were the main reason for non-compliance. CONCLUSION We observed suboptimal compliance to RM, which occurred most frequently in older patients. Clinic visit compliance, optimal medical therapy, and lower mortality were associated with higher compliance, whereas insufficient understanding of RM usage was the chief barrier to compliance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyoung Seo
- Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | - Suraj Krishnan
- Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Tinatin Saralidze
- Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Hyomin Lim
- Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Brett Chen
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - David Flomenbaum
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Ahmad Naser
- Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Amrin Kharawala
- Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Samuel J Apple
- Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Neal Ferrick
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Jay Chudow
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Luigi Di Biase
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - John D Fisher
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Andrew Krumerman
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| | - Kevin J Ferrick
- Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McLaughlin MM, Raitt MH, Tarasovsky G, Whooley MA, Dhruva SS. Informational Postcards Increase Engagement with Remote Monitoring Among Veterans with Pacemakers and Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: a Stepped-Wedge Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:87-96. [PMID: 38252247 PMCID: PMC10937872 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08478-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Remote monitoring (RM) of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduces morbidity and mortality. However, many patients are not adherent to RM. OBJECTIVE To test the effect of informational postcards on RM adherence. DESIGN/PATIENTS Stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial among Veterans with pacemakers and ICDs. INTERVENTION In wave 1, Veterans who had sent at least 1 transmission within the past 2 years but had become non-adherent were randomly assigned to receive a postcard or no postcard. Those receiving postcards were randomized to 1 of 2 messages: (1) a"warning" postcard describing risks of non-adherence or (2) an "encouraging" postcard describing benefits of adherence. In wave 2, Veterans who had either not received a postcard in wave 1 or had since become non-adherent were mailed a postcard (again, randomized to 1 of 2 messages). Patients who did not send an RM transmission within 1 month were mailed a second, identical postcard. MAIN MEASURES Transmission within 70 days. KEY RESULTS Overall, 6351 Veterans were included. In waves 1 and 2, postcards were mailed to 5657 Veterans (2821 "warning" messages and 2836 "encouraging" messages). Wave 1 included 2178 Veterans as controls (i.e., not mailed a postcard), some of whom received a postcard in wave 2 if they remained non-adherent. In wave 2, 3473 postcards were sent. Of the 5657 patients mailed a postcard, 2756 (48.7%) sent an RM transmission within 70 days, compared to 530 (24.3%) of 2178 controls (absolute difference 24.4%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.2%, 26.6%). Of those who sent a transmission, 71.8% did so after the first postcard. Transmission rates at 70 days did not significantly differ between "warning" and "encouraging" messages (odds ratio 1.04, 95% CI 0.92, 1.18). CONCLUSIONS Informational postcards led to a 24.4% absolute increase in adherence at 70 days among Veterans with pacemakers and ICDs who were non-adherent to RM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan M McLaughlin
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Merritt H Raitt
- Portland Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Gary Tarasovsky
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Mary A Whooley
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sanket S Dhruva
- San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA.
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xia J, Brownell NK, Fonarow GC, Ziaeian B. New models for heart failure care delivery. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2024; 82:70-89. [PMID: 38311306 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024]
Abstract
Heart failure (HF) is a common disease with increasing prevalence around the world. There is high morbidity and mortality associated with poorly controlled HF along with increasing costs and strain on healthcare systems due to a high rate of rehospitalization and resource utilization. Despite the establishment of clear evidence-based guideline directed medical therapies (GDMT) proven to improve HF morbidity and mortality, there remains significant clinical inertia to optimizing HF patients on GDMT. Only a minority of HF patients are prescribed on all four classes of GDMT. To bridge the gap between the vulnerable population of HF patients and lifesaving GDMT, HF implementation is of increasing importance. HF implementation involves strategies and techniques to improve GDMT optimization along with other modalities to improve HF management. HF implementation meets patients where they are, including at the time of acute decompensation in the inpatient setting, at the vulnerable discharge stage, and at the chronic management stage in the outpatient setting. Inpatient HF implementation strategies include protocolized rapid titration of GDMT, site-level audit-and-feedback, virtual GDMT optimization teams, and electronic health record notifications and alerts. Discharge HF implementation strategies include education at patient and provider levels, discharge summaries, and HF transitional programs. Outpatient HF implementation strategies include digital innovations such as electronic health record utilization and mobile applications, population level strategies such as registries and clinical dashboards), changes in HF team structure and member roles, remote monitoring with implanted devices and telemonitoring, and hospital at home care model. With a growing population of HF patients, there is an increasing need for novel and creative HF implementation and monitoring methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeffrey Xia
- Department of Medicine David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, United States of America.
| | - Nicholas K Brownell
- Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, United States of America.
| | - Gregg C Fonarow
- Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, United States of America.
| | - Boback Ziaeian
- Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ferrick AM, Raj SR, Deneke T, Kojodjojo P, Lopez-Cabanillas N, Abe H, Boveda S, Chew DS, Choi JI, Dagres N, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Frazier-Mills CG, Gilbert O, Han JK, Hewit S, Kneeland C, DeEllen Mirza S, Mittal S, Ricci RP, Runte M, Sinclair S, Alkmim-Teixeira R, Vandenberk B, Varma N. 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on practical management of the remote device clinic. Heart Rhythm 2023; 20:e92-e144. [PMID: 37211145 DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2023.03.1525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023]
Abstract
Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Haruhiko Abe
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aarti S Dalal
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Olivia Gilbert
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Janet K Han
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Runte
- University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Bert Vandenberk
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Scholte NTB, Gürgöze MT, Aydin D, Theuns DAMJ, Manintveld OC, Ronner E, Boersma E, de Boer RA, van der Boon RMA, Brugts JJ. Telemonitoring for heart failure: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2023; 44:2911-2926. [PMID: 37216272 PMCID: PMC10424885 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 04/28/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/24/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Telemonitoring modalities in heart failure (HF) have been proposed as being essential for future organization and transition of HF care, however, efficacy has not been proven. A comprehensive meta-analysis of studies on home telemonitoring systems (hTMS) in HF and the effect on clinical outcomes are provided. METHODS AND RESULTS A systematic literature search was performed in four bibliographic databases, including randomized trials and observational studies that were published during January 1996-July 2022. A random-effects meta-analysis was carried out comparing hTMS with standard of care. All-cause mortality, first HF hospitalization, and total HF hospitalizations were evaluated as study endpoints. Sixty-five non-invasive hTMS studies and 27 invasive hTMS studies enrolled 36 549 HF patients, with a mean follow-up of 11.5 months. In patients using hTMS compared with standard of care, a significant 16% reduction in all-cause mortality was observed [pooled odds ratio (OR): 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.77-0.93, I2: 24%], as well as a significant 19% reduction in first HF hospitalization (OR: 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.88, I2: 22%) and a 15% reduction in total HF hospitalizations (pooled incidence rate ratio: 0.85, 95% CI 0.76-0.96, I2: 70%). CONCLUSION These results are an advocacy for the use of hTMS in HF patients to reduce all-cause mortality and HF-related hospitalizations. Still, the methods of hTMS remain diverse, so future research should strive to standardize modes of effective hTMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niels T B Scholte
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Muhammed T Gürgöze
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Dilan Aydin
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Dominic A M J Theuns
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Olivier C Manintveld
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Eelko Ronner
- Department of Cardiology, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Reinier de Graafweg 5, Delft, South Holland 2625 AD, The Netherlands
| | - Eric Boersma
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Rudolf A de Boer
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Robert M A van der Boon
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| | - Jasper J Brugts
- Department of Cardiology, Thorax Centre, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, South Holland 3015 GD, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Varma N, Braunschweig F, Burri H, Hindricks G, Linz D, Michowitz Y, Ricci RP, Nielsen JC. Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices and disease management. Europace 2023; 25:euad233. [PMID: 37622591 PMCID: PMC10451003 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
This reviews the transition of remote monitoring of patients with cardiac electronic implantable devices from curiosity to standard of care. This has been delivered by technology evolution from patient-activated remote interrogations at appointed intervals to continuous monitoring that automatically flags clinically actionable information to the clinic for review. This model has facilitated follow-up and received professional society recommendations. Additionally, continuous monitoring has provided a new level of granularity of diagnostic data enabling extension of patient management from device to disease management. This ushers in an era of digital medicine with wider applications in cardiovascular medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niraj Varma
- Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44118, USA
| | | | - Haran Burri
- University Hospital of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Dominik Linz
- Maastricht University Medical Center, 6211 LK Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Yoav Michowitz
- Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Hebrew University, Jerusalem 9112001, Israel
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Boriani G, Bertini M, Manzo M, Calò L, Santini L, Savarese G, Dello Russo A, Santobuono VE, Lavalle C, Viscusi M, Amellone C, Calvanese R, Santoro A, Rapacciuolo A, Ziacchi M, Arena G, Imberti JF, Campari M, Valsecchi S, D’Onofrio A. Performance of a multi-sensor implantable defibrillator algorithm for heart failure monitoring in the presence of atrial fibrillation. Europace 2023; 25:euad261. [PMID: 37656991 PMCID: PMC10498140 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS The HeartLogic Index combines data from multiple implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) sensors and has been shown to accurately stratify patients at risk of heart failure (HF) events. We evaluated and compared the performance of this algorithm during sinus rhythm and during long-lasting atrial fibrillation (AF). METHODS AND RESULTS HeartLogic was activated in 568 ICD patients from 26 centres. We found periods of ≥30 consecutive days with an atrial high-rate episode (AHRE) burden <1 h/day and periods with an AHRE burden ≥20 h/day. We then identified patients who met both criteria during the follow-up (AHRE group, n = 53), to allow pairwise comparison of periods. For control purposes, we identified patients with an AHRE burden <1 h throughout their follow-up and implemented 2:1 propensity score matching vs. the AHRE group (matched non-AHRE group, n = 106). In the AHRE group, the rate of alerts was 1.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0-1.5]/patient-year during periods with an AHRE burden <1 h/day and 2.0 (95% CI: 1.5-2.6)/patient-year during periods with an AHRE-burden ≥20 h/day (P = 0.004). The rate of HF hospitalizations was 0.34 (95% CI: 0.15-0.69)/patient-year during IN-alert periods and 0.06 (95% CI: 0.02-0.14)/patient-year during OUT-of-alert periods (P < 0.001). The IN/OUT-of-alert state incidence rate ratio of HF hospitalizations was 8.59 (95% CI: 1.67-55.31) during periods with an AHRE burden <1 h/day and 2.70 (95% CI: 1.01-28.33) during periods with an AHRE burden ≥20 h/day. In the matched non-AHRE group, the rate of HF hospitalizations was 0.29 (95% CI: 0.12-0.60)/patient-year during IN-alert periods and 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02-0.08)/patient-year during OUT-of-alert periods (P < 0.001). The incidence rate ratio was 7.11 (95% CI: 2.19-22.44). CONCLUSION Patients received more alerts during periods of AF. The ability of the algorithm to identify increased risk of HF events was confirmed during AF, despite a lower IN/OUT-of-alert incidence rate ratio in comparison with non-AF periods and non-AF patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION http://clinicaltrials.gov/Identifier: NCT02275637.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Boriani
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Matteo Bertini
- Cardiology Department, University of Ferrara, S. Anna University Hospital, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Michele Manzo
- Cardiology Department, OO.RR. San Giovanni di Dio Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy
| | - Leonardo Calò
- Division of Cardiology, Policlinico Casilino, Rome, Italy
| | - Luca Santini
- Division of Cardiology, Giovan Battista Grassi’ Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Gianluca Savarese
- Division of Cardiology, ‘S. Giovanni Battista’ Hospital, Foligno, Italy
| | - Antonio Dello Russo
- Cardiology and Arrhythmology Clinic, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ezio Santobuono
- University Cardiology Unit, Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Carlo Lavalle
- Department of Clinical, Internal, Anesthesiologist and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Miguel Viscusi
- Cardiology Department, S. Anna e S. Sebastiano Hospital, Caserta, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Antonio Rapacciuolo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Matteo Ziacchi
- Cardiology Unit, Cardio-Thoracic and Vascular Department, S.Orsola University Hospital, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Arena
- Cardiology Department, Ospedale Civile Apuane, Massa (MS), Italy
| | - Jacopo F Imberti
- Cardiology Division, Department of Biomedical, Metabolic and Neural Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
- Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Monica Campari
- Rhythm Management Division, Boston Scientific, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Antonio D’Onofrio
- Unità Operativa di Elettrofisiologia, Studio e Terapia delle Aritmie, Monaldi Hospital, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ferrick AM, Raj SR, Deneke T, Kojodjojo P, Lopez‐Cabanillas N, Abe H, Boveda S, Chew DS, Choi J, Dagres N, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Frazier‐Mills CG, Gilbert O, Han JK, Hewit S, Kneeland C, Mirza SD, Mittal S, Ricci RP, Runte M, Sinclair S, Alkmim‐Teixeira R, Vandenberk B, Varma N, Davenport E, Freedenberg V, Glotzer TV, Huang J, Ikeda T, Kramer DB, Lin D, Rojel‐Martínez U, Stühlinger M, Varosy PD. 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic. J Arrhythm 2023; 39:250-302. [PMID: 37324757 PMCID: PMC10264760 DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Haruhiko Abe
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health HospitalJapan
| | | | | | | | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Heart Center Leipzig at the University of LeipzigLeipzigGermany
| | | | | | | | | | - Janet K. Han
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare SystemLos AngelesCalifornia
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Runte
- University of LethbridgeLethbridgeAlbertaCanada
| | | | | | - Bert Vandenberk
- University of CalgaryCalgaryAlbertaCanada
- Department of Cardiovascular SciencesLeuvenBelgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Ferrick AM, Raj SR, Deneke T, Kojodjojo P, Lopez-Cabanillas N, Abe H, Boveda S, Chew DS, Choi JI, Dagres N, Dalal AS, Dechert BE, Frazier-Mills CG, Gilbert O, Han JK, Hewit S, Kneeland C, Mirza SD, Mittal S, Ricci RP, Runte M, Sinclair S, Alkmim-Teixeira R, Vandenberk B, Varma N, Davenport E, Freedenberg V, Glotzer TV, Huang JL, Ikeda T, Kramer DB, Lin D, Rojel-Martínez U, Stühlinger M, Varosy PD. 2023 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS Expert Consensus Statement on Practical Management of the Remote Device Clinic. Europace 2023; 25:euad123. [PMID: 37208301 PMCID: PMC10199172 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Remote monitoring is beneficial for the management of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices by impacting morbidity and mortality. With increasing numbers of patients using remote monitoring, keeping up with higher volume of remote monitoring transmissions creates challenges for device clinic staff. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide cardiac electrophysiologists, allied professionals, and hospital administrators in managing remote monitoring clinics. This includes guidance for remote monitoring clinic staffing, appropriate clinic workflows, patient education, and alert management. This expert consensus statement also addresses other topics such as communication of transmission results, use of third-party resources, manufacturer responsibilities, and programming concerns. The goal is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all aspects of remote monitoring services. Gaps in current knowledge and guidance for future research directions are also identified.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Haruhiko Abe
- University of Occupational and Environmental Health Hospital, Kitakyushu, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Nikolaos Dagres
- Heart Center Leipzig at the University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Aarti S Dalal
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Olivia Gilbert
- Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Janet K Han
- VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mary Runte
- University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Alberta, Canada
| | | | | | - Bert Vandenberk
- University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nagy B, Pál-Jakab Á, Kiss B, Orbán G, Sélley TL, Dabasi-Halász Z, Móka BB, Gellér L, Merkely B, Zima E. Remote Management of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:jcdd10050214. [PMID: 37233181 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10050214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Remote monitoring (RM) is the newest function of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). In our observational retrospective analysis, we aimed to assess whether telecardiology could be a safe alternative to routine outpatient examinations during the COVID-19 pandemic. The in- and outpatient visits, the number of acute cardiac decompensation episodes, the RM data from CIEDs, and general condition were examined via questionnaires (KCCQ, EQ-5D-5L). Regarding the enrolled 85 patients, the number of personal patient appearances was significantly lower in the year following the pandemic outbreak compared to the previous year (1.4 ± 1.4 and 1.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.0077). The number of acute decompensation events was five before and seven during lockdown (p = 0.6). Based on the RM data, there was no significant difference in heart failure (HF) markers (all related p > 0.05); only patient activity increased after restrictions were lifted compared to that before the lockdown (p = 0.03). During restrictions, patients reported increased anxiety and depression compared to their previous state (p < 0.001). There was no subjective change in the perception of HF symptoms (p = 0.7). Based on the subjective perception and CIED data, the quality of life of patients with CIED did not deteriorate during the pandemic, but their anxiety and depression intensified. Telecardiology may be a safe alternative to routine inpatient examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bettina Nagy
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Ádám Pál-Jakab
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Boldizsár Kiss
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Gábor Orbán
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | | | - Zsigmond Dabasi-Halász
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Barbara Bernadett Móka
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - László Gellér
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Béla Merkely
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Endre Zima
- Heart and Vascular Centre, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, 1122 Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vandenberk B, Raj SR. Remote Patient Monitoring: What Have We Learned and Where Are We Going? CURRENT CARDIOVASCULAR RISK REPORTS 2023; 17:103-115. [PMID: 37305214 PMCID: PMC10122094 DOI: 10.1007/s12170-023-00720-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Remote monitoring (RM) of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is an important part of patient follow-up. The increasing number of patients with CIEDs and the recent pandemic pose several challenges for already limited device clinic resources. This review focuses on recent evolutions in RM and identifies future needs to improve RM. Recent Findings RM has been associated with multiple clinical benefits, including improved survival, early detection of actionable events, reduction in inappropriate shocks, longer battery lives, and more efficient healthcare utilization. The survival benefit was driven by studies using alert-based continuous RM with daily transmissions and fast reaction times. Patients report a high satisfaction rate without significant differences in quality of life between RM and in-office follow-up.The increasing workload, due to the increasing number of CIEDs implanted with daily remote transmissions, results in several challenges for the future of RM. RM requires appropriate reimbursement for RM device clinics to optimize patient/staff ratios, including sufficient non-clinical and administrative support. Universal alert programming and data processing may minimize inter-manufacturer differences, improve the signal-to-noise ratio, and allow the development of standard operating protocols and workflows. In the future, programming by remote control and true remote programming may further improve remote CIED management, patient quality of life, and device clinic workflows. Summary RM should be considered standard of care in management of patients with CIEDs. The clinical benefits of RM can be maximized by an alert-based continuous RM model. Adapted healthcare policies are required to keep RM manageable for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bert Vandenberk
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Satish R. Raj
- Department of Cardiac Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, GAC70 HRIC Building, 3280 Hospital Dr NW, Calgary, AB T2N 4Z6 Canada
- Autonomic Dysfunction Center, Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kolk MZH, Narayan SM, Clopton P, Wilde AAM, Knops RE, Tjong FVY. Reduction in long-term mortality using remote device monitoring in a large real-world population of patients with implantable defibrillators. Europace 2023; 25:969-977. [PMID: 36636951 PMCID: PMC10062290 DOI: 10.1093/europace/euac280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
AIMS Remote monitoring (RM) for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is advocated for the potential of early detection of disease progression and device dysfunction. While studies have examined the effect of RM on clinical outcomes in carefully selected populations of heart failure patients implanted with ICDs from a single vendor, there is a paucity of data in real-world patients. We aimed to assess the long-term effect of RM in a representative ICD population using real-world data. METHODS AND RESULTS This is an observational retrospective longitudinal study of 1004 patients implanted with an ICD or cardiac resynchronization therapy device (CRT-D) from all device vendors between 2010 and 2021. Patients started on RM (N = 403) within 90 days following de novo device implantation and yearly in-office visits were compared with patients with only bi-yearly in-office follow-up (non-RM, N = 601). In a propensity score matched cohort of 430 patients (mean age 61.4 ± 14.3 years, 26.7% female), all-cause mortality at 4-year was 12.6% in the RM and 27.7% in the non-RM group [hazard ratio (HR) 0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.32-0.82; P = 0.005]. No difference in inappropriate ICD-therapy (HR 1.90, 95% CI 0.86-4.21; P = 0.122) was observed. The risk of appropriate ICD-therapy (HR 1.71, 95% CI 1.07-2.74; P = 0.026) was higher in the RM group. CONCLUSION Remote monitoring was associated with a reduction in long-term all-cause and cardiac mortality compared with traditional office visits in a real-world ICD population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maarten Z H Kolk
- Amsterdam UMC location AMC, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart failure & arrhythmias, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sanjiv M Narayan
- Department of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, 780 Welch Road, MC 5773, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Paul Clopton
- Department of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, 780 Welch Road, MC 5773, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Arthur A M Wilde
- Amsterdam UMC location AMC, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart failure & arrhythmias, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reinoud E Knops
- Amsterdam UMC location AMC, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart failure & arrhythmias, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fleur V Y Tjong
- Amsterdam UMC location AMC, Department of Cardiology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Heart failure & arrhythmias, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Medicine and Cardiovascular Institute, Stanford University, 780 Welch Road, MC 5773, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kowal D, Katarzyńska-Szymańska A, Prech M, Rubiś B, Mitkowski P. Early Smartphone App-Based Remote Diagnosis of Silent Atrial Fibrillation and Ventricular Fibrillation in a Patient with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Defibrillator. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 2023; 10:jcdd10010030. [PMID: 36661925 PMCID: PMC9865368 DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10010030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to distressing statistics concerning cardiovascular diseases, remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) has received a priority recommendation in daily patient care. However, most bedside systems available so far are not optimal due to limited patient adherence. We report that smartphone app technology communicating with CIED improved the patient's engagement and adherence, as well as the accuracy of atrial and ventricular arrhythmias diagnosis, thus offering more efficient treatment and, consequently, better patient clinical outcomes. Our findings are in concordance with previously published results for implantable loop recorders and pacemakers, and provide new insight for heart failure patients with an implanted cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagmar Kowal
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland
- Doctoral School, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-812 Poznan, Poland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-696-495-222 or +48-616-418-303
| | | | - Marek Prech
- Department of Cardiology, Provincial Hospital, 64-100 Leszno, Poland
| | - Błażej Rubiś
- Department of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznan, Poland
| | - Przemysław Mitkowski
- 1st Department of Cardiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-355 Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hillmann HAK, Hansen C, Przibille O, Duncker D. The patient perspective on remote monitoring of implantable cardiac devices. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1123848. [PMID: 36937908 PMCID: PMC10017432 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1123848] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Remote monitoring for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) is well established in clinical routine and recommended by current guidelines. Nevertheless, data regarding patients' perceptions are limited. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the patient perspectives on the remote monitoring of cardiac devices in Germany. Methods and results Patients with CIEDs and remote monitoring of all current manufacturers from three German centers were asked to participate. The questionnaire consisted of 37 questions regarding the patients' individual use and perspectives on remote monitoring. Survey participation was anonymous and on a voluntary basis. A total of 617 patients (71.6% men) participated. Most patients reported feeling well informed (69.3%) and reported having unchanged or improved coping (98.8%) since the start of remote monitoring. At least 39.7% of patients experienced technical problems regarding the transmitter, whereas most patients (60.3%) reported that they never noted technical issues. Older patients had significantly less interest than younger patients in using their own smartphones for data transfer (p < 0.001). Conclusion Patients with remote follow-up of CIED reported that they felt well informed about the remote monitoring approach. Remote monitoring can support coping with their disease. With remote monitoring, patients experienced a prolongation of intervals of in-person follow-up visits, and especially younger patients would appreciate smartphone-based data transfer of their CIEDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henrike A. K. Hillmann
- 1Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Claudius Hansen
- 2Heart and Vascular Center, Hospital Neu-Bethlehem, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Przibille
- 3Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien (CCB), Device Clinic, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - David Duncker
- 1Hannover Heart Rhythm Center, Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- *Correspondence: David Duncker,
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lapage L, Foulon S, Poels P, Hoekman B, Vermeulen J, Dorrestijn A, Ector J, Haemers P, Voros G, Garweg C, Willems R. Is it feasible to outsource the remote monitoring of implantable cardiac defibrillators in a large tertiary hospital? Acta Cardiol 2022:1-12. [PMID: 36222546 DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2022.2119664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
AIM To provide a detailed description of the workflow at our telecardiology centre and to analyse the workload of real-world remote monitoring with the aim to assess the feasibility to outsource this service. METHODS A retrospective analysis was conducted on the telecardiology service provided at the University Hospitals of Leuven by extracting patient demographic data, general time usage and detailed information about the type of remote contacts. 10,869 contacts in 948 patients have been included. A 2-week prospective study was conducted on the same service by documenting and monitoring every action performed by specialised nurses when analysing and solving remote monitoring transmissions. 337 contacts in 262 patients were collected during this period. RESULTS Both analyses indicated similar numbers of events and interventions. Unplanned transmissions were more challenging and required more interventions than planned transmissions. Relatively little time (retrospective median: 1.83 min; prospective median: 1.56 min, per event) was spent on incoming non-actionable 'normal' transmissions (retrospective: 46%; prospective: 40% of all events). Retrospectively 54% and prospectively 60% of transmissions showed abnormalities and were responsible for most of the time expended. Disease-related issues were the most frequent cause for these 'abnormal' alerts. Contacting patients and physicians were key interventions undertaken. Interaction initiated by patients mainly involved the installation process (42%) and bedside monitoring problems (32%). CONCLUSION External data centres could deal with 40% of the transmissions, but the decline in workload would be negligible for the in-hospital remote monitoring team, because very little time is spent dealing with the many 'non-event' transmissions whereas most of the time is spent solving clinical problems. Providing sufficient resources and optimising communication protocols is necessary to aid in managing the workload of the remote monitoring team. Implications for practiceContacting patients and physicians are key interventions for specialist nurses in remote monitoring centres.Detailed timing confirmed that most time was spent on relevant disease-related clinical problems.Despite dealing with ∼40% of transmissions, outsourcing to external data centres would decrease the workload only by 15-25%.Patient initiated contacts with questions concerning remote monitoring form a high burden and should be countered by scaling the service and creating communication protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liesbeth Lapage
- Master in Nursing, University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department for Nursing, UC Leuven-Limburg, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Stefaan Foulon
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Patricia Poels
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Boukje Hoekman
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Jonas Vermeulen
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Axel Dorrestijn
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Joris Ector
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter Haemers
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Gabor Voros
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe Garweg
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rik Willems
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, University Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Lappegård KT, Moe F. Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience? INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 19:ijerph19010312. [PMID: 35010572 PMCID: PMC8751026 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/25/2021] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Cardiac implantable electronic devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators are increasingly monitored by systems transmitting information directly from the patient to the hospital. This may increase safety and patient satisfaction and also under certain circumstances represent an economic advantage. The review summarizes some of the recent research in the field of remote monitoring of cardiac devices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Knut Tore Lappegård
- Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodo, Norway;
- Department of Clinical Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, N-9037 Tromso, Norway
- Correspondence:
| | - Frode Moe
- Department of Medicine, Nordland Hospital, N-8092 Bodo, Norway;
| |
Collapse
|