Catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis: a systematic review

Catheter ablation compared to medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia in sarcoidosis: nationwide outcomes and hospital readmissions

Background

Catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular tachycardia (VT) can be a useful treatment strategy, however, few studies have compared CA to medical therapy (MT) in the sarcoidosis population.

Objective

To assess in-hospital outcomes and unplanned readmissions following CA for VT compared to MT in patients with sarcoidosis.

Methods

Data was obtained from the Nationwide Readmissions Database between 2010 and 2019 to identify patients with sarcoidosis admitted for VT either undergoing CA or MT during elective and non-elective admission. Primary endpoints were a composite endpoint of inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock, cardiac arrest and 30-day hospital readmissions. Procedural complications at index admission and causes of readmission were also identified.

Results

Among 1581 patients, 1217 with sarcoidosis and VT underwent MT compared to 168 with CA during non-elective admission. 63 patients admitted electively underwent CA compared with 129 managed medically. There was no difference in the composite outcome for patients undergoing catheter ablation or medical therapy during both non-elective (9.0 % vs 12.0 %, p = 0.312) and elective admission (3.2 % vs. 7.8 %, p = 0.343). The most common cause of readmission were ventricular arrhythmias (VA) in both groups, however, those undergoing elective CA were less likely to be readmitted for VA compared to non-elective CA. The most common complication in the CA group was cardiac tamponade (4.8 %).

Conclusion

VT ablation is associated with similar rates of 30-day readmission compared to MT and does not confer increased risk of harm with respect to inpatient mortality, cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest. Further research is warranted to determine if a subgroup of sarcoidosis patients admitted with VT are better served with an initial conservative management strategy followed by VT ablation.

Management of patients with an electrical storm or clustered ventricular arrhythmias: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the ESC-endorsed by the Asia-Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, Heart Rhythm Society, and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society

Electrical storm (ES) is a state of electrical instability, manifesting as recurrent ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) over a short period of time (three or more episodes of sustained VA within 24 h, separated by at least 5 min, requiring termination by an intervention). The clinical presentation can vary, but ES is usually a cardiac emergency. Electrical storm mainly affects patients with structural or primary electrical heart disease, often with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD). Management of ES requires a multi-faceted approach and the involvement of multi-disciplinary teams, but despite advanced treatment and often invasive procedures, it is associated with high morbidity and mortality. With an ageing population, longer survival of heart failure patients, and an increasing number of patients with ICD, the incidence of ES is expected to increase. This European Heart Rhythm Association clinical consensus statement focuses on pathophysiology, clinical presentation, diagnostic evaluation, and acute and long-term management of patients presenting with ES or clustered VA.

Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation: Patient Selection, Access, and Ablation Techniques and Strategies to Manage Complications

Epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation is an important treatment modality for refractory ventricular tachycardia. This comprehensive review guides clinicians through optimized strategies for improved procedural outcomes and patient safety during epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation. Patient selection criteria, including cardiomyopathy type, electrocardiogram findings, and prior ablation history, are discussed. Detailed techniques for safe pericardial access are provided. Potential complications and strategies for prevention and management are explored. The review also addresses challenges and pitfalls of epicardial mapping and ablation.

The new European Society of Cardiology guideline for the management of cardiomyopathies: key messages for cardiac electrophysiologists

Electrocardiographic findings and arrhythmias are common in cardiomyopathies. Both may be an early indication of a specific diagnosis or may occur due to myocardial fibrosis and/or reduced contractility. Brady- and tachyarrhythmias significantly contribute to increased morbidity and mortality in patients with cardiomyopathies. Antiarrhythmic therapy including risk stratification is often challenging and plays a major role for these patients. Thus, an "electrophysiological" perspective on guidelines on cardiomyopathies may be warranted. As the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) has recently published a new guideline for the management of cardiomyopathies, this overview aims to present key messages of these guidelines. Innovations include a new phenotype-based classification system with emphasis on a multimodal imaging approach for diagnosis and risk stratification. The guideline includes detailed chapters on dilated and hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and their phenocopies, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and restrictive cardiomyopathy as well as syndromic and metabolic cardiomyopathies. Patient pathways guide clinicians from the initial presentation to diagnosis. The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and genetic testing during diagnostic work-up is stressed. Concepts of rhythm and rate control for atrial fibrillation have led to new recommendations, and the role of defibrillator therapy in primary prevention is discussed in detail. Whilst providing general guidelines for management, the primary objective of the guideline is to ascertain the disease etiology and disease-specific, individualized management.

Management of the arrhythmic manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is characterised by a high burden of arrhythmic manifestations and cardiac electrophysiologists play an important role in both the diagnosis and management of this challenging condition. CS is characterised by the formation of noncaseating granulomas within the myocardium, which can subsequently lead to fibrosis. Clinical presentations of CS are varied and depend on the location and extent of granulomas. Patients may present with atrioventricular block, ventricular arrhythmias, sudden cardiac death or heart failure. CS is being increasing diagnosed through use of advanced cardiac imaging, however endomyocardial biopsy is often still required to confirm the diagnosis. Due to the low sensitivity of fluoroscopy-guided right ventricular biopsies, three-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping and electrogram-guided biopsies are being investigated as a means to improve diagnostic yield. Cardiac implantable electronic devices are often required in the management of CS, either for pacing or for primary or secondary prevention of ventricular arrhythmias. Catheter ablation for ventricular arrythmias may also be required, although this is often associated with high recurrence rates due to the challenging nature of the arrhythmogenic substrate. This review will explore the underlying mechanisms of the arrhythmic manifestations of CS, provide an overview of current clinical practice guidelines, and examine the important role that cardiac electrophysiologists play in managing patients with CS.

The Effectiveness of Catheter Ablation in the Management of Ventricular Tachycardia in Comparison With Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients With Structural Heart Disease: A Meta-Analysis

The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation versus antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) in the management of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart diseases. Two independent investigators searched electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Excerpta Medica database (EMBASE) using keyword combinations (Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free terms) such as "catheter ablation," "ventricular tachycardia," "escalation," and "antiarrhythmic drugs" from inception to November 30, 2022. The primary efficacy outcomes included recurrence of VT at follow-up, all-cause mortality, and cardiovascular mortality. The secondary efficacy outcomes assessed in the current meta-analysis included implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shock and hospitalization due to cardiac reasons. Safety outcomes included treatment-related adverse events and serious adverse events. A total of three studies were included in this meta-analysis. There was no significant difference in the risk of recurrence of VT (RR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.72-1.24, p-value: 0.67), all-cause mortality (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.67, 1.46, p-value: 0.98), cardiovascular mortality (risk ratio (RR): 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.56-1.45, p-value: 0.67), incidence of ICD shocks (RR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.76-1.29, p-value: 0.93, I-square: 0%), and hospitalization due to cardiac reasons in follow-up (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.55-1.07, p-value: 0.12) between the catheter ablation group and the antiarrhythmic drug group. However, the risk of treatment-related adverse events was lower in the ablation group compared to the antiarrhythmic medicine (AAM) group (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.29-0.67, p-value: 0.0001). In this meta-analysis of three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients with structural heart disease who had ventricular tachycardia, the incidence of the recurrence of VT, all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and ICD shock was not significantly different between patients who received catheter ablation and antiarrhythmic drugs. However, regarding safety, catheter ablation is a safe procedure with a low risk of treatment-related events compared to antiarrhythmic drugs.

Patient Selection, Techniques, and Complication Mitigation for Epicardial Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Percutaneous epicardial ventricular tachycardia ablation can decrease implanted cardioverter defibrillator shocks and hospitalizations; proper patient selection and procedural technique are imperative to maximize the benefit-risk ratio. The best candidates for epicardial ventricular tachycardia will depend on history of prior ablation, type of cardiomyopathy, and specific electrocardiogram and cardiac imaging findings. Complications include hemopericardium, hemoperitoneum, coronary vessel injury, and phrenic nerve injury. Modern epicardial mapping techniques provide new understandings of the 3-dimensional nature of reentrant ventricular tachycardia circuits across cardiomyopathy etiologies. Where epicardial access is not feasible, alternative techniques to reach epicardial ventricular tachycardia sources may be necessary.

Outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia in patients with sarcoidosis: Insights from the National Inpatient Sample database (2002-2018)

INTRODUCTION

Data on utilization, major complications, and in-hospital mortality of catheter ablation (CA) for sarcoidosis-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) are limited. We sought to determine the outcomes of sarcoidosis-related VT, and incidence and predictors of complications associated with the CA procedure.

METHODS

We queried the 2002-2018 National Inpatient Sample database to identify patients aged ≥18 years with sarcoidosis admitted with VT. A 1:3 propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis was used to compare patient outcomes between CA and medically managed groups. Multivariable regression was performed to determine independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications associated with the CA procedure.

RESULTS

Of 3220 sarcoidosis patients with VT, 132 (4.1%) underwent CA. Patients who underwent CA were younger, male predominant, more likely Caucasian, had differences in baseline comorbidities including more likely to have heart failure, less likely to have prior myocardial infarction, COPD, or severe renal disease, had a higher mean household income, and more likely admitted to a larger/urban teaching hospital. After PSM, we examined 106 CA cases and 318 medically managed cases. There was a trend toward a lower in-hospital mortality rate in the CA group when compared to the medically managed group (1.9% vs. 6.6%, p = 0.08). The most common complications were pericardial drainage (5.3%), postoperative hemorrhage (3.8%), accidental puncture periprocedure (3.0%), and cardiac tamponade (2.3%). Independent predictors of in-hospital mortality and procedural complications among the CA group included congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR], 13.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.7-104.2) and mild to moderate renal disease (OR, 3.9; 95% CI, 1.1-13.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to patients with sarcoidosis-related VT who received medical therapy alone, those who underwent CA have a trend for a lower mortality rate despite procedure-related complications occurring as high as 9.1%. Additional studies are recommended to better evaluate the benefits and risks of VT ablation in this group.

Evaluation and Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Ventricular arrhythmias are a common clinical manifestation in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and other arrhythmogenic inflammatory cardiomyopathies (AIC). The management of sustained ventricular arrhythmias in these patients presents unique challenges. Current therapies include immunosuppressive, antiarrhythmic agents, and catheter ablation. Significant progress has been made in deciphering the importance of patient selection for ablation, systematic preablation evaluation, and optimal ablation timing, as well as ablation approaches and techniques. In this overview, we discuss the evaluation and management of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CS, focusing on catheter ablation, which has evolved into an effective approach in reducing the burden of ventricular arrhythmias in these patients in the context of multifaceted treatment along with medical therapies.

Risk stratification of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis: the ILLUMINATE-CS registry

AIMS

This study evaluated the prognosis and prognostic factors of patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), an underdiagnosed disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients from a retrospective multicentre registry, diagnosed with CS between 2001 and 2017 based on the 2016 Japanese Circulation Society or 2014 Heart Rhythm Society criteria, were included. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death, hospitalization for heart failure, and documented fatal ventricular arrhythmia events (FVAE), each constituting exploratory endpoints. Among 512 registered patients, 148 combined events (56 heart failure hospitalizations, 99 documented FVAE, and 49 all-cause deaths) were observed during a median follow-up of 1042 (interquartile range: 518-1917) days. The 10-year estimated event rates for the primary endpoint, all-cause death, heart failure hospitalizations, and FVAE were 48.1, 18.0, 21.1, and 31.9%, respectively. On multivariable Cox regression, a history of ventricular tachycardia (VT) or fibrillation [hazard ratio (HR) 2.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.59-4.00, P < 0.001], log-transformed brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels (HR 1.28, 95% CI 1.07-1.53, P = 0.008), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (HR 0.94 per 5% increase, 95% CI 0.88-1.00, P = 0.046), and post-diagnosis radiofrequency ablation for VT (HR 2.65, 95% CI 1.02-6.86, P = 0.045) independently predicted the primary endpoint.

CONCLUSION

Although mortality is relatively low in CS, adverse events are common, mainly due to FVAE. Patients with low LVEF, with high BNP levels, with VT/fibrillation history, and requiring ablation to treat VT are at high risk.

Meta-Analysis of Catheter Ablation Outcomes in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) frequently leads to ventricular tachycardia (VT), which is often refractory to antiarrhythmic and/or immunosuppressive medications and requires catheter ablation. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the role of catheter ablation in patients with refractory VT undergoing catheter ablation. We searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases from their inception to December 31, 2021 with search terms "cardiac sarcoidosis" AND "electrophysiological studies OR ablation." Fifteen studies were ultimately included for evaluation. Patient demographics, VT mapping, and acute and long-term procedural outcomes were extracted. A total of 15 studies were included in our meta-analysis, with a total of 401 patients, of whom 66% were male, with ages ranging from 39 to 64 years. A total of 95% of patients were on antiarrhythmics and 79% of patients were on immunosuppressants. Left ventricular ejection fraction ranged from 35% to 49% and procedure duration ranged from 269 to 462 minutes. Ablation was reported using both irrigated and nonirrigated catheter tips. A total of 25% of patients (84/339) underwent repeat ablation. Acute procedural success was achieved in 57% (161/285). Procedure complications occurred in 5.7% (17/297) procedures. VT recurrence after first ablation was 55% (confidence interval 48% to 63%, 213/401); VT recurrence after multiple ablations was 37% (81/220). The composite end point of death, heart transplant, and left ventricular assist device implantation was 21% (confidence interval 14% to 30%, 55/297). In conclusion, catheter ablation is a useful modality in patients with CS with refractory VT. However, patients with CS presenting with refractory VT after undergoing VT ablation carry a poor prognosis.

Management of ventricular arrhythmias in heart failure: Current perspectives

Congestive heart failure (HF) is a progressive affliction defined as the inability of the heart to sufficiently maintain blood flow. Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common in patients with HF, and conversely, advanced HF promotes the risk of VAs. Management of VA in HF requires a systematic, multimodality approach that comprises optimization of medical therapy and use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and/or device combined with cardiac resynchronization therapy. Catheter ablation is one of the most important strategies with the potential to abolish or decrease the number of recurrences of VA in this population. It can be a curative strategy in arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy and may even save lives in cases of an electrical storm. Additionally, modulation of the autonomic nervous system and stereotactic radiotherapy have been introduced as novel methods to control refractory VAs. In patients with end-stage HF and refractory VAs, an institution of the mechanical circulatory support device and cardiac transplant may be considered. This review aims to provide an overview of current evidence regarding management strategies of VAs in HF with an emphasis on interventional treatment.

Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease with 2 different phases (inflammation and scar). In the current era of targeted use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and modern heart failure therapy, recent data indicate the prognosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is much improved, and hence more patients are presenting with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT). This review highlights our current understanding of the pathophysiology and management of ventricular arrhythmias in CS with the major focus on indications, techniques, and outcomes of ablation. It is likely macroreentry phenomena around areas of fibrosis is the most frequent mechanism of ventricular arrhythmia in CS. It is also possible that inflammation may play a role in initiating reentry with ventricular ectopy in CS patients, or by slowing conduction in diseased tissue. The best available data would suggest annual rates of VT of perhaps 1%-2% and 10%-15% in patients with initially clinically silent and clinically manifest disease, respectively. Current guidelines recommend a stepwise approach to VT management. The first suggested step is treatment with immunosuppression if there is evidence of active inflammation. Antiarrhythmic medications are often started at the same time, with catheter ablation considered if VT cannot be controlled. Activation and entrainment mapping and ablation are favored in the setting of hemodynamically tolerated VT. Substrate ablation targets areas of abnormal electrogram and favorable pace mapping using linear and/or cluster lesion sets with the goal of abolishing critical isthmuses and/or blocking VT exit sites. Epicardial mapping ablation is required in 20%-35% of cases. In general, more morphologies of VT are induced (often 3-4) and subsequent outcomes (recurrence rates 40%-50%) are less favorable than in other forms of nonischemic cardiomyopathy. The prognosis of CS is much improved and, as a result, more patients are developing VT during follow-up. Likely principally related to the complex disease substrate, VT ablation is technically challenging, with moderate outcomes, and much remains to be learned.

Sarcoidosis-Related Cardiomyopathy: Current Knowledge, Challenges, and Future Perspectives State-of-the-Art Review

The prevalence of sarcoidosis-related cardiomyopathy is increasing. Sarcoidosis impacts cardiac function through granulomatous infiltration of the heart, resulting in conduction disease, arrhythmia, and/or heart failure. The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) can be challenging and requires clinician awareness as well as differentiation from overlapping diagnostic phenotypes, such as other forms of myocarditis and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Clinical manifestations, extracardiac involvement, histopathology, and advanced cardiac imaging can all lend support to a diagnosis of CS. The mainstay of therapy for CS is immunosuppression; however, no prospective clinical trials exist to guide management. Patients may progress to developing advanced heart failure or ventricular arrhythmia, for which ventricular assist device therapies or heart transplantation may be considered. The existing knowledge gaps in CS call for an interdisciplinary approach to both patient care and future investigation to improve mechanistic understanding and therapeutic strategies.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

A Comprehensive Review of Sarcoidosis Treatment for Pulmonologists

Due to frequent lung involvement, the pulmonologist is often the reference physician for management of sarcoidosis, a systemic granulomatous disease with a heterogeneous course. Treatment of sarcoidosis raises some issues. The first challenge is to select patients who are likely to benefit from treatment, as sarcoidosis may be self-limiting and remit spontaneously, in which case treatment can be postponed and possibly avoided without any significant impact on quality of life, organ damage or prognosis. Systemic glucocorticosteroids (GCs) are the drug of first choice for sarcoidosis. When GCs are started, there is a > 50% chance of long-term treatment. Prolonged use of prednisone at > 10 mg/day or equivalent is often associated with severe side effects. In these and refractory cases, steroid-sparing options are advised. Antimetabolites, such as methotrexate, are the second-choice therapy. Biologics, such as anti-TNF and especially infliximab, are third-choice drugs. The three treatments can be used concomitantly. Regardless of whether treatment is started, the clinician needs to organize regular follow-up to monitor remissions, flares, progression, complications, toxicity and relapses in order to promptly adjust the drugs used.

Arrhythmia in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is a complex disease that can manifest as a diverse array of arrhythmias. CS patients may be at higher risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD), and, in some cases, SCD may be the first presenting symptom of the underlying disease. As such, identification, risk stratification, and management of CS-related arrhythmia are crucial in the care of these patients. Left untreated, CS carries significant arrhythmogenic morbidity and mortality. Cardiac manifestations of CS are a consequence of an inflammatory process resulting in the myocardial deposition of noncaseating granulomas. Endomyocardial biopsy remains the gold standard for diagnosis; however, biopsy yield is limited by the patchy distribution of the granulomas. As such, recent guidelines have improved clinical diagnostic pathways relying on advanced cardiac imaging to help in the diagnosis of CS. To date, corticosteroids are the best studied agent to treat CS but are associated with significant risks and limited benefits. Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators have an important role in SCD risk reduction. Catheter ablation in conjunction with antiarrhythmics seems to reduce ventricular arrhythmia burden. However, the appropriate selection of these patients is crucial as ablation is likely more helpful in the setting of a myocardial scar substrate versus arrhythmia driven by active inflammation. Further studies investigating CS pathophysiology, the pathway to diagnosis, arrhythmogenic manifestations, and SCD risk stratification will be crucial to reduce the high morbidity and mortality of this disease.

Critical Care of Patients With Cardiopulmonary Complications of Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a systemic inflammatory disease defined by the presence of aberrant granulomas affecting various organs. Due to its multisystem involvement, care of patients with established sarcoidosis becomes challenging, especially in the intensive care setting. While the lungs are typically involved, extrapulmonary manifestations also occur either concurrently or exclusively within a significant proportion of patients, complicating diagnostic and management decisions. The scope of this review is to focus on what considerations are necessary in the evaluation and management of patients with known sarcoidosis and their associated complications within a cardiopulmonary and critical care perspective.

Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis Bench to Bedside: A Case-Based Review

Cardiac sarcoidosis is a component of an often multiorgan granulomatous disease of still uncertain cause. It is being recognized with increasing frequency, mainly as the result of heightened awareness and new diagnostic tests, specifically cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography scans. The purpose of this case-based review is to highlight the potentially life-saving importance of making the early diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis using these new tools and to provide a framework for the optimal care of patients with this disease. We will review disease mechanisms as currently understood, associated arrhythmias including conduction abnormalities, and atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, guideline-directed diagnostic criteria, screening of patients with extracardiac sarcoidosis, and the use of pacemakers and defibrillators in this setting. Treatment options, including those related to heart failure, and those which may help clarify disease mechanisms are included.

Inflammation as a Predictor of Recurrent Ventricular Tachycardia After Ablation in Patients With Myocarditis

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the risk stratification of patients with myocarditis undergoing ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to describe VT ablation results and identify factors associated with arrhythmia recurrences in a cohort of patients with myocarditis.

METHODS

The authors enrolled 125 consecutive patients with myocarditis, undergoing VT ablation. Before ablation, disease stage was evaluated, to identify active (AM) versus previous myocarditis (PM). The primary study endpoint was assessment of VT recurrences by 12-month follow-up. Predictors of VT recurrences were retrospectively identified.

RESULTS

All patients (age 51 ± 14 years, 91% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 52% ± 9%) had history of myocarditis diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy (59%) and/or cardiac magnetic resonance (90%). Furthermore, all had multiple episodes of drug-refractory VTs. Multimodal pre-procedural staging identified 47 patients with AM (38%) and 78 patients with PM (62%). All patients showed low-voltage areas (LVA) at electroanatomical map (97% epicardial or endoepicardial); of them, 25 (20%) had wide borderzone (WBZ, constituting >50% of the whole LVA). VT recurrences were documented in 25 patients (20%) by 12 months, and in 43 (34%) by last follow-up (median 63 months; interquartile range: 39 to 87). At multivariable analysis, AM stage was the only predictor of VT recurrences by 12 months (hazard ratio: 9.5; 95% confidence interval: 2.6 to 35.3; p < 0.001), whereas both AM stage and WBZ were associated with arrhythmia recurrences anytime during follow-up. No VT episodes were found after redo ablation was performed in 23 patients during PM stage.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest that VT ablation should be avoided during AM, but is often of benefit for recurrent VT after the acute phase of myocarditis.

Updates in Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to recurrent ventricular tachycardia is an important clinical sequela in patients with structural heart disease. As a result, ventricular tachycardia (VT) has emerged as a major clinical and public health problem. The mechanism of VT is predominantly mediated by re-entry in the presence of arrhythmogenic substrate (scar), though focal mechanisms are also important. Catheter ablation for VT, when compared to standard medical therapy, has been shown to improve VT-free survival and burden of device therapies. Approaches to VT ablation are dependent on the underlying disease process, broadly classified into idiopathic (no structural heart disease) or structural heart disease (ischemic or non-ischemic heart disease). This update aims to review recent advances made for the treatment of VT ablation, with respect to current clinical trials, peri-procedure risk assessments, pre-procedural cardiac imaging, electro-anatomic mapping and advances in catheter and non-catheter based ablation techniques.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Arrhythmias Associated with Inflammatory Cardiomyopathies

Purpose of review

To provide an approach to the diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias associated with inflammatory cardiomyopathies.

Recent findings

Inflammatory cardiomyopathies are increasingly recognized as the etiology of both ventricular and supraventricular arrhythmias. There have been recent studies providing novel insights into the pathogenesis of arrhythmias in inflammatory cardiomyopathies and exploring the role of various diagnostic tools and treatment strategies.

Summary

Patients with inflammatory cardiomyopathies often present with one or more arrhythmias, including atrioventricular block, atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias, and occasionally sudden cardiac death. Given dynamic pathophysiology and heterogeneous presentation, the management of arrhythmias in these patients presents unique challenges. We review the current approach to the diagnosis and treatment of arrhythmias in this challenging cohort of patients with an emphasis on cardiac sarcoidosis.

Supplementary Information

The online version of this article (10.1007/s11936-020-00871-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Update in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Increasing awareness of cardiac manifestations of sarcoidosis and the widespread availability of advanced imaging tests have led to a tidal wave of interest in a condition that was once considered rare. In this Focused Review, we explore important clinical questions that may confront specialists faced with possible cardiac involvement. In the absence of an ideal reference standard, three main sets of clinical criteria exist: the Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Heart Rhythm Society, and the World Association for Sarcoidosis and Other Granulomatous Disorders criteria. Once cardiac sarcoidosis is suspected, clinicians should be familiar with the prevalence of the disease in different clinical scenarios. Before obtaining advanced cardiac imaging, electrocardiogram, ambulatory electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and B-type natriuretic peptide may be useful. The available therapies for cardiac sarcoidosis include immunosuppression, antiarrhythmic medications, heart failure medications, device therapy, ablation therapy, and heart transplantation. Contemporary data suggest that long-term survival in cardiac sarcoidosis is better than previously believed. There is no randomized controlled trial demonstrating benefits of screening, but screening is recommended based on observational data.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Evaluation of the right heart using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac devices

BACKGROUND

Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) necessitate comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) examinations. The aim of this study was to provide data on CMR image quality and feasibility of functional assessment of the right heart in patients with CIED depending on the device type and imaging sequence used.

METHODS

120 CIED carriers (Insertable cardiac monitoring system, n = 13; implantable loop-recorder, n = 22; pacemaker, n = 30; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), n = 43; and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator (CRT-D), n = 12) underwent clinically indicated CMR imaging using a 1.5 T. CMR protocols consisted of cine imaging and myocardial tissue characterization including T1-and T2-weighted blackblood imaging and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) imaging. Image quality was evaluated with regard to device-related imaging artifacts per right-ventricular (RV) segment.

RESULTS

RV segmental evaluability was influenced by the device type and CMR imaging sequence: Cine steady-state-free-precision (SSFP) imaging was found to be non-diagnostic in patients with ICD/CRT-D and implantable loop recorders; a significant improvement of image quality was achieved when using cine turbo-field-echo (TFE) sequences with a further improvement on post-contrast TFE imaging. LGE scans were artifact-free in at least 91% of RV segments with best results in patients with a pacemaker or an insertable cardiac monitoring system.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with CIED, artifact-free CMR imaging of the right ventricle was performed in the majority of patients and resulted in highly reproducible evaluability of RV functional parameters. This finding is of particular importance for the diagnosis and follow-up of right-ventricular diseases.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Management of ventricular electrical storm: a contemporary appraisal

Ventricular electrical storm (VES) is a clinical scenario characterized by the clustering of multiple episodes of sustained ventricular arrhythmias (VA) over a short duration. Patients with VES are prone to psychological disorders, heart failure decompensation, and increased mortality. Studies have shown that 10–28% of the patients with secondary prevention ICDs can sustain VES. The triad of a susceptible electrophysiologic substrate, triggers, and autonomic dysregulation govern the pathogenesis of VES. The rate of VA, underlying ventricular function, and the presence of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) determine the clinical presentation. A multi-faceted approach is often required for management consisting of acute hemodynamic stabilization, ICD reprogramming when appropriate, antiarrhythmic drug therapy, and sedation. Some patients may be eligible for catheter ablation, and autonomic modulation with thoracic epidural anesthesia, stellate ganglion block, or cardiac sympathetic denervation. Hemodynamically unstable patients may benefit from the use of left ventricular assist devices, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Special scenarios such as idiopathic ventricular fibrillation, Brugada syndrome, Long and short QT syndrome, early repolarization syndrome, catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy, and cardiac sarcoidosis have been described as well. VES is a cardiac emergency that requires swift intervention. It is associated with poor short and long-term outcomes. A structured team-based management approach is paramount for the safe and effective treatment of this sick cohort.

The ECG in sarcoidosis - a marker of cardiac involvement? Current evidence and clinical implications

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disease of unknown etiology characterized by noncaseating granulomas. Cardiac involvement is often limiting patients' prognosis. Cardiac sarcoidosis can manifest with variant cardiac arrhythmias, of which atrioventricular (AV)-block-related bradycardia and ventricular tachycardias are the most common. Although cardiac sarcoidosis remains a histopathological diagnosis, the significance of imaging modalities, especially cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is increasing rapidly but mainly remains reserved for patients with a high suspicion due to a previous arrhythmia or unknown cardiomyopathy. Thus, there is a need for screening in daily clinical practice so that possible characteristic electrocardiographic (ECG) findings may guide the way to detect the disease. We therefore evaluated the ECG as a potential tool for screening of cardiac sarcoidosis and present different electrophysiological manifestations of cardiac sarcoidosis based on a literature review. The ECG is a valuable tool for screening of cardiac involvement in patients with sarcoidosis. Several parameters have been shown to be associated with cardiac involvement in sarcoidosis such as higher-degree AV-block, QRS complex fragmentation and widening, as well as certain T wave abnormalities that may indicate cardiac involvement, of which the latter two are most promising and specific. However, prospective studies examining a large number of trials are desirable.

Association of Arrhythmias in Cardiac Amyloidosis and Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Cardiac involvement in amyloidosis and sarcoidosis is poorly understood, and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, along with conduction defects, are frequent in cardiac amyloidosis and sarcoidosis. Atrial dysfunction in cardiac amyloidosis may result in atrial fibrillation and increases the risk of stroke, making anticoagulation significant and challenging. Ventricular arrhythmia and conduction defects are more common in AL amyloidosis and cardiac sarcoidosis. Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) from Purkinje fibers trigger ventricular arrhythmias in cardiac amyloidosis, while the inflammation and scarring leading to the reentrant process is the cause in cardiac sarcoidosis. The typical treatment modalities include Class II and III antiarrhythmic drugs and ablation techniques, while corticosteroids and immunosuppressants are indicated in cardiac sarcoidosis to reduce the burden of the disease and arrhythmias. Sudden cardiac death can be a manifestation of both disorders that can be prevented by the Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), although the predictive risk factors for primary prevention remain uncertain. In this review, we addressed the current understanding of the pathways involved in inducing arrhythmias in cardiac amyloidosis and sarcoidosis-also, the complications including sudden death and stroke associated with arrhythmia in both diseases. We have discussed other preventive steps needed to minimize arrhythmias to provide symptomatic relief and palliation to patients.

Exercise-induced torsades de pointes as an unusual presentation of cardiac sarcoidosis: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Sarcoidosis is a rare multisystem disease characterized histologically by non-caseating granuloma formation in the affected organ. While cardiac sarcoidosis is found on autopsy in up to 25% of sarcoidosis cases, it is still underdiagnosed and is associated with a poor prognosis. Although the etiology of sarcoidosis remains unclear, an antigen triggered exaggerated immune response has been hypothesized. Early detection and prompt management of cardiac sarcoidosis remains pivotal.

CASE SUMMARY

A 60-year-old female, with pulmonary sarcoidosis in remission, presented to the cardiology outpatient clinic for evaluation of weeks-long dyspnea on moderate exertion (New York Heart Association class II) that was relieved by rest. Submaximal exercise stress test showed multifocal ventricular extrasystoles, followed by a self-limiting torsades de pointes. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed nondilated and normotrophic left ventricle with basoseptal and mid-septal dyskinesis. The magnetic resonance imaging-derived left ventricular ejection fraction was 45%. Delayed enhancement showed patchy transmural fibrosis of the septum and hyperenhancement of the papillary muscles, all in favor of extensive cardiac involvement of sarcoidosis. A double-chamber implantable cardiac defibrillator was implanted, and methylprednisolone (12 mg/d) and methotrexate (12.5 mg/wk) treatment was initiated. Follow-up and implantable cardiac defibrillator interrogation showed episodes of asymptomatic nonsustained ventricular tachycardia and an asymptomatic episode of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia ending by the first antitachycardia pacing run.

CONCLUSION

Along an extensive review of the literature, this unusual case report highlights the importance of early detection of cardiac involvement of sarcoidosis, in order to avoid potential complications and increase survival.

Patient Selection for Epicardial Ablation-Part I: The Role of Epicardial Ablation in Various Cardiac Disease States

Epicardial catheter ablation is most commonly performed following unsuccessful endocardial ablation. Given the frequency of epicardial substrates in certain cardiomyopathic disease states, however, a combined endocardial–epicardial approach should be considered as a primary treatment strategy. Although epicardial ablation is primarily deployed in patients with ventricular arrhythmias, the role of epicardial approaches in supraventricular tachycardias (eg, atrial fibrillation, inappropriate sinus tachycardia, and—rarely—accessory pathways) is growing, with continued advances being made.

Cardiac Arrhythmias in Autoimmune Diseases

Autoimmune diseases (ADs) affect approximately 10% of the world's population. Because ADs are frequently systemic disorders, cardiac involvement is common. In this review we focus on typical arrhythmias and their pathogenesis, arrhythmia-associated mortality, and possible treatment options among selected ADs (sarcoidosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, type 1 diabetes, Graves' disease, rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis [AS], psoriasis, celiac disease [CD], and inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]). Rhythm disorders have different underlying pathophysiologies; myocardial inflammation and fibrosis seem to be the most important factors. Inflammatory processes and oxidative stress lead to cardiomyocyte necrosis, with subsequent electrical and structural remodeling. Furthermore, chronic inflammation is the pathophysiological basis linking AD to autonomic dysfunction, including sympathetic overactivation and a decline in parasympathetic function. Autoantibody-mediated inhibitory effects of cellular events (i.e., potassium or L-type calcium currents, M₂muscarinic cholinergic or β₁-adrenergic receptor signaling) can also lead to cardiac arrhythmia. Drug-induced arrhythmias, caused, for example, by corticosteroids, methotrexate, chloroquine, are also observed among AD patients. The most common arrhythmia in most AD presentations is atrial arrhythmia (primarily atrial fibrillation), expect for sarcoidosis and scleroderma, which are characterized by a higher burden of ventricular arrhythmia. Arrhythmia-associated mortality is highest among patients with sarcoidosis and lowest among those with AS; there are scant data related to mortality in patients with psoriasis, CD, and IBD.

Multimodality Imaging to Guide Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients with Non-ischaemic Cardiomyopathy

Catheter ablation is an effective treatment option for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). The heterogeneous nature of NICM aetiologies and VT substrate in patients with NICM play a role in long-term ablation outcomes in this population. Over the past decades, more precise identification of NICM aetiologies and better characterisation of various substrates have been made. Application of multimodal imaging has greatly contributed to the accurate diagnosis of NICM subtypes and improved VT ablation strategies. This article summarises the current knowledge of multimodal imaging used in the characterisation of non-ischaemic NICM substrates, procedural planning and image integration for the optimisation of VT ablation.

Cardiac Sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this state-of-the-art review, we highlight our current understanding of diagnosis, assessment, and management of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), focusing on recently published data and expert consensus statement guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Academic interest in cardiac sarcoidosis research has increased over the past decade along with increased clinical awareness among clinicians. In 2014, the Heart Rhythm Society published the first expert consensus statement on diagnosing and managing arrhythmias associated with CS. Cardiac magnetic resonance has emerged as a valuable tool both for diagnosing CS and predicting risk of life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias based on burden of late gadolinium enhancement. Cardiac fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography now plays a role in diagnosis, risk stratification, and assessing response to immunosuppressive therapy. Collaborative, multidisciplinary research efforts are needed to further our understanding of this rare, complex disease. Two large multicenter prospective registries-the international Cardiac Sarcoidosis Consortium and the Canadian Cardiac Sarcoidosis Research Group-are enrolling patients to help provide insights into the natural history of the disease and current treatment strategies. Future research should focus on randomized controlled trials comparing different treatment strategies and identifying and testing novel therapeutic agents.

Treatment of cardiac sarcoidosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In sarcoidosis, the appropriate management strategy remains challenging especially because of the lack of confident diagnosis, considerable variability in initial presentation, disease evolution, and outcome. Although asymptomatic patients with limited cardiac involvement have been described to have a benign outcome, cardiac sarcoidosis is associated with high morbidity and mortality and even sudden cardiac death in a significant proportion of patients. Higher morbidity and mortality can be related with both the disease activity and extent of fibrosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Historical series suggested a 5-year mortality rate of 60% in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. This has definitely improved with the appropriate use of anti-inflammatory medications as well as heart failure treatment, antiarrhythmic medication and device implantation. Timely recognition and vigorous initial approach is essential in avoiding life-threatening arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Advanced imaging modalities have proven to be helpful in the diagnostic approach and guiding treatment decisions. However, there is no optimal screening and risk stratification strategy available and further studies are required to determine, which patients would benefit from the available treatments.

SUMMARY

This review concentrates on the broad principles of management in cardiac sarcoidosis and the efficacy of sarcoidosis-specific medication and cardiac-specific therapies for cardiac dysfunction and rhythm disturbances.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Prognostic impact of beta-blocker compared to combined amiodarone therapy secondary to ventricular tachyarrhythmias

OBJECTIVE

The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of treatment with beta-blocker (BB) compared to combined BB plus amiodarone (BB-AMIO) on long-term survival in patients surviving ventricular tachyarrhythmias on admission.

BACKGROUND

Data regarding the prognostic outcome of patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmias treated with BB and BB-AMIO is limited.

METHODS

A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients surviving index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias from 2002 to 2016. Patients treated with BB were compared to patients with BB-AMIO. The primary prognostic endpoint was long-term all-cause death at 3 years. Kaplan-Meier, multivariable Cox regression and propensity score matching analyses were applied.

RESULTS

A total of 1354 patients was included, 85% treated with BB, 15% with BB-AMIO. Within the unmatched real-life cohort, uni- and multivariable Cox regression models revealed BB associated with improved long-term survival compared to BB-AMIO (univariable: HR = 0.550; p = 0.001, multivariable: HR = 0.712; statistical trend, p = 0.052). After propensity-score matching (n = 186 matched pairs), BB therapy was still associated with improved survival compared to BB-AMIO (mortality rate 18% versus 26%; log rank p = 0.042; HR = 0.634; 95% CI = 0.407-0.988; p = 0.044). Prognostic superiority of BB was mainly observed in patients with LVEF ≥ 35% (HR = 0.463; 95% CI = 0.215-0.997; p = 0.049) and in those without atrial fibrillation (non-AF) (HR = 0.415; 95% CI = 0.202-0.852; p = 0.017).

CONCLUSION

BB therapy is associated with improved secondary long-term prognosis compared to BB-AMIO in patients surviving index episodes of ventricular tachyarrhythmias.

Management of Arrhythmias Associated with Cardiac Sarcoidosis

Sarcoidosis is a multisystem granulomatous disorder of unknown etiology. The annual incidence of systemic sarcoidosis is estimated at 10-20 per 100,000 individuals. Owing to the recent advances in imaging modalities, cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) is diagnosed more frequently. The triad of CS includes conduction abnormality, ventricular tachycardia, and heart failure. Atrial and ventricular arrhythmias are caused by either inflammation or scar formation. Inflammation should be treated with immunosuppression and antiarrhythmic agents and scar formation should be treated with antiarrhythmics and/or ablation, in addition to implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation, if necessary. Ablation can provide a good outcome, but it might require bipolar ablation if the critical portion is located mid-myocardium. Late recurrence might be caused by reactivation of sarcoidosis, which would need to be evaluated by positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging. Risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) in patients with advanced atrioventricular block is not low, and ICD implantation could be considered instead of a pacemaker. For risk stratification for SCD, late gadolinium enhancement by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging or program stimulation is often used.

Ventricular Arrhythmias in Cardiac Sarcoidosis

The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), especially in cases where there is limited or no extracardiac involvement, is challenging. Patients with CS are at increased risk of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. Several techniques for risk stratification for sudden cardiac death have been proposed in this population, including advanced cardiac imaging and electrophysiology study. Clinical ventricular arrhythmias in patients with CS may be treated with immunosuppressant therapy, antiarrhythmic drugs, catheter ablation, or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator placement. This article will provide an update on techniques for diagnosing CS, risk stratifying patients with CS for sudden cardiac death, and treating patients with CS with ventricular arrhythmias, focusing on evidence that has become available since publication of the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Arrhythmias Associated With Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

Epicardial Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia: a Review

For over 3 decades, it has been known that reentry circuits for ventricular tachycardia (VT) are not limited to the subendocardial myocardium. Rather, intramural or subepicardial substrates may also give rise to VT, particularly in those with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. Percutaneous epicardial mapping and ablation has been successfully introduced for the treatment of such subepicardial VT. Herein, we review the indications for epicardial ablation and the identification of epicardial VT by electrocardiographic and imaging modalities. We also discuss the optimal technique for epicardial access and the implications of epicardial fat which has the potential to mimic scar, decreasing the specificity of electrogram morphology and impeding energy delivery to the tissue. Finally, we also report on possible complications of the procedure and strategies to mitigate adverse events.