Ablation therapy following unsuccessful electrical cardioversion in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation

Electrical cardioversion (ECV) a widely utilized intervention for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) aimed at restoring sinus rhythm. However, ECV can be ineffective, raising questions about subsequent treatment options. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of non-ablation therapy versus ablation therapy following unsuccessful ECV. A total of 125 consecutive patients with persistent AF who underwent unsuccessful ECV between November 2017 and August 2023 was included in this retrospective analysis. Of these, 51.2% received only medical therapy (non-ablation therapy group, n = 64), while 48.8% underwent AF ablation (ablation therapy group, n = 61). Various ablation methods were employed, including catheter and thoracoscopic ablation. Ablation therapy was associated with significantly better AF-free survival compared to non-ablation therapy [hazard ratio (HR), 0.37; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.22-0.61; p < 0.01]. There was no difference of AF-free survival between catheter ablation and thoracoscopic ablation groups (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.34-1.83; p = 0.58). AF duration > 5 year (HR 1.51; 95% CI 0.930-2.437; p = 0.10), BMI ≤ 25 kg/m2 (HR 1.61; 95% CI 1.004-2.581; p = 0.05) and diabetes (HR 2.38; 95% CI 0.902-6.266; p = 0.08) were considerable as predictor of AF recurrence. Ablation therapy following unsuccessful ECV was associated with maintaining sinus rhythm, regardless of the specific ablation method utilized.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation undergoing electrical cardioversion

Introduction

Cardioversion for atrial fibrillation (AF) is routinely implemented in daily practice; however, it can be associated with the development of recurrent AF. In this study we aimed to evaluate the predictors of AF recurrence after electrical cardioversion, and to compare the outcomes of patients with or without AF recurrence during follow-up.

Methods

Patients with persistent AF were enrolled from March 2015 to September 2018. Patients with recurrent AF within 6 months after the index cardioversion were considered as AF recurrence (AFR) group, and those with normal sinus rhythm were defined as normal sinus rhythm (NSR) group. Thereafter, all patients were followed up for the incidence of adverse events, including death, requiring dialysis, coronary artery intervention/surgeries, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, and recurrent AF beyond 6 months.

Results

Of 129 patients, 11 patients had failed cardioversion and 7 patients lost to follow-up. So, 34 and 77 patients were categorized as the NSR and the AFR groups. During a median follow-up time of 54 (46-75) months, there was a trend for a higher incidence of major adverse events in the AFR group compared to the NSR group (P=0.063). Lower body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 0.885, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.794-0.986, P=0.027) and coarse AF before the index cardioversion (OR 3.846, 95% CI 1.189-12.443, P=0.025) were the independent predictors of recurrent AF.

Conclusion

In patients with persistent AF undergoing cardioversion, the presence of coarse AF and the lower values of body mass index were found to be associated with the AF recurrence.

Association of Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence with Right Coronary Atherosclerosis and Increased Left Arterial Epicardial Fat Following Catheter Ablation-Results of a Multimodality Study

BACKGROUND

Identification of predictors for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) can lead to better long-term results. Our aim was to investigate the association between novel CT imaging markers reflecting the severity of coronary atherosclerosis and the risk of recurrence following PVI.

METHODS

This study included 80 patients with paroxysmal/persistent AF who underwent PVI. The patients were divided into two groups: Group 1-23 patients with recurrence and Group 2-57 patients without recurrence.

RESULTS

Patients with recurrence presented with a more enlarged left atrial diameter and reduced left ventricle EF, as assessed by echocardiography. Elevated calcium scores and right coronary artery (RCA) stenosis were correlated with a higher risk of AF recurrence (25.38 ± 4.1% vs. 9.76 ± 2.32%, p = 0.001). Patients with AF recurrence presented a higher left atrial volume index (LAVI) (61.38 ± 11.12 mm3/m2 vs. 46.34 ± 12.27 mm3/m2, p < 0.0001). The bi-atrial volume index (BAVI) was similarly higher in the AF recurrence group (98.23 ± 14.44 mm3/m2 vs. 76.48 ± 17.61 mm3/m2, p < 0.0001). Increased EAT volumes located around the LA (EAT-LA) were correlated with recurrence (25.55 ± 6.37 vs. 15.54 ± 8.44, p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

RCA stenosis, together with atrial volumes and EAT-AS evaluated by CCTA, is associated with the risk of AF recurrence following PVI.

Diabetes mellitus and atrial fibrillation-from pathophysiology to treatment

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular complications around the globe and one of the most common medical conditions. Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common supraventricular arrhythmia, with a rapidly increasing prevalence. T2DM has been closely associated with the risk of AF development, identified as an independent risk factor. Regarding cardio-vascular complications, both AF and T2DM have been linked with high mortality. The underlying pathophysiology has not been fully determined yet; however, it is multifactorial, including structural, electrical, and autonomic pathways. Novel therapies include pharmaceutical agents in sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, as well as antiarrhythmic strategies, such as cardioversion and ablation. Of interest, glucose-lowering therapies may affect the prevalence of AF. This review presents the current evidence regarding the connection between the two entities, the pathophysiological pathways that link them, and the therapeutic options that exist.

The Impact of Right Atrial Size to Predict Success of Direct Current Cardioversion in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The prognostic implication of right atrial (RA) and left atrial (LA) size for an immediate success of direct current cardioversion (DCCV) in atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. This study aimed to compare RA and LA size for the prediction of DCCV success.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2018, 734 consecutive outpatients were screened for our prospective registry. Each eligible patient received a medical history, blood analysis, and transthoracic echocardiography with a focus on indexed RA (iRA) area and LA volume (iLAV) prior to DCCV with up to three biphasic shocks (200-300-360 J) or additional administration of amiodarone or flecainide to restore sinus rhythm.

RESULTS

We enrolled 589 patients, and DCCV was in 89% (n=523) successful. Mean age was 68 ± 10 years, and 40% (n=234) had New York heart association class >II. A prevalence of the male sex (64%, n=376) and of persistent AF (86%, n=505) was observed. Although DCCV success was associated with female sex (odds ratio [OR], 1.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.65), with absence of coronary heart disease and normal left ventricular function (OR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.26-4.25), with short AF duration (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.05-4.04) in univariable regression, only iRA area remained a stable and independent predictor of DCCV success (OR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.12-0.69; area under the curve 0.71), but not iLAV size (OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.05-1.56) in multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

iRA area is superior to iLAV for the prediction of immediate DCCV success in AF.

Intra- and Postprocedural Multimodality Imaging in Atrial Fibrillation

Multi-modality imaging plays critical roles during and after procedures associated with atrial fibrillation. Transesophageal echocardiography is an invaluable tool for left atrial appendage occlusion during the procedure and at follow-up. Both cardiac computed tomography and cardiac magnetic resonance contribute to postprocedural evaluation of pulmonary vein isolation ablation. The present review is the second of a 2-part series where we discuss the roles of cardiac imaging in the evaluation and management of patients with atrial fibrillation, focusing on intraprocedural and postprocedural assessment, including the clinical evidence and outcomes data supporting this future applications.

Electrical cardioversion for early recurrences post pulmonary vein isolation

BACKGROUND

To study the association between timing and success of electrical cardioversion (ECV) for the treatment of early recurrences (ERs) of atrial fibrillation post pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) on long-term rhythm outcome.

METHODS

Data of 133 patients ablated for paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation receiving ECV for ERs, i.e., atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrences within 90 days post ablation were analyzed. During 1-year follow-up, patients were screened for late recurrences (LRs), i.e., recurrences after the blanking period.

RESULTS

In 114 patients (85.7%), ECV was successful compared to 19 patients (14.3%) with failed ECV. A higher body mass index (odds ratio (OR) 1.19 (95% CI 1.02-1.39), p = 0.029), a lower left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 1.07 (95% CI 0.99-1.15), p = 0.079), and performance of ECV > 7 days from ER onset (OR 2.99 (95% CI 1.01-8.87), p = 0.048) remained independently associated with ECV failure. During 1-year follow-up, the rate of LR was significantly higher among patients with failed ECV as compared to patients with successful ECV (hazard ratio (HR) 3.00 (95% CI, 1.79-5.03), p < 0.001). Patients with ECV performed > 7 days from ER onset had a significantly higher risk of developing LR as compared to patients with ECV performed within ≤ 7 days from ER onset (HR 1.73 (95% CI 1.15-2.62), p = 0.009). Performance of ECV > 7 days from ER onset (HR 1.76 (95% CI 1.16-2.67), p = 0.008) and failed ECV (HR 3.32 (95% CI 1.96-5.64), p < 0.001) remained independently associated with LR.

CONCLUSIONS

A failed ECV and performance of ECV > 7 days from ER onset were independently associated with LR.

Frontal plane QRS-T angle predicts early recurrence of acute atrial fibrillation after successful pharmacological cardioversion with intravenous amiodarone

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Although restoration of sinus rhythm is the integral part of the atrial fibrillation (Af) management, recurrence frequency of Af is high after cardioversion. However, little is known about the association of electrocardiography (ECG) parameters with Af recurrence after restoration of sinus rhythm. The present study aimed to investigate whether frontal plane QRS-T (fQRST) angle, as a marker of ventricular repolarization heterogeneity, predicts Af recurrence after successful pharmacological cardioversion.

METHODS

One hundred and sixty-five paroxysmal Af patients with an acute Af episode who underwent successful pharmacological cardioversion with intravenous amiodarone infusion were included into the study. Patients were divided into two groups according to presence or absence of in-hospital Af recurrence. The association between fQRST angle and Af recurrence was investigated.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Af recurrence was observed in 42 (25.4%) patients. The mean fQRST angle was significantly higher in patients with Af recurrence compared to those without Af recurrence (90 ± 45.8 vs. 51 ± 38.2, p < 0.001). Also, Af recurrence was more frequent in patients who had fQRST angle >90˚, compared to patients with fQRST angle ≤90˚ (54.1% vs. 13.7%, p < 0.001). Moreover, ROC curve analysis demonstrated that an increased fQRST angle >92.5˚ predicted in-hospital Af recurrence with a sensitivity of 76.2% and a specificity of 81.4% (AUC:0.728, p < 0.001). Furthermore, multivariate analysis demonstrated that fQRST angle was an independent predictor of in-hospital Af recurrence after successful pharmacological cardioversion (OR: 1.892, 95% CI: 1.361-2.917, p < 0.001).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

As a parameter that can be easily calculated from automated ECG recordings, fQRST angle may be useful in the prediction of early Af recurrence after successful pharmacological cardioversion with amiodarone.

Effect of electrical cardioversion on 1-year outcomes in patients with early recurrence after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence is common in the 3‐month blanking‐period after catheter ablation, during which electrical cardioversion (ECV) is usually performed to restore sinus rhythm. Whether ECV can affect the clinical outcome of post‐ablation AF patients is inconsistent, however. We aimed to explore the 1‐year effect of ECV on AF recurrence and rehospitalization in patients experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation.

Methods

Patients who experienced recurrence within 3‐month after AF catheter ablation procedure were enrolled from the China Atrial Fibrillation Registry (China‐AF). A 1:3 Propensity score matching (PSM) method was applying to adjust the confounders between patients who had been treated by ECV or not. Logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate the association of ECV with 1‐year AF recurrence and rehospitalization.

Results

In this study, 2961 patients experienced AF recurrence within 3‐month after the procedure, and 282 of them underwent successful ECV, 2155 patients did not undergo ECV. One‐year AF recurrence rates were 56.4% in ECV group versus 65.4% in non‐ECV group (p = .003), and were 55.9% versus 65.9%, respectively, after PSM (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.49–0.88, p = .005). However, the difference of 1‐year rehospitalization rates between two groups were not statistically significant before (ECV group: 23.7% vs. non‐ECV group: 22.3%, p = .595) and after PSM (ECV group: 24.4% vs. non‐ECV group: 21.6%, adjusted OR1.14; 95% CI 0.81–1.62, p = .451).

Conclusions

Successful ECV was associated with lower rate of one‐year recurrence in patients with early recurrent AF after catheter ablation.

Diabetes and Endocrine Disorders (Hyperthyroidism/Hypothyroidism) as Risk Factors for Atrial Fibrillation

Risk factors including cardiometabolic and endocrine disorders have a significant impact on atrial remodeling causing atrial fibrillation (AF). Diabetes mellitus and hyperthyroidism are strong independent risk factors for AF and worsen outcomes of rhythm control strategies. An early diagnosis and intervention for these risk factors combined with rhythm control strategies may improve the overall cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge about the AF risk factors diabetes mellitus and thyroid disease, and discusses the impact of the modification of these risk factors on primary and secondary prevention of AF.

Atrial Fibrillation and Diabetes Mellitus: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most common chronic medical conditions, and is a risk factor for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF). The presence of diabetes in patients with AF is associated with increased symptom burden and increased cardiovascular and cerebrovascular mortality. The pathophysiology of diabetes-related AF is not fully understood, but is related to structural, electrical, electromechanical, and autonomic remodeling. This paper reviews the complex interaction between diabetes and AF, and explores its effect on the prevention and treatment of AF.

Catheter ablation in atrial fibrillation: is there a mortality benefit in patients with diabetes and heart failure?

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most commonly sustained arrhythmia, and patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) exhibit an increased incidence of AF. Besides DM, heart failure (HF) shares pathophysiological links with AF, mainly related to the pathological remodeling of hearts affected by structural disease. As in a vicious circle, AF may contribute to HF worsening and increased mortality in patients with structural heart diseases, and the outcome may be further impaired when concomitant DM is present. Although no data directly referring to DM patients with HF are available, indirect information can be drawn from large studies on patients with HF and AF. The present review discusses the outcome of AF ablation in patients with DM and HF, focusing on safety, efficacy, and most particularly on hard endpoints such as mortality and thromboembolic event incidence.

Usefulness of Failed Electrical Cardioversion for Early Recurrence After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation as a Predictor of Future Recurrence

Early recurrence of atrial arrhythmia (ERAA) during a blanking period after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) does not always result in subsequent AF recurrence. We investigated whether failed electrical cardioversion (ECV) during the blanking period was associated with recurrence. A total of 1,240 consecutive patients who underwent first-time CA for AF at our institution between March 2012 and March 2016 were investigated. Among the 517 patients (42%) who experienced ERAA, 262 underwent ECV. Failure or success of ECV was defined according to the current expert consensus statement. Failed ECV was defined as failure to terminate AF and/or relapse into AF within 30 seconds after transient sinus rhythm conversion by ECV with a shock energy of 270 J in this study. Of the patients, 254 (97%) with restored sinus rhythm were included, and 8 who experienced sustained AF afterward and discontinued the rhythm-control strategy were excluded. We divided the 254 patients into the following 2 groups on the basis of failed or successful ECV: failed-ECV (n = 105; at least 1 failed ECV but experienced successful ECV at a later date nevertheless) and successful-ECV (n = 149, no failed ECV) groups. At the median follow-up period of 610 days after CA, the recurrence rate was higher in the failed-ECV group than in the successful-ECV group (76.2% vs 45.6%, log-rank p < 0.001). After adjustment for baseline differences, failed ECV was found to be a significant predictor of recurrence in the multivariate model (p < 0.001). In conclusion, failed ECV for ERAA was an independent predictor of future recurrence.

Is epicardial fat tissue associated with atrial fibrillation recurrence after ablation? A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Although an undoubted association between epicardial fat tissue (EFT) and atrial fibrillation (AF) has been recently approved, the association between EFT and post-ablation AF recurrence is not evident yet. This study aimed to assess the association between EFT and AF recurrence after ablation.

METHODS

The present study was a systematic review and meta-analysis using related literature available in electronic databases until July 2018 via "atrial fibrillation" and "epicardial fat" as the main keywords. Considering the different methods of EFT measurement, three different pooled meta-analyses were conducted in this study including: 1) comparison of total EFT volume, 2) left atrium (LA)-EFT volume, and 3) EFT thickness between two groups with and without AF recurrence estimating standardized mean difference (SMD) through a random and non-random effect meta-analysis. Statistical analysis was also performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis (CMA) Software.

RESULTS

Following a search into a total number of 518 articles, the findings of 12 studies published in 10 articles were enrolled in this meta-analysis. Accordingly, the results of meta-analysis showed that LA-EFT and total EFT volumes were higher in recurrent subjects (LA-EFT: SMD = 0.862 ml; I2 = 0.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.567-1.156; total EFT: SMD = 1.017 ml, I2 = 0.00, 95% CI = 0.748-1.286). Besides, a significant higher EFT thickness in patients with AF recurrence compared to those with no AF recurrence was observed (SMD = 0.808 mm, I2 = 91.07, 95% CI = 0.215-1401).

CONCLUSION

The total EFT and LA-EFT volumes, as well as EFT thickness, seemed to be associated with AF recurrence in patients undergoing AF ablation.