Short Message Service Reminder Nudge for Parents and Influenza Vaccination Uptake in Children and Adolescents With Special Risk Medical Conditions: The Flutext-4U Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Children with chronic medical conditions are at increased risk of severe influenza. Uptake of influenza vaccination in children and adolescents with these identified special risk medical conditions (SRMCs) is suboptimal.

Objective

To assess the effectiveness of Flutext-4U, a parent short message service (SMS) reminder nudge intervention, in increasing influenza immunization in children and adolescents with SRMCs.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This randomized clinical trial was conducted at a tertiary pediatric hospital in Adelaide, South Australia, from April 15 to September 30, 2021. Children and adolescents aged 6 months to younger than 18 years with SRMCs and a subspecialist outpatient appointment over a 5-month period during the Australian seasonal influenza vaccination season (April-August 2021) were eligible to participate. Follow-up was until September 30, 2021.

Interventions

Participants were randomly assigned (1:1 ratio) to control: clinician nudges (hospital vaccine availability, ease of access, and recommendation from hospital subspecialists) or SMS intervention (control conditions plus an additional SMS reminder nudge to parents), with randomization stratified by age group (<5 years, 5-14 years, or >14 to <18 years).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was influenza vaccination, as confirmed by the Australian Immunisation Register.

Results

A total of 600 participants (intervention group: 298 [49.7%]; mean [SD] age, 11.5 [4.6] years; 162 female participants [54.4%]; control group: 302 [50.3%]; mean [SD] age, 11.4 [4.7] years; 155 female participants [51.3%]) were included. Influenza vaccination was 38.6% (113 of 293) in the SMS intervention group compared with 26.2% (79 of 302) in the control group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.79; 95% CI, 1.27-2.55; P = .001). Time to vaccine receipt was significantly lower among SMS participants (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.25-2.22; P < .001). For participants randomly assigned by June 15, a significantly greater proportion receiving the SMS intervention were vaccinated during the optimal delivery period April to June 30 (SMS group: 40.0% [76 of 190] vs 25.4% [50 of 197]; aOR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.28-3.06; P = .002).

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this randomized clinical trial suggest that an additional SMS reminder nudge for parents delivered in the tertiary care hospital setting to children and adolescents with SMRCs resulted in higher influenza vaccine uptake compared with clinician nudges alone.

Trial Registration

ANZCTR Identifier: ACTRN12621000463875.

Using provider-parent strategies to improve influenza vaccination in children and adolescents with special risk medical conditions: a randomised controlled trial protocol

INTRODUCTION

Influenza immunisation is a highly cost-effective public health intervention. Despite a comprehensive National Immunisation Program, influenza vaccination in children and adolescents with special risk medical conditions (SRMCs) is suboptimal. Flutext-4U is an innovative, multi-component strategy targeting paediatric hospitals, general practice and parents of children and adolescents with SRMC. The Flutext-4U study aims to assess the impact of Flutext-4U to increase influenza immunisation in children and adolescents with SRMC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a randomised controlled trial involving parents of children and adolescents (aged >6 months to <18 years) with SRMC receiving tertiary care at the Women's and Children's Hospital (WCH), Adelaide, South Australia, who are eligible for funded influenza immunisation with a hospital appointment between the start of the seasonal influenza vaccination season and 31 July 2021, their treating general practitioners (GPs), and WCH paediatric specialists.Parents (of children/adolescents with SRMC) are randomised (1:1 ratio) to standard care plus intervention (SMS reminder messages to parents; reminders (written correspondence) for their child's GP from the hospital's Paediatric Outpatients Department) or standard care (hospital vaccine availability, ease of access and reminders for WCH subspecialists) with randomisation stratified by age-group (<5, 5-14, >14 to <18 years).The primary outcome is influenza vaccination, as confirmed by the Australian Immunisation Register.The proportion vaccinated (primary outcome) will be compared between randomised groups using logistic regression, with adjustment made for age group at randomisation. The effect of treatment will be described using an OR with a 95% CI.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The protocol and all study materials have been reviewed and approved by the Women's and Children's Health Network Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC/20/WCHN/5). Results will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publication and at scientific meetings, professional and public forums.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12621000463875).

Disparities in parental awareness of children's seasonal influenza vaccination recommendations and influencers of vaccination

Objective

To determine parental awareness of influenza vaccination recommendations for children and explore associations with awareness.

Design

Cross-sectional survey.

Setting/participants

South Australian parents with a telephone listing in the Electronic White Pages were randomly selected.

Methods

Participants were interviewed using Computer Assisted Telephone Interviewing (CATI) during May–July 2016. Univariable and multivariable analyses explored characteristics associated with awareness; with the survey data weighted to reflect the population of SA and the probability of selection within a household.

Results

Of 539 parents, 33% were aware of the recommendation that all children (<5 years) should receive the influenza vaccine annually with 51.9% aware that children with special risk medical conditions (SRMC) should also receive the vaccine annually. Characteristics strongly associated with parental awareness of the recommendation for children aged < 5 years were knowledge of recommendation for children with a SRMC (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR] 10.46, CI 4.44–24.63) or living in a metropolitan area (aOR 2.91, CI 1.19–7.09). There was lack of awareness in those not working (aOR 0.13, CI 0.04–0.47), with trade level education (compared with high school) (aOR 0.25 CI, 0.09–0.71) and in those born in the UK or Ireland (aOR 0.19, CI 0.04–0.85). Awareness of the recommendation for children with SRMC to receive the vaccine was strongly associated with knowledge of the influenza recommendation for children <5 years (aOR 10.22, CI 4.39–23.77) or not being born in Australia [UK/ Ireland (aOR 7.63, CI 1.86–31.31); other (aOR 3.93, CI 0.94–16.42)]. The most influential cues to future receipt were a general practitioner (GP) recommendation (63.8%) and providing influenza vaccine free for all children (37.6%). More parents who delayed or excluded vaccines believed that their children’s vaccinations (in general) were unnecessary, as other children were vaccinated (42.8%) compared to those with no or minor concerns (11.1%) (p<0.0001).

Conclusions

Parental awareness of children’s influenza vaccine recommendations is low. Targeted communication strategies and resources are required to establish broader community awareness of recommendations. Healthcare provider endorsement of the vaccine remains key and health care professionals, particularly GPs and paediatric specialists should be encouraged to discuss influenza vaccine with parents at every opportunity. Many parents have vaccine concerns and addressing concerns across the spectrum of hesitancy is crucial.

Influenza in Children With Special Risk Medical Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Children with special risk medical conditions (SRMC) are over-represented in influenza hospitalizations. A systematic review was undertaken to determine whether children with SRMCs experience greater complications or severity following influenza infection.

METHODS

Bibliographies of pertinent articles were searched in MEDLINE and EMBASE (1990 to March 2018) and contact made with the investigators of unpublished studies containing relevant data. Studies of children (aged ≤18 years) with a SRMC hospitalized with influenza were included. Outcomes were pneumonia, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, mechanical ventilation, neurologic outcomes (seizures, encephalopathy), death and length of stay in hospital or ICU.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria. Compared with healthy peers, children with SRMC had higher odds of ICU admission [pooled odds ratio (OR) 1.66 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.25-2.21)], for mechanical ventilation [pooled OR 1.53 (95% CI: 0.93-2.52)] and death [pooled OR 1.34 (95% CI: 0.74-2.41)]. Additionally, children with SRMC were more likely to develop bacterial pneumonia (crude OR 1.7; 95% CI: 1.1-2.6) or experience prolonged hospital length of stay [adjusted rate ratio 1.75 (95% CI: 1.44-2.11)]. The level of GRADE evidence was low for all outcomes considered in this review.

CONCLUSIONS

While there was evidence that ICU management and bacterial pneumonia increases in children with SRMC, evidence showing an increase in the probability of death or need for mechanical ventilation was inconsistent. Further research using large datasets should evaluate the impact of complications and associated morbidity from influenza in SRMC children.