1
|
Barría-Sandoval C, Ferreira G, Navarrete JP, Farhang M. The impact of COVID-19 on deaths from dementia and Alzheimer's disease in Chile: an analysis of panel data for 16 regions, 2017-2022. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. AMERICAS 2024; 33:100726. [PMID: 38584874 PMCID: PMC10993180 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 03/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/09/2024]
Abstract
Background Although several studies have documented the detrimental impacts of global COVID-19 containment measures on individuals with Alzheimer's disease and dementia, a comprehensive analysis of mortality rates for these conditions within the Chilean population is notably lacking. This study aimed to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on mortality rates among individuals with dementia and Alzheimer's disease in Chile. Methods A retrospective longitudinal cross-sectional study was conducted, considering mortality data for specific mental health conditions during the pre-pandemic and pandemic contexts of COVID-19 in Chile. Quantile regression techniques were employed to analyze the existence of differences between the two periods, while non-observable heterogeneity models for panel data methods were used to evaluate the effect of COVID-19 mortality on crude mortality rates. Findings Statistically significant differences were observed in the number of deaths from dementia and Alzheimer's disease between the pre-pandemic and COVID-19 pandemic periods. Specifically, crude mortality rates decreased by 10% (-0.10 [95% CI: -0.16, -0.05]) during the pandemic period. Furthermore, the number of deaths from COVID-19 during the pandemic period has a very weak incidence of deaths from mental health conditions such as dementia and Alzheimer's. Specifically, a unit percentage increase in confirmed cases from COVID-19 would result in a 7% (-0.07 [95% CI: -0.13, -0.001]) decrease in the number of deaths from dementia and Alzheimer's. These findings are supported by the application of panel regression with one-way random effects models. Interpretation The study findings indicate a reduction in mortality rates attributed to dementia and Alzheimer's disease during the COVID-19 pandemic in Chile. This decline could be attributed to the potential underreporting of mental illness as the cause of death during the pandemic period. Several studies have highlighted that approximately 30% of death certificates fail to document the presence of a dementia syndrome. Moreover, the cause of death recorded for individuals with mental health conditions may be influenced by the physician's familiarity with the patient or reflect the prevailing approach to managing end-stage dementia patients. Funding This work received no funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Barría-Sandoval
- Facultad de Ciencias para el Cuidado de la Salud, Universidad San Sebastián, Concepción, Chile
| | | | - Jean Paul Navarrete
- Department of Statistics, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
| | - Maryam Farhang
- Facultad de Salud y Ciencias Sociales, Universidad de Las Américas, Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute for Research in Depression and Personality (MIDAP), Santiago, Chile
- Millennium Institute for Care Research (MICARE), Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Uneno Y, Iwai M, Morikawa N, Tagami K, Matsumoto Y, Nozato J, Kessoku T, Shimoi T, Yoshida M, Miyoshi A, Sugiyama I, Mantani K, Itagaki M, Yamagishi A, Morita T, Inoue A, Muto M. Development of a national health policy logic model to accelerate the integration of oncology and palliative care: a nationwide Delphi survey in Japan. Int J Clin Oncol 2022; 27:1529-1542. [PMID: 35713754 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02201-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite recommendations to deliver palliative care to cancer patients and their caregivers, their distress has not been alleviated satisfactorily. National health policies play a pivotal role in achieving a comprehensive range of quality palliative care delivery for the public. However, there is no standardised logic model to appraise the efficacy of these policies. This study aimed to develop a logic model of a national health policy to deliver cancer palliative care and to reach consensus towards specific policy proposals. METHODS A draft version of the logic model and specific policy proposals were formulated by the research team and the internal expert panel, and the independent external expert panel evaluated the policy proposals based on the Delphi survey to reach consensus. RESULTS The logic model was divided into three major conceptual categories: 'care-delivery at cancer hospitals', 'community care coordination', and 'social awareness of palliative care'. There were 18 and 45 major and minor policy proposals, which were categorised into four groups: requirement of government-designated cancer hospitals; financial support; Basic Plan to Promote Cancer Control Programs; and others. These policy proposals were independently evaluated by 64 external experts and the first to third Delphi round response rates were 96.9-98.4%. Finally, 47 policy proposals reached consensus. The priority of each proposal was evaluated within the four policy groups. CONCLUSIONS A national health policy logic model was developed to accelerate the provision of cancer palliative care. Further research is warranted to verify the study design to investigate the efficacy of the logic model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Uneno
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| | - Maki Iwai
- Former Non-Profit Organization, Cancer Policy Summit, Tokyo, 155-0032, Japan
| | - Naoto Morikawa
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai, 981-8563, Japan
| | - Keita Tagami
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
| | - Yoko Matsumoto
- Specified Non-Profit Organization, Ehime Cancer Support Association Orange, Matsuyama, 790-0023, Japan
| | - Junko Nozato
- Department of Internal Medicine, Palliative Care, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Hospital, Tokyo, 113-8519, Japan
| | - Takaomi Kessoku
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Yokohama City University Hospital, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, 3-9 Fukuura, Kanazawa-ku, Yokohama, 236-0004, Japan
| | - Tatsunori Shimoi
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan
| | - Miyuki Yoshida
- Program for Nursing and Health Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime University, Ehime, 791-0295, Japan
| | - Aya Miyoshi
- Specified Non-Profit Organization, Cancer Support Kagoshima, Kagoshima, 890-8511, Japan
| | - Ikuko Sugiyama
- Division of Nursing, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
| | - Kazuhiro Mantani
- Cancer Support Centre, National Hospital Organization, Osaka-Minami Medical Center, Osaka, 586-8521, Japan
| | - Mai Itagaki
- Section of Research Administration, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan
| | - Akemi Yamagishi
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, School of Medicine, Keio University, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Morita
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Seirei Mikatahara General Hospital, Hamamatsu, 433-8558, Japan
| | - Akira Inoue
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan.
| | - Manabu Muto
- Department of Therapeutic Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Miranda R, Smets T, De Schreye R, Faes K, Van Den Noortgate N, Cohen J, Van den Block L. Improved quality of care and reduced healthcare costs at the end-of-life among older people with dementia who received palliative home care: A nationwide propensity score-matched decedent cohort study. Palliat Med 2021; 35:1701-1712. [PMID: 34109861 DOI: 10.1177/02692163211019321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While palliative home care is advocated for people with dementia, evidence of its effectiveness is lacking. AIM To evaluate the effects of palliative home care on quality and costs of end-of-life care for older people with dementia. DESIGN Decedent cohort study using linked nationwide administrative databases and propensity score matching. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS All home-dwelling older people who died with dementia between 2010 and 2015 in Belgium (N = 23,670). EXPOSURE Receiving palliative home care support for the first time between 360 and 15 days before death. RESULTS Five thousand six hundred and thirty-seven (23.8%) received palliative home care support in the last 2 years of life, of whom 2918 received it for the first time between 360 and 15 days before death. Two thousand eight hundred and thirty-nine people who received support were matched to 2839 people who received usual care. After matching, those using palliative home care support, in the last 14 days of life, had lower risk of hospital admission (17.5% vs 50.5%; relative risk (RR) = 0.21), undergoing diagnostic testing (17.0% vs 53.6%; RR = 0.20) and receiving inappropriate medications, but were more likely to die at home (75.7% vs 32.6%; RR = 6.45) and to have primary care professional contacts (mean 11.7 vs mean 5.2), compared with those who did not. Further, they had lower mean total costs of care in the last 30 days of life (incremental cost:-€2129). CONCLUSIONS Palliative home care use by home-dwelling older people with dementia is associated with improved quality and reduced costs of end-of-life care. Access remains low and should be increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Miranda
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tinne Smets
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Robrecht De Schreye
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kristof Faes
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Joachim Cohen
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pivodic L, Smets T, Gott M, Sleeman KE, Arrue B, Cardenas Turanzas M, Pechova K, Kodba Čeh H, Lo TJ, Nakanishi M, Rhee Y, Ten Koppel M, Wilson DM, Van den Block L. Inclusion of palliative care in health care policy for older people: A directed documentary analysis in 13 of the most rapidly ageing countries worldwide. Palliat Med 2021; 35:369-388. [PMID: 33295232 DOI: 10.1177/0269216320972036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Palliative care is insufficiently integrated in the continuum of care for older people. It is unclear to what extent healthcare policy for older people includes elements of palliative care and thus supports its integration. AIM (1) To develop a reference framework for identifying palliative care contents in policy documents; (2) to determine inclusion of palliative care in public policy documents on healthcare for older people in 13 rapidly ageing countries. DESIGN Directed documentary analysis of public policy documents (legislation, policies/strategies, guidelines, white papers) on healthcare for older people. Using existing literature, we developed a reference framework and data extraction form assessing 10 criteria of palliative care inclusion. Country experts identified documents and extracted data. SETTING Austria, Belgium, Canada, Czech Republic, England, Japan, Mexico, Netherlands, New Zealand, Singapore, Slovenia, South Korea, Spain. RESULTS Of 139 identified documents, 50 met inclusion criteria. The most frequently addressed palliative care elements were coordination and continuity of care (12 countries), communication and care planning, care for family, and ethical and legal aspects (11 countries). Documents in 10 countries explicitly mentioned palliative care, nine addressed symptom management, eight mentioned end-of-life care, and five referred to existing palliative care strategies (out of nine that had them). CONCLUSIONS Health care policies for older people need revising to include reference to end-of-life care and dying and ensure linkage to existing national or regional palliative care strategies. The strong policy focus on care coordination and continuity in policies for older people is an opportunity window for palliative care advocacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Pivodic
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Tinne Smets
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Merryn Gott
- Te Arai Palliative Care and End of Life Research Group, School of Nursing, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Katherine E Sleeman
- Cicely Saunders Institute of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | | | - Karolina Pechova
- Faculty of Humanities, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Hana Kodba Čeh
- University Clinic for Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Tong Jen Lo
- Division of Supportive and Palliative Care, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Miharu Nakanishi
- Research Center for Social Science & Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Institute of Medical Science, Tokyo, Japan
| | - YongJoo Rhee
- Department of Health Sciences, College of Natural Science, Dongduk Women's University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Maud Ten Koppel
- Department of Public and Occupational Health, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Expertise Center for Palliative Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Donna M Wilson
- Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
de Nooijer K, Pivodic L, Deliens L, Miccinesi G, Vega Alonso T, Moreels S, Van den Block L. Primary palliative care for older people in three European countries: a mortality follow-back quality study. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2019; 10:462-468. [PMID: 31619438 PMCID: PMC7691801 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2019-001967] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2019] [Revised: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many older people with serious chronic illnesses experience complex health problems for which palliative care is indicated. We aimed to examine the quality of primary palliative care for people aged 65-84 years and those 85 years and older who died non-suddenly in three European countries. METHODS This is a nationwide representative mortality follow-back study. General practitioners (GPs) belonging to epidemiological surveillance networks in Belgium (BE), Italy (IT) and Spain (ES) (2013-2015) registered weekly all deaths in their practices. We included deaths of people aged 65 and excluded sudden deaths judged by GPs. We applied a validated set of quality indicators. RESULTS GPs registered 3496 deaths, of which 2329 were non-sudden (1126 aged 65-84, 1203 aged 85+). GPs in BE (reference category) reported higher scores than IT across almost all indicators. Differences with ES were not consistent. The score in BE particularly differed from IT on GP-patient communication (aged 65-84: 61% in BE vs 20% in IT (OR=0.12, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.20) aged 85+: 47% in BE vs 9% in IT (OR=0.09, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.16)). Between BE and ES, we identified a large difference in involvement of palliative care services (aged 65-84: 62% in BE vs 89% in ES (OR=4.81, 95% CI 2.41 to 9.61) aged 85+: 61% in BE vs 77% in ES (OR=3.1, 95% CI 1.71 to 5.53)). CONCLUSIONS Considerable country differences were identified in the quality of primary palliative care for older people. The data suggest room for improvement across all countries, particularly regarding pain measurement, GP-patient communication and multidisciplinary meetings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim de Nooijer
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lara Pivodic
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Luc Deliens
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guido Miccinesi
- Clinical and Descriptive Epidemiology Unit, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy
| | - Tomas Vega Alonso
- Public Health Directorate, Regional Ministry of health (Direccion General de Salud Publica, Conselleria de Sanidad), Castille and Leon, Valladolid, Spain
| | - Sarah Moreels
- Epidemiology and Public Health, Health Services Research, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB) & Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Miranda R, Bunn F, Lynch J, Van den Block L, Goodman C. Palliative care for people with dementia living at home: A systematic review of interventions. Palliat Med 2019; 33:726-742. [PMID: 31057088 PMCID: PMC6620864 DOI: 10.1177/0269216319847092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The European Association for Palliative Care White Paper defined optimal palliative care in dementia based on evidence and expert consensus. Yet, we know little on how to achieve this for people with dementia living and dying at home. AIMS To examine evidence on home palliative care interventions in dementia, in terms of their effectiveness on end-of-life care outcomes, factors influencing implementation, the extent to which they address the European Association for Palliative Care palliative care domains and evidence gaps. DESIGN A systematic review of home palliative care interventions in dementia. DATA SOURCES The review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines and the protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018093607). We searched four electronic databases up to April 2018 (PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane library and CINAHL) and conducted lateral searches. RESULTS We retrieved eight relevant studies, none of which was of high quality. The evidence, albeit of generally weak quality, showed the potential benefits of the interventions in improving end-of-life care outcomes, for example, behavioural disturbances. The interventions most commonly focused on optimal symptom management, continuity of care and psychosocial support. Other European Association for Palliative Care domains identified as important in palliative care for people with dementia, for example, prognostication of dying or avoidance of burdensome interventions were under-reported. No direct evidence on facilitators and barriers to implementation was found. CONCLUSIONS The review highlights the paucity of high-quality dementia-specific research in this area and recommends key areas for future work, for example, the need for process evaluation to identify facilitators and barriers to implementing interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rose Miranda
- 1 End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,2 Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Frances Bunn
- 3 Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Lynch
- 3 Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Lieve Van den Block
- 1 End-of-Life Care Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Ghent University, Brussels, Belgium.,2 Department of Family Medicine and Chronic Care, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Claire Goodman
- 3 Centre for Research in Primary and Community Care, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Fliedner MC, Mitchell G, Bueche D, Mettler M, Schols JMGA, Eychmueller S. Development and Use of the 'SENS'-Structure to Proactively Identify Care Needs in Early Palliative Care-An Innovative Approach. Healthcare (Basel) 2019; 7:E32. [PMID: 30791565 PMCID: PMC6473309 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare7010032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2018] [Revised: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Anticipatory planning for end of life requires a common language for discussion among patients, families, and professionals. Studies show that early Palliative Care (PC) interventions based on a problem-oriented approach can improve quality of life, support decision-making, and optimize the timing of medical treatment and transition to hospice services. The aim of this quality-improvement project was to develop a pragmatic structure meeting all clinical settings and populations needs. Based on the Medical Research Council (MRC) framework, a literature review identifying approaches commonly used in PC was performed. In addition, more than 500 hospital-based interprofessional consultations were analyzed. Identified themes were structured and compared to published approaches. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of this structure with an online survey among professionals. The emerged 'SENS'-structure stands for: Symptoms patients suffer from; End-of-life decisions; Network around the patient delivering care; and Support for the carer. Evaluation among professionals has confirmed that the 'SENS'-structure covers all relevant areas for anticipatory planning in PC. 'SENS' is useful in guiding patient-centered PC conversations and pragmatic anticipatory planning, alongside the regular diagnosis-triggered approach in various settings. Following this approach, 'SENS' may facilitate systematic integration of PC in clinical practice. Depending on clearly defined outcomes, this needs to be confirmed by future randomized controlled studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica C Fliedner
- University Centre for Palliative Care, University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
- Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI (Care and Public Health Research Institute), Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Geoffrey Mitchell
- Primary Care Clinical Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane 4072, Australia.
| | - Daniel Bueche
- Centre for Palliative Care, Kantonsspital St.Gallen, CH-9007 St.Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - Monika Mettler
- Centre for Palliative Care, Kantonsspital St.Gallen, CH-9007 St.Gallen, Switzerland.
| | - Jos M G A Schols
- Department of Health Services Research, School CAPHRI (Care and Public Health Research Institute), Maastricht University, Duboisdomein 30, 6229 GT Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Steffen Eychmueller
- University Centre for Palliative Care, University Hospital Bern, 3010 Bern, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|