1
|
Denig P, Stuijt PJC. Perspectives on deprescribing in older people with type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular conditions: challenges from healthcare provider, patient and caregiver perspective, and interventions to support a proactive approach. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2024:1-18. [PMID: 39119644 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2024.2378765] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For people with type 2 diabetes and/or cardiovascular conditions, deprescribing of glucose-lowering, blood pressure-lowering and/or lipid-lowering medication is recommended when they age, and their health status deteriorates. So far, deprescribing rates of these so-called cardiometabolic medications are low. A review of challenges and interventions addressing these challenges in this population is pertinent. AREAS COVERED We first provide an overview of relevant deprescribing recommendations. Next, we review challenges for healthcare providers (HCPs) to deprescribe cardiometabolic medication and provide insight in the patient and caregiver perspective on deprescribing. We summarize findings from research on implementing deprescribing of cardiometabolic medication and reflect on strategies to enhance deprescribing. We have used a combination of methods to search for relevant articles. EXPERT OPINION There is a need for rigorous development and evaluation of intervention strategies aimed at proactive deprescribing of cardiometabolic medication. To address challenges at different levels, these should be multifaceted interventions. All stakeholders must become aware of the relevance of deintensifying medication in this population. Education and training for HCPs and patients should support patient-centered communication and shared decision-making. Development of procedures and tools to select eligible patients and conduct targeted medication reviews are important for implementation of deprescribing in routine care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Denig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Peter J C Stuijt
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pocknell S, Fudge N, Collins S, Roberts C, Swinglehurst D. 'Troubling' medication reviews in the context of polypharmacy and ageing: A linguistic ethnography. Soc Sci Med 2024; 352:117025. [PMID: 38850679 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.117025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 05/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
Healthy ageing is a global priority. Polypharmacy (the use of 5+ medicines) amongst older people is increasing, with over one-third of adults in England, aged 80-89, prescribed at least eight medications. Although sometimes necessary, polypharmacy can be harmful; the risk of harm increases with age and number of medicines prescribed. Medication reviews are recommended as one way of reducing the potential harms of polypharmacy although evidence of clinically significant benefit of medication reviews as currently delivered is limited. What happens in medication reviews in practice is poorly understood. We used a linguistic ethnography approach to explore how medication reviews proceed and what is accomplished during these consultations. We studied 18 video-recorded medication review consultations from three general practices in England. The consultations involved patients aged 65 or older, prescribed 10+ medications ('higher risk' polypharmacy), and primary care clinicians (general practitioner or clinical pharmacist). Video-recordings were gathered as part of a wider ethnographic study investigating practices of polypharmacy in primary care between 2017 and 2021. We conducted microanalysis of consultation data, drawing on our ethnographic knowledge of the organisational, institutional and domestic contexts of polypharmacy to inform our interpretation of these interactions. Consultations were time-consuming and involved lengthy stretches of interactional trouble: non-understandings; misunderstandings; misalignments. These stretches revealed profound uncertainties as to the effectiveness of medicines in the context of multimorbidity and polypharmacy. These uncertainties seeped further into 'troubles talk' concerning patients' existential concerns relating to enduring illness, ageing and mortality. Although these existential concerns were partially articulated, clinicians and patients left such troubles talk unelaborated, unresolved and unfinished. Participants succeeded in smoothing over interactional difficulties and maintaining respectful relationships but often fell short of addressing problematic polypharmacy more directly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Pocknell
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Nina Fudge
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK
| | - Sarah Collins
- Edinburgh Medical School, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, University of Edinburgh, UK
| | - Celia Roberts
- School of Education, Communication & Society, Faculty of Social Science & Public Policy, King's College London, UK
| | - Deborah Swinglehurst
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geremie T, Guiguet-Auclair C, Laroche ML, Mely P, Gerbaud L, Blanquet M. Deprescribing in older adults in a French community: a questionnaire study on patients' beliefs and attitudes. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:562. [PMID: 38937665 PMCID: PMC11212408 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-05165-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND General practitioners (GPs) have a central role to play on reduction of polypharmacy and deprescribing. This study aimed to assess beliefs and attitudes towards deprescribing in patients, aged 65 years or older in primary care, and to identify factors associated with deprescribing and their willingness to stop medication. METHODS A questionnaire study was performed between 23 May and 29 July 2022 on patients aged 65 years or older attending a GP's surgery in a French area. We used the French version of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing self-report questionnaire (rPATD), which measures four subscales ("Burden", "Appropriateness", "Concerns about stopping" and, "Involvement"), patients' willingness to stop one of their regular medicines, and patients' satisfaction with their current medicines. RESULTS The study enrolled 200 patients. Median age was 76 years old (IQR 71-81), 55% were women, and 42.5% took 5 or more medications per day. Although most patients (92.5%) were satisfied with their current medicines, 35% were reluctant to stop medications they had been taking for a long time, and 89.5% were willing to stop medication if asked to by their GP. Patients aged less than 75 years old reported more concerns about stopping. Women and patients with higher educational attainment showed significantly higher involvement in medication management. CONCLUSIONS The majority of older adults were willing to stop one or more of their regular medicines if asked to do so by their GP. GPs should address deprescribing into their current practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Candy Guiguet-Auclair
- Public Health, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Clermont Auvergne INP, Clermont Auvergne College, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS Pascal Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marie Laure Laroche
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology- Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
- UR 24134 (Ageing, Frailty, Prevention, e-Health), Institute Omega Health, University of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | - Pierre Mely
- Surgery of Riom-ès-Montagnes, Riom-ès-Montagnes, France
| | - Laurent Gerbaud
- Public Health, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Clermont Auvergne INP, Clermont Auvergne College, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS Pascal Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marie Blanquet
- Public Health, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
- Clermont Auvergne INP, Clermont Auvergne College, University Hospital of Clermont-Ferrand, CNRS Pascal Institute, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
van der Waal MS, Teunissen SC, Uyttewaal AG, Verboeket-Crul C, Smits-Pelser H, Geijteman EC, Grant MP. Factors influencing deprescribing in primary care for those towards the end of life: A qualitative interview study with patients and healthcare practitioners. Palliat Med 2024:2692163241261202. [PMID: 38916262 DOI: 10.1177/02692163241261202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For people with limited lifetime expectancy, the benefit of many medications may be outweighed by their potential harms. Despite the relevance of reducing unnecessary medication use, deprescribing is poorly enacted in primary care practice. AIM This study aims to describe factors, as identified by primary care professionals and patients, that influence deprescribing in the last phase of life. DESIGN Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using a thematic approach. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS This study was performed in primary care settings, including general practices, hospices and community care teams in The Netherlands. Purposefully identified primary care professionals (general practitioners, pharmacists, nurses) and patients with limited lifetime expectancy due to advanced chronic illness or cancer and their caretakers were interviewed. RESULTS Three themes emerged detailing factors influencing deprescribing in the last phase of life in primary care: (1) non-maleficence, the wish to avoid additional psychological or physical distress; (2) reactive care, the lack of priority and awareness of eligible patients; and (3) discontinuity of care within primary care and between primary care and specialty care. CONCLUSIONS Deprescribing is an incremental process, complicated by the unpredictability of life expectancy and attitudes of patients and health care professionals that associate continued medication use with clinical stability. Opportunities to facilitate the deprescribing process and its acceptance include the routinely systematic identification of patients with limited life expectancy and potentially inappropriate medications, and normalisation of deprescribing as component of regular primary care, occurring for all patients and continuing into end-of-life care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike S van der Waal
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Ccm Teunissen
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | - Eric Ct Geijteman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus Medical Center Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthew P Grant
- Center of Expertise in Palliative Care Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Japelj N, Horvat N, Knez L, Kos M. Deprescribing: An umbrella review. ACTA PHARMACEUTICA (ZAGREB, CROATIA) 2024; 74:249-267. [PMID: 38815201 DOI: 10.2478/acph-2024-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
This umbrella review examined systematic reviews of deprescribing studies by characteristics of intervention, population, medicine, and setting. Clinical and humanistic outcomes, barriers and facilitators, and tools for deprescribing are presented. The Medline database was used. The search was limited to systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in English up to April 2022. Reviews reporting deprescribing were included, while those where depre-scribing was not planned and supervised by a healthcare professional were excluded. A total of 94 systematic reviews (23 meta--analyses) were included. Most explored clinical or humanistic outcomes (70/94, 74 %); less explored attitudes, facilitators, or barriers to deprescribing (17/94, 18 %); few focused on tools (8/94, 8.5 %). Reviews assessing clinical or humanistic outcomes were divided into two groups: reviews with deprescribing intervention trials (39/70, 56 %; 16 reviewing specific deprescribing interventions and 23 broad medication optimisation interventions), and reviews with medication cessation trials (31/70, 44 %). Deprescribing was feasible and resulted in a reduction of inappropriate medications in reviews with deprescribing intervention trials. Complex broad medication optimisation interventions were shown to reduce hospitalisation, falls, and mortality rates. In reviews of medication cessation trials, a higher frequency of adverse drug withdrawal events underscores the importance of prioritizing patient safety and exercising caution when stopping medicines, particularly in patients with clear and appropriate indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nuša Japelj
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nejc Horvat
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Lea Knez
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
- 2University Clinic Golnik 4204 Golnik, Slovenia
| | - Mitja Kos
- 1University of Ljubljana Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hung A, Kim YH, Pavon JM. Deprescribing in older adults with polypharmacy. BMJ 2024; 385:e074892. [PMID: 38719530 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2023-074892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/15/2024]
Abstract
Polypharmacy is common in older adults and is associated with adverse drug events, cognitive and functional impairment, increased healthcare costs, and increased risk of frailty, falls, hospitalizations, and mortality. Many barriers exist to deprescribing, but increased efforts have been made to develop and implement deprescribing interventions that overcome them. This narrative review describes intervention components and summarizes findings from published randomized controlled trials that have tested deprescribing interventions in older adults with polypharmacy, as well as reports on ongoing trials, guidelines, and resources that can be used to facilitate deprescribing. Most interventions were medication reviews in primary care settings, and many contained components such as shared decision making and/or a focus on patient care priorities, training for healthcare professionals, patient facing education materials, and involvement of family members, representing great heterogeneity in interventions addressing polypharmacy in older adults. Just over half of study interventions were found to perform better than usual care in at least one of their primary outcomes, and most study interventions were assessed over 12 months or less.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Hung
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Duke-Margolis Center for Health Policy, Durham, NC, USA
- Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation, Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
- Co-first authors
| | - Yoon Hie Kim
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Co-first authors
| | - Juliessa M Pavon
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
- Geriatrics Research, Education, and Clinical Center (GRECC) Durham VA Health Care System, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McDonald EG, Lundby C, Thompson W, Boyd C, Farrell B, Gagnon C, Herbin J, Khuong N, Moriarty F, Pierson T, Scott S, Scott IA, Silvius J, Spinewine A, Steinman MA, Tannenbaum C, Trimble J, Turner JP, Reeve E. Reducing potentially inappropriate polypharmacy at a national and international level: the impact of deprescribing networks. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2024; 17:433-440. [PMID: 38739460 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2024.2355270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Over the past decade, polypharmacy has increased dramatically. Measurable harms include falls, fractures, cognitive impairment, and death. The associated costs are massive and contribute substantially to low-value health care. Deprescribing is a promising solution, but there are barriers. Establishing a network to address polypharmacy can help overcome barriers by connecting individuals with an interest and expertise in deprescribing and can act as an important source of motivation and resources. AREAS COVERED Over the past decade, several deprescribing networks were launched to help tackle polypharmacy, with evidence of individual and collective impact. A network approach has several advantages; it can spark interest, ideas and enthusiasm through information sharing, meetings and conversations with the public, providers, and other key stakeholders. In this special report, the details of how four deprescribing networks were established across the globe are detailed. EXPERT OPINION Networks create links between people who lead existing and/or budding deprescribing practices and policy initiatives, can influence people with a shared passion for deprescribing, and facilitate sharing of intellectual capital and tools to take initiatives further and strengthen impact.This report should inspire others to establish their own deprescribing networks, a critical step in accelerating a global deprescribing movement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily G McDonald
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Carina Lundby
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Wade Thompson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Cynthia Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology in the School of Medicine, the Center on Aging and Health, and the departments of Epidemiology and Health Policy and Management at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Barbara Farrell
- Bruyère Research Institute, Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Camille Gagnon
- Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jennie Herbin
- Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ninh Khuong
- Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Frank Moriarty
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tiphaine Pierson
- Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sion Scott
- School of Healthcare, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Ian A Scott
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jim Silvius
- Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Provincial Seniors Health & Continuing Care, Alberta Health Services, Alberta, Canada
| | - Anne Spinewine
- Louvain Drug Research Institute, Clinical Pharmacy Research Group UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michael A Steinman
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco and San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Cara Tannenbaum
- Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Johanna Trimble
- Canadian Medication Appropriateness and Deprescribing Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Justin P Turner
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (CMUS), Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emily Reeve
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety (CMUS), Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Melbourne, SA, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pereira A, Veríssimo M, Ribeiro O. Influence of chronic medical conditions on older patients' willingness to deprescribe medications: a cross-sectional study. BMC Geriatr 2024; 24:315. [PMID: 38575904 PMCID: PMC10993447 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-024-04891-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aging correlates with a heightened prevalence of chronic diseases, resulting in multimorbidity affecting 60% of those aged 65 or older. Multimorbidity often leads to polypharmacy, elevating the risk of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use and adverse health outcomes. To address these issues, deprescribing has emerged as a patient-centered approach that considers patients' beliefs and attitudes toward medication and reduces inappropriate polypharmacy in older adults. Our study aims to investigate whether certain chronic medical conditions are associated with older patients' willingness to deprescribe medications. METHODS A cross-sectional study enrolled 192 community-dwelling individuals aged 65 or older taking at least one regular medication. Data included demographics, clinical characteristics, and responses to the Portuguese revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire. Descriptive statistics characterized participants, while multiple binary logistic regression identified associations between chronic medical conditions and willingness to deprescribe. RESULTS Among the participants (median age: 72 years, 65.6% female), 91.6% had multimorbidity. The analysis revealed that willingness to deprescribe significantly increased with the presence of gastric disease (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 4.123; 95% CI 1.221, 13.915) and age (aOR = 1.121; 95% CI 1.009, 1.246). Conversely, prostatic pathology (aOR = 0.266; 95% CI 0.077, 0.916), higher scores in the rPATD appropriateness factor (aOR = 0.384; 95% CI 0.190, 0.773), and rPATD concerns about stopping factor (aOR = 0.450; 95% CI 0.229, 0.883) diminished patients' willingness to deprescribe. CONCLUSIONS This study highlights the intricate relationship between older patients' attitudes toward deprescribing and chronic medical conditions. We found that gastric disease was associated with an increased willingness to deprescribe medications, while prostate disease was associated with the opposite effect. Future research should explore how patients with specific diseases or groups of diseases perceive deprescribing of medications general and for specific medications, aiding in the development of targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabela Pereira
- Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Associate Laboratory RISE- Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal.
| | - Manuel Veríssimo
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548, Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Oscar Ribeiro
- Centre for Health Technology and Services Research, Associate Laboratory RISE- Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bužančić I, Držaić M, Kummer I, Ortner Hadžiabdić M, Brkić J, Fialová D. Deprescribing potential of commonly used medications among community-dwelling older adults: insights from a pharmacist's geriatric assessment. Sci Rep 2024; 14:6235. [PMID: 38485992 PMCID: PMC10940601 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-56780-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Pharmacist's geriatric assessment can provide valuable insights into potential deprescribing targets, while including important information on various health-related domains. Data collected from a geriatric assessment questionnaire, for 388 patients, from the Croatian cohort of the EuroAgeism H2020 ESR 7 international project, along with guideline-based deprescribing criteria, were used to analyse potentially inappropriate prescribing of four medication groups (benzodiazepines (BZN), proton pump inhibitors (PPI), opioids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)), and to assess the deprescribing potential. Binary logistic regression was used to explore the effects of age, gender, number of medicines and diagnoses, self-reported health, frailty score, and healthcare utilization on the likelihood of needing deprescribing. More than half of participants (n = 216, 55.2%) are candidates for deprescribing, with 31.1% of PPI, 74.8% of NSAID, 75% of opioid, and 96.1% of BZN users meeting at least one criterion. Most common criteria for deprescribing were inappropriately long use and safety concerns. Women (aOR = 2.58; p < 0.001), those reporting poor self-reported health (aOR = 5.14; p < 0.001), and those exposed to polypharmacy (aOR = 1.29; p < 0.001) had higher odds of needing to have medicines deprescribed. The high rate of deprescribing potential warrants prompt action to increase patient safety and decrease polypharmacy. Pharmacist's geriatric assessment and deprescribing-focused medication review could be used to lead a personalised approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iva Bužančić
- City Pharmacies Zagreb, Kralja Držislava 6, Zagreb, Croatia
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Center for Applied Pharmacy, University of Zagreb, Ante Kovačića 1, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Margita Držaić
- City Pharmacies Zagreb, Kralja Držislava 6, Zagreb, Croatia
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Center for Applied Pharmacy, University of Zagreb, Ante Kovačića 1, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ingrid Kummer
- Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovského 1203/8, Hradec Králové, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Maja Ortner Hadžiabdić
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, Center for Applied Pharmacy, University of Zagreb, Ante Kovačića 1, 10 000, Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Jovana Brkić
- Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovského 1203/8, Hradec Králové, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Legislation, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Belgrade, 450 Vojvode Stepe Street, Belgrade, Serbia
| | - Daniela Fialová
- Department of Social and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Akademika Heyrovského 1203/8, Hradec Králové, Prague, Czech Republic
- Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, 1st Faculty of Medicine in Prague, Charles University, Kateřinská 32, Prague, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weir KR, Jungo KT, Streit S. Older adults' adherence to medications and willingness to deprescribe: A substudy of a randomized clinical trial. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2024; 90:905-911. [PMID: 37953525 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Revised: 10/20/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Our study investigated the association between patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed and medication adherence. This longitudinal substudy of the 'Optimizing PharmacoTherapy In the Multimorbid Elderly in Primary CAre' (OPTICA) trial, a cluster randomized controlled trial, took place in Swiss primary care settings. Participants were aged ≥65 years and over, with ≥3 chronic conditions and ≥5 regular medications. At baseline, the 'revised Patient Attitudes Towards Deprescribing' (rPATD) questionnaire was measured. The A14-scale measured adherence (self-report) at the 12-month follow-up. Multilevel linear regression analyses adjusted for baseline variables were performed. Of the 298 participants, 45% were women, and the median age was 78. Participants reported a high level of adherence and willingness to have medications deprescribed. We did not find evidence for an association between patients' willingness to deprescribe and medication adherence. Further research is needed to explore the relationship between these concepts and to inform collaborative decisions about medicines in the context of polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Primary Health Care BIHAM, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Katharina Tabea Jungo
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Primary Health Care BIHAM, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sven Streit
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Primary Health Care BIHAM, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Nguyen-Soenen J, Weir KR, Jungo KT, Perrot B, Fournier JP. Does missing data matter in the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire? A systematic review and two case analyses. Res Social Adm Pharm 2024; 20:296-307. [PMID: 38168621 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire was developed to capture beliefs and perceptions of patients about deprescribing. In general, handling of missing data is underreported in survey studies. Underlying mechanisms related to missing data may impact the findings from survey studies. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the missing data in studies using the rPATD questionnaire through a systematic review and datasets from two studies. METHODS First, this review updated a systematic review on the rPATD (and other versions). We searched Medline via OVID, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science until 31st January 2023. Missing data reporting and methods to handle them were collected. Second, data from two deprescribing studies were analyzed using three methods of missing data handling: complete case analysis, personal mean substitution, and multiple imputation. We compared the scores from each domain and the associations of the domains with two questions from the rPATD to highlight how using different methods can influence the interpretation of study findings. RESULTS We identified 49 studies: 31 (63 %) from this study and 18 (37 %) from the original systematic review. The question or domain with the most missing data could be identified in 9 studies (18.4 %). Missing data management was reported in 19 studies (38.8 %). In one case analysis, the "Burden" domain was significantly associated with the question "I would like to try stopping one of my medicines to see how I feel without it" using complete case analysis (p = 0.044) or multiple imputation (p = 0.038), but not when using personal mean substitution (p = 0.057). CONCLUSIONS Missing data and methods used to handle missing data were underreported in studies using the rPATD questionnaire. The methods should be chosen carefully as our analyses from two distinct studies suggest that they may impact the interpretation of the findings from the questionnaire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérôme Nguyen-Soenen
- SPHERE - UMR INSERM 1246, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, France; Département de Médecine Générale, Faculté de Médecine, Nantes Université, France.
| | - Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Katharina Tabea Jungo
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA; Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Bastien Perrot
- SPHERE - UMR INSERM 1246, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, France; Direction de la recherche, Plateforme de Méthodologie et Biostatistique, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Jean-Pascal Fournier
- SPHERE - UMR INSERM 1246, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, France; Département de Médecine Générale, Faculté de Médecine, Nantes Université, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Thompson W, McDonald EG. Polypharmacy and Deprescribing in Older Adults. Annu Rev Med 2024; 75:113-127. [PMID: 37729029 DOI: 10.1146/annurev-med-070822-101947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
Older adults commonly end up on many medications. Deprescribing is an important part of individualizing care for older adults. It is an opportunity to discuss treatment options and revisit medications that may not have been reassessed in many years. A large evidence base exists in the field, suggesting that deprescribing is feasible and safe, though questions remain about the potential clinical benefits. Deprescribing research faces a myriad of challenges, such as identifying and employing the optimal outcome measures. Further, there is uncertainty about which deprescribing approaches are likely to be most effective and in what contexts. Evidence on barriers and facilitators to deprescribing has underscored how deprescribing in routine clinical practice can be complex and challenging. Thus, finding practical, sustainable ways to implement deprescribing is a priority for future research in the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wade Thompson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada;
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Emily G McDonald
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada;
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
- Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Jungo KT, Weir KR, Cateau D, Streit S. Older adults' attitudes towards deprescribing and medication changes: a longitudinal sub-study of a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075325. [PMID: 38199626 PMCID: PMC10806786 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between older patients' willingness to have one or more medications deprescribed and: (1) change in medications, (2) change in the appropriateness of medications and (3) implementation of prescribing recommendations generated by the electronic decision support system tested in the 'Optimising PharmacoTherapy In the Multimorbid Elderly in Primary CAre' (OPTICA) trial. DESIGN A longitudinal sub-study of the OPTICA trial, a cluster randomised controlled trial. SETTING Swiss primary care settings. PARTICIPANTS Participants were aged ≥65 years, with ≥3 chronic conditions and ≥5 regular medications recruited from 43 general practitioner (GP) practices. EXPOSURES Patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed was assessed using three questions from the 'revised Patient Attitudes Towards Deprescribing' (rPATD) questionnaire and its concerns about stopping score. MEASURES/ANALYSES Medication-related outcomes were collected at 1 year follow-up. Aim 1 outcome: change in the number of long-term medications between baseline and 12 month follow-up. Aim 2 outcome: change in medication appropriateness (Medication Appropriateness Index). Aim 3 outcome: binary variable on whether any prescribing recommendation generated during the OPTICA medication review was implemented. We used multilevel linear regression analyses (aim 1 and aim 2) and multilevel logistic regression analyses (aim 3). Models were adjusted for sociodemographic variables and the clustering effect at GP level. RESULTS 298 patients completed the rPATD, 45% were women and 78 years was the median age. A statistically significant association was found between the concerns about stopping score and the change in the number of medications over time (per 1-unit increase in the score the average number of medications use was 0.65 higher; 95% CI: 0.08 to 1.22). Other than that we did not find evidence for statistically significant associations between patients' agreement with deprescribing and medication-related outcomes. CONCLUSIONS We did not find evidence for an association between most measures of patient agreement with deprescribing and medication-related outcomes over 1 year. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03724539.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Tabea Jungo
- Institute of Primary Health Care BIHAM, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Center for Healthcare Delivery Sciences (C4HDS), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Institute of Primary Health Care BIHAM, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Damien Cateau
- Community Pharmacy, Centre for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Sven Streit
- Institute of Primary Health Care BIHAM, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lundby C, Nielsen M, Simonsen T, Galsgaard S, Haastrup MB, Ravn-Nielsen LV, Pottegård A. Attitudes towards deprescribing in geriatric psychiatry: A survey among older psychiatric outpatients. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2024; 134:97-106. [PMID: 37823673 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13952] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023]
Abstract
Understanding the patient perspective is a significant part of the deprescribing process. This study aimed to explore the attitudes of older patients with psychiatric disorders towards deprescribing. A total of 72 of psychiatric outpatients (68% women; median age 76 years) completed the validated Danish version of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire. Patients used a median of eight medications (interquartile range 6-12), with 88%, 49% and 24% using antidepressants, antipsychotics and anxiolytics, respectively. Fifty-one percent of patients reported an intrinsic desire to stop one of their medications, while 92% would be willing to stop one on their physician's advice. Seventy-five percent of patients would be worried about missing out on future benefits following deprescribing and 37% had previous bad deprescribing experiences. Use of ≥8 regular medications was associated with more concerns about stopping medication and greater perceived burden of using medication, while use of antipsychotics was not associated with any differences in rPATD factor scores. It is crucial for health care professionals to be aware of patients' specific concerns and past experiences to promote a patient-centred deprescribing approach that takes into account the needs and preferences of older patients with psychiatric disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Lundby
- Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
- Odense Deprescribing Initiative (ODIN), Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Marianne Nielsen
- Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Trine Simonsen
- Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Stine Galsgaard
- Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
| | - Maija Bruun Haastrup
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| | | | - Anton Pottegård
- Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
- Odense Deprescribing Initiative (ODIN), Odense University Hospital and University of Southern Denmark, Odense C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shrestha S, Poudel A, Steadman KJ, Nissen LM. Deprescribing Tool for Older PeoPle with Limited-life Expectancy (De-TOPPLE) version 1: Development and validation using a modified Delphi technique. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2024; 134:15-27. [PMID: 37264733 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023]
Abstract
Deprescribing decision making in older adults with limited life expectancy is often challenging for clinicians. We aimed to develop and validate a Deprescribing Tool for Older People with Limited-life Expectancy (De-TOPPLE). Modified Delphi technique was used to gain experts' consensus on the tool and further develop using their feedback. Experts [Round-1 (n = 13), Round-2 (n = 7)] had clinical and/or research background on geriatric medicine, geriatrics, family medicine or pharmacotherapy. Round-1 consensus was achieved on approach taken by the tool to evaluate risk and benefit; distinguishing medications as preventive, symptom control or dual-purpose; referring to established deprescribing process; stepwise approach to deprescribing; and the overall concept. Common feedback was to reflect upon harm-benefit analysis, distinguish medication types earlier, qualify adverse events, use time-to-benefit (TTB), prioritise symptom relief, monitor post-deprescribing, include shared decision making and define terms for clinical familiarisation. After tool update, Round-2 consensus was achieved on usability in clinical setting, flexibility of implicit judgement, ceasing preventive medication with inadequate TTB, ceasing symptom control medication with inadequate symptom relief, ceasing dual-purpose medication (DPM) with inadequate TTB and symptom relief, and continuing DPM with adequate TTB and symptom relief. De-TOPPLE version 1 was developed and validated through two rounds of the Delphi process. Clinical use of the tool needs final validation following the addition of contextual statements to the tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shakti Shrestha
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Arjun Poudel
- School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Kathryn J Steadman
- School of Pharmacy, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Lisa M Nissen
- Centre for the Business and Economics of Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weir KR, Scherer AM, Vordenberg SE, Streit S, Jansen J, Jungo KT. The Patient Typology about deprescribing and medication-related decisions: A quantitative exploration. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2024; 134:39-50. [PMID: 37300477 PMCID: PMC11187678 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/28/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
This study aimed to test the adequacy of a quantitative measure of our qualitatively developed Patient Typology-categories of older adults' attitudes towards medicines and medicine decision-making-and identify characteristics associated with each Typology. We conducted secondary data analyses of a subset of survey item measures of adults (≥65 years) who were members of online survey panels in Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands (n = 4688). Multinomial logistic regression analyses assessed associations between demographic, psychosocial and medication-related measures. Mean age was 71.5 (5), and 47.5% of participants were female. Factors associated with an increased likelihood of identifying with Typology 1 'Attached to medicines' over Typology 2 'Open to deprescribing' were higher positive attitude towards polypharmacy (RRR = 1.12, p = <0.001) and higher need for certainty (RRR = 1.11, p = 0.039). Factors associated with an increased likelihood of identifying with Typology 3 'Defers (medication decision-making) to others' over Typology 2 were older age (RRR = 1.47 per 10-year age increase, p = <0.001) and a decreased likelihood of prior deprescribing experience (RRR = 0.73, p = 0.033). This study provides validation of the Typology with large samples from four countries, with the quantitatively-measured typologies generally aligning with the qualitatively derived categories. Our Patient Typology measure provides a succinct way researchers can assess attitudes towards deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Aaron M. Scherer
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Sarah E. Vordenberg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sven Streit
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Thompson W, Reeve E, McDonald EG, Farrell B, Scott S, Steinman MA, Morin L, Lundby C. Ten deprescribing articles you should know about: A guide for newcomers to the field. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2023; 133:661-664. [PMID: 37142559 PMCID: PMC10831497 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/17/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wade Thompson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Emily Reeve
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, SA, Australia
| | - Emily G. McDonald
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Experimental Medicine, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Clinical Practice Assessment Unit, Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Barbara Farrell
- Bruyere Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
- University of Waterloo School of Pharmacy, Waterloo, Canada
| | - Sion Scott
- School of Healthcare, University of Leicester, United Kingdom
| | - Michael A. Steinman
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Geriatrics, Palliative, and Extended Care Service Line, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, California, USA
| | - Lucas Morin
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Inserm CIC 1431, CHU Besançon, Besançon, France
- Inserm U1018, High-Dimensional Biostatistics for Drug Safety and Genomics, CESP, Villejuif, France
| | - Carina Lundby
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bužančić I, Ortner Hadžiabdić M. Deprescribing in a multimorbid older adult: A case vignette study among community pharmacists and primary care physicians. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2023; 133:729-740. [PMID: 37177977 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
Collaborative deprescribing can include pharmacists' medication review with identification and suggestion of potential deprescribing targets to physicians. Case vignettes can be a valuable method for researching variations in clinical decision making, especially in settings unaccustomed to newer clinical approaches such as deprescribing. This study aimed to explore if pharmacists can identify deprescribing targets and if physicians would accept pharmacist's deprescribing rationales. A cross-sectional study was performed using an online case vignette based on a real-life elderly patient. Pharmacists were asked to indicate which medicines they would recommend deprescribing, alongside a rationale. Physicians were asked to state their acceptance of the proposed pharmacist's deprescribing suggestion. Pharmacists gave 1275 deprescribing rationales, and most were given for deprescribing opioids, NSAID and diuretics. Physicians would accept rationales to deprescribe a median of 10 medicines, while pharmacist would recommend deprescribing a median of six medicines. Most difference lays in deprescribing of preventative medicines. Healthcare providers share agreement on deprescribing targets, but pharmacists show hesitancies in making recommendations that could hamper potential collaboration. Action is needed to improve pharmacists' skills in recognizing deprescribing targets and confidence in making suggestions, which could lead to opening of possibilities for joint patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iva Bužančić
- City Pharmacies Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
- Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vordenberg SE, Rana R, Shang J, Choi J, Scherer AM, Weir KR. Reasons why older adults in three countries agreed with a deprescribing recommendation in a hypothetical vignette. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2023; 133:673-682. [PMID: 36894739 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to examine factors important to older adults who agreed with a deprescribing recommendation given by a general practitioner (GP) to a hypothetical patient experiencing polypharmacy. We conducted an online, vignette-based, experimental study in the United Kingdom, United States and Australia with participants ≥65 years. The primary outcome was an agreement with a deprescribing recommendation (6-point Likert scale; 1 = strongly disagree and 6 = strongly agree). We performed a content analysis of the free-text reasons provided by participants who agreed with deprescribing (score of 5 or 6). Among 2656 participants who agreed with deprescribing, approximately 53.7% shared a preference for following the GP's recommendation or considered the GP the expert. The medication was referred to as a reason for deprescribing by 35.6% of participants. Less common themes included personal experience with medicine (4.3%) and older age (4.0%). Older adults who agreed with deprescribing in a hypothetical vignette most frequently reported a desire to follow the recommendations given the GP's expertise. Future research should be conducted to help clinicians efficiently identify patients who have a strong desire to follow the doctor's recommendations related to deprescribing, as this may allow for a tailored, brief deprescribing conversation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Vordenberg
- University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
- University of Michigan Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, 28000 Plymouth Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48019, Michigan, USA
| | - Ruchi Rana
- University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jenny Shang
- University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jae Choi
- University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Aaron M Scherer
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, 200 Hawkins Drive, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Reeve E, Thompson W, Boyd C, Lundby C, Steinman MA. The state of deprescribing research: How did we get here? Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2023; 133:657-660. [PMID: 36973899 PMCID: PMC10831488 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Reeve
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, VIC, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, SA, Australia
| | - Wade Thompson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Pharmacology, and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Cynthia Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore MD, USA
| | - Carina Lundby
- Research Unit of General Practice, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Environmental Medicine, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Hospital Pharmacy Funen, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Michael A. Steinman
- Division of Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Geriatrics, Palliative, and Extended Care Service Line, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Medical Center, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pereira A, Ribeiro O, Veríssimo M. Predictors of older patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed: A cross-sectional study. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2023; 133:703-717. [PMID: 37070165 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing is a complex process requiring a patient-centred approach. One frequently expressed deprescribing barrier is patients' attitudes and beliefs towards deprescribing. This study aimed to identify the predictors of patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted with community-dwelling patients aged ≥65 who are taking at least one regular medication. Data collection included patients' demographic and clinical characteristics and the Portuguese revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to present the patients' characteristics. Multiple binary logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of the patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed. RESULTS One hundred ninety-two participants (median age 72 years; 65.6% female) were included. Most (83.33%) were willing to have medications deprescribed, and the predictors were age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.136; 95% CI 1.026, 1.258), female sex (aOR = 3.036; 95% CI 1.059, 8.708) and the rPATD concerns about stopping factor (aOR = 0.391; 95% CI 0.203, 0.754). CONCLUSIONS Most patients were willing to have their medications deprescribed if it is recommended by their doctors. Older age and female sex increased the odds of willingness to deprescribe; higher concerns about stopping medications decreased the odds. These findings suggest that addressing patients' concerns about stopping their medicines may contribute to deprescribing success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anabela Pereira
- Department of Education and Psychology of the University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research at the Associate Laboratory RISE, Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
- Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Oscar Ribeiro
- Department of Education and Psychology of the University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research at the Associate Laboratory RISE, Health Research Network (CINTESIS@RISE), University of Aveiro, Campus Universitário de Santiago, Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Manuel Veríssimo
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
McCarthy C, Flood M, Clyne B, Smith SM, Boland F, Wallace E, Moriarty F. Association between patient attitudes towards deprescribing and subsequent prescription changes. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol 2023; 133:683-690. [PMID: 36930881 DOI: 10.1111/bcpt.13859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/19/2023]
Abstract
Deprescribing is an essential component of safe prescribing, especially for people with higher levels of polypharmacy. Identifying individuals prepared to consider medicine changes may facilitate deprescribing-orientated reviews. We aimed to explore the relationship between revised patients' attitudes towards deprescribing (rPATD) scores and medication changes in older people prescribed ≥15 medicines. A secondary analysis of rPATD scores and prescription data from a cluster randomised controlled trial of a GP-delivered, deprescribing-orientated medication review was conducted. The association between number of medicines stopped, started and changed and baseline rPATD scores was assessed using Poisson regression, adjusting for patient age, gender, study group allocation, baseline number of medicines and effects of clustering. Participants (n = 404) had a mean age of 76.4 years and were prescribed a mean of 17.1 medicines at baseline. Willingness to stop a medicine was associated with higher rates of both deprescribing (IRR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.06-1.84) and initiating medicines (IRR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.09-1.88). Satisfaction with current medicines was associated with a lower rate of deprescribing (IRR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.57-0.85). The rPATD questionnaire could be used as part of a deprescribing intervention to identify participants who may be prepared to engage in deprescribing, enabling more efficient use of clinician time during complex consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline McCarthy
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Michelle Flood
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Barbara Clyne
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Susan M Smith
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Fiona Boland
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
- Data Science Centre, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emma Wallace
- Department of General Practice, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Frank Moriarty
- Department of General Practice, RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
- School of Pharmacy and Biomolecular Sciences, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Quantz D, Wong GY, Liang K. Patient perspectives on the environmental impact of inhalers: A survey in British Columbia. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2023; 156:298-302. [PMID: 38024456 PMCID: PMC10655797 DOI: 10.1177/17151635231202980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023]
|
24
|
Bucsa C, Onea M, Rusu A, Farcas A, Porojan M, Dumitrascu D, Iaru I, Leucuta D, Mogosan C, Reeve E, Moga D. Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of the revised patients' attitudes towards deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in Romanian older adults. Res Social Adm Pharm 2023; 19:1471-1479. [PMID: 37495451 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2023.07.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing is part of ensuring appropriate medication use and may reduce medication-related harm. Capturing the beliefs and attitudes of patients towards deprescribing by using a validated tool may support optimizing medication use in practice. OBJECTIVES To translate, culturally adapt and validate the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in Romanian and to investigate the attitudes and beliefs of older adults towards deprescribing. METHODS The rPATD questionnaire was translated using forward-backward translation into Romanian and culturally adapted. The psychometric properties were evaluated in older adults ≥65 years of age. Structural validity was assessed by item load on factors using an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) which was compared to the original English version and the internal consistency by Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was evaluated by calculating the Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between the factor scores obtained using the revised version of the Romanian rPATD and scores on the Beliefs about Medicines Questionnaire (BMQ) Specific Concerns Romanian version. Floor and ceiling effect were also examined. RESULTS We translated the questionnaire and administered it to 224 participants (median age 72 years [interquartile range: 68.0; 77.0]). In the EFA individual items loaded onto 4 factors, grouped similarly to the English version (Involvement, Burden, Appropriateness, Concerns about Stopping factors). Two items from each of the Involvement and Appropriateness factors were removed to improve factor loading and avoid cross-loading. The Cronbach's alpha values for the 4 factors ranged between 0.522 and 0.773. The scores for Burden and Concerns about Stopping factors were found to be positively correlated with BMQ Specific Concerns score. We identified a ceiling effect for one of the four factors (Involvement) and no floor effects. CONCLUSIONS The Romanian rPATD was validated in 4 factor structure similar to the original English questionnaire. The Romanian version of the questionnaire may support the health care professionals in Romania to initiate and support patient-centered deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Bucsa
- Pharmacovigilance Research Center, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - M Onea
- Pharmacovigilance Research Center, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
| | - A Rusu
- Department of Diabetes and Nutrition Diseases, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - A Farcas
- Pharmacovigilance Research Center, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - M Porojan
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - D Dumitrascu
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - I Iaru
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Physiopathology, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - D Leucuta
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - C Mogosan
- Department of Pharmacology, Physiology and Physiopathology, Faculty of Pharmacy, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - E Reeve
- Monash University, Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; University of South Australia, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - D Moga
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Institute for Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, College of Pharmacy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA; Sanders-Brown Center on Aging, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Weir KR, Shang J, Choi J, Rana R, Vordenberg SE. Factors Important to Older Adults Who Disagree With a Deprescribing Recommendation. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2337281. [PMID: 37819657 PMCID: PMC10568363 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.37281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 10/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Little is known about why older adults decline deprescribing recommendations, primarily because interventional studies rarely capture the reasons. Objective To examine factors important to older adults who disagree with a deprescribing recommendation given by a primary care physician to a hypothetical patient experiencing polypharmacy. Design, Setting, and Participants This online, vignette-based survey study was conducted from December 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021, with participants 65 years or older in the United Kingdom, the US, Australia, and the Netherlands. The primary outcome of the main study was disagreement with a deprescribing recommendation. A content analysis was subsequently conducted of the free-text reasons provided by participants who strongly disagreed or disagreed with deprescribing. Data were analyzed from August 22, 2022, to February 12, 2023. Main Outcomes and Measures Attitudes, beliefs, fears, and recommended actions of older adults in response to deprescribing recommendations. Results Of the 899 participants included in the analysis, the mean (SD) age was 71.5 (4.9) years; 456 participants (50.7%) were men. Attitudes, beliefs, and fears reported by participants included doubts about deprescribing (361 [40.2%]), valuing medications (139 [15.5%]), and a preference to avoid change (132 [14.7%]). Valuing medications was reported more commonly among participants who strongly disagreed compared with those who disagreed with deprescribing (48 of 205 [23.4%] vs 91 of 694 [13.1%], respectively; P < .001) or had personal experience with the same medication class as the vignette compared with no experience (93 of 517 [18.0%] vs 46 of 318 [12.1%], respectively; P = .02). Participants shared that improved communication (225 [25.0%]), alternative strategies (138 [15.4%]), and consideration of medication preferences (137 [15.2%]) may increase their agreement with deprescribing. Participants who disagreed compared with those who strongly disagreed were more interested in additional communication (196 [28.2%] vs 29 [14.2%], respectively; P < .001), alternative strategies (117 [16.9%] vs 21 [10.2%], respectively; P = .02), or consideration of medication preferences (122 [17.6%] vs 15 [7.3%], respectively; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance In this survey study, older adults who disagreed with a deprescribing recommendation were more interested in additional communication, alternative strategies, or consideration of medication preferences compared with those who strongly disagreed. These findings suggest that identifying the degree of disagreement with deprescribing could be used to tailor patient-centered communication about deprescribing in older adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
- Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jenny Shang
- currently a graduate student at University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor
| | - Jae Choi
- currently a graduate student at University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor
| | - Ruchi Rana
- currently a graduate student at University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor
| | - Sarah E. Vordenberg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Norton JD, Zeng C, Bayliss EA, Shetterly SM, Williams N, Reeve E, Wynia MK, Green AR, Drace ML, Gleason KS, Sheehan OC, Boyd CM. Ethical Aspects of Physician Decision-Making for Deprescribing Among Older Adults With Dementia. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2336728. [PMID: 37787993 PMCID: PMC10548310 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.36728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Physicians endorse deprescribing of risky or unnecessary medications for older adults (aged ≥65 years) with dementia, but there is a lack of information on what influences decisions to deprescribe in this population. Objective To understand how physicians make decisions to deprescribe for older adults with moderate dementia and ethical and pragmatic concerns influencing those decisions. Design, Setting, and Participants A cross-sectional national mailed survey study of a random sample of 3000 primary care physicians from the American Medical Association Physician Masterfile who care for older adults was conducted from January 15 to December 31, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures The study randomized participants to consider 2 clinical scenarios in which a physician may decide to deprescribe a medication for older adults with moderate dementia: 1 in which the medication could cause an adverse drug event if continued and the other in which there is no evidence of benefit. Participants ranked 9 factors related to possible ethical and pragmatic concerns through best-worst scaling methods (from greatest barrier to smallest barrier to deprescribing). Conditional logit regression quantified the relative importance for each factor as a barrier to deprescribing. Results A total of 890 physicians (35.0%) returned surveys; 511 (57.4%) were male, and the mean (SD) years since graduation was 26.0 (11.7). Most physicians had a primary specialty in family practice (50.4% [449 of 890]) and internal medicine (43.5% [387 of 890]). A total of 689 surveys were sufficiently complete to analyze. In both clinical scenarios, the 2 greatest barriers to deprescribing were (1) the patient or family reporting symptomatic benefit from the medication (beneficence and autonomy) and (2) the medication having been prescribed by another physician (autonomy and nonmaleficence). The least influential factor was ease of paying for the medication (justice). Conclusions and Relevance Findings from this national survey study of primary care physicians suggests that understanding ethical aspects of physician decision-making can inform clinician education about medication management and deprescribing decisions for older adults with moderate dementia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Chan Zeng
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Elizabeth A. Bayliss
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
| | | | - Nicole Williams
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Emily Reeve
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Matthew K. Wynia
- University of Colorado Center for Bioethics and Humanities, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora
| | - Ariel R. Green
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Melanie L. Drace
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | - Kathy S. Gleason
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora
| | | | - Cynthia M. Boyd
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Jamieson H, Nishtala P, Bergler HU, Weaver S, Pickering J, Ailabouni N, Abey-Nesbit R, Gullery C, Deely J, Gee S, Hilmer S, Mangin D. Deprescribing Anticholinergic and Sedative Drugs to Reduce Polypharmacy in Frail Older Adults Living in the Community: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2023; 78:1692-1700. [PMID: 36692224 PMCID: PMC10460556 DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glac249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Polypharmacy is associated with poor outcomes in older adults. Targeted deprescribing of anticholinergic and sedative medications may improve health outcomes for frail older adults. Our pharmacist-led deprescribing intervention was a pragmatic 2-arm randomized controlled trial stratified by frailty. We compared usual care (control) with the intervention of pharmacists providing deprescribing recommendations to general practitioners. METHODS Community-based older adults (≥65 years) from 2 New Zealand district health boards were recruited following a standardized interRAI needs assessment. The Drug Burden Index (DBI) was used to quantify the use of sedative and anticholinergic medications for each participant. The trial was stratified into low, medium, and high-frailty. We hypothesized that the intervention would increase the proportion of participants with a reduction in DBI ≥ 0.5 within 6 months. RESULTS Of 363 participants, 21 (12.7%) in the control group and 21 (12.2%) in the intervention group had a reduction in DBI ≥ 0.5. The difference in the proportion of -0.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -7.9% to 7.0%) provided no evidence of efficacy for the intervention. Similarly, there was no evidence to suggest the effectiveness of this intervention for participants of any frailty level. CONCLUSION Our pharmacist-led medication review of frail older participants did not reduce the anticholinergic/sedative load within 6 months. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) lockdown measures required modification of the intervention. Subgroup analyses pre- and post-lockdown showed no impact on outcomes. Reviewing this and other deprescribing trials through the lens of implementation science may aid an understanding of the contextual determinants preventing or enabling successful deprescribing implementation strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamish Jamieson
- Department of Medicine, Burwood Hospital, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Prasad S Nishtala
- Department of Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Centre for Therapeutic Innovation, University of Bath, Bath, UK
| | - Hans Ulrich Bergler
- Department of Medicine, Burwood Hospital, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Susan K Weaver
- Department of Medicine, Burwood Hospital, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - John W Pickering
- Department of Medicine, Burwood Hospital, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Nagham J Ailabouni
- The Pharmacy Australian Centre of Excellence (PACE), School of Pharmacy, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, South Australia, Australia
- UniSA Clinical and Health Sciences, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rebecca Abey-Nesbit
- Department of Medicine, Burwood Hospital, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Carolyn Gullery
- Planning, Funding and Decision Support, Canterbury District Health Board, General Manager of Planning, Funding and Decision Support; Lightfoot Solutions, Healthcare Systems, Specialist Advisor, Berkshire, UK
| | - Joanne Deely
- Burwood Academy Trust, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Susan B Gee
- Psychiatry of Old Age Academic Unit, Canterbury District Health Board, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Sarah N Hilmer
- Geriatric Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Northern Clinical School, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Dee Mangin
- Primary Care Research Group, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Raghunandan R, Howard K, Ilomaki J, Hilmer SN, Gnjidic D, Bell JS. Preferences for deprescribing antihypertensive medications amongst clinicians, carers and people living with dementia: a discrete choice experiment. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afad153. [PMID: 37596920 PMCID: PMC10439526 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 08/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal management of hypertension in people with dementia may involve deprescribing antihypertensives. Understanding differing treatment priorities is important to enable patient-centred care. This study explored preferences for antihypertensive deprescribing amongst people living with dementia, carers and clinicians. METHODS Discrete choice experiments (DCEs) are a stated preference survey method, underpinned by economic theory. A DCE was conducted, and respondents completed 12 labelled choice-questions, each presenting a status quo (continuing antihypertensives) and antihypertensive deprescribing option. The questions included six attributes, including pill burden, and event risks for stroke, myocardial infarction, increased blood pressure, cognitive decline, falls. RESULTS Overall, 112 respondents (33 carers, 19 people living with dementia, and 60 clinicians) completed the survey. For people with dementia, lower pill burden increased preferences for deprescribing (odds ratio (OR) 1.95, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.08-3.52). Increased stroke risk (for each additional person out of 100 having a stroke) decreased the likelihood of deprescribing for geriatricians (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.55-0.92) and non-geriatrician clinicians (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.45-0.86), and carers (OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.58-0.88). Increased myocardial infarction risk decreased preferences for deprescribing for non-geriatricians (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95) and carers (OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.98). Avoiding cognitive decline increased preferences for deprescribing for geriatricians (OR 1.17, 95% CI 1.03-1.33) and carers (OR 1.27, 95% CI 1.09-1.48). Avoiding falls increased preferences for deprescribing for clinicians (geriatricians (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.11-1.29); non-geriatricians (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.07-1.25)). Other attributes did not significantly influence respondent preferences. CONCLUSIONS Antihypertensive deprescribing preferences differ amongst people with dementia, carers and clinicians. The study emphasises the importance of shared decision-making within the deprescribing process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakhee Raghunandan
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Jenni Ilomaki
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Sarah N Hilmer
- Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital and University of Sydney, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
- Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Danijela Gnjidic
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - J Simon Bell
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Gadisa DA, Gebremariam ET, Yimer G, Deresa Urgesa E. Attitudes of Older Adult Patients and Caregivers Towards Deprescribing of Medications in Ethiopia. Clin Interv Aging 2023; 18:1129-1143. [PMID: 37522072 PMCID: PMC10378541 DOI: 10.2147/cia.s400698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/17/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Deprescribing is essential for reducing inappropriate medication use and polypharmacy. For a holistic approach, it is essential to know how older adult patients and their caregivers perceive deprescribing. Objective To assess the attitude of older adult patients and caregivers towards deprescribing medication at Ambo University Referral Hospital. Methodology Institutional-based cross-sectional study was conducted using the revised Patients' Attitude Towards Deprescribing tool (rPATD). The data was analyzed using the SPSS-25 software. Backward linear regression and logistic regression were used to measure association between outcome and determinant variables. The two-sided P-value ≤0.05 with 95% confidence interval was utilized for reporting significant factors. Results One hundred fifty-six (81.3%) of the respondents (ie, 85.0% of older adult and 77.2% of caregivers) agreed to stop one or more of their regular medications if the physician said it was possible despite 98 (51.0%) of them (ie, 49.0% of older adult and 53.3% of caregivers) being satisfied with their/their care recipient's medications. On the overall aggregate mean score, the respondents had a neutral position (2.6-3.59) regarding the burden and concerns of stopping medications whereas the majority of them disagree (1.0-2.59) with the inappropriateness of the medication they were taking and agreed (3.6-5.0) with the need for their involvement in treatment decision making. Concerns about stopping medicine scores (AOR = 0.440, 95% CI = 0.262-0.741, P = 0.035) and perceived levels of medication inappropriateness (AOR = 0.653, 95% CI = 0.456-0.936, P = 0.020) was significantly associated with the willingness to discontinue and overall satisfaction with their medicine regimen respectively. Conclusion The majority of older adult patients and caregivers would like to deprescribe if the physicians recommended it. The perceived concerns of stopping and inappropriateness of the medicines were associated with the willingness to deprescribe and overall satisfaction with their medicine respectively. Healthcare providers should prompt the deprescribing process with older adult patients and caregivers by addressing their concerns about stopping medications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diriba Alemayehu Gadisa
- Pharmacy Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ambo University, Ambo, Oromia, Ethiopia
| | | | - Getnet Yimer
- Department of Genetics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Penn Center for Global Genomics & Health Equity, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Efa Deresa Urgesa
- Contract Director Management Department, Ethiopian Pharmaceutical Supply Service, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Scott S. Unveiling the latest deprescribing research: a new themed collection. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE 2023; 31:267-268. [PMID: 37149748 DOI: 10.1093/ijpp/riad031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Sion Scott
- University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Vordenberg SE, Weir KR, Jansen J, Todd A, Schoenborn N, Scherer AM. Harm and Medication-Type Impact Agreement with Hypothetical Deprescribing Recommendations: a Vignette-Based Experiment with Older Adults Across Four Countries. J Gen Intern Med 2023; 38:1439-1448. [PMID: 36376636 PMCID: PMC10160278 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-022-07850-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about what factors are important to older adults when deciding whether to agree with a recommendation to deprescribe. OBJECTIVE To explore the extent to which medication type and rationale for potential discontinuation influence older adults' acceptance of deprescribing. DESIGN Cross-sectional 2 (drug: lansoprazole - treat indigestion; simvastatin - prevent cardiovascular disease) by 3 (deprescribing rationale: lack of benefit; potential for harm; both) experimental design. PARTICIPANTS Online panelists aged ≥65 years from Australia, the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States INTERVENTIONS: Participants were presented with a hypothetical patient experiencing polypharmacy whose PCP discussed stopping a medication. We randomized participants to receive one of six vignettes. MAIN MEASURES We measured agreement with deprescribing (6-point Likert scale, "Strongly disagree (1)" and "Strongly agree (6)") for the hypothetical patient as the primary outcome. We also measured participants' personality traits, perceptions of risk and uncertainty, and attitudes towards polypharmacy and deprescribing. KEY RESULTS Among 5311 participants (93.3% completion rate), the mean (M) agreement with deprescribing for the hypothetical patient was 4.71 (95% confidence interval (CI): 4.67, 4.75). Participants reported higher agreement with stopping lansoprazole (n=2656) (M=4.90, 95% CI: 4.85, 4.95) compared to simvastatin (n=2655) (M=4.53, 95% CI: 4.47, 4.58), P<.001. Participants who received the combination rationale (n=1786) reported higher agreement with deprescribing (M=4.83, 95% CI: 4.76, 4.89) compared to those who received the rationales on lack of benefit (n=1755) (M=4.66, 95% CI: 4.60, 4.73) or potential for harm (n=1770) (M=4.65, 95% CI 4.58, 4.72). In adjusted regression analyses (n=5062), participants with a higher desire to engage in health promotion behaviors (b=0.08, 95% CI 0.02, 0.13) or need for certainty (b=0.12, 95% CI 0.04, 0.20) reported higher agreement with deprescribing. CONCLUSIONS Older adults across four countries were accepting of deprescribing in the setting of polypharmacy. The medication type and rationale for discontinuation were important factors in the decision-making process. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT04676282, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04676282?term=vordenberg&draw=2&rank=1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah E Vordenberg
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan College of Pharmacy, 428 Church St, 3563 NUB, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Adam Todd
- Newcastle University School of Pharmacy, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Aaron M Scherer
- University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Weir KR, Bonner C, Naganathan V, Tam CWM, Rigby D, McLachlan AJ, Jansen J. Supporting conversations about medicines and deprescribing: GPs' perspectives on a Medicines Conversation Guide. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE 2023; 31:102-105. [PMID: 36413580 DOI: 10.1093/ijpp/riac088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore GP perspectives on a Medicines Conversation Guide to support deprescribing communication. METHODS Semistructured interviews with GPs from Australia (n = 32). Participants were purposively sampled with varying experiences and locations. Transcribed audio recordings of interviews were coded using framework analysis. KEY FINDINGS Most GPs stated they would use the Guide in consultation with an older patient to discuss medications. The strengths of the Guide included empowering the patient voice on an important topic. Limitations included time and complex concepts. CONCLUSIONS Overall, the Medicines Conversation Guide was perceived by GPs to be a useful communication tool to support discussions about deprescribing with patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristie Rebecca Weir
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Carissa Bonner
- Sydney School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Vasi Naganathan
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing (CERA), Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Concord Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chun Wah Michael Tam
- Primary and Integrated Care Unit, South Western Sydney Local Health District, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Population Health, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Debbie Rigby
- School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew J McLachlan
- Centre for Education and Research on Ageing (CERA), Department of Geriatric Medicine, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Pharmacy School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jesse Jansen
- Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Vasilevskis EE, Shah AS, Hollingsworth EK, Shotwell MS, Kripalani S, Mixon AS, Simmons SF. Deprescribing Medications Among Older Adults From End of Hospitalization Through Postacute Care: A Shed-MEDS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med 2023; 183:223-231. [PMID: 36745422 PMCID: PMC9989899 DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Accepted: 12/04/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Importance Deprescribing is a promising approach to addressing the burden of polypharmacy. Few studies have initiated comprehensive deprescribing in the hospital setting among older patients requiring ongoing care in a postacute care (PAC) facility. Objective To evaluate the efficacy of a patient-centered deprescribing intervention among hospitalized older adults transitioning or being discharged to a PAC facility. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial of the Shed-MEDS (Best Possible Medication History, Evaluate, Deprescribing Recommendations, and Synthesis) deprescribing intervention was conducted between March 2016 and October 2020. Patients who were admitted to an academic medical center and discharged to 1 of 22 PAC facilities affiliated with the medical center were recruited. Patients who were 50 years or older and had 5 or more prehospital medications were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to the intervention group or control group. Patients who were non-English speaking, were unhoused, were long-stay residents of nursing homes, or had less than 6 months of life expectancy were excluded. An intention-to-treat approach was used. Interventions The intervention group received the Shed-MEDS intervention, which consisted of a pharmacist- or nurse practitioner-led comprehensive medication review, patient or surrogate-approved deprescribing recommendations, and deprescribing actions that were initiated in the hospital and continued throughout the PAC facility stay. The control group received usual care at the hospital and PAC facility. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the total medication count at hospital discharge and PAC facility discharge, with follow-up assessments during the 90-day period after PAC facility discharge. Secondary outcomes included the total number of potentially inappropriate medications at each time point, the Drug Burden Index, and adverse events. Results A total of 372 participants (mean [SD] age, 76.2 [10.7] years; 229 females [62%]) were randomized to the intervention or control groups. Of these participants, 284 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (142 in the intervention group and 142 in the control group). Overall, there was a statistically significant treatment effect, with patients in the intervention group taking a mean of 14% fewer medications at PAC facility discharge (mean ratio, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.80-0.93; P < .001) and 15% fewer medications at the 90-day follow-up (mean ratio, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.78-0.92; P < .001) compared with the control group. The intervention additionally reduced patient exposure to potentially inappropriate medications and Drug Burden Index. Adverse drug event rates were similar between the intervention and control groups (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.52-1.30). Conclusions and Relevance Results of this trial showed that the Shed-MEDS patient-centered deprescribing intervention was safe and effective in reducing the total medication burden at PAC facility discharge and 90 days after discharge. Future studies are needed to examine the effect of this intervention on patient-reported and long-term clinical outcomes. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02979353.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard E. Vasilevskis
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Avantika Saraf Shah
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | | | | | - Sunil Kripalani
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Amanda S. Mixon
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
- Section of Hospital Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Sandra F. Simmons
- Center for Quality Aging, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, Veterans Affairs Tennessee Valley Healthcare System, Nashville, Tennessee
- Center for Health Services Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
- Division of Geriatrics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Affiliation(s)
- Anabela Pereira
- Center for Health Technology and Services Research (CINTESIS@RISE), Department of Education and Psychology, University of Aveiro. Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.,Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Rua de Jorge Viterbo Ferreira, 228, 4050-313, Porto, Portugal
| | - Manuel Veríssimo
- Coimbra Institute for Clinical and Biomedical Research (iCBR), Faculty of Medicine, University of Coimbra, Azinhaga de Santa Comba, 3000-548, Coimbra, Portugal.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Oktora MP, Yuniar CT, Amalia L, Abdulah R, Hak E, Denig P. Attitudes towards deprescribing and patient-related factors associated with willingness to stop medication among older patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Indonesia: a cross-sectional survey study. BMC Geriatr 2023; 23:21. [PMID: 36635653 PMCID: PMC9835373 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03718-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Deprescribing of preventive medication is recommended in older patients with polypharmacy, including people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). It seems that many patients in low-middle-income countries are not willing to have their medicines deprescribed. This study aims to assess attitudes of Indonesian patients with T2D towards deprescribing in general and regarding specific cardiometabolic medicines, and factors influencing their willingness to stop medicines. METHODS Primary care patients with T2D of ≥60 years in Indonesia completed the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire. Attitudes in general and for cardiometabolic medicines were reported descriptively. Proportions of patients willing to stop one or more medicines when recommended by different healthcare professionals were compared with Chi-square test. Multiple regression analysis was used to analyse the influence between patient-related factors and the willingness to stop medicines. RESULTS The survey was completed by 196 participants (median age 69 years, 73% female). The percentages willing to stop medicines were 69, 67, and 41%, when the general practitioner (GP), the specialist, or the pharmacist initiates the process (p-value < 0.001). Higher perceived burden of medicines (p-value = 0.03) and less concerns about stopping (p-value < 0.001) were associated with a higher willingness to stop medicines if proposed by the GP. Patients using multiple glucose-regulating medicines were less willing to stop (p-value = 0.02). Using complementary or alternative medicines was not associated with the willingness to stop. If proposed by their pharmacist, patients without substantial education were more willing to stop than educated patients. CONCLUSIONS Only two-thirds of older people with T2D in Indonesia were willing to stop one or more of their medicines if the GP or specialist recommended this, and even less when the pharmacist proposed this. Attention should be given to concerns about stopping specific medicines, especially among patients using multiple glucose-lowering medicines, who may be more eligible but were less willing to accept deprescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Pury Oktora
- grid.4830.f0000 0004 0407 1981University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Cindra Tri Yuniar
- grid.434933.a0000 0004 1808 0563School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Lia Amalia
- grid.434933.a0000 0004 1808 0563School of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Institut Teknologi Bandung (ITB), Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Rizky Abdulah
- grid.11553.330000 0004 1796 1481Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Pharmacy, Universitas Padjadjaran (UNPAD), Bandung, Indonesia
| | - Eelko Hak
- grid.4830.f0000 0004 0407 1981Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, Unit of PharmacoTherapy, -Epidemiology and –Economics, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Petra Denig
- grid.4830.f0000 0004 0407 1981University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Reeve E, Bayliss EA, Shetterly S, Maiyani M, Gleason KS, Norton JD, Sheehan OC, Green AR, Maciejewski ML, Drace M, Sawyer J, Boyd CM. Willingness of older people living with dementia and mild cognitive impairment and their caregivers to have medications deprescribed. Age Ageing 2023; 52:afac335. [PMID: 36702513 PMCID: PMC9879708 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afac335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND people living with cognitive impairment commonly take multiple medications including potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), which puts them at risk of medication related harms. AIMS to explore willingness to have a medication deprescribed of older people living with cognitive impairment (dementia or mild cognitive impairment) and multiple chronic conditions and assess the relationship between willingness, patient characteristics and belief about medications. METHODS cross-sectional study using results from the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire (rPATDcog) collected as baseline data in the OPTIMIZE study, a pragmatic, cluster-randomised trial educating patients and clinicians about deprescribing. Eligible participants were 65+, diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, and prescribed at least five-long-term medications. RESULTS the questionnaire was mailed to 1,409 intervention patients and 553 (39%) were returned and included in analysis. Participants had a mean age of 80.1 (SD 7.4) and 52.4% were female. About 78.5% (431/549) of participants said that they would be willing to have one of their medications stopped if their doctor said it was possible. Willingness to deprescribe was negatively associated with getting stressed when changes are made and with previously having a bad experience with stopping a medication (P < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION most older people living with cognitive impairment are willing to deprescribe. Addressing previous bad experiences with stopping a medication and stress when changes are made to medications may be key points to discuss during deprescribing conversations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Reeve
- Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Faculty of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, Clinical and Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Bayliss
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Susan Shetterly
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Mahesh Maiyani
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Kathy S Gleason
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jonathan D Norton
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Orla C Sheehan
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, RCSI Hospitals Group, Connolly Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ariel R Green
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Matthew L Maciejewski
- Durham Center of Innovation to Accelerate Discovery and Practice Transformation (ADAPT), Durham, Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Melanie Drace
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Jennifer Sawyer
- Institute for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Cynthia M Boyd
- Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gerontology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lüthold RV, Jungo KT, Weir KR, Geier AK, Scholtes B, Kurpas D, Wild DMG, Petrazzuoli F, Thulesius H, Lingner H, Assenova R, Poortvliet RKE, Lazic V, Rozsnyai Z, Streit S. Understanding older patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed in primary care: a protocol for a cross-sectional survey study in nine European countries. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:920. [PMID: 36451180 PMCID: PMC9709365 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03562-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To reduce inappropriate polypharmacy, deprescribing should be part of patients' regular care. Yet deprescribing is difficult to implement, as shown in several studies. Understanding patients' attitudes towards deprescribing at the individual and country level may reveal effective ways to involve older adults in decisions about medications and help to implement deprescribing in primary care settings. In this study we aim to investigate older adults' perceptions and views on deprescribing in different European countries. Specific objectives are to investigate the patients' willingness to have medications deprescribed by medication type and to have herbal or dietary supplements reduced or stopped, the role of the Patient Typology (on medication perspectives), and the impact of the patient-GP relationship in these decisions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This cross-sectional survey study has two parts: Part A and Part B. Data collection for Part A will take place in nine countries, in which per country 10 GPs will recruit 10 older patients (≥65 years old) each (n = 900). Part B will be conducted in Switzerland only, in which an additional 35 GPs will recruit five patients each and respond to a questionnaire themselves, with questions about the patients' medications, their willingness to deprescribe those, and their patient-provider relationship. For both Part A and part B, a questionnaire will be used to assess the willingness of older patients with polypharmacy to have medications deprescribed and other relevant information. For Part B, this same questionnaire will have additional questions on the use of herbal and dietary supplements. DISCUSSION The international study design will allow comparisons of patient perspectives on deprescribing from different countries. We will collect information about willingness to have medications deprescribed by medication type and regarding herbal and dietary supplements, which adds important information to the literature on patients' preferences. In addition, GPs in Switzerland will also be surveyed, allowing us to compare GPs' and patients' views and preferences on stopping or reducing specific medications. Our findings will help to understand patients' attitudes towards deprescribing, contributing to improvements in the design and implementation of deprescribing interventions that are better tailored to patients' preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Renata Vidonscky Lüthold
- grid.5734.50000 0001 0726 5157Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland ,grid.5734.50000 0001 0726 5157Graduate School for Health Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Katharina Tabea Jungo
- grid.5734.50000 0001 0726 5157Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Kristie Rebecca Weir
- grid.5734.50000 0001 0726 5157Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland ,grid.1013.30000 0004 1936 834XSydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Anne-Kathrin Geier
- grid.9647.c0000 0004 7669 9786Department of General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Beatrice Scholtes
- grid.4861.b0000 0001 0805 7253Research Unit of Primary Care and Health, Department of General Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
| | - Donata Kurpas
- grid.4495.c0000 0001 1090 049XFamily Medicine Department, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Dorothea M. G. Wild
- grid.10388.320000 0001 2240 3300Institute of Family Medicine and General Practice, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn University, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ferdinando Petrazzuoli
- Sezione SNaMID Caserta, Caserta, Italy ,grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Center for Primary Health Care Research, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Hans Thulesius
- grid.8148.50000 0001 2174 3522Department of Medicine and Optometry, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden ,grid.4514.40000 0001 0930 2361Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Heidrun Lingner
- grid.10423.340000 0000 9529 9877Hannover Medical School, Center for Public Health and Healthcare, Hannover, Germany
| | - Radost Assenova
- grid.35371.330000 0001 0726 0380Department of Urology and General Practice, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Rosalinde K. E. Poortvliet
- grid.10419.3d0000000089452978University Network for the Care sector Zuid-Holland, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands ,grid.10419.3d0000000089452978Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Vanja Lazic
- Health center Zagreb – Centar, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Zsofia Rozsnyai
- grid.5734.50000 0001 0726 5157Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sven Streit
- grid.5734.50000 0001 0726 5157Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gillespie R, Mullan J, Harrison L. Factors which influence the deprescribing decisions of community-living older adults and GPs in Australia. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e6206-e6216. [PMID: 36165345 PMCID: PMC10087828 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.14058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Deprescribing aims to reduce polypharmacy and inappropriate medication use. Both General Practitioners (GPs) and older adults have expressed a willingness to consider deprescribing. However, deprescribing is often deferred in practice. The aim of this study was to identify factors which influence GP and older adult decisions about deprescribing in primary care. Semi-structured interviews were used in this qualitative study, conducted in a regional area in Australia. Participants included GPs and adults aged 65 years or older, using five or more medications and living independently in the community. Data were collected between January 2018 and May 2019. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the verbatim transcribed interviews using NVivo 12. A total of 41 interviews were conducted, 25 with older adults and 16 with GPs. Four key themes influenced deprescribing decisions: views of ageing, shared decision-making, attitudes toward medication use and characteristics of the health care environment. Discussions of deprescribing were limited by the influence of negative stereotypes toward age and ageing, a lack of older adult participation in shared decision-making, a positive attitude towards ongoing medication use and perception of the normality of using medications in older age. Time constraints, poor communication about prescribing information and unclear roles regarding responsibility for deprescribing also prevented discussions. Continuity of care, involvement of older adults in medication reviews and GPs who asserted their generalist role were the main factors which promoted discussion of deprescribing. GPs are well placed to discuss deprescribing with their older patients because they are trusted and can provide continuity of care. Actively encouraging and involving older adults in medication reviews in order to understand their preferences, supports shared decision-making about deprescribing. Active involvement may also reduce the influence of negative views of ageing held by both older adults and GPs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Gillespie
- School of MedicineUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Judy Mullan
- Centre for Health Research Illawarra—Shoalhaven PopulationUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| | - Lindsey Harrison
- School of Health and SocietyUniversity of WollongongWollongongNew South WalesAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Birt L, Wright DJ, Blacklock J, Bond CM, Hughes CM, Alldred DP, Holland R, Scott S. Enhancing deprescribing: A qualitative understanding of the complexities of pharmacist-led deprescribing in care homes. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e6521-e6531. [PMID: 36336895 PMCID: PMC10100492 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.14099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 08/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
The English National Overprescribing Review identified that older people often take eight or more medicines a day. The report recommended pharmacists in primary care should take responsibility for addressing polypharmacy. Overprescribing is a safety concern in care homes as approximately half of older care home residents are prescribed at least one medicine that is unnecessary or now harmful. This predisposes them to adverse outcomes including hospitalisation and mortality. Deprescribing is the planned activity of stopping or reducing a medicine that may no longer be appropriate. Deprescribing, when performed by a pharmacist, is a multidisciplinary activity requiring close communication with general practitioners (GPs) and care home staff. A recently completed trial that integrated pharmacists with prescribing rights into older peoples' care homes found significant variation in proactive deprescribing activity. The aim of the current study was to specifically explore beliefs and practices of deprescribing in care homes. A qualitative approach was adopted to examine individual, social and contextual factors that acted as enablers and barriers to pharmacist deprescribing in care homes. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with participants of the previous study (16 pharmacists, 6 GPs and 7 care home staff from Northern Ireland, Scotland and England). Using thematic analysis, we identified two themes: (a) Structures and systems affecting deprescribing, that is the context in which deprescribing happened, including team involvement and routine practices in GP surgeries and care homes; (b) Balancing risks when deprescribing, that is the perception of individual risk and social barriers were mitigated by understanding the medical background of residents. This supported the clinical understanding that risks from overprescribing were greater than risks from deprescribing. While deprescribing can involve all health professionals in the primary care team, these results suggest the pharmacist is well placed to lead the process; by having both clinical competence and professional willingness to drive this activity forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Birt
- School Allied Health ProfessionalsUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | - David J. Wright
- Allied Health ProfessionalsUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| | | | - Christine M. Bond
- Institute of Applied Health SciencesUniversity of AberdeenLeicesterUK
| | | | | | | | - Sion Scott
- Allied Health ProfessionalsUniversity of LeicesterLeicesterUK
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Goyal P, Safford M, Hilmer SN, Steinman MA, Matlock D, Maurer MS, Lachs M, Kronish IM. N-of-1 trials to facilitate evidence-based deprescribing: Rationale and case study. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 88:4460-4473. [PMID: 35705532 PMCID: PMC9464693 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.15442] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Revised: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Deprescribing has emerged as an important aspect of patient-centred medication management but is vastly underutilized in clinical practice. The current narrative review will describe an innovative patient-centred approach to deprescribing-N-of-1 trials. N-of-1 trials involve multiple-period crossover design experiments conducted within individual patients. They enable patients to compare the effects of two or more treatments or, in the case of deprescribing N-of-1 trials, continuation with a current treatment versus no treatment or placebo. N-of-1 trials are distinct from traditional between-patient studies such as parallel-group or crossover designs which provide an average effect across a group of patients and obscure differences between individuals. By generating data on the effect of an intervention for the individual rather than the population, N-of-1 trials can promote therapeutic precision. N-of-1 trials are a particularly appealing strategy to inform deprescribing because they can generate individual-level evidence for deprescribing when evidence is uncertain, and can thus allay patient and physician concerns about discontinuing medications. To illustrate the use of deprescribing N-of-1 trials, we share a case example of an ongoing series of N-of-1 trials that compare maintenance versus deprescribing of beta-blockers in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. By providing quantifiable data on patient-reported outcomes, promoting personalized pharmacotherapy, and facilitating shared decision making, N-of-1 trials represent a potentially transformative strategy to address polypharmacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Parag Goyal
- Division of Cardiology, Weill Cornell Medicine (New York, NY)
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine (New York, NY)
| | - Monika Safford
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine (New York, NY)
| | - Sarah N. Hilmer
- Kolling Institute, University of Sydney and Royal North Shore Hospital (Sydney, Australia)
| | - Michael A. Steinman
- Division of Geriatrics, University of California San Francisco (San Francisco, CA)
| | - Daniel Matlock
- Division of Geriatrics, University of Colorado (Denver, CO)
| | - Mathew S. Maurer
- Department of Medicine, Columbia University Irving Medical Center (New York, NY)
| | - Mark Lachs
- Division of Geriatrics, Weill Cornell Medicine (New York, NY)
| | - Ian M. Kronish
- Center for Behavioral Cardiovascular Health, Columbia University, (New York, NY)
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Mann NK, Schmiedl S, Mortsiefer A, Bencheva V, Löscher S, Ritzke M, Drewelow E, Feldmeier G, Santos S, Wilm S, Thürmann PA. Development of a deprescribing manual for frail older people for use in the COFRAIL study and in primary care. Ther Adv Drug Saf 2022; 13:20420986221122684. [PMID: 36091625 PMCID: PMC9452796 DOI: 10.1177/20420986221122684] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Many older adults are affected by multimorbidity and subsequent polypharmacy which is associated with adverse outcomes. This is especially relevant for frail older patients. Polypharmacy may be reduced via deprescribing. As part of the complex intervention in the COFRAIL study, we developed a deprescribing manual to be used by general practitioners (GPs) in family conferences, in which GPs, patients and caregivers jointly discuss treatments. Methods: We selected indications with a high prevalence in older adults in primary care (e.g. diabetes mellitus, hypertension) and conducted a literature search to identify deprescribing criteria for these indications. We additionally reviewed clinical practice guidelines. Based on the extracted information, we created a deprescribing manual which was then piloted in an expert workshop and in family conferences with volunteer patients according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol. Results: Initially, 13 indications/topics were selected. The literature search identified deprescribing guides, reviews and clinical trials as well as lists of potentially inappropriate medication and systematic reviews on the risk and benefits of specific drugs and drug classes in older patients. After piloting and revisions, the deprescribing manual now covers 11 indications/topics. In each chapter, patient- and medication-related deprescribing criteria, monitoring and communication strategies, and information about concerns related to the use of specific drugs in older patients are provided. Discussion: We found varying deprescribing strategies in the literature, which we consolidated in our deprescribing manual. Whether this approach leads to successful deprescribing in family conferences is being investigated in the cluster-randomised controlled COFRAIL study. Plain Language Summary Development of a manual to help doctors to identify which medications can be withdrawn Many older adults suffer from chronic diseases and take multiple medications concurrently. This can lead to side effects and other undesired events. We developed a manual to help doctors identify which medications can be withdrawn, so that they can discuss this with their patients. This manual was used in the COFRAIL study where doctors, patients and caregivers met in family conferences to discuss their preferences and decide together how future treatments should be handled. The manual contains information on common medications, symptoms and diseases in older patients such as diabetes and high blood pressure. Before the manual was used in the study, it was tested by volunteer patients and their doctors and caregivers to make sure that it is user-friendly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina-Kristin Mann
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, 58448 Witten, Germany
| | - Sven Schmiedl
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Philipp Klee-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Achim Mortsiefer
- Institute of General Practice and Primary Care, Chair of General Practice II and Patient-Centredness in Primary Care, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Veronika Bencheva
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany
| | - Susanne Löscher
- Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Manuela Ritzke
- Institute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Eva Drewelow
- Institute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Gregor Feldmeier
- Institute of General Practice, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Sara Santos
- Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Stefan Wilm
- Institute of General Practice, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - Petra A Thürmann
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine, Faculty of Health, Witten/Herdecke University, Witten, Germany; Philipp Klee-Institute for Clinical Pharmacology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Guo X, Li M, Du X, Jiang C, Li S, Tang R, Sang C, Yu R, Long D, Dong J, Ma C. Multimorbidity, polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation: A report from the China Atrial Fibrillation Registry Study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2022; 9:988799. [PMID: 36148073 PMCID: PMC9485537 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.988799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundMultimorbidity, polypharmacy and inappropriate prescribing is common in elderly patients worldwide. We aimed to explore the current status of multimorbidity, polypharmacy and the appropriateness of pharmacological therapy among elderly patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) in China.Materials and methodsWe randomly selected 500 patients aged 65 years or older from the China AF Registry study. Multimorbidity was defined as ≥2 comorbidities and polypharmacy was defined as ≥5 long-term prescribed drugs. Appropriateness of prescribing was evaluated using the Screening Tool of Older People’s Prescriptions/Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment (STOPP/START) criteria version 2. Patients’ attitudes toward polypharmacy were evaluated by the Patients’ Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (PATD) questionnaire.ResultsAmong the 500 patients included (mean age 75.2 ± 6.7 years, 49.0% male), 98.0% had multimorbidity and 49.4% had polypharmacy. The prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) was 43.6% (n = 218) and 71.6% (n = 358), respectively. Traditional Chinese medicine attributed largely to PIMs. Anticoagulants were the most common PPOs. Many clinical factors increased the risk of PIMs and PPOs. However, polypharmacy increased the risk of PIMs (OR 2.70, 95%CI 1.78–4.11; p < 0.0001), but not PPOs. In addition, 73.7% patients with polypharmacy were willing to have one or more of their medications prescribed if advised by their doctor.ConclusionMultimorbidity and polypharmacy were highly prevalent in elderly patients with AF in China. A high prevalence of inappropriate prescribing was also observed. Therefore, much more attention should be paid to the serious health problem in the elderly population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xueyuan Guo
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Mengmeng Li
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
- Department of Cardiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Du
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Chenxi Jiang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Songnan Li
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Ribo Tang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Caihua Sang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Ronghui Yu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Deyong Long
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Jianzeng Dong
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
| | - Changsheng Ma
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Changsheng Ma,
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Roux B, Rakheja B, Sirois C, Niquille A, Pétein C, Ouellet N, Spinewine A, Sibille FX, Laroche ML. Attitudes and beliefs of older adults and caregivers towards deprescribing in French-speaking countries: a multicenter cross-sectional study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2022; 78:1633-1646. [PMID: 35896803 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-022-03368-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Successful deprescribing requires understanding the attitudes of older adults and caregivers towards this process. This study aimed to capture these attitudes in four French-speaking countries and to investigate associated factors. METHODS A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted by administrating the French version of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire in Belgium, Canada, France, and Switzerland. Community-dwelling or nursing home older adults ≥ 65 years taking ≥ 1 prescribed medications and caregivers of older adults with similar characteristics were included. Multivariate logistic regressions were carried out to examine factors associated with willingness to deprescribe. RESULTS A total of 367 older adults (79.3 ± 8.7 years, 63% community-dwelling, 54% ≥ 5 medications) and 255 unrelated caregivers (64.4 ± 12.6 years) of care recipients (83.4 ± 7.9 years, 52% community-dwelling, 69% ≥ 5 medications) answered the questionnaire. Among them, 87.5% older adults and 75.6% caregivers would be willing to stop medications if the physician said it was possible. Reluctance to stop a medication taken for a long time was expressed by 46% of both older adults and caregivers. A low score for the factor "concerns about stopping" (older adults: aOR: 0.21; 95% CI: 0.07-0.59), and a high score for the factor "involvement" (older adults: aOR: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.01-7.07; caregivers: aOR: 11.28; 95% CI: 1.48-85.91) were associated with willingness to deprescribe. CONCLUSIONS A significant proportion of older adults and caregivers of French-speaking countries are open to deprescribing. Despite this apparent willingness, deprescribing conversations in clinical practice remains marginal, emphasizing the importance of optimizing the integration of existing tools such as rPATD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Roux
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France
| | | | - Caroline Sirois
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Laval University, Quebec, Canada.,Centre of Excellence On Aging of Quebec, Quebec, Canada.,Centre de recherche sur les soins et les Services de premieres lignes de l'Université Laval, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anne Niquille
- Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.,Community Pharmacy, Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences of Western Switzerland, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Catherine Pétein
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Nicole Ouellet
- Department of Health, University of Quebec at Rimouski, Rimouski, Canada
| | - Anne Spinewine
- Clinical Pharmacy Research Group, Louvain Drug Research Institute, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium.,Pharmacy Department, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - François-Xavier Sibille
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium.,Institute of Health and Society, UCLouvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Marie-Laure Laroche
- Centre of Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Pharmacology-Toxicology and Centre of Pharmacovigilance, University Hospital of Limoges, Limoges, France. .,Unité VIESANTE - UR 24134 (Vieillissement, Fragilité, Prévention, e-Santé), IFR OMEGA HEALTH, Université de Limoges, Limoges, France.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tan J, Wang M, Pei X, Sun Q, Lu C, Wang Y, Zhang L, Wu C. Continue or not to continue? Attitudes towards deprescribing among community-dwelling older adults in China. BMC Geriatr 2022; 22:492. [PMID: 35676628 PMCID: PMC9175377 DOI: 10.1186/s12877-022-03184-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Inappropriate prescribing of medications and polypharmacy among older adults are associated with a wide range of adverse outcomes. It is critical to understand the attitudes towards deprescribing—reducing the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs)—among this vulnerable group. Such information is particularly lacking in low - and middle-income countries. Methods In this study, we examined Chinese community-dwelling older adults’ attitudes to deprescribing as well as individual-level correlates. Through the community-based health examination platform, we performed a cross-sectional study by personally interviews using the revised Patients’ Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire (version for older adults) in two communities located in Suzhou, China. We recruited participants who were at least 65 years and had at least one chronic condition and one prescribed medication. Results We included 1,897 participants in the present study; the mean age was 73.8 years (SD = 6.2 years) and 1,023 (53.9%) were women. Most of older adults had one chronic disease (n = 1,364 [71.9%]) and took 1–2 regular drugs (n = 1,483 [78.2%]). Half of the participants (n = 947, 50%) indicated that they would be willing to stop taking one or more of their medicines if their doctor said it was possible, and 924 (48.7%) older adults wanted to cut down on the number of medications they were taking. We did not find individual level characteristics to be correlated to attitudes to deprescribing. Conclusions The proportions of participants’ willingness to deprescribing were much lower than what prior investigations among western populations reported. It is important to identify the factors that influence deprescribing and develop a patient-centered and practical deprescribing guideline that is suitable for Chinese older adults. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-022-03184-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jie Tan
- Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Academic Building 3038 No. 8 Duke Avenue, 215316, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
| | - MinHong Wang
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 215002, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - XiaoRui Pei
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 215002, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Quan Sun
- Gusu District Wumenqiao street Nanhuan community Health Service Center, 215008, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - ChongJun Lu
- Gusu District Pingjiang street Loujiang community Health Service Center, 215008, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Ying Wang
- Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Academic Building 3038 No. 8 Duke Avenue, 215316, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China
| | - Li Zhang
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Gusu School, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing Medical University, 215002, Suzhou, Jiangsu Province, China.
| | - Chenkai Wu
- Global Health Research Center, Duke Kunshan University, Academic Building 3038 No. 8 Duke Avenue, 215316, Kunshan, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Barriers and Enablers of Healthcare Providers to Deprescribe Cardiometabolic Medication in Older Patients: A Focus Group Study. Drugs Aging 2022; 39:209-221. [PMID: 35187614 PMCID: PMC8934783 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-021-00918-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Benefits and risks of preventive medication change over time for ageing patients and deprescribing of medication may be needed. Deprescribing of cardiovascular and antidiabetic drugs can be challenging and is not widely implemented in daily practice. Objective The aim of this study was to identify barriers and enablers of deprescribing cardiometabolic medication as seen by healthcare providers (HCPs) of different disciplines, and to explore their views on their specific roles in the process of deprescribing. Methods Three focus groups with five general practitioners, eight pharmacists, three nurse practitioners, two geriatricians, and two elder care physicians were conducted in three cities in The Netherlands. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Directed content analysis was performed on the basis of the Theoretical Domains Framework. Two researchers independently coded the data. Results Most HCPs agreed that deprescribing of cardiometabolic medication is relevant but that barriers include lack of evidence and expertise, negative beliefs and fears, poor communication and collaboration between HCPs, and lack of resources. Having a guideline was considered an enabler for the process of deprescribing of cardiometabolic medication. Some HCPs feared the consequences of discontinuing cardiovascular or antidiabetic medication, while others were not motivated to deprescribe when the patients experienced no problems with their medication. HCPs of all disciplines stated that adequate patient communication and involving the patients and relatives in the decision making enables deprescribing. Barriers to deprescribing included the use of medication initiated by specialists, the poor exchange of information, and the amount of time it takes to deprescribe cardiometabolic medication. The HCPs were uncertain about each other’s roles and responsibilities. A multidisciplinary approach including the pharmacist and nurse practitioner was seen as the best way to support the process of deprescribing and address barriers related to resources. Conclusion HCPs recognized the importance of deprescribing cardiometabolic medication as a medical decision that can only be made in close cooperation with the patient. To successfully accomplish the process of deprescribing they strongly recommended a multidisciplinary approach.
Collapse
|
46
|
Oktora MP, Edwina AE, Denig P. Differences in Older Patients' Attitudes Toward Deprescribing at Contextual and Individual Level. Front Public Health 2022; 10:795043. [PMID: 35223732 PMCID: PMC8874144 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.795043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Deprescribing requires patients' involvement and taking patients' attitudes toward deprescribing into account. To understand the observed variation in these attitudes, the influence of contextual-level factors, such as country or healthcare setting, should be taken into account. Methods We conducted a systematic review of studies using the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire among older adults. We searched articles in Medline and Embase up to 30 June 2021. PRISMA guideline was used for the search process and reporting. We summarized the outcomes from the rPATD and compared attitudes at study population level between high or low-middle-income countries, global regions, and healthcare settings using ANOVA testing. Correlations of the rPATD outcomes with the mean age of the study populations were tested. Associations with the rPATD outcomes at individual patient level extracted from the included studies were summarized. Results Sixteen articles were included. Percentages of patients willing to stop medication were significantly lower in low-middle-income countries (<70% in Nepal and Malaysia) compared to high-income countries (>85% in USA, Australia, European countries). No significant differences were observed when results were compared by global region or by healthcare setting but a high willingness (>95%) was seen in the two studies conducted in an inpatient population. A higher mean age at study level was associated with a higher willingness to stop medication. At individual level, associations between patient characteristics, including demographics and education, and attitudes toward deprescribing showed inconsistent results. Conclusion Findings about attitudes toward deprescribing are influenced by contextual factors. Future research should pay more attention to the influence of the healthcare system and setting as well as the culture on patients' attitudes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monika Pury Oktora
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- *Correspondence: Monika Pury Oktora
| | - Angela Elma Edwina
- Faculty of Science and Engineering, Medical Pharmaceutical Sciences Programme, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
- Unit of Geriatrics and Gerontology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven – University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Petra Denig
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG), University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
Polypharmacy characterizes ongoing prescription of multiple medications in a patient. Following the demographic change and growing number of elderly patients, polypharmacy is of major concern due to the associated risks and even mortality. Many causes made this geriatric syndrome more common in the past decade. First, the management of comorbidities is often lacking in disease-specific guidelines. Second, multimorbidity is rising due to the ageing population. Third, deprescribing methods are sparse, and results are conflicting. This mini review integrates the effects of polypharmacy on mortality and morbidity, the causes and confounders of polypharmacy, and presents a practical stepwise manual of deprescribing. The work is based on a literature search for randomized control trials and reviews in English and German from 2015 onwards in the PubMed database, with integration of relevant citations as a result of this search.
Collapse
|
48
|
Heinrich CH, Hurley E, McCarthy S, McHugh S, Donovan MD. Barriers and enablers to deprescribing in long-term care facilities: a 'best-fit' framework synthesis of the qualitative evidence. Age Ageing 2022; 51:6514232. [PMID: 35077555 DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afab250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION older adults are at risk of adverse outcomes due to a high prevalence of polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Deprescribing interventions have been demonstrated to reduce polypharmacy and PIMs. However, deprescribing is not performed routinely in long-term care facilities (LTCFs). This qualitative evidence synthesis aims to identify the factors which limit and enable health care workers' (HCWs) engagement with deprescribing in LTCFs. METHODS the 'best-fit' framework approach was used to synthesise evidence by using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) as the a priori framework. Included studies were analysed qualitatively to identify LTCF barriers and enablers of deprescribing and were mapped to the TDF. Constructs within domains were refined to best represent the LTCF context. A conceptual model was created, hypothesising relationships between barriers and enablers. RESULTS of 655 records identified, 14 met the inclusion criteria. The 'best-fit' framework included 17 barriers and 16 enablers, which mapped to 11 of the 14 TDF domains. Deprescribing barriers included perceptions of an 'established hierarchy' within LTCFs, negatively affecting communication and insufficient resources which limited HCWs' engagement with deprescribing. Enablers included tailored deprescribing guidelines, interprofessional support and working with a patient focus, allowing the patients' condition to influence decisions. DISCUSSION this study identified that education, interprofessional support and collaboration can facilitate deprescribing. To overcome deprescribing barriers, change is required to a patient-centred model and HCWs need to be equipped with necessary resources and adequate reimbursement. The LTCF organisational structure must support deprescribing, with communication between health care systems.
Collapse
|
49
|
Scott S. Deprescribing: a call for research that supports implementation in practice. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACY PRACTICE 2021; 29:525-526. [PMID: 34849944 DOI: 10.1093/ijpp/riab074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sion Scott
- School of Allied Health Professions, College of Life Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Weir KR, Ailabouni NJ, Schneider CR, Hilmer SN, Reeve E. Considerations for systematic reviews of quantitative surveys: Learnings from a systematic review of the patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing questionnaire. Res Social Adm Pharm 2021; 18:2345-2349. [PMID: 34340909 DOI: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2021.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Revised: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This commentary looks at the process of conducting a systematic review of surveys and validated questionnaires. Surveys and other questionnaire style tools are often used in the field of social and administrative pharmacy, to capture beliefs, attitudes and experiences of patients and healthcare professionals (including pharmacists). Currently, there is little guidance available on how to conduct a systematic review of these types of studies. Considerations related to the process of a systematic review are highlighted, including identification of articles, data extraction, assessing quality of articles and synthesis and analysis of data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristie Rebecca Weir
- University of South Australia, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre (QUMPRC), Adelaide, SA, Australia; University of Sydney, Sydney School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
| | - Nagham J Ailabouni
- University of South Australia, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre (QUMPRC), Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | - Carl R Schneider
- University of Sydney, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sarah N Hilmer
- University of Sydney, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia; Departments of Clinical Pharmacology and Aged Care, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, Australia; University of Sydney, Northern Clinical School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Emily Reeve
- University of South Australia, UniSA: Clinical and Health Sciences, Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre (QUMPRC), Adelaide, SA, Australia; Dalhousie University and Nova Scotia Health Authority, Geriatric Medicine Research, Faculty of Medicine, and College of Pharmacy, Halifax, Australia
| |
Collapse
|