1
|
Maheri M, Rezapour B, Didarloo A. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention based on the integrated theory of planned behavior among the average-risk individuals. BMC Public Health 2022; 22:1800. [PMID: 36138376 PMCID: PMC9494818 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-022-14191-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to determine the predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention based on the integrated theory of planned behavior among average -risk individuals in Urmia. Identifying these predictors will help design and implement various interventions, including educational interventions, according to the needs of this group, thereby taking a step towards improving the colorectal cancer screening index. Methods The present cross-sectional study was performed on 410 individuals at average risk of colorectal cancer referring to the comprehensive health services centers of Urmia in Iran. The data collection tool was a researcher-made questionnaire consisting of two parts. The first part captured the demographic information and medical history of the participants. The second part involved questions designed based on constructs of motivational phase of health action process approach, and theory of planned behavior, as well as behavioral intent to perform colorectal cancer screening. Data analysis was performed using SPSS software. Results Outcome expectancies, risk perception, action self-efficacy, and normative beliefs, respectively had the largest impact and were significant and positive predictors of colorectal cancer screening intention. The study’s conceptual framework explained about 36% of the variance of behavioral intention among the average-risk individuals in Urmia. Conclusions Constructs of motivational phase of health action process approach, and theory of planned behavior are valuable and appropriate to identify the factors affecting the intention to undergo colorectal cancer screening as well as to design and implement educational interventions in this field. The four constructs of outcome expectancies, risk perception, action self-efficacy, and normative beliefs are suggested to be integrated into all educational interventions designed and implemented to improve the colorectal cancer screening index.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Maheri
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, 5756115198, Iran.,Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Baratali Rezapour
- Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Alireza Didarloo
- Social Determinants of Health Research Center, Clinical Research Institute, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, 5756115198, Iran. .,Department of Public Health, School of Public Health, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Maheri M, Darabi F, Khalili S, Hesari M. The effect of educational intervention based on theory of planned behavior on the improvement of colorectal cancer screening intention among average-risk individuals referring to Asadabad city clinics. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION AND HEALTH PROMOTION 2021; 10:57. [PMID: 34084804 PMCID: PMC8057192 DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_741_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in men and the fourth most common cancer in women in Iran. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of educational intervention based on the theory of planned behavior (TPB) on the improvement of CRC screening intention among average-risk individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS This quasi-experimental study was performed on the 50-69-year-old individuals referred to Asadabad city clinics in 2020. The individuals were randomly assigned to multistage cluster sampling in each intervention and control group. The instrument used in this research was a researcher-made questionnaire based on TPB. Educational intervention was conducted for the intervention group, one of their family members, and staff of clinic under intervention. Finally, the data were entered into SPSS and analyzed utilizing descriptive and analytical statistics. Results were considered significantly <0.05. RESULTS There were no significant differences between two intervention and control groups in the preintervention phase in terms of the mean scores of attitude (P = 0.58), subjective norms (P = 0.59), and behavioral intention (P = 0.66). However, in the postintervention phase, these differences were significant. Furthermore, regarding the mean score of perceived behavioral control, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the preintervention phase (P < 0.02), while in the postintervention phase, this difference was not significant (P = 0.29). CONCLUSION Educational intervention based on the TPB has been effective in improving the CRC screening intention among average-risk individuals. Therefore, using the results of this research and developing appropriate educational programs at the community level can be increased the participation of community members in CRC screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Maheri
- Department of Public Health, School of Health, Reproductive Health Research Center, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Darabi
- Department of Public Health, Asadabad School of Medical Sciences, Asadabad, Iran
| | - Saeede Khalili
- Department of Health Services and Health Promotion, School of Health, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Marziyeh Hesari
- Department of Public Health, Asadabad School of Medical Sciences, Asadabad, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Coroiu A, Moran C, Bergeron C, Thombs BD, Geller AC, Kingsland E, Körner A. Operationalization of skin self-examination in randomized controlled trials with individuals at increased risk for melanoma: A systematic review. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2020; 103:1013-1026. [PMID: 31917011 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.12.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2019] [Revised: 11/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate how skin self-examination was operationalized and the psychometric properties of the scales used to assess this behavior in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) testing interventions that promote SSE among individuals at increased risk for melanoma. METHOD Eight scientific databases (e.g., Medline, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO) and four trial registries (e.g., Clinicaltrials.gov, UK Clinical Trails Gateway) were searched from inception through April 2, 2019. Three reviewers carried out the selection of relevant trials and conducted data extraction. RESULTS The review identified 13 unique RCT's. The definition of skin self-exams, extrapolated from instructions provided to participants during the trials and reported in only 6/13 trials, included periodically checking the skin of the entire body, individually or with partners/mirrors, with or without tracking or monitoring tools, and using the ABCDE criteria to identify early signs of melanoma. There was variability in how skin self-examination behavior was measured with respect to item content, number of items, response format, and type of outcome variable used: continuous or binary). No validity evidence and minimal reliability evidence for the measures were identified. CONCLUSIONS AND PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Future studies are needed to establish the psychometric properties of measures assessing skin self-examination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adina Coroiu
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada.
| | - Chelsea Moran
- Department of Psychology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Catherine Bergeron
- Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Brett D Thombs
- Department of Educational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Department of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alan C Geller
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Emily Kingsland
- McGill Library and Archives, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
| | - Annett Körner
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States; Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montréal, Quebec, Canada; Louise Granofsky Psychosocial Oncology Program, Segal Cancer Center, Montreal, Canada; Psychosocial Oncology Program, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lowery JT, Ahnen DJ, Schroy PC, Hampel H, Baxter N, Boland CR, Burt RW, Butterly L, Doerr M, Doroshenk M, Feero WG, Henrikson N, Ladabaum U, Lieberman D, McFarland EG, Peterson SK, Raymond M, Samadder NJ, Syngal S, Weber TK, Zauber AG, Smith R. Understanding the contribution of family history to colorectal cancer risk and its clinical implications: A state-of-the-science review. Cancer 2016; 122:2633-45. [PMID: 27258162 PMCID: PMC5575812 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.30080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 117] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Revised: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 01/15/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Persons with a family history (FH) of colorectal cancer (CRC) or adenomas that are not due to known hereditary syndromes have an increased risk for CRC. An understanding of these risks, screening recommendations, and screening behaviors can inform strategies for reducing the CRC burden in these families. A comprehensive review of the literature published within the past 10 years has been performed to assess what is known about cancer risk, screening guidelines, adherence and barriers to screening, and effective interventions in persons with an FH of CRC and to identify FH tools used to identify these individuals and inform care. Existing data show that having 1 affected first-degree relative (FDR) increases the CRC risk 2-fold, and the risk increases with multiple affected FDRs and a younger age at diagnosis. There is variability in screening recommendations across consensus guidelines. Screening adherence is <50% and is lower in persons under the age of 50 years. A provider's recommendation, multiple affected relatives, and family encouragement facilitate screening; insufficient collection of FH, low knowledge of guidelines, and poor family communication are important barriers. Effective interventions incorporate strategies for overcoming barriers, but these have not been broadly tested in clinical settings. Four strategies for reducing CRC in persons with familial risk are suggested: 1) improving the collection and utilization of the FH of cancer, 2) establishing a consensus for screening guidelines by FH, 3) enhancing provider-patient knowledge of guidelines and communication about CRC risk, and 4) encouraging survivors to promote screening within their families and partnering with existing screening programs to expand their reach to high-risk groups. Cancer 2016. © 2016 American Cancer Society. Cancer 2016;122:2633-2645. © 2016 American Cancer Society.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan T Lowery
- Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Dennis J Ahnen
- School of Medicine and Gastroenterology of the Rockies, University of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado
| | - Paul C Schroy
- Department of Medicine, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Heather Hampel
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | - Randall W Burt
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Lynn Butterly
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | | | | | - W Gregory Feero
- Maine Dartmouth Family Medicine Residency Program, Augusta, Maine
| | | | - Uri Ladabaum
- Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California
| | | | | | - Susan K Peterson
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - N Jewel Samadder
- Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | | | - Ann G Zauber
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Courtney RJ, Paul CL, Carey ML, Sanson-Fisher RW, Macrae FA, D'Este C, Hill D, Barker D, Simmons J. A population-based cross-sectional study of colorectal cancer screening practices of first-degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:13. [PMID: 23305355 PMCID: PMC3556153 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2012] [Accepted: 12/27/2012] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The aim of this study was to determine the proportions and predictors of first-degree relatives (FDRs) of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (i) ever receiving any CRC testing and (ii) receiving CRC screening in accordance with CRC screening guidelines. Methods Colorectal cancer patients and their FDRs were recruited through the population-based Victorian Cancer Registry, Victoria, Australia. Seven hundred and seven FDRs completed telephone interviews. Of these, 405 FDRs were deemed asymptomatic and eligible for analysis. Results Sixty-nine percent of FDRs had ever received any CRC testing. First-degree relatives of older age, those with private health insurance, siblings and FDRs who had ever been asked about family history of CRC by a doctor were significantly more likely than their counterparts to have ever received CRC testing. Twenty-five percent of FDRs “at or slightly above average risk” were adherent to CRC screening guidelines. For this group, adherence to guideline-recommended screening was significantly more likely to occur for male FDRs and those with a higher level of education. For persons at “moderately increased risk” and “potentially high risk”, 47% and 49% respectively adhered to CRC screening guidelines. For this group, guideline-recommended screening was significantly more likely to occur for FDRs who were living in metropolitan areas, siblings, those married or partnered and those ever asked about family history of CRC. Conclusions A significant level of non-compliance with screening guidelines was evident among FDRs. Improved CRC screening in accordance with guidelines and effective systematic interventions to increase screening rates among population groups experiencing inequality are needed. Trial Registration Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry: ACTRN12609000628246
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J Courtney
- Priority Research Centre for Health Behaviour, School of Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Buchbinder D, Mertens AC, Zeltzer LK, Leisenring W, Goodman P, Lown EA, Alderfer MA, Recklitis C, Oeffinger K, Armstrong GT, Hudson M, Robison LL, Casillas J. Cancer prevention and screening practices of siblings of childhood cancer survivors: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012; 21:1078-88. [PMID: 22576363 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-11-1095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the skin and breast/cervical cancer prevention/screening practices of adult siblings of childhood cancer survivors with controls and to identify modifying factors for these practices. METHODS Cross-sectional, self-report data from 2,588 adult siblings of 5+ year survivors of childhood cancer were analyzed to assess cancer prevention/screening practices. Two age, sex, and race/ethnicity-matched samples (N = 5,915 and N = 37,789) of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System participants served as the comparison populations. Sociodemographic and cancer-related data were explored as modifying factors for sibling cancer prevention/screening practices through multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS Compared with controls, siblings were more likely to practice skin cancer prevention behaviors: use of protective clothing [OR, 2.85; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.39-3.39], use of shade (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.88-2.36), use of sunscreen (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14-1.40), and wearing a hat (OR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.58-1.98). No differences were noted for breast/cervical cancer screening including mammography and Pap testing. Having less than a high school education and lack of health insurance were associated with diminished cancer prevention/screening behaviors. Survivor diagnosis, treatment intensity, adverse health, chronic health conditions, and second cancers were not associated with sibling cancer prevention/screening behaviors. CONCLUSIONS Siblings of cancer survivors report greater skin cancer prevention practices when compared with controls; however, no differences were noted for breast/cervical cancer screening practices. Access to care and lack of education may be associated with decreased cancer prevention/screening behaviors. Interventions are needed to address these barriers. IMPACT Research should be directed at understanding the impact of the cancer experience on sibling health behaviors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Buchbinder
- Department of Pediatrics and Division of Hematology at Children's Hospital of Orange County, Orange, CA 92868, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Manne S, Jacobsen PB, Ming ME, Winkel G, Dessureault S, Lessin SR. Tailored versus generic interventions for skin cancer risk reduction for family members of melanoma patients. Health Psychol 2011; 29:583-93. [PMID: 21090893 DOI: 10.1037/a0021387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Improving strategies for risk reduction among family members of patients with melanoma may reduce their risk for melanoma. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of two behavioral interventions designed to improve the frequency of total cutaneous skin examination by a health provider (TCE), skin self-examination (SSE), and sun protection among first degree relatives of patients with melanoma; and to evaluate whether increased intentions, increased benefits, decreased barriers, and improved sunscreen self-efficacy mediated the effects of the tailored intervention, as compared with the generic intervention on TCE, SSE, or sun protection. METHODS Four hundred forty-three family members (56 parents, 248 siblings, 239 children) who were nonadherent with these practices were randomly assigned to either a generic (N = 218) or a tailored intervention (N = 225) which included 3 print mailings and 1 telephone session. Participants completed measures of TCE, SSE, and sun protections at baseline, 6 months, and 1 year, and measures of intentions, benefits, barriers, and self-efficacy at baseline and 6 months. RESULTS Those enrolled in the tailored intervention had almost a twofold increased probability of having a TCE ( p < .0001). Treatment effects in favor of the tailored intervention were also noted for sun protection habits ( p < .02). Increases in TCE intentions mediated the tailored intervention's effects on TCE. Increases in sun protection intentions mediated effects of the tailored intervention's effect on sun protection. CONCLUSIONS Tailored interventions may improve risk reduction practices among family members of patients with melanoma.
Collapse
|