Perinatal and obstetric outcomes of donor insemination using cryopreserved semen in Victoria, Australia

Higher incidence of preeclampsia among participants undergoing in-vitro fertilization after fewer sperm exposures

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of preeclampsia (PE) incidence among participants undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) after various cycles of sperm donation (SD) via intrauterine inseminations (IUI) or IVF.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study was conducted at a single tertiary medical center between 2011 and 2019 which included participants who conceived via IVF using SD from a single sperm bank and had a successful singleton birth at Sheba Medical Center. The study cohort was divided into two groups: Group 1 (participants who conceived via IVF after 0-1 cycles of IUI or IVF from the same sperm donor) and Group 2 (participants who conceived via IVF after 2 or more cycles of IUI or IVF from the same sperm donor). Baseline characteristics and pregnancy outcomes between the two groups were compared. In addition, a comparison between the study groups and a control of participants of the same age who conceived spontaneously and had a singleton birth at Sheba Medical Center during the same period with a record of up to two previous deliveries was done.

RESULTS

A total of 228 participants conceived through IVF from SD and met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 110 were defined as Group 1 and 118 as Group 2. The participants showed no differences in their age, gravidity and parity, chronic medical conditions, or history of pregnancy complications. Preeclampsia was positively associated with Group 1 (9 [8.2%] vs. 2 [1.7%], P = 0.022). PE was observed to be more prevalent in Group 1 (P < 0.001) when compared to a control group of 45,278 participants who conceived spontaneously. No significant differences were observed in comparing Group 2 with the same control group.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of PE was higher among participants who were exposed to 0-1 IUI or IVF cycles than in those who were exposed to 2 or more cycles of IUI or IVF from the same sperm donor. On comparing both groups with a control group, the incidence of PE was higher in participants who were exposed to 0-1 cycles, while there was no difference in participants exposed to 2 or more cycles.

IMPLICATIONS STATEMENT

If there is a statistically significant increase in the incidence of PE when conception occurred following fewer sperm exposures, then there may be a correlation between these two. The reason for this is not entirely clear, but based on former literature, we hypothesize it may be related to the fact that repeated exposures to paternal antigens may alter the maternal immune response causing a better adaptation to the semi-allogenic nature of the fetus, its paternal half.

Effects of donor sperm on perinatal and neonatal outcomes resulting from in vitro fertilization-intracytoplasmic sperm injection and embryo transfer cycles: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The impact of donor sperm on pregnancy outcomes is controversial. The aim of this study was to investigate whether donor sperm in in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatment could reduce the rate of live births or increase the incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes and birth defects in neonates.

Methods

This single-centre, retrospective cohort study included 1,559 patients with infertility who received donor sperm at our hospital from 2015 to 2019. All the patients received fresh embryos and underwent first-cycle transfer. After propensity score matching, 4,677 controls who received their partners’ sperm were matched at 1:3. Clinical pregnancy, perinatal, and neonatal outcomes were compared between the donor sperm and partner sperm groups.

Results

The embryo development was better in the donor sperm group than in the partner sperm group. The high-quality embryo and available embryo rates were significantly higher in the donor sperm group (P<0.05 for both groups). The rate of high-quality embryos transferred from the donor sperm group was higher than that from the partner sperm group (P<0.05). The clinical pregnancy (62.99% vs. 59.65%; P=0.02) and live birth (54.65% vs. 51.59%; P=0.036) rates were higher in the donor sperm group. After adjusting for confounding factors, no significant difference in live birth rates was observed between the two groups (adjusted P=0.057). The low birthweight (18.21% vs. 21.39%; P=0.023) and small for gestational age (SGA) (7.60% vs. 11.97%; P<0.001) rates were lower in the donor sperm group. To exclude the effect of multiple pregnancies, we evaluated neonatal outcomes of singleton pregnancies. No significant differences were noted in preterm and very preterm birth, SGA, mean birthweight, high birthweight, and low birth weight (LBW) and very low birth weight (VLBW) rates (P>0.05 for both groups). Further, no significant between group differences were observed in the ectopic pregnancy rate, early and late spontaneous abortion rates, gestational age, rate of large for gestational age (LGA), and neonatal defects.

Conclusions

Compared with partner sperm, donor sperm did not reduce live birth rate and did not increase neonatal LBW or low birth defects.

Obstetric and perinatal risks after the use of donor sperm: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Donor sperm is widely used in infertility treatments. The purpose of the study was to investigate, whether use of donor sperm in intrauterine insemination (IUI) or in vitro fertilization (IVF) or intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) treatments affect maternal and perinatal risks compared with spontaneously conceived pregnancies or use of partner sperm in IUI, IVF or ICSI. We provide a systematic review and meta-analyses on the most clinically relevant obstetric and perinatal outcomes after use of donor sperm compared with partner sperm: hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia, low birth weight, and preterm birth. Our meta-analyses showed an increased risk for preeclampsia (pooled adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.77, 95% CI 1.26-2.48) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (pooled aOR 1.55, 95%, CI 1.20-2.00) in pregnancies resulting from IUI with donor sperm compared with IUI with partner sperm. No increased risk was seen for low birth weight or preterm birth after the use of donor sperm in IUI compared with the use of partner sperm in IUI. Subgroup analysis for singletons only did not change these results. The meta-analysis on low birth weight showed a lower risk after in IVF with donor sperm compared with IVF with partner sperm (pooled aOR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83-0.94). For hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, preeclampsia and preterm birth, no difference was found between IVF with donor sperm vs. partner sperm. Patients need to be informed about the moderately increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and preeclampsia in pregnancies after IUI with donor sperm.

Characteristics of preeclampsia in donor cell gestations

Pregnancies conceived through donor oocytes or sperm show increased risk for preeclampsia. We studied this issue in a preeclampsia case-control cohort (n = 2778), and found overrepresentation of donor cell gestations among women with preeclampsia (14/1627, 0.86%; OR 1.81; 95% CI: 1.07-3.08; P = 0.025) compared to the population data. Moreover, we observed excess of male births from donor cell pregnancies (male-to-female ratio 2.5 vs. 0.97; OR 2.57; 95% CI 1.02-6.36; P = 0.043). Maternal age (36.7 vs. 30.2; P < 0.0001) and preterm deliveries (64% vs. 38%; P = 0.046) distinguished donor cell gestations from other pregnancies with preeclampsia. These results support foreign fetal antigens as modulators of preeclampsia.

Outcomes of pregnancies using donor sperm compared with those using partner sperm: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Registry data from the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) show an increase of 40% in IUI and 377% in IVF cases using donor sperm between 2006 and 2016.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective of this study was to establish whether pregnancies conceived using donor sperm are at higher risk of obstetric and perinatal complications than those conceived with partner sperm. As more treatments are being carried out using donor sperm, attention is being given to obstetric and perinatal outcomes, as events in utero and at delivery have implications for long-term health. There is a need to know if there is any difference in the outcomes of pregnancies between those conceived using donor versus partner sperm in order to adequately inform and counsel couples.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcomes of pregnancies conceived using donor sperm compared with partner sperm. Searches were performed in the OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, CENTRAL and CINAHL databases, including all studies published before 11 February 2019. The search strategy involved search terms for pregnancy, infant, donor sperm, heterologous artificial insemination, donor gametes, pregnancy outcomes and perinatal outcomes. Studies were included if they assessed pregnancies conceived by any method using, or infants born from, donor sperm compared with partner sperm and described early pregnancy, obstetric or perinatal outcomes. The Downs and Black tool was used for quality and bias assessment of studies.

OUTCOMES

Of 3391 studies identified from the search, 37 studies were included in the review and 36 were included in the meta-analysis. For pregnancies conceived with donor sperm, versus partner sperm, there was an increase in the relative risk (RR) (95% CI) of combined hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: 1.44 (1.17-1.78), pre-eclampsia: 1.49 (1.05-2.09) and small for gestational age (SGA): 1.42 (1.17-1.79) but a reduced risk of ectopic pregnancy: 0.69 (0.48-0.98). There was no difference in the overall RR (95% CI) of miscarriage: 0.94 (0.80-1.11), gestational diabetes: 1.49 (0.62-3.59), pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH): 1.24 (0.87-1.76), placental abruption: 0.65 (0.04-10.37), placenta praevia: 1.19 (0.64-2.21), preterm birth: 0.98 (0.88-1.08), low birth weight: 0.97 (0.82-1.15), high birthweight: 1.28 (0.94-1.73): large for gestational age (LGA): 1.01 (0.84-1.22), stillbirth: 1.23 (0.97-1.57), neonatal death: 0.79 (0.36-1.73) and congenital anomaly: 1.15 (0.86-1.53).

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

The majority of our findings are reassuring, except for the mild increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and SGA in pregnancies resulting from donor sperm. However, the evidence for this is limited and should be interpreted with caution because the evidence was based on observational studies which varied in their quality and risk of bias. Further high-quality population-based studies reporting obstetric outcomes in detail are required to confirm these findings.

The incidence of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy following sperm donation in IVF: an Australian state-wide retrospective cohort study

STUDY QUESTION

Does IVF using donor sperm increase the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and fetal growth restriction (FGR)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

IVF conceptions arising from sperm donation are not associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy or FGR.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

It has been hypothesized that the absence of prior exposure to factors within the paternal ejaculate increases the risk of preeclampsia and FGR among nulliparous women or women with a new partner-the concept of 'primipaternity'. It remains unclear which element of the ejaculate is responsible: the sperm cell or the constituents of seminal fluid. IVF pregnancies arising from donor sperm where the seminal fluid is absent provide a unique opportunity to test the theory of primipaternity and the relative contribution of the sperm cell. Pregnancies conceived via artificial reproductive technology are at increased risk of preeclampsia and FGR.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

Theories about the development of preeclampsia and the relative contribution of spermatic factors were explored by comparing the risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and FGR among IVF pregnancies conceived with autologous gametes (own eggs and partner sperm) and those conceived with donor sperm, donor egg (and partner sperm) and donor embryo. To do this, we performed a retrospective cohort analysis of pregnancy outcomes among singleton pregnancies (n = 15 443) conceived through fertility clinics within Australia between 2009 and 2017.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

All pregnancies resulting in a singleton pregnancy delivering after 20 weeks' gestation were included. The cohort was divided into donor sperm, donor egg and donor embryo (where both gametes came from a donor to create an embryo, or in a surrogate pregnancy) groups. We also compared the data with a control group, defined as IVF-conceived pregnancies from autologous cycles. A multivariable regression model was used to calculate an adjusted odds ratio (aOR).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The final cohort contained 1435, 578 and 239 pregnancies conceived by donor sperm, donor egg and donor embryo, respectively, and 13 191 controls. There were a very small number of women lost to follow-up (31 women; 0.2% of total cohort). Compared to control pregnancies, there was no increase in the risk of hypertensive disorders among pregnancies conceived via donor sperm (aOR 0.94; 95% CI 0.73-1.21). Subgroup analysis was performed for a cohort where parity was known (n = 4551), and of these, 305 multigravida pregnancies were conceived via donor sperm. Among this cohort, no increased risk of preeclampsia or pregnancy-induced hypertension was found (aOR 1.18; 95% CI: 0.69-2.04) as a result of primipaternity (new sperm donor).A significantly increased risk for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy was associated with the use of donor eggs (but partner sperm; aOR 2.34; 95% CI 1.69-3.21). However, the association was no greater among pregnancies conceived with donor embryos (i.e. donated egg and sperm; aOR 2.0; 95% CI 1.25-3.17) than among the donor oocyte group. The overall incidence of FGR (defined as birthweight <10th centile) was 18%. There were no significant differences observed between donor sperm, or donor embryo pregnancies; however, egg donation was associated with a 1.5-fold increase in FGR.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study was limited by a lower than expected rate of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (n = 862, 5.6%), which is contrary to the well-established increased risk among women using IVF. However, this is likely to be evenly distributed across the study groups and, therefore, unlikely to have introduced significant bias.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

These findings suggest that exposure to new sperm may not be implicated in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. The mechanism of increased risk seen in conceptions arising from egg or embryo donation remains unclear. Further investigation is required to elucidate these mechanisms and, ultimately, improve pregnancy outcomes following IVF.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This study was supported by the Australian Commonwealth Government-Graduate Research Scheme (A.K.). Salary support was provided by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (S.T.), Mercy Foundation (A.L.), and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at the University of Melbourne (R.H.). There are no competing interests.

The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention

Pre‐eclampsia (PE) is a multisystem disorder that typically affects 2%–5% of pregnant women and is one of the leading causes of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality, especially when the condition is of early onset. Globally, 76 000 women and 500 000 babies die each year from this disorder. Furthermore, women in low‐resource countries are at a higher risk of developing PE compared with those in high‐resource countries. Although a complete understanding of the pathogenesis of PE remains unclear, the current theory suggests a two‐stage process. The first stage is caused by shallow invasion of the trophoblast, resulting in inadequate remodeling of the spiral arteries. This is presumed to lead to the second stage, which involves the maternal response to endothelial dysfunction and imbalance between angiogenic and antiangiogenic factors, resulting in the clinical features of the disorder. Accurate prediction and uniform prevention continue to elude us. The quest to effectively predict PE in the first trimester of pregnancy is fueled by the desire to identify women who are at high risk of developing PE, so that necessary measures can be initiated early enough to improve placentation and thus prevent or at least reduce the frequency of its occurrence. Furthermore, identification of an “at risk” group will allow tailored prenatal surveillance to anticipate and recognize the onset of the clinical syndrome and manage it promptly. PE has been previously defined as the onset of hypertension accompanied by significant proteinuria after 20 weeks of gestation. Recently, the definition of PE has been broadened. Now the internationally agreed definition of PE is the one proposed by the International Society for the Study of Hypertension in Pregnancy (ISSHP). According to the ISSHP, PE is defined as systolic blood pressure at ≥140 mm Hg and/or diastolic blood pressure at ≥90 mm Hg on at least two occasions measured 4 hours apart in previously normotensive women and is accompanied by one or more of the following new‐onset conditions at or after 20 weeks of gestation: 1.Proteinuria (i.e. ≥30 mg/mol protein:creatinine ratio; ≥300 mg/24 hour; or ≥2 + dipstick); 2.Evidence of other maternal organ dysfunction, including: acute kidney injury (creatinine ≥90 μmol/L; 1 mg/dL); liver involvement (elevated transaminases, e.g. alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase >40 IU/L) with or without right upper quadrant or epigastric abdominal pain; neurological complications (e.g. eclampsia, altered mental status, blindness, stroke, clonus, severe headaches, and persistent visual scotomata); or hematological complications (thrombocytopenia–platelet count <150 000/μL, disseminated intravascular coagulation, hemolysis); or 3.Uteroplacental dysfunction (such as fetal growth restriction, abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveform analysis, or stillbirth). It is well established that a number of maternal risk factors are associated with the development of PE: advanced maternal age; nulliparity; previous history of PE; short and long interpregnancy interval; use of assisted reproductive technologies; family history of PE; obesity; Afro‐Caribbean and South Asian racial origin; co‐morbid medical conditions including hyperglycemia in pregnancy; pre‐existing chronic hypertension; renal disease; and autoimmune diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and antiphospholipid syndrome. These risk factors have been described by various professional organizations for the identification of women at risk of PE; however, this approach to screening is inadequate for effective prediction of PE. PE can be subclassified into: 1.Early‐onset PE (with delivery at <34+0 weeks of gestation); 2.Preterm PE (with delivery at <37+0 weeks of gestation); 3.Late‐onset PE (with delivery at ≥34+0 weeks of gestation); 4.Term PE (with delivery at ≥37+0 weeks of gestation). These subclassifications are not mutually exclusive. Early‐onset PE is associated with a much higher risk of short‐ and long‐term maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. Obstetricians managing women with preterm PE are faced with the challenge of balancing the need to achieve fetal maturation in utero with the risks to the mother and fetus of continuing the pregnancy longer. These risks include progression to eclampsia, development of placental abruption and HELLP (hemolysis, elevated liver enzyme, low platelet) syndrome. On the other hand, preterm delivery is associated with higher infant mortality rates and increased morbidity resulting from small for gestational age (SGA), thrombocytopenia, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cerebral palsy, and an increased risk of various chronic diseases in adult life, particularly type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and obesity. Women who have experienced PE may also face additional health problems in later life, as the condition is associated with an increased risk of death from future cardiovascular disease, hypertension, stroke, renal impairment, metabolic syndrome, and diabetes. The life expectancy of women who developed preterm PE is reduced on average by 10 years. There is also significant impact on the infants in the long term, such as increased risks of insulin resistance, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and hypertension in infants born to pre‐eclamptic women. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) brought together international experts to discuss and evaluate current knowledge on PE and develop a document to frame the issues and suggest key actions to address the health burden posed by PE. FIGO's objectives, as outlined in this document, are: (1) To raise awareness of the links between PE and poor maternal and perinatal outcomes, as well as to the future health risks to mother and offspring, and demand a clearly defined global health agenda to tackle this issue; and (2) To create a consensus document that provides guidance for the first‐trimester screening and prevention of preterm PE, and to disseminate and encourage its use. Based on high‐quality evidence, the document outlines current global standards for the first‐trimester screening and prevention of preterm PE, which is in line with FIGO good clinical practice advice on first trimester screening and prevention of pre‐eclampsia in singleton pregnancy.1 It provides both the best and the most pragmatic recommendations according to the level of acceptability, feasibility, and ease of implementation that have the potential to produce the most significant impact in different resource settings. Suggestions are provided for a variety of different regional and resource settings based on their financial, human, and infrastructure resources, as well as for research priorities to bridge the current knowledge and evidence gap. To deal with the issue of PE, FIGO recommends the following: Public health focus: There should be greater international attention given to PE and to the links between maternal health and noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) on the Sustainable Developmental Goals agenda. Public health measures to increase awareness, access, affordability, and acceptance of preconception counselling, and prenatal and postnatal services for women of reproductive age should be prioritized. Greater efforts are required to raise awareness of the benefits of early prenatal visits targeted at reproductive‐aged women, particularly in low‐resource countries. Universal screening: All pregnant women should be screened for preterm PE during early pregnancy by the first‐trimester combined test with maternal risk factors and biomarkers as a one‐step procedure. The risk calculator is available free of charge at https://fetalmedicine.org/research/assess/preeclampsia. FIGO encourages all countries and its member associations to adopt and promote strategies to ensure this. The best combined test is one that includes maternal risk factors, measurements of mean arterial pressure (MAP), serum placental growth factor (PLGF), and uterine artery pulsatility index (UTPI). Where it is not possible to measure PLGF and/or UTPI, the baseline screening test should be a combination of maternal risk factors with MAP, and not maternal risk factors alone. If maternal serum pregnancy‐associated plasma protein A (PAPP‐A) is measured for routine first‐trimester screening for fetal aneuploidies, the result can be included for PE risk assessment. Variations to the full combined test would lead to a reduction in the performance screening. A woman is considered high risk when the risk is 1 in 100 or more based on the first‐trimester combined test with maternal risk factors, MAP, PLGF, and UTPI. Contingent screening: Where resources are limited, routine screening for preterm PE by maternal factors and MAP in all pregnancies and reserving measurements of PLGF and UTPI for a subgroup of the population (selected on the basis of the risk derived from screening by maternal factors and MAP) can be considered. Prophylactic measures: Following first‐trimester screening for preterm PE, women identified at high risk should receive aspirin prophylaxis commencing at 11–14+6 weeks of gestation at a dose of ~150 mg to be taken every night until 36 weeks of gestation, when delivery occurs, or when PE is diagnosed. Low‐dose aspirin should not be prescribed to all pregnant women. In women with low calcium intake (<800 mg/d), either calcium replacement (≤1 g elemental calcium/d) or calcium supplementation (1.5–2 g elemental calcium/d) may reduce the burden of both early‐ and late‐onset PE.

Assisted reproductive technology and the risk of preeclampsia: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The objective of this systematic review and meta-analyses was to assess the risk of preeclampsia among women who conceived with assisted reproductive technology (ART).

Methods

We searched the ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline/PubMed, Scopus, and Embase (from inception to May 2017) for English language articles using a list of key words. In addition, reference lists from identified studies and relevant review articles were also searched. Data extraction was performed by two authors, and the study quality was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Random-effects model meta-analysis was applied to pool the relative risks (RR) across studies.

Results

A total of 48 studies (5 case-control studies and 43 cohort studies) were included in this meta-analysis. The Cochran Q test and I² statistics revealed substantial heterogeneity (Q = 26,313.92, d.f. = 47, p < 0.001 and I² = 99.8%). Meta-analysis showed a significant increase in preeclampsia in women who conceived by ART compared with those who conceived spontaneously (RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.11–2.62, p = 0.015).

Conclusions

The findings of this systematic review indicate that the use of ART treatment is associated with a 1.71-fold increase in preeclampsia.

Risk of preeclampsia following assisted reproductive technology: systematic review and meta-analysis of 72 cohort studies

Objective: Previous studies have indicated that women with assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy have an increased risk of preeclampsia. The aim of this current study was to estimate, through a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies, the risk of preeclampsia in women who conceived with ART.Materials and methods: We searched ISI Web of Knowledge, Medline/PubMed, Scopus and Embase up to August 2017 for English-language articles pertaining to risk of preeclampsia in ART pregnancy using standard keywords. Data extraction was conducted by two authors and quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A random-effects model was used for the meta-analysis.Results: In total, 72 cohort studies (n = 164 870) were included. The results of Cochran test and I² statistic indicated considerable heterogeneity among studies (Q = 15 415.61, df = 71, p < .001, I²=99.5%). The pooled estimate of preeclampsia risk using the random effects model was 10.8% (95% CI: 9.10-12.5). Furthermore, the funnel plot and Begg's test showed evidence of publication bias.Conclusions: We found that the risk of preeclampsia was very high among women who conceived with ART. Women should be counseled carefully before undergoing ART treatment.

Paternal Determinants in Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is a condition associated with high rates of maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality. It usually occurs in 3–10% of nulliparous women and 18% of previously affected women. Different lines of evidence have demonstrated the role of the father in the onset of preeclampsia. The placenta is the cornerstone of preeclampsia and poses important paternal genetic determinants; in fact, the existence of a “paternal antigen” has been proposed. Nulliparity is a well-known risk factor. Change of partner to a woman without history of preeclampsia increases the risk; however, this change decreases in women with history of the condition. High interval between pregnancies, short sexual intercourse before pregnancy, and conception by intracytoplasmic sperm injection suggest a limited exposure to the so-called paternal antigen. A man who was born from a mother with preeclampsia also increases the risk to his partner. Not only maternal but also paternal obesity is a risk factor for preeclampsia. Fetal HLA-G variants from the father increased the immune incompatibility with the mother and are also significantly associated with preeclampsia in multigravida pregnancies. An analysis of a group of Swedish pregnant women showed that the risk for preeclampsia is attributable to paternal factors in 13% of cases, which could be related to genetic interactions with maternal genetic factors. This review aimed to evaluate the evidences of the father’s contribution to the onset of preeclampsia and determine the importance of including them in future studies.

IUI: review and systematic assessment of the evidence that supports global recommendations

BACKGROUND

IUI with or without ovarian stimulation (OS) has become a first-line treatment option for many infertile couples, worldwide. The appropriate treatment modality for couples and their clinical management through IUI or IUI/OS cycles must consider maternal and perinatal outcomes, most notably the clinical complication of higher-order multiple pregnancies associated with IUI-OS. With a current global emphasis to continue to decrease maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity, the World Health Organization (WHO) had established a multi-year project to review the evidence for the establishment of normative guidance for the implementation of IUI as a treatment to address fertility problems, and to consider its cost-effectiveness for lower resource settings.

OBJECTIVE AND RATIONALE

The objective of this review is to provide a review of the evidence of 13 prioritized questions that cover IUI with and without OS. We provide summary recommendations for the development of global, evidence-based guidelines based upon methodology established by the WHO.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search using question-specific relevant search terms in May 2015. For each PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) drafted by WHO, specific search terms were used to find the available evidence in MEDLINE (1950 to May 2015) and The Cochrane Library (until May 2015). After presentation to an expert panel, a further hand search of references in relevant reviews was performed up to January 2017. Articles that were found to be relevant were read and analysed by two investigators and critically appraised using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias, and AMSTAR in case of systematic reviews. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE system. An independent expert review process of our analysis was conducted in November 2016.

OUTCOMES

This review provides an assessment and synthesis of the evidence that covers 13 clinical questions including the indications for the use of IUI versus expectant management, the sperm parameters required, the best and optimal method of timing and number of inseminations per cycle, prevention strategies to decrease multiple gestational pregnancies, and the cost-effectiveness of IUI versus IVF. We provide an evidence-based formulation of 20 recommendations, as well as two best practice points that address the integration of methods for the prevention of infection in the IUI laboratory. The quality of the evidence ranges from very low to high, with evidence that may be decades old but of high quality, however, we further discuss where critical research gaps in the evidence remain.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS

This review presents an evidence synthesis assessment and includes recommendations that will assist health care providers worldwide with their decision-making when considering IUI treatments, with or without OS, for their patients presenting with fertility problems.

Assisted reproductive technology with donor sperm: national trends and perinatal outcomes

BACKGROUND

Information regarding the use of donor sperm in assisted reproductive technology, as well as subsequent treatment and perinatal outcomes, remains limited. Outcome data would aid patient counseling and clinical decision making.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of the study were to report national trends in donor sperm utilization and live birth rates of donor sperm-assisted reproductive technology cycles in the United States and to compare assisted reproductive technology treatment and perinatal outcomes between cycles using donor and nondonor sperm. We hypothesize these outcomes to be comparable between donor and nondonor sperm cycles.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study using data from all US fertility centers reporting to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System, accounting for ∼98% of assisted reproductive technology cycles (definition excludes intrauterine insemination). The number and percentage of assisted reproductive technology cycles using donor sperm and rates of pregnancy, live birth, preterm birth (<37 weeks), and low birthweight (<2500 g) were the primary outcomes measured. Treatments assessed include use of donor vs nondonor sperm. The trends analysis included all banking and fresh assisted reproductive technology cycles using donor and autologous oocytes performed between 1996 and 2014 (n = 1,710,034). The outcomes analysis was restricted to include only fresh autologous cycles performed between 2010 and 2014 (n = 437,569) to focus on cycles with a potential outcome and cycles reflective of current practice, thereby improving the clinical relevance. Cycles canceled prior to retrieval were excluded. Statistical analysis included linear regression to explore polynomial trends and log-binomial regression to estimate relative risk for outcomes among cycles using donor and nondonor sperm.

RESULTS

Of all banking and fresh donor and autologous oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles performed between 1996 and 2014, 74,892 (4.4%) used donor sperm. In 2014, 7351 assisted reproductive technology cycles using donor sperm were performed, as compared with 1763 in 1996 (6.2% vs 3.8% of all cycles). Among all autologous oocyte cycles performed between 2010 and 2014, the live birth rate was lower for donor sperm (27.9%) than nondonor sperm cycles (32.5%); however, after adjustment for maternal age, donor sperm use was associated with an increased likelihood of live birth (adjusted relative risk, 1.06, 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.10). Per transfer, there was no significant difference in live birth rates for donor vs nondonor sperm (31.9% vs 36.8%; adjusted relative risk, 1.04, 95% confidence interval, 0.998-1.09). Per singleton live birth, there was no significant difference in preterm birth (11.5% vs 11.8%; adjusted relative risk, 0.98, 95% confidence interval, 0.90-1.06); however, low birthweight delivery was slightly lower in donor sperm cycles (8.8% vs 9.4%; adjusted relative risk, 0.91, 95% confidence interval, 0.83-0.99).

CONCLUSION

Donor sperm use in assisted reproductive technology has increased in the United States, accounting for approximately 6% of all assisted reproductive technology cycles in 2014. Assisted reproductive technology treatment and perinatal outcomes were clinically similar in donor and nondonor sperm cycles.

Immunological Tolerance, Pregnancy, and Preeclampsia: The Roles of Semen Microbes and the Father

Although it is widely considered, in many cases, to involve two separable stages (poor placentation followed by oxidative stress/inflammation), the precise originating causes of preeclampsia (PE) remain elusive. We have previously brought together some of the considerable evidence that a (dormant) microbial component is commonly a significant part of its etiology. However, apart from recognizing, consistent with this view, that the many inflammatory markers of PE are also increased in infection, we had little to say about immunity, whether innate or adaptive. In addition, we focused on the gut, oral and female urinary tract microbiomes as the main sources of the infection. We here marshall further evidence for an infectious component in PE, focusing on the immunological tolerance characteristic of pregnancy, and the well-established fact that increased exposure to the father's semen assists this immunological tolerance. As well as these benefits, however, semen is not sterile, microbial tolerance mechanisms may exist, and we also review the evidence that semen may be responsible for inoculating the developing conceptus (and maybe the placenta) with microbes, not all of which are benign. It is suggested that when they are not, this may be a significant cause of PE. A variety of epidemiological and other evidence is entirely consistent with this, not least correlations between semen infection, infertility and PE. Our view also leads to a series of other, testable predictions. Overall, we argue for a significant paternal role in the development of PE through microbial infection of the mother via insemination.

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile patients who conceived following low technology interventions for fertility enhancement: a comprehensive review

PURPOSE

Low technology interventions for fertility enhancement (LTIFE) are strategies that avoid retrieval, handling, and manipulation of female gametes. The definition of LTIFE is yet to be widely accepted and clarified, but they are commonly used in milder cases of infertility and subfertility. Based on these considerations, the aim of the present study was comprehensively to review and investigate the obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile patients who underwent LTIFE.

METHODS

A literature search up to May 2017 was performed in IBSS, SocINDEX, Institute for Scientific Information, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. An evidence-based hierarchy was used according to The Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine to determine which articles to include and analyze, and to provide a level of evidence of each association between intervention and outcome.

RESULTS

This analysis identified preliminary and low-grade evidence on the influence of LTIFE on obstetric and perinatal outcomes in subfertile women.

CONCLUSIONS

LTIFE women should deserve major consideration from Clinicians/Researchers of Reproductive Medicine, because these treatments could be potentially responsible for mothers' and babies' complications. So far, the lack of well-designed and unbiased studies makes further conclusions difficult to be drawn.

A meta-analysis of sperm donation offspring health outcomes

Although the use of donor sperm as a treatment modality for male infertility has become common place, the health outcomes for those conceived has been poorly studied. A structured search of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Reviews was performed to investigate the health outcomes of offspring conceived from donor sperm. Eight studies were eligible and included in the review, and of these, three were included in a meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of clinical outcomes showed that donor sperm neonates are not at increased risk of being born of low birth weight (<2500 g), preterm (<37 weeks) or with increased incidences of birth defects, than spontaneously conceived neonates.

Assisted reproductive technology and pregnancy-related hypertensive complications: a systematic review

Hypertensive complications in pregnancy are the leading cause of maternal morbidity, at least in the developed countries. In recent years, infertility issues are managed with ever growing therapeutic options namely assisted reproductive technologies (ART), which improve the ratio of successful induction of pregnancy. It is still debated whether various ART modalities are associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including hypertensive complications, particularly with higher incidence of preeclampsia. The main source of controversy stems from the diversity of effect modifiers modulating the association between ART-oriented pregnancy and hypertensive disorders. Indeed, women undergoing an ART procedure are affected by diverse causes of infertility, are frequently characterized by different genetic patterns with respect to their artificially conceived embryo and experienced multiple gestations. In order to investigate whether ART modalities are associated with increased incidence of hypertensive complications in pregnancy, we reviewed all published studies carried out before the end of 2010 and identified in the PubMed database. Among the 47 studies finally selected and by acknowledging the potential of shortcomings related to the different study design and populations, the overall evidence suggests that ART-oriented pregnancies-especially the in-vitro fertilization techniques-are accompanied by increased risk for gestational hypertension and preeclampsia as compared with non-ART pregnancies, even after adjustment for confounders. Multiple gestations, advanced age and underlying polycystic ovary syndrome resulted in constant confounders of the questioned association. Reducing multiple gestations by implementing single embryo techniques might be the therapeutic limiting step to lower the rate of hypertensive complications in assisted pregnancies.

The potential use of intrauterine insemination as a basic option for infertility: a review for technology-limited medical settings

Objective. There is an asymmetric allocation of technology and other resources for infertility services. Intrauterine insemination (IUI) is a process of placing washed spermatozoa transcervically into the uterine cavity for treatment of infertility. This is a review of literature for the potential use of IUI as a basic infertility treatment in technology-limited settings. Study design. Review of articles on treatment of infertility using IUI. Results. Aspects regarding the use of IUI are reviewed, including ovarian stimulation, semen parameters associated with good outcomes, methods of sperm preparation, timing of IUI, and number of inseminations. Implications of the finding in light of the needs of low-technology medical settings are summarized. Conclusion. The reviewed evidence suggests that IUI is less expensive, less invasive, and comparably effective for selected patients as a first-line treatment for couples with unexplained or male factor infertility. Those couples may be offered three to six IUI cycles in technology-limited settings.

Is the use of donor sperm associated with a higher incidence of preeclampsia in women who achieve pregnancy after intrauterine insemination?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence of preeclampsia after intrauterine insemination (IUI) with either donor's or partner's sperm in women with primary infertility.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Between January 1999 and December 2006, 823 women who achieved pregnancy after IUI and delivered at > or =24 weeks of gestation were reviewed. Only women with primary infertility and no known medical disorders were included. On the basis of the available outcome data, the final analysis was performed in 713 pregnancies (438 pregnancies using donor's sperm and 275 pregnancies using partner's sperm).

INTERVENTION(S)

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The incidence of preeclampsia.

RESULT(S)

The incidence of preeclampsia in pregnancies resulting from donor sperm was higher than in the partner insemination group: 10.9% (48/438) versus 7.2% (20/275), respectively (difference, 3.7; 95% confidence interval -0.8 to +7.8). Logistic regression was performed controlling for the following parameters: type of sperm, number of previous cycles, and number of babies. In the final model, the variables that significantly predicted the risk of preeclampsia were the type of sperm used for insemination and the number of previous IUI cycles performed. The fewer cycles that were performed, the higher the incidence of preeclampsia that was observed.

CONCLUSION(S)

IUI with donor sperm appears to increase the incidence of preeclampsia when pregnancy is achieved. A protective effect of multiple cycles appears also to be present in this respect.

Inadequate tolerance induction may induce pre-eclampsia

The fetus is semi-allograft to the maternal host; therefore, a system of tolerance must be present during pregnancy. Epidemiological findings support a relationship between pre-eclampsia and the failure of tolerance induction. For induction of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I-specific tolerance, long-term exposure to seminal fluid, which contains paternal soluble MHC class I antigens, may induce paternal MHC class I-specific tolerance. Furthermore, soluble HLA-G1, which induces the deletion of CD8(+) T-cells, and the combination of maternal killer-immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIR) on NK cells and fetal HLA-C, which affects the balance between inhibition and activation signals of NK cells, regulatory CD8(+) T cells, and regulatory NK cells, may play very important roles in the induction of MHC class I-specific tolerance. On the other hand, exposure to sperm, which express paternal HLA-DR, and trophoblastic debris, which contain intracellular fetal HLA-DR, may induce paternal MHC class II-specific tolerance. In this process, CD4(+)CD25(+) regulatory T (Treg)-cells play central roles. In this review, we discuss the relationship between the risk of pre-eclampsia and tolerance induction.

Pre-eclampsia: Is the immune maladaptation hypothesis still standing? An epidemiological update

Despite much research, and clear improvement in our understanding of risk factors and pathogenetic mechanisms, the exact etiology of pre-eclampsia remains unknown. The immune maladaptation hypothesis has been challenged recently by several large epidemiological studies. One of the explanations for contradictory findings might be that the type of pre-eclampsia seen by obstetricians in developed countries mostly involves 30 and more years old, mildly obese pregnant women having near-term pre-eclampsia. It could be that this type of pre-eclampsia is primarily related to pre-existing maternal constitutional factors. This type of pre-eclampsia might be the dominant type of pre-eclampsia in the large Scandinavian and USA studies. In contrast, the epidemiology of pre-eclampsia in young women (age 15-25), so commonly seen in developing countries and certain lower socio-economic groups in developed countries, appears more in line with the immune maladaptation hypothesis. The aim here is to provide an updated review on studies supporting or challenging the immune maladaptation hypothesis.

The role of the immune system in preeclampsia

Recent data demonstrate that an altered immune response may play a key role in the development of preeclampsia. Some epidemiological findings and animal models support this idea. In this article, we review the innate immune system and adaptive immune system in preeclampsia and discuss the pathophysiology of preeclampsia from an immunological viewpoint. The most characteristic immunological finding in preeclampsia is the activation of both the innate and adaptive immune system. Activated neutrophils, monocytes, and NK cells initiate inflammation which induce endothelial dysfunction, and activated T cells may support inadequate tolerance during pregnancy. The cytokine profile in preeclampsia shows that the production of type 1 cytokines, which induce inflammation, is dominant while the production of type 2 cytokines, which regulates inflammation, is suppressed. Furthermore, the immunoregulatory system is down-regulated in preeclampsia and persistent inflammation reduces regulatory T cell function. Therefore, systematical immunoactivation may be one cause of preeclampsia.

The incidence of pre-eclampsia among couples consisting of Japanese women and Caucasian men

Recent data from Hiby (2004) have suggested that a combination of maternal killer immunoglobulin receptor (KIR) AA genotype and fetal HLA-C2 genotype increases the risk of pre-eclampsia. Different human populations have a reciprocal relationship between KIR AA frequency and HLA-C2 frequency. Japanese people have highest frequency of KIR-AA alleles and lowest frequency of HLA-C2 alleles. However, Caucasians have a moderate frequency of KIR-AA and HLA-C2 alleles. If this hypothesis is correct, the incidence of pre-eclampsia among couples consisting of Japanese women and Caucasian men should be higher than that among couples consisting of Japanese women and Japanese men. Therefore, we investigated the incidence of pre-eclampsia among 324 couples consisting of Japanese women and Caucasian men. The incidence of pre-eclampsia in these couples consisting of Japanese women and Caucasian men was similar to that in Japanese women and Japanese men. Our data do not support that of Hiby et al. [Hiby, S.E., Walker, J.J., O'Shaughnessy, K.M., Redman, C.W.G., Carrington, M., Trowsdale, I., Moffett, A., 2004. Combinations of maternal KIR and fetal HLA-C genes influence the risk of pre-eclampsia and reproductive success. J. Exp. Med. 200, 957-965], although we did not check the haplotypes for HLA-C and KIR.

Perinatal outcome of 12,021 singleton and 3108 twin births after non-IVF-assisted reproduction: a cohort study

Perinatal outcome of pregnancies caused by assisted reproduction technique (ART) is substantially worse when compared with pregnancies following natural conception. We investigated the possible risks of non-IVF ART on perinatal health. We conducted a retrospective cohort study with two exposure groups: a study group of pregnancies after controlled ovarian stimulation (COS), with or without artificial insemination (AI), and a naturally conceived comparison group. We used the data from the regional registry of all hospital deliveries in the Dutch-speaking part of Belgium during the period from January 1993 until December 2003 to investigate differences in perinatal outcome of singleton and twin pregnancies. 12 021 singleton and 3108 twin births could be selected. Naturally conceived subjects were matched for maternal age, parity, fetal sex and year of birth. The main outcome measures were duration of pregnancy, birth weight, perinatal morbidity and perinatal mortality. Our overall results showed a significantly higher incidence of prematurity (<32 and <37 weeks), low and very low birth weight, transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit and most neonatal morbidity parameters for COS/AI singletons. Twin pregnancies resulting from COS/AI showed an increased rate of neonatal mortality, assisted ventilation and respiratory distress syndrome. After excluding same-sex twin sets, COS/AI twin pregnancies were at increased risk for extreme prematurity and very low birth weight. In conclusion, COS/AI singleton and twin pregnancies are significantly disadvantaged compared to naturally conceived children.

Immunogenetic Determinants of Preeclampsia and Related Pregnancy Disorders

OBJECTIVE

We sought to systematically review the impact of immunogenetic factors, specifically human leukocyte antigen (HLA) allele frequencies, maternal homozygosity, couple sharing, and maternal-fetal sharing, on the risk of preeclampsia and intrauterine growth restriction.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized search of PubMed databases from 1975 to 2003 was performed with the terms "preeclampsia," "eclampsia," "intrauterine growth restriction," and "human leukocyte antigens" and limited to studies of human subjects in English. No restrictions were placed on study design. All bibliographies were cross-referenced to identify additional pertinent studies.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Titles and abstracts were reviewed carefully. Observational and basic science research studies were selected if their main objective was to assess the relationship of any aspect of HLA genotypes with preeclampsia and related disorders of pregnancy.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Data were abstracted and tabulated from 22 original research studies. Meta-analytic techniques were not performed owing to variations in disease and exposure definitions as well as research methodologies. Studies that examined maternal, paternal, and fetal HLA allele frequencies, maternal homozygosity, and couple sharing yielded inconsistent results. Although the cumulative evidence points to the HLA-DR locus (particularly DR4) as a correlate of preeclampsia, it remains unclear whether any specific HLA allele, haplotype, or susceptibility gene in linkage disequilibrium with the HLA region is responsible. Although genetic evidence is suggestive of gene-gene interaction between mother and fetus, few studies have evaluated the influence of maternal-fetal HLA sharing.

CONCLUSION

In the early 1990s, HLA genotypes were dismissed as possible etiologic factors for preeclampsia, based on studies that are heterogeneous with respect to study design, outcome, and exposure assessment. Many of these studies did not take into account the interactions between maternal, paternal, and infant genotypes. Thus, adequately powered studies designed specifically to assess the effect of maternal-fetal HLA sharing on risk of preeclampsia are needed.

Ovulation induction/intrauterine insemination in infertile couples is associated with low-birth-weight infants

OBJECTIVE

The study was undertaken to determine the outcome of singleton pregnancies conceived through ovulation induction and intrauterine insemination using a partner's (OI/IUI) or donor sperm (OI/IUID) by comparison with naturally conceived singletons within a national cohort.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study in primigravid women who were treated with OI/IUI (n = 97) or OI/IUID (n = 35) at Glasgow Royal Infirmary between March 1993 and March 1997 and identified within the Scottish national cohort (n = 109,443) delivering during the same period. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to examine outcomes and to determine the factors associated with infertility treatment and low birth weight.

RESULTS

OI/IUI singletons were more likely to be lighter, of clinically low birth weight, and born more prematurely than natural conceptions. After adjustment for associated factors, these infants were 4.85 times (95% CI 2.25-10.48) more likely to be of low birth weight. We could not demonstrate any differences between OI/IUID and natural conceptions.

CONCLUSION

The perinatal outcome of singletons born to subfertile mothers conceived through OI/IUI is poorer than that of matched natural conceptions. We suggest that intrinsic factors in subfertile couples predispose them to having smaller infants and that "infertility" should be added to the list of recognized factors associated with low birth weight.

The partner's role in the etiology of preeclampsia

The etiology of preeclampsia is often considered to be purely maternal, i.e. maternal constitutional factors that impair maternal cardiovascular/endothelial mechanisms normally required to cope with the specific pregnancy demands, being primarily a generalised inflammatory response and a hyperdynamic circulation. Recent data strongly indicate an important role for the male partner in the causation of this common pregnancy disorder. The aim of this review is to discuss the relevant literature and to explain how paternal, relational and sexual factors play an important role in the etiology of preeclampsia.

First trimester insulin resistance and subsequent preeclampsia: a prospective study

Insulin resistance is implicated in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia, but prospective data are limited. SHBG, a marker of insulin resistance among nonpregnant individuals, has not been studied in detail during pregnancy. We conducted a prospective, nested, case-control study to test the hypothesis that increased insulin resistance, marked by reduced first trimester SHBG levels, is associated with increased risk of subsequent preeclampsia. First trimester SHBG levels were measured in 45 nulliparous women who subsequently developed preeclampsia (blood pressure, > or =140/90 mm Hg; proteinuria, either > or =2+ by dipstick or > or =300 mg/24 h, after 20 wk gestation) and in 90 randomly selected normotensive nulliparous controls. Compared with controls, women who developed preeclampsia had significantly reduced first trimester SHBG levels (302 +/- 130 vs. 396 +/- 186 nmol/liter; P < 0.01). Every 100 nmol/liter increase in SHBG was associated with a 31% reduced risk of preeclampsia [odds ratio (OR), 0.69; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.55, 0.88; P < 0.01]. After adjusting for covariates in a multiple logistic regression model, the association between first trimester SHBG and preeclampsia remained significant (per 100 nmol/liter increase; OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.47, 0.92; P = 0.01). When subjects were stratified by body mass index (lean: body mass index, < 25 kg/m(2); overweight: body mass index, > or =25 kg/m(2)), overweight women had lower SHBG levels than lean women (286 +/- 156 vs. 410 +/- 166 nmol/liter; P < 0.01), and within each stratum, women with preeclampsia had lower SHBG levels than their respective controls. In a multivariable analysis, the association between SHBG and preeclampsia strengthened among lean women, such that every 100 nmol/liter increase in serum SHBG was associated with a 55% reduction in the risk of preeclampsia (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.27, 0.77; P < 0.01), whereas in overweight women, the association was mitigated (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.62, 1.69; P = 0.9). We conclude that increased early pregnancy insulin resistance is independently associated with subsequent preeclampsia. First trimester SHBG levels may be a useful biomarker for preeclampsia, especially among lean women who otherwise would be perceived to be at low risk.