1
|
Tu B, Zhang H, Chen L, Yang R, Liu P, Li R, Qiao J. Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG (double trigger) for final oocyte maturation increases the number of top-quality embryos in patients undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles. J Ovarian Res 2024; 17:137. [PMID: 38961417 PMCID: PMC11223314 DOI: 10.1186/s13048-024-01465-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utilization of a double trigger, involving the co-administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation, is emerging as a novel approach in gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist (GnRH-ant) protocols during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH). This protocol involves administering GnRH-a and hCG 40 and 34 h prior to ovum pick-up (OPU), respectively. This treatment modality has been implemented in patients with low/poor oocytes yield. This study aimed to determine whether the double trigger could improve the number of top-quality embryos (TQEs) in patients with fewer than three TQEs. METHODS The stimulation characteristics of 35 in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles were analyzed. These cycles were triggered by the combination of hCG and GnRHa (double trigger cycles) and compared to the same patients' previous IVF attempt, which utilized the hCG trigger (hCG trigger control cycles). The analysis involved cases who were admitted to our reproductive center between January 2018 and December 2022. In the hCG trigger control cycles, all 35 patients had fewer than three TQEs. RESULTS Patients who received the double trigger cycles yielded a significantly higher number of 2PN cleavage embryos (3.54 ± 3.37 vs. 2.11 ± 2.15, P = 0.025), TQEs ( 2.23 ± 2.05 vs. 0.89 ± 0.99, P < 0.001), and a simultaneously higher proportion of the number of cleavage stage embryos (53.87% ± 31.38% vs. 39.80% ± 29.60%, P = 0.043), 2PN cleavage stage embryos (43.89% ± 33.01% vs. 27.22% ± 27.13%, P = 0.014), and TQEs (27.05% ± 26.26% vs. 14.19% ± 19.76%, P = 0.019) to the number of oocytes retrieved compared with the hCG trigger control cycles, respectively. The double trigger cycles achieved higher rates of cumulative clinical pregnancy (20.00% vs. 2.86%, P = 0.031), cumulative persistent pregnancy (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001), and cumulative live birth (14.29% vs. 0%, P < 0.001) per stimulation cycle compared with the hCG trigger control cycles. CONCLUSION Co-administration of GnRH-agonist and hCG for final oocyte maturation, 40 and 34 h prior to OPU, respectively (double trigger) may be suggested as a valuable new regimen for treating patients with low TQE yield in previous hCG trigger IVF/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Binbin Tu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hua Zhang
- Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lixue Chen
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Yang
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China.
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
| | - Ping Liu
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rong Li
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jie Qiao
- Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
- Key Laboratory of Assisted Reproduction (Peking University), Ministry of Education, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Reproductive Endocrinology and Assisted Reproductive Technology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gambini S, Sonigo C, Robin G, Cedrin-Durnerin I, Vinolas C, Sifer C, Boumerdassi Y, Mayeur A, Gallot V, Grynberg M, Peigné M. Risk factors for poor oocyte yield and oocyte immaturity after GnRH agonist triggering. Hum Reprod 2024; 39:963-973. [PMID: 38452353 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deae041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION What are the potential risk factors for poor oocyte recuperation rate (ORR) and oocyte immaturity after GnRH agonist (GnRHa) ovulation triggering? SUMMARY ANSWER Lower ovarian reserve and LH levels after GnRHa triggering are risk factors of poor ORR. Higher BMI and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels are risk factors of poor oocyte maturation rate (OMR). WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The use of GnRHa to trigger ovulation is increasing. However, some patients may have a suboptimal response after GnRHa triggering. This suboptimal response can refer to any negative endpoint, such as suboptimal oocyte recovery, oocyte immaturity, or empty follicle syndrome. For some authors, a suboptimal response to GnRHa triggering refers to a suboptimal LH and/or progesterone level following triggering. Several studies have investigated a combination of demographic, clinical, and endocrine characteristics at different stages of the treatment process that may affect the efficacy of the GnRHa trigger and thus be involved in a poor endocrine response or efficiency but no consensus exists. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION Bicentric retrospective cohort study between 2015 and 2021 (N = 1747). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS All patients aged 18-43 years who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and ovulation triggering by GnRHa alone (triptorelin 0.2 mg) for ICSI or oocyte cryopreservation were included. The ORR was defined as the ratio of the total number of retrieved oocytes to the number of follicles >12 mm on the day of triggering. The OMR was defined as the ratio of the number of mature oocytes to the number of retrieved oocytes. A logistic regression model with a backward selection method was used for the analysis of risk factors. Odds ratios (OR) are displayed with their two-sided 95% confidence interval. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE In the multivariate analysis, initial antral follicular count and LH level 12-h post-triggering were negatively associated with poor ORR (i.e. below the 10th percentile) (OR: 0.61 [95% CI: 0.42-0.88]; P = 0.008 and OR: 0.86 [95% CI: 0.76-0.97]; P = 0.02, respectively). A nonlinear relationship was found between LH level 12-h post-triggering and poor ORR, but no LH threshold was found. A total of 25.3% of patients suffered from oocyte immaturity (i.e. OMR < 75%). In the multivariate analysis, BMI and AMH levels were negatively associated with an OMR < 75% (OR: 4.34 [95% CI: 1.96-9.6]; P < 0.001 and OR: 1.22 [95% CI: 1.03-1.12]; P = 0.015, respectively). Antigonadotrophic pretreatment decreased the risk of OMR < 75% compared to no pretreatment (OR: 0.72 [95% CI: 0.57-0.91]; P = 0.02). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION Our study is limited by its retrospective design and by the exclusion of patients who had hCG retriggers. However, this occurred in only six cycles. We were also not able to collect information on the duration of pretreatment and the duration of wash out period. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In clinical practice, to avoid poor ORR, GnRHa trigger alone should not be considered in patients with higher BMI and/or low ovarian reserve, balanced by the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. In the case of a low 12-h post-triggering LH level, practicians must be aware of the risk of poor ORR, and hCG retriggering could be considered. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) None. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Gambini
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy, France
| | - C Sonigo
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Paris Saclay, Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
| | - G Robin
- CHU de Lille, Université de Lille, Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France
| | - I Cedrin-Durnerin
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy, France
| | - C Vinolas
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy, France
| | - C Sifer
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Unité de Biologie de la Reproduction, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy, France
| | - Y Boumerdassi
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Unité de Biologie de la Reproduction, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy, France
| | - A Mayeur
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Paris Saclay, Service de Biologie de la Reproduction, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
| | - V Gallot
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Paris Saclay, Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
| | - M Grynberg
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy, France
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Paris Saclay, Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
| | - M Peigné
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Service de Médecine de la Reproduction et Préservation de la Fertilité, Hôpital Jean-Verdier, Bondy, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Svenstrup L, Möller S, Fedder J, Pedersen DE, Erb K, Andersen CY, Humaidan P. Investigation of luteal HCG supplementation in GnRH-agonist-triggered fresh embryo transfer cycles: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biomed Online 2024; 48:103415. [PMID: 38452605 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 09/14/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Does splitting the human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) support in IVF cycles triggered by a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist result in a better progesterone profile? DESIGN Randomized controlled three-arm study, performed at the Fertility Clinic, Odense University Hospital, Denmark. Patients with 12-25 follicles ≥12 mm were randomized into three groups: Group 1 - ovulation triggered with 6500 IU HCG; Group 2 - ovulation triggered with 0.5 mg GnRH agonist, followed by 1500 IU HCG on the day of oocyte retrieval (OCR); and Group 3 - ovulation triggered with 0.5 mg GnRH agonist, followed by 1000 IU HCG on the day of OCR and 500 IU HCG on OCR + 5. All groups received 180 mg vaginal progesterone. Progesterone concentrations were analysed in eight blood samples from each patient. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients completed the study. Baseline and laboratory data were comparable. Progesterone concentration peaked on OCR + 4 in Groups 1 and 2, and peaked on OCR + 6 in Group 3. On OCR + 6, the progesterone concentration in Group 2 was significantly lower compared with Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). On OCR + 8, the progesterone concentration in Group 3 was significantly higher compared with the other groups (both P<0.001). Progesterone concentrations were significantly higher in Group 3 from OCR + 6 until OCR + 14 compared with the other groups (all P ≤ 0.003). Four patients developed ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in Group 3. CONCLUSION Sequential HCG support after a GnRH agonist trigger provides a better progesterone concentration in the luteal phase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Svenstrup
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Fertility Clinic, Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Sören Möller
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Open Patient Data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Jens Fedder
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Research Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Fertility Clinic, Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Dorrit Elschner Pedersen
- Fertility Clinic, Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Karin Erb
- Fertility Clinic, Unit of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Claus Yding Andersen
- Laboratory of Reproductive Biology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Women, Children and Reproduction, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Peter Humaidan
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; The Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Skive, Denmark; Faculty of Health, Institute for Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Aziz NA, Ibrahim A, Ramli R, Yaacob N, Rahman SNA, Ismail EHE, Omar AA. Comparison between hCG and GnRH Agonist for Ovulation Trigger in GnRH Antagonist In-Vitro Fertilization Cycles in a Tertiary Hospital in Malaysia: An observational study. JBRA Assist Reprod 2024; 28:21-26. [PMID: 38224580 PMCID: PMC10936917 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20230066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE hCG is commonly used as an ovulation trigger in IVF. Its usage is associated with OHSS. GnRH agonist is an alternative to hCG and is associated with reduced incidence of OHSS. This study compared the cycle outcomes of GnRH agonists with hCG as an ovulation trigger in IVF cycles. METHODS The medical notes of 209 IVF cycles receiving GnRH agonist and hCG as ovulation trigger over 18 months were reviewed in this retrospective study. The number and quality of mature oocytes, the number and quality of embryos, pregnancy rates, and outcomes were compared using Independent T-test or One-way ANOVA for normal distribution. The Mann-Whitney test or Kruskal-Wallis test was used for not normally distributed. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS The cycle outcomes of 107 GnRH agonist-trigger and 102 hCG-trigger were compared. The MII oocytes retrieved and 2PN count was significantly higher in the GnRH agonist trigger group (p<0.001). Clinical pregnancy rate and ongoing pregnancy were higher in the GnRH agonist trigger group but were not statistically significant. The GnRH agonist trigger group was associated with low OHSS than the hCG trigger group (n=2(1.9%) and n=12(11.8%) respectively, p=0.004). CONCLUSION GnRH agonist trigger is an option as a final maturation trigger in high-responder women undergoing IVF or ICSI cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nor Azimah Aziz
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medical
Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gyneaecology, Hospital Universiti
Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Sultanah Nur
Zahirah, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
| | - Adibah Ibrahim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medical
Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gyneaecology, Hospital Universiti
Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Roziana Ramli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Sultanah Nur
Zahirah, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
| | - Nasuha Yaacob
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Sultanah Nur
Zahirah, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
| | - Siti Nabillah Abdul Rahman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hospital Sultanah Nur
Zahirah, Kuala Terengganu, Terengganu, Malaysia
| | - Engku Husna Engku Ismail
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medical
Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gyneaecology, Hospital Universiti
Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| | - Ahmad Akram Omar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medical
Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gyneaecology, Hospital Universiti
Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Thapa K, Khan H, Kaur G, Kumar P, Singh TG. Therapeutic targeting of angiopoietins in tumor angiogenesis and cancer development. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2023; 687:149130. [PMID: 37944468 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2023.149130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
The formation and progression of tumors in humans are linked to the abnormal development of new blood vessels known as neo-angiogenesis. Angiogenesis is a broad word that encompasses endothelial cell migration, proliferation, tube formation, and intussusception, as well as peri-EC recruitment and extracellular matrix formation. Tumor angiogenesis is regulated by angiogenic factors, out of which some of the most potent angiogenic factors such as vascular endothelial growth factor and Angiopoietins (ANGs) in the body are produced by macrophages and other immune cells within the tumor microenvironment. ANGs have a distinct function in tumor angiogenesis and behavior. ANG1, ANG 2, ANG 3, and ANG 4 are the family members of ANG out of which ANG2 has been extensively investigated owing to its unique role in modifying angiogenesis and its tight association with tumor progression, growth, and invasion/metastasis, which makes it an excellent candidate for therapeutic intervention in human malignancies. ANG modulators have demonstrated encouraging outcomes in the treatment of tumor development, either alone or in conjunction with VEGF inhibitors. Future development of more ANG modulators targeting other ANGs is needed. The implication of ANG1, ANG3, and ANG4 as probable therapeutic targets for anti-angiogenesis treatment in tumor development should be also evaluated. The article has described the role of ANG in tumor angiogenesis as well as tumor growth and the treatment strategies modulating ANGs in tumor angiogenesis as demonstrated in clinical studies. The pharmacological modulation of ANGs and ANG-regulated pathways that are responsible for tumor angiogenesis and cancer development should be evaluated for the development of future molecular therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Komal Thapa
- Chitkara School of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, 174103, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Heena Khan
- Chitkara College of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, 140401, Punjab, India
| | - Gagandeep Kaur
- Chitkara School of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, 174103, Himachal Pradesh, India
| | - Puneet Kumar
- Department of Pharmacology, Central University of Punjab, Ghudda, 151401, Bathinda, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Castillo J, Kol S. Time-sensitive assessment of luteal phase progesterone after HCG ovulation triggering: another brick off the wall? Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 47:103324. [PMID: 37716193 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2023.103324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
In recent years, there has been growing interest in understanding the dynamics of progesterone levels during the luteal phase after HCG-triggered ovulation. Recent studies have provided data showing a deviation from the natural ovulatory cycle, with peak progesterone concentrations occurring earlier and declining steadily thereafter, demonstrating that a fall in progesterone concentration early in the luteal phase was associated with lower rates of ongoing pregnancy. These findings highlight the importance of changes in progesterone concentration, rather than absolute concentrations, in determining optimal endometrial conditions. The disadvantages of HCG triggering, including the lack of a natural FSH surge and asynchronization between embryo age and endometrium receptivity, can be addressed by using gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) triggering. GnRHa triggering induces both LH and FSH surges, ensures appropriate progesterone concentrations and offers flexibility in manipulating the luteal phase. Transitioning to GnRHa triggering could improve infertility treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Castillo
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Instituto Bernabeu, Alicante, Spain
| | - Shahar Kol
- IVF unit, Elisha Hospital, Haifa, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guler I, Demirdag E, Akdulum MFC, Polat M, Erdem A, Erdem M. Serum LH level prior to progestin administration is significant on pregnancy and live birth in programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2023; 14:1293576. [PMID: 37929039 PMCID: PMC10621734 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1293576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the impact of serum LH levels prior to progestin administration on the outcomes of programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Methods Retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare the treatment outcomes between four groups based on the 25 percentiles of serum LH levels before progestin administration in 596 cycles of 518 patients undergoing artificial endometrial preparation protocols for FET. Primary outcome measures were ongoing and live birth rates. Secondary outcome measures were the pregnancy rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and pregnancy loss rates. Results The trends in clinical pregnancy (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) increased from the first to the fourth quartile (Q1 to Q4) of serum LH levels prior to progestin administration (37,0% to 48,3%, p = 0.042, and 22.6% to 39.5%, respectively, p = 0.003). Pregnancy loss rates (PLR) were higher in group Q1, although the difference was not statistically significant. Based on a multivariate logistic regression analysis, a low serum LH level before progestin initiation was found to be the most significant predictor associated with a negative effect on live birth (OR: 0,421, 95% CI 0,178 - 0,994, p=0,048). The day of estrogen initiation was significantly correlated with serum LH levels and quartiles of serum LH levels before progestin administration (r=0,200, p=0,015 and r=0,215, p=0,009, respectively). Conclusion The serum LH level prior to progestin administration significantly affects pregnancy and live birth rates in patients undergoing an artificial endometrial preparation protocol for FET. LH monitoring should be incorporated into the follow-up, in addition to assessing endometrial thickness and morphology in artificial FET cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Guler
- Gazi University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara, Türkiye
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ip PNP, Mak JSM, Law TSM, Ng K, Chung JPW. A reappraisal of ovarian stimulation strategies used in assisted reproductive technology. HUM FERTIL 2023; 26:824-844. [PMID: 37980170 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2023.2261627] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Ovarian stimulation is a fundamental step in assisted reproductive technology (ART) with the intention of inducing ovarian follicle development prior to timed intercourse or intra-uterine insemination and facilitating the retrieval of multiple oocytes during a single in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle. The basis of ovarian stimulation includes the administration of exogenous gonadotropins, with or without pre-treatment with oral hormonal therapy. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist or antagonist is given in addition to the gonadotropins to prevent a premature rise of endogenous luteinizing hormone that would in turn lead to premature ovulation. With the advancement in technology, various stimulation protocols have been devised to cater for different patient needs. However, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and its serious complications may occur following ovarian stimulation. It is also evident that suboptimal ovarian stimulation strategies may have a negative impact on oogenesis, embryo quality, endometrial receptivity, and reproductive outcomes over recent years. This review describes the various forms of pre-treatment for ovarian stimulation and stimulation protocols, and aims to provide clinicians with the latest available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia N P Ip
- Assisted Reproductive Technology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jennifer S M Mak
- Assisted Reproductive Technology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Tracy S M Law
- Assisted Reproductive Technology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Karen Ng
- Assisted Reproductive Technology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Jacqueline P W Chung
- Assisted Reproductive Technology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cevher Akdulum MF, Arık Sİ, Demirdağ E, Erdem M, Erdem A. In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes With a Dual Trigger in Normoresponders in Antagonist Cycles. Cureus 2023; 15:e45623. [PMID: 37868584 PMCID: PMC10588958 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45623] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate whether the dual trigger of ovulation with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and the standard dose of recombinant human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) (dual trigger) is better than hCG alone in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles of patients who responded well to ovarian stimulation. Methods Between January 2013 and December 2021, 5593 antagonist cycles of patients were reviewed. This study included women who had an antral follicle count of 5 or more and exhibited a normoresponse to ovarian stimulation using the GnRH antagonist protocol, as determined by the follicular output rate (FORT). The primary outcome indicators consisted of the quantities of retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes. The secondary outcome markers included live birth rates, clinical pregnancy rates, and continued pregnancy rates. Results A total of 1244 normoresponder women who met the inclusion criteria were identified from the scanned files and subsequently enrolled in the GnRH antagonist protocol. A total of 383 cycles were observed in the group that was given the standard hCG trigger while 861 cycles were observed in the group that was given the dual trigger. The number of mature oocytes and top-quality embryos was significantly higher in the dual trigger group. The maturation rate in the hCG group was 74.8% while it was 76.9% in the dual trigger group (p=0.018). The dual trigger group exhibited an ongoing pregnancy rate of 37.6%, whereas the hCG group had a rate of 30.1% (p = 0.02). The dual trigger group exhibited a slightly higher live birth rate (34.3% vs 29.2%, p = 0.11), although this difference did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion Dual trigger of ovulation was superior to hCG alone in terms of the number of mature oocytes yielded, top quality of embryos, maturation rates, and ongoing pregnancy in IVF cycles of normoresponders having ovarian stimulation on the GnRH antagonist protocol.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erhan Demirdağ
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University, School of Medicine, Ankara, TUR
| | - Mehmet Erdem
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gazi University, Ankara, TUR
| | - Ahmet Erdem
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gazi University, Ankara, TUR
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Clinical Application of Double Ovulation Stimulation in Patients with Diminished Ovarian Reserve and Asynchronous Follicular Development Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Technology. Curr Med Sci 2023; 43:304-312. [PMID: 36913110 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-022-2687-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to compare the clinical effects of double ovulation stimulation (DouStim) applied during the follicular and luteal phases with the antagonist protocol in patients with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) and asynchronous follicular development undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS The clinical data of patients with DOR and asynchronous follicular development receiving ART from January 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to their ovulation stimulation protocol: DouStim group (n=30) and antagonist group (n=62). Assisted reproduction and clinical pregnancy outcomes were compared between the two groups. RESULTS In the DouStim group, the number of oocytes retrieved, metaphase II (MII) oocytes, two-pronuclei (2PN), day 3 (D3) embryos, D3 high-quality embryos as well as blastocyst formation, implantation, and human chorionic gonadotropin-positive rates were significantly greater than those in the antagonist group (all P<0.05). No significant differences were found in MII, fertilization, or continued pregnancy rates at the first frozen embryo transfer (FET), in-vitro fertilization (IVF) cancellation, or early medical abortion rates between the groups (all P>0.05). Except for the early medical abortion rate, the DouStim group generally had favorable outcomes. In the DouStim group, the dosage and duration of gonadotropin and the fertilization rate were significantly greater in the first ovulation stimulation induction than in the second ovulation stimulation induction (P<0.05). CONCLUSION The DouStim protocol efficiently and economically obtained more mature oocytes and high-quality embryos for patients with DOR and asynchronous follicular development.
Collapse
|
11
|
Young SHR, Chang YE, Yang WCV, Lu BJ, Chou SY, Chen CH. Maximize the safety and efficacy of fertility preservation by random start/dual ovarian stimulation for early breast cancer patients. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 62:330-333. [PMID: 36965903 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2022.08.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 03/27/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE What is the more efficient and safer protocol during controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) for early-stage breast cancer patients seeking emergency fertility preservation before adjuvant chemo/radiotherapy? MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, case-series study involved two early-stage (Ia) breast cancer patients that requested for fertility preservation within 3 weeks. Random start/dual stimulation protocols with aromatase inhibitor (AI) were used to maximize oocyte yield and suppress serum estradiol (E2) level. RESULTS E2 levels on trigger day during dual COH were between 112.0 and 407.0 pg/mL. Duration of COH could be shortened to only 17 days, and up to 41 oocytes were successfully retrieved with two retrievals. CONCLUSION This remarkable efficient and safe protocol involves the combination of random start/dual stimulation with step-up AI dosage beforehand which not only maximize oocyte yield within the shortest possible timeframe, but also to maintain the low level of E2 to avoid over-stimulating estrogen-sensitive cancer cells and to decrease the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shih-Hung Richard Young
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hung-Chi Women & Children's Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yi-En Chang
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chung Vivian Yang
- The PhD Program for Translational Medicine, College of Medical Science and Technology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Buo-Jia Lu
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Szu-Yuan Chou
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Huang Chen
- Division of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kahraman S, Sahin Y, Duzguner INB, Duzguner S. Factors influencing the number of mature oocytes and cryopreservable blastocysts in hyperresponder patients triggered with a GnRH analog. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:407-416. [PMID: 36600075 PMCID: PMC9935779 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02702-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate which patient and cycle characteristics may affect the number of mature oocytes and cryopreservable blastocysts in the GnRH analog trigger cases. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of 2749 GnRHa trigger cycles in patients at risk of OHSS, including a group of PGT patients, between 2011 and 2020 at Istanbul Memorial Hospital, ART and Reproductive Genetics Center. Patient and cycle characteristics were evaluated using the Generalized Linear Mixed Model (GLMM). The number of mature oocytes and the number of cryopreservable blastocysts were evaluated. RESULTS A one-unit increase in female age, daily gonadotropin dose, E2 level on day 2, and LH level on trigger day significantly decreased the number of mature oocytes retrieved (p < 0.001) and the number of cryopreservable blastocysts as p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.003, respectively. The duration of GnRH antagonist use also decreased the number of mature oocytes retrieved (p < 0.001) but not the number of cryopreservable blastocysts. CONCLUSION The GLMM used in our study showed that a one-unit increase in female age, daily gonadotropin dose, E2 level on day 2, and LH level on trigger day significantly decreased the number of mature oocytes retrieved and the number of cryopreservable blastocysts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Semra Kahraman
- Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Genetics Center, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Piyalepasa Bulvari, Sisli, Istanbul, 34384, Turkey.
| | - Yucel Sahin
- Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Genetics Center, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Piyalepasa Bulvari, Sisli, Istanbul, 34384, Turkey
| | - Ipek Nur Balin Duzguner
- Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Genetics Center, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Piyalepasa Bulvari, Sisli, Istanbul, 34384, Turkey
| | - Soner Duzguner
- Assisted Reproductive Technologies and Reproductive Genetics Center, Istanbul Memorial Hospital, Piyalepasa Bulvari, Sisli, Istanbul, 34384, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Drakopoulos P, Khalaf Y, Esteves SC, Polyzos NP, Sunkara SK, Shapiro D, Rizk B, Ye H, Costello M, Koloda Y, Salle B, Lispi M, D'Hooghe T, La Marca A. Treatment algorithms for high responders: What we can learn from randomized controlled trials, real-world data and models. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2023; 86:102301. [PMID: 36646567 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2022.102301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
A high ovarian response to conventional ovarian stimulation (OS) is characterized by an increased number of follicles and/or oocytes compared with a normal response (10-15 oocytes retrieved). According to current definitions, a high response can be diagnosed before oocyte pick-up when >18-20 follicles ≥11-12 mm are observed on the day of ovulation triggering; high response can be diagnosed after oocyte pick-up when >18-20 oocytes have been retrieved. Women with a high response are also at high risk of early ovarian hyper-stimulation syndrome (OHSS)/or late OHSS after fresh embryo transfers. Women at risk of high response can be diagnosed before stimulation based on several indices, including ovarian reserve markers (anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] and antral follicle count [AFC], with cutoff values indicative of a high response in patients with PCOS of >3.4 ng/mL for AMH and >24 for AFC). Owing to the high proportion of high responders who are at the risk of developing OHSS (up to 30%), this educational article provides a framework for the identification and management of patients who fall into this category. The risk of high response can be greatly reduced through appropriate management, such as individualized choice of the gonadotropin starting dose, dose adjustment based on hormonal and ultrasound monitoring during OS, the choice of down-regulation protocol and ovulation trigger, and the choice between fresh or elective frozen embryo transfer. Appropriate management strategies still need to be defined for women who are predicted to have a high response and those who have an unexpected high response after starting treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panagiotis Drakopoulos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, 21526, Egypt.
| | - Yakoub Khalaf
- Reproductive Medicine and Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Sandro C Esteves
- ANDROFERT, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Campinas, Brazil; Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nikolaos P Polyzos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, 08028, Barcelona, Spain; Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent (UZ Gent), 9000, Gent, Belgium
| | - Sesh K Sunkara
- Department of Women's Health, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Great Maze Pond, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Botros Rizk
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Alabama, Mobile, AL, 36604, USA
| | - Hong Ye
- Chongqing Key Laboratory of Human Embryo Engineering, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Clinical Research Center for Reproductive Medicine, Chongqing, China; Reproductive and Genetic Institute, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children, No. 64 Jin Tang Street, Yu Zhong District, Chongqing, 400013, China
| | - Michael Costello
- Division of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, School of Women's and Children's Health, UNSW and Royal Hospital for Women and Monash IVF, Sydney, Australia
| | - Yulia Koloda
- Center of Reproduction "Life Line", Moscow, Russia; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education, Moscow, Russia
| | - Bruno Salle
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CHU Lyon, Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, 59 Bd Pinel, 69500, Bron, France; Université Claude Bernard, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Sud, 165 Chemin Du Petit Revoyet, Oullins, France; INSERM Unité, 1208, 18 Avenue Doyen Lépine, Bron, France
| | - Monica Lispi
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; PhD School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Unit of Endocrinology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University Medical School, New Haven, USA
| | - Antonio La Marca
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences for Mother, Child and Adult, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, and Clinica Eugin, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Letrozole and Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS): A Promising Prevention Strategy. J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12020614. [PMID: 36675543 PMCID: PMC9862679 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12020614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS) is an uncommon but serious complication occurring in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation. It is characterized by ovarian enlargement, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain/distension, and reduction in urine output. However, OHSS may rarely evolve into a life-threatening condition with ascites, hemoconcentration and hypercoagulability. Prevention of OHSS consists of an integrated approach that associates behavioral aspects with administration of pharmacological compounds. Among drugs used to manage OHSS, Letrozole has recently been proposed as an effective option for prevention of the syndrome. However, despite the promising findings reported by several studies, to date Letrozole is not yet officially mentioned in the guidelines for "Prevention and Treatment of moderate and severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome". In this scenario, the current study discusses Letrozole approaches scientifically available to prevent OHSS.
Collapse
|
15
|
Santulli P, Blockeel C, Bourdon M, Coticchio G, Campbell A, De Vos M, Macklon KT, Pinborg A, Garcia-Velasco JA. Fertility preservation in women with benign gynaecological conditions. Hum Reprod Open 2023; 2023:hoad012. [PMID: 37124950 PMCID: PMC10130191 DOI: 10.1093/hropen/hoad012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Although a wealth of data has been published regarding fertility preservation (FP) in women with malignant diseases who receive gonadotoxic treatment, the role of FP in non-malignant conditions has been studied to a much lesser extent. These include benign haematological, autoimmune, and genetic disorders, as well as a multitude of benign gynaecological conditions (BGCs) that may compromise ovarian reserve and/or reproductive potential due to pathogenic mechanisms or as a result of medical or surgical treatments. Alongside accumulating data that document the reproductive potential of cryopreserved oocytes and ovarian tissue, there is potential interest in FP for women with BGCs at risk of infertility; however, there are currently insufficient data about FP in women with BGCs to develop guidelines for clinical practice. The purpose of this article is to appraise the available evidence regarding FP for BGC and discuss potential strategies for FP based on estimated ovarian impairment and on short-term and long-term reproductive goals of patients. Cost-effectiveness considerations and patients' perspectives will also be discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro Santulli
- Correspondence address. Service de Gynécologie-Obstétrique II et Médecine de la Reproduction, CHU Cochin—Bâtiment Port Royal, 123 Boulevard de Port-Royal 75679 Paris 14, France. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | - Michel De Vos
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kirsten Tryde Macklon
- Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anja Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Juan A Garcia-Velasco
- Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad (IVI-RMA), Madrid, Spain
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Dong L, Lian F, Wu H, Xiang S, Li Y, Wei C, Yu X, Xin X. Reproductive outcomes of dual trigger with combination GnRH agonist and hCG versus trigger with hCG alone in women undergoing IVF/ICSI cycles: a retrospective cohort study with propensity score matching. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2022; 22:583. [PMID: 35869444 PMCID: PMC9308204 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-04899-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite a large number of studies on the selection of trigger drugs, it remains unclear whether the dual trigger with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, compared to the trigger with hCG alone, can improve the reproductive outcome of patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the laboratory and clinical outcomes of dual trigger versus single trigger. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we evaluated 520 in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (IVF/ICSI) cycles between July 2014 and September 2020 at the Reproductive and Genetic Center of Integrative Medicine, The Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine. All patients underwent IVF/ICSI treatment with fresh embryo transfer using the GnRH antagonist protocol. We used propensity score matching to control for confounding variables and binary logistic regression analysis to determine the correlations between trigger methods and pregnancy outcomes. After propensity score matching, 57 cycles from each group were evaluated and compared for laboratory or clinical outcomes in this retrospective cohort study. Results There was no significant difference in the number of oocytes retrieved, embryos available, top-quality embryos, or the rate of normal fertilization between the dual-trigger and single-trigger protocols, respectively. The incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, implantation rate, biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, ectopic pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate, and live birth rate were also similar between the two groups, while the miscarriage rate (37.0% vs. 12.5%, p = 0.045) was higher in the dual-trigger than the single-trigger group. Subsequent binary logistic regression analysis showed that age was a remarkably significant independent predictor of both clinical pregnancy rate (odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval: 0.84–0.97, p = 0.006) and live birth rate (odds ratio = 0.89, 95% confidence interval: 0.82–0.97, p = 0.005). Conclusions Therefore, dual-trigger for final oocyte maturation might increase miscarriage rate, but in terms of the laboratory and other pregnancy outcomes such as clinical pregnancy rate, early miscarriage rate or live birth rate, there was no evidence to show that dual trigger was superior to an hCG-trigger alone for patients undergoing GnRH-antagonist cycles with fresh embryo transfer. Trial registration Retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bilister Egilmez C, Koyu A, Azak Pazarlar B, Keselik E, Oz Oyar E, Kurus M. Effects of intracerebroventricular and intravenous administration of Kisspeptin-54 and Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist in rats with ovarian hyperstimulation. Neuropeptides 2022; 96:102298. [PMID: 36367482 DOI: 10.1016/j.npep.2022.102298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2022] [Revised: 10/15/2022] [Accepted: 10/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aim to determine the effect of local and systemic administration of kisspeptin-54 on ovarian hyperstimulation. METHODS Immature female rats were used. In order to generate the ovarian hyperstimulation model, 50 IU PMSG was administered for 4 consecutive days and a single dose of 25 IU hCG was administered to all groups except for the sham group. To synchronize the sham group, a single dose of 10 IU PMSG followed by 10 IU hCG (48 h later) was applied. Kisspeptin-54 and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists were administered 48 h after hCG injection. While intracerebroventricular injection is performed with stereotaxic surgery, Intravenous administration was from the tail vein. Ovarian weights were measured. FSH, LH, estrogen and progesterone hormones were detected in serum by ELISA. VEGFa, IL-1β, TNF-α, MCP-1 immunohistochemical staining was performed on the ovaries and hypothalamus and their optical densities were determined with Image J. Kiss1R mRNA expression was determined by qRT-PCR. RESULTS Ovarian weights increased significantly in the OHSS group and the systemic GnRH agonist group. The optical densities of VEGFa, IL-1β, TNF- α and MCP-1 immunoreactivity showed us that both local and systemic applied kisspeptin-54 attenuates the level of investigated inflammation parameters in the ovaries. Moreover, local administration of kisspeptin-54 has been shown to enhance the level of Kiss1R mRNA in both the ovaries and the hypothalamus. CONCLUSION(S) Local and systemic administration of Kisspeptin-54 as a post-treatment reduces inflammation parameters in the ovaries. These findings promote the potential use of kisspeptin-54 on OHSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cansu Bilister Egilmez
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey.
| | - Ahmet Koyu
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Burcu Azak Pazarlar
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Erdi Keselik
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Eser Oz Oyar
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Meltem Kurus
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Faculty of Medicine, Izmir Katip Celebi University, Izmir, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
ELhelw EM, El Serour AGEA, Rady MS, Abdeltawab A. Freeze-all policy versus luteal phase support with low dose of human chorionic gonadotrophin for high-responder patients undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection on pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort observational study. MIDDLE EAST FERTILITY SOCIETY JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s43043-022-00113-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
The literature has always controversies on the use of freeze-all policy in high-responder women performing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. In this article, we discuss the benefits of freeze-all policy on the incidence of pregnancy outcomes and the complications.
The main body of abstract
Freeze-all policy is applied to the intracytoplasmic sperm injection program by freezing of all embryos and delaying embryo transfer to another subsequent ovarian cycle, to decrease the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, especially in high-responder women. Unfortunately, freeze-all policy is correlated with an increase in the economic costs and more ICSI laboratory effort. Delayed embryo transfer (ET) is correlated with more anxiety among the patients. An alternative strategy is to perform fresh embryo transfer with more intensive luteal phase support to compensate for the negative effect of the GnRH agonist on the endometrial receptivity and luteal phase support.
Short conclusion
The freeze-all policy had better pregnancy rates with less incidence of moderate to severe hyperstimulation syndrome compared with original fresh embryo transfer in high-responder women performing intracytoplasmic sperm injection.
Collapse
|
19
|
Rahav Koren R, Miller N, Moran R, Decter D, Berkowitz A, Haikin Herzberger E, Wiser A. GnRH agonist-triggering ovulation in women with advanced age. Sci Rep 2022; 12:16401. [PMID: 36180515 PMCID: PMC9525572 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-20619-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
This study evaluates the effect of GnRH agonist (GnRHa) trigger for ovulation induction among women with advanced maternal age (AMA). This is a retrospective study performed at a single assisted reproductive technology centre, 2012 to 2020. A total of 306 patients with 515 IVF cycles who were triggered with GnRHa for Ovum Pick Up (OPU), were divided into two groups according to maternal age: age ≥ 40 and age < 40. The groups were compared for demographics, stimulation parameters of IVF treatment and IVF treatment outcomes. The patients in the age < 40 group were approximately 10 years younger than the patients in the age ≥ 40 group (31 ± 5.4 vs. 41.5 ± 1.3 years, p < 0.001). The age ≥ 40 group had significantly higher mean E2/retrieved oocytes ratio, compared to the age < 40 group (310.3 ± 200.6 pg/ml vs. 239 ± 168.2 pg/ml, p = 0.003), and a lower mean MII/retrieved oocyte (35 ± 37.8 vs. 43.4 ± 35.9, p = 0.05, respectively). Multivariable logistic regression analysis for E2/retrieved oocytes demonstrated that age < 40 and total dose of gonadotropins were significant variables. In conclusion, GnRHa for ovulation triggering in high responder patients prior to OPU appears to be a good option for AMA. However, this population is characterized by different parameters of ovarian response that require further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roni Rahav Koren
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 4428164, Kfar Saba, Israel. .,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Netanella Miller
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 4428164, Kfar Saba, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Rimon Moran
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 4428164, Kfar Saba, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Dean Decter
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 4428164, Kfar Saba, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Arie Berkowitz
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 4428164, Kfar Saba, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Einat Haikin Herzberger
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 4428164, Kfar Saba, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Amir Wiser
- IVF Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tchernichovsky St., 4428164, Kfar Saba, Israel.,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, 6997801, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tulek F, Kahraman A, Demirel LC. Dual trigger with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin improves live birth rates in POSEIDON group 3 and 4 expected poor responders. Gynecol Endocrinol 2022; 38:731-735. [PMID: 35856433 DOI: 10.1080/09513590.2022.2101635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of dual triggering with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) on outcomes of fresh embryo transfers following gonadotropin antagonist cycles in POSEIDON group 3 and group 4 low prognosis women and to compare the outcomes with hCG-only triggering. METHODS This study was conducted by retrospective analysis of patients with expected poor ovarian response (POSEIDON group 3 and 4) that underwent fresh embryo transfers following in-vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles with either dual triggering or hCG-only triggering between January 2010 and April 2020. A total of 1068 women that underwent dual triggering and 1931 that underwent hCG-only triggering were included in the study. RESULTS Number of retrieved oocytes, M2 oocytes, oocyte maturation rate, fertilization rate, obtained 2PN embryos, implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth delivery rates were found significantly higher in dual-triggering group in comparison to hCG-only group (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.02, p < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSION Dual trigger with concomitant injections of GnRH agonist and hCG in GnRH antagonist cycles appears to improve IVF outcomes, increase quality of embryos, reduce miscarriage rates and consequently increase live birth delivery rates in POSEIDON groups 3/4 poor responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Firat Tulek
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Midwifery, Uskudar University, Istanbul, Turkey
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial Atasehir Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alper Kahraman
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haseki Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Lutfi Cem Demirel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Memorial Atasehir Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Grynnerup AG, Løssl K, Toftager M, Bogstad JW, Prætorius L, Zedeler A, Pinborg A. Predictive performance of peritoneal fluid in the pouch of Douglas measured five days after oocyte pick-up in predicting severe late-onset OHSS: A secondary analysis of a randomized trial. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2022; 274:83-87. [PMID: 35609351 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate if the amount of peritoneal fluid (PF) in the Pouch of Douglas at oocyte pick-up (OPU) or OPU + 5 days predict severe late-onset ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in women undergoing ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive technology (ART). STUDY DESIGN A secondary analysis of a dual-centre RCT on 1050 women referred for their first ART treatment in two public fertility clinics in Denmark and randomized 1:1 to GnRH-antagonist or GnRH-agonist protocol. All women from the two arms who were examined on day of OPU and OPU + 5 days were included in this study (n = 940). The ability of PF in the pouch of Douglas to predict severe late-onset OHSS was assessed by multivariate logistic regression analyses and receiver operator characteristics (ROC) curve analyses and compared with other known predictors of OHSS. The final models were cross-validated by the leave-one-out method to assess the models' generalizability. RESULTS A total of 28 (3%) women developed severe late-onset OHSS. PF in the pouch of Douglas measured on OPU + 5 days predicted severe late-onset OHSS. The optimal cut-off value was 17.5 mm at OPU + 5 days with a 61% sensitivity and 71% specificity (Area under the curve = 0.70 95% CI 0.61-0.80). PF on the day of OPU was not predictive of late on-set OHSS as the adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses showed insignificant results. CONCLUSION Although PF in the pouch of Douglas could predict late-onset severe OHSS, the low sensitivity underlines that it is not useful as a sole marker to decide whether to perform blastocyst transfer or to use a freeze-all strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A G Grynnerup
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark.
| | - K Løssl
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark; Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Toftager
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - J W Bogstad
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark; Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - L Prætorius
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - A Zedeler
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - A Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Kettegård Allé 30, DK-2650 Hvidovre, Denmark; Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Strączyńska P, Papis K, Morawiec E, Czerwiński M, Gajewski Z, Olejek A, Bednarska-Czerwińska A. Signaling mechanisms and their regulation during in vivo or in vitro maturation of mammalian oocytes. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2022; 20:37. [PMID: 35209923 PMCID: PMC8867761 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-022-00906-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2021] [Accepted: 02/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In vitro fertilization (IVF) is currently one of the most effective methods of infertility treatment. An alternative to commonly used ovarian hyperstimulation can become extracorporeal maturation of oocytes (in vitro maturation; IVM). Fertilization and normal development of the embryo depends on the cytoplasmic, nuclear and genomic maturity of the oocyte. The microenvironment of the ovarian follicle and maternal signals, which mediate bidirectional communication between granulosa, cumulus and oocyte cells, influence the growth, maturation and acquisition of oocyte development capability. During oogenesis in mammals, the meiosis is inhibited in the oocyte at the prophase I of the meiotic division due to the high cAMP level. This level is maintained by the activity of C-type natriuretic peptide (CNP, NPPC) produced by granulosa cells. The CNP binds to the NPR2 receptor in cumulus cells and is responsible for the production of cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP). The cGMP penetrating into the oocyte through gap junctions inhibits phosphodiesterase 3A (PDE3A), preventing cAMP hydrolysis responsible for low MPF activity. The LH surge during the reproductive cycle reduces the activity of the CNP/NPR2 complex, which results in a decrease in cGMP levels in cumulus cells and consequently in the oocyte. Reduced cGMP concentration unblocks the hydrolytic activity of PDE3A, which decreases cAMP level inside the oocyte. This leads to the activation of MPF and resumption of meiosis. The latest IVM methods called SPOM, NFSOM or CAPA IVM consist of two steps: prematuration and maturation itself. Taking into account the role of cAMP in inhibiting and then unblocking the maturation of oocytes, they have led to a significant progress in terms of the percentage of mature oocytes in vitro and the proportion of properly developed embryos in both animals and humans.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrycja Strączyńska
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Oncological Gynecology in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Faculty of Medical Sciences in Zabrze, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
- Gyncentrum Fertility Clinic, Katowice, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Papis
- Center for Translational Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
- nOvum Fertility Clinic, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Emilia Morawiec
- Gyncentrum Fertility Clinic, Katowice, Poland
- Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine in Zabrze, University of Technology in Katowice, Katowice, Poland
| | | | - Zdzisław Gajewski
- Center for Translational Medicine, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Anita Olejek
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Oncological Gynecology in Bytom, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Najdecki R, Michos G, Peitsidis N, Timotheou E, Chartomatsidou T, Kakanis S, Chouliara F, Mamopoulos A, Papanikolaou E. Agonist triggering in oocyte donation programs-Mini review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:838236. [PMID: 36093096 PMCID: PMC9462512 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.838236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Oocyte donation programs involve young and healthy women undergoing heavy ovarian stimulation protocols in order to yield good-quality oocytes for their respective recipient couples. These stimulation cycles were for many years beset by a serious and potentially lethal complication known as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The use of the short antagonist protocol not only is patient-friendly but also has halved the need for hospitalization due to OHSS sequelae. Moreover, the replacement of beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (b-hCG) with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) triggering has reduced OHSS occurrence significantly, almost eliminating its moderate to severe presentations. Despite differences in the dosage and type of GnRH-a used across different studies, a comparable number of mature oocytes retrieved, fertilization, blastulation, and pregnancy rates in egg recipients are seen when compared to hCG-triggered cycles. Nowadays, GnRH-a tend to be the triggering agents of choice in oocyte donation cycles, as they are effective and safe and reduce OHSS incidence. However, as GnRH-a triggering does not eliminate OHSS altogether, caution should be practiced in order to avoid unnecessary lengthy and heavy ovarian stimulation that could potentially compromise both the donor's wellbeing and the treatment's efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Najdecki
- Assisting Nature, Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
- *Correspondence: Robert Najdecki,
| | - Georgios Michos
- Assisting Nature, Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Nikos Peitsidis
- Assisting Nature, Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Evangelia Timotheou
- Assisting Nature, Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | - Stelios Kakanis
- 3rd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Foteini Chouliara
- Assisting Nature, Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Apostolos Mamopoulos
- 3rd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Evangelos Papanikolaou
- Assisting Nature, Centre of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
- 3rd Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abdulkhalikova D, Bokal EV, Stimpfel M, Ciglar P, Korosec S. Reproductive Outcome After GnRH Agonist Triggering With Co-Administration of 1500 IU hCG on the Day of Oocyte Retrieval in High Responders: A Long-Term Retrospective Cohort Study. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2022; 13:826411. [PMID: 35464066 PMCID: PMC9019487 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.826411] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
UNLABELLED While triggering oocyte maturation with GnRH agonist (GnRHa) seems to be safe and effective in terms of the risk of developing OHSS and the number of metaphase II oocytes, it nevertheless results in luteal phase deficiency. To date, strategies have been developed in order to rescue defective luteal phase of GnRHa triggered cycles. Our study aimed to assess the reproductive outcome of GnRHa triggered cycles combined with modified luteal support (1500 IU hCG at the day of oocyte retrieval) in women with high ovarian response and to compare the outcome with hCG triggered cycles in GnRH antagonist IVF-ICSI procedures. A retrospective cohort database review of the results of GnRH antagonist IVF-ICSI cycles was conducted at a tertiary-care IVF center in Ljubljana, Slovenia. A total of 6126 cycles, performed from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2020, were included in the final analysis. Final oocyte maturation was performed with either 5000, 6500, or 10,000 IU hCG (women with normal ovarian response) or 0.6 mg GnRHa (buserelin), supplemented with 1500 IU hCG on the day of oocyte retrieval (in women with high ovarian response). In cases of excessive ovarian response and/or high risk of OHSS luteal support was not introduced and all good quality blastocysts were frozen. According to significant differences in patients' age and the number of oocytes in the two groups, matching by age and number of oocytes was performed. No significant differences were observed regarding pregnancy rate per embryo transfer, rate of early pregnancy loss, and livebirth rate per pregnancy between the GnRHa and hCG trigger groups, respectively. A significant difference in the number of developed embryos and blastocysts, as well as the number of frozen blastocysts, was seen in favor of the GnRHa trigger. However, the birth weight in the GnRHa trigger group was significantly lower. CONCLUSION The results of our study support the use of GnRHa for final oocyte maturation in GnRH antagonist IVF cycles in women with high ovarian response. Luteal phase rescue was performed by co-administration of 1500 IU hCG on the day of oocyte retrieval and estradiol and progesterone supplementation. In our experience, such an approach results in a comparable reproductive outcome with hCG trigger group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dzhamilyat Abdulkhalikova
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Human Reproduction, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Eda Vrtacnik Bokal
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Human Reproduction, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Martin Stimpfel
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Human Reproduction, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primoz Ciglar
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Ptuj General Hospital, Ptuj, Slovenia
| | - Sara Korosec
- Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Department of Human Reproduction, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- *Correspondence: Sara Korosec,
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Ghunaim S, Khalife D, Taha L, Odeh O, Habr N, Awwad J. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome following the use of GnRH agonist trigger of final oocyte maturation and freeze-all strategy: A case report and review of the literature. ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTION 2022. [DOI: 10.4103/2305-0500.356846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
26
|
Lovrec VG, Kozar N, Reljic M. Outcome of vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer performed on days 5–7 after urine LH detection. Reprod Biomed Online 2021; 44:630-635. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 11/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
27
|
Sharma R, Meena I. To Compare the Effect of GnRH Agonist versus Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) Trigger on Clinical Pregnancy Rate in Intrauterine Insemination Cycle. J Hum Reprod Sci 2021; 14:267-272. [PMID: 34759616 PMCID: PMC8527070 DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_100_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Context: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist trigger mimics the natural surge more closely with both luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone surge. The present study attempts to find whether this apparent physiological advantage translates into the better pregnancy rate. Aims: To compare the effect of GnRH agonist versus human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger on the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) in infertile women undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) with oral ovulogens. Settings and Design: Retrospective analysis at a tertiary care in vitro fertilization center. Materials and Methods: The records of 280 infertile women, who underwent IUI with oral ovulogens were analyzed. Women who received 0.2 mg triptorelin (GnRH agonist (GnRHa)) as trigger were categorised in Group A (n = 129) and those who received 10,000 IU urinary hCG in Group B (n = 151). The outcome in terms of CPR was studied. Statistical Analysis Used: The quantitative variables were compared using the independent t-test/Mann–Whitney test. The qualitative variables were compared using the Chi-square test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There was a trend toward better CPR in Group A (21/129 – 16.28%) than in Group B (16/151 – 10.60%), although the difference was not found to be statistically significant (P – 0.162). Conclusions: There was a trend toward better CPR with the use of GnRH agonist trigger in IUI cycles with oral ovulogens in comparison to hCG trigger, although the difference was not found to be statistically significant. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rashmi Sharma
- IVF and Reproductive medicine, Origyn fertility and IVF, 4 floor HB Twin Tower-2 NSP Near D Mall, Pitampura New Delhi -110 034, India
| | - Imlesh Meena
- IVF and Reproductive medicine, Origyn fertility and IVF, 4 floor HB Twin Tower-2 NSP Near D Mall, Pitampura New Delhi -110 034, India
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Zareii A, Davoodi S, Alborzi M, Moghadam ME, Askary E. Co-administration of GnRH agonists with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle: An RCT. Int J Reprod Biomed 2021; 19:863-872. [PMID: 34805726 PMCID: PMC8595909 DOI: 10.18502/ijrm.v19i10.9817] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Revised: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since progesterone alone does not seem to be enough for luteal phase support (LPS), especially in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles, so gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) is suggested as an adjuvant therapy in combination with progesterone for LPS. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of the administration of GnRH-a with vaginal progesterone compared to vaginal progesterone alone in luteal phase support of the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this randomized controlled clinical trial, 240 infertile women who were candidates for FET were evaluated into two groups (n = 120/each). Group I received 400 mg vaginal progesterone twice a day from the time of transfer. The second group received vaginal progesterone and also 0.1 mg diphereline on days 0, 3, and 6 of FET for LPS. Finally, the clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, and the implantation, and spontaneous abortion rates were compared in two groups. RESULTS Results showed that there was no significant difference between the mean age of women and the duration of infertility (p = 0.78, p = 0.58, respectively). There were no significant differences between groups in the terms of implantation and spontaneous abortion rates (p = 0.19, p = 0.31, respectively). However, in terms of clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates, the significant differences were seen between groups (p = 0.008 and p = 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSION Co-administration of GnRH-a and vaginal progesterone in LPS may be superior to vaginal progesterone alone in women who underwent a frozen-selected embryo transfer cycle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Afsoon Zareii
- Infertility Division, Infertility Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sara Davoodi
- Infertility Division, Infertility Research Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mahshid Alborzi
- Infertility Division, School of Medicine, Jahrom University of Medical Sciences, Jahrom, Iran
| | | | - Elham Askary
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Laparoscopy Research Center, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mutlu I, Demirdag E, Cevher F, Erdem A, Erdem M. Dual trigger with the combination of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist and standard dose of human chorionic gonadotropin improves in vitro fertilisation outcomes in poor ovarian responders. J OBSTET GYNAECOL 2021; 42:1239-1244. [PMID: 34565274 DOI: 10.1080/01443615.2021.1945560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
The study aimed to evaluate the impact of the dual trigger with the combination of GnRH agonist and standard dose of recombinant hCG on IVF outcomes in poor ovarian responders with GnRH antagonist protocol. 1283 cycles of 1010 poor responder patients according to Bologna criteria were retrospectively analysed in terms of final oocyte maturation: dual trigger group (250 μg hCG + 0.2 mg triptorelin) or standard group (250 μg hCG). Primary outcome measures were the number of retrieved and mature oocytes. The secondary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates.The number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, and the top-quality embryos transferred were significantly higher in the dual trigger group (p < .001). Fertilisation rates (73.6% vs 69.6%, p = .009), implantation rates (18.7% vs 14.6, p = .039), clinical pregnancy rate per embryo transfer (27.5% vs. 19.9%, p = .010) and live birth rate per embryo transfer (21.6% vs. 14.9%, p = .011) were also significantly higher in the dual trigger group as compared to the hCG trigger group. The usage of dual trigger with a GnRH agonist and a standard dosage of hCG could improve clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates in poor ovarian responders undergoing GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI cycles.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Dual trigger with standard dose of hCG has been the subject of trials in normal responders to optimise IVF outcomes. The results of these studies showed significant improvements in implantation and pregnancy rates with an increase in the number of mature oocytes retrieved. As a result, dual trigger has become a popular ovulation trigger option in GnRH antagonist cycles.What do the results of this study add? There is limited data about the use of dual trigger in poor ovarian responders (PORs). According to our study, increasing the number of retrieved oocytes, mature oocytes, the number of fertilised oocytes, the number of transferred embryos and top quality embryos transferred by using dual trigger in patients with PORs have a positive impact on pregnancy outcomes.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? These findings implies potential advantages of dual trigger usage for improving IVF outcomes in PORs. With large sample sized prospective randomised trials, dual trigger with combination of GnRHa and a standard dose of hCG might replace the traditional ovulation trigger with hCG in PORs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilknur Mutlu
- IVF Unit, Novaart IVF and Women Health Center, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Erhan Demirdag
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Funda Cevher
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Erdem
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Erdem
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
In reply to: Christ J, Herndon CN, Yu B. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome associated with long-acting GnRH agonist in oncofertility patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38:751-6. doi:10.1007/s10815-020-02051. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:2801-2802. [PMID: 34431024 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02305-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
|
31
|
Zhang Y, Guo X, Guo L, Chang HM, Shu J, Leung PCK. Outcomes comparison of IVF/ICSI among different trigger methods for final oocyte maturation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. FASEB J 2021; 35:e21696. [PMID: 34085322 DOI: 10.1096/fj.202100406r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Revised: 04/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
During the in vitro fertilization treatment, human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) is routinely used as a substitute for the natural endogenous LH surge during the final stage of oocyte maturation. However, it does not provide the FSH surge observed in the mid-cycle of the natural cycle. To date, whether the FSH surge can improve oocyte quality and pregnancy outcomes remains unknown. Randomized controlled trials comparing the following four trigger methods to conventional hCG were examined: GnRH agonist (GnRHa), kisspeptin, GnRHa plus hCG (dual trigger), and FSH plus hCG (FSH co-trigger). The results showed that the use of dual triggers was associated with a significantly higher number of retrieved cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) (weighted mean difference [WMD] 1.625, 95% CI 0.684-2.565), retrieved mature oocytes (WMD 0.986, 95% CI 0.426-1.545) and fertilized (2PN) oocytes (WMD 0.792, 95% CI 0.083-1.501), compared with the use of hCG. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of pregnancy rate. The FSH co-trigger resulted in significantly higher rates of 2PN oocytes retrieved than the hCG trigger (WMD 0.077, 95% CI 0.028-0.126). Notably, the risk of OHSS did not differ among the three treatment groups compared to that of the hCG group. This review protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD 42020194201).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Zhang
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Xiaoyan Guo
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Linjiang Guo
- Public Policy Research Institute, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hsun-Ming Chang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jing Shu
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Peter C K Leung
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In a conventional IVF cycle, final oocyte maturation and ovulation is triggered with a bolus of hCG, followed by progesterone-based luteal support that spans several weeks if pregnancy is achieved. This article summarizes several approaches of the exogenous progesterone-free luteal support in IVF. RECENT FINDINGS Triggering ovulation with GnRH agonist may serve as an alternative to hCG, with well established advantages. In addition, the luteal phase can be individualized in order to achieve a more physiologic hormonal milieu, and a more patient friendly treatment, alleviating the burden of a lengthy exogenous progesterone therapy. SUMMARY GnRH agonist trigger followed by a 'freeze all' policy is undoubtedly the best approach towards the 'OHSS-free clinic'. If fresh embryo transfer is considered well tolerated after GnRH agonist trigger, rescue of the corpora lutea by LH activity supplementation is mandatory. Herein we discuss the different approaches of corpus luteum rescue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahar Kol
- IVF Unit, Elisha Hospital, Haifa, Israel
| | - Peter Humaidan
- The Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Skive
- Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus
- Faculty of Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Shapiro M, Romanski P, Thomas A, Lanes A, Yanushpolsky E. Low dose hCG supplementation in a Gn-RH-agonist trigger protocol is associated with worse pregnancy outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. FERTILITY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021; 7:12. [PMID: 34049598 PMCID: PMC8161625 DOI: 10.1186/s40738-021-00104-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
Background A number of studies have looked at dual triggers with hCG and GnRH agonist (GnRHa) in varying doses, but the question remains: what is the optimal dose of hCG to minimize ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and still offer adequate pregnancy rates? The purpose of this study was to compare pregnancy and OHSS rates following dual trigger for oocyte maturation with GnRHa and a low-dose hCG versus hCG alone. A secondary objective was the assess pregnancy outcomes in subsequent frozen cycles for the same population. Methods A total of 963 women < 41 years old, with a BMI 18–40 kg/m2 and an AMH > 2 ng/mL who underwent fresh autologous in vitro fertilization (IVF) with GnRH antagonist protocol at a University-based fertility center were included in this retrospective cohort study. Those who received a low dose dual trigger with hCG (1000u) and GnRHa (2 mg) were compared to those who received hCG alone (10,000u hCG/250-500 μg Ovidrel). Differences in implantation rates, pregnancy, live birth, and OHSS were investigated. Results The dual trigger group was younger (mean 33.6 vs 34.1 years), had a higher AMH (6.3 vs 4.9 ng/mL,) more oocytes retrieved (18.1 vs 14.9) and a higher fertilized oocyte rate (80% vs 77%) compared with the hCG only group. Yet, the dual trigger group had a lower probability of clinical pregnancy (gestational sac, 43.4% vs 52.8%) and live birth (33.4% vs 45.8%), all of which were statistically significant. There were 3 cases of OHSS, all in the hCG-only trigger group. In subsequent frozen cycles, pregnancy rates were comparable between the two groups. Conclusions The dual trigger group had a better prognosis based on age and AMH levels and had better stimulation outcomes, but significantly worse pregnancy outcomes, suggesting the low dose hCG (1000u) in the dual trigger may not have provided adequate luteal support, compared to an hCG-only trigger (10,000u hCG/250-500 μg Ovidrel). Interestingly, the pregnancy rates were comparable in subsequent frozen cycles, further supporting the hypothesis that the issue lies in inadequate luteal phase support, rather than embryo quality. Based on these findings, our program has changed the protocol to 1500u of hCG in a dual trigger.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maren Shapiro
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Center for Reproductive Health, University of California, 499 Illinois Street, 6th floor, San Francisco, CA, 94158, USA.
| | - Phillip Romanski
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Ronald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ann Thomas
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrea Lanes
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elena Yanushpolsky
- Obstetrics & Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Does gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist cause luteolysis by inducing apoptosis of the human granulosa-luteal cells? J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:2301-2305. [PMID: 34031766 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02226-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluates the effect of different modes of final follicular maturation triggering on the degree of apoptosis of granulosa cells (GCs) and the potential effect on progesterone secretion. METHODS Thirty patients undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation for IVF who received hCG, GnRH agonist, or dual trigger for final follicular maturation were included in the study. Granulosa cells were obtained at the time of oocyte retrieval. The proportion of apoptotic cells was evaluated via TUNEL and immunohistochemistry. RESULTS The proportion of apoptotic cells was significantly higher in the GnRH agonist-alone group compared to hCG-alone and the dual trigger groups (13.5 ± 1.5% vs. 7.8% ± 1.8 vs. 10.1% ± 2, respectively, P < 0.01). Moreover, the expression of active-caspase-3 was also significantly increased in the GnRH agonist-alone group compared with the hCG-alone and the dual trigger groups (15.5% ± 2.9 vs. 8.4% ± 1.6 vs. 12.7% ± 2.6, respectively, P < 0.01). The progesterone levels measured in the granulosa-luteal cell culture medium after 24 h of incubation were similar between the three groups. CONCLUSIONS The levels of apoptosis are increased after GnRH agonist/dual trigger. The increased apoptosis might be one of the culprit of the subsequent premature demise of the corpus luteum post GnRH agonist trigger.
Collapse
|
35
|
Luteal Support with very Low Daily Dose of Human Chorionic Gonadotropin after Fresh Embryo Transfer as an Alternative to Cycle Segmentation for High Responders Patients Undergoing Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist-Triggered IVF. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14030228. [PMID: 33800021 PMCID: PMC7998839 DOI: 10.3390/ph14030228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The segmentation of the in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycle, consisting of the freezing of all embryos and the postponement of embryo transfer (ET), has become popular in recent years, with the main purpose of preventing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in patients with high response to controlled ovarian stimulation (COS). Indeed cycle segmentation (CS), especially when coupled to a GnRH-agonist trigger, was shown to reduce the incidence of OHSS in high-risk patients. However, CS increases the economic costs and the work amount for IVF laboratories. An alternative strategy is to perform a fresh ET in association with intensive luteal phase pharmacological support, able to overcome the negative effects of the GnRH-agonist trigger on the luteal phase and on endometrial receptivity. In order to compare these two strategies, we performed a retrospective, real-life cohort study including 240 non-polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCO) women with expected high responsiveness to COS (AMH >2.5 ng/mL), who received either fresh ET plus 100 IU daily human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as luteal support (FRESH group, n = 133), or cycle segmentation with freezing of all embryos and postponed ET (CS group, n = 107). The primary outcomes were: implantation rate (IR), live birth rate (LBR) after the first ET, and incidence of OHSS. Overall, significantly higher IR and LBR were observed in the CS group than in the FRESH group (42.9% vs. 27.8%, p < 0.05 and 32.7% vs. 19.5%, p < 0.05, respectively); the superiority of CS strategy was particularly evident when 16-19 oocytes were retrieved (LBR 42.2% vs. 9.5%, p = 0.01). Mild OHSS appeared with the same incidence in the two groups, whereas moderate and severe OHSS forms were observed only in the FRESH group (1.5% and 0.8%, respectively). In conclusion, in non-PCO women, high responders submitted to COS with the GnRH-antagonist protocol and GnRH-agonist trigger, CS strategy was associated with higher IR and LBR than the strategy including fresh ET followed by luteal phase support with a low daily hCG dose. CS appears to be advisable, especially when >15 oocytes are retrieved.
Collapse
|
36
|
Oocyte competence is independent of the ovulation trigger adopted: a large observational study in a setting that entails vitrified-warmed single euploid blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:1419-1427. [PMID: 33661465 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02124-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether the GnRH-agonist or urinary-hCG ovulation triggers affect oocyte competence in a setting entailing vitrified-warmed euploid blastocyst transfer. METHODS Observational study (April 2013-July 2018) including 2104 patients (1015 and 1089 in the GnRH-a and u-hCG group, respectively) collecting ≥1 cumulus-oocyte-complex (COC) and undergoing ICSI with ejaculated sperm, blastocyst culture, trophectoderm biopsy, comprehensive-chromosome-testing, and vitrified-warmed transfers at a private clinic. The primary outcome measure was the euploid-blastocyst-rate per inseminated oocytes. The secondary outcome measure was the maturation-rate per COCs. Also, the live-birth-rate (LBR) per transfer and the cumulative-live-birth-delivery-rate (CLBdR) among completed cycles were investigated. All data were adjusted for confounders. RESULTS The generalized-linear-model adjusted for maternal age highlighted no difference in the mean euploid-blastocyst-rate per inseminated oocytes in either group. The LBR per transfer was similar: 44% (n=403/915) and 46% (n=280/608) in GnRH-a and hCG, respectively. On the other hand, a difference was reported regarding the CLBdR per oocyte retrieval among completed cycles, with 42% (n=374/898) and 25% (n=258/1034) in the GnRh-a and u-hCG groups, respectively. Nevertheless, this variance was due to a lower maternal age and higher number of inseminated oocytes in the GnRH-a group, and not imputable to the ovulation trigger itself (multivariate-OR=1.3, 95%CI: 0.9-1.6, adjusted p-value=0.1). CONCLUSION GnRH-a trigger is a valid alternative to u-hCG in freeze-all cycles, not only for patients at high risk for OHSS. Such strategy might increase the safety and flexibility of controlled-ovarian-stimulation with no impact on oocyte competence and IVF efficacy.
Collapse
|
37
|
Suboptimal response to GnRH agonist trigger: causes and practical management. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2021; 33:213-217. [PMID: 33896918 DOI: 10.1097/gco.0000000000000701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW GnRH agonist products are used extensively worldwide to trigger ovulation and final oocyte maturation in in vitro fertilization cycles. The purpose of this article is to outline possible causes for a suboptimal response to the GnRH agonist trigger. RECENT FINDINGS Risk factors for such a suboptimal response include prolonged hormonal contraceptive use, previous GnRHa-induced pituitary downregulation, a hypogonadotropic/hypogonadal condition, patient error, environmental conditions that may damage the GnRHa product used, GnRH and luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors polymorphisms, low baseline LH and low endogenous serum LH levels on trigger day as well as low BMI. The induction of an adequate LH surge can be ascertained by an LH urine test 12 h post trigger. SUMMARY In most cases, GnRHa trigger elicits effective LH+follicle stimulating hormone surges, resulting in mature, fertilizable oocytes. Clinical awareness to conditions that may predispose to a suboptimal response to the GnRHa trigger may prevent failed oocyte retrial.
Collapse
|
38
|
Deepika K, Suvarna R, Sumi M, Snehal D, Arveen V, Anuja K, Gautham P, Kamini R. HCG trigger versus GnRH agonist trigger in PCOS patients undergoing IVF cycles: frozen embryo transfer outcomes. JBRA Assist Reprod 2021; 25:48-58. [PMID: 32960521 PMCID: PMC7863104 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The use of Gonadotrophin releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), with freeze-all strategy followed by frozen embryo transfer (FET) has been found to eliminate the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) undergoing IVF cycles. However, physicians still hesitate to routinely use GnRHa as a trigger, replacing human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), for concerns of compromised cycle outcome. We aimed to evaluate outcomes following the transfer of embryos in FET cycles obtained from GnRHa trigger in comparison with hCG trigger in PCOS patients of Asian origin. Methods: Prospective observational cohort study. 210 PCOS patients undergoing IVF in an antagonist protocol who were randomized in the previous study (to evaluate if GnRHa trigger is a better alternative than hCG in PCOS patients to prevent OHSS; Group A: GnRHa trigger (n=92)] and Group B: hCG trigger (n=101)], were followed up in FET cycles to assess the outcomes. Results: The odds of cumulative live birth rate per stimulation cycle favors GnRHa trigger against the hCG trigger [OR=2.15; (CI 1.2-3.83); p=0.008]. A significantly higher number of mature oocytes (19.1±11.7 versus 14.1±4.3; p<0.001) and blastocysts (4.2±1.63 versus 3.26±1.22; p<0.001) were available in the GnRHa group as compared to the hCG group. Conclusion: The cumulative live birth rate was better following transfer of frozen-thawed embryos generated from GnRHa-triggered cycles compared to hCG trigger. Hence, in PCOS undergoing IVF, as a good practice point, hCG trigger should be replaced by a GnRHa trigger with vitrification of all embryos followed by FET.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Maria Sumi
- Milann, the fertility Centre, Bangalore, India
| | | | | | | | | | - Rao Kamini
- Milann, the fertility Centre, Bangalore, India
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Noushin AM, Singh S, Sonia A, Singh S, Basheer R, Ashraf R, Waseem AN, Ashraf M. Genuine Empty Follicle Syndrome: Role of Double Trigger and Delayed Oocyte Retrieval (DTDO). J Hum Reprod Sci 2021; 14:36-41. [PMID: 34083990 PMCID: PMC8057151 DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.jhrs_230_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Empty follicle syndrome (EFS) is a condition of undetermined etiology where no oocytes are retrieved in an ART cycle despite adequate response to ovarian stimulation and diligent follicular aspiration. Because of the rarity of this condition, no much published strategies are available to tackle this. AIM The aim of this study was to evaluate whether sequential administration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as a trigger at 40 h and 36 h, respectively, before oocyte retrieval (OCR) could correct genuine empty follicle syndrome (GEFS). STUDY SETTING AND DESIGN This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in a tertiary fertility center over a period of 6 years from January 2014 to December 2019. Patients with a history of GEFS were administered GnRHa and recombinant hCG subcutaneously at 40 h and 36 h, respectively, before OCR, i.e., double trigger and delayed oocyte retrieval (DTDO) (n = 13). The primary outcome measures studied were number of mature oocytes retrieved, oocyte maturation index (OMI), number of fertilized oocytes, and number of embryos available for embryo transfer. The secondary outcome measures were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), miscarriage rate (MR) and live birth rate (LBR) per first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle, incidence of inadvertent premature ovulation, and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Comparison between the groups was analysed by Fisher's exact test and paired t-test. RESULTS Patients in the DTDO group showed a significant improvement (P < 0.01) in the number of mature oocytes retrieved, OMI, number of fertilized oocytes, and number of embryos available for embryo transfer. In the first FET cycle, CPR (44.44%), LBR (44.44%), and MR (11.11%) were observed in the DTDO group. CONCLUSION Our findings implicate that double trigger and delayed OCR (DTDO) is a safe and efficacious treatment strategy for GEFS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Majiyd Noushin
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CRAFT Hospital and Research Centre, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Sankalp Singh
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CRAFT Hospital and Research Centre, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Aluvilayil Sonia
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CRAFT Hospital and Research Centre, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Swati Singh
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CRAFT Hospital and Research Centre, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Reema Basheer
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CRAFT Hospital and Research Centre, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Raiza Ashraf
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CRAFT Hospital and Research Centre, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Ahmed N. Waseem
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CRAFT Hospital and Research Centre, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| | - Mohamed Ashraf
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, CRAFT Hospital and Research Centre, Thrissur, Kerala, India
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Zhu H, Zhao C, Pan Y, Zhou H, Jin X, Xu W, Zhang S. Dual Trigger for Final Follicular Maturation Improves Cumulative Live-Birth Rate in Ovarian Stimulation for Freeze-All In Vitro Fertilization/Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection Cycles. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:708247. [PMID: 34349729 PMCID: PMC8326793 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.708247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Does dual trigger in freeze-all in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles improve the cumulative live-birth outcome compared with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger? SUMMARY ANSWER Dual trigger for final follicular maturation improves the cumulative pregnancy and live-birth rates compared with hCG trigger in freeze-all IVF/ICSI cycles. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Dual trigger could increase the numbers of oocytes and mature oocytes and improve pregnancy rates. STUDY DESIGN SIZE DURATION This retrospective cohort analysis included data from 4438 freeze-all IVF/ICSI cycles between January 2012 and December 2017. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS SETTING METHODS Women aged 20-49 years who underwent ovarian stimulation and oocyte retrieval for autologous IVF/ICSI with a freeze-all policy in our centre were enrolled. Data on number of oocytes retrieved, number of mature oocytes, clinical pregnancy rate, live-birth rate, cumulative pregnancy rate, and cumulative live-birth rate (CLBR) were assessed and compared between patients who underwent a dual trigger and hCG trigger. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to identify and adjust for factors known to independently affect the CLBR. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE A total of 4438 IVF/ICSI cycles were analyzed, including 1445 cycles with single hCG trigger and 2993 cycles with dual trigger. The cumulative biochemical pregnancy rate (60.8% vs. 68.1%, P<0.001; odds ratio (OR): 0.727; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.638-0.828), cumulative clinical pregnancy rate (52.9% vs. 58.5%, P<0.001; OR: 0.796; 95%CI: 0.701-0.903), and CLBR (44.3% vs. 50.5%, P<0.001; OR: 0.781; 95%CI: 0.688-10.886) were all significantly lower in the hCG-trigger group compared with the dual-trigger group. The clinical pregnancy rate (48.2% vs. 58.2%, P=0.002; OR: 0.829; 95%CI: 0.737-0.934) and embryo implantation rate (34.4% vs. 38.9%, P<0.001; OR: 0.823; 95%CI: 0.750-0.903) in each transfer cycle were also significantly lower in the hCG-trigger group compared with the dual-trigger group. After controlling for all potential confounding variables, the trigger method was identified as an independent factor affecting the CLBR. The OR and 95%CI for hCG trigger were 0.780 and 0.641-0.949 (P=0.013). LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION The data used to analyse the effect of dual trigger on cumulative pregnancy and live-birth outcomes were retrospective, and the results may thus have been subject to inherent biases. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are required to verify the beneficial effects of dual trigger. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Dual trigger had a positive effect on CLBRs, suggesting that it could be used as a routine trigger method in freeze-all cycles. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This study was supported by grants from National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1004800), the Natural Science Program of Zhejiang (LY19H040009), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81601236). No authors have competing interests to declare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haiyan Zhu
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Songying Zhang, ; Haiyan Zhu,
| | - Chenqiong Zhao
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yibin Pan
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Hanjing Zhou
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xiaoying Jin
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wen Xu
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
| | - Songying Zhang
- Assisted Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Management of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Songying Zhang, ; Haiyan Zhu,
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Abstract
In vitro fertilization is indicated for infertile women with polycystic ovarian syndrome (PCOS) after unsuccessful treatment with ovulation induction agents or in women deemed high-risk of multiple gestations who are ideal candidates for single embryo transfers. PCOS patients are at increased risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; therefore, attention should be made in the choice of in vitro fertilization treatment protocol, dose of gonadotropin utilized, and regimen to achieve final oocyte maturation. Adopting these strategies in addition to close monitoring may significantly reduce the ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome risk. Future developments may improve pregnancy outcomes and decrease complications in PCOS women undergoing fertility treatment.
Collapse
|
42
|
Kim SJ, Kim TH, Park JK, Eum JH, Lee WS, Lyu SW. Effect of a dual trigger on oocyte maturation in young women with decreased ovarian reserve for the purpose of elective oocyte cryopreservation. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2020; 47:306-311. [PMID: 33227187 PMCID: PMC7711099 DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2020.03657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 08/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to determine whether co-administration of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) for final oocyte maturation improved mature oocyte cryopreservation outcomes in young women with decreased ovarian reserve (DOR) compared with hCG alone. Methods Between January 2016 and August 2019, controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) cycles in women (aged ≤35 years, anti-Müllerian hormone [AMH] <1.2 ng/mL) who underwent elective oocyte cryopreservation for fertility preservation were retrospectively analyzed. Results A total of 76 COS cycles were triggered with a GnRH agonist and hCG (the dual group) or hCG alone (the hCG group). The mean age and serum AMH levels were comparable between the two groups. The duration of stimulation, total dose of follicle-stimulating hormone used, and total number of oocytes retrieved were similar. However, the number of mature oocytes retrieved and the oocyte maturation rate were significantly higher in the dual group than in the hCG group (p=0.010 and p<0.001). After controlling for confounders, the dual-trigger method remained a significant factor related to the number of mature oocytes retrieved (p=0.016). Conclusion We showed improved mature oocyte collection and maturation rate with the dual triggering of oocyte maturation in young women with DOR. A dual trigger appears to be more beneficial than hCG alone in terms of mature oocyte cryopreservation for young women with DOR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Se Jeong Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae Hyung Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Kyun Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Hee Eum
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Sik Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Woo Lyu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fertility Center of CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Şükür YE, Ulubaşoğlu H, İlhan FC, Berker B, Sönmezer M, Atabekoğlu CS, Aytaç R, Özmen B. Dual trigger in normally-responding assisted reproductive technology patients increases the number of top-quality embryos. Clin Exp Reprod Med 2020; 47:300-305. [PMID: 33113599 PMCID: PMC7711097 DOI: 10.5653/cerm.2020.03804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The feasibility of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) trigger in normal responders is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to compare the number of mature oocytes, the number of good-quality embryos, and the live birth rate in normal responders triggered by GnRHa alone, GnRHa and human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG; a dual trigger), and hCG alone. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the infertility clinic of a university hospital. Data from 200 normal responders who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation and intracytoplasmic sperm injection with a GnRH antagonist protocol between January 2016 and January 2017 were reviewed. The first study group consisted of patients with cycles triggered by GnRHa alone. The second study group consisted of patients with cycles triggered by both GnRHa and low-dose hCG (a dual trigger). The control group consisted of patients with cycles triggered by hCG alone. Results The groups were comparable in terms of demographics and cycle characteristics. The numbers of total oocytes retrieved and metaphase II oocytes were similar between the groups. The total numbers of top-quality embryos were 3.2±2.9 in the GnRHa group, 4.4±3.2 in the dual-trigger group, and 2.9±2.1 in the hCG group (p=0.014). The live birth rates were 21.4%, 30.5%, and 28.2% in those groups, respectively (p=0.126). Conclusion In normal responders, a dual-trigger approach appears superior to an hCG trigger alone with regard to the number of top-quality embryos produced. However, no clinical benefit was apparent in terms of live birth rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yavuz Emre Şükür
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hasan Ulubaşoğlu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Ceylan İlhan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yenimahalle State Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bülent Berker
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Murat Sönmezer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cem Somer Atabekoğlu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ruşen Aytaç
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Batuhan Özmen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tsakiridis I, Najdecki R, Tatsi P, Timotheou E, Kalinderi K, Michos G, Virgiliou A, Yarali H, Athanasiadis A, Papanikolaou EG. Evaluation of the safety and efficacy of corifollitropin alfa combined with GnRH agonist triggering in oocyte donation cycles. A prospective longitudinal study. JBRA Assist Reprod 2020; 24:436-441. [PMID: 32489086 PMCID: PMC7558885 DOI: 10.5935/1518-0557.20200033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: In order to help make the dream of parenthood come true for oocyte acceptors, it is essential that the procedure is not dangerous or unpleasant for oocyte donors. The aim of this study was to identify differences in safety, efficacy and patient acceptability between a traditional stimulation antagonist protocol with recombinant-FSH (rFSH) with hCG-triggering, compared with an innovative antagonist protocol with corifollitropin alfa (Elonva®) plus GnRH agonist triggering in oocyte donors. Methods: A prospective longitudinal study was conducted at an in vitro fertilization center in Greece. The same eighty donors underwent two consecutive antagonist stimulation schemes. Primary outcomes were patient satisfaction (scored by a questionnaire) and delivery rate per donor. Secondary outcomes were mean number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes, metaphase II (MII) oocytes and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rate. Results: Donors reported better adherence and less discomfort with the corifollitropin alpha + GnRH agonist-triggering protocol (p<0.001). No significant differences were identified in the clinical pregnancy rate per donor (p=0.13), the delivery rates, the number of oocytes (p=0.35), the number of MII oocytes (p=0.50) and the number of transferred embryos, between the two protocols. However, the luteal phase duration was significantly shorter (p<0.001) in the corifollitropin alpha + GnRH agonist-triggering protocol. Moreover, three cases of moderate OHSS (3.75%) were identified after hCG triggering, whereas no case of OHSS occurred after GnRH agonist ovulation induction (p=0.25). Conclusion: The use of corifollitropin alpha combined with a GnRH agonist for triggering is a safe, effective and acceptable protocol for oocyte donors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioannis Tsakiridis
- 3rd Department Ob-Gyn, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Robert Najdecki
- Assisting Nature, Center of Reproduction & Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Petroula Tatsi
- Assisting Nature, Center of Reproduction & Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Evi Timotheou
- Assisting Nature, Center of Reproduction & Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Kallirhoe Kalinderi
- 3rd Department Ob-Gyn, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Georgios Michos
- 3rd Department Ob-Gyn, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Andriana Virgiliou
- 3rd Department Ob-Gyn, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | | | | | - Evangelos G Papanikolaou
- 3rd Department Ob-Gyn, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Assisting Nature, Center of Reproduction & Genetics, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Oron G, Sapir O, Wertheimer A, Shufaro Y, Bar-Gil R, Margalit T, Shlush E, Ben-Haroush A. A matched propensity score study of embryo morphokinetics following gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus human chorionic gonadotropin trigger. J Assist Reprod Genet 2020; 37:2777-2782. [PMID: 32980940 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-020-01953-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 09/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare morphokinetic parameters and quality of embryos derived from GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles triggered either with GnRH agonist or standard hCG between matched groups of patients. METHODS Morphokinetic parameters of embryos derived from matched first GnRH antagonist ICSI cycles triggered by GnRH agonist or standard hCG between 2013 and 2016 were compared. Matching was performed for maternal age, peak estradiol levels, and number of oocytes retrieved. Outcome measures were: time to pronucleus fading (tPNf), cleavage timings (t2-t8), synchrony of the second and third cycles (S2 and S3), duration of the second and third cycle (CC2 and CC3), optimal cell cycle division parameters, and known implantation data (KID) scoring for embryo quality. Multivariate linear and logistic regression analyses were performed for confounding factors. RESULTS We analyzed 824 embryos from 84 GnRH agonist trigger cycles and 746 embryos from 84 matched hCG trigger cycles. Embryos derived from the cycles triggered with hCG triggering cleaved faster than those deriving from GnRH agonist trigger. The differences were significant throughout most stages of embryo development (t3-t6), and a shorter second cell cycle duration of the hCG trigger embryos was observed. There was no difference in synchrony of the second and third cell cycles and the optimal cell cycle division parameters between the two groups, but there was a higher percentage of embryos without multinucleation in the hCG trigger group (27.8% vs. 21.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION The type of trigger in matched antagonist ICSI cycles was found to affect early embryo cleavage times but not embryo quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Galia Oron
- Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel.
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Onit Sapir
- Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Avital Wertheimer
- Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yoel Shufaro
- Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Roni Bar-Gil
- Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tamar Margalit
- Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ekaterina Shlush
- Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Avi Ben-Haroush
- Infertility and IVF Unit, Helen Schneider Hospital for Women, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, 4941492, Petah Tikva, Israel
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lainas GT, Lainas TG, Sfontouris IA, Chatzimeletiou K, Venetis CA, Bosdou JK, Tarlatzis BC, Grimbizis GF, Kolibianakis EM. Is oocyte maturation rate associated with triptorelin dose used for triggering final oocyte maturation in patients at high risk for severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? Hum Reprod 2020; 34:1770-1777. [PMID: 31384921 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez105] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2019] [Revised: 05/01/2019] [Accepted: 05/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
STUDY QUESTION Are oocyte maturation rates different among 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mg triptorelin used for triggering final oocyte maturation in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) undergoing ICSI? SUMMARY ANSWER A dose of 0.1 mg triptorelin results in similar oocyte maturation rates compared to higher doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg in patients at high risk for OHSS undergoing ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY The GnRH agonist triptorelin is widely used instead of hCG for triggering final oocyte maturation, in order to eliminate the risk of severe OHSS in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. However, limited data are currently available regarding its optimal dose use for this purpose in patients at high risk for OHSS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A retrospective study was performed between November 2015 and July 2017 in 131 infertile patients at high risk for severe OHSS undergoing ovarian stimulation for ICSI. High risk for severe OHSS was defined as the presence of at least 19 follicles ≥11 mm in diameter on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Ovarian stimulation was performed with recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. Patients received 0.1 (n = 42), 0.2 (n = 46) or 0.4 mg (n = 43) triptorelin for triggering final oocyte maturation. Hormonal evaluation of FSH, LH, estradiol (E2) and progesterone (PRG) was carried out on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, 8 and 36 hours post triggering and 3, 5, 7, and 10 days after triptorelin administration. During this period, all patients were assessed for symptoms and signs indicative of severe OHSS development. Primary outcome measure was oocyte maturation rate, defined as the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes divided by the number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes retrieved per patient. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE No significant differences in patient baseline characteristics were observed among the 0.1 mg, the 0.2 mg and the 0.4 mg groups. Regarding the primary outcome measure, no differences were observed in oocyte maturation rate among the three groups compared [82.6% (17.8%) versus 83.3% (18.8%) versus 85.1% (17.2%), respectively, P = 0.686].In addition, no significant differences were present among the 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg groups, regarding the number of mature (MII) oocytes [21 (13) versus 20 (6) versus 20 (11), respectively; P = 0.582], the number of oocytes retrieved [25.5 (13) versus 24.5 (11) versus 23 (12), respectively; P = 0.452], oocyte retrieval rate [81.0% (17.7%) versus 76.5% (23.5%) versus 75.0% (22.5), respectively; P = 0.088], the number of fertilized (two pronuclei) oocytes [12.5 (9) versus 14.5 (7) versus 14.0 (8), respectively; P = 0.985], fertilization rate [71.7% (22%) versus 77.1% (19.1%) versus 76.6% (23.3%), respectively; P = 0.525] and duration of luteal phase [7 (1) versus 8 (2) versus 7 (1) days, respectively; P = 0.632]. Moreover, no significant differences were present among the three triptorelin groups regarding serum levels of LH, FSH, E2 and PRG at any of the time points assessed following triggering of final oocyte maturation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This is a retrospective study, and although there were no differences in the baseline characteristics of the three groups compared, the presence of bias cannot be excluded. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Based on the results of the current study, it appears that triggering final oocyte maturation with a lower (0.1 mg) or a higher dose (0.4 mg) of triptorelin, as compared to the most commonly used dose of 0.2 mg, does not confer any benefit in terms of oocyte maturation rate in patients at high risk for severe OHSS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funding was obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G T Lainas
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Eugonia Unit of Assisted Reproduction, Athens, Greece
| | - T G Lainas
- Eugonia Unit of Assisted Reproduction, Athens, Greece
| | | | - K Chatzimeletiou
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - C A Venetis
- Centre for Big Data Research in Health and School of Women's and Children's Health UNSW Medicine, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - J K Bosdou
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - B C Tarlatzis
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - G F Grimbizis
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - E M Kolibianakis
- Unit of Human Reproduction, First Department of OB/Gyn, Medical School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Blockeel C, Campbell A, Coticchio G, Esler J, Garcia-Velasco JA, Santulli P, Pinborg A. Should we still perform fresh embryo transfers in ART? Hum Reprod 2020; 34:2319-2329. [PMID: 31803911 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of researchers have alluded to the potential benefit of deferring the transfer of embryos produced during assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) away from ovarian stimulation, using cryopreservation to enable this. The scientific evidence that may justify this recent trend in the use of the so-called 'freeze-all strategy' includes early, mostly small randomised controlled trials that have demonstrated an increase in live birth rates after elective embryo cryopreservation in certain patient populations, as well as evidence from cohort studies and retrospective analyses. What are the risks and benefits of freeze-all strategies in ART, who are the patients in whom it is likely to be advantageous, and does the current evidence allow us to identify situations when deciding that a fresh embryo transfer would be counter-productive? ART professionals are often faced with challenging clinical decisions regarding the best course of treatment for their patient. The purpose of this opinion paper is to provide a clinical guide for whether to perform a fresh embryo transfer or to opt for freezing all embryos in specific situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Blockeel
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | | - John Esler
- Queensland Fertility Group, Toowoomba Specialist Centre, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Juan A Garcia-Velasco
- Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad (IVI-RMA), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pietro Santulli
- Université Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Paris, France.,Faculté de Médecine, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.,Department of Development, Reproduction and Cancer, Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016 (Professor Batteux), Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Anja Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lee RWK, Khin LW, Hendricks MS, Tan HH, Nadarajah S, Tee NWS, Loh SF, Tai BC, Chan JK. Ovarian biomarkers predict controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilisation treatment in Singapore. Singapore Med J 2020; 61:463-468. [PMID: 33043373 DOI: 10.11622/smedj.2020130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ovarian biomarkers have been shown to predict responses to controlled ovarian hyperstimulation (COH) during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) in predominantly Caucasian populations, with limited studies performed in Southeast Asian women in Singapore. METHODS We evaluated the performance of serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone and oestradiol levels, antral follicle count (AFC), body mass index, ovarian volume, and age to establish thresholds for the prediction of poor (< 4 oocytes retrieved) and excessive responses (> 19 oocytes retrieved) in 263 women undergoing COH. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to calculate probabilities for poor and excessive responders to COH. RESULTS 36 (13.7%) and 50 (19.0%) women had poor and excessive response to COH, respectively. An AMH value of 0.69 ng/mL predicted poor ovarian response with positive likelihood ratio (LR) of 2.94, compared to an AFC of ≤ 5 when the positive LR is 2.36. Conversely, an AMH value of ≥ 3.06 ng/mL predicted excessive ovarian response with positive LR of 2.24, compared to an AFC cut-off of ≥ 12 with positive LR of 1.93. CONCLUSION AMH levels and AFC are equivalent in the prediction of both poor and excessive ovarian response in women undergoing IVF. Our study highlights the importance of establishing population-specific cut-off biomarker values so that protocols can be tailored to optimise IVF treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan Wai Kheong Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Lay Wai Khin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Heng Hao Tan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Sadhana Nadarajah
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nancy Wen Sim Tee
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore
| | | | - Bee Choo Tai
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore, Singapore.,NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jerry Ky Chan
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore.,Programme in Cancer and Stem Cell Biology, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Stormlund S, Sopa N, Zedeler A, Bogstad J, Prætorius L, Nielsen HS, Kitlinski ML, Skouby SO, Mikkelsen AL, Spangmose AL, Jeppesen JV, Khatibi A, la Cour Freiesleben N, Ziebe S, Polyzos NP, Bergh C, Humaidan P, Andersen AN, Løssl K, Pinborg A. Freeze-all versus fresh blastocyst transfer strategy during in vitro fertilisation in women with regular menstrual cycles: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2020; 370:m2519. [PMID: 32759285 PMCID: PMC7399608 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m2519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the ongoing pregnancy rate between a freeze-all strategy and a fresh transfer strategy in assisted reproductive technology treatment. DESIGN Multicentre, randomised controlled superiority trial. SETTING Outpatient fertility clinics at eight public hospitals in Denmark, Sweden, and Spain. PARTICIPANTS 460 women aged 18-39 years with regular menstrual cycles starting their first, second, or third treatment cycle of in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. INTERVENTIONS Women were randomised at baseline on cycle day 2 or 3 to one of two treatment groups: the freeze-all group (elective freezing of all embryos) who received gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist triggering and single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in a subsequent modified natural cycle; or the fresh transfer group who received human chorionic gonadotropin triggering and single blastocyst transfer in the fresh cycle. Women in the fresh transfer group with more than 18 follicles larger than 11 mm on the day of triggering had elective freezing of all embryos and postponement of transfer as a safety measure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome was the ongoing pregnancy rate defined as a detectable fetal heart beat after eight weeks of gestation. Secondary outcomes were live birth rate, positive human chorionic gonadotropin rate, time to pregnancy, and pregnancy related, obstetric, and neonatal complications. The primary analysis was performed according to the intention-to-treat principle. RESULTS Ongoing pregnancy rate did not differ significantly between the freeze-all and fresh transfer groups (27.8% (62/223) v 29.6% (68/230); risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.10, P=0.76). Additionally, no significant difference was found in the live birth rate (27.4% (61/223) for the freeze-all group and 28.7% (66/230) for the fresh transfer group; risk ratio 0.98, 95% confidence interval 0.87 to 1.10, P=0.83). No significant differences between groups were observed for positive human chorionic gonadotropin rate or pregnancy loss, and none of the women had severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome; only one hospital admission related to this condition occurred in the fresh transfer group. The risks of pregnancy related, obstetric, and neonatal complications did not differ between the two groups except for a higher mean birth weight after frozen blastocyst transfer and an increased risk of prematurity after fresh blastocyst transfer. Time to pregnancy was longer in the freeze-all group. CONCLUSIONS In women with regular menstrual cycles, a freeze-all strategy with gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist triggering for final oocyte maturation did not result in higher ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates than a fresh transfer strategy. The findings warrant caution in the indiscriminate application of a freeze-all strategy when no apparent risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome is present. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02746562.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sacha Stormlund
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Allé 30, Copenhagen DK-2650, Denmark
| | - Negjyp Sopa
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Allé 30, Copenhagen DK-2650, Denmark
| | - Anne Zedeler
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Allé 30, Copenhagen DK-2650, Denmark
| | - Jeanette Bogstad
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisbeth Prætorius
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Allé 30, Copenhagen DK-2650, Denmark
| | | | | | - Sven O Skouby
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anne Lis Mikkelsen
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Holbæk University Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark
| | - Anne Lærke Spangmose
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Ali Khatibi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Nina la Cour Freiesleben
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Allé 30, Copenhagen DK-2650, Denmark
| | - Søren Ziebe
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Nikolaos P Polyzos
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Dexeus University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Christina Bergh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg University, Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Peter Humaidan
- Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital and Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Anders Nyboe Andersen
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristine Løssl
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Anja Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Hvidovre, Kettegaard Allé 30, Copenhagen DK-2650, Denmark
- Fertility Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bar Hava I, Yafee H, Omer Y, Humaidan P, Ganer Herman H. GnRHa for trigger and luteal phase support in natural cycle frozen embryo transfer - A proof of concept study. Reprod Biol 2020; 20:282-287. [PMID: 32741721 DOI: 10.1016/j.repbio.2020.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to explore whether ovulation induced by a GnRH analogue (GnRHa), followed by daily GnRHa luteal support provides an efficient platform for natural cycle frozen embryo transfer (NC-FET). In this cohort study, included were normo-ovulatory women who underwent NC-FET cycles, under the age of 40, with an antral follicle count > eight. Ovulation was triggered with triptorelin (0.2 mg Decapeptyl; Ferring), and luteal support was initiated two days later, using a Nafarelin inhaler (Synarel, Pfizer), 200 μg twice daily. Main outcome measures were luteal estradiol and progesterone levels (three to five days following ovulation), implantation rate, ongoing pregnancy rate, early pregnancy loss rate, and live birth rate. Fifty-one patients treated between 2017 and 2018 were included. Mid luteal progesterone levels among study patients, were non-significantly different between patients who achieved pregnancy and those who did not, but differed significantly on day 14 following ovulation (86.0 ± 31.3 vs. 9.8 ± 9.5 nmol/L, respectively, p < 0.001). Twenty-three patients achieved a clinical pregnancy (45.1 %); interestingly, there were no chemical pregnancies. Three pregnancies ended in an early abortion at 6-7 weeks gestation, and 20 pregnancies continued as ongoing pregnancies (39.2 %). One patient had a late abortion at 16 weeks gestation, and 14 had a live birth. In conclusion, in this proof of concept study, inducing ovulation with a bolus of GnRHa in NC-FET, followed by repeated daily GnRHa administration, resulted in satisfactory luteal phase steroid levels and high ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Itai Bar Hava
- The Fertility Center from A to Z, Affiliated with Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Hadar Yafee
- The Fertility Center from A to Z, Affiliated with Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yeela Omer
- The Fertility Center from A to Z, Affiliated with Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Peter Humaidan
- The Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Denmark; Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Denmark
| | - Hadas Ganer Herman
- The Fertility Center from A to Z, Affiliated with Assuta Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; The Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, P.O.B 39040, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|