Risk Factors for Medication Nonadherence to Self-Injectable Biologic Therapy in Adult Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Applying Machine Learning Models Derived From Administrative Claims Data to Predict Medication Nonadherence in Patients Self-Administering Biologic Medications for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

Adherence to self-administered biologic therapies is important to induce remission and prevent adverse clinical outcomes in Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This study aimed to use administrative claims data and machine learning methods to predict nonadherence in an academic medical center test population.

Methods

A model-training dataset of beneficiaries with IBD and the first unique dispense of a self-administered biologic between June 30, 2016 and June 30, 2019 was extracted from the Commercial Claims and Encounters and Medicare Supplemental Administrative Claims Database. Known correlates of medication nonadherence were identified in the dataset. Nonadherence to biologic therapies was defined as a proportion of days covered ratio <80% at 1 year. A similar dataset was obtained from a tertiary academic medical center's electronic medical record data for use in model testing. A total of 48 machine learning models were trained and assessed utilizing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as the primary measure of predictive validity.

Results

The training dataset included 6998 beneficiaries (n = 2680 nonadherent, 38.3%) while the testing dataset included 285 patients (n = 134 nonadherent, 47.0%). When applied to test data, the highest performing models had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.55, indicating poor predictive performance. The majority of models trained had low sensitivity and high specificity.

Conclusions

Administrative claims-trained models were unable to predict biologic medication nonadherence in patients with IBD. Future research may benefit from datasets with enriched demographic and clinical data in training predictive models.

Individual and Community-Level Characteristics and Adherence to Specialty Medications

Background: Understanding risk factors for nonadherence can help specialty pharmacies optimize resources to prevent nonadherence and inform risk-stratification processes. Objective: To determine which individual and community-level characteristics are associated with nonadherence to specialty medications. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of patients enrolled in a prospective randomized controlled trial having filled a specialty medication at least 4 times in the previous 12 months with a proportion of days (PDC) covered < 0.90. We collected patient age, gender, race, medication administration type, therapy start date, home address, insurance type, and online patient portal status from the electronic health record. An ordinal logistic regression model was used to assess the association of nonadherence with individual and community-level patient characteristics. Results: Most patients were female (68%), white (82%), and held commercial insurance (58%) with a median age of 53 (interquartile range [IQR] 40, 64) years. Patients were mostly from the adult rheumatology (35%), multiple sclerosis (20%) and lipid (17%) clinics. Given a 10-year increase in age, patients had lower odds of having lower PDC (odds ratio [OR] = 0.82, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.71-0.94, P = 0.005). Patients on therapy greater than or equal to 1 year had half the odds of having lower PDC relative to patients on therapy less than 1 year (OR = 0.52, CI = 0.35 - 0.75, P < 0.001). No statistically significant associations were found between PDC and gender, race, insurance type, route of administration, clinic type, patient portal status, median income, percent receiving government assistance, or percent with no health insurance. Conclusion: Patients with younger age and shorter duration on treatment may be at-risk for lower adherence. Specialty pharmacies may benefit from targeting adherence interventions to these groups.

The Comorbidity of Patient-Reported Crohn's Disease Activity and Depression: The Role of Health Behavior Mediators

Background

Longitudinal research reveals a unidirectional relationship between a nonsomatic symptom of depression, a negative view of the self, and later reported Crohn's disease (CD) activity. We evaluated whether health behaviors mediated this association using a longitudinal design.

Methods

We studied 3304 adult volunteers with a self-reported diagnosis of CD who completed a baseline survey that included demographics, CD activity, a symptom-specific index of depression, and measures of physical activity, smoking, and sleep quality. Crohn's disease status and the cognitive index of depression were also measured 6 and 12 months after the baseline evaluation. We specified single-mediator and multiple-mediator models to elucidate the depression-disease activity relationship.

Results

Among 2395 females and 909 males, we found a significant mediation effect for activity level (P < .001) after adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. There was no evidence that sleep quality and smoking are significant single mediators. When we considered multiple mediation models, smoking and less activity partially mediate the depression-CD association.

Conclusions

Smoking and lower levels of physical activity are potential mediators of the unidirectional association between a nonsomatic symptom of depression-a negative view of the self-and patient-reported CD activity. Evaluating and treating specific symptoms of depression may reduce the frequency of CD exacerbations.

Understanding Medication Nonadherence in Crohn's Disease Patients: A Qualitative Evaluation

BACKGROUND

Immune-modifying medications are widely available and recognized as valuable by most gastroenterologists. However, approximately 40% of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) do not comply with regimens using these medications, resulting in complications, hospitalization, and surgeries. We sought to identify factors that motivate adherence or nonadherence with medication recommendations for CD.

METHODS

We conducted qualitative interviews with patients living with CD who were identified as adherent or nonadherent to immune-modifying medication recommendations by their treating gastroenterologist. Semistructured interview guides were developed based on an established framework for understanding health behaviors. We conducted content analysis of the resulting qualitative data using an inductive-deductive approach to identify emergent themes that influence medication decision-making.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with CD completed interviews for this study. Interviews were independently coded and analyzed for thematic content. Two broad domains emerged comprising (1) themes reflected in the Theoretical Domains Framework and (2) novel themes specific to medication decision-making in CD. Adherent patients conveyed a sense of trust in science and healthcare provider expertise, while nonadherent patients were more likely to express beliefs in their ability to self-manage CD, concern about risks associated with medication, and a general ambivalence to treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

There are clear cognitive, behavioral, and relational factors that guide patients' medication-related decision-making. Several of the factors share features of other behavioral change and decision-making processes, while others are specific to the experience of patients with CD. A fuller understanding of these factors is essential to developing effective behavioral interventions to improve adherence to evidence-based treatment recommendations.

Impact of Telemedicine on Delivery of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease Care

OBJECTIVES

Outpatient inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) care shifted from office visits (OVs) to a model with integrated telemedicine during the 2020 COVID-19 pandemic. We describe the impact of this shift on delivery of pediatric IBD care.

METHODS

We collected electronic medical record data from office and telemedicine visits for pediatric patients with IBD at a single center from April 2019 to December 2020. We compared visit volume, duration, and test ordering between 2019 and 2020, and between OV and telemedicine, and assessed for differences in telemedicine adoption by sociodemographic factors.

RESULTS

Visit volume was maintained between 2019 and 2020. Median overall appointment time was shorter for telemedicine versus OV [46 (interquartile range, IQR 35-72) vs 62 (IQR 51-80) minutes; P < 0.001] with no significant difference in time spent with provider [28 (IQR 21-41) vs OV 30 (IQR 24-39) minutes; P = 0.08]. Accounting for drive time, telemedicine visits were 2.6 times shorter than office visits in 2020 ( P < 0.001). In univariate analyses, there was no difference in telemedicine utilization by race or gender. Variables significantly associated with telemedicine were older age, English as primary language, being non-Hispanic, commercial insurance, living in an area of very high opportunity, and having a longer drive time to the office ( P < 0.05 for all comparisons). In multivariate analyses, visits among patients with commercial insurance were significantly more likely to be conducted via telemedicine ( P = 0.02). Among those with a telemedicine visit, multivariate analyses demonstrated multiracial patients were significantly more likely to have video visits (vs audio-only; P = 0.02), while patients with public insurance, no or missing insurance, and whose primary language was Arabic were significantly less likely to have video visits ( P < 0.05 for all comparisons).

CONCLUSIONS

Integrated telemedicine allowed for continued delivery of pediatric IBD care and significantly decreased appointment time. While telemedicine may improve access for those who live further from the office, concerns remain about the introduction of disparities.

Medication Adherence Rates in Adolescents With Eosinophilic Esophagitis Are Low and Are Associated With Health Habits

Although swallowed topical steroids are effective in inducing histological remission in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), their efficacy is limited by treatment nonadherence. In this study, we objectively measured adherence rates to swallowed topical steroids in adolescents with EoE over the course of 8 weeks and analyzed the association between adherence rate, disease and demographic features, symptom severity, and medication-taking habit strength. We found that approximately 20% of adolescents with EoE were over-dosing on their medications. After excluding these patients, mean adherence rate was 67.0% (±19.4%) and median adherence rate was 63% (interquartile range 53%-88%). Adherence was not associated with demographic features, disease history, symptom severity, or quality of life but was associated with habit strength (Pearson r = 0.48, P = 0.04). These findings suggest that habit strength may serve as a potential target for interventions aimed at improving adherence in adolescents with EoE.

Impact of Care in an Interdisciplinary Inflammatory Bowel Disease Specialty Clinic on Outcomes in Patients Insured with Medicaid

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients are known to benefit from care delivered in a specialized, interdisciplinary setting. We aimed to evaluate the impact of this model on health outcomes, quality metrics, and health care resource utilization (HRU) in IBD patients insured with Medicaid.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In July 2017, IBD patients at our tertiary hospital were transitioned from a fellows' general gastroenterology (GI) clinic to a fellows' interdisciplinary IBD clinic. IBD patients were included if they were insured with Medicaid, had at least 1 visit in the general GI clinic between July 1, 2016 and June 30, 2017, and at least 1 visit between July 1, 2017 and June 30, 2018 in the IBD clinic. Characteristics related to patients' IBD course, overall health care maintenance, and HRU were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 170 patients (51% male, mean age 39 y) were included. After the transition to the IBD clinic, use of corticosteroids (37% vs. 25%; P =0.004) and combination therapy were significantly lower (55% vs. 38%; P =0.0004), although use of high-dose biologics numerically increased (58.5% vs. 67%; P =0.05). Posttransition, patients showed significantly lower levels of mean C-reactive protein ( P =0.04). After the transition, patients attended significantly fewer outpatient GI visits ( P =0.0008) but were more often seen by other health care specialists ( P =0.0003), and experienced a numeric decrease in HRU with fewer emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and surgeries.

CONCLUSIONS

Care in an interdisciplinary, IBD specialty setting is associated with significantly decreased corticosteroid use, decreased C-reactive protein levels, and improved access to ancillary services in Medicaid patients.

Effectiveness of educational intervention in improving medication adherence among patients with diabetes in Klang Valley, Malaysia

Background

The diabetes patients’ adherence to prescription medication is 67.5%, which is lower than that of patients with any other medical conditions. Patients with low medication adherence are more likely to experience clinical complications, repeated hospitalizations, increased mortality, and increased healthcare costs, hence, education on disease and medication adherence is vital now. This study aimed to assess the level of medication adherence, medicine and information-seeking behaviour, and the effectiveness of online educational intervention in improving medication adherence and medicine and information-seeking behaviours among patients with diabetes in Klang Valley, Malaysia.

Methods

Individuals aged 12 years and above with a prior diagnosis of diabetes were identified and randomly divided into (control (n=183), and intervention groups (n = 206). Data about their medication adherence and information-seeking behaviour were obtained. As part of the online educational intervention, a month of daily general reminders to take their medications and educational materials about diabetes had provided to them via WhatsApp groups. After a month, the groups were reassessed, and the data were compared.

Results

The results showed that, at baseline, most of the respondents in the control (58.8% females and 53.08% males) and intervention (65.52% females and 85.12% males) groups had a low level of medication adherence. After a month of intervention, medication adherence was significantly improved in the intervention group (91.4% females and 71.28% males) compared to the control group (38.23% females and 44.44% males). At baseline, only 96 (52.45%) respondents in the control group and 110 (52.38%) in the intervention group preferred to read online educational materials to know more about their condition(s), it was improved after a month of intervention in the intervention group where 204 (99.02%) respondents prefer online materials, however no change in the control group response.

Conclusion

The study concludes that medication adherence and information-seeking behaviours among the study population have been significantly improved after a month of structured intervention. Medication adherence plays a crucial role in risk reduction strategies subsequently it improves the patient’s quality of life. Thus, well-planned more robust educational interventions on chronic diseases are warranted to improve the health outcomes of the patients.

The cost of inflammatory bowel disease in high-income settings: a Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology Commission

The cost of caring for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) continues to increase worldwide. The cause is not only a steady increase in the prevalence of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis in both developed and newly industrialised countries, but also the chronic nature of the diseases, the need for long-term, often expensive treatments, the use of more intensive disease monitoring strategies, and the effect of the diseases on economic productivity. This Commission draws together a wide range of expertise to discuss the current costs of IBD care, the drivers of increasing costs, and how to deliver affordable care for IBD in the future. The key conclusions are that (1) increases in health-care costs must be evaluated against improved disease management and reductions in indirect costs, and (2) that overarching systems for data interoperability, registries, and big data approaches must be established for continuous assessment of effectiveness, costs, and the cost-effectiveness of care. International collaborations should be sought out to evaluate novel models of care (eg, value-based health care, including integrated health care, and participatory health-care models), as well as to improve the education and training of clinicians, patients, and policy makers.

Illness Identity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND

We examined the degree to which adults with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) integrated their illness into their identity and linked illness identity to important patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

A total of 109 adults with IBD, aged 18 to 60 (M_age = 35.93; 77% women) completed questionnaires on the four illness identity dimensions (rejection, acceptance, engulfment, and enrichment), medication adherence, depressive symptoms, life satisfaction, health status, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The illness identity scores of adults with IBD were compared to existing data from adults with congenital heart disease (CHD), refractory epilepsy (RE), and multisystemic connective tissue disorders (MSDs) using multivariate analyses of covariance. In adults with IBD, associations between illness identity and patient-reported outcomes were examined through hierarchical regression analyses, controlling for sex, age, illness duration, diagnosis, self-reported flares, and co-existing illnesses.

RESULTS

Adults with IBD scored higher on rejection and engulfment and lower on acceptance than adults with CHD, lower on rejection but higher on engulfment than adults with RE, and higher on engulfment and enrichment but lower on rejection than adults with MSDs. Higher engulfment scores were related to more depressive symptoms, lower life satisfaction, and a poorer health status and HRQoL. In contrast, higher enrichment scores were related to more life satisfaction and a better HRQoL. Rejection and acceptance were not uniquely related to any of the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Adults with IBD showed relatively high levels of engulfment. Substantial associations were observed between illness identity and patient-reported outcomes, with engulfment being the strongest, most consistent predictor.

Multicenter Study of Nonadherence to Self-Injectable Biologic Therapy in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Risk Factors and Outcomes

Background and Aims

This study aimed to evaluate adherence to subcutaneous biologic therapy and impact of nonadherence including risk factors and outcomes in academic centers with integrated specialty pharmacies for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort analysis of patients aged ≥18 years receiving care in 3 tertiary care outpatient IBD clinics with integrated specialty pharmacies. Subjects were prescribed injectable anti-TNF therapy (adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab) or anti-IL 12/23 therapy (ustekinumab) with at least 3 consecutive prescription claims. The primary outcomes were medication possession ratio (MPR), percent achieving optimal adherence (MPR > 0.86); in addition, we sought to verify a prior risk factor model including smoking status, narcotic use, psychiatric history, and prior biologic use. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits (ED) and IBD-related hospitalizations. Statistical analysis was performed using Wilcox rank sum test, Pearson's Chi-squared test, and logistic regression model as an unordered, factor variable to flexibly estimate the probabilities of adherence.

Results

Six hundred eight subjects were included. Overall median MPR was 0.95 (interquartile range 0.47, 1) and adherence was 68%-70%. When the number of risk factors for nonadherence increased, the likelihood of nonadherence increased (P < .05). In unadjusted and adjusted analysis, nonadherence increased the likelihood of ED visits [rate ratio 1.45 (95% confidence interval 1.05, 1.97)] and hospitalizations [rate ratio 1.60 (95% confidence interval 1.16, 2.10)].

Conclusion

Academic centers with integrated pharmacies had high adherence. Prior risk factors for nonadherence remained significant in this multicenter model. Nonadherence was associated with higher likelihood of hospitalizations and ED visits.

Inconsistencies in the days supply values reported in pharmacy claims databases for biologics with long maintenance intervals

BACKGROUND: Days supply values reported in large administrative claims databases are commonly used to estimate drug exposure and quantify adherence and persistence with prescribed therapy. In recent claims database studies assessing treatment patterns for biologic therapies, a high frequency of 28-31-days supply values has been observed for therapies with label-recommended maintenance dosing intervals longer than 4 weeks. Such inconsistencies suggest potential inaccuracy of days supply data. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the existence and describe the extent of inconsistencies in the reported days supply values and the documented fill intervals among prescription claims from administrative claims databases for 2 different biologics with label-recommended maintenance dosing intervals longer than 4 weeks and 2 biologics with intervals less than or equal to 4 weeks. METHODS: Using data from 2 large US administrative claims databases (IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters and the Optum Clinformatics Data Mart Socio-economic Status [SES]), the reported days supply values and associated intervals between consecutive fills for 2 biologics with maintenance dosing intervals longer than 4 weeks (guselkumab and ustekinumab) and 2 with intervals less than or equal to 4 weeks (adalimumab and ixekizumab) were described. For all fill pairs with reported days supply values of 28-31 days, the percentage with inconsistent fill intervals (defined as >45 days or >60 days) was calculated. RESULTS: Across all datasets, the proportions of fill pairs with inconsistent days supply values and fill intervals (ie, days supply values of 28-31 days but fill intervals of >45 days) were 41.8%-73.4% for guselkumab, 33.4%-59.4% for ustekinumab, 8.5%-9.5% for adalimumab, and 7.3%-11.4% for ixekizumab. The same trend was observed across these biologics when using more than 60 days to define an inconsistent fill interval. Unlike adalimumab and ixekizumab, a wide distribution of fill intervals was observed among guselkumab and ustekinumab fill pairs with 28-31 days supply values, with peaks evident at approximately 28-31 days as well as around the label-recommended maintenance dosing intervals for these therapies (56 or 84 days). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated a large discrepancy between days supply values and fill intervals reported in administrative claims data for biologics with label-recommended maintenance dosing intervals longer than 4 weeks (ie, guselkumab and ustekinumab), potentially suggesting widespread underestimation of days supply values for these therapies. Such inconsistencies in the reported days supply values may lead to underestimation of treatment adherence and persistence for these biologics, which could be mitigated by systematic data imputation. DISCLOSURES: This study was funded by Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC. Ms Xu and Drs Ferrante, Fitzgerald, Pericone, and Wu are employees of Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, and shareholders of Johnson & Johnson, of which Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, is a wholly owned subsidiary. Funding for programming support and medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by Janssen.

Psychiatric Disorders in Adult and Paediatric Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases [IBD], which are associated with a high disease burden, are also reported to be accompanied by a high prevalence of psychiatric disorders. However, the literature on IBD and psychiatric disorders has not been reviewed.

METHODS

This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines, and its protocol was registered at PROSPERO [ID: CRD42020214359]. PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO were consulted for the literature search. Studies reporting on diagnosed psychiatric disorders in IBD were included. Pooled prevalence rates were calculated using random effects meta-analyses. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale [NOS].

RESULTS

Sixty-nine studies were identified with an average cohort size of 60 114 patients. Pooled prevalence rates were: mood disorders, 10% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 7%; 15%); anxiety disorders, 12% [95% CI = 8%; 18%]; substance misuse, 3% [95% CI = 1%; 7%]; psychotic disorders, 2% [95% CI = 1%; 4%]; behavioural disorders, 1% [95% CI = 0%; 3%]; personality disorders, 3% [95% CI = 1%; 10%]; developmental disorders, 1% [95% CI = 0%; 3%]; and behavioural and emotional disorders with onset usually during childhood, 1% [95% CI = 1%; 3%]. All analyses had high statistical heterogeneity [I2 > 99%]. Seven studies reported an increased risk of suicide in IBD patients compared to controls.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities was high [11-82%] in patients with IBD and was higher than in the background population. Addressing mental health problems in patients with IBD can improve their adherence to treatment and the somatic disease course and, consequently, reduce morbidity and mortality.

Treatment persistence and maintenance dose titration among ulcerative colitis patients on biologics: a pooled study of three United States claim databases

OBJECTIVE

This real-world study evaluated biologic treatment patterns in patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

IQVIA PharMetrics, IBM MarketScan, and Optum Clinformatics were pooled to identify UC patients with ≥1 claim for UC and ≥1 claim for adalimumab (ADA), golimumab (GOL), infliximab (IFX), or vedolizumab (VDZ). The index date for each biologic was the first claim for that biologic. Patients could be included in >1 cohort if they switched biologics during the identification period. Continuous eligibility for medical/pharmacy benefits was required for 12 months before (baseline) and after (follow-up) the index date. Patients lacking claims for any biologic during baseline were categorized as bio-naïve; those with any biologic claim were categorized as bio-experienced. Persistence was defined as the proportion of patients that remained on the index biologic without a gap between claims of >28 days for ADA, >56 days for GOL, and >112 days for IFX and VDZ. Dose titration was assessed among patients with ≥2 maintenance doses during follow-up among ADA, GOL, and VDZ patients.

RESULTS

In total, 6,106 bio-naïve UC patients and 1,027 bio-experienced UC patients were identified. Patients treated with VDZ and IFX had the highest persistence followed by ADA and GOL patients for bio-naïve and bio-experienced, respectively. ADA patients had a numerically higher proportion of patients with 50% dose escalation, followed by VDZ and GOL; 50% dose reduction was observed in ≤1% patients.

CONCLUSIONS

In this descriptive study of UC patients without confounder adjustment, VDZ persistence was numerically highest followed by IFX, GOL, and ADA across both populations.

Real-world data on switching from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Vedolizumab is a gut-selective treatment approved for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Recently, a subcutaneous formulation of vedolizumab was approved. The aims of this study were to evaluate efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, patient experience and costs following a switch from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab treatment.

METHODS

Patients were switched from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab maintenance treatment and followed prospectively for 6 months and a subgroup for 12 months. The primary endpoint was change in faecal calprotectin levels. Furthermore, we evaluated clinical disease activity, remission rates, plasma CRP, drug persistence, adverse events, local injection reactions, serum drug concentrations, patient satisfaction, quality-of-life and treatment costs.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were included (48 CD; 41 UC). Faecal calprotectin decreased significantly in CD but not in UC. Clinical indices, remission rates, plasma CRP levels and quality-of-life scores remained unchanged. Patients that had been on standard compared to optimised IV vedolizumab dosing displayed similar outcomes on standard SC dosing. Drug persistence at 6 and 12 months was 95.5% and 88.5%, respectively. Frequencies of adverse events were similar before and after the switch. No serious adverse events occurred. Transient severe local injection reactions were experienced by 1.2% of patients. Median vedolizumab trough levels were 2.3 times higher on subcutaneous compared to intravenous treatment. Patient satisfaction was generally high. Annualised treatment costs were reduced by 15% following the switch.

CONCLUSIONS

The switch from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab could be done with preserved therapeutic effectiveness, safety, high patient satisfaction and low discontinuation rate, at a reduced cost.

The Crohn's disease exclusion diet for induction and maintenance of remission in adults with mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease (CDED-AD): an open-label, pilot, randomised trial

BACKGROUND

The Crohn's disease exclusion diet (CDED) with partial enteral nutrition is effective for induction of remission in children with mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease. We aimed to assess the CDED in adults with Crohn's disease.

METHODS

We did an open-label, pilot randomised trial at three medical centres in Israel. Eligible patients were biologic naive adults aged 18-55 years with mild-to-moderate Crohn's disease (defined by a Harvey-Bradshaw Index score of 5-14 points), a maximal disease duration of 5 years, with active disease on colonoscopy, or imaging with elevated inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein >5 mg/L or faecal calprotectin concentration >200 μ/g). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to CDED plus partial enteral nutrition or CDED alone for 24 weeks. Randomisation was via block randomisation (block sizes of six) using sealed, numbered, and opaque envelopes. Patients and investigators were aware of which group patients were assigned to due to the nature of the different interventions. The primary endpoint was clinical remission, defined as a Harvey-Bradshaw Index score of less than 5 at week 6. The primary endpoint was assessed in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population, which included all patients who used the dietary therapy for at least 48 h. We report results of the final analysis. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02231814.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 12, 2017, and May 11, 2020, 91 patients were screened, of whom 44 were randomly assigned to the CDED plus partial enteral nutrition group (n=20) or CDED alone group (n=24). 19 patients in the CDED plus partial enteral nutrition group and 21 patients in the CDED alone group received the allocated intervention for at least 48 h and thus were included in the ITT analysis. At week 6, 13 (68%) of 19 patients in the CDED plus partial enteral nutrition group and 12 (57%) of 21 patients in the CDED group had achieved clinical remission (p=0·4618). Among the 25 patients in remission at week 6, 20 (80%) were in sustained remission at week 24 (12 patients in the CDED plus partial enteral nutrition group and eight in the CDED alone group). 14 (35%) of 40 patients were in endoscopic remission at week 24 (eight patients in the CDED plus partial enteral nutrition group and six in the CDED alone group). No serious adverse events or treatment-related adverse events were reported in either group.

INTERPRETATION

CDED with or without partial enteral nutrition was effective for induction and maintenance of remission in adults with mild-to-moderate biologic naive Crohn's disease and might lead to endoscopic remission. These data suggest that CDED could be used for mild-to-moderate active Crohn's disease and should be assessed in a powered randomised controlled trial.

FUNDING

Azrieli Foundation and Nestle Health Science.

Adherence to self-administered biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs across health-system specialty pharmacies

Disclaimer

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose

Adherence to self-administered biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) is necessary for therapeutic benefit. Health-system specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) have reported high adherence rates across several disease states; however, adherence outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) populations have not yet been established.

Methods

We performed a multisite retrospective cohort study including patients with RA and 3 or more documented dispenses of bDMARDs from January through December 2018. Pharmacy claims were used to calculate proportion of days covered (PDC). Electronic health records of patients with a PDC of <0.8 were reviewed to identify reasons for gaps in pharmacy claims (true nonadherence or appropriate treatment holds). Outcomes included median PDC across sites, reasons for treatment gaps in patients with a PDC of <0.8, and the impact of adjusting PDC when accounting for appropriate therapy gaps.

Results

There were 29,994 prescriptions for 3,530 patients across 20 sites. The patient cohort was mostly female (75%), with a median age of 55 years (interquartile range [IQR], 42-63 years). The original(ie, prereview) median PDC was 0.94 (IQR, 0.83-0.99). Upon review, 327 patients had no appropriate treatment gaps identified, 6 patients were excluded due to multiple unquantifiable appropriate gaps, and 420 patients had an adjustment in the PDC denominator due to appropriate treatment gaps (43 instances of days’ supply adjusted based on discordant days’ supply information between prescriptions and physician administration instructions, 11 instances of missing fills added, and 421 instances of clinically appropriate treatment gaps). The final median PDC after accounting for appropriate gaps in therapy was 0.95 (IQR, 0.87-0.99).

Conclusion

This large, multisite retrospective cohort study was the first to demonstrate adherence rates across several HSSPs and provided novel insights into rates and reasons for appropriate gaps in therapy.

Understanding attitudes, concerns, and health behaviors of patients with inflammatory bowel disease during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to a rapid shift in care delivery models for patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); however, little is known about patient perceptions during this period. We aimed to prospectively evaluate the attitudes, concerns, and health behavior of IBD patients during COVID-19.

METHODS

An online survey was sent to patients from a tertiary IBD Service. The survey included demographic information and questions about the impact of COVID-19, levels of concern caused by COVID-19, perceived risk of IBD medications, medication cessation, and care delivery preferences.

RESULTS

Of 97 respondents (39%), 95 (98%) reported concern about the impact of COVID-19 on their health, and 43% felt their risk of contracting COVID-19 was above average; 62% reported concern about medication-induced COVID-19 risk, and 11% stopped medications because of COVID-19. Patients considered all medications to increase the risk of COVID-19 susceptibility and severity; 45% preferred telehealth while 16% preferred face-to-face clinic reviews. Preference for IBD monitoring tools in decreasing order was blood testing, stool collection, gastrointestinal ultrasound, magnetic resonance enterography, and then colonoscopy.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with IBD are demonstrated to experience concern related to their diagnosis and medications. The insights provided by the survey are informative for a possible "second-wave" of COVID-19 and routine care, including acceptance of telemedicine, preference for non-invasive investigations, and a need for dissemination of information and education.

Development, implementation, and evaluation of a health outcomes and research program at an integrated health-system specialty pharmacy

PURPOSE

Health-system specialty pharmacies (HSSPs) provide high-quality, efficient, and collaborative care to patients receiving specialty therapy. Despite proven benefits of the integrated model, manufacturer and payer restrictions challenge the viability and utility of HSSPs. Vanderbilt Specialty Pharmacy developed a health outcomes and research program to measure and communicate the value of this model, drive improvement in patient care delivery, and advocate for recognition of HSSP pharmacists' role in patient care. The purpose of this descriptive report is to describe the development and results of this program.

SUMMARY

The health outcomes and research program began as an initiative for pharmacists to evaluate and convey the benefits they provide to patients, providers, and the health system. Early outcomes data proved useful in communicating the value of an integrated model to key stakeholders and highlighted the need to further develop research efforts. The department leadership invested resources to build a research program with dedicated personnel, engaged research experts to train pharmacists, and fostered internal and external collaborations to facilitate research efforts. As of March 2021, the health outcomes and research program team has published 33 peer-reviewed manuscripts, presented 88 posters and 7 podium presentations at national conferences, and received 4 monetary research awards. Further, the program team engages other HSSP teams to initiate and expand their own health outcomes research in an effort to empower all HSSPs in demonstrating their value.

CONCLUSIONS

The health outcomes and research program described has pioneered outcomes research among HSSPs nationwide and has proven valuable to specialty pharmacists, the health system, and key specialty pharmacy stakeholders.

Opioid Use Among Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Despite reported adverse effects of opioids in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the burden of opioid use in this population appears to be high. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prior studies to determine the prevalence of opioid use among patients with IBD as well as risk factors and outcomes associated with opioid use in this population.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library through November of 2019. Primary outcomes included the prevalence of opioid use and demographic and clinical variables associated with opioid use in patients with IBD. Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. We used random-effect meta-analysis to estimate pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Of 780 citations identified, 31 were included in our study. The prevalence of opioid use was 21% (95% CI, 13%-30%) in the outpatient setting. Likewise, 62% (95% CI, 25%-92%) of patients received opioids while hospitalized for IBD. Opioid use was associated with female sex (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.03-1.40), depression (1.99; 95% CI 1.80-2.19), substance abuse (4.67; 95% CI 2.87-7.60), prior gastrointestinal surgery (2.33; 95% CI 1.66-3.26), biologic use (1.36; 95% CI 1.06-1.74), and steroid use (1.41; 95% CI 1.04-1.91). Based on the systematic review, opioid use also appeared to be associated with increased IBD activity, healthcare use, infection, and mortality.

CONCLUSION

In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we found that 21% of outpatients with IBD (and 62% of hospitalized patients) are opioid users; use is associated with more severe IBD and increased healthcare use. Further studies are required to determine whether opioids are the cause or an effect of these associations. Nonetheless, urgent interventions are needed to reduce opioid use, improve disease-related outcomes and reduce healthcare costs.

Chronic opioid use is associated with early biologic discontinuation in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic opioid use is associated with poorer clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease.

AIMS

To investigate an association between chronic opioid use and persistence with biologic agents in management of inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

A total of 16 624 patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease and receiving a first-time biologic prescription from 2011 to 2016 were identified retrospectively from the Truven MarketScan Database. A cohort of 1768 patients were identified as chronic opioid users utilising outpatient prescription claims. Utilisation patterns of biologic therapies were assessed from inpatient administration and outpatient claims data, including persistence calculations. Information on healthcare utilisation and common comorbidities was also collected. A Cox regression model was constructed to assess the hazard of chronic opioid use on early discontinuation of biologic therapy controlling for disease severity.

RESULTS

A mean 1.5 different biologic agents were utilised by inflammatory bowel disease patients with chronic opioid use (vs 1.37 in the comparator group; P < 0.0001). A lower proportion of the chronic opioid use cohort persisted on biologic therapies to the end of the study period (16.2% vs 33.5% P < 0.0001). Inflammatory bowel disease patients with chronic opioid use utilised more healthcare resources and had a higher rate of comorbidities than the reference cohort. Patients with chronic opioid use were 23% more likely (hazard ratio 1.23; 95% CI [1.16-1.31]) to be non-persistent with biologic therapy while accounting for relevant markers of disease acuity.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic opioid use is associated with increased hazard of biologic discontinuation in inflammatory bowel disease. Symptoms of opioid withdrawal may mimic IBD flares thereby leading providers to inappropriately switch biologic therapies and compromise disease control.

Epidemiology, burden of disease, and unmet needs in the treatment of ulcerative colitis in Asia

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory disease of the colon, characterized by relapsing and remitting symptoms. Although traditionally viewed as a Western disease, the incidence and prevalence of UC is increasing in developing regions, including Asian countries.

AREAS COVERED

A PubMed search identified articles describing epidemiology, disease burden, patient demographics, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and treatment of UC across Asia. We review the epidemiology and disease course of UC across Asia, including region-specific factors that may aid development of more cost-effective treatment approaches tailored to the needs of Asian populations.

EXPERT OPINION

The opinion of non-Pfizer-affiliated practicing gastroenterologists is that epidemiological data from the last four decades have shown 1.5-fold to almost 20-fold increases in the incidence and prevalence of UC in some Asian countries, although prevalence remains generally lower than in the West. As the prevalence of UC rises, so will overall healthcare costs. Disparities in healthcare systems and funding mean that different Asian countries face unique challenges in how best to use available resources, including selection from a growing number of emerging treatment options. More clinical trial and real-world data are required to help define treatment approaches that will most benefit Asian populations.

Adherence to subcutaneous biological therapies in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review

Aim: To assess adherence to subcutaneous biologicals in adults with inflammatory rheumatic diseases or inflammatory bowel disease and evaluate factors possibly associated with adherence. Materials & methods: Systematic searches were conducted of main databases from January 2000 to June 2019. Results: 41 articles (32 full papers and nine abstracts) were included in the review. Among studies which used a medication possession ratio threshold of ≥80% as the end point, adherence varied from 28.8 to 89.4%. Possible predictors of adherence were older age, professional or family member support, belief in medication necessity, lower concerns about medication and monthly versus weekly administration. Conclusion: Considerable variability in adherence rates across published studies reflects study heterogeneity and the absence of a 'gold standard' to measure adherence.

Effects of Race and Ethnicity on Diagnosis and Management of Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Although Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) have been considered as disorders that affect individuals of European ancestry, the epidemiology of the inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) is changing. Coupled with the increasing incidence of IBD in previously low-incidence areas, the population demographics of IBD in the United States are also changing, with increases among non-White races and ethnicities. It is therefore important to fully understand the epidemiology and progression of IBD in different racial and ethnic groups, and the effects of race and ethnicity on access to care, use of resources, and disease-related outcomes. We review differences in IBD development and progression among patients of different races and ethnicities, discussing the effects of factors such as access to care, delays in diagnosis, and health and disease perception on disparities in IBD care and outcomes. We identify research priorities for improving health equity among minority patients with IBD.

Adherence to Adalimumab Was Not Improved by a Reminder-Based Intervention with an Electronic Needle Container

BACKGROUND

Adherence to adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is reported to be below par. Non-adherence may result in loss-of-response and increased hospitalization. We analyzed the effect of an electronic needle container (ENC) on adherence to adalimumab.

METHODS

In this multicenter, 12-months observational study, we included adalimumab treated IBD patients. All patients were invited to receive an ENC. Patients who declined or did not complete the registration for an ENC served as controls. Primary endpoint was whether an ENC increased adherence, calculated from pharmacy refills as proportion of days covered (PDC). Secondary endpoints were clinical outcomes, including loss-of-response, identification of predictors of adherence and correlation between different modalities for measuring adherence. Loss-of-response was defined as a disease flare, dose-escalation or IBD-related hospitalization or surgery.

RESULTS

The pharmacies' records identified 198 eligible patients, of whom 32 were excluded. The ENC was supplied to 69 patients, the remaining 97 patient formed the control group. Median baseline PDC (98.4% vs. 96.1%, p = 0.047) and the proportion of adherent (PDC ≥ 86%) patients (87.0% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.045) was higher for the ENC group. The ENC did not improve the adherence of patients during follow-up (odds ratio 1.26, 95% CI 0.55-2.86). During follow-up, five (7.2%) patients in the ENC group and 13 (13.4%) in the control group discontinued adalimumab (log-rank p = 0.22). Loss-of-response occurred in 12 (17.4%) and 14 (14.4%) patients, respectively (log-rank p = 0.66).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show no beneficial effect of a reminder-based intervention on adherence or treatment outcomes.

Knowledge of disease and self-management of adolescents with inflammatory bowel diseases

AIM

To describe factors that might affect successful transition in young adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Questionnaires regarding the personal disease history, treatment and diseases specific knowledge and patients' self-efficacy were completed by teenaged patients with IBD aged 14-18 years, during routine clinic visits. Patient answers were then compared with information obtained from the medical records and information provided by treating physician.

RESULTS

The study included 80 patients with IBD, 54 (67.5%) with Crohn's disease. Patients demonstrated good knowledge in their personal disease history and current treatment. Knowledge gaps were observed in medication dosages, knowledge of potential side effects and effects of smoking on disease, with only 53/80 (66%), 12/80 (15%) and 6/36 (16.7%) of patients providing correct answers. Only 25/36 (69.4%) of the patients aged 16-18 had read about their disease. All patients in 16-18 age group reported needing assistance to schedule a gastroenterologist appointment.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge and self-efficacy skills of IBD teenagers are suboptimal regarding medications, smoking and appointment management. Medical providers should work with parents and teenaged patients with IBD to allow them to attain missing information and promote self-efficacy skills, in order to reinforce readiness towards transition.

Patient-Preferences Favoring Treatment Discontinuation Are Reduced With Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab Compared With TNF Antagonists in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

Nonadherence to biologic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with risk of relapse, immunogenicity, and disease complications. Significant nonadherence prevalence is reported with tumor necrosis factor (TNF) antagonists but the risk of nonadherence with newer biologics with better safety profiles is unknown. This study aimed to investigate if IBD patient-preferences favoring biologic discontinuation vary by biologic class and analyze factors associated with such preferences.

Methods

A convenience sample of 200 adults with IBD on biologic therapy treated at an academic outpatient center was surveyed using a 22-point questionnaire. Patient-preference favoring treatment discontinuation between TNF-antagonist and non-TNF-antagonist biologics [vedolizumab (VDZ)/ustekinumab (UST)] was compared using χ ² test. Risk factors associated with a preference to discontinue biologic therapy were evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression, and Spearman rank correlation analyses.

Results

A total of 190 questionnaires were analyzed that contained data on preferences regarding biologic discontinuation (median age 36 years, 62% were females; 63% had Crohn disease; 56% were receiving a TNF antagonist, 31% VDZ, and 14% UST). Overall, 32% patients reported a preference to discontinue biologic treatment with a higher proportion among those receiving a TNF antagonist compared with VDZ/UST (39.6% vs 21.4%; P < 0.01). Current VDZ/UST use was independently associated with a reduced odds of patient-preference favoring biologic discontinuation [adjusted odds ratio: 2.67 (1.42-5.01); P < 0.01]. The most concerning factor to patients was the perceived risk of side effects. Patients on VDZ/UST perceived their therapy to be safer than those receiving a TNF antagonist (r = 0.2, P = 0.04).

Conclusions

Patient-preference favoring treatment discontinuation is improved with VDZ/UST compared with TNF-antagonist biologic therapy.

Janus Kinase inhibitors in the New Treatment Paradigms of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

This review provides guidance in the decision-making process regarding when to choose a janus kinase [JAK] inhibitor as medical treatment strategy. The focus will be on ulcerative colitis, because the only yet available JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, has approval for use in ulcerative colitis. The guidance path will include consideration of disease activity, previous treatment, comorbidities, family planning, patient preferences, pharmacology as well as concurrent chronic inflammatory diseases or extraintestinal manifestations. The suggested guidance path illustrates our daily difficulties in the decision-making process regarding best choice for the individual patient. However if predictive biomarkers are lacking, the named criteria can be applied to any other strategy and hence provide support in daily practice.