Intravenous iron therapy for patients with preoperative iron deficiency or anaemia undergoing cardiac surgery reduces blood transfusions: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Multi-Modal Prehabilitation in Thoracic Surgery: From Basic Concepts to Practical Modalities

Over the last two decades, the invasiveness of thoracic surgery has decreased along with technological advances and better diagnostic tools, whereas the patient's comorbidities and frailty patterns have increased, as well as the number of early cancer stages that could benefit from curative resection. Poor aerobic fitness, nutritional defects, sarcopenia and "toxic" behaviors such as sedentary behavior, smoking and alcohol consumption are modifiable risk factors for major postoperative complications. The process of enhancing patients' physiological reserve in anticipation for surgery is referred to as prehabilitation. Components of prehabilitation programs include optimization of medical treatment, prescription of structured exercise program, correction of nutritional deficits and patient's education to adopt healthier behaviors. All patients may benefit from prehabilitation, which is part of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs. Faster functional recovery is expected in low-risk patients, whereas better clinical outcome and shorter hospital stay have been demonstrated in higher risk and physically unfit patients.

Perioperative selenium administration in cardiac surgery patients, a way out to reduce post surgical adversities? A meta analysis

Introduction

The oxidative damage suffered in cardiac surgery is associated with declining trace elements which lead to the development of multi organ dysfunction (MOD), acute kidney injury (AKI), or increased length of hospital stay (LOS). Recent evidence shows the cardioprotective role of the trace element selenium as it mitigates worsening outcomes post cardiac surgery. Hence, this meta analysis aims to investigate the role of selenium in lowering cardiac surgery related adverse outcomes.

Methods

Literature search of five electronic databases was performed from the inception of the paper till 29th July, 2023. Eligibility criteria included; (a) randomized clinical trials with Adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing cardiac surgery (b) intervention with selenium pre or/and postoperatively; (c) a control group of a placebo, normal saline, or no selenium. Outcomes of interest include postoperative mortality, LOS in the hospital and Intensive Care Unit (ICU), AKI, troponin I, and Creatinine Kinase-MB (CK-MB). The Cochrane bias assessment tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias. Outcomes were pooled with the Mantel-Haenszel Random-effects model using Review Manager.

Results

Seven RCTs with 2,521 patients and 65% of males were included in this paper. No noticable differences were observed between selenium and control groups in terms of postoperative AKI, mortality, LOS in hospital and ICU, troponin I, and CK-MB levels. All studies had a low risk of bias on quality assessment.

Discussion

Our meta analysis demonstrated no discernible effects of selenium infusion on post operative complications among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Further large scale multi centered studies comparing the protective role of selenium with combined therapy of other bioactive agents are needed to provide convincing explanations.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO Identifier: 424920.

Prognostic Implication of Preoperative Anemia in Redo Cardiac Surgery: A Single-Center Propensity-Matched Analysis

Preoperative anemia has been associated with increased morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery, but little is known about its prognostic value in the setting of redo procedure. A retrospective, observational cohort study of prospectively collected data was undertaken on 409 consecutive patients referred for redo cardiac procedures between January 2011 and December 2020. The EuroSCORE II calculated an average mortality risk of 25.7 ± 15.4%. Selection bias was assessed with the propensity-adjustment method. The prevalence of preoperative anemia was 41%. In unmatched analysis, significant differences between the anemic and nonanemic groups emerged in the risk for postoperative stroke (0.6% vs. 4.4%, p = 0.023), postoperative renal dysfunction (29.7% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.001), a need for prolonged ventilation (18.1% vs. 7.2%, p = 0.002), and high-dosage inotropes (53.1% vs. 32.9%, p < 0.001) along with both length of ICU and hospital stay (8.2 ± 15.9 vs. 4.3 ± 5.4 days, p = 0.003 and 18.8 ± 17.4 vs. 14.9 ± 11.1, p = 0.012). After propensity matching (145 pairs), preoperative anemia was still significantly associated with postoperative renal dysfunction, stroke, and the need for high-dosage inotrope cardiac morbidity. Preoperative anemia is significantly associated with acute kidney injury, stroke, and the need for high-dosage inotropes in patients referred for redo procedures.

Multidisciplinary paper on patient blood management in cardiothoracic surgery in the UK: perspectives on practice during COVID-19

The coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic disrupted all surgical specialties significantly and exerted additional pressures on the overburdened United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service. Healthcare professionals in the UK have had to adapt their practice. In particular, surgeons have faced organisational and technical challenges treating patients who carried higher risks, were more urgent and could not wait for prehabilitation or optimisation before their intervention. Furthermore, there were implications for blood transfusion with uncertain patterns of demand, reductions in donations and loss of crucial staff because of sickness and public health restrictions. Previous guidelines have attempted to address the control of bleeding and its consequences after cardiothoracic surgery, but there have been no targeted recommendations in light of the recent COVID-19 challenges. In this context, and with a focus on the perioperative period, an expert multidisciplinary Task Force reviewed the impact of bleeding in cardiothoracic surgery, explored different aspects of patient blood management with a focus on the use of haemostats as adjuncts to conventional surgical techniques and proposed best practice recommendations in the UK.

Perioperative Optimization of the Cardiac Surgical Patient

Perioperative optimization of cardiac surgical patients is imperative to reduce complications, utilize health care resources efficiently, and improve patient recovery and quality of life. Standardized application of evidence-based best practices can lead to better outcomes. Although many practices should be applied universally to all patients, there are also opportunities along the surgical journey to identify patients who will benefit from additional interventions that will further ameliorate their recovery. Enhanced recovery programs aim to bundle several process elements in a standardized fashion to optimize outcomes after cardiac surgery. A foundational concept of enhanced recovery is attaining a better postsurgical end point for patients, in less time, through achievement and maintenance in their greatest possible physiologic, functional, and psychological state. Perioperative optimization is a broad topic, spanning multiple phases of care and involving a variety of medical specialties and nonphysician health care providers. In this review we highlight a variety of perioperative care topics, in which a comprehensive approach to patient care can lead to improved results for patients, providers, and the health care system. A particular focus on patient-centred care is included. Although existing evidence supports all of the elements reviewed, most require further improvements in implementation, as well as additional research, before their full potential and usefulness can be determined.

The efficacy of intravenous iron for treatment of anemia before cardiac surgery: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

BACKGROUND

Preoperative anemia is common in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with various etiologies, among which iron deficiency is the leading cause. However, the benefit of intravenous (IV) iron for the treatment of anemia before cardiac surgery is uncertain. This updated meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IV iron in adult cardiac surgery patients with preoperative anemia.

METHODS

This review was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. We searched Embase, PubMed and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and the strength of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria. Trial sequential analysis was performed on the primary outcome (transfusion rate) to confirm whether firm evidence was reached.

RESULTS

Six RCTs (936 patients) and 5 observational studies (1350 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The IV iron group and the control group were comparable in terms of transfusion rate [55.1% vs 60.9%, risk ratio (RR) = 0.91, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.81-1.03, P = 0.13, low quality]. There were no significant differences in units transfused per patient, ICU stay and hospital length of stay between the two groups. And pooled data showed a benefit of IV iron compared to the control group on mortality (2.76% vs 3.75%, RR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.95, P = 0.03, moderate quality) and no mortality reduction existed when including only RCTs.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggested that IV iron treatment for patients with anemia before cardiac surgery did not reduce the transfusion requirement (low quality), but it was associated with decreased mortality (moderate quality). More large-scale, high-quality randomized clinical trials are warranted to confirm or refute our findings. PROSPERO registry reference: CRD42022331875.

Guidelines on enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump

OBJECTIVE

To provide recommendations for enhanced recovery after cardiac surgery (ERACS) based on a multimodal perioperative medicine approach in adult cardiac surgery patients with the aim of improving patient satisfaction, reducing postoperative mortality and morbidity, and reducing the length of hospital stay.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 20 experts from the French Society of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine (Société française d'anesthésie et de réanimation, SFAR) and the French Society of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Société française de chirurgie thoracique et cardio-vasculaire, SFCTCV) was convened. A formal conflict-of-interest policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guideline process was conducted independently of any industry funding. The authors were advised to follow the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to guide the assessment of the quality of evidence.

METHODS

Six fields were defined: (1) selection of the patient pathway and its information; (2) preoperative management and rehabilitation; (3) anaesthesia and analgesia for cardiac surgery; (4) surgical strategy for cardiac surgery and bypass management; (5) patient blood management; and (6) postoperative enhanced recovery. For each field, the objective of the recommendations was to answer questions formulated according to the PICO model (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome). Based on these questions, an extensive bibliographic search was carried out and analyses were performed using the GRADE approach. The recommendations were formulated according to the GRADE methodology and then voted on by all the experts according to the GRADE grid method.

RESULTS

The SFAR/SFCTCV guideline panel provided 33 recommendations on the management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery under cardiopulmonary bypass or off-pump. After three rounds of voting and several amendments, a strong agreement was reached for the 33 recommendations. Of these recommendations, 10 have a high level of evidence (7 GRADE 1+ and 3 GRADE 1-); 19 have a moderate level of evidence (15 GRADE 2+ and 4 GRADE 2-); and 4 are expert opinions. Finally, no recommendations were provided for 3 questions.

CONCLUSIONS

Strong agreement existed among the experts to provide recommendations to optimise the complete perioperative management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

High-dose intravenous iron supplementation after preoperative autologous blood donation is useful to prevent post-donation/preoperative anemia

To estimate the effectiveness of high-dose intravenous (IV) iron supplementation for iron deficiency anemia after preoperative autologous blood donation (PAD), 155 donors who visited the donation office of the University of Tokyo Hospital from December 2020 to June 2021 and showed suspected post-donation anemia were analyzed. The participants were treated with high-dose intravenous (IV) iron supplementation (high-dose group, n = 30) or a combination of low-dose IV iron and oral iron supplementation (low-dose group, n = 125). The preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) and Hb decreasing ratios during PAD (ΔHb) were compared between the two groups. Multivariate linear regression analyses were also performed to identify the confounding factors associated with preoperative Hb and ΔHb as well as high-dose IV iron supplementation. Preoperative Hb level was slightly higher in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group (12.1 ± 1.1 vs. 11.9 ± 1.1 g/dL, p = 0.27). ΔHb was significantly higher in the high-dose group than in the low-dose group (3.7 % ± 8.8 % vs. 7.7 % ± 6.5 %, p = 0.011). On the multivariate linear regression analyses, high-dose IV iron supplementation was significantly associated with higher preoperative Hb and lower ΔHb levels (p = 0.021 and 0.017, respectively) as well as the donation available period (period from the first visit to the donation office to the operation) and administration of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents. High-dose IV iron supplementation after PAD will be useful in the treatment of post-donation anemia.

Cardiac Surgery in Patients With Blood Disorders

Blood disorders that can contribute to abnormal bleeding can have a detrimental effect during cardiac surgery. Patients who are known to have such pathologies should be investigated thoroughly and cautious measures would need to be taken when cardiac surgery is needed in this cohort. The majority of current literature for cardiac surgery in patients with von Willebrand Disease and haemophilia are case reports. Nevertheless, evidence shows that optimising factor levels pre, intra and postoperatively offers outcomes similar to that of patients without these disorders. Preoperative screening followed by appropriate iron therapy reduces mortality for patients with anaemia. In this group, haemoglobin levels can be improved postoperatively through iron supplementation. The management strategy of cardiac surgery for people with blood disorders requires a multidisciplinary approach that is highly individualised for each patient. It is essential to adequately adjust preoperative, perioperative and postoperative care to the patient's blood disorder in order to achieve outcomes similar to that of patients without blood disorders.

Retrograde autologous priming in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines recommend retrograde autologous priming (RAP) of the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. However, the efficacy and safety of RAP is not well-established. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effects of RAP on transfusion requirements, morbidity and mortality.

METHODS

We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Medline, ScienceDirect, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature and Embase for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing RAP to no-RAP. We performed title and abstract review, full-text screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment independently and in duplicate. We pooled data using a random effects model.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs (n = 1206) and 17 observational studies (n = 3565) were included. Fewer patients required blood transfusions with RAP [RCTs; risk ratio 0.58 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.51, 0.65], P < 0.001, and observational studies; risk ratio 0.65 [95% CI: 0.53, 0.80], P < 0.001]. The number of units transfused per patient was also lower among patients who underwent RAP (RCTs; mean difference -0.38 unit [95% CI: -0.72, -0.04], P = 0.03, and observational studies; mean difference -1.03 unit [95% CI: -1.76, -0.29], P < 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis supports the use of RAP as a blood conservation strategy since its use during cardiopulmonary bypass appears to reduce transfusion requirements.