The impact of angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies on post-heart transplantation outcome in Heart Mate II bridged recipients

Outcome-based Risk Assessment of Non-HLA Antibodies in Heart Transplantation: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Current monitoring after heart transplantation (HT) employs repeated invasive endomyocardial biopsies (EMB). Although positive EMB confirms rejection, EMB fails to predict impending, subclinical, or EMB-negative rejection events. While non-human leukocyte antigen (non-HLA) antibodies have emerged as important risk factors for antibody-mediated rejection after HT, their use in clinical risk stratification has been limited. A systematic review of the role of non-HLA antibodies in rejection pathologies has the potential to guide efforts to overcome deficiencies of EMB in rejection monitoring.

METHODS

Databases were searched to include studies on non-HLA antibodies in HT recipients. Data collected included the number of patients, type of rejection, non-HLA antigen studied, association of non-HLA antibodies with rejection, and evidence for synergistic interaction between non-HLA antibodies and donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibody (HLA-DSA) responses.

RESULTS

A total of 56 studies met the inclusion criteria. Strength of evidence for each non-HLA antibody was evaluated based on the number of articles and patients in support versus against their role in mediating rejection. Importantly, despite previous intense focus on the role of anti-major histocompatibility complex class I chain-related gene A (MICA) and anti-angiotensin II type I receptor antibodies (AT1R) in HT rejection, evidence for their involvement was equivocal. Conversely, the strength of evidence for other non-HLA antibodies supports that differing rejection pathologies are driven by differing non-HLA antibodies.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review underscores the importance of identifying peri-HT non-HLA antibodies. Current evidence supports the role of non-HLA antibodies in all forms of HT rejection. Further investigations are required to define the mechanisms of action of non-HLA antibodies in HT rejection.

Improved Graft Function following Desensitization of Anti-AT1R and Autoantibodies in a Heart Transplant Recipient Negative for Donor-Specific Antibodies with Antibody-Mediated Rejection: A Case Report

HLA donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) pre and post transplant increase the risk of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and lead to poor graft survival. Increasing data exist to support the involvement of non-HLA antibodies in triggering an immunological response. The development of non-HLA antibodies specific for AT1R is associated with poor clinical outcomes in orthotopic heart transplant recipients. This case presents an investigation of non-HLA antibodies in a 56-year-old female heart transplant recipient diagnosed with AMR in the absence of DSAs.

Association of positive pre-transplant angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies with clinical outcomes in lung transplant recipients

INTRODUCTION

Autoantibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R-Ab) have been previously associated with de novo donor-specific antibody (DSA) formation in lung transplantation. However, data regarding the clinical significance of AT1R-Ab in long-term graft function after lung transplantation are lacking.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients who underwent lung transplantation between July 2016 and January 2020 were enrolled in this study. We examined the relationship between pre-transplant AT1R-Ab levels and graft function, clinical outcomes, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) DSA levels during the first 3 years post-transplantation.

RESULTS

Seventeen (23.9%) patients were AT1R-Ab-positive, and 54 (76.1%) were AT1R-Ab-negative. The median antibody value of the AT1R-Ab-positive group was 18 [18-22.5] U/mL, while that of the AT1R-Ab-negative group was 5.1 [3.5-8.0] U/mL (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the median acute cellular rejection (ACR) scores between the two groups (median [interquartile range] 1 [0.8-3] vs. 0.7 [0-1]; p = 0.145). However, there was a significant difference in the distribution of the ACR scores between the two groups (p = 0.015). Most (41.2%) patients in the pre-transplant AT1R-positive group scored above 1. The incidence of de novo DSA was also higher in AT1R-Ab-positive than in AT1R-Ab-negative patients (52.9% vs. 20.4%, p = 0.009). The incidence of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) within 3 years was significantly higher in AT1R-Ab-positive than in AT1R-Ab-negative patients (58.3% vs. 11.8%; p < 0.001). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, AT1R-Ab positivity (hazard ratio, 9.46; 95% confidence interval, 2.89-30.94; p < 0.001) was significantly associated with early CLAD. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that AT1R-Ab-positive patients had a shorter survival time (χ2 = 39.62, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High AT1R-Ab levels in the pre-transplant serum of lung recipients were associated with the development of de novo HLA-DSA, ACR, early CLAD, and short survival.

Elevated Plasma Immunoglobulin Levels Prior to Heart Transplantation Are Associated with Poor Post-Transplantation Survival

Cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) and antibody-mediated rejection are immune-mediated, long-term complications that jeopardize graft survival after heart transplantation (HTx). Interestingly, increased plasma levels of immunoglobulins have been found in end-stage heart failure (HF) patients prior to HTx. In this study, we aimed to determine whether increased circulating immunoglobulin levels prior to transplantation are associated with poor post-HTx survival. Pre-and post-HTx plasma samples of 36 cardiac transplant recipient patients were used to determine circulating immunoglobulin levels. In addition, epicardial tissue was collected to determine immunoglobulin deposition in cardiac tissue and assess signs and severity of graft rejection. High levels of IgG1 and IgG2 prior to HTx were associated with a shorter survival post-HTx. Immunoglobulin deposition in cardiac tissue was significantly elevated in patients with a survival of less than 3 years. Patients with high plasma IgG levels pre-HTx also had significantly higher plasma levels after HTx. Furthermore, high pre-HTX levels of IgG1 and IgG2 levels were also significantly increased in patients with inflammatory infiltrate in CAV lesions. Altogether the results of this proof-of-concept study suggest that an activated immune response prior to transplantation negatively affects graft survival.

Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Antibody-mediated Rejection Following Orthotopic Heart Transplant: A Single-center Experience

BACKGROUND

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) following orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) causes significant morbidity and mortality. There are limited data on antibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) causing rejection following OHT.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-center study that presents our 2-y experience with a series of 11 patients with evidence of nonspecific graft dysfunction and pathologic levels of AT1R-Ab. The clinical outcomes and treatments were compared to a group of 10 patients, also with evidence of nonspecific graft dysfunction, but who had nonsignificant AT1R-Ab titers.

RESULTS

The mean age of the AT1R-Ab cohort was 52% and 73% were bridged to transplant with an left ventricular assist device. The average left ventricular ejection fraction at presentation was 45%, and most were not on an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). Endomyocardial biopsies in those with elevated AT1R-Ab levels frequently showed reactive endothelium/endocardium without C4d or intravascular CD68 staining. Ten patients (91%) were started on an ARB. Other therapies included plasmapheresis and IVIg (64%), with 4 patients also receiving rituximab. Most patients had symptom improvement, but minimal change in graft function at an average 6 mo of follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The role of AT1R-Ab-mediated rejection in OHT recipients remains poorly understood. More than half of patients at our center who presented with graft dysfunction in the absence of acute cellular rejection or AMR were found to have elevated AT1R-Ab titers. Empiric AMR treatment in conjunction with ARB therapy may improve patient outcomes. Future studies are needed to better define the optimal treatment modalities for ATR1-Ab-mediated AMR.

Antibodies against Angiotensin II Type 1 and Endothelin 1 Type A Receptors in Cardiovascular Pathologies

Angiotensin II receptor type 1 (AT1R) and endothelin-1 receptor type A (ETAR) are G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) expressed on the surface of a great variety of cells: immune cells, vascular smooth cells, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts express ETAR and AT1R, which are activated by endothelin 1 (ET1) and angiotensin II (AngII), respectively. Certain autoantibodies are specific for these receptors and can regulate their function, thus being known as functional autoantibodies. The function of these antibodies is similar to that of natural ligands, and it involves not only vasoconstriction, but also the secretion of proinflammatory cytokines (such as interleukin-6 (IL6), IL8 and TNF-α), collagen production by fibroblasts, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) release by fibroblasts and neutrophils. The role of autoantibodies against AT1R and ETAR (AT1R-AAs and ETAR-AAs, respectively) is well described in the pathogenesis of many medical conditions (e.g., systemic sclerosis (SSc) and SSc-associated pulmonary hypertension, cystic fibrosis, and allograft dysfunction), but their implications in cardiovascular diseases are still unclear. This review summarizes the current evidence regarding the effects of AT1R-AAs and ETAR-AAs in cardiovascular pathologies, highlighting their roles in heart transplantation and mechanical circulatory support, preeclampsia, and acute coronary syndromes.

Current Desensitization Strategies in Heart Transplantation

Heart transplant candidates sensitized to HLA antigens wait longer for transplant, are at increased risk of dying while waiting, and may not be listed at all. The increasing prevalence of HLA sensitization and limitations of current desensitization strategies underscore the urgent need for a more effective approach. In addition to pregnancy, prior transplant, and transfusions, patients with end-stage heart failure are burdened with unique factors placing them at risk for HLA sensitization. These include homograft material used for congenital heart disease repair and left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Moreover, these risks are often stacked, forming a seemingly insurmountable barrier in some cases. While desensitization protocols are typically implemented uniformly, irrespective of the mode of sensitization, the heterogeneity in success and post-transplant outcomes argues for a more tailored approach. Achieving this will require progress in our understanding of the immunobiology underlying the innate and adaptive immune response to these varied allosensitizing exposures. Further attention to B cell activation, memory, and plasma cell differentiation is required to establish methods that durably abrogate the anti-HLA antibody response before and after transplant. The contribution of non-HLA antibodies to the net state of sensitization and the potential implications for graft longevity also remain to be comprehensively defined. The aim of this review is to first bring forth select issues unique to the sensitized heart transplant candidate. The current literature on desensitization in heart transplantation will then be summarized providing context within the immune response. Building on this, newer approaches with therapeutic potential will be discussed emphasizing the importance of not only addressing the short-term pathogenic consequences of circulating HLA antibodies, but also the need to modulate alloimmune memory.

The emerging field of non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies in transplant medicine and beyond

The major medical advances in our knowledge of the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) system have allowed us to uncover several gaps in our understanding of alloimmunity. Although the non-HLA system has long sparked the interest of the transplant community, recognition of the role of immunity to non-HLA antigenic targets has only emerged recently. In this review, we will provide a comprehensive summary of the paradigm-changing concept of immunity to the non-HLA angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R), discovered by Duška Dragun et al., that began from careful bedside clinical observations, to validated detection of anti-AT1R antibodies and lead to clinical intervention. This scientific approach has also allowed the recognition of broader pathogenicity of anti-AT1R antibodies across multiple organ transplants and in other human diseases, the integration of both non-HLA and HLA systems to understand their immunologic effects on organ allografts, and the identification of future directions for therapeutic intervention to modulate immunity to AT1R. Rationally designed successful interventions to target AT1R system provide an exemplar for other non-HLA antibodies to cross borders between medical specialties, will generate new avenues in translational research beyond transplantation, and will foster the development of new and reliable tools to improve our understanding of non-HLA immunity and ultimately allow us to improve patient care.

Profiling non-HLA antibody responses in antibody-mediated rejection following heart transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) driven by the development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) directed against mismatched donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) is a major risk factor for graft loss in cardiac transplantation. Recently, the relevance of non-HLA antibodies has become more prominent as AMR can be diagnosed in the absence of circulating DSA. Here, we assessed a single-center cohort of 64 orthotopic heart transplant recipients transplanted between 1994 and 2014. Serum collected from patients with ≥ pAMR1 (n = 43) and non-AMR (n = 21) were tested for reactivity against a panel of 44 non-HLA autoantigens. The AMR group had a significantly greater percentage of patients with elevated reactivity to autoantigens compared to non-AMR (P = .002) and healthy controls (n = 94, P < .0001). DSA-positive AMR patients exhibited greater reactivity to autoantigens compared to DSA-negative (P < .0001) and AMR patients with DSA and PRA > 10% were identified as the subgroup with significantly elevated responses. Reactivity to 4 antigens, vimentin, beta-tubulin, lamin A/C, and apolipoprotein L2, was significantly different between AMR and non-AMR patients. Moreover, increased reactivity to these antigens was associated with graft failure. These results suggest that antibodies to non-HLA are associated with DSA-positive AMR although their specific role in mediating allograft injury is not yet understood.

Prevalence of AT1R antibody (AT1R-Ab) among Malaysian multi-ethnic population

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) is a non-HLA antibody that has been reported to cause antibody-mediated rejection and graft loss in kidney transplantation. The prevalence of positive AT1R-Ab varies between 8% and 18% in different regions. Thus, this study aims to determine the prevalence of AT1R-Ab among the Malaysian population.

METHODOLOGY

All sera for AT1R-Ab were collected at the University Malaya Medical Centre (UMMC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. The sera were centrifuged and kept refrigerated at -80 °C before being transported to the South Australian Transplantation and Immunogenetics Laboratory (SATIS). Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (One Lambda) was used for the detection of AT1R-Ab, and it was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. The level of >17.1 U/mL was considered to be AT1R-Ab positive; 10.0-17.1 U/mL at risk, and <10.0 U/mL negative.

RESULTS

A total of 115 samples were collected from 99 patients pre and post-kidney transplant recipients. From the pre-transplant sera (n = 68) 17.7% were positive, 35.3% were at risk and 47.0% were negative. The positive AT1R-Ab cohort were relatively younger, with a mean age of 34.7 ± 8.3 years old and statistically significant, with a p-value of 0.028. Among the sera that were tested positive, 19.0% were from the Chinese ethnicity, 6.7% from Malay and 16.7% from Indian. There was no difference in the rejection episodes, persistent or de novo HLA-DSA, and graft function between the group (AT1R-Ab negative vs AT1R-Ab at risk and positive) and the results were consistent in a model adjusted for all potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of positive (>17.1 U/mL) pre-transplant AT1R-Ab was 17.7% and 35.3% were at risk (10.0-17.1 U/mL) in our pre-transplant cohort.

Elevated AT1R Antibody and Morbidity in Patients Bridged to Heart Transplant Using Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Devices

BACKGROUND

We studied longitudinal levels of angiotensin-II type 1 receptor antibody (AT1R-Ab) and their effects on adverse events (death, treated rejection and cardiac allograft vasculopathy) in patients who were bridged to heart transplant using a continuous flow left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

Sera of 77 patients bridged to heart transplant (from 2009 to 2017) were tested for AT1R-Ab and CRP before and after LVAD. Elevated AT1R-Ab was defined as >10.0 U/mL. The median follow-up after transplant was 3.6 years (interquartile range, 2.2-5.6 years). After LVAD, AT1R-Ab levels increased from baseline and remained elevated until transplant. Freedom from adverse events at 5 years was lower in those with elevated AT1R-Ab levels at time of transplant. In an adjusted, multivariable Cox analysis, an AT1R-Ab level of >10 U/mL was associated with developing the primary end point (adjusted hazard ratio 3.4, 95% confidence interval 1.2-9.2, P = .017). Although C-reactive protein levels were high before and after LVAD placement, C-reactive protein did not correlate with AT1R-Ab.

CONCLUSIONS

In LVAD patients bridged to heart transplant, an increased AT1R-Ab level at time of transplant was associated with poor outcomes after heart transplant. Post-LVAD AT1R-Ab elevations were not correlated with serum markers of systemic inflammation. Larger studies are needed to examine the pathologic role of AT1R-Ab in heart transplant.

Combined Heart and Kidney Transplantation: Clinical Experience in 100 Consecutive Patients

Background

Combined heart and kidney transplantation (HKTx) is performed in patients with severe heart failure and advanced renal insufficiency. We analyzed the long‐term survival after HKTx, the influence of age and dialysis status, the rates of cardiac rejection, and the influence of sensitization.

Methods and Results

From June 1992 to December 2016, we performed 100 HKTx procedures. We compared older (≥60 years, n=53) with younger (<60 years, n=47) recipients, and recipients on preoperative dialysis (n=49) and not on dialysis (n=51). We analyzed actuarial freedom from any cardiac rejection, acute cellular rejection, and antibody‐mediated rejection, and survival rates by sensitized status with panel‐reactive antibody levels <10%, 10% to 50%, and >50%, and compared these survival rates with those from the United Network for Organ Sharing database. There was no difference in 15‐year survival between the 2 age groups (35±12.4% and 49±17.3%, ≥60 versus <60 years; P=0.45). There was no difference in 15‐year survival between the dialysis and nondialysis groups (44±13.4% and 37±15.2%, P=0.95). Actuarial freedom from any cardiac rejection (acute cellular rejection>0 or antibody‐mediated rejection>0) was 92±2.8% and 84±3.8%, acute cellular rejection (≥2R/3A) 98±1.5% and 94±2.5%, and antibody‐mediated rejection (≥1) 96±2.1% and 93±2.6% at 30 days and 1 year after HKTx. There was no difference in the 5‐year survival among recipients by sensitization status with panel‐reactive antibody levels <10%, 10% to 50%, and >50% (82±5.9%, 83±10.8%, and 92±8.0%; P=0.55). There was no difference in 15‐year survival after HKTx between the United Network for Organ Sharing database and our center (38±3.2% and 40±10.1%, respectively; P=0.45).

Conclusions

HKTx is safe to perform in patients 60 years and older or younger than 60 years and with or without dialysis dependence, with excellent outcomes. The degree of panel‐reactive antibody sensitization did not appear to affect survival after HKTx.

Hyperacute graft dysfunction in an orthotopic heart transplant in the presence of non-HLA antibodies

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in heart transplants in the absence of anti-HLA donor-specific antibody (DSA) is not well studied or documented. This case reviews hyperacute fulminant graft dysfunction suspected to be mediated by non-HLA antibodies. After cross clamp removal, the patient developed severe pulmonary edema, profound coagulopathy, and biventricular failure. The patient's presumed AMR, cardiogenic shock, and coagulopathy were treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), multiple blood products, and prothrombin complex concentrate. The recipient was 0% panel-reactive antibody (PRA), ABO, and crossmatch compatible. Intraoperative biopsy sample revealed a thrombotic process suggestive of a coagulation pathway activated by AMR; however, no C4d deposition was detected. Postmortem biopsies also suggested AMR. Retrospective testing of the patient's pretransplant serum revealed strong antiangiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) antibodies and a strongly positive endothelial cell crossmatch. Anti-AT1R antibodies are known to be AT1 receptor agonists and may trigger inflammation and activate the extrinsic coagulation pathway. Given the potential effects of signaling through the AT1R, the patient's preexisting anti-AT1R antibodies and procoagulant therapy may have adversely affected the patient's clinical course.

Heart Transplantation After Ventricular Assist Device Therapy: Benefits, Risks, and Outcomes

Heart transplantation is an established treatment for end-stage heart failure. Due to the increase in demand and persistent scarcity of organ, mechanical circulatory devices have played a major role in therapy for advanced heart failure. Usage of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) has gone up from 6% in 2006 to 43% in 2013 as per the United Network of Organ Sharing database. Majority of patients presenting for a heart transplantation are often bridged with an assist device prior for management of heart failure while on wait-list. On one hand, it is well established that LVADs improve survival on wait-list; on the other hand, the effect of LVAD on morbidity and survival after a heart transplantation is still unclear. In this article, we review the available literature and attempt to infer the outcomes given the risks and benefits of heart transplantation with prior LVAD patients.

Sensitization to endothelial cell antigens: Unraveling the cause or effect paradox

Anti-endothelial cell antibodies (AECAs) have been correlated with increased acute and chronic rejection across all organ types and early graft dysfunction in kidney and heart transplantation. Nevertheless, the lack of appropriate tools and clear criteria for defining injurious versus non-injurious AECAs prohibits their routine inclusion in clinical risk assessments and diagnostic algorithms for antibody mediated injury. Clinical characterization of AECAs is complicated due to the wide range of polymorphic and non-polymorphic antigens expressed across different vascular tissues and the diverse array of specificities observed between individuals. This complexity is also reflected in the broad spectrum of reported injury phenotypes. AECAs detected at time of allograft dysfunction may represent biomarkers of past vascular injury or active contributors to a current rejection process. New tools within the fields of proteomics, genomics, bioinformatics, and imaging are currently being validated and hold great promise for unraveling the AECA paradox.

Xenoreactive antibodies and latent fibrin formation in VAD and cardiac transplant recipients can confound the detection and measurement of anti-AT1R antibodies

Autoantibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) are thought to be important in antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), especially in the absence of anti-HLA antibodies. We used a variety of methods to examine the specificity of a commercially available kit designed to quantitate anti-AT1R antibodies. We found that fibrin formation in serum samples from patients awaiting cardiac transplantation with ventricular assist devices (VADs) can produce falsely elevated anti-AT1R values. In addition, absorption studies with a variety of cell lines with or without expression of human AT1R, and those that express xenoantigens, suggest that many of the antibodies detected in the AT1R test system are heterophilic and have reactivity to xenoantigens. Furthermore, we provide data that show that reactivity to the sialic acid Neu5Gc is a common finding among samples that are highest in anti-AT1R levels. We conclude that a common laboratory method for quantitation of anti-AT1R antibodies is nonspecific and overestimates the frequency of true positives. A reevaluation of the role that anti-AT1R antibodies play in allograft function and patient outcomes is warranted.

Revealing a new mode of sensitization induced by mechanical circulatory support devices: Impact of anti-AT1 R antibodies

BACKGROUND

Increased levels of angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT₁ R) antibody have been shown to be associated with allograft rejection. This study aims to determine the rate of development of antibody to AT₁ R after mechanical circulatory support device (MCS) implantation, and if the development of strong binding AT₁ R antibodies is associated with survival.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients who had one MCS implantation were accessed based on serum availability. Mechanical circulatory support devices in this cohort included pneumatic bilateral paracorporeal ventricular assist device, continuous flow left ventricular assist device, and total artificial heart.

RESULTS

Of 88 patients, seven patients had AT₁ R antibodies ≥40 U/mL preimplantation. For 81 patients who had AT₁ R antibodies <40 U/mL, the median value was 8 U/mL. Of these 81 patients, AT₁ R antibody levels in 55 (68%) patients reached the saturated concentration (≥40 U/mL) postimplantation (P < .0001), with the highest percentage of patients with the saturated level of AT₁ R antibody observed in the pneumatic bilateral paracorporeal ventricular assist device group. Compared to patients without the saturated level of AT₁ R antibodies, patients with the saturated AT₁ R antibody level had lower 18-month survival (P = .040).

CONCLUSION

Mechanical circulatory support devices implantation significantly increases AT₁ R antibody levels. The saturated level of AT₁ R antibodies is associated with lower patient survival postimplantation.

Ventricular assist device elicits serum natural IgG that correlates with the development of primary graft dysfunction following heart transplantation

BACKGROUND

Pre-transplant sensitization is a limiting factor in solid-organ transplantation. In heart transplants, ventricular assist device (VAD) implantation has been associated with sensitization to human leukocyte antigens (HLA). The effect of VAD on non-HLA antibodies is unclear. We have previously shown that polyreactive natural antibodies (Nabs) contribute to pre-sensitization in kidney allograft recipients. Here we assessed generation of Nabs after VAD implantation in pre-transplant sera and examined their contribution to cardiac allograft outcome.

METHODS

IgM and IgG Nabs were tested in pre-transplant serum samples collected from 206 orthotopic heart transplant recipients, including 128 patients with VAD (VAD patients) and 78 patients without VAD (no-VAD patients). Nabs were assessed by testing serum reactivity to apoptotic cells by flow cytometry and to the generic oxidized epitope, malondialdehyde, by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

RESULTS

No difference was observed in serum levels of IgM Nabs between VAD and no-VAD patients. However, serum IgG Nabs levels were significantly increased in VAD compared with no-VAD patients. This increase was likely due to the presence of the VAD, as revealed by lower serum IgG Nabs levels before implantation. Elevated pre-transplant IgG Nabs level was associated with development of primary graft dysfunction (PGD).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that VAD support elicits IgG Nabs reactive to apoptotic cells and oxidized epitopes. These findings further support broad and non-specific B-cell activation by VAD, resulting in IgG sensitization. Moreover, the association of serum IgG Nabs levels with development of PGD suggests a possible role for these antibodies in the inflammatory reaction accompanying this complication.

Antibody Subclass Repertoire and Graft Outcome Following Solid Organ Transplantation

Long-term outcomes in solid organ transplantation are constrained by the development of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) against human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and other targets, which elicit antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). However, antibody-mediated graft injury represents a broad continuum, from extensive complement activation and tissue damage compromising the function of the transplanted organ, to histological manifestations of endothelial cell injury and mononuclear cell infiltration but without concurrent allograft dysfunction. In addition, while transplant recipients with DSA as a whole fare worse than those without, a substantial minority of patients with DSA do not experience poorer graft outcome. Taken together, these observations suggest that not all DSA are equally pathogenic. Antibody effector functions are controlled by a number of factors, including antibody concentration, antigen availability, and antibody isotype/subclass. Antibody isotype is specified by many integrated signals, including the antigen itself as well as from antigen-presenting cells or helper T cells. To date, a number of studies have described the repertoire of IgG subclasses directed against HLA in pretransplant patients and evaluated the clinical impact of different DSA IgG subclasses on allograft outcome. This review will summarize what is known about the repertoire of antibodies to HLA and non-HLA targets in transplantation, focusing on the distribution of IgG subclasses, as well as the general biology, etiology, and mechanisms of injury of different humoral factors.

The importance of non-HLA antibodies in transplantation

The development of post-transplantation antibodies against non-HLA autoantigens is associated with rejection and decreased long-term graft survival. Although our knowledge of non-HLA antibodies is incomplete, compelling experimental and clinical findings demonstrate that antibodies directed against autoantigens such as angiotensin type 1 receptor, perlecan and collagen, contribute to the process of antibody-mediated acute and chronic rejection. The mechanisms that underlie the production of autoantibodies in the setting of organ transplantation is an important area of ongoing investigation. Ischaemia-reperfusion injury, surgical trauma and/or alloimmune responses can result in the release of organ-derived autoantigens (such as soluble antigens, extracellular vesicles or apoptotic bodies) that are presented to B cells in the context of the transplant recipient's antigen presenting cells and stimulate autoantibody production. Type 17 T helper cells orchestrate autoantibody production by supporting the proliferation and maturation of autoreactive B cells within ectopic tertiary lymphoid tissue. Conversely, autoantibody-mediated graft damage can trigger alloimmunity and the development of donor-specific HLA antibodies that can act in synergy to promote allograft rejection. Identification of the immunologic phenotypes of transplant recipients at risk of non-HLA antibody-mediated rejection, and the development of targeted therapies to treat such rejection, are sorely needed to improve both graft and patient survival.